Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:51:10 UTC No. 16634231

>>16634216
There are so many ways to answer these questions. One way is: women are more conforming and therefore more industrious in the current school and work environments that are geared increasingly towards following protocol and meeting expectations rather than towards adding value like innovation. So it's also about how performance is measured and what kind of performance is valued.

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:54:17 UTC No. 16634235

>>16634216
At which scale [sampling]?

Anonymous at Tue, 1 Apr 2025 00:44:13 UTC No. 16634374

>>16634216
why are there any differences consider the two have evolved together for thousands of years?

Anonymous at Tue, 1 Apr 2025 01:15:25 UTC No. 16634418

>>16634374
>together
Wrong, you need multiple species for them to be said to exist "together," we actively share genes to reproduce. We've been mixing

Anonymous at Tue, 1 Apr 2025 01:24:14 UTC No. 16634436

>>16634216
>And why are young women outperforming men?
Too general of a question. Be more specific on which concepts men are outperformed in.

Anonymous at Tue, 1 Apr 2025 01:43:27 UTC No. 16634471

>>16634216
women get graded more leniently
after I realized that in uni
I always joined the team with women on it

Anonymous at Tue, 1 Apr 2025 02:00:58 UTC No. 16634510

I get the difficulty and cost of getting a truly normative sample of average adults but it bothers me that IQ studies are done on 16 year olds and not 21+ adults.

Anonymous at Tue, 1 Apr 2025 02:28:21 UTC No. 16634529

>>16634216
The average chud is simply incapable of grasping the idea that the Female IQ mean is higher than that of Male IQ. They start seething and coping about how men have a broader distribution of IQ(which is probably true) while completely missing the point that on average, a woman will outpreform a man on many white collar jobs in the modern economy.

Is this a problem? Depends on your politics

Anonymous at Tue, 1 Apr 2025 03:21:08 UTC No. 16634554

>>16634529
do you not understand that broader distribution makes the average at little more negligible? and more importantly, why does this fucking matter so much to you. this conversation is retarded

Anonymous at Tue, 1 Apr 2025 04:05:51 UTC No. 16634582

>>16634418
>you need multiple species for them to be said to exist "together,"
there are multiple species, long in the past and still today.

Anonymous at Tue, 1 Apr 2025 04:15:47 UTC No. 16634589

>>16634582
And it would have been fine to say we lived together with any of them, which was not the statement.

Anonymous at Tue, 1 Apr 2025 04:18:11 UTC No. 16634592

>>16634216
Wojaks are for fags

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:48:57 UTC No. 16634854

Men do more rumination on negative events and women do less rumination on negative events, which is an advantage when you live in a world where negative things have easy solutions.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:54:55 UTC No. 16634861

>>16634529
>Female IQ mean is higher than that of Male IQ
Source? Distribution differences don't neccessarily mean that the average is different

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:11:38 UTC No. 16634872

>>16634436
>Be more specific on which concepts men are outperformed in.
University degrees. Women are earning degrees at nearly twice the rate of men.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:22:34 UTC No. 16634878

>>16634861
their IQ is higher because they attain sex more often