Anonymous at Sun, 30 Mar 2025 18:42:43 UTC No. 16632975

>>16632929
>There have been human beings for millions of years, and they have eaten almost anything.
Wrong, anatomically and mentally humans as we know it only existed for a couple tens of thousands of years ago
>If there is a med that you can take orally and will let you live 159 years, how come it wasn't discovered already?
Because most science and innovations only occurred in the past 200 years out of humanity's many millennia of existence. Also we've already managed to increase lifespan by a lot, people now live in their 90s and 100s way more than just a century ago.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Mar 2025 18:49:54 UTC No. 16632991

>>16632929
There already is such a med: diet, exercise, low stress, lots of love, no toxins. The powers that be don't want that because their pyramid scheme can only continue with everyone exploiting eachother. Society decreases your lifespan and wants to offer you expensive meds to make you buy back the lifespan it has stolen from you by working for society even more. Evil genius.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Mar 2025 19:07:25 UTC No. 16633011

>>16632975
Integration of ancient comprehension is the missing part

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:15:54 UTC No. 16634213

>>16632929
This is 'Algeron argument' basically

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 08:54:08 UTC No. 16634839

>>16632929
Most meds you have today didn't grow on trees and didn't occur naturally, they had to be chemically synthesized

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:54:35 UTC No. 16634859

>>16632991
>There already is such a med: diet, exercise, low stress, lots of love, no toxins
None of these will prevent your cartilage from running out or your prostate growing to the size of a basketball. There are lifespan and quality of life bottlenecks unrelated to lifestyle that we won't get past without major scientific intervention.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:59:13 UTC No. 16634864

>>16632975
A Roman Emperor lived to 81 btw, that's higher the life expectancy of the US today.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:58:36 UTC No. 16634902

>>16634864
>this nigger again
Yes Anon, no one is arguing you can't live to 80 or even 100 without modern medicine if you are extraordinarily lucky to not suffer any diseases, injuries or cancer that would require medical intervention. What modern medicine does is give you a chance to live even if you do suffer from those, bumping the average up significantly.
Outliers living past expectancy are just that, outliers.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 13:08:39 UTC No. 16634992

People lived for hundreds of years in pre flood times.