🧵 Does the midwit meme have any merit? What is /sci/'s IQ?
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 02:54:50 UTC No. 16625548
Please take the CAIT here and post the results:
https://cognitivemetrics.com/
Anyways, what do (you) think the average IQ of /sci/ is? Are you all midwits larping as geniuses? What about other boards?
I still can't believe that IQ is normally distributed. For every 110 iq person, there is a 90 iq person. For every 120iq person, there is an 80iq person. For every 150iq person, there is a 50iq person.
Of course this is logical, but 70iq seems so much dumber than 130iq seems smart.
>inb4 iq isn't real copers
lol ok
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 16:43:15 UTC No. 16625894
>>16625548
I took cait a while ago I got 107 FSIQ im pretty smart
iq is not normally distributed
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 16:47:17 UTC No. 16625895
>>16625548
I will not take those shitty tests, but it is true that the vast majority of this board is midwits larping as geniuses.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:08:21 UTC No. 16625914
>>16625913
>filtered by question 1
lmao sorry saar better luck next time
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:15:18 UTC No. 16625920
>>16625914
>radio
>heater
>gas tank
they all come assembled from a factory, which one is the correct one?
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:15:18 UTC No. 16625921
>>16625913
>retarded
Oh come the fuck on.
>>16625548
>he forgot about the sped class
To be clear, sir. Midwit means something other than 100. If it were 100, they would be called "average." There was a reason the term was coined.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:16:21 UTC No. 16625923
>>16625920
TAKE ONE OUT UNTIL YOU DON'T HAVE A FUCKING CAR.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:18:45 UTC No. 16625928
>>16625923
I still have a car without gas tank. Some cars don't have gas tanks to begin with. None of this answers the question "what is more likely to be in a car". The answer is all 3 of those things. The questions is literally "guess what I had in my mind" and you are an imbecile to defend it.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:18:47 UTC No. 16625929
>>16625548
I must say it's a fact that IQ worshipping mongrels like yourself are the most dimwitted of all.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:20:16 UTC No. 16625930
>>16625923
>be me
>have a car
>take out radio
>don't have a car anymore
genius
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:22:02 UTC No. 16625933
>>16625928
>I still have a car without gas tank
>he knows the fucking answer but now wants to argue his bullshit angle
The list quite literally makes "functional" implicit. Do you know about implications?
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:27:35 UTC No. 16625938
>>16625933
>erm well it IMPLIED
yeah this is what I'm talking about, retarded guessing questions, this is why all these IQ tests are gambling garbage
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:29:26 UTC No. 16625941
Here's cool question to test your IQ.
What is more likely to be in OP's ass?
1) shit
2) cock
Guess what i IMPLIED here
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:29:34 UTC No. 16625942
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:32:23 UTC No. 16625945
>>16625938
>retarded guessing question
For you.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:50:59 UTC No. 16625972
>>16625945
Bane.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 09:43:52 UTC No. 16626485
>>16625938
You are supposed use your superior iq to guess that amerisharts drink leaded gasoline for breakfast, so it's obviously the gas tank.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:02:21 UTC No. 16626511
>>16625933
The fair question would be "What is most likely to be found in functional car". Of course it is easy to guess, but the problem is that you have to guess, assume things and either add more to the conditions of the question, or go against them. The problem with these types of question is that when there's no concrete specifications, people can start assuming that there's some trickery going on and answer wrong not because they couldn't find the answer, but because they assumed that test tries to trick them into picking the "right" answer.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:16:41 UTC No. 16626516
>>16625913
Which points to most self proclaimed IQ tests being invalid. Wish someone would sue one of those companies for false claims but I guess if they don't charge for the tests, it would be difficult to prove economic damage to a court.
If you want to know the general neighborhood of your IQ score, get a therapist to administer a valid test. You could try Mensa but in the US they don't score them, it's just pass/fail. The online "Mensa" tests are all invalid scams.
It's not like knowing your score is going to make you more or less intelligent than you are now. Maybe the only real positive outcome would be to keep you from being delusional about your level of intelligence. If you're not two standard deviations above the mean, that's completely fine. The vast majority of people aren't and most of them still are able to have good lives. But if it turns out your IQ is around 105, maybe going into theoretical physics isn't a good choice.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:17:42 UTC No. 16626518
>>16625933
Electric vehicles exist and are functional.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:28:18 UTC No. 16626528
If you really want to test your intellect start doing math. Math is literally pure logic in its essential form. How far you will be able to climb in understanding math is how smart you are. All these "are curtains blue" and "put shape into a shape hole" tests are bullshit and are more useful to test your autism or adhd rather than intelligence.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 12:02:40 UTC No. 16626533
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:00:40 UTC No. 16626592
>>16626533
"Midwit zone" is where most nobel prize winners are.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:52:15 UTC No. 16626631
>>16626511
You don’t have to guess, retard. Why are autists like this?
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:54:15 UTC No. 16626635
>>16626592
Nobel prize winners are in the 145+ zone
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:58:00 UTC No. 16626639
>>16626533
>midwit is when higher than mid
what a shame
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:06:20 UTC No. 16626644
IQ threads like this are cope/mental masturbation for NEET failures that have nothing but an online IQ test to make themselves feel better. They feel better about having accomplished nothing than having degrees because only midwits care about degrees and they with their true intellect are above the award of frivolous certificates that that just take effort rather than true intellect.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:07:22 UTC No. 16626646
>>16625548
>Of course this is logical, but 70iq seems so much dumber than 130iq seems smart.
>assumes IQ is linear
>confuses frequency of incidence with similar difference of ability compared to the mean
midwit lol
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:14:06 UTC No. 16626654
>>16626652
It says I'd have to pay $10 for the full report. I was unsure if that included the score or not and wasn't willing to tryhard for 30 mins to find out.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:15:06 UTC No. 16626659
>>16625548
Real IQ is skewed, and for every 120 IQ white person there are 5 75 IQ niggers or more.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:15:50 UTC No. 16626660
>>16626654
It's free
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:15:50 UTC No. 16626661
>>16626654
Nvm, you can just click "submit" before the time runs out. It only tells you how many standard deviations above/below rhe mean you are. So I guess if you know what the standard deviation is you can figure out your IQ, but I don't.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:16:51 UTC No. 16626663
>>16626661
you are on the wrong test retard
it's this one:
https://cognitivemetrics.com/test/C
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:16:51 UTC No. 16626664
>>16626660
>free
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:17:51 UTC No. 16626666
>>16626663
oh
this doesn't bode well for my IQ does it
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:41:24 UTC No. 16626693
>>16626635
120-140. Smart enough to do study difficult matters, not smart enough to not care. The higher you go, the closer you get to self-isolated off the grid nomads
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:42:25 UTC No. 16626694
>>16626664
Lmao, nice meme
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:43:45 UTC No. 16626695
>>16626661
Standard derivation for iq is 15. So it's
100 + 15 * standard derivation
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:02:37 UTC No. 16626744
>>16626666
I did the symbol search and got 100
picrel is for figure weights
whole thing is retarded, I get wildly different scores
and the directions for the symbol search are totally unclear (are rotated symbols the same symbol?)
and the directions for weights are unclear (can you use pen/paper? then every single problem reduces to middle school algebra. i didn't use pen and paper because another test said you shouldn't, but i didn't know)
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:07:14 UTC No. 16626746
>>16626744
>are rotated symbols the same symbol
No.
>whole thing is retarded, I get wildly different scores
They are different parts of the test.
>No outside resources are allowed at any point during this test. Pencils, paper, calculator, Google, etc., are NOT ALLOWED. The use of any outside Resources invalidates your test result.
No you cannot use pen and paper
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:11:45 UTC No. 16626749
> They are different parts of the test.
then why do they each report an IQ score? if they're all part of the same test they should report some subscore that only when considered by some aggregate formula returns an IQ. im not taking like 6 tests fuck this shit nigga
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 19:50:34 UTC No. 16626862
>>16626827
I (>>16626744) literally have a PhD in theoretical CS ok
but am I retarded?
yes
but you are too
>inb4 NOOO PHDS ARE A TEST OF ENDURANCE NOT INTELLIGENCE
nigga I had to solve problems no one has ever solved before shit wasn't easy ok????
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 20:06:01 UTC No. 16626873
>>16626862
oh man >>16626533
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 20:15:26 UTC No. 16626879
>>16626873
I KNOW IM A MIDWIT YOU THINK THIS IS NEW INFORMATION????
Eyedol at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 20:41:27 UTC No. 16626906
I scored 1.667 deviations above the mean. Then it asked my for $10 to see my I.Q score
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:00:58 UTC No. 16626961
>>16626879
Tbh, I feel you. I'm a doctoral candidate in EE focusing on statistical signal processing (so basically information theoretic statistics) and I feel like a retard a good 70% of the time I'm learning new material.
Getting absolutely filtered hard right now by Gallier's "introductory" computational Geometry book.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 23:15:11 UTC No. 16627001
>>16626518
FINALLY someone comes in with the obvious stupid response.
Volume.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:34:04 UTC No. 16627033
>>16626528
Why is logic the best indicator of intelligence?
s10fag !N7td22U8k6 at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 03:07:06 UTC No. 16627098
>>16626693
yeah about 5 years ago a bunch of californians moved into my town and its population tripled to 300k, they bought up my neighbors farms and built subdivisions, i left to live on a farmstead outside a town of <10k, and im working on buying my neighbors properties so it doesnt happen again. i dont want to see people, i dont want to know people, i dont want to know their stupid problems
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 07:50:17 UTC No. 16627174
>>16627098
lmfao you cheated like shit
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:48:47 UTC No. 16627186
>>16625548
Am I smart /sci/?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:50:48 UTC No. 16627188
>>16625548
#49 and #53 are flawed, and probably some others too
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 09:44:55 UTC No. 16627194
>>16627098
Twinsies
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:01:36 UTC No. 16627199
ITT: midwits calling others midwidts
You're midwit under 3 STDs.
145+IQ is required to actually call yourself intelligent, and even then it's not that much.
110-140 IQ range is populated by the most insufferable, self-righteous, autistic retards without self-awareness of their inferior intellect. They tryhard into everything, very intellectually insecure species, as evident by this thread. They even cheat on IQ tests to show off to strangers on 4chan. How pathetic is that?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:12:12 UTC No. 16627200
>>16627199
>135 is midwit
Lol. Retard.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:21:29 UTC No. 16627202
>>16627200
I see cope is in full throttle.
Funny how you are proving my own point, by of course feeling a need to call me intellectually inferior, when we both know the truth.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:14:13 UTC No. 16627217
>>16627200
>>16627200
>A midwit is five less than whatever I score
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:17:13 UTC No. 16627220
>>16627186
>only 2.8
lol brainlet. getting this framed
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:12:25 UTC No. 16627238
>>16627199
Midwit is 105-125 by definition. You can make up your own definition like the 2+2=5 people do, but realize you're not making a coherent argument, you're just changing the meaning of words to fit your person viewpoint.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:49:42 UTC No. 16627274
>>16626664
But it already tells you that you're stupid.a
s10fag !N7td22U8k6 at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:07:37 UTC No. 16627332
>>16627174
How many cars did you pass on the way to work today? Hundreds? Maybe you took the interstate, thousands then. At 2% you passed tens or maybe hundreds of "geniuses". What were they doing? Driving to a wage cage they hate in a depreciating asset they don't own eating dog shit. Intelligence is a worthless statistic that dumb people value. Sure you have the capacity to understand maths if you dedicate your entire life to it, that scenario is called a luxury. There's also self awareness most people lack to end their own suffering. These tests aren't worth cheating on.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:15:13 UTC No. 16627673
0.867 deviations above the mean.
I have become a retard.
Thats what drugs and brain trauma does I guess.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:18:16 UTC No. 16627675
>>16627673
As a child I scored 138, but I guess I was just precocious.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:39:24 UTC No. 16627688
>>16625548
I took this a year and a half back. 140 FSIQ. It has translated to real-world outcomes. I got nearly perfect grades in undergrad, perfect grades in grad school, and I work at Nvidia.
However, I'm neurotic and it means I don't enjoy life very much. I likely have OCD.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:19:49 UTC No. 16627807
>>16627675
The tests also changed
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 02:28:15 UTC No. 16627918
>entire thread is full of people taking the wrong test
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 03:26:19 UTC No. 16627961
>>16627918
The page for the test OP reccomended is a broken mess.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 04:07:03 UTC No. 16627979
>>16627961
>go to website
>it works perfectly
Is this some thirdie thing or does it work different for stupid people or what?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 04:08:27 UTC No. 16627982
>>16627891
I feel like it'd be ray.
A planet orbits
"A light" doesn't photon, or gravity, or eclipse, or solar
"A light" would therefore "ray" despite the shitty grammar
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 04:44:58 UTC No. 16627995
>>16627982
yeah it's ray
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 05:27:07 UTC No. 16628016
It seems that the midwit meme has legitimacy. Anecdotally, I've spoken to dumb, homeless stoners who avoid the vaccine like the plague.
I've also spoken to PhD guys that took the vaccine, but they're still somewhat likely to take it.
I will rant a bit about the midwit meme since I came from >>>/pol/501388867
Part of the archetypes of a midwit is nitpicking unnecessary details and then passing it off as if you're einstein. This guy was nitpicking that I chose the wrong lagrangian off of google, and then tried to assert that I don't have a degree, and my argument is invalid, even though lagrangian mechanics is deterministic for all times. It's one of those things a typical redditor basedboy would do. They'd point out a spelling mistake instead of the actual argument and then play it off as if you committed heresy and need your degree and upvotes revoked.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 05:29:17 UTC No. 16628018
>>16626516
I got 149 at mensa but I was 11 at the time, so I'm actually afraid to retake the test because it would actually cause my self esteem damage if I scored less, which is bad because you can't change IQ anyway.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 05:31:00 UTC No. 16628021
>>16627982
It'd be way less ambiguous if it was 'beams' but it'd also be more correct
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 06:34:57 UTC No. 16628039
>>16628016
>vaccine tard
it's been 5 fucking years
move on nigger
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 06:45:00 UTC No. 16628043
>>16628039
No, I will not let (((them))) memoryhole this
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:23:02 UTC No. 16628062
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:27:31 UTC No. 16628063
>>16627200
>he doesn't know
The original IQ distrubution was based on native Europeans, with an average of 100.
The current IQ distribution is based on the entire "species" we call human, and average is once again 100.
A purely native European population would test at an average of 110 on the current scale. Please review the numbers provided in the post you responded to, and properly adjust your expectations.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:43:09 UTC No. 16628089
>>16628039
What better example is there than that graph?
p.s. i never took it vaxxie, and i will remember that the australian government tried to force me to
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:36:23 UTC No. 16628123
>>16625548
It’s a cope by retards trying to claim smart people would agree with them
Intelligence is a straight line relationship with being correct, it’s virtually impossible for a person above 190 IQ to be wrong about anything, 160 IQ is midwitt level, 140 and below is drooling retard level.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:43:30 UTC No. 16628214
>>16628063
Only east asian countries get remotely close to 110.
Even a country like Iceland which is almost entirely rich white European is not particularly high on the IQ scale. Same goes for Finland pr Switzerland or any country in Europe.
Maybe if you exclude white supremacist retards then the average white european iq would jump to 110.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:46:38 UTC No. 16628217
>>16627979
Post your combined score then.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:59:25 UTC No. 16628227
>>16625913
there isn't even a correct answer here
if the question is asking which is the most common, gas tank isn't really correct because EVs are so common nowadays and a lot of cars don't even have spare tires, but those two things are far more common than the rest
if the question is asking you to finish the sentence off with the correct term, mud flaps is wrong because almost no cars have mud flaps
what a weirdly worded question
i'm retarded for reading it this way, right?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:16:11 UTC No. 16628243
>>16626695
...wait really?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:20:31 UTC No. 16628247
>>16625548
Only question I felt at a loss on was the one about counting the gaps between two geometric shapes, wasn't sure what it was asking.
When I took an IQ test in grade school for gifted placement, they measured me at barely over 130.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:14:08 UTC No. 16628281
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:34:38 UTC No. 16628292
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:08:17 UTC No. 16628303
>>16628281
i'm at min a midwit for wasting the thirty minutes to take the test and post my results
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:17:15 UTC No. 16628307
Midwits are real, but the trvke is that the midwit meme is used by midwits.
In other words, you need to flip the “good” and “bad” opinions in order to accurately reflect reality.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:18:18 UTC No. 16628309
>>16628281
>>16628303
I'm a midwit for spending 30 minutes taking the wrong test
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 18:01:41 UTC No. 16628327
>>16628016
that bottom comic has an important part of nuance that the midwits who screech about this meme don't seem to pick up on. the tard and genius may reach similar ultimate conclusions but they get there in different ways - the tard based on gut intuition and the genius on insight, pattern recognition and "seeing the forest for the trees," as it were
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 18:05:16 UTC No. 16628328
>>16625942
agreed, anon
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Mar 2025 18:19:22 UTC No. 16628334
c-c-c-c-captcha reset
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 01:32:31 UTC No. 16628649
>>16628063
>>16628214
Holy cope lol
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 01:41:16 UTC No. 16628660
>>16628649
>telling people they're overrated by 10 points is cope
At best it would be a self own. At worst, I'm laughing at your stupidity.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 01:55:19 UTC No. 16628667
>>16625913
Imagine being this retarded
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 01:56:25 UTC No. 16628668
>>16626533
Utter midwit cope
Midwits are between 80 to 120 IQ
At these points there is no real difference they are all disabled by midwitism
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 01:58:36 UTC No. 16628671
>>16628016
>mrna gene therapy that gets into the organs as well as the LNP vehicle
>yeah bro put that shit in me
Regrettably I had to do it for my work, but I knew the organ damage would be pretty low.
The shit I do to "participate" in "society"
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 02:13:18 UTC No. 16628673
>>16628327
Yes. One more aspect:
The dimwit operates on instinct, and doesn't really think abstrctly enough to be sold on ideas that contradict it (e.g. gender studies or similar nonsense). The midwit is happier disregarding his instinct, having "fath in syenss" and a desire to show off fancy ideas to his colleagues, so he will dive assfirst into hatever retarded big-word idea. The smart guy is more likely unable to buy into the ideas, ever feeling them to be suspect. Maybe he put a lot of thought in and validated that which his instinct told him anyway.
tldr midwits smart enough for fancy but retarded ideas; idiots don't because can't; smarts don't cus it's retarded, reverts to instinct
I guess it's also propaganda: you target your propaganda at the masses, not the far ends of the bell curve, so it will go over the idiot and under the smartie to be more convincing for the midwit
>>16628668
Retard. How would I cope anyway, as my definition has a higher bar for midwits?
Go read my shit carefully you may get the point that it's "mid" between "normal" and "genius" (but, Dr Tism, this is not easy to put in a meme so it gets drawn at mid=100)
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 02:32:30 UTC No. 16628689
>>16628018
>which is bad because you can't change IQ anyway.
In all practical respects, this is not a true statement. Brain damage and neurocognitive impairment can come from a variety of sources over your lifetime. If at 12 you moved to a house with lead paint and air pollution and had a few concussions playing sports and binge drank a few too many times at parties and smoked a bunch of weed, staring at your PC and phone screens for the majority of your day, for several years and then took another IQ test it would be lower and you would be less intelligent. But the brain is also miraculously skilled at healing and adapting to injury, so you probably wouldn't be fully retarded unless you got some serious injury, just slower than if you had much less environmental damage.
This world is not designed to be mind-safe, act accordingly.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 05:21:35 UTC No. 16628762
>>16628761
smug pepe so you can understand how smug I am right now (quite smug)
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:26:29 UTC No. 16628806
Some of these questions were mildly frustrating. A horse does not require eyes to be a horse, for example. It'd be nice to see how my responses were marked. Paywalls are lame.
Also, after browsing this thread, it appears I may have taken the wrong test.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:32:21 UTC No. 16628810
>>16628806
I don't particularly care what the right test is, the body can't write coherent questions.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:53:10 UTC No. 16628839
>>16628806
I've now spent considerably longer than the original 30 minutes on the other tests I noticed linked in this thread. I don't think I would weigh a rote vocabulary test so highly in a generalized IQ metric. The digits test was a little unwieldy toward the end. I think I enjoyed the figure weights test the most. I might look more of these up.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:11:06 UTC No. 16628853
>>16628307
I'm not sure about this data. Anecdotally, something I've maybe noticed throughout my life is that a considerable portion of the people I've encountered who could perform well with rote memorization were what I'd probably consider religious to some degree, but I've spent most of my time in the eastern to southeastern US, so probably the majority of people I've encountered, in general, are what I'd consider at least somewhat religious. I generally think IQ metrics are too misleading to take seriously, though I do enjoy some of the tests themselves, for some reason. I think I've seen some chimp-like apes that would perform well on some of the visual parts of the CAIT.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:29:09 UTC No. 16628861
>>16625928
"likely"
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:13:10 UTC No. 16628875
>>16625913
>retard says test is stupid
>>16628806
>147 iq guy says test is stupid
>>16628861
>>16628667
>>16626631
>>16625933
>all midwits say it's fine
oh my god the meme is real holy shit