🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:35:45 UTC No. 15992611
Stoke the fire edition
Previous: >>15990158
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:52:31 UTC No. 15992636
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:57:23 UTC No. 15992640
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:02:07 UTC No. 15992643
Latest Russian "timeline" shows only single Soyuz going to #ISS in 2026 and 2028, no flights in 2030. I wonder if NASA knows that it will have one crew exchange opportunity in those years? (...and we can ignore the shown ROS schedule as completely, positively unachievable):
https://x.com/russianspaceweb/statu
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:03:34 UTC No. 15992647
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:06:45 UTC No. 15992652
>>15992611
retard OP
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:09:48 UTC No. 15992661
>>15992643
its over
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:11:25 UTC No. 15992662
>>15992611
Lest be honest, this shit is cringe as fuck and makes no sense
Youre telling me you need at least 10 starships + SLS launches just to put a nigger and a whore on the moon , and its gonna be ready in years when starship cant even reach orbit? LMAO. thanks god this gonna be cancel after artemis II. So
/sfg/ bros, our last hope to see people on the moon in 4k is China and, at least were not gonna see a LGBT, BLM and Trans flags on the moon
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:12:15 UTC No. 15992665
IFT-3 Status?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:13:05 UTC No. 15992666
>>15992665
2 weeks
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:14:12 UTC No. 15992669
>>15992611
Can mars ever be truely interpendent? Maybe they can be self sustaining but it seems like they can never avoid the total destruction by getting nuked, so they can always be coerced by earth. Unless maybe they get nuclear weapon but even then, they will never have enough nukes to destroy earth completly but earth has enough nukes to destroy every human infastructure on mars and a single starship would be enough to deliver enough nukes to mars. And i also assume that earth has better capacities to counter rockets filled with nukes since mass producing antirocketrockets and developing new technologies is easier on a planet with billions of humans.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:17:28 UTC No. 15992675
>>15992669
>interpendent
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:18:52 UTC No. 15992677
>>15992643
Should replace the russian space station images
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:19:03 UTC No. 15992678
>>15992669
yes, but they need to be fully self-sufficient
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:20:09 UTC No. 15992681
>>15992665
Dont you see they are LITERALLY desmantle starbase you fat fuck? All this private american space experiment had failed, its so over , it was funny watch them blow up tho
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:20:12 UTC No. 15992682
>>15992674
> Despite not landing on the Moon, Thornton was upbeat about what the company was able to accomplish on Peregrine, saying that customers other than NASA on the mission thanked him for getting the payloads running on the mission. One example he offered was DLR, the German aerospace center, which had a radiation detector on the lander that was able to collect more than 90 hours of what DLR called “extremely valuable” data during the flight.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:22:29 UTC No. 15992686
>>15992665
perpetually 3 weeks away since the FAA hasn't granted or finished review after the IFT2 failure
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:23:57 UTC No. 15992688
>>15992675
I wish being an esl would be a good excuse for my fucked up english but my peers tend to be somewhat good in english or at least better than me with english.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:25:38 UTC No. 15992691
>>15992662
>>15992681
i feel so demoralized
china is strong
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:27:05 UTC No. 15992694
>tim ellis vocal fry
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:30:11 UTC No. 15992697
>>15992674
That whole flip flop sideways landing design just seems like a real bad idea with few advantages.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:40:24 UTC No. 15992709
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:41:35 UTC No. 15992712
>>15992668
gary church is still at it in the comments? damn
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:41:46 UTC No. 15992713
>>15992669
>they can never avoid the total destruction by getting nuked
but Earthers are immune to nuclear weapons?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:48:25 UTC No. 15992723
>>15992716
Delete this
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:02:25 UTC No. 15992745
>>15992611
>>15992691
>>15992682
>>15992697
>>15992709
When are we leaving this planet bros? Im tired of delays and im getting older... They told us were gonna go to mars and beyond... Whats taking so long
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:09:44 UTC No. 15992754
>>15992745
>>15992662
>reposting last thread's comments
>thread is literally on life support
Wow Im glad I have been gone for a long time. The anime poster really killed /sfg/, see you maybe for the moon landing probably not though.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:11:56 UTC No. 15992756
>>15992662
Elon said the latest Starship launch actually would have made it to orbit if it had included a payload. Because the ship was lighter than usual there was excess propellant, and they were venting the oxygen which led to an explosion.
(technically sub-orbit because it wasn't aiming for a complete orbit)
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:14:07 UTC No. 15992758
>>15992662
Once you build a gas station, you dont need to keep building gas stations for the same thing. Just get 1 tanker to the station once a month.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:32:39 UTC No. 15992784
>>15992754
>implying there's only one of us
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:36:47 UTC No. 15992791
>>15992784
/sfg/ is one person though?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:37:11 UTC No. 15992792
>>15991882
>Third, in a subsequent paper, the same authors found some traits that were perhaps less desirable in space. People in these more frontier-inclined areas showed less willingness to trust scientific consensus and less willingness to social distance or use face masks early in the COVID-19 pandemic. That might not be great in the environment of space, a place where survival will be dependent on high technology and mutual cooperation.
lol, these people still drone on about the masks
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:49:17 UTC No. 15992803
>>15992754
>implying you can leave 4chan
lol, see you in 15 minutes
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:54:06 UTC No. 15992809
>>15992807
1/5 slides
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:55:10 UTC No. 15992811
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:55:27 UTC No. 15992813
>>15992792
Leftist propaganda machine running to this day to justify their propaganda
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:55:57 UTC No. 15992815
>>15992754
You mad, bro?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:56:15 UTC No. 15992816
>>15992811
3/5
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:57:18 UTC No. 15992818
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:58:20 UTC No. 15992819
>>15992818
last slide
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:04:14 UTC No. 15992826
Nobody wants to discuss the unfortunate implications derived from SLIM's failure:
Topheavy landers are no good for the moon, short and squat is the way to go.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:15:11 UTC No. 15992842
>>15992840
> Tons of folks likely tied to contract obligations (cancellation penalty can be up to $400 I believe; similar to ViaSat).
>Leaves tons of room for Starlink growth in the US, which is obviously the most lucrative geo in terms of average subscriber value.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:26:28 UTC No. 15992854
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:35:00 UTC No. 15992861
>>15992852
what a fucking mess
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:36:29 UTC No. 15992864
>>15992852
fucking tech trees man
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:43:52 UTC No. 15992875
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:45:22 UTC No. 15992876
>>15992875
By the time they reach "lunar base" the sun will be dead.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:50:58 UTC No. 15992881
>>15992876
har har har youre FUNNY!! because le tortoise is le slow? hahaha so great and funniiiiiii
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:14:27 UTC No. 15992900
>>15992611
Why did Tory kill peregrine?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:14:41 UTC No. 15992901
>>15992881
Is building BE-4 the ultimate cuckoldry?
I cannot think or comprehend of anything more cucked than building a BE-4. Honestly, think about it rationally. You are designing, prototyping, building and testing an engine for at least 18 years solely so it can go and get flown into space by another man. All the hard work you put into your beautiful little engine - deciding on an architecture, designing the turbine and fuel pumps, making sure the combustion chamber doesn't melt or explode, pretending desperately it's somehow comparable to Raptor. All of it has one simple result: its TWR is higher for the men that will eventually use it to orbit their payloads.
Made the perfect engine? Great. Who benefits? If you're lucky, a random man who had nothing to do with the way it was built, who integrates it. He gets to ignite it on launch day. He gets the benefits of its reliability that came from the way you designed it.
As a man builds BE-4, you are LITERALLY dedicating at least 20 years of your life simply to make an engine for another man to enjoy. It is the ULTIMATE AND FINAL cuck. Think about it logically.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:26:03 UTC No. 15992917
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyw
T-10:00 to the next Vandenberg scrub. Fifth times the charm?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:30:22 UTC No. 15992926
>>15992826
>short and squat
like your mom
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:36:01 UTC No. 15992931
>>15992917
scrubcels on suicide watch
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:37:14 UTC No. 15992933
>starlink launched but the feed died
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:38:46 UTC No. 15992939
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:42:48 UTC No. 15992948
>>15992901
Meanwhile, Elon is building harems of Meriln and Raptor engines. Sure, the early ones are lost quickly but most of them launch again and again.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:52:14 UTC No. 15992957
Is it possible that the mars colony could be STD free if we have perfect screening of who is allowed to go?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:53:52 UTC No. 15992958
>>15992758
but the gas station is just a tanker sitting on the side of the road with a cardboard sign
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:54:52 UTC No. 15992961
>>15992957
Of course. there are no diseases on the ISS.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:57:37 UTC No. 15992964
>>15992957
If you screened for diseases, genetic conditions, and all sorts of things like that you could selectively eliminate quite a few ailments, but not all of them since they have compound risk factors.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:05:08 UTC No. 15992969
>>15992957
>>15992964
>>15992961
this is evil, this is eugenics
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:07:19 UTC No. 15992972
>>15992957
no dorks with glasses also
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:09:21 UTC No. 15992977
>>15992939
I don't think the burbs got away in time...
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:14:32 UTC No. 15992980
>>15992926
Moon landers need to be fatassed shortstacks, keep the center of mass nice and low.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:14:39 UTC No. 15992981
>>15992957
blacks and homos have STD rates 50 or even hundreds of times higher than normal people
unfortunately we have to sacrifice some amount of diversity in order to achieve a disease free planet
I trust the science on this one
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:18:26 UTC No. 15992986
>>15992969
This is eugenics. I'll wait for you to explain what makes Eugenics evil if you can avoid the "because Nazis" argument.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:19:37 UTC No. 15992989
1/3 - Starlink 7-9
1/3 - Ovzon-3
1/7 - Starlink 6-35
1/14 - Starlink 7-10
1/15 - Starlink 6-37
1/18 - Axiom-3
1/23 - Starlink 7-11
A launch every 3.29 days. 366 days in 2024. On pace for 111 total launches if the rate holds.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:19:54 UTC No. 15992990
>>15992977
good.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:21:31 UTC No. 15992991
>>15992980
Intuitive machines will prove you wrong
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:23:35 UTC No. 15992994
in the future launch # will be a shitty metric
just tons to orbit
since 10:1 launches will be refueling rather than actually shit to BE in space (starship tankers...)
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:25:44 UTC No. 15992997
>>15992989
HE CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:27:04 UTC No. 15992998
>>15992994
>since 10:1 launches will be refueling rather than actually shit to BE in space (starship tankers...)
no they wont be. the majority of missions will go to LEO without refueling.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:28:31 UTC No. 15993000
>>15992989
>On pace for 111 total launches
They're behind
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:33:37 UTC No. 15993003
>>15992958
Tankers are gas stations on wheels instead of one without wheels and buried underground.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:34:39 UTC No. 15993005
>>15992989
Will speed up with spring/summer/autumn weather
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:39:58 UTC No. 15993011
>>15992989
It's over... Elonbros, why can't we keep pace...?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:53:01 UTC No. 15993022
>>15992643
Does Russia get paid to participate in the ISS? Is that why they can't fund their own space station?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:56:32 UTC No. 15993026
>>15992989
have to accelerate to get to 150
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:03:30 UTC No. 15993031
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:11:16 UTC No. 15993035
>>15993022
We lost the shuttle for nearly 10 years. They got ~$4 billion for 71 seats on Soyuz. Rough ~$400M per year in deal . That doesn't sound a lot in America, but with Russian economy/inflation in the country, that 400M goes 10X the way in terms of actual value. Thus it became the lifeblood of the Russian space.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:13:27 UTC No. 15993036
>>15993035
I know about the Soyuz stuff, but did Russia get paid for their ISS modules as well?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:16:55 UTC No. 15993038
https://interestingengineering.com/
Chinese ceramic heat shields
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:19:24 UTC No. 15993039
>>15993031
I'm also fielding some experimental mass-saving magyyks, perhaps we will use some of these lessons not only in Kerbal Space Program but in the real world.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:20:16 UTC No. 15993040
>>15993036
Zarya was built and operated by Russia, but it was paid for and owned by America. We also paid for the completion of the last two of Mir's modules as part of the pre-ISS Shuttle-Mir program. There might have been a bit more financial aid in there somewhere but those are the big parts.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:21:35 UTC No. 15993042
>>15993039
you can't timewarp on ladders
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:23:19 UTC No. 15993048
When is the FAA going to do the thing so we can move on with our lives?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:25:44 UTC No. 15993053
>>15993040
So is there nothing really stopping Russia from build their own station using their ISS budget?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:28:26 UTC No. 15993057
>>15993048
>When is the FAA going to do the thing
What thing, dissolve?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:34:11 UTC No. 15993064
>>15993048
I'm fucking around, shield+seat is the final frontier of mass saving until I figure out how to make the smaller heat shield survivable on interplanetary trajectories
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:36:49 UTC No. 15993069
>>15993064
Depending on how fast you're coming in you only need 100 ablator or so, the heat shields are overly heavy imo and you can shave off half the mass in the VAB, easy
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:37:41 UTC No. 15993070
>>15993053
They could, but that would mean pulling out of their ISS participation, which would ground the cosmonaut corps for years until the new station was ready. That's a big problem because "paused" almost always means hard canceled when it comes to the Russian space program. Things that stop almost never start back up again because all the funding vanishes.
They don't need to though, because ROS modules are already under construction. The advantage of starting ROS around 2030 is that the components can limp along to completion with minimal funding while the cosmonauts keep flying and the Kremlin doesn't reallocate their budget.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:42:19 UTC No. 15993075
>>15993069
Oh these do interplanetary with 40, I'm talking about the tiny radius heat shield which just vaporizes the kerbal
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:42:51 UTC No. 15993077
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 03:19:31 UTC No. 15993097
>>15993048
When SpaceX finishes the investigation
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:18:45 UTC No. 15993122
>>15992745
Why leave this planet, my friends? I'm enjoying the delays, and I'm getting younger... They never mentioned Mars and beyond... What's the rush?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:21:11 UTC No. 15993125
>1hr btween posts
/sfg/ is ded ded
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:22:33 UTC No. 15993126
>>15993125
falcon is so regular nobody even watches the streams to notice they cut out
nothing else flies
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:24:15 UTC No. 15993128
>>15993126
SpaceX are truly on another level, off the playing field, in a league of their own
only Starship can excite now, or maybe IM-1
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:32:16 UTC No. 15993133
>>15993125
>>15993126
DeathShipTwo is flying on Friday morning
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:34:51 UTC No. 15993135
>>15992849
>>15993077
lol they showed new glenn, but not starship?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:36:34 UTC No. 15993136
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:37:12 UTC No. 15993137
>>15993135
Starship is implied in "commercial super heavy lift designs in development" cause there's really only one, yes this is NASA saying NG isn't superheavy lift
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:38:08 UTC No. 15993138
>>15993137
yeah i figured that, but they couldn't bother to put a pic?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:38:13 UTC No. 15993139
>>15993136
wats pic from?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:39:15 UTC No. 15993140
>>15993138
I have a feeling that NASA ESDMD and Associate Admin (who worked for fucken Boeing) is Starship averse and wouldn't like that
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:41:29 UTC No. 15993141
>>15993139
Peter Siebold parachuting back to Earth after SpaceshipTwo broke up mid-air and threw his chair clear of the debris. Michael Alsbury was killed, due to skill issues.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:42:14 UTC No. 15993142
>>15993141
oh shit man, didn't know people survived that
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:42:41 UTC No. 15993144
>>15993137
New Glenn has never been claimed to be a SHLV?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:45:37 UTC No. 15993145
Spaceflight should be more deadly, impose higher g loads, cause more swelling and vomiting to filter out the spacepseuds from the true cosmocels. Can we get 6x higher cosmic radiation up in here?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:50:49 UTC No. 15993148
>>15993142
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter
It was just the two of them I think, but yeah Pete survived. Imagine coming to consciousness while falling under parachute, that had to be momentarily disorienting to say the least.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:55:40 UTC No. 15993154
What is the proper term for space simulators that aren't futuristic?
Rocket simulator?
Hard sci-fi space simulator?
Realistic space simulator?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:56:55 UTC No. 15993155
>>15993154
autism simulator
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:08:45 UTC No. 15993159
>>15992957
They shall be made clean
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:18:48 UTC No. 15993161
>>15993154
name one
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:20:13 UTC No. 15993162
>>15993161
KSP with realism overhaul modpack
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:20:17 UTC No. 15993163
>>15993161
I'll do you one better:
Children of a Dead Earth
Kerbal Space Program
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:20:52 UTC No. 15993164
>>15993148
>Thrown clear of the Enterprise when it broke up in mid-air, Siebold survived a descent from about 50,000 feet at Mach 1 speed with just a flightsuit.
God DAMN. That's fucking unreal, I had no idea about this.
Sometimes I think what kind of wacky stories from the current day will get passed around in the future as trivia about the early days of the space renaissance. This is going to be one of them, and I even missed it when it happened.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:24:19 UTC No. 15993166
>>15993162
>>15993163
hard sci-fi
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:26:48 UTC No. 15993167
>>15993164
Parachuting to safety after the plane you were in broke up around you is already pretty incredible, make it a spaceplane (suborbital, derogatory) and its even more incredible to walk away from.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:33:05 UTC No. 15993171
>>15993166
nah with the realism overhaul mod, you start off in the 1950s and have to worry about stuff like ullage for igniting engines. There is literally no other game that comes close to these levels of autism for rocketry.
It's literally the ARMA of space sims.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:35:24 UTC No. 15993172
>>15993171
thats still hard science fiction. "hard" in this context means realistic.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:40:01 UTC No. 15993174
>>15993172
JPL mission design software and webtools?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:40:07 UTC No. 15993175
>>15992901
mmm, delicious pasta, I must save it
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:41:05 UTC No. 15993178
>>15993172
Yeah, the problem with that is that if I look up hard sci-fi space sim, I still get stuff that's way too futuristic. Is ultra-realistic hard sci-fi a better term to describe this niche?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 05:49:47 UTC No. 15993183
>>15993178
Legitimately recommend JPL mission design webtools and model rocketry then
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 06:19:11 UTC No. 15993203
>>15993125
minimal shitposting is good.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 06:23:10 UTC No. 15993205
Modern day epicycles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vzm
Anything to avoid questioning if matter condenses from aether under high gravitational fields
Earth and venus leaking helium in the exact same proportion https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:30:39 UTC No. 15993254
>the military has drones on standby ready to sink rockets that float instead of submerging under the water
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo
wtf
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:53:15 UTC No. 15993266
https://twitter.com/MarcusHouse/sta
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:57:12 UTC No. 15993270
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:00:37 UTC No. 15993274
>China believes that its biggest competitive pressure no longer comes from Nasa but from private space companies, represented by SpaceX.
Let that sink in
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:04:42 UTC No. 15993279
>>15993274
They are right
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:11:18 UTC No. 15993285
>>15993161
Orbiter
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:12:51 UTC No. 15993286
>>15993285
I played this like 13 years ago and followed n apollo checklist like I was a clueless monkey. It worked though.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:17:42 UTC No. 15993289
>>15992636
>the kids love this one
Imagine seeing first hand your father work on a project like this. Seeing the time, effort, the details of it. Going from doubt to seeing the project take shape and even reach space and all the steps it took.
And then realizing you will NEVER be able to contribute to a project like this because your dumber, slower and duller and weaker than your father ^_^
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:02:26 UTC No. 15993314
>>15992669
>they can never avoid the total destruction by getting nuked, so they can always be coerced by earth
This applies at present to any non-nuclear state. But it doesn't mean that states can't be self-sufficient in practical terms, just that they fall under the sphere of influence of one of the great powers.
Mars can certainly be self-sufficient. It's not like a space station. There are resources right outside the door to be had. They may choose to import hydrogen in bulk rather than extracting it from water. Nitrogen may also become a commodity. They can probably trade with overall expertise of orbital construction, since access to Mars orbit is so easy which would lead to an advantage in space infrastructure.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:55:06 UTC No. 15993414
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:02:39 UTC No. 15993422
>>15993274
the sink is already inside and was for several years
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:05:58 UTC No. 15993475
>>15993254
better that than letting a chinese fishing boat steal it
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:08:03 UTC No. 15993479
>>15993472
>Only elec and software
Does spaceflight not require mechanical engineers?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:31:00 UTC No. 15993494
>>15992875
>In space manufacturing
Unless they're talking about some dinky little 3d printer there's absolutely no way they'll make any kind of real advancement that early in their tech tree.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:08:54 UTC No. 15993518
>>15993479
I hate flanges
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:15:25 UTC No. 15993522
>>15993479
ideally no
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:19:33 UTC No. 15993525
>>15993270
5 more years
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:21:24 UTC No. 15993526
>>15993479
>and Software
Embedded Software is basically applied elec anyways
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:41:26 UTC No. 15993548
>>15993532
Same as anything else on 4chan: someone got buttmad over something in it and wants to ruin it for everyone else.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:23:37 UTC No. 15993614
>>15993532
What people?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:23:59 UTC No. 15993616
status on the second tower?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:25:07 UTC No. 15993618
>>15993614
rocketry experts
think r/space, r/rocketry, twitter community
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:28:00 UTC No. 15993622
>>15993618
So you "don't like /sfg/" and are fishing for accomplices.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:29:33 UTC No. 15993623
>>15993618
Twitter community is okay as long as you follow only CEOs, journalists and tankwatchers. Shitposting faggots are the worst.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:34:30 UTC No. 15993629
>>15992716
What is this?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:34:53 UTC No. 15993630
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:36:57 UTC No. 15993632
>>15993629
Unruh radiation and "action/reaction horizons" stuff, which is the lifeline the propellantless drive guys are currently holding on to.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:37:11 UTC No. 15993633
>>15993630
I don't get it.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:39:04 UTC No. 15993636
>>15993616
mr president there's been a second starship
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:39:54 UTC No. 15993639
>>15993618
>reddit niggers
>tranny side of the space group
LMAO
Follow actual people in the industry and you get the opposite response.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:52:14 UTC No. 15993662
>>15992881
>because le tortoise is le slow?
The Tortoise is fucking dead pal
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:56:45 UTC No. 15993670
>>15993616
The one in cape?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:05:35 UTC No. 15993682
>>15993670
the one they're building in starbase. they moved a bunch of the pieces there recently.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:16:56 UTC No. 15993697
>>15993629
It's the thing which is gonna give us real flying saucers. QI drives don't need to exhaust anywhere. It's in orbit and the test is going to start 2 weeks from today.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:26:15 UTC No. 15993717
>>15993697
>QI drive
Doesn't work
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:27:16 UTC No. 15993720
>>15993709
Pretty fucking based desu
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:28:46 UTC No. 15993722
>>15993532
get off discord you fucking tranny faggot
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:30:49 UTC No. 15993725
>>15993610
How long before IFT-2 did SpaceX submit the mishap report?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:32:32 UTC No. 15993729
>>15993725
presumably there was less to investigate this time because range safety functioned perfectly and the launch infrastructure didn't evaporate
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:33:09 UTC No. 15993731
>>15993709
It's not a bad plan. Common core reusable boosters take a lot of work to finish and the Indian SRB program is already well developed. It's pretty much what I'd expect Firefly-Northrop to do when they try upgrading their MLV to work in the Falcon Heavy's weight class.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:36:10 UTC No. 15993736
>>15993731
It's not a bad plan at all
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:37:40 UTC No. 15993739
>>15993731
Expendable version isn't a bad plan
Reusable version is kinda shit because of the additional separation speed needing more propellant ot slow down, it's like trying to recover the center core of a Falcon heavy without the propulsive power of the FH Boosters, I imagine the performance increase would be very limited over even a reusable NGLV LEO
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:38:43 UTC No. 15993742
>>15993739
(and no, I don't take the performance value seriously that early)
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:55:58 UTC No. 15993757
>>15993739
The NGLV Heavy looks like it's planning on reusing the boosters and expending the core like FH. I wouldn't be surprised if NGLV-M didn't try recovering the core very often either.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:58:51 UTC No. 15993760
>>15993632
I can make a propellantless vehicle that travels at the speed of light, but you're not going to like it
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:02:33 UTC No. 15993762
Some interesting information about the Gravity-1 rocket
Yao Song, co-CEO of Orienspace, says he thinks the cost will be $5-6k/kg to orbit, which he says is currently the lowest commercial launch price in China. From the context of talking about remote sensing satellites, I think means to SSO. He also says the Gravity-1 can be ready for launch within 5 hours from being built, and that it can carry 20-30 remote sensing satellites at once.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Avv
Jean Deville says CGSTL bought 4 Gravity-1 launches at $27m each, which works out to $4.2k/kg to LEO or $6.4k/kg to 500km SSO
https://youtu.be/VgdOSwVDEbc?featur
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:02:57 UTC No. 15993764
>>15993709
S120s can be made for fractions of the cost of GEM 63 XLs
It's fine if they can't get a Merlin-tier engine
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:05:52 UTC No. 15993766
>>15993764
adding to this
i suspect its to simplify the design of the engines so they can get a VTVL rocket ASAP
why they start flying it they can then tune it like SpaceX did with F9 v1.1
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:07:10 UTC No. 15993767
>>15993709
If India's solid rocket motor industry needs the extra business to remain viable, then why not. Such industry has military-strategic value and would've needed to be supported one way or the other anyway
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:08:35 UTC No. 15993769
>>15993762
It's definitely an interesting rocket. It'll be interesting to see how the recovery and reuse will work for their future rockets
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:11:25 UTC No. 15993772
>>15993682
probably not starting before 3rd flight
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:16:41 UTC No. 15993776
it's funny because CZ-5 is actually pretty cheap ($3k/kg which is expendable F9 level) and they finally have a foreign customer for it but it takes a really long time to prepare it
they only managed to launch it once last year which puts it behind Delta IV Heavy in terms of prep time (it did two back to back NROL missions once)
>>15993762
this things so ksp lol
I remember seeing solids called FG1000 or FG1100 or sth like that a few years ago which is more akin to GEM 60s that wouldve been used on Omega.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:26:57 UTC No. 15993783
>>15993776
They managed to launch three times back in 2020, so they can hit a better cadence if they try. I think most of the problem is that China's domestic payloads are small and launching to undemanding orbits and they can't get international GEO customers because the State Department/ITAR won't let American sourced tech fly on Chinese rockets.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:44:19 UTC No. 15993799
>>15993709
If its cheaper than the heavy variant for some missions then why not
Its only partially reusable anyway
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:45:41 UTC No. 15993801
>>15993795
You're late
>>15993709
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:17:40 UTC No. 15993822
>>15993270
got me for a second
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:35:57 UTC No. 15993843
>>15993762
Wonder what the cost is without the government subsidies.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:36:49 UTC No. 15993844
>>15993822
You can get expendable launch vehicles to work economically if you can build them cheaply enough and launch them often enough. The problem is that reuseables will out complete you logistically, so you'll end up with a low cadence because lol no payloads. Your production line ends up working at maybe 5% capacity which drives your price all the way up and your problems start feeding off each other like a toxic relationship.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:38:10 UTC No. 15993846
>>15993843
Probably not much more. The rocket looks cheap
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:39:02 UTC No. 15993848
>>15993479
Not many for a generic 0g space station.
>standard ISS docking mechanisms
>pressure vessels
>electrically actuated solar panels
All you really need a MechE for is fluid handling, designing the cupola, and materials selection.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:06:50 UTC No. 15993871
>>15993717
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024/
Blackpilled cuck, it will work because I believe it will.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:36:48 UTC No. 15993899
>>15993871
It will not work
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:42:04 UTC No. 15993909
>>15993899
It held a pendulum against gravity in a vacuum chamber on Earth. Why wouldn't it work on orbit?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:43:36 UTC No. 15993910
>>15993871
Where is the Gellar field device?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:46:39 UTC No. 15993913
>>15993910
This is for moving through realspace, no Gellar Field needed.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:57:59 UTC No. 15993923
>>15993909
>It held a pendulum against gravity in a vacuum chamber on Earth
it did not.
just like copper-lead alloy is not a superconductor.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:00:14 UTC No. 15993926
>>15993909
>It held a pendulum against gravity in a vacuum chamber on Earth
>>15993923
>it did not.
Well, only one of you can be right. Who is it?
Anons, please show your work to the rest of the class so we can all learn together.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:01:24 UTC No. 15993929
>>15993709
>S120 boosters
crazy how the PSLV has a S139 as a its core stage. so the strap on boosters for this are like an entire core stage of their existing rocket.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:05:57 UTC No. 15993933
>>15993909
>>15993923
>>15993926
https://youtu.be/45E822mP59Q?featur
Timestamp 8:27
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:10:17 UTC No. 15993935
I want to believe
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:10:32 UTC No. 15993936
>not doing any hops with the boosters
so like
still 5 years away from regular use huh
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:22:21 UTC No. 15993949
>>15993935
believe in what?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:23:26 UTC No. 15993951
>>15993949
miracles
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:26:46 UTC No. 15993956
>>15993909
So did EmDrive in many claimed experiments. Until it got to a lab that knew what they were doing and took an objective view, then it magically stopped working. If the people testing it have a vested interest in seeing a positive result then their claims are basically worthless.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:27:49 UTC No. 15993957
>>15993954
multi-track drifting, its like how this place has its fare share of unironic /pol/tards and fascist sympathizers too
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:28:01 UTC No. 15993958
>>15993954
this is the liberal agenda of 100 years now
and you think its just going to go away?
did any less immigrants arrive this year ?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:28:24 UTC No. 15993959
>>15993954
or is this just an autism thing and previously it wasn't socially acceptable/trendy to flaunt your mental illnesses
like if you look back 30 years ago or something, autists weren't flaunting their mental illnesses? There was probably some other way to be attention seeking but maybe not
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:28:51 UTC No. 15993960
>>15993957
fair*
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:30:38 UTC No. 15993964
>>15993951
Do events with probability 0 count?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:34:08 UTC No. 15993968
>>15993954
It's trendy in schools right now.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:34:25 UTC No. 15993970
>>15993964
>reported thrust in vacuum with device switched on
>did null test in same vacuum with device switched off and got no thrust
>is in a vacuum right now
I don't think its 0 but it is infinitesimally small even still
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:35:26 UTC No. 15993973
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:35:38 UTC No. 15993974
>>15993959
There was a brief fad of media-induced anorexia in the mid to late 90s, middleschool and highschool girls (and college) were most effected.
Same shit different era.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:36:39 UTC No. 15993976
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:36:45 UTC No. 15993977
>>15993957
>shittle in the middle
>choose one of faggotry, failure and flaming death or the right path
everything seems to be in order here
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:39:13 UTC No. 15993983
https://mylesbianworld.com/2023/02/
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:40:13 UTC No. 15993985
>>15993973
Incredible, a little social shaming is all it takes to correct lefthandedness in 50% of the lefthanded population. With a little more we could eradicate lefthandedness forever.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:41:16 UTC No. 15993989
>>15993985
why stop there?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:49:28 UTC No. 15994001
>>15993973
>>15993976
>>15993985
If you're not left handed you're not a spaceflight autist
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:49:55 UTC No. 15994002
>>15993974
The agenda has been 1 step at a time
If they didn't nuke all sense of community with mass immigration, how else could modern social groups be basically totally online
Everyone on fucking meds for some sorta mental problem.. This is the world the boomers wanted, remember that
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:51:03 UTC No. 15994003
>>15993954
It's a combination of standard adolescent insanity (present since the dawn of man) and the state of the world. I look at what's been going on, imagine myself 10 years younger during all that shit, and I know for certain that I'd be weirder than I already am. The world is changing so rapidly that I can't really blame them for disregarding reality when that same reality doesn't seem stable from day to day. It seems almost like a defense mechanism.
It also doesn't help that all the millennials in the education system are predatory enablers of all this stuff.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:51:37 UTC No. 15994004
>>15994001
>Left-handers are overrepresented among those with lower cognitive skills and mental impairments, with those with intellectual disability being roughly twice as likely to be left-handed, as well as generally lower cognitive and non-cognitive abilities amongst left-handed children.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:52:20 UTC No. 15994005
>>15994004
Explains Obama
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:53:06 UTC No. 15994006
>>15993954
What's the point of complaining about younger generations? They are a product of their environment, which in this case are propaganda in public schools and the internet.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:53:48 UTC No. 15994008
>>15993983
>The only author on the entire page is "Uifs9"
>all of their Contact Us info is clearly bogus
This is what Elon was warning us about when he said AI was dangerous
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:55:02 UTC No. 15994009
>>15994008
I just posted that for a joke didn't even click the link, thats hilarious though, AI has absolutely overrun the net, SEO was a mistake and google is paying the price
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:55:26 UTC No. 15994010
>>15994008
>mylesbianworld.com
This is what God was warning us about when he said thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:55:41 UTC No. 15994011
>>15994006
I'm not complaining as such, I just hope this isn't some permanent thing, this isn't good for society
birthrates are below replacement already if a third of the people born remove themselves from the genepool through shit like this its not good
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:57:29 UTC No. 15994014
>>15994011
What if it's only retards and losers choosing effective celibacy?
If anything, this is going to get rid of gay retarded loser genes that were being protected for too long by social norms against degeneracy.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:57:59 UTC No. 15994016
>>15993988
Moments before toppling
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:59:12 UTC No. 15994019
>>15994016
no retard flip for Nova-C
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:02:31 UTC No. 15994021
>>15994014
but is it only people like that? seems like a lot of young girls especially are getting brainwashed that are just going through teenage angst and such
previously they became emos or whatever, now they are cutting their tits off and taking hormones that make their voices permanently lower
and if they snap out of it a few years later, its too late, their bodies are permanently disfigured and they might have even made themselves infertile
you are correct that men that would have been social outcasts anyway starting to take hormones might not affect the gene pool too much, but percentages this high (15-20%) then you are going to have some damage anyway
and who knows how many "outcasts" would reform/bloom later in life? kind of harder to do that if you cut your dick off
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:04:16 UTC No. 15994025
>>15994016
it'll be alright though right? maybe when the sun moves it could hit the solar panels?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:04:31 UTC No. 15994027
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/
> The LIFE habitat's inflatable shell is primarily made of a material called Vectran. "This is a material which gives you high strength and low elasticity," Buckley said.
>According to Kuraray, a Japanese manufacturer of specialty chemicals, fibers, and resins, Vectran is a "high-performance multifilament yarn spun from liquid crystal polymer." Pound for pound, Vectran is five times stronger than steel and 10 times stronger than aluminum, Kuraray says on its website.
>Technicians mold the Vectran into straps, which are woven together to give the pressure shell the strength it needs to hold pressure in space, Buckley said. A series of threads, stitches, and tapes also make up the structure.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:08:45 UTC No. 15994028
https://spacenews.com/blue-origin-g
> The NSSL Phase 3 procurement is divided into two lanes: Lane 1 caters to lower-risk missions to lower orbits, while Lane 2 focuses on demanding missions to higher orbits, requiring certified launch vehicles and full mission assurance. The latter is where Blue Origin, with its New Glenn heavy-lift rocket, could aim to challenge incumbents SpaceX and United Launch Alliance.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:09:06 UTC No. 15994029
>>15994025
I thought it powered down yesterday or the day before, but yeah maybe it'll come back on when the sun rises on it? I'm more interested in what became of the little ball rover, it deployed and I haven't heard shit about it since.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:11:24 UTC No. 15994032
https://spacenews.com/orbit-fab-and
> “Our initial goal is to put our Orbit Fab and ClearSpace hardware together, put it through its paces, and get that platform into orbit in the next two years,” Faber said.
> ClearSpace won a European Space Agency contract to remove a Vespa payload adapter from orbit. Under a U.K. Space Agency contract, ClearSpace is designing a mission to capture two inactive U.K. satellites.
>Orbit Fab, meanwhile, won a contract to provide hydrazine for the U.S. Space Force Tetra-5 spacecraft. The ClearSpace satellite for the U.K. ADR mission includes Orbit Fab’s RAFTI.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:11:32 UTC No. 15994034
>>15994030
beam me up, Scotty
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:12:26 UTC No. 15994036
>>15994030
did he say anything interesting
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:12:51 UTC No. 15994037
>>15994029
I think they powered it down to wait for the sun to be in the right position.
The rovers supposedly deployed fine but I doubt they have a strong enough antenna to talk back to earth so they're waiting/hoping for the lander to come back on.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:13:02 UTC No. 15994038
>>15994004
You're delusional.
Like 50% of geniuses or otherwise exceptional people are left handed.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:13:10 UTC No. 15994039
>>15994032
>ClearSpace mascot
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:13:42 UTC No. 15994041
https://www.space.com/reflectors-in
> Unlike proposals to build solar power stations in space and transmit energy down to earth, all the generation would still happen down here. Crucially, these reflectors could help solar farms generate electricity even when direct sunlight is not available, especially during evening and early morning hours when demand for clean energy is greatest. Colleagues and I call this concept “orbiting solar reflectors”.
> With the reflectors orbiting 900km above us – about twice the altitude of the International Space Station – we estimate that the illuminated area on the Earth would be approximately 10km across when at its brightest. Therefore, a system like this would not be aimed at individual rooftop solar panels but large solar power farms, typically located away from inhabited areas.
> Each pass would extend energy generation by about 15 to 20 minutes around the dawn or dusk hours. This is important because those hours are when electricity demand is the highest and often exceeds the amount being generated by wind and solar, meaning coal and gas power plants are used to compensate. Reflectors may therefore help abate fossil fuel use without needing to store energy during the day.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:14:46 UTC No. 15994042
>>15992989
>only 111
fuck we're way behind schedule
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:15:12 UTC No. 15994046
>>15994038
Look it's fine that you're lefthanded and all, just keep it in your bedroom
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:16:15 UTC No. 15994047
https://europeanspaceflight.com/exp
> Despite only just securing the first tranche of funding, Expansion has already invested around €30 million into 13 startups through a “warehousing structure” called Geodesic, which started to deploy capital towards the end of 2021.
> Notable companies currently supported by Expansion include launch startups Latitude and HyPrSpace, space transportation companies Space Cargo Unlimited and the Exploration Company, and space tourism company Zephalto. The fund also participated in Aldoria’s recently announced €10 million Series A funding round.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:16:59 UTC No. 15994048
Whatever happened to the space drugs that were meant to be landing in aus after the faa told them they couldn't land in the us?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:18:02 UTC No. 15994049
>>15994030
Edinburgh?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:18:41 UTC No. 15994050
>>15994048
Smoked by aboriginals before the recovery crew could chase them off.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:19:03 UTC No. 15994052
>>15994048
They've decided to let them reenter over FAA HQ to quote "send a message"
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:19:33 UTC No. 15994053
>>15993954
Educational institutions are corrupt politically and are indoctrinating kids like these as a form of rebellion against the what they consider a crusader against the normal/majority. Thats is basically, they want the capitals from the normal. The straight, the white, the cis, the normal, the prosperous, the hard working, the father, the mother, the marriage, the childbirth, etc/etc. I tell again and again that its nu-marxism because its exactly that. They just applied the notion of "capital" from just wealth to everything else in the world. The division thats bourne is natural product of the marxist ploy
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:20:05 UTC No. 15994054
https://spacenews.com/europe-weeks-
> Executives from Airbus Defence and Space, Thales Alenia Space, and Arianespace — part of a group of companies developing the Infrastructure for Resilience, Interconnectivity and Security by Satellite (IRIS2) constellation, discussed the project Jan. 23 at the European Space Conference in Brussels.
> Despite setbacks with Arianespace’s next-generation Ariane 6 rocket, recently causing Europe to lose independent access to space and lean on U.S.-based SpaceX, Kavvada said the plan is still to deploy IRIS2 with domestic rockets.
an internal launch market for european launch startups that should continue to require launches for the foreseeable future like starlink
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:20:42 UTC No. 15994056
@15994053
Meds
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:21:07 UTC No. 15994057
>>15994036
Was pretty interesting in general but there's no single bit that stood out. Had a few based moments like "fuck solar" and "fuck planetary protection".
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:21:28 UTC No. 15994058
>>15994056
Don't tell anon to take poison, what's wrong with you
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:21:58 UTC No. 15994060
>>15994028
Can't wait to see SpaceX forced to match Blue's pricing instead of ULA's.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:22:09 UTC No. 15994061
>>15994049
yes
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:22:40 UTC No. 15994062
https://payloadspace.com/estimating
> As you can see below, Payload’s revised 2023 estimate gets us to $8.721B of sales.
> Please note: Subscription revenue isn’t a simple total subscriber x cost per month calculation. We calculated it monthly with an assumed growth rate.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:23:40 UTC No. 15994064
>>15994056
>>15993954
>These people exists
>point out how insane they are
>NOOO THEY DONT EXISTS!!!!
lmao. What drives these response?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:24:46 UTC No. 15994067
>>15994054
>Still stuck in the mindset that internal european rocketry is viable
More money thrown to the wind. the US or China whoever will be dominant at the end of the century will still be more than happy to sell launches and grow economic ties with europe.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:26:55 UTC No. 15994071
>>15992681
What?! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:30:40 UTC No. 15994076
>>15992665
SpaceX has requested a modified launch license now, after submitting investigative report. We're now waiting on license from FAA.
On the launch site, they're reworking/bolstering some barriers that guard the tank farms with more concrete walls.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:50:40 UTC No. 15994101
>>15994041
This would directly compete against battery storage. Doesn't seem very feasible.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:53:00 UTC No. 15994107
>>15994101
Mylar inflatable mirrors are cheap. Look at the proposal for the solar moth, this was supposed to be expendable with LH2 monoprop.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:01:58 UTC No. 15994117
>>15994041
>>15994101
>>15994107
>still pretending that synthetic natural gas won't entirely solve the storage problem
cope harder
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:06:34 UTC No. 15994120
>>15994041
Not to play the beetle's advocate, but shining a bunch of giant space spotlight down on a multi-kilometer target seems like the kind of thing that could have unintended environmental consequences.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:18:44 UTC No. 15994129
>>15994057
>fuck solar
lol why? not as good as nuclear?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:19:25 UTC No. 15994130
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024/
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:20:15 UTC No. 15994131
>>15994128
Maybe they should focus on getting it to lift payloads into proper orbits first? Just throwing out ideas here.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:20:21 UTC No. 15994132
>>15994036
when has he ever, to he dësú
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:20:32 UTC No. 15994133
>>15994130
someone explain this shit I still don't get it, and am also reluctant to dive deep into a theory that may just get debunked by its own experiment in a month
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:23:13 UTC No. 15994136
>>15994129
As long as you have fuel, you have nuclear energy. Solar on the other hand is not a reliable or storable source of energy.
>>15994133
"Dark Matter" = theory to make up for the mass and gravity of black holes while seemingly ignoring their existence.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:27:31 UTC No. 15994144
>>15994128
It's not, but it's not a bad idea. With a single RD-191 at minimum throttle a cluster of five URM-1 modules plus landing gear would have a thrust-mass ratio of less than 1, which would mean that it wouldn't need to perfect Falcon 9's hoverslam.
The problem is that this is planning on using a downrange barge landing, and Russia doesn't have the easily means of getting something this size from Vladivostok back to Vostochny. It also seems to need a hydrogen upper stage, which is something Russia's had a lot of issues with in the past and doesn't have any infrastructure to support currently.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:28:55 UTC No. 15994146
TIL Atlas Series 400 had Spanish-made (CASA/Astrium) interstage
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:37:33 UTC No. 15994154
Where is the startup working on nuclear space tugs?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:38:01 UTC No. 15994156
>>15994133
Very crudely: Inertia is caused by quantum waves pushing against objects, and quantum waves are naturally dampened in certain directions because of horizons, this dampening explains why galaxies stick together when they should scatter. (The previous explanation for this was dark matter)
Since the waves can be dampened, we can exploit this by dampening them artifically with electromagnets, if we dampen in one direction we get thrust in that direction, allowing us to get thrust without fuel, by pushing against the waves
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:40:44 UTC No. 15994157
>>15994117
Syngas and night time reflector generators are complementary, you can keep driving synthesis plants at night or just burn less stored gas.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:43:44 UTC No. 15994160
>>15994156
To clarify this anon's point, the Unruh radiation bath is the same in all directions except when damped by mass (this causes gravity) or by acceleration (damped in one direction, intensified in another, this causes inertia). The reason quantum events don't seem to obey gravity is that unless the waves coalesce into actual photons, quantum scale events literally don't have gravity.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:45:06 UTC No. 15994161
>>15994130
That is laughable. What's missing is the long list of stuff which MOND cannot explain, like the fluctuations in the CMB, lensing, like the bullet cluster or clusters in general. Things which McCulloch totally promises he can explain but you can see any of the details.
>>15994133
It's "predictions" for galaxy dynamics have already been falsified, with wide binaries.
The paper McCulloch wrote on the topic just copied old data which made the mistake of just averaging over all the objects. But if one looks at the actual distribution it looks nothing like MOND without the EFE (which is what QI copies). People are still arguing about GR vs MOND, but QI is just way off.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:45:10 UTC No. 15994162
>>15994156
Ok I kind of get it now and since they recorded thrust in a vacuum chamber with the drive and electromagnets switched on but recorded no thrust with the same vacuum experiment setup but electromagnet switched off then it should lead to measurable thrust in space I see
>>15994160
>quantum scale events literally don't have gravity.
Lmao, so much for the theoretical physicists dreams of unifying gravity and quantum mechanics,
>muh theory of everything
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:46:16 UTC No. 15994163
>>15994161
Ok but is there any way this drive could still work as advertised and be revolutionary without relying on QI?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:48:09 UTC No. 15994168
>>15994163
it could be producing aparrent force through distortion of spacetime
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:48:42 UTC No. 15994172
>>15994050
lol
they thought it was petrol
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:57:25 UTC No. 15994185
>>15994163
Not according to known physics, no.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:01:37 UTC No. 15994192
>>15994185
Unknown physics then
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:12:38 UTC No. 15994205
>I'm a habitually overly-cautious guy. However, I'm now sure after 19 yrs work, 25 peer reviewed papers, three books, #DARPA funding & five positive lab tests, that #quantisedinertia is valid & can give us new quantum energy, thrust & travel to Proxima in a human lifetime.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:15:47 UTC No. 15994210
>>15994038
lmao, you are assblasted
did you think I just came up with that on my own?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:17:52 UTC No. 15994214
>>15994046
I prefer "wronghanded", "perverse" or "sinister".
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:19:43 UTC No. 15994217
>>15994163
Not based on the way Mansell is describing the way they did their null-thrust tests. Either he's lying or QI works.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:20:39 UTC No. 15994218
>>15994217
We'll know soon enough
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:23:19 UTC No. 15994222
>>15994218
>>15994217
Mike McCullough just flew over my house!
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:23:44 UTC No. 15994223
>>15994192
Nobody can answer that. But conservation of momentum seems like an unlikely law to be overturned.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:25:12 UTC No. 15994225
>>15994163
Trust the chudience
https://nitter.1d4.us/memcculloch/s
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:26:00 UTC No. 15994226
>>15994223
Fuck lawfags, its time for chaoschads to rule
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:31:47 UTC No. 15994237
>>15994214
Left just ain't right
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:34:41 UTC No. 15994243
>>15994225
From the quote tweet above that he replied to:
>hiding the true nature of the universe, including what forces are driving everything, and how we came to be here. This includes the secret to free energy, and how they are keeping the world in a form of slavery
>- his work is one of the foundational pillars that is making them look for a dark matter and other strange particles, and building the large collider’s, which are actually attempted portals for inter-dimensional interaction; they needed the excuse to build them
The elite inteligencia Mike is engaging with on Twitter. Pseudoscience and conspiracy theories are birds of a feather.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:37:20 UTC No. 15994251
>>15994223
It's an extension of the conservation law to mass-energy-information, not total deletion of CoM.
>>15994243
When government, industry, and academia develop credibility problems, society loses its bullshit filter. If you want to suppress conspiracy theories about pseudoscience try not proving the ones about ethnic replacement correct.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:42:43 UTC No. 15994265
>>15993518
commercial flanges aren't bad but Navy flanges are hell
they're kind of heavy though
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:45:30 UTC No. 15994272
>>15994251
And what is the equation which describes this conservation law? How is information quantified?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:46:27 UTC No. 15994273
>>15993709
please understand they must do the needful and support their ICBM manufacturers
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:47:59 UTC No. 15994276
So how hard will /sci/ collectively seethe once QI is proven to be true? Actually I think /sci/ might be the least seething and most accepting, reddit will definitely lose their shit
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:49:28 UTC No. 15994280
>>15993709
Personally I'd do a solid first stage and a fuel-rich staged combustion Methalox upper stage.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:49:55 UTC No. 15994281
>>15993957
I will drop rocks on the fascists
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:50:24 UTC No. 15994283
>>15994276
Why attempt to inject artificial outrage and strife here, what's the point. If it works, neat. If not, too bad. Quit being a faggot.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:52:29 UTC No. 15994285
>>15994283
Bored
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:53:02 UTC No. 15994288
>>15994276
>how hard will /sci/ seethe once LK-99 is proven to be a room temperature superconductor
Reddit won't lose their shit because they don't have any shit left to lose
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:53:45 UTC No. 15994290
>>15994276
No real /sfg/ poster would be mad SF tier magic propulsion. If QI ends up being real it's literal colonize the stars level tech. If QI is real I'm popping the champagne, quitting my job, and working for a company building QI thrusters. It's not real, though.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:56:52 UTC No. 15994293
>>15994288
oh yeah LK-99 is not out of the fight yet either now known as PCPOSOS (sulphur dopped)
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:57:09 UTC No. 15994294
>>15994290
I will sell a bunch of assets and raise money to found that company if it happens.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:58:48 UTC No. 15994299
>>15994120
that's why we need to focus it down to a few dozen square meters
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:01:48 UTC No. 15994301
>>15994299
*centimers
*specifically the FAA
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:03:17 UTC No. 15994303
>>15994276
A. it won't be proven true
B. if it works it's time for spaceplanes
C. I fucking love spaceplanes
I have no love for current physics but I think conservation of momentum is an unlikely law to be overturned
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:04:48 UTC No. 15994305
>>15994301
A. if you use a big enough mirror the desired effect will be reached regardless
B. atmospheric distortion will bloom out your death ray no matter what so there's no point in going below a certain size
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:09:39 UTC No. 15994309
>>15994299
You're still going to get scatter. I'm just wondering how much secondary illumination the area outside the target is going to get.
>>15994301
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMx
You know, I think I've seen something like this before
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:12:10 UTC No. 15994314
>>15994303
If QI works then spaceplanes with roll in/out solar arrays and beamed power are the optimal way to do mass interplanetary travel, which is hilarious. You'd only need QI/NEP for explorer ships to set up the nuclear fed transport laser stations around moons and dwarf planets in the outer system, or for warships, or for a semi generation ship to Alpha Centauri.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:22:54 UTC No. 15994328
>Ctrl+F QI
>12 results
shut the fuck up star trek child predator. the satellite is decaying as you speak.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:27:16 UTC No. 15994333
>>15994328
It hasn't been turned on yet.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:30:11 UTC No. 15994340
>>15994333
And it never will because it doesn't actually do anything.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:41:47 UTC No. 15994345
>>15994016
#6 needs this
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:43:28 UTC No. 15994346
QI will succeed, and if it doesn't some other magic space drive will someday. The Earth was never big enough for us.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:43:59 UTC No. 15994347
>>15994041
>oops our mirror guidance system screwed up
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:45:52 UTC No. 15994350
>>15994328
single stage to orbit electric spaceplanes running on over-unity QI power
>>15994347
not enough fire
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:46:31 UTC No. 15994351
>>15994060
Body Odor would need a working orbital launch system first.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:47:30 UTC No. 15994352
>>15994346
>I want things to be easy
You're a faggot. You don't have the right stuff.
You don't desire hardship.
Both fission and fusion do not violate the laws of physics.
God is not going to help you any further.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:48:05 UTC No. 15994354
>>15994340
It produced thrust in the lab and the theory works out. We are going to Alpha Centauri within the century. Rumor is they will turn it on 2 weeks from today.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:48:54 UTC No. 15994355
>>15994352
>I want things to be hard
You're a poseur. You've never had the right stuff.
You don't want things to be done.
You will be left in the dust.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:51:50 UTC No. 15994358
>>15994354
>It produced thrust in the lab
No it didn't.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:52:46 UTC No. 15994360
What would QI ships look like anyways
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:55:00 UTC No. 15994363
Does anyone remember dynamic soaring on the solar magnetisphere
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:55:49 UTC No. 15994365
>>15994355
Extremely pathetic
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:56:06 UTC No. 15994366
>>15994358
Please refer to the .gif in the previous post I think it will quell your doubts.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:57:16 UTC No. 15994367
>>15994354
lol stupid frogposter
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:59:33 UTC No. 15994369
>>15994368
How do you get in
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:21 UTC No. 15994370
>>15994368
Based submarine murder rapist associated company planning to kill more people.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:31 UTC No. 15994371
>>15994369
through the hatch
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:02:09 UTC No. 15994372
>>15994367
Gtfo only trannies hate frogs
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:02:22 UTC No. 15994373
>>15994360
Because it's purely electric there isn't any exhaust so it could just be a cube or a sphere or a flying saucer.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:02:49 UTC No. 15994374
>>15994372
nigger
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:06:16 UTC No. 15994378
>>15994376
https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcr
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:10:44 UTC No. 15994383
>>15994377
there's worse ways to die, believe me darling
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:17:59 UTC No. 15994387
>>15994360
lots of solar panels
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:18:31 UTC No. 15994388
>he's ACTUALLY doing it
Elon is a god amongst men
https://youtube.com/watch?v=8ZWTAYQ
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:20:07 UTC No. 15994390
SpaceX bought a 737
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:22:27 UTC No. 15994393
I found life in your ass
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:25:15 UTC No. 15994394
>>15994388
ah yes, spaceflight
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:25:23 UTC No. 15994395
>>15994393
Always in the last place you look
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:34:31 UTC No. 15994399
>>15994394
In a lot of ways Starship is a safer bet than FSD was.
The spaceflight industry needs to prepare for the "hype" and "exaggerations" of the one who shall not be named to become reality.
Every day they're not EXPECTING Starship to lower the cost to LEO by 100x is shooting another one of their legs off.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:39:24 UTC No. 15994400
>>15994399
Even if they were only expecting a 2x that'd make all their current plans obsolete except MAYBE Vulcan and New Glorp.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:59:57 UTC No. 15994415
>>15994413
eh, the apollo suits had severely limited mobility
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:00:58 UTC No. 15994418
>>15994413
>>15994415
the future will be spandex spacesuits, and I'll hate it
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:01:45 UTC No. 15994419
>>15994418
I'm going to cover my spacesuit in body fitting ceramic rifle plates and there's nothing you can do to stop me
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:02:21 UTC No. 15994421
>>15994413
for me its Gemini
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:02:35 UTC No. 15994422
Lunar hamster balls so you don't have to get changed to go roll around on the moon.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:02:51 UTC No. 15994424
>>15994421
hell yeah wrap me in aluminum foil and throw me out the airlock, daddy
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:07:47 UTC No. 15994427
>>15994425
Are you man enough to work through a micrometeoroid shower?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:08:06 UTC No. 15994428
>>15994422
Just make these into rovers at that point
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:08:32 UTC No. 15994429
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:12:27 UTC No. 15994433
>>15994428
But then you wouldn't get any exercise from it
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:45:19 UTC No. 15994453
>>15994354
>two weeks
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:53:52 UTC No. 15994457
>>15994453
Nigger weeks
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 02:09:07 UTC No. 15994469
>>15994154
regulatory hurdles are too large
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 02:30:31 UTC No. 15994498
>>15994490
Stop giving the flatcels the ammo they want retard
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 02:38:24 UTC No. 15994505
>>15994128
I still think that abandoning Energia-M is a mistake. Soviet/Russia already spend much in developing RD-170 and RD-0120 to just discard it. They can even make the booster into a flyback one in the future.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 02:43:11 UTC No. 15994512
>>15994505
You're underestimating how bad the collapse was in the 90s. This would have been completely beyond them.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:08:14 UTC No. 15994536
>>15994490
moon confirmed female
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:16:50 UTC No. 15994540
>>15994536
Very homosexual of the artist to put a tranny on the right.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:35:02 UTC No. 15994549
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status
haven't listened to it yet but the random spot I clicked he was talking about optimus, but the text talks about hitting SpaceX
probably no new info though but I'm gonna listen to it anyway and say if there is anything
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:38:38 UTC No. 15994555
Realistically, what will Russian American collaboration in spaceflight look like after the ISS is bye bye?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:41:13 UTC No. 15994561
>>15994354
the trvthnvke that saved the 'general
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:41:46 UTC No. 15994562
>>15994555
Russian will be collaborating with China from now on. India will be the replacement for Russia. You joke but Indians are good at producing functional stuff with 10% of the budget. It is a better partner than the volatile Russians.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:44:13 UTC No. 15994566
>>15994562
do the russians have anything to offer the chinese realistically?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:45:57 UTC No. 15994571
>>15994566
Land, resources, and women. This will not be a good decade to be Russian.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:48:54 UTC No. 15994578
>>15994540
obsessed
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:49:29 UTC No. 15994579
>>15994540
possessed
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:49:37 UTC No. 15994580
>>15994566
>do the country that dominates all front in space exploration except putting a man on the moon has anything to offer to a new startup called China?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:53:07 UTC No. 15994582
>>15994580
dominates? maybe 70 years ago lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:06:02 UTC No. 15994594
>>15994578
Kys troon
>>15994579
Lys ghost
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:08:52 UTC No. 15994598
>>15994561
that's a lithium rocket
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:09:21 UTC No. 15994599
>>15994594
>implying that a ghost would want to stay dead
holy fail
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:10:46 UTC No. 15994600
>>15994599
if I was a ghost I'd go haunt Mars that would be real neato.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:11:50 UTC No. 15994602
>>15994600
how does a ghost perform a trans martian injection burn?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:13:22 UTC No. 15994603
>>15994602
Ghosts use antigravity propulsion.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:13:46 UTC No. 15994605
>>15994602
ghost rocket obviously
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:14:06 UTC No. 15994607
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U61
JAXA press conference on SLIM, live in about 45 minutes
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:14:18 UTC No. 15994610
>>15994562
>Russian will be collaborating with China
China only wants submissive partners and Russia has too much pride to be anything less than an equal. The only thing Russia had worth bargaining with was its propulsion tech, and China's interest in bargaining for that fell through in 2016. They haven't caught up yet to Russia's skill with staged combustion but they're not far off.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:16:14 UTC No. 15994613
>>15994607
>sent a shoe box to moon
>communicate to the Earth for 45 minutes before shutting down
YES NIHONJIN LANDED ON MOON
MOONLANDER FOLDED 1000 TIMES
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:16:21 UTC No. 15994614
>>15994602
Spookily
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:17:48 UTC No. 15994615
>>15994613
hey man I just want the pictures it took
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:18:49 UTC No. 15994617
>>15994615
I just wanna know what the lil ball rover did, that cueball has my attention.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:20:11 UTC No. 15994620
>>15994613
Same energy as
>landed way off the mark from the south pole
>rover died after 1 lunar day
YES POO FINALLY FOUND LOO IN THE SOUTH POLE OF MOON
THE REAL SOUTH POLE ISRO BEST SPACE AGENCY
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:04:46 UTC No. 15994661
>>15994613
>>15994620
The over-enthusiasm is a bit eyerolling, but at the same time I AM happy to see it. If (you) somehow got a smallsat to touch down on the moon you'd be jumping up and down too, so would I.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:15:20 UTC No. 15994665
>>15994602
>trans martian
It -AAAAACKs itself all the way there via space tug
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:22:40 UTC No. 15994668
>>15994662
what I got via google translating some of the slides
>they got within ~10 meters of target landing zone
>more like ~3 if you measure from before they did obstacle avoidance
>an anomaly occurred that caused them to lose ~55% of thrust
>you can see one of the engine bells blown off in a picture it took
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:28:26 UTC No. 15994670
>>15994668
>because they lost the engine they were moving more sideways than expected
>lev 1 and 2 were dropped at 5 meters
>vertical speed at touchdown was lower than expected but lateral speed was higher, so the vehicle settled into an unexpected attitude
>we believe the spacecraft is almost vertical with the panels facing west
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:31:44 UTC No. 15994672
Live Clear reaction!
https://twitter.com/clearusui/statu
https://twitter.com/clearusui/statu
https://twitter.com/clearusui/statu
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:33:41 UTC No. 15994675
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:34:43 UTC No. 15994677
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:37:21 UTC No. 15994679
>>15994677
>we believe that in the evening power generation will be restored and operations may resume. we are preparing to resume spacecraft operations on feb 1
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:38:51 UTC No. 15994680
>>15994672
Nobody will hear your screams in the vacuum of space
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:47:46 UTC No. 15994688
>>15994686
Oh shit is this from the ball rover?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:48:37 UTC No. 15994689
>>15994688
Yes from LEV-2.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:48:43 UTC No. 15994690
>>15994686
>record scratch
>freeze frame
>yep, that's me. and that's my lander upside down on the moon
>you're probably wondering how I got into this situation
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:52:31 UTC No. 15994693
>>15994689
>LEV
Noice, I'm glad the little rover survived long enough to transmit images, that's awesome. Has it traversed at all yet? Or are they still waiting to try and move it anywhere?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:54:53 UTC No. 15994695
>>15994693
>>15994686
https://www.jaxa.jp/press/2024/01/2
>This image was transferred to the ground via LEV-1, and it was confirmed that the communication function between LEV-1 and LEV-2 was operating normally. Additionally, since LEV-2 was deformed from its spherical state in its stored state, we were also able to confirm that it was successfully deployed and driven on the lunar surface after being released from SLIM. Furthermore, under autonomous control, LEV-2 used an image processing algorithm to select high-quality images that were within the SLIM's field of view from among multiple images taken using its onboard optical camera, and then sent them. I also know that.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:55:00 UTC No. 15994696
>>15994686
the surface looks gnarly.
might just be the camera though
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:01:09 UTC No. 15994699
>>15994696
The day side of the Moon is very bright and the regolith has never been worn down by erosion.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:04:58 UTC No. 15994702
>>15994686
ah yeah I see the problem, they put the ground on the wrong side
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:09:21 UTC No. 15994705
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u30
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:12:12 UTC No. 15994710
>>15994705
Accept us
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:14:31 UTC No. 15994712
>>15994686
Bruh I think she’s missing an engine bell
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:20:31 UTC No. 15994715
>>15994705
Small-launch companies are simply farms that create future Spacex employees
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:43:35 UTC No. 15994730
What if we just denied all Terrans entry to Mars after 2060
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:55:07 UTC No. 15994738
>>15994030
Did you get a sniff?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:57:27 UTC No. 15994740
>>15994030
Why has he not just gone full bald 10 years ago the hair is getting embarassing
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:57:49 UTC No. 15994741
>>15994730
The competency crisis on Earth will take care of the problem for you.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:04:33 UTC No. 15994742
>>15994740
He started malding when Trump was nominated in 2016 and has never stopped.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:07:53 UTC No. 15994744
>>15994686
Does it have any RCS fuel left over? Could it use the thrusters to tip itself back on its feet?
Also: retarded landing system.
Also: nice job landing intact with a missing engine bell despite retarded landing system.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:10:19 UTC No. 15994745
>>15994744
Also: im trans
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:28:48 UTC No. 15994753
>>15994549
>some of this is just communism rebranded t: musk
this should be interesting
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:36:36 UTC No. 15994759
>>15994753
musk says his "religion" is to expand human consciousness into the stars as much as possible
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:40:55 UTC No. 15994760
>>15994759
>starship is the first spaceship capable of making life multiplanetary
nothing new yet
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:49:50 UTC No. 15994766
>>15994760
humans on mars within 10 years, 40 years to get it self-sustaining
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:14:59 UTC No. 15994782
>>15994769
When did you realize you were wrong
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:19:28 UTC No. 15994784
>>15994769
And you were right.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:21:45 UTC No. 15994786
>>15994784
Why dont you kill yourself coal burning nigger lover
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:22:24 UTC No. 15994787
>>15994686
Didn't they insist that landing went alright and it was just problems with solar panels?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:50:14 UTC No. 15994798
>>15992611
How long would it takes to go from venus to mercury? Asking for a friend.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:51:56 UTC No. 15994799
>>15994798
Mercury is so close to the sun that it has higher delta-V requirements than Saturn and it's about 7x as bright as Earth.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:53:17 UTC No. 15994802
How will current events affect SpaceX operations in Texas?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:58:22 UTC No. 15994807
>>15994802
The Mexican launch viewing site will get a bunch of razorwire barriers in the river but nothing that impedes ops or even watching from land.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:05:16 UTC No. 15994814
>>15994686
slim chan is such a clutz
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:08:40 UTC No. 15994816
>>15994814
she is assume this position for my penis
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:17:19 UTC No. 15994822
>>15994816
moon alien hands typed this post
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:42:52 UTC No. 15994850
>>15992611
THE FIRE RISES
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:09:57 UTC No. 15994863
knower here
some very bad info will be dropped at the last minute on friday
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:33:40 UTC No. 15994877
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:18:27 UTC No. 15994896
>>15994787
The lander soft landed at a lower-than-expected speed and within the 100m radius landing area, it was a success by the basic criteria
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:33:03 UTC No. 15994903
>>15994879
A lower quality repost of an off topic image no one gave a shit about. Do better, as the zoomers say
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:56:07 UTC No. 15994917
>>15994580
the answer is "No" btw
>>15994814
thank you, anon
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:57:08 UTC No. 15994919
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:58:44 UTC No. 15994921
>>15994879
i shit blood :(
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:02:29 UTC No. 15994923
What's heavier? A kilogram of lox or a kilogram of methane?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:03:46 UTC No. 15994925
I had a dream that six new vehicles were brought together and placed in a tight circle. All of the launch companies agreed to conduct a simultaneous launch from the same pad for their maiden flights.
Starship
Terran R
Ariane 6
New Glenn
ABL RS-1
Vulcan
All of them scrubbed, except for Terran R, which flew flawlessly and its first stage RTLS safely.
Take from this dream what you will.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:04:17 UTC No. 15994927
>>15994923
do we have cryocoolers
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:11:41 UTC No. 15994935
>>15994686
>lost an engine
>still managed to land with 55m of the target
that's sniper accuracy right there
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:20:40 UTC No. 15994941
>>15994923
you will have exactly twice as much methane as oxygen
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:22:11 UTC No. 15994944
>>15994941
the mass of the liquids is the same but by their volume the mass of the tankage will be different
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:33:59 UTC No. 15994961
>>15994944
yes, but O2 ways twice as a much as CH4 per molecule. 32 vs 16.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:35:00 UTC No. 15994963
>>15994961
*weighs
and I mean atomic mass
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:35:06 UTC No. 15994964
>>15994961
we're not measuring by molecule or mol here anon
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:36:29 UTC No. 15994967
>>15994923
But methanes heavier than oxygen
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:45:11 UTC No. 15994977
>>15994969
Go fuck yourself.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:45:49 UTC No. 15994978
>>15994969
the USGov will lose this fight
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:46:04 UTC No. 15994979
>>15994969
>I'll say it for the last time
we hope so.
>noooo not muh poor illegalerinos!!!
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:46:14 UTC No. 15994980
>>15994787
>Didn't they insist that landing went alright and it was just problems with solar panels?
Mission operation teams do shit like this all the time because they're cowards and the public will move on without caring about what the actual fuckup was that led to the termination, there is is never any consequence to being highly misleading about it. All the propellent leaked out of your spacecraft and it can't even maintain attitude control? Insist that the problem is that it's low on power and that you will continue trying to reestablish contact.
It's like the Spirit rover who JPL got stuck and rendered it worthless, when it finally died it was 'ooooo a dust storm killed it, solar is hard :('. All while they allude to under sizing their power system to only meet their very short design life criteria and that they don't actually want to do long term missions, citing limited scientific value. Ingenuity lives on out of pure spite, or perhaps because they used a bunch of off the shelf commercial components like the battery cells which have managed to be better than anything they could have come up with.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:46:33 UTC No. 15994981
>>15994128
>paper rocket
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:51:48 UTC No. 15994986
>>15994390
>SpaceX bought a 737
They're taking it apart and looking at how the passenger sections are implemented
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:52:54 UTC No. 15994988
>>15994488
Holy shit....
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:53:28 UTC No. 15994989
Radian, the startup building a SSTO space plane that launches off of rails is still kicking around
https://x.com/radianspace/status/17
> Radian recently teamed up with @NASAglenn's Aerospace Polymeric Materials Branch toformulate, synthesize, and test various #aerogel options to identify the ideal thermal protection system (TPS)and insulation materialfor future Radian One missions. (1/3)
> After rigorous assessment, we've chosen acustomized aerogel formulationwith remarkable insulative properties, hydrophobicity, and flexibility to conform to our complex geometry. (2/3)
> Next up is our trial by fire, as we put the integrated TPS and insulation system to the torch test to gather initialheat of reentryperformance data. Stay tuned! (3/3)
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:55:58 UTC No. 15994993
Confession: I used to be really confident in E2E starship, but now it seems outlandish and retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:58:40 UTC No. 15994998
>>15994993
I know right. Just as outlandish and retarded as transatlantic flights
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:58:56 UTC No. 15994999
>>15994925
How do I dreammaxx like this bros? The only dreams I ever get are ones in which I die
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:02:54 UTC No. 15995003
>>15994999
I used to have dreams like that, then I decided that I would rather kill instead of die
now I keep getting trapped in repetitive mundane nightmares
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:09:58 UTC No. 15995008
>>15994999
I just have dreams where I'm posting on 4chan
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:12:16 UTC No. 15995011
>>15994276
What are the implications for potential FTL travel? My stance on QI depends entirely on that.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:15:28 UTC No. 15995013
>>15994561
Bro... that's not a molecule.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:19:06 UTC No. 15995017
>>15992611
>ex-SpaceX and Blue Origin
kek im seeing so many of these lately
what's going on?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:19:26 UTC No. 15995018
>>15994276
>once QI is proven to be true
>proven to be true
>proven
It's never gonna happen though is it? The "science" behind it doesn't work.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:36:13 UTC No. 15995032
>>15995017
People leave jobs all the time. The days of loyalty to your corporation to the grave are long gone.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:39:21 UTC No. 15995035
>>15994276
Why would I seethe if a wonder-technology that unlocks the stars actually worked? The only thing I'm mad at is the blind hope people have for things that don't really have good experimental backing.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:41:42 UTC No. 15995039
>>15995017
You leave SpaceX because you get worked as a slave and youthful energy only lasts so long. You leave BO because nothing is happening.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:44:05 UTC No. 15995042
>>15994399
FSD is already here lmao. The success rate for FSD right now is ~95% or so, thats better than 0% for the rest of the industry. People are sold a lie where they are told to not accept this as a win in any way.
The guy literally drove inside a busy streets of LA with all sorts of daily driving events that no other car in the world can navigate.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:01:11 UTC No. 15995051
>>15994715
or retire burnt-out SpaceX employees
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:13:27 UTC No. 15995058
>>15995042
>The success rate for FSD right now is ~95% or so
What does that mean?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:13:39 UTC No. 15995059
>>15994989
The space plane in question
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:15:08 UTC No. 15995061
>>15995042
He said in 2019 that Teslas were appreciating assets because robotaxi functionality coming soon. Didn't quite turn out that way. FSD better be good if he charges $12k for it.
Rich techbros from Cali won't be fazed by much, but I would be pissed if I was a normie roped in to purchase a Tesla based on promises like that.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:59:32 UTC No. 15995089
>>15994999
set some sort of alarm that will beep once to jolt you into REM phase if you are a heavy sleeper
sleep deprivation also works wonders although that's borderline on hallucinating
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:05:03 UTC No. 15995092
>>15995089
This + write down your dreams as soon as you wake up/remember them
Will show improvements In a few weeks
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:10:48 UTC No. 15995095
PDFs from JAXAs press conference
SLIM
https://www.jaxa.jp/projects/files/
LEV-1
https://www.jaxa.jp/projects/files/
LEV-2
https://www.jaxa.jp/projects/files/
They're in Japanese but you can get some out of it with machine translation
>Note that disconnecting the battery is a measure to avoid permanent loss of the spacecraft due to over-discharge. SLIM can operate as long as the power generated by the solar cells exceeds a certain level, so it is expected that operations will resume once the power is recovered in the future.
>The remaining battery power (SOC) when the battery relay is OFF is approximately 12%.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:19:03 UTC No. 15995106
>>15995061
>>15995058
I mean we're calling chatgpt/stable diffusions/etc AI when they need much a lot of human guidance/prompt. The AI tesla has, the driving one, literally drives itself through the city. Thats an achievement that no other company in any field has.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:29:49 UTC No. 15995110
>>15995095
>so it is expected that operations will resume once the power is recovered in the future
50 years from now.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:49:51 UTC No. 15995127
>>15994969
Completely dissolve the federal government in order to free up Starship testing cadence.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:57:13 UTC No. 15995140
>>15995127
https://ihsoyct.github.io/?mode=com
this guy is so mad haha
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:58:29 UTC No. 15995142
>>15995140
>reddit archive
No thanks, I'll read your summery of it though
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:17:34 UTC No. 15995157
>>15995061
>He said in 2019 that Teslas were appreciating assets because robotaxi functionality coming soon
2019 was 5 years ago
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:43:54 UTC No. 15995172
>>15995169
I'm glad the lil cueball rover is okay. Shame about SLIM going ass-up like a drunken slut though, but hey at least it didn't impact or miss the moon entirely. 6/10
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:47:36 UTC No. 15995173
>>15995169
ええええええええええーーー??
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:47:58 UTC No. 15995174
>>15995017
All roads lead to a job at LM
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:08:05 UTC No. 15995188
>>15994969
texas needs a space force NOW
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:17:19 UTC No. 15995197
>>15995190
superpowa
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:21:34 UTC No. 15995199
>>15995190
owari da
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:40:38 UTC No. 15995211
>It is traveling at 4.72 miles per second. If over the next few months it increases in speed instead of falling out of orbit then this would be evidence that the Quantum Drive works. They want to raise the orbit by 100 kilometers (60 miles). This should start sometime in the next 1-8 weeks and the drive will be on for a month or more.
>1-8 weeks
WHY SO LONGGggg
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:43:25 UTC No. 15995212
>>15995211
When did they say this? I thought it was supposed to start already.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:43:45 UTC No. 15995213
>>15995211
They need full control of the whole satellite including the reaction wheels because the thrusters don't gimbal. That means they have to wait for all the other payloads to go first.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:44:28 UTC No. 15995215
>>15995212
From the latest meme drive article
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024/
apparently the guy interviewed McCollough so he has extra deets
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:45:35 UTC No. 15995216
>>15995213
There are no other payloads its testing software related shit I think https://rogue.space/missions/barry-
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:48:37 UTC No. 15995219
>>15995211
hes stalling for time. they know it wont work but dont accept it yet. praying for a miracle basically.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:57:10 UTC No. 15995224
>>15995215
Bit of a better explanation as to where exactly the thrust comes from I guess, I understand it a bit better now
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:58:12 UTC No. 15995225
>>15995224
also 'quantum void thruster' would be a good cool name for this drive
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:10:53 UTC No. 15995232
>>15995225
Shut up
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:11:33 UTC No. 15995233
>>15995232
Make me
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:16:24 UTC No. 15995236
>>15995224
One thing the article doesn't mention is that like all capacitor driven systems this produces pulsed thrust, so you can vary the thrust by altering the pulse rate.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:18:25 UTC No. 15995239
>>15994617
It's over
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:19:26 UTC No. 15995240
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:21:20 UTC No. 15995246
>>15995233
Ill see you out the airlock then
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:22:51 UTC No. 15995249
>>15995246
*activates MOOSE*
haha sucker, get MOOSED on
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:24:33 UTC No. 15995250
>>15995239
>>15995240
it literally performed perfectly, enough to take this photo and communicate it back to Earth
>>15995169
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:25:57 UTC No. 15995253
>>15995250
>not charging
>works perfectly
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:26:55 UTC No. 15995255
>>15995250
Wow, thanks for showing me that two hour old news, I had no idea.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:27:18 UTC No. 15995256
>>15995211
Because it doesn't actually produce thrust, the grift is stringing along the hopeful.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:27:58 UTC No. 15995258
>>15995253
does he little ball charge? I thought it was just a one-and-done sort of thing. either way its the landers fault.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:30:46 UTC No. 15995261
>>15995256
What grift?
>company develops drive
>find another company to agree to host it on their cubesat
>cubesat launches to space
>?????
>either drive works or doesn't
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:35:09 UTC No. 15995265
>>15995261
mike mcullough's death cult. his book sales, appearances, conventions, etc.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:35:10 UTC No. 15995266
>>15995261
They aren't working for free.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:36:04 UTC No. 15995268
>>15995011
None whatsoever.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:39:46 UTC No. 15995272
>>15995255
Get out offboarder
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:44:08 UTC No. 15995277
>>15995224
I don't get why a layer of metal should block Unruh radiation. Isn't it ultra long frequency? If you could block it wouldn't that mean you could just eliminate inertia with a screen?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:08:45 UTC No. 15995299
https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/sta
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:14:12 UTC No. 15995301
>>15995017
SpaceX is hard work. Even the OGs needed to call it quits after 20 years or so.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:24:37 UTC No. 15995309
>>15995299
Earth blew up?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:29:58 UTC No. 15995313
>>15995299
Oumuamua turned around and is coming back
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:34:02 UTC No. 15995318
>>15995316
WTF
They better dive the rover over there and take pictures of the crash site.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:38:17 UTC No. 15995323
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:41:36 UTC No. 15995327
>>15995323
I agree Bobby
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:42:56 UTC No. 15995329
>>15995323
I agree Bobby
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:43:06 UTC No. 15995331
>>15995316
Damn, should have lasted longer. That’s pathetic
>stfu JPL didn’t even expect it to work at all. We’re lucky it lasted this long, goy!
KYS we aren’t getting anywhere with that low-effort mindset
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:44:21 UTC No. 15995332
>>15995331
Yeah, that's a problem. This side project somehow ended up being more interesting than the rover.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:45:08 UTC No. 15995334
>>15995331(me)
In all seriousness though it appears it only stopped flying because a blade broke. That’s actually really good news. Unfortunate, but that means she could theoretically keep going with minor upgrades (literally some duct tape if humans were there)
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:57:25 UTC No. 15995346
>>15995334
misread that as "if humans were real"
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:04:42 UTC No. 15995355
>>15995316
>>15995318
This one kind of hurts
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:08:36 UTC No. 15995360
>>15995299
Berger shit blood again? Yeah we know
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:17:37 UTC No. 15995368
>>15995363
have to break it so they get money for a new toy
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:20:14 UTC No. 15995370
>>15995363
did it hit something
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:23:13 UTC No. 15995373
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:26:19 UTC No. 15995375
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:31:32 UTC No. 15995378
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:34:47 UTC No. 15995379
>>15995211
>2^3 weeks
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:39:05 UTC No. 15995385
>>15995266
They have other products.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:40:11 UTC No. 15995387
>>15995370
yeah a rock on the ground
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:43:02 UTC No. 15995394
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:43:52 UTC No. 15995396
>>15995363
that is all it take to imbalance the blade
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:51:49 UTC No. 15995410
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:09:17 UTC No. 15995434
>>15992662
CHYNA NUMBA WAN
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:17:01 UTC No. 15995442
>>15995110
>50 years from now
more like 1.5-2 weeks, need to wait for Lunar sunset
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:17:12 UTC No. 15995444
>>15995018
its another lk-99. big break throughs almost never happen at once, its a gradual escalation until they snowball into something new. Nobody imagined the transistor when they wonder of the first steam engine came to light
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:28:34 UTC No. 15995453
>>15995363
WHERES THE STICKY AHHHHHH
:(((((((((((
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:38:24 UTC No. 15995461
>>15995442
its a full moon now, Shioli crater is 25 degrees East. A half moon is in a weeks time, but by then the sun will have set for the lander. So the sun should be shining from an angle in 3-4 days.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:40:25 UTC No. 15995463
>>15994969
>democrats accept border laws republicucks have demanded
>suddenly republicans are against the package because it would undermine Brumpfs campaign
Hmmm....
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:45:10 UTC No. 15995468
>>15992662
The two biggest problem with Artemis is
1. they have no real long term plan (if they did you would've seen a lunar constellation already)
2. the Orion spacecraft is NOT CAPABLE of getting down to low lunar orbit, it uses NRHO!
The Constellation folks probably thought they were clever designing Orion in a way that is different from Apollo ie. a space station orbiting the Moon but its stupid.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:45:54 UTC No. 15995469
>>15995463
The Texas thing is happening because the Biden admin not only refuses to enforce the law but is actively enabling criminal activity.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:46:06 UTC No. 15995470
>>15995468
and worst of all: you can't talk about this if you work at NASA or any of its contractors
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:47:32 UTC No. 15995472
>>15995468
>low information anon makes absolute statements
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:51:42 UTC No. 15995477
>>15995277
>no one answered his question
>I couldn't find the answer myself either
Well? Where are the meme drive experts and QI quacks on here
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:51:50 UTC No. 15995478
https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/n
>First mission dependent on the Human Landing System (HLS) — requiring approximately 15 fueling
launches to support Artemis III
It's ogre
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:52:50 UTC No. 15995480
>>15995478
>source: my ass
They can just build stretched tankers, where are they getting this 15 number from, even SpaceX said 10
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:54:29 UTC No. 15995481
>>15995480
>NASA is my ass
pure cope
SpaceX relunctantly saying ten-ish makes it clear that they don't want to admit it's definitely above 10
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:55:36 UTC No. 15995484
>>15995478
BO says 16, Nasa says 15, SpaceX says 10, Elon says 6
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:55:58 UTC No. 15995485
>>15995481
They can just stretch Starship tankers, its not a big deal
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:58:57 UTC No. 15995489
>>15995485
>stretch
changed aerodynamics, at some point you need more engine to lower gravity losses, at some point you also need to strengthen and stretch the S1 because it's inadequate.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:59:38 UTC No. 15995491
ok /sfg/ is getting retarded again
see you guys in the next thread
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:00:18 UTC No. 15995493
What does The Science (TM) say about an underice Europa base
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:00:19 UTC No. 15995494
>>15995478
Its part of the Biden admin's push to stop funding SpaceX right?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:01:30 UTC No. 15995497
>>15995494
lol no if anything SpaceX is getting more contracts soon: https://www.space.com/pentagon-us-m
Why are they declassifying stuff?
So other players (SpaceX) can bid more on govt launches.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:03:52 UTC No. 15995498
>>15995497
A bird in hand is more real that 100 birds in 100 trees 10 years from now
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:10:34 UTC No. 15995505
>>15995478
Remember, all these are put forward by Bill Nelson's HLS admin pick and HLS admin's assistant put forward by Biden admin. These are more likely political statements than otherwise
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:33:02 UTC No. 15995532
>>15995478
What is the problem?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:40:24 UTC No. 15995542
>>15995532
Problem is Musk for Biden admin. Remember the HLS admin saying fixed firm price is flawed few months ago? Or the demotion from active role for Kathy? Or the Bill Nelson and Biden admin not being able to say the SpaceX/Tesla word for a year+? Or the snubbing of starlink contract from FCC as a first act of the Biden admin? Or the starlink negotiations being leaked by Biden admin to CNN as a hit piece?
These aren't random events. Connect the fucking dots. The current aim is to paint SpaceX as a bad choice for them to discontinued partnership or to make it look as bad as possible.
/sfg/ - Spaceflight General at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:47:53 UTC No. 15995555
Kerbal IRL edition
Previous: >>15992611
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:50:11 UTC No. 15995558
>>15995555
retard
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:53:38 UTC No. 15995563
>>15995542
not to mention all the other attacks on Musk companies and musk personally from all kinds of random directions
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:55:33 UTC No. 15995570
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jan 2024 23:20:31 UTC No. 15995610
>>15995542
biden minecraft admin
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:27:03 UTC No. 15995715
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jan 2024 03:06:22 UTC No. 15995798
>>15995277
>>15995477
Ok there's no explicit evidence that it does. But wouldn't it be cool if it did?? That's what BARRY-1 is up there to find out.