Anonymous at Sun, 30 Mar 2025 23:03:50 UTC No. 16633213

>>16633068
>Hello, saars. I would be liking the trample, will meth help elephant trample me better?

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Mar 2025 23:39:36 UTC No. 16633230

It doesn't sound like an elephant has ever been given an amphetamine of any kind, so it's unknown.
Not much drug testing has been done on elephants, other than one that was injected with a massive dose of LSD and was sadly killed by it.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Mar 2025 23:54:13 UTC No. 16633237

>>16633230
How much LSD is "enough to kill an elephant"? Asking for a fat friend.

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:22:30 UTC No. 16633248

>>16633237
>On August 3, 1962, researchers from the University of Oklahoma injected (human use involves oral ingestion) 297 mg of LSD to him, which is nearly three thousand times the human recreational dose (for an animal weighing roughly one hundred times as much as a human).
>Within five minutes he collapsed to the ground and one hour and forty minutes later he died.

So it was almost certainly massive overkill and a much smaller amount also would have done it.

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:29:54 UTC No. 16633256

>>16633248
We'll be putting a big red line on the syringe at 300 mg. Maybe a yellow at 150 as well.
I hope the elephant had a good talk with Ganesh.
Any idea what the goal of juicing up the elephant was supposed to be? Hopefully it wasn't a bunch of O'Chems trying to get rid of evidence.

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:54:22 UTC No. 16633280

>>16633256
It had something to do with trying to understand musth and come up with ways to prevent it from happening in zoos.
But due to the careless stupidity and insane dosage given, little to nothing was learned from it.

20 years later, the experiment was repeated with two elephants but with much more reasonable dosages
>0.003mg/kg for one and 0.1mg/kg for the other
>Not only did the elephants survive, but they "didn't seem too upset at all" and exhibited similar tripping symptoms as humans.
>They made "strange vocalizations such as chirping and squeaking" and were moving more slowly than usual, but after a few hours they were back to normal.

isekai qt at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:59:41 UTC No. 16633283

>>16633280
>back to normal
Uhh, how do I get...

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 01:06:14 UTC No. 16633289

>>16633068
Man, I fucking love elephants. I have nothing else to add to this thread. Elephants are based.

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 01:25:23 UTC No. 16633305

>>16633289
'Phants are based

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 20:04:26 UTC No. 16634160

>>16633230
>It doesn't sound like an elephant has ever been given an amphetamine of any kind, so it's unknown.
Really? Amphetamine usage in an elephant would not be the equivalent to a human or mice?

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 23:36:09 UTC No. 16634314

>>16633248
Why though?

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 23:45:47 UTC No. 16634330

>>16633068
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Jolyon_West

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 23:47:03 UTC No. 16634332

>>16633248
These researchers deserve the rope

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 13:39:49 UTC No. 16635022

>>16634160
It could be toxic for all we know, probably not though. Elephants on meth and especially in musth sounds fascinating, pushing nature to its limits. imagine the sheer strength that would occur with that. the elephant could probably destroy a tank.