Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:55:06 UTC No. 16609744

Sticky this shit or the sloppy seconds from the 1st attempt, please.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:55:48 UTC No. 16609746

previous scrub thread
>>16605526

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:56:08 UTC No. 16609747

>>16609739
If this scrubs Im gona blow up a hospital

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:56:32 UTC No. 16609751

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:56:34 UTC No. 16609752

>not including Ria's stream
CRINGE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CjPUDTWhJ4

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:56:51 UTC No. 16609754

/trash/ reporting in!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:57:24 UTC No. 16609755

/scrub/ general

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:57:37 UTC No. 16609756

newCHAD here. can someone explain the /sci/ board culture to me?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:58:23 UTC No. 16609759

Clear live!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:58:56 UTC No. 16609761

If dubs it will explode on the pad

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:59:17 UTC No. 16609764

put poop in my mouth

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:59:25 UTC No. 16609765

official stream started

https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1lPKqMQbAWLKb

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:59:27 UTC No. 16609766

stream is turned on, refresh it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:59:58 UTC No. 16609768

They will catch the booster a 3rd time and all the skeptoomers will sneeth and snmald while snitting and snissing themsnelves

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:00:15 UTC No. 16609769

Let's fucking go

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:00:37 UTC No. 16609770

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CjPUDTWhJ4

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:01:02 UTC No. 16609772

the booster is going to knock into the tower, i can feel it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:01:22 UTC No. 16609773

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:01:43 UTC No. 16609775

>>16609772
I'm gonna knock your mom, UP!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:02:14 UTC No. 16609776

building rockets is probably not that hard to be honest

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:02:28 UTC No. 16609777

WHERE IS THE NON WHITE FEMALE???

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:03:33 UTC No. 16609779

Let's go

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:03:45 UTC No. 16609781

>>16609777
nice beard

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:03:47 UTC No. 16609782

>>16609777
Welcome to Trump's America

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:03:49 UTC No. 16609783

Lotta fanfare for a scrub

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:03:58 UTC No. 16609784

>>16609777
Deported :(

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:04:07 UTC No. 16609785

>we need to go to MARS right NOW to save MATT DAMON
>uhhh sowwy we can't waunch because of some miscawibwations :((((((

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:04:21 UTC No. 16609787

>>16609779
Reimu mogs

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:04:27 UTC No. 16609789

>>16609779
that'll never fit, baka

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:04:46 UTC No. 16609790

>4chan logo on the patch
What did they mean by this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:05:04 UTC No. 16609793

>>16609777
Dan's looking florid and unwell these days. also starting to look like a crack hobo

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:05:17 UTC No. 16609794

Have a feeling this one's going to detonate before leaving the tower fully.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:05:19 UTC No. 16609795

>>16609790
elon is a known channer

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:05:24 UTC No. 16609796

>>16609790
Anon occupied spacex

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:05:40 UTC No. 16609798

WE GAAN

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:05:42 UTC No. 16609799

>33
nothing to see here folks

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:05:59 UTC No. 16609800

>>16609793
probably lives at starbase, working around the clock

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:06:38 UTC No. 16609802

>>16609799
shut up goy

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:07:26 UTC No. 16609804

>>16609800
he's the only ever spacex presenter who doesn't have an engineering job and is strictly a comms guy, what could he possibly be doing?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:08:18 UTC No. 16609806

Dear Adult Jesus, please can you make Elon's rocket explode? That would be so fucking funny. Thank you.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:08:35 UTC No. 16609807

>>16609799
get yo 2017 ass schizopost outta here

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:08:46 UTC No. 16609808

>>16609804
shitposting with Musks account

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:08:56 UTC No. 16609809

why does kate have such a deep high test voice?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:09:06 UTC No. 16609810

>>16609779
>>16609787
Tea break required by Starship crew prior to launch

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:09:17 UTC No. 16609811

Chris G

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:09:20 UTC No. 16609812

>homo accent

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:09:23 UTC No. 16609813

>>16609799
its gonna be 35 with block 3

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:09:51 UTC No. 16609815

>>16609800
their comms guy should shave sometimes and not be bright red in the face

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:09:53 UTC No. 16609816

Scrubbed flight inc.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:09:57 UTC No. 16609817

why are they releasing so much gas?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:10:21 UTC No. 16609820

>>16609817
they hate the enviroment

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:10:26 UTC No. 16609821

that raptor 1 is sexy

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:10:28 UTC No. 16609822

>LATER THIS YEAR

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:11:16 UTC No. 16609825

I thought my stream fucked up because that photo of the engines is my desktop background.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:11:24 UTC No. 16609826

>>16609817
Mexican food is no joke

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:11:37 UTC No. 16609827

why they launch 100 rockets instead of using simulations?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:11:56 UTC No. 16609830

it's the vibrations again

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:12:17 UTC No. 16609832

He's starting to become red hulk...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:12:25 UTC No. 16609833

>>16609827
Hype and they have the money for that

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:12:39 UTC No. 16609835

>>16609820
to kill the seals and beetles.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:12:57 UTC No. 16609836

>>16609827
Why not just simulate going to Mars and call it a day, that would be way cheaper

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:13:35 UTC No. 16609838

What is your prediction for this flight?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:13:47 UTC No. 16609840

>>16609777
Southern American descent can't be shown in case the president is watching.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:14:06 UTC No. 16609842

>still no Block 2 Booster ETA

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:14:44 UTC No. 16609845

>>16609842
they said they're gonna use raptor 3 later this year

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:14:49 UTC No. 16609846

>>16609842
They want to reuse a booster first

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:14:53 UTC No. 16609847

>>16609835
>seals are EXTINCT in the gulf of mexico
Elon must pay for this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:15:26 UTC No. 16609850

>>16609838
scrubadub dub

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:15:38 UTC No. 16609851

>>16609845
Next year then?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:15:41 UTC No. 16609852

>>16609838
Starlink demonstrators are successfully deployed and Starship sticks a graceful landing in the ocean

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:15:49 UTC No. 16609854

>>16609847
Gulf of America *

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:16:02 UTC No. 16609855

so when is this thing going to mars? 2 weeks?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:16:25 UTC No. 16609857

>>16609851
likely

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:16:30 UTC No. 16609858

>seals are EXTINCT in the gulf of America
Elon must pay for this


>>16609854
Please forgive me

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:16:31 UTC No. 16609859

>>16609847
id pay to see the deer getting sonic boomed and roasted by a landing booster

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:16:44 UTC No. 16609860

>>16609836
certified RR (ask me what that means)

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:17:05 UTC No. 16609861

B-bros, I want her to have my children...
How do I impregnate such a female?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:17:34 UTC No. 16609862

>>16609861
with my penis

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:17:40 UTC No. 16609864

>>16609861
With your rocket

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:17:46 UTC No. 16609865

imagine being the graphic designer at spacex
>yeah i work at spacex
>wow you make rockets? so cool
>haha no i make the logo

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:17:52 UTC No. 16609866

>>16609861
Idk, go ask her out

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:18:37 UTC No. 16609871

>>16609865
The /g/ user's ultimate job

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:18:47 UTC No. 16609873

>>16609865
/g/ approved

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:18:47 UTC No. 16609874

>>16609861
She has a wide neck

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:18:49 UTC No. 16609875

OH SHIT ACT COOL
SHE'S READING THIS THREAD RIGHT NOW

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:19:04 UTC No. 16609876

>>16609865
you say that but half this thread would happily go be a dishwasher at starbase if given the option

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:19:34 UTC No. 16609877

>>16609866
But I live far away, and I am poor. Do you think that if I write to her she will come to meet me in Mumbai?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:19:39 UTC No. 16609878

>>16609865
Better than being the costume mascot at ULA

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:19:51 UTC No. 16609879

>>16609861
>>16609875
>3DPD
not even a tenth as cute as Clear

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:20:06 UTC No. 16609880

>demise as a verb
I don't like this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:20:11 UTC No. 16609881

>>16609876
desu this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:20:18 UTC No. 16609882

why does this dude breath in so loudly?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:20:30 UTC No. 16609884

Is the fire alarm going off in the building? I hear one over this guy's mic.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:20:41 UTC No. 16609885

>>16609865
>GNC, go no go? GO!
>FAA, go no go?? Go!
>Logo, go no go logo? Go Flight!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:20:43 UTC No. 16609886

>>16609882
big brains need big oxygen

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:21:18 UTC No. 16609890

>>16609884
He's in a loud environment so they shove the mic right into his mouth.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:21:42 UTC No. 16609892

Did it ever get confirmed whether or not there are cameras on the dummy sats?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:10 UTC No. 16609893

>>16609885
>sorry everyone the fat /g/ tard was too busy masturbating to his linux distro to finish the logo so the launch is scrubbed

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:17 UTC No. 16609894

>giving third worlders cheap and unlimited internet access
What actually is the benefit of this?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:19 UTC No. 16609895

>>16609886
Thats why jew's noses are so big.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:22 UTC No. 16609896

lol

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:36 UTC No. 16609897

>Gulf of America mentioned
lol

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:37 UTC No. 16609898

>GULF OF AMERICA
i love you too kate

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:37 UTC No. 16609899

wait did she actually say gulf of america

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:46 UTC No. 16609900

another starshit flight not making it to orbit lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:48 UTC No. 16609901

>>16609892
Unknown but unlikely because they probably would've said so

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:51 UTC No. 16609902

give me ONE MOTHER FRICKING reason that they don't just put enough pressure into the fuel tanks instead of venting it constantly?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:22:58 UTC No. 16609903

inb4 perfect launch and it is revealed AOC is pregnant with musks baby

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:23:00 UTC No. 16609904

Gulf of Starbase when?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:23:00 UTC No. 16609905

>>16609894
getting money

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:23:01 UTC No. 16609906

>>16609894
it funds the escape to mars

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:23:10 UTC No. 16609907

>>16609892
Sorry sweety, the NOAA license for that many cameras in space was too expensive.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:23:28 UTC No. 16609909

>>16609894
>What actually is the benefit of this?
You get to enjoy diversity and multiculuralism in internet you chud.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:23:29 UTC No. 16609910

>>16609900
At least they land their boosters

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:23:39 UTC No. 16609911

>>16609752
ugh imagine the smell

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:23:42 UTC No. 16609912

>>16609900
Nice double dubs but gay origin is doomed to insignificance

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:24:00 UTC No. 16609913

>>16609894
For Elon's Grand SAARmy

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:24:08 UTC No. 16609914

>>16609902
Boiling fuel increases pressure, needs to be vented so there isn't an overpressure

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:24:13 UTC No. 16609915

>>16609892
If they did we probably would have seen a license for it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:24:27 UTC No. 16609917

are Starship and the booster separate anime waifus? What about the staging thing?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:24:29 UTC No. 16609918

>>16609902
its subcooled and would be very inefficient to try to recirculate everything and cool it down instead of venting
also a safety issue I would guess

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:24:32 UTC No. 16609919

>>16609894
anti-indian sentiment rose to critical levels off the back of thirdies getting internet

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:24:52 UTC No. 16609920

>we're going to hear this spiel about sonic booms every single flight now
jesus christ

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:25:11 UTC No. 16609921

>inb4 hold at 40s

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:25:23 UTC No. 16609922

>>16609920
Superpower 2020!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:25:32 UTC No. 16609924

>>16609914
then fuel it slowly lol. are rocket engineers retarded?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:25:38 UTC No. 16609925

>13 years into the program
>can't even get the rocket to LEO without blowing up

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:25:41 UTC No. 16609926

lol, a midget

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:25:43 UTC No. 16609927

>>16609921
NO HOLD
FULL SEND

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:25:47 UTC No. 16609928

>>16609921
>inb4 hold my dick in your mouth for 40s while I PISS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:25:48 UTC No. 16609929

>>16609920
You vill hear booms and you vill love it.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:25:50 UTC No. 16609930

>Shuttle

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:26:09 UTC No. 16609933

>>16609924
Thats not very rapidly reusable of you anon

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:26:20 UTC No. 16609934

>>16609922
That was scrubbed. It's 2030 now.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:26:55 UTC No. 16609935

Cunny

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:26:58 UTC No. 16609936

So after this one gets scrubbed too, when's the actual launch?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:27:16 UTC No. 16609937

Let's remember why this is really possible

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:27:18 UTC No. 16609938

hes talking about the hold at 40 seconds again

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:27:24 UTC No. 16609939

>>16609936
2 weeks

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:27:27 UTC No. 16609941

LUNCH

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:27:34 UTC No. 16609942

>>16609934
>implying indians scub anything

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:28:14 UTC No. 16609944

>>16609924
that doesn't help at all, makes it worse actually

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:28:18 UTC No. 16609945

c'mon please launch, I got a ton of channel points riding on this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:28:24 UTC No. 16609946

>>16609942
lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:28:26 UTC No. 16609947

RECYCLE THE COUNT

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:28:53 UTC No. 16609948

Pls I want this to work so much.
I wanna see the dummy sattelites deployed.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:10 UTC No. 16609949

>WHOOP!
Jesus christ this guy almost gave me a heart attack

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:17 UTC No. 16609950

HOLD

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:17 UTC No. 16609951

HOLD

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:41 UTC No. 16609954

>>16609894
Having retarded boomers get their savings scammed.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:44 UTC No. 16609955

its over

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:48 UTC No. 16609957

Time has stopped

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:48 UTC No. 16609958

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOo

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:52 UTC No. 16609959

bro

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:54 UTC No. 16609960

it's ogre

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:56 UTC No. 16609962

Bloddy bastards you all jinxed it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:57 UTC No. 16609963

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:29:58 UTC No. 16609964

FUCK HOLD

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:00 UTC No. 16609965

>>16609739
>h*ld

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:06 UTC No. 16609966

rip hodl.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:10 UTC No. 16609967

Its over...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:15 UTC No. 16609968

TAKE MY ENERGY

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:26 UTC No. 16609970

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:27 UTC No. 16609971

not again please

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:28 UTC No. 16609972

GO FOR LAUNCH GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOOGO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:30 UTC No. 16609973

GO BABY GO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:30 UTC No. 16609974

IT'S HABBENING

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:37 UTC No. 16609976

HOLDbros....

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:38 UTC No. 16609977

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:39 UTC No. 16609978

LETS GO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:41 UTC No. 16609979

WE GAAN

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:43 UTC No. 16609980

OH SHIT

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:48 UTC No. 16609981

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:49 UTC No. 16609983

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:30:57 UTC No. 16609986

WE GO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:06 UTC No. 16609987

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:08 UTC No. 16609988

WE GAAN

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:23 UTC No. 16609989

>>16609897
>>16609898
>>16609899
At 27:08
She hesitated lol
>the Gulf of uhhh America
she nearly said Mexico lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:24 UTC No. 16609990

GO FOR LAUNCH

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:27 UTC No. 16609991

For a second I thought it was stuck on the pad...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:29 UTC No. 16609992

starshipsisters.
we won.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:32 UTC No. 16609994

>pieces flying off of ship again
uh, bros?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:46 UTC No. 16609995

NOMINAL

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:50 UTC No. 16609996

\o/

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:51 UTC No. 16609997

>>16609988
FUCK SHE FLEW OFF

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:31:59 UTC No. 16609998

WAS THAT A HEAT TILE

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:01 UTC No. 16609999

DONT BLOW UP NOW

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:13 UTC No. 16610000

This is it boys. This one will be flawless. I can feel it.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:14 UTC No. 16610001

Who is Max Q?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:21 UTC No. 16610003

some fur dangling off there

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:23 UTC No. 16610004

Here we go!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:38 UTC No. 16610005

COULDNT GET A FUCKING GPU BUT AT LEAST WE GOT A LAUNCH

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:46 UTC No. 16610006

>>16610001
Min Qs brother

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:47 UTC No. 16610007

>missed the launch cause i want to read the thread instead

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:49 UTC No. 16610008

>>16610001
quirkiness

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:50 UTC No. 16610010

>already pieces flying off
it's over

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:51 UTC No. 16610011

A heat tile just landed on my roof

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:32:58 UTC No. 16610013

GO FOR CATCH

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:33:00 UTC No. 16610014

>>16610001
Kate

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:33:07 UTC No. 16610015

seems like the max q was off by like 7 seconds. should have happened at 1:02

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:33:12 UTC No. 16610016

>>16610001
Short of Max Cute

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:33:36 UTC No. 16610018

a starship just flew over my house

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:33:37 UTC No. 16610019

OH NO THE ENGINES

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:33:46 UTC No. 16610021

>>16610007
>open X stream with mpv
>set to "always on top"

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:33:47 UTC No. 16610022

GO FOR CATCH

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:33:57 UTC No. 16610023

two engines dead

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:33:59 UTC No. 16610025

It's OVER

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:34:01 UTC No. 16610026

uhhhhhh

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:34:14 UTC No. 16610029

>Raptor reliability

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:34:22 UTC No. 16610031

so cool

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:34:22 UTC No. 16610032

wonder if the engines will revive like last time

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:34:27 UTC No. 16610033

still go for catch wtf

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:34:30 UTC No. 16610034

This is insanely fucking bad

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:34:31 UTC No. 16610036

>11/13
its over

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:34:34 UTC No. 16610037

Thunderf00t was right....

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:34:42 UTC No. 16610039

>>16610029
Raptor 3 will fix this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:34:48 UTC No. 16610040

ITS GONNA CRASH NIGGAS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:35:02 UTC No. 16610041

>>16610029
R3 will fix this, trust the plan

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:35:03 UTC No. 16610042

>>16610001
Max Payne's cousin.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:35:38 UTC No. 16610044

Still no confirmation on catch

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:04 UTC No. 16610045

tower is gonna get fucked

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:07 UTC No. 16610046

I'M FUCKING SCARED NOW

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:09 UTC No. 16610047

didnt they say go for catch a while ago?>>16610044

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:10 UTC No. 16610048

>chris refusing to call it gulf of america
fire him NOW

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:11 UTC No. 16610049

>>16610044
pretty sure they confirmed it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:16 UTC No. 16610050

thats disappointing man
even if they catch, they shouldn't be losing 2 engines

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:18 UTC No. 16610051

>>16610044
they confirmed it already

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:19 UTC No. 16610052

AAAAAAAA PARTS ARE FALLING OFF

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:23 UTC No. 16610053

ALIENSSS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:35 UTC No. 16610054

BOOSTER BROS.....

ENGINE FIRE?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:36 UTC No. 16610055

>>16610050
they were redundant

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:39 UTC No. 16610056

DUDE AYY LMAO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:45 UTC No. 16610057

go for catch

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:47 UTC No. 16610058

>>16610052
wtf is that thing

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:36:52 UTC No. 16610059

LOOK AT THAT HEAT

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:37:05 UTC No. 16610060

tower bros... it's gonna hit us...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:37:44 UTC No. 16610061

fucking EASY

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:37:44 UTC No. 16610062

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:37:48 UTC No. 16610064

holy fuck that was marginal

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:37:48 UTC No. 16610065

KINO KINO KINO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:37:52 UTC No. 16610067

FUCK YEAAAAA

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:37:54 UTC No. 16610069

it's that easy in rocketry

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:37:54 UTC No. 16610070

USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:07 UTC No. 16610072

>landed even with one engine out of order

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:08 UTC No. 16610073

VICTORY

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:08 UTC No. 16610074

BOOSTER BROS WE'RE SO BACK

CLUTCHED THE LANDING WITH 12/13

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:09 UTC No. 16610075

incredible

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:09 UTC No. 16610076

IT'S THAT EASY

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:14 UTC No. 16610077

>>16610064
That's how you know you're doing it right

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:17 UTC No. 16610078

Was that the first time it did it while missing one?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:18 UTC No. 16610079

AINT NO WAY
EVEN WITH ONE ENGINE OUT
SPACE IS EASY ACTUALLY

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:22 UTC No. 16610081

wasn't even scared

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:22 UTC No. 16610082

>three attempts
>three catches
SpaceX is styling on the rest of the world so hard it's absurd.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:24 UTC No. 16610083

Gotta love engine out capability.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:28 UTC No. 16610084

>the commentators aren't excited by the landing anymore
it's getting old, bros...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:36 UTC No. 16610085

I think we've become too OP as a species

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:37 UTC No. 16610086

It’s a cake walk at this point man, sheesh
No one can even compete

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:38 UTC No. 16610087

11/13
12/13

Still landed flawlessly

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:38 UTC No. 16610088

SASUGA ELON

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:41 UTC No. 16610089

BRAVISSIMMI

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:43 UTC No. 16610090

very nice, but EU still wins

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:44 UTC No. 16610091

wtf he did it with 11/13 engines, its unstoppable

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:46 UTC No. 16610092

Thunderfoot bros...it's over.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:46 UTC No. 16610093

Space is so easy

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:48 UTC No. 16610094

I KNEEL...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:49 UTC No. 16610095

go ship go

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:51 UTC No. 16610096

>>16610064
at 8 its marginal right?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:38:53 UTC No. 16610097

okay now if we can just get ship to not RUD

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:01 UTC No. 16610099

uh oh

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:02 UTC No. 16610100

based

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:04 UTC No. 16610101

Just goes to show Elon was right with going for stupid amount engines.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:04 UTC No. 16610102

NOOOOOOOOOOOOO AIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:07 UTC No. 16610103

>distracted by booster again
>OH SHIT SHIP EXISTS
>SIX RAPTORS STILL
phew

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:09 UTC No. 16610104

lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:12 UTC No. 16610106

WHO NEEDS A 13th ENGINE ANYWAY? HAHAHAHAHHAAHA

USA USA USA USA USA USA

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:12 UTC No. 16610107

NOOOOOOOO WTFFFFFFFFFFFF

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:14 UTC No. 16610108

Engine redundancy is where its at.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:17 UTC No. 16610109

WALK IN THE PARK

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:17 UTC No. 16610110

>>16610097
We can't

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:17 UTC No. 16610111

its over

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:18 UTC No. 16610112

it's over

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:19 UTC No. 16610113

F

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:19 UTC No. 16610114

it's over

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:19 UTC No. 16610115

>>16610097
UHO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:20 UTC No. 16610116

IT'S OVER

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:20 UTC No. 16610117

SHIP DEAD

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:21 UTC No. 16610118

NOOOO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:24 UTC No. 16610119

NONONONONONONONO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:24 UTC No. 16610120

RIP ship. No sugar coating that tumble.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:28 UTC No. 16610122

And there it goes i to the trash kek

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:30 UTC No. 16610124

OWARI DA

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:31 UTC No. 16610125

it's over...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:34 UTC No. 16610126

KWAB

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:35 UTC No. 16610127

OH SHIT

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:39 UTC No. 16610129

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:41 UTC No. 16610130

IT'S UNCANNY HOW EASY IT IS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:42 UTC No. 16610131

THANK YOU ADULT JESUS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:43 UTC No. 16610132

uh bros?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:47 UTC No. 16610134

ELOOOOON

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:47 UTC No. 16610135

Thunderfoot bros...we're so fucking back.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:48 UTC No. 16610136

SHIP SPINNING, FUCK

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:49 UTC No. 16610137

kek

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:50 UTC No. 16610138

WTAF HAPPENED

NICE VIEWS THO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:39:54 UTC No. 16610140

>>16610103
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:02 UTC No. 16610142

lol

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:04 UTC No. 16610143

SHUT IT DOWN

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:06 UTC No. 16610144

HANG IN THERE
GET BACK UNDER CONTROL
YOU CAN DO TI

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:10 UTC No. 16610145

is it supposed to do that??

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:13 UTC No. 16610146

SPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:14 UTC No. 16610148

Seriously? V2 was a mistake.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:17 UTC No. 16610150

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:19 UTC No. 16610151

DO A FLIP!!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:19 UTC No. 16610152

I's tumbling down...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:21 UTC No. 16610155

NOT AGAIN

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:21 UTC No. 16610156

BROS I CAN'T DO THIS ANYMORE IT'S ACTUALLY GENUINELY OVER FUCK'S SAKE

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:26 UTC No. 16610162

there's no way to sugarcoat this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:28 UTC No. 16610163

This is what you get when he spends 100% of his time owning the libs and trannies. Hope it was fucking worth it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:28 UTC No. 16610164

goodbye ship

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:32 UTC No. 16610166

SHIP REGAINING FUEL, DOOMERS BTFO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:35 UTC No. 16610167

>>16610097
well, so much for that

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:38 UTC No. 16610168

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:39 UTC No. 16610169

V2 is DOA

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:39 UTC No. 16610170

one RVAC blew up
again

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:39 UTC No. 16610171

>>16609900
damn you jeff

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:39 UTC No. 16610172

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:42 UTC No. 16610173

>>16610140
BRUH THEY DID THIS A BUNCH OF TIMES HOW CANT IT MANAGED A FUCKING ORBIT

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:42 UTC No. 16610174

it's over...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:43 UTC No. 16610177

how the fuck is the ship the hard part

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:44 UTC No. 16610178

KEEEEEEEEEEEEEK

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:46 UTC No. 16610179

so is this gonna come down over the caribbean or was it too far along?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:49 UTC No. 16610181

>the seemingly insanely hard thing turns out to be "It's literally that easy in rocketry."
>the seemingly very simple thing turns out to be "It's not that easy in rocketry."

How? What about this redesign is causing this?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:40:51 UTC No. 16610182

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:04 UTC No. 16610184

JUST GO BACK TO V1 FUCK HOW IS IT SO DIFFICULT TO MAKE A WORKING FUCKING ROCKET

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:07 UTC No. 16610185

fucking. kek.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:08 UTC No. 16610186

NO NO NO NONO NONONOONONONONONOo
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
I'm gonna kill myself

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:18 UTC No. 16610189

rip dem starlink satellite niggas

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:20 UTC No. 16610190

MODS STICKY THIS POST
https://youtu.be/hoKluzn07eQ?si=d8bWMiJUqKLv4EZy

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:20 UTC No. 16610191

>>16610162
Huge success
They're going to collect so much data

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:20 UTC No. 16610192

HOLY SHIT A STARSHIP JUST BLEW UP OVER MY HOUSE

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:21 UTC No. 16610193

V2 sucks so much ass it’s unreal

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:22 UTC No. 16610195

So, 150 tons to LEO is pretty much confirmed now.
Going to mars, not so much...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:25 UTC No. 16610197

And it's gone.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:30 UTC No. 16610198

>>16610182
Thunderfoot-sensei...I apologize.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:32 UTC No. 16610199

No refunds

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:38 UTC No. 16610201

>>16610181
EDS infestation in the starship team

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:40 UTC No. 16610202

welp.
Starship V2 is a bust. Back to the drawing board and do a V1.5

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:43 UTC No. 16610203

more INDIANS!
MORE!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:45 UTC No. 16610204

It has been terminated by explosives

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:46 UTC No. 16610205

>posting in a sticky

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:41:55 UTC No. 16610207

>>16610181
Seriously what is wrong with the current ship, it's managed to come down with fire burning through the fins, and now it can't even complete the orbit

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:00 UTC No. 16610209

Ariane 6 won bigly

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:03 UTC No. 16610210

maybe they should go back to doing a few hops or something

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:04 UTC No. 16610212

It all returns to nothing

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:12 UTC No. 16610214

oh noes

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:16 UTC No. 16610215

>and now we wait for the new debris videos

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:17 UTC No. 16610218

TERRY DAVIS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:21 UTC No. 16610219

HOW THE FUCK IS THE V1 BETTER THAN THE V2 THE FUCKING THING LITERALLY MELTED DURING REENTRY

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:23 UTC No. 16610221

>>16610181
Gremlins.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:27 UTC No. 16610223

Saarship

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:29 UTC No. 16610225

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:36 UTC No. 16610226

It literally just works.

I was about to say on booster catch. I'm actually just really sad. Starship is the only thing I'm excited about nowadays. itsowarida :(

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:38 UTC No. 16610228

Elon is too busy seething about DEI woke nonsense to notice

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:45 UTC No. 16610229

>V2 failed to reenter TWICE
really nigger

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:48 UTC No. 16610230

eh close enough

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:49 UTC No. 16610231

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:57 UTC No. 16610232

I'm pretty sure it was another attic fire like last time, could see fire coming from powerhead/joint SL raptors on ship

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:42:58 UTC No. 16610233

Retard here.
Is that thing now falling back to earth completely out of control?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:03 UTC No. 16610237

DEMOCRAT SPACEX/MUSK FUD IN
3
2
1

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:04 UTC No. 16610238

5 minutes until we get videos of another 100 tons of space debris

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:05 UTC No. 16610239

>>16610190
I WISH THAT I COULD TURN BACK TIME
V1 WAS DOING SO FINE
NOW V2 BURNING DOWN

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:14 UTC No. 16610242

Well... that happened.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:18 UTC No. 16610244

>>16610231
well where are the webms?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:19 UTC No. 16610245

>>16610182
>Tesla stock crashing
>Xitter going nowhere
>SpaceX regressing
I apologize. Thunder King.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:20 UTC No. 16610246

Thread Theme:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_N66Hud_Tq4

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:20 UTC No. 16610247

This is bad. Really bad.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:27 UTC No. 16610249

LMAO STARSHIT FAILED AGAIN NEVER GONNA REACH LEO LMAO HAHAHAHAH OH NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:39 UTC No. 16610250

>>16610177
they know boosters with F9

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:48 UTC No. 16610252

>>16610233
Only the attitude is out of control

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:51 UTC No. 16610253

>>16610242
Would.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:43:58 UTC No. 16610255

thunderbros are eating good tonight

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:44:04 UTC No. 16610256

>>16610231
he's filming the epic documentary

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:44:06 UTC No. 16610257

>>16610233
They blow it, and it burns up, most of it, but some third worlders will get pieces droped on them.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:44:09 UTC No. 16610258

this didn't age well...

Apologize at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:44:21 UTC No. 16610262

>>16610238
this one burned for way too long, I believe it fly past the spics

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:44:28 UTC No. 16610263

its all gone very quiet

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:44:33 UTC No. 16610264

>>16610219
they tried to min-max the shit outa it and the "min" was higher than expected.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:44:44 UTC No. 16610270

>got some practice with V2 failing

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:44:50 UTC No. 16610271

they've got some practice now it's chill bros

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:44:59 UTC No. 16610273

>>16610215
we wont even have those, it exploded way too far from the coast, maybe from some plane in the middle of the atlantic but nothing else

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:45:18 UTC No. 16610275

WE ONLY CARE ABOUT THE DATA

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:45:24 UTC No. 16610276

>this is the second time so we have a lot of practice now
Really nigga. Just make the fucking thing work. How is it so hard

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:45:26 UTC No. 16610278

GAAN STATUS: not gaan

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:45:32 UTC No. 16610280

so you telling me i waited all week just for this?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:45:49 UTC No. 16610283

>>16610278
it fucking WENT

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:45:51 UTC No. 16610284

see you losers in two weeks

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:45:56 UTC No. 16610285

Musk should focus on rockets, and leave politics alone

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:45:59 UTC No. 16610287

>>16610280
yeah, we did

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:45:59 UTC No. 16610288

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:02 UTC No. 16610290

>>16610207
Having an odd number of engines is a big risk.
Had it had just 4 engines they can shut down the symmetrical to the failed one and continue with just 2.
Or if it really needs to be 3 engines, at least center them so that if one fails the other 2 can gimball their way and push toward the CoM.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:03 UTC No. 16610291

too white!
hire more indians NOW!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:04 UTC No. 16610292

>>16610262
One day one of these will crash on Ironmouse. One day, but not today...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:06 UTC No. 16610293

Orbit status?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:08 UTC No. 16610295

>"we have some practice with this now"
>"progress isnt always linear"
>"we gathered valuable data"
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:10 UTC No. 16610296

There's no way to sugarcoat this.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:21 UTC No. 16610299

>>16610280
Flight 9 in two more months.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:29 UTC No. 16610302

>>16609806
well I hope you were fucking amused

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:32 UTC No. 16610303

The next flight better be in less than a month. This is ridiculous now.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:34 UTC No. 16610304

Should've waited 40 seconds longer

Apologize at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:46:52 UTC No. 16610306

Elon Musk is so confident on the Starship design he said he and Trump are going onboard in the next flight.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:05 UTC No. 16610309

>25 flights in 2025

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:09 UTC No. 16610310

launch, sep and booster catch is working great but this new Ship has got some serious engine/fuel line problems. same thing as happened last time

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:13 UTC No. 16610312

this is the one thing we didn't want to happen

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:13 UTC No. 16610313

>>16610278
They gaan'd perfectly, took off and then exploded almost immediately after

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:14 UTC No. 16610314

Hopefully this will accelerate V3

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:21 UTC No. 16610315

What was the velocity when things got fucked. Roughly the same as last time?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:25 UTC No. 16610318

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:29 UTC No. 16610319

>>16610293
we only wanted data anyway

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:38 UTC No. 16610321

>rockets that go to nowhere

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:40 UTC No. 16610322

I'm quite surprised.
After the promising start of V1 I'd have expected further issues with the booster and heatshield, not that they have trouble even getting it up.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:42 UTC No. 16610324

any images of re-entry?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:46 UTC No. 16610325

I reckon someone on the inside is sabotaging the Starship program to prevent the Martian uprising.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:51 UTC No. 16610326

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:56 UTC No. 16610328

>>16610303
it's gonna have to be, he's supposed to be bringing those astronauts back in a few weeks from the ISS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:47:58 UTC No. 16610329

maybe spacex can just make boosters and subcontract the rest out

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:48:13 UTC No. 16610332

>>16610278
Gaan status is at ABSOLUTELY GAAN.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:48:13 UTC No. 16610333

>>16610302
Blame Jesus, not me

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:48:14 UTC No. 16610334

https://x.com/systems_zero/status/1897794641572884702

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:48:15 UTC No. 16610335

so what exactly went wrong this time? don't spin outs only happen when the rocket is tilted too fast?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:48:19 UTC No. 16610336

V2 IS FUCKING DEAD. REBUILD WHAT? THERE IS NOTHING LEFT!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:48:28 UTC No. 16610338

>do the hard part perfectly 3 times
>can't do the part they used to do perfectly

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:48:48 UTC No. 16610340

>>16610325
if true it's most likely just EDS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:48:53 UTC No. 16610341

theres a video of it coming down, you find it if you go to the florida reddit and sort by new

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:49:05 UTC No. 16610342

So where will it re-enter? If it had been spinning I guess it could go in areas it isn't "allowed" to crash.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:49:06 UTC No. 16610343

And this is why an orbital flight should never be authorised by the FAA.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:49:06 UTC No. 16610345

"I can see it! All one thousand pieces of it! "

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:49:10 UTC No. 16610347

>>16610335
It tumbled because they lost engines. No word on why they lost engines.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:49:44 UTC No. 16610353

everything has been downhill since they "updated" flap chan

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:49:55 UTC No. 16610356

>>16610325
>>16610340
>internal sabotage due to EDS
Honestly this is a real possibility. I'm terrified of this.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:05 UTC No. 16610358

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:10 UTC No. 16610359

Okay, just have Firefly make the ship.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:11 UTC No. 16610360

We didn't need it anyways, and actually this was a complete success because we will learn from the mistakes and correct it next time, so we actually won!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:20 UTC No. 16610362

>>16610341

also theres this

https://x.com/TrevorMahlmann/status/1897796003245314474

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:21 UTC No. 16610363

>>16610342
Implying anyone knows

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:30 UTC No. 16610364

https://x.com/NorcrossUSA/status/1897796234502349117

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:34 UTC No. 16610365

HLS just got +1 year of delays.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:37 UTC No. 16610366

>>16610325
Kamala did this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:40 UTC No. 16610367

>>16610347
same reason as last time!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:52 UTC No. 16610368

>>16610360
this but unironically. You learn way more from failure than success

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:50:58 UTC No. 16610369

Trump ain't gonna like this one

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:51:20 UTC No. 16610370

>>16610340

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:51:26 UTC No. 16610371

https://x.com/SeeClickFlash/status/1897796382221910338

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:51:27 UTC No. 16610372

>>16610367
Sabotage.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:51:43 UTC No. 16610374

>>16610366
Did he forget that we've already reached Mars multiple times and have rovers on it right now collecting data?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:51:45 UTC No. 16610375

What are the chances this one was sabotage?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:51:50 UTC No. 16610376

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:51:51 UTC No. 16610377

>>16610368
you see, SLS never ever launching means it can never go wrong

much smarter

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:06 UTC No. 16610379

>rats coping already

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:12 UTC No. 16610380

>>16610370
THIS MOTHER FUCKER

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:15 UTC No. 16610381

>>16610369
He's not having the best week.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:18 UTC No. 16610382

>>16610356
what is EDS, precious?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:23 UTC No. 16610383

>>16610368
if you're smart, you can learn without forever being stuck in the pit of failure. Spacex seems to have become dumb.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:25 UTC No. 16610384

>>16610342
In the Atlantic presumably. It had more velocity this time but they still detonated the FTS. Without being in one piece I don't imagine any of the pieces have enough mass to make it all the way to Africa or beyond while encountering drag.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:25 UTC No. 16610385

It's a good thing FAA won't get in his way again and he can disintegrate another Starship on ascent very soon.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:30 UTC No. 16610387

THE KINO IS ROLLING IN
I REPEAT, THE KINO IS ROLLING IT

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:37 UTC No. 16610388

Come on say something you fat useless retard faggot

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:40 UTC No. 16610389

WOW I CAN'T WAIT FOR V3 TO HAVE THE SAME PROBLEMS

Apologize at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:52:53 UTC No. 16610393

>>16610362
this one is kino

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:53:04 UTC No. 16610395

>>16610387
mp4 bro where you at?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:53:11 UTC No. 16610396

>>16610372
you want that two day deliverey dont you elon?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:53:14 UTC No. 16610397

We celebrated to soon and God reminded us

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:53:18 UTC No. 16610399

>>16610376
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGNiXGX2nLU

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:53:25 UTC No. 16610400

A rocket is not much good if it cant launch anything into orbit. Booster landings are useless if the cargo is destroyed. The new glen got it payload to orbit on the 1st try even though the booster landing failed.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:53:36 UTC No. 16610401

>>16610388
>govt waste
ironic...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:53:47 UTC No. 16610402

Is there any prevailing theory as to why this happened? Why did some engines malfunction?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:53:47 UTC No. 16610403

this is bad
the engines going out on boostback and landing are also bad

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:53:49 UTC No. 16610404

>>16610375
What are the odds that everybody in SpaceX is totally cool with Elon's politics, and none of them are deranged redditors with enough strategic thought to stay quiet about it and undermine things in deniable ways?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:53:53 UTC No. 16610405

>>16610399

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:54:15 UTC No. 16610408

>Still no Interstellar edits

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:54:17 UTC No. 16610410

>>16610362
>>16610393
It's like a mini supernova

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:54:26 UTC No. 16610413

what's that saying about trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?

what good are these launches doing anyone?

is human wellbeing getting advanced somehow?

to what end?

what's the point of human exploration of space when we inevitably take all of our diseases of society with us?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:54:37 UTC No. 16610415

>>16610402
could it be another fire? sure they installed some suppression but maybe that only slowed it down?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:54:47 UTC No. 16610417

i unironically just jumped out of my chair and screamed "KINO ALERT!!!!!!!!" 3 times in a row i am not even joking

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:55:02 UTC No. 16610420

I got eyes on it. I live in vi

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:55:05 UTC No. 16610421

Why don't they just NOT shit the bed?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:55:08 UTC No. 16610422

>>16610402
the was fire inside the skirt for a good while before SECO, something probably overpressured

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:55:14 UTC No. 16610424

>>16610413
>what's that saying about trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?
ask any athlete, don't ask me

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:55:32 UTC No. 16610430

>>16610413
It's advancing rocketry and making Mars possible. Hang yourself troon

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:55:34 UTC No. 16610431

>>16610376
Fucking kino

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:55:50 UTC No. 16610433

KABOOM!!!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1897796181478027470

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:56:32 UTC No. 16610439

time for husk to quit screwing around in politics and save his company

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:56:36 UTC No. 16610440

>>16610376
me shitposting in star citizen

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:56:53 UTC No. 16610443

>Booster's engines are powering through every time
>Starshit's can't

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:56:54 UTC No. 16610444

>>16610312
I get this reference Sean

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:56:55 UTC No. 16610447

Live report from NASA...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:56:56 UTC No. 16610448

>>16610433
>classified footage
RELEASE IT ELON

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:57:01 UTC No. 16610449

https://x.com/jackywacky_3/status/1897796181478027470?s=19

An engine exploded

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:57:24 UTC No. 16610452

This is probably not supposed to be red hot.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:57:59 UTC No. 16610454

>>16610402
The only change is adding something as cargo. Must be increasing vibration. They did a long static fire on this starship so I wonder if one of the engines just exploded. Not very reassuring for reuse

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:58:09 UTC No. 16610458

>>16610362

>>>/wsg/5828002

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:58:39 UTC No. 16610462

Raptor v3 when

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:58:52 UTC No. 16610465

>Next we will add EVEN MORE NITROGEN FIRE SUPPRESSANT to the upper stage! We will fill the entire LOX tank with it!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:58:56 UTC No. 16610466

>>16610315
around 20k kmh i think. it lasted longer than the previous one i think but then something blew up and an engine went out. the spin started right then and that was it. maybe the fire suppression was better this time or something.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:59:26 UTC No. 16610469

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:59:52 UTC No. 16610474

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Mar 2025 23:59:57 UTC No. 16610476

>>16610465
I don't think a nitrogen purge cares about vibrations in the fuel lines cracking them apart.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:00:09 UTC No. 16610477

V3 engines will fix it. No reentries until then.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:00:30 UTC No. 16610480

>>16610433
nice catch, save it!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:01:02 UTC No. 16610482

>>16610452
that's exactly what I was mentioning
>>16610422
I wager that they wanted to lighten up the engines and ended up with pipes that are way too thin for the pressures at hand

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:01:06 UTC No. 16610484

debris reentry when?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:01:30 UTC No. 16610489

>Literally playing Kerbals irl

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:01:47 UTC No. 16610490

>>16610476
SHUT UP, LIBTARD!
FILL THE METHANE TANK TOO!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:01:50 UTC No. 16610491

so are they going to keep using v2 or postpone launches until v3 drops?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:01:52 UTC No. 16610492

>>16610458
thats crazy

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:01:54 UTC No. 16610493

>Gulf of Americ-ACK

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:02:10 UTC No. 16610495

>>16610369
I don't think he'll mind so much because the booster came back, and this isn't the first ship failure

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:02:13 UTC No. 16610496

Both times seeing Starship debris fall back to earth reminds me of when Tetsuo rode the SOL into the atmosphere.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:02:25 UTC No. 16610498

>>16610368
Anon they failed at the exact same point as FLT 7

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:02:27 UTC No. 16610499

>>16610489
I mean, if you could, wouldn't you?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:02:31 UTC No. 16610500

Raptor 3, save us from this misery!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:02:47 UTC No. 16610504

>>16610493
Gulf of Goys

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:03:17 UTC No. 16610506

>>16610496
I need to watch this certified kino again.
(I watched it again last night.)

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:03:36 UTC No. 16610509

>>16610364

>>>/wsg/5828007

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:03:41 UTC No. 16610511

>>16610368
are you my brother? stop saying stupid things and get a job

Apologize at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:03:44 UTC No. 16610512

>>16610491
I mean, they have to launch, otherwise what are they going to do with the hardware? throw it in the dump?

Might as well just launch and get the data

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:03:50 UTC No. 16610514

>>16610433

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:03:58 UTC No. 16610515

Elon bros.....
We lost...
Again....

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:04:15 UTC No. 16610517

>>16610496
such a kino scene, I really miss cell animated mechanical designs

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:04:59 UTC No. 16610523

>>16610514
Kino

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:05:16 UTC No. 16610526

>>16610402
I mean they got the booster fixed now. It's the block 2. Went from 220000 to leo to 330000, the last one was a reworked I think version 2 of the upper but they reworked it

It's the vibrations. They added 110000 lbs more power.

They'll reset it again probably two more times then go to block 3 or the 440,000 to leo booster by the end of the year.

Even if it crashes they augment the old build. They have to get to the 44000 to leo baseline then, they'll prototype it for a year then make a mars dry run. More or less the booster scaled up will be finalized after this whole they reset the upper again probably twice
Even If the upper keeps failing they'll scale to 440000, then they will have a prototype ready to go.
They could have stuck at 220,000 and kept everything in place and used that as the prototype but it's got to get over 400000 to leo to even think about a mars shot even off a refuels. the 440000 with a lunar version upper could single shot to the moon yes

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:05:18 UTC No. 16610527

>>16610490
Time to stop working from home, Mr. Musk.
Time to get back in the office.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:05:27 UTC No. 16610528

>>16610514
Are they using raptors 2s or 3s?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:05:57 UTC No. 16610534

I had to miss the launch, how did it all go?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:05:59 UTC No. 16610535

engine was on fire

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:06:01 UTC No. 16610536

>>16610371

>>>/wsg/5828009

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:06:11 UTC No. 16610537

>>16610528
retard

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:06:29 UTC No. 16610540

>>16610534
Ship is well and truly GAAN.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:06:30 UTC No. 16610541

>>16610528
2, possibly 2.5, same engine just different mount/connection

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:06:30 UTC No. 16610542

>>16610528
2. 3 is not ready yet.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:06:37 UTC No. 16610544

>>16610514

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:06:43 UTC No. 16610545

>Destroyed by fire third fucking time
What the fuck

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:06:47 UTC No. 16610546

>>16610534
it went to mars

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:07:01 UTC No. 16610548

>>16610537
It's probably a touristfren. Be nice.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:07:14 UTC No. 16610551

the competency crisis is really doing a number on mankind, eh?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:07:24 UTC No. 16610553

So, are you apologizing yet?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:07:39 UTC No. 16610556

>>16610535
raptor sucks

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:07:40 UTC No. 16610557

>>16610545
New version is complete and utter jank. I'll laugh my fucking head off if the vibrations are caused by the offset nose wings.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:07:49 UTC No. 16610560

>>16610553
i- I'M SORRY!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:07:56 UTC No. 16610563

>>16610553

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:08:49 UTC No. 16610572

>>16610540
>>16610546
Oh my.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:08:50 UTC No. 16610573

>>16610545
It's a new fucking system
Just goddamn it
They added 50% fucking to leo ability

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:09:07 UTC No. 16610574

>>16610526
Cool. I'm learning.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:09:11 UTC No. 16610576

>>16610556
RVAC sucks

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:09:27 UTC No. 16610579

SLS lives on for two more months

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:09:38 UTC No. 16610580

>>16610535
the entire underskirt was

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:09:40 UTC No. 16610581

Not looking good for spaceflight.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:09:53 UTC No. 16610582

>>16610553

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:10:20 UTC No. 16610586

>NO LONGER STICKY

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:10:46 UTC No. 16610589

>>16610573
>muh vibrations
Build a tougher rocket then

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:10:48 UTC No. 16610590

>>16610586
STARSHIP IS KILL

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:10:49 UTC No. 16610591

is this how NASA developed their rockets once upon a time?
are we in the camp that there were lunar landings?
how's it so difficult to merely put something into a stable orbit?
this is nearly century-old technology
apparently unlearned over the last while
how entertaining

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:10:58 UTC No. 16610593

>>16610553

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:11:09 UTC No. 16610594

>>16610452
It has a entire piece blown out i think.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:12:00 UTC No. 16610600

>>16610581
>SLS budget increased by $12b
>Americans will launch on Soyuz again

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:12:24 UTC No. 16610603

KNEEL TO EVROPE

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:12:27 UTC No. 16610604

>>16610591
Von Braun didn't need to test his hardware to failure. It worked first time.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:13:18 UTC No. 16610607

>>16610604
why can't rocket scientists do this anymore?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:13:26 UTC No. 16610611

>>16610574
Yeah the added a shit ton more thrust and took a lot of weight off and it's a vibration issue leading to fires. Something is shaking like crazy, sensors or pumps or mixes are getting screwed up which goes down hill.
The booster was the most important thing. Now it's nailed down they have a baseline vehicle to scale the upper. They launch upper and lower even though the booster keeps being scaled which can screw up the upper to advance as fast as possible .space x will burn through 20 more launches until they finally try to standardize everything them ten more test launches. Elon is aiming for 2026

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:13:32 UTC No. 16610612

>>16610604
you're damn right and that's because he was an actual engineer as opposed to whatever these clowns are pretending to be
measure twice cut once i think is the phrase
unlearned like so much else

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:13:53 UTC No. 16610615

So we can all finally agree the Starship program is a failure?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:13:56 UTC No. 16610616

IT ALL COMES TUMBLING DOWN TUMBLING DOWN TUMBLING DOOOOWWWWWNN

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:14:17 UTC No. 16610619

IT'S OVER

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:14:35 UTC No. 16610621

>>16610611
>The booster was the most important thing. Now it's nailed down
Yeah, until the V2 booster shits the bed too

Apologize at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:14:37 UTC No. 16610622

what did Elongated Muskrat mean by this?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:14:41 UTC No. 16610623

>>16610611
I volunteer to ride in there and report whats shaking

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:15:02 UTC No. 16610627

>>16610607
Because von Braun had $300 billion.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:15:23 UTC No. 16610631

>>16610616
I WISH
THAT I COULD TURN BACK TIME

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:15:42 UTC No. 16610633

Is this,... as they say... nominal?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:15:58 UTC No. 16610636

>>16610604
He tested his hardware on the English

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:16:21 UTC No. 16610638

>>16610633
>fuck your program elong
>meatspin.mp3

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:16:26 UTC No. 16610640

>>16610633
>how it feels to chew 5gum

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:16:39 UTC No. 16610641

I wonder if the tight fitting of the engines is causing gas to be sucked back into the engine bell during flight

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:17:04 UTC No. 16610645

I fucking hate brown shits Jesus fucking Christ turn off your location tracking when you save memes and post them you fucking idiots. Google "stores near me" if it a store close to you pops up your location tracking is on

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:17:09 UTC No. 16610646

>>16610633
>do a 360 and moon walk away

Apologize at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:17:11 UTC No. 16610648

>>16610633
t-think the amount of data they got from this!

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:17:12 UTC No. 16610649

>>16610633
Like it or not, this is what peak attitude control looks like

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:17:46 UTC No. 16610651

>>16610633

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:17:54 UTC No. 16610653

Was Ship already out of attitude just before it lost the engines? I didn't think it was supposed to be rotating like that but I just watch these casually.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:18:02 UTC No. 16610656

Fragmented Water Unplanned Landing near Miami FLA.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:18:16 UTC No. 16610660

>>16610633

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:18:38 UTC No. 16610665

Seriously Brown and yellow people just can't act fucking right or let others be happy look at this fucking thread

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:19:00 UTC No. 16610666

>>16610656
not a good look

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:19:01 UTC No. 16610667

>During Starship's ascent burn, the vehicle experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly and contact was lost. Our team immediately began coordination with safety officials to implement pre-planned contingency responses.

They didn't even terminate it, it just blew up

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:19:45 UTC No. 16610669

time to give up on second stage reuse

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:20:13 UTC No. 16610672

>>16610669
*use

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:20:31 UTC No. 16610674

>>16610667
there was an FTS is safed callout as it began to spin

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:22:05 UTC No. 16610684

>>16610653
no, it was the loss of gimbaling center engines and asymmetric thrust that caused it

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:22:17 UTC No. 16610685

ahead of schedule and under budget amirite bros???

Apologize at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:22:25 UTC No. 16610687

>>16610669
why though? this explosion has nothing to do with reusability, it's a just a poozed engine

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:24:35 UTC No. 16610703

>>16610685
why_are_you_such_a_pessimist_after_6_years?.jpg

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:24:36 UTC No. 16610704

>>16610687
>this explosion has nothing to do with reusability, it's a just a poozed engine
retarded nigger. You don't even know what engines starship uses. Leave and never come back, tourist

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:25:09 UTC No. 16610707

*Mogs your Starship completely on the first try*
Apologize.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:25:34 UTC No. 16610709

>>16610685
Do you not know what the word "initial" means or something?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:26:38 UTC No. 16610716

So, it happened AGAIN. We can blame Elon Musk, we can blame FAA regulations, we can blame NASA micromanagement, we can blame faulty welds, we can blame space being hard, we can praise the engineers' effort, but the truth is it's simply not enough. Planning, execution, you name it, it all stinks.

Don't get me wrong, I still have full faith in SpaceX and the vision, but MASSIVE improvements are desperately needed before Starship is truly orbital-ready. Otherwise, I'm not very optimistic about our chances of Mars in this decade. Not launching like this.

What do you think, /sci/? Where is the heat shield? Do you think we can get anything from NASA for all these test flights? Is Starship just another Starhopper? How can we feed Raptor engines more reliably? Has the Musk era stalled?? ELON #IN or #OUT?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:26:46 UTC No. 16610719

>>16610685
This nigga ain't getting niggas to Mars.
I'd respect Elon if he just sent a ton of robots to return soil and rock samples for us to study back here. I mean honestly that's the only thing worth going to Mars for, to search for fossils, lifeforms, learn more about its geological history, etc. If Starship can carry a heavy enough cargo to set up an autonomous core drilling device we could bring back literal core samples from Mars to analyze back on Earth.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:27:22 UTC No. 16610725

>>16610402
leak like last time causing a fire in the engine bay and then a vacuum engine explosion, which fucked the sea level engines
the result was 2 vacuum engines giving an asymmetric thrust making the whole ship spin

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:27:53 UTC No. 16610727

Are we ready to admit it'll be another Space Shuttle style disaster?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:28:22 UTC No. 16610729

how long will a nigga have to wait for the elon post so a nigga can get he some sleep?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:28:27 UTC No. 16610730

>>16610716
we don't even know if the new headshield shit works since V2 can't even get to SECO

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:28:34 UTC No. 16610731

>>16610716
(he typed faggly)

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:29:00 UTC No. 16610732

>>16610727
The Space Shuttle was a complete success compared to this.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:29:24 UTC No. 16610734

>>16610729
elon killed himself

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:30:45 UTC No. 16610743

Why doesnt thunderf00t livestream spacex flights anymore?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:31:06 UTC No. 16610746

>>16610709
initial, as in first. they have lots of plans for mars and the first one is to land a cargo starship on mars in 2022.
you're the retard confusing initial with tentative

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:32:01 UTC No. 16610750

>>16610743
he caught on to the fact that every time he does it it succeeds

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:34:47 UTC No. 16610760

why are the moderators not banning you n-word spamming freaks?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:34:52 UTC No. 16610761

>>16610746
So, no, you do not.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:35:18 UTC No. 16610763

>>16610633
Starship saw it's trajectory was crossing India, turned 360° degrees and flew away.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:36:01 UTC No. 16610769

>>16610750
New superstition unlocked.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:36:34 UTC No. 16610771

hay guise did u kno that the starship is capable of building a city on mars and a city on the moon???
as evidenced here today

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:40:00 UTC No. 16610780

>>16610226
Well he doesn't give a shit anymore, so it'll probably continue to not do well.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:43:12 UTC No. 16610786

>>16610734
big if true

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:44:30 UTC No. 16610791

did preliminary physical studies and testing and margin of safety get forgotten somewhere along the line in western rocketry?