🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:34:01 UTC No. 16387282
FAA regulatory overreach - edition
previous >>16385317
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:38:03 UTC No. 16387288
>>16387282
Me like this photo
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:38:50 UTC No. 16387291
>>16387282
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1836606
Slow mo static fire
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:40:31 UTC No. 16387293
>>16387286
there is a 5min slow-mo video from underneath the test stand (assuming this isn't just the same video that was posted a few months ago, would be wierd)
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:40:46 UTC No. 16387294
Unfortunate multistage, try to communicate staging better next time anon so we dont have two threads going at once. Ive put out a warning in the other thread >>16387289 so that nobody uses it as well as in the previous thread >>16387287.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:45:43 UTC No. 16387299
>>16387285
I don't think its NASA specific, just another example of government bureucracy and basically the incompetence it incentivizes
it could very well be these same exact people were much more effective under a different culture, at least that is what Musk seems to think
the examples he used during the All-in interview were west-vs-east germany and north-vs-south korea
a country gets divided up arbitrarily at some point for a while, different managment cultures (in a sense) get employed
the other one is much more productive and these start compounding year after year so the results become massively different after a while
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:50:14 UTC No. 16387361
>>16387331
>we
no, fuck off
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:50:36 UTC No. 16387364
Death to FAA
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:54:38 UTC No. 16387370
Why has FCC and FAA become so vindicative and compromised by partisan poltiics?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:05:32 UTC No. 16387384
>>16387370
Because of the appointees sitting in the offices serve at the pleasure of the President. They are doing what their boss (or the guys puppeting him) wants them to do.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:09:17 UTC No. 16387386
This is of interest to us
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAb
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:26:52 UTC No. 16387409
>>16387370
Twitter was their ideological Death Star that they never expected to be taken out of their hands. Now they're showing the world what happens to those who get in the way of the agenda.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:29:35 UTC No. 16387413
>>16387370
>biden
>kamala
>racism
>communism
>china
>russia
>eds
Pick your answer
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:35:22 UTC No. 16387416
>>16387409
Who is they? Why did the company file a lawsuit to force Musk to close the deal if they didn't want him to have it? Nice lore you got there.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:38:15 UTC No. 16387421
>>16387416
probably thought Musk would just fall in line and let it run like it did previously, not fire 80% of the staff and transform the company
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:53:18 UTC No. 16387443
I hate the FAA btw
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:57:19 UTC No. 16387448
>>16387443
based
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:16:27 UTC No. 16387468
Is there a 3D interactive map of the galaxy, or at least something that has all the stars and exoplanets within 1000 LY?
And a semi-related question, if humanity had to fuck off from the solar system due to an impending cataclysm, what's currently the best candidate for a habitable system we could colonize?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:41:16 UTC No. 16387483
>>16387481
link please
but to speculate on your question: better stability to balance the heavy engines, uses an area of the ship which might be difficult to use otherwise, a cuboid shape should be much easier to use and design some standardized payload container
intermodal container but for space
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:45:40 UTC No. 16387488
>>16387459
what would be the best way to smuggle ketamine to Mars.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:46:41 UTC No. 16387490
>>16387481
It's more about the mass anyway.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:46:59 UTC No. 16387492
>>16387416
I like to think it was sort of a Brer Rabbit thing on Musk's part to make sure they didn't back out of selling.
>Oh noes, don't make me buy dat twitta briar patch!
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:47:26 UTC No. 16387493
>>16387488
Better off just synthesizing it on mars.
it's not hard.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:50:11 UTC No. 16387499
>>16387481
Because it has to flip when landing, and that makes sure that the fuel goes to one end. The last thing you want is for the fuel to be sloshing around somewhere other than the pipe that comes out of the fuel tank.
And it makes me sad because the nose cone is such an obvious place to put a docking port.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:54:09 UTC No. 16387504
>>16387499
but isn't it full before the landing sequence starts?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:54:58 UTC No. 16387506
>>16387488
>smuggle
There are no border controls to space.
This is why illegals are called aliens.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:58:34 UTC No. 16387507
>>16387483
https://ringwatchers.com/pl/article
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:58:49 UTC No. 16387508
>>16387504
it only takes one wrong slosh to get air over the drain pipe, so you want to make sure that the virtual gravity is always going the right way, and you can't be sure of that with the header tank somewhere else, especially with the regular big tank
you want it on an extreme end of the rocket when it flips because the centrifugal force is strongest
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:01:51 UTC No. 16387511
>>16387507
POLISH
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:02:19 UTC No. 16387514
>>16387507
>pl
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:06:17 UTC No. 16387519
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:19:43 UTC No. 16387531
>>16387481
>half a cubic kilometer
That's way too much space
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:25:03 UTC No. 16387536
>>16387531
Agreed. It should be banned.
What does anyone need so much space for?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:26:45 UTC No. 16387539
>>16387536
the FAA is already handling the situation
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:26:49 UTC No. 16387540
Didn’t realize we staged. Copying my post from last thread
>>16387025
How do you play the factorio game when you’re doing something niche though, such as commercial stations? You’re not going to need thousands of modules. It could work for someone like SpaceX (though they probably don’t want to run a station for NASA, that’s a lot of work but I digress) they could leverage their already-factorio business model via Falcon and Starship industrial chains and just make station pieces as well. But how could Axiom do it? How could Rocket Lab play factorio with satellite buses? When there isn’t high demand?
That’s what I don’t understand. Musk had F1 but quickly pivoted to F9 and started pumping them out like crazy. How did he get away with that?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:30:11 UTC No. 16387547
>>16387481
New Glenn and SLS Block 2 will probably have more payload volume but oh well. People aren’t building huge ass loads anyways.
One day orbital manufacturing will be a thing and you will just build the big payloads in space, stuff bigger than could ever fit in a single rocket payload space
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:33:54 UTC No. 16387551
>>16387370
>Why has FCC and FAA become so vindicative and compromised by partisan poltiics?
It’s the nature of government workers. They trend towards believing in government. That comes prior to anything else like Piagets Iron Law of Bureaucracy or the immorality of civil Unions or the Dilbert Principle.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:35:40 UTC No. 16387554
>>16387290
depends on your engines and when you are aiming to stage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSi
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:44:48 UTC No. 16387564
https://orbitalindex.com/archive/20
>However, a new generation of companies are again pushing asteroid mining forward—Factories in Space has a reasonably current list of entities working in the space. AstroForge, the apparent leader of the small scrappy pack, just raised an additional $40M to get them through their third test mission.
https://www.factoriesinspace.com/sp
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:46:26 UTC No. 16387567
>>16387416
>Who is they
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:47:20 UTC No. 16387569
> Arianespace rocket debris found by Irmen, an aerospace engineer from Dayton, Ohio, while snorkeling on a remote island off the coast of Honduras.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/trave
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:48:03 UTC No. 16387572
>>16387519
Cannot into space
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:51:53 UTC No. 16387578
>>16387572
Actually, we can.
https://youtu.be/4bySNlqMwss
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:59:02 UTC No. 16387587
>>16387575
>Damn, I hate being back on Earth
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:01:43 UTC No. 16387588
Who is going to be the first person to walk on Mars?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:03:06 UTC No. 16387589
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:03:25 UTC No. 16387591
>>16387587
>there could be earthers here
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:03:50 UTC No. 16387592
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:11:43 UTC No. 16387598
>>16387588
The first person on Mars will likely be a crew of dead bodies, due to a fatal landing accident.
Its hard to tell who was really first, when its a scattering of gibs raining down onto terrain. "They" will all be first.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:12:47 UTC No. 16387600
>>16387468
>3D interactive map of the Galaxy
Unironically look at Elite dangerous for a 3d star map, if not learn python and browse through ESA's Gaia catalogue
>and exoplanets
That's more tricky, a good chunk of exoplanet findings are just saying that there are significant mass bodies beyond the star, with very little data on Radius, Density etc...
>best candidate
take you pick, none of them are perfect and all of them are too far anyway
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:13:59 UTC No. 16387602
>>16387598
SpaceX is not going to send crew until they are very certain about safe landing, which they can and will test with cargo starships
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:16:23 UTC No. 16387606
>>16387602
In 2029, right?
Human DNA scattered around Mars = seeds planted = making life multi-planetary = mission accomplished.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:18:41 UTC No. 16387607
>>16387606
yes hopefully, but perhaps not extremely high likelihood
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:20:43 UTC No. 16387608
>>16387588
This anon>>16387589
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:21:35 UTC No. 16387610
>>16387468
>what's currently the best candidate for a habitable system we could colonize?
Proxima b. Possibly quite shitty but the planet is at least at the right distance and about the right size.
>uhm sir are you aware that Proxima is a flare star
Look beggars can't be choosers
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:24:43 UTC No. 16387613
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:25:55 UTC No. 16387614
>>16387613
lmao
it is what it is
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:38:04 UTC No. 16387622
>>16387488
probably no sniffer dogs checking your PPK
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:45:38 UTC No. 16387630
>>16387598
Landing on mars is easier than on earth
You just need a bunch of parachute and a booster kick
Kerbal taught me that
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:49:30 UTC No. 16387632
>>16387610
Canyon autism anon would finally get his pit cities as a necessity
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:53:33 UTC No. 16387638
>>16387370
Controlled by democrats and other breeds of leftist. Nothing more complex than the left wing is ontologically evil.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:54:47 UTC No. 16387639
>>16387638
>REEEEEEEE
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:58:21 UTC No. 16387641
>>16387639
He (>>16387638) is right but (you) however, are not.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:58:54 UTC No. 16387642
>>16387551
natural selection operates on human systems.
this is proof that governments should be removed
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:05:04 UTC No. 16387645
>>16387610
Looking for habitable worlds is a reminder that rare Earth hypothesis is right. Combined obviously with rare evolution too.
When you look at pictures of galaxies you are probably looking at many galaxies which have no spacefaring life in them at all. I would conservatively guess its in a ratio of 2 dead to 1 alive, but the number could be in the thousands, or easily could be so high that the entire observable universe is dead. It's quite spectacular to think about.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:06:28 UTC No. 16387647
>>16387645
I'm almost positive that several orders of magnitude more than the observable universe is dead
>>16386352
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:09:37 UTC No. 16387650
>>16387331
Are you still complaining about people staging early because the image limit had been hit?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:19:34 UTC No. 16387660
>>16387481
>Why are header tanks on the top?
Otherwise they'd be butter tanks.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:20:21 UTC No. 16387663
https://x.com/AndrewParsonson/statu
>ESA Wants to Develop a “Very High Thrust” Rocket Engine
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:22:19 UTC No. 16387666
>>16387647
>Even going a trillion times the speed of light we would never find anyone
Haunting
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:24:54 UTC No. 16387670
>>16387663
>Published on 5 December, the tender is part of the agency’s Future Launchers Preparatory Programme (FLPP). FLPP began in 2003
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:27:40 UTC No. 16387673
>>16387670
>
Any significant work on a very high thrust engine will likely have to wait until after the next ESA ministerial-level council meeting, which will take place in late 2025.
takes years between meetings before they can even start the work
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:28:42 UTC No. 16387675
>>16387670
>Any significant work on a very high thrust engine will likely have to wait until after the next ESA ministerial-level council meeting, which will take place in late 2025.
takes years between meetings before they can even start the work
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:29:49 UTC No. 16387677
>>16387647
Yeah you're right. I wasn't even thinking about the start of life, but that adds a whole extra layer which by itself is fatal. Just the probability of a perfect planet and evolution of life on that planet are insane. The albedo of Earth has miraculously changed over the course of its history to compensate for the changing luminosity of the sun. What are the chances of that!?
People back in the early space age were so naive on that stuff. Even now loads of astronomers for some reason follow the copernican principle. As if there is anything typical about our situation.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:33:44 UTC No. 16387680
>>16387481
Are they planning to have fully expendable second stages at all for special payloads? Imagine a 200,000 ton space station going up in one go.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:36:57 UTC No. 16387683
>>16387481
>only 200m3 for Starlink
>only 550m3 overall
Guys, this is actually very concerning.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:38:05 UTC No. 16387685
>>16387680
They might be forced to do that if Starlab gets built, after all it is 8m wide.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:42:35 UTC No. 16387694
>>16387683
Yeah why is the pen dispenser so small? Kind of doesn’t seem worth it for Starlink.
>>16387685
Good point. I honestly don’t see the need for 100 launches a year also. Might be more common than we think.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:43:29 UTC No. 16387695
>>16387677
I'm actually of the opinion that one self replicating molecule will inevitably lead to technological civilization, as that's what our N=1 suggests. That would mean the only solution to the Fermi paradox and the only great filter is abiogenesis.
Even here, the Earth is only around 0.0000000000012% alive by mass, and the Earth is only 0.0003% of the solar system's mass. The universe was not designed for life.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:43:31 UTC No. 16387696
>>16387481
i enjoy watching normgroids gradually get blackpilled on starship and realise its actually a competitir to new glenn and not some "muh 150 metric kilotonnes to orbit" super rocket
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:45:18 UTC No. 16387701
>V1 starship
>some literal who website
>treating this like it's SpaceX's finalized design
stop being retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:45:46 UTC No. 16387703
>>16387696
yeah, its going to be 200 tonnes to orbit
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:48:55 UTC No. 16387705
>>16387696
The competition is based on mass per dollar not mass per launch
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:56:28 UTC No. 16387713
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:57:53 UTC No. 16387716
>>16387695
our civilization was far from inevitable, it rests on a large number of astronomically improbable events. There are basic fiilters like does the planet have the correct amount of water, is combustion possible in the atmosphere, is useful photosynthesis possible etc which all rely on an increidbly rare planet to begin with. In our solar system Earth is the only planet with a perfect ratio of water, all the others being deserts or water worlds. It is the only planet where you can start a fire in the open air, which I know is caused by life, but you could have a world with different chemistry where that doesnt happen. It is the only planet where useful photosynthesis is possible because it has a thin enough atmoshere to allow energy rich radiation to reach the surface, but has a gigantic moon acting as a dynamo which diverts the highest energy radiation away from the planet. Even if all these conditions are met, the planet must remain perfect for billions of years around a changing star, and going by Earths example we very nearly passed through the entire habitable history of the planet without any complex lifeforms developing
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:58:07 UTC No. 16387717
>>16387710
WOOO
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:06:17 UTC No. 16387721
>>16387710
FUCK THE FAA
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:11:26 UTC No. 16387724
>>16387716
I agree, I guess I worded it wrong. All the filters are before abiogenesis. I think the theory was a product of the time (cold war) that intelligent life could arise and then disappear (nukes)
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:11:26 UTC No. 16387725
>>16387710
AAAAAAA
NOT SPACEFLIGHT
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:13:08 UTC No. 16387727
6 weeks to approve a location change that doesn't affect anything at all
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:14:49 UTC No. 16387730
>>16387728
No, the secular religion we have now is the worship of the state.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:15:43 UTC No. 16387731
>>16387728
Its referring to communism woke nonsense
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:16:15 UTC No. 16387732
>>16387642
>governments should be removed
You’re an idiot.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:16:46 UTC No. 16387733
>>16387728
This must be my least favorite view on religion. Voluntary self-delusion out of necessity.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:17:10 UTC No. 16387734
>>16387732
>stealing from people is moral
this is you
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:18:53 UTC No. 16387737
>>16387733
its not voluntary to the retards the religion is aimed at
either you give them a somewhat benign religion like christianity or they start following secular retarded shit like woke communism
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:18:57 UTC No. 16387738
>>16387730
>>16387731
>>16387733
He literally just RENOUNCED his MARS COLONIZATION RELIGION
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:18:58 UTC No. 16387739
Think about all the fish that will die when Spacex drops a hot stage ring on them
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:19:36 UTC No. 16387741
>>16387735
MIC DROP
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:21:03 UTC No. 16387744
https://europeanspaceflight.com/esa
ESA has awarded a contract to the Franco-Spanish startup Pangea aerospace to develop a 200tf FFSC engine.
Very surprising choice, most expected Arianegroup (who already have a large engine program), or maybe Exploration Company, RFA or ISAR
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:21:46 UTC No. 16387745
>>16387710
TOTAL FAA DEATH
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:22:00 UTC No. 16387746
>>16387741
the other too issues are similar but just a bit longer
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:25:15 UTC No. 16387750
EDS + revolving door between Boeing and FAA and it all begins to make sense.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:26:17 UTC No. 16387752
>>16387750
>how does this guy that smokes weed keep beating us
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:26:19 UTC No. 16387753
>>16387744
>two more decades
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:29:08 UTC No. 16387755
>>16387739
FWS already said this was fine. "incidental takings" is the term used.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:34:12 UTC No. 16387760
>>16387710
>>16387713
>the dahlagates Elahn, take them and launch
>I'll hold 'em off, don't tell Dahnald about this
Cruz missles report in
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:38:24 UTC No. 16387762
>>16387733
Something is necessary, after Christianity's search for truth led to its own murder, it took the west no time at all to destroy itself with Nazism and communism. We still haven't figured out a solution, we were just rich enough to distract ourselves with music and drugs (every decade since Woodstock can be defined by a genre and a drug). Now that things are getting rough, a pseudo religious ideology has shown up again. This is a dire unsolved problem worse than any other we face.
I've been exploring some method for logic based fanaticism, and I think it may have something to do with space exploration. Space and time are infinite, so if you assume infinite expansion you can draw a cubic function of human lives over time. At some future point, say a million years, you could say that shifting the curve a second to the right reduces the human lives by a trillion. So every second wasted in not spreading out through the stars costs a trillion lives. If human life is inherently valuable then the math is obvious. Nothing would be more important, and expending your life to remove an impediment wouldn't require a second thought. I'm not sure how to codify it but I probably will attempt to start a cult when I do. Be on the lookout for a rust red cathedral in boca chica
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:38:38 UTC No. 16387763
>>16387710
so how is NSF going to spin this?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:39:38 UTC No. 16387765
>>16387762
isn't that just long termism
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:40:23 UTC No. 16387766
>>16387744
What are they planning to do with a 2MN engine? That's the same size as the RD-191 or about half of an RD-180. If they're going to build a propulsively landed rocket powered by these they'd need to be planning for something in the same size range as New Glenn, which I guess wouldn't be the worst thing.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:44:19 UTC No. 16387768
>>16387766
its explicitly for a super heavy launcher
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:44:51 UTC No. 16387769
>>16387765
Man every time I invent something someone beat me to it
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:45:19 UTC No. 16387770
>>16387361
>>16387650
newfaggots
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:46:30 UTC No. 16387771
>>16387770
tourist
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:46:59 UTC No. 16387772
Mid-day reminder that FAA fucking sucks
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:46:59 UTC No. 16387773
>>16387746
Like I said in the previous thread, USSF is the range authority yet the FAA tried to stick its nose in anyway. The FAA like many agencies will attempt to invent new powers for itself and no one will stop them if you don't push back. Yet brainlets ITT were trying to claim that's 'just how it is' 'gotta pay the fine' for regulations that were literally made up on the spot.
>>16387763
Do they really have the EDS? I've never seen any evidence but then again I mute or ignore anything with live commentary.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:47:02 UTC No. 16387774
After Chevron Deference overturned by Supreme Court, SpaceX's legal fight against FAA just stronger.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:47:16 UTC No. 16387775
>>16387771
No u
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:47:57 UTC No. 16387776
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:49:16 UTC No. 16387777
>>16387773
they had an update that went into the post SpaceX made about the Starship launch and the fines I think
they defended FAA from what I heard, though I wasn't paying much attention
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ela
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:49:50 UTC No. 16387778
>>16387735
Abolish the FAA and form a new agency designed to do what the FAA was meant to do.
Like most of the government the solution is to turn the machine off and back on again to reset it.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:50:50 UTC No. 16387780
>>16387710
SHUT IT DOWN
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:51:24 UTC No. 16387782
People are saying that SpaceX is lying...
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:52:50 UTC No. 16387784
>>16387782
>people
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:53:51 UTC No. 16387785
>>16387783
this faggot is definitely on the no-mars list
should be on the no-LEO list too
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:53:57 UTC No. 16387786
>>16387782
People say that SpaceX only makes money because of government subsidies and that Elon is only rich because of his dad's slave-operated emerald mines. Fuck people. They're all idiots.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:54:02 UTC No. 16387787
>>16387783
He's a raging faggot. What else is there?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:54:45 UTC No. 16387788
>>16387782
I don't think people are. I think you're lying and trying to make me think something that isn't true, and if that's what you're doing then I want to visit physical reprisal upon you for daring to attempt manipulation on me, you fucker. Fuck you. FUCK YOU!
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:55:03 UTC No. 16387789
>>16387782
>commies are people
Animals are not people
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:55:16 UTC No. 16387790
>>16387772
it’s not even 9am
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:59:51 UTC No. 16387793
>>16387791
I don't watch the gay dragons show, can he rephrase this sentiment for actual people to be able to read?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:00:04 UTC No. 16387794
>>16387792
faggy meme, you should be ashamed of yourself.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:00:37 UTC No. 16387795
>>16387793
when pigs fly
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:00:54 UTC No. 16387796
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:01:55 UTC No. 16387800
>>16387795
Thank you
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:03:52 UTC No. 16387801
>>16387787
"Ugh! Elon is SO political and polarizing, Unlike moi."
Just imagine this is your Aerospace teacher.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:09:42 UTC No. 16387805
>>16387801
Kick Chris Combs to death in the street.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:10:32 UTC No. 16387807
>>16387791
I don't think this is as unreasonable as Berger is making it out to be. ~400 satellites is a a constellation about 60% the size of OneWeb. If they've got the same form-factor as OneWeb's satellites and can launch 34 at a time that'd only need 12 Soyuz-2 launches to deploy everything, which would be easy for RSC Progress to provide and wouldn't break the bank of even a Russian-funded project. You should be able to do build this for less than $5 billion, but when you work in Russia you do need to budget a bit extra for graft.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:19:16 UTC No. 16387816
>>16387717
>>16387721
>>16387741
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAS you sound like reddit
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:20:05 UTC No. 16387818
>>16387793
You don't need to have watched any TV show to understand what he means. You are merely upset by seeing a pop culture reference.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:21:19 UTC No. 16387821
>>16387816
nice try but we all know who you are
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:21:41 UTC No. 16387823
>>16387816
YWNBAW
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:22:59 UTC No. 16387825
can anyone provide an argument as to why the faa shouldnt hold spacex to the same regulations they hold every single launch provider and aircraft company to? bieing skirts the rules sometimes but two wrongs doesnt make a right
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:22:59 UTC No. 16387826
>>16387823
Thats crazy
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:24:49 UTC No. 16387828
>>16387825
>regulations
Are not law
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:25:47 UTC No. 16387832
>>16387825
i agree faa should let spacex do whatever they want until spacex killed more than 300 civilians
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:27:33 UTC No. 16387835
>>16387801
>I want to go to mars
>I want to experimentally test my rocket over the open ocean more than once per 6 months
wow so polarizing
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:29:31 UTC No. 16387838
>>16387835
WHY do you want to go to mars?
try not to come across like a colonizer asshole..
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:29:44 UTC No. 16387840
>>16387825
If SpaceX is to be believed the FAA don’t even have jurisdiction over the tank farm move and the T-2 hour check.
Imagine if your company got a fine because some bureaucrat didn’t fill out paperwork to approve your new mouse pad for 6 weeks.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:30:05 UTC No. 16387841
didn't ask
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:31:12 UTC No. 16387843
>>16387551
That's Pournelle, unless I'm mistaken.
>In any bureaucracy, the people devoted to the benefit of the bureaucracy itself always get in control and those dedicated to the goals that the bureaucracy is supposed to accomplish have less and less influence, and sometimes are eliminated entirely.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:31:50 UTC No. 16387844
>>16387818
>Omg this launch is just like that episode of the Smurfs!
It's gay, talk like a real human.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:33:37 UTC No. 16387845
>>16387844
>smurfs
cap
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:34:37 UTC No. 16387847
>>16387838
To establish New Rhodesia
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:34:44 UTC No. 16387848
>>16387832
It wasn't even the deaths that did it, it was China grounding them and half the world following suit. The FAA was going to continue ignoring it
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:36:53 UTC No. 16387850
>>16387847
WOW.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:39:35 UTC No. 16387851
>>16387663
They should create regulations mandating a minimum thrust. Easy!
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:40:31 UTC No. 16387853
>>16387748
This just seems like the space elevator with extra steps.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:40:55 UTC No. 16387854
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/183655
Any guesses as to what he actually found with the salvage ship near S11 splashdown spot?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:41:56 UTC No. 16387857
>>16387854
*B11
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:43:29 UTC No. 16387859
>>16387807
>only need 12 Soyuz-2 launches
Russian had 20 orbital launches last year. Not much of a margin even for that very optimistic 12 launches.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:49:19 UTC No. 16387867
>>16387848
Thats not really true either. Trump had to go over the FAAs head and make an executive order to ground them.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:49:41 UTC No. 16387868
>>16387854
Idk since he said blue fin tuna, and said he didnt actually catch a tuna, Im assuming they got a gridfin from B11 maybe?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:51:50 UTC No. 16387870
>>16387843
Thank you for the correction. Been a while since I was in a Soc class.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:56:15 UTC No. 16387874
>>16387864
Stick to X DogeDesigner
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:56:45 UTC No. 16387875
>>16387447
>20-30 people
Where are you going to put them moron? What station in orbit is large enough to accommodate 30 fucking people? Not even the planned stations are that ambitious.
>Just use starship
you are missing the point entirely.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:01:54 UTC No. 16387878
>>16387859
https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_m
They actually need 24 rockets, but that's spread out from here to 2030 so it's only about 5 extra launches per year. If you discard the plan to have 400 satellites in orbit by the end of the decade as completely unreasonable (which it is since they haven't started building the satellites yet) and let the timeline stretch out meeting the launch demand becomes almost trivial. Russia's launch rate has always been held back by a lack of payloads. Getting the funding is going to be a lot more difficult than contracting the boosters.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:03:39 UTC No. 16387880
>>16387875
I think he meant with that Starship line as in make Starship do what Polaris Dawn did to sell seats, which at that point is just Starship Station kek
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:04:00 UTC No. 16387881
>>16387868
I don't think he actually went out to the sea. He originally thought the ship was recovering B11 and was investigating it with SAR imaging.
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/183639
B11 recovery was the mahi mahi he was referring to. So the blue fin tuna should be something even bigger than that. Frankly I'm not sure it's B11 related at this point.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:06:27 UTC No. 16387883
>>16387881
Oh yeah youre probably right, man I hate crypticfags
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:13:53 UTC No. 16387887
>>16387499
>And it makes me sad because the nose cone is such an obvious place to put a docking port.
A docking port in the TPS would also be bad.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:18:08 UTC No. 16387891
>>16387763
"spacex needs to provide us more proof that they aren't wrong and they FAA doesn't"
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:19:01 UTC No. 16387892
Theia never existed just like Vulcan never existed. You were lied to.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:23:09 UTC No. 16387894
>>16387887
wouldnt they have a docking port in the payload section like on space shuttle? the nose cone makes sense on a capsule, but on a spaceplane like starship the nose gets too much heating
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:23:18 UTC No. 16387895
>>16387282
tourist here.
watching https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-x
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:23:53 UTC No. 16387897
>>16387773
>Do they really have the EDS? I've never seen any evidence but then again I mute or ignore anything with live commentary.
I don't know much but it seems like they are eggshell walking to avoid damaging relationships with government agencies and members of their community with connections to them. It's just transparently retarded at this point because anyone can tell two months to ask if a hotstaging ring falling somewhere else is clearly poor performance for your tax dollars.
Has NSF ever said a 3 letter agency needs to stop sucking? doubt it. It's an obvious hall pass
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:23:57 UTC No. 16387898
>>16387892
Vulcan is real. You’ve seen it down at slc-41. We haven't seen any proof of Theia, except that if you slap 3 planets together that becomes the earth and moon. It’s not that easy in planetry.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:24:17 UTC No. 16387899
>>16387895
The Russians produced them continuously while the Americans switched from Saturn to the Shuttle
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:25:54 UTC No. 16387901
>>16387892
>Theia never existed
https://earthsky.org/space/blobs-in
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:26:26 UTC No. 16387903
>>16387825
because these aren't actual regulations, its just something that FAA made up
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:27:10 UTC No. 16387905
>>16387801
>At first I liked him because he was advancing our species but then I found out we disagree politically so...
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:27:14 UTC No. 16387908
>>16387903
isnt that their job though? like, let them cook.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:27:27 UTC No. 16387909
>>16387864
BASED
the day of the sink is approaching
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:28:55 UTC No. 16387910
>>16387908
Their job is imagining ways to stall SpaceX for political reasons?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:29:15 UTC No. 16387911
>>16387825
If the FAA is holding up regular aviation for issues that don't affect safety because someone might hit a dolphin they can fuck off with that too.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:29:23 UTC No. 16387912
>>16387908
chevron deference my good anon
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:29:32 UTC No. 16387913
>>16387908
no, its the job of the legislators to make up the rules and law, not agencies
the agencies are supposed to see that the regulations are followed
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:29:54 UTC No. 16387915
>>16387282
THE CHOOPSTOCKS ARE MOVING
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:30:02 UTC No. 16387916
>>16387910
They wouldn’t phrase it like that but yes.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:30:09 UTC No. 16387917
>>16387899
>The Russians produced them continuously
even after the fall of the soviet union. why? and why so many different families of rockets?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:30:14 UTC No. 16387918
>>16387895
It's easy to keep production going when you keep production going.
America stopped work on anything relating to the Saturn and thus the tooling and methods where lost.
There is no inherent roadblocks to keep something manufactured for an exceedingly long time. Especially for something as bespoke as a rocket engine where nearly everything is produced in the country.
If anything it should get easier with time. If you manually machined something 70 years ago, you can use CNC machining instead and get more consistent results faster.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:31:36 UTC No. 16387920
>>16387825
Because giving regulations work just so you can keep their useless selves employed is holding back competitiveness and human progress. The regulations serve no useful purpose and the only reason the other LSPs aren't complaining are because they exist to absorb corporate welfare and most of their staff is no more useful than the regulators themselves. It all has to go.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:31:50 UTC No. 16387921
>>16387916
Then they must be destroyed with extreme prejudice, at once.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:31:54 UTC No. 16387922
>>16387917
>why so many different families of rockets?
of ENGINES. fuck.
>>16387918
see >>16387917
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:34:36 UTC No. 16387927
>>16387898
Vulcan the planet
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vul
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:35:29 UTC No. 16387928
>>16387915
BREAKING NEWS!! THE CHOPSTICKS JUST COLLAPSED
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:40:06 UTC No. 16387933
>>16387901
>Theiafags coping hard
Its over you popsci fruit
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:41:57 UTC No. 16387934
>>16387933
This is a space telescope? It looks like a truss with a doohickey attached to it. More info on this? Now Im curious.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:46:34 UTC No. 16387937
>>16387922
I honestly don't see what the Soviet union falling would have to do with much.
Nothing is lost with a change in management when it comes to the physical places that manufacture things. The Soviet space program pretty quickly pulled itself together after the fall of the Union.
If anything the decrease in government support after the fall would only increase the use of historic designs due to already having parts and engines ready and avoiding the investment required to produce new designs.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:50:11 UTC No. 16387940
>>16387928
A CHOPSTICKS JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:54:27 UTC No. 16387943
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:55:18 UTC No. 16387945
>>16387922
Part of that is because the Soviets were centrally planned dumbasses. You'll read accounts of major planning meetings and you'll see them struggling with questions like "how to we provide enough tasks to keep all 70,000 workers at these design bureaus from sitting around idle?" Having lots of different engine production lines helped with that. They also preferred to have rockets tailored to launch a specific payload rather than designing a standardized rocket and fitting their payloads to that with some extra capacity left over. That was why they had a dozen different R7 variants flying before they standardized everything with the Soyuz-U. Having separate customized Soyuz/Voskhod/Molnyia types all flying at once helped keep worker utilization at 100%.
>>16387934
A few of the projects suggested in the Apollo Applications Program were big space telescopes assembled by EVA. That one looks like the proposed X-ray telescope.
>Large space structure experiments for AAP. Volume 4 - Focusing X-ray telescope a large space structure for X-ray astronomy Final report, 15 Sep. 1966 - 15 Sep. 1967
https://web.archive.org/web/2010040
The report vanished off of the NTRS site, but the pdf was captured on internet archive if you want to read about it
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:02:39 UTC No. 16387956
>>16387937
>I honestly don't see what the Soviet union falling would have to do with much.
do you know what happens when a country fails and its economy crashes and its government gets disbanded?
>>16387945
>the Soviets were centrally planned dumbasses.
but the rocket engine design offices were not, were they? the video mention that they competed against each other.
>how to we provide enough tasks to keep all 70,000 workers at these design bureaus from sitting around idle?
why does that even mean that the information on engineering designs and construction would be kept for many decades, even after the fall of the SU and the creation of the russian federation?
I don't think you have responded to my question here...
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:13:31 UTC No. 16387964
>>16387956
>but the rocket engine design offices were not, were they?
They worked for the central idiots. They were good at making engines but had no say in what engines they made or how the projects were planned overall
They had a lot of engines because it was useful for keeping everyone working. They kept the engines after the wall came down because maximizing employment was even more important in the 1990s and it was a lot easier and cheaper than designing and building new engines. Russia has barely built anything new in the last 40 years.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:17:50 UTC No. 16387969
>>16387864
Markiplier.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:18:36 UTC No. 16387970
>>16387956
>even after the fall of the SU
I can explain this one. Really theres 2 reasons for it, the first is a deliberate policy by the US government to fund soviet space activities so their engineers don't go rogue, secondly since the US never developed a ORSC engine the only engines available in the US were hydromeme or gas generator. The soviet engines despite being decades old were far superior to anything else available in the US which led to a lot of american companies buying them for cheap.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:19:32 UTC No. 16387972
>>16387956
>do you know what happens when a country fails and its economy crashes and its government gets disbanded?
Life goes on?
That's quite literally what happens when seemingly major historic events happen.
90% of the population goes about their daily lives. This would include anyone involved with manufacturing, well anything.
If the top management ever dissolves. People don't suddenly stop going where they are employed. More often then not when the administration or management structure collapses, workers create one of their own.
Plenty of examples where factories abandoned by owners with employees left to fend for themselves often form a new company producing the exact same products. Just without the gross mismanagement.
A working management structure would forcibly remove workers and dismantle the factory should they want production to stop
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:23:02 UTC No. 16387974
>>16387969
That's what they will call the new king of Mars
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:24:30 UTC No. 16387977
>>16387874
I have been posting that image on /sfg/ long before you even heard of dogecoin zoomernewfag
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:24:50 UTC No. 16387978
>>16387937
>Nothing is lost with a change in management when it comes to the physical places that manufacture things.
Energia's boosters were manufactured in the Ukrainian part of USSR.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:27:45 UTC No. 16387981
>>16387282
Why are they testing the chopsticks at such a high position? Won't it make the whole tower wobble more? Maybe they want to use the elasticity of the tower as an extra damper for a smoother Starship catch.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:36:28 UTC No. 16387988
>>16387981
You really need to educate yourself on large structures if you think a steel tower is supposed to be rigid.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:36:32 UTC No. 16387989
>>16387981
Testing the worst case scenario?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:42:56 UTC No. 16387997
>>16387696
>only the truly enlightened agree with the current federal administration's propaganda and mass media
Yeah, you are very wise
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:43:39 UTC No. 16387999
>>16387511
>>16387572
take it easy, Seth
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:54:53 UTC No. 16388010
>>16387286
he will eat his words. flight 6 no earlier than may 2025
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:55:45 UTC No. 16388013
why does data from other planets needs to be sent in radiowaves? why not return it to earth in SD cards, SSDs or some shit? that way you'd be able to captura a LOT more data, albeit at a later date.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:56:28 UTC No. 16388014
>>16387606
>t. engineer
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:56:30 UTC No. 16388015
>>16387468
Have you never heared of Space Engine?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:58:10 UTC No. 16388017
>>16388013
Are you stupid?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:58:47 UTC No. 16388019
>>16388017
Yes
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:00:32 UTC No. 16388023
>>16387468
Proxima is just right over there, you can go there and there's stuff there to see and do.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:00:35 UTC No. 16388024
>>16388017
no. I don't see a problem? spaceflight is pretty reliable nowadays, so you could send lower res stuff through radio and get the higher res stuff later.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:01:39 UTC No. 16388025
I can't wait for DAVINCI.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:02:14 UTC No. 16388027
>>16388025
Who painted the Mona Lisa?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:03:06 UTC No. 16388028
>>16388015
NTA but I like Space Engine :)
>inb4 picrel
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:03:18 UTC No. 16388029
>>16388013
Soviets used to deorbit their spy sats to get the film reels out
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:03:26 UTC No. 16388030
>>16387468
Closest thing is ESA Gaia. Even that only contains a fraction due to difficulties seeing the opposite side.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:05:18 UTC No. 16388031
>>16388015
Instructions unclear, downloaded Universe Sandbox and am now angry
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:06:23 UTC No. 16388032
>>16388031
Redditor comment
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:10:15 UTC No. 16388034
>>16388025
based HIP 102152 poster
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:11:02 UTC No. 16388035
>Space Force Close to New Launch Contracts—But Only If Congress Passes a Budget
>The Space Force is preparing to award billions of dollars in launch contracts by the end of this year—provided Congress passes a budget. If Congress only passes a continuing resolution, the schedule may have to slip.
>By the end of 2024, Space Systems Command wants to award a contract for the next phase of its National Security Space Launch program. It also wants to observe a final certification flight from United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan Centaur rocket and see the first certification flight from Blue Origin’s New Glenn vehicle.
>All three events are key to Phase 3 of the NSSL program, which will be responsible for launching the military’s most important new satellite systems into orbit from 2025 to 2029.
>ULA and Blue Origin are widely considered the top two competitors after getting Lane 1 contracts, but neither company has an active launch system that is certified for NSSL’s most important missions.
>Strictly speaking, neither company’s rocket needs to be certified before a contract award—SSC’s criteria only requires that the bidders have a plan to achieve certification by October 2026.
https://www.airandspaceforces.com/s
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:11:17 UTC No. 16388036
>>16388028
space engine is awesome. I like how it has a plausible disposition of life in the universe. You never encounter an inhabited world by accident because they are so rare, and the vast majorety are desers with barely any life
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:26:40 UTC No. 16388048
I wonder: let's assume that you aren't an engineer and have no actual knowledge of mechanical engineer, but have unrestricted access to any tool that might help you build (DIY) and run rockets and rocket engines (incl. fuel), as detect and mitigate problems. do you think you would be able to "learn by doing" and actually make a working rocket, launcher or whatever?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:30:38 UTC No. 16388053
>>16388048
Fuel isn't even the hard part... Falcon 9 is running on kerosene, remember.
As to your question, if you're planning on making anything larger than a desk toy you're going to kill yourself.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:32:33 UTC No. 16388058
>>16388053
what if this person has basic knowledge of physics and, lot of common sense and access to lots of cameras and robots to test shit remotely?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:37:36 UTC No. 16388063
>>16388058
At your own risk, dumbass. It would probably be far more productive to just learn how to do it properly. You're still never going to do something beyond hobby tier by yourself.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:45:08 UTC No. 16388069
>>16387977
He gets paid for cringe levels of dick suck. You do not.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:50:08 UTC No. 16388075
>>16387908
Per the United States Supreme Court, no. The regulations are created by the Congress, and enforced through the agencies. If the law that created the agencies says nothing about a particular subject, either the inference to create said regulation must be created carefully to be sure it maximally fulfills the function of the legally created boy for the purposes in which it was made, or it is unlawful. We have spent the last 40 years in a situation where these agencies could come up with whatever they want with minimal oversight of what they decided to regulate because the Courts created a precedent where they said "Chevron Deference" to say that they can run themselves, and that time is now over.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:54:18 UTC No. 16388077
>>16388075
Legally created body*
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:57:42 UTC No. 16388080
>>16388075
Is the concept behind Chevron Deference practiced in the rest of the world? I heard it never existed in Australia.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:59:23 UTC No. 16388082
>>16388048
Understanding the details of fuel grain combustion are a bit beyond me, but the mechanical of casting a solid propellant motor are fairly straightforward. I never got into doing that but I knew a few model rocket guys a few decades ago that did. Anyone with the right tools and materials should be capable of doing that. If you can get basic solid fuel manufacture down then upgrading the design to a pressure-fed hybrid engine shouldn't be impossible either. Improving would just be a matter of iteration with the only big question being if I'm smart enough to figure out why the latest design is working better or worse (spoiler: I'm probably not).
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:01:19 UTC No. 16388085
>>16388080
I honestly don't really pay much attention to bureaucratic nonsense even within the USA, let alone the rest of the world. I don't think the rest of the world really needs it because they still have systems where the Sovereign gets to do whatever it thinks it needs to, or can do, without much of anything in the way of limits, in the name of governance.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:05:52 UTC No. 16388091
>>16388048
If ancient chinese peasants could figure out rockets, you can figure out rockets too. Unless you mean good rockets, then the answer is no.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:06:55 UTC No. 16388093
>>16388069
Elon could literally kill my father, rape my sister and mother, drown my dog. He could dwstroy my career and burn my home to the ground. Fuck and impregnate my girlfriend (if I had one). All while I watch in horror, but still I would support him at the end of the day. Anything that gets us closer to Mars and I mean it. I dont think anyone here can really comprehend perfect devotion
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:10:22 UTC No. 16388098
>>16387908
>let them cook
You need to be at least 18 to use this website
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:14:57 UTC No. 16388102
>>16388035
>ULA and Blue Origin are widely considered the top two competitors
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:16:32 UTC No. 16388103
>>16388098
Bro really thought he cooked [math]\unicode{x2620}[/math]
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:17:02 UTC No. 16388104
>>16388041
>ground water already seeping in
Well I suppose it was a nice idea I guess
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:18:05 UTC No. 16388105
>>16388085
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/
>After considering these foreign legal systems, we conclude that Chevron is not inevitable if we understand Chevron to mean either its current two-step formation or a judicial deference regime that fills a similar space. Italy and the UK, despite some indications to the contrary, are best thought of as having eschewed Chevron deference. Two countries with something similar to Chevron — Germany and Australia — give their deference doctrines significantly smaller domains than Chevron. Canada was the only country that we studied that had a similar form of deference. Moreover, Chevron’s focus on agency authority to act with the force of law and statutory ambiguity is nearly always absent in other countries’ deference doctrines.
I wonder why the usual suspects aren't saying the euro way is better this time.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:18:40 UTC No. 16388106
>>16388063
You talk like a fag
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:22:39 UTC No. 16388110
evening reminder that FAA sucks
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:33:51 UTC No. 16388121
>>16388106
No, I'm trying to prevent faggotry. If he blows his penis off while experimenting with solid fuel rockets he'll have to transition to the dark side.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:37:51 UTC No. 16388124
>>16388121
But what if he’s actually a genius and that doesn’t happen?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:39:57 UTC No. 16388127
>>16387981
>they want to use the elasticity of the tower as an extra damper
You got it.
If you don't bend, you break.
The sway in the tower actually widens it's tolerances.
That's why modern skyscrapers are designed to gently sway back and forth during an earthquake or 100 mph winds, if they didn't have any give they would experience structural failure when the forces involved become too great.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:41:09 UTC No. 16388128
>>16388124
He's not a genius, he isn't even willing to skim an engineering textbook.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:44:39 UTC No. 16388131
>>16387744
>Franco-Spanish
lmao reminds me of some franco-spanish ship or submarine (can't remember) that was so bad it got scrapped because its construction wuality was too low
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:49:00 UTC No. 16388136
does Musk have any plans to implement tuned mass dampeners to reduce the g force vibrations on his ships
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:56:05 UTC No. 16388144
>>16388137
What’s got you so tired?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:58:39 UTC No. 16388150
>>16388136
We don’t work at SpaceX and Musk doesn’t decide what every change that happens on Starship is.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:00:57 UTC No. 16388152
>>16387710
what is the isp of this bottled up anger now being released?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:02:57 UTC No. 16388154
>>16388152
Ever seen a jet of water cut steel?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:04:29 UTC No. 16388156
>>16388152
1.21Gs
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:06:40 UTC No. 16388159
>>16388041
I was off sfg when the flame trench was revealed
QRD? Did the shower floor not work good enough? Are they tired of repainting things?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:07:14 UTC No. 16388160
>>16388128
Lived experiences are more important than books
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:08:21 UTC No. 16388163
>>16388160
Do apu users really?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:10:06 UTC No. 16388168
>>16388159
>>16388041
makes me laugh how youpeople said there woud be no flame trench when it was OBVIOUS to anyone with a brain
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:10:39 UTC No. 16388169
>>16388160
There are no 'lived experiences' when it comes to explosives other than maybe the kind that leave you with a nickname like 'Stumpy.'
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:16:00 UTC No. 16388173
>>16388168
Well right now its a pool so you better start drinking
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:19:09 UTC No. 16388176
>>16387766
Both CNES (top) and ESA (bottom) have studied superheavy launchers over the past year
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:19:32 UTC No. 16388177
Always a reality check when people you respect actually ask space-related questions for once, but feel the need to throw in
>I don’t know or care about space
Like damn. Makes me realize it’s on NOBODY’s radar unless they autistically go out and do research themselves. Space just isn’t in the normiesphere it’s sad
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:22:54 UTC No. 16388182
>>16388160
this. losing an arm really helps you understand the technical issues with building rockets.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:25:28 UTC No. 16388184
>>16388175
Tether rocket? Sorry I’ve never heard of this do you have any resources for me to read up on
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:25:33 UTC No. 16388185
>>16388168
>Elon redesigns the launch pad
>doesn't let anyone tell him it's retarded
>first launch digs a flame trench anyway
>more expenses and delays
We really can't let him experiment like this with the Mars city, he'll make mattress Mars or something
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:25:44 UTC No. 16388186
>>16388177
space is an autism thing because there are no people out there. and even then only a fraction of autists get a space fixation. normgroids and schizos dont care at all about space. even most people in academia or even spacex are just playing a role and are there for the status as it relates to other people.
The best thing we can do to mobilize the public about space is actually have humans living on other worlds and make them pretty/handsome so earthers want to fuck them and therefor think about space 24/7
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:25:56 UTC No. 16388187
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82m
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:27:25 UTC No. 16388189
>>16388185
What is your issue with the Mars mattress?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:27:50 UTC No. 16388190
>>16387791
Bureau 1440 actually demonstrated the same end-to-end video communication Kuiper did a few months before - august 2023 - and an operational size satellites were launched in May
IMO it's like, max 2 years behind Kuiper and G60/Qianfan in maturity, problem is funding. It's VERY much ahead of Europe's IRIS2
It's not quite as big as Kuiper or G60/Qianfan, satellites are 150-200 kg and they only plan 300-400 of them for operational capability (full scale is 900, which they hope to reach by 2035), it's also a private program that is moving faster than Sfera, IMO without the war it would have been possible to deploy this decade or early next one, problem is well, the war.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:29:23 UTC No. 16388191
I don't care about space, I care about planets
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:30:29 UTC No. 16388192
>>16388191
Do you care about Mars?
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:31:24 UTC No. 16388194
>>16388192
Does your dad care about my cock? (sucking and fucking)
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:33:04 UTC No. 16388197
>>16388194
So do you care about the colonization of Mars since you care about planets?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:33:28 UTC No. 16388199
>>16388185
what is your fucking problem
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:34:46 UTC No. 16388201
>>16388197
Based Socrates
>>16388194
Based Diogenes
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:35:10 UTC No. 16388202
>>16387290
why do they make starship so long instead of making it thicker for better volume vs surface?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:36:15 UTC No. 16388205
>>16388202
Everything was already designed for 9m diameter. Why bother redesigning all architecture and essential parts when you could just extend it instead with the same capabilities and much less work?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:47:57 UTC No. 16388209
>>16388206
At this rate we won't even get an ISS replacement. NASA grift to axiom total fucking disaster
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:48:33 UTC No. 16388210
>>16388206
always has been
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:51:57 UTC No. 16388213
>>16388189
>>16388199
>they don't know
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:52:43 UTC No. 16388214
>>16388206
Forgot to add that to my filter thanks. Also fitting image
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:00:32 UTC No. 16388219
>>16388184
https://toughsf.blogspot.com/2020/0
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:02:02 UTC No. 16388221
>>16388191
>I don't care about space, I care about planets
t.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:02:21 UTC No. 16388223
>muh filter
snowflake detected
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:02:46 UTC No. 16388225
>>16388219
just a whole ass Saturn S-IC stage sitting there, what did it hitch a ground launch ride on project Orion or something?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:02:52 UTC No. 16388226
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/
Thoughts?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:03:54 UTC No. 16388227
>>16388219
Neat, I saw Stratzenblitz do something like that in KSP in order to throw something into orbit having used only air-breathing engines to build the speed.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:03:57 UTC No. 16388228
>>16388221
Have fun spinning in the void homo
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:04:33 UTC No. 16388229
>>16388190
>problem is funding
That is an understatement and because of it they are not ahead of anyone.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:06:31 UTC No. 16388232
>>16388229
They're definitely ahead of Iris2, whose only political support (Thierry Breton) was fired a few days ago and will probably not survive the year.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:07:14 UTC No. 16388233
>>16388227
this is so retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:09:21 UTC No. 16388235
>>16388192
yea
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:12:21 UTC No. 16388237
is he /our/ guy?
https://www.youtube.com/@Space_Chip
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:12:30 UTC No. 16388238
>>16388233
wrong
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:14:13 UTC No. 16388241
>>16388229
Funding might not be as hard to get as it would be otherwise. Starlink has performed exceptionally well in Ukraine and there's a lot of people in the Russian military that would like to have a similar system for their own use. For all the talk about a 1440 constellation putting high speed internet in every Russian home it's the dual-use possibles that would get something like this funded.
And it's a low bar to say that they're ahead of Iris2. Even the constellations that haven't officially announced yet are ahead of Iris2.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:14:32 UTC No. 16388242
>>16388237
No. Where the fuck do you people come from?? This is like the eights literal who posted this week. Buy an ad
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:14:56 UTC No. 16388244
>>16388237
buy an ad
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:15:11 UTC No. 16388245
>>16387783
>>16387801
what low iq does to people
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:18:58 UTC No. 16388249
>>16388237
God, I hope not. He's a tiktok twink. He even does faggy Mr Beast subtitles.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:21:04 UTC No. 16388253
>>16388228
taking an elevator to free fall is indeed fun, wellnigger
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:28:48 UTC No. 16388261
>>16387801
>polarizing
yeah it filters for mission-focused no-nonsense/drama people you resentful middling acadumbic
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:37:08 UTC No. 16388269
>>16388237
Fuck off nigger
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:37:32 UTC No. 16388271
>>16388268
WTF is this real?!?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:38:16 UTC No. 16388272
>>16388174
>Ssto
The only viable ssto is a space elevator
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:38:46 UTC No. 16388273
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18368
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:41:40 UTC No. 16388277
>>16388015
No actually, looks cool though. Thanks.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:42:20 UTC No. 16388279
>>16388271
Yes Elon posted it on X
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:43:57 UTC No. 16388281
>>16388205
by thicker i mean make it more than double the diameter. maybe in a few years they will see the light. starship is still too small for mars colonization
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:46:28 UTC No. 16388284
>>16387786
>Fuck people. They're all idiots.
I just wanted to point out this one part.
That's all you need.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:48:54 UTC No. 16388287
>>16388227
No such thing as a free lunch. Enjoy the Gs slamming into that fucking thing.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:50:02 UTC No. 16388289
>>16388268
>von braun photo in the back
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:51:46 UTC No. 16388290
>>16388287
>Enjoy the Gs
You wouldn't fly PEOPLE on that contraption, right? It'd just be for cargo and probes or whathaveyou.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:55:28 UTC No. 16388295
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:57:37 UTC No. 16388299
>>16388293
>hydrolox first stages
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:59:14 UTC No. 16388300
>>16388299
Actually it’s a hydrolox sustainer with hydrolox strap on boosters. No “first stage” here
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:59:46 UTC No. 16388302
>>16388300
hydrolox sustainer == turbo gay
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:01:10 UTC No. 16388304
>>16388289
Elon: I consent
Krystal: I consent
Werner: Is there someone you forgot to ask?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:02:53 UTC No. 16388309
>>16388293
My guy, that rocket can barely manage 1.25g of acceleration.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:03:26 UTC No. 16388310
>>16388304
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:04:47 UTC No. 16388311
>>16388309
Could be worse
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:05:52 UTC No. 16388312
>>16388311
At the end of the day, you're not Astra.
Or maybe you are.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:07:47 UTC No. 16388313
>>16388311
Genuinely how did they fail this badly
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:07:59 UTC No. 16388314
>>16388309
accelerate
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:08:56 UTC No. 16388317
>>16388299
stupid frogposter
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:09:05 UTC No. 16388318
>>16388313
That was just the first of many fuckups. I mean, pressure fed 2nd stage?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:12:00 UTC No. 16388322
Venus manned flyby Genesis reading when
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:12:39 UTC No. 16388324
>>16387837
Tampermonkey took its sweet time porting to Firefox Mobile, so this is news to me too.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:12:43 UTC No. 16388325
Update on FAA death watch?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:13:41 UTC No. 16388327
>>16388314
1.65g. Better
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:13:51 UTC No. 16388328
>>16388313
QD arm didn't D Q enough. Ripped out a fuel line to an engine. 1.25 TWR became 1.00000000001 TWR.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:13:53 UTC No. 16388329
>>16388318
RIP Tropics trio batch 1
Did Rocketlab put up the other two pairs?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:14:14 UTC No. 16388330
>>16388322
I don't see the Chinese doing that
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:14:57 UTC No. 16388332
>>16387837
Clover/Kuroba/KurobaEx has been around for ages.
>>16388329
They did.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:15:13 UTC No. 16388333
>>16387680
>>16387481
Fully expendable for wartime Brilliant Pebbles deployments.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:18:56 UTC No. 16388336
>>16388335
It was one anons position, not /sfg/‘s and it’s not mainstream either.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:20:03 UTC No. 16388337
>>16388330
I don't see the Chinese doing much beyond the moon. Even their unmanned ambitions seem to be stalling out.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:20:15 UTC No. 16388338
>>16388329
At least they provided us with a little lulz.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:20:21 UTC No. 16388339
>>16388300
>a first stage is not a first stage
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:22:05 UTC No. 16388342
>>16388328
Which is fitting for a company that couldn't make a reliable pressure fed engine despite having NASA engineers help them.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:22:13 UTC No. 16388343
>>16388290
It requires energy to fling you. you are stealing momentum
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:23:46 UTC No. 16388346
>>16387912
has just been revoked
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:23:57 UTC No. 16388347
>>16388342
The first stage engines were electric pump fed. I swear it's like the /pol/ memes are real and Jews are allergic to turbomachinery.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:24:22 UTC No. 16388348
>>16388336
Theia is as fake as Wakanda, cope
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:27:08 UTC No. 16388350
>>16388337
The Moon is nothing more than a national aggrandizement stunt. The real meat of the new space race is to see who can put the most hardware into earth orbit the fastest. China was in the lead BRIEFLY but SpaceX has secured America's place at the top for a while longer at least. The FAA and the DNC are working for the Chinese to slow down SpaceX, because of course they are.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:28:14 UTC No. 16388352
>>16388347
They seem to be allergic to anything with radial symmetry.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:29:43 UTC No. 16388354
>>16388350
me when i’m schizo and should have refrained from posting
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:31:58 UTC No. 16388356
>>16388352
>flag is a six pointed star
>round little hats
not so sure
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:32:06 UTC No. 16388357
>>16388350
Kamala harris is asian so this tracks
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:33:57 UTC No. 16388358
>>16388354
He has a point, mass-to-orbit is much more important from a strategic and economical standpoint than moon landings, which are mostly a prestige thing. There is very little on the moon that applies to Earther power struggles.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:36:04 UTC No. 16388360
>>16388342
Pressure fed engines are deceptively difficult. They're mechanically simple but they are eager to not work right. Pump fed engines are unironically more dependable in practice.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:38:22 UTC No. 16388362
>>16388273
I keep thinking wtf is Carr smoking because Spectrum has been connecting RDOF homes for over 1.5 years at least (https://corporate.charter.com/news
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:42:13 UTC No. 16388366
>>16388343
>you are stealing momentum
Call the space police then, narc
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:43:00 UTC No. 16388367
>>16388366
Sorry commie, perpetual motion isnt real :)
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:46:37 UTC No. 16388369
>>16388356
I should have said, allergic to things which ONLY have radial symmetry.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:47:48 UTC No. 16388370
>>16388358
Exactly. All hardware in space which has commercial or strategic value is pointed at earth. Anything not pointed at earth is a glorified science fair project to keep eggheads entertained.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:48:09 UTC No. 16388371
>>16388367
Who said it was? Cease rotation
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:51:04 UTC No. 16388373
>>16388360
you ever worked with either?
thought not...
pressure fed astronaut is right about starship. it should have been pressure fed from the start..
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 22:51:15 UTC No. 16388374
>>16387645
We can barely detect any worlds at all
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:01:58 UTC No. 16388383
>>16387645
Rare Earth Hypothesis is, at the very least, consistent with ALL observations thus far made. It always amuses me when people get all huffy and start citing the number of stars in the galaxy and the number of galaxies and all that crap.
Like bro, okay. Add up all those zeros. How many orders of magnitude are you at? A reasonable estimate is 10^24 stars. Oooooh such a huge number amirite? Is it really though? If there are only 24 independent 1-in-10 dice rolls that need to occur for a planet with human-like life to develop, that's your 24 zeros already. Or just twelve mere 1-in-100 shots to clear. What are the real obstacles and how likely are they to be cleared?
One hint is that it took life on Earth something like a billion years to go from unicellular to multicellular. That development jump alone eats up several of your 24 zeros. And after unicellular life develops, a technologically advanced life form is by no means a given! It's not as though evolution works towards human-like lifeforms as a goal, it just selects for survival and if it "prefers" anything it prefers dumb crabs instead of smart apes. Even if life gets to the state of advanced ape, how likely is it to survive and thrive long enough to develop even basic radio technology? Anatomically modern humans got genetically bottlenecked at least once, probably several times. Our survival was by no means a given even once we became clever apes who knew how to knock the rocks together. It could easily be the case that we simply got quite lucky to even be here. 24 zeros just isn't a lot.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:15:16 UTC No. 16388390
>>16388383
>Rare Earth Hypothesis is, at the very least, consistent with ALL observations thus far made
Not consistent with the observation of earth itself.
>Muh moon
Massive collisions are common, and thus so are large moons
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:15:35 UTC No. 16388391
>>16388373
you can't scale up pressure fed engines
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:16:53 UTC No. 16388393
>>16388383
If we assume all life starts out aqueous then the bottlenecks past multicellular sea life are having well watered land area capable of hosting primitive plants, and periodic major impacts. The land area offers an escape from sea predators for plants (it is MUCH easier to adapt photosynthesis to land), and competition for rain and sunlight among plants will drive along all axes until something like trees emerge. Then eventually animals figure out air breathing to escape danger or for better performance, so you just need to keep rolling the "shuffle land animals" dice with major impactors until tree animals with dextrous limbs and 3D navigation brains emerge. I'd wager that at least 10% of planets that evolve ape like life develop chemical spacecraft if given sufficient time before the star kills the planet.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:17:58 UTC No. 16388394
>>16388393
>Then eventually animals
?
and where did these "animals" come from without God ?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:18:15 UTC No. 16388395
>>16388383
that whole routine citing the number of stars is such a common popsci knee-jerk reaction when you assert life is rare. I think it developed as a nu-atheist reaction to christians because alien life, especially advanced alien life, would discredit the human centric bible. it really has no basis in fact whatsoever. people who believe alien civilizations must populate the milky way only do so because they have had their preconceptions set by starwars
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:19:10 UTC No. 16388397
>>16388394
simpler multicellular life, like the plants
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:19:39 UTC No. 16388398
>>16388391
wasnt sea dragon pressure fed?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:20:22 UTC No. 16388399
The humanoid form is the idea one, any world that isn't producing hominids should be reseeded into one that someday will.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:21:29 UTC No. 16388400
Because there are so many intelligent humanoids other than humans on this planet
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:23:43 UTC No. 16388401
I find it funny that religious retards (who probably come from /pol/) blame everything on atheism and their supposed opposition to religion. how obsessed do you have to be with a group of people to make up shit like this?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:27:06 UTC No. 16388403
>>16388393
NTA but I'm confident life did not start in the sea and that water worlds cant produce abiogenesis.
life probably started in volcanic lakes which would evaporate most of their water content during volcanic activity leaving behind a chemically rich pond.
There is the first problem after abiogenesis. How does life get from the pond to the sea, and howdoes it survive the very different conditions in the sea?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:28:32 UTC No. 16388404
>>16388400
>Because there are so many intelligent humanoids other than humans on this planet
your dad on my cock doesnt count.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:32:46 UTC No. 16388405
>>16388400
There used to be, yeah. We all were chow for giant birds for a long time.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:33:10 UTC No. 16388406
>>16388403
>How does life get from the pond to the sea
there are many vulcans below and at sea levels or barely above.
>and howdoes it survive the very different conditions in the sea?
it could have reproduced in or near a vulcan that was at sea level. maybe?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:34:49 UTC No. 16388408
>>16388383
>blah blah blah life is rare
No it's not. Also aliens are real and have been here for thousands of years.
Deal with it chud.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:37:36 UTC No. 16388411
>>16388398
Yeah and sea dragon worked so well.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:39:40 UTC No. 16388412
>>16388408
>getting fooled by disinformation 30 years after the intended recipient collapsed
I seriously hope you guys don't do this
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:42:37 UTC No. 16388414
>>16388400
At one point there were multiple species of human living at the same time in our planet. Also our closest relatives in the ape family are humanoid and they are intelligent too in case you forgot.
Not only that but every single step that created the humanoid body plan of one head two arms two legs and a torso can absolutely happen on other planets. The laws of physics shape animals into the same body plans all the time, it's called convergent evolution. There is nothing stopping a quadrupedal animal from evolving on another planet. There is nothing stopping that quadruped from taking up an arboreal lifestyle (trees have evolved multiple times!). There is nothing stopping that arboreal quadruped from developing grasping appendages. There is nothing stopping that quadruped from coming down from the trees and becoming bipedal.
You are retarded.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:44:34 UTC No. 16388416
>>16388412
I know because I've seen them.
No I will not elaborate.
you will look incredibly foolish when they finally show themselves. In the end I will be the one who laughs.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:49:20 UTC No. 16388422
>>16388414
>At one point there were multiple species of human living at the same time in our planet.
Right now there are. And the only one capable of technological civilization is going EXTINCT.
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:52:50 UTC No. 16388429
>>16388416
Release the big floating cube tech cowards
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:53:13 UTC No. 16388430
>>16388373
Why would I have to? Everybody using pressure fed engines has had protracted and catastrophic difficulties with their pressure fed uppers. Virgin Orbit, Astra, and even SpaceX struggled with them. Hell, even the Vega's Avum stage has been problematic with a pressure fed hypergolic upper stage.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:02:45 UTC No. 16388446
>>16388429
It's not going to happen. The government already tried to get Lockheed and the other defense contractors to make the tech available but nothing came of it. The real research is being done by the sol foundation. Very promising results came from Garry Nolan's work with "experiencers". They found a tangible difference between the brain of an average person and the brain of the people they were studying. It was found in whole family groups, just like John Mack and co. Found through their research on the phenomenon.
If they did comprehensive blood work they would find more links. I've had elevated creatinine my entire life and I suspect that might also be a commonality.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:05:23 UTC No. 16388448
>>16388446
No compelling evidence for what you're claiming exists. It's always tempting to believe everyone else is delusional, but it is much more likely, and much easier, that you (rhetorical) are the one that is deluded.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:06:14 UTC No. 16388450
I always love how cold war propaganda has stuck with boomers fifty years later
>you couldn't believe the type of stuff they're cooking up in secret
Meanwhile it's all rotting shit and if there was a war that mattered we'd be toast
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:10:26 UTC No. 16388455
>>16388450
>if there was a war that mattered we'd be toast.
I doubt it. America numba wahn baybee.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:11:52 UTC No. 16388458
>>16388455
Yeah. I should not have said that. I really hope this doesn't start a 100 post off topic sperg out
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:12:10 UTC No. 16388459
>>16388448
Doesn't mean the research shouldn't be done. And I do think finding 1/200 structural difference in the brain in every one of these individuals is a significant find. It's nothing to sneeze at. The science is being done and hopefully will continue to be done.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:13:58 UTC No. 16388461
>>16388459
Structural variation is poorly studied but far from novel. Everybody is actually pretty different under the hood, and tons of anatomical variation exists, but it's very poorly documented.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:17:08 UTC No. 16388464
>>16387370
Both are part of the executive branch of the government. They aren't really nonpartisan organizations to begin with.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:20:46 UTC No. 16388468
>>16388458
Commendable levels of self-awareness.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:22:22 UTC No. 16388470
>>16388461
It's very unlikely that the majority of the people they looked at all had the same over connection, all many times more than the average person. He explains as much in his interview on Lex Friedman
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0VOpX
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:23:37 UTC No. 16388471
>>16387801
>Spacex is inspiring the wrong youth
>:(
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:24:17 UTC No. 16388473
>>16388450
OKAY VATNIK.
>shoots himars atyou
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:28:20 UTC No. 16388476
>>16388390
>Not consistent with the observation of earth itself.
Yes it is.
>>16388408
>No it's not.
Life being rare is consistent with our observations. Your assertion that life is common is an article of faith, something you believe without evidence.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:29:28 UTC No. 16388478
>>16388476
oh yeah? explain why every body in the solar system that has or at one point had liquid water has life or remnants of life
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:32:49 UTC No. 16388480
>>16388478
panSPERMia nigga
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:34:25 UTC No. 16388481
>>16388478
What remnants of life do you see on Mars?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:35:53 UTC No. 16388486
>>16388313
You could argue that it failed excellently. The margins for error on failing in that exact way and executing the maneuver it did afterward were minuscule.
I have it solidly at #1 for funniest launch failure, with a close second being the Proton that flipped because a drunk Russian hammered some sensors in upside down.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:37:27 UTC No. 16388487
>>16388482
we are at least thirty years away from this level of deep space automation
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:40:26 UTC No. 16388490
>>16388478
You have no evidence for that. Life has only EVER been observed on Earth or in Earth's atmosphere.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:46:39 UTC No. 16388495
>>16388490
I saw homo sapiens on the Moon a couple of times
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:51:32 UTC No. 16388500
>>16388495
It happened more than twice
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:52:12 UTC No. 16388501
>>16388476
>Yes it is.
Baseless assertion to support your floundering rare earth axiom
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:53:55 UTC No. 16388504
>>16388490
Bayesian reasoning.
Either abiogenesis is almost entirely, but not quite, impossible, or it's completely mundane like most other things. Which hypothesis seems more likely?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:54:16 UTC No. 16388506
>>16388501
Rare Earth Hypothesis doesn't say that life never occurs, only that the occurrence of life is very rare. This is consistent with the observation of life on a single planet, and never anywhere else.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:55:13 UTC No. 16388507
>>16388504
If you're a Bayesian then you need to update your prior with our repeated and continuous failure to detect any signature of life elsewhere in the universe.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:55:44 UTC No. 16388509
Not a single person posting this Ship 34 (aka Starship block 2) nose cone? /sfg/ is dead
It looks like shit!
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:56:07 UTC No. 16388510
>>16388507
We haven't even been trying. What attempts to detect life are you aware of?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:56:54 UTC No. 16388513
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:57:49 UTC No. 16388515
>>16388510
We have tried, repeatedly, for decades. A hundred years ago people were quite sure we'd find it as soon as we took a closer look at Venus and Mars. That didn't pan out, nor has it been found in any decade since.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:58:51 UTC No. 16388519
>>16388513
I wonder how Viking’s landing computer worked
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:59:02 UTC No. 16388521
Everything outside of the Oort cloud is procedurally generated and exists only cosmetically.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:59:25 UTC No. 16388524
>>16388509
nobody cares.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:00:08 UTC No. 16388526
>those lines on Mars? Canals.
>o-okay maybe they're not canals but I bet those dark spots are vegetation
>okay it's not vegetation but I bet if we go there and look under some rocks we'll find marshrooms or something
>o-okay we haven't found anything like that but maybe, if we dig deep under the surface and pull out the microscope....
Life of the gaps.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:00:26 UTC No. 16388527
>>16388521
HAHAHAHAHA
thats what she said
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:00:49 UTC No. 16388530
>>16388509
/sfg/ doesn’t like minute changes. I used to post more minor Starship changes and anons told me to shut up and only bring the more important benchmarks
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:02:09 UTC No. 16388533
>>16388509
Look at this dude
look at the top of his head
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:02:31 UTC No. 16388534
>>16388510
Very important post. Listen to this anon.
Imagine looking outside your window into your backyard, not seeing any animals, and then confidently coming to the conclusion that animals do not exist. This is the same kind of lunacy that
>>16388507 (you)
are participating in anon. Also note that this applies to the search or intelligence as well. No one has been looking. No one wants to look. No one has bothered doing any significant searches in our own backyard let alone out in the cosmos. And yet academics confidently assert that there is no evidence and that aliens do not exist despite them not even attempting to look and actually see if that is the case.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:03:25 UTC No. 16388536
>>16388533
We have fallen so far from the original ITS kino plan, it’s unreal
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:03:29 UTC No. 16388537
>>16388509
>>16388530
I care, I don't go off looking for updates and just wait for them to percolate and collect here so I can learn about them, on account of profound laziness on my part.
>>16388533
New and improved flap?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:03:46 UTC No. 16388539
>>16388527
I find it hard to believe that a woman actually used half of those words.
>>16388534
Imagine looking out your window for a century and never seeing any animals, plants, or even fungus. And yet for some reason you believe they are there.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:04:43 UTC No. 16388540
>>16388509
Given how much and how quickly things change in starbase, I'm not going to care about minor modifications to articles that aren't launching within a week.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:05:12 UTC No. 16388541
>>16388533
they are on design version 2 and they still havent figured out a fucking payload door. how embarassing.
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:06:19 UTC No. 16388542
>>16388537
>New and improved flap?
your dad has a new and improved cock which i sucked last night
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:06:51 UTC No. 16388544
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:07:53 UTC No. 16388546
Idgi. why do you guys hate Tim Dodd so much?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:08:45 UTC No. 16388549
>>16388515
>We have tried, repeatedly, for decades
How?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:09:25 UTC No. 16388550
>>16388470
It's actually very likely. The variations tend to have root genetic causes, and that seems to be the case here. I can't be arsed to actually find out how that's supposed to result in proof of aliens, though.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:09:57 UTC No. 16388552
>>16388533
The new flaps just feel too skinny to me. That's a purely aesthetic judgement, I'm certain they're mechanically sound.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:10:00 UTC No. 16388553
>>16388219
i see pop sci slop tubers use this as stock footage in their videos lel
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:10:33 UTC No. 16388554
>>16388545
>>16388544
hilarious how they were running these tests on bare concrete before, not to mention the first flight lmao. what a spectacle. musk has made some colossal fuck ups
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:10:36 UTC No. 16388555
>>16388537
>New and improved flap?
It's the V2 Starship flap design, moved slightly leeward and with a different shape for better aerodynamic characteristics.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:11:30 UTC No. 16388558
>>16388539
Except no one actually has. Look at the actual history of missions trying to discover life on Mars etc. there haven't been many over your century. All of seti can be boiled down to taking a Dixie cup to the ocean occasionally, scooping out some water, and checking for any fish. That is the analogy used by actual seti researchers.
We have not been looking. Not even close. You are delusional if you think we have done any significant searches. And again, we haven't even checked our own back yard. Plenty of examples of strange things going on, but it's all dismissed instead of looked into. I have yet to see a real, rigourus, and unbiased study on the abduction phenomenon. None.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:12:10 UTC No. 16388560
>>16388546
Hey Tim. “Hate” isn’t the right world. Cringe at the amount of redditry, the over-use of emojis, and the absolute dogshit interviewing style despite being given unprecedented access that thousands of other autistic crave.
I respect you for being unfortunately divorced by your bitch ex wife and going out and making a career doing what you love; but you’re just kinda cringe and need to work out or take some test lol
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:12:17 UTC No. 16388561
>>16388554
They went with a diverter design instead of bare concrete because the sites are packed with a lot of infrastructure that wasn't there originally and they have less room than they used to. The new infrastructure gets rid of the test site crane that they used to need every time they static fired the ship.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:12:20 UTC No. 16388562
>>16388268
based and /cfa/ pilled
averi better btw
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:14:33 UTC No. 16388563
>>16388560
>t.paranoid retard
ok, I get it. yeah, the guy is kinda cringe
but I just finished watching https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-x
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:16:22 UTC No. 16388565
>>16388550
It's not proof of anything, but it does correlate with the anecdotal/witness evidence and that's a start. More research needs to be done. As I've said, no one yet has done any serious research into this subject. If no one looks how could anyone possibly find the concrete evidence you do desire?
Also I think I will trust the PhD when he says it's very unlikely for multiple pairs of individuals with a very specific genetic abnormality to come together like they found.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:18:07 UTC No. 16388567
>>16388546
He used to be an order of magnitude more cringe, and he's STILL pretty cringe. The most recent Starbase tour was a massive downgrade from the first one he did, and would have been just about as informative if it was just a camera following Elon around as he occasionally pointed at things.
That said, I genuinely appreciate his videos and they're legitimately good to show to normies because the ones on fundamental spaceflight topics are informative but easy to follow. I feel like that's probably actually the prevailing attitude here and you're just too autistic to understand the bantz.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:25:07 UTC No. 16388572
>>16388554
Fondag was the best material if you're going to launch a rocket off of it.
What they didn't envision was the ground under it to basically liquefy from vibration. Fondag ultimately being a concrete can't sustain a being load from no longer being supported.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:25:58 UTC No. 16388574
https://x.com/eugeneawi/status/1835
Huge home made model
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:26:22 UTC No. 16388576
>>16388549
Telescopes, radios, rovers, etc.
>>16388558
We literally have looked, you're just whining that we haven't looked enough, but it will never be enough.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:27:55 UTC No. 16388579
>>16388574
Kenyans are some of the most innovative person in the world
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:28:30 UTC No. 16388580
>>16388546
I don't hate you, it's tough love. The kind your father should have given you so you didn't end up to be so wimpy.
>I'm not wimpy
You care what people on the internet think about you. That's proof of your wimpiness right there.
Hailou AI Thread !Mjk4PcAe16 at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:28:49 UTC No. 16388582
>>16388509
>Ship 34
I can post Rule 34 (of Krystal) if you want
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:29:55 UTC No. 16388583
>>16388580
one thing i did to your dad was suck him off...
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:30:32 UTC No. 16388585
>>16388576
Ask actual seti researchers and they will say the same thing. We have not looked nearly enough. Even if we watched the entire sky 24/7 for a hundred years it still would even be close to being a significant search. You need a large time resolution to do seti.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:30:37 UTC No. 16388586
>>16388574
That's pretty fucking impressive.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:31:08 UTC No. 16388588
>>16388562
You’re both niggers
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:31:53 UTC No. 16388589
>>16388585
>guys who do a thing will tell you they want more money to do the thing
yeah no kidding dude.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:32:12 UTC No. 16388590
>>16388576
>rovers
Viking found life on Mars
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:32:54 UTC No. 16388592
>>16388590
It didn't but keep coping.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:34:47 UTC No. 16388596
>>16388585
>seti
are you retarded? seti is basically saying "we are hoping to find signals of intelligent life elsewhere" as if intelligent life means they all developed radio comms that are somehow compatible with our comms. it's lazy and fucking retarded.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:39:57 UTC No. 16388602
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:40:37 UTC No. 16388605
>>16388596
>that are somehow compatible with our comms.
Would you not be able to tell between natural noise and something that looks structured. You don't have to decode it into alien music or tv
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:40:59 UTC No. 16388607
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:44:56 UTC No. 16388613
>>16388605
>Would you not be able to tell between natural noise and something that looks structured
The more it's compressed, the closer it looks to noise
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:45:04 UTC No. 16388614
>>16388546
I saw Tim Dodd at a grocery store in Brownsville a few weeks ago. I told him how cool it was to meet him in person, but I didn’t want to be a douche and bother him and ask him for photos or anything.
He said, “Oh, I don't mind at all” and wouldn't do the meme.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:49:38 UTC No. 16388619
>>16388614
things that never happened
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:50:36 UTC No. 16388620
>>16388614
my dad works at nintendo and he says he saw Tim at the factory once.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:59:53 UTC No. 16388632
>>16388602
What’s the point? Just testing aerodynamics? Or is this a structural test thing
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:02:04 UTC No. 16388633
>>16388632
The stringers help transfer the weight of the booster to the catch hard points at the top, but I have no idea why they painted them.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:02:57 UTC No. 16388635
>>16388596
There are various forms of seti not just radio. They also want to search for laser comms as well. Some want to do "near seti" which is searching our solar system for artifacts or signs of intelligences. All are valid.
I just wish they also researched abduction cases as well. If people are reporting literal non human intelligences on earth, you would think at least someone would be interested in looking into that. even if there is only a 0.0001% chance that it might be legit, it'd still be the biggest discovery in all of human history.
More than enough to land your name in the books.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:04:10 UTC No. 16388636
>>16388632
maybe to make it easier to see where the arms damaged the booster?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:04:33 UTC No. 16388638
>>16388635
Human memory is not reliable enough to be a useful witness, even if the claims were actually true.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:06:04 UTC No. 16388640
FAA is a threat to humanity.
Democrats are \a threat to humanity.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:06:35 UTC No. 16388642
>>16388640
I don’t think anyone here disagrees lol
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:15:41 UTC No. 16388647
>>16388638
Irrelevant. That's why you take large, diverse, sample sizes and use control groups.
Treat it like a police investigation. Police work with memory all the time and they have plenty of ways to deal with it. One of the most basic things they do is withhold specific details from the public. Say a woman murders a guy and accidentally leaves a red purse at the scene. They don't disclose this detail to the public. That way when a tip comes in regarding a strange woman entering the house with a red purse but leaving without it the police know that tip is more likely to be legitimate.
The same technique was used by abduction researcher and psychologist John Mack. He and his colleagues would keep certain details a secret and use them as a marker for legitimate abduction cases.
When you hear the same small detail over and over and over from vastly different people who do not know each other that becomes much more compelling than just one guy telling a story. It's not impossible to study this subject. No one has really made the effort to do so. It's a real shame too because we are losing valuable witnesses every day. This phenomenon has roots all the way back in the late 1800s. They've traced families back that far, and it may go back even further though that is more folkloric content which is less likely to bear fruit upon investigation.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:22:03 UTC No. 16388651
>>16388640
I haven't been convinced that pro/anti space is correlated with blue/red politics
My guess is it probably is (most things are), but I haven't seen much on this
Accept for musk tweets
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:27:47 UTC No. 16388660
>>16388657
Alpaca?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:28:04 UTC No. 16388661
>>16388651
Neither really care.
It's just in this instance the tip of the spear is SpaceX and is being hampered by bureaucracy.
One party wants to keep course and inflate the admin state even more, the other wants to gut agencies for better and for worse and has potentially done so already.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:29:42 UTC No. 16388663
>>16388657
Blue Origin's response to the sustainability requirement is so funny to me
>uhhh yeah we're going to build a better one later
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:30:36 UTC No. 16388665
>>16388660
only landers that can go on a diet get in this club
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:31:22 UTC No. 16388667
>>16388665
Still would have been the best choice
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:31:49 UTC No. 16388669
>>16388651
Blue is antispace because technological innovation in the short term and human expansion in the long term threaten their ability to control everyone. Red is also (mostly) antispace because red is usually just blue with different branding. Red-vs-blue understandings of American politics are fundamentally flawed. The two party scam is just kayfabe set up to train the populace to only choose between two parts of the same group. In the past quarter century there's been a rising anti-establishment movement that manifested in two outsider factions on the left and right. The Regime was able to subvert the anti-establishment left almost completely, but was only partly successful with the anti-establishment right.
Antispace is earther status quo; prospace is always some type of insurrectionist belonging to one of a range of political philosophies
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:32:30 UTC No. 16388671
>>16388657
Blue Moon isn’t HLS, it’s SLD.
HLS solely refers to Starship. Also it’s not really “Blue Moon” either
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:32:36 UTC No. 16388672
>>16388651
The tide is probably changing but historically neither have made it a priority. Red just wanted the money moving around and blue wanted the money elsewhere. From a policy standpoint the part we care about didn't even come up
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:34:38 UTC No. 16388673
>>16388640
I kind of like "gay race communists" as a catch-all. There are GOPe creatures this applies too as well. Would be very kek lel and jej to see Elon use this in 6 months or so.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:42:00 UTC No. 16388677
>>16388669
your mom sucked my antispace dick last night, you """insurrectionist""" faggot
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:42:37 UTC No. 16388680
>>16388674
2 months with the new FAA delay
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:43:24 UTC No. 16388682
>>16388632
Looks cool
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:44:41 UTC No. 16388683
>>16388651
As others have said, there is no real correlation.
The reason basically all space policy is gay and lame is because overt imperialism went out of fashion. The Outer Space Treaty was a fucking disaster for mankind. If the US and Soviets had refused to sign it, we'd have research outposts on Ceres by now.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:53:22 UTC No. 16388695
>>16388677
I'm not sure why the truth makes you this angry, but it's an amusing reaction. Thank you.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 02:59:18 UTC No. 16388702
In January the new congress will pass the FOFFAA (Fuck Off Faggot FAA) act granting SpaceX blanket license to do what it needs to do for Starship and will be back on track.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:02:56 UTC No. 16388704
>>16388695
I didn't even read your crap except for a few words
you are so delusional and have such a big victim complex that you had to write that shit to feel better about your cringe crap. get therapy, retard.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:06:46 UTC No. 16388708
>>16388702
Harris will veto that.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:13:51 UTC No. 16388712
>Air Force Dodges PFAS Water Cleanup in Arizona, Citing Supreme Court Chevron Ruling
https://www.commondreams.org/news/a
SpaceX should told FAA fuck off like Air Force
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:37:09 UTC No. 16388734
>>16388712
SpaceX should get an Air Force
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:46:20 UTC No. 16388745
>>16388495
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Hw
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:05:42 UTC No. 16388763
is this general full of boomers or some shit? if so, how do you faggots even find this place? did you come from r/t_d or something?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:13:37 UTC No. 16388767
>Musk is being investigated by FBI and NSA
it's over...
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:17:17 UTC No. 16388771
>>16388667
Somebody needs to build one of these, if I win the lottery I'm starting work on one.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:20:56 UTC No. 16388776
>>16388665
Exotic matter solves the negative payload issue
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:42:03 UTC No. 16388793
>>16388771
Why does it have a whole ton of thrusters on one side
Are the ones pointing down not good enough? Thrusters usually point down
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:43:12 UTC No. 16388795
What would you guys do if you had 10 acre of land and $50k in cash to waste on random stuff?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:46:19 UTC No. 16388796
>>16388712
>commondreams
propaganda outlet for leftist
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:46:45 UTC No. 16388797
>>16388763
Some boomers, mostly zoomers though from what I’ve seen after being here a few years. Its mostly total geeks who know the internet (young) and are also obsessed with everything space. Boomers don’t find this place because they usually go to more common platforms like YouTube or for those a bit more professional they paying out to L2 at NSF which is a different forum that is dedicated to spaceflight. The thing about them is it costs money to post and is again extremely professional so you can’t say Nono words like you can here. So this general is the place where you can discuss spaceflight and such indepth while also being free to say what you want in relation to that. And yeah as you said right now we are infested with election tourists from r/T_d who are constantly on about muh party and shilling for whichever candidate. The janitor on this board sucks so nothing can be done other than filter them and wait until it’s over.
TLDR, no mostly autistic zoomers but right now is not the best time for the entire site so just use filter.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:48:45 UTC No. 16388800
>>16388795
$50k won’t get you shit in to space. Why ask this question?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:50:47 UTC No. 16388802
>>16388800
Maybe you could build your own mini-spinlaunch to throw cameras into LEO or something?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:57:25 UTC No. 16388809
>>16388796
Yeah it's all "corrupt right-wing court" this and "corporate polluters" that
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:58:18 UTC No. 16388810
>>16388802
Build a big cannon, fire the cameras on suborbital arcs, drink the remaining money away as I shoot stuff outside the atmosphere
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:58:32 UTC No. 16388812
>>16388797
>right now we are infested with election tourists from r/T_d
Statements like this make it easy to identify redditors in the wild. r/the_donald was banned years ago and they'll still bring it up wherever they go.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:58:39 UTC No. 16388813
>>16388795
Plant a small mobile tiny home (so regulators wont bonk you) and add starlink.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:59:29 UTC No. 16388814
>>16388599
whats this?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:08:00 UTC No. 16388819
>>16388812
>Statements like this make it easy to identify redditors in the wild.
>r/the_donald was banned years ago
anon... what you said only shows that (You) are a the redditor here...
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:13:01 UTC No. 16388825
>>16387481
They can definitely do more than that with PEZ.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:15:55 UTC No. 16388827
>>16388763
reddit commies get the rope
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:18:23 UTC No. 16388835
booster 12 for flight 6 testing is rolling out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwN
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:20:10 UTC No. 16388836
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:24:31 UTC No. 16388839
redditors will be sent Io's volcanoes
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:27:07 UTC No. 16388840
>>16388812
Yeah the cope is unreal
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:27:29 UTC No. 16388842
>>16388450
This post is underrated. If you know boomers, this myth remains stubbornly ingrained.
The Reagan crowd is clearly into throwing immense amounts of cash into the military-industrial complex to this very day. They also don't mind that all of the money gets siphoned off by Israel and Jewish profiteers.
They still think Area 51, Skunkworks, and other classified military shit is a century ahead of SpaceX, but in reality they have jack shit and are just feeding the beast.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:27:53 UTC No. 16388843
>>16388835
Boycott NFS faggots suck FAA dick
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:29:00 UTC No. 16388845
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18369
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:29:52 UTC No. 16388846
China launched another six Jilin-1 satellites on a Long March 2D
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:38:14 UTC No. 16388849
>>16387588
>Who is going to be the first person to walk on Mars?
at this rate it might be isaacman
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:44:29 UTC No. 16388855
Less regulation.... is good!
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:46:49 UTC No. 16388858
>>16388849
He is the obvious choice, and on track to be first.
Eventually he will become a SpaceX employee and divest his businesses to focus on Mars full time.
I'm okay with this, he is highly competent and that is the correct selection criteria.
Intelligence, real-world competence, relentless drive, similar values to Musk, being white, and most of all, being LOYAL to Musk is what matters.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:52:36 UTC No. 16388859
>>16388814
Hardpoints on the side of Booster 12.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:54:05 UTC No. 16388860
>>16388859
what for?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 05:55:24 UTC No. 16388861
>>16388835
TWO MONTHS
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:02:04 UTC No. 16388871
>>16388860
Catching pins! They are now reinforced with external stringers that are painted black to highlight them, to look even more badass.
This feature is KEY and the most innovative item on super heavy, aside from the Raptors themselves. These little fuckers replace the need for landing legs and a pad, crane, and complex vehicle post landing safing system, which is huge. The chopsticks can place the fucker right back on the mount, where the BQD will detank it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:03:10 UTC No. 16388872
2 month delay is good actually t.NSF
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:05:55 UTC No. 16388873
>>16388871
catching pins are higher >>16388602 >>16388607
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:12:09 UTC No. 16388880
>>16388763
Trump won
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:13:35 UTC No. 16388882
what happened to jeff's dildo ride? why isnt it launching more often?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:15:27 UTC No. 16388885
>>16388873
The new lifting scheme, both with the crane jig, and chopsticks, is now a 4 point grip for stability.
The second stage has 4 points, now the booster does too. Measure the spacing between the upper and lower points on the ship and booster, they are the same.
Hanging a booster from 2 points is inherently unstable, it will swing, and we do not want humans holding tag line ropes to get the fucking thing on the mount without banging Raptors on the sides. And the vertical launch mount alignment pins are fucking gay, and must be removed before launches. They are deleted for being gay and lame.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:16:05 UTC No. 16388887
>FAA regulations explicitly defer to range rules for explosive safety requirements, including prop tank farms under 14 CFR 420.63(b)
>The range operator (NSSF) had already approved the tank farm
EDS made them forget their own regs kek
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:17:38 UTC No. 16388891
>>16388887
>(NSSF)
USSF rather
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:27:08 UTC No. 16388901
its been so slow lately
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:28:34 UTC No. 16388904
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82
>less than 800 views
is this worth listening to or not?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:31:54 UTC No. 16388907
>>16388901
Watch this live if you need Starship fix.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwN
Mute if you think NSF is gay. 2X playback speed is recommended.
Ship 31 is also rolling back from Massey's, and booster 12 and the hotstage ring rolled to the launch site, and is currently engaging with the chopsticks right now for its lift up.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:35:26 UTC No. 16388911
>>16388901
As in important launches or /sfg/
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:37:11 UTC No. 16388913
>>16388907
only launches matter now. we're past caring about the pre-launch minutia.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:37:22 UTC No. 16388914
Are we gonna get a flight with the same profile as IFT-4? Is flight 6 gonna be the first tower catch test?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:40:44 UTC No. 16388916
>>16388882
it just launched like a week or two ago
it was grounded for like over a year due to a bad landing
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:41:45 UTC No. 16388918
>>16388885
nice
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:43:20 UTC No. 16388921
>>16388916
why isnt it launching once a week? i heard there was stupid amounts of demand.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:43:25 UTC No. 16388923
>>16388914
Flight 5 will tower catch, flight 6 might be a 2nd attempt if flight 5 catch fails.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:44:07 UTC No. 16388925
>>16388904
Had to quit not far in when they were talking about their space-nerd "origin stories" and making references to scenes from nu star wars.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:44:32 UTC No. 16388927
>>16388913
Engineering minds want to see this. This is also a minor reveal of new booster and stage zero upgrades and capabilities, as well as insight into novel testing methods.
Casual tourists can watch Marvel movies and The Acolyte on Disney +.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:44:36 UTC No. 16388928
>>16388914
No. Flight 5 is catch test. They will not waste a Starship and more importantly their prep time on a preflight of the flight 4 trajectory. It earns no important data for them.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:44:38 UTC No. 16388929
>>16388914
There has to be a reason spacex is reticent to fly without a tower catch
I think they are really unsure about the catch arms and if they aren't adequate they don't want to repeat a bad design on tower 2.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:48:10 UTC No. 16388934
>>16388929
Yeah at some point they will be stalled on tower 2 because they need the catch data to know how to proceed. A repeat of flight 4 would only yield data about the new heat shield's performance and perhaps also improvents to raptor startup reliability that were made if any.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:50:55 UTC No. 16388941
>>16388925
>Had to quit not far in when they were talking about their space-nerd "origin stories"
what's wrong with tha-
>and making references to scenes from nu star wars.
-*ACK*
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:52:17 UTC No. 16388944
>>16388929
They need to know ASAP whether tower catch is viable in practice or not.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:56:59 UTC No. 16388952
B12 is in the chopsticks now but nobody cares anyways
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:57:24 UTC No. 16388953
>>16388855
less pointless regulation is good yes
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 06:59:47 UTC No. 16388960
>>16388395
>because alien life, especially advanced alien life, would discredit the human centric bible.
Christians were the ones most likely to believe that there was life on other planets in our solar system before we found out otherwise.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:01:10 UTC No. 16388962
>>16388952
because we already know that launch is 2 months away
previous lifts meant we were 2 weeks away from a launch
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:01:59 UTC No. 16388964
>>16388955
He's holding two astronauts hostage on the ISS so they can't.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:03 UTC No. 16388966
>>16388955
What threats?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:04:02 UTC No. 16388968
>>16388966
A good time in space.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:04:33 UTC No. 16388969
>>16388914
Flight 5 will tower catch, flight 6 will be the FAA headquarters "tower catch".
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:06:17 UTC No. 16388973
>>16388962
shut up fag i want updates about shit like this you just hate space
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:08:40 UTC No. 16388978
>>16388929
yes, they are retificient because the tower catch is the next critical step
heatshields can be iterated with or without tower catch independently on every flight, doing a launch which would basically only be about testing if the new flap heatshield works better or worse than the last one (that did work to an extent already) is basically just minor iteration
and if FAA wants to be the slow cunts they are, wasting launches is very bad
they get to the goal of full reusability quicker this way overall even if the time between IFT-4 and IFT-5 is longer this way (it shouldn't be really, that is just FAA fuckery, deciding to consult FWS about shit that they didn't care about previously and now that is confirmed by this complete bullshit fine about things that happened a year ago and they don't even have the jurisdiction over)
maximizing the amount of launches is not the actual goal here, its to develop a fully reusable launch system
launches give you new data which are critical for the development, but doing something that you already know works is pointless, minute iteration can wait
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:10:39 UTC No. 16388980
>>16388962
Then just leave and do something else until December.
I'm sure CNN will tell you when a launch is coming. If you find this boring, you should rethink your life. Maybe you can find your true purpose with a different venture. Anon wants you to be happy.
The "administration" does not want to see kino success from the opponent before the election, so they flexed their power illegally, and got normies to buy it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:19:50 UTC No. 16388992
>>16388973
>>16388980
i don't know who shit in your breakfast/s this morning but this is one of the dullest parts of the buildup to launch. No new parts being installed, no testing being done, no testing of fuelling processes or the arms. They're just rolling the stages out to the pad for a second time, for a launch that we know is months away. I'm watching anyway because I have nothing better to do but the stack will be more interesting
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:25:50 UTC No. 16388998
>>16388860
I don't rightly know why exactly they need a coating. Could be something to make it easier to see where the catch arms contact the booster.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:26:48 UTC No. 16388999
>>16388955
>Enough is enough.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:26:51 UTC No. 16389000
>>16388990
He doesn't know the difference between law and regulation.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:30:41 UTC No. 16389003
>>16388990
wow I didn't know congress voted on tank farms
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:33:46 UTC No. 16389005
morning reminder that FAA fucking sucks and that apologists are enabling this shit
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:35:16 UTC No. 16389008
>>16389004
I hope they filmed this long in advance because not talking about starship at all is really bad timing or makes them FAAgot shills
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:37:33 UTC No. 16389012
>>16388990
>regulations are laws
That's insane. Even when Chevron deference was around that's not how it worked. Only congress can make law.
>enforcing what's written out
Like the part that said tank farms fall under the range operator? The FAA insisting it needs to rubber stamp something another government entity already approved isn't going to work in court anymore. The FAA's testimony on what the basis of the T-2 hour poll "rule" is will be something like because that's how so and so used to do it so that's how it must be done because it just does okay? Out of their depth and should go back to regulating airplanes which they also suck at but it will then at least not be our problem.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:38:32 UTC No. 16389016
>>16389000
>>16389003
Wanna bet this faggot just has his LAST tour of Starbase?
Its clear he is trying (and failing) to walk a middle line, and not pick sides, kind of like what NSF is doing.
If you are not with SpaceX, you are against SpaceX. Fuck you estronaut, enjoy your future covering exciting Firefly and BO launches only (yawn)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:40:18 UTC No. 16389018
>>16389008
doesn't seem like they are talking about the fines and SpaceX suing FAA either, at least that is the impression I'm getting
there was a video about the Starship license a few days ago and they were whining about why isn't SpaceX launching Starship with the old license and defending FAA
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:41:27 UTC No. 16389020
>>16389012
yes the 2h polling thing especially seems to just be some arbitrary thing that FAA thinks they have power over and that they can in fact arbitrarily waive as well
its insane administrative state bullshit
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:42:55 UTC No. 16389023
>>16389016
I don't think elon is that vindictive. I think elon would rather just explain spacex's position to estronaut's audience
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:46:39 UTC No. 16389028
>>16389008
but yeah, I forgot about this F9 grounding thing but it was absolute bullshit as well
the landings don't have any safety problems when they happen out at sea, so the most the FAA should have done is something like ban RTLS until the problem is solved
grounding the whole fleet is fucking retarded, that combined with the frivolous 60 day delay to Starship and this completely frivolous fines from over one year ago are very obvious signs of the FAA being used as a politicla tool of harassment, lawfare
FAA are probably understaffed and incompetent to boot, but that doesn't explain all of this
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:47:53 UTC No. 16389031
>>16389025
it started a few years ago, but now FAA went over the line
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:48:12 UTC No. 16389032
>>16388651
It's all REDGOV vs BLUGOV so with the ascent of the space force and now star shield the lines are drawn
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:49:03 UTC No. 16389034
>>16389025
You sound like a pretentious loser. The only people I ever see unironically call themselves or others ‘punished’ is coping losers. Leave Elon out of your fantasies
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:49:26 UTC No. 16389035
>>16389034
newfag
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:50:58 UTC No. 16389036
>>16389016
The winning move is to say lets see how the courts rule on it or just say nothing.
>>16389020
Requiring the FAA to defer to NASA/USSF judgment on matters when launching from CC would fix most of this.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:52:04 UTC No. 16389037
>>16389034
newfag
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:54:38 UTC No. 16389041
>>16389034
>here's all my baggage about this stale meme
How many days did you say you were staying?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:56:03 UTC No. 16389043
>>16389034
You're the faggy redditor from earlier. I can tell lol
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:57:03 UTC No. 16389044
Space force should just handle everything related to space. They should also execute the traitors in the FAA
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:57:11 UTC No. 16389045
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:01:03 UTC No. 16389047
>>16389044
The only obvious answer.
The military should clear the way for spaceflight with absolute priority, and civilian concerns and lawsuits can fuck right the fuck off.
FAA can deal with airports, airlines, pilots, Boeing and aircraft safety, and restricting drones.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:04:02 UTC No. 16389048
>>16389025
Don't want to derail, but eyepatches are fucking kino. lmagine the aftermath of the inevitable Elon assassiaton attempt.
>spaceflight?
Will we one day see (lol) astronauts with one or blind eyes fly into space? How will zero-g affect their eyesockets, and how will gamma rays affect sight?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:05:02 UTC No. 16389049
Starship launchsites need to have permanently restricted launch corridors
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:05:56 UTC No. 16389050
>>16389044
>>16389047
Imagine NASA with that DoD budget, we could do one or two more Artemis missions.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:06:33 UTC No. 16389051
>>16389048
Meant to post, delet if uneccesary
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:08:05 UTC No. 16389053
>>16389049
Already is
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:13:38 UTC No. 16389059
>>16389053
Because Brownsville is a shitty place for launches outside of R&D testing. You cant get any reasonable inclinations except one plane, and there are too many people to bitch about the sonic booms and beach access.
Vandenberg, the Cape, and probably other host nations + offshore platforms are the future, just due to geography.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:13:59 UTC No. 16389060
>>16389053
I said permanently
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:15:07 UTC No. 16389062
relocate people if you need to
raze the nearby towns and cities, redirect flights and ship traffic
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:15:38 UTC No. 16389064
>>16389060
Does land move retard?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:16:28 UTC No. 16389066
>>16389064
are you retarded?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:17:26 UTC No. 16389067
>>16389064
Yes, it does actually.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:19:45 UTC No. 16389069
>>16389064
>>16389066
You are both retarded.
SpaceX is hoping to get airliner-safety status, meaning they will have permission to overfly land, but honestly I doubt this, so we are back to >>16389059
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:19:51 UTC No. 16389070
Saw either a very bright planet or a UFO in the western sky this evening.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:21:37 UTC No. 16389071
Something new to the FAA drama that we suddenly started caring again? Dunno who has taken them seriously since the whole Boeing debacle..
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:21:54 UTC No. 16389072
>>16389070
>UFO
uhm yikes sweety, we don't use that term anymore because it's offensive
we call them UAP now (unidentified anomalous phenomena)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:22:17 UTC No. 16389073
strap FAA apologists onto the deluge plate
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:25:01 UTC No. 16389077
>>16389025
Time to move spacex operations offshore
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:25:12 UTC No. 16389078
>>16389067
>Starbase still has a launch corridor over water and is even closer to the equator
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:26:56 UTC No. 16389081
>>16389071
FAA made up new regulations for things they didn't have claim over and amusingly enacted one of their regulations wrong
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:32:58 UTC No. 16389089
>>16388533
Why is there much fewer welds in the middle?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:35:44 UTC No. 16389090
>>16389089
internal stringers needed to support the heatshield weight?
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:38:54 UTC No. 16389092
>>16389004
watching this, its so fucking retarded that missions get randomly licensed by FAA or NASA
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:40:07 UTC No. 16389094
>>16389004
watching this, it is so fucking retarded that missions get randomly licensed by FAA or NASA
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:43:22 UTC No. 16389096
>>16389077
SpaceX should take Venezuela, build kino brutalist launch complex.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:45:01 UTC No. 16389099
>>16389006
yeah its earlier in the thread, nobody gave a shit
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:05:03 UTC No. 16389111
>>16389099
This is a tough audience to please, what the fuck do you want to discuss?
The forward flaps are so clearly out of the plasma stream now, biggest problem solved.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:07:33 UTC No. 16389113
>>16389089
I don't know why you fags say this looks ugly, it looks fine to me. The original ITS looked plasticy and cheap in comparison.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:08:34 UTC No. 16389115
>>16389072
>unidentified anomalous phenomena
Wait, they changed it from "aerial"? Lmao
Actually that name does sound pretty kino, like an SCP knockoff videogame
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:09:03 UTC No. 16389116
>>16389113
before its integrated and the ship fully built out, I think its too early to tell if this is aesthetically worse or not
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:09:35 UTC No. 16389117
>>16389025
Metal Gear Solid is for gays and weebs
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:10:04 UTC No. 16389118
>>16389115
>SCP
infiltrated by trannies now
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:11:25 UTC No. 16389121
>>16389117
>Metal Gear Solid is for [...] weebs
Do you know where we are?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:31:19 UTC No. 16389132
>>16389118
>infiltrated by trannies
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:03:57 UTC No. 16389147
>>16389121
Don't leave out the gays, they are a huge chunk of this site's crowd.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:10:51 UTC No. 16389151
>>16389147
/v/ is a fast board but I don't think they are a "huge chunk" of the userbase
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:20:13 UTC No. 16389155
>>16388526
you're making me hungry
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:26:06 UTC No. 16389158
>>16388526
>Nooo don't put any life detecting equipment on the probe
>Follow the water goyim
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:27:06 UTC No. 16389159
>>16388999
checked
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:28:47 UTC No. 16389160
>>16389118
SCP has been cucked ever since that Russian dude rugpulled everyone and trademarked it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:30:12 UTC No. 16389161
>>16388311
I will never forget this launch. It was one of the first ones I got my normie friends to watch me and when they happened they all turned and asked if that was supposed to happen.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:46:41 UTC No. 16389176
>>16389160
I was into SCP since the /x/ days, I wrote the "Josie the Half-Cat" entry.
I took at look at it again the other year, and it's on a whole new site and full of slenderman-tier larping.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:55:23 UTC No. 16389186
>>16388640
everyone already agrees with that statement.
are you the guy who's still seething because people said they were sick of politics on /sfg/ all the time?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:00:55 UTC No. 16389196
>>16389176
>full of slenderman-tier larping
lmao you weren't there when the site was first made and it was taken over by deviantart larpers.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:01:14 UTC No. 16389197
>>16388812
yeah, it was dispanded, and the fallout of them spreading to other places where they thought they were welcome can still be felt today, like you, for instance.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:06:14 UTC No. 16389204
Bleak. I’ve heard Jurveston is a pedo, I’m inclined to believe. This is a nihilist thread
https://x.com/futurejurvetson/statu
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:08:20 UTC No. 16389209
>>16388842
>yeah we could get to Mars in a week they just won't release it....
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:17:45 UTC No. 16389213
>>16388858
>Eventually he will become a SpaceX employee
No way, he clearly has some business planned for human space flight
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:31:41 UTC No. 16389222
>>16388872
The couple of retired old space NASA geezers that camp their forums had made them so tedious to read. Have to scroll past endless pages of their "I want to talk to your Manager" bitching at other posters.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:33:08 UTC No. 16389226
>>16389213
I only say he must be an employee so his family cant sue if the mission fails. Like all new crew vehicles require testing with elite NASA test pilot/astronauts, until certified for civilian use. Unless Elon's hand is forced by the US Government, and send NASA's chosen crew instead (BIG mistake), they are probably going to need to send exclusively their own employees, who legally swore on a stack of bibles, declaring explicitly their contracts "this is risky and accept death, without slowing SpaceX from trying again immediately."
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:35:19 UTC No. 16389229
>>16388607
no hotstage ring?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:39:41 UTC No. 16389231
>>16389229
don't need that for static fires or tank testing
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:43:00 UTC No. 16389235
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18370
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:47:42 UTC No. 16389240
>>16389234
China claims to have a booster shortage; yet has a million different rockets, and all of them are like
>Oriongalaxy Space Sheinzhou Dongfang15 “private” rocket
>500,000 kg mass on-par with an entire falcon 9
>1.7 T LEO
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:53:16 UTC No. 16389246
>>16389234
ToT constellation
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:18:01 UTC No. 16389266
>>16389254
Imagine the ploom
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:31:45 UTC No. 16389280
>>16389276
I think they are gonna do some catch testing now. They are lifting the booster up right now.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:32:19 UTC No. 16389281
>>16389254
The AJ-260 used a 1.1 MN thrust SRB as separate igniter firing downward into the nozzle
>The Igniter motor, designed by aerojet, flew up a sled track and was supposed to have been brought to a controlled landing by four 320 ft tethers in a small pond near the test pit, the ignited broke all the tethers as a result of a slight delay in its release from the firing position, but landed about 100ft from the planned position after a much higher flight than expected
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:33:30 UTC No. 16389283
>>16389280
Apparently they won't be doing a WDR so yeah, probably.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:35:04 UTC No. 16389285
>>16389280
yep, its up way higher than necessary to mount it on the OLM
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:47:25 UTC No. 16389297
>>16388960
yeah obviously, but nu-atheists target christianity and not other religions because that would be raycis.
Just because loads of christians did beleive in ET life doesnt mean it wouldne be one step ina long list of steps discrediting holy scripture. Back when aylmaos became popular christianity was already functionally dead for most of the population
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:48:03 UTC No. 16389299
>>16389240
Basically every chinese launchers fall within 4 categories:
>Derived from 60s hypergolic ICBMs, itself reverse engineered from 50s soviet rocket, using the same tooling,engines,infrastructure that were built under Mao.
>Derived from the same "building blocks" that China spent 25 years (1990-mid 2010s) developping from reverse engineering Energia/Zenit.
>Derived from the Solid ICBMs that the chinese developped in the 80s/90s/2000s, some are literally repurposed missiles (like the one that launched today), other are "just" civilian applications of the same technologies.
>Very Recent ones made from copying the general architecture and solutions as SpaceX has (Zhuque, Tianlong...), almost all of them have Hydrocarbon/LOX GG engines inspired by Merlin.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:00:40 UTC No. 16389309
>>16387937
>I honestly don't see what the Soviet union falling would have to do with much
Dumbest post in this thread.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:04:32 UTC No. 16389314
>>16389301
what did we do to deserve this kinda kino, bros?
i remember a few years ago elon started mentioning catching the booster as an option and the honest response was chuckling. i myself thought he was making a funny joke.
and now here we are, so close to the first catch attempt (yet so far away).
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:06:37 UTC No. 16389319
>>16388846
and then a few hours later a Kuaizhou-1A launched five more TianQi sats (IoT constellation). That makes three chinese launches in a row.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:09:24 UTC No. 16389323
>>16389240
reminds me of starship
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:11:23 UTC No. 16389327
>>16389285
is catching it on the fins really a good idea? that puts a lot of negative gees on the vehicle when its specifically built to take high positive gees...
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:12:11 UTC No. 16389329
>>16388093
I can't believe you would just sit there and watch Elon do that. A real fan would help Elon.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:12:43 UTC No. 16389330
SpaceX missed a trick by not using spherical tanks like on N1.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:12:43 UTC No. 16389331
>>16389327
there are actually catch hard points below the fins, too small to see from a security camera though
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:13:38 UTC No. 16389332
>>16389328
>2018
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:13:58 UTC No. 16389333
>>16389328
BE4 is unironically the most reusable first stage engine in the world. Theyve done a literal decade worth of fires on test engines so it must be.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:14:53 UTC No. 16389334
>>16388177
You respect Earthers?!?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:16:29 UTC No. 16389335
>>16389328
>the most advanced in the world
1: you're not developing it
2:it's not nearly as advanced as raptor and categorically worse in size, mass, thrust and probably ISP too.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:17:20 UTC No. 16389337
>>16389325
looks like the cat meme
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:18:04 UTC No. 16389338
>>16389337
That’s the point… new
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:18:21 UTC No. 16389340
>>16388177
Funny to imagine that as Mars industrialization proceeds there will still be a guy that never left his home town of 8000 people whose main concern is when the eagles will next play the redskins. That guy will probably exist on Mars by the time we visit another star
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:18:42 UTC No. 16389342
>>16389335
jef is right, you want medium performance out of a high performance archietecture to get reusability. meanwhile spacex is pushing and pushing the material limits of their raptors. a recepie for disaster when it comes to reusability.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:22:11 UTC No. 16389345
>>16389342
They have however gotten the cost of the raptor under a million and they're pushing it lower. The ship can handle some loss rate without problems and replacing them would also not be a problem
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:22:50 UTC No. 16389346
>>16389342
they need to push those limits because the ship is horrendously overweight and need to overcome that via brute force, v3's mass reduction is actually quite impressive but im eager to find out if they have fixed those v2 issues...
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:24:44 UTC No. 16389350
>>16389342
This is exactly what losers like Jeff Bezos and Peter Beck often regurgitate, because they can't figure out full flow staged combustion (which runs cooler and less stress on the turbo pumps)
They need to run their shitty engines at 80% or else they would NOT be reusable at all. Raptor 3 doesn't have this problem.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:27:55 UTC No. 16389355
>>16388509
I have moved on with my life. It has already been 9 years since the last test flight. You need to let it go.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:31:52 UTC No. 16389360
>>16388546
Look up the pickle rick tweet. It's insane.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:35:06 UTC No. 16389364
>>16388614
kek
I don't think infetterance is a real word, though.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:40:41 UTC No. 16389370
>>16388683
There's no correlation between personal politics and attitudes toward space policy. But the current administration is absolutely attacking Elon and is both in practice and ideologically anti-space.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:41:03 UTC No. 16389371
Remind me was HSR supposed to forever be expendable or is that only an adjustment made for right now?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:41:42 UTC No. 16389373
>>16388734
They're building a space force.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:42:37 UTC No. 16389376
>>16389371
only for block 1 boosters. on flight 3 the HSR literally sheared off from aerodynamic forces because it's not really integrated into the structure of the booster properly. They're dumping them in the ocean earlier in flight to avoid that
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:43:23 UTC No. 16389378
>>16388795
I already have cash to waste and I don't do anything with it
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:45:58 UTC No. 16389379
>>16388795
I already have 5 acres and if I had an extra $50k I'd put a down payment on a smaller lot. Seriously worst mistake I've ever made. Do you have any idea how long it takes to mow an acre?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:47:10 UTC No. 16389381
>>16388855
Total regulation death. Roundhouse kick regulations into the concrete. Slam dunk a regulation baby into the trash can. Curb stomp pregnant black regulations. Slice a regulation with a katana. Push old regulations down the stairs.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:47:57 UTC No. 16389382
hey guys come watch this fog
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1837125
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:49:19 UTC No. 16389384
>>16389382
So many failures lately these make me nervous
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:50:10 UTC No. 16389386
>>16388990
He's stupid.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:51:22 UTC No. 16389389
>>16389012
>That's insane
yeah
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:54:10 UTC No. 16389393
>>16389034
>thinks Elon is above retarded shit
Check out his shitposting and SNL appearance
and leave Elon out of your fantasies, NIGGER
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:55:35 UTC No. 16389396
>>16389044
Ground Non-violence has no authority and no combat troops.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:56:19 UTC No. 16389397
Just so happen to have come across a /x/tard website. They have a section for nasa lies. Heres their take on the osiris-rex missions.
https://stolenhistory.net/threads/c
This is a side of antispace that I rarely get to see.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:56:33 UTC No. 16389398
>>16389373
Whatever lets them get away with telling government agencies to go fuck themselves.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:57:50 UTC No. 16389400
>>16389073
based
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:57:52 UTC No. 16389401
coming in sideways
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:57:57 UTC No. 16389402
>>16389396
Every Guardian is a master craftsman of war
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:57:59 UTC No. 16389403
>>16387825
the military should just step in at thus point and label SS as some public skunkwerks shit and tell the FAA to piss off since space force also wants their own units.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:58:19 UTC No. 16389405
kino booster cam. look at those clouds
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:01:29 UTC No. 16389410
>>16389405
>goes through clouds
>didn't see ship until the very last second
I panicked a little ngl
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:02:49 UTC No. 16389412
>>16389338
I think he meant it looks like the meme with the stretched out cat
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:03:34 UTC No. 16389413
>>16389338
>new
no, they have just not gone to the top with the booster before
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:05:16 UTC No. 16389415
>>16389398
Amen!
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:10:06 UTC No. 16389417
The moon landing was fake and gay.
Debunk these 14 points https://centerforaninformedamerica.
Protip: you can't
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:10:46 UTC No. 16389418
>>16389417
back to /pol/ with you
>>>/pol/
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:11:23 UTC No. 16389420
>>16389342
this is bullshit to cope with the fact that it's an inferior engine in every way.
they could reduce maximum thrust on the raptor and that would give it bigger safety margins than the BE-4 AND still keep all of it's other stats far above the BE-4.
it's simply an inferior and less mature engine design, stop crying about it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:12:28 UTC No. 16389422
>>16389420
blue will land on the moon before spacex. watch.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:13:29 UTC No. 16389423
>>16389418
Thats /x/ stuff retard.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:13:33 UTC No. 16389424
>>16389418
Inb4 samefagged replies saying /pol/ and politics is good
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:13:42 UTC No. 16389425
I don't really know anything about particle accelerators, but could you scale them up a thousand fold if you build one in space? like LISA is to LIGO. or are there some issues like needing physical hardware every so many feet?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:14:46 UTC No. 16389431
>>16389423
They both are flerf and moon landing denier boards.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:15:18 UTC No. 16389433
>>16389414
was looking through the archive for this image
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:15:41 UTC No. 16389436
>>16389425
>but could you scale them up a thousand fold if you build one in space?
no
all you can really do is wait for extremely energetic cosmic rays to impact your stuff in space but building a giant particle accelerator in space is counterproductive
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:17:03 UTC No. 16389437
>>16389425
The real usecase for CERN type equipment in space is for x-ray free electron laser killsats.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:20:58 UTC No. 16389440
>>16389437
that's an interesting idea actually... why do they use missiles to destroy sats, when they could throw a bunch of heavy, high energy particles at them?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:23:31 UTC No. 16389443
>>16389323
Hahah
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:23:50 UTC No. 16389444
>>16389440
>>16389437
Didn’t a particle beam go through a jannys head at one of these things and he lived to be old. How exactly would these destroy satellites? It’s only a few billion particles. Or maybe I’m thinking about it wrong?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:24:25 UTC No. 16389446
>>16388885
He should make it with giant Optimus hands.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:25:30 UTC No. 16389449
>>16389444
AFAIK he got a hole in his head and was lucky to live for long.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:25:50 UTC No. 16389451
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:25:52 UTC No. 16389452
>>16389444
XFELs can vaporize steel targets over an AU away. They're an actual planetary defense weapon.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:28:47 UTC No. 16389456
>>16389451
Pictograms are awesome. You can speak any language and understand these basically universally-agreed upon symbols
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:29:56 UTC No. 16389458
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:30:26 UTC No. 16389459
>>16389449
He’s still alive and he had no hole in his head. He didn’t speak about it until a decade after. The only thing that happened was he went bald where it passed through. Why speak when you don’t know anything? This is just false info.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:32:01 UTC No. 16389461
>>16389459
Well not the only thing but like in terms of physically holes happening in his head that’s the only thing that actually happened I mean. He of course has more underlying ailments now and had seizures and such but physically this was about the only thing that happened in a hole like manner.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:32:48 UTC No. 16389464
>>16389028
>grounding the whole fleet is fucking retarded
Having worked in aviation, that part is pretty standard. It allows you to check every vehicle faster and more safely. A three day safety stand down is not punitive IMO.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:33:14 UTC No. 16389466
>>16389459
I’ve known about this story for a long time, it’s a very popular “interesting trivia” topic.
But what I don’t understand is how you get into the looney tunes scenario of sticking your head into an active particle accelerator like how do the stars even align for this to accidentally happen
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:35:44 UTC No. 16389468
>>16389466
He had told them to turn it off prior. They didn’t. Then the safety checks weren’t in place to warn him it was on either. So he simply went to do his job which he thought he was safe to do and it turns out it wasn’t.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:35:47 UTC No. 16389470
>>16389464
but this was not a safety issue and not an issue for launch success either
it was a landing issue, something that no other rocket does
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:36:36 UTC No. 16389471
>>16389444
>>16389459
a jannies brain is more empty and robust than sensitive electronics
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:37:04 UTC No. 16389473
>>16389467
I’m going to embarrassingly soiface so hard when the tower catch actually works (if flight 5 is ever happens ffs)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:38:48 UTC No. 16389475
>>16389470
did they ground the fleet for the landing failure? even when it was happening I couldn't find an explicit statement from someone involved that falcon was grounded. the FAA just said they were requiring an investigation.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:39:35 UTC No. 16389476
>>16389475
Yes, they did
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:40:38 UTC No. 16389477
>>16389476
source plz
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:41:52 UTC No. 16389478
>>16389470
That’s still a safety issue. And I’m just arguing from my perspective and experience. I’ve seen entire fleets grounded for a worn bolt hole. It wasn’t a safety issue in the sense that people could die, but rather that shot could fall off the plane that wasn’t supposed to. Turns out every plane in the fleet had the same wear, and now that bolt is on the maintenance checklist (that mode doesn’t fly anymore so it’s moot, but still).
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:42:26 UTC No. 16389479
>>16389471
Turns out he was a particle physicist but was checking on a malfunctioned piece of equipment. Still didn’t have his PhD yet
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:43:41 UTC No. 16389481
>>16389478
its not
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:47:37 UTC No. 16389488
>>16389418
I'll take that as an admission you can't refute it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:47:37 UTC No. 16389489
>>16389477
Literally jsut google ‘falcon 9 FAA grounding’
They grounded the fleet for a few days, then decided to allow flights to resume while they were investigating
https://spacenews.com/spacex-resume
https://www.npr.org/2024/08/28/g-s1
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:47:59 UTC No. 16389490
>>16389379
Plant wildflowers and call it a meadow. Get bees and register as a farm. Then you just need to mow like twice a year.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:48:30 UTC No. 16389491
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:49:02 UTC No. 16389493
>>16389490
BZZZZZZZZZZpilled
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:51:14 UTC No. 16389498
>>16389488
you posted a fucking novel, i'm not gonna bother reading through a novel of /x/pol/-slop just to use basic logic and a high school understanding of physics to rebuke it
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:52:53 UTC No. 16389500
>>16389498
>waaaaaahh it's too much!
I accept your concession.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:54:47 UTC No. 16389504
>>16389467
is it just me or does this thing look cleaner/less dirty than previous boosters? i don't mean in terms of design i literally just mean it looks a lot shinier with less blemishes.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:56:18 UTC No. 16389510
>>16389500
>NOOO YOU MUST READ THE /X/AI MOON LANDING HOAX SLOP NOVEL OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN
why don't you investigate if it could have happened instead of latching onto fringe arguments (never any solid ones) about why it didn't?
you're just wasting time with bad faith arguments disguised in some /pol/ novel
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:57:22 UTC No. 16389511
>>16389510
How you read what I linked, maybe you'll learn something....
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:58:01 UTC No. 16389513
>>16389500
whats your best argument? make it concise
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:58:25 UTC No. 16389514
>>16389511
have you read what you linked?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:59:03 UTC No. 16389515
>>16389509
>Israel
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:00:02 UTC No. 16389516
>>16389504
Manufacturing is still improving. I hope the final product is 50s scifi shiny
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:01:54 UTC No. 16389518
>>16389500
pretending to be retarded and being retarded are both equally bad anon, just saying, there's no scenario where you are not a loser right now.
underage kids really do this and think it's trolling.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:01:57 UTC No. 16389519
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/53199
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:02:27 UTC No. 16389521
>>16389440
was already tried by the SDI in 1989
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:03:14 UTC No. 16389523
>>16389519
Can you go back to posting screenshot together with Xeets? Saves me the trouble of having to open it
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:03:23 UTC No. 16389524
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:03:25 UTC No. 16389526
>>16389509
>european spaceflight hinges on a single bureaucrat in the EU
what a pathetic culture
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:04:49 UTC No. 16389529
>>16389519
What could this be? micro starlinks or some new constellation with a different purpose?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:05:47 UTC No. 16389532
>>16389526
>he says as the US FAA stops spacex from launching starship
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:06:56 UTC No. 16389535
>>16389526
you guys are in no position to make statements like that rn lol.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:06:59 UTC No. 16389536
>>16389529
>November 10, 2014
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:07:40 UTC No. 16389537
>>16389514
Of course.
>>16389513
The moon landings are a hoax.
>>16389518
>if you don't accept the moon hoax you're trolling!
I shouldn't have expected anything better from 4chan...
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:07:57 UTC No. 16389538
>>16389536
so probably regular starlinks then
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:09:06 UTC No. 16389541
>>16389537
>10 minutes for a shallow cope post
not looking good anon, if you actually read what you posted you could sum it up and actually argumentate why it's le hoax
but you didn't.
so you didn't read it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:10:18 UTC No. 16389542
>>16389473
You can just say "i'll be excited when this happens" and not sound like a dork
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:11:30 UTC No. 16389543
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:12:19 UTC No. 16389544
>>16389473
I'm practicing my hand flapping as we speak
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:13:41 UTC No. 16389545
>>16389544
it'll be one of those rare moments where an estronaut style basedface and jumping up and down like a toddler are completely acceptable and appropriate behaviour, just like when flight 4 made it against all odds.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:14:29 UTC No. 16389547
>>16389491
>>16389542
>>16389544
don’t care, still dropping my jaw and standing up out of my chair and pointing at my screen when it happens. You can all be posh losers and pretend to act calm even when nobody is in the room with you when you are watching the live stream
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:14:31 UTC No. 16389548
>>16389537
The burden of proof is on you you stupid bantu, you're coming in here claiming "ITS A HOAX!!!" but you won't even write down a single argument, you're simply not worth arguing with if you can't even form an argument to begin with and just go "COPE I WON!!!" when someone says you have to from an argument
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:15:22 UTC No. 16389550
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:16:19 UTC No. 16389551
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:17:07 UTC No. 16389552
>>16389548
I’m less curious about the lack of moon landing and more curious about them all seeing UFOs.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:17:09 UTC No. 16389553
>>16389551
Shoot frogs
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:17:41 UTC No. 16389555
>>16389547
when the flap started glowing i unconsciously jumped out of my seat and started shaking, my heartrate spiked and it only got more extreme as it came through, survived, and landed safely.
it's one of those moments that far future historians may very well mark as the make or break moment for humanity.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:18:02 UTC No. 16389556
>>16389547
Yeah I'll be excited too, I'm just not going to describe it like a terminally online meme addict
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:18:44 UTC No. 16389557
>>16389552
Why are you deflecting?
Are you really unable to form an argument based on this novel that you *totally* read?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:19:17 UTC No. 16389558
>>16389537
>The moon landings are a hoax.
that is a statement, not an argument
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:20:05 UTC No. 16389559
>>16389556
yet that’s what you are nonetheless, curious
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:21:18 UTC No. 16389560
>>16389556
>i'm scared of showing my emotions for fear of social repercussion.
you do you.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:21:19 UTC No. 16389561
>>16389557
Oh sorry. nta
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:23:37 UTC No. 16389563
>>16389509
>He competes against the entire space industry on his own
>In order to compete with Space X, the entire European space sector must be united and ambitious
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:24:13 UTC No. 16389564
>>16389559
>>16389560
"OMFG SOIFAAAACE"
Talk like adults, you fags.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:26:51 UTC No. 16389566
>>16389564
>I-I'M AN ADULT BECAUSE I TALK IN A VERY SPECIFIC WAY AND I NEVER SHARE HOW I FEEL EVEN DURING SUPER HYPE MOMENTS BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT ADULTS DO
this is actually how a lot of teenagers see the world, yes.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:34:45 UTC No. 16389573
>>16389566
kek, you will never learn. gen alpha incel.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:35:28 UTC No. 16389574
>>16389573
>t. seething millennial
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:39:11 UTC No. 16389579
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:39:14 UTC No. 16389580
>>16389566
I don't know man, millennials do that too now.
>dude beard oil
Very superficial perception of adulthood
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:49:30 UTC No. 16389586
>>16389158
remember when they poured some isotopically labelled sugar water on Mars surface and then claimed bacteria were metabolising it to CO2 when in reality it was perchlorates on surface chemically reacting with it instead?
I do.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:58:19 UTC No. 16389600
>>16389541
Unlike you losers I have a life outside 4chan.
>>16389543
see >>16389537
>>16389548
the arguments are in what I linked. I've already spoonfed you enough.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:58:21 UTC No. 16389601
>>16389573
i accept your concession.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:59:32 UTC No. 16389604
>>16389600
see >>16389518
actually read it this time, kid.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:59:34 UTC No. 16389605
>>16389601
>>16389579
throat my cock bitch.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:59:46 UTC No. 16389606
>>16389560
You can be excited for launch to the point that you’re on the edge of your seat but no normal person even if they’re not hiding their emotions screams like a little girl at a launch like this. Look at how sportsballs fans react to their team scoring a touchdown. Thats what a normal person looks like. You stamping your feet flappin your hands pointing at the screen and screaming unintelligible things because you’re about to cream your pants at the thought of a launch is not normal. Being excited is normal. (You) are not
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:00:20 UTC No. 16389608
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:00:41 UTC No. 16389609
>>16389605
that's not a very adult response anon...
adults don't talk like that.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:01:20 UTC No. 16389611
>>16389608
damn I messed it up
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:01:51 UTC No. 16389613
>>16389604
see >>16389537
actually read it this time, kid.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:01:51 UTC No. 16389614
>>16389606
>Screaming unintelligible things
you're adding a bunch of hallucinations to the description that were never mentioned lol.
so desperate to win something, what i don't know.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:02:40 UTC No. 16389616
>>16389609
you cant talk with my dick in your throat idiot.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:02:52 UTC No. 16389617
>>16389608
bulli this anon.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:03:54 UTC No. 16389618
>>16389613
>no u levels of rage-induced retardation now.
i'm sorry this >>16389518 post made you really mad but that's no reason to have a temper tantrum.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:04:15 UTC No. 16389619
what is all this stupid shit about?
If this place is going to suck, I will just go to X
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:06:37 UTC No. 16389622
>>16389619
go back delta9250. nobody gives a fuck.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:07:12 UTC No. 16389623
>>16389619
>what is all this stupid shit about?
it's about retards feeding the troll
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:07:28 UTC No. 16389624
>>16389616
talk like an adult, you fag.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:08:46 UTC No. 16389629
>>16389619
Ok. Go back then. Bye now.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:09:15 UTC No. 16389630
>>16389618
>gets mad when I put int the same level of effort you do
Maybe actually engage next time kiddo
see>>16389537
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:11:56 UTC No. 16389634
>>16389613
>kid
Holy shit you are literally 12 how the fuck did you find this site
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:12:35 UTC No. 16389636
nothing personnel kid
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:13:34 UTC No. 16389637
>>16389630
>level of effort
the only reason that i'm reminding you you're an underage who doesn't understand what trolling is because your posts were so low effort, i actually respect high effort trolls.
sorry kid, but the only attention you're getting is reminders that you are not smarter than a retard for merely pretending to be one, it's been that way since the dawn of time, it's still that way now, see >>16389518
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:13:48 UTC No. 16389638
>>16389624
It’s a literal child notice the poster saying kid allot. The only time I’ve ever heard someone call another person kid this often is literal fetuses in VC on a game or in text chat. I did this when I was young and I’m sure you did as well if you’re not a boomer
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:14:05 UTC No. 16389640
>>16389624
This, anon has been posting "suck my dick" and "I fucked ur dad" repeatedly for the last few days like it's his first week on the internet. Children should not be on this website.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:15:45 UTC No. 16389641
>>16389640
Good point. Another one for the ‘You must be 18 or older’ bin. Does anyone have that Komarov image?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:17:59 UTC No. 16389643
enough shit slinging listen to this loud ass chinese rocket
>>>/wsg/5684902
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:18:09 UTC No. 16389644
>>16389637
>still trying to dodge the issue
https://centerforaninformedamerica.
I'm waiting.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:18:32 UTC No. 16389645
>all this seething because i called the troll underage
that's hilarious, jannies aren't going to do anything about pretend retards anyways so i might as well bully them while they're here.
also i aint >>16389616 >>16389605 i was actually the one making fun of him for giving a shit how people talk.
this whole seething maelstrom because i called the tardling in question a kid is another good example of that.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:19:32 UTC No. 16389647
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:20:40 UTC No. 16389650
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:22:01 UTC No. 16389653
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:22:14 UTC No. 16389654
fags
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:22:50 UTC No. 16389656
>>16389647
>>16389650
>>16389653
see>>16389647
and >>16389650
and>>16389653
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:25:50 UTC No. 16389661
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:26:30 UTC No. 16389663
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:27:13 UTC No. 16389664
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:27:31 UTC No. 16389665
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:28:46 UTC No. 16389668
>>16389660
Why am I supposed to care about Kineis again
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:29:30 UTC No. 16389670
>>16389660
electron launches are fun even if it's a small rocket. the launch site is so pretty and it's not as played out as falcon
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:29:33 UTC No. 16389671
>>16389668
I don't either but I like Electron, I just think its neat.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:30:04 UTC No. 16389672
>>16389666
No you don’t Satan
>>16389671
No but what are they.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:30:52 UTC No. 16389673
>>16389672
try and stop me froggy
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:31:00 UTC No. 16389674
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:31:32 UTC No. 16389676
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:31:54 UTC No. 16389677
>>16389673
Actually no keep going. Shitting up this thread is good.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:32:06 UTC No. 16389678
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:33:30 UTC No. 16389682
>>16389677
there's no salvaging it but at least this is adjacent to being topical
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:34:14 UTC No. 16389683
>>16389672
>Second batch of five satellites for the French Kinéis IoT constellation designed to operate with 25 nanosatellites of 30 kg each. The constellation will enable Kinéis, a company backed by private and public investors including the French government’s space agency CNES (Centre National d'Études Spatiales) and CLS (Collecte Localisation Satellites) an international space-based solutions provider, to improve its global IoT connectivity.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:40:50 UTC No. 16389688
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:41:30 UTC No. 16389689
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:43:20 UTC No. 16389692
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:45:22 UTC No. 16389694
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/
Jai hind. Though it doesn't take much if your competition after US and China is Russia/Europe.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:46:07 UTC No. 16389696
>>16389692
>starship lovers with sls
yurifags are retarded
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:46:54 UTC No. 16389697
>>16389694
It is the world’s third largest. wtf does europe have right now? Russia?
The pecking order is USA>Chinks>Saars
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:48:44 UTC No. 16389700
>>16389694
>Third largest space power
And it only took 10 launches kek
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:49:30 UTC No. 16389701
>>16389694
I don't have hard data but it feels like they get a much better value for their money than other major players (spacex excluded, obviously)
>>16389696
the rockets are lesbos, sorry to break it to you
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:50:08 UTC No. 16389704
>>16389697
Whatever launches ArianneGroup is able to wring out of ESA for Arianne-6 and the odd weather/GPS sat
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:50:43 UTC No. 16389705
>>16389697
More solar system probes and satellites.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:51:01 UTC No. 16389706
>>16389701
Starship hates sls retard
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:51:20 UTC No. 16389707
>>16389704
Europe currently launches their unambitious projects on The Launcher aka Falcon 9
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:51:56 UTC No. 16389708
>>16389689
see >>16389518
i know you haven't because it states plainly that it doesn't matter whether or not you're an actual retard (moon landing denier) or pretend retard (underage user), you're a moron and a loser for it either way, there's simply no winning proposition on your end, i'm sorry.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:52:30 UTC No. 16389709
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:52:40 UTC No. 16389710
>>16389701
Keep posting this thread but let’s not do this shit next thread jah?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:53:36 UTC No. 16389713
>>16389708
holy shit you two need to shut the fuck up
>>16389710
that's the plan. I'll probably stop here as soon as the two retards stop posting at eachother
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:54:36 UTC No. 16389715
>>16389274
>censored
did you mean [redacted]
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:55:12 UTC No. 16389717
>>16389701
>>16389706
Like starship is obviously in love with starship tanker, they're constantly having orbital dolphin sex like come on
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:55:13 UTC No. 16389718
I've gotten banned for less than this dumb shit
I also know that jannies visit this general
jannies, do your fucking work, jfc.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:56:15 UTC No. 16389719
So are they gonna have replaceable launch mounts?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:56:25 UTC No. 16389721
>>16389718
This
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:57:07 UTC No. 16389722
>>16389712
>expected catch height
higher than I would have expected. maybe to keep flame off the OLM? but it's only 3 throttled down engines, maybe the damage adds up over time.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:58:26 UTC No. 16389723
>>16389712
>>16389716
>>16389720
Hey, hold on there, not so fast buddy.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:01:06 UTC No. 16389727
>>16389723
What's up, bud?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:04:47 UTC No. 16389732
>>16389719
Expendable TPS tiles, hot stage rings, ground system launch mounts, chopstick fixes between every flight, COPV replacements, the list is dire
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:07:31 UTC No. 16389733
>>16389722
Higher Isp means longer flames.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:07:34 UTC No. 16389734
>>16389732
not to mention the fact that the tps cant withstand entry from anything above leo LOL
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:08:37 UTC No. 16389739
>>16389722
>Adds up over time
It probably would given the launch cadence that SpaceX is looking at for the boosters especially with all of the damage that OLM takes on lift-off, the new flame trench on OLM-2 will mitigate that improving longevity.
I still suspect that the current tower will need to undergo a big redesign to not only increase height (definitely going to happen with Starship V.2 & 3) but to also improve the range of motion of the catch arms and minimize the tower shaking when it moves the arms
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:09:49 UTC No. 16389743
It’s still reusable if you are reusing human labor to build new ships for every flight
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:11:22 UTC No. 16389749
the state of muskcel cope
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:14:33 UTC No. 16389753
the state of bezoscuck cope
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:15:17 UTC No. 16389754
the state of becktard cope
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:15:39 UTC No. 16389755
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:17:39 UTC No. 16389760
the state of kemptroon cope
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:17:41 UTC No. 16389761
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:17:48 UTC No. 16389762
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:18:51 UTC No. 16389764
Report them for spam idgaf
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:19:23 UTC No. 16389765
>>16389764
>announcing a report
Reported!
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:20:39 UTC No. 16389768
spacex peaked years ago
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:22:32 UTC No. 16389772
>>16389768
SpaceX peaked with flight 4.
Reentry footage was kino and you know it. Unfortunately flight 5 will never happen. FAA too busy huffing their own farts to do the paperwork.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:22:50 UTC No. 16389773
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:23:02 UTC No. 16389774
the state of brunofag cope
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:23:33 UTC No. 16389776
>>16389768
if youre talking about efficiency then 100% unironically true. they developed falcon 1 and 9 for a tiny fraciton of the cost of what a legacy provider would take. then falcon heavy cost 1.5 BILLION. which was pretty high and similar to a legacy company. Now starship costs at least 15 BILLION and hasnt even reached a useable state. by the time it is working it will cost more than SLS.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:23:52 UTC No. 16389777
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:26:45 UTC No. 16389780
>>16389720
A downpour of superheated hot staging rings raining upon the gulf
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:31:15 UTC No. 16389786
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:31:47 UTC No. 16389787
indua is the 3rd largest space power
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:31:59 UTC No. 16389788
This is what lack of spaceflight does to a general
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:32:17 UTC No. 16389789
>>16389778
>centaur
>not a centaur
where is the horsepussy?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:32:27 UTC No. 16389790
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:33:41 UTC No. 16389793
>>16389788
2 rockets have already launched today. a third is scheduled for this afternoon. it's gotten to the point we can't function unless an rocket that isn't falcon or chinese is currently in the air.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:33:46 UTC No. 16389794
>>16389791
>launching anyway
HOLY BASED
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:34:01 UTC No. 16389796
>>16389768
Honestly the falcon heavy test is probably the peak so far for a normal person. A car with a space suit orbiting the earth is something everyone can understand and get excited about
>what? a metal version of the space shuttle blew up again? why would I care?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:35:05 UTC No. 16389799
>>16389787
>NARMAL
Next ISRO launch when? I may not care about what they are launching but I will at least be entertained
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:37:14 UTC No. 16389800
>>16389776
To be fair, falcon 1, falcon 9, and even falcon heavy are all things that have been done before. Landing them hasn't, but they iterated to that after having a functional vehicle. Nothing like starship has ever existed, there is no playbook to follow. They have to spend money on failure after failure. It still isn't even guaranteed
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:37:32 UTC No. 16389801
>>16389797
>smelly
>mouldy
>random fires
the wild west days
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:38:22 UTC No. 16389804
>>16389697
Why don't you go look at the actual launches this year retard?
India has only launched 3 times this year, 1 SSLV (<1t LEO capability), 1 PSLV (3t LEO), 1 GSLV (6t LEO)
Russia's at 11 launches, of larger vehicles, and for Europe the single Ariane 6 launch is more capable than India's launches combined
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:39:36 UTC No. 16389806
>Romania's ANCOM delegation met in Washington with the FCC in order to develop a strategic collaboration between the countries in the area of satellite communications. Shortly after they met with SpaceX representatives on coverage in remote areas.
>Looks like Romania puts their citizens first, unlike the FCC...
https://x.com/SERobinsonJr/status/1
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:41:50 UTC No. 16389809
>>16389796
>Made in earth by humans
>Stained with dried up jizz
Yeah you dirty little circuit board. You were MADE by us bitch. Now take this hot load.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:44:40 UTC No. 16389811
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:49:52 UTC No. 16389816
>>16389804
Japan is also ahead of India, by the way.
I don't know why people believe India is going to somehow become a leader in spaceflight, their delusional optimism is mocked everywhere else online for a reason. "India superpower by 2020" became a meme because of that
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:49:56 UTC No. 16389817
>>16389811
see >>16389786
i'm really enjoying how hard you're seething
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:52:46 UTC No. 16389821
INDIA SUPERPOOER 2024
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:53:14 UTC No. 16389822
>>16389796
Only because it's hard to show the real scale (just the size of it, that's crazy) on a stream in an effective way. Being at a Falcon heavy launch and RTLS vs a superheavy/ship catch in person would be an easy choice
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:56:21 UTC No. 16389825
>>16389804
>>16389816
>>16389821
sars... durgasoft flightcontrol avionics java
nagoor babu sir weapon of durga
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:56:54 UTC No. 16389826
>>16389817
see >>16389537
i'm really enjoying how hard you're ignoring https://centerforaninformedamerica.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:57:02 UTC No. 16389827
how small of a rocket could viably carry 3 astronauts and dock with a space station? Soyuz is a pretty small rocket, but the spacecraft could theoretically lose the orbit module and fly on an even smaller rocket.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:02:15 UTC No. 16389834
>>16389826
you're clearly not, you're really mad that there is no victory in this ultimatum, you are either a retard or a socially awkward moron who thinks pretending to be a moon landing denier is trolling (it isn't)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:05:37 UTC No. 16389839
>>16389834
Keep dancing around the issue
You cannot refute https://centerforaninformedamerica.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:07:01 UTC No. 16389841
>>16389839
see >>16389518
pretending to be retarded = bad
actually retarded = also bad
this was established almost 2 decades ago now, and you still haven't learned.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:07:33 UTC No. 16389842
>>16389841
STOP REPLYING TO HIM YOU STUPID FAGGOT
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:08:28 UTC No. 16389844
>>16389827
There really isn't a hard answer because that's never been a design objective of any rocket I'm aware of. Based on existing rockets something around the size of Electron would be a starting point.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:08:38 UTC No. 16389845
>>16389842
he must be reminded at every turn that pretending to be retarded is also retarded.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:09:07 UTC No. 16389847
>>16389841
see >>16389537
retarded moon hoax believer calling others retards is rich
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:10:03 UTC No. 16389848
When is stoke gonna save us from high crew launch costs
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:10:07 UTC No. 16389849
>>16389845
He isn't pretending. Unfortunately I think neither are you
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:10:36 UTC No. 16389851
I will pick endless FAA bashing over whatever is going on in this thread.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:10:37 UTC No. 16389852
>>16389847
pretending to be retarded is the same as being actually retarded.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:11:17 UTC No. 16389854
>>16389852
retarded moon hoax believer calling others retards is rich
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:11:38 UTC No. 16389855
>>16389849
i'm not pretending to bully this poor little guy, no, i'm actually doing that.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:12:40 UTC No. 16389857
>>16389854
moon is not a hoax though, and you are retarded if you think that, you're also retarded if you're pretending to be someone who thinks that.
why is there so much steam coming out of your ears? you should calm down.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:13:13 UTC No. 16389859
Does super heavy get caught on the pins or the grid fins? I thought they were doing grid fins because that's easier, and if the ship is slightly rotated the pins would miss. But I've never seen any actual information on it. And the catch arms would need additional hardware to pick the ship off the grid fins and settle it on the pins to secure it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:13:25 UTC No. 16389860
>>16389839
>https://centerforaninformedamerica
IP grabber. do NOT click or open.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:13:28 UTC No. 16389861
>>16389844
I've thought about that but electron is too small for even one person. with a 700 lb payload capacity, even if you limit your astronauts to 100 lb short women, you only get 600 lbs for pressure vessel, life support, attitude control, and docking port. that's a hard ask.
I think you could *maybe* squeeze by on 3 tons for 3 people.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:13:51 UTC No. 16389862
>>16389857
retarded moon hoax believer calling others retards is rich
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:15:48 UTC No. 16389865
>>16389861
>you only get 600 lbs for pressure vessel, life support, attitude control, and docking port
I bet you could do an even more stripped down Gemini like that, if you're wearing a suit what do you need a hull for anyway?
>>16389862
>>16389857
fuck off
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:16:20 UTC No. 16389866
>>16389859
Pins, fins might be backup plan though. I'm not sure what the plan is if super heavy attempts the catch but for whatever reason can't position itself properly to be caught. Does it have enough fuel to gtfo of there or do we get a nice explosion?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:19:26 UTC No. 16389868
>>16389865
you could make the capsule not store pressure. that adds risk and the need to dock to an airlock on the space station.
I've been coming at this from the perspective of using international docking system standard but if you really wanted to save weight you could design an new standard that is narrower gauge and has a built in airlock on the station side.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:24:06 UTC No. 16389871
>>16389868(me)
you could also not have a docking port at all and force the station to birth the entire capsule into a large airlock to save even more mass. but I don't think that's in the spirit of the question so I'm not going to consider it.
let's say no birthing, the spacecraft has to be pressurized and be able to maneuver and dock itself.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:31:31 UTC No. 16389876
>>16389862
>more seething
delicious
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:33:35 UTC No. 16389878
>>16389871
How long can an MMU keep someone alive? If you've got some tethered life support during rendezvous then you only need to disconnect and maneuver over to the station yourself and go inside the airlock. If no berthing like you say then this probably won't work, what's a docking ring weigh anyway? It'd probably be the bulk of your 500lb spacecraft.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:36:19 UTC No. 16389880
>>16389827
I don't think a capsule carrying three crew could get much smaller than 5-6,000 kg, so you'd need a rocket at least as big as an Antares or a Zhuque-2. I did find a proposal for a 4,800 kg capsule that would have launched on a Delta II but it was just a 2-seater.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/199
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:41:09 UTC No. 16389882
>>16389880
8 tons reusable is Neutron's sweet spot so you could definitely put a two man crew bus on it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:45:04 UTC No. 16389887
Between reflights do they completely empty out and clean F9 tanks during refurb or is it likely they just leave the little bits of RP-1 left in the tank and just top it off when it needs to launch next
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:47:39 UTC No. 16389892
>>16389878
a few hours
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:48:38 UTC No. 16389895
>>16389882
>Only two
Not really economical. Hell, even 4 at a time isn't really economical with partial reuse, as shown by axiom.
Really you need to bring up 7+ or use a fully reusable small rocket and bring up 4 at a time. 2 is pretty pointless.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:50:31 UTC No. 16389898
>>16389880
good find, thanks. actually looks like it seats 5 packing them in like sardines. so it could definitely lose some weight shrinking it down to 3 seats and using more modern systems like using RCS fuel for abort like dragon does.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:51:25 UTC No. 16389899
>>16389895
>you need to bring up 7+
Really shows how shortsighted NASA was forcing Dragon to become a 4 seater.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:58:53 UTC No. 16389906
The funniest outcome would be finally doing a mission into Europa’s mysterious ocean, finding hydrothermal vents and perfect Earth-like conditions… and just not finding any life at all. Not an iota of it. No weird blood worms, no extremophile single-cell creatures. It’s just barren.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:00:47 UTC No. 16389907
>>16389899
It's like 55 million per seat roughly goes down to 31 million ish with 7 people. Not great but still 24 mil cheaper per person.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:03:18 UTC No. 16389909
>>16389906
Wrong.
The funniest outcome would be discovering microbial life on Europa. Having it be a huge deal the world over for about a week, only for the grey niggas to show up and completely overshadow that accomplishment.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:05:30 UTC No. 16389913
>>16389906
Correct. This is also what will probably happen
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:06:28 UTC No. 16389914
>>16389906
At that point just send a bunch of Octopuses there
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:07:03 UTC No. 16389915
>>16389907
>The publication reveals that Axiom is due to pay $670 million to SpaceX for four Crew Dragon missions, each of which includes a launch and ride for four astronauts to and from the station encompassing a one- to two-week period. This equates to $167.5 million per launch, or $41.9 million per seat.
If you take the $67 million figure and do the same calculation, you get per seat price of 24 million which is BO NS territory.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:07:18 UTC No. 16389916
>>16389909
>>16389906
incorrect
funnier would be if they find a rich ecosystem of multicellular life, even some vertebrate analogs, and surviving extremophiles on the probe infect the ecosystem and kill all the alien life.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:08:07 UTC No. 16389918
>>16389716
>they got fined for dumping water here
clown world
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:11:08 UTC No. 16389919
>>16389915
Gentle reminder that at the GAO’s launch/cost figure of roughly $1 billion for Orion, four astronauts means each seat costs $250,000,000 and somehow this is supposed to be acceptable
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:18:09 UTC No. 16389924
>>16389920
Year of the tipped landers
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:21:50 UTC No. 16389927
>>16389919
The point is NASA's decision to not allow Dragon propulsive landing had the domino effect of jeopardizing their own CLD program because of high seat cost.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:21:58 UTC No. 16389928
>>16389899
I suspect it was some shuttleboomer not wanting to admit that the arm and cargo bay were the only things Shuttle did better than Dragon.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:22:01 UTC No. 16389929
yet another lawsuit to slow down spacex as much as possible
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:22:51 UTC No. 16389931
>>16389920
VIPER is also way bigger than I thought. I envisioned it as a tiny little RC car but it turns out it’s pretty damn big
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:24:55 UTC No. 16389934
>>16389929
What the fuck bwahahahah based SpaceX. I hope Elon builds an X Corp trumpwall just to spite those leftyfags.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:27:24 UTC No. 16389938
>>16389929
curiously, it looks like the same land that they bought awhile back. it looks like this is going to be another one of those situations where spacex owns all the land except one tiny plot that they're not allowed to develop on and will keep suing them just to be annoying.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:28:08 UTC No. 16389940
>>16389929
Cards against cheetoman spent 2 million on a worthless plot of land? Amazing.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:29:49 UTC No. 16389941
>>16389915
>41 mil per seat.
Seems the 55mil figure is out of date then. Either way it's still not economical for small stations unless they start putting up 7 at a time. 1-2 Station keepers. 2-4 government/nasa researchers and the rest could be space tourists.
Ideally we get a fully reusable medium lift specifically for crew and cargo. Hopefully stoke makes a 10-15ton rocket that can do 4-7 crew to orbit with just the price of fuel /refurb being the main factor in cost. That would allow for small space stations to live comfortably in orbit with ticket prices in the 100k range rather than 20 million
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:29:51 UTC No. 16389942
>>16389929
>against humanity
Living up to the name
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:31:05 UTC No. 16389944
>>16389940
no they probably spent a few thousand and pocketed the rest
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:34:47 UTC No. 16389949
>>16389929
that's surprising, i thought they at least had a sense of humor but apparently they suffer from both terminal TDS and EDS
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:39:28 UTC No. 16389957
>>16389929
The state needs to sponsor lobotomies for Ars commenters, it's the only way they could ever act human.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:39:52 UTC No. 16389958
i said after flight 4 that it would really scare the fuck out of EDS'ers and kick them into high gear when it comes to interfering with spacex, they can see spacex is succeeding now and will do everything in their power to stop them because their entire personalities and worldviews hang on spacex being a failure.
i was right.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:40:34 UTC No. 16389959
>>16389957
yep there's lots of comments that are calling for spacex employees to be hunted down and shot to death and for spacex's stuff to get destroyed
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:40:36 UTC No. 16389960
>>16389929
Just kill their CEO
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:41:14 UTC No. 16389961
>>16389955
>>16389957
that's what you get for reading ars comments on an article that wasn't written by berger or clark
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:41:48 UTC No. 16389962
>>16389957
But what would you do if you couldn't gossip about retard commenters. Clearly it's your passion.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:41:48 UTC No. 16389963
>>16389961
even berger's articles are full of EDSfags now
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:44:12 UTC No. 16389966
I'm starting to think this thread is half bots
you "guys" support your beloved leader even when he takes over private property?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:44:21 UTC No. 16389967
>>16389959
EDS giving way to Elon fatigue thanks to over-reporting
"I'm just so tired"
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:45:33 UTC No. 16389968
>>16389966
i'm reserving judgement on this until we know absolutely for sure that this story is being wholly truthful and not leaving out fine details, as anti-spacexers usually do.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:46:57 UTC No. 16389970
>>16389966
*God-Emperor, Master of Mankind, or simply "the Emperor", will do
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:47:06 UTC No. 16389971
>>16389966
I want to go to Mars. I don't care if Elon builds a fucking palace on the CAH lot. It also helps that the CAH people bought it literally only because of 'the wall' and did literally nothing with it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:48:16 UTC No. 16389972
>>16389966
Yes. Anything against Musk is lawfare. Anything for him is rule of law.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:48:20 UTC No. 16389973
>>16389966
Yes.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:49:14 UTC No. 16389974
>>16389966
Literally yes and I’m not even a 1. I’m maybe a 2 or a 3 and the SpaceX Mars project is more important than any E*arther land plot
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:49:55 UTC No. 16389976
>>16389971
>CAH people ... did literally nothing with it.
SpaceX should claim squatters rights
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:51:07 UTC No. 16389977
>>16389968
>i'm
YOU are "reserving judgement". the rest of the retards ITT are not.
>until we know absolutely for sure that this story is being wholly truthful
I can clearly see a lawsuit being announced
https://cah-sues-elon-musk.s3.amazo
>>16389972
>Anything against Musk is lawfare. Anything for him is rule of law.
yeah. he's a poor victim. you should give him all your money to help him.
>>16389971
>It also helps that the CAH people bought it literally only because of 'the wall' and did literally nothing with it.
... and? I thought americans cared about private citizens and their property?
are you even american, btw? I've noticed lots of non-americans ITT lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:51:35 UTC No. 16389978
>>16389929
>COH Co-Created by Max Temkin who worked on the Obama campaign
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:53:05 UTC No. 16389980
>>16389966
SpaceX bots? Get a fucking grip man
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:53:29 UTC No. 16389981
>>16389977
Blow it out your ass
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:54:17 UTC No. 16389982
>>16389977
I am an American, but the CAH people are honorary illegal aliens.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:54:58 UTC No. 16389983
>>16389980
x.ai bots? twitter bots? tesla bots???
elon loves AI, so why wouldn't he use bots? he's a tech guy after all. do you even know what tech people do?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:55:45 UTC No. 16389984
>>16389966
You are surprised people look down on those who bought a piece of land not to use it or develop it but only for the sole purpose of litigation, speculation and extortion?
>>16389977
>leddit spacing
Figures. Here's the last (you).
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:00:00 UTC No. 16389985
>>16389984
>>leddit spacing
>Figures. Here's the last (you).
redditanon... stop projecting and go back
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:05:31 UTC No. 16389991
>>16389986
this drawing isn't accurate, Buran should be mortally injured by a piece of giant debris.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:05:35 UTC No. 16389992
>>16389986
post those two fucking
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:07:08 UTC No. 16389994
>>16389991
and shuttle should have a big wet pee stain on her crotch and an embarrassed look.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:07:09 UTC No. 16389995
>>16389929
>group buys land to stop border wall
>help them by using it as a construction site so it's even harder for trump to imminent domain it or build around it.
>they get mad
?????
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:07:13 UTC No. 16389996
>>16389989
leftists want to destroy this. never thought the future would be leftists turning to luddites and the right trying to usher in a golden age of science and technology.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:08:59 UTC No. 16390001
>>16389994
Actually I was thinking she should probably have a wooden expression and be affixed to some sort of pedestal as if she were taxidermied.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:11:59 UTC No. 16390006
>>16389929
Squatter's rights, right? Isn't that what all the lefties love so much? They're not using the land for anything so it's up for grabs. Property is theft, as they say.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:12:41 UTC No. 16390008
>>16390006
>"its okay when we do it"
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:16:17 UTC No. 16390012
>>16390008
who are you quoting?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:20:03 UTC No. 16390021
>>16390012
nta but
you. that's literally what you are saying lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:21:50 UTC No. 16390026
>>16389966
CAH employees should be executed for bringing forth this lawsuit
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:22:25 UTC No. 16390028
>>16389984
Reddit spacing is a newfag trap, and that wasn’t even how it looks like, not all double spacing is Reddit spacing. Nice job exposing urself retard. You’re probably from that /pol/ link aren’t you because only those tourists are stupid enough to try to pretend to be oldfags and expose themselves like this.
>inb4 double down
You’ve done this twice already it’s getting embarassing
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:22:54 UTC No. 16390030
>>16390008
Unironically yes.
Fuck lefties, kill lefties, curb stomp lefties, decompress lefties in the airlock, chain lefties under the rocket during a static fire, launch lefties into the stratosphere, drop lefties from orbit, flood leftie air supply with CO2, TOTAL LEFTIE DEATH.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:23:14 UTC No. 16390031
>>16390021
I wasn't the anon you were replying to, but more importantly, GTFO newfag and gb2r.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:23:54 UTC No. 16390032
>>16390030
hey man I just want to be able to buy mirrored scissors
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:24:52 UTC No. 16390035
>>16389996
Anything the State feels it can't control it will be compelled to try and destroy
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:25:19 UTC No. 16390036
>>16390028
so you had severe EDS all along, figures
fuck off
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:26:20 UTC No. 16390039
>>16390030
based
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:27:46 UTC No. 16390041
>>16390030
post address then. I'm overtaking your property.
I will be heavily prepared for the visit :^)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:31:15 UTC No. 16390048
>>16390041
Enjoy getting 12 gauge up your ass commie
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:31:47 UTC No. 16390049
>>16390036
Elon was never mentioned once. You are getting backed in to a corner for being a cancerous tumor newfag trying to make yourself fit in and lashing out at anyone that replies to you. You are using shit flinging tactics to make anyone that criticizes your horrid behavior seem less reputable. I am not even the original anon which would be easy to tell if you checked the typing styles. Nobody likes or wants you here. You can samefag as many replies as you like to pretend like you won but any real /sfg/ regular can see you stick out like a sore thumb. You know I’m right but you refuse to admit it. You are acting like a manchild. You don’t have to keep rabidly defending yourself like this. We are all anonymous. If you changed your behavior to fit in better instead of taking the discussion down with you then nobody would remember this shit spewing. You cannot make a general bend to your will just so you can win an argument.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:31:57 UTC No. 16390050
>>16390048
>didn't post address
post address COWARD
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:33:07 UTC No. 16390053
>>16390049
lmao what a massive wall of text
didnt read btw
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:34:06 UTC No. 16390055
>>16390053
based and keyed
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:36:39 UTC No. 16390057
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-p
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:36:42 UTC No. 16390059
>>16390053
TLDR for 0 attention spam zoomer newfags like you. We all can tell you’re a newfag from the /pol/ link and all the little things you do we notice, nobody likes you here. Stop the shitflinging, discuss spaceflight.
>>16390055
>keyed
Another newfag trap, or you’re from the sharty which is even worse.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:38:13 UTC No. 16390061
>>16390059
>keyed
>newfag trap
Do you really not know?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:38:14 UTC No. 16390062
>>16390060
Keep spamming these. They’re still here they just stopped their usual see cancer.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:39:08 UTC No. 16390063
>>16390043
It really is mask off. They're gong to war with him.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:39:15 UTC No. 16390064
>>16390060
this picture isn't accurate her skirt should be tattered and full of holes.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:39:35 UTC No. 16390065
>>16390043
Is there some coordinated thing happening right now?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:40:31 UTC No. 16390067
>>16390065
yeah it's called the US presidential election
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:40:36 UTC No. 16390068
>>16390053
Based
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:41:13 UTC No. 16390069
>>16390065
seems like it
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:42:08 UTC No. 16390071
>>16390061
Yes I know it’s from /tv/. Nobody on this site uses it outside of there, /pol/ and the sharty though, you cannot deny this. Saying keyed and based in the same sentence is also the exact same thing it’s like saying based and based. Only an absolute retard or a newfag who doesn’t know how to use the word would say it like that. You make yourself so obvious.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:42:33 UTC No. 16390072
>>16390065
You've been living under the rock for the past 4 years?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:43:09 UTC No. 16390074
>>16390071
why are you so verbose, do you have autism
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:43:33 UTC No. 16390075
>>16390043
Tranny activist propagadist has Musk on target since the Biden told them to target him.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:44:25 UTC No. 16390077
>>16389978
>One of the creators, Max Temkin, a designer from Chicago, is Jewish. He also is the co-creator of the politically incorrect game Cards Against Humanity.
Wow, what are the odds?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:44:40 UTC No. 16390079
>>16390036
nobody even mentioned elon newfag.
you should just leave now, you've disgraced yourself.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:45:36 UTC No. 16390081
>>16390079
stop samefagging tranny
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:45:41 UTC No. 16390082
>>16389966
Yes, it's okay when it happens to people I don't like.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:46:39 UTC No. 16390083
>>16389929
The guy is an Obama political activist. CoH bought the property to stop Trump's border wall drive. Now they target Musk for whatever frivolous suit they hope to slow down SpaceX.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:46:53 UTC No. 16390085
>>16390074
>using words is difficult
for retards like yourself, i'm sure it is.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:47:08 UTC No. 16390086
>>16390080
probably some criminal case eventually if you just keep launching with the justification of safety
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:48:58 UTC No. 16390091
the sperg is starting to lose its shit again
fuck the FAA
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:49:02 UTC No. 16390092
>>16390079
You showed your tranny cult card. You suffer from EDS
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:49:13 UTC No. 16390093
>>16390081
>NOOOOO MULTIPLE PEOPLE ARE TELLING ME TO FUCK OFF HOW COULD THIS BE HAPPENING?
instant panicked tranny accusation too lol.
i've seen this trend in recent years that newfags just try to sling the word tranny at everything a half-assed attempt to fit in.
you will NEVER fit in, you will NEVER be a 4channer.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:49:17 UTC No. 16390094
>>16390081
Reply to both posts I will screenshot. Here Ill do it for you.
>>16390079
>>16390028
>>16390049
You could again check typing styles if you wanted to check samefaggery. Screenshot going up in one second.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:49:19 UTC No. 16390095
>>16390085
who are you quoting?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:50:17 UTC No. 16390098
>>16390081
>>16390092
haha holy shit this guy is losing his mind, this is hilarious.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:50:24 UTC No. 16390099
>>16390094
Go ahead and check which posts were mine.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:50:39 UTC No. 16390100
>>16390093
>>16390079
>>16390028
>>16390049
all me btw, also I'm trans
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:50:56 UTC No. 16390101
Why is /sfg/ being raided? What’s the point of that?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:51:01 UTC No. 16390102
>>16390086
Clearly the first step is to drop roggs on the FAA, DOJ, and FBI so that can there's nobody left to charge you.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:51:47 UTC No. 16390103
>>16390095
you, since you seem to get really angry for no reason when someone uses more than 10 words in a response.
i'm guessing this comes with the territory of being an underage zoomer who doesn't belong here?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:51:56 UTC No. 16390105
>>16390101
What do you think is the point of a raid?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:52:21 UTC No. 16390106
>>16390101
I don't think we're being raided, this is our home grown autism. Spaceflight exclusively attracts autists, like trains.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:53:06 UTC No. 16390108
>>16390101
US election. The entire site is being raided. We were also linked to from /pol/ recently so general quality is turboshit since we’re infested with newfags. Thanks to whoever did that by the way, dick. It’s going to be like this until the election it seems. Did you see those posts where a /pol/ tourist said we have to fix the country and earth before we go to mars and then in the same breath said gatekeeping was bad?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:53:59 UTC No. 16390111
>>16390101
i remember browsing 4chan 10 years ago on ANY board and there wouldn't be this amount of obtuse fucking loser newfags trying really hard to fit in and getting mad when they get called out.
newfags need to understand that they will get literally zero respect and nothing but disdain when they haven't lurked for at least a few years first, bullying newfags should become top priority again.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:54:07 UTC No. 16390112
>>16390108
>/pol/s are degrowth commie trannies
I dont think so, sister.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:55:38 UTC No. 16390116
>>16390106
No. Its not. Its not natural, it happened directly after we were linked to from /pol/ and none of the shitslingers are talking about spaceflight. It is entirely obvious it’s not normal. There was even some random retards glorifying /pol/ for using trigonometry as if their ‘astronomy’ division was special because they watched a capture the flag video. You cannot call this normal but you do because this is the only normal you know.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:55:50 UTC No. 16390117
>>16390111
I smell projection
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:55:52 UTC No. 16390118
>>16390108
a few threads ago you'd notice this one dude who got REALLY mad every time people suggested gatekeeping, i'm assuming that's the /pol/tard that linked us and started this whole fiasco.
this is even worse than the furfag incident during IFT-2.
god i fucking hate normalniggers, none of these people belong on this site, they should just permaban everyone post-2014
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:56:19 UTC No. 16390119
>>16390105
Anon, I’m not a regular. I just check in from time to time because I like cool shit and space flight is cool. Near as I can tell nothing happens in here except genera discussions. So I don’t understand the point of raiding this place. I also don’t understand the point of vegans screaming at me while enjoying a burger.
>>16390106
Seems off the rails for Otto be homegrown. But I suppose we all have some crazy family members.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:57:15 UTC No. 16390121
>>16390064
Why? She hasn't been ass blasted by the atmosphere yet.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:57:25 UTC No. 16390122
lmao the coward niggerfaggot never posted his address.
such tough keyboard warriors ITT kek
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:57:38 UTC No. 16390124
>>16390108
>>16390111
Dude, just to be very serious for a moment, I can obviously tell who you are across posts and you need to chill out. Not everyone who has chuddy opinions is a /pol/tard. I'm still riding the FAA hate train and shitting on them every opportunity despite hating /pol/tards myself.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:57:52 UTC No. 16390125
>>16390117
>low word count angry response
your generation's brains have been rotten by social media lol, completely incapable of engaging in higher thought.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:59:21 UTC No. 16390126
>>16390119
It’s not natural. Trust me I know. Even the IFTs weren’t this bad afterwards.
>>16390125
Good point. Another ticker to add to the list of identifying them.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:00:48 UTC No. 16390128
i looked at the CAH land and I gotta ask...how big is the lot? because there are two buildings on either side of it. the whole thing looks like one continuous project. if part of it is their land then it has to be very small.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:01:39 UTC No. 16390130
>>16390128
Its a throwaway political project for them. Ignore it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:03:38 UTC No. 16390135
>>16390124
clearly you can't lol.
>not everyone who has chuddy opinions
i have chuddy opinions, likely the exact same on this issue, that's irrelevant to the fact that these cunts do not belong and should fuck off.
i used to browse /pol/ back when it was new and fresh, there was some genuine fun to be had there.
since 2015 and especially in 2016 /pol/ got fucking murdered by newfags from plebbit who never got bullied off this site afterwards, they're STILL here and they STILL think they belong, matter of fact they all think they're oldfags now. as a result i fucking spit on these cuntbags who think they deserve a lick of respect just because they have chuddy opinions, that's not good enough.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:04:01 UTC No. 16390136
>>16390124
I haven’t been complaining about FAA hate since last thread, I put it on filter until it’s done since I don’t want to discuss it and honestly it’s worked out pretty well. You can discuss it I’m just not gonna look at it anymore and I feel like right now that’s for the better. I accept I was wrong in trying to silence it since so much of the recent news has been on it, I still hold my opinion though. Probably better for me to just filter it since it is on topic discussion so I haven’t been talking about that since then. Those are also not me, here’s proof. Again, check similar writing styles if you’re looking for samefagging.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:04:28 UTC No. 16390138
>>16390128
0.39 acres according to one of the commenters on ars
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:05:59 UTC No. 16390142
Tell me what I have to do, I live 3 miles from FAA headquarters. Tell me in no uncertain terms what needs to be done.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:06:20 UTC No. 16390145
>>16390135
>3358x190
Confirmed ultra wide tranny
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:07:50 UTC No. 16390148
>>16390145
nah just 4k
>seething so hard he's looking for anything to grasp onto, including monitor size now
you call others trannies when your balls probably haven't even dropped yet, faggot, nobody buys your facade.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:08:17 UTC No. 16390150
>>16390142
Go there and talk to the manager.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:08:31 UTC No. 16390152
>>16390135
>i used to browse /pol/
kek
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:08:39 UTC No. 16390153
>>16390136
>>16390124
And again if you hate /pol/tards it should be more than obvious how many are in here. Ignore all FAA related posts in thinking about this, do you think >>16390122 and >>16390092 and >>16390036 are normal? Two of those are the exact same post about EDS when Elon wasn’t mentioned (I also proved that was my first reply there) so any earlier conversation doesn’t pertain.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:08:51 UTC No. 16390155
>>16390138
>$150k for that tiny plot of land in the middle of no where
Sounds like a scam
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:09:10 UTC No. 16390157
>>16389966
>you didn't uncritically accept the article and plaintiffs assertions?
>you must be bots
You've clearly learned nothing over the last several years.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:09:18 UTC No. 16390158
>>16390142
falseflag obviously, walk in with a bomb strapped to your chest, detonate and also leave a anarch commie manifesto where you lament that the FAA didn't lawfare hard enough.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:09:21 UTC No. 16390159
>>16390142
picket out front
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:10:03 UTC No. 16390160
>>16390148
why do you keep telling your life story in every post? Might want to get a diary instead
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:10:17 UTC No. 16390161
>>16390153
>when Elon wasn't mentioned
You showed your tranny card. We know you're a tranny. People aren't stupid lmao.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:10:19 UTC No. 16390162
>>16390152
back when subhuman offsite faggots like the ones now shitting up this general weren't infesting it completely, it was quite useable, there were fun space elevator threads there.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:11:23 UTC No. 16390164
>>16390162
>back when
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:11:35 UTC No. 16390165
>>16390153
like seriously, can you imagine being such a fucking aggressively egotistical newfag that you don't actually know what EDS means but still copy it's usage in the desperate hope to fit in?
crush newnig skulls with a mallet.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:12:50 UTC No. 16390166
>>16390162
No, it has been infested by trannies like every other place, even the mods are trannies
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:12:59 UTC No. 16390167
>>16390161
>newfag now just ranting and raving unintelligebly
you're too tilted, best you go do your homework now, you can (try to) pretend to belong again tomorrow.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:14:16 UTC No. 16390169
>>16390166
>it has been infested by trannies
yes, after the 2016 election gave it a shitload of signal boosting. i just said that, your reading comprehension is lacking.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:14:41 UTC No. 16390172
>>16390167
We see through your reddit, sister.
You will never be a woman.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:16:12 UTC No. 16390175
>>16390165
The random tranny cards too. It’s just incessant name calling with whatever you can think of even when it makes no sense. Anyone who disagrees with them is tranny, commie, lefitst, EDS, TDS, democrat even when nobody was talking about any of those. You’d think they’d maybe mix it up with /sfg/ specific names like wellnigger, earther, spincel, etc. but they just outright refuse to make themselves less obvious.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:16:17 UTC No. 16390176
>>16390172
your writing style suggests you're a reddit transplant likely obsessed with basedjak memes.
you should consider suicide.
you will never belong, you will never fit in.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:16:31 UTC No. 16390178
>>16390165
I'm pretty sure I came up with the term, at least used it quite a bit before I started seeing it used more frequently here and then in other places (I mean the term itself is a pretty natural extension of the related TDS term)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:16:49 UTC No. 16390180
Boy I sure do love rockets.
Does anyone else want to talk about rockets?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:17:05 UTC No. 16390181
>eeek oook
What happened this time?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:17:59 UTC No. 16390183
>>16390180
I would, what rocket do you think would send this up?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:18:11 UTC No. 16390184
>>16390175
yep, they try to fit in by using EDS because that's a term already somewhat familiar with them, but they likely haven't even experienced any EDS themselves, they just got here after all.
you could show them some equations and ask them to solve those but they'd just pussy out and call you a tranny again.
every single one of these niggers deserves mandatory execution.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:18:23 UTC No. 16390185
>>16390182
ywnbaw
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:19:45 UTC No. 16390188
>>16390181
/qa/sister is having a meltdown in thread >>16390185
he's telling me that i, a bearmode logger, will never be a woman.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:20:03 UTC No. 16390190
>>16390175
Honestly, its only random if you live in a bubble. Everyone else understands the connection between the words, ideologies, the narratives, etc. Thats why we can connect the dots.
Its even more true today than it ever was in history. If you can pin point a single stance, you can pinpoint their entire worldview.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:20:08 UTC No. 16390191
>>16390183
None, it's not going up.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:20:09 UTC No. 16390192
>>16390183
I wonder what happened to them, dont really see much news or other stuff
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:20:10 UTC No. 16390193
>>16390183
their plan is starship right? although it flatpacks and scales well onto any rocket.
I bet the flat tiles could even fit through the pez dispenser. it's a match made in heaven.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:20:37 UTC No. 16390194
>>16390175
EDS is inside the /sfg/ vernacular though
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:21:10 UTC No. 16390195
>>16390185
Why are you biting such obvious bait? Good lord you are such a horrible poster. Do you just feel a possession to respond to everything possible when it even the slightest bit ticks you off? Grow some thicker skin Jesus.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:22:00 UTC No. 16390196
>>16390183
i think a lot of these starship derived payloads called it a little too early trying to hedge their entire market pitch on a (revolutionary) rocket who's completion date is subject to the whims of creative genius, general competence, bad luck and regulatory hurdles.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:22:48 UTC No. 16390197
>>16390180
2 months
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:23:31 UTC No. 16390198
>>16390180
Delayed by FAA because of politics
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:23:35 UTC No. 16390199
>>16390194
yes, it is, but when you use the vernacular completely out of it's context in a hamfisted attempt to say
>"l-look at me guys i-i'm not a newfag i can use your lingo!"
it instantly pops out as extremely unnatural.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:24:21 UTC No. 16390200
>>16390185
I am a beautiful woman, and you will never be happy :)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:25:18 UTC No. 16390201
>>16390191
>>16390192
Yeah considering we haven’t seen much progress from them recently online about it indicates it’s not going well. Didn’t even make that CLD presentation.
>>16390193
No those tiles are slightly curved, not flat enough pez. I think they could do it on Falcon though if they sent it up in bits and pieces which I think was their original plan? Not 100% on that though.
>>16390196
Seems about right, I wonder how they plan to deal with this though? ThinkOrbitals plan is more adaptable like I said before but other stations (not Haven-1) will have that issue
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:25:30 UTC No. 16390203
>>16390199
But you do pretty clearly have some level of EDS, this isnt the first time you are sperging out
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:26:55 UTC No. 16390206
>>16390158
would this really work?;
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:28:57 UTC No. 16390208
>>16390203
>b-but you h-have EDS t-tho
no, and i probably know more about EDSers than you.
you're just seething that people don't fucking tolerate you for being an abject newnigger subhuman.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:29:02 UTC No. 16390209
https://x.com/RocketLab/status/1837
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:29:59 UTC No. 16390210
>>16390206
only one way to find out.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:31:04 UTC No. 16390212
>>16390209
Expendable launches are boring
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:32:17 UTC No. 16390214
>>16390203
YOU are not the arbiter of who has EDS or not, you're alien to this place and it is extremely apparent to everyone.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:32:50 UTC No. 16390216
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:33:10 UTC No. 16390217
>>16390142
>enter building
>go to the commercial space offices
>find the permitting paperwork
>approve it
>put it in the filing cabinet
>don't forget to cc elon on the email
>ask the girl at the front desk what her plans are this weekend
>get her number
>exit building
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:33:18 UTC No. 16390218
>>16390215
vast? more like small
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:33:34 UTC No. 16390219
you muskovite lovers are really funny
btw, this general is a mess, and the jannies aren't doing shit
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:34:45 UTC No. 16390221
There is one single faggot in here that has taken up more space in the thread complaining about /pol/ than the actual /pol/ posters. It also mysteriously started after /pol/ was linked here, despite no noticeable uptick in /pol/ posting. If you ignored it and posted about rockets instead it would go away, but I'm guessing you can't actually participate in a discussion about rockets, can you?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:34:50 UTC No. 16390222
>>16390216
>two weeks
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:34:52 UTC No. 16390223
>>16390216
Please sir if you post these include screenshot. Also very interesting development, seeming more likely that Starliner gets cancelled. Though obviously still a good possibility they just put someone else on the board and remain committed without announcing anything publicly.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:35:08 UTC No. 16390224
>>16390217
i am getting an uncanny feeling that it really is that easy
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:36:35 UTC No. 16390226
>>16390217
>ask the girl at the front desk what her plans are this weekend
That girl is probably 50 years old and overweight.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:36:56 UTC No. 16390227
>>16390221
>despite no noticeable uptick in /pol/posting
Are you blind? I have also been discussing the ThinkOrbital station just now kek. Why don’t you tell me what this equation is really quick.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:37:43 UTC No. 16390228
>muh /pol/
>waaaaaaaaah
rent free dutch autist
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:37:44 UTC No. 16390229
what's the image limit on /sci/?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:37:45 UTC No. 16390230
>>16390221
Happened in the previous thread too and all the talk about newfags just seems like either projection or some infiltration attempt, trying to astroturf the general opinion here
I.e. dont talk about the politics related to FAA, musk should shut up, defending random bullshit card against humanity lawsuits
Its a pattern
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:39:24 UTC No. 16390233
>>16390221
>dispite no noticeable uptick in /pol/ posting
ah you're the guy who posted the links, so far you've come in with damage control like this every single time people call attention to the amount of newfaggotry as of late.
>guessing you can't actually participate in a discussion about rockets, can you.
high hypocricy coming from a newfag who unironically linked this general on not just /pol/ but also /k/ and /v/ with the specific stated goal to bring in more newfags.
you're a vile and wretched creature on par with a jew, you should genuinely do genetics a favour and end your bloodline.
>>16390230
>>16390228
this is also the same guy btw, he keeps panic samefagging every time attention is drawn to this.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:40:15 UTC No. 16390235
>>16390227
Another thing, how many times do I have to tell you that it’s not just 1 person? I’ve proven it multiple times with screenshots too and writing styles are clearly different. You just can’t accept that nobody here likes what you bring to the table which is all name calling and no space.
>>16390232
Still shit play the original. Was doing docking training right now actually but can’t get the fucker lined up. Allot more precise than previous maneuvers it’s crazy.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:40:19 UTC No. 16390236
>>16390226
Share the love and you'll find the permitting goes a lot smoother.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:40:26 UTC No. 16390237
>>16390223
I get whined at in both cases, easier this way
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:40:44 UTC No. 16390238
>>16390227
>le rocket equation meme
Anyway faggot you have ruined like three threads in a row
>>16390230
It's all relevant politics too, no one is saying we're going to Mars to shut out niggers or something, it's developments in the space space
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:41:21 UTC No. 16390239
>inb4 a bunch more samefags claiming the people noticing newfag activity are all just projecting
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:41:31 UTC No. 16390240
>>16390237
That’s true I guess. Atleast you bring news to us, so thankful for that. I can try to post follow up images if you’d like whenever I see so you don’t take the heat?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:42:17 UTC No. 16390242
>>16390233
>>16390235
>you
>you're the guy
That is the first time I've posted all day, I usually lurk. You two have shit up multiple threads now
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:42:32 UTC No. 16390243
>>16390239
keep feeding the collective paranoia lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:44:02 UTC No. 16390244
>>16390240
If you like (the real reason there was no screenshot is because I was phoneposting)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:45:32 UTC No. 16390245
>>16390239
Yeah I noticed that a long time ago but didn’t want to do as >>16390243 this anon said. Generally just not a good idea to start with samefag accusations but this thread is kinda ruined enough already. Even rocketgirlspam couldn’t curb the shitness. We keep also getting moved up in pages and janny does nothing about this mess even though he’s online. It’s going to be a long thread and the light at the end of the tunnel just keeps getting further and further away. We were on page 6 like 18 hours ago!
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:45:40 UTC No. 16390246
>>16390242
YOU have shit up multiple threads, seriously you're not being very subtle, i know newfags struggle with this but as others have pointed out it's not very hard to tell writing styles apart. you're going out of your way to damage control and your incessant attempts to pretend the linking didn't happen make it pretty obvious it's you.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:47:46 UTC No. 16390249
>>16390246
Lmao you are losing it
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:47:48 UTC No. 16390250
>>16390247
This is what happens when we get bored of Starlink launches and the gooberment is visibly cockblocking Starship.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:48:12 UTC No. 16390252
>>16390216
NTA.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:48:16 UTC No. 16390253
>>16390247
this is why gatekeeping is so important, you should never let subverters in, earthers should be gatekept aggressively lest they draw even more attention and bring their earther friends.
one little incident probably added about 50 alien tumors to this place.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:48:16 UTC No. 16390254
>>16390246
Woah, you're sick. That's wild. I'm going to abandon this general for a couple days in case it's contagious
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:48:24 UTC No. 16390255
>>16390247
Spaceflight will heal when the current admin is removed and Trump takes office. Seriously, not even a political post but from a pure function pov. Harris will go after spacex
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:49:00 UTC No. 16390257
>>16390247
Yeah not a good time :( I wanted to do more Space Engine requests but it would get lost in this mess so what’s the point.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:49:36 UTC No. 16390258
>>16390249
>same shortform angry response again.
if i was wrong you wouldn't have said anything lol
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:50:42 UTC No. 16390260
>>16390253
He’s gonna call you a larper if you mention earthers since it’s not in his double digit word count vocabulary
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:51:39 UTC No. 16390261
>>16390260
no i think he'll just keep calling me paranoid as he has been.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:52:17 UTC No. 16390265
>>16390233
>16390230
>16390228 (You)
those two posts are LITERALLY two seconds apart, tardfaec newfag sperglord
it would have been physically impossible for me to make them both
seriously you're a basket case and a fucking idiot
you want to qq about samefags but can't even check timestamps
makes me think YOU are the one samefagging and just accusing others of what you're guilty of
pure cancer
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:53:07 UTC No. 16390266
>>16390257
>so what’s the point
Adapting to being on our own on Mars. Janny can't come to the rescue there. Have to settle things among ourselves. Chudlon will be in charge, earthers will be after us.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:53:41 UTC No. 16390267
>>16390253
>earthers
you're the only subverter ITT
the guilty ALWAYS point fingers elsewhere to deflect blame
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:54:19 UTC No. 16390268
>>16390257
If you post it itt and then next thread I wouldn't be mad
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:54:25 UTC No. 16390269
>>16390265
>it would have been impossible for me to make them both
oh i'm sorry you only posted one of those, my bad.
thanks for reconfirming you're here though, now go away, permanently.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:55:29 UTC No. 16390271
>>16390267
>literally accusing the people noticing your activity of what you're doing
lol, going with the firehose of falsehood approach now i see?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:56:20 UTC No. 16390272
>>16390267
Do you have any idea how hypocritical you are right now? What causes people to twist their logic into pretzels like this?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:56:20 UTC No. 16390273
Next thread will be better
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:57:20 UTC No. 16390274
>>16390273
Janny keeps moving us up in pages. Its a long ways off
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:57:45 UTC No. 16390276
>>16390269
ffs you thickheaded dutch autist
that's pure rookie shit
never, EVER apologize
ALWAYS double down
and you call me a newfag, lmao okay
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:58:18 UTC No. 16390278
>>16390272
/pol/tards justify their behaviour to themselves by thinking the places they're aggressively invading who don't want them will be bettered by their presence somehow, much like the trannies that they accuse everyone of being.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:01:19 UTC No. 16390280
/sfg/ was never good
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:01:26 UTC No. 16390282
>>16390276
you keep calling me dutch so it's basically 100% certain that you are the one who posted those fucking threads SPECIFICALLY stating you wanted to infest this place with newfags and are continually blaming me instead in some sort of unholy mental gymnastic monkeybar.
even earlier you were constantly damage controlling and then telling me that i'm paranoid for noticing you, pretending you're not in the thread.
>and you call me a newfag
you act like one, obtuse, annoying, constantly trying to subvert, inflated ego and sense of self-importance.
>b-but i b-browsed this place a few times before in 2020.
not good enough lol.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:02:14 UTC No. 16390283
>>16389790
impressive, very nice
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:03:02 UTC No. 16390284
>>16390278
Yeah. I mentioned that earlier. The behavior is so uniform between them all that it’s obvious when you have one. You’d think it’s bots but no bot could be this rabidly stupid.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:03:41 UTC No. 16390285
>>16390282
I'm pretty sure there are like 4-5 people that have replied to you
You think there is only one?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:03:45 UTC No. 16390286
>>16390283
check this shit out >>16390292
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:04:49 UTC No. 16390287
>>16390285
>n-no i'm actually multiple people
you keep doing this, you literally just confirmed it's you, you were in that thread.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:05:52 UTC No. 16390288
>>16390280
Wrong. It was good just a few threads ago. That siphon station one was peak /sfg/. Autistic discussion of Mars surface megastructures, that rotary station OC also got posted there and we had a great time, solar vs nuclear and spin vs well made a comeback there too.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:05:59 UTC No. 16390289
>>16390282
You are a pure basket case.
Paranoid doesn't even begin to cover it.
That's how I know you're the flaming dutch retard who posted in that ONE Polaris Dawn thread on /pol/.
His OPSEC simply does not exist, and merely encourages saltminers.
I don't post threads.
That shit is for chumps.
But I do know this general would improve if you stopped fucking posting for two threads entirely.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:06:45 UTC No. 16390290
https://x.com/alx/status/1837231217
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:07:32 UTC No. 16390291
>>16390286
fail
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:07:46 UTC No. 16390292
>>16390290
Anon this is twitter news…
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:07:52 UTC No. 16390293
/sfg/
soi flamewars general
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:08:01 UTC No. 16390294
>>16390288
yep i posted that siphon station one specifically so people would be encouraged to actually talk about fun /sfg/ topics but it's become rather difficult now with the sheer amount of new regulatory warfare against spacex to report on, even though i'm rather getting sick of discussing it since it'll probably sort itself out and we have no impact on the outcome.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:08:05 UTC No. 16390295
>>16390291
Success
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:09:09 UTC No. 16390299
>>16390292
SEC sanctions might affect Musk CEO status in the worst case
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:09:46 UTC No. 16390301
>>16390289
>that's how i know you're the flaming dutch retard
you saw me remind a bunch of /pol/nigs that they would never belong on this site, which means you were in that thread, and your incessant defence of the posting of those threads pretty much garuantees you are the /pol/nig responsible for this mess.
and yet you STILL call me paranoid lol, i knew /pol/tards were dumb but this is a new low.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:11:09 UTC No. 16390304
>>16390299
But how does that correlate to SpaceX. Thats for twitter
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:11:28 UTC No. 16390306
>>16390301
I've been samefagging for over 500 posts in this thread
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:12:26 UTC No. 16390309
>>16390301
Caught him in his own logic.
>>16390306
And an admittance. We all knew it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:13:05 UTC No. 16390312
>>16390306
>non-response
stop panicking, this isn't even the first time you revealed yourself, you were at it in previous threads too.
it's ironic that people from your board are now just as subversive as the people it used to claim to be against.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:14:32 UTC No. 16390314
>1246R
Fuck happened here?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:15:56 UTC No. 16390318
>>16390314
Someone linked us in /pol/ like 2 threads ago and this is the fallout. Don’t even bother if you just got here, just wait for new bread.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:16:11 UTC No. 16390319
>>16390314
people were discussing the amount of newfag activity as of late and they started instant damage control, even calling people EDS'ers completely out of context in an attempt to fit in.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:17:26 UTC No. 16390322
>>16390301
YOU are more responsible for encouraging /pol/ to migrate here than I, believe that.
They are attracted to salt, which your tears of impotent rage provide in droves.
Your petty and feeble insults are an invitation.
>the posting of those threads
But there was only one.
You act like there's a systematic campaign on /pol/ to raid you.
Most of them don't know you even exist.
Could it be you're just parroting this line to derail the general, and don't really believe it?
Yes, it could.
>>16390309
You're an idiot for thinking everyone who responds to you is the same person.
Just because someone doesn't use NTA doesn't mean they are TA.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:18:46 UTC No. 16390323
>>16390314
The antianime schizo is back woth a new shtick
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:18:48 UTC No. 16390324
>>16390319
>>16390318
>>16390314
This is what happened >>16390306
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:19:07 UTC No. 16390325
>>16390314
Someone tries to defend CAH which degenerated into newfag/tranny/poltard name calling.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:20:07 UTC No. 16390326
>>16390324
>>16390312
autism
yes, everyone ITT is one person
especially the posts that are only 2 seconds apart
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:20:28 UTC No. 16390327
>>16390323
Hey that’s not true. Its a different cancer, you can tell because there were multiple rocketgirls posted itt and he didn’t stop to say anything about it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:20:55 UTC No. 16390330
I think you should go outside
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:22:06 UTC No. 16390332
>>16390314
Two trannies have been having a meltdown for multiple threads now accusing people of being newfags and schreeching about /pol/
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:22:54 UTC No. 16390333
>>16390322
>go out of your way to post multiple threads about spaceflight on at least 3 large boards, including /pol/
>incessantly link /sfg/ in each one
>blame dude who came into thread to remind them they are subhumans
YOU posted the threads, and those links, you are DIRECTLY responsible for everything that has happened afterwards, stop trying to shit blame, this newfag fiasco is exactly what you wanted otherwise you wouldn't have done it crab bucket fag.
>>16390309
>you're an idiot for thinking everyone who responds to you is the same person
that's not me, that's post is clearly a crude attempt at mockery.
how did you end up like this, what kind of upbringing would steer someone to this kind of subversive behaviour?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:23:30 UTC No. 16390336
>>16390330
I just was, eatin dinner but it started raining so I went back inside.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:24:23 UTC No. 16390337
>>16390324
damn you're really pissed off because people noticed aren't you.
no, you're not samefagging 500 posts in a row, nobody claimed that, you don't have to throw a temper tantrum just because people are having an allergic reaction to your linking of /sfg/
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:24:37 UTC No. 16390339
>>16390333
I think you replied to the wrong anon on the second one. Unless you didn’t? Then idk why you quoted the other guy
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:25:23 UTC No. 16390341
>>16390332
>more seething
i'm sorry you will never belong anon, there is nothing you can do about it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:25:34 UTC No. 16390343
>>16390333
No, that wasn't me.
I keep saying I haven't posted a thread anywhere on this entire website for more than a year now because it's true.
You are the cancer, this general is derailed because of YOU.
Not me.
Go to bed.
Do not post in this general again until two threads have hit page 10.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:26:24 UTC No. 16390344
>>16390339
wasn't a reply, was part of the greentext.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:26:55 UTC No. 16390347
>>16390337
I didn’t link /sfg/. Why are you replying to me? I think you’re thinking I’m the other one who sent the 4th message? I’m very confused but you’re accusing the wrong person atleast I’m pretty sure
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:27:56 UTC No. 16390350
>>16390344
Ah I see my mistake, all good now
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:27:59 UTC No. 16390351
>>16390343
yeah it wasn't you except that you were in the exact same place and you can recall me and you specifically point me out every time blame is placed on the person who actually made the thread, link and opened the floodgates to /sfg/.
threads were posted on both /k/ AND /v/ as well as /pol/.
you should consider suicide.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:30:21 UTC No. 16390352
>>16390288
I'm the one that made the rotor city and I also post the Mars mattress every day. Are you saying I'm the only one making these threads worthwhile? I'll take it
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:31:57 UTC No. 16390354
Two more months (of this)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:33:25 UTC No. 16390357
>>16390351
Yeah, it's obviously you.
Dutch autist, your posting style and ridiculous hate fixation on /pol/ gives you away every time.
I bet you don't even remember the flag I admonished you under in that thread.
>threads were posted on both /k/ AND /v/ as well as /pol/
good
really wasn't me, but if it makes you seethe in buttangre then and that's a GOOD thing too
someone should link this general to /b/ next time so you have an aneurysm
I saw that /pol/ thread ONLY because someone posted a crossboard link to that thread in this general.
And seeing you flip out in that /pol/ thread was very funny.
You really should take my advise, this general would be healthier.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:33:27 UTC No. 16390358
>>16390318
Yeah. Gonna check some other threads for now. Maybe wait for the next launch till this calmed down.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:33:57 UTC No. 16390359
Do they put something into the water supply in the Netherlands that turns the people extremely autistic?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:35:05 UTC No. 16390361
>>16390288
if i recall correctly it was right around the end of the siphon station that some faggot started early staging while loudly bragging about it, the exact same guy also ended up linking us over and over on /pol/ during the duration of the polaris dawn mission until right around the end of the EVA.
i sincerely hope this doesn't happen again, /sfg/ seriously needs it's own board or something because with the lackluster janny more newfag invasions like these form a serious threat to the integrity of this general.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:35:24 UTC No. 16390362
>>16390347
yo I made a similar hat. now I need to make an extremely serious hat. thanks frog
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:35:49 UTC No. 16390363
>>16390358
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oii
Maybe the launch after the next launch. Electron is going up in 20 min and I don't see this calming down by then.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:35:55 UTC No. 16390365
>>16390352
Big factor, though there are other anons helping and posting interesting things. I’ve personally been trying to contribute but no big info dump interviews have come up recently though I did do some Space Engine stuff. I’m dinkin around with KSP1 right now and I’m stuck on docking, I may do Space Engine stuff again later but first I want to figure this out. If you have a request you want me to try to get a good gif of I can take down your request since you’re here and see what I can do. Up to you though and it would be a bit until I get to it.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:36:32 UTC No. 16390368
>>16390357
yes, and?
i'm not the one trying to hide, you are, lol.
you're trying to draw attention to me but i don't give a fuck, what's important is that you're out here blatantly admitting that you're responsible for all of it while desperately flicking residue of responsibility onto me.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:37:48 UTC No. 16390369
>>16390367
You don’t have the original? Here fren, take this one.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:37:50 UTC No. 16390370
>>16390359
>>16390357
you don't have to post twice, you can just put it in one post.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:37:56 UTC No. 16390371
>>16390363
fake stream you got baited
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:38:37 UTC No. 16390374
>>16390363
>>16390371
https://youtu.be/beVTGh_PrA0
This is it, right?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:38:59 UTC No. 16390375
>>16390367
yeah, a truly terrible outcome.
gatekeeping should be done more heavily for now so newfags don't get the idea that they'll be accepted automatically.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:39:54 UTC No. 16390378
>>16390362
I also made a shirt to go with it
>>16390365
Not sure how you'd frame it but I'd like to see the shadow cast by any moon on any gas giant from the surface of said moon, or another moon behind it. (>>16390352 is me)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:40:01 UTC No. 16390379
>>16390371
>SCAN THE QR CODE AND CHANGE YOUR LIFE
It does look that way
>>16390374
Yeah, that's the right one
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:40:04 UTC No. 16390380
>>16390368
>you're out here blatantly admitting that you're responsible for all
you're out here blatantly admitting that you're responsible for all but too stupid to realize that ans what a crank you are
how your ridiculous autism is having a negative effect on this general
makes me think you're derailing with flamewar fauxdrama on purpose like you're paid to
but it's more likely your obsessive compulsive and have /P/DS conditioning
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:40:32 UTC No. 16390381
>>16390363
>Launch i care about
Have fun, anon. Electron is too much DOA for my taste.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:41:34 UTC No. 16390383
>>16390370
Are you two dutch spergs a couple?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:42:00 UTC No. 16390384
/pol/ derangement syndrome thread is deranged
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:42:02 UTC No. 16390385
>>16390362
>I
You or the child in Bangladesh?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:42:13 UTC No. 16390386
>>16390378
Kek that’s a good combo. I’ll try and get that in a while then, I’ll post it next thread too.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:42:58 UTC No. 16390388
>>16390385
I own a decorated apparel company
>>16390386
Next thread is probably best kek
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:43:13 UTC No. 16390389
>>16390247
I've learned to ignore all the metaposting, especially that which occurs around this time of day.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:43:29 UTC No. 16390390
if harris wins its over for spaceflight.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:43:30 UTC No. 16390391
>>16390384
And there you have it. Nobody defends /pol/ except /pol/ immigrants. Thanks for playing bud. You don’t fit in.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:43:38 UTC No. 16390392
>>16390380
>N-NO IT'S ACTUALLY YOUR FAULT MY POSTS LEAD TO THE ENSHITTIFACTION OF /SFG/
>B-BECAUSE I SAW YOU IN MY THREAD MAKING FUN OF PEOPLE AND I SAW YOUR FLAG HAHA!
yeah i well and truly don't give a shit what you think about me, all you've succeeded in doing is outing yourself.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:43:50 UTC No. 16390393
>>16390388
why don't you own a spaceflight company?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:44:27 UTC No. 16390395
>>16390393
Space is easy, weaving is hard.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:44:37 UTC No. 16390396
>>16390391
nobody needs to defend /pol/
you need to attack /pol/ in every single thread because obsessive compulsive disorder autism
personal boogeyman
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:44:39 UTC No. 16390397
>>16390384
no such thing as /pol/ derangement syndrome, it deserves all the hate it gets, just like the FAA.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:45:47 UTC No. 16390398
>>16390396
>nobody defends /pol/
which is why you're doing it right now and are getting cross that people notice?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:45:47 UTC No. 16390399
>>16390393
I tried pretty hard a couple years back to figure out absolutely anything I could do to get involved with space suit manufacturing, but there was nothing. Total dead end. Do not recommend as a career path
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:45:52 UTC No. 16390400
>>16390392
I know what country you post from.
But you don't even remember mine, despite the fact you saw my flag and we talked in that thread I didn't make but got crosslinked to this general.
That makes me better than you.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:46:08 UTC No. 16390401
https://x.com/Andercot/status/18372
Brilliant pebbles
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:47:22 UTC No. 16390402
>>16390400
>i'm a /pol/nigger addicted to flags
that's hilarious, really goes to show how newfags will never fit in.
i don't care about flags and i never will, it's so ridiculously easy to pretend to be from different places with that system.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:47:24 UTC No. 16390403
>>16390401
>eliminate the possibility of a nuclear holocaust
gay and lame
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:47:24 UTC No. 16390404
>>16390398
Oh?
When did I defend /pol/?
I've been telling you to stop shitting up this general with complaints about /pol/ existing for many threads now.
Any spacecrew would fucknig airlock your ass within a matter of two weeks.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:47:40 UTC No. 16390405
>>16390401
>Brilliant pebbles mentioned
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:49:05 UTC No. 16390407
>>16390369
>original
>posts higher number
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:49:10 UTC No. 16390408
>>16390404
by calling /pol/ a boogeyman and really awkwardly trying to force the phrase "/pol/ derangement/ as a crude derivative of EDS and TDS.
you're really out here trying to claim that /pol/ gets unjustified levels of hatred in the way that trump or elon musk does.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:49:25 UTC No. 16390409
>>16390247
Then its ok if we check under your floor panels for earthers?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:49:43 UTC No. 16390410
>>16390402
it's ridiculously easy for me to identify your country of origin because you took it upon yourself to post on /pol/ ABOUT THIS GENERAL
that's stupid yo
what worries me is the fact you still don't know where I'm from, despite the visual evidence that has passed before your very eyes
you should give this whole 4chan thing a break for a few threads
lurk moar, etc
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:51:07 UTC No. 16390412
>>16390410
>post on /pol/ about this general
nah i just made fun of /pol/tards a little in that thread and didn't make any mentions of this place, you however went out of your way to mention /sfg/ every time you replied to me, once again reconfirming that you posted that thread and are directly responsible.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:51:19 UTC No. 16390413
>>16390408
/pol/ is obviously a personal boogeyman of yours
consider that a complementary profiling service
>/pol/ gets unjustified levels of hatred in the way that trump or elon musk does
I'm not the one who mentioned Musk, Trump, and /pol/ in one breath.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:51:50 UTC No. 16390414
>>16390384
its just reddit trannies. nothing more.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:51:57 UTC No. 16390415
>>16389254
apparently, you could see the plume from miami
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:52:03 UTC No. 16390416
>>16390407
I’m using 4ChanX file randomizer, it sets a date for your filenames within the last year.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:52:08 UTC No. 16390417
>>16390410
>lurk moar
>for not giving a fuck about flags
haha nu/pol/ is a racket
when'd you blow in, 2018 or something?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:52:57 UTC No. 16390419
>>16390412
Not just this thread.
Every thread more or less since Polaris Dawn launch.
>>16390414
I got the same feeling when they started talking about "gatekeeping".
They don't know about rule 1.
And why is that?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:54:16 UTC No. 16390422
>>16390413
no but you did make a really silly attempt to compare EDS with perfectly healthy levels of disdain for 4chan's containment board. the board that is a containment board for a very good reason.
sorry nobody like /pol/ bro, i know it must be very upsetting the rest of the website sees you as basically romanian gypsy's.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:55:15 UTC No. 16390424
Shoot netherlands into the sun
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:55:23 UTC No. 16390425
>>16390419
>once again seething about being gatekept
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:55:53 UTC No. 16390427
>capable of lifting 320 kilograms to low orbit
is that new? last I heard electron could lift 300 even
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:57:05 UTC No. 16390429
>>16390416
>doesn't proudly keep his original file numbers
okbro
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:58:00 UTC No. 16390431
>>16390399
Actually hey while this general is totally off topic, is there any spaceflight related shirts or hats you'd wear? When I say any, I really mean any
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:58:34 UTC No. 16390434
>>16390422
>you did make a really silly attempt to compare EDS
I have never even typed EDS before now.
No reason to.
The fact you think I am everyone ITT who talks about that subject just proves my estimation of your mental health is accurate.
I'm here for you dude, but you need to take my advise and swear off the internet for a few days first.
>>16390425
You don't gatekeep shit.
None of your insults affect me.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:58:39 UTC No. 16390435
>>16390430
i wonder how much money their grifting has net them.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:59:02 UTC No. 16390436
>>16390431
i would maybe wear a hat that has "Kill all Earthers" embroided on it
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:59:05 UTC No. 16390437
>>16390419
>"gatekeeping"
I watched seething shitters in the dark near the tanhauser gate
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:59:42 UTC No. 16390438
>>16389799
good question. They have only had three launches this year, getting blown out by New Zealand of all things!
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:59:46 UTC No. 16390439
>>16390430
Are all of them deflecting?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:00:16 UTC No. 16390441
>>16390435
At least a grand each stream probably
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:00:30 UTC No. 16390443
>>16390436
any images or just the text?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:00:37 UTC No. 16390444
>>16390439
idk, but atleast 2 of them are deflecting.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:01:44 UTC No. 16390446
>>16390112
yeah some of them are
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:02:29 UTC No. 16390447
>>16390434
from >>16390384
>/pol/ derangement syndrome thread is deranged
what an absolute retard you are lol.
>n-none of your insults affect me
once again the exact same shit that the guy who posted those links said.
i'd say they're affecting you quite a bit since you jump in to damage control every single time the newfag incident is mentioned, and you use these exact same phrases over and over again.
oh and also whining about my nationality as some sort of really weird attempt at a threat.
nigga you don't know me, you could tell me i'm dutch a whole bunch more and it wouldn't change the impetus that you caused all of this and you're responding to me in the exact same way every time because you feel threatened.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:02:29 UTC No. 16390448
Any book recommendations? Berger's Reentry is coming out in a few days and I have also found out about this one, which is going to be released in November.
>Astronaut Dr. Charles Camarda has uncovered a recurring cause of accidents that no one has articulated yet--loss of a research culture that places a premium on learning and the quest for knowledge and what that means. He shows how to develop high-performing teams and networks of such research teams to solve anomalies rapidly, which can help prevent catastrophes in complex high-risk/high-reliability organizations.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:02:45 UTC No. 16390449
>>16390437
>tanhauser gate
fuck bro
you got me
damn
my salvage corvettes ate such serious shit during that mission
mistakes were made
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:02:50 UTC No. 16390450
man the schizo and trollposting ITT is strong
also funny how the jannies delete random threads from the catalog but won't even touch the shitposters ITT.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:04:15 UTC No. 16390453
>>16390450
deleting random threads takes a lot less effort than actually reading threads and deleting the obvious shitposters there
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:04:25 UTC No. 16390455
>>16390431
no but i have pins from a handful of JPL missions.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:05:11 UTC No. 16390456
>>16390450
janny being absent is the only reason that douchebag got away with early staging and linking us in the first place.
it's only going to become a larger problem over time, something really needs to be done, /sfg/ needs it's own moderation.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:05:13 UTC No. 16390457
>>16390447
you posted on /po/ and told them about this general
deal with it
exile is the price
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:05:29 UTC No. 16390458
>>16390232
the entire studio was laid off
game is dead
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:05:37 UTC No. 16390459
>>16389451
What was the point of having the sign in English? What did they mean by this?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:06:23 UTC No. 16390462
>>16390458
is there anything worth salvaging from ksp2 or it's back to ksp1
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:07:02 UTC No. 16390463
>>16390457
>you posted
you posted on /pol/, yes
>and told them about this general
nope, i made fun of them, didn't mention this place, you did in your responses to me however.
>deal with it
i already have and you're panicking, if it's for good reason idk since the janny is dead anyway but you've thrown every single thing in the book at me.
>exile is the price
says the newfag lol.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:07:05 UTC No. 16390464
>>16390455
Woah are those legit? Awesome. Any patches?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:07:50 UTC No. 16390465
>>16390462
nope
one good thing is that a lot of modders hired by the ksp2 team went back to ksp1 modding
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:08:46 UTC No. 16390466
Another battery dumped into the ocean...
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:08:53 UTC No. 16390467
wtf why'd they cut away from the batteries just as they did the hotswap?!?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:09:22 UTC No. 16390468
>>16390466
the fishes need electricity
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:09:47 UTC No. 16390470
>Switches camera view from engine to payload just before battery hotswap is supposed to happen
Why, hobbitlab stream operator?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:09:48 UTC No. 16390471
>>16390467
ya'll niggas realize that coincidences exist right? not everything has to have a reason.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:09:53 UTC No. 16390472
>>16390463
>didn't mention this place
you did though
told them to stay away IIRC
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:11:07 UTC No. 16390475
>>16390472
no i very specifically told them they would never belong on this site, and only that.
you went out of your way to talk about /sfg/ specifically though.
not that any of that matters since you are the one who let newfags in in the first place.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:11:13 UTC No. 16390476
>>16390471
if they're going to put so much production value into a constellation launch nobody cares about the least they could do is point the cameras in the interesting directions.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:11:22 UTC No. 16390478
>page 8
>1300+ posts
I'm not reading all this shit, what happened?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:11:45 UTC No. 16390480
>>16390453
you must be dumb. he keeps this one alive by deleting other threads. he could let this one hit page 10 to let anons start a new one but instead he promotes the shitposting
>>16390456
>that douchebag
anon... take your meds
>/sfg/ needs it's own moderation.
I got banned from this board once for posting some stupid shit ITT, but apparently the new janny/ies don't care about this general.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:11:56 UTC No. 16390481
>>16390478
schizophrenia
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:12:13 UTC No. 16390482
lmao why does their mission control camera pan back and forth?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:13:06 UTC No. 16390483
>>16390474
>another seething response
man all this ducking and weaving and whining about me being paranoid and now you're reduced to smugly making halfhearted jokes to cope with the situation.
pretty sad.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:13:15 UTC No. 16390484
>>16390453
i wasn't referring to /sfg/ threads in particular you retard
i was referring to how janitors operate in general
jesus fucking christ why is everyone in this thread a low-functioning autist
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:13:47 UTC No. 16390485
>>16390481
>>16390478
And politics, I think. At least, at some point yesterday one of the involved people called me a retarded nigger faggot for saying that the uniparty exists in American politics. I stopped paying attention after that.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:13:59 UTC No. 16390487
>>16390462
>>16390465
what happeend to ksp2? is it worth buying?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:14:05 UTC No. 16390488
>>16390475
the only reason I even posted in that /pol/ thread was to tell you to shut the fuck up
>you went out of your way to talk about /sfg/ specifically though
burden of proof is on you
go ahead, find that thread on an archive and post proofs
I'll wait.
>newfags
that's rich, coming from you
you can't even check timestamps between two different posts before accusing me of samefagging
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:14:53 UTC No. 16390489
>>16390484
>i was referring
so this ^ faggot is actually impersonating other anons kek
8/10, funny
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:14:59 UTC No. 16390490
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:14:59 UTC No. 16390491
>>16390478
people noticed all the off-topic posting, couple newfags outed themselves and started trying to emulate /sfg/ terms and lingo. discussion shifted towards the person responsible for linking /sfg/ to other places and he turned up instantly trying to damage control the situation.
that's the TL;DR
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:15:46 UTC No. 16390493
>>16390488
>Dutch anon can't tell between two different posters
Based retard
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:16:23 UTC No. 16390495
>>16390492
you are one of them idiot. i know its you.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:17:25 UTC No. 16390498
>>16390491
you fucking idiot. thats not what happened.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:17:58 UTC No. 16390500
>>16390488
>BRO SSSSSHHHH DON'T TALK ABOUT /SFG/ SPACEFLIGHT GENERAL OR THEY'LL COME AFTER US
mmhmmm, just trying to help were you?
nobody but the guy posting direct links to /sfg/ drew attention to it until you came along and "warned me" to stop making fun of them.
you realize how this story doesn't add up, right?
you're still trying to use me as a scapegoat over and over again but i'm sorry, it doesn't work that way.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:18:38 UTC No. 16390501
I don't think I've ever seen a thread reach 2000 replies.
Could be wrong about that.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:19:05 UTC No. 16390502
>>16390492
there's only one retard trying to damage control though.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:20:53 UTC No. 16390503
>>16390500
>just trying to help
I am helping when I reiterate to you the need to stfu immediately.
You are not helping the situation.
>"warned me" to stop making fun of them
You fucking zoomers don't know how flamewars work.
That's a callout. I 100% you are too young to understand what I mean.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:21:11 UTC No. 16390504
I wonder if the one(s) stirring shit are using AI for their trolling, and also, how many posts ITT are actually simple samefagging
it's really sad that 4chan decided to remove the IP count...
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:23:01 UTC No. 16390506
>>16389790
kek
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:23:32 UTC No. 16390509
>>16390503
>n-no YOU'RE the newfag
rest of this post had basically nothing of substance.
i guess that's it then, all your options are exhausted and you're just starting to repeat yourself, i think we're done here, thank you for coming out to damage control, i think i have a better idea of what makes you tick now.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:25:12 UTC No. 16390512
>>16390509
bot tier post
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:27:28 UTC No. 16390516
>>16390431
OCCUPY MARS
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:28:08 UTC No. 16390517
>>16390512
>even shorter non-response
that eager to get the last word in? i'll let you have it if you want it so bad.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:29:31 UTC No. 16390520
>OCCUPY MARS
why are right-wingers so shit at memeing?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:30:35 UTC No. 16390521
>>16390520
I think the libtard spacex employees came up with that one
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:31:07 UTC No. 16390523
I figured it was a giant /sfg/ thread because it is a rare three-launch-day. But no...
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:31:33 UTC No. 16390524
Once Mars is settled, discussion about Martian affairs will become political and therefore inappropriate for /sfg/.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:31:46 UTC No. 16390526
>>16390499
>Trans World Airlines
...
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:32:20 UTC No. 16390527
i want to become trans. transplanet
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:33:54 UTC No. 16390531
Everyone I have a solution to our predicament. It’s all jannies fault for being a lazy bastard and not moderating the thread. Go to 4chan home page navigate to the bottom and click there. Submit moderation feedback saying that /sci/ has dogshit moderation in /sfg/ because janny is too god damn lazy. Let janny sort out who does and doesn’t need to go, and get the mods to get on his ass about it. Best solution is to have an arbitrator on this since nobody wants to back down
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:33:58 UTC No. 16390532
>>16390524
We need a space board
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:35:05 UTC No. 16390533
>>16390531
Just so we're clear, this is a call to raid? Yikes
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:35:37 UTC No. 16390534
>>16390524
>>16390532
If Mars is actually settled I don't think /mars/ would be an unreasonable addition to this site
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:36:30 UTC No. 16390538
>>16390533
>immediatly try and subvert moderation of obviously shit thread
You are why we need to submit moderation feedback. Janny clearly has not done shit here and you want him to continue not moderating the thread?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:36:51 UTC No. 16390539
>>16390499
all lawyers should be sent in a single starship directly to the sun
>>16390531
anon, you can give jannies and mods direct feedback in their IRC channel
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:38:11 UTC No. 16390541
>>16390526
Wait till you hear about Transtage
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:38:38 UTC No. 16390542
>>16390531
inb4 this gets deleted for global 8
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:38:58 UTC No. 16390543
Just woke up. 1400 posts at page 8? What happened?
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:41:41 UTC No. 16390548
>>16390543
Someone said starship wasn’t a spaceplane and everyone dogpiled to explain that it is
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:41:53 UTC No. 16390549
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:42:32 UTC No. 16390550
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:44:05 UTC No. 16390553
>>16390543
why did they roll the ship out to the launch pad if they have no hotstage ring on the booster
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:44:34 UTC No. 16390554
Oh so it's just some spergs. Sad. See you guys next thread.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:46:37 UTC No. 16390557
>>16390543
Elon Musk's downful. it is over
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:48:18 UTC No. 16390561
It would probably be easy to get away with rape on Mars since there's no police
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:49:26 UTC No. 16390564
You're missing it! GET IN HERE
https://www.youtube.com/live/Dp3tGA
https://www.youtube.com/live/Dp3tGA
https://www.youtube.com/live/Dp3tGA
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:49:38 UTC No. 16390565
>>16390561
Same with the ISS. Or Dragon for that matter
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:49:40 UTC No. 16390566
>>16390561
no, the raped would form a rape pact and rape the rapees
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:50:16 UTC No. 16390567
>>16390561
US extraterritorial laws means she will rape you back and take all your money when you come back.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:50:40 UTC No. 16390569
>>16390564
buy an ad
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:52:10 UTC No. 16390570
>>16390569
You must be the EDS poster. Leave our thread!
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:52:28 UTC No. 16390571
rape will be mandatory on mars to fulfill breeding quota's.
tall martian women will be freely allowed and encouraged to corner and rape earther immigrants.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:53:28 UTC No. 16390572
>>16390565
Hot milf on theleft deserves to having titties suckd
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:53:28 UTC No. 16390573
>>16390570
>newfag is still going
wew.
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:55:08 UTC No. 16390574
The subhumans that think about rape constantly like turd worlders are exactly the type of people who wngts. Would you like to be raped in the shower by another male prison inmate since you seem so fond of it? That’s the only thing that will happen when you’re sent to a prison penal colony in LEO. The whole point of going to mars is to get away from (You)
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:56:00 UTC No. 16390575
>>16390534
Mars would fit in on /int/, all they would need is a new flag icon
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:56:03 UTC No. 16390576
>>16390571
it's gonna be a sausage fest. modern women would not dare opt for a life with the slightest inconvenience
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:56:27 UTC No. 16390577
>>16390565
>>16390572
sexstronaut
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:58:08 UTC No. 16390579
>>16390576
Just like on the American frontier
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:58:18 UTC No. 16390580
>>16390574
rape is natural. you are surpressing pedophilia
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:59:29 UTC No. 16390581
>>16390580
Oh stop it that’s demented
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:59:55 UTC No. 16390582
>>16390574
>would you like to be raped in the shower by another male
no i only want to get raped by women taller than me, i want them to physically overpower me and poot my penus in vaginer.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:02:28 UTC No. 16390583
>>16390574
t. rapelet
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:04:57 UTC No. 16390586
>VGH
>/pol/ is ruining my general
I KNOW
LETS RUIN IT EVEN MORE
this thread
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:06:53 UTC No. 16390587
getting ready to deploy the five Kineis satellites
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:09:07 UTC No. 16390588
>>16390587
The final swarm will be 25 iirc
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:09:13 UTC No. 16390589
>>16390561
You forgot about the Space Marshal
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:10:21 UTC No. 16390592
>>16390539
Waste of delta-v. Send them into a parking orbit and make them stay there.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:13:48 UTC No. 16390597
>>16387837
>>16390416
you are everything wrong with this site
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:14:03 UTC No. 16390598
>>16390594
Just ask me 50 years ago if venus has lava and you would have the right answer. instead you ask scientists who waste your money for 100s of years and then after trillions spent they say "we really cant know for sure but it seems to shit like a duck and eat bread crumbs like a duck...idk im agnostics!"
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:15:14 UTC No. 16390601
>4chanX mobile
now you know why this general is wrecked
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:16:36 UTC No. 16390603
>>16390594
post the original images then we decide
geological activity on Venus surprises nobody
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:17:22 UTC No. 16390604
>>16390601
Free speech
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:18:03 UTC No. 16390605
>>16390598
To the credit of planetary scientists there has only been limited data from limited missions around Venus. Everyone thought the evidence for volcanism would be extremely “in-our-face”. Instead, we’ve had trouble identifying active melt flows, tectonic activity, ash-induced lightning (or hard evidence of lightning of any kind whatsoever), etc.
But bear in mind what I said earlier—only limited data. It took a team of researchers dusting off what I believe was old Magellan data and re-analyzing it in fine detail to notice strange topological changes from different orbital passes to suggest active volcanic activity.
WE NEED MORE VENUS MISSIONS, VENUS IS ACTUALLY INTERESTING
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:19:12 UTC No. 16390607
>>16389982
based and true
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:19:21 UTC No. 16390609
>>16390601
Mobile devices should not be able to post on 4chan.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:19:42 UTC No. 16390610
>>16390604
America is why this general exists in the first place.
Relocate to NSF forums.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:20:07 UTC No. 16390611
>>16390601
half the shitposters write in lowercase, though
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:20:25 UTC No. 16390612
>>16390605
Yeah the Magellan data was synthetic aperture radar data from a probe launched in 1989. Simply putting modern sensors and a camera on an LVO orbiter would be insanely useful.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:22:01 UTC No. 16390614
>>16390610
I know youre a newfag because we respect NSF here. they are home to L2 the most insider friendly place in the space industry. we get the scoop before berger, but you have to pay
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:22:45 UTC No. 16390616
>>16390612
JPL has had a robotic martian political stronghold on NASA for far too long. They can fuck off; we’re sending humans there soon enough. Divert funds to Venus, and Icy Moons missions NOW. Oh, and let’s visit Uranus and/or Neptune again, Cassini-style
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:23:56 UTC No. 16390617
>>16390614
You clearly don't realize the NSF are a terrorist organization.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:25:19 UTC No. 16390618
>>16390605
Venus is interesting in the same way organisms at deep sea vents are interesting.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:25:27 UTC No. 16390619
>>16390617
Yeah im sure bill nye is evil psyop. puhlese, just give it a rest. youre exhausting
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:26:49 UTC No. 16390620
dropping by to say that the entire /sfg/ discord is laughing at you
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:27:48 UTC No. 16390622
>>16390586
no i think the thread is just /pol/ getting mentioned and the people who have some weird love pact with /pol/ going out of their way to defend it.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:27:50 UTC No. 16390623
Why isnt spacex blitzing starlinks to every body in the solar system? Add some sensors and cameras, hoard the data and sell it to the scientists for billions
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:31:14 UTC No. 16390624
>>16390623
The plan is to probably establish intranet spheres around the Moon and Mars eventually, once humans are there.
As for gatekeeping scientific data: that works for earth observation (i.e. MAXAR and stuff) but not really for other planetary bodies. The demand is purely scientific at that point, and people autistic enough to care will simply call you a paywall asshole and probably be smart enough to find a way to hack your data one way or another lol
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:32:14 UTC No. 16390626
>>16390620
discord trannies have more problems, the entire castrated cult is a voluntary extinctionist movement.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:32:35 UTC No. 16390627
>>16390623
They are comm sats dude. Making an interplanetary probe isn't simple as slapping sensors on your comm sat.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:33:08 UTC No. 16390628
>>16390624
>>16390623
Because NASA will only give billions to do so to failing VC startups
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:33:20 UTC No. 16390629
>>16390623
Limits of launch capabilities are 1) regulatory 2) capital allocation 3) vehicle recycle time (but more regulatory)
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:33:45 UTC No. 16390630
>>16390627
okay incel.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:38:20 UTC No. 16390634
>>16389473
Okay but how many of you are going to cum when it happens?
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:38:57 UTC No. 16390635
>>16390634
depends on how hard your mom's working at the time
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:40:35 UTC No. 16390636
>>16390630
I'm not an incel. I had sex with my assigned hybrid alien gf.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:42:50 UTC No. 16390640
>>16390634
>>16390635
go back to >>>/pol/ faggots
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:43:01 UTC No. 16390641
>>16390636
they prefer "castiza"
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:54:07 UTC No. 16390653
New thread when??¿!¿‽
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:54:31 UTC No. 16390654
Reminder, current lawfare against Musk and his companies.
>FAA
Starship
>FTC
X
>SEC
X
>2 of California's new law about "disinformation" and AI parodies
X
>FCC
SpaceX/Starlink
>NHTSA
Tesla
>NTSB
Tesla
Prob many more I dont remember
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:54:49 UTC No. 16390655
>>16390653
>upside down question mark
are you latinx by any chance?
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:55:08 UTC No. 16390656
>>16390653
I'll let you guess newfaggot
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:55:16 UTC No. 16390657
>>16390049
>your beloved leader
Because obviously that could be anyone, or has ever referenced anyone other than Elon Musk in these bait posts...
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 00:57:34 UTC No. 16390659
>>16390655
No I held down ¿ On my phone keyboard too long¡‽
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:02:39 UTC No. 16390661
>>16390654
that's good. what doesn't kill you makes you stronger
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:04:20 UTC No. 16390664
>>16390543
Flight 5. Anon, you slept through it. The booster was caught.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:10:18 UTC No. 16390666
>>16390654
several of these are entirely self-inflicted
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:15:36 UTC No. 16390670
>>16390654
Don't worry it's not a one-way phenomenon.
>Inside Elon Musk’s 23 active lawsuits
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:19:53 UTC No. 16390675
>>16390666
For the friends of the admin, everything. For their enemy, the law. Magical laws only uniquely became active when politics didnt align.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:24:39 UTC No. 16390676
>>16390675
for your mom, muh dick
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:25:59 UTC No. 16390677
>>16390655
No, Australian
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:34:40 UTC No. 16390679
Just 8, no, 7 more posts!!
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:41:21 UTC No. 16390682
>>16390611
i write in lower case on my smartphone to deceive the computer goyim
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:51:23 UTC No. 16390693
>>16390687
With BO naming boosters I suggest we name booster 12 "Godzilla" that way mechazilla can catch Godzilla
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:57:38 UTC No. 16390696
>>16390694
Oopsy poopsy yeah I’m bakin. We near image limit
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:58:56 UTC No. 16390698
>>16390697
DC-3, hopefully.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:59:31 UTC No. 16390700
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 01:59:34 UTC No. 16390701
>>16390687
So much has gone right with the Starship program but we’re still so so far from the end goal it’s unreal. These things need to be flying on the order of months/weeks; not once or twice a year
>inb4 it’s the FAA
>inb4 it’s a democrat political attacks against Musk
I don’t give a fuck and I don’t disagree, I’m just pointing out the fact that SS has a shitload of engineering hurdles it still needs to jump and it needs many more flights to sort them out. Hell there is probably at least 5-10 fundamental ship-killing problems that exist the tankage/plumbing/engines that they haven’t even considered as a failure mode yet just because they have a lack of flight data at the moment
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:00:26 UTC No. 16390702
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:00:37 UTC No. 16390703
>>16390694
if you stage with that image I'm going to come to your house and piss on your mom (whose house you live in the basement of)
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:00:38 UTC No. 16390704
>>16390694
Tuxedos are silly little specimens. This guy has two brain cells
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:01:01 UTC No. 16390705
>>16390694
Was that the one frogs killed after it safely returned home?
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:02:00 UTC No. 16390706
>>16390702
This is an image limit stage, it hit 250 with that staging post
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:03:01 UTC No. 16390708
>>16390706
OOPSY POOPSY WHEN DID IMAGE LIMIT GO OVER 250 I AM RETARDED ABORT ABORT DO NOT USE STAGE REPORT THE THREAD ITS NOT IMAGE LIMIT
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:03:42 UTC No. 16390710
>>16390706
you were off by 1 dumbass. crap staging photo too
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:04:18 UTC No. 16390711
>>16390708
The limit is 251. We're there.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:05:14 UTC No. 16390713
>>16388414
>Also our closest relatives in the ape family are humanoid and they are intelligent too
One just chills in trees eating fruit, one just sits on the ground eating sticks
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:05:15 UTC No. 16390714
>>16390711
>>16390710
>>16390708
>>16390706
Fuck when did that happen. You’re right I see red at the top now. Nevermind continue as normal, deleting post
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:05:48 UTC No. 16390716
>>16390702
congrats retard, you’re supposed to put “/sfg/” in the body text, now your thread cannot be found by a filter search
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:05:59 UTC No. 16390717
>>16390080
What's the penalty for luring a hundred FAA inspectors onto the launch pad and then static firing 30 raptor engines on top of them?
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:07:25 UTC No. 16390719
>>16390716
Huh? I see it in the name section what are you talking about. That I didn’t mess up.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:07:27 UTC No. 16390720
>>16390717
Slap on the wrist under Project 2025.
Side note, also throw in the faggots who designed the new sliding number/letter captchas
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:09:00 UTC No. 16390723
>>16390716
It's fine as long as it's actually in the subject field and not the name field. RIP.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:09:03 UTC No. 16390724
>>16390720
what's a captcha?
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:09:07 UTC No. 16390725
>>16390719
you put the title in the name when it should goes to subject
rookie mistake
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:09:25 UTC No. 16390726
>>16390719
Actually jk you have a good thread but for whatever reason it’s not showing up in my filtered tab. Weird, I’ve never seen this before. Huh
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:11:31 UTC No. 16390730
>>16390724
kek
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:14:18 UTC No. 16390735
>>16390725
Oh fuck I see now. Damn it Im still getting used to the extension. See that’s why it’s not showing up my bad guys. How do we want to move forward? I’m fine with having someone remake thread if it’s felt to be that important
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:21:12 UTC No. 16390744
>>16390702
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:22:04 UTC No. 16390745
BAKING
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:23:04 UTC No. 16390747
>>16390702
>FTS activated
Based retard janny
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:23:31 UTC No. 16390748
>>16390702
ACK
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:23:47 UTC No. 16390750
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 02:24:16 UTC No. 16390751
PROPER STAGING
>>16390746
>>16390746
>>16390746
>>16390746
>>16390746
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 03:37:52 UTC No. 16390845
>>16390356
What was the purpose of asking this?
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 05:29:38 UTC No. 16390909
>>16390605
Venus is like the bottom of the sea except worse