🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:13:35 UTC No. 16331535
Vulcan and Delta - Edition
Previous >>16328631
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:25:34 UTC No. 16331547
>>16331535
Why would anyone buy ULA
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:35:59 UTC No. 16331559
>>16331547
Grab their facilities and tooling. Maybe a few good engineers. Throw away management and company culture.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:37:50 UTC No. 16331560
>>16331547
Nobody wants it really. The contracts already secured are really the final countdown to the end of an obsolete company. Its not just why would anyone buy it, but why would anyone talented actually work there? They can only retain very old "talent" who are end of career retirees who are calling it quits by 2032 or before. And even they know, its likely they will be forced out even sooner than that.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:42:56 UTC No. 16331563
>>16331547
Guaranteed 60% NSSL contract. Stable state approved market insulated cash flow
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:55:00 UTC No. 16331570
>Day 74 of the 8-day Boeing Starliner flight test.
Elon could easily go rescue those astronauts, but orange man bad, so they won't let him.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:58:20 UTC No. 16331573
>>16331570
Guarantee you the only problem lies in autistic rules and regulations requiring astronauts to have emergency vehicle every second of their stay. There's no free docking ports, so they'll have to jettison the trash can before a Dragon can dock or do the 2 man crew for next flight option.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:02:52 UTC No. 16331578
Can EUropoors like me study Aerospace Engineering in the USA for a graduate degree? I am tired of windmills
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:11:54 UTC No. 16331587
>>16331573
The problem is that they can't eject Starliner safely.
>no automated undock
>port is too small to climb through in an EVA suit
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:15:01 UTC No. 16331593
>>16331587
If they can use the canadarm to catch trash cans, they can use it to yeet them off.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:18:22 UTC No. 16331596
>>16331570
They could return in the dragon currently onboard if they were okay with having 2 of them not seated
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:20:12 UTC No. 16331598
>>16331593
capture points are important in the case. Canadarm is dumb and super specialized and can’t really grab on to any yee yee ass hardware
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:23:21 UTC No. 16331601
>>16331598
They should've built it with replaceable claws so you could screw a suction cup part onto it instead.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:27:49 UTC No. 16331604
>>16331601
>suction cup in space
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:43:09 UTC No. 16331614
>>16331604
yet another problem that would have been solved by encasing the ISS in a 200 meter pressurized BoPET balloon.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:46:53 UTC No. 16331617
>>16331337
how is antimatter obtained in the first place?
also, if it's this easy... then why do >we give a shit about fusion? lmao
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:53:04 UTC No. 16331622
>>16331547
Their launch sites are worth it if you're building anything other than a small launcher. There's only so many good launch sites and most in the US are currently occupied. Look at all the trouble SpaceX had getting starbase going, and the ongoing legal shit.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:53:57 UTC No. 16331623
>>16331617
Antimatter is energy storage, not an energy source. We currently generate it in particle accelerators. You still need fusion driven electricity or an absurd amount of solar to generate the antimatter.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:56:45 UTC No. 16331626
>>16331623
Just disassemble Mercury and turn it into a dyson swarm that generates antimatter.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:58:41 UTC No. 16331627
>>16331617
>>16331623
There’s a decent bit in the Van Allan belts of Earth and Jupiter but it’s an absolute bitch to separate from the radiation belt, and to store because it needs to be a plasma to not turn into a nuclear weapon
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:01:30 UTC No. 16331629
>>16331598
They need to So Long Gay Bowser that shitcan one way or the other.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:05:40 UTC No. 16331632
>>16331627
>a decent bit
the first stack overflow question I found says saturn as the most at 400 micrograms and earth has 3 orders of magnitude less. that uhh... doesn't strike me as enough to be a viable fuel source.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:08:49 UTC No. 16331637
>>16331632
It's not. In the blogpost he cites 360 micrograms as enough for one Mars mission.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:13:34 UTC No. 16331641
>>16331623
>an absurd amount of solar to generate the antimatter.
how much would that be, and how efficient is the conversion? because that sounds like a good idea to me, considering that energy storage from solar energy is kind of difficult with the tech we have today, so storing a ton of energy as antimatter to heat water later when needed sounds good, if the process is efficient enough
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:15:41 UTC No. 16331643
https://x.com/OASES_miyako/status/1
>Multiple Lunar collision flash candidates have been discovered in a short time, presumably due to the Perseus Meteor shower! On the night of 8/12, the OASES observation system at Ishigaki-jima observed the Moon's moving image and found at least 40 Moon flash candidate events in just 5 minutes. There have been no reports of 5 lunar flash candidates observed in such a short time. It is possible that a sudden mass collision of meteor bodies occurred along with the Perseus meteor shower on the moon.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:17:44 UTC No. 16331645
>>16331641
Solar starts to enter serious discussion around the time you start talking about building equatorial accelerators around the lunar equator.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:21:16 UTC No. 16331646
>>16331617
>>16331623
>>16331641
nvm, this is actually discussed in the blogpost to some degree (I'm still reading it) and the author himself apparently suggested the idea himself in another blogpost lmao
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:24:16 UTC No. 16331649
>>16331593
It can't undock automatically. It would be like trying to take the cap off a bottle without unscrewing it first
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:32:33 UTC No. 16331650
>>16331646
>Tevatron produced 2 nanograms, or 360 kJ, per year. A 30 kW beam consumed 1 TJ in a year, for a total production efficiency of 1:2,620,000. Not great! But not terrible.
>antihydrogen ice
hahahahahahaha
yeah, this is some funny shit
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:38:41 UTC No. 16331658
>>16331641
>invent antimatter mass production
>use it to heat water
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:41:02 UTC No. 16331660
>>16331658
We need a Kardashev scale but for how efficiently a civilization can extract work out of hot water.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:45:18 UTC No. 16331665
>>16331658
anon, that is how fission, fusion and thermoelectric production works in general...
I gotta admit I'm 99.99% ignorant about these topics, but AFAIU, as long as we don't have efficient rectennas, we are fucked
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:48:38 UTC No. 16331670
>>16331665
fusion startup helion has a rector design that cuts out the water and has the plasma generate electricity directly. I don't know if they'll be able to make it commercially viable or even energy positive but it's kinda interesting.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:51:36 UTC No. 16331675
>>16331649
Why don't they just make a little mechanical switch flipper or something to replicate a human in the loop?
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:52:44 UTC No. 16331677
>>16331675
nta but
>>16331675
>Why don't they make
because they are in space??
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:53:34 UTC No. 16331678
>>16331675
I will produce my card to you and the floaty people sketch.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:05:57 UTC No. 16331699
>>16331547
the girls love big rockets
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:10:55 UTC No. 16331707
>>16331578
Sure. I read my engin at U.Michigan at Ann Arbor UG and grad, and there were many Eurofags studying aero there. This was a key to the success of our rugby teams -- our euro and commonwealth players had 10+ years extra experience on our adversaries. Purdue is another good aero school as is Johns Hopkins and U. Washington. You just have to be admitted and pay the tuition.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:12:22 UTC No. 16331710
>>16331675
I mean the obvious answer is that you shouldn't have to. This conversation can only happen if multiple things have gone wrong in a row. But now that they have, the answer is to not try anything until Butch and Suni have a separate craft with dedicated space suits to take refuge in, which could also have the switch flipper. If they want to make an automatic switch flipper from the ground they definitely could do that, but you don't get into this position in the first place by allowing your engineers to make the right decisions quickly.
An obvious second question stemming from your question is, why the fuck don't they just use the automatic switch flipper they already have in robonaut, and if it can't do that then what the hell can it do and why does it exist and what have they been doing for the last decade with $30 billion
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:14:05 UTC No. 16331712
>>16331699
They also like frivolousness things that are super overpriced, and disposable things. They want to see a man spend an absolute fortune for a shiny thing, regardless of its intrinsic value.
tl;dr women are stupid
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:19:05 UTC No. 16331716
>>16331643
Cool
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:22:08 UTC No. 16331721
https://spacenews.com/first-rfa-lau
>Rocket Factory Augsburg (RFA) is “a matter of weeks” away from attempting its first orbital launch, according to the chief executive of its corporate parent.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:25:50 UTC No. 16331726
>>16331721
2 weeks?
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:26:34 UTC No. 16331727
>>16331710
Exactly what I’ve been thinking. Not only that but NASA is actively testing a new robotic helper, at least I’ve seen them testing one at the JSC mockup facility right next to flight hardware and actual Axiom mobility suit testing for Artemis. Seems like such an obvious use for billions of dollars if (when) they decide to bring back Butch and Suni on Crew-9.
Like are we being naive? All it would need to do is go through the undocking procedure, which is a slow process anyways and could be handled by the slow ass actuating fingers and arms. The only argument I can think of is if it needs to be flown manually. Didn’t butch and suni have to take it out of automated docking and do some manual flying to dock in the first place? Could be a problem that robonaut might not be equipped to handle.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:27:23 UTC No. 16331728
>>16331721
I hope they will do some spectacle failure on the first run.
Like say, it accidentally lands on London.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:27:35 UTC No. 16331729
>>16331721
inb4 it gets delayed to “Q1 2025”
>>16331726
audible kek
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:39:21 UTC No. 16331741
Casey's got the right idea, but sympathetic magic has a theoretical mass-energy conversion ratio of infinity. 1 ritual performed aboard a spaceship could easily heat 3000t+ of liquid hydrogen.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:49:06 UTC No. 16331753
>>16331547
Only reason would be all the talent with the NSSL connections that can be leveraged for all future efforts. That said, if SNC were to buy ULA, it would actually be interesting in that they would not longer technically have to rely on NASA contracts to fly Dreamchaser. They can rate it for VC themselves, and then launch payloads to orbit as a competitor to dragon for private missions for any parties interested and also compete with NASA for ISS, Axiom/Vast/Gravitics station launches, and/or flights to Gateway if and when that becomes a thing.
Unfortunately, regardless of who ULA gets sold to, they carry a strategic risk that's impossible to derisk, which is that their flight hardware core stage engines are BlOrgin. Which means that any BE-4 failure that happens at launch, during flight, during reentry slowdown, and up to landing burn, will INSTANTLY ground VC until FAA approves BlOrgin and thereby ULA. Neither ULA nor potentially SNC have any answer on what happens to their company if and when BlOrgin encounters a failure or vehicle RUD.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:52:29 UTC No. 16331760
>>16331623
Why not just directly use the insane amount of power generated via fusion then? Is the idea you tap off that insane power to create antimatter, which yields even more power?
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:56:46 UTC No. 16331768
>>16331760
sorry thought of something else
…or is the idea you use fusion/lots and lots and lots of solar or whatever, you “store” the antimatter (good luck), and then you tap that stored antimatter later? I.e. it’s just a battery
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:16:53 UTC No. 16331790
>>16331707
I am only interested in Stanford, MIT and Harvard. Rest would be a downgrade for me. They hand out scholarships don't they?
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:23:10 UTC No. 16331800
https://x.com/McGill_AdAstra/status
McGill U schooling on Handmer
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:23:17 UTC No. 16331801
The estrogon astronauts blue orgin&bezos tour was really boring.
I had to force myself to keep watching.
And it unlike the musk&boca chica tours, the tour with bezos felt forced as fuck, and tim was obviously walking on eggshells the entire time.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:24:52 UTC No. 16331805
>>16331801
>that obviously staged interaction with a random employee that named all the previous companies he worked for
>Bezos trying to laugh it off and deflect like he didn't obviously set that shit up
it was so cringe
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:27:08 UTC No. 16331808
>>16331753
>BE-4 failure on New Glenn will INSTANTLY ground Vulcan
It won't. The only one of those circumstances that has any relevance to Vulcan's flight operations would be a failure during ascent
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:28:43 UTC No. 16331810
>>16331805
It felt more like a tour for investors then for spacenerds.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:36:30 UTC No. 16331819
brilliant pebbles
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:38:13 UTC No. 16331823
>>16331800
>Your suggestion of using antimatter to heat hydrogen propellant was examined in some detail by David Morgan at Lawrence Livermore National Lab in the 1980s (see link below for his NASA-funded study).
lol
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:38:14 UTC No. 16331824
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:38:17 UTC No. 16331825
>>16331810
Exactly
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:39:19 UTC No. 16331827
fruity pebbles
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:46:44 UTC No. 16331834
>>16331832
selling to sierra space and retiring to his ranch
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:47:46 UTC No. 16331835
>>16331832
>It will take the market several years to catch up to that level
I guess 10+ years counts as several, sure.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:49:47 UTC No. 16331841
>>16331832
Organize a sale of ULA to Blue Origin, or Sierra, retire with his golden parachute afterwards and shitpost on twitter between charged speaking engagements
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:49:51 UTC No. 16331843
>>16331832
Sell the company and retire.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:51:53 UTC No. 16331846
>>16331670
>fusion startup helion has a rector design
this video says Helion marketing is a load of bs, and that such a reactor would be as dangerous as
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vU
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:53:58 UTC No. 16331849
>>16331810
It was bozo’s attempt at a PR win I think. He probably had his engineers brief him on some talking points right before lol
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:04:14 UTC No. 16331856
>>16331834
>>16331843
This. He is smart enough to know he is the captain of a sinking ship. In that situation, the noble man would take the first lifeboat in secret, and leave the other yes men to deal with the mess. All signs point to this event happening SOON. A short announcement imminent, he was grateful but now needs to spend time with his family. Why play a known losing hand? Just bail now dude, you are rich. This is obvious flowchart decision making.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:07:48 UTC No. 16331859
>>16331846
I remember this video, it has been a while since I watched it but a point I recall after watching was: so there is a lot of radiation so what? The same is true for nuclear and other fusion reactors, it is just How it will be. I dont see why radiation is such a massive obstacle, after all we can operate real radioactive reactors today
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:09:44 UTC No. 16331860
>>16331800
That's not what he was saying though. He said to use the reaction to heat something with a high melting point so that can heat the hydrogen
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:11:45 UTC No. 16331862
>>16331670
They claimed it would operate this summer, However, looking at the website real quick and they havent posted anything about it. I know they were test firing it, so I suppose it is just waiting and seeing
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:14:37 UTC No. 16331866
ULA deserves a coup de grâce; SpaceX should buy and liquidate them.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:15:45 UTC No. 16331867
>>16331800
Schizo university knows what he's talking about. Didn't he get abducted once and that was what got him into the field? The schizo field
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:16:16 UTC No. 16331868
>>16331859
fusion is different, that neutron radiation is pretty spicy. Corrodes basically everything internally and even with shielding it doesn’t give a shit about anything that isn’t the shielding itself
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:49:19 UTC No. 16331889
>>16331886
i'm embarrassed to live in the same solar system
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:50:36 UTC No. 16331890
>>16331886
looks ass
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:55:16 UTC No. 16331891
>>16331886
Damn it's like if the shittiest place on Earth was a whole planet but with no air. It's going to be a lot of work to make sure the children of the future colonists don't immediately decide to kill themselves
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:55:23 UTC No. 16331892
>>16331886
Nice try, but I know a muffin when I see one.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:57:35 UTC No. 16331893
>>16331886
damn Mars has monkeypox now?
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:38:04 UTC No. 16331929
>>16331886
Groace, imma O'Neill fag now
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:00:41 UTC No. 16331947
>>16331886
I don't hate it. in fact I'm glad they didn't paint it a candy apple red to make it appeal to normies.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:02:07 UTC No. 16331950
>>16331940
>Germans having a Henry Ford moment again
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:03:38 UTC No. 16331951
>>16331950
Currently they're experiencing a Fall of Babylon moment.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:03:58 UTC No. 16331952
>>16331940
Only if they rename to Raketenfabrick Spurmann Brieschenk.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:05:09 UTC No. 16331953
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:13:50 UTC No. 16331959
>>16331950
Ford was an absolute genius, and to this day he was correct. This masterpiece published more than 100 years ago should be quoted in the modern era a LOT more often, as well as Martin Luther's best work: On the Jews and Their Lies.
Germany knows a thing or two about the state of things, they are extremely perceptive and natural born problem solvers. The best German minds had this figured out AGES ago, as shown in many famous historical texts (which Elon has based his world views on)
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:19:46 UTC No. 16331961
report and don't reply.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:29:23 UTC No. 16331970
>>16331961
seethe all you want. he's right.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:31:47 UTC No. 16331973
>>16331959
All problem solvers left for America. This is why America is thriving and exploring space while Europe has been in decline for decades.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:36:31 UTC No. 16331979
>>16331973
the engineering is there. if they can do airbus they can do better than arianespace. they're just missing the will at the high levels
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:51:42 UTC No. 16331993
>>16331991
Elon, king of the Mexicans
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:53:46 UTC No. 16331997
>>16331987
Never mind, its just Gwynne's BBC order
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:56:08 UTC No. 16331999
>>16331997
Big Brownsville Cryogenics
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:57:53 UTC No. 16332001
>>16331675
Because that would cost money. And if there's one thing Boing likes to do, it's pinch pennies. And that's why they have so many jeets working for them.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:59:05 UTC No. 16332003
>>16331991
He better put up a Wernher bust to go with it.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:59:34 UTC No. 16332004
>>16331940
Delayed to 2025
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:02:53 UTC No. 16332007
>>16331843
This. Tory will retire to his ranch and deal with nothing larger than cattle.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:04:10 UTC No. 16332010
>>16331929
The best kind of O'Neill colony is one that doesn't need to be launched into orbit.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:11:09 UTC No. 16332017
>>16331593
Star dumber lacks the fixture the Arm can grasp.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:12:14 UTC No. 16332020
>>16332017
Is there a single thing on that shitcan that was well thought out?
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:12:51 UTC No. 16332021
>>16331832
> Company sold
> Tony Baloney retires to obscurity
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:15:46 UTC No. 16332026
>>16332023
>built by the french
>launched on an american rocket
good job senegal
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:18:40 UTC No. 16332031
fags
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:21:32 UTC No. 16332032
>>16332023
>public domain sputnik pic
just lazy
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:27:00 UTC No. 16332038
>>16332010
Damn it's the first time I wasn't the one to post that image
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:28:04 UTC No. 16332039
>>16332032
>a journalist thought it was fine because satellites must still look like that
Somewhere I have a screencap of CNN saying the Space Shuttle was traveling 25 times the speed of light.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:28:55 UTC No. 16332041
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:28:55 UTC No. 16332042
>>16331658
the perfect fuel mix for a spaceship would be anti-matter and the crew's waste products, a stream of poo poo + pee pee intersecting a stream of antimatter in your reaction chamber will be known as the 4chans drive
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:32:32 UTC No. 16332047
>>16332041
Its different than this one IIRC, many such cases it would seem.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:34:56 UTC No. 16332048
>>16332032
They spent all their money on their logo.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:36:19 UTC No. 16332051
>>16332032
>>16332039
>>16332041
New York Times predicted that it would take 10 million years to invent a flying machine. 2 months later was the first successful flight. You do not hate journalists enough.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:40:20 UTC No. 16332055
>>16332054
blacksat
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:40:56 UTC No. 16332056
>>16332054
there's black and then there's midnight
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:04:03 UTC No. 16332072
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:04:18 UTC No. 16332074
>>16332064
I really hope that isn't true
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:06:42 UTC No. 16332077
>>16332051
>rocketships to nowhere
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:07:36 UTC No. 16332078
>>16332064
Reality is not that interesting.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:09:11 UTC No. 16332080
>>16332064
This is a deliberately curated image of black projects meant to frighten adversaries. They briefly attempted to do the same thing by pretending to have alien technology. It's all propaganda and it isn't even meant for you
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:10:05 UTC No. 16332081
>>16332074
>>16332078
Listen here Jack, that's how it works.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:13:35 UTC No. 16332085
>>16332081
Every boomer I've ever spoken to believes the government has magic powers and we live in some sort of Marvel universe >>16332080
The adversary frightened to local schizo created ratio must be way too god damn low for that to have been worth it
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:17:06 UTC No. 16332087
>>16332081
Okay now I'm convinced it isn't true, there's no UFOs or aliens sadly.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:17:30 UTC No. 16332088
>>16332064
>>16332081
"locked up in black projects"
I assume this means, said projects are possible, but too expensive when we have reparations to pay to all blacks
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:19:27 UTC No. 16332092
>>16332088
Honestly the fact that DARPA seem interested in all the meme drives like the EM-drive and lately the QI drive means they're just as clueless and hopeful as the rest of society and hoping to find that breakthrough just as badly as we are
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:24:47 UTC No. 16332096
>>16331643
I've been getting a lot more interested in the Moon
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:32:23 UTC No. 16332100
>>16331768
Yes, for example you could imagine huge solar arrays in orbit pumping terajoules of energy into the machinery that's generating your antimatter product, and every now and then a tanker arrives to pick up a few grams of the stuff. Elsewhere it's used in tiny amounts at a time for propulsion, power, weaponry, etc.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:35:38 UTC No. 16332102
>>16331643
I still remember Shoemaker-Levy but NASA had butterfingers and we missed collision kino unlikely to be seen again in our lifetimes.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:36:29 UTC No. 16332103
the black project is just orion. and i guess casey's antimatter teakettle too now.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:49:59 UTC No. 16332108
>>16332102
shoutout to Gene Shoemaker who was the embodiment of /sfg/ turbo autism. Super smart geologist, went to caltech at 16 and got out studying metamorphic rocks. Got into astronomy as a side hobby and got his wife into. They discovered this comet. Gave the apollo astronauts a crash course in identifying important rocks to bring back when they were mass autism budgeted.
King shit.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:54:57 UTC No. 16332110
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADq
He's right, fuck this pole autism
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:55:59 UTC No. 16332111
>>16332102
>but NASA had butterfingers and we missed collision kino unlikely to be seen again in our lifetimes.
wdym we have footage of it
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:09:10 UTC No. 16332119
>>16332111
Nta but off the top of my head they floated getting some type of Ulysses/Cassini type mission out there to see it up-close but sat on the idea too long so they missed the launch window opportunity and just opted to do ground-based observation. What we saw was great but we could have had an up-close view of a very rare cosmic event that we had the luxury of knowing about beforehand
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:13:33 UTC No. 16332122
>>16332119
>but sat on the idea too long so they missed the launch window opportunity
So fucking typical of NASA, I expect the exact same to happen with Apophis when it comes closest to us, just wait and see
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:14:36 UTC No. 16332124
>>16332085
Boomers replaced God with Government
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:26:58 UTC No. 16332131
>>16332124
Except the MAGA types for some reason,its the opposite
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:33:05 UTC No. 16332136
>>16332119
What actually happened was that Challenger blowing up fucked up NASA's launch schedule for a decade. Galileo was supposed to be deployed in May 1986 by Atlantis on using a Centaur G-prime, and would have arrived at Jupiter in late 1988. Shoemaker Levy-9 was a highly eccentric two-year orbit that approached Jupiter every second July. Galileo would have arrived too late to see the 1988 pass but it would have observed the one in 1990. That would have given astronomers enough data to predict it would dip within the Roche limit in 1992 and we would have had front row seats for the impact in 1994.
But Challenger blew up in January of 1986 and the Shuttle stopped flying until 1988. Galileo didn't launch until October of 1989 and since Shuttle-Centaur had been canceled it had to ride on an IUS solid kickstage. That meant it had to take a much more roundabout gravity assist trajectory, and in July 1994 it was still 18 months out from arriving at Jupiter.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:34:06 UTC No. 16332137
>>16332111
>>16332119
The Galileo spacecraft hadn't arrived yet, had it arrived a little sooner we'd have closeup shots.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:36:46 UTC No. 16332139
>>16332136
>>16332137
Thanks! I used to know it off the top of my head but it’s been a while since I’ve thought about it. Funny how these things work out. And it’s fun to research the history of these things
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:44:35 UTC No. 16332144
So apparently NASA made an entire imaginary reference architecture called "Hercules" to avoid admitting methalox Starship was useful for Mars and was already in the pipeline. Beat oldspace with cheap COTS hammers.
https://projectrho.com/public_html/
https://sacd.larc.nasa.gov/files/20
>>16332136
That one fucking O-ring set us back 20 years as a spacefaring nation. Reagan should have had all the managers responsible hanged for treason.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:51:00 UTC No. 16332146
>>16332144
I mean look at this shit.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:52:06 UTC No. 16332147
>>16332146
starship from temu
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:56:05 UTC No. 16332148
>>16332136
What could've been...
https://www.americaspace.com/2015/0
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:56:22 UTC No. 16332149
>>16332144
If it wasn't that O-ring it was going to be something else. NASA had fifteen missions planned for 1986. With that sort of rate something going wrong was less of an "if" and more of a "when," and the Shuttle-Centaur program always had some very loose ideas about how mission safety was supposed to work.
Still, if everything had worked out we would have seen Ulysses and Galileo launch back to back in May, Atlantis would have deployed the Hubble Space Telescope in August, and Discovery would launched from Vandenberg twice.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:58:06 UTC No. 16332150
>>16332149
>and Discovery would launched from Vandenberg twice.
I think at that point the air force would at least say "what the fuck this is putting our people at risk, we need to fix the design" and avoid the 30 year stagnation period.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 01:01:30 UTC No. 16332152
>>16332148
>“Anna Fisher … would have operated the control panels to prepare Skynet for deployment and then deploy it,”
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 01:02:51 UTC No. 16332154
>>16332147
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 01:06:14 UTC No. 16332157
>>16332150
The Air Force would just skip the fixing part and launch their payloads on a Titan IV. There was a lot of big talk about what having crew would enable the Shuttle to do, but outside of Hubble servicing it hardly ever got used.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 01:14:12 UTC No. 16332165
>>16332148
Damn, no way they were gonna fit all of that in a single year
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 01:24:03 UTC No. 16332171
I didn't realize Polaris Dawn was coming up so quick, shit
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 01:27:17 UTC No. 16332174
>>16332144
It wasn't the O-ring, it was the culture at NASA. And it happened again when they decided that if they didn't look for tile damage, it wouldn't happen.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:03:17 UTC No. 16332192
>Upon its September 1992 rediscovery, the comet's date of perihelion passage was off from the 1973 prediction by 17 days. It was then noticed that if its next perihelion passage (July 2126) was also off by another 15 days (July 26), the comet could impact the Earth or the Moon on August 14, 2126 (IAUC 5636: 1992t).
Swift-Tuttle Judgement Day
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:18:31 UTC No. 16332197
>>16332192
So we don't even need to do anything.
The Earther problem solves itself.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:20:16 UTC No. 16332198
>>16332192
Inshallah martians get to watch earth eat a comet
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:23:57 UTC No. 16332202
https://x.com/LeighFletcher/status/
>We're a little over 24 hours away from JUICE flying 700km above the moon (21:16UT), the first part of the lunar-earth double flyby (LEGA) that'll send JUICE on towards Venus. All instruments will operate at some point, but there's a special opportunity to test RIME (radar)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:24:12 UTC No. 16332203
>>16332010
I can't ride an elevator from healthy 1g to delicious 0g on niggerfaggot Mars
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:24:20 UTC No. 16332204
>>16332197
>Martian Emperor Elon Musk IV tweeted his condolences and expressed regret that Blue Origin had yet to launch their New Glenn III rocket while also blaming NASA politics for preventing an Earth rescue mission
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:24:27 UTC No. 16332205
>>16332192
Ugh thank goodness, if only it could be sooner!
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:37:14 UTC No. 16332209
>>16331808
That's incorrect, as any failure condition has an impact on Vulcan due to the engine performance and ability to stay ignited falls into question. An engine failure is an engine failure independent of whether its ascent or descent. ULA doesn't have the flexibility to say "well, our booster was descending, but loss was built into the flight" which Blue has, because they intend to land the rocket and reuse it over time.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:39:23 UTC No. 16332212
>>16331886
You can tell where the oceans were and where they weren't with this.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:42:22 UTC No. 16332214
>>16332212
don’t remind me it just makes me mad.
If I had a time machine I’d skip all the stupid “go see hitler, go see napoleon, communicate with socrates, shake hands with alexander the great” stuff. I’d take an EVA suit and go see waterworld Mars and Venus.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:43:24 UTC No. 16332215
>>16332192
Death to the earthnoids inshallah, may the lord bless his mighty rocks journey.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:45:59 UTC No. 16332220
>>16332214
Blue Mars and Blue Venus would have been absolute treat to witness. 3 habitable worlds with huge planet spanning oceans with stable atmospheres, rotation patterns, and active core dynamos generating a protective magnetosphere in the same solar system roughly within the span of each other, give or take a few million years, would make Sol basically 0.0001% in terms of rarity even by Drake's Equation standards.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:46:49 UTC No. 16332221
>>16332192
how big is it?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:49:41 UTC No. 16332225
>>16332220
Weird that the InSight lander made arguably the biggest discovery on Mars in decades in terms of 'what went wrong' and yet nobody talks about it.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:51:18 UTC No. 16332226
>>16332221
26km, and the relative high speed and retrograde orbit mean a high energy nearly head on collision.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:52:41 UTC No. 16332228
>>16332226
Yikes
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:54:05 UTC No. 16332230
Kek musk is ‘tism posting
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:54:06 UTC No. 16332231
>>16332225
Because a lot of space news is pretty boring in the grand scheme of things, and most science organizations unfortunately aren't trained in the art of being genre savvy. Which leads them to taking what would and should be interesting news, and making it boring; causing the public to tune them out.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:55:26 UTC No. 16332235
>>16332226
damn, that might hurt a little
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:58:55 UTC No. 16332238
starship next test flight when? still no date known?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:58:59 UTC No. 16332239
>>16332226
That's insane
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:59:15 UTC No. 16332240
>>16332238
2 weeks
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:00:02 UTC No. 16332241
>>16332228
>>16332235
>>16332226
>A radius of 13.5 km and an estimated density of 0.6 g/cm3 gives a cometary mass of 6.2×1018 g. An encounter velocity of 60 km/s yields an impact velocity of 61 km/s, giving an impact energy of 1.15×1032 ergs, or 2.75×109 megatons, about 27.5 times the estimated energy of the K–T impact event.
We're all gonna make it to space, as ejecta.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:04:21 UTC No. 16332243
>>16332241
All those earthers will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:09:30 UTC No. 16332248
>>16332192
Hm. Sounds relatively easy to redirect into Earth, if a Martian or moon wizard were so inclined.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:16:45 UTC No. 16332257
>>16332023
This is genuinely cool to see. I'd like to think the outreach done years ago for New Horizons (NASA did an observing campaign with local astronomers) encouraged some to get into aerospace.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:17:52 UTC No. 16332258
>>16332241
sounds like you'd have a hard time even finding a living vertebrate after. the K-T impact wiped like 3/4 of species of the planet.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:19:42 UTC No. 16332262
>>16331535
>muh nasashit that launches once a year and costs more than 100 spacex launches
shit tier op
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:23:48 UTC No. 16332263
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:32:39 UTC No. 16332272
>>16332192
>>16332241
>This information and subsequent observations have led to recalculation of its orbit, which indicates the comet's orbit is sufficiently stable that there is absolutely no threat over the next two thousand years. It is now known that the comet will pass 0.153 AU (22.9 million km; 14.2 million mi) from Earth on August 5, 2126. and within 0.147 AU (22.0 million km; 13.7 million mi) from Earth on August 24, 2261.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:35:21 UTC No. 16332278
>>16332272
It can still be nudged back
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:55:56 UTC No. 16332291
What will ULA and Tory shills do after ULA finally be sold and slowly fading into irrelevant and disappear?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 04:01:51 UTC No. 16332294
>>16332277
Never you communist scumfuck
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 04:04:18 UTC No. 16332295
>>16331658
Your choices for antimatter reaction products are a shitload of hard gamma rays (electron-positron) or partial annihilation spraying neutrons everywhere (antiprotons). Water is a good absorber of both. Also in the article the idea is to shoot antiprotons at a big lump of metal carbide to heat it to 4000K and then run LH2 over it a la NERVA.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 04:09:00 UTC No. 16332297
>>16332291
I’m going to switch to shilling Northrup Grumman.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 04:24:45 UTC No. 16332302
>>16331997
please don't say such ghastly things about the goddess of spaceflight
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 04:27:40 UTC No. 16332304
>>16332297
Firefly*
I hope NG gets serious about doing space vehicles after the ISS is deorbited. They need something reusable. Commercial space is going to need trucks and taxis.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 04:31:12 UTC No. 16332307
>>16332297
You should consider adding a commercial space station company to your portfolio of /sfg/ shilling. I see youve taken a liking to old space, may I recommend you shill Sierra or Blorigin?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:04:03 UTC No. 16332321
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:06:09 UTC No. 16332322
>>16332321
o hell no
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:07:28 UTC No. 16332324
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bU1
a man can only dream...
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:10:16 UTC No. 16332326
>>16332225
I don't even know what it was.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:49:40 UTC No. 16332352
>>16332304
>Commercial space is going to need trucks and taxis
Enter stoke space.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:52:18 UTC No. 16332354
>>16332352
Stoke Space is a launch provider. Someone still needs dedicated inter-orbital reusable spacecraft, and depots.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 05:56:06 UTC No. 16332356
>>16332326
>The seismic measurements from the InSight lander revealed that the Martian outer core is in a liquid state and larger than expected.
>In one model, a partially crystallized Martian core explains the current state of Mars (i.e., lack of magnetic field despite liquid outer core), and this model predicts that the magnetic field has the potential to be reactivated in the future.
>On 25 October 2023, scientists, helped by information from InSight, reported that the planet Mars has a radioactive magma ocean under its crust.
The previous thinking that the core was small and had cooled down too much was wrong, it's the other way around.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:02:13 UTC No. 16332358
>>16332356
Oh shit. So what's missing, just spin for a magnetosphere?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:03:26 UTC No. 16332359
>>16332356
Radioactivity is turning out to be a surprisingly vital component of planetary evolution. Pluto, for instance, would be a solid rock if it weren't for all the radioactives keeping things moving.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:16:58 UTC No. 16332363
>>16332359
Makes one wonder how much that could affect (the still quite in its infancy) planetary formation in the coming billion years as radioisotopes decay, presumably decreasing the time they'll have any geological activity and its intensity. Guess we won't be around to measure that anyway.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:30:32 UTC No. 16332368
>>16332356
Samefag, one other take away from this is there is more seismic activity than previously thought. The oversized core blocks a greater percentage of S-waves than does Earth's. A large marsquake was detected right before the lander shutdown.
>>16332358
I'm not a geologist but based on what additional information I could find the problem seems to be occurring at the core-mantle boundary and proper convective heat transfer is not taking place. Rather the crust and mantle are acting like an insulator hence the lack of recent volcanic activity. Further speculation was that the core underwent a reheat event for unknown reasons causing the lower mantle to melt and become part of the outer core and fucking up its composition. Newer research seems to constrain the size of the outer core somewhat so I'm not clear what the latest theories propose.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:40:18 UTC No. 16332370
>>16332368
>A denser layer of silicon-rich molten rock could act like a thermal insulator layer, preventing the core from cooling and solidifying, Samuel explained. This, in turn, would help explain why Mars lacks a planetary magnetic field — Earth's magnetic field results from the way in which its solidifying inner core stirs up its outer liquid core, creating powerful electric currents that generate a magnetic field.
https://www.space.com/mars-core-mol
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:43:40 UTC No. 16332371
>>16331560
>Nobody wants it really
Several buyers are interested, just not at the price Boeing and Lockheed want.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:46:25 UTC No. 16332372
>>16331991
I've heard that Cybertruck has a lot of issues, but god damn it looks good.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:56:29 UTC No. 16332375
>>16331991
Wait... why is the rear indicator red?
Is it just blinking the brake light lmao
Did Elon cheap out
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:58:17 UTC No. 16332376
>>16332294
he's referencing the settling of the west you dumb kid
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:05:01 UTC No. 16332378
>>16332370
Huh.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:07:44 UTC No. 16332381
>>16332375
It's depressingly common these days even on "nice" cars.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:14:02 UTC No. 16332385
>>16332375
anon it's a turn signal, have you never seen a car before?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:18:09 UTC No. 16332387
>>16332375
Orange turn signals are a European thing, they think people can't differentiate a solid brake light from a blinking turn signal.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:27:07 UTC No. 16332392
>>16332238
musk said about 3 weeks 1 week ago
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:28:07 UTC No. 16332394
>>16332241
so 102 years until the next global extinction event
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:31:34 UTC No. 16332397
>>16332324
>the impact peels 10km of crust off the surface
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:39:55 UTC No. 16332405
>>16332387
Orange turn signals are an everyone except American auto manufacturer thing. It's pretty sensible to have your turn light a different colour from the brake light when there are who knows how many tens of millions of retards driving with one brake light out.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:40:57 UTC No. 16332407
>>16332403
https://x.com/whoisheartbreak/statu
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:44:26 UTC No. 16332408
>>16331991
>>16332375
What is this from? Did he really have a giant bust of himself made and drove around with it? Reality keeps getting more sim like.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:47:21 UTC No. 16332412
>>16332408
>>16332375
This crypto ELONGOAT shitcoin that dropped this $600k statue off at Tesla HQ was the funniest shit ever.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:47:56 UTC No. 16332413
https://x.com/ajtourville/status/18
the clip is from the 4 year old tour of Smarter Everyday/Destin getting shown around ULAs Alabama rocket factory
I skimmed through the tour and it was basically just about the tank manufacturing (machining ortho or isogrid onto the aluminium-lithium plates, bump forming them, then some clean and anodization before showing the stir welding)
didn't seem to talk about anything else really
Atlas used isogrid but Vulcan changed to the simpler orthogrid,apparently its 2x as fast to cnc machine, lighter and stronger
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0f
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:59:12 UTC No. 16332421
>>16332405
brake lights and blinkers are sepeate bulbs and brake lights don't blink, the fundamental premise of requiring a different color for the blinker is that Euros are actually retarded
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:02:46 UTC No. 16332425
>>16332376
America Is A Communist Country
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:09:24 UTC No. 16332427
>>16332421
>is that Euros are actually retarded
I guess your astronauts are too. They could have just made this all red to save some trouble. The warning is clearly indicated by position and label already.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:15:36 UTC No. 16332429
>>16332421
>brake lights don't blink
Er, yes, they do. Or are you a mongoloid who just smashes the brake pedal down? Lots of people tap their brakes while slowing into a turn or intersection for a smooth ride and saving wear on the vehicle.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:17:56 UTC No. 16332432
Spaceflight
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:19:01 UTC No. 16332434
>>16332421
>Euros are actually retarded
Every single car manufacturer on the planet has different coloured indicator bulbs. Except for ours because they are cheap jews and you simp for them.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:20:38 UTC No. 16332436
first colorblind astronaut when?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:23:06 UTC No. 16332438
>>16332436
framstronaut
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:28:39 UTC No. 16332441
>>16332413
Aluminum-lithium sure has come a long way since the Space Shuttle first started using it in the external tank
I just went hunting for the SLWT Lessons Learned paper I regret not saving and ran into this instead: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:30:51 UTC No. 16332442
>>16332441
I also like the little tidbit towards the end which remarks that if the SSME ever ran oxygen rich for any reason it would fucking explode
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:31:59 UTC No. 16332443
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/
Small Rockets
>A quick turnaround for Rocket Lab [9 days between launches]
>Defense contractors teaming up on solid rockets.
Medium Rockets
>Going polar with crew.
>Russia's launch rate has plummeted.
>10 launches in 19 days
>Stoke Space wants to walk before running.
>Engineers are reportedly leaving ULA.
Heavy Rockets
>FAA postpones Starship hearings.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:32:08 UTC No. 16332444
>>16332442
what the fuck
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:32:08 UTC No. 16332445
>>16332441
>Aluminum-lithium sure has come a long way since the Space Shuttle first started using it in the external tank
The fatiguing is unavoidable. It's shit for reusable rocketry.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:38:53 UTC No. 16332449
>>16332432
Spacefloat
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:40:34 UTC No. 16332450
>>16332444
RS-25s truly were a mistake
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:41:18 UTC No. 16332451
ISS has a 3D printer but anyone know how it deals with the gravity difference? Zero G seems like it wouldn't cause too much trouble but the ISS is really a complex free fall environment. I get that some of the motion ends up being relative to the rest of the station so it effectively doesn't exist within that frame of reference but is that true for all DOF?
Sorry if some of the terms are off or not precise. It's been a long time since I studied physics.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:55:23 UTC No. 16332460
>>16332441
>The final phase of the producibility enhancements was first implemented
on ET-134 (STS-130) and flown on the final tank, ET-138 (STS-135).
Are you fucking kidding me.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:55:31 UTC No. 16332461
>>16332451
No idea, just as clueless as you are, but for a standard printer I wonder if an accelerometer wouldn't be all that's needed to compensate for movements that could somehow affect it on very long prints, I'm not sure the stepper motor would have such fine and precise control. That's an old one by the way, they have a fancy metal one up there now.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:56:15 UTC No. 16332462
>>16332451
Wouldn't have to adjust for much. Your step motor operates through friction, the extruder is mechanically pressure-fed with filament, and the object still needs to get attached to the plate so the printer knows where the parts are. You'd get away with next to no support scaffolds though.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:07:52 UTC No. 16332465
>>16332451
There's really no difference IMO. All the production is relative to the printer and nothing really needs gravity, the pressure from the nozzle and its adhesion to the existing layer are the prinsry forces. Stepper motors, screws and belts are independant of gravity. Even if you got every astronaut to push off from one side of the ISS I doubt it would make any noticeable difference.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:10:39 UTC No. 16332467
Why the fuck do normies not give a fuck about space? Will Artemis revive the public interest in space travel? NASA barely gets a few hundred likes on their tweets. Even the 55th anniversary Moon landing tweet only got like 15k likes. No one apart from autists care about space travel. No one knows or cares about JUICE or Europa Clipper. No one cares about what SpaceX is achieving. No one gives a fuck and it depresses me. All they care about is pushing globohomo and sucking off Israel and their pointless wars when we (whites and asians) could be coming together to achieve humanity's destiny.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:12:55 UTC No. 16332468
>>16332467
>Why the fuck do normies not give a fuck about space?
Nobody is telling them to. They are basically NPCs.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:24:06 UTC No. 16332473
>>16332466
>I pulled the video because grift memecoins are bad
>anyway here's this clout post featuring the same content as the video I took down but with an obnoxious moral message
Smash all smartphones, make accessing the internet difficult again.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:33:24 UTC No. 16332476
>>16332467
Normalfags only focus on sex and reproduction. Most autists do not. Simple as.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:37:31 UTC No. 16332480
>>16332467
We have to pray that Elon can get enough people off this shithole that when it inevitably devolves into a nigger/jew hellhole nightmare slave world, there is enough people and machinery off world to keep shit going. That's it, that's where we're at.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:39:03 UTC No. 16332485
>>16332467
Elon (unwittingly?) posioned the waterhole, taking spaceflight from "le futuristic gay space communism" and condeming it to an aIt right escapist fantasy.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:40:16 UTC No. 16332486
>>16332482
Still stuck.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:40:26 UTC No. 16332487
>>16332482
SAAR ROCKET SHIP IS OF GOOD CONDITIONING. STOP POSTING THE FALSE NEWS UPDATE OR WILL BE CALLING THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE THEM DOWN FOR INDIA RACISM
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:42:57 UTC No. 16332490
>>16332485
The gay space communist fantasy period was basically responsible for our decline because "just give the government more money" only reinforced the shuttle pork stasis. Returning spaceflight to the steely eyed missile men with a dash of computer hackers is what made it actually work again.
>>16332487
>OR WILL BE CALLING THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE THEM DOWN
Isn't that what NASA is already trying to do?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:44:59 UTC No. 16332492
>>16331856
>He is smart enough to know he is the captain of a sinking ship.
Is he? Raptor 3 was quite literally unbelievable to him. Prior to that I would've thought he was obviously more aware than he showed publicly. But after that I've started to think he really might be delusional and out of touch with reality.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:49:17 UTC No. 16332495
>>16332482
NARMAL
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:50:05 UTC No. 16332497
>>16332492
Not delusional, just too deep into the old-space mentality to realize just how much SpaceX has absolutely and unquestionably put into shame half a century of engine design and manufacturing, I don't think most others working in the sector have realized this yet. I believe that's their best achievement so far.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:52:14 UTC No. 16332500
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:03:54 UTC No. 16332507
>>16331846
This guy also doesn't understand the process of production and argued everything based on their current prototype reactor, being completely ignorant of the fact that future reactors will be larger and different. Same type of person who says Starship is dead because IFT4 could've only done 50t to orbit. Either willfully dishonest or shockingly shortsighted, either way worthy of being disregarded.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:23:26 UTC No. 16332515
Should I shill out an amount of money to buy Musk's biography?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:25:26 UTC No. 16332518
>>16332441
They should've hired me I can TIG weld 0.2mm Al-Li by hand.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:26:08 UTC No. 16332519
Yes
Watch this
https://youtu.be/WMy6HaAvv8M
Next
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:36:53 UTC No. 16332525
>>16332202
>arrives in 2031
>europa clipper arrives in 2030
i will start to care in 2030. i think it would be better if the outer planets didnt exist, they are making me feel sad about how fast i am aging.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:48:26 UTC No. 16332530
>>16332525
time flies. 2030 is here in no time. JUICE, Europa Clipper, Dragonfly.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:48:34 UTC No. 16332532
>>16332387
US auto manufacturers switching to “all red” has been so confusing. It’s hard to tell if people are braking or changing lanes, especially if they have a tail light out. And it can be incredibly deceptive in places like Austin or Houston where you can go from everyone driving 85 in a 75 to gridlock-stop traffic over a crested hill. Bring back the auburn orange lights I say
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:57:04 UTC No. 16332534
>>16332515
imagine paying for anything when libgen exists
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:00:18 UTC No. 16332537
>>16332534
but I like physical books more.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:05:32 UTC No. 16332540
>>16332467
Just a thought but the proliferation of television had only recently happened (mid 50s) and there were still only a few channels available during the Apollo landings in the 70s. Everyone crowded around to see walter cronkite cover the event on CBS.
No one watches cable anymore. Kids aren’t inspired by CNN or Fox, nor do they give a shit. Those are boomer drama channels.
We live in a boring, enfeebled point in the history of internet/television. For example, remember in the early 00s-10s when you’d watch let’s plays of your favorite game? Yeah now if you try to look up gameplay of these games you’re met with hundreds of modern archived livestreams of gameplay that have replaced these pre-recorded let’s plays. That’s unfortunately what it’s moved to. This sort of shift from “push media” to “pull media” where kiddos and the public are needing to actively search out what they want instead of it being fed to them.
It will take the public actively looking for a NASA livestream of these Artemis landings, which if they’re not interested in already then they’re not going to watch. NASA has an uphill battle they need to be prepared to fight (in terms of getting the public primed and ready for this. It NEEDS to be on the radar) and I’m afraid they aren’t prepared to do what is needed. Elon will be a big help with X and his own tweets that get lots of engagement. But NASA needs to have a plan to incentivize the public.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:06:47 UTC No. 16332541
>>16332480
Dire. I agree completely
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:08:11 UTC No. 16332543
>>16332144
Your nasa link is broken.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:12:44 UTC No. 16332546
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:14:48 UTC No. 16332547
>>16332467
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy7
As much as I hate those other guests, I loved seeing Bill Nye die a bit from his ideological allies.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:19:55 UTC No. 16332550
>>16332532
>Austin
>85
other than the toll road (which is pretty far outside Austin), there's no way you can go that fast anywhere in Austin traffic
>yuro can't notice when a light is blinking regularly
brain problems
and you still have to actually turn the blinkers on anyhow, turn signals can't read the driver's mind
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:21:02 UTC No. 16332551
>>16332547
It’s funny because bill is a sellout but I think he still has hopeful scientific optimism in good faith (in other word, here he is expressing GENUINE excitement over the prospect of life itself being found on Mars) but the world has run out of hope. Especially left wingers, my God. These further-than-left quasi-progressives (whatever you want to call them, you get what I’m going for hopefully) are obsessed with playing the victim card wherever they can, acting like the world is on fire, needs to be on fire, and will be on fire in the future, and spaceflight is the last thing they care for in a world without hope. This also explains why everyone is going sterile. Younger people look around and see political dismay, high price of living, and figure they just can’t afford children in this world.
I don’t feel bad for Bill Nye here though, you reap what you sow bozo
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:24:47 UTC No. 16332553
>>16332540
To add, SpaceX's livestreams are great and the post launch edits with music are even better, but it only represents a fraction of a percentage of slop ingested that week by the average viewer
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:27:44 UTC No. 16332554
>>16332532
I can't tell if you're young or a just a non American but all red is nothing new. It doesn't confuse anyone and half the drivers don't use their turn signals to begin with.
>>16332550
>other than the toll road (which is pretty far outside Austin), there's no way you can go that fast anywhere in Austin traffic
It's not far at all really, but the speed limit is 80 and the 85 part doesn't start until south of Austin a bit. It also passes by the Tesla gigafactory.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:28:44 UTC No. 16332556
Livestreams from the moon's surface HAVE to increase public interest, right?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:29:36 UTC No. 16332557
>>16332555
https://x.com/JeffGreason/status/18
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:31:31 UTC No. 16332559
>>16332556
maybe if it was a youtuber celebrity playing videogames from the surface of the moon livestream
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:33:06 UTC No. 16332561
>>16332559
20 zoomer streamers going around the moon, I wonder if that would increase the interest of that particular population or would it just be seen like an exotic oddity (lets say they did the same with a big sub or whatever, that might not really increase the interest for deep sea mining or building underwater habitats)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:34:19 UTC No. 16332563
>>16332556
If we can't even get a 4K UHD 360 livestream from Low Earth Orbit to increase interest, what makes you think it will be any better.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:37:06 UTC No. 16332566
>Artemis 2 lands back on Earth after a successful mission
>“I thought the Space Shuttle already went to the Moon or something? Huh. Anyways…”
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:38:40 UTC No. 16332568
>>16332556
We need space sports. Not just sports in space, but proper space spots that take advantage of the low/lack of gravity.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:43:02 UTC No. 16332573
>>16332555
yeah i'm of the same mind, the moment i heard all the yapping about cryogenic propellant it just sounded to me like the first thing that midwit naysayers clamped onto because "it hadn't been done before" despite the fact that we know how fluid works in a vaccuum and we've had ullage thrusters for about half a decade now.
the very first time i heard a close friend of mine mentioned it as we were discussing it i just had to kind of shake my head in disbelief, this is what people thought was going to hold up this super ambitious project, as opposed to, y'know, re-entry, landing both stages and especially the tower catch.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:44:20 UTC No. 16332575
>>16332559
>cosmic rays deleted my save file
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:46:24 UTC No. 16332579
>>16332554
>I can't tell if you're young or a just a non American but all red is nothing new. It doesn't confuse anyone and half the drivers don't use their turn signals to begin with
Everyone else across the entire planet has used different coloured turn signals since forever. Keep dick riding your corporate masters though GLUK GLUK GLUK
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:47:25 UTC No. 16332580
>>16332573
propaganda that took a life of its own and started self propagating seeded by the depot haters
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:48:26 UTC No. 16332582
>>16332579
you are mixing up your analogies there buddy
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:51:25 UTC No. 16332584
>>16332566
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:55:57 UTC No. 16332588
>>16332579
>Everyone else across the entire planet has used different coloured turn signals since forever.
One of my cars is German and uses red turn signals. If you weren't a no car bus rider faggot you'd know that.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:59:24 UTC No. 16332592
>>16332568
Send MMA fighters to the Moon, see who comes out on top in 1/6g
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:00:31 UTC No. 16332594
>>16332580
shelby unironically set spaceflight back decades by banning the word depot in NASA circles
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:00:35 UTC No. 16332595
>>16331728
>Like say, it accidentally lands on London.
Failure?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:03:37 UTC No. 16332597
>>16332594
We should name the first fuel orbital fuel depot the richard shelby memorial depot.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:04:14 UTC No. 16332600
>>16332588
and if you weren't such a shut in, you'd know that american domestic market cars can be made anywhere in the world despite conforming to US standards. Other countries REQUIRE the turn signal to be a different colour
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:09:33 UTC No. 16332601
>>16332600
Porsche doesn't make a US version of this car buddy. Have a nice day.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:11:55 UTC No. 16332605
>>16332579
Red turn signals is just something Americans do to be difficult, like the whole "separation of powers" and "free speech" things.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:14:25 UTC No. 16332606
>>16332557
The old Greasball stopped grifting about Plasma Magnet, eh?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:16:49 UTC No. 16332608
>>16332606
Greason is fine idk why /sfg/ dislikes him
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:18:03 UTC No. 16332609
>>16332606
he says NASA is full of non-risk taking bureaucrats so he is based in my books
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:18:44 UTC No. 16332610
>>16332606
He seems to talk more about beaming stuff now
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:22:23 UTC No. 16332612
>>16332606
>>16332609
He's right about NASA. Hopefully the Starship launch economics era lowera the cost floor enough to change that ideology. The biggest issue is actually just convincing the public that NASA doean't actually spend much of their money overall.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:22:42 UTC No. 16332614
>>16332609
He has /sfg/ views but there's autists here who think plasma magnets are memedrives even though they require no new physics
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:33:09 UTC No. 16332617
>>16332561
Using the ocean is a good analogy.
How do you astroturf the public into being extremely interested in, say, a submarine ocean voyage? Obviously OceanGate brought it into the public sphere, but for the same reasons Apollo 13 did. And you can’t just rely on a staged emergency lol.
What is the secret to taking something monotonous and blowing it into dinner table talk
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:37:21 UTC No. 16332618
>>16332617
China and Russia phobia. Blow it out of proportion. You have to make Artemis look like a jihad. Not necessarily a “land grab” (normies shit their pants at the idea of le colonialism) but somehow you have to make it into a holy war of the evil ILRS program vs the “democratic” Artemis. Is NASA willing to get political like this again how they were in the 1970s? Or are they going to do this with kumbaya team humanity noodlebrain thinking?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:39:41 UTC No. 16332619
>>16332617
Have a confession booth with astronauts can talk privately to camera about how they really feel about the others
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:39:41 UTC No. 16332620
>>16332617
I don't think you really can
people don't care how computers work even if they use them every day all day
if/when going to space becomes more commonplace like with space hotels or a moon colony then people would understand the importance of launch sites and so on as far as it concerns those directly but I don't know how you would make the general public more interested in space in general
but there are some practical applications already which affect people like starlink (of course you have stuff like GPS but you don't need many launches for that)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:42:25 UTC No. 16332623
https://lunar.unnecessarymodificati
this looks fun but i don't know shit about javascript. Where do i start.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:43:59 UTC No. 16332624
>>16332617
Secret Rapist
"Leak" that there's a secret rapist on the moon mission and they're planning to do the first moon rape. Everyone will watch hoping to see it live but it obviously won't happen and no one will be able to complain because then they'd have to admit they wanted someone to get raped for their enjoyment.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:01:54 UTC No. 16332632
>>16332624
Secret Rapist on the moonship with MisterBeast
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:08:02 UTC No. 16332636
>>16332624
>>16332632
Desu Among Us reality TV show, combined with >>16332619 like Survivor/Big Brother
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:25:25 UTC No. 16332643
>>16332617
Kill 7 more astronauts. Preferably in a way that doesn’t get anything worthwhile grounded. Maybe on starliner.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:27:46 UTC No. 16332645
>>16332643
that wouldn’t do anything. When the Titan submersible imploded every normie said
>REEEE LEAVE IT TO THE PROFESSIONALS
If Starliner killed astronauts these same normies would say it’s too dangerous when all we need is climate satellites and nothing more
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:31:11 UTC No. 16332646
>>16332623
Basically by writing a loop where you continually check the provided values (angle, altitude) and adjust your thrust values based on those values. Keep doing that until you're landed.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:35:43 UTC No. 16332650
>>16332537
Then do whatever you want.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:43:04 UTC No. 16332683
>>16332679
maybe I'm just a nerd but I find the fact that they're spacewalking in the van allen belts far more interesting than the fact that this is a commercial space walk.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:45:10 UTC No. 16332684
>>16332683
putting to bed the myth of radiation being the great filter of spaceflight
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:52:57 UTC No. 16332689
>>16332683
>>16332684
It's a good strategy
>"Appollo was faked, men cannot fly through the VA belts!"
>spends days in the VA belts including hours on EVA, not even shielded by spacecraft walls
The coping will be sweet
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:53:27 UTC No. 16332690
>>16332683
they aren't spacewalking in the van allen belts I'm pretty sure
they raise the orbit, then do tests, then lower the orbit again and do the spacewalk on the third day in lower orbit
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:54:13 UTC No. 16332691
>>16332679
We're gonna see non-government human lunar spaceflight before 2034, even if it's just to orbit around the Moon
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:59:42 UTC No. 16332696
https://x.com/PolarisProgram/status
https://polarisprogram.com/polaris-
2h until briefing about Polaris Dawn
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:05:02 UTC No. 16332699
>>16332696
>>16332683
yeah like I remembered, spacewalk is not happening at the high altitude >>16332690 (number 2 in the pic)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:06:29 UTC No. 16332704
>>16332699
or I guess technically they might
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_A
>Earth's two main belts extend from an altitude of about 640 to 58,000 km (400 to 36,040 mi)[2] above the surface, in which region radiation levels vary.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:08:04 UTC No. 16332706
>DORITOS®, a PepsiCo Foods brand, is making a significant donation to St. Jude and will join this historic mission.
lmaooo
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:10:25 UTC No. 16332711
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:14:03 UTC No. 16332717
>>16332579
Nigger.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:15:11 UTC No. 16332720
>>16332715
https://x.com/johnkrausphotos/statu
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:15:17 UTC No. 16332721
>>16332718
This is probably the best crew in years
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:17:04 UTC No. 16332724
>>16332699
cool mission. i seem to remember a Gemini flight going about this high...maybe a little lower. But yeah, its the highest one for a while
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:17:18 UTC No. 16332725
>>16332722
https://x.com/KiddPoteet/status/182
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:19:10 UTC No. 16332727
SpaceX Moon suit next?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:19:23 UTC No. 16332728
>>16332724
I gotta say, watching SpaceX go through their own little Gemini and Apollo programs has been fascinating.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:20:04 UTC No. 16332730
>>16332724
well this is basically equivalent to gemini
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okq
>Polaris Dawn - Your Very Own Human Space Program
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:21:08 UTC No. 16332731
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:21:35 UTC No. 16332732
>>16332722
The black jumpsuits look awesome, unlike nasa's gay blue ones.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:23:44 UTC No. 16332737
When I was a kid I got the impression that one of the main barriers to being an astronaut was all the G's they encountered
But aren't launches like 1.5-2.0 thrust-to-weight? Is "spaceflight is high G" a myth?
Is it only during reenty? Is it even a problem to faint from high G's during reentry and then wake up during the parachute decent?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:24:59 UTC No. 16332741
>>16332737
Fighter pilots experience much worse.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:25:52 UTC No. 16332742
>>16332738
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJ
I guess module 8 is on top of the tower now? missed it completely
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:28:28 UTC No. 16332744
>>16332743
https://x.com/CSI_Starbase/status/1
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:29:29 UTC No. 16332746
>>16332744
its happening
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:31:13 UTC No. 16332748
>>16332744
>total of ~384
>assuming these take about an hour each, I think this may take at least 2 weeks
why would they not be done in parallel?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:32:19 UTC No. 16332750
>>16332746
https://x.com/CSI_Starbase/status/1
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:33:26 UTC No. 16332751
>>16332748
they would be of course, I guess some places will be blocked by other manlifts but its not going to take 2 weeks
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:35:45 UTC No. 16332757
>>16332679
>the only SpaceX employees that get to go in a company dominated by men are women
Pussy pass at work and the sad simps that allow it
I didn't know SpaceX was trying to copy Boeing
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:35:49 UTC No. 16332758
>>16332321
cado?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:36:32 UTC No. 16332761
>>16332736
That's not really surprising. It'd be weird to bump the mission commander and the cosmonaut seat-swap has important international agreements behind it. Still, kinda sucks for Nick Hague. That man has terrible luck trying to get to space.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:38:07 UTC No. 16332763
>>16332750
I love how janky those look
>>16332757
Isaacman is a fence sitter and tries to pander to the left.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:41:45 UTC No. 16332766
>>16332748
>expecting a nigger to understand such a complex concept as parallel work. Let alone work in general
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:43:18 UTC No. 16332768
>>16332728
>>16332730
yeah it do be like that...with mars as the goal
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:45:51 UTC No. 16332775
>>16332763
less grief if you have 2 men and 2 women on board, these are bound to be very competent people if they are working for SpaceX anyway
are they the 2 best if you stack rank all possible spacex employees that would like to go on the flight and have similar experience (one needs to have medical experience)? maybe, maybe not, but does it matter in this case?
it very well could be the case they are, the fact that DEI has become so widespread kind of poisons everything
and in fact if you look at it from the experiment point of view, it probably makes sense to have women and men on board as most of the experiments are about the effects of radiation, microgravity and so on in space so it makes sense to see if there are differential effects
its not like Polaris Dawn or SpaceX are highlighting the sexes of the crew members in any way (unlike NASA is with the Artemis missions where it seems to be basically the top priority)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:46:15 UTC No. 16332776
>>16332557
make this man nasa administrator
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:48:10 UTC No. 16332777
>>16332559
>>16332561
SpaceX xwitter account followed Mr.Beast a while back. Not to mention Elon shilling his videos.
But I guess that's never gonna happen now...
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:48:17 UTC No. 16332778
>>16332679
Only cute girls allowed
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:49:59 UTC No. 16332780
>>16332696
Exactly what do we not know about this mission at this point?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:50:32 UTC No. 16332782
How many possibilities are there that New Glenn is going to launch in september 2024? They seem to be ramping up with the tests.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:54:28 UTC No. 16332788
>>16332782
zero chance
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:55:14 UTC No. 16332790
>>16332734
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18255
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:58:03 UTC No. 16332796
>>16332775
I hope NASA switches out the Artemis crews to be all white again. "Sorry, you people demanded gibs instead of spaceflight, so that is what you get."
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:00:35 UTC No. 16332798
>>16332796
it would be pretty funny if they met their stated goals and put 1 (one) black man and one (1) woman on the moon, then had another dozen artemis missions crewed entirely by white men.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:02:25 UTC No. 16332801
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:04:22 UTC No. 16332803
>>16332760
modules 1-6 have 3 levels while modules 7 and 8 have 2 levels
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:05:00 UTC No. 16332804
>>16332798
The post you just made is the perfect synthesis on why quotas are destined to fail and i like it.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:05:39 UTC No. 16332806
>>16332803
different from tower 1 (pic related)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:06:14 UTC No. 16332807
>>16332806
how do the heights of the two towers compare?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:09:45 UTC No. 16332812
>>16332807
they didn't say explicitly, pic are the levels of the first 8 modules added together, both have 22 levels alltogether but tower 2 still has module 9 left
which has 2 levels? so tower 2 would be 2 levels higher than tower 1, idk
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:14:35 UTC No. 16332817
>>16332798
>crewed entirely by white men.
We need qts with big tits to jiggle in low gravity too
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:14:53 UTC No. 16332818
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:16:32 UTC No. 16332821
>>16332817
slim and flat girls make for a better mission profile, if you know what i mean
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:18:28 UTC No. 16332824
>>16332736
> The Boeing castaways have to be rescued by a Tar Heel.
The utter humiliation.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:22:10 UTC No. 16332829
>>16332737
yeah, reentry can see 5-6 G pretty easily, but i think they were also selected based on their ability to withstand high G incase something went wrong during the missions and they had to try fixing something, like during the Gemini flight where Armstrong and Scott nearly lost the ship due to a stuck RCS thruster
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:23:59 UTC No. 16332831
>>16332790
not starship, boooring
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:24:43 UTC No. 16332832
>>16332818
extra tiles
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:25:54 UTC No. 16332836
>>16332818
needs more payload bay
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:28:38 UTC No. 16332842
>>16332832
shock absorption pad with metal shield on the chopsticks
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:29:47 UTC No. 16332846
>>16332818
>header tanks lowered
>normal tanks raised
where's the fucking payload
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:30:45 UTC No. 16332847
>>16332846
payload?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:32:20 UTC No. 16332850
>>16332807
>>16332812
Heights were listed as part of the FAA permitting for the crane. Tower A is listed as 460ft + 42ft for the spire. Tower B is listed as 474ft and will not have a spire.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:34:24 UTC No. 16332855
>>16332846
v3 nigga
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:36:10 UTC No. 16332859
>>16332852
45 minute delay. not looking good
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:36:47 UTC No. 16332860
>>16332832
flap-sama grows stronger
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:37:01 UTC No. 16332861
>>16332859
not a delay, its 15min earlier
should start in 9 minutes
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:40:13 UTC No. 16332863
>>16332425
shut the fuck up, retard
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:42:49 UTC No. 16332867
Stupid Starliner incompetence robbed us of first USSF man in space
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:43:33 UTC No. 16332868
>>16332846
>header tank lowered
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:43:41 UTC No. 16332869
https://x.com/SpaceflightNow/status
>The Polaris Dawn crew is wheels down at the Kennedy Space Center ahead of their planned launch no earlier than Aug. 26.
>: @ABernNYC for SFN
>@PolarisProgram
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:44:37 UTC No. 16332870
>>16332824
She's baring her teeth like a chimpanzee
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:45:58 UTC No. 16332872
>>16332817
There needs to be a minimum cup size requirement for women in space
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:47:06 UTC No. 16332876
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1825574
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:47:40 UTC No. 16332878
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:47:56 UTC No. 16332879
Who tf is this old dude
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:48:42 UTC No. 16332881
>>16332879
Bill Gerstenmaier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willi
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:49:14 UTC No. 16332883
This is so boring, this sort of media event is so outdated I'm out
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:49:18 UTC No. 16332885
>>16332793
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:49:50 UTC No. 16332886
>>16332879
>>16332883
I hate how they do this cringy overbearing speech about how great of an endeavor they are going on or whatever
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:51:47 UTC No. 16332890
how long of a delay between polaris ii and polaris iii
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:54:11 UTC No. 16332895
>>16332891
I'm guessing this would have had to happen before Dear Moon
Is the second lunar flyby mission still a go?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:55:36 UTC No. 16332899
>>16332897
what ship and booster is that?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:56:01 UTC No. 16332900
>>16332895
I haven't seen any info about it after it was announced but I guess so
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:56:37 UTC No. 16332901
Mission overview finally
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:57:37 UTC No. 16332905
3:38 AM launch lol, at least there's a spacewalk
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:57:55 UTC No. 16332906
>>16332897
>stroker
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:58:03 UTC No. 16332907
>>16332902
>3:38am ET
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:58:38 UTC No. 16332910
This dude has Obama ears
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:58:51 UTC No. 16332911
>>16332375
>>16332412
please tell me this was done by North Korea (the world leader in monumental architecture, mostly for despotic dictators)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:59:01 UTC No. 16332912
times between 0370 to 0700 have the launch windows
might have misheard
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:01:23 UTC No. 16332915
chances of a suit failure on EVA?
what would be the fallout?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:01:39 UTC No. 16332916
Why does a mission like this even have a launch window? Unless there's a risk of collision just fucking go when they're ready.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:02:41 UTC No. 16332920
>>16332915
Low, they test them in vaccuum chambers for a reason
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:02:57 UTC No. 16332921
>>16332918
fewnag
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:03:50 UTC No. 16332924
>>16332922
oh great now normies are gonna think this is what it actually looks like
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:03:58 UTC No. 16332925
>>16332922
Inspiring
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:05:00 UTC No. 16332927
100 PERCENT OXYGEN
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:05:30 UTC No. 16332928
>>16332920
go tell that to Boeing
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:05:38 UTC No. 16332930
>>16332777
Hopefully it's a fully livestreamed mission to launch Mr Beast into deep space never to return.
>>16332782
Haven't all the test been with mockups? I get that maybe they don't want to risk any damage to flight ready stuff but they're gonna have to do it eventually.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:06:01 UTC No. 16332933
wtf am I looking at
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:06:35 UTC No. 16332935
>On the ground integrated vacuum test
Boing would never
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:08:05 UTC No. 16332940
>special message
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:09:05 UTC No. 16332944
>>16332940
>holy shit its flat
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:10:20 UTC No. 16332947
>>16332914
why isnt Fram2 pushing the boundaries of science and tech as hard as Polaris Dawn?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:10:26 UTC No. 16332948
>>16332918
WTF they never do this??? dogwhistle
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:11:01 UTC No. 16332950
>>16332948
this
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:12:03 UTC No. 16332952
>>16332949
>>16332947
because they are basically tourists
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:12:35 UTC No. 16332955
The gold visor makes these suits look so cool
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:12:48 UTC No. 16332956
>>16332945
the kino EVA suit
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:12:50 UTC No. 16332957
>>16332949
lazy, cost-cutting
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:13:07 UTC No. 16332960
>>16332947
Isaacman is built different
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:13:57 UTC No. 16332962
>>16332945
Why dont they show the real thing and demonstrate it? Hmm
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:14:07 UTC No. 16332963
>>16332955
its copper
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:14:51 UTC No. 16332964
>>16332623
>Where do i start
start with the Greeks
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:15:14 UTC No. 16332966
>>16332945
>>16332946
Invert the colors and lose the boots and false seam between the upper and lower sections.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:15:16 UTC No. 16332967
>>16332957
no, faster iteration
its not about cost
>>16332962
what do you mean? I guess you missed the suit unveil a month or so ago
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:16:24 UTC No. 16332971
>>16332955
It's getting closer to the super epic black panther marvel superstar vision tony stark originally envisioned
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:16:25 UTC No. 16332972
>>16332966
>just make the spacesuit black bro
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:16:25 UTC No. 16332973
>Kidd Po-teet
>Fighter pilot
>Combat experience
cringe
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:17:37 UTC No. 16332975
>>16332973
>>16332967
They're doing a press conference and they didnt bring the suit with? Did they forget at home?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:18:21 UTC No. 16332977
>Musk wants to put regular ordinary citizens through all this shit
P2P is not happening, I just don't see it being practical
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:19:33 UTC No. 16332979
What is this stream that I'm missing?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:20:01 UTC No. 16332980
>>16332977
Eh if you're liquidating your assets to take a ticket to Mars some astronaut training isn't a big deal.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:20:18 UTC No. 16332982
>>16332979
you're a big boy, you can find the link that's in this thread
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:20:41 UTC No. 16332984
>>16332977
Musk is a shit fascist who poops on his hands and farts xD
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:20:45 UTC No. 16332985
Anna is my waifu
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:21:24 UTC No. 16332986
>>16332979
https://x.com/PolarisProgram/status
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:21:31 UTC No. 16332987
>>16332623
ez game
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:21:56 UTC No. 16332989
Anna dyed her hair before the flight.
Her eyes are very pretty too
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:22:04 UTC No. 16332990
>>16332986
I already found it, but thanks.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:22:56 UTC No. 16332993
AAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:23:35 UTC No. 16332995
those contact lenses look cool as fuck
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:23:47 UTC No. 16332996
>>16332623
how do i work on phone?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:24:08 UTC No. 16332997
ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY RESEARCH
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:25:15 UTC No. 16333001
the science stuff is so cringe. there is no science to be done in a couple hour test. waste of time and mass, awful virtue signalling
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:25:42 UTC No. 16333004
>>16332946
I reckon for a lunar version they would have bulkier over-boots like Apollo did
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:27:31 UTC No. 16333008
>>16333001
what do you mean couple hour?
its 5 days
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:27:35 UTC No. 16333009
>>16333006
that poor usb port
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:27:51 UTC No. 16333010
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:29:08 UTC No. 16333015
>>16332986
when i was looking for a postbacc in houston i noticed that they had a bunch of aerospace and astronaut classes
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:29:27 UTC No. 16333016
As a journalist,
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:30:18 UTC No. 16333018
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:30:35 UTC No. 16333019
>>16333008
they are doing "hundreds" of experiments
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:31:47 UTC No. 16333021
>>16333018
It's weird looking back how this woman took reddit by storm and then completely vanished
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:31:53 UTC No. 16333022
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:32:30 UTC No. 16333026
>>16333008
>quest 2
thats a yikes from me dawg. enjoy your screen door and puking.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:32:55 UTC No. 16333027
>>16333022
I want to slap her ass, if I may
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:33:21 UTC No. 16333029
>>16333019
https://polarisprogram.com/science-
most of those are very short I think
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:33:51 UTC No. 16333032
>>16333001
But enough about New Shepard.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:34:35 UTC No. 16333034
>Not a chance!
BASED, journos btfo
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:35:04 UTC No. 16333035
I like these guys. they give real answers to questions. none of this wishy washy pr speak we usually get out of news conferences.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:35:16 UTC No. 16333037
>>16333032
It very similar. just a talking point to make them feel better about themselves and for PR. it doesnt accomplish much, just like 100% of modern academia
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:35:43 UTC No. 16333040
>>16333006
expanse vibes. is that ultrasound?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:36:32 UTC No. 16333042
>>16333040
she habing a baby in the rocket o_o
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:37:01 UTC No. 16333043
short tether, it's over
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:37:26 UTC No. 16333044
>>16333040
i don't know, they said they were in a pressure chamber for 2 days or something
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:37:53 UTC No. 16333045
>>16333034
very rude to jeff foust, he did not harm a soul
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:39:23 UTC No. 16333049
>>16333043
it's called pandering to idiots like you.
>ZOOOMGG THEY ARE REEALLY DOING ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY!!!
see >>16332997
In reality it is a pointless gesture
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:40:04 UTC No. 16333050
>>16333037
I mean what do you think these experiments need to be?
pic related for example, testing how quickly a drug might work with a new delivery method
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:40:14 UTC No. 16333051
>>16333049
what the fuck are you talking about?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:40:26 UTC No. 16333052
>>16332986
why do they keep their hair so long? i can't think of a single thing having long hair wouldn't make more difficult and annoying while being an astro
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:41:20 UTC No. 16333054
>>16333051
The test proves nothing, and only serves to get the kiddies excited. Starship tether will never happen, and should never happen, logically
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:41:37 UTC No. 16333056
>>16333049
is this your first time browsing this thread?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:42:14 UTC No. 16333058
>>16333054
the tether is how far out of dragon they can spacewalk dumbass. it has nothing to do with artificial gravity
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:42:28 UTC No. 16333060
>>16333050
They should not do it at all
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:42:38 UTC No. 16333061
>>16333054
you are such a fucking retard
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:42:50 UTC No. 16333062
>>16332935
>squandering money that could go to shareholders on some dog and pony show called an "integrated vacuum test"
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:43:22 UTC No. 16333063
>>16333052
hair is very important to women due to sexual, personal, and cultural reasons. they hate cutting it because it takes years to grow back to a decent length.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:43:43 UTC No. 16333064
>>16333054
This post really made me think
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:44:18 UTC No. 16333065
>>16333054
>>16333049
im liking this fast iterative development process of EDS. we could really see something new and fully functional soon.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:44:31 UTC No. 16333067
>>16333053
>space advertising is here
its over
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:44:37 UTC No. 16333068
>>16333054
you fucking retard
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:45:06 UTC No. 16333070
>>16333060
go to space? fuck off
someone is going to do things the first time in space, makes sense to document that i.e. do an experiment
if space sickness drugs work faster and better delivered with a nasal spray vs something else, then of course they should test it to know if space sickness meds should be administered nasally or some other way
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:45:35 UTC No. 16333072
>>16333063
i know all that but it just looks and must be a PITA. i'd cut that shit down to a bob or even neck length of something for the duration of my astronautical career. practicality is more important.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:45:37 UTC No. 16333073
>>16333067
>giant billboards in space visable across continents
donut steel guise
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:45:41 UTC No. 16333074
>>16333070
No idiot I'm talking about the experiments
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:46:29 UTC No. 16333075
>>16333074
that is one of the experiments retard
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:46:57 UTC No. 16333076
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:48:17 UTC No. 16333080
>>16333075
Yes it is and it is retarded. Take anti nausea and stfu. throwing up once is not a big deal and doesnt require research to fix
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:48:33 UTC No. 16333081
>>16333049
Idiot those are both my posts and both two different things, a probably brief spin test, and the length of the spacewalk tether
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:49:31 UTC No. 16333083
>>16333067
foremost milk bros...
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:49:34 UTC No. 16333084
>>16333053
Polaris Dawn - sponsored by Doritos(TM)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:49:38 UTC No. 16333085
stream frozen for everyone or just me?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:50:28 UTC No. 16333086
>>16333085
yes, audio only
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:50:39 UTC No. 16333088
>>16333081
My point stands that they are both stupid. Not going to ingage further
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:50:42 UTC No. 16333089
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:50:55 UTC No. 16333090
>>16333085
its fucking frozen lol, the absolute state of X
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:51:46 UTC No. 16333091
>>16333085
>>16333086
great job Elon, masterful gambit with the "X" stream
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:51:56 UTC No. 16333092
>>16333088
Gotta start somewhere
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:53:14 UTC No. 16333094
>>16333088
>ingage
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:53:16 UTC No. 16333095
This is really bad...
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:53:21 UTC No. 16333096
>>16333090
>>16333091
I don't think it was X, I looked at some other stream and the video was fine
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:54:21 UTC No. 16333097
>>16333018
how long until we get Dragon flights paid for by Sports Illustrated?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:56:04 UTC No. 16333101
>>16333083
I have a feeling that's the face he would make after reviewing the last 10 years of the Starliner saga.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:56:27 UTC No. 16333102
not frozen anymore
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:57:48 UTC No. 16333105
>>16333095
IT'S SO FUCKING O V E R!
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:58:13 UTC No. 16333106
>>16333102
already switched to a new thing to do. let me know what happens rest of the stream
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:58:22 UTC No. 16333107
>>16333084
"Mmmmm - zero gravity oil based coating. *drool*"
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:58:49 UTC No. 16333108
pretty funny to see the juxtaposition of this custom dragon flight vs the shartliners ongoing disaster
lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:00:00 UTC No. 16333111
>>16333107
how have doritos solved the chip outgassing issue?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:01:01 UTC No. 16333114
Woooah Gerst said the suits are geared more toward mobility and walking on other terrestrial bodies
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:01:42 UTC No. 16333115
>>16333106
lmao I switched off as well, idc about press shit
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:02:08 UTC No. 16333118
>>16333107
Where do I buy this?? Hello??????
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:02:32 UTC No. 16333120
if i was doing a billionaire space program i'd focus on developing emergency and disaster management
>spacewalks to rescue astronauts and repair spacecraft damage
>astronaut evacuation
>fire suppression
>rapid emergency launch
>ship to ship recovery
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:02:42 UTC No. 16333121
>>16333102
Twitter is such a fucking shit streaming platform.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:04:17 UTC No. 16333127
>>16333120
that's gay and nasa would never let you run a rescue mission even if it came up.
I'd spam a probes to the outer solar system (no further than neptune)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:04:47 UTC No. 16333130
>>16333120
You're such a fucking pussy. Go away
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:05:15 UTC No. 16333132
>>16333118
https://donate.tiltify.com/738da34f
200 smackeroons to the childrens hospital
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:05:16 UTC No. 16333133
>>16333127
whats nasa got to do private missions? besides, nasa would want to be all over it anyway.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:05:41 UTC No. 16333134
>>16333111
yes but only pre-consumption
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:06:41 UTC No. 16333137
>>16333132
Lmfao no thanks. Can someone make a gofundme?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:13:21 UTC No. 16333151
>>16333148
based based based
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:14:00 UTC No. 16333152
>>16333148
they aren't doing it because it is easy, but because it is hahd.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:15:47 UTC No. 16333154
>>16333132
I might buy the jacket, very much a burgerpunk piece of clothing.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:16:29 UTC No. 16333157
>>16333096
https://x.com/johnkrausphotos/statu
like I said, EDS retards shitting their pants again immediately
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:17:31 UTC No. 16333160
>>16333152
because its necessary for mars, doesn't matter if its easy or hard
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:18:19 UTC No. 16333163
>>16333137
Why don't you just go shoplift some from the Space 7-11? Cheapskate.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:19:34 UTC No. 16333166
>>16333163
I think that's a good idea
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:20:41 UTC No. 16333168
>>16333148
Goofy shit
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:21:49 UTC No. 16333169
>>16333154
Yeah sorry they dont make XXXXL fatty McFatfat
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:23:24 UTC No. 16333171
>>16333132
>XXL DORITOS® MISSION T-SHIRT
>8 left
>MEDIUM DORITOS® MISSION T-SHIRT
>64 left
I know it's to be expected but I still find this funny.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:23:57 UTC No. 16333172
Sarah cute
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:26:51 UTC No. 16333181
>>16333132
Is this us only? Kinda tempted to get the space doritos.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:29:33 UTC No. 16333186
>>16333171
There is low demand, so they make less. Are you a midwit?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:29:41 UTC No. 16333187
>>16333172
Anna cuter
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:30:51 UTC No. 16333190
>>16333132
I might legitamotely buy 5, for my family. I'm American and get what I want when I want
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:32:43 UTC No. 16333193
>>16333172
>>16333187
three way with anna and sarah at the sane time, servicing me
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:32:44 UTC No. 16333195
>>16332636
solarfag and cloudcity are the ponyfags, consider solar flare pony and cloudsdale city
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:32:50 UTC No. 16333196
>>16333181
There is no clause about it and Pepsi is handling the delivery so you might be fine internationally.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:35:56 UTC No. 16333201
>>16333196
>no clause about it
That could just be stupid burgers forgetting that the rest of the world exists.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:36:14 UTC No. 16333202
Do u guys think the framstronauts are gonna have sex in space?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:36:32 UTC No. 16333203
>>16333201
Worst case you donated some money to a poor kid dying of ligma
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:37:58 UTC No. 16333205
>>16333002
>https://x.com/SpaceX/status/182557
>>16332998
>>16332994
>>16332992
>>16332986
>>16332983
>>16332978
>>16332976
Astronaut training has always been cool
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:39:38 UTC No. 16333207
>>16333203
What the heck is ligma?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:40:00 UTC No. 16333209
>>16332742
why isnt 2nd tower taller if its supposed to deal with ver3 150m starship?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:40:26 UTC No. 16333210
>>16333207
ligma balls
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:41:06 UTC No. 16333211
>>16333209
This is the most damning question of all. Why indeed
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:41:29 UTC No. 16333213
>>16333209
it is taller >>16332850
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:44:01 UTC No. 16333216
https://x.com/elfamosisimoJON/statu
Someone webm this shit that's the highest quality MMU footage I've ever seen
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:52:27 UTC No. 16333224
>>16333222
Jek
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:52:57 UTC No. 16333226
>>16333222
audible lol
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:54:18 UTC No. 16333230
>>16333222
A hearty kekkle from me
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:55:21 UTC No. 16333235
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:58:28 UTC No. 16333243
>>16333222
checked
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:00:37 UTC No. 16333245
>>16333222
nice
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:06:46 UTC No. 16333255
>>16333222
Epic! Epic for the win!
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:13:27 UTC No. 16333263
>>16332144
It wasn't THAT o-ring, it was EVERY SINGLE BOOSTER JOINT IN THE ENTIRE PROGRAM. Not a single one of them performed as designed, ALL of the O-rings were consequentially out of spec from the very beginning, and only sort of worked most of the time by ACCIDENT.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:17:51 UTC No. 16333271
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:20:49 UTC No. 16333277
>>16332405
On one hand, I do prefer orange blinkers. On the other hand, whether the car in front of you is turning or stopping you better be fucking ready to slow down either way, so it doesn't really matter in practice.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:21:48 UTC No. 16333279
>>16333274
Go back to /k/, you piece of shit.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:22:22 UTC No. 16333281
>>16333279
silence, zigger
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:22:36 UTC No. 16333284
>>16333271
is that the final piece of the tower to be stacked? i remember the final piece of the first tower was shorter than the other pieces.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:23:03 UTC No. 16333285
>>16333274
humans are wildlife
cities are as "unnatural" as termite mounds
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:23:37 UTC No. 16333287
>>16332445
This, aluminum is a trash metal. It has no fatigue limit, so if you so much as look at it repeatedly it will eventually break. Every single aluminum part in literally any application has an expiration date.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:24:36 UTC No. 16333288
>>16333284
yes, this time the last three pieces are shorter I think
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:27:43 UTC No. 16333299
>>16332597
>>16332580
>>16332594
An /sfg/ classic
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:29:32 UTC No. 16333305
>>16333281
No you simply have it wrong. I was merely imitating the anti /pol/ poster. He only comes out against /pol/ and never against /k/ posters. You see, I'm trying to even out the field.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:31:41 UTC No. 16333309
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:34:39 UTC No. 16333315
>>16333309
lol I wonder how it would feel to work when there are 2.5k autists looking at you
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:37:41 UTC No. 16333319
>>16332144
?
Sorry, but the page you were trying to view does not exist.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:39:13 UTC No. 16333322
>>16332737
G's in spaceflight are very tolerable because the astronauts are always oriented in a kind of laying down position.
The real reason qualifications were so high is because with extreme seat costs it makes sense to have one guy be a pilot+engineer+orbital mechanics expert+materials scientist, because that way gets the same work done but saves 3 seats.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:39:23 UTC No. 16333323
>>16333319
What the fuck, it worked yesterday.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:40:34 UTC No. 16333327
>>16332748
>an hour each
why would that take so long
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:42:01 UTC No. 16333330
>>16333319
ok found it on Wayback Machine
https://web.archive.org/web/2020061
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:42:30 UTC No. 16333331
>>16333323
NASA has been deleting shit off the internet like crazy, NTRS too
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:44:31 UTC No. 16333333
>>16333331
why would they do that
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:46:22 UTC No. 16333335
>>16333263
that is news to me. I thought the O-ring failed because it was out of temperature spec because that was the coldest ever shuttle launch.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:47:50 UTC No. 16333336
>>16332817
>I believe this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing big naturals on the Moon and returning them safely to the Earth
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:48:11 UTC No. 16333338
>>16333330
>2017
Anon this is way too early to say it was a NASA Starship.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:49:46 UTC No. 16333341
>>16333263
lol, the space shuttle had quite a few close calls, they were unbelievably lucky that there were only 2 failures with loss of crew.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:51:06 UTC No. 16333346
>>16333333
digits confirm strangeness
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:52:03 UTC No. 16333349
>>16333344
Why does 4ch ONLY lose its mind with my exif data when it’s pics of aerospace hardware. Rotates the photos all over the place.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:57:20 UTC No. 16333356
>>16333349
Last photo, I won’t spam. I highly recommend the trip from El Paso into NM. Not a long drive. You crest a giant hill on I-10 and the geology goes from good to insanely great; giant mountains flanking a plateau with volcanoes everywhere.
There’s an on-site museum with a ton of nazi and early american hardware. Kennedy’s podium from his ride speech. Very cool trip for the tism.
I’ll go back to JPL next week and check the mock-up facility to see how it’s changed as well
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:59:13 UTC No. 16333359
>>16333052
>>16333063
>>16333072
Any woman can put their hair into a braid or bun (and can bun their braids as well), and if they aren't doing it in space it's because of either vanity or thoughtlessness or both.
I say this as a long hair'd man who occasionaly works around rotating equipment & has avoided being scalped or decapitated so far.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:00:30 UTC No. 16333364
>>16333111
methane warm-gas thruster, isp is very low however
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:04:07 UTC No. 16333368
>barely any interest by reddit
>no interest on nsf forum
why dont people care about polaris dawn?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:11:35 UTC No. 16333373
>>16333209
why can't they just put the lift/catch points on v3 starship the same distance from the rear of the vehicle as in v2/v1? Starship can be taller without needing to lift it from higher.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:15:02 UTC No. 16333375
>>16333257
tl;dw?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:15:38 UTC No. 16333377
>>16333375
launch on the 26th
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:16:08 UTC No. 16333378
>>16333375
they talk about the mission profile and quite a bit about the training then there is a short QA at the end
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:17:15 UTC No. 16333380
>>16333375
the tether is short now
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:18:08 UTC No. 16333382
>>16333287
For this reason we should build space habitats out of steel/iron, both bases and stations.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:19:33 UTC No. 16333385
>>16333287
airplanes are made of aluminum and they last 30+ years of constant use.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:20:27 UTC No. 16333388
>>16332946
SpaceX wants it for Mars where heavy duty boots are important
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:20:49 UTC No. 16333389
>>16333333
>sexting in sfg
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:23:35 UTC No. 16333393
>>16333356
nice shots anon. i remember seeing a V1 and V2 at an air museum in the UK somewhere as a kid. not sure how they got them there in the end....maybe some brought over after the war ended?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:24:03 UTC No. 16333395
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:24:34 UTC No. 16333396
>>16333393
They caught them with big nets.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:24:55 UTC No. 16333397
>>16333359
>because of either vanity or thoughtlessness or both.
i was kind of leaning in that direction. i dont get why they keep long hair when when staying on the ISS for months at a time and cleaning is a huge hassle.
may your hair live long and prosper.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:25:44 UTC No. 16333399
>>16333397
>i dont get why they keep long hair
Women only ever cut their hair short for emotional damage reasons.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:25:57 UTC No. 16333400
>>16333396
jolly good show what?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:26:26 UTC No. 16333401
>>16333388
It makes more sense to have a separate outer boot that the suit feet fit into, same goes for outer gloves and even an outer layer of fabric covering everything desu. If everything that rubs and abrades against the environment is cheap, simple, and easily replaceable, it'll massively cut down on the headache & expense of EVA ops on the Moon and Mars. Can't have multi-million dollar suits breaking down after fifty hours of use.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:30:24 UTC No. 16333404
>>16333397
Keeping their hair isn't actually an issue (a daily brushing and scalp scrub is more than sufficient to maintain long hair), it's the fact that they're letting it fly free. It's unironically selfish of them, they're essentially adopting a 20 inch radius hairstyle in cramped quarters. Submariner women tie their hair back/up, astronaut women should braid their hair at minimum, and ideally bun it. Shorter hair is an option but I bet if a mission controller asked a woman to cut her hair there would be outrage among women on Earth lol.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:30:59 UTC No. 16333405
>>16332945
>>16332946
SpaceX suit is genuinely awful.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:34:18 UTC No. 16333410
>>16333375
100 experiments
faster further higher
hot bitches
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:34:28 UTC No. 16333411
>>16332429
You're supposed to slowly add pressure.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:36:30 UTC No. 16333415
>>16333401
lifetime is probably not a priority yet, though they are designing these for mass production
but Musk has a philosophy of making it work first and then iterating for a better solution if its necessary (for instance the way tile attachment pins are added to the ships)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:36:59 UTC No. 16333416
>>16333401
the dust will be an issue. wonder what material can be used on the outermost layer to stop it grinding away at the suits. Beta Cloth was good but seemed too easy to wear away.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:38:35 UTC No. 16333419
>>16333405
probably the best suit out there right now, and this is v1 whipped up in 2 years
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:43:57 UTC No. 16333425
>>16333222
>VOTE KAMALA LMAO
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:45:50 UTC No. 16333428
>>16333416
My suggestion would be a thick & stiff alumina fiber cloth outerlayer with the inside surface coated/soaked with a smallish amount of some plastic like HDPE, and big sharp folds like rhino skin around the joints for mobility.
The reason to use alumina fibers is because the harshest abrasive component in lunar dust is alumina particles, so if the barrier layer is also alumina it should wear more slowly. The plastic inside is just to prevent dust from working its way thru the fibers.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:47:12 UTC No. 16333431
>>16333415
I guess what I'm saying is, building tough boots into the suits now just adds more work for later & isn't useful right now anyway.
They could literally just design a separate set of over-suit boots for their current EVA suit, later.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:47:48 UTC No. 16333432
>>16333430
THIS IS WHY WE TEST
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:48:29 UTC No. 16333435
>>16333375
No new info
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:48:50 UTC No. 16333436
>>16333430
Well, I guess they're not going to be launching in two weeks.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:49:24 UTC No. 16333437
>>16333428
>The plastic inside is just to prevent dust from working its way thru the fibers.
yeah, some kind of impermeable barrier against the dust will be good. from what they said on Apollo it has a way of getting into everything so perhaps they will have a cleaning room to not drag too much into the hab areas. and a good vacuum cleaner to pull as much out of the suit material as possibe
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:49:34 UTC No. 16333438
>>16333430
it's over
Q4 2025
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:50:42 UTC No. 16333440
>>16333419
No, theuve been developing this piece of shit for at least 10 years, maybe 15
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:50:55 UTC No. 16333442
>>16333430
they have hot fired a first stage (which I assume is the same or at least mostly the same design) before, pic related is from May
https://x.com/rfa_space/status/1792
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:53:15 UTC No. 16333445
>>16333416
Dust is going to be a big problem for working machinery too. Forget rovers, how do we keep dust out of all the bearings & joints of an excavator that moves 30,000 tonnes of regolith every 10 hour shift? Seals? How do you make a seal so good that not even the tiniest grains of dust can enter & start chewing a bigger hole?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:54:11 UTC No. 16333447
>>16333440
even if you include the IVA suit development, its 9 years
and I don't see why you would, its a different suit and including the IVA is arbitrary, you might as well include suits it took inspiration from and so on
its like saying Starship started development in the 1950s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space
>In February 2015, SpaceX began developing a space suit for astronauts to wear within the Dragon 2 space capsule
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:54:25 UTC No. 16333448
>>16333445
how is this any different than machinery on earth?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:55:46 UTC No. 16333451
>>16333385
All airplane parts have expiration dates. Particularly pressurized fuselages. Aluminum fatigue is an unavoidable fact of physics.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:56:32 UTC No. 16333453
>>16333257
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L_
>Polaris Dawn Mission Overview Briefing
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:56:41 UTC No. 16333454
>>16333395
Eh? Sex?!
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:57:22 UTC No. 16333455
>>16333453
a real milf
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:57:55 UTC No. 16333456
>>16333453
>zenith sojourn - everyday astronaut
ok real question here how did he end up getting so many organizations to play his space music? rocketlab plays it too.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:01:31 UTC No. 16333461
>>16333456
Well he's good at sucking up to everyone, and it's decent TRAX desu
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:02:36 UTC No. 16333463
>>16333456
Everybody likes him and I make really good music, that's why.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:03:41 UTC No. 16333466
>>16333456
Everybody likes him and he makes really good music, that's why.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:05:41 UTC No. 16333469
>>16333463
hi tim. I can't stand listening to you speak please stop being the only one to get rocket factory tours.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:07:08 UTC No. 16333470
>>16333462
They've already talked about him running a "government efficiency" agency, so if Trump wins, expect 80% of federal employees to get fired twitter style kek.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:09:19 UTC No. 16333471
>>16333445
good point. lunar dust is smaller and sharper than most anything encountered in large amounts on earth, so far as i know
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:09:34 UTC No. 16333472
>>16333470
Yeah this time the drain the swamp man is gonna do it. He was just merely pretending for four years.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:10:38 UTC No. 16333473
>>16333437
Airlocks with at least two stages will be a must-have. We need an outer airlock and an inner airlock. For ingress into the habitat, astronauts will enter the outer airlock, inspect the door seal for contamination & give it a wipe if necessary, then close the door & pressurize the room. With suits on, they can enter a "shower" stall which blows oxygen gas jets at them to clean off most dust. This dust gets caught in a big filter pack & the oxygen is reused. Once the shower is complete, the astronauts can remove their protective outer layers and enter the inner airlock. The inner airlock is where they'll undress to their habitatwear and hang up their suits.
>two airlocks with dust decontamination in the outer airlock eliminates all risk potential for a seal failure
>oxygen gas showers both remove and oxidize the dust particles, rendering them inert
>filter packing for dust collection can be produced in-situ from basalt fibers, thus can be used & replaced at minimal cost, & oxygen gas will be avaliable in huge quantity as a waste product from metal smelting operations
>keeping the EVA suits clean will eliminate dust erosion as a life-limiting factor
>tough anti-dust outerlayer can enable astronauts to do "dirty" jobs outside
>any one door seal can be worked on or replaced without impacting the habitat
>airlocks should be relatively long corridors anyway since early bases will be buried under piled regolith with no structural reinforcement
idk I'm just tossing this out here
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:11:11 UTC No. 16333474
>>16333472
Trump won't, but Musk will, he simply doesn't care, since he is not running for office himself. He only needs the FAA to get faster, and probably for the FCC to stop existing.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:11:44 UTC No. 16333476
>>16333472
draining the swamp refers to something different
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:18:21 UTC No. 16333482
>>16333448
On Earth we have
>air to reoxidize any bare metal surfaces exposed from wear
>an atmosphere and temperature range that lets us use grease as a barrier to dust & debris (can't use grease in vacuum)
and do not generally have
>9.0 moh's scale dust with micrometer to nanometer particle size
>dust grains that are literally jagged and spikey because they condensed from mineral vapor in vacuum
>solar electrostatic charging that actually attracts the dust to your vehicle
We're basically talking about a landscape made of an abrasive that's harder and rougher than what we typically use for grinding and cutting steel. Oh also it gets to over 120C during the day and below -130C at night. aka -200F to 250F.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:19:45 UTC No. 16333484
>>16333107
>oil
great, can't wait for someone to smear that all over the touchscreen.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:22:26 UTC No. 16333489
>>16333385
In a single spaceflight an aluminum structure may be subjected to millions of cycles of stress due to thermal expansion and contraction, engine vibration, RCS firing, pressurization & depressurization, resonating motion like wiggling, etc. The ISS has fatigue cracks all over after just a couple decades and it's pretty much doing the bare minimum for a long term crewed spacecraft. Steel is better for crewed spacecraft, or really any vehicle that will see more action than a robotic space probe or satellite.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:25:36 UTC No. 16333492
>>16333299
I wonder if something similar to ULA's smart return would work for this kek. Just return the engines with their own pod shield
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:30:25 UTC No. 16333496
>>16333401
Seems like a good way to get more friction you don't want. Anyway this is mk1 and they're using it in an environment noted for its lack of dust. I'm sure they'll figure something out
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:30:52 UTC No. 16333497
>>16333430
https://x.com/Orbital_Perigee/statu
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:31:35 UTC No. 16333499
>>16333497
>laterial sea level orbit
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:40:19 UTC No. 16333512
>>16332736
Wait what just now seeing this. This is surprising to me!
I thought they would just keep the two most senior astronauts by # of flights (I thought it would be hague and wilson, this would be their second and fourth flights respectively)
To keep the Russian is already weird. A sign of international cooperation, is that what they’re prioritizing? Or as the other anon said, prioritization via crew swap agreement but nah I could see nasa telling POCKOCMOC they’d just do it later. I think they’re doing this for respect of our cooperation or whatever. This is his first spaceflight and as of rn he’s the mission specialist. Berger is saying he’d be bumped up to pilot which is something
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:44:45 UTC No. 16333518
>>16333482
>dust grains that are literally jagged and spikey because they condensed from mineral vapor in vacuum
Is Mars dust that way? Moon dust yes
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:44:54 UTC No. 16333519
>>16333083
He was so real for this. Could have been a water or a fanta. But no.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:46:09 UTC No. 16333520
>>16332978
Gotta spin fast
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:48:32 UTC No. 16333523
>>16333222
>EDS/TDS
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:50:21 UTC No. 16333525
>>16333497
>Fiery but mostly successful test.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:53:42 UTC No. 16333530
>>16333497
Yikes
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:55:18 UTC No. 16333531
>>16333445
ESD shield, might even end up working better on the moon than on Earth
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:55:58 UTC No. 16333532
>>16333518
Mars dust has been 'weathered' and isn't like fine jagged glass
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:56:19 UTC No. 16333534
>>16333531
active ESD*
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:57:12 UTC No. 16333537
>>16333222
i dont get it
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:57:52 UTC No. 16333538
>>16333530
Well, at least it didn't accidentally take off
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:58:16 UTC No. 16333539
>>16333497
oops
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:59:19 UTC No. 16333540
>>16333537
Watch moar movies
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:59:51 UTC No. 16333541
>>16333315
they know about sbl
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:00:06 UTC No. 16333542
>>16333530
https://x.com/rfa_space/status/1825
>On Monday evening, RFA conducted a hot fire of its first stage at their launch site at SaxaVord Spaceport.
>This resulted in an anomaly that led to the loss of the stage. No one was injured in the process. The launch pad has been saved and is secured, the situation is under control, and any immediate danger has been mitigated. We are now working closely with SaxaVord Spaceport and the authorities to gather data and info to eventually resolve what happened.
>We will take our time to analyze and assess the situation.
>We develop iteratively with an emphasis on real testing. This is part of our philosophy and we were aware of the higher risks attached to this approach. Our goal is to return to regular operations as soon as possible.
>We will keep you updated on our channels. Until then we kindly ask for your patience.
>RFA
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:04:17 UTC No. 16333550
>>16333462
wasn't he an advisor in 2016?
I think he left because he didn't like Trump leaving the pairs climate accord
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:07:00 UTC No. 16333551
>>16333497
There’s no way to sugarcoat this
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:07:55 UTC No. 16333552
>>16333550
yes briefly, but I don't think Musk really had much influence then
this time I imagine it would be quite different
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trum
>Trump also said that if elected, he would tap Tesla CEO Elon Musk for a cabinet or advisory role "if he would do it."
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:08:27 UTC No. 16333554
>>16333550
He left because TDS turned into EDS for the first time and Elon got scared
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:11:24 UTC No. 16333559
>>16332554
>It also passes by the Tesla gigafactory.
Yes, I know, because I've been there.
And nobody will stop you from going 85 in an 80 zone.
In the parts that aren't Austin, I can sometimes go 85 on I-35, but it's less often these days. And holy shit that bit in south Austin has been constantly under construction since like 2012 or so. So glad I left.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:12:54 UTC No. 16333561
>>16332004
Holy shit didn’t expect THAT
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:15:49 UTC No. 16333566
>>16333559
He was a hero.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:16:08 UTC No. 16333567
>>16332555
checked
>>16332573
The main problem is going to be the temperature that LH2 needs, for those companies that are stuck on hydroloxbrain because muh eyeesspees.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:17:29 UTC No. 16333568
>>16333554
He seems much more secure now, probably because he knows Starship and Xeeter make him untouchable.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:17:50 UTC No. 16333570
>>16332568
wings
but you need a big space to do fly in, either a properly opened up starship or that soccer ball shaped station.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:18:22 UTC No. 16333571
>>16333567
check this nigga >>16333333
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:18:41 UTC No. 16333572
>>16333568
>starship
I don't think anyone really understands the implications yet.
Starlink though, the military loves starlink
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:19:06 UTC No. 16333573
>>16333299
Who has the "Based Depot" image with some part labeled "Shelby agitator"?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:20:23 UTC No. 16333577
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18255
Nice to see Musk hyped for a Dragon mission for once
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:22:51 UTC No. 16333580
>>16333579
caked up
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:23:30 UTC No. 16333582
Bros I'm trying so hard to not buy the space Doritos. Fuck. I love space and I love strange food but I also love retaining $200. Fuck
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:25:13 UTC No. 16333584
>>16333568
People forget that in 2016, the falcon 9 had just landed so it wasn't yet obvious that reusability would be profitable, Starlink didn't exist, no falcon heavy, no crew launches yet, obviously no twatter. But most importantly Tesla was hemorrhaging money, no serious production, no model 3, no FSD, no optimus etc. Back then Elon really looked like a snake oil salesman. It was in the last 5 years when he finally started to deliver - mostly with SpaceX, but Tesla also, mainly the increased production.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:27:15 UTC No. 16333586
>>16333582
It's just some oily chips, you can get those for $1.50 anon
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:27:45 UTC No. 16333587
>>16333579
Naughty naughty AI... first off. Elon would be dead almost immediately for taking his helmet off on the airless environment of the moon, which also means there can't be any lightning. I won't give too much grief to the "NASA" lander because the first Starship missions on the moon should be NASA missions for Artemis, however, I don't know what in the stub-nozzle-hell that round aerospike wanna be engine is, but I wouldn't trust it with my life, that's for sure!
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:28:46 UTC No. 16333588
>>16333587
Oh also the flag is missing the top pole that kept it fully deployed. This flag would simply be limp on the moon (again, no atmosphere)
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:29:42 UTC No. 16333590
>>16333587
>I don't know what in the stub-nozzle-hell that round aerospike wanna be engine is
it's an AI trying to draw a cluster of SSMEs
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:32:59 UTC No. 16333593
>>16333579
the parallels...
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:35:54 UTC No. 16333596
>>16333572
the USSF loves the implications of Starship
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:36:16 UTC No. 16333597
>>16333579
You can get lightning in volcanic ash here on earth due to the electrostatic buildup and discharge of the fine particulates. Do you need an atmosphere to transmit lightning, or does the ash cloud act as the medium itself? Could you get lightning within the regolith plume due to a rocket takeoff or landing? Or an impact ejecta on the Moon, could that generate lightning?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:36:37 UTC No. 16333598
>>16333497
>german engineering
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:40:52 UTC No. 16333605
Invoke the Defense Production Act to produce more Starships.
Send national security letters to anyone found having EDS.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:41:11 UTC No. 16333608
https://youtu.be/sMDn0AxSeJs
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:43:53 UTC No. 16333611
>>16333605
Yes unironically
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:44:40 UTC No. 16333614
>>16333608
>rainbow over the tower
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:45:15 UTC No. 16333615
>>16333608
ULA sniper intruded the Crew-9 F9 booster with water what the FUCK
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:47:28 UTC No. 16333619
>>16333608
is this the polaris one?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:47:36 UTC No. 16333620
>>16333608
STOP TALKING OVER THEM
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:51:57 UTC No. 16333627
>>16333597
>Do you need an atmosphere to transmit lightning,
Yes. Lighting is an electrical current moving through a channel of ionized air, and you need air for that to happen. Electrical discharges in vacuum are mostly a contact effect since vacuum is a fantastic insulator.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:53:20 UTC No. 16333631
>>16333627
I wonder what the lower limit is for atmospheric pressure. Mars would probably be too thin, I imagine
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:54:14 UTC No. 16333632
>>16333542
OOF
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:57:35 UTC No. 16333633
>>16333542
webm of failure
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:06:49 UTC No. 16333642
>sound never reached the camera
hmm......
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:11:26 UTC No. 16333645
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:33:11 UTC No. 16333661
>>16333584
2016 was so long ago it makes my head spin
Totally different world
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:34:24 UTC No. 16333664
>>16333631
Carbon dioxide is quite conductive so tends to dissipate charge
You might get lightning on Titan
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:45:38 UTC No. 16333679
>>16333349
rotation is usually in exif data, and 4chang strips it all
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:47:39 UTC No. 16333683
>>16333596
For what?
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:48:11 UTC No. 16333687
>>16333683
spaceplane fleet
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:48:59 UTC No. 16333688
>>16333687
>spaceplane
I hate them so much
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:15 UTC No. 16333702
>>16333587
>>16333588
All the evidence points to their being an atmosphere in the picture. This is clearly a picture from within a pressurised dome
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:01:19 UTC No. 16333704
>>16333702
why are they an atmosphere
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:13:20 UTC No. 16333721
>>16333584
Weird that the left liked him so much more back then
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:17:55 UTC No. 16333727
>>16333586
Not space chips though
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:18:12 UTC No. 16333728
>>16333721
https://x.com/aang254/status/182568
>And even more images from JUICE, downlinked a few minutes ago for the newer ones. Still all from @amsatdl's Bochum antenna. There's a lot of them already (more than 100!) - and they're still coming down but the rest will wait, it's late already...
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:19:21 UTC No. 16333732
>>16332146
>>16333716
How many rocket designs will go down as a more expensive way to do Starship
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:20:13 UTC No. 16333735
>>16333732
Most if not all lol
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:21:18 UTC No. 16333737
>>16333728
that's a cool photo. I like that rock. easily top 5 rocks in the solar system
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:21:25 UTC No. 16333739
>>16333728
get to Ganymede already you euroshit of a probe
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:51:16 UTC No. 16333754
>>16333052
Because private astronauts don't need to worry about that shit.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:03:07 UTC No. 16333762
>>16332775
Also by including women on this flight, you don't have the push for the first comercial female space walk. If there wasn't a female flying on this mission I could even see Boeing trying a copycat mission just to try and get a first, and it would be in line with their oh so important dei goals.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:04:37 UTC No. 16333764
>>16333497
Hopefully europe outlaws rocket launch for good after this. Did you see how dangerous that looks?
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:08:30 UTC No. 16333768
>>16333762
nah boeing doesn’t care that much and they don’t have a vehicle to do commercial space flights
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:09:09 UTC No. 16333769
I know we talk a lot about speculative futures in this general but do you guys think spaceflight will actually be possible in our lifetimes?
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:12:00 UTC No. 16333772
>>16333769
We're already putting people in space, so you'll have to define "spaceflight" before anyone can answer.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:12:24 UTC No. 16333773
>>16333769
50/50
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:32:31 UTC No. 16333788
Imagine living in the early days and not knowing if there's a firmament to puncture or if radiation will kill you instantly or if the low gravity meant moon dust was more like a liquid you could sink into. Does Mars have people? Does Venus have jungles? Maybe.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:37:38 UTC No. 16333795
>>16333788
who cares these people of ye olden times were dumb and uninformed and now they’re all dead
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:45:16 UTC No. 16333801
>>16333633
https://x.com/NASASpaceflight/statu
longer video
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:53:25 UTC No. 16333808
>>16333768
that's because commercial space flights can't be charged on a cost-plus basis
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 01:56:07 UTC No. 16333812
>>16333801
Well hey, the WHOLE rocket didn't explode, so that's something right?
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:09:29 UTC No. 16333824
>>16333812
It's uh... it's cooked, sir.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:16:02 UTC No. 16333832
>>16333801
>>16333812
That's not an explosion, it's a deflagration.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:16:16 UTC No. 16333833
>>16332736
>russian cosmonauts riding on a spacex vehicle are going to save nasa's stranded astronauts
you cant make this shit up. boing is a laughing stock.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:16:37 UTC No. 16333834
>>16333812
Nah it’s actually never been more over than it is right now
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:19:16 UTC No. 16333837
>>16332926
Are they actually connecting to Starlink from above?
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:25:30 UTC No. 16333840
>>16333837
Well it ain’t called Groundlink
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:26:22 UTC No. 16333842
>>16333496
Friction is not the problem, abrasion is.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:30:14 UTC No. 16333844
>>16333837
Yes that's part of the tests
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:30:53 UTC No. 16333845
>>16332978
For some reason this one made me laugh like a retard
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:34:02 UTC No. 16333847
>>16333661
Yeah wow, SpaceX was a real underdog back then, it's hard to believe now actually
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:35:31 UTC No. 16333850
>>16333844
Interesting, did they say how? Are they using the laser links? I don't think the regular antennas would have any line of sight to above, right?
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:37:14 UTC No. 16333851
>>16333850
yeah laser testing, it’s gonna be cool
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:38:12 UTC No. 16333852
>>16333728
I want to industrialize you
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:49:07 UTC No. 16333856
>department of government efficiency
>DOGE
Musk is a huge redditor It’s tiresome
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:49:59 UTC No. 16333858
>>16333430
>>16333497
Fucking hell if this means Isar gets first I'm gonna be annoyed
Also fuck's sake
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:52:02 UTC No. 16333859
>>16333858
ARCA is making it to orbit in two weeks trust the plan
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:55:35 UTC No. 16333863
>>16333860
Wasn’t the government recently talking about revamping production of the Catalina or did I dream that?
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 03:01:55 UTC No. 16333869
https://x.com/AdamCuker/status/1825
>Possible second Raptor 3 static test fire tonight at SpaceX in McGregor, TX. If confirmed, this Raptor 3 test lasted 169 seconds which would be a full duration of a Super Heavy flight.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 03:03:08 UTC No. 16333872
>>16333869
it’s that easy
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 03:08:17 UTC No. 16333880
>>16333869
Starship is going to be artwork that also just happens to fly
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 03:09:15 UTC No. 16333882
>>16333880
at least you can post here anonymously, Mr. Bezos!
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 03:10:33 UTC No. 16333884
New /sfg/ stage
>>16333883
>>16333883
>>16333883
>>16333883
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 03:11:55 UTC No. 16333888
>>16333869
Space
is
maybe not so hard as once presumed
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 03:16:54 UTC No. 16333899
>3rd reich von braun or meme drive schizo edition
Which shit OP do we go to
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 03:30:05 UTC No. 16333909
>>16333899
I'm just going to go read old NASA papers until the universe comes to a decision.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 03:31:44 UTC No. 16333913
>>16333909
I love the look of these old hand painted concepts and schematics. Very aesthetically pleasing.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 07:10:58 UTC No. 16334102
>>16333473
>enter a "shower" stall which blows oxygen gas jets at them to clean off most dust
doesn't an oxygen jet encountering static electricity or a spark become a torch?
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Aug 2024 07:23:09 UTC No. 16334117
>>16334102
not in a vacuum