Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 22:15:05 UTC No. 16618172

>>16618164
I can go for a suicide mission to make it upright again.

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 22:32:30 UTC No. 16618179

>>16618164
What took that photo?
A nearby Moon lander?

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 23:22:42 UTC No. 16618227

>>16618164
inertia

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 23:46:34 UTC No. 16618243

>>16618164
IM built it.

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Mar 2025 23:53:23 UTC No. 16618254

>>16618172
I would probably do this

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:26:19 UTC No. 16618289

>>16618164
pressed the wrong button

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 01:20:33 UTC No. 16618326

>>16618164
the front fell over

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 01:49:08 UTC No. 16618346

>>16618164
Moon niggers pushed it to fuck with us

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:12:39 UTC No. 16618816

>>16618179
the other one that landed and also fell over. the image is rotated for your viewing pleasure

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:06:30 UTC No. 16618851

>>16618164
The laser altimeter didn't work, ....again

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:11:27 UTC No. 16618857

>>16618164
should have been wider than it was tall, couldn't have fallen over than

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:24:24 UTC No. 16618866

>>16618164
they didn't use the airbag technique

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:36:08 UTC No. 16618868

>>16618346
>>16618164
R8 my moon Pic from last night

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:41:14 UTC No. 16618870

>>16618866
what a load of balls that was

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:42:16 UTC No. 16618873

>>16618868
its so nice i dont even know what im looking at

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:55:42 UTC No. 16618878

>>16618164
What is the business model of these smaller private companies? There is literally no money to be made in space apart from bringing satellites up like spacex

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:58:08 UTC No. 16618881

>>16618179
Alien or nazis in the Moon.

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 18:16:59 UTC No. 16618890

>fund a lander that crashes
>shame on me
>fund a second lander that also crashes
>shame, shame on,
>YA GET FOOLED YA CAN'T GIT FOOLED AGAIN!

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 18:31:55 UTC No. 16618898

>>16618873
It's the moon

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 19:36:04 UTC No. 16618952

>>16618898
oh yeah....its beautiful. and theres some kind of atmosphere or something. i love it

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 19:42:04 UTC No. 16618957

>>16618164
The landing leg broke

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 19:55:17 UTC No. 16618967

>>16618164
obesity of the mind, jewish origin

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 21:42:53 UTC No. 16619059

>>16618967
is that like mental diabetus?

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 21:43:43 UTC No. 16619060

>>16618952
atmosphere?

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 21:58:11 UTC No. 16619070

>>16619060
you dont see the bluish tinge around the whole things that looks like an atmosphere? what is that?

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Mar 2025 22:31:42 UTC No. 16619115

>>16618857
>what's a centre of gravity
congratulations, you're smarter than the reeteys who designed this shit

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Mar 2025 03:21:04 UTC No. 16619469

>>16619070
The moon doesn't have an atmosphere. I think he may have taken the photo through some glass which caused some weird light refraction fuckery.

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:05:14 UTC No. 16619640

>>16618164
>MoonLanderFallenOver.jpg
yeah, but not on the Moon
it fell over on a(nother) Hollywood set

look at the clear floor
littered with grey styrofoam

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:13:02 UTC No. 16619646

>>16618957
understandable, have a nice day

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:24:12 UTC No. 16619658

>>16619640
Trvthnvke

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:41:14 UTC No. 16619706

>>16619469
>The moon doesn't have an atmosphere. I
well, its very thin but there is something there. i was thinking that perhaps some lighting or exposure effect cause it to be visible but you're probably right about the glass. never seen any other photo like that.

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Mar 2025 14:19:10 UTC No. 16619744

>>16618164
>now that the dust has settled
>what went wrong?

How retarded does a company have to be to repeat the same failure twice!?

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Mar 2025 20:32:27 UTC No. 16620045

>>16619744
no, it's NASA and their retardation and corruption, giving out multiple contracts to a startup company with no track record in anything
the leaders of the company are actually smart for giving themselves huge salaries without producing any value