Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:26:09 UTC No. 16629150

>>16629147
In a world of Bohr's, be a Plankchad.

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:07:22 UTC No. 16629347

>>16629150
>Plankchad
More like bhenchod lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Mar 2025 23:27:26 UTC No. 16630320

>>16629147
Nice elephant. God loves elephants.

Anonymous at Fri, 28 Mar 2025 01:12:18 UTC No. 16630412

>>16629147
Bohr was actually based on QM. QM totally broke Wigner and Von Neumann and it sent the dialectical materialist ideologues like Bohm into an existential tailspin.

The free open range of philosophical virgin land was where you find the enduring legacy of that era. honestly, no active scientists care about that stuff anymore. You’ve got some philosophers like Maudlin still trying to litigate some halakhic laws but nobody cares.

I think if you want a decent interpretation of QM you can just read some old books like Quark and Jaguar by Gell-Mann and move onto real studf