Image not available

736x736

1730021517783943.jpg

๐Ÿงต Volume of Solid of Revolution Conceptual Issue

Anonymous No. 16592113

For the area enclosed by the curves y=0, y=8, and y=x^(3/2) we can find a solid of revolution using the shell method with the expected volume being equal to 192pi cubic units. When we integrate in terms of y with the integrand as 2pi y(y^(2/3)dy with upper limit y=8 and lower limit y=0 we find the correct volume. When we integrate with the integrand 2pi x(8-x^3/2)dx with upper limit x=4 and lower limit x=0 we find a value that is off from the correct volume by a multiplication exactly equal to (volume found)(7/2). What is a general method to arrive at the scaling factor for any solid of revolution problem so we may choose to integrate with respect to either variable and find the correct volume?

It may be helpful to notice that when only finding the area under the curve for the integral y=0 to y=8 (y^2/3)dy area found is equal to area found by the integral x=0 to x=4 (8-x^3/2).

Image not available

450x800

1739829060608652.webm

Anonymous No. 16592134

>>16592113
>(volume found)(7/2)
You're spinning it around the x axis creating a completely different shape.

Image not available

1216x362

Capture.jpg

Anonymous No. 16592159

>>16592134
I don't understand how you can conclude that you have to change the variable of integration when rotating about a horizontal or vertical line. Here's an example that contradict your idea.

Image not available

1261x223

Capture.jpg

Anonymous No. 16592160

>>16592159
Whoops wrong example, but my point remains.

Anonymous No. 16593712

>>16592113
Can you write this in MathJaX?

Anonymous No. 16594725

>>16593712
obviously not.