Image not available

1024x686

4899836692_d36374....jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 939225

Has anyone tried Bryce3d or other retro software? How does it hold up?

Anonymous No. 939367

>>939225
old 3d tools are no less capable than nushit. they're just slower.
comfy irix >>>>>> autojew
any day of the week.

Anonymous No. 939369

>>939225
is that a blender addon? nice render.

Anonymous No. 939907

>>939225
I got it from some Russian website last year, pretty nice if you just want some shitty low poly hills.
7.5/10

Anonymous No. 939952

bump for interest

Anonymous No. 939956

>mfw old enough to have used bryce back when it came out
i know there's like a few other anons here older than me as well

Anonymous No. 940232

>>939225
why are zoomers so obsessed with bryce3d?

>>939956
>old enough
nice larp.

Anonymous No. 940276

>>939225
It's cool

Anonymous No. 940298

>>939225
what do you need to do to get this to run on your pc?

Anonymous No. 940300

>>940232
>why are zoomers so obsessed with bryce3d?
It started blowing up when the YouTube algorithms were recommending people 90's Drum & Bass albums, most of which have Bryce3d renders to accompany the music.
Sometimes people joke that zoomers like 90's and 80's stuff because they wish to go back to a time before the world was ruined, and things like the internet were still being pioneered and weren't packed with all the crap you have to deal with today. As a zoomer, I think there may be some truth in that. I love consuming retro media because a lot of industries back then thought they actually hade to make something good if they wanted people to buy their stuff.

Anonymous No. 940337

>>940300
that's actually a based viewpoint. it will only be cringe if you get into one of those yesterweb circles who long for the old internet and yet they insists on revisionism/denialism as if the old internet is not homophobic/transphobic unlike the current social climate, which is of course not the fact beause it is actually the opposite.

Anonymous No. 940344

>>939225
Better question is why would you use something ancient when you can just replicate the style with modern software?

Image not available

1920x1200

waves.jpg

Anonymous No. 940345

>>939225
There's been some interesting and stimulating discussion surrounding Bryce here >>>934428

Anonymous No. 940408

>>940344
for authenticity