Image not available

2324x1374

1662406774292772.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16631308

Where do the numbers of this graph come from? I read the entire source and it's not mentioned anywhere. Is it all fake after all? How did they even conduct these studies anyway? Isn't that basically showing child porn to people? Is it legal if it's for scientific research?

https://gwern.net/doc/psychiatry/1995-hall.pdf

Anonymous No. 16631315

>>16631308
The graph was created by a sexual deviant who knew that most people wouldn't bother to type in the URL and read the study. 99% of the time he was correct that no one would check.

Anonymous No. 16631319

>>16631308
Not sure but i do concur with their findings doctor.

Anonymous No. 16631330

>>16631308
it's literally made up bs
>t search for its "source" that shows something unrelated to that plot

Anonymous No. 16631333

>>16631330
searched*

Anonymous No. 16631393

>>16631308
Not from the UK thats for sure. If the study was done here the graft would be much further to the left. Most of our girls become vomit enducing ugly before even reaching 20.

Image not available

2324x1374

fixed.jpg

Anonymous No. 16631395

Image not available

1280x1600

1697296551769366.jpg

Anonymous No. 16631412

>>16631315
FPBP.

Anonymous No. 16631415

>>16631395
>hag enjoyers

Anonymous No. 16631455

>>16631308

iirc was year 1953 study in great britain male audience

Image not available

425x567

WOULD.jpg

Anonymous No. 16631693

>>16631308

Anonymous No. 16632725

>>16631308
>>16631315
you can even see it's Excel chart from the little circles in the corners
Some pedo made bar chart in Excel then searched for a study that sounded like it could contain such information. Other pedos on this site are more than happy to uncritically share it because it normalizes their condition.

Image not available

266x200

.....................gif

Anonymous No. 16632752

>>16631315
>>16632725

Anonymous No. 16633070

>>16631308
Didn't you read what you posted? It says it's just images of nude people and clothed as control. Nude images of people aren't illegal.

Anonymous No. 16633084

>>16632725
>being attracted to females at the peak of their fertility and bonding capacity is an illness

Meanwhile sexual dynamics are collapsing everywhere and you don't say a word.

Anonymous No. 16633097

>>16633084
>fertility
Interesting.
>bonding capacity
Hm, I suppose, study is necessary
>all the omitted crap
The essay everyone reading this feels like self-inserting themselves upon

Image not available

871x1197

1562212803397.jpg

Anonymous No. 16635464

>>16632725
The image sans study had been circulating around 4pedo for 10+ years but I haven't seen it recently. This version with the citation popped up within the past few years. It was probably an edit by somebody who wanted to trick the gullible and desperate.

There was also other garbage like picrel.

Anonymous No. 16635653

>>16635464
The first time I saw OP's graph long long ago, everything on it was shifted to the right, which is reasonable. Peak female attractiveness being somewhere around college age matches up historically with when women typically would start bearing children. It might not have even been a pedo that made the first edit changing the ages along the x axis (trolls gonna troll) but the study probably was added by one who saw the graph, wanted it to be true to justify their desires, and added the citation when called degenerate and asked for the source.

Anonymous No. 16635709

>>16631393
most euros south of scandinavia are born ugly

>>16632752
what are you so upset about retard?

Anonymous No. 16635746

>>16635709
dick head

Image not available

1472x1200

GY2655-BLACK-1_18....jpg

Anonymous No. 16636426

>>16631308
> are they seriously implying that men are attracted to 14 year olds ?! this has to be a conspiracy because that can't possibly be true !
average cuckservative american