Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 20:11:33 UTC No. 16621859

>>16621839
it shows

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 20:51:53 UTC No. 16621902

>>16621839
I don't believe in frogposting

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:47:20 UTC No. 16621942

>>16621839
what part do you not believe in?

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:58:41 UTC No. 16621959

>>16621942

how do molecular machines evolve from stochastic chemical processes. How do the hyper-complex systems involved in neurochemistry self-reinforce in a way that goes from primordial soup to human cognition?

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:29:24 UTC No. 16622085

>>16621839
>believe
Neither do I. Turns out, belief was never a valid stance. Take your faith posting to /x/.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:34:34 UTC No. 16622087

>>16621959
Even without knowing the details, the fact that there were around thirty trillion iterations makes it hard to imagine anything too difficult to brute force.
>primordial soup to human cognition
Thirty trillion steps.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:45:26 UTC No. 16622093

>>16622087

yeah dude and if we wait around in the universe for 400 trillion years a consciousness will just arise out of the quantum fluctuations

turns out "scientists" believe all kinds of retarded crap even if you're not self aware >>16622085

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 01:33:20 UTC No. 16622118

>>16622093
nonsensical
gb2>>>/x/

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 01:59:00 UTC No. 16622132

>>16622118

questioning retardation is anti-science, we just have faith that random chemical reactions become coherent after 30 trillion iterations

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 02:26:10 UTC No. 16622145

>>16622093
Hmm, an indirect mention. What part didn't you like? The part where "belief" has multiple meanings, half of which are inadmissible to scientific discussion? Word better.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 02:32:19 UTC No. 16622147

>>16622145

belief leads to pursuit of novel ideas, it inspires the process the science but isn't the end result of it

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 02:35:25 UTC No. 16622148

>>16621839
do you believe in the society of clones aka heaven?

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 06:59:32 UTC No. 16622276

>>16622132
the reason you see this so black and white is because you don't realize how big downstream effects you can have on any given system from tiny changes in the initial conditions. You should apply that to the very nature of the type of chemical reactions that are possible, qualities shaped by its environment. In one area of the primordial soup you get conditions that are conducive to life and the other non life

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 07:21:02 UTC No. 16622281

>>16622087
>it was brute forced trust me bro
faggot

Eyedol at Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:25:28 UTC No. 16624474

>>16622132
Shut up, low I.Q moron

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Mar 2025 05:18:01 UTC No. 16624763

your gut is telling you the truth

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Mar 2025 05:19:07 UTC No. 16624764

>weeb lingo
>also holds retard opinion

imagine my absolute shock

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Mar 2025 05:46:28 UTC No. 16624771

>>16622281
>intelligent design is the null hypothesis because it just is
Why do you think complex life either needed to arise from random elements on Earth or have been put there by some intelligent being? First is unlikely and the second solves nothing because now you have to explain the origin of that precursor intelligent being. Life was probably kick started by something not-quite-life that formed in regions of space with greater energy gradients and landed on Earth. And this probably happened many times and failed to become life on all attempts but one.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Mar 2025 06:06:06 UTC No. 16624774

Test

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:52:54 UTC No. 16624856

>>16621839
go back to your containment board

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:26:33 UTC No. 16625606

>>16622087
so basically, you don't know and just take some soientist's word at face value.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:28:42 UTC No. 16625607

>>16622085
Womanly seething.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:32:07 UTC No. 16625610

>>16624771
>panspermia
LOOOOOL. This really is the stupidest board.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:51:06 UTC No. 16625622

Me too. The chances are too slim. Check out the fine tuningTheory

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:01:07 UTC No. 16625907

>>16621839
>itt: /sci/ once again believes evolution is all about the rise of life and consciousness from non life
Many such cases

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:33:45 UTC No. 16625947

>>16621839
Why did the intelligent designer give giraffes a nerve that runs all the way down their neck and loops all the way back up for no reason?

Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:28:11 UTC No. 16627377

>>16621959
evolution doesn't claim to know the origin in life so you're already starting off bad