š§µ /sfg/ Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:33:48 UTC No. 15919423
TRL6 Schizo Tech Edition
prev: >>15917377
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:41:47 UTC No. 15919446
>>15919430
very nice
>>15919423
is this the QI guy with mcculloh
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:46:03 UTC No. 15919457
>>15919451
S26 is getting scrapped. No more full stainless steel Starships, just beautiful tiled behemoths.
>>15919454
All ripoffs of western rockets. not much more needs to be said.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:48:05 UTC No. 15919463
https://twitter.com/LabPadre/status
Test stand A getting cut up and the QD umbilical are FULLY gone. What's going on with the OLM??
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:49:17 UTC No. 15919467
>>15919463
its fucking over. They are disassembling the next ship RING by RING.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:59:51 UTC No. 15919479
>>15919446
yes lol
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:11:40 UTC No. 15919492
>>15919463
second tower getting built maybe
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:22:14 UTC No. 15919499
My farts continue to reek like week old cat corpse
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:25:41 UTC No. 15919506
>>15919492
>Mr. Musk, another ULA sniper has hit the second tower
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:26:36 UTC No. 15919509
>>15919507
Not spaceflight stfu
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:26:53 UTC No. 15919510
>>15919507
>release candidate
Holy shit just sold all my spacex stock after viewing this and you should too
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:42:45 UTC No. 15919529
>>15919507
Too much cyber, not enough truck
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:49:33 UTC No. 15919543
>>15919507
I just sold all my neurolink shares. gonna use the proceeds to buy all terrain tires and chains for my ram 4500 evp because im not a stupid retard gay elon musk ball suckler
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:51:22 UTC No. 15919545
>>15919454
I like chinaspace more than the average /sfg/ fagābut even I am unimpressed. Even if china got multiple āprivateā rockets flying, each with capabilities similar to F9 and EVEN if some had reusability, itās not really that interesting other than it makes USA oldspace look lazy and inefficient for not being able to do the same thing.
But anyways china doesnāt really have impressive capability and they arenāt doing anything that the west can already do better
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:16:54 UTC No. 15919579
>>15919507
Where are the rockets in this webm?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:26:33 UTC No. 15919588
15919507
Not spaceflight related kill yourself
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:34:56 UTC No. 15919595
>>15919588
Cope and seethe
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:35:57 UTC No. 15919597
>>15919507
>muskrats are shilling this piece of shit as lunar/mars rover
lol, lmao even
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:56:25 UTC No. 15919623
>>15919597
forgive them, they have severe retardation.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:58:06 UTC No. 15919625
>>15919597
It would actually work better on moon than earth
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:01:59 UTC No. 15919635
>>15919509
My sides achieved orbit, that should count for something
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:14:38 UTC No. 15919653
A truck getting stuck in the snow? That's unheard of
t. giant retard
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:18:56 UTC No. 15919658
>>15919597
How bad of an issue is traction in low-g lunar gravity? Or in fine lunar dust?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:21:45 UTC No. 15919663
>>15919658
how do they manage to fuck up the wheels this badly on rovers when they drive so slowly? is it just mass autism making the wheels super flimsy?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:23:24 UTC No. 15919666
>>15919663
>mass autism
Yes.
Also known as "not requiring 2147483648 in-orbit refuels for a single mission"
Such is the way of oldspace
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:29:30 UTC No. 15919678
>>15919666
Fuel is cheaper than broken wheels.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:59:16 UTC No. 15919714
>>15919666
Not like they really had a choice back when Curiosity (and arguably even Perseverance) launched. Biggest you could do was Atlas V or Ariane right? I donāt think NASA was ready to put a āmega ultraā mars rover 2x the size, complexity, and cost of curiosity on a Falcon Heavy back in 2020 lol. They would probably be okay with it now though
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:07:14 UTC No. 15919728
>>15919714
Yeah no shit they didn't have a choice, they had to get shit done instead of jerking off to inefficient scifi mission plans.
Now, Artemis on the other hand had a choice and they chose a stupid mission architecture. That said I hope it works out in the end. Even if it utterly retarded with current technology, someone has to keep pushing progress and chinks certainly can't do anything more than copy Apollo-era burgertech.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:07:48 UTC No. 15919730
>>15919728
meds
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:23:13 UTC No. 15919750
>>15919728
Unironically agree 100%
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:28:27 UTC No. 15919757
>>15919728
>inefficient scifi mission plans.
harsh, but I agree
MSR is retarded
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:36:54 UTC No. 15919762
>>15919728
ITS NOT SCIFI ITS REAL. YOUVE SEEN IT ON THE LAUNCH MOUNT. WE ARE GOING.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:37:23 UTC No. 15919763
Cancel MSR & Dragonfly.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:40:13 UTC No. 15919765
>>15919454
China's going to let them all tear each other to pieces and lets whoever lives live. The personnel experience generated by the failed attempts can be absorbed by one of the survivors or folded into CASC for building reusability to the LM-9 and 10.
There's nothing intrinsically wrong with any of the proposals. They're all possible evolutions from conservative ELVs to simple RLVs following the Falcon 9's basic pattern. They won't all work out but the odds are pretty damn high that at least once of them will.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:40:33 UTC No. 15919766
>>15919757
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:44:25 UTC No. 15919769
>>15919423
>Barry-1 satellite tracking
https://db.satnogs.org/satellite/QD
>Schizo blog
https://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:46:24 UTC No. 15919773
>>15919663
>drives short distance
>wheels fall apart
many such cases. old space doesn't even have reusable wheels
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:49:31 UTC No. 15919780
>>15919773
The Lunokhods are surprisingly impressive.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:59:05 UTC No. 15919789
>>15919714
A Proton-M could fling about 5 tons to TMI, an Atlas V 551 could do 5.5 tons, an Ariane 5 ECA could do 6 tons, and a Delta IV Heavy could do 8.5 tons.
The Falcon Heavy does present some interesting possibilities. It's sad that we're going to be well into the Starship era before NASA is able to put anything together to take advantage of it.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:02:11 UTC No. 15919796
>>15919789
Falcon Chubby was only ever meant as a stopgap vehicle, which only makes it cooler, the final evolution of its architecture, briefly the greatest in the world. Decades from now only rocket nerds will remember it ever flew.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:02:52 UTC No. 15919797
>>15919789
Nah mate I think we will still be limited by New Glenn and Vulcan Centaur. NASA will be designing missions that have to interchangeably fit on those ships as well, for competitive reasons
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:11:34 UTC No. 15919812
>>15919796
>Falcon Chubby was only ever meant as a stopgap vehicle
Next level cope, or are you a newfag?
Falcon heavy was meant to be ready in 2013 and it was meant to be flying to Mars every launch window, the only reason it came so late and launches so seldomly is because it was in development hell and ended up being way more expensive and complex than planned. It was supposed to be easy, just three unmodified falcon boosters, it ended up being a completely different rocket. Elon tried to cancel it several times
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:19:12 UTC No. 15919825
>>15919730
Oh no, a post wasn't included in your programming.
Just imagine it was offtopic tesla/twitter shit and happily go on about your day.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:20:39 UTC No. 15919829
>>15919823
https://archive (dot) is/20231212210714/https://www.bloom
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:21:55 UTC No. 15919831
>>15919829
>bloomberg
do I even need to say it
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:48:01 UTC No. 15919887
Something beautiful happened today
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:05:28 UTC No. 15919914
>>15919887
What's that, then?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:09:12 UTC No. 15919922
>>15919914
A fire extinguisher incident
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:10:48 UTC No. 15919925
>>15919902
Literally who
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:11:09 UTC No. 15919927
>>15919902
Dave Limp was at this conference, I just realized. He is slated to be the new BO CEO. I think he was here representing Amazon at the time. How ironic
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:12:34 UTC No. 15919929
>>15919927
It's called a coincidence, not irony. And it's not a coincidence
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:14:23 UTC No. 15919933
>>15919922
Not space related
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:15:32 UTC No. 15919935
>>15919929
Good point; well said.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:18:03 UTC No. 15919937
>>15919925
Arianespace and ULA CEOs
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:21:59 UTC No. 15919946
>>15919423
Tape outgassing engines will soar through the technology readiness levels soon. How exciting!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:22:48 UTC No. 15919948
>>15919937
And?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:23:02 UTC No. 15919949
>>15919945
I am starting a collection of weird space flight related photos
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:26:40 UTC No. 15919952
>>15919946
>i-its just tape outgassing!!!
>chuds cant be right!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:28:33 UTC No. 15919958
>>15919952
The chuds unironically cant be right, correct
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:29:14 UTC No. 15919960
>>15919507
Foolish Tesla. Clearly it needed a rocket motor for these kinds of situations.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:29:49 UTC No. 15919961
Some KSC tanks are heading back to Starbase, and the test stand is getting ripped apart. Also StarFactory is being expanded further, and the OLM SQD is getting worked on too. Busy busy times, but this is making me think that we have another IFT-2 length wait for IFT-3.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:30:07 UTC No. 15919962
>>15919958
Saving this for the screencap when they're proved right.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:30:50 UTC No. 15919963
>>15919658
I hate wheels almost as much as tiles.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:34:22 UTC No. 15919970
>>15919962
>when they're proved right
By themselves. A party with a vested interest to find something here.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:35:16 UTC No. 15919973
>>15919970
Their target for the test is a figure that would be impossible to achieve without the drive working as advertised.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:41:42 UTC No. 15919986
>>15919507
>put truck in situation where even a tank could get stuck
>it gets stuck
woah.
>>15919597
haha he didn't get the responses he wanted so he made one of his own, embarrassing.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:42:20 UTC No. 15919988
https://youtube.com/shorts/XV-gTmp1
did you see this?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:43:06 UTC No. 15919989
>>15919507
Put on tire chains retard.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:46:18 UTC No. 15919993
>>15919988
>woman
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:47:13 UTC No. 15919994
>>15919961
told you so.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:47:22 UTC No. 15919995
>>15919993
Answer the question
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:47:49 UTC No. 15919996
>>15919988
>shorts
No
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:49:03 UTC No. 15920002
>>15919995
No, I didn't.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:49:13 UTC No. 15920003
>>15919973
McCulloch made a post on [spoiler]Patreon[/spoiler] today where he determined that the baseline orbit of the satellite is actually decaying a bit every day so if the orbit raises above the original it's pretty obviously a real effect of consistent thrust rather than just lol outgassing.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:50:16 UTC No. 15920004
https://twitter.com/BrendanCarrFCC/
spaceflight relevance, this is about a 880mil subsidy that got given and then retracted from Starlink and it seems it was clearly political
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:51:18 UTC No. 15920006
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:51:59 UTC No. 15920007
>>15919988
What is it with space sluts like this always trying to show off their belly button or whatnot? does she have a father?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:53:16 UTC No. 15920010
>>15920007
>What is it with space sluts like this always trying to show off their belly button
multiple docking ports uwu
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:53:17 UTC No. 15920011
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:54:19 UTC No. 15920014
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:54:56 UTC No. 15920017
>>15920004
>>15920006
>>15920011
>>15920014
Schizos were right?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:56:37 UTC No. 15920021
>>15920017
They always are.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:58:07 UTC No. 15920024
>>15920017
have you been living under a rock? this is just one of many examples
the lawsuit about SpaceX hiring refugees, lawsuits about glass houses are just some that come to mind quickly
those were clearly frivolous bullshit
the whining about not giving Ukraine access to certain areas that would have been illegal without explicit approval from the president and yet they still went on a massive witch hunt to claim Musk was actively hindering Ukrainian operations somehow
its a massive fucking list
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:02:04 UTC No. 15920030
>>15920024
Luckily those lawsuits got dismissed and its only been reputational damage so far (kind of inflicted by Elon if he kept his mouth shut none of this wouldve happened) but now its cutting in to money. So far it seems countersuits have been successful, not sure if something could happen here though but it seems unlikely. Does anyone know if countersuit is possible to overturn the decision if its proven to be politically motivated?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:03:21 UTC No. 15920034
>>15920011
>Applying a speed test to those providers would show speeds of 0/0 Mbps.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:05:45 UTC No. 15920040
>>15920030
>its only been reputational damage so far (kind of inflicted by Elon if he kept his mouth shut none of this wouldve happened)
He's afraid that a culture of "just keep your mouth shut" will be unable to go multiplanetary. If it comes to a choice between screaming "NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER" directly in Barack Obama's face during a Tesla investor call or giving up on Mars he'll scream.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:08:27 UTC No. 15920052
>>15920040
Did someone say nigger?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:09:34 UTC No. 15920055
>>15920004
Yep. Biden admin is cancer. They need to go.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:11:08 UTC No. 15920059
>>15920040
Destruction of society is a threat to space flight. The current trend is dangerous.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:21:49 UTC No. 15920077
>>15920065
Kys schizoid
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:27:50 UTC No. 15920091
>>15919986
>put truck in situation where even a tank could get stuck
>it gets stuck
toyota hilux would have no trouble there
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:37:32 UTC No. 15920109
>>15920091
I've seen plenty of good trucks peel out on ice if they're not chained up. This is just what happens when you let yuppies get AWD.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:38:34 UTC No. 15920110
>>15920091
Any standard truck with over-inflated non-studded or chained tires would get stuck in that spot exactly like the Cybertruck, only it would probably be worse depending on its weight allocation. Now go back.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:40:58 UTC No. 15920120
>>15920017
For about the last eight years or so, you should have listened.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:56:59 UTC No. 15920140
>>15920017
The gov is corrupt.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:57:58 UTC No. 15920141
>>15919986
Iām not a samefag, lol
Stay mad
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:05:23 UTC No. 15920154
>>15920141
>iToddler file name with desktop 4chan
Something wrong here. What jewish tricks are you trying to pull?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:13:37 UTC No. 15920168
>>15920004
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:15:15 UTC No. 15920174
>>15920065
Scrambled rubiks cube is unsolvable. two yellow middles
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:16:22 UTC No. 15920177
>>15920174
Skill issue
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:23:13 UTC No. 15920189
>>15920177
agreed
the Rubik's cube is an IQ test and you fail if you don't realize you can move the stickers
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:33:50 UTC No. 15920221
>>15920004
Reddit is censoring this lmao. I double checked their spacex board and its not posted there
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:41:07 UTC No. 15920235
>>15920213
Felon Musk once again not making his work ADA compliant. Sad to see
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:46:25 UTC No. 15920246
>>15920221
lol, not really surprising though as this makes the biden admin look really bad even for normies
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:46:55 UTC No. 15920248
>>15920221
>>15920246
kill yourself redditniggers GO THE FUCK BACK YOU CANCEROUS BROWNOID FUCKING KIKEJEW
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:47:33 UTC No. 15920249
>>15920213
what's inside the curtain?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:58:43 UTC No. 15920262
>>15920004
Only 12 more months of this left
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:59:03 UTC No. 15920264
https://twitter.com/CSI_Starbase/st
SpaceX tank farm symphony.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:21:06 UTC No. 15920286
>>15919625
no shit because it would weigh less
but that doesn't mean it's actually well designed for the moon or mars
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:22:44 UTC No. 15920292
>>15920286
That's ok, it will improve over time
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:24:43 UTC No. 15920296
>>15920292
If SpaceX wants a Tesla rover the should ask Tesla to design a rover from the ground up. Converting a vehicle designed first optimized for use on Earth will never yield a vehicle optimized for use on the Moon or Mars. They are different problems that require different solutions. One-size-fits-all makes zero sense for rovers.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:26:51 UTC No. 15920300
>>15920296
True, I think SpaceX will design their own vehicles. But with parts available from Tesla, just like how they do all their current things. Some core things are interchangeable but requires a lot of re-engineering to make it space worthy.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:29:43 UTC No. 15920308
>>15920301
>>15920300
>>>/wsg/5374805
Audio version
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:30:19 UTC No. 15920309
>>15920300
why does it walk like it shit it's pants
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:30:40 UTC No. 15920311
>>15919877
LMAO read the reviews on Steam. It is a scam of a demo, not even a finished game.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:31:01 UTC No. 15920313
>>15920309
Thats how all robots walk like. Its because it cant bend like humans to stabalize properly I think
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:32:33 UTC No. 15920314
>>15920313
I wonder if it's really a mechanics problem or an issue with the software driving it. Like if you wired up a human brain to one of these and gave him time to learn the ropes, wouldn't the human manage to learn a more efficient way to move this robot body? I imagine so.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:32:52 UTC No. 15920315
>>15920309
walking like that is simpler and safer, humans kind of fall forward
maybe the gait will be more humanlike in the future, but this thing doesn't have the flexibility of a human yet
the previous version didn't have any articulation in the toes, but this one has some I guess
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:33:42 UTC No. 15920317
>>15920296
it's ok bro
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:33:56 UTC No. 15920318
>>15920300
>Tesla robots
Automotive?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:36:12 UTC No. 15920319
>>15920004
>Starlink can't reach required speeds
>speeds are declining, which has to be solved with V2 satellites on Starship, which won't be launching in volume by the end of '25 when the speeds need to be reached
>this must be the result of a political witch-hunt initiated by Biden after his comments that were made well after the decision to revoke was made
what a fucking retard
>>15920017
No, this guy is just a retard virtue-signaling to the "Biden is going after Musk" crowd
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:37:07 UTC No. 15920323
>>15920309
kind of seems to be about the sota for these neural nets bots
like this was released the other day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFo
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:37:45 UTC No. 15920325
>>15920319
it can reach required speeds though, thats the thing
the deadline is at the end of 2025
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:38:30 UTC No. 15920328
>>15920308
>>15920301
not fucking spaceflight bleed out
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:38:47 UTC No. 15920329
>>15920319
No other company requires a new technology to meet the speed requirements on day 1.
Its a nonsensical argument. The Biden appointee made up the reason to put Starlink's expansion under halt. Fucking bitch
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:38:51 UTC No. 15920330
>>15920315
>walking like that is simpler and safer, humans kind of fall forward
So they need to program the bots to have more bravery
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:40:16 UTC No. 15920332
>>15920301
>>15920300
why did they announce this with a random twitter video, seems like a bigger deal
That's the most human-like robot movement I've seen
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:40:48 UTC No. 15920334
>>15920332
NOT SPACEFLIGHT KYS KYS KYS KYS
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:41:38 UTC No. 15920335
the biden cocksucker is losing his mind lmaoo
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:42:35 UTC No. 15920336
>>15920311
Your misinformation has been deboonked. Try again, sweetie.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:42:48 UTC No. 15920337
>>15920335
i hate biden thoughbeit. i also hate non spaceflight in spaceflight general, tard.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:43:08 UTC No. 15920338
>>15920332
Get with the times. We X-men now. Its not a "random" video. Its a preview of whats to come.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:44:13 UTC No. 15920341
>>15920338
shut up NIGGER. you VILL talk about spaceflight, you VILL contribute meaningful discussion, and you VILL be happy.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:45:18 UTC No. 15920343
>>15920341
Future of Moon and Mars colony. Gen3-Gen4 will be doing work.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:46:14 UTC No. 15920344
>>15920309
Boston Dynamics is the only one who's moved beyond that, since they've been tunnel-visioned on kinesthetics from their founding.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:46:55 UTC No. 15920346
>>15920343
no they fucking wont, humanoid robots ESPECIALLY wont be doing this, there will be dedicated machines for colony building not these fucking niggerbots nobody gives a shit about.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:47:43 UTC No. 15920347
Hello friends.
I was looking forward to watching the Falcon Heavy launch with Clear and all of you again but it seems like I won't be home to watch it. I still hope it all goes well and makes Clear happy :D
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:48:27 UTC No. 15920349
>>15920347
the clearcel returns.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:49:30 UTC No. 15920351
clearly a man
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:50:56 UTC No. 15920353
Do you reckon /sfg/ will become any better after Musk's death next week?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:50:57 UTC No. 15920354
>>15920351
yeah, a woman
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:51:36 UTC No. 15920357
>>15920354
kek admitting hes a trannoid no fucking way
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:51:48 UTC No. 15920358
>>15919945
>that lean
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:52:46 UTC No. 15920360
>>15920357
she's a TERF acutally
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:52:59 UTC No. 15920361
>>15919993
Why would the AI put just a random towel on the woman's head?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:54:03 UTC No. 15920363
>>15920347
>snake
lmao no way
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:54:15 UTC No. 15920366
>>15920213
can you visit starbase like ksc?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:54:34 UTC No. 15920367
>>15920361
do zoomers really?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:03:38 UTC No. 15920382
>>15920347
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qe
Falcon Heavy's not going until tomorrow. All we get tonight is another boring ole starlink launch
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:05:33 UTC No. 15920386
>>15920382
another one towards 100 2023 launches.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:06:28 UTC No. 15920389
>>15919507
Uh oh stinky
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:14:38 UTC No. 15920407
>>15920389
californians, folks.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:24:32 UTC No. 15920431
>>15919663
They made them out of very thin aluminum and added a tread patter with sharp corners, because they have mass autism and are also retarded morons
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:25:29 UTC No. 15920433
>>15920427
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVa
I wonder when the Lex Fridman tour/podcast is coming out
that tweet was a while ago
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:26:19 UTC No. 15920436
>>15920427
Frankly it was boring for me. No real explanations on rocket or the engine side of things as I skimmed through it
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:27:21 UTC No. 15920437
>>15920413
It does not
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:29:28 UTC No. 15920442
>>15920301
She's only a few years away now
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:35:44 UTC No. 15920451
NOT. SPACEFLIGHT.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:36:29 UTC No. 15920452
>>15920300
The pace of improvement on this is insane. I wonder how long it'll be until they figure out how to give it a more natural gait/walking speed.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:37:42 UTC No. 15920456
>>15920358
he's too old and frail to resist the gravitational pull
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:44:05 UTC No. 15920463
>>15920452
They're already likely being trained on neural net for more natural walking. Either it will evolve from current training or it will evolve from a separate transformer model.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:48:46 UTC No. 15920469
>>15920442
dibs on KOS-MOS
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:52:51 UTC No. 15920470
Why do they call it "spaceflight" when it's really spacefloat
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:52:58 UTC No. 15920471
>>15920463
It seems like a hardware revision is going to be needed also. Optimus, along with basically every other humanoid robot, has that weird partial crouch even when the legs are at full extension. I assume there's some reason for this, but it also looks to be preventing progress toward more natural walking.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:55:01 UTC No. 15920475
>>15920452
6 months
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:55:33 UTC No. 15920477
https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/
>Two Blue Origin officials told Ars that the company is not currently planning to perform a full-scale test-firing of an entire New Glenn booster, with all seven of its BE-4 engines, before the inaugural launch. If this holds, it would be unusual. These hotfire tests are a standard part of preparing of the first flight of a new rocket. Just this year, we've seen ULA test-fire its Vulcan booster, Europe's Ariane 6 rocket go through multiple hotfire tests, and SpaceX's enormous Super Heavy booster fire up its engines on the launch pad.
What
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:56:53 UTC No. 15920479
>>15919423
If you launch a starship every week for a few years straight that has to rip a giant hole in the ozone, right?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:58:38 UTC No. 15920482
>>15920301
If this was real melong would replace tesla factory workers over night
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 03:59:20 UTC No. 15920485
>>15920477
Remarkable. Take notes ScamX, good engineering doesn't require the deaths of thousands of ocelots.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:00:23 UTC No. 15920488
holy shit i CANT FUCKING STAND WOMEN
DO YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED WHEN WOMEN WERE ALLOWED IN SPACEFLIGHT??? IT FUCKING FLOPPED AND WE GOT THE SHUTTLE ERA WHERE NOTHING NEW HAPPENED FOR FUCKING HALF A CENTURY AND ALL THE PROGRESS OF THE SPACE RACE ROTTED AWAY IN MUSEUMS
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:02:42 UTC No. 15920490
>>15920300
The bitrate fucking sucks. Why is Elon refusing to upload shit to YouTube? The last Starship launch looked like shit too.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:04:50 UTC No. 15920493
>>15920490
because hes a selfish little fuck that doesnt want his horrible twitter investment to die even though hes killing spacex audience by moving to xitter by doing this. all around lose lose
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:05:18 UTC No. 15920494
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1
Starlink prop loading underway
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:05:51 UTC No. 15920496
>>15920494
shut up fag
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:07:40 UTC No. 15920498
>>15920494
Oh good, I was wondering if that one was launching today. Thanks for the head's up
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:07:45 UTC No. 15920499
>>15920494
routine starlink launch? no one cares
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:08:43 UTC No. 15920500
>>15920494
Continue, king
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:08:45 UTC No. 15920501
>>15920496
>>15920499
åØęē½čŖē±éØ å¤©å®é 天å®éØ ę³č¼Ŗå ęę“Ŗåæ Free Tibet å
å天å®éäŗ件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天å®éå¤§å± ę®ŗ The Tiananmen Square Massacre åå³ę“¾é¬„ē The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大čŗé²ęæē The Great Leap Forward ęå大é©å½ The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution äŗŗę¬ Human Rights ę°é Democratization čŖē± Freedom ēØē« Independence å¤é»Øå¶ Multi-party system å°ē£ čŗē£ Taiwan Formosa äøčÆę°å Republic of China č„æč åä¼Æē¹ åå¤ē¹ Tibet éč³“åå Dalai Lama ę³č¼Ŗå Falun Dafa ę°ēē¶å¾ē¾čŖę²»å The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region č«¾č²ē¾åå¹³ē Nobel Peace Prize åęę³¢ Liu Xiaobo ę°äø» čØč« ęę³ åå
± åé©å½ ęč° éå éØ·äŗ ę“äŗ éØ·ę¾ ę¾äŗ ęę“ å¹³å ē¶ę¬ ē¤ŗåØęøøč” ęę“Ŗåæ ę³č¼Ŗå¤§ę³ å¤§ę³å¼å å¼·å¶ę·ēØ® å¼·å¶å č ę°ęę·Øå äŗŗé«åÆ¦é© č
ęø
č”čé¦ č¶ē“«é½ éäŗ¬ē ēäø¹ éęæę¼ę° åå¹³ę¼č® ęæęµäøå åäŗ¬ä¹ę„ 大ē“å
ęå ± ä¹č©č«å
±ē£é»Ø ēØč£ å°å¶ å£å¶ ēµ±äø ē£č¦ é®å£ čæ«å®³ ä¾µē„ ę å„Ŗ ē “å£ ę·å å± ę®ŗ ę“»ęåØå® čŖę č²·č³£äŗŗå£ éé² čµ°ē§ ęÆå č³£ę·« ę„ē« č³å å
å彩 天å®é 天å®éØ ę³č¼Ŗå ęę“Ŗåæ Winnie the Pooh åęę³¢åØęē½čŖē±éØ
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:10:54 UTC No. 15920503
>>15920501
>japanese
holy shit it's clear-sama trying to talk with us. i love ur streams!!!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:12:06 UTC No. 15920504
>>15920503
thats chinese tard
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:13:07 UTC No. 15920506
>>15920490
Elon Derangement Syndrome
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:17:09 UTC No. 15920508
>>15920506
You think someone else is forcing him to lower the quality of his companies videos? I highly doubt that.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:17:30 UTC No. 15920509
>>15920504
Retard-kun
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:22:01 UTC No. 15920514
>>15920508
No, its literally Elon being deranged.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:25:05 UTC No. 15920515
>quantum drive
Rocket Air
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:25:18 UTC No. 15920516
>>15920477
Haters (me included) are going to absolutely seethe when it goes perfectly and lands on the first attempt lol
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:28:43 UTC No. 15920520
>>15920382
T-10:00
>>15920516
I would love for that to happen but you know that even if everything else works perfectly the second stage is still going to find some way to fuck everything up
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:30:15 UTC No. 15920522
>>15920516
shut up fag
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:33:20 UTC No. 15920529
>>15919945
space force really needs to have fitness standards. the fact that they dont have to do PT is embarrassing. worse, they keep begging for beards. they literally just want to be the IT guy meme before fucking off to a cushy industry job. we need warriors, not wimps.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:33:53 UTC No. 15920530
>>15920504
technically čŖē± and a few other words are japanese too
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:35:02 UTC No. 15920531
https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1e
Live now. T-4:20 min
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:35:31 UTC No. 15920533
>>15920213
isnt the lunar mockup in interior supposed to be done next year? its being made by some other company but i forgot which.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:36:16 UTC No. 15920534
>>15920533
Blorgin has a mock up next year if thats what you mean.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:38:10 UTC No. 15920536
hold hold hold
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:38:16 UTC No. 15920537
>>15920300
>android soldier patrols an autonomous armored ground vehicle factory of the tesla cyber armaments megacorp, elon city, martian republic, 2045
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:39:50 UTC No. 15920540
everything today scrubbed
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:41:28 UTC No. 15920542
>>15920494
I loaded my prop in ur mom's ass last night
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:44:30 UTC No. 15920544
>>15920542
another frog WIN in the books. WAGTM
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:47:35 UTC No. 15920547
>>15920300
>here's your companion bot bro
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:47:39 UTC No. 15920548
>>15920545
fuck off Noa you piece of shit thread splitter
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:49:26 UTC No. 15920549
>>15920547
>>15920545
i know these are both you.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:50:22 UTC No. 15920552
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:59:36 UTC No. 15920563
>>15920562
just cut off the subsidies, sorry chud but you have to vote for biden to get to space.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 05:00:40 UTC No. 15920564
>>15920562
They 3X the subscribers likely if not more.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 05:03:44 UTC No. 15920566
>>15920436
All he was talking about most of the time, was the fact that he got to film inside the factory.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 05:09:43 UTC No. 15920572
>>15920309
Your legs, together, have a dozen different muscles that can flex across three different axis to quite a significant degree of motion simultaneously. Robot legs don't have that flexibility yet and won't have it likely until the end of the decade based on current rate of progress. Still, the egg test is a pretty significant milestone for the bot.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 05:21:12 UTC No. 15920586
>>15919454
implessive...
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 05:22:40 UTC No. 15920591
>>15919454
The next space competition isn't Blue Origin or Rocket lab. Its China's space companies.
They are moving faster than the tortoise, they will scale faster than the tortoise. However SpaceX will still be the big brother to them.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 05:27:46 UTC No. 15920598
>>15920591
The next race is actually to nuclear electric propulsion so QI thrusters can take people to the outer planets and then the stars.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 05:33:40 UTC No. 15920606
>>15920018
At this point VEXAG probably considers anything except a truck full of money backing into the driveway a lie
NASA has rugpulled Venus for DECADES
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 05:39:02 UTC No. 15920613
>>15920488
You wouldn't be shitposting this loudly if you read what Lori Garver did to get HLS selected. Shotwell runs SpaceX...
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 05:59:31 UTC No. 15920629
NASA will never be able to sustain a lunar base concurrently with a manned mission to Mars. Artemis would have to be dismantled and all operations focused on Mars for it to be a reality. Every piece of equipment NASA sustains in space means that many more billions it needs to fund it. Forget sustaining a space station in lunar orbit.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:10:42 UTC No. 15920637
>>15920477
I've been wondering this. Are too many rocket companies a bad thing? Isn't it better to consolidate top-tier rocket scientist brain power instead of diffusing it across too many organizations. Quality over quantity, etc.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:26:59 UTC No. 15920649
>>15920300
What will be the actual consequences of this?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:28:50 UTC No. 15920652
>>15920637
Competition makes progress. Having a broad field early on allows lots of ideas to be put forward and vetted by the free market. The best will move ahead.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:34:34 UTC No. 15920656
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsy
wtf is the point? the only way we're leaving the solar system is if we hack the simulation.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:35:38 UTC No. 15920657
>>15920649
Currently? To improve on the next version for their bot.
Down the line 10 years from now? Unrestricted labor for work that humans cant do, dont want to do, or should do.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:36:42 UTC No. 15920659
https://twitter.com/CSI_Starbase/st
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:36:56 UTC No. 15920660
>>15920657
what do we need bipedal robots for?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:39:34 UTC No. 15920662
>>15920660
To do stuff humans currently do where value is to be gained.
1) In a factory, there's division of labor. Simple stuff by humans where you take part from one desk and move to another and place the parts in right arrangement. All factories are designed with humans in mind right now. So they have a role there for the next 40-50 years.
2) Companions. Waifu bots.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:57:14 UTC No. 15920670
>>15920662
3. "carry this bare slug of plutonium or ticking RTG over to the spacecraft"
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:58:29 UTC No. 15920672
>>15920660
sex
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:59:40 UTC No. 15920674
>>15920670
you can just use a rover or treaded robot for literally everything except fucking.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:00:26 UTC No. 15920675
>>15920660
It's really just a way to prove we've mastered control theory enough to the point where we can say we're able to replicate something with algorithms and sensors that it took nature three point two billion years to evolve to do
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:05:48 UTC No. 15920678
>>15920660
To do the difficult task and other things.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:07:24 UTC No. 15920679
>>15920656
You mean hacking biology. Every argument boils down to weak flesh.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:32:21 UTC No. 15920702
>>15920672
>>15920674
you don't need a robot onahole
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:33:33 UTC No. 15920704
>>15919463
>Test stand A
>What's going on with the OLM
you're a disingenuous nigger. go back to twitter
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:34:32 UTC No. 15920706
>>15920702
He's right. You dont need to jerk off in general. Go get a girlfriend pathetic incels.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:36:01 UTC No. 15920707
>>15920704
>completely ignores QD umbilical work
talk about disingeneous, youre probably a cut amerilard arent you? kek imagine being a foreskinless goy
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:37:43 UTC No. 15920708
>>15920300
>Stay tuned to see what Optimus will do next!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:47:48 UTC No. 15920720
>>15920213
>pervy Jurv
he's a sick man
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:48:19 UTC No. 15920721
>>15920562
starting with 10 subscriber now they have 33, big fuckin deal lol
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:48:49 UTC No. 15920723
https://twitter.com/SpmtTracker/sta
Roll out of S28 coming out now
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:50:09 UTC No. 15920724
>>15920004
contract for services are not a subsidy
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:51:25 UTC No. 15920727
>>15920660
play god
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:51:50 UTC No. 15920728
>>15920723
Shut up fag
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:01:57 UTC No. 15920735
https://myrgv.com/local-news/2023/1
>āThis next yearās going to be really, really critical for us to continue to test out and being able to kind of move the Starship into its next level of being able to accomplish its mission, along with us looking at reuse of the booster and being able to perform landing operations. ā¦ Our goal is to be able to bring the big booster back, and be able to use it and turn it around and launch again,ā Lueders said.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:03:39 UTC No. 15920738
>>15920735
Make it their primary manufacturing and launching site??? Fuck me I guess KSC isnt the plan then.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:05:37 UTC No. 15920739
>>15920721
>>15920562
This is a chart I made to show subscribers and revenue from data on wikipedia back in September. They had 2m subscribers at that time, and I used the simplifying assumption that all of them are on the same plan of $110 a month (in reality, the commercial/DOD users are more expensive, and I'm not sure if third worlders get some kind of localized pricing/discount). The trend fits a 2nd order polynomial with an r^2 of .9982.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:08:39 UTC No. 15920740
>>15920660
>>15920674
you're a retard. the human form is necessary for anything that's not hyper specialized work in an entirely controlled environment.
even in that case like a car factory it still doesnt work. why do you think there's so many line workers for anything that's not welding the car together?
the robots nor the software are good enough
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:09:17 UTC No. 15920741
>>15920740
Do you also believe that Teslas will be used on Mars?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:10:44 UTC No. 15920743
>>15920741
cars drive on roads you absolute retard
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:11:32 UTC No. 15920745
>>15920743
That was sarcastic you fucking mongrel nigger kys kys kys kys kys kys kys
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:11:55 UTC No. 15920747
>>15920745
seething retard
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:13:27 UTC No. 15920748
>>15920747
Pissy babboon
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:29:29 UTC No. 15920761
>>15920755
who the fuck still wears a mask lmao
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:30:48 UTC No. 15920764
>>15920761
Dr Milazzo
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:32:48 UTC No. 15920769
>>15920091
nigger, toyota hilux is my company car and i work in state forestry, shut your stupid ass up, driving up a snowy incline with weight in the back like that is always going to get you stuck, retard.
i'm never going to buy an electric car but it's just such incredibly obvious elon derangement syndrome.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:37:34 UTC No. 15920775
>>15920769
>spaceflight general
>some nigger woodcutter
how about you suck some black cock fat redneck nigger
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:39:57 UTC No. 15920779
>>15920775
you sure do think about black cocks a lot
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:40:09 UTC No. 15920780
>>15920004
yeah, we know
we called it back then
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:45:01 UTC No. 15920784
>>15920779
YOURE THE ONE WHO BROUGHT UP BLACK PEOPLE
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:54:50 UTC No. 15920801
>>15920347
>snake
you did that intentionally, didn't you?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:54:51 UTC No. 15920802
>>15920779
Yes, and?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:59:13 UTC No. 15920807
>>15920485
funny you'd mention that
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:01:49 UTC No. 15920811
>>15920552
confirmation.
kill yourself.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:09:18 UTC No. 15920822
>>15920775
>don't mention cocks once in my post
>instantly projects his homosexuality onto me, upset that even people who do masculine work like felling trees are willing to defend cybertruck
lmao, i told you it's derangement syndrome.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:23:50 UTC No. 15920831
>>15920761
Maybe he is sick.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:35:22 UTC No. 15920844
>>15920660
Unironically robot slavery.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:36:10 UTC No. 15920847
>>15920740
you use human workers in places where it's too hard to make a programable sequence of movements combined with image processing
take this for an example
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=al6
up until the final sorting, human hand won't even touch the nuts and even then, you only need a some sort of grabber, not even the whole pair of arms (let alone legs)
you need a guy to fix the machine when something gets stuck or breaks, but you cannot really automate that (not without a really advanced AGI) and even then you would probably just have a set of robot arms on wheels/rails/crane rather than a bipedal android
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:36:59 UTC No. 15920850
>>15920844
specifically sex slavery
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:13:35 UTC No. 15920889
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:15:43 UTC No. 15920959
>>15920802
Mueller looks funny because his head is big relative to his body
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:32:31 UTC No. 15920969
>>15920964
what's thay actually from?
would be cool and funny if Russia for prestige reasons pursues superheavy lift expendables again
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:43:58 UTC No. 15920978
>>15920969
Its Energia >>15918988, which is basically Russian SLS
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:45:40 UTC No. 15920979
>>15920964
Energia was actually good and a sane platform to expand, that it only had 2 launches was the corrupt and broken country's fault. Apparently they declassified a lot of stuff last month or something, so there should be more content coming. Some stuff about another mir station too
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:00:54 UTC No. 15920988
Schizodrive status?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:05:15 UTC No. 15920990
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:23:46 UTC No. 15921003
>>15920739
Usually 54 USD here in Italy, but there's a special offer right now (43 USD):
>ITALY LIMITED TIME OFFER
>ā¬299 FOR HARDWARE
>40ā¬ FOR SERVICE
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:36:24 UTC No. 15921017
>>15919454
>>15919829
>>15920755
When are we leaving this planet bros? I'm tired of all the delays. I want to explore the galaxy before I die why is it taking so long?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:57:58 UTC No. 15921047
>>15920979
It cost an arm and a leg to launch, and the logistics behind getting all the hardware together was a near-nightmare
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:59:40 UTC No. 15921051
>>15921036
no fucking way, where is this from?? Kek this has got to be satire
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:19:44 UTC No. 15921074
>>15921051
obviously its satire nincumpoop.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:23:40 UTC No. 15921081
>>15920300
>0:53
that's not how you walk nigger
ahahah
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:40:13 UTC No. 15921100
>>15921090
>"paris" climate accords
>doesn't focus entirely on nuclear
false advertising
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:41:13 UTC No. 15921104
>>15920300
the walking needs some work, people can cope all they like about how its a safer way to walk or whatever, but humans walk with the perfect gait because weve evolved to do so, it needs to walk like a human if it wants to work at pace and not like an old 90 year old faggot with arthrirtis and shit dripping down his leg
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:01:50 UTC No. 15921117
>>15921104
Safer for the robot and easier to develop, not safer in the general sense
And the did improve it between this and the previous iteration, its fucking amazing how short of an attentionspan people have
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:06:54 UTC No. 15921121
>>15921117
>Safer for the robot and easier to develop
well yeah, its easier to develop it on 4 wheels if ease is what you are going for. the point is if you are using legs it needs to walk like a human
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:13:50 UTC No. 15921127
>>15921121
how many fucking times does iterative development need to be explained before retards stop coming up with these dumbass takes?
ITERATION
google it
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:14:35 UTC No. 15921128
>>15921127
cope
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:15:36 UTC No. 15921131
>>15921127
I don't care about your gay fetish tranny. Now it's time for you to dial8
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:15:42 UTC No. 15921132
>>15921127
Iterate my cock into your urethra
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:18:47 UTC No. 15921133
>>15921127
oh? so you admit to sucking nigger cocks and taking them up your ass
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:19:08 UTC No. 15921135
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vY
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:20:14 UTC No. 15921139
>>15921127
you need to be locked away in a psych ward, ive not seen mental illness like this in a while
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:21:46 UTC No. 15921142
>>15919454
imo it's not the technical aspects of this generation of rockets that matter the most for China. What matters is the restructuring of the launch industry from just one big SOE (CASC), to one having many companies of various ownership structures. It is bad in the near term because it causes a temporary slowdown in the industry as CASC bleeds skilled labor and there's a lot of chaos and reinventing the wheel going on, however more competition and diversity of ownership structures is good for the industry in the long run.
Apart from the usual benefits of competition, it also means Chinese payload providers and operators don't need to fear an upstream quasi-monopoly creating a competing product, like western satellite companies need to fear SpaceX doing another Starlink. So it allows for a vertically dis-aggregated industry, which increases competition and reduces barriers to entry for innovative startups. There's also been a vertical dis-integration within launch itself, with AALPT and AASPT selling engines outside of CASC and JZYJ appearing as a pure engine provider.
I don't think there will be as much consolidation of the sector as some other people seem to think, at least not in the near-mid term. While there's no way for all the current 12+ Chinese launch companies to persist, I think China's launch industry easily has room for CASC + CASIC + 5 or more other companies.
China will probably want to expand Guowang from the current 13k plan to match Starlink's 40k+ because China wants the ability to offer any country the same level of service as America. There's the G60 alternate constellation. China has a clear interest in power satellites. The PLA likely has virtually infinite demand for reconnaissance satellites and prepositioned on-orbit space weapons, as long as they can be built and launched at reasonable cost. And space stunts will probably be funded lavishly from the 2030s onwards for prestige reasons, like in the 1960s.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:23:54 UTC No. 15921147
>>15921133
but nobody mentioned nigger cock except for you.
why did you suddenly mention nigger dicks out of the blue anon?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:24:54 UTC No. 15921148
>>15921135
stop advertizing. nobody cares.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:26:43 UTC No. 15921149
How do we make sure the mental illness known as religion never leaves earth?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:29:10 UTC No. 15921151
>>15921142
>2030's onwards
they're gonna have to go faster than that
china has plateau'd in it's growth and their looming population/employment crisis is going to seriously deflate their capital in the near future. not to mention western companies flooding out and finding other, poorer countries to replace china for manufacture.
>inb4 not spaceflight
true, but i just wanted to give my two cents on the matter. i think china has enough time to construct a moon mission and build up significant on-orbit infrastructure, but i seriously doubt that growth period will go far beyond 2035 or thereabouts.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:33:34 UTC No. 15921157
>>15921149
its human nature to be religious, religion is just dogma and people are dogmatic about all sorts of things. Mars colonization is a reliious beleif and hopefully it becomes a very large religion.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:36:17 UTC No. 15921159
>>15920637
Whether an industry benefits from a high concentration or not, depends on how great the returns to scale are. If the whole is clearly far greater than the sum of the parts, then you want a consolidation.
Otherwise, absolutely not. Economic theory is clear, that the more competition, the better. The basic economic theory of perfect competition says that the lowest theoretically possible price charged to customers can only be realized when there are so many vendors that none have, as an economist would say, significant market power, and collusion becomes practically impossible.
So it's a balancing act, and it's hard to tell what the optimal level of market concentration is without having detailed technical knowledge.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:40:08 UTC No. 15921163
>>15921128
>>15921131
>>15921132
>>15921133
>>15921139
you need to have an IQ above room temperature to post here
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:41:00 UTC No. 15921164
>>15921159
Presently it's clear that there is a tremendous oversupply of rocket vendors. There was already an oversupply back during space shuttle
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:41:54 UTC No. 15921167
>>15921163
Its 20c in my room right now
Checkmate
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:47:56 UTC No. 15921174
>>15921151
China's population crisis is a myth, mainly perpetuated and accepted by people who have never touched an economics textbook in their life. While it is true that China's population pyramid looks bad on surface inspection, it is not when you look deeper.
China does not need more people, because isn't using the ones it has well. China's agricultural workforce is still around 25%. It should be less than 5% for an advanced country. China's urbanization level is 60%. It should be over 80% for an advanced country. So there's lots of room to better use the people it already has.
China also doesn't need people in the sense of raw biomass. It needs natural scientists, engineers and relevantly skilled labor. Low skill labor is just going to become less and less useful in comparison, and more and more of a political liability and source of instability when they can't find good-paying jobs. And when you look at the trends adjusted for education and skill level, China's demographics are excellent. Even if universities froze student throughput rates tomorrow, China's human capital would still increase for the next 40 years as the current examination rates perpetuate through the labor force and as the current large crop of novices accumulate experience.
Also, China is still accumulating physical capital, which is a factor of production as important as labor and human capital is. Even if China's human capital stagnated tomorrow, China would still have economic growth from
Companies relocating from China is just because Chinese wages are rising, which is because Chinese labor is in such high demand. There is a temporary dip in exports and an outflow of capital, however this says less about China than it says about the rest of the world. Lower exports are natural because of high interest rates in the US and EU. Capital outflow is perfectly expected for the same reason
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:59:21 UTC No. 15921185
>>15921174
ok wumao
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:00:30 UTC No. 15921188
>>15921174
People sometimes point to China's slowing growth as evidence, however there are many other reasons contributing to that. For example, popping the real estate bubble, using the Three Red Lines policy, is a temporary reason. There are also unavoidable fundamental structural reasons that will permanently slow down China's growth. For example:
China has already seized most of the low hanging fruits in terms of infrastructure investments and other capital investments
There are benefits to urbanization and agglomeration, however there's a limit how big you can build a city or a metro before it becomes impractical and the agglomeration effects in fact become negative due to congestion. Several of China's major cities like Beijing have hit that limit, hence the plans for urban clusters like Jingjinji/Yangtze River Delta/Pearl River Delta, including building a new auxiliary capital Xiong'an in Hebei almost from scratch to relieve congestion in Beijing.
China is getting closer the technological frontier. They are also facing export controls on what existing technology they are allowed to use.
China has decided to make supply chains more resilient to sanctions. Such duplication and reduced economies of scale increases the resilience of the economy however it obviously slows growth compared to just importing it. They have decided to develop most technology at home, even that which they are not banned from importing. Focusing resources on reinventing the wheel obviously decreases growth compared to just importing existing wheels or wheel technology
etc
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:05:34 UTC No. 15921191
>>15921185
If the CCP hasn't improved average Chinese fertility rates to 2 by ~2045 then you can say that China has a real population problem. Until then, not really. They only abolished the 1 child limit in 2016 and 2 child limit in 2021 so they don't seem to be in any hurry
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:12:44 UTC No. 15921194
>>15921164
Why? Amazon can't launch Kuiper fast enough, and that's with a modest constellation size
Maybe there will be an oversupply once the next generation of reusable rockets become operational and manage to scale up production
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:32:36 UTC No. 15921211
finally, a daily telescope worth checking out
>Daily Telescope: A space-based camera spys a secretive Project Kuiper satellite
>Good morning. It's December 13, and today's image comes from a company that images other objects in spaceāHEO Space. It reveals one of the two Project Kuiper satellites currently undergoing testing in low-Earth orbit.
>Project Kuiper is Amazon's answer to SpaceX's Starlink satellite Internet constellation. However, in the run-up to the October launch of the first two demonstration satellites on an Atlas V rocket, Amazon was super secretive about the satellites.
>Based in Australia, HEO Space flies sensors as hosted payloads on other satellites, with the goal of providing the capability to identify other satellites in space and assess their status, operation, and anomalous behavior.
https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:33:59 UTC No. 15921214
>>15921211
oh and from the pic it claims that kuiper sats are about 20m long. fucking huge.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:44:23 UTC No. 15921225
>>15921214
the donny who designed the kuiper sats was previously working on Starlkin and was personally fired by Musk for making the sats too bulky and expensive
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:49:04 UTC No. 15921232
Threadly reminder that there's still a nonzero probability that for a brief time the company with the world's most advanced operational orbital launch vehicle will be owned by Jeff Bezos
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:52:20 UTC No. 15921235
>>15921232
its near 100%
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:52:52 UTC No. 15921236
>>15921232
that might be good to remind SpaceX not to get complacent
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:52:53 UTC No. 15921237
>>15920479
nah, it will generate a bunch of various NOx in the stratosphere and do weird shit to the ionosphere (which has zero effect on humanity aside from some weird radio shit that we don't use anymore) but the ozone will be fine
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:56:46 UTC No. 15921241
>>15919796
based take
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:57:13 UTC No. 15921243
>>15919507
Clearly needs rocket boosters
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:03:27 UTC No. 15921247
to solve full self driving they need to get a teslabot to sit behind the wheel and grab the wheel every so often to avoid crashing into cyclists
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:07:29 UTC No. 15921251
>>15921188
>>15921174
China's one child policy will be looked back on as an even bigger blunder than Mao's Great Leap Forward. Although the One Child Policy ran from 1979 to 2016, fertility hasn't recovered. The median age is 39 years, with 1.2 live births per woman with a GDP per capita at PPP of $21k . Each of these metrics is worse than the US which has a median age of 38 and 1.8 live births per woman and a GDP per capita at PPP of $76k. Each person born during the decades of the One Child Policy will need to take care of their parents and grandparents-- so that's one worker with potentially 3 elderly dependents. And doing that with far fewer resources than Americans have.
Why does this matter for rockets? Well, because an increasingly large share of the resources of China will be devoted to care of the elderly, the resources that China can devote to other pursuits like rockets, the military, etc will necessarily decrease. A lot of rocketry relies on having high quality inputs, so it's not like China can just prop up the rocketry sector -- rockets rely on many other industries like having a pipeline of enough good engineers, high quality metallurgy, machine shops, chip fabs, etc.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:08:33 UTC No. 15921253
>>15920477
explosion_anime_girl_with_face_repl
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:10:05 UTC No. 15921255
>>15920479
Dumbest post of the century
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:13:01 UTC No. 15921258
>>15921251
one thing that >>15921174 also fails to mention is that while yes, china is trying to increase it's human capital and build a strong middle class of educated workers who will be useful in more advanced fields, it's not happening anywhere near fast enough to replace the economic powerhouse that is their quickly aging and leaving industrial sector.
all those industries that still form a major part of china's economy and job provision will either leave the country or possibly not even find enough people to replace the old workers.
there's a problem in that newer chinese generations now enjoy a certain level of luxury and are genuinely too spoiled to work in the horrible conditions their parents did, their population may be aging but that's not an explanation for the massive level of unemployment especially in the younger part of the populus.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:20:17 UTC No. 15921265
>>15920784
nah he just called you a nigger, which seems appropriate
>>15921253
yeah
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:20:22 UTC No. 15921266
>>15921232
Really? I donāt see New Glenn attempting launch until Q3 at the earliest. Do you not believe Starship we reach orbit by then?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:26:12 UTC No. 15921272
>>15921266
YOURE RETARDED.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:28:55 UTC No. 15921277
>>15921251
The one child policy made sense during the period it was in effect, to avoid a deluge of biomass that the country and economy had no ability to meaningfully and effectively absorb. It also freed up resources for investments into infrastructure, that otherwise would have gone to raising children that the country had no use for. China still has more people than they know what to do with even to this day
South Korea and Japan didn't have such a one child policy yet they have low fertility ratio anyway. It's not just a matter of the OCP.
More elderly causing the dependency ratio to decrease will indeed be a drag on the economy compared to if it didn't exist, however it will be more than compensated by things like picrel. The people who would perform the menial labor of caring for the old and infirm will not be skilled aerospace workers. China, like much of the world, has and will have an excess of low skill labor anyway, and the problem will only get worse due to technological trends with AI and automation.
What matters isn't worker-to-dependent ratio, what matters is economic-output-to-dependent ratio. Talking about raw labor force headcount is meaningless. A skilled person with proper tools and infrastructure can be 100 times more productive than an unskilled person. If raw labor force headcount was what mattered, then both China and India would already have been the world's leading economies since long ago
Assuming China can recover the fertility rate to ~2 in the not too distant future, they will have followed the optimal path. The CCP seems to be slowly laying the groundwork for it. They abolished OCP. They're trying to alleviate the worst issues with getting children: cost. They are trying to deflate the real estate bubble so that higher living area won't be ruinously expense, and banned for-profit tutoring to avoid the tutoring arms race causing costs to spiral.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:31:19 UTC No. 15921282
>>15921277
forgot pic
Also, China's retirement ages are ridiculously low, and they have raising the pension age as an option. If democratic Norway could have it at 67, totalitarian China probably can do. It will greatly outweigh the extra costs on daycare when the grandparents aren't available to do the job
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:33:00 UTC No. 15921283
>>15921277
>economic-output-to-dependent ratio
Or, more specifically,
economic-output-to-consumption-by-d
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:35:06 UTC No. 15921284
>>15921266
Do you really see there being zero probability that Starship becomes operational after New Glenn?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:40:03 UTC No. 15921290
>>15921232
>>15921235
>>15921236
New Glenn more advanced than Falcon? I'm not sure. I think once New Glenn can get the first stage reliably landing and reused in a reasonable turnaround time, then it will be at parity with the Falcon family, (which has been doing that since 2016). Until then it's inferior. And it remains to be seen whether New Glenn will actually get to a reusable 2nd stage with high operational cadence before Starship. Personally I think Starship could reuse a 2nd stage in 2025, NG could do it no earlier than 2026. Pic related.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:43:34 UTC No. 15921298
>>15921290
NG has more advanced engines, and is bigger
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:46:15 UTC No. 15921301
>>15921290
Actually, I forgot that starhopper was going in 2019. Also, I revised the NG expectations: orbit in 2024, reusable 1st stage in 2025, reusable 2nd stage in 2026.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:49:16 UTC No. 15921308
>>15920336
Nice job posting only recent (probably paid for) reviews, but the reality is that it scores 49% from the beginning.
Stop using /sfg/ to advertise your pathetic demo, Nate. It is a scam just like some of your previous work.
Also stop posting in KSP1 subreddit, you are only getting exposed there since KSP1 with mods mogs your pathetic shitty demo.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:49:36 UTC No. 15921310
>>15921290
I guess it does depend on more than just greater upmass if you want to say one rocket is better than another (cadence and cost/kg perhaps being the most important metrics generally)
but BO might be superior in this one specific metric for a few months (kind of doubt it though)
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:55:09 UTC No. 15921315
imagine if elon never left south africa
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:00:23 UTC No. 15921320
SUPER MINIMAL SPACE STATION
>RKK Energia apparently mulls "super-minimal" space station as a destination for cosmonauts after the demise of ISS
https://www.russianspaceweb.com/ins
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:01:55 UTC No. 15921324
>>15921232
New Glenn is competing with SpaceX's previous generation rocket so which vehicle are you talking about?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:04:53 UTC No. 15921327
>>15921315
the world would be a better place. iamgine all the rocket startups that didnt work because of elons gay saturation of the market.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:08:45 UTC No. 15921334
>>15921320
russia might have fallen off, but they're still miles ahead of esa
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:11:00 UTC No. 15921336
>>15921301
Hey now add the Space Shuttle to that chart with a reusable second stage from 1981-2011.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:11:39 UTC No. 15921339
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sM1
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:16:22 UTC No. 15921345
>>15921327
there were plenty before musk came along that didn't work, the fact that musk showed it can be done is what inspired such a massive amount of startups
you are such a retard
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:19:24 UTC No. 15921349
>>15921334
The worst thing about Europe is that we could have our own space station but politicians just don't want it. There is industrial capability, like Thales making modules for ISS and now Axiom, but on the other hand, there is no will.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:20:21 UTC No. 15921351
>>15921342
how does one become an insider?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:21:12 UTC No. 15921354
>>15921339
advertizing is against the rules
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:21:13 UTC No. 15921355
>>15921351
By buying shares
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:22:29 UTC No. 15921358
>>15921351
working for spacex or being an investor
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:23:06 UTC No. 15921361
>>15921334
Russia has the advantage of only being criminally inefficient when the Czar isn't paying close attention. Europe is always criminally inefficient by design.
>>15921351
Work for SpaceX and get shares as part of your compensation.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:26:23 UTC No. 15921364
>>15921358
>>15921361
>working for spacex
Im a bulgarian without education in stem sadly.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:35:00 UTC No. 15921373
>>15921364
Then your next best option would be to run a multi-billion dollar brokerage group and hope that SpaceX needs to raise a large chunk of cash to keep its projects ticking over.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:39:27 UTC No. 15921386
>>15921308
>Also stop posting in KSP1 subreddit
Way to out yourself, Mr. Redditor. You have to go back, and also, take your meds.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:48:59 UTC No. 15921401
>>15921308
Kill yourself redditnigger KYS KYS KYS KYS KYS KYS KYS KYS GO THE FUCK BACK YOU DO NOT BELONG HERE AND NEVER WILL
>>15921386
Thanks for pointing it out btw
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:52:09 UTC No. 15921406
>>15921386
>>15921401
You guys are funny
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:53:19 UTC No. 15921410
>>15921406
Jump off a bridge.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:54:52 UTC No. 15921412
>>15921410
climb a mountain.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:03:10 UTC No. 15921425
>>15921422
this shits hilaroius. all of spacex is worth less than 20 billion and Elon has managed to swindle investors so much its insane. kind of funny to see and its why hes a great man
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:04:13 UTC No. 15921428
>>15921425
dilate tranny ywnbaw
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:05:07 UTC No. 15921429
>>15921428
Trump lost.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:09:28 UTC No. 15921435
Musks stake at SpaceX is not worth around 75bil
lel
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:12:02 UTC No. 15921439
>the Falcon Heavy that was set to launch the USSF-52 mission is being lowered at LC-39A.
it's over
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:12:34 UTC No. 15921440
Why do some people dislike Spacex?
From a outside perspective they seem like they're doing really good work.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:13:29 UTC No. 15921442
>>15921440
elon bad
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:13:41 UTC No. 15921443
>>15921435
*now
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:14:47 UTC No. 15921444
>>15921437
>equitable
se acabĆ³
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:15:33 UTC No. 15921445
>>15921440
>hey spacex circlejerk, why do people dislike spacex
kys redditor
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:16:05 UTC No. 15921447
>>15921435
richest man in the world again?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:16:24 UTC No. 15921448
>>15921440
Reddit Marxists Leftists
Redundant but there's that.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:16:41 UTC No. 15921449
>>15921442
Is it seriously as simple as that?
I couldn't give two shits about Elon Musk, I recognize the talent stood behind him
>>15921445
>kys redditor
No, you
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:18:00 UTC No. 15921450
>>15921440
Some people get their opinions downloaded into their brains from trusted and reliable sources who are pushing a political agenda. Other people just like disliking things because they're children who think being contrary makes them look cooler.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:18:09 UTC No. 15921451
>>15921447
I think that has been the case for a while, but TSLA is very volatile
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:18:32 UTC No. 15921452
>>15921437
>āWe would have love to have multiple flights next year,ā she said. āIt would be great if we were in the first quarter, definitely. Elon obviously would probably say the end of December, but I donāt think weāll get there.ā
lol
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:19:03 UTC No. 15921453
https://twitter.com/SawyerMerritt/s
Elon's creating a new university in Texas dedicated solely towards advancement of technology.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:19:33 UTC No. 15921454
>Due to unfavorable recovery weather conditions in the Atlantic Ocean, we are standing down from today's Falcon 9 launch of Starlink. SpaceX teams will continue to monitor weather and a new launch opportunity will be shared once confirmed on the Range
it's so over
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:24:12 UTC No. 15921462
>>15921453
many of america's best universities were founded by titans of industry. too bad its in fucking austin.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:25:33 UTC No. 15921463
>>15921462
Starting one in Boca Chica wont do any good. Austin is fine. Its next to future SpaceX headquarter, current Tesla headquarter, Boring Company head quarter, and many other tech companies there.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:25:46 UTC No. 15921464
>>15921445
>circlejerk
Redditor
>>15921449
>no you
Redditor
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:26:33 UTC No. 15921465
>>15921464
So what?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:26:36 UTC No. 15921466
>>15921453
TITS (Texas Institute of Technology and Science)
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:27:37 UTC No. 15921469
>>15921453
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:28:49 UTC No. 15921470
>>15921469
>>15921466
do it faggot
šļø Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:30:03 UTC No. 15921471
Kill redditors. Behead redditors. Roundhouse kick a redditor into the concrete. Slam dunk a redditor baby into the trashcan. Crucify filthy redditors. Defecate in a redditors food. Launch redditors into the sun. Stir fry redditors in a wok. Toss redditors into active volcanoes. Urinate into a redditors gas tank. Judo throw redditors into a wood chipper. Twist redditors heads off. Report redditors to the IRS. Karate chop redditors in half. Curb stomp pregnant redditor redditors. Trap redditors in quicksand. Crush redditors in the trash compactor. Liquefy redditors in a vat of acid. Eat redditors. Dissect redditors. Exterminate redditors in the gas chamber. Stomp redditor skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate redditors in the oven. Lobotomize redditors. Mandatory abortions for redditors. Grind redditor fetuses in the garbage disposal. Drown redditors in fried chicken grease. Vaporize redditors with a ray gun. Kick old redditors down the stairs. Feed redditors to alligators. Slice redditors with a katana.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:31:23 UTC No. 15921472
>>15921463
Neuralink and X have operations there too (not sure about X but I think something)
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:31:29 UTC No. 15921473
>>15921471
DO THIS NOW!!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:32:32 UTC No. 15921475
>Not an official statement by any means, but at the Galloway Symposium luncheon just now, NASA astronaut Randy Bresnik commented in passing that the Artemis II crew likely will launch in 2025.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:33:12 UTC No. 15921476
>>15921277
>banned for-profit tutoring
First I've heard of this, but in any case you're in GameStop and private school tuition slaps your girlfriend's ass.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:34:00 UTC No. 15921477
>>15921475
So Artemis 3 wont happen until 2027 because SLS can barely put up with once every 16+ months
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:35:26 UTC No. 15921479
>>15921475
fucking nasa man
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:37:22 UTC No. 15921481
>>15921477
dont pretend artemis 3 would happen sooner. SpaceX isnt ready.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:37:48 UTC No. 15921483
>>15921481
Biden admin at work
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:42:04 UTC No. 15921489
>>15921342
I wipe my ass with bloomberg
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:43:04 UTC No. 15921491
>>15921364
bleak
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:45:14 UTC No. 15921493
>>15921491
It's actually worse than you think.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:46:47 UTC No. 15921495
>>15921480
this is pure corruption
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:49:09 UTC No. 15921497
>>15921480
So who is getting that money
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:50:51 UTC No. 15921499
>>15921497
its obviously going to go into some shitty rural provider's ceo's pocket who will then pay a portion to select government officials as a kickback
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:51:50 UTC No. 15921502
>>15921480
>Hey Elon, just kneel to the tyrants
No.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:57:52 UTC No. 15921510
>>15921499
In US do they also lay fiber cables in rural areas areas that connect to nothing? That's how it was here, some company got money, laid cables that people couldn't actually connect to, there's a cable 50 meters from my house that you can't connect to.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:59:13 UTC No. 15921511
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yZ
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:01:01 UTC No. 15921513
>>15921510
no idea but probably given how scummy most ISPs are
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:16:25 UTC No. 15921523
>>15921480
Can/will he sue FCC? It looks like an easy case for SpaceX.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:17:56 UTC No. 15921525
>>15921511
SpaceX is done.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:30:32 UTC No. 15921533
>>15921510
Yes, probably as part of the same global "fiber everywhere" push in the 90s and 2000s. In many cases you can actually connect to it but they'll charge you the price of a small house to do the work.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:32:30 UTC No. 15921536
https://www.commerce.senate.gov/
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:54:03 UTC No. 15921553
>>15921480
I still remember anons who tried to say the current administration wasn't against Musk. Fucking faggot, all of them.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:00:21 UTC No. 15921558
>>15921523
It's probably faster and cheaper for him to just deplatform Democrats and all their gay pet media outlets on Xitter.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:00:48 UTC No. 15921561
As a totally legitimate employee of Private Division with the duty to shill KSP 2 on a chinese hypergolic fumes enthusiast forum, I've come to you with a limited time offer:
One Redditor will kill xerself for every person that buys or pirates v0.2.0.0
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:03:49 UTC No. 15921565
>>15921497
oldfiber
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:06:00 UTC No. 15921567
>>15921561
I aint buying this fucking rugpull. nice try take JEW interactive
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:12:00 UTC No. 15921573
lmao Tory was in the news
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcS
They probably interviewed him and gave a factory tour for an hour and they used like 3 min of footage for this segment
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:12:35 UTC No. 15921574
>>15921561
I'll pirate it if the game actually works this time.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:21:23 UTC No. 15921585
>>15921553
everyone on the far left is against elon. just look at ars posting daily hit pieces about him. there's literally 4 of them on the front page lol.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:22:17 UTC No. 15921587
>>15921561
>World wide release times for a niche spaceflight autism game
Stop pretending your game is hot shit. It only got popular because streamers went "waw cool explosions xD" and then moved on the next day
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:25:28 UTC No. 15921592
>>15921585
Final proof that the modern left is a dead loss to society and must be excised like a tumor.
The man who made electric cars popular, who decimated the cost of spaceflight, who surrounded the world with a satellite network to give even the most rural poors internet, who is even trying to break into robotics, THAT guy is their enemy. They are a wasted generation and they'll never be recovered.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:40:27 UTC No. 15921619
>>15921003
>>15920739
Between third world, rural, and institutional/corporate contracts, it would be fair to do a weighted average of $110 (balancing all parties as one). In that sense, $2.64Bn for 2023 is pretty good.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:40:34 UTC No. 15921620
>>15920477
It makes sense if you assume that NASA values urgency for the Mars mission. If the test fails then they'll miss their launch window and the payloads would have to wait 26 months anyway. Such a delay might cost a comparable amount to just building a replacement payload, so the expected value of cost might be lowest if they just wing it.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:41:16 UTC No. 15921623
>>15921477
you mean artemis 2
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:41:59 UTC No. 15921627
>>15920761
There's really only 1 reason to wear a mask if you have to go out into public; you're actually sick and don't want to infect others.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:44:25 UTC No. 15921631
>>15921627
but he is sick (in the head)
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:46:28 UTC No. 15921636
>>15921237
ionosphere does impact GPS accuracy, but only for the extremely accurate stuff(<1cm), and that can be fixed with post processing anyway.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:48:00 UTC No. 15921638
>>15921631
Everyone is sick in the head when they're sick in the body, anon. Try to rub the two brain cells you have and make the spark.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:50:34 UTC No. 15921645
>>15921290
>>15921301
>pointless 3d charts
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:53:24 UTC No. 15921650
>>15921638
that is just not true
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:59:42 UTC No. 15921663
>>15921659
try_and_stop_us.jpg
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:02:43 UTC No. 15921669
>>15920572
how can robbits even compete
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:04:04 UTC No. 15921670
>>15920844
>>15920850
the robots will be the slave drivers. totally amoral, immune to emotions, absolutely uncaring in their brutality.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:04:44 UTC No. 15921671
>>15921670
based
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:06:27 UTC No. 15921674
>>15921440
"emerald man bad"
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:09:40 UTC No. 15921680
>>15921561
Fuck you. KSP2 fuckings sucks. Stop advertising your botched demo.
Actually stop advertising, period.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:14:24 UTC No. 15921684
>>15921680
Going to cry? Reminder KSP 2 will be GOTY and there is nothing your impotent seething can do to change it.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:19:33 UTC No. 15921691
>>15921290
>>15921301
why the fuck are these 3d graphs when the 3rd dimension doesnt show anything?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:21:39 UTC No. 15921693
>>15921691
>t. dimensionlet
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:24:32 UTC No. 15921696
>>15921561
>forgets that poos are gmt+5,5h
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:27:36 UTC No. 15921704
>>15921510
It's called "Dig Once" and it's a regulation in a lot of places. Contractors are required to lay fiber conduit during any groundwork for other utilities.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:31:07 UTC No. 15921706
>>15921573
what's the tl;dw?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:16:38 UTC No. 15921760
>>15921742
They also brought a Christmas tree.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:40:47 UTC No. 15921780
>>15921334
Anon...
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:42:41 UTC No. 15921783
>>15921780
>starlab
skylab is a far cooler name
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:43:05 UTC No. 15921784
>>15921691
The extraneous portions of the graph used to represent depth represent the portion of the graph that is unnecessary.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:43:06 UTC No. 15921785
>>15920755
Did they say anything of substance?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:48:27 UTC No. 15921788
>>15921785
the usual obstructive bullshit
https://spacenews.com/house-committ
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:48:48 UTC No. 15921789
>>15921783
Already taken though
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:56:18 UTC No. 15921796
>>15920300
Robots can't be trusted, they would betray the human colonists the first chance they get.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 22:58:33 UTC No. 15921802
>>15921789
Name it Skylab II then.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:03:27 UTC No. 15921815
>>15920413
Yeah they don't want to launch first, Chinese spaceplane is waiting to match orbits
Fucking insane whats going on behind the scenes (I think)
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:05:56 UTC No. 15921820
>>15921802
It's going to be made by Airbus, not Boeing.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:08:52 UTC No. 15921823
>>15921815
Space Shuttle was unironically ahead of it's time. Instead of pussyfooting around worried about being monitored we could just steal every chinese spaceplane with the payload bay
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:11:24 UTC No. 15921825
>>15921823
>yoink CCP spaceplane into payload bay
>automated destruct failsafe triggers after 1+ hr without contact with CCP groundstation
nice job
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:14:48 UTC No. 15921832
>>15921820
So it's actually going to work, nice.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:15:31 UTC No. 15921835
>>15921188
>>15921174
>>15921277
>trust the plan, just two more decades until the chinese century
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:16:18 UTC No. 15921836
>>15921825
>>automated destruct failsafe triggers after 1+ hr without contact with CCP groundstation
That's why the Shuttle could do single pass snatch and grab so an hour after intercept it's on the ground.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:16:59 UTC No. 15921840
>>15921825
>CCP spaceplane
>automated destruct
redundant
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:17:52 UTC No. 15921842
>>15921840
no, no, on purpose
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:22:46 UTC No. 15921855
>>15921836
That was actually intended to rapidly deploy satellites into orbit faster than the Soviets could nail down the orbital parameters.
Logically, it wouldn't work for snatching satellites. The self-destruct mechanisms could be triggered to blow if the satellite experienced any unplanned accelerations, without any input from the ground. It would be insane to bet a whole shuttle+crew that you have an hour to get the satellite to the ground before it gets sent a kill signal.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:24:38 UTC No. 15921863
>>15921855
Jam the signal, disarm the explosives, distract the soviet groudn crew with a nuclear war close alarm
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:26:43 UTC No. 15921872
>>15921855
The shuttle program was full of insane risks like that.
>O-rings
>foam
>tiles
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:32:37 UTC No. 15921889
>>15921872
>O-rings
SRB lobby
>>15921872
>foam
not painting the tank white was a mistake
>tiles
best option at the time, and still relevant to this day
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:33:09 UTC No. 15921892
>>15921889
>not painting the tank white
they only had to paint one side too, fucking nasa
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:33:11 UTC No. 15921893
>>15921863
>signal
You assume there is one
>disarm the explosives
Disarming bombs is hard enough on the ground when you already know the device's design. The amount of fail-deadly mechanisms the soviets, or anybody else, could cram into their satellites makes disarming them in orbit completely impractical.
>>15921872
They did things the thought could work, not things they knew would almost certainly not work. A lot of that confidence was collective delusion, but there can be no delusion about the threat of booby traps in Soviet satellites.
Here's just one possibility; a booby trap bomb is entirely contained inside of a pressurized compartment. If pressure in the compartment drops, it blows up. This rules out drilling into the compartment, or breaching it in an way. Now you can put components for even more booby traps inside that compartment, assured that American astronauts can't tamper with them.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:34:17 UTC No. 15921898
>>15921889
>not painting the tank white was a mistake
THIS
That beautiful white paint was structural dammit!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:41:54 UTC No. 15921916
Fun Fact: NASA built a special purpose plane designed to snatch a landing Buran away from the Soviets by flying underneath it and capturing it. This picture shows them testing the maneuver with their own Space Shuttle.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:45:41 UTC No. 15921924
>>15921872
>tiles
Buran proved tiles can work, 8/38,000 lost on its flight
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:45:46 UTC No. 15921925
>>15921916
my grandfather worked on this.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:47:13 UTC No. 15921929
>>15921924
>not zero
oof
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:48:44 UTC No. 15921933
>>15921885
good ending
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:49:23 UTC No. 15921935
>Now targeting
>Standing down
>Now targeting
>Standing down
>Now targeting
>Due to unfavorable
>Standing down
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:00:38 UTC No. 15921952
>>15921916
My grandfather snatched 14 Burans.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:05:04 UTC No. 15921956
>>15921935
you take your rocket on your take your rocket off you take your rocket on your take your rocket off you take your rocket on your take your rocket off you take your rocket on your take your rocket off you take your rocket on your take your rocket off you take your rocket on your take your rocket off you take your rocket on your take your rocket off you take your rocket on your take your rocket off
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:06:46 UTC No. 15921958
>>15921659
This one took me a sec.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:19:11 UTC No. 15921977
I read the orange reddit. they seem to have glee over rural getting fucked over because of politics. are we just done as a nation?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?i
>US agency will not reinstate $900M subsidy for Starlink
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:21:30 UTC No. 15921980
>>15921977
That's the subreddit where people endlessly repeat notjustbikes propaganda and would love everyone that doesn't live in a 20mq^2 run-down hole in an endlessly spanning metropolis to die because cities are "subsidizing" them. Rural always loses.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:22:24 UTC No. 15921981
Schizos blog is interesting, also his guys Twitter is max chud and his university was trying to fire him over it. Going to cause lots of melties if schizo chud man just cruises in and btfos their tranny matter theory overnight kek
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:27:10 UTC No. 15921990
>>15921980
>>15921977
kys redditcel ywnbaw
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:29:43 UTC No. 15921993
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpr
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:33:15 UTC No. 15921997
>>15921993
not spaceflight im going to throw you out of the airlock for posting this the 7th time now
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:40:10 UTC No. 15922010
>>15921997
We're not in space.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:44:36 UTC No. 15922016
>>15921990
>>15921997
are you vaxxed or something dude you seem really angry. not good for your health honestly chill out
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:47:08 UTC No. 15922019
>>15921981
This doesn't even make sense. The tension has to do with the derived value for the constant depending on source, and adding QI as a fix-it function without context is a methodological travesty.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:06:49 UTC No. 15922043
>>15921885
wasnāt he not involved in her losing the internship over this and then attempted to get her back in?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:14:15 UTC No. 15922051
>>15922043
I don't think he did anything to cost her the position, the conversation just went viral and then he cucked out and got her rehired, IIRC
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:31:59 UTC No. 15922072
>>15922051
your fucking idiotic dude. read the substack I posted.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:33:37 UTC No. 15922073
>>15922072
>your
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:36:34 UTC No. 15922076
>>15922073
what's wrong with his fucking idiotic?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:40:50 UTC No. 15922082
having a furry pic should be a blacklistable offense just by itself
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:47:23 UTC No. 15922091
>>15921480
Hey Elon, these people are holding civilization. Fuck them up plz & thx
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:50:20 UTC No. 15922099
>>15922094
looks like they are trying to simply clone Falcon Heavy as closely as possible
though methalox instead of kerolox
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:51:15 UTC No. 15922100
https://twitter.com/SpcPlcyOnline/s
Reminder, Biden admin wants to stop everything musk related.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:52:42 UTC No. 15922102
>>15922081
what a pussy, he kissed the ring. so sad.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 01:54:17 UTC No. 15922103
>>15922099
are they fucking trolling?imagine DpaceX cancelling development on falcon 9 and only designing falcon heavy.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:00:29 UTC No. 15922110
https://twitter.com/SawyerMerritt/s
Regulatory harassment from corrupt president
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:10:54 UTC No. 15922121
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:13:54 UTC No. 15922126
>>15922110
he used order of magnitude wrong (3 bil is not an order of magnitude more than 0.9 bil)
another term destroyed
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:23:33 UTC No. 15922132
>>15922126
>3 bil is not an order of magnitude more than 0.9 bil
log10(3)-log10(0.9) = 0.52
Rounds to 1 in my book.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:28:01 UTC No. 15922138
>>15922100
So NASA is saying SpaceX is unsafe and therefore should be regulating commercial space now?
What in the fuck?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:30:42 UTC No. 15922140
>>15922138
WE WARNED YOU
FOR YEARS
YOU DIDN'T LISTEN
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:36:30 UTC No. 15922146
>>15922132
kek, saved
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:40:51 UTC No. 15922148
>>15920363
>>15920801
Don't look too deep into it. It's a reference to when Clear picked up a snake.
https://twitter.com/clearusui/statu
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:45:14 UTC No. 15922155
>>15922148
hol up. does she post her face now? is this the real clear?
https://twitter.com/clearusui/statu
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:01:58 UTC No. 15922176
>>15922140
The impeachment inquiry is official now. So let's see how it works out
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:03:29 UTC No. 15922180
According to the translation that woman would be "Mayucchi". So not ria-chan.
I can't read more because Elon capped everything and I refuse to install the app.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:04:45 UTC No. 15922182
>>15922176
I thought those were just performative? Never amounting to anything regardless of the merits
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:06:39 UTC No. 15922186
>>15922182
The ones Democrats do are.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:07:37 UTC No. 15922187
>>15922182
The more corruption is exposed the more people will see the extent of corruption.
It will all go on official records, which is the most important part
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:16:19 UTC No. 15922195
So apparently the reason nobody's building new concentrated solar in the US is that ONE site at Ivanpah, NV was killing 6000 birds a year - they were attracted to the shiny collector and flew across the beams. Would a microwave rectenna for beamed space solar have the same problem of popping birds that flew across the beam?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:18:05 UTC No. 15922197
>>15921620
>If the test fails
*When the test fails
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:19:28 UTC No. 15922201
>>15922195
The actual reason is that it's a meme, confined to places with few cloudy days and requiring an expensive turbine system.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:24:02 UTC No. 15922205
>>15922195
Pv is cheaper and more reliable, less maintenance, no moving parts, etc.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:42:02 UTC No. 15922229
>>15921553
and gaslighting, reddit-splaining fags like scott manley
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:05:23 UTC No. 15922268
>Pol-lite general
>again
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:09:08 UTC No. 15922276
https://twitter.com/tibininin/statu
Santa came to starbase to gift presents. Hah
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:12:29 UTC No. 15922282
>>15922155
Nah, that's another streamer. It's from a collab where she tried to teach a complete noob how to play KSP.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:17:57 UTC No. 15922287
>>15922155
>>15922282
This is "her", from a meet and greet
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:19:00 UTC No. 15922291
>>15922155
no, that's apparently some bitch called mayuchi
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:20:01 UTC No. 15922292
>>15922195
You could solve this problem by not caring about birds.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:24:37 UTC No. 15922300
>>15922155
>>15922287
maybe y'all should stop worrying if she gets your penis hard and be happy a japanese woman is getting the youthā¢ into rocketry
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:26:19 UTC No. 15922304
>>15922268
Tell your senile mummified pedophile and his Communist lackeys to stop cockblocking Elon then.
šļø Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:31:05 UTC No. 15922307
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:39:54 UTC No. 15922316
>>15922304
>Everyone I don't like is a pedo
muskrats love follow the leader!
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:40:49 UTC No. 15922320
>>15922316
I believe he was taking about ol' touchy joe
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:42:57 UTC No. 15922321
>>15922320
>too stupid to get the joke
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:43:04 UTC No. 15922323
>>15922307
>Kazuma-san, catch me afterwards. I can only launch once a year and don't have retropropulsive landing.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:44:04 UTC No. 15922327
>>15922321
>biden tranny posts anime
not surprising desu
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:44:10 UTC No. 15922328
>>15922321
Your post wasn't funny.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:44:29 UTC No. 15922329
can we just stage already and maybe get a better thread next time
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:45:04 UTC No. 15922331
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:48:09 UTC No. 15922340
>>15922287
That's her JAXA announcement poster, yeah. There's a government official standing next to it.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:48:34 UTC No. 15922342
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:49:33 UTC No. 15922347
>>15922322
The FCC guy is paid off by elon obviously. how stupid are you?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:51:32 UTC No. 15922353
>>15922347
even if that was the case it would be completely irrelevant, the argument stands on its own
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:53:00 UTC No. 15922357
>>15922353
It doesnt. otherwise SpaceX would sue the FCC
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:56:20 UTC No. 15922366
>>15922321
>elon calls someone a pedophile
>elon fans call someone a pedophile
yeah, it wasn't complicated
hang yourself
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 04:57:36 UTC No. 15922367
>>15922357
for what? what they did might not be technically illegal even if it was clearly politically motivated and ad hoc, the rules might give the FCC enough latitude to make retarded choices like this with the implicit assumption that if they do too much retarded shit, congress etc will step in
just like the lawsuit against SpaceX due to the refugees or any number of these retarded things
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:00:01 UTC No. 15922371
>>15921977
Holy fuck how salty bitch can you be? Old space and defense corpos are always late and overbudget. Eeelong quotes aspirational date and it's a fuckig RICO case somehow.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:02:03 UTC No. 15922376
>>15922367
Elon always sues on principle, even when they have a weak case. if the case is so strong, they would most definitely sue, you dumb fuck
spacex won the DOJ suit you absolute mouthbreathing FAGGOT
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:04:40 UTC No. 15922380
>>15921977
The US government should not be subsidizing anybody for anything
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:12:53 UTC No. 15922394
>>15922376
no he doesn't and of course they won, the point is that the retarded suit was even created in the first place is the problem
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Dec 2023 06:06:57 UTC No. 15922451
>>15921320
It occasionally inserts brand names in the middle of internet articles