Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 16:00:46 UTC No. 16635183

>are these imaginary numbers in the room with us right now?

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Apr 2025 16:04:28 UTC No. 16635189

>>16635183
>I SWEAR THEYRE THE SQUARE ROOT OF MINUS O- WELL YES I KNOW YOU CAN'T SQUARE ROOT NEGATIVE NUMBERS BU- WAIT! WHERE ARE YOU TAKING ME?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 06:22:21 UTC No. 16635764

>>16635183
Can you even describe what a "room" is without using inherently math based terminology like space, segment, partition, inside, enclosed, etc?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 06:27:29 UTC No. 16635768

>>16635764
A cozy room with live laugh love garbage and LED lights. There you go, incel sperg.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 06:34:18 UTC No. 16635773

>>16635768
So room is room? The only way you can describe a room without math references is to say that it is a room?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 06:38:37 UTC No. 16635774

>>16635773
That’s why girls don’t sleep with you teehee.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 06:43:27 UTC No. 16635775

>>16635774
What is a girl?
Let me guess, a girl, right?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:30:16 UTC No. 16635805

>>16635764
Literal schizo post

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:33:59 UTC No. 16635807

>>16635805
Yet here you are completely unable to define room without invoking math and geometry and coping/seething as a result.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:36:09 UTC No. 16635809

>>16635775
Sorry, a girl is an equivalence class in the set of people. Because that’s how normal people think about it…

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:38:49 UTC No. 16635816

>>16635809
>class
So you can't even define girl without bringing in set theory math. let alone trying to define room without math and geometry?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:40:45 UTC No. 16635819

>>16635816
Anon, you are genuinely autistic. I was being sarcastic.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:44:17 UTC No. 16635825

>>16635807
You're just going to say that any non-mathematical term i use to describe anything is actually mathematical because all mathematicians are schizos who see and hear things that arent there and scribble them down in nonsensical symbols.

A room is simply a place, usually in a house, sometimes with things in it such as furniture and people.
>inb4 a bunch of seething math schizo nonsense in reply.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:45:50 UTC No. 16635826

>>16635816
Holy shit mathematicians really are schizos.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:54:03 UTC No. 16635829

>>16635819
Doesn't matter what you were trying to do when what you actually did was fail to produce results.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:56:39 UTC No. 16635830

>>16635825
>place
So like a specific area as in a series of connected points in space?
How is that not completely geometric in nature again?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:57:40 UTC No. 16635831

>>16635826
Too bad the person who actually said it already admitted they specifically used a math term on purpose as a joke.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:01:57 UTC No. 16635832

>>16635830
>So like a specific area as in a series of connected points in space?
Nope, just a location, try again math schizo, you can deconsturct everything as much as you want but eventually you're going to hit a dead end.
>>16635831
That was the joke... Normal people don't use and don't need to use mathematical terms.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:15:38 UTC No. 16635837

>>16635832
>location
So some area between some locus points?
>you can deconsturct everything as much as you want but eventually you're going to hit a dead end.
No, eventually you are going to have to use math terms like "much" and the "dead end" is simply the math concept 0 where everything begins and ends.
>Normal people don't use and don't need to use mathematical terms.
Wrong, as you keep proving, you retarded normies simply don't realize when your folksy sayings are derived from math and you can't even understand the connection even when its clearly explained.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:56:39 UTC No. 16635860

>>16635837
Nope, just a location, for instance, i point at a table, the table is at that location, nothing more complicated needed to describe that
>and the "dead end" is simply the math concept 0 where everything begins and ends.
Literal schizophrenia, "0" doesn't exist in reality and you cannot point me to anywhere it exists.
>>Normal people don't use and don't need to use mathematical terms.
>Wrong, as you keep proving
Normies don't need to know a single thing about mathematics to describe basic things, to deny this is just schizophrenia.
>you retarded normies simply don't realize when your folksy sayings are derived from math and you can't even understand the connection even when its clearly explained.
No, no, you have things exactly in reverse because you are a math schizo, reality comes first, then math is made up, math doesn't come first, thats insane.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:18:25 UTC No. 16635879

>>16635773
How much importance do you put into mathematics as a foundation of your understanding of reality?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:20:25 UTC No. 16635880

>>16635879
Probably such importance that, for him, mathematics supercedes reality and reality is a pesky afterthought.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:29:14 UTC No. 16635889

>>16635860
>just a location
That is what a location is which is why it uses loc- as its prefix same as locus points.
>point
Yes I said it was a collection of points already, so of course you would be using a point based system to refer to it because your understanding is based on spacial area which is based on collections of points.

>the table is at that location
Yes that is what I said from the beginning the locus points you provide indicate the location to which you are referring.
>"0" doesn't exist in reality and you cannot point me to anywhere it exists.
Unlike you, I have 0 smelly dicks in my mouth right now.
>Normies don't need to know a single thing about mathematics
I can tell, its clearly why you still don't even understand the relationship between locus points and location despite having it explained to you.
>reality
Your folksy saying about classes and sets of people wasn't based on a reality tethered from math, it is based on a reality specifically defined through math just like your repeated use of the word location.

You can say that all you want, but you still can't even describe your reality or your room without invoking numerous mathematical concepts.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:30:15 UTC No. 16635891

>>16635879
Is that a rhetorical question to yourself since you can't even describe your room without relying on jargon that came from math?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:31:53 UTC No. 16635893

>>16635880
That'd be a super clunky way to live. Poor OP.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:35:08 UTC No. 16635895

>>16635879
Did you use the math concept foundation sarcastically this time too just like the last anon who started talking about sets of people as if sets wasn't a math term?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:36:31 UTC No. 16635896

>>16635880
Let me guess, you only believe in "reality" because there are a number of things you have in common with a number of other people?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:42:13 UTC No. 16635901

>>16635880
>me mad at math because me think math proves one reality

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:45:55 UTC No. 16635902

>>16635891
I guess you can't say I'm not trying to be ignorant of math, I'm just trying not to be autistic here.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:50:45 UTC No. 16635906

>>16635895
Maybe one day you'll catch on.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:00:11 UTC No. 16635914

>>16635902
No, you are definitely being tranny tier autistic desperately trying to pretend things aren't the way they are because you don't identify as such so you get mad at words.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:01:23 UTC No. 16635915

>>16635906
So I will somehow add to my knowledge even though knowledge has nothing to do with math?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:10:56 UTC No. 16635921

>>16635914
Lol.

Things aren't what way? Being able to justify a position with words?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:15:54 UTC No. 16635922

>>16635921
>Things aren't what way?
Inherently mathematical
>Being able to justify a position with words?
You can't justify anything without using words specifically derived from math, even the word position is inherently geometric.
Your entire understanding of yourself and your reality is obviously based on words made to do math even if you don't understand or want accept it, trantist.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:19:48 UTC No. 16635925

Math is opposite of schizophrenia.
It's objective and you can agree on it with everybody.

Our civilization would be lost without math.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:22:28 UTC No. 16635927

>>16635915
Damn, I thought you already knew this. Sarcasm can be difficult for some people, but it is a learned behavior.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:26:43 UTC No. 16635931

>>16635927
I do already know, that is why it was so easy, rather than difficult, to identify your sarcasm and ridicule its inherent contradiction.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:37:39 UTC No. 16635939

>>16635922
I wasn't interested in things being inherently mathematical to post that reply. I also don't care about people that pretend math doesn't exist.

I'll leave you to it, realist.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:44:44 UTC No. 16635943

>>16635889
>That is what a location is which is why it uses loc- as its prefix same as locus points.
Alright you're just literally playing semantical games at this point to the point of losing all meaning towards objectively definable aspects of reality.
>Unlike you, I have 0 smelly dicks in my mouth right now.
Not an argument you're literally a schizo, you're typing paragraphs of incomprehensible word salad with no simple language at all, just proving my point that math is schizo.
>>16635925
>It's objective
Based on what? Isn't it quite literally abstract?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:45:19 UTC No. 16635944

>>16635939
Ok, any more of your silly coping mechanism you want to rant about unsolicited?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:45:47 UTC No. 16635946

>>16635931
Touché. I'm very much a midwit here.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:48:52 UTC No. 16635949

>>16635943
No, words have meanings, the reason those words have the same prefix is because they have similar base meanings, sorry if you don't like that fact and want to abuse language to seethe about it as a result.

>Not an argument
Except the 0 dicks in my mouth at any given time completely proves I can have 0 amounts of things, obviously you will never understand since you will never have only 0 dicks in your mouth.

>incomprehensible
You don't even understand how prefixes work, so of course basic language is going to seem incomprehensible to a complete retard like that.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:48:57 UTC No. 16635950

>>16635893
I'm OP and i don''t believe that.
>>16635896
>Denying reality
And i thought math schizos couldn't go any lower.
Reality is simply what is, what exists, and something seems to exist, therefore reality exists, regardless of it's an illusion or not or whatever.
>>16635901
What? I believe there is only one reality and you don't need math to know that.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:52:28 UTC No. 16635952

>>16635950
I didn't deny it I said it was inherently mathematical which you agree with since you keep using equality statements to describe it.

>I believe there is only one reality and you don't need math to know that.
Sure, retard, one isn't a math concept at all, you totally figured out reality by calling it one.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:54:10 UTC No. 16635955

>>16635949
>sorry if you don't like that fact and want to abuse language to seethe about it as a result.
Projection
Location simply means what it means, everyone knows what it means, it just means where something is, you talking about prefixes and what not while ignoring the meaning that everyone understands is you abusing language and distorting it into nonsense, it's also not an argument, you think you can endlessly break down and create smaller and smaller mental models of reality and that one day, one glorious day, it will somehow reach reality, you are wrong.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:56:06 UTC No. 16635956

>>16635944
You're on 4chan. If you're unwilling to accept this, go eat someone else's shit.

I'm seriously concerned for you.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:56:30 UTC No. 16635957

>>16635952
>I didn't deny it I said it was inherently mathematical which you agree with since you keep using equality statements to describe it.
No, i don't agree, reality is NOT inherently mathematical, math is inherently based on reality, it's the other way around.
What's an equality statement?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:00:32 UTC No. 16635959

>>16635955
Yes I am projecting what you are doing since you clearly don't understand how words or prefixes or etymology work, so you can't understand why location and locus are inherently related.

No, letting any folksy retard redefine words because they don't like the real definition instead of following what the word actually means is the abuse of language, you are the one trying to distort things instead of actually look at the word and what it means.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:01:33 UTC No. 16635961

>>16635957
Doesn't mean I denied anything just because your circular definition is demonstrably retarded.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:01:33 UTC No. 16635962

Before coming here, I thought the OP was purely a harmless shitpost.
Now that I've read through this thread, I see that it was truly a nuke of a truth.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:06:34 UTC No. 16635970

>>16635950
> I'm OP and i don''t believe that.

More power to you on your math studies.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:18:12 UTC No. 16635975

>>16635959
>Yes I am projecting what you are doing since you clearly don't understand how words or prefixes or etymology work, so you can't understand why location and locus are inherently related.
>No, letting any folksy retard redefine words because they don't like the real definition instead of following what the word actually means is the abuse of language, you are the one trying to distort things instead of actually look at the word and what it means.
You haven't said anything, you're just spouting meaningless schizo word salad at this point, you have no point.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:20:09 UTC No. 16635978

>>16635961
You're not making any arguments.
Asserting that reality is based on maths is denying reality, because maths doesn't exist.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:22:41 UTC No. 16635980

>>16635962
Thank you, i try to only say trvth nvke when it is truly a thermotrvklear missile

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:24:06 UTC No. 16635984

>>16635970
Sorry i don't study schizophrenia, that's for physchologists and saints.

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:17:29 UTC No. 16636357

>>16635114
math is just made up bullshit by feeble human minds to try to understand their reality better. No matter how seemingly complex the math gets, it's always filtered by the fact humans are fucking stupid with limited perception..

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:18:52 UTC No. 16636358

>>16635764
can you describe mathematical concepts without language? You realize what you just said, right?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:21:04 UTC No. 16636364

>>16636357
Let me guess: you're the anon who asserts that predictability is an illusion of confirmation bias?

Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:36:20 UTC No. 16636381

>>16636364
I'm the anon wondering what the fuck you're talking about.