Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 20:24:44 UTC No. 16621877
Steinsgate reference?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:56:08 UTC No. 16621955
>>16621857
fake and gay
>meteor orbiting a planet
THATS CALLED A MOON
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:14:15 UTC No. 16621983
>>16621955
>THATS CALLED A MOON
Dr. Moonner
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:18:54 UTC No. 16621993
>>16621983
That's Moon Man to you.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:25:56 UTC No. 16622003
>>16621857
>dr pepper-sized
>heavy as 3 baby elephants
what the fuck is that portion size amerifats?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:29:32 UTC No. 16622012
btw, a natural dr pepper sized object can at most be like 18 lbs (no funny business), obv less than 1 baby elephant weight
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:39:35 UTC No. 16622019
>>16622012
>natural
>(no funny business)
doing a lot of work
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:02:56 UTC No. 16622068
>>16621955
You're so right
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:20:45 UTC No. 16622079
>>16621857
That's 2.3 Big Macs in volume, and 1500 Big Macs in weight FYI
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:26:41 UTC No. 16622083
>>16622079
I'd gladly use big macs as a weight value over the metric (gay) system
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 01:24:50 UTC No. 16622112
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:13:31 UTC No. 16622171
>>16621857
is it made of unobtanium?
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 04:08:21 UTC No. 16622205
>>16622112
>there was a time when even quirky wholesome chungus sporks would make crude dick jokes
Just how far has the fabric of our culture fallen
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 06:54:13 UTC No. 16622272
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:58:56 UTC No. 16622305
>>16621857
Indian baby elephants or African baby elephants?
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:44:21 UTC No. 16622315
>>16621857
>orbititing
why did you stop there, you should have spelled it orbitititititing or something like that.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:26:21 UTC No. 16622383
>>16621857
And just how would we spot this Dr Pepper-sized meteor in the orbit of Mars?
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 14:14:05 UTC No. 16622408
>>16621857
How can Musk possibly be expected to land on Mars now? It's so over.