Image not available

660x574

1609162373534.png

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 175781

if brazilian jiu jitsu negates size and strength, does that mean that the best BJJ practitioners could take on a polar bear?

Anonymous No. 175782

>>175781
No, but I could

Anonymous No. 175783

No, but I could

Anonymous No. 175786

>>175781
>Black bear
Look big, fight back
>Brown bear
Play dead
>Polar bear
Kiss your ass goodbye

Anonymous No. 175787

>>175781
>brazilian jiu jitsu negates size and strength
it doesn't, and the only reason you may sometimes see a smaller person win in open weight divisions is because stalling is a usable strategy within the rules

Anonymous No. 175836

In big bear jitsu, white pelt > brown pelt > black pelt

Anonymous No. 176864

>>175781
>brazilian jiu jitsu negates size
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

Anonymous No. 176898

>>175781
no, bears have claws.
Also, no, bjj doenst "deny size".

Anonymous No. 176948

BJJ nerds need a reality check fr.
Fags get a blue belt these days and think they can take on actual fighters lmao.

Anonymous No. 177146

>>175787
This
>>175781
If two guys one at 68kg and another at 85kg both know some jiu-jitsu, who do you think will win at grappling?
>>176948
The amount of guys ive seen quit at blue belt too.

Image not available

640x853

gonjhomvm5d31.jpg

Anonymous No. 177168

Anonymous No. 177252

>>175786
What about pandas and Grizzlies?

Anonymous No. 177853

>>177252
>pandas
Just don't annoy it, it's usually harmless
>grizzly
That's just a brown bear in America

Anonymous No. 177884

>>175781
Bjj = gay sex no discrimination

Anonymous No. 177904

>>175781
Bjj just negates the ability to remain heterosexual.