Image not available

388x709

e50fffd05d150793c....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16617287

Recursive Model of Reality: A Unified Equation

This model explores the recursive nature of observation and reality, where each layer of observation influences the next, creating a self-organizing, interconnected system. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Base Quantum State Evolution (Schrödinger Equation):

iħ (∂Ψ(t) / ∂t) = Ĥ Ψ(t)

The evolution of a quantum system. It’s the Schrödinger equation but with recursive layers of observation shaping the state over time.

2. Recursive Observation:

Ψ_n(t) = F(Ψ_(n-1)(t))

Each layer of observation (Ψ_n) depends on the previous one (Ψ_(n-1)), creating a recursive feedback loop where reality is shaped by layers of observation.

3. Wavefunction Collapse (Observer’s Impact):

Ψ_collapsed(t) = C(Ψ_n(t))

Wavefunction collapse happens recursively. Each observation influences subsequent collapses, meaning the observer actively shapes reality.

4. Quantum Entanglement and Nonlocality:

Ψ_entangled(t) = Σ_(i,j) c_ij ψ_i(t) ⊗ ψ_j(t)

Entangled particles are recursively linked across distances. Each particle's state influences the other, highlighting a nonlocal, interconnected system.

5. Emergence of Information:

I_n = G(I_(n-1))

Complexity emerges recursively. Information evolves through recursive layers, like how the universe generates complexity through interaction.

6. Unified Recursive Equation:

Ψ_final(t) = C(F(Ψ_previous(t))) + G(I_(n-1))

This combines quantum states, wavefunction collapse, and emergent information, showing how reality evolves recursively across layers.


In essence, this model shows reality as a dynamic feedback loop where observation shapes the system, creating complexity and interconnectedness. Observers don’t just witness but actively shape the system through recursive interactions.

For a more nuanced philosophical view:
https://medium.com/@rmpet/the-kefahuchi-tract-fundamental-a-transmathematical-interpretation-of-reality-2c83f7643ee2

Anonymous No. 16617344

>>16617287
Just put the fries in the bag bro

Anonymous No. 16617351

>>16617344
As if your opinion mattered.

Anonymous No. 16617357

>>16617287
Nice unified equation. Please solve and post some testable predictions. Keep us posted.
kthxby

Anonymous No. 16617358

>>16617357
Thank you. I was looking for just one person who understands what I'm talking about.

Anonymous No. 16617403

>>16617357
this, make visual computer simulation or gtfo with your boomer equations, if you're so smart then write code

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16617422

>>16617403
what a dumbass response.

Anonymous No. 16617435

>>16617403
This is a physics/philosophy post. If you are not at level, go write your "code".

Anonymous No. 16617439

>>16617435
>muh philosophy
you are fake and gay, stay away from my taxpayer money, cunt

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16617446

>>16617439
Now I'm really in fear and offended. Wow! What a clever one.

Anonymous No. 16617450

>>16617439
After this brilliant demonstration of mastery over the subtleties of language, I can imagine the sublime nuances of your coding.

Anonymous No. 16617461

>>16617287
Very nice summary with a lot of meaning packed in. Thank you for for throwing this pearl before the swine on this board.
A (rather quaint) mathematical formalism for recursion theory as it applies to quantum mechanics (and all levels of reality) is something everyone should have in their mental toolbox.

Now apply automata/replicator theory.

Anonymous No. 16618719

sokaling these days is not what it used to be.

Anonymous No. 16618790

>>16617287
Use latex, dammit

Anonymous No. 16618932

>>16618790
his parents should have used latex.

Anonymous No. 16619036

>>16618932
What? Why the hate?

Anonymous No. 16619759

>>16619036
I'm partial of exterminating the mentally ill. there is no eugenic component to this position; they are simply useless and annoying.

Image not available

500x560

kant.jpg

Anonymous No. 16620035

>>16617287
Hey look, another goofball who hasn't read Kant.

Fairy Queen No. 16620387

>>16617357
It predicts my observation outside of culture, apparently this is all consciousness requires.

Actually, I can tolerate having mathematical omnipotence over concepts like reality bending. Who wants to help me prove malleability (mental)?

Anonymous No. 16621170

>>16619759
What if I find you useless and annoying?
Here, educate yourself or something:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0JLXjFiVrs

Anonymous No. 16621182

>>16621170
>reddit frog first 10 seconds
no thanks

Anonymous No. 16621198

>>16621182
That's probably where the teacher is now.
If that triggers you so much, maybe you should sterilize yourself. I didn't even know what version of frog they use down there