Image not available

350x494

1715016867663334.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16629965

Pi is a fabrication

Anonymous No. 16629979

>>16629965
Ancient Greeks (homosexuals) BTFO

Anonymous No. 16629983

what is the difference between [math]L_1[/math] and [math]L_2[/math] norms, zombie alex?

Anonymous No. 16630019

>>16629983
How to tell me you don't know what you're talking about, without saying you don't know what you're talking about.

Anonymous No. 16630052

>>16629965
Pi is just what the pharaoh’s taxmen used to calculate farmer’s lands between the drought and the flooding seasons.

Anonymous No. 16630054

TT again?

Anonymous No. 16630060

Let's judge by the standards of Archimedes' day.
>Perimeter = 4
and clearly longer than the circumference
>Perimeter is still 4
and still longer than the circumference
>Repeat to infinity
Thinking about infinity might help you figure out the answer, but it isn't a proof.

Anonymous No. 16630070

more on >>16630060

Try turning your picture into a proper proof by the method of exhaustion. The proof should look something like this:

Assume pi > 4.
Find a contradiction with one of your diagrams.
Assume pi < 4.
Find a contradiction with one of your diagrams.
Therefore pi = 4.

All of your diagrams of something drawn around a circle contradict pi > 4 but none of them contradict pi < 4. I'm not counting the last diagram since it uses infinity and therefore isn't valid as proof of anything.

Anonymous No. 16630077

>>16629965
If 1=0.9999999 then so can this work

Eyedol No. 16630092

>>16630077
Irrational numbers

Anonymous No. 16630111

>starting off with a false premise
>proceeds to say bullshit to misdirect
nice magician tactics

Anonymous No. 16630168

>>16629965
Indeed, nature doesn't use Pi.

Nature cares about pressure mediation.

Pi has a special value given the dimensionality of your space. Pi in 2d is different than Pi in 3d. the ratio of the n-sphere / n-cube is the magic number

a geometric proof of the fine structure constant, appeal to ancient aliens edition

Image not available

4516x2170

1739830955216752 ....jpg

Anonymous No. 16630172

>>16630168
pic related. Perhaps the radius of a sphere of volume 1 is actually 1/golden ratio .

thats the rabbit hole

Anonymous No. 16630190

>>16629965
circles are not defined by edges/angles/sides, they are infinite points equal from the center which take up no space at all. I don't understand what's so difficult to understand about this. Defining a circle by sides means it's not a circle anymore.

Anonymous No. 16630227

>>16630190
But a circle has a top and bottom side
Like a perfectly flat coin

Anonymous No. 16630228

>>16630227
a circle is not 3d so no it doesn't. Like, this is basic fucking geometry.

Anonymous No. 16630234

>>16630228
I guess you never saw flatland, huh
Triangle ass nigga

Anonymous No. 16630332

>>16630077
what is the difference between 0,(9) and 1? It's 0,(0)1 which means it's 0 which means they are the same

Anonymous No. 16630542

Consecutively removing the corners from an initial square configuration will not result in a circle.

Anonymous No. 16630696

>>16630542
Can you make an animation using some Python library?

Anonymous No. 16631909

Proofs are like science experiments. They aren’t always true.

s10fag !N7td22U8k6 No. 16631924

>>16629965
turn those inefficient corners into sides of a triangle to better follow the contour of a circle. lets keep it simple and say your third image is a 20 sided "circle" with a circumference of 4, making each "side" .2 units long. using a^2+b^2=c^2, we get the hypotenuse is .283 units. we have 8 of these sides on our new dodecagon. add that to the 4 sides we cant cut corners on and our circumference is now 3.064 units. repeat this infinitely and you'll reach 3.14

Anonymous No. 16632035

>>16631909
Prove it

Anonymous No. 16633438

Couldn't you do the same shit with a triangle to prove pi=3sqrt(3)? Why use a square?

Anonymous No. 16633502

>>16629965
Remove corners is ill-defined, since it doesn't specify what rectangle should be removed, exactly.

Anonymous No. 16633795

>>16631909
This isn't even a proof. A circle isn't a polygon. Simple as.

Anonymous No. 16634226

>>16633502
You can always remove a square region, the troll still wins.