Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 20:52:06 UTC No. 16621903

>>16621872
Not going to invest time into watching it. Did she join the global warming cult or swing the other way?

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:01:56 UTC No. 16621912

let me know when professor dave debunks it, kind of a waste of time to watch this sabine stuff raw

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:58:46 UTC No. 16621960

>>16621903
you can't go full retard if you want to retain brilliant sponsorship, so expect a balancing act

i do wonder when sabine shitcoin will drop though, should be right after that scheduled rogan interview lmao

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:00:55 UTC No. 16621963

>>16621872
>a bottle of port
How long are these fucking videos?!?

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:09:17 UTC No. 16621974

I can only watch her on 2x speed. She sounds mentally challenged on 1x

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:15:05 UTC No. 16621985

>>16621963
meant to say a cup.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:16:24 UTC No. 16621988

>>16621960
Meh. Why even waste time then?
>"So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth." -- Revelation 3:16

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 01:02:30 UTC No. 16622101

>>16621872
I understand what she means, but hearing scientists talk about statistical significance hurts my soul. The standard chi-squared based significance tests only make sense if you have a good reason the model prediction errors are Gaussian with a known variance/covariance.

A bigger confidence interval doesn't necessarily mean "bad paper" and this shouldn't be the standard that it currently is. It could just as easily be "fat tailed truth."

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:44:01 UTC No. 16622314

>>16621974
She's ESL, don't be mean.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:08:44 UTC No. 16622320

she's a retarded grifter and got mad her video got taken down for spreading misinformation

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:11:27 UTC No. 16622321

>paper says
global warming increased the chance of LA fires
>sabine
they say global warming caused the LA fires

you have proof she's a retard and a grifter. that retarded bitch is pro global warming, why is she mad again?

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:14:08 UTC No. 16622354

>>16622101
>"fat tailed truth."
American truths

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:15:20 UTC No. 16622426

>>16622354
Or Cauchy, or really any alpha stable distribution which is platykurtic.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:16:32 UTC No. 16622427

>>16622426
Leptokurtic* oops.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:17:33 UTC No. 16622428

Didn't she most recently admit that climate hysteria is a scam

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:14:32 UTC No. 16622444

>>16622428
Odd considering she thinks climate change is probably worse than what we think it is because she says climate scientists feel the need to make really conservative estimates, models and assumptions to avoid being labelled schizo alarmist pessimists.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:27:37 UTC No. 16622502

>>16622428
she always says the opposite of the current thing

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 21:12:14 UTC No. 16622703

>>16622314
I am as well.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Mar 2025 23:54:25 UTC No. 16623114

>>16621872
I do a shot everytime Eyen-shhh-stein!

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:31 UTC No. 16623122

>>16622101
How do I learn about what you're saying?

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:53:23 UTC No. 16623518

>>16621872
Ugly dyke

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:39:27 UTC No. 16623604

>>16623122
Read a theoretical statistics book with significant coverage on hypothesis testing, goodness of fit testing, and confidence intervals.

You'll need some mathematics chops, but it will teach you what these "significance tests" are actually doing (assuming that the null is some zero mean Gaussian on the space with some variance, and defining significance via a chi-squared goodness of fit test intended to "reject" this null). This is an incredibly heuristic and weak way to approach hypothesis testing and it blows my mind that it's the standard in so many avenues of science.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Mar 2025 22:28:17 UTC No. 16623953

>>16623604
it's only standard in "*non-science*-science" fields like climate """"""""""""""""""science"""""""""""""""""""""

bodhi at Wed, 19 Mar 2025 23:44:42 UTC No. 16623999

>>16621985
Who drinks wine in cups? You from the trailer park?

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:12:50 UTC No. 16624463

>>16623953
Experimental particle physics too

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:17:27 UTC No. 16624465

>>16621903
She's still part of the cult. Quite cucked.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:24:30 UTC No. 16624472

>>16621903
She just makes absurd declarations to get views. Nothing she says has any value. She's a lolcow.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:45:28 UTC No. 16624494

I don't get what's her problem. Early in her career she received an offer for serious funding but refused it because of how it was labeled and thought they only gave it to her out of pity because she was a woman (they didn't). With affirmative action the only reasonable thing you can do is give the grants to people that fit the criteria but don't need it in the first place to avoid the opportunity cost. What I mean is that you give it to a competent person who is a minority so that someone who isn't a minority still gets the regular funding, instead of giving regular funding to competent minorities and being left with nothing for people who aren't minorities.
She took this way too personally and instead decided to be a contrarian on YouTube after realizing how much dough it brings. The fact that she threw away her dignity and pride for money in the most shameless way because she was so badly jaded after being asked to swallow her pride, to a rather minor degree, for funding is extremely ironic. I don't know what kind of autism drives these people towards this behavior.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:30:36 UTC No. 16624921

>>16624494
>she threw away her dignity and pride for money in the most shameless way
She's on onlyfans?

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:57:01 UTC No. 16625979

>>16624494
this reads exactly like a character assassination piece.

Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 08:56:03 UTC No. 16626473

>>16624494
>somebody quits academia because they got a consolation funding for niggers
>rightfully gets pissed off; try doing science communication on YouTube instead
>it succeeds
>some nigger tries to portray this as if you are an onlyfans model degenerating society
u ok?

Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:03:30 UTC No. 16626594

>>16626473
Women should never have been given the vote.
>Change my mind

Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 16:23:10 UTC No. 16626716

>>16626594
Who they voted for b4?

Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 16:30:21 UTC No. 16626721

>>16626594
If it means anything they were given the vote against their will.

Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 16:53:01 UTC No. 16626740

>>16626473
didn't a majority of white women vote for trump, i thought you loved trump, should those white wahmen votes be taken away then?