๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 19:45:53 UTC No. 16158126
why haven't we been back to the moon in such a long time?
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 20:00:25 UTC No. 16158146
Because we had to supervise the middle east and feed niggers
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 20:04:08 UTC No. 16158150
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 20:15:07 UTC No. 16158160
>>16158146
What about china? They love the moon! Even use a lunar calendar
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 20:31:20 UTC No. 16158188
>>16158126
because nasa is fucking retarded
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 20:45:20 UTC No. 16158199
>>16158126
Because there's nothing there, it's a big stupid rock with no atmosphere.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 20:50:43 UTC No. 16158204
>>16158199
the desert is just a pile of sand and people love going there
antarctic is a bunch of snow and rocks and scientists cant get enough of it
before the moon landings people were romanticizing all kinds of stuff to do on the moon
now it's just crickets
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 20:53:40 UTC No. 16158205
>>16158146
>we
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 20:56:10 UTC No. 16158207
>>16158204
Both the desert and antarctica have more to offer than the moon. They also have an atmosphere, and aren't nearly as hard to get to.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 20:56:33 UTC No. 16158208
>>16158204
>the desert
>antarctic
you can breathe and don't need a pressure suit in those places. you also can have a chopper get you out in case of trouble.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 21:20:03 UTC No. 16158225
>>16158199
there's a whole field of study that is obsessed with rocks
why do you hate rocks?
pic unrelated
it's just showing ai exposing apollo mission pictures as fake
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 21:24:10 UTC No. 16158228
>>16158225
There are space agencies from all over the world who're orbiting the moon with their satellites. If there were no stuff at the supposed Apollo landing site someone would've noticed. There even was Japanese rover that checked the site out, afaik.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 21:30:08 UTC No. 16158234
>>16158228
the ai must be lying then
or maybe its space agencies who maintain this charade
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 21:34:32 UTC No. 16158235
>>16158228
you can see the rover trails
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 21:37:27 UTC No. 16158239
>>16158228
Who controls all the financing of those space agencies? Oh, right, New York.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 21:41:55 UTC No. 16158241
>>16158225
Ah yes, because AI has never made mistakes before
Dumb fucking vatniks. The USSR at the time even conceded that the Americans landed on the moon
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 21:43:01 UTC No. 16158242
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:14:20 UTC No. 16158266
>>16158242
They're feeding you this sort of disinfo in order to sow discord within Western societies.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:21:19 UTC No. 16158269
>>16158266
they're feeding you this disinfo to make you believe you can leave this earth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16D
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:22:25 UTC No. 16158270
>>16158269
sure thing buddy. Don't forget you meddy time before you go to sleep
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:23:02 UTC No. 16158271
>>16158269
we can but not as meat
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:23:37 UTC No. 16158272
>>16158270
that's the best cope you have
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:23:40 UTC No. 16158273
>>16158126
Politics. Same reason we aren't building a dozen new fission plants a year even though it's objectively the highest efficiency means of generating baseload power available to us right now.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:25:59 UTC No. 16158276
>>16158269
>they're feeding you this disinfo to make you believe you can leave this earth
Retard alert.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:29:50 UTC No. 16158277
>>16158276
the first living being to orbit the earth still holds the record for the highest altitude reached by any mammal
and she didn't survive for long
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 23:01:32 UTC No. 16158321
>>16158126
VCR's came out and they couldn't risk normie consumers recording and analyzing their fake moon footage at the time it was broadcast. Had to wait for CGI tech to get to the where it is now.
Now we can have moon missions, jupiter missions, and, shit, even niburu missions. The sky is the limit.
otherwise... I mean I'm sure it's a total coincidence they waited 50 years until it became doable to create realistic fake video of literally anything conceivable.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 23:06:59 UTC No. 16158326
>>16158241
Why would any nation try to debunk they very scam that they will use on their own citizenry? It's like asking why Russia didn't expose our fiat currency or social security scams. I mean, use your fucking brain.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 23:12:18 UTC No. 16158332
Most of soience is lies constructed with political goals in mind, why would the moon landing be any different?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 00:05:42 UTC No. 16158373
>>16158321
>>16158326
>>16158332
Retard alert.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 00:40:43 UTC No. 16158389
Armstrong and Aldrin were tentacle raped by aliens and made NASA sign a form of non-disclosure and promise to never talk about it ever again.
>t. Insider
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 00:41:24 UTC No. 16158391
>>16158332
>but muh infographics from /pol/ and bitchuter with 56 views regularly have it all figured out
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 00:46:32 UTC No. 16158394
>>16158146
In return the West gets a shit ton of natural resources like cobalt. It goes both ways
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 00:47:35 UTC No. 16158395
>>16158146
In return the West gets a shit ton of natural resources like cobalt and oil. It goes both ways
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 00:48:57 UTC No. 16158397
>>16158126
because congress didn't feel like going back until recently
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 00:56:02 UTC No. 16158401
>>16158204
There's also life in those places
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 00:59:44 UTC No. 16158405
>>16158228
LMAO, you are overdosing in copium.
https://is2.4chan.org/wsg/171478433
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 01:04:01 UTC No. 16158409
>>16158405
what do you expect it to look like?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 01:07:30 UTC No. 16158411
>>16158409
I'm not even invested in this, but c'mon.. look at it. Star-Wars that came right after was more believable overall.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 01:08:32 UTC No. 16158412
>>16158411
and why do you think Star Wars is more "realistic"?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 04:28:17 UTC No. 16158527
>>16158126
no one wanted to pony up the money, not even the US government, they pulled to plug on the blank check to NASA in the early 70s and cut the last few Apollo missions, that's why
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 04:53:38 UTC No. 16158546
>>16158273
Can't profit (((Pfizerstein))) with fission plants and actual science exploration instead of fake hollywood shots based ''''moon landings'''''.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 05:00:41 UTC No. 16158552
>>16158273
>building a dozen new fission plants
you don't need only the tech to have cheaper energy, you need to shake off the leaches, which is the actual hardest part of the equation. they'll rather die than lose the money you now pay.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 11:33:34 UTC No. 16158827
>>16158401
we could bring life to the moon
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 16:44:01 UTC No. 16159280
>>16158225
>pic unrelated
>it's just showing ai exposing apollo mission pictures as fake
Wow US had AI for 50 years and never told anyone
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 17:18:22 UTC No. 16159323
>>16158395
Which creates capital that is spent on housing and feeding the ones we brought here to "pay our pensions".
Any day now, they'll break even.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 17:40:41 UTC No. 16159348
>>16158126
>why haven't we been back to the moon in such a long time?
Only stupid subhuman UShitholers will travel to a debris bowl to hop around like ridiculous bunnies in the rubble just to "win".
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 18:30:48 UTC No. 16159399
>>16158707
how is believing what a telescope says any different than believing what nasa says?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 18:33:44 UTC No. 16159404
>>16159280
>secret technology can't exist
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 19:12:18 UTC No. 16159463
>>16158126
I know the answer but /sci/ wonโt like it
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 21:11:20 UTC No. 16159616
>>16159463
go on...
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 21:13:36 UTC No. 16159620
>>16158707
You're never gonna convince these dense retards. Even if you took them there personally, they'd say they were drugged. It's a matter of belief for them.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 21:25:02 UTC No. 16159638
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 21:33:47 UTC No. 16159652
>>16158126
>back
?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 21:41:01 UTC No. 16159664
>>16159638
Stay mad. Reminder that you'll never have true knowledge or skill, which is why you have to cope with baiting on an anonymous imageboard to gain some elusive sense of superiority.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 21:44:52 UTC No. 16159671
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 21:46:38 UTC No. 16159675
I'm going to respond to your post in exactly 6h. So now you'll be on edge for the next couple of hours eagerly awaiting my reply to post a witty retort wasting another day in front of your computer.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 21:47:40 UTC No. 16159680
>>16158126
Because there is nothing that currently holds net value there, even less so anything that requires a human to be in a hostile environment. The motivation to 'show the ruskies we can into space too' isn't there anymore because they've lost that lead.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 21:58:39 UTC No. 16159696
>>16159652
you know, back, like the direction you get sexed in