Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 14:01:20 GMT No. 16635051 Report

Science is a process not a conclusion

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 14:03:28 GMT No. 16635055 Report

>>16635051
If science was only a process you wouldn't learn anything, checkmate.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 14:49:51 GMT No. 16635093 Report

>>16635055
learning isn't science though, science helps us observe and examine things, but they can then be learned by anybody without using science.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 15:00:21 GMT No. 16635099 Report

>>16635038
>Prove me wrong.
Science can not give definitive proof.
But upon reviewing your post history, the preponderance of evidence strongly suggests that you have always been wrong about everything and always will be.
You're like a broken oracle that is 100% wrong all the time.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 15:12:53 GMT No. 16635113 Report

>>16635093
>science helps us observe and examine things
But you have to reach some sort of conclusion or you haven't learned anything and it's worthless navel gazing.
>>16635099
>Science can not give definitive proof.
Because most of science is fake as i said.
>But upon reviewing your post history, the preponderance of evidence strongly suggests that you have always been wrong about everything and always will be.
>You're like a broken oracle that is 100% wrong all the time.
Schizo scientist contradicting his own "scientific" beliefs as always.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 15:16:59 GMT No. 16635118 Report

>>16635038
Most of science can't be fake when 100% of it is gay. QED
Change my mind.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 15:22:26 GMT No. 16635123 Report

>>16635118
We're both right.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 15:23:11 GMT No. 16635124 Report

>>16635113
I guess the conclusions are usually just "this is what we observed, and this is what we think it means" then that gets translated by academics into "facts" but usually there's an asterisk next to everything, until we call it a "law" instead of a theory, then it's pretty much set in stone.

I study birds a lot and I'll tell you the science around them draws very few conclusions, only lots of observation. Common behavior is known but there's lots of undocumented, uncommon behavior that nobody has answers for.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 15:25:10 GMT No. 16635125 Report

>>16635124
Yet, you still draw conclusions, and mostly false ones.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 15:31:33 GMT No. 16635132 Report

>>16635125
It depends on the domain and the experiment. Theoretical physics? Everything is "false" because very little is provably true. Medical imaging? Yeah we can be pretty sure that artery is clogged, the science behind these x-ray spex is solid.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 15:39:42 GMT No. 16635146 Report

>>16635132
>Yeah we can be pretty sure that artery is clogged
Proportionally that's a tiny tiny part of science and probably even the theory you have for that is wrong, not to mention the rest of science youre leaving out is bullcrap. It's rare to hear a truth from scienitific institutions.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 18:29:12 GMT No. 16635290 Report

>>16635038
Wrong. That maybe was true for most of scientific history but in 2025 we can be 100% certain of our knowledge

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025, 21:04:33 GMT No. 16635441 Report

>>16635038
Science is as fake as money.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 08:51:16 GMT No. 16635828 Report

>>16635290
>That maybe was true for most of scientific history but in 2025 we can be 100% certain of our knowledge
Wow! How convenient!
>>16635441
Trvke.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 09:33:25 GMT No. 16635845 Report

>>16635038
And yet, aeroplanes fly. Computers function. How do you explain that? Obviously, social "science" etc is not actually science.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 09:43:37 GMT No. 16635852 Report

>>16635845
>And yet, aeroplanes fly. Computers function. How do you explain that?
And yet, i can trick a fool on the street to give me money, does that make the half-baked lies i told him to obtain his money real?
useful =/= true, most scientists don't understand this because they don't care about truth, only utility.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 09:49:45 GMT No. 16635856 Report

>>16635852
Kek. OK bro, go build a time machine and suck Plato's chode.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 09:50:58 GMT No. 16635857 Report

>>16635038
>Baseless assertion with no evidence
Into the trash it goes.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 09:53:58 GMT No. 16635858 Report

>>16635856
>No argument
I'm right, you kinow i'm right you just can't make sense of it in your utilitarian worldview.
And i don't believe in Plato's realm of the forms but i may agree with some aspects of neoplatonism.
>>16635857
The burden of proof is on science to prove its validity, but of course as a scientist you wouldn't know these silly little things about basic logic.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 09:55:05 GMT No. 16635859 Report

>>16635858
>I accept your concession.
Yes, very impressive. Looks like you won the argument.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 10:00:33 GMT No. 16635864 Report

>>16635859
What was your argument? You never made one.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 10:01:17 GMT No. 16635866 Report

>>16635864
Do you think this is debate class?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 10:02:55 GMT No. 16635868 Report

>>16635866
You quite literally said "you won the argument", are you schizophrenic?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 10:04:19 GMT No. 16635869 Report

>>16635868
OK, well to be clear your argument was >>16635858
>I'm right.
i.e.
>I won the argument.
Taking your argument in good faith, I had to admit defeat.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 10:11:30 GMT No. 16635871 Report

>>16635869
You never made an argument to begin with you just told me to suck an ancient Greek philosophers chode, i never responded with an argument either because you cant respond to a non-argument with an argument, there was never a debate so if you want to congratulate me on winning a debate that you made up in your imagination go ahead schizo.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 10:13:37 GMT No. 16635873 Report

>>16635871
ok

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 10:15:42 GMT No. 16635876 Report

>>16635873

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 13:21:25 GMT No. 16636037 Report

>>16635858
You've asserted something without evidence.
The onus is on you to provide it.
You'd know this if you weren't a complete niggerbrain.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025, 18:17:43 GMT No. 16636272 Report

valid challenge

bodhi at Sat, 5 Apr 2025, 01:13:24 GMT No. 16637749 Report

>>16635099
this means he is 100% right also then because you know whatever he says the opposite is true 100% of the time

Anonymous at Sat, 5 Apr 2025, 01:21:09 GMT No. 16637758 Report

>>16635038
You're right

Anonymous at Sat, 5 Apr 2025, 01:27:56 GMT No. 16637762 Report

>>16637749
>b-but notyes is no, rite?
What is an opposite? You might be very surprised.

Anonymous at Sat, 5 Apr 2025, 01:50:21 GMT No. 16637767 Report

>>16636265
read Dr. Robert Sungenis to understand how fake science is

Anonymous at Sat, 5 Apr 2025, 01:54:47 GMT No. 16637771 Report

>>16635038
So true because consciousness is unexplainable by science oh my god I'm so high IQ I just came a bit just from thinking about this.