Image not available

1395x460

1742376382373782.jpg

🧵 is race socially constructed?

Anonymous No. 16623546

what does the science say?

Image not available

1500x1101

IMG_4024.jpg

Anonymous No. 16623594

>>16623546
>It’s important to note that race and ethnicity are not the same.
It’s important to note that sets and groups are not the same. A group is set equipped with an identity element and an associative binary operation.
There is a place for this kind of technical jargon, but to demand your jargon be shoehorned into everyday English is stupid, arrogant and evil

Anonymous No. 16623617

>>16623546
Science says no.
>but why does that article say that yes, race is indeed socially constructed?
Because that's not science, it's (((science))). Being able to differentiate between the two is a very important skill to have these days.

Anonymous No. 16623631

>>16623546
>SULC
there's your problem you've, confused them for human

Image not available

1280x811

socialconstruct.jpg

bodhi No. 16624005

Image not available

1815x1039

David Reich Genet....png

Anonymous No. 16624050

>>16624005

Anonymous No. 16624054

>>16624005
yeah this stupid shit DEFINITELY wont survive gene editing. i'd love to see the losers upholding this insanity die of diseases that might become easily curable. it would be extremely hilarious and satisfying.

Image not available

714x658

IMG_4463.jpg

Anonymous No. 16624162

>>16623546
>race
>ethnicity
Not /sci/
Try lit.
Yes, ….by their definition.
Which could almost be interesting if they were aurging in good faith for an idea of identity in a certain time and place. but they will switch definition mid paragraph to the one people expect revealing it is just a political agenda

Image not available

3851x4665

gg190405.f2.png

Anonymous No. 16624577

The way we have created them are