Anonymous at Sun, 16 Mar 2025 21:45:03 UTC No. 16621153

>>16621150
of course. If you believe anything the mainstream claims you are objectively fucken retarded.

this is why I'm rich as fuck. Redditors and other idiots just give me their money because social media said so lol.

climate change... ahahahahahahahahahaha

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:21:16 UTC No. 16621174

>>16621150
thank you mankind for the carbon dioxide which has spurred the growth of trees around the world

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:31:37 UTC No. 16621180

1. people already estimated all non-anthropocentric sources
2. measuring CO2 at global scale is trivial, for air and oceans
With both you can have a pretty good understanding of the CO2 cycle, the question is how much it does affect the climate and in which ways. But of course, some people seems more interested in validating its own hypothesis and others are simply receiving $...

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Mar 2025 23:02:57 UTC No. 16621203

>volcano shits itself and eclipses mankind's CO2 output
pollution still sucks shit because then every downtown traffic pit is basically spewing volcano fumes that you have to huff if you live there.
There's a million reasons to support environmentalism but the doomsday scare tactic is indeed a grift

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Mar 2025 23:37:13 UTC No. 16621223

That graphic shows 0.04% or 400ppm co2. We are actually slightly above that currently. For the last million years we have been below 300ppm.
Raising air temperatures from the greenhouse effect causes arctic ice to melt, causing weather extremes. It's also making the ocean acidic, so in the future we may not be able to rely on our oceans to provide food when we trigger a marine extinction event.

On the bright side, USA and Europe have been lowering their co2 output, but china and india have increased theirs.
One of the 14 NAE grand engineering challenges for the 21st century are to "Develop Carbon Sequestration Methods", which is necessary to have negative co2 output to mitigate the damage we are causing.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:30:35 UTC No. 16621260

>>16621180
>estimated

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 01:08:12 UTC No. 16621283

>>16621150
>Di-oxide
grifters gonna grift

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 01:23:49 UTC No. 16621288

>>16621150
What's increasing the temperature then? Friction from my cock and your mom's vagina?

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 01:30:31 UTC No. 16621292

>>16621288
Nvidia GPU's generating too much AI porn

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:07:15 UTC No. 16621402

>>16621150
>it is impossible to measure CO2, only guesswork
lmao state of chuds

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:26:39 UTC No. 16621408

>>16621203
Volcanism creates rocks that weather and erode absorbing co2 in the process taking it out of the atmosphere. This is called the Rock Cycle.

Taking coal and oil out of the earth and burning it is clearly a massive imbalance that no natural cycle can absorb. Unfortunetly the entire world economy relies almost exclusively on coal, oil and gas.

Doomsday is not the right word because its going to happen over thousands of years, slowly getting worse and worse.

Its basically inevitable. The ship is too big to turn.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:36:50 UTC No. 16621412

>>16621408
Why can't plant life just absorb more CO2?

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:42:26 UTC No. 16621414

>>16621412
the same plants on which we salt the soil with and reserve for cattle?

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:45:33 UTC No. 16621416

>>16621414
Can you explain a bit more what you mean?

Also cattle is typically only raised in places that are not suitable to intense agriculture (grasslands) and they are fattened up for a year before slaughter.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 07:01:39 UTC No. 16621422

>>16621416
I'm talking about land clearing, burning, treatment and turnover into pastureland, palm oil, poisoned oil fields, nitrated cesspits, and further desertification.
Dense rainforests and carbon sinks don't just come back, and forest maintenance or meme capture have been the most effective solutions because of how essential they are or could be to buffering this shit.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 07:13:15 UTC No. 16621425

>>16621414
Cattle have been shown to be carbon negative.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 07:14:58 UTC No. 16621428

>>16621425
Not that it matters anyway since carbon is good for the environment. We are all made of carbon.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:18:39 UTC No. 16621482

>>16621223
sequestration is a fantasy

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:19:37 UTC No. 16621484

>>16621425
my ass they have
how the fuck is a cow carbon negative? where does the carbon end up?

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:27:21 UTC No. 16621517

>>16621484
In me.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:38:52 UTC No. 16621523

>>16621402
The lies get more insane every year

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:42:49 UTC No. 16621555

>>16621484
It is less consequential than the clearing and raping of more land
we can have beef and trees, but not at an infinite scale

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:48:54 UTC No. 16621599

>>16621260
It's the proper term retard.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:05:25 UTC No. 16621918

>>16621555
OK but is it carbon negative? No it's not.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:23:31 UTC No. 16621927

>>16621918
true

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:39:07 UTC No. 16621934

>>16621918
>cows magically create carbon retard vs cows magically delete carbon retard
i always love seeing these two groups do what they believe passes as argument

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 23:20:06 UTC No. 16622046

>>16621934
Unless you have nobel prize proof that cows are somehow autotrophs that we can use as an infinite energy source, they're heterotrophs that takes in fuel and shits out methane and carbon dioxide

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:15:22 UTC No. 16622339

>>16621150
The only people worse than climate alarmists are these people who think drumpf does anything for any other reason than to appease israel

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:11:33 UTC No. 16622352

>>16621150
Climate change is a hoax made by oil companies to discredit any future discussion of environmental health. It's like when whenever there are something sketchy going on with the government, they release flat-earthers to align themselves with the noticers and make it seems like everyone who believes there's something sketchy going on is a nutjob. Which happened with the covid, for example. We destroying the earth by pollution and destruction of nature, not by cow farts. The reason why Bill Gates and oil companies don't want you to hear the truth is because in order to solve this problem we would have to re-design the whole industry from scratch and they don't want to spend that much money. This is why instead of inventing preventive technologies for nuclear plants we have protestors throwing canned tomatoes on random pictures in museums.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:12:33 UTC No. 16622353

>>16621599
I estimated that your mother takes from 0 to 10 cocks in her ass per week. Might be 0, might be 10. It's an estimation.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:58:28 UTC No. 16622399

>>16621150
We need lithium being affordable for flying cars dumbfuck.