Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:45:07 UTC No. 16178873

https://twitter.com/E_Bruxxx/status/1791115023747621009
>Elon's opening SpaceX presentation slide to the National Space Society on May 20, 2005.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:46:07 UTC No. 16178876

>As if politics doesn't creep into everything.
Anyway, I still want an SSTO. Let's make an air-breathing engine that can turn into a rocket engine outside the atmosphere and stick it on a space plane that can tip itself straight up for vertical launches on planets with no air.
Who's with me?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:46:57 UTC No. 16178877

https://twitter.com/SERobinsonJr/status/1791197707916226649
>- How to Train Your Dragon... SpaceX was conducting Dragon retrieval training in Port Canaveral, Florida, this morning. Pic by Greg Scott in the thread.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:47:58 UTC No. 16178878

>>16178876
you have politics and then you have /pol/ shitposting with the self-admitted goal of disrupting and killing /sfg/

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:48:30 UTC No. 16178880

>>16178847
Doing some back of the napkin math that seems like about .15kg of ice per square meter giver or take. Doesn’t seem that unreasonable. It’s pretty thin.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:48:51 UTC No. 16178881

>>16178873
>he has been saying the exact same thing for almost ten years now, maybe more.
What causes such behavior?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:49:48 UTC No. 16178885

>>16178876
hear me out, how about we give it a drop tank. That way it will be way lighter and smaller for the same payload to orbit. We probably need boosters to lift it fully fuelled, just enough to lob it out the thick part of the atmopshere and let it do it's ssto thing. to minimize on cost they should pprobably be something simple like solid rocket boosters.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:50:24 UTC No. 16178886

>>16178881
it works

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:51:14 UTC No. 16178888

>>16178876
Read up a little bit about the difficulties air breathing engines experience due to issues like inlet shockwaves, you seething transphobic chud. If you had two IQ points to rub together maybe you wouldn't be such an ignorant know-nothing pseud.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:53:24 UTC No. 16178890

>>16178877

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:53:35 UTC No. 16178891

>>16178885
>how about we give it a drop tank
I could live with that.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:54:44 UTC No. 16178893

>>16178890
I want to hear the geostationary satellites operators cope for this. Last time I heard they were mumbling something about ground stations.

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:55:44 UTC No. 16178898

>poltard made an OP so bad people jumped ship in 10 posts
can't make this up

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:56:01 UTC No. 16178899

>>16178888
>Read up a little bit about the difficulties air breathing engines experience due to issues like inlet shockwaves
So you're saying we might have to solve problems to make technology better?
Wow, who knew technology would require problem-solving?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:56:08 UTC No. 16178900

>>16178893
its not going well, you have already had a bunch of mergers and acquisitions I think

https://payloadspace.com/echostars-subscriber-declines-payload-research/

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:56:51 UTC No. 16178901

>>16178876
As cool as a SSTO would be, it offers really no benefit over a multi stage design where all stages are reuseable.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:57:33 UTC No. 16178902

>>16178876
You need either a revolution in engine technology, extremely expensive materials or accepting you'll only be getting a miniscule payload to orbit. Actually you probably need all three at once.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:57:54 UTC No. 16178903

>>16178900

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 20:59:26 UTC No. 16178906

>>16178901
>As cool as a SSTO would be, it offers really no benefit over a multi stage design where all stages are reuseable.
Yeah, but it's fucking COOL!
And don't tell me that's not a valid consideration. A priority, no, but valid nonetheless.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:02:41 UTC No. 16178910

>>16178903
As much as I hate Starlink-style constellations (and I do because competitors are going to fill every square inch of the sky with satellites until you can't see the fucking stars anymore), it does have one massive advantage over geostationary systems: It's decentralized. A lost satellite or two makes very little difference to its functionality.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:02:50 UTC No. 16178912

Why doesnt she appear on stream anymore?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:03:42 UTC No. 16178913

>>16178912
Who's that guy?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:04:03 UTC No. 16178914

>>16178903
Felongated Huskrat is faking the numbers. Hughes is strong.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:05:07 UTC No. 16178916

>>16178914
>Elon Musk is faking the numbers.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:05:45 UTC No. 16178919

>>16178910
>fill every square inch of the sky with satellites until you can't see the fucking stars anymore
Literally just paint the underside black. It’s that easy in rocketry.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:08:17 UTC No. 16178921

>>16178903
that's not as terrible as I thought it would be.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:08:45 UTC No. 16178923

>>16178912
She shot a scene with Facialabuse.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:12:05 UTC No. 16178926

>>16178921
-30% is pretty bad in just a few years

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:17:22 UTC No. 16178927

Wood spacecrafts.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:17:53 UTC No. 16178928

>>16178899
>we
how far have you gotten on the project so far?
let me guess, you've never even passed a calculus class and have zero understanding of the issues involved so all you can contribute is your stupid dunning kruger fantasies

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:18:47 UTC No. 16178930

>>16178916
stupid frogposter, don't reply to bait

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:22:43 UTC No. 16178933

>>16178923
link?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:27:43 UTC No. 16178937

>>16178933
I've got a spare one, just for you

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:28:40 UTC No. 16178939

>>16178927
Wood this work?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:30:43 UTC No. 16178940

>>16178937
Nice. Could you send link in gerudo clothes?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:31:24 UTC No. 16178942

>>16178939
I don't know if anybody has tried to put wood in a vacuum but I don't think it would tolerate either the UV exposure or vacuum very well
>>16178940
are you retarded that is the gerudo armor

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:31:24 UTC No. 16178943

>>16178939
Yeah, my uncle works at nasa and he said the space shuttle 2 is going to be made out of wood.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:32:39 UTC No. 16178944

>>16178942
You know the version I want.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:34:26 UTC No. 16178947

>>16178944
yeah but I'm not going to dump fanart for a video game on fucking /sci/ are you retarded? It's funny as a joke once.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:36:45 UTC No. 16178951

>>16178942
cork based ablative heat shielding materials exist. idk if they’ve made their way onto any spacecraft though.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:36:58 UTC No. 16178952

>>16178937
wolf link is hotter

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:40:09 UTC No. 16178958

>>16178951
cock based ablative heat shielding material
sounds painful

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:43:14 UTC No. 16178965

>>16178942
>I don't know if anybody has tried to put wood in a vacuum but I don't think it would tolerate either the UV exposure or vacuum very well
https://www.space.com/nasa-japan-launch-wooden-satellite-lignosat-2024
We're gonna find out pretty soon

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:51:18 UTC No. 16178979

>>16178947
satisfy my penus or else

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:51:46 UTC No. 16178981

>>16178965
that shit is hardly wood

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:53:46 UTC No. 16178985

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:58:11 UTC No. 16178990

>>16178985
its fucking hilarious how much of a debacle the starship heat sield is.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:00:19 UTC No. 16178994

https://twitter.com/n4Cr/status/1791205454678286682
>Amazing experience seeing a rocket test live at SaxaVord_Space. Great job rfa_space. Feel incredibly lucky to be at the right place at the right time!

This is the part where I'd want to say something something nice about European spaceflight, but that shutdown sequence looked a bit not quite normal.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:00:45 UTC No. 16178995

Good edition, tweet screenshot OPs deserve this treatment

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:05:43 UTC No. 16179001

>>16178995
And also remember to port the other thread for spamming/flooding so tranitor gets off his ass.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:06:38 UTC No. 16179002

>>16178981
They say they're using magnolia wood, but I can't find anything on the manufacture process.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:12:15 UTC No. 16179004

>>16178985
best tile no tile

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:17:10 UTC No. 16179007

>>16179004
Then best ship is no ship

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:19:21 UTC No. 16179008

>>16179002
we had a whole thread on it a few years ago, the amount of processing they do to it is amazing

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:26:16 UTC No. 16179014

>>16178985
I mean, at least they didn't crack, right?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:28:02 UTC No. 16179016

>>16178985

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:31:26 UTC No. 16179018

>>16178994
I have hope. praying for these based Krauts and their beer keg rocket.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:38:16 UTC No. 16179022

>>16179018
The audio for the twitter video didn't have any bangs or pops at the end of the burn, so it might have been okay. Maybe

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:40:30 UTC No. 16179023

>>16179008
Is it like a veneer sheet they epoxy onto a normal cubesat, or is the satellite itself built on a skeleton of wood? It seems like the kind of thing that'd have just a thin layer of paneling like an Atari or old station wagon.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:54:20 UTC No. 16179032

>AA is still only flying regional jets between DFW and Brownsville
when will Brownsville get popular enough it gets upgraded to mainline service?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 22:55:43 UTC No. 16179034

https://twitter.com/SierraSpaceCo/status/1791128328331485615
>For more than five weeks, Dream Chaser and Shooting Star were subjected to multiple cold-hot cycles in a vacuum environment, between -150F to +250F, with teams conducting functional tests at temperature plateaus to verify system performance.
>Temperatures in space can range from the extremely cold – hundreds of degrees below freezing – to several hundred degrees Fahrenheit due to radiation from the sun. TVAC testing is a realistic thermal simulation of the flight environment and critical to ensuring mission success.

This might explain why things are taking so long

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:04:00 UTC No. 16179039

>>16179034
I remember reading about this in magazines when I was in school. Feels like it's been in development forever.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:07:04 UTC No. 16179041

Would you take the one way trip on a generation ship? It seems like the most plausible form of large scale travel, but you are guaranteed to never see it end due to the length of the trip.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:16:28 UTC No. 16179049

>>16178867
>>16178809
>Huh that seems really light though I guess it makes sense that the frost has a lot of entrained air
Continuing the discussion of how much the ice weighs on a fully stacked and fueled starship. I posted in the wrong thread

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:16:35 UTC No. 16179050

>>16179041
As long as I get to bring 11,000 gallons of vodka and some tang powder I'm good

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:19:36 UTC No. 16179051

>>16179041
an old kindle and a laptop. Maybe some heirlooms. I'm kind of boring.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:22:41 UTC No. 16179054

>>16178880
>>16179049
>someone replied
I guess it would depend on some situational factors like a function of temp and humidity on launch day by the time it sits fueled plus some other factors like evap/transpiration from sunlight. Quite a bit of ice can buildup on uninsulated cryo vessles

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:23:37 UTC No. 16179055

>>16179041
Sure. I'm not actually a viable option for a generation ship that depends on you know making multiple generations but I wouldn't mind ending up in a cult worshipping the ship with its maintenance manuals acting as holy texts.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:27:55 UTC No. 16179058

>>16178921
I figure some of the starlink adopters are people who were previously priced out of other sat internet services, so it's not exactly a 0 sum thing

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:30:41 UTC No. 16179060

just started the first session. anybody else in it? you will know what im talking about and if you dont fuck off

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:32:07 UTC No. 16179061

>>16179055
I have good news, Hamilton's Rule means that even in the worst case it probably isn't over for you.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:33:17 UTC No. 16179062

>>16179060
I don't know what you're talking about, and I doubt anyone else does.
Unless you mean the discord thing, then yeah, I'm on.

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:35:24 UTC No. 16179066

>>16179062
i dont mean that and if nobody else knows what im talking about then ignore the post because you all dont need to know.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:39:23 UTC No. 16179068

>>16178994
https://twitter.com/AndrewParsonson/status/1791222246687523289
>the test needed to be completed this week, as after Sunday, SaxaVord will need to be shut down until the end of June because of bird breeding in the area
Also this guy says he has a source in the company confirming it was successful

Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:52:37 UTC No. 16179078

>>16178867
is this what starbase factory is supposed to look like?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:04 UTC No. 16179089

>>16178890
I'm living on board at the moment and thinking about starlink, it is a bit power hungry though. Biggest thing stopping me is that coastal areas are kind of a grey zone. Most people report no issues on the roaming package soclong as you arent way offshore but they can rugpull you any time since it's not meant to be used on the water and then you are stuck with either buying the retard expensive marine package or having to flip a dish that's now a paper weight. Wish they would offer a package for cruisers but i guess its a small market and they are jews.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:03:53 UTC No. 16179091

>>16179089
no competition means they can charge what they want, unfortunately.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:11:43 UTC No. 16179102

>>16179091
I know I know. I wouldn't mind paying the same price or a bit more as boomers do for their caravan roaming package since its basically the same service, not far enough away from ground stations for needing laser comms. It's just being stuck in a grey area that is garbage.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:18:49 UTC No. 16179109

>>16178927
looks very Myst

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:22:47 UTC No. 16179113

>>16179068
>SaxaVord will need to be shut down until the end of June because of bird breeding
it's almost as bad as JAXA having to shut down Tanagashima because the fishing lobby saying that their catch was getting scared

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:22:50 UTC No. 16179114

>>16179078
that's the starlink factory

S-K-Y_H-0-0-K_C-H-@-N at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:30:12 UTC No. 16179122

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWlpNm1C5gw

All you chemical rocket cultists need to watch Dr. O'Dowd's newest video. He really spells out how difficult it is to get humans to our nearest star. The distances, times, and ship size all help explain why it can not and will not ever be possible with chemical rockets. He clearly points to the water shield being key to space exploration. You can't launch the water let alone the ship, crew, and misc junk. It would take Starship hundreds if not thousands of launches to build a single interstellar generation ship that had any hopes of success. That's a single ship too! Even if you scale that down for Mars it's only going to be 1/4 the scale at best. Becoming a multi planet species is impossible with ONLY CHEMICAL ROCKETS. Hopefully as Tesla collapses into ass gas you cultists will begin to wake up and do some real work towards space flight in the 21st Century.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWlpNm1C5gw

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:34:15 UTC No. 16179125

>>16178876
You can have that on Mars.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:38:08 UTC No. 16179131

>>16178876
here's your practical and cost-effective ssto bro

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:38:37 UTC No. 16179132

>>16179125
imagine the shenanigans martian rocketeers will get up to

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:47:12 UTC No. 16179140

>>16179122
hey dumbass we’re just focusing on moon/mars right now. Not a single person gives a shit about a manned proxima mission. It’s a problem for our kids kids kids kids kids, aka NOT GONNA HAPPEN IN OUR LIFETIME and we all know this

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:48:02 UTC No. 16179142

>>16178927
How the fuck would this make a good pressure vessel huh. Riddle me that

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:49:16 UTC No. 16179145

We're about to get another 100 post samefag sperg out session from the namefag it seems.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:49:33 UTC No. 16179146

>>16179142
pressure vessel? it need to hold like 5 psi. who cares

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:51:14 UTC No. 16179149

Mars has seasons but does it have any recognized month divisions/names?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:52:24 UTC No. 16179153

>>16179034
I don't really understand why the cargo version exists.
It's just to test the for crew version, right?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:53:18 UTC No. 16179155

>>16179153
Lurk more dammit this is spaceflight knowledge 101, literally tip of the iceberg

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:53:54 UTC No. 16179156

>>16179145
just report him

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:54:25 UTC No. 16179157

>>16179149
we'll have to wait for an international agreement on a time and date system for mars. dont expect anything for at least 10-20 years.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:55:21 UTC No. 16179161

>>16179156
Already done 3 times over

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:57:02 UTC No. 16179163

>>16179161
reported for announcing a report

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:57:53 UTC No. 16179165

>>16179163
>>16179163

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:59:36 UTC No. 16179166

>>16179157
Martians should have to use Earth time to remind them to keep grateful and servile.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:04:59 UTC No. 16179170

>>16179166
How about go fuck yourself

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:10:03 UTC No. 16179173

>>16179149
are the seasons standardized? They’re just called “winter, spring, summer, autumn” everywhere in the entire universe I guess huh

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:15:18 UTC No. 16179179

>>16179173
Is martian fall and spring distinct from each other? I'm tempted to say they are basically the same when you don't have plants or melting ice

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:30:22 UTC No. 16179191

i hate that we're so reliant on spacex because space is too difficult for everyone else

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:31:20 UTC No. 16179193

how many propulsion systems have been tested in space? I don't mean used, I mean tested, so that spaceships can maybe use hybrid systems, some for getting to space and some for traveling throgh space

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:33:51 UTC No. 16179194

>>16179193
>>16179191
samefag

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:34:41 UTC No. 16179195

>>16179194
but seriously

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:39:21 UTC No. 16179199

why are there 2 /sfg/s, and why does it look completely dead here?

>>16179194
retard

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:41:43 UTC No. 16179202

>>16179199
seems like you might want to dilate

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:43:13 UTC No. 16179205

>>16179199
the other one is retarded trannybait that's probably going to be deleted when the janny wakes up
this is a normal level of activity?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:52:31 UTC No. 16179213

so now that "15 refuelling flights is a hoax" trannies have been obliterated by Kathy leaders herself, where will the goalpost move to now?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:53:21 UTC No. 16179214

>>16179202
want me to dilate your ass? bend over, you fucking faggot

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 01:53:52 UTC No. 16179215

>>16179213
Its still there until they actually do it. But once it happens then its cadence.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:04:25 UTC No. 16179222

>>16179213
I dont speak this language
How many refueling flights for a lunar lander

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:06:45 UTC No. 16179223

>>16179222
15. It's been known as fact for almost a year but trannies who can't accept any criticism of spacex kept repeating it was a lie, but now even spacex says its true.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:08:42 UTC No. 16179224

>>16179222
negative 2. they actually dump fuel overboard because they have too much

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:13:16 UTC No. 16179227

What are your thoughts on living on Mars and having your cat stick to the ceiling with his claws and you cant get him down.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:15:53 UTC No. 16179230

>>16179227
cats go out the airlock

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:18:38 UTC No. 16179231

>>16179230
(You) first

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:23:45 UTC No. 16179234

>>16179213
it was 15 refills to get to mars
and while it takes a similar dV to get to the moon, the required payload for HLS landing 1 is going to be peanuts because no useful mass can be brought back on orion. so I would still expect low teens at most

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:27:13 UTC No. 16179238

>>16179122
It would make much more sense to send off our DNA and have humans lab-grown on site, instead of making flying city to send out. Hell cryo sleep is a much more feasible challenge then keeping 500 people alive for 500 years.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:31:21 UTC No. 16179240

>>16179238
Fuck off

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:32:44 UTC No. 16179241

>>16179234
I wonder how fast all that cryo would boil off
It should be possible to get a good estimate, we know the material starship tanks are made out of

If a full orbital tank takes 2 years to boil, we could have fuel sitting in orbit just to be ready for anything, and you just top off the fuel depo whenever you have the chance
If it's 2 months to boil, then you need to tightly coordinate all 15+ launches

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:44:08 UTC No. 16179248

>>16179227
38% Earth gravity means you can jump and reach the cat, dumbass.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 02:53:45 UTC No. 16179254

>>16179227
Mars needs strong families, not gay men and crazy cat ladies.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:03:19 UTC No. 16179268

>>16179227
Just cut their claws off, all they use then for is being little cunts and torturing small animals anyway. Cats are the niggers of the animal kingdom.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:16:06 UTC No. 16179281

there won't be any pets allowed in the pioneer mars colony
waste of resources

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:23:17 UTC No. 16179286

>>16178985
Why can't spacex use magnets to hold the tiles on?

The obvious problem with putting magnets in the tiles is magnets degrade wtih heat, and its unclear what would keep them from sliding around

But what if you put magnets on the inside of the hull, with very magnetic steel inside the tiles. Magnets get better when chilled, and each tile is attracted to a specifc point

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:29:03 UTC No. 16179301

>>16178923
THAT WAS HER?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:29:40 UTC No. 16179303

>>16179281
bugman mentality you might as well pack the starships full of only optimus bots and have those be the entire colony
there will be dogs and you will play fetch with them and you will be happy

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:36:26 UTC No. 16179307

This is a fake, duplicate /sfg/

>>16178834 is the real /sfg/

>>16178869 it wasn't deleted, you're just a butthurt attention whore, thats why you started a duplicate /sfg/

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:37:07 UTC No. 16179310

didn't ask

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:38:15 UTC No. 16179314

btw since this thread is apparantly not /sfg/ then we won't be reconnecting with the other one when page 10 comes.

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:39:20 UTC No. 16179318

I shit in my own mouth i literally eat my own shit!!!!

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:41:21 UTC No. 16179321

>>16179303
lol cope
the first colonists would be autist ubermensch who are fine with samey meal plans and have the mental fortitude to function without superfluous trifles like "pets"

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:46:11 UTC No. 16179327

spam thread
enjoy ur b& op

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:59:07 UTC No. 16179335

>>16179321

I'm thinking a young male and female of a good breed will be early arrivers on Mars and their puppies will be a welcome addition later on and highly sought after by colony families.

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 04:00:59 UTC No. 16179337

>>16179307
be less of a gay nigger and maybe people will use your threads

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 04:23:47 UTC No. 16179348

Why was there a delay from the first starship stacking in 2022 to the first test flight?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 04:29:40 UTC No. 16179354

>>16179348
too many plovers on the launch pad

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 04:37:40 UTC No. 16179363

>>16179348
Envirowhores

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 05:13:33 UTC No. 16179382

>>16179321
just today during the event kathy lueders mentioned how much spacexers love their dogs. they won't be autist ubermensch they'll be sociable chads who bring ping pong tables golf clubs and yes dogs
you can do your wehrmacht battalion larp eventually if you want but that isn't going to be the first wave. enjoy the chud barracks away from everyone else

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 05:20:31 UTC No. 16179386

>>16179382
im gonna be in the chud barracks mewing to looksmaxxing tiktok edits with phonk music while edging to rocket girl yuri fr fr no cap

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 05:33:44 UTC No. 16179394

>>16179382
Im gonna kill the whole colony then

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 05:35:10 UTC No. 16179396

Uhhh spacebros

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 05:36:12 UTC No. 16179398

>>16179396

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 05:53:55 UTC No. 16179416

>>16179398
>no new flares in days
it's over

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 05:56:26 UTC No. 16179419

>>16179416
Fucking finally. I hated all the flare posts holy shit the discussion has been so bad

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:10:38 UTC No. 16179427

We talk about space all the time but we aren't profiting off of it. Why don't we become industry analysts? Our tickets to mars aren't going to buy themselves.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:16:10 UTC No. 16179436

>>16179427
this >>16179060 was in reference to something directly related to that. you ask why we arent already doing it, i ask why you think we arent. non-spaceflight industry collegiates/professionals are not allowed to post here from now on

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:31:50 UTC No. 16179445

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1791342653348450797

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:33:07 UTC No. 16179446

>>16179445
im basedfacing rn

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:36:18 UTC No. 16179450

>>16179240
No, "humans" will never visit other stars, stay mad Timmy.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:42:21 UTC No. 16179454

>>16179445
hmm

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:44:02 UTC No. 16179456

>shitliner delayed again
lol, lmao

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:45:43 UTC No. 16179458

>>16179456
Fake as shit link your article by Berger, Clark, Foust or Davenport or fuck off

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:49:02 UTC No. 16179462

>>16179445
/sfg/ becomes the most powerful general

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:51:46 UTC No. 16179466

>>16179458
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/05/boeing-is-troubleshooting-a-small-helium-leak-on-the-starliner-spacecraft/
faggot faggot faggot

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:59:06 UTC No. 16179475

>>16179466
this is three day old news retard

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 07:04:14 UTC No. 16179481

>>16179475
not my problem, retard

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 09:51:20 UTC No. 16179605

is an L2 subscription worth getting

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:12:35 UTC No. 16179620

>>16179307
delicious /pol/tard seethe
kill yourself faggot.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:24:25 UTC No. 16179630

Got a twitter after they forced accounts to view posts. It's incredibly awful. I don't know why, it just is, can't even use it just to browse spaceflight stuff. Maybe I should delete my account.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:29:52 UTC No. 16179636

>>16179630
you need to follow enough spaceflight related accounts, mute accounts you don't want to see and generally curate your feed

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:34:38 UTC No. 16179638

>>16179636
>>16179630
by curate you can click on the upper right corner of a post on the main feed and click "Not interested in this post"

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:39:06 UTC No. 16179639

also, interacting with posts is a sign for the algorithm to feed you more of the same
if you see something you don't like, don't start replying to it if you don't want to see more of the same
just mute the account or do the "not interested" thing, you also need to stop following accounts if they start posting too much uninteresting shit (which has happened with some bigger accounts after monetization)

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:40:40 UTC No. 16179641

>>16179639
I have never posted, but I try to signal what I want with the heart things.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:49:21 UTC No. 16179648

>>16179630
it really is shocking how the search function on X straight up doesn't work. I search for something and it comes up with like 3 results only, and all from 2016 or earlier. Or god forbid I search and it comes up with lots of results but TOTALLY unrelated to what I searched. Usually shows gay porn when I search for trains etc.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:56:31 UTC No. 16179653

>>16179286
we can't use magnets because we don't know how they work and scientists have been deceptive on the topic

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:57:12 UTC No. 16179654

>>16179648
lmao
the few times I've used it it has been fine (search for a specific post in some screenshot), don't use it often though

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:04:31 UTC No. 16179660

>>16179636
I dunno if anyone else feels like this, but it feels very clustrophobic and echo-chambery, moreso than Reddit even. My entire feed is like a dozen terminally online spaceflight related people, half of which also post here [spoiler]like me[/spoiler]

>>16179648
>I search for trains
Based

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:12:36 UTC No. 16179665

>>16179660
just follow more people then

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:14:45 UTC No. 16179668

>>16179665
There is also the problem that if your follows follow shit accounts it's gonna promote their content to you too.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:15:56 UTC No. 16179669

>>16179668
yes but then you mute the retarded shit
sometimes you find some quite interesting stuff (generally, not related to spaceflight so much)

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:20:09 UTC No. 16179671

>>16179416
>>16179419
I'm a Carrington truther now, its as fake as Helen Keller

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:25:02 UTC No. 16179673

>>16179416
It's because the sunspot is on the side of the sun facing away from earth right now.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:26:41 UTC No. 16179674

>>16178985
It's fucking over.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:29:07 UTC No. 16179677

>>16178985
why is she such a lewd slut?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:31:09 UTC No. 16179679

The ideal climate has
-a constant temperature of 27 Celsius
-30 mm rain every single night
-blue sky every day
-constant 10 km/h wind that never changes direction
Is this too much to ask for bros?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:33:27 UTC No. 16179681

>>16179679
>27 Degrees Celsius
Too hot, you want that at 18-22.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:34:04 UTC No. 16179682

>>16179166
Martians should have to use Earth time to remind them of a time before Earth was a cratered nuclear wasteland.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:36:29 UTC No. 16179686

>>16179179
>>16179173
Because of Mars' orbit, the seasons are of different lengths depending on which hemisphere you're in. Northern summer much longer than it's winter and vice versa for the south.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:41:08 UTC No. 16179691

>>16179679
Too hot and humid. I don't want to live in a jungle.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:44:59 UTC No. 16179695

>The year is divided into 24 months. The first 5 months in each quarter have 28 sols, while the final month has 27 sols unless it is the final month of a leap year, when it contains the leap sol as its final sol.
>The calendar maintains a seven-sol week, but the week is restarted from its first sol at the start of each month. If a month has 27 sols, this causes the final sol of the week to be omitted.
>This is partly for tidiness and can also be rationalised as making the average length of the Martian week close to the average length of the Terrestrial week; 28 Earth days is very close to 27+1⁄4 Martian sols, whereas a month is an average length of 27+5⁄6 Martian sols.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darian_calendar

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:55:07 UTC No. 16179703

>>16179695
I wonder how difficult it would be to adjust to a 24h 40min day

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:16:43 UTC No. 16179726

Which extremophiles could survive atvthe bottom of Europa's ocean?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:20:04 UTC No. 16179729

>>16179726
Europa is lifeless

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:22:55 UTC No. 16179732

https://x.com/StarshipGazer/status/1791272728647139641
>Another section of Starbase Orbital Launch Tower 2 is ready to roll out later tonight.
>5/16/24

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:23:59 UTC No. 16179733

>>16179732

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:28:58 UTC No. 16179737

>>16178903
>>16178900
The fact that there are still customers for HughestNet blows my mind. If your family still uses HughesNet, you should be ashamed of yourself. Its dogshit

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:31:48 UTC No. 16179741

>>16179636
>>16179638
Yep. The follow accts you like, use "not interested in this post" feature.

Also filter words. I filter garbage politics in my feed. Biden, Ukraine, Trump, War, Israel, Gaza, Palestine, Bitcoin, coin, etc

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:50:16 UTC No. 16179768

I THINK RED DWARF STARS SUCK

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:54:23 UTC No. 16179772

Can someoe explain to me how Starship is supposed to survive a single engine RUD if from V2 onwards it will have NO engine shielding??

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:55:50 UTC No. 16179774

>>16179768
Absolutely based, hate those niggerstars

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:59:57 UTC No. 16179780

>How would you feel if you didn't flare yesterday?
>But I did flare yesterday

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:13:48 UTC No. 16179794

>>16179774
what rover took this iamge? before you anser, if its cg then the entire theory of gay-zers is fake and gay.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:25:16 UTC No. 16179812

>>16178985
Is there any conceivable universe in which transpiration works? I hate tiles so much it's unreal.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:25:32 UTC No. 16179813

>>16179794
Mars Polar Lander, don’t you remember? It was huge news.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:27:10 UTC No. 16179815

>>16179034
>spend forever making sure everything is perfect
this is a recipe for failure

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:31:07 UTC No. 16179821

>>16179149
Every month is March

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:34:28 UTC No. 16179828

>>16179703
You get an extra half hour sleep-in time every morning, sounds great

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:34:32 UTC No. 16179829

>>16179454
t. too stupid to use a web browser

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:36:42 UTC No. 16179834

>>16179166
Use Unix time. 10 digits counting seconds from 1 Jan 1970. 100000 seconds is about 1.1 standard earth days, so the leading 5 digits become the space date and the trailing 5 the time of day.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:37:16 UTC No. 16179835

>>16179780
kek

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:38:44 UTC No. 16179838

>>16179780
why would flares be a problem for planets with magnetic fields?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:40:56 UTC No. 16179843

>>16179686
The southern interior of the single continent is going to be a frozen shithole after terraforming, perfect for white people.
On the other hand the Northern Sea might be prevented from forming an ice cap, which could be advantageous so as to maintain a lower albedo.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:42:05 UTC No. 16179845

>>16179679
>30 mm rain every single night
That's a fucking deluge

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:42:09 UTC No. 16179847

>>16179774
>Spiders

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:43:13 UTC No. 16179851

>>16179780
>Brown Dwarf
Stars look a lot better dim and covered in spots. Better than blinding white.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:47:06 UTC No. 16179858

>>16179794
There's some very obvious biological activity near the south pole of Mars that comes and goes with the seasons. As usual crackpot abioticists came up with a Rube Goldberg geological explanation.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 13:57:41 UTC No. 16179875

>>16179858
is that like the black shit which venom uses for his suit?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 14:05:21 UTC No. 16179888

>>16179838
there are 2 issues
1. a planet in a red dwarf HZ will be tidally locked and therefore a slow rotation and therefore a weak magnetic field
2. a planet in a red dwarf HZ is vastly closer to its star than Earth and therefore will be hit by much more intense CMEs, much more frequently. even a planet with a decent field would struggle at that distance

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 14:22:09 UTC No. 16179924

>>16179681
>64-71F
I'll take a dry 80 every day.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 14:29:43 UTC No. 16179938

>>16179679
nigga wants to live in the triassic

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 14:31:41 UTC No. 16179943

>>16179227
Cats aren't afraid of heights.
When it's tired it will just leave the ceiling and drop down, probably on its legs.
I wonder which animal would adapt better at low gravity, I think cats have good chances.
Fish most probably, but being in water is a special case.
It probably makes also some difference if they are born there.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 14:32:09 UTC No. 16179944

>>16179938
I always thought dinosaurs were cool, but I'm more of a Cretaceous guy my self

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 14:51:35 UTC No. 16179973

dinosaur general

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 14:52:30 UTC No. 16179974

>destroys a beautiful future of spaceflight coorperation

Hey nothing personal sfg

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 14:56:12 UTC No. 16179977

It is a mistake for Venus to not be a lush jungle world teeming with dinosaurs.
This mistake must be corrected.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:03:50 UTC No. 16179988

>>16179977
are you telling me that gods creationis not perfect? go to hell.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:05:40 UTC No. 16179989

>>16179988
Look at Venus and tell me the devil didn't fuck a good thing up there just because.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:17:00 UTC No. 16179998

>>16179988
>God
This is /sci/

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:31:09 UTC No. 16180009

Common sense sceptic is now an ally of /sfg/

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:33:01 UTC No. 16180011

>>16180009
I like it how he was eating ESGhound out on one video then they completely fell out in the background and he never mentioned him again.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:34:04 UTC No. 16180013

I don't follow twitter people

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:38:09 UTC No. 16180017

>>16180013
go back to discord tranny.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:42:24 UTC No. 16180020

>>16180011
I'd paying to watch lesbian sex between those two

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:46:45 UTC No. 16180027

https://youtu.be/tnsyM3NPy1c
we need a spacex/anduril collab for robot drones to populate the solar system

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:49:18 UTC No. 16180028

>>16180009
Your fotograph is doctored

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:50:22 UTC No. 16180030

>>16179686
It's even worse: at Mars' aphelion, the southern hemispere is in its winter, so the southern hemisphere has harsher seasons in general. The winters in the south are brutal, even for mars, and while the summers are very hot, they're also very short. Even worse again, the end of southern summer is dust storm season, which lowers temps by quite a bit and sometimes spreads to the north.
The south is shit.
>>16179179
Northern spring/southern fall is actually the longest season (it lasts 194 sols). Northern fall (shortest season) is about 52 sols shorter.
>>16179695
the better way is to do away with months (months are lunar, no utility on mars) and use intervals of solar longitude (Ls), which is relatively easy to locally calculate even if you've lost track of time. Rover operators use this, so it seems pretty useful.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:52:20 UTC No. 16180033

>>16180030
meant to post picrel instead, but whatever.
Might as well post about how shit dust storms are: Did you know that every time mars has a significant dust storm, large amounts of water are transported to the upper atmosphere and lost to space? Yeah.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:54:37 UTC No. 16180034

Thoughts on this thing I found. How would gravity work on if if they rotated

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:54:42 UTC No. 16180036

>>16180028
maybe u are the shooper, but not i

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:56:51 UTC No. 16180040

>>16180036
https://x.com/c_s_skeptic_
https://x.com/c_s_skeptic_/status/1791383436990861538
Fake CSS and tweet
https://x.com/c_s_skeptic
Real CSS by follower count

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:59:58 UTC No. 16180045

>>16178951
IIRC they use cork as part of the heat shielding in the engine skirt of the SLS core stage.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:01:01 UTC No. 16180047

>>16180045
Hey fuckwit answer >>16180034

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:03:14 UTC No. 16180048

>>16180047
It's an absolutely trivial answer if you understand the principles behind spin gravity. lrn2physics

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:03:16 UTC No. 16180049

>>16180047
How do you intend to dock that shit?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:04:51 UTC No. 16180050

>>16180034
>>16180047
I prefer martian calendar discussions.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:06:43 UTC No. 16180052

>>16180049
Slow down the station rotation for docks, but what if you just rotate the ships individually in place for artificial gravity??

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:07:15 UTC No. 16180053

>>16180034
Since the astronauts will be at a small radius they will experience a smaller G than the rest of the ship
If you want the astronauts at 10m radius to have 0.5 G, the bottom of the ship at 50m will be at 2.5 G
So it depends if starship is structurally strong enough to not rip apart when you hang it by its tip and at super gravity
Since it isn't optimized to do this, it saves weight by not being able to do this
So it shouldn't work.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:07:51 UTC No. 16180054

>>16180052
Coriolis force would make that contraption a roman shower no matter which way you spin it.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:11:23 UTC No. 16180060

I shall now remind /sfg/ that we have already seen a spinhab in action.
Thank you Nauka.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:12:34 UTC No. 16180063

>>16180060
soyuz tried to deorbit the station

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:14:38 UTC No. 16180066

>>16180053
You could probably make spin gravity work on starship.
Take 2 of them, attach long (200m+) cables to their moint points, pull the cable taight, aim the starships towards eachother, then spin the whole thing along an axis perpendicular to the cables
This way, the top an bottom are 100m radius and 150m radius, so they have similar-ish G's.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:17:35 UTC No. 16180076

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3vXqizCuQY

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:20:02 UTC No. 16180080

>>16180076
America is better

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:24:18 UTC No. 16180084

>>16180076
irrefutable FACT
>>16180080
non sequitur, nobody mentioned americans.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:25:50 UTC No. 16180087

>>16180084
Replying to yourself is cringe

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:26:44 UTC No. 16180088

>>16180087

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:27:00 UTC No. 16180090

>>16180076

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:29:18 UTC No. 16180093

>>16180080
I don't think America is very good at building Soyuz at the moment

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:30:31 UTC No. 16180095

>>16180088
Include the original message in that screenshot too since you have 4chanX. Inspect Element couldve been done there easily

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:32:15 UTC No. 16180097

>>16180084
stupid frogposter

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:32:28 UTC No. 16180098

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:32:30 UTC No. 16180099

>>16180095
k, I guess.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:33:55 UTC No. 16180100

>>16180009
divide et impera

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:38:17 UTC No. 16180103

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 16:55:55 UTC No. 16180114

>>16180093
just because we havent done it doesnt mean we arent better at it

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:02:00 UTC No. 16180126

I miss when he wasnt cringe

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:05:49 UTC No. 16180129

The helium pressurization leak in the Boeing Starliner spacecraft's propulsion system has not yet been eliminated. A launch next Tuesday is off the table; it appears NASA and Boeing are targeting a no-earlier-than launch on 5/25

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:07:58 UTC No. 16180130

>>16180129
it's so fucking over it never even began

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:10:20 UTC No. 16180133

hatsune miku x Space-x?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:15:45 UTC No. 16180139

>>16180133

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:16:53 UTC No. 16180140

>>16180133
weird that she wasnt one of the 12 seats for dear moon

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:25:43 UTC No. 16180153

>>16180034
the coriolis would be horrible at the cargo section near the hub, but down near the engines it would probably be ok

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:28:46 UTC No. 16180155

>>16180140
I want to see some v-tumors win a trip to the moon and on the day of the launch they get their suits on but at the last minute they are redirected to a cuckshed from which they have to live stream in character for the duration of the mission

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:29:27 UTC No. 16180156

Can you use radon gas in a hall effect thruster?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:34:17 UTC No. 16180159

>>16180156
sure but why would you?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:48:37 UTC No. 16180176

>>16179605
no

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:49:51 UTC No. 16180180

>>16179660
fuck off

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:56:19 UTC No. 16180187

>>16179679
it needs to hit 40 C consistently

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:57:17 UTC No. 16180188

>>16179679
Is it possible to terraform a planet so that it's exactly like earth, but with no black people?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:58:10 UTC No. 16180190

>>16180188
wouldn't be too hard to terraform terra to be like that, but the envirofags and black people would be fussy about it

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 17:59:06 UTC No. 16180191

>>16180188

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 18:00:15 UTC No. 16180193

new hullo

https://youtu.be/Z3vXqizCuQY?si=f_oJOfJyyGRrjf50

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 18:00:57 UTC No. 16180195

>>16180193
delayed et homosexual

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 18:02:14 UTC No. 16180197

>>16180193
shame
>>16180076

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 18:06:01 UTC No. 16180204

this thread is spam, the real /sfg/ is >>16178834
check the times on the OPs of each thread

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 18:49:15 UTC No. 16180276

https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/05/rocket-report-blue-origin-launch-on-tap-sunday-starship-stacked-in-texas/

Small Rockets
>Blue Origin launch on tap this weekend.
>Spaceport Camden is officially no more.
>Polaris Spaceplanes moves on to bigger things.

Medium Rockets
>Starliner launch still on hold.
>India test-fires 3D-printed engine

Heavy Rockets
>Pentagon concerned about Vulcan delays
>ULA hit with government fines.
>More regulatory headwinds for Starship.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 18:52:19 UTC No. 16180281

https://spacenews.com/nasa-and-esa-complete-agreement-for-cooperation-on-mars-rover-mission/

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 18:53:32 UTC No. 16180282

classics of /sfg/

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 18:55:25 UTC No. 16180285

>>16180276
>Space Port Candem is no more
I always thought that was a forced meme anyways. Anyways, speaking of Candem county, there was a Thiokol plant there that went boom once upon a time

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 18:56:24 UTC No. 16180286

>>16180285
common SRB L

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 18:57:48 UTC No. 16180288

https://payloadspace.com/ast-spacemobile-secures-att-direct-to-cell-agreement/
>AST SpaceMobile ($ASTS) clinched a deal with AT&T to provide satellite-to-cell connectivity through 2030, the two companies announced Wednesday.
>Public markets cheered the definitive commercial agreement signed with the country’s largest cellular provider, propelling AST’s stock up nearly 70% yesterday and pushing its market cap to $1B+.

some competition for starlink direct to-cell, ASTS satellites are arguably much more effective and will be able to do some data as well, but they only have one prototype satellite in space as far as I know and its not going to be a megaconstellation
you also have starlink v2 might remove most of that competitive advantage of ASTS

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:02:34 UTC No. 16180293

https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/1791531987490029864?t=-JbcFix2_Kt7nhPsUHrbqw&s=19
john carmack reviewed the jew anti mars book

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:03:13 UTC No. 16180294

https://x.com/blueorigin/status/1790412952325030369

Blue Origin doing a suborbital hop again on Sunday

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:04:44 UTC No. 16180298

>>16180293
>But in general, if you care about something, “wait until it is easier” is usually not good advice. You try to do important things despite them being hard, because you think they are worth it. You try and fail, over and over, looking for angles on the problem that change the difficulty. Exploring a problem by actively trying to solve it gives different results than just studying it.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:10:54 UTC No. 16180312

>>16180294
not spaceflight

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:11:42 UTC No. 16180316

>>16180312
It reaches space, it's spaceflight related.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:12:34 UTC No. 16180319

>>16180281
They literally just left a complete mars rover on earth, holy fuck i hate politics

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:13:20 UTC No. 16180322

>>16180316
No orbit, no spaceflight. It's like saying climbing a ladder is mountaineering.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:13:27 UTC No. 16180323

>>16180312
/sfg/ needs a bot to reply this to all the clapping Xeets saying otherwise

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:14:26 UTC No. 16180324

>>16180294
I'm so excited. You literally can't knock blue. They do some serious shit and do what they say they are going to do. Theyve been flying astronuats since years before SpaceX. I think it's an acheivement which doesn't get enough coverage in certain quaters.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:16:09 UTC No. 16180326

>>16180324
They built the first reusable rocket

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:18:22 UTC No. 16180328

>>16180326
Nobody even seems to know or care this fact. SpaceX even had to violate the Blue patent on droneship recovery because Blue has been cooking serious business for a long time.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:19:12 UTC No. 16180329

>>16180326
if we're counting reusable rockets that don't reach orbit, then the honor goes to ching long-dong who refilled a spent paper rocket with black powder back in 1309

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:19:40 UTC No. 16180334

>>16180328
Im still excited for the day SpaceX loses claim to pad 39A. Blue rightfully deserves it from a heritage standpoint alone

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:21:37 UTC No. 16180340

Allegedly the crew of Columbia died within seconds of the spacecraft depressurization due to "muh exposure to space". But werent they wearing pressure suits?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:22:40 UTC No. 16180343

>>16180340
Obviously not if they died within seconds moron

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:25:54 UTC No. 16180348

>>16180343
So they decided to undress for that particular reentry?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:26:19 UTC No. 16180351

>>16180340
The pressure suits do not have internal air supplies or the ability to maintain internal pressure, and depend on spacecraft systems for it. The only purpose of the suit is to prevent death in the event of a Soyuz 11 style loss of cabin pressure.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:27:02 UTC No. 16180352

>>16180340
procedure was to take them off during reentry for comfort

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:27:22 UTC No. 16180353

>>16180340
they had the visors up

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:27:47 UTC No. 16180354

>>16180340
>The remains of the crew members indicated they all experienced depressurization. The astronauts' helmets have a visor that, when closed, can temporarily protect the crew member from depressurization. Some of the crew members had not closed their visors, and one was not wearing a helmet; this would indicate that depressurization occurred quickly before they could take protective measures.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:28:11 UTC No. 16180355

>>16180351
We should have reentered two crews at the same time, so that if one crew is lost, at least we have another redundant crew

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:28:42 UTC No. 16180357

>>16180351
>The pressure suits do not have internal air supplies
Wouldnt kill you in seconds
>or the ability to maintain internal pressure
what do you mean?
Then they must not be pressure suits.
>Soyuz 11 style loss of cabin pressure
basically what happened to Columbia which allegedly killed the crew

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:28:43 UTC No. 16180358

>>16180193
I stopped watching baldy mcshithead a while ago but this popped up on my recommended and I’m actually going to watch it tonight. Any chance to dunk on the russian space program makes me lel (plus I actually like shenzhou unironically)

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:29:03 UTC No. 16180360

>>16180355
Redundant Air of Inexpensive Astronauts

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:29:20 UTC No. 16180362

>>16179122
>It would take Starship hundreds if not thousands of launches
Musk's plan is to build one or two a day, which is about the same as Tesla's output by raw material mass, and comparable to Boeing's plane output. Those all being reusable, 1000 launches might take place Q1 2030. You old space guys don't understand what a paradigm shift this rocket is

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:29:46 UTC No. 16180363

>>16180357
i think they probably got burned pretty bad

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:30:04 UTC No. 16180364

>>16180355
Redundant Array of Inexpensive Astronauts

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:32:07 UTC No. 16180366

>>16180357
I mean the suits are not self-pressurizing: an external air supply provides pressure, along with breathable air.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:33:42 UTC No. 16180368

>>16180357
>basically what happened to Columbia which allegedly killed the crew
Honestly probably just someone trying to make people feel less bad that the astronauts got whipped around by extreme G-forces before getting flash-fried by reentry plasma while very rapidly and aggressively slowing down in a hypersonic air stream.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:41:47 UTC No. 16180377

>>16180336
>SpaceX will be the largest company on Earth
There's no way this is true, right?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:44:44 UTC No. 16180380

>>16180377
probably not, but it will be much bigger than it is now and who knows what happens with space industry and what other lines of business SpaceX gets into

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 19:54:21 UTC No. 16180387

>>16180377
No, on other places in the solar system maybe but definetly not Urf

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:05:09 UTC No. 16180402

Who is SpaceGuy5?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:05:35 UTC No. 16180403

>>16180402
Dont worry yourself with twitter drama.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:06:52 UTC No. 16180405

https://x.com/wapodavenport/status/1791560154401391067
INCOMING

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:08:42 UTC No. 16180408

>>16180405
starliner will be announced to be delayed again, to no ones surprise

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:09:14 UTC No. 16180409

>>16180402
a seething faggot

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:16:11 UTC No. 16180419

>>16180319
Meh, who knows what would have happen with the recent Russian success ratio. Even with ESA's quality control it didn't look good.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:20:23 UTC No. 16180426

>>16179768
Just use a dyson sphere you cuck. No more radiation, HAPPY?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:21:20 UTC No. 16180427

>>16179227
this is a danger to the integrity of the inflatable habitat
>>16179268
True. And their owners(me) will like them even if they bring me dead birds

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:22:55 UTC No. 16180429

>>16179679
Oh and also if the night would always last 8 hours and day 16 hours.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:24:07 UTC No. 16180431

>>16180405
friday news dumps are always bad news related

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:25:12 UTC No. 16180433

the russian launch caused the government to temporarily close the airspace off of california for 10 days
https://www.twz.com/space/russian-rocket-booster-not-military-exercise-prompts-airspace-warning-off-california

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:25:20 UTC No. 16180434

https://x.com/blueorigin/status/1791561236481552529

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:29:34 UTC No. 16180438

https://x.com/SERobinsonJr/status/1791559675546083638

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:29:48 UTC No. 16180439

https://x.com/jeff_foust/status/1791566479592226990
ITS OVER

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:30:36 UTC No. 16180440

>>16180439
oh no
anyway

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:30:51 UTC No. 16180441

>>16180439
>>16180408
Anon predicted the most obvious news
>>16180431
And this anon too

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:30:51 UTC No. 16180442

>>16180426
> claim to be a Kardashev 2 civilization
> get laughed out of galactic society when they learn you only have the 'power' of a M6V glowworm

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:31:15 UTC No. 16180443

>>16180438
sometimes i want to vote for biden because im not a big trump fan but then shit like this happens. yes, spacex is violating the constitution, right...

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:31:37 UTC No. 16180444

from an actual tranny on discord
lmao

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:32:24 UTC No. 16180446

>>16180444
Go back there and stay there you fucking faggot troon lover

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:33:38 UTC No. 16180448

https://x.com/seashellduvall/status/1791153935010447787

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:35:44 UTC No. 16180449

To counter the Isaacman ego point:

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:36:00 UTC No. 16180450

>>16180439
They get to live another week. Hooray.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:41:40 UTC No. 16180455

>>16180431
it's good news for boings two sacrifices

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:42:04 UTC No. 16180456

>>16180439
do we celebrate?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:42:30 UTC No. 16180457

>>16180450
>>16180439
imagine being mock executed repeatedly by boeing over a course of months and even years
never knowing if the next time will be real

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:43:42 UTC No. 16180458

>>16180368
Probably. The challenger crew was alive until they hit the water.
>t. Have heard a first hand account from someone who was in mission control, albeit they were pretty drunk at the time of telling

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:46:42 UTC No. 16180464

>>16180457
I would never want to touch a gay man, not even a dead one, but these russian boys got their hands all over em

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:48:20 UTC No. 16180469

>>16180464
after some deliberation I have decided to not write a provocative reply to your post after all.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:49:03 UTC No. 16180470

>>16180458
It's confirmed and known that the astronauts on Challenger were alive until they hit the water.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:49:23 UTC No. 16180471

>>16180448
>Posting literally who idiots from Twitter
Should be bannable lmao

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:49:33 UTC No. 16180472

the sad thing is that starliner may be a sad joke, but the fact that it's one of three manned spacecraft that america* has makes other countries look like an even worse joke

* five if you count suborbitals

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:50:48 UTC No. 16180473

>>16180471
should be laudable, I need some entertaiment

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:52:01 UTC No. 16180477

https://x.com/rookisaacman/status/1791259419478818957

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:55:03 UTC No. 16180484

>>16180464
Well they are russians after all.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:55:14 UTC No. 16180485

>>16180470
why didn't they jump out just before impact?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:56:28 UTC No. 16180488

>>16180485
Treating this as if it's a serous question: the orbiter cabin did not have egress capabilities and the astronauts did not have any kind of parachutes to slow them down.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:56:56 UTC No. 16180490

>>16180477
im 100% on board with isaacman trying to fix hubble. idk why people are so against progress just because a billionaire is involved. too many people are black and white thinkers.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:58:34 UTC No. 16180494

>>16180477
>NASA middle managers are willingly destroying an artifact of taxpayer ownership to spite the only vehicle/group willing to keep the telescope functional
Petty :(

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 20:59:25 UTC No. 16180497

>>16180490
When are we just gonna let the money pit deorbit and send up a cheaper and more capable telescope?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:00:37 UTC No. 16180499

>>16180477
what did he mean by solar cycle removing rescue points?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:02:52 UTC No. 16180501

>>16180499
the upper atmoshpere gets heated by solar storms so expands and makes the hubble orbit degrade much faster

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:06:30 UTC No. 16180505

test
https://twitter.com/rookisaacman/status/1791259419478818957

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:08:04 UTC No. 16180507

>>16180494
>NASA doesn’t want to risk a telescope and the lives of the repair crew on a here-to-fore unproven mission architecture when they can wait 8 years until the telescope degraded and the mission plan is mature
nuanced :(

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:08:41 UTC No. 16180508

I’m tired of pretending it’s funny; It is an insult to every tax paying American that Starliner got the bigger $$$ contract and has yet to deliver a SINGLE soul to orbit. Dragon 2 got the “budget deal,” and is arguably in its latter-half life cycle having already safely delivered+returned lots of people to space.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:09:14 UTC No. 16180511

>>16180507
Hi spaceguy5

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:10:51 UTC No. 16180513

>>16180511
nigger they can literally just do it on polaris dawn 5 instead of 2

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:11:58 UTC No. 16180515

Hubble needs to be serviced by a “serious” vehicle, such as Starliner-SLS.
This isn’t a child’s toy.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:14:36 UTC No. 16180518

>>16180507
Shuttle had a 1 in 9 chance of going wrong during the Hubble serving mission. I’m tired of these boomer NASA niggers acting like Dragon isn’t holy enough to approach a telescope and save it from destruction.
Complete and total death to oldspace

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:14:49 UTC No. 16180519

>>16180507
>>16180477
There were people within NASA who specifically campaigned to block the development of human rated launchers derived from existing commercial launchers after the Saturn V was canned. NASA has no reason to exist if all of its operations can be accomplished without it.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:16:09 UTC No. 16180520

>>16180513
can they do? what about the space weather

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:17:18 UTC No. 16180523

>>16180191
This guy is falling in with the wrong crowd

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:18:06 UTC No. 16180524

>>16180508
Just think of it as hastening the decline of the american empire

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:18:30 UTC No. 16180525

RIP

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:18:48 UTC No. 16180526

>>16180508
ULA also got 60% of NROL launches with a unproven rocket and now ULA is getting fined for delays and pentagon is worried about the ability of ULA to scale
ULA is also supposed to launch Kuiper (along with Ariane 6 and New Glenn)
its not really looking good for Kuiper either, perhaps they think the regulators will be lax on them to give Starlink some competition

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:19:33 UTC No. 16180527

>>16180525

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:19:41 UTC No. 16180529

>>16180191
>>16180523
>fraser cain
Could never stand this ugly fag. It was always obvious what he was about.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:20:00 UTC No. 16180530

>>16180519
NASA should focus on pure science missions and leave the launches, servicing etc to private companies

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:20:51 UTC No. 16180532

>>16180525
unpopular opinion: we need to stop immortalizing dead astronauts. It is indeed sad, but people put columbia and challenger and apollo 1 on a weird pedestal like it’s taboo to make fun of it or acknowledge that it can/will happen again in the future.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:21:54 UTC No. 16180534

>>16180524

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:22:01 UTC No. 16180535

>>16180529
Yeah Cain has no real interest in space. John Michael Godier might be an alien schizo but at least he interviews interested people.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:22:40 UTC No. 16180536

>>16180532
I agree, but you can still pay your respects.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:23:25 UTC No. 16180540

>>16180536
Fair enough, I do not disagree

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:23:42 UTC No. 16180542

>>16180527
FEETA

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:24:17 UTC No. 16180543

>>16180534

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:27:21 UTC No. 16180545

>>16180530
Can't you see that it's been shrinking? It used to be that NASA was in full control of human spaceflight in America.
Sooner or later their relevance will reduce again. Who's to say that someone else can't do scientific missions better, without even having to go through NASA? (apart from maybe regulatory reasons)

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:27:28 UTC No. 16180546

>>16180543
kek

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:30:05 UTC No. 16180550

>>16180545
>Who's to say that someone else can't do scientific missions better
this will be demonstrated no later than next year and fully accepted as fact by the end of this decade

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:30:27 UTC No. 16180551

>>16180545
they probably could, but private companies don't have a financial interest to do pure science
why should NASA do shit that private companies could do better and for no cost to the tax payer? seems retarded to me

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:31:44 UTC No. 16180552

>>16180532
>Q. What does NASA stand for?
>A. Need Another Seven Astronauts

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:34:46 UTC No. 16180558

>>16180551
>why should NASA do shit that private companies could do better and for no cost to the tax payer?
Is exactly the question the american taxpayer or the OIG might start asking, which is exactly what NASA wishes to avoid.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:39:11 UTC No. 16180565

>>16179671
I remember seeing this render in a pop-sci video
clicked off immediately

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:40:13 UTC No. 16180567

>>16180527
Quick! where did you get video of astronaut FEET in zero g? I need to find out urgently for research purposes while my wife is asleep.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:46:45 UTC No. 16180579

>>16180552
>for those of you hissing, it should be noted that this joke was written by a dead astronaut

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:53:33 UTC No. 16180592

>>16179630
Take all the spaceflight shit you're following and put it into it's own list. Then when you want space just look in there

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:55:50 UTC No. 16180595

>>16180579
>Just kidding, we don't hire losers

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:57:19 UTC No. 16180598

https://x.com/ConceptualJames/status/1791557306372497627

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 21:59:20 UTC No. 16180600

vindicated.
https://x.com/Spaceguy5/status/1790859077175627995

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:03:32 UTC No. 16180605

>>16180598
>>16180600
>two consecutive twitter links + a single word
Take a screenshot at least. That first one needs a webm or something.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:09:41 UTC No. 16180610

https://x.com/TheOldManPar/status/1791575652522410043

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:10:35 UTC No. 16180611

>>16180497
You trust JPL to design something cheaper?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:14:02 UTC No. 16180613

>>16180600
kathy doesnt know shit. she calls it "falcon 9 heavy" like fuck haha

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:15:50 UTC No. 16180614

>>16180613
You rn

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:16:15 UTC No. 16180615

I will fucking destroy this general

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:17:09 UTC No. 16180617

>>16180613
>kathy doesnt know shit
bad look since she's incharge of starbase LOL.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:17:24 UTC No. 16180618

>>16180614
This is me

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:19:48 UTC No. 16180620

>>16180329
Just attack China before they can reach the Moon. I'll take WW3 over national embarrassment

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:21:09 UTC No. 16180622

>>16180618
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLPeehsXAr4
Frogs WILL survive.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:21:22 UTC No. 16180623

>>16180617
"in charge" lol. nasa veterans (kathy, gerst, various astronauts) get hired at spacex bc it's a corrupt operation. get more contracts that way. you know, same as how boeing/locksmart does it

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:22:28 UTC No. 16180624

>>16180567
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhAGrOQEVHo&list=PL46C2B72FFEAEE72D
There's probably more in here, it's just a lot of footage. (haha)

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:22:51 UTC No. 16180626

>>16180623
DONT CORRECT MY GRAMMAR DICKHEAD.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:25:15 UTC No. 16180630

>>16180615

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:26:55 UTC No. 16180631

>>16180624
>that webm
Good lord. If she flew like that without socks on that would be enough for me to file a sexual harassment case. (after unscheduled contact with my tongue/nose)

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:30:56 UTC No. 16180632

>>16180033
too bad Shoemaker-Levy 9 crashed into Jupiter instead of Mars, think of what 21 fragments, the largest around 2km in diameter, hitting Mars would have done

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:37:08 UTC No. 16180633

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:40:13 UTC No. 16180637

>>16180053
you'd have the "bottom" of the ship doing 0.5g and everything closer in at 0.4g, 0.3g, etc etc, retard, nothing spun in space is every going to be built for 2.5g or spin that fucking fast, again: retard

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:53:57 UTC No. 16180649

>>16180507
FUD isn't nuance, it's putting walls around someone's government fiefdom.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:57:08 UTC No. 16180652

Starliner. huh. kinda like 787 Dreamliner

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 22:58:52 UTC No. 16180653

doesn't the fact that FH doesn't get used for starlink suggest that it isn't actually cheaper in $/kg terms than F9 is? and don't give me muh fairing or muh adapter as an excuse. they've launched 165 starlink missions so far. if spending a few million bucks on a new fairing and adapter for FH would have saved them any money at all they would have done it years ago.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:00:31 UTC No. 16180654

>>16180637
Hey now, one day I hope we get gainstations built for 2.5 g or even more; granted you are correct in that any rotational structure would obviously have the "gravity" at the bottom set to something the structure can handle.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:01:44 UTC No. 16180655

>>16180615
Please put it out of its misery janny.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:06:59 UTC No. 16180657

>>16180632
s/Mars/Earth/g

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:07:13 UTC No. 16180659

>>16180488
maybe equipping the crew cabin with an out-of-sight out-of-mind parachute assembly just incase it ever became separated from the orbiter and was free falling would have been a good idea, especially if the cabin had been designed as "breakaway" if the vehicle itself ever disintegrated

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:13:36 UTC No. 16180664

>>16180653
Volume limited

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:16:38 UTC No. 16180667

it always feels weird seeing spaceflight stuff appear in non spaceflight places

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:16:53 UTC No. 16180668

>>16180664
I looked this over once and figured that if it had enough payload volume one Falcon heavy could lift about two full loads of starlink satellites. Falcon Heavy's only real possible niche is in higher energy trajectories.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:19:54 UTC No. 16180671

>>16180654
>one day I hope we get gainstations built for 2.5 g or even more
OK, a true and proper gainstation is a dream all /sfg/ chads share but it will have to come later after the lesser stations more accommodating to NEETs and soibois are perfected

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:21:40 UTC No. 16180673

>>16180667
Go back to keddit you fucking subhuman nigger

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:23:35 UTC No. 16180674

Loicense no longer required to update every launch kek. Thunderthighs must be seething

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:24:35 UTC No. 16180675

>>16180674
Literally not what it says retard

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:27:31 UTC No. 16180679

>>16180675
Are we looking at the same image fuckwit? Your eyes must be blurry and your mouth too open. Go get your doctor to sew up both since you clearly dont need either.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:27:42 UTC No. 16180680

>>16180675
BACK TO DISCORD TRANNY

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:29:23 UTC No. 16180681

>>16180679
>>16180680
See you all in June hahaha

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:33:19 UTC No. 16180684

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BigxImsLGVk
It's that time again
T-59:00

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:35:32 UTC No. 16180688

>>16180654
>I hope we get gainstations built for 2.5 g or even more
you wouldn't be able to move dipshit

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:38:33 UTC No. 16180691

>>16180688
Any practical reason to build mech suits? I think they’re cool and want to justify them

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:40:20 UTC No. 16180694

>>16180668
I think the real show stopper would be the need for two/three drone ships per launch.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:40:23 UTC No. 16180695

>>16180691
Martians will need them to move their puny bodies around Earth

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:42:50 UTC No. 16180701

I love rube goldberg trajectories used to avoid using big rockets

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:43:05 UTC No. 16180702

>>16180688
t. fat
meanwhile I'm skelly maxing

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:48:25 UTC No. 16180708

>>16180695
>martians coming to earth
What part of "one way trip" didn't you understand?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:50:29 UTC No. 16180709

>>16180694
And if you want to recover the core then you can't stage at significantly higher velocity than a single stick falcon. They only completed facon heavy development because they had DOD contracts which they legally couldnt cancel. It became clear years before the rocket was complete that it was not a good idea.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:51:48 UTC No. 16180710

>>16180708
some things will have to be done in person

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:53:55 UTC No. 16180713

>>16180633
space sÖyjak, at last

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:55:54 UTC No. 16180714

>>16180701
Remember only a few years ago, your only real option was a delta II, delta iv medium, or atlas. Or maybe a shuttle cargo launch.
The last delta ii flew in 2018 (!!) Having ready access to large rockets hasn’t ever really been a thing after skylab. FH also sucks at launching deep space missions unfortunately

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:58:44 UTC No. 16180716

>>16180714
wtf did /sfg/ exist during the last Delta II launch? It was in 2018?!?!

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:59:01 UTC No. 16180717

>>16180340
Realistically speaking, how is a pressure suit supposed to protect you from this? There is no point to wearing for entry. It's false protection, like wearing seatbelts on a bus.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 23:59:21 UTC No. 16180719

Remember the Viasat 3 debacle? It cost the space insurance market $770 million after the large antenna developed by locksneed shartin failed to unfold all the way. That loss, on top of a string of GEOsat failures in 2023 has basically cored out the space insurance market.
India is moving to get a foot in the door now that everyone else has bowed out.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:00:22 UTC No. 16180720

>>16180719
forgot link: https://spacenews.com/india-enters-troubled-space-insurance-market/

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:03:56 UTC No. 16180723

>>16180694
Just one ship, actually. I was looking at RTLS booster landings and a drone ship core landing. That got about 37 tons to Starlink's initial 337x325 km injection orbit, which is just over 2x Falcon 9's current 17.5 ton record. If you try to get more performance out of the boosters you blow way past what you could fit in an extended fairing. This load is already something like 50 v2 minis and I'm not sure if there's even room for even that many.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:11:14 UTC No. 16180734

>>16180719
insurance is such a fucking scam

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:14:52 UTC No. 16180741

>>16180734
t. eesa vega project manager

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:16:24 UTC No. 16180744

>>16180734
If you can't afford to take the immediate loss, but can stand to pay more over time, maybe it makes sense? I feel like there are better options though.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:21:55 UTC No. 16180747

>>16180710
Old time drawings of planets look so goofy. I mean what even is that

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:22:13 UTC No. 16180749

>>16180717
The cockpit didnt break up for some time so I assume they would not be getting as toasty by the time it broke up

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:23:23 UTC No. 16180751

>>16180747
Check a real pic That's what Mars looks like.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:24:00 UTC No. 16180754

T-9m for the next Starlink launch

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:28:02 UTC No. 16180759

>>16180618
to all the fags, the guy who redrew this Cirno's feet is the "footfag" I was talking about
and somebody using his filenames is still hanging around, which is fun

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:28:08 UTC No. 16180760

>>16180754
>crickets

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:31:04 UTC No. 16180766

>>16180760
starship in 10 years

>woooow shit another 100 people launching to mars???! WHO CARES

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:31:43 UTC No. 16180768

>>16180760
ok, the interesting thing: this will be the first time a first stage has been reused 21 times

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:32:15 UTC No. 16180769

>>16180768
nobody gives a fuck

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:33:40 UTC No. 16180770

>>16180760
I didn't feel the need to comment, but I am watching. Or at least listening while I compare rocket stats in other tabs

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:37:50 UTC No. 16180775

why were there 4 objects on nsf's camera? the booster, the upper stage, ???, and ???

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:41:24 UTC No. 16180777

whoa, we got live landing audio this time!

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:42:21 UTC No. 16180781

>>16180470
Ya, but hearing the story first hand from someone who was there was pretty sobering

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:42:45 UTC No. 16180782

>>16180775
fairing halves

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:42:52 UTC No. 16180783

>>16180775
Fairing halves. Viewing conditions are pretty close to perfect tonight

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:49:14 UTC No. 16180788

>>16180768
What comes next after 21?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 00:49:21 UTC No. 16180789

>>16180477
He's actually responding to a horsefucker "nasa" employee

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:02:30 UTC No. 16180798

>>16180789
What is it with people in aerospace fucking horses?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:09:53 UTC No. 16180804

spess vegene

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:10:57 UTC No. 16180805

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:16:10 UTC No. 16180817

>>16180788
hitting the bar. This Falcon 9 first stage can now legally switch to ethanol fuel!

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:21:34 UTC No. 16180821

>>16180817
why the fuck would you do that? you do realise that ethanol is a less efficient fuel than kerosene right? I can't figure out if youre trolling.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:31:19 UTC No. 16180828

>>16180695
don't forget all the deformed martian babies that live in my head

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:31:50 UTC No. 16180830

>>16180804
hallo saars

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:40:50 UTC No. 16180834

>>16180821
beep boop

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:42:43 UTC No. 16180836

WHEN DO I GET MY VILLA IN THE SKY SO I CAN START HOSTING PATIO WINE AND FONDUE PARTIES FOR SPACE BABES? WHEN??

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:49:06 UTC No. 16180840

>>16180760
At this point its gotten so routine to hurl pieces of a mega constellation into space on the back of a reusable first stage that I only watch for the white lab-rats' appearances.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:36:01 UTC No. 16180875

uhhh based?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:37:02 UTC No. 16180876

>>16180875
https://twitter.com/BCCarCounters/status/1791611426991157438
>NSF followed up with the question if this would mean that a positive outcome of this investigation would mean the launch license will be modified before the mishab is closed?

>The FAA answered: "Yes, provided all other license requirements are met."

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:37:25 UTC No. 16180877

>>16180876
>>16180875
already posted fuck off

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:38:15 UTC No. 16180878

>>16180877

>>16180876
hasn't been posted yet

Fuck you

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:39:28 UTC No. 16180881

>>16180878
just post the follow up then shithead

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:39:47 UTC No. 16180882

>>16180875
>>16180876
None of this is news, complete non-statement. Can you dumbfuck retards stop posting please?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:40:45 UTC No. 16180886

>>16180882
>complete non-statement.
actually its a pretty big deal

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:40:51 UTC No. 16180887

>>16180882
SHUT UP NIGGER

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:46:36 UTC No. 16180889

>>16180886
>>16180887
And yet, it will take longer from OFT-3 to OFT-4, than OFT-2 to OFT-3. We're moving so fast guys!!

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:57:57 UTC No. 16180895

Moon sky geometry, i wonder why.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKYe7OHWQe8&list=PLhh-JqytP_Ehufd3DwmcrljKyp1qeqBiC&index=7

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:12:54 UTC No. 16180901

/sfg/ is beyond saving.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:16:53 UTC No. 16180903

>>16180901
only true because janny is too busy dilating xer neovagina all day to actually moderate this fucking board

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:23:20 UTC No. 16180909

i poop and i poop and i poop and i pee and pee and pee all over!

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:25:58 UTC No. 16180912

>>16180716
I think it was before the tankwatching took off but we had a special launch thread for it

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:28:34 UTC No. 16180916

>>16180901
What makes you say that? Lots of effortful posts today

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:29:35 UTC No. 16180918

>>16180916
Key example right here lmao

this thread is ruined

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:31:19 UTC No. 16180919

>>16180918
but but but

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:33:31 UTC No. 16180922

>>16180919
it's okay squiddy there will be shrimp on Mars

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:36:51 UTC No. 16180926

>>16180637
>bottom of ship at 0.9G
>Human portion of ship at 0.1G
This is stupid and could be easily fixed with a better design
Just flipping around the ships upside down would be a big improvement

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:38:32 UTC No. 16180927

>>16180926
what if you hang the ships on wire that's 100 meters long

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:39:36 UTC No. 16180928

>>16180927
Yeah I said to do that already
>>16180066

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:41:16 UTC No. 16180931

Tether gravity with starship will never happen. it has the structural integrity of a tesla car

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:42:22 UTC No. 16180932

Hello friends,
Finally finished with work and now watching Clear's recent Starlink watchalong while catching up with the thread.
It's unfortunate that there are some who choose to actively diminish the quality of /sfg/, but don't let them get you down or dissuade from posting about spaceflight.
The /sfg/ spirit will persevere.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:43:07 UTC No. 16180933

>>16180931
they can pick them up on Earth with cargo so they can do tether gravity in space
they might not be able to do it with propellant in the tanks, however

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:44:28 UTC No. 16180935

>>16180932
this

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:48:07 UTC No. 16180937

>>16180932
ive asked you before can you confirm or deny that you are the person that said 'they wanted to be the little girl sometimes'

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:52:44 UTC No. 16180939

>>16180937
is there a man on this planet who does not with to be the little girl?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 03:59:54 UTC No. 16180941

>>16180933
Since you have 2 starships, you could put all the fuel into one and leave the other one with just humans
Human one will be much lighter
Same tether tension, so the one with less mass will have a higher G
You could balance the tanks out when you stop spinning

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:02:23 UTC No. 16180942

>>16180939
>>16180932
is this a samara? post screenshot of proof using 4chanX so it cant be faked

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:03:10 UTC No. 16180943

>>16180942
a what?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:07:21 UTC No. 16180944

>>16180943
A samefag autocorrect fucked me. Now show proof

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:08:08 UTC No. 16180945

congress passed a law where you cant track private jets anymore like elon's and taylor swift's
https://www.twz.com/news-features/congress-has-made-fully-obscuring-aircraft-ownership-information-a-reality

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:10:49 UTC No. 16180949

>>16180937
NTA i posted that, what do you need?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:12:33 UTC No. 16180955

>>16180945
elon pays off congress for this, but not make mars colonies legal? cant even get EPA to overlook his launch pad construction? wtff

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:13:21 UTC No. 16180957

>>16180955
Who gives a shit about earth laws on mars

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:13:32 UTC No. 16180958

>>16180944
nigger, ywnbaw
>>16180949
based

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:14:41 UTC No. 16180962

>>16180949
Ok are you the one that posted the IFT-3 date or not from clears twitter. Yes or no simple answer

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:16:35 UTC No. 16180964

>>16180962
promise me you wont be mad

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:17:39 UTC No. 16180965

>>16180964
that's my secret, I'm already mad

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:21:57 UTC No. 16180973

>>16180964
Ive heard enough. Youve lost my respect from the IFT-3 incident.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:26:12 UTC No. 16180978

>>16180965
>>16180973
to answer your question,no. i dont even know what youre talking about. even if it were me, what difference, at this point, would it make?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:28:25 UTC No. 16180980

>>16180978
It would confirm you as a tranny

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:39:34 UTC No. 16180988

>Almost 5 months, China only launched 22/100 of its goal for 2024
What went wrong Chinkbros?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:46:42 UTC No. 16180997

>>16180937
Thats a common 4chan saying, only newfags are surprised by it

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:49:19 UTC No. 16181001

>>16180980
>tranny tranny tranny tranny
ywnbaw
>>16180997
it's really predictable how these tourists instantly and absolutely out themselves as retarded newfags

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 05:13:15 UTC No. 16181032

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 05:20:32 UTC No. 16181047

STAGING

>>16181044
>>16181044
>>16181044
>>16181044
>>16181044

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 08:46:20 UTC No. 16181193

>>16178942
>but I don't think it would tolerate either the UV exposure
Correct. One of e main purposes of paint is to protect against UV.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 11:06:13 UTC No. 16181276

>>16179301
Yes, seriously. The one with the yellow puke. The description said she fantasized about it for a long time.