Image not available

960x693

z24013254V.jpg

๐Ÿงต What would be the best pointing system for mma?

Anonymous No. 162829

By best, I mean
>possibly immune to biased judges
>encouraging fighters to be active
>gives the win to someone who would probably win in a no time limit fight

Anonymous No. 162830

>>162829
You cant have all 3 of these. The last two basically contradict each other. The 2nd one favours the man who constantly goes for takedowns and strikes whilst the last one favours the man who basically attritions his opponent to death via grappling, someone who conserves his energy and uses control positions to exhaust his spazzy explosive opponent.

Anonymous No. 162833

if there's no finish they both get losses on their record
you'll see a finish every time

Anonymous No. 162835

it doesnt stop until someone is either knocked out, submitted or passed out from exhaustion

Anonymous No. 162838

>>162835
It might be cool from time to time but fighting like this on daily basis would probably become too exhausting for fighters and boring for fans

Anonymous No. 162840

I realize most of it was fixed, but the idea at least of the longer first round in Japan might come closer to achieving that. But it's less viable to general viewer enjoyment and the way things are structured around it, so probably wouldn't work anyway.

Anonymous No. 162851

>>162835
This just makes the sport 100% owned by dagestan dan humping your ass until you gas and everyone turns off the show

Anonymous No. 164943

>>162829
only one round

no dumb leg kicks that need 3 rounds to have an effect and only make the fight look stupid

if you lay on your back like those retards from bjj you automaticaly lose, meaning you gave up

no rules against an oponent that fall on his kness or is off balance or down (ppl exploit this when it is a very very very very vulnerable spot to be in)

Anonymous No. 164964

>>164943
Just watch combat sambo instead of turning mma into combat sambo

Anonymous No. 165309

>>164943
> t. seething vatnik
the fact that Russians not nothing about Jiu Jitsu doesn't mean Jiu Jitsu should be banned
Russians only know how to stall and that's it, they almost never finish their fights
if there was no time limit, Russians would be nowhere near as successful as they are

Anonymous No. 165375

>>165309
>Fedor Emielianienko
40-8, 1 no contest
16 KOs
15 submissions
>Alexander Emielianienko
28-9-1
20 KOs
5 submissions
>Khabib Nurmagomedov
29-0
8 KOs
11 submissions
>Abubakar Nurmagomedov
17-3-1
6 KOs
4 submissions
>Umar Nurmagomedov
16-0
2 KOs
7 submissions
>Said Nurmagomedov
17-3
4 KOs
5 submissions
>Islam Makhachev
24-1
4 KOs
11 submission
>Khamzat Chimaev
12-0
6 KOs
5 submissions
>Askar Askarov
14-1-1
4 KOs
7 submissions
>Magomed Ankalaev
18-1-1
10 KOs
8 submissions
>Petr Yan
16-5
7 KOs
1 submission
>Mamed Khalidov
47-8-2
17 KOs
16 submissions
>Mosvar Evloev
17-0
3 KOs
4 submissions
>Sergei Pavlovich
18-1
15 KOs
>Aleksander Volkov
36-10
24 KOs
3 submissions
There are more good russian fighters but I got bored. Almost all of these who I listed won most of their fights by knockouts and submissions.

Anonymous No. 165393

>>165375
>it's just a list of can crushers
lmao

Anonymous No. 165626

>>165375
keep humping the leg, vatnik

Anonymous No. 165627

>>165626
I'm not even russian. You don't need to be russian to know that in terms of mma russian muslims>Americans and Brazilians>rest of the world.

Anonymous No. 165682

>>162829
Knock Out 30 points (the guy actually gets knocked out), TKOs 20 points (referee stops a match as a KO), 10 points tap out, 5 points for take downs, 2 point for each strike with arms, 3 points for each strike with the legs, spinning + jumping techniques get extra +2 points since they are harder to pull off in MMA.

Anonymous No. 165683

>>165627
Nah, Russians ain't that good, second place I would say definitely.

Anonymous No. 165706

They don't even use the current scoring rules properly
One FC has separate striking & grappling points which might be better
I don't see how you decide whether striking > grappling* except if you have each fighter select a priority before the fight starts, and then they're judged based on how well they do at that priority
So a wrestler vs a boxer, the wrestler is judged on his offensive grappling and control, and the striker is judged on whether he was able to outstrike the other guy
This is retarded for obvious reasons but the alternative is to decide - or have judges decide - whether striking or grappling is more important, in the moment.
The current scoring criteria already does this (striking > grappling) but the judges don't actually follow it really so they're doing this and the fans don't care

Anonymous No. 165745

>>165706
The meta for scoring big is to control the grappling and strike a bit to show that you are "damaging" the guy and not just hugging him like a fag.