🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 15:54:00 UTC No. 16414200
Didymos and Dimorphos Edition
previous >>16411492
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 15:55:00 UTC No. 16414205
>>16414200
FIRST FOR ULA <3
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 15:56:11 UTC No. 16414209
>Blue Origin built a second New Shepard
What for?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 15:58:40 UTC No. 16414215
>>16414209
maybe its actually positive from a margin perspective
or they want to keep their mission control etc people fresh
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:03:29 UTC No. 16414218
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:06:54 UTC No. 16414221
>>16414210
Is this the wokest launch stream ever?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:08:52 UTC No. 16414225
>>16414221
I cant listen to this shit.
I unmuted for a moment, and they were saying its a terrible day of remembrance for Jews, all sad
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:09:23 UTC No. 16414228
>>16414215
I wonder if they had a bunch of tourist hops booked before the first NS failed, so they HAD to build another one to meet obligations?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:10:06 UTC No. 16414229
>>16414228
that is a possibility too
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:13:50 UTC No. 16414234
Whats the hold up?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:16:32 UTC No. 16414237
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:19:15 UTC No. 16414239
>>16414232
Now they're almost crying.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:29:39 UTC No. 16414254
they sure do love their holds over at BO
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:29:46 UTC No. 16414255
THERES ANOTHER HOLD?????????
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:30:19 UTC No. 16414259
blue hold
hold origin
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:32:36 UTC No. 16414262
i thought this was a spaceflight general.
why are we watching a high atmospheric suborbital flight?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:35:05 UTC No. 16414265
i heard a loud bang, did they blow a burst disc overpressurizing the vehicle or something?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:36:26 UTC No. 16414267
>let's talk about, um, the new shepard experience.
much like what it's outside appearance suggests.
a short burst of fun and then premature descent.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:36:55 UTC No. 16414268
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:37:27 UTC No. 16414269
>>16414264
why the hell can't a launch just be scheduled earlier rather than later when bad wheather is suspected to delay it anyway if forced to launch on the current date?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:38:32 UTC No. 16414270
>>16414268
hardly a real rocket though, it's more like an overblown sounding rocket that wastes a lot of it's time trying to carry people rather than experiments.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:38:44 UTC No. 16414271
>>16414268
>spaceflight
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:41:50 UTC No. 16414274
>>16414268
it isn't called rocket general anon, it's called spaceflight general.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:42:49 UTC No. 16414276
>>16414270
>>16414271
>>16414274
I didn't hear yall bitching when we watched that chinese hopper crash the other week
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:42:53 UTC No. 16414277
>>16414274
What you suppose we use instead of rockets? A frog legged thing? Haha faggot you don't even know another tech that can spacefare
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:43:16 UTC No. 16414278
I FUCKING HATE BLUE ORIGIN YOU TEASES
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:45:17 UTC No. 16414281
>>16414276
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obz
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:47:27 UTC No. 16414284
https://www.businesswire.com/news/h
Rocket Lab was downselected for MSR
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:48:27 UTC No. 16414285
>>16414269
>What are delta-v optimized launch windows
The solar system doesn't stop for some clouds
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:52:27 UTC No. 16414289
>>16414284
along with four other companies
>>16413848
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:55:40 UTC No. 16414290
>>16414106
What is this anime actually about? The premise of "vampire, but cute girl, not evil, and in space" seems extremely gay.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:56:13 UTC No. 16414292
>>16414284
Ok let's see the mission architecture
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:57:09 UTC No. 16414293
>>16414264
Milton? I thought it was Helene.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:57:50 UTC No. 16414295
>>16414264
Hope Yucanta will weaken it a bit.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:57:57 UTC No. 16414296
>>16414293
yes new hurricane
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:58:27 UTC No. 16414297
scrub
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:59:52 UTC No. 16414299
>>16414296
Gee, America! How come God let's you have TWO hurricanes?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:01:45 UTC No. 16414304
>>16414290
Alt-world space race loosely paralleling USA/USSR in the 50s-60s. The "vampires" are just weird romanians, but aren't considered human in not-USSR. That's why they select one as a test pilot ahead of the "real" first manned flight. The anime is her training for her first flight, basically.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:05:04 UTC No. 16414310
>>16414307
I fucking hate blue origin
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:10:56 UTC No. 16414315
>>16414307
Oh no, the earf rocket is stuck on earf. When will they get those poor, stranded, earfnauts back onto solid terra firma?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:29:13 UTC No. 16414321
> Hera
> Mission to confirm an asteroid we already confirmed moved slightly, actually -- moved slightly.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:31:11 UTC No. 16414322
>>16414321
Maybe they'll learn something that'll come in handy for designing future impactors meant for redirecting Earth-threatening asteroids? Maybe they'll just take some cool pictures and that's fine by me since I didn't pay for it.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:34:16 UTC No. 16414327
>>16414321
nobody knows what the impact crater will look like up close. that's worth something
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:40:13 UTC No. 16414334
>>16414321
It's up close battle damage assessment for a planetary defense mission, which is based.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:40:52 UTC No. 16414335
>>16414321
>move confirmed
>m-maybe it just moved on its own
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:47:48 UTC No. 16414341
>>16414340
https://arstechnica.com/science/202
>So by Wednesday, at the latest, Milton should be weakening as it approaches the Florida coast. However, it will nonetheless be a very large and powerful hurricane, and by that point the worst of its storm surge capabilities will already be baked in—that is, the storm surge will still be tremendous regardless of whether Milton weakens.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:48:15 UTC No. 16414342
Barnard's Star is so back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiR
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:51:11 UTC No. 16414347
>>16414321
yeah but I wanna see clear pictures of that asteroid looking wrecked
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:59:22 UTC No. 16414363
>>16414274
>>16414270
>>16414271
New Shepard goes to space
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:59:59 UTC No. 16414365
>>16414356
Calm down Diogenes
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:05:41 UTC No. 16414370
>>16414327
It will look like a crater or somewhat crater-like. There, just saved $100m or whatever Hera cost.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:09:50 UTC No. 16414373
>>16414370
yeah or maybe it won't jackass. look at all the craters dimorphos had before. basically none. it's a pile of gravel with almost no gravity. could be any large impact just rearranges the gravel into a new blob. only way to check is to go there.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:13:01 UTC No. 16414376
>>16414373
The initial probe took plenty of data, as did remote telescope observation from Earth. There is nothing new being learned from Hera. If the Mafia wants to explore an asteroid, pick any one of the hundreds of NEA within their ability to reach.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:14:03 UTC No. 16414379
>>16414363
it dips it's toes into space
this is like saying a parachute flies.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:15:04 UTC No. 16414381
>>16414376
you are wrong.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:15:42 UTC No. 16414382
>>16414376
>The initial probe took plenty of data
DART zoomed in and crashed after seconds of arriving near the asteroids, and LICIACube was a very simple probe.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:17:17 UTC No. 16414384
>>16414290
>The premise of "vampire, but cute girl, not evil, and in space" seems extremely gay.
Why are you gay?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:26:27 UTC No. 16414390
>>16414381
> Mama Mia! Yousa wrongo!
Okay Tony. Is my sub ready?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:44:28 UTC No. 16414410
>>16414237
fiery but nominal observation
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:49:49 UTC No. 16414422
>>16414390
30 minute waiting penalty for being wrong.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:50:49 UTC No. 16414423
>>16414290
>premise of women doing cute things is gay
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:00:04 UTC No. 16414431
>>16414353
>Ariane
>1
We don't need a reusable rocket for our one (1) launch
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:00:23 UTC No. 16414433
>>16414354
Beautiful
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:01:21 UTC No. 16414436
>>16414435
Oh shit this is actually big
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:02:31 UTC No. 16414437
What's Musks gameplan when Demonrats win?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:03:15 UTC No. 16414440
>>16414436
the justifications seemed like bullshit if I remember correctly
saying Starlink can't hit a target even though the time to hit it was in 2025 or something
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:04:17 UTC No. 16414442
>>16414437
to keep grinding like he always does
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:08:03 UTC No. 16414449
>>16414442
Will Kameltoe Hay-rice really let him?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:08:49 UTC No. 16414451
>>16414435
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-cont
>"The use of Starlink to repair and enhance connectivity in the devastating aftermath of Hurricane Helene suggests that Starlink can support rural communities recovering from natural disasters—and therefore in daily usage, too; FCC Commissioner Carr has argued that the FCC is now among a “growing list of administrative agencies that are taking action against Elon Musk’s businesses.” The FCC must ground its decision-making in law and not politics."
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:11:08 UTC No. 16414456
>>16414449
there will be harassment probably but its not like she can just execute him or something
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:11:37 UTC No. 16414457
>>16414456
>its not like she can just execute him or something
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:13:02 UTC No. 16414459
>>16414437
Hide behind the DoD
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:13:09 UTC No. 16414460
>>16414435
>>16414451
They dont have an executor who will carry out the justice. Only investigate. DOJ wont take action.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:14:49 UTC No. 16414463
Total FAA and FCC Death
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:15:31 UTC No. 16414464
>>16414268
yeah, I can't wait until New Years and the Fourth of July!
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:21:03 UTC No. 16414473
https://youtu.be/N1GVb5jGnmE?t=45
Is the reaction between n2o and nitromethane hypergolic?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:22:45 UTC No. 16414475
>>16414437
>when Demonrats win?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:29:48 UTC No. 16414485
>>16414477
Eberyome GET IN HEREEEE!!!!!!!
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:33:16 UTC No. 16414488
Why are they repeating the WDR? This isnt a good sign
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:33:20 UTC No. 16414489
why is Musk trying to go to fucking mars when the moon is much easier and would benefit humanity a shitload more in the space industry?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:34:23 UTC No. 16414491
>Still need to destack for FTS install
yikes
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:34:36 UTC No. 16414494
>>16414489
Moon is a satellite of Earth and if by chance Earth is captured by the castration cult, its over. Mars it the next best bet.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:36:25 UTC No. 16414496
>>16414489
The Luna is woke garbage
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:37:40 UTC No. 16414497
>>16414489
"With a starship, you can go anywhere you want"
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:38:53 UTC No. 16414500
You guys seriously need to watch this
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:39:12 UTC No. 16414501
>>16414489
to make life multiplanetary
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:39:15 UTC No. 16414502
>>16414500
woah that was so cool do it again
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:41:23 UTC No. 16414507
>>16414502
Everyone is hyped about how crazy OFT5 will be
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:42:12 UTC No. 16414508
>>16414501
the moon is a planet so moon colonization fulfills that goal.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:42:56 UTC No. 16414509
>>16414501
The Moon is a planet
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:46:17 UTC No. 16414513
>>16414509
>>16414508
no the moon is a harsh mistress
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:46:22 UTC No. 16414514
>>16414508
>>16414509
multiple meaning more than two
NASA is doing a mars base anyway
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:46:34 UTC No. 16414515
>>16414456
unfortunately the Democrats have a numerical advantage when it comes to crazed assassins
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:47:24 UTC No. 16414516
why doesnt elon suck kamala-coochie and just do what the FAA say
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:48:02 UTC No. 16414517
>>16414515
There's fuck ton of deranged democrats killing people, their motives dont get much coverage on media because it goes against the narrative. Only way to find out the motives is to get some leaker.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:48:06 UTC No. 16414518
>>16414516
you need to go back
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:50:12 UTC No. 16414519
>>16414238
i want to blow up inside LV0011
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:51:20 UTC No. 16414521
>>16414488
That wasn’t a full WDR chud
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:51:36 UTC No. 16414522
so you're telling me the entire reason you want to go to mars instead of the moon is because the moon is too close for you to fully escape the "woke mind virus" or whatever the fuck and you have a breeding fetish
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:52:54 UTC No. 16414524
>>16414522
you're forgetting the child brides but yeah pretty much. what of it?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:55:04 UTC No. 16414526
>>16414524
I think God should kill you
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:56:45 UTC No. 16414529
>>16414514
*Moon base
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:56:46 UTC No. 16414530
>>16414526
God is on my side on this one.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:57:06 UTC No. 16414532
>>16414521
You literally dont know that
>>16414524
based
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:57:25 UTC No. 16414533
>>16414508
>>16414513
It's, uhh, a moon
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:59:08 UTC No. 16414538
>>16414534
manray..
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:59:16 UTC No. 16414539
>>16414522
Woke mind virus is just the latest symptom, the greater problem is civilizational decay on many different fronts
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:59:47 UTC No. 16414540
>>16414534
real shame they don't recover and refly those things.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:00:05 UTC No. 16414542
>>16414522
The human extinctionist movement is what woke virus is. So the threat is very real as they coalesce and branch out into all sorts of anti-human ideology and practices. Whether that is the castration cult, the depopulation cult, the degrowth cult, deindustrialization cult, the communist cult, etc. One overarching goal of this movement is extinction.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:00:13 UTC No. 16414543
>>16414534
Is it just a trick of the camera or is it really at a 45 degree angle of attack?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:00:35 UTC No. 16414544
>>16414540
ULA boosters are designed to go too fast at cutoff so they'd just burn up
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:01:17 UTC No. 16414545
>>16414437
Cry about stolen election
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:01:24 UTC No. 16414546
>>16414543
It was fairly angled-up after that SRB failure
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:01:50 UTC No. 16414547
>>16414477
> another partial load test
I sleep.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:05:14 UTC No. 16414551
>>16414548
>NTO/Pentaborane ISRU on Mars
uh
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:05:18 UTC No. 16414552
Are they going for launch?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:06:44 UTC No. 16414556
>>16414552
WE GAAN
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:09:30 UTC No. 16414560
>>16414437
"I'm fucked" - first minute of the new Carlson interview
Then he does the Elon laugh. Kek.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:10:13 UTC No. 16414562
>>16414548
Pair it with ClF3 instead of N2O4 and we're cooking.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:14:53 UTC No. 16414570
>>16414548
Sucks that all the best propellent combinations are turbo toxic and incredibly reactive desu.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:22:39 UTC No. 16414583
>>16414570
The only alternative to chemistry and ions is nuclear (fission) and that comes with a suite of its own problems. Laser propulsion techniques are criminally understudied though
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:31:29 UTC No. 16414594
>>16414583
Lasers are the physical essence of the Exhaust Problem, any system energy dense enough for interplanetary space travel is a weapon.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:35:04 UTC No. 16414599
https://x.com/ajtourville/status/18
Starlink connected drones now being deployed in NC for disaster relief
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:35:50 UTC No. 16414600
>nsf: ship catch is NET 2026. its physically impossible to currently catch a ship. anyone saying otherwise doesnt know what they're talking about. its. not. happening.
legit?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:38:35 UTC No. 16414603
>>16414600
if they are talking about starship and not the booster then probably yes
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:38:42 UTC No. 16414604
>>16414600
if they can catch booster, why cant they catch ship? will biden faa block spacex from catching ship?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:39:51 UTC No. 16414605
>>16414600
Yes, it physically can't be caught currently. It doesn't have anywhere for the arms to catch.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:41:09 UTC No. 16414607
https://octoberskyminute.com/cm/pod
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:45:42 UTC No. 16414616
>>16414600
to catch the ship they need to evacuate the population of texas and arizona to keep people safe. its NEVER HAPPENING.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:48:17 UTC No. 16414621
I wouldn't be surprised if they end up adding legs on starship
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:49:49 UTC No. 16414625
>>16414621
Obviously. You need to land quite a few before you can build a catch tower there
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:53:05 UTC No. 16414633
>>16414621
Its not a surprise. Moon/Mars need it. SpaceX/Musk has said they'll be using legs.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:58:02 UTC No. 16414636
>>16414621
>>16414625
>>16414633
Who is more insufferable than legfags. You idiots shit up every general you touch. They wont be using legs btw. Musk already explained this.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:58:11 UTC No. 16414637
>>16414600
I don't give a FUCK what faggots on NSF are saying
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:03:32 UTC No. 16414645
>>16414533
That's no moon....
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:05:00 UTC No. 16414646
>>16414562
>Pair it with ClF3
Ah yes, the substance that firmly proves Satan's existence.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:06:29 UTC No. 16414647
>>16414646
Skill issue tbph
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:10:59 UTC No. 16414654
>>16414262
rogget
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:12:00 UTC No. 16414657
>>16414274
well personally I wanted to name it Tank Watcher General back in 2018 but nooooooo that's not inclusive enough
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:17:24 UTC No. 16414662
>>16414647
Well yes, running skills are very important when dealing with it.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:17:51 UTC No. 16414663
>>16414376
you should be Raped.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:19:22 UTC No. 16414664
>>16414397
anyone else always zoom into these crowd shots to search for fuckable women?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:21:03 UTC No. 16414667
>>16414290
extremely mediocre romcom anime with spaceflight theme
it has a good rocket launch in it
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:22:16 UTC No. 16414670
>>16414456
why not, cuz it's illegal? lol
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:22:46 UTC No. 16414671
>>16414292
That's what they've been downselected to do.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:25:06 UTC No. 16414674
>>16414489
Try to get to Mars with lots of cargo and as a direct result you have vehicles that make accessing the Moon easy.
You're basically asking "why aren't they building a worse Moon rocket"
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:33:11 UTC No. 16414680
>>16414636
I >>16414625 was talking about the moon and Mars
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:35:03 UTC No. 16414681
>>16414680
they will not use legs on the moon and Mars. Be imaginative.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:40:01 UTC No. 16414686
>>16414293
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:42:12 UTC No. 16414688
>>16414356
they're even straight lines if you put it on a sphere
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:42:23 UTC No. 16414689
>>16414687
nothing burger
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:45:44 UTC No. 16414692
>>16414489
>doesn't know that Mars is similar dV cost to landing on the moon
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:48:37 UTC No. 16414694
>>16414687
duh, it's the highly eccentric orbits in weird heliocentric inclinations with low reflectivity that are really dangerous.
if one of those was on a course to hit us there's likely very little warning time and we wouldn't be able to strike it multiple orbits ahead of the potential impact, we'd need to hit it with enough force so it gets deflected even if it's already on terminal approach.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:49:17 UTC No. 16414695
>>16414604
They need to catch booster first because it's more expensive and more useful. Ship can be expendable for high energy missions.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:50:53 UTC No. 16414696
>>16414681
What, shuttle style?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:51:25 UTC No. 16414697
>>16414695
why would there be 1+ year delays between booster catch and ship catch?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:53:24 UTC No. 16414700
>>16414679
total oldspace death inshallah
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:53:30 UTC No. 16414701
>>16414697
it's not that easy in ship catchery
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:54:04 UTC No. 16414702
>>16414646
Pentaborane is even worse if you look at the fire diamond.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:54:04 UTC No. 16414703
>>16414677
Getting stuff to TRL6 is not a scam, just a well-funded hobby that may potentially translate to millions if NASA buys it
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:54:44 UTC No. 16414705
>>16414697
Because the ship is shedding like 5x the energy of the booster after going around the Earth a couple times. You want precision out of a maneuver like that? SpaceX is good, but they don't have magic
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:55:54 UTC No. 16414709
>>16414489
Because Mars is more than a 3 day trip from Earth and its retarded Earthers?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:57:47 UTC No. 16414713
>>16414534
cute fairing-chan flapping away
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:58:13 UTC No. 16414714
>>16414697
they need a new fishing license for that
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:58:23 UTC No. 16414715
Mars colonization is fake and gay and Elon Musk will take the pay.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:59:22 UTC No. 16414716
>>16414679
almost the Ginyu Force pose but not quite
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:59:31 UTC No. 16414717
>>16414600
>legit?
The catch arms for the Booster can't hold a Ship, the way both are held is completely different.
Don't be surprized if there are dedicated Ship catch towers.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:00:15 UTC No. 16414718
>>16414489
Moon is a shithole. Mars less so.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:03:43 UTC No. 16414722
>>16414705
It's easy actually.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:03:57 UTC No. 16414724
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:05:09 UTC No. 16414726
>>16414719
My wife tells me to stop talking about it so much and that she doesn't want to go if we can. This makes me sad because we might get the opportunity (early 20s) but I'd need to get a divorce first
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:05:26 UTC No. 16414728
>>16414696
Think Opportunity.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:07:31 UTC No. 16414732
>>16414696
>>16414728
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSb
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:12:13 UTC No. 16414735
>>16414726
If I got the opportunity I would choose to go to Mars in a heartbeat even if it meant I would survive for only 30 minutes there.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:14:01 UTC No. 16414737
>>16414701
It might be, we don't know. Nobody knows, that's what's so exciting. Explosions might happen, or miracles, probably both.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:14:23 UTC No. 16414738
>>16414728
>>16414732
>mattress skies
>mattress landing
How fucking sleepy are these Martians going to be
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:21:03 UTC No. 16414743
>>16414738
Mars winters are twice as long so they'll have to hibernate as well
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:26:49 UTC No. 16414745
>>16414534
i could fuck that fairing. someone draw anime girl fairing please!
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:34:03 UTC No. 16414753
>>16414664
yes
slim pickings
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:34:18 UTC No. 16414754
>>16414745
I did my best
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:34:54 UTC No. 16414755
>>16414437
Destroy all SpaceX data and send backups to china.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:47:30 UTC No. 16414765
>>16414732
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aj
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:59:09 UTC No. 16414771
"I want to go to Mars" is code for "I want to get away from black people"
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:00:55 UTC No. 16414772
>>16414771
If you go to Mars, you will go with other people, at least some of which will be n black people. And you will be in confined quarters with them for a very long time.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:01:40 UTC No. 16414773
>>16414771
Well, we are running out of retreat positions fast.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:01:49 UTC No. 16414774
>898mb
lil Milton aint fuckin around
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:06:35 UTC No. 16414779
>>16414772
If they want to go to Mars they are perfectly capable of starting their own space program
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:15:24 UTC No. 16414786
>>16414771
Progressives don't actually want to be around black people and, like crab in a pot, it means that if they cannot get away no one else is allowed to either.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:21:57 UTC No. 16414794
>>16414779
Gimme space catgirls or gtfo
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:25:53 UTC No. 16414798
>>16414766
>we need religion
mechanicus...
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:28:57 UTC No. 16414802
>>16414771
Yes.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:29:15 UTC No. 16414803
>>16414342
naw bro kyplanet aint gonna seggs you
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:30:19 UTC No. 16414804
>>16414798
I was actually interested in that topic but he kinda went full “I’m atheist but I’m culturally christian”
Just convert already. Musk would be such an autistic Catholic it would be entertaining and based and would suit him well
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:30:26 UTC No. 16414805
>>16414798
>>16414766
He's talking about decline of religion creating a vacuum. In the absence of an official religion, the adoption of a pseudo religion in all but name becomes adopted. The woke religion. It has all the characteristics of a religion. It has churches. It has popes. It has dogmas. It has religious proselytism. It has holy wars. And so its a religion by all definition.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:30:32 UTC No. 16414806
>>16414772
And who are you to proclaim what the makeup of Mars will be?
>nooo you have to take <x> people, and <y> people too!
How about you stay here and we fuck off? You can enjoy all the <x>s and <y>s that you love so much, keep every single one of 'em
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:31:29 UTC No. 16414807
>>16414804
Musk is atheist but he adopts the standard moral/ethical framework of the background religion. Thats culturally religious.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:31:44 UTC No. 16414808
>>16414803
kyplanet is my son.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:39:57 UTC No. 16414813
>>16414807
he's a gnostic
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:40:57 UTC No. 16414814
>>16414812
>its real
WTFFFFF
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:41:57 UTC No. 16414815
>>16414804
>Just convert already
The pope is a globohomo communist. Why do you want Elon to ally with disgusting earther movements that will only try to undermine him?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:42:19 UTC No. 16414816
>>16414812
>/sfg/ was right
wow
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:45:28 UTC No. 16414819
>>16414812
Didnt they post something similar like a month ago
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:45:48 UTC No. 16414820
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:46:04 UTC No. 16414821
>>16414812
Trying to force the faa’s hand by getting every non cucked agency on board for an oct 13 launch. Unfortunately I don’t think it will work.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:46:30 UTC No. 16414822
>>16414819
nope they didn't give a date, they just said that the vehicles were "ready to fly" but they would do further testing
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:48:43 UTC No. 16414825
>>16414812
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1843435
How many leftists are seething
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:49:22 UTC No. 16414826
>>16414812
Get USSF to put literally anything on S30. Claims this is a national security launch and needs no approval from FAA.
It's just that simple.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:49:33 UTC No. 16414827
>>16414824
you mean the test articles? testicles for short
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:49:50 UTC No. 16414828
>>16414824
Lefties gets triggered
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:51:08 UTC No. 16414830
>>16414825
That doesn't mean anything. They're always seething
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:53:33 UTC No. 16414833
>>16414820
stupid frogposter
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:54:23 UTC No. 16414834
Everyone and their mother (literally, at this point) has an iphone and can take high-resolution photographs whenever and wherever they please.
But what separates the average joe from someone like matthew dominick?
He obviously has autistic knowledge of his equipment and sets up specific shots beforehand. But he also has some sort of uncanny ability to COMPOSE photos. I don’t understand photography composition. How can I get better at photography?
https://x.com/dominickmatthew/statu
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:54:51 UTC No. 16414835
>>16414820
>>16414833
get along chuddies
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:57:17 UTC No. 16414837
>>16414812
we're so back
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:57:41 UTC No. 16414839
>>16414812
Everyone told me that the Democrats were blocking the application? Were they lying? Are patriots in control?
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:58:30 UTC No. 16414840
>>16414839
dark MAGA brandon personally approved it
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:58:53 UTC No. 16414841
>>16414828
because they already chopped theirs off
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:59:27 UTC No. 16414842
>>16414839
Elon had to personally call the Secretary of Transportation and yell at him to get Starship and NC relief unblocked.
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:59:46 UTC No. 16414843
>>16414839
>>16414840
the west has risen
billions must launch
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:59:52 UTC No. 16414844
>>16414824
Did NSF talk about Musk's 2026 Mars mission? Or Trump/Musk statement on Mars?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:00:22 UTC No. 16414846
>>16414839
It took dragging them out in front of congress to get them to move some papers around. Really disgusting that starship didn’t launch in august. Don’t let them off easy
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:00:59 UTC No. 16414849
>>16414839
If you dont push back and become vocal, you wont get anything. Simple as that. Same thing happened with the Pete Butigeg with Hurricane Helene
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:02:11 UTC No. 16414851
>>16414844
context of that pic was when they were talking about the water ball sack thingies. they have a strict no-politics rule so they only mentioned the former, not the latter
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:02:19 UTC No. 16414852
it's really funny how some queers in this thread and elsewhere online were adamant that a launch couldn't happen NET late november even after the NOTAM was filed
>FAA reconfirmed their earlier statement! It's not that easy in launch approvalry!
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:02:22 UTC No. 16414853
>>16414837
use this one instead
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:03:19 UTC No. 16414854
>>16414851
>no politics
That just code word for "no Trump" right? Cause I doubt there would be silence if Musk/Biden announced Mars 2026.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:04:42 UTC No. 16414855
>as soon as
The FAA won't give them a license before the 13th. Nothingburger
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:06:23 UTC No. 16414858
>>16414849
>>16414842
>relief unblocked
This didn't happen though Elon just lied to push his political agenda.
He does this a lot, presumably because he thinks you are all mindless cattle (he is right).
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:07:23 UTC No. 16414859
who keeps posting kyplanet? Ive seen his entire catalog of videos from watching them embedded in sfg
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:08:32 UTC No. 16414860
>>16414858
>"It didn't happen!" said the government that was caught doing it by hundreds of eyewitnesses
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:10:01 UTC No. 16414862
>>16414812
HOW
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:12:08 UTC No. 16414863
>>16414862
"We'll be ready to launch by this date, so give us the license by this date." -Elon
I hope it works, fuck the FAA, no reason we couldn't have had five flight tests this year.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:13:48 UTC No. 16414864
>>16414806
>And who are you to proclaim what the makeup of Mars will be?
Not me, them.
>nooo you have to take <x> people, and <y> people too!
That's exactly how it will be. You're delusional if you think they're only going to send white people.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:14:40 UTC No. 16414865
https://x.com/DrPhiltill/status/184
>5th strongest Hurricane EVER
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:14:46 UTC No. 16414866
>>16414863
i really hope its on a weekend
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:14:48 UTC No. 16414867
>>16414860
Me and your mother were caught doing it by hundreds of eyewitnesses.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:15:21 UTC No. 16414868
Fire in the Sky - A Space Age Song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8A
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:15:58 UTC No. 16414870
>>16414865
>only 5th
lame
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:22:20 UTC No. 16414871
>>16414688
If you put it on a sphere wouldn't it no longer have four right angles?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:22:43 UTC No. 16414872
now that it's all but CONFIRMED that starship is launching this weekend, what are the chances (NOT 50%) of super heavy's landing being successful?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:24:06 UTC No. 16414873
>weather forecast for the 13th is sunny, no strong winds
>basically perfect weather and on the weekend where almost everyone can enjoy the show
PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD LET IT BE THIS SUNDAY PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:25:57 UTC No. 16414874
>>16414864
>That's exactly how it will be
And this will be enforced with violence?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:27:16 UTC No. 16414875
>>16414872
>POV, super heavy preparing to hit the tank farm at 500 mph
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:28:23 UTC No. 16414876
>>16414873
yjk that high altitude wind sheer is lurking
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:31:54 UTC No. 16414877
>>16414863
Announcing a date means they know the license is coming.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:32:16 UTC No. 16414878
>>16414600
makes sense to me
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:33:56 UTC No. 16414879
>>16414705
NASA figured it out on their first flight of shuttle.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:41:09 UTC No. 16414881
>>16414875
I still think its idiotic that they put everything so close together
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:42:53 UTC No. 16414884
>>16414694
We cant even detect city destroyer asteroids in time. Need some kind of early alert system
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:43:39 UTC No. 16414885
>>16414771
No, I also want to get away from Jews, Arabs, Hispanics, Indians, Turks, Russians, Chinese, Europeans, Southeast Asians, and probably a few other groups too insignificant to remember off hand.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:44:27 UTC No. 16414887
i hate how most good spaceflight discussion is now done on paid discords
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:45:21 UTC No. 16414889
>>16414881
Its fine. They've had multiple crashes without catastrophic issues. So its been proven to be just fine. Plus I think the tower catch/launch are from the side angles thats facing away from the farm (especially the Tower2), so I forsee minimal problems even in the event of RUD
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:46:04 UTC No. 16414890
>>16414881
Wow, the KSC is super inefficient. But imagine how many launch pads it'll be able to hold when they renovate it in the future.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:47:13 UTC No. 16414891
>>16414881
was originally a site for launching falcon 9
plus it's size limited by the wilderness around it and the mexico border is right below it
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:50:33 UTC No. 16414892
>>16414871
Tell us, how did you do on the imagine an apple test?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:55:10 UTC No. 16414895
>>16414892
But on a sphere a triangle can have 3 90 degree angles.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:58:34 UTC No. 16414900
>>16414898
that doesnt make sense. go give spacex 3 months to land people on mars. protip: you cant do it.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:00:51 UTC No. 16414903
>>16414858
Starship..? What are they doing, delivering a headcrab payload
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:00:58 UTC No. 16414904
>>16414901
nothing happens until FTS is applied
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:02:44 UTC No. 16414906
>>16414842
Starship..? What are they doing, delivering a headcrab payload
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:02:49 UTC No. 16414907
>>16414879
Yeah but shuttle was a spaceplane and starship is not
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:07:12 UTC No. 16414910
>If [Trump] loses, I'm fucked
Direct quote from Elon
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:08:50 UTC No. 16414911
>>16414900
Yeah bevause a little thing called F.A.A.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:10:18 UTC No. 16414912
>>16414910
He's not wrong. The current government is deeply hostile towards American innovation and anyone who threatens the State's absolute information control and Elon is dead center in both of those categories
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:11:02 UTC No. 16414913
>>16414901
Wtf is this supposed to be? I hate tankwatch engagement farmers, stop with your obtuse bullshit implicatory statements
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:11:38 UTC No. 16414914
>>16414912
The current government must be replaced, or we're never gonna make it.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:12:23 UTC No. 16414916
>>16414913
>anon's never seen trucks before
lel
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:12:48 UTC No. 16414917
>>16414913
propellant deliveries have ramped up
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:13:11 UTC No. 16414918
>>16414913
Starship runs on fuel, right? How does that fuel get out to the Starbase?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:13:34 UTC No. 16414919
>>16414916
what are they getting ready for? dump cum into a big pit? what is something big and what role do they play
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:14:42 UTC No. 16414922
>>16414918
>>16414917
How are the tanks not already full? Theyve been "ready" for months?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:17:54 UTC No. 16414924
so why exactly aren't you making hydrazine for your homemade rocket?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydp
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtY
if hydrazine is too spicy you could even make some hydrogen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIW
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:20:31 UTC No. 16414925
>>16414924
how does hypochlorite and ammonia make hydrazine, doesn't that usually just make chloramines
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:21:37 UTC No. 16414926
>>16414924
>hydrazine
it was good enough for a junkman to get to the moon
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:24:38 UTC No. 16414928
>>16414922
You know what they meant when they said the vehicles were ready.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:25:22 UTC No. 16414929
>>16414881
Crashing onto your own tank farm is a skill issue
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:25:45 UTC No. 16414930
>>16414921
congress and the military have been putting the pressure on
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:26:25 UTC No. 16414931
>>16414918
What's the plan for propellant delivery when they're launching 100+ Starships a year? Literally tens of thousands of truggs?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:27:43 UTC No. 16414933
>>16414931
Lox and methane can both be made onsite with enough electricity
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:30:50 UTC No. 16414936
https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/statu
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:32:43 UTC No. 16414938
>>16414931
Either on-site like anon said or run a pipeline to the nearest production site, let it be for SpaceX's use only.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:32:54 UTC No. 16414939
>>16414931
Import ISRU propellant from Mars.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:35:33 UTC No. 16414940
>>16414928
Ready to fly pending regulatory approving (and weeks of tanker trucks refueling) ok dude
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:35:38 UTC No. 16414941
>>16414938
I don't think cryogens can be transported long distances by pipeline. Maybe pipe in nat gas and liquefy on-site?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:36:31 UTC No. 16414942
>>16414936
Lads... I think I know why Flight 5 is happening
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:36:40 UTC No. 16414943
>>16414933
Not possible, not enough storage, not fast enough to produce, too expensive to produce
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:38:55 UTC No. 16414946
>>16414943
>Not possible
the chemistry is simple
>not enough storage
build more storage
>not fast enough to produce
build more machines. inputs (air and water) are not limited at all
>too expensive to produce
yeah
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:40:24 UTC No. 16414949
>and a manual command from the mission’s Flight Director. If this command is not sent prior to the completion of the boostback burn, or if automated health checks show unacceptable conditions with Super Heavy or the tower, the booster will default to a trajectory that takes it to a landing burn and soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:41:40 UTC No. 16414951
Been feeling with no power or cell from Helene. Can I get a basic gestalt on flight five?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:43:06 UTC No. 16414952
>>16414941
What do you think liquefied natural gas is?
LNG has had a long history and is the sole reason natural gas distribution is viable between states and countries.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:43:31 UTC No. 16414953
>>16414951
Damn the torpedoes
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:47:42 UTC No. 16414956
The government is cloud seeding to stop all launches. bexos has the only rocket that is hirricane proof and thats Blue Gleen.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:50:12 UTC No. 16414957
>>16414812
lmao
I wonder if the FAA is making a last-ditch effort to convince Musk to spare their jobs when his towering autistic rage is unleashed on the regulatory agencies.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:51:21 UTC No. 16414959
>>16414952
Is LNG transported any serious distances by pipeline? It's moved by tankers and shit, stored near shore in insulated tanks, then regasified for distribution.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:52:00 UTC No. 16414960
>>16414356
Chat is this real
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:52:05 UTC No. 16414961
>>16414812
How is this allowed? FAA said november. They are breaking laws to move SpaceX faster? This needs to be investigated
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:53:35 UTC No. 16414963
>>16414961
I detect the influence of Putin
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:57:55 UTC No. 16414967
>>16414812
>GAAN
Why are you speaking dutch?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 01:58:56 UTC No. 16414968
>>16414961
I demand that the FAA self immolate
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:00:21 UTC No. 16414969
I don't think we can justify sending any of our precious African Americans on Felon Husk's deathtrap water tower to Mars. Like, an acceptable number would be absolutely zero
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:01:07 UTC No. 16414972
>>16414961
This just confirmed that there was never any actual safety concern for the public. Nobody was ever breaking any law. The 60+ day delay was always a politically motivated move by the corrupt democratic administration.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:04:09 UTC No. 16414973
>>16414972
2 months wasted over N O T H I N G
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:07:34 UTC No. 16414974
differences in flight profile between 4 and 5
>gap between MECO and stage sep is 8 seconds instead of 4 seconds on flight 4 (reducing performance but improving relight reliability)
>boostback burn is 10 seconds shorter
>landing burn begins 10 seconds earlier
>landing burn is 3 seconds longer assuming a tower catch
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:08:30 UTC No. 16414975
>>16414961
They lied. Particularly the FAA admin lied.
https://x.com/RepKiley/status/18390
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:10:06 UTC No. 16414977
Cape Canaveral could be leveled by Milton, which is intensifying rapidly.
Looking at the outer band forming off the coast of the Yucatan.
Tampa is going to be a disaster area.
Both areas are directly in the forecasted trajectory of the storm eye, by some chance.
Stacks and infrastructure are at risk.
>NHC reports winds hit 180 mph Monday, making Milton very strong Category 5 storm
8 Oct 2024 - 0:00 UTC ...CENTRAL PRESSURE IN THE EYE OF MILTON HAS FALLEN TO A NEAR RECORD LOW... ...MILTON POSES AN EXTREMELY SERIOUS THREAT TO FLORIDA AND RESIDENTS ARE URGED TO FOLLOW THE ORDERS OF LOCAL OFFICIALS... As of 7:00 PM CDT Mon Oct 7 the center of Milton was located near 21.9, -90.4 with movement E at 10 mph. The minimum central pressure was 897 mb with maximum sustained winds of about 180 mph.
>SpaceX launches European asteroid probe as hurricane weather closes in
Dodging stormy weather ahead of Hurricane Milton, SpaceX launched the European Space Agency's $398 million Hera probe Monday on a follow-up flight to find out precisely how a moonlet orbiting a small asteroid was affected by the high-speed impact of NASA's DART probe in 2022.
The launching was in doubt until the last moment, with thick clouds and rain across Florida's Space Coast, fueled by moisture pulled in by the intensifying hurricane to the west.
>>16414812
it's too late now, we're in the middle of hurricane season now
if the damage is as bad as projected it might not matter
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:10:08 UTC No. 16414978
>>16414974
>only three seconds longer
The only reason I still think the tower catch is possible is faith. I can't comprehend a logical reason it should work
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:11:55 UTC No. 16414979
>>16414975
We he said SpaceX should adopt a safety culture like Boeing I wanted to [redacted for legal reasons]. Hatred is an understatement for what I feel
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:13:17 UTC No. 16414980
>>16414977
That won't even touch Starbase
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:13:37 UTC No. 16414981
>>16414977
>Cape Canaveral could be leveled by Milton, which is intensifying rapidly.
This is the most redditor take I've heard all day
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:16:05 UTC No. 16414982
>>16414978
3 seconds is a long time in burnery
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:18:17 UTC No. 16414985
>>16414981
>>16414980
dude a category 5 hurricane isn't shit
180 mph winds, who cares amirite
what's a 15 foot storm surge
you had better pray this gets weaker as it approaches landfall, but from what I'm seeing it's only building up right now
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:18:21 UTC No. 16414986
>>16414984
who is this guy and what does he claim to know about the inner workings of spacex?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:19:17 UTC No. 16414987
>>16414978
Until I see it I don't think I can believe it, no matter how much I want to. It's bonkers, even though it totally might end up working.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:19:57 UTC No. 16414988
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:20:38 UTC No. 16414989
>>16414978
This desu. It's already been basically proven
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:21:19 UTC No. 16414991
>>16414982
>bunnery
HOP???
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:23:52 UTC No. 16414993
>>16414980
Other anons might not realize this, but Brownsville, Texas is not actually located in western Florida.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:24:23 UTC No. 16414994
>>16414993
source?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:24:28 UTC No. 16414995
>>16414986
leftists in shambles
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:28:38 UTC No. 16415000
>>16414985
They better move all those space rockets out of Tampa, and fast!
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:32:14 UTC No. 16415003
>>16414985
nigga its gonna weaken to a cat 3 by the time it makes landfall
literal nothing burger
>t.lives in florida
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:33:15 UTC No. 16415005
>>16415003
I hope you're right because it looks like it's just getting stronger ATM.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:33:44 UTC No. 16415006
>>16414979
When he said that I wanted to visit FAA HQ and alter history forever (kill him)
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:34:29 UTC No. 16415007
>>16414985
>infrastructure in Florida has never prepared for something as nightmarish as a big hurricane. It's like an earthquake in Japan! No one ever even imagined that it could happen
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:35:24 UTC No. 16415008
>>16415007
tsmt
remember when they left out SLS for that other hurricane?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:35:49 UTC No. 16415009
>>16414991
omg so cute!!
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:53:18 UTC No. 16415020
>>16415017
>"I see no FAA up here"
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 02:53:47 UTC No. 16415021
>>16415000
KSC is Atlantic coast
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:01:08 UTC No. 16415024
>>16415017
ngl already preordered it
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:02:56 UTC No. 16415025
>>16414985
200mph gusts
it's gonna hit like a freight train
no evidence it's gonna lose power since the ocean temp is in the perfect range to maintain the power
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:07:34 UTC No. 16415028
>>16415017
Spacex knows their audience: manchildren who literally cant grow up. they want to play with spaceman teddy bear forever
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:07:35 UTC No. 16415029
>>16415025
This sucker's a Cat-6
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:08:39 UTC No. 16415031
>>16415029
cringe incel chuds with no meteorological knowledge love to make unsubstantiated claims based on pop-sci sensationalized headlines
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:10:26 UTC No. 16415032
>>16415025
it's not gonna be that strong when it makes landfall. maybe cat2 or 3 if lucky
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:11:32 UTC No. 16415034
>>16415029
it could be. the reason why we dont have cat 6 is because the government doesnt want to downplay cat 4 and cat 5.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:11:56 UTC No. 16415035
>>16415032
true
watch this be a nothing burger (like everything else)
nothing
ever
happens
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:13:23 UTC No. 16415036
What happens to nothing ever happens bros when a happening happens
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:13:23 UTC No. 16415037
>>16415028
>audience
i promise you, nobody who ponders buying a space launch soifaces over a plushie you joyless faggot
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:14:33 UTC No. 16415038
>>16415031
Talk like a regular person, weirdo
>>16415034
It's a damned strong one, whatever you want to call it. I'm glad I'm not down there in the path, good luck to any /sfg/ regulars who live in the area.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:15:47 UTC No. 16415039
>>16415037
struck a nerve? i wasnt talking about you (or was i?) I think you can buy a plushie, do what makes you happy but save some for the actual children
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:17:01 UTC No. 16415041
>>16415039
aight anon you got me, i'll save one for you
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:17:16 UTC No. 16415042
>>16415035
Hawk tuah to that. I donno much about hurricanes or weather, but I do know media and experts lie
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:17:20 UTC No. 16415043
>>16415038
bro its literally gonna weaken to a tropical storm by the time it makes landfall
you need to stop falling for pol doomer bait
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:17:23 UTC No. 16415044
>>16415017
cute
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:19:16 UTC No. 16415048
>>16414989
No one has commented yet that the raptor plume looks like shit on the landing footage, crazy rich mixture or something, shouldn't be this yellow
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:19:22 UTC No. 16415049
>>16414989
why does that thing look so much like the replica "Luke's lightsaber" I bought like 10 years ago?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:20:09 UTC No. 16415052
>>16415041
Oh so you're a pedo. Sorry I'm not an underage girl, I know your fatass gets a chub when you think about those
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:20:24 UTC No. 16415053
>>16415034
>>16415029
Category 6 doesn't have a reason to exist because buildings already aren't expected to survive a Category 5.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:20:40 UTC No. 16415054
>>16415025
I know.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:21:04 UTC No. 16415055
>>16415039
>save some for the actual children
sixty bucks for a toy? no kid is worth that much!
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:21:43 UTC No. 16415056
>>16415043
I'm not your bro, bro, and I saw the storm on TV. Weather is interesting when it is intense, that's all. Chill out anon.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:22:41 UTC No. 16415058
Keep in mind, the same people predicting this is the strongest hurricane ever recorded told you there would be auroras in Arizona last friday night. Maybe stop listening to these fools
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:25:00 UTC No. 16415061
>>16415058
THIS SO MUCH THIS
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:25:22 UTC No. 16415062
>>16415036
they get real quiet
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:27:13 UTC No. 16415064
>>16415036
nothing happened tho
and nothing will ever happen
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:27:54 UTC No. 16415066
>>16415058
Wilma was the strongest on record, this one's like #5 so far. We'll see if things change, they often do with the fickle atmosphere. All the more reason to remove the whole damned thing.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:28:23 UTC No. 16415067
>>16415029
kot5
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:29:25 UTC No. 16415068
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:36:05 UTC No. 16415071
>>16415068
cute
plush starship when?
only thing they have is the $925 steel starship model
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:38:11 UTC No. 16415074
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:40:57 UTC No. 16415077
>>16415074
>it's a pattern
do I look like I know how to sew?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:46:47 UTC No. 16415080
>>16415077
yes
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:48:15 UTC No. 16415082
>>16414812
yessss, fuck FAA
>>16414839
They still haven't announced a license yet. Couldn't it still be DoD or NASA? FAA said they wouldn't approve until November or December IIRC.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:11:08 UTC No. 16415089
>>16414812
we're so there
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:11:51 UTC No. 16415090
IT'S OVER, MUSK IS LAUNCHING WITHOUT A LICENSE HE'S COUNTING ON A TRUMP WIN TO PARDON HIM THAT'S WHAT HE MEANS BY "IF HE LOSES, I'M FUCKED"
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:12:48 UTC No. 16415091
>>16415090
Yep, that's what I said here >>16414942
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:22:55 UTC No. 16415096
>>16415090
so this is what he meant by dark maga
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:25:50 UTC No. 16415098
>>16415090
>"IF HE LOSES, WE'RE FUCKED"
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:25:52 UTC No. 16415099
>>16415090
Gaan status: we
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:28:09 UTC No. 16415101
>>16415098
>>16415090
Everyone loses if Dems win. They are a death cult and are importing millions of illegal immigrants to destabilize the country and give themselves those millions of new voters.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:35:40 UTC No. 16415105
>>16414831
Holy, i wonder what changed
FAA is one of the reasons Musk went full MAGA so perhaps they are getting shit on internally too
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:43:02 UTC No. 16415108
>>16414881
No choice die to enviromental reqs
They used an old spot that haf been cleared for something else, getting virgin land would have meant probably a half decade or more of delaysb
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:43:26 UTC No. 16415109
>>16415032
Computer models starting to pivot a bit on this, boundary might not arrive in time to weaken it much. TT discussed the possibility of a sting jet developing on the south side of the storm due to interaction with cold air to the north which could result in up to a 50kt enhancement in wind speeds from cold air advection. Europa Clipper NET Friday minimum.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 04:47:53 UTC No. 16415111
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:10:40 UTC No. 16415126
feels like we're getting our hopes up for nothing desu, just a feeling
prepare to be disappointed most likely
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:19:46 UTC No. 16415131
>>16415126
2 more weeks
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:29:41 UTC No. 16415135
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18434
>SpaceX says it will attempt to catch the Starship Super Heavy booster with the pad chopsticks, but it would “require healthy systems on the booster and tower and a manual command from the mission’s Flight Director. If this command is not sent prior to the completion of the boostback burn, or if automated health checks show unacceptable conditions with Super Heavy or the tower, the booster will default to a trajectory that takes it to a landing burn and soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico.”
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:30:43 UTC No. 16415136
>>16414353
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18434
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:30:47 UTC No. 16415137
>>16415074
Go back
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:32:50 UTC No. 16415140
>>16415127
allegedly it's because the fourth Falcon 1 flight succeeded
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:36:52 UTC No. 16415147
>>16414431
Yeah, its not like there was a asteroid impact inspector ESA needed launching this quarter
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:37:56 UTC No. 16415149
>>16415136
>6:48 AM
Eurorangutans not allowed
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:37:59 UTC No. 16415150
>>16415141
Commies aren't even subtle about it. I guess they dont fear losing everything yet.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:38:05 UTC No. 16415151
>>16415134
that's crazy
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:39:41 UTC No. 16415153
>media invites were sent out
ok yeah its 90% happening
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:45:32 UTC No. 16415157
>>16415153
I really wonder what changed, this isn't even about just redoing the old test but actually the test flight they want to do
perhaps a shit load of pressure from all republican aligned government etc?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:47:45 UTC No. 16415158
>>16415138
Check out Merida, Mexico weather right now
its a nothing burger again
they have us in constant panic
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:54:13 UTC No. 16415163
>>16415160
starlink is a true unicorn product
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:56:19 UTC No. 16415166
>>16415160
>Partnering with vodafone
le sigh
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:56:28 UTC No. 16415167
>>16415157
FAA trying to appease Musk ahead of a Trump victory in the hopes he won't gut their workforce too hard. OR the current administration has realized he's capable of being enough of a pain in the ass that it's worth simply cooperating with him.
Maybe the DoD sat down with some top DNC people and said "sometimes the great man theory is actually true, we'd like to own the Moon before China does, and if you don't let Musk do what he wants, we're fucked."
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:57:05 UTC No. 16415168
>>16415165
its still scary to me that the pro-STEM left quickly turned against science and technology if it gets pushed by someone on the right side of the political spectrum
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:57:06 UTC No. 16415169
>>16415163
Telecoms are sweating bullets, but it may be too late to put the genie back in the bottle.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:57:52 UTC No. 16415170
>>16415165
btw a lot of unhinged replies to this lmao
they are really, really mad
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:59:09 UTC No. 16415171
>>16415163
>hmm
>colonizing Mars is an incredibly expensive endeavor with no immediate economic return
>I have a lot of money but not nearly enough to fund it on my own
>I think I will simply begin replacing the telecom industry
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:59:15 UTC No. 16415172
>>16415166
they are going to partner with everyone eventually I think, if there isn't some other satellite based service provider doing the same thing such as AST space mobile
this is going to become as ubiquituos as cell towers in general
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:01:57 UTC No. 16415175
>>16415167
whatever it is, I hope it continues
why can't the democrats just work with Musk?
I'm not sure what broke the camels back for Musk but there was probably a lot of shit that he disagreed with, but would have let happen anyway just to stay apolitical
but they just came after everything
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:04:27 UTC No. 16415176
>3 months left in the year
>still 40 launches behind last year's total
hmmmmmm
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:04:51 UTC No. 16415177
>>16415146
Good man
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:10:19 UTC No. 16415178
>>16414562
>full score on the spiciness diamond
Wew lad
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:14:45 UTC No. 16415179
what if starlink isnt viable long term? what if for some reason it can only work for the next 10 or 15 years? what will spacex resort to then? maybe its time to diversify their sources of revenue.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:17:33 UTC No. 16415181
>>16415168
for communists, science is valued only as a means of propagating their dialectic of historical materialism
when it does not serve that end, it is sidelined or suppressed for the good of the "people"
if science finds something to be true that the party does not approve of, it is pseudoscience
many such cases, doesn't take long to find examples of this
they don't believe in objective truth
for them, dialogue is not a cooperative effort to discover truth but rather a power struggle that they are obliged to win because of the necessary progression of history as determined by their deontological principles
>>16415169
they are obsoleted and completely compromised, both in terms of security and institutional corruption
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:17:49 UTC No. 16415182
>>16415136
China falling behind. What's their problem?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:20:21 UTC No. 16415185
>>16415182
they dont need much for commercial launches because almost their entire population is located in the eastern half of the country in very dense urban areas. communication satellites are a waste of time for them. who knows what their killer app for commercial spaceflight will be.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:20:39 UTC No. 16415186
>>16415159
Lol dont leave, they are doing another landgrab
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:21:43 UTC No. 16415187
>>16415157
REDGOV started issuing threats
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:23:29 UTC No. 16415189
>>16415179
what do you mean by nonviable? even if there is competition, that would only decrease the profits somewhat and right now it doesn't seem like any other competitor will be coming in the near term
but lets say competition happens and SpaceX only gets a few billion profit per year
SpaceX still has the launch business and Musk has 5 other companies, he can funnel money from them after they become mature (Tesla in the medium term, the others a bit further back)
and by funnel money I mean Musk personally taking his share of dividends and just plowing them into the mars colony, not that the companies would start to do anything, just Musk personally with his holding
dividends would allow him to keep the shares, but that requires a mature company with more money coming in than the company can use for growth, if thats not the case yet then he can just start divesting slowly a bit like Bezos has been doing with Amazon to fund Blue Origin
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:24:43 UTC No. 16415191
>>16415168
he wasn't even on right side of the political spectrum when they started hating him
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:25:16 UTC No. 16415192
>>16415175
>I'm not sure what broke the camels back for Musk
besides general incompatibility his companies have with the regulatory agencies and how they function (corruptly) it really does seem he got radicalized by twitter deciding to filter all vaccine "misinformation" and I think even directly states if he had been able to access the information he wouldn't have gotten vaxxed. also the troon kid probably set him off too ESPECIALLY if he's been given insight into what kind of life his son will have after SRS and other various surgeries (KF has a good thread on after results). But maybe it was just simply that the BLUGOV wasn't moving fast enough for him so he had an autism about it and went dark mode
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:26:45 UTC No. 16415193
>>16415182
nothing really is their problem, its just that SpaceX is revolutionary and the chinese have not replicated reusable boosters yet
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:26:59 UTC No. 16415194
>>16415185
back when starlink was getting started I always figured china would eat the cost and create their own version of it under the belt and roads label for thirdies. also as a somewhat decent way to fund the nascent spaceflight industry they're trying to jump start.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:28:06 UTC No. 16415195
>>16415189
>what do you mean by nonviable?
i was thinking of the telephone pole regulation the other day, where every telco had their own wires on the pole. eventually the government said that was stupid and forced all the companies to use a single line. with all the megaconstellations, i wonder if we'll see a similar thing for commercial constellations. at that point starlink would just be one of dozens of service providers.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:28:17 UTC No. 16415196
Alright fags, Ive returned for IFT-5. I will also be going in person for gaan. Expect some /sfg/ exlcusive photos and maybe videos of both launch and catch though from far away. I never take photos or videos though so camerawork is likely to be ass and from a phone.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:29:55 UTC No. 16415199
>>16415176
lost 3 weeks of total flight time due to observations
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:30:51 UTC No. 16415200
>>16415198
i saw it, it dropped right around the time that spacex dropped the notice about a flight this weekend. the video's info was soon outdated.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:31:59 UTC No. 16415201
>>16414200
Why has nobody made a Diddy joke about OP yet?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:32:39 UTC No. 16415204
>>16415201
baby oil as rocket fuel
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:32:41 UTC No. 16415205
>>16415195
I kind of doubt it as there are multiple companies trying to replicate it like Amazon with Kuiper
that might happen perhaps at some point, right now it seems pre-mature
and the analogy doesn't really work, the satellites are not permanent infrastructure, its something that has to be continued to be launched and upgraded compared to some copper and wooden poles
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:35:51 UTC No. 16415208
>>16415206
interview #193729147369146 of gargling elons nuts
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:36:25 UTC No. 16415210
>>16414831
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
said it on Oct 2 initially, what kind of info does he have
Berger clearly knows something
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:36:49 UTC No. 16415211
>>16415134
Why'd he UOH?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:38:19 UTC No. 16415216
>>16415208
seething
>>16415211
UOH? if you mean why isn't he going, a childhood friend is having a wedding apparently and he said he has already dedicated the last 5 years of his life to this, so he can't skip everything
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:45:15 UTC No. 16415226
spacex first stage, esa second stage
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:50:20 UTC No. 16415235
>>16414530
Allah*
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:51:12 UTC No. 16415238
>>16415223
its very quite in Merida right now
don't worry homie
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:51:50 UTC No. 16415241
>>16415176
>still 40 launches behind last year's total
SpaceX launched 98 rockets in 2023, they are at 95 rockets as of the Hera launch this morning.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:58:21 UTC No. 16415251
https://x.com/Stefan__Powell/status
Spaceplane test video
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:58:34 UTC No. 16415252
>>16414967
Newfag proves his newness again
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:04:59 UTC No. 16415262
Who up fuelin they rocket?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:10:30 UTC No. 16415265
>>16415210
october 2/3 was when the first NOTMARs came out, plus booster pins had been removed the previous week so there was definitely something afoot by then
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:14:04 UTC No. 16415268
>>16415265
yeah, but seems like Berger had some additional information not available to the public
or maybe he was just speculating, but he did say he has heard "chatter"
>I've heard chatter that an earlier Starship launch is possible, including some time in October. But nothing is finalized.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:17:37 UTC No. 16415271
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:24:59 UTC No. 16415279
>>16415277
destack probably tomorrow then?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:27:07 UTC No. 16415282
>>16414804
>Just convert already
>Just abandon reason and start believing jewish fairytales from 2000 years ago, even though you already didn't need them to not be a shitty person
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:29:19 UTC No. 16415284
>>16414804
christians are anti-racist and are more than happy at importing africans (even strangely non-christian ones) and of course since all sins can be redeemed a former porn whore with stds would make a perfect wife for a tradbro like you
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:29:21 UTC No. 16415285
>>16414898
I can clean my house in under 2 hours.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:30:57 UTC No. 16415287
>>16415025
>This is nothing short of astronomical
It is actually. It's atmospheric.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:32:24 UTC No. 16415290
>>16415289
where is the choice that they are simply going no matter what
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:33:37 UTC No. 16415291
>>16415290
posturing is the closest to that I guess
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:34:23 UTC No. 16415293
>>16415289
NASA is too cucked to do anything, FAA already reaffirmed when they werent as pressured that they wouldnt change course, so that only leaves DoD who are more likely to step in about this sort of thing though they have less of a vested interest. Buckbroken isnt a specific reason, why is that option there.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:37:50 UTC No. 16415296
>>16415293
listing all the different reasons why FAA is giving out the license would be too many options
maybe they got pressured externally by the public, maybe they got pressured through congress or other republican entities, maybe they got it done faster for some reason, maybe Musks call with Buttigieg had some effect
I would say all of that falls under being buckbroken due to being adamant previously about the date not moving left from end of November
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:39:08 UTC No. 16415300
>>16415289
NSF say that since the spacex announcement, all of their enquiries to the FAA are being ignored lol
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:40:36 UTC No. 16415302
If Trump wins I will admit that I was wrong to doubt Elon. Big motherfucking if there though, putting Mars on the line is an extremely risky gambit that plays with the future of and interplanetary and maybe even interstellarhumanity
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:40:38 UTC No. 16415303
>>16415300
the current FAA admin needs to be publicly flogged
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:41:39 UTC No. 16415305
>>16415303
Shit yourself immediatly
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:43:36 UTC No. 16415308
>>16415305
there needs to be Congressional hearings where the admin admits to being a massive faggot
after that, a flogging
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:44:43 UTC No. 16415311
corporal punishment for bureaucrat obstructionism, that should speed things up
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:45:00 UTC No. 16415312
>>16415300
If I worked at the FAA I would blacklist NSF too
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:46:01 UTC No. 16415313
>>16415312
The only thing you blacklist is white people
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:51:06 UTC No. 16415315
>>16415289
FAA bent the knee to the future king of Mars!
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:53:26 UTC No. 16415318
>>16415289
I doubt NASA has the power to order the FAA to change something like that, unless maybe it was at the KSC itself.
Given the Coast Guard was the first source for a potential launch this weekend I'd say it's likely DOD pressure. Especially considering that the FAA made an open, public, very clear statement that Starship would not be launching until late November at the earliest. For the FAA to get egg on their face like this I think it'd have to be some pressure from a pretty powerful actor with some serious weight to throw around.
There's no reason why the FAA would just randomly decide to go back on themselves and back down, and there have been several sources pointing towards a potential launch this weekend so it's definitely not SpaceX just bullshitting.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:54:35 UTC No. 16415321
>>16415318
NASA and DOD can issue their own separate licenses if they really want to
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:55:18 UTC No. 16415322
maybe it wasnt any one source of pressure but a bunch of small pressures from multiple sides...nasa, dod, congressmen, etc. could've all contributed to the pressure that finally caused the faa to give in.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:55:40 UTC No. 16415323
maybe I should have made separate poll options for NASA and DOD issuing licenses themselves instead of just pressure coming from there, but whatever
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:56:38 UTC No. 16415324
>>16415321
Really? That's the first time I've heard of that.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:02:05 UTC No. 16415327
>>16415324
yes (14:45 in the video) >>16415198
for instance, the Starliner crew demo launch didn't have a FAA license, it was launched under NASAs experimental something something
and apparently the DOD can also launch if they deem it necessary
in both cases the given party takes responsibility if something goes wrong, i.e. NASA or DOD can then be sued if public safety was compromised or something like that
NSF talked about some of this in a previous video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3To
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:05:55 UTC No. 16415328
>>16415327
at 7:05 in the video "Why Falcon 9 Faced FAA Investigations But Not Starliner | We Asked The FAA" they talk about it
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:06:55 UTC No. 16415329
>>16415328
>none of the Shuttle launches were managed by the FAA
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:14:53 UTC No. 16415335
>>16415181
>for communists, science is valued only as a means of propagating their dialectic of historical materialism
when it does not serve that end, it is sidelined or suppressed for the good of the "people"
Lysenkoism is well known but Bolsheviks also had big issues with relativity and quantum theory. Physicists had to be careful what they said until politicos chilled out on those fields of research
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:16:41 UTC No. 16415337
wonder if elon dropping the FEMA lack of competency and agreeing to be a team player (in those tweets to buttiboy) was part of some deal to get an earlier launch. he had a bunch of spacex engineers on site all over the place probably recording all kinds of things
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:21:31 UTC No. 16415339
>>16415324
The US Governments launches nor it's payloads are beholden to the FAA as the law is written
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:22:14 UTC No. 16415342
>>16415337
maybe
Musk stops grilling current admin on FEMA incompetence, they in turn allow Starlink D2C for emergency use temporarily + expedite the Starship launch license
but has Musk stopped grilling the admin about FEMA?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:22:30 UTC No. 16415343
Maybe spaceX and the FAA both bent the knee and made a weird arrangement
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:23:36 UTC No. 16415346
>>16415342
surely his tweets would have been posted here since that's the only way I know what he's up to
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:27:36 UTC No. 16415350
>>16415166
What part of space to cell don't you get? In order to function this thing has to actually route calls over the internet from SpaceX's ground stations to the regular cell network. This would have actually been impossible before VoIP became standard in 4G/5G
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:37:00 UTC No. 16415360
>>16415350
I thought it bypassed the existing towers of the so-called "regular cell network" altogether. Is this just using Starlink for backhaul?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:42:08 UTC No. 16415362
>>16415360
its supplemental service for locations with no cell towers, there will never be enough capacity for this to completely replace terrestrial cell towers
so yes, if you are calling someone that is in a city from somewhere in the wilderness, then you need the existing network
its not backhaul either really (the normal starlink could be used for that perhaps), but covers areas where there is no cell service and routes that through the satellite into a cell tower, which then works normally
https://www.starlink.com/business/d
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:43:13 UTC No. 16415363
>>16415175
You are not nearly cynical enough to talk politics. The situation with SpaceX does not directly benefit Democrats. Elon moving his companies out of blue states was his "all in" political gesture once he determined he was not getting the patronage he sought. (I'm not sure what he expected. The US hasn't had an official industrial policy in nearly 80 years.) Not really a surprise given the current makeup of likely Democrat donors (who don't care about space at all, even as a national prestige project) and the industries they represent. The only thing keeping them from openly committing lawfare is, paradoxically, the same intel community that hates the former president Elon is backing now. All of them, even the people he aligns with, are perpetually baffled by Elon tilting at windmills, but simultaneously aware he struck gold twice already, three times if you count PayPal (ehhhhh). If he's playing a long con, he's been doing it for 20 years and I have to respect his commitment to the bit.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:49:02 UTC No. 16415366
>>16415171
Becoming an ISP is just a money printer anyway, couldn't have chosen a better industry
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:15:04 UTC No. 16415371
>>16415362
hmm, i figured they simply attached a dishy to the cellphone towers
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:17:08 UTC No. 16415372
>>16415371
no, cell phone companies are doing that too, but direct to cell is something different
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:18:22 UTC No. 16415373
>>16415370
I can't believe they pussied out of having a crewed landing ship
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:24:48 UTC No. 16415377
>>16415370
They're doing what they do pretty differently from SpaceX, and with much heavier duty infrastructure compared to Falcon.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:25:06 UTC No. 16415378
>>16415370
They shouldnt name it the same thing. It needs a new name
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:32:04 UTC No. 16415381
>>16415377
>droneship
>propulsive landing
sounds like they're still playing catch up
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:33:26 UTC No. 16415382
> According to Andy Lawrence, Regius Professor of Astronomy at University of Edinburgh, “It’s exactly like climate change. You know it’s getting gradually worse, but where do you say ‘stop’, and how do you manage to make it stop?”
Oh no. Anyway.....
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:40:33 UTC No. 16415384
>>16415382
Ahh no not the heckin kessler!
Better just stay at home forever then, chuds
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:44:25 UTC No. 16415387
>>16415382
another day another FUD article about spaceflight
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:48:01 UTC No. 16415389
>>16415382
>it's exactly like climate change
so a nothingburger?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:02:33 UTC No. 16415399
>>16415363
PayPal could have been way bigger
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:03:45 UTC No. 16415400
>>16415382
>very likely
Weird they don't give a specific estimate...
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:04:15 UTC No. 16415401
>>16415399
might see the potential with X at some point
they are continuing to get more money transmitter licenses, up at 38 states now
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:08:41 UTC No. 16415404
HERA is a US mission that just happens to be built by Europeans
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:08:41 UTC No. 16415405
>>16415401
Alibaba basically followed the plan elon posted for paypal's new owners (that they didn't listen to) and became huge with alipay+taobao. I could see the platform being used for stuff like kickstarter/patreon way before those sites even existed as well.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:09:53 UTC No. 16415407
>>16415368
>license will drop in time
Two weeks perhaps
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:10:28 UTC No. 16415410
Why do people that have severe EDS refuse to use Musks name?
Instead using stuff like Elmo, Leon or something. Its pretty retarded. Like is Leon somehow an insult? lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:11:49 UTC No. 16415411
>>16415410
Voldemort
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:11:59 UTC No. 16415412
>>16415410
it's a carryover from TDS, which kicked off the name thing with DRUMPF
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:12:44 UTC No. 16415413
>>16415410
Drumpf stuff somehow lol
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:15:10 UTC No. 16415415
Oh. Elon and Trump teaming up must be making them (the insane) lose their fucking minds huh
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:19:52 UTC No. 16415421
>>16415415
based on what I've been reading the people that really hated him, hated him already so much this doesn't really matter
he was already hitler-tier to them
it might have tipped some that already disliked him into full blown hate though, hard to say
but I'm pretty sure it also made him new fans so on balance I'm not really sure what the "favorability" of Musk is after all this (did it go up or down on aggregate after the rally or endorsement)
I've seen some posts about people selling their Teslas and Tesla stock due to the Trump endorsement bug again, on balance not sure
you also have people that will be buying Teslas now based on it, people that thought EVs were for leftist enviromentalist faggots and so on
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:20:07 UTC No. 16415422
>>16415415
can only imagine the seethe at all levels
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:24:23 UTC No. 16415428
>>16415422
not to mention the trump/elon interview thing and now the tucker carlson/elon interview. Although they really needed to turn up elon's mic audio a bit since tucker is Elon is quiet so you turn it up then tucker talks and blows your eardrums out.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:26:21 UTC No. 16415431
SpaceX is about to break its total number of launches in a year record with Starship launch.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:27:36 UTC No. 16415433
>>16415431
99?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:32:20 UTC No. 16415438
>>16415370
Why is there so much bloat on the barge? Is it self propelled?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:35:37 UTC No. 16415441
>>16415438
Apparently they want to start refurbishing the booster right after landing, so those structures may serve as workshops and storages.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:39:34 UTC No. 16415443
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:43:39 UTC No. 16415446
i shit in a bag!!!! FUCK
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:50:40 UTC No. 16415449
>>16414991
>cirno AND bunnies
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:55:55 UTC No. 16415455
>>16415438
blue origin is all about bloat
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:25 UTC No. 16415457
>>16415455
bloat origin
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:04:30 UTC No. 16415459
>>16414993
The European mind can't comprehend the scale of this country
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:15:55 UTC No. 16415468
>>16415141
Aw, that's his current "wife". Cute
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:20:21 UTC No. 16415472
>>16415467
that tweet is from 5 days ago and the FAA have refused to make a comment or reconfirm their previous statements since SpaceX announced a NET Oct 13 date
nigger
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:22:35 UTC No. 16415474
>>16415443
Hopefully less of that.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:23:54 UTC No. 16415475
>>16415467
At this point what can the FAA even do to stop IFT-5, send in their special agents?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:25:03 UTC No. 16415479
>>16415475
ULA snipers
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:34:18 UTC No. 16415489
>>16415486
Slo-mo sucks, it takes away the power.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:35:59 UTC No. 16415490
>>16415486
>he still thinks there's gonna be a catch attempt on the 13th
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:36:19 UTC No. 16415491
>>16415486
They're not gonna try to catch it this time. Either the guy won't give the order or the booster will say things aren't going well enough.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:41:18 UTC No. 16415494
To all of us, and even SpaceX this time, I think clear visibility and proper lighting is going to be a requirement for this catch attempt. I say delay it until the weather has HIGH atmospheric clarity, to analyze the high probability of a mishap.
As of right now, NWS forecast looks good:
>Saturday Night
>Mostly clear, with a low around 73. East wind 3 to 7 mph.
>Sunday
>Sunny, with a high near 85. Light south southeast wind becoming >east 5 to 9 mph in the afternoon.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:43:52 UTC No. 16415495
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAa
>Trump Gives Surprise Offer To Ex-Space Force Commander Who Says HE Was Kicked Out For Bashing DEI
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:50:38 UTC No. 16415498
>>16415495
This is a requirement, the US military has become a fucking clown joke, at what point did we lose all common sense?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:51:17 UTC No. 16415499
>>16415439
https://youtu.be/69EUgdj7lzI?si=AIw
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:52:51 UTC No. 16415503
>>16415500
>not a certainty
It's so fucking over, the fishermen won
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:52:55 UTC No. 16415504
>>16415498
1865
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:53:02 UTC No. 16415505
Christian Davenport
@wapodavenport
Am told the regulatory approval from the FAA is indeed possible for a Starship launch by Sunday but not a certainty.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:54:03 UTC No. 16415506
Eric Berger is a real wizard
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:55:04 UTC No. 16415507
ERIC BERGER IS A N
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:55:55 UTC No. 16415508
>>16415494
I don't think atmospheric clarity matters a great deal as the most likely time for an observation will be the catch itself, at sea level. As long as it's fairly clear out with minimal low cloud cover it should be good viewing
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:56:49 UTC No. 16415509
>>16415507
He's saying "Eric Berger is near"
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:58:41 UTC No. 16415510
>>16415495
>we've gotta lotta good looking men in the audience, huh?
he's never beating the allegations
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:00:55 UTC No. 16415511
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJ
currently the expected time of day flight 5 will launch at. Not very well lit
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:01:39 UTC No. 16415512
>>16415025
It's already a Cat 3 and the pressure has increased by like 30 now. What a fucking disappointment
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:02:22 UTC No. 16415514
>>16415509
No, gone blame it dang blammit!
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:03:14 UTC No. 16415516
>>16415514
Is there a new Sheriff in the town of Boca Chica?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:04:04 UTC No. 16415517
>>16415486
What is so important that he would not fly down for the launch lol?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:05:02 UTC No. 16415518
>>16415511
I disagree with the majority here. A night landing on the chopsticks will look so much nicer. I just hope they are landing on the chopsticks via the use of sensors or infrared lasers and not just eyeballing it with the cameras lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:05:37 UTC No. 16415519
>>16415472
>>16415475
>(sept 11 statement)
lel
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:05:46 UTC No. 16415520
>>16415517
his wife has a tattoo appointment
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:06:37 UTC No. 16415522
>>16415520
...what tattoo?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:07:55 UTC No. 16415524
>>16415522
Of his wife's son.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:08:16 UTC No. 16415525
>>16415518
They'll operate the chopsticks manually looking through binocs
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:08:24 UTC No. 16415526
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:08:29 UTC No. 16415527
>>16415504
Dixie shall rise again!
I wish I was in Dixie
Hooray, Hooray!
In Dixie's land, I'll take my stand to live and die in Dixie!
Away, away, away down South in Dixie!
Away, away, away down South in Dixie!
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:09:32 UTC No. 16415529
>>16415526
Heinous bros, how do we respond to this without sounding mad?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:10:10 UTC No. 16415531
>>16415516
Unfortunately for ESGHound there is one thing that stands between him and that property: the rightful owners.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:10:51 UTC No. 16415532
>>16415526
Imagine being a grown ass adult and calling other people "evil" like it's a Sunday cartoon.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:11:17 UTC No. 16415533
>>16415141
Kind of hard not to seem biased when you've literally had Ol Musky's baby batter inside you
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:13:00 UTC No. 16415534
>>16415512
it's gonna pick back up soon
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:13:22 UTC No. 16415535
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:14:12 UTC No. 16415536
>>16415511
at least we'll know if it is actually gonna be the 13th if they destack and install the FTS
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:17:58 UTC No. 16415538
>>16415511
would look pretty cool on launch with it lighting up the area
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:20:25 UTC No. 16415541
>>16415535
lmao this will never stop being funny
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:20:43 UTC No. 16415542
>>16414717
That defeats the purpose of catching them, which is so they can be refueled and launched without being moved around.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:22:37 UTC No. 16415546
>>16415495
We are so back
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:22:57 UTC No. 16415547
>>16415531
This is why we need Trump.
Military privilege this essential program, eminent domain the private land, the wildlife reserve and beach is already government owned, close Highway 4 most of the year, Texas will say Yes Sir, Mr. President, and the much larger land plot is now officially named the "Elon Musk Starbase Space Force Proving Grounds". And we get Mexico to let us build a row of towers all the way to the border, their corner of Mexico will be permanently closed. LNG and LOX pipelines directly from the Port. And we are going to authorize it with support from the Pentagon on Day 1.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:23:24 UTC No. 16415548
>>16414717
>Don't be surprized if there are dedicated Ship catch towers.
You forgot one thing - that would be fucking stupid
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:27:16 UTC No. 16415550
>>16414717
pretty sure the idea is catch the booster, lower it down to its normal spot then when starship comes down however many days later it lands on the same chopsticks
they already use the chopsticks to assemble the stack so it can lift either one
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:27:19 UTC No. 16415551
>>16415547
how likely is something like this? or parts of it at least
at some point it should become pretty clear that Starship is critical military infrastructure
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:29:04 UTC No. 16415552
who is the retard that keeps posting cp embedded in images?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:29:23 UTC No. 16415553
>>16414839
>two months of delays
>"you were lying about delays"
kill yourself immediately
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:30:35 UTC No. 16415554
>>16415526
lmao get fucked journos
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:32:46 UTC No. 16415557
>>16415552
Nice bot, trying to get this place shut down.
Who owns you? The Democratic Party, or a foreign nation?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:34:33 UTC No. 16415560
>>16414913
pretty dumb, desu
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:35:56 UTC No. 16415561
>>16415421
Honestly I really worry about people doing some very stupid things with him going all in.
I hope Elon ramps up his security both for himself and at Starbase. Along with some very increased scrutiny on individual employees.
These people are extremely dirty.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:36:38 UTC No. 16415562
>>16415486
>Only job is documenting space shit, making space content, talking about space history, and interviewing important figures in rocket engineering
>Can't find the time to document space shit
Don't forget to sub to his patreon
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:39:03 UTC No. 16415564
>>16415562
Yeah, its not like you don't have ample time to change your fucking plans dude. Its not that expensive.
Walter Cronkite would have done it. Just sayin'
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:41:47 UTC No. 16415567
>>16415562
especially when it's for a friend's wedding
guy should look at the divorce rates, he'll be going to another one soon enough
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:43:59 UTC No. 16415571
>>16415567
Doesn't he make enough money to charter a private flight wherever he wants? Apparently his friends wedding is later in the week lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:44:25 UTC No. 16415573
>>16415571
lol
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:44:46 UTC No. 16415575
>>16415567
I bet that friend is a dude, who would gladly reschedule the wedding, but his bitch ass bride had a literal tantrum at that possibility.
What a onions-fed faggot, I'm kinda done with him to be honest. His streams suck
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:46:23 UTC No. 16415577
>>16415575
>His streams suck
true
I just watch the official stream and catch the highlights from the other people's cams later
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:47:57 UTC No. 16415579
>>16415575
>>16415577
Imagine how he would he been on a DearMoon stream from orbit
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:49:31 UTC No. 16415583
>>16415575
he said it was a long time friend
so its probably a pretty close friendship if you know what I mean
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:50:48 UTC No. 16415584
>>16415583
Who even has "friends" past high school. What a child
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:51:48 UTC No. 16415585
I am tired of the Kyplanet hate
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:52:32 UTC No. 16415586
>>16415585
It'll end when he stops making bad arguments.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:55:21 UTC No. 16415590
>>16415585
He's underage and formed all his moon/Mars opinions from EDS instead of facts. Any Mars video he makes is just a list of untruths. Fuck him
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:56:18 UTC No. 16415592
>>16415585
stop being a faggot
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:58:47 UTC No. 16415594
Why haven't we gone back to the Moon?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOm
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:59:59 UTC No. 16415595
>>16415594
societal collapse
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:01:46 UTC No. 16415598
>>16415594
the 19th amendment
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:01:55 UTC No. 16415599
>>16415583
Imagine the immense guilt that pussy whipped faggot will feel for a lifetime, along with widespread hate for the community, by making the next Walter Cronkite completely miss the most epic victory spaceflight has seen in the modern age.
HOW EMBARRASSING.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:07:02 UTC No. 16415605
>>16415583
He has to attend his boyfriend's beard attachment ceremony
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:09:19 UTC No. 16415608
>>16415605
doesn't he know it's 2024 and you can walk around in old space suits and be gay?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:09:32 UTC No. 16415609
>>16414807
What are some notable moral or ethical things specific to Christianity? Stuff like "don't murder each other" or "don't steal people's shit" seem pretty universal to human societies
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:09:42 UTC No. 16415610
>>16415522
Ace of Spades
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:12:42 UTC No. 16415611
>>16415609
Don't have slaves
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:13:42 UTC No. 16415613
>>16415609
there needs to be something so the retards get it and a way to keep hammering it in their heads
I don't think its so much that Christianity is unique, its that without some religion there is a vacuum that then gets filled with something else that is akin to a religion, in this case woke race communism which is much worse
so basically its a retard wrangler on a societal level, maybe this could be solved with eugenics or something as well but very smart people seem to get infected with the woke mind virus too, so perhaps this is something that is partly orthogonal with raw intelligence
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:23:44 UTC No. 16415621
>>16415617
Just gonna keep blueballing us huh
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:31:31 UTC No. 16415630
>>16414967
Je bent zo een grote nieuwflikker als je niet weet waarom
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:32:04 UTC No. 16415631
>>16415611
Slavery is nowhere condemned in the New Testament. John Brown and his pals were pulling arguments out of their ass.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:35:07 UTC No. 16415636
>>16415609
Ironically, the search for truth. People immersed in a Christianity derived culture can't see it, but without that we never would've gotten here. The scientific method is fundamentally Christian. Unfortunately this also means Christianity as a system has basically committed suicide by disproving aspects of itself. But yeah, look at any competitor or replacement. Even "the science" often referenced today is different from the science of the scientific method. There will be cathedrals on Mars or there will be nothing on Mars. That's our condition
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:36:57 UTC No. 16415640
>>16415111
niceu jobbu anon.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:38:04 UTC No. 16415643
>>16415636
Why would China build cathedrals on Mars?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:38:05 UTC No. 16415644
>>16415594
Because Nixon was a schizo faggot.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:38:39 UTC No. 16415645
>>16415468
i mean, more like "breeding sow" but sure.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:40:50 UTC No. 16415649
>>16415636
what about a new religion that has the usual (don't kill, steal, etc) but also stuff about praising merit and objectivity as cornerstones somehow
protestantism has hard work as a feature
not really sure if that's feasible though, everything seems to be subverted one way or another eventually
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:41:42 UTC No. 16415651
>>16415644
>not LBJ spending fortunes on Vietnam
Nixon dindu nuffin, the die was cast
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:48:59 UTC No. 16415659
>>16415571
He could be there, but he'd have to pay for a last minute ticket and walk fast thru the airport. Not worth it to him.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:52:32 UTC No. 16415665
>>16415650
Will you be able to see the reentry from Madacascar?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:58:36 UTC No. 16415672
>>16415585
nobody here gives a shit about that loser and the retard constantly advertising him here should consider roping or finding a fucking hobby.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:00:57 UTC No. 16415677
>>16414967
jij gaat zeker weten niet.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:01:54 UTC No. 16415679
>>16415649
What's important especially for engineering minded people to understand is that you can't design these things from scratch. Looking at the results from attempts in the 20th century should be caution enough. Religions evolve naturally and respond to selective pressure. Our best bet is understanding our inadequacies in this area and keeping what works.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:02:37 UTC No. 16415680
>>16415650
was worried for a sec that that was taiwan lol.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:03:39 UTC No. 16415681
>>16415650
does that mean we'll get a night launch of starship?
i hope we get the first twilight launch that would be so fucking kino.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:05:59 UTC No. 16415686
>>16415679
also important is to keep it's tenets somewhat simple, you might want more abstract concepts like merit and objectivity to become parts of your religion but that gets a little too complicated for the types of people that most desperately need religion to survive.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:10:44 UTC No. 16415693
>>16415659
Walter Cronkite would have done it
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:15:36 UTC No. 16415695
>>16415650
Why the significant shift in landing location?
>>16415681
7am cdt. same as the rest.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:19:31 UTC No. 16415698
>FTS installing on Super Heavy
It's happ...
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:20:24 UTC No. 16415699
>>16415650
>>16415695
I'm guessing, but landing that soon could mean a ballistic trajectory with a higher apogee, and possibly a very high speed reentry, to REALLY test the heat shield?
Also the daylight/sunset landing would be cool as fuck
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:23:49 UTC No. 16415705
>>16415698
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJ
LIAR
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:26:58 UTC No. 16415711
>>16415643
State worship can only end one way
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:30:23 UTC No. 16415716
>>16415672
But everyone sure loves to read your complaints.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:30:52 UTC No. 16415718
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:31:45 UTC No. 16415720
>>16415716
So the square olm is bad news?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:33:02 UTC No. 16415722
>>16415716
So the square olm is good news?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:37:52 UTC No. 16415730
>>16415552
That hasn't been a thing for years. Rip lithurdays
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:38:33 UTC No. 16415733
>>16415716
>read your complaints
you're the only one complaining.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:39:33 UTC No. 16415736
>>16415718
Drag from top and touch the back button to exit full screen.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:39:48 UTC No. 16415737
>>16415716
Can you post the X link, or at least post the full size images of it?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:42:09 UTC No. 16415741
>>16415733
> No -- you!
Snappy comeback. You must have used AI to help you with that one.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:45:08 UTC No. 16415745
>>16415737
Account name is right there. Are you banned from X?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:45:26 UTC No. 16415746
>>16415741
Fuck off kyplanet, no one's buying it
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:47:23 UTC No. 16415749
>>16415617
Run up to the FAA and nail planks over the doors and windows so nobody can get out, cut power and plumbing going into the building, cut network connections and begin burying the building under garbage. Thereafter we can form a new FAA that isn't so fucking gay.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:53:10 UTC No. 16415754
>>16415741
you got angry that someone reminded you nobody cares about youtuber advertisements and felt the need to respond based on that.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:55:00 UTC No. 16415758
>>16415486
Go back to the sharty wojak spamming retard.
>inb4 youre a tranny dogpile
Notice he shortens ‘horomones’ as ‘mones. If you were around for sharty raids and CAT WIPES you would know they do this to any word they van
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:55:58 UTC No. 16415760
>>16415745
ok but for real why is it square?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:57:11 UTC No. 16415761
>>16415760
Same reason wombats shit cubes
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:57:41 UTC No. 16415763
>>16415745
Does anyone get banned from X?
I just haven't made an account yet, I guess I need one, since nearly 100% of space news comes from X.
/sfg/ is a X reposting board
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:57:49 UTC No. 16415764
>>16415760
because that's hip.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:57:57 UTC No. 16415765
>>16415761
Wtf this is real
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:58:29 UTC No. 16415766
>>16415716
>NOTAM for splashdown
>They keep SN30 in orbit instead
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:58:58 UTC No. 16415768
>>16415761
are they worried about it rolling away?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:59:43 UTC No. 16415771
>>16415760
simpler to manufacture
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:00:44 UTC No. 16415772
https://x.com/INiallAnderson/status
>With new OLM parts seen within this week's RGV Flyover I am now no longer convinced of the Massey's Design and am sticking strong to a square mount! I have edited a mockup of what I believe OLM B and it's deluge plates will possibly look like:
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:00:46 UTC No. 16415773
>>16415763
/sfg/ isnt a board you mutant
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:01:46 UTC No. 16415778
>>16415772
>These reinforcements are what convinced me. These look to integrate very well with the new sections that have arrived to go on top not something super elevated like the Masseys Stand
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:01:48 UTC No. 16415779
>>16415767
ITS HAPPENING?!
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:03:27 UTC No. 16415782
>>16415767
Happening.
>>16415760
I'm guessing its the same square footprint as the ship static fire stand, at Massey's, also a square.
It needs to be mobile, fit on SPMTs, so size limited, but a modular plug in to the permanently mounted portion of the OLM at the launch pad. SpaceX is brilliant.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:03:38 UTC No. 16415783
>>16415773
I frequently forget this
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:04:56 UTC No. 16415784
We status?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:06:44 UTC No. 16415785
>>16415784
GAAN
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:09:30 UTC No. 16415788
>>16415773
/sci/ is the /sfg/ and friends board
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:16:33 UTC No. 16415792
Low effort is low.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:18:49 UTC No. 16415795
>>16415789
Imagine not knowing what an orbital frame is
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:31:37 UTC No. 16415809
>>16415758
> If you were around for...!!!
Oh, you're one of the sad Gollums that has spent his entire life in a chan, so everything is chan-lore and reliving old battles.
Tragic waste of one's short Life.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:57:32 UTC No. 16415830
>>16415829
Earth is so dynamic from afar
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:01:45 UTC No. 16415835
Space is flat
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:02:21 UTC No. 16415836
>>16415829
Hurricanes look so soft and puffy. I don’t see how that could possibly destroy anyone’s house.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:03:45 UTC No. 16415838
>>16415830
>literally posts a gif from avatar 2
your point?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:06:35 UTC No. 16415841
>>16415838
I can't tell if you're dumb or just pretending to be dumb.
https://www.nasa.gov/earth/tonga-er
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:23:20 UTC No. 16415850
>>16415835
Space is 3 dimensional
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:31:52 UTC No. 16415859
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:35:27 UTC No. 16415860
>>16415859
Very good frog you got there
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:39:46 UTC No. 16415863
>>16415198
Only ones confused are those that are doubting SpaceX. The leftists cant stand Musk/SpaceX
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:42:00 UTC No. 16415866
>>16415410
Its called derangement syndrome for a reason. They are not thinking straight and are mentally ill.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:44:44 UTC No. 16415867
>>16415784
>>16415785
dutch cultural victory
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:48:05 UTC No. 16415870
>>16415867
I hope "We Gaan!" is the official motto of Mars
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:48:29 UTC No. 16415872
>>16415789
i'm sure that image looks really scary and counterintuitive to someone who's brain gets fried by 3d objects.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:50:28 UTC No. 16415874
>>16415870
we gaan en de aardlingen blijven hier.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:51:43 UTC No. 16415877
>>16415609
Many of the morals christians have have shared values across variety of other religions. The comparison Musk makes isn't to other established religion but to the current woke one. The difference is that most other religion bases their moral on a grounded God as proprieter. Regardless of whether God exists or not, the standard religious ethics have kept society going. So it has its uses. The current woke principles has "foundations" based upon nihilism/relativism. So everything is permitted. From killing babies to defending/promoting terrorists acts to sexually grooming children and then castrating them to promoting institutional racism to promoting the collapse of society to promoting every other forms of death cult practices. The nature of woke principles roots itself in unbounded actions, in queer actions, in taboo breaking, etc. Such that it breaks society and destroys it.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:56:09 UTC No. 16415886
>>16415879
we gaan deze keer echt, FAA zal buigen net als tenerife luchtverkeersleiding boog voor onze gulden jongen.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:58:52 UTC No. 16415891
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:01:54 UTC No. 16415894
>>16415886
If you make me read this gobbledegook again I'm sending you a tikkie
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:03:02 UTC No. 16415899
>>16415886
Speak American or don't speak at all
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:06:23 UTC No. 16415901
>>16415749
Set the building on fire with eberyone inside?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:07:45 UTC No. 16415903
>>16415901
Just entomb it in garbage, make it a new landfill. In a thousand years future archeologists can excavate the intact tomb and learn about our time.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:11:47 UTC No. 16415910
>>16415903
>bureaucracy buried in garbage
truly a fitting metaphor for our time.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:20:20 UTC No. 16415927
>>16415899
>>16415894
jullie spreken een verstrengelde versie van nederlands en gaan niet.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:22:27 UTC No. 16415929
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:27:20 UTC No. 16415933
>>16415929
i mean that's pretty fitting since both are an aquatic people.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:28:30 UTC No. 16415937
>>16415929
This is incredibly rude
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:30:41 UTC No. 16415941
>>16415937
Yeah, Jar-Jar was a respected politician and war hero. He would never stoop to the level of the dutch.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:30:44 UTC No. 16415942
>>16415937
dit is ongelofelijk onbeleefd.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:31:31 UTC No. 16415944
>>16415939
Yeah right, nothing ever happens.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:31:46 UTC No. 16415945
i am so excited guys, are you guys fucking excited?
are you fucking hyped?
show YFW getting excited for oct 13 launch.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:32:17 UTC No. 16415946
>>16415939
>destacking
it's over
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:33:48 UTC No. 16415950
>Stack, destack, stack, destack, stack, destack...
Someone should count how many times it was stacked and destacked
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:34:09 UTC No. 16415951
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:35:13 UTC No. 16415953
>>16415951
het gaat komen
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:39:40 UTC No. 16415961
>>16415950
You put the rocket on then you take the rocket off then you put the rocket on then you take the rocket off then you put the rocket on then you take the rocket off then you put the rocket on then you take the rocket off...
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:44:46 UTC No. 16415965
I have paranoid schizophrenia
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:45:09 UTC No. 16415966
>>16415716
That's not an OLM, it's a [math]\unicode{x25A1}[/math]LM.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:45:32 UTC No. 16415967
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:45:38 UTC No. 16415968
>>16415950
>restack rocket over and over
>Check odometer
>Has already traveled vertically enough to have gone to space multiple times
EZ reusable rocket
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:48:22 UTC No. 16415971
Now that the dust has settled, do you guys think Trump is gonna be at Starbase this Sunday? Surely he's not gonna miss this historic mission, right?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:49:47 UTC No. 16415974
>>16415965
thats gay
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:49:55 UTC No. 16415975
>>16415968
>FAA storms in
>sorry sir, the odometer on your rocket shows it's already completed one launch and orbit, we're going to have to delay your next launch and require you do a full MOT on this vehicle before it flies again.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:50:55 UTC No. 16415977
>>16415971
nigga he doesn't actually give a shit about spaceflight it just looks good in his campaign, dude literally admitted he'd never even heard of starlink right before they started getting used in those recent rescue ops.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:52:11 UTC No. 16415978
>>16415971
could be good campaign footage I guess but idk if Musk is willing to go that far
on the other hand Obama did visit SpaceX in the 2010s but I think that was after the election
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:53:51 UTC No. 16415985
>>16415977
Lots of people have never heard of Starlink
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:56:28 UTC No. 16415988
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS3
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:57:59 UTC No. 16415989
>>16415977
He cares that America can launch astronauts on our own again instead of buying seats from Russia, that's something even the dullest boomer can wrap their fingers around and understand.
Paying Russia was just bad business, fuck that post-STS gap hard.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:59:14 UTC No. 16415992
>>16415927
Looks like I've got 0.50€ coming my way
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:02:01 UTC No. 16415993
They cant launch without a license. bottom line: they have NO license
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:02:14 UTC No. 16415995
>>16415977
Pence seems to actually care about spaceflight but he’s not on the ticket so the point is moot.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:02:45 UTC No. 16415996
>>16415993
This country was built on escaping loicense fags
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:07:21 UTC No. 16416000
>>16415993
Fuck licenses, fuck regulators and FUCK the FAA
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:07:43 UTC No. 16416001
>>16415977
>nigga he doesn't actually give a shit about spaceflight
But he does, he was there for the first crewed dragon launch.
Sure, he only cares due to national and personal prestige but honestly I don't give a fuck about his motivations. All I care about is trump has done more for spaceflight than biden/harris have.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:08:52 UTC No. 16416003
>>16415993
They're gonna get the licence and we are gonna laugh at you
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:09:26 UTC No. 16416004
>>16416001
>he only cares due to national and personal prestige
That's fine too, it'd be nice to have a real space enthusiast as President whose primary goal was boots on Mars ASAP, but I'll settle for one who isn't actively trying to strangle SpaceX and therefore the future of the human race.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:10:07 UTC No. 16416006
>>16416001
>>16416004
>>16415978
>>16415971
Trump should NOT attend this launch/landing, because there is a high chance of an accident looking bad. Also, their fancy new office / very hardened command center bunker wont be done for a while, wherever they operate from right now is shitty and unsafe, not great for Trump to be there, Elon will be busy sperging out with technical stuff and his elite team.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:11:47 UTC No. 16416010
>>16416001
> Trumpy was there for the first crewed dragon launch.
About that.....
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:12:47 UTC No. 16416013
>>16414892
He did very well I imagine.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:13:20 UTC No. 16416015
>>16416010
We all get mad at scrubs, anon. Imagine how much madder you'd be if you set aside half your day for a launch and went in person only for it to scrub. If you say you wouldn't be pissed you're a dirty liar.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:13:24 UTC No. 16416016
>>16415971
The border zone is supposed to be completely lawless and wild. Doesn't do him any good to visit a nominally functioning rocket factory on the border.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:13:31 UTC No. 16416017
>>16416010
I was pissed on that day too.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:13:58 UTC No. 16416019
https://x.com/NASAArtemis/status/18
>Welcome to the Artemis Accords, Dominican Republic! The Dominican Republic has become the 44th nation to sign this historic agreement as we usher in the new era of space exploration.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:15:06 UTC No. 16416021
>>16416010
Trump getting mad at a scrub proves he actually cares, retard
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:15:28 UTC No. 16416022
>>16416019
Still shocked theres no members of both, how much longer until we get a fence sitter?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:16:14 UTC No. 16416023
Why arent NSF streams in 8K at this point?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:16:19 UTC No. 16416024
>>16416022
you cant. UAE tried and the US threatened them.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:16:39 UTC No. 16416025
>>16416010
>get angry at scrubs
Trump is one of us confirmed.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:17:50 UTC No. 16416027
>>16416023
the human visual limit is 4k
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:18:17 UTC No. 16416029
Trump doesn't give a shit. He just wanted to land on the moon with people by the end of 2024 (he thought he could win in 2020).
>" On March 26, 2019, the NSC met in Huntsville. When it came time for Vice President Pence to speak beneath a fully-assembled Saturn V in our Davidson Hall, I found myself seated beside Buzz Aldrin. We had a nice chat before the VP's speech and then, while Buzz and I sat attentive, my friend Mike announced that it was his plan to have the United States land Americans on the moon by 2024 "by any means necessary." Mike's idea would be called Artemis, a nice name with echoes of Apollo. It worked for me."
So yeah, he literally just launched Artemis after a conversation with Buzz.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:18:34 UTC No. 16416030
>>16416015
No excuse for the President to melt down in front of witnesses and start screaming at the head of NASA like a teenage girl.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:19:03 UTC No. 16416032
>>16416024
You totally can, theres no ink in either prohibiting you from being in the other. It's a voluntary treaty too so they can threaten all they want but theres nothing they can do about it.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:19:20 UTC No. 16416033
>>16416022
Almost all the countries with a serious investment in space are already signed on. The rest are just adding their name for terrestrial political points, and you don't get much of that by signing twice
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:19:44 UTC No. 16416036
>>16416015
>>16416017
>>16416021
>>16416025
It was a goddamn weather no-go, there was a tornado warning in the area.
How can anyone blame SpaceX for that scrub? Its their first manned launch.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:21:14 UTC No. 16416038
So, how fucked is starbase with this mega storm that is about to assrape the entire state of florida?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:21:51 UTC No. 16416039
>>16416038
0 considering starbase is in texas.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:22:38 UTC No. 16416040
>>16416038
>>16416039
Oh fuck, nevermind, i keep forgeting starbase isnt in florida.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:23:23 UTC No. 16416041
>>16416040
Many in /sfg/ do apparently
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:23:52 UTC No. 16416043
>if Europa Clipper doesn't launch by November 6 it will have to go back into storage for the next alignment
b-bros...
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:23:53 UTC No. 16416044
>>16416039
the failed booster catch will do more damage to starbase than any hurricane ever could
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:25:09 UTC No. 16416046
>>16416044
>will
Lmao they're gonna do it first time
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:25:35 UTC No. 16416047
>>16416030
>>16416036
>no, you HAVE to hate him!
Seek mental help from a professional.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:25:35 UTC No. 16416048
>>16416044
The booster will miss and hit undeveloped wetlands.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:25:44 UTC No. 16416049
>>16416036
It's Jim Bridenstine's fault. Trump was right to be mad, that's what a good executive does is get to the bottom of it
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:27:36 UTC No. 16416050
Emperor Elon. There will be no constitution on Mars, so we are truly free
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:31:28 UTC No. 16416055
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:34:12 UTC No. 16416065
>>16416060
So?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:35:41 UTC No. 16416068
>>16416060
The "law" can kick sand
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:35:44 UTC No. 16416069
Soo we arent gonna survive this storm huh
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:38:01 UTC No. 16416071
>>16416050
That doesn't sound good.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:42:58 UTC No. 16416078
>>16416050
Von Braun himself predicted this.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:55:04 UTC No. 16416095
>>16416083
i dont envy the black hole hunters in 3024
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:05:56 UTC No. 16416112
>>16416082
Back to >>>/pol/
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:06:57 UTC No. 16416115
>>16416083
You could launch through that no problem.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:11:11 UTC No. 16416120
>>16415950
Believe it was Artemis I where they were reaching the limit of roll out cycles and they didn't know if the vehicle would be damaged by additional roll outs, or maybe it was tankings. The nice thing about starship being designed for reuse is you don't have some arbitrarily small number of cycles you can test it for before you worry about damaging the vehicle. If anything they are learning operational failure points and what will ware and tare to expect by stacking and de-stacking.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:16:06 UTC No. 16416133
>>16416120
>ware and tare
heh
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:17:05 UTC No. 16416136
>>16416060
Total FAA death
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:17:39 UTC No. 16416137
>>16416095
They are called light holes now, you fucking racist.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:18:26 UTC No. 16416139
we heben seriee probleeme
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:19:07 UTC No. 16416141
>>16416139
we hebben een serieus probleem.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:20:01 UTC No. 16416143
Elon is pretty based for telling govt. agencies to just fuck off instead of doing what other aerospace companies (or almost every other major corporation, for that matter) does and "lobby" the government to work more in their interests.
He definitely has more than enough money to lobby for anything he wants. He could slip a giant wad of cash into Joe Biden's back pocket and launch tomorrow.
They hate him because he has integrity.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:20:45 UTC No. 16416145
>>16416143
Elon will get buckbroken when kamala gets in
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:23:07 UTC No. 16416146
>>16415636
>the search for truth.
Only in Catholicism, inherited from Greek philosophy. Orthodoxy has none of that, in spite of being more Greek. Protestantism promotes autism but not science.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:24:22 UTC No. 16416149
>>16416145
You're filth.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:24:25 UTC No. 16416150
>>16415643
Cathedrals to the Omnissiah
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:27:43 UTC No. 16416154
>>16416149
Elon said it himself chud
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:27:45 UTC No. 16416155
>>16415141
>Shivon Zills
more like Zion Shills
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:29:54 UTC No. 16416156
How are the same newfags still feeding (You)s to political bait.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:38:01 UTC No. 16416166
>>16416161
>SRB's
Dont care lol
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:40:44 UTC No. 16416168
>>16416050
Elon is a great engineer which means he would make a terrible ruler.
>why are my fungible units of labor not working hard enough
>they have enough starch for adequate calories
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:41:29 UTC No. 16416170
>>16416161
What kind of batches can they make in that thing? I don’t see a gem63 worth of apcp fitting in there. Do they plan on splitting up a motor into 30 batches or only making things the size of an rpg7?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:41:44 UTC No. 16416171
>>16416168
already ahead of you, just nerve staple the fungible units of labour (neuralink)
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:47:31 UTC No. 16416178
>>16416161
was this the company that made that anime missile ad?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:47:46 UTC No. 16416180
>>16416166
That machine is for mass producing missile motors rather than rocket SRB.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:48:35 UTC No. 16416184
>>16416178
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzV
yes lmfao
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:50:03 UTC No. 16416187
>>16416178
the founder is a weeb
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:51:43 UTC No. 16416190
>>16416187
wow he went from designing VR headsets to running an arms manufacturing company
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:53:27 UTC No. 16416192
>>16416190
his brother-in-law is a house rep., no wonder he was able to get those defense contracts. nepotism works
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:54:27 UTC No. 16416196
>>16416190
Fortuitous that he got booted out of meta. So much human capital locked in trying to come up with better ways to serve ads to people. Disgusting.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:01:14 UTC No. 16416207
>>16416192
i don't mind nepotism if it supports a good cause, nothing wrong with debloating the MIC.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:02:38 UTC No. 16416209
>>16416187
>>16416190
>>16416192
Yes and?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:03:45 UTC No. 16416212
>>16416196
Both him/meta has moved on from that Era. Importantly, the people that fired/octracized him no longer works at Meta, according to the latest posts by him
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:07:40 UTC No. 16416218
>>16416216
not much
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:09:13 UTC No. 16416219
>>16416209
>that paintjob
when are we doing this for roggits
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:12:20 UTC No. 16416222
>>16416216
has zubrin voiced anything on musks support for Trump?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:12:21 UTC No. 16416223
>>16416209
shit taste tbqh
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:13:33 UTC No. 16416224
>>16416216
same as always, slowly decaying and forcefully posting vaporware online mandated by their propaganda department under threat of getting even more funding cut.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:14:26 UTC No. 16416225
>>16416216
they got the ukraine treatment
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:16:02 UTC No. 16416226
>>16416216
making trams
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:17:18 UTC No. 16416228
>>16416222
Zubrin already endorsed Kamila so what's to say?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:18:20 UTC No. 16416230
>>16416228
>whole life has revolved around sending humans to mars
>the chance finally arises
>he votes against it
???????????????????
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:19:27 UTC No. 16416232
>>16416230
He seems to be a warhawk
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:19:27 UTC No. 16416233
>>16416230
eh it makes sense, i hate ziggers as well, any normal person does. i just lean towards finding spaceflight more important so i vote trump instead.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:21:06 UTC No. 16416235
>>16416232
every single true martian would vote to nuke ukraine (earth) into oblivion if it meant saving the mars colony
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:21:23 UTC No. 16416238
>>16416230
The Zubrinist grindset is beyond mortal understanding
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:22:30 UTC No. 16416241
>>16416235
He is also an earther and cares about his personally designed mission over the actual stuff spacex is creating
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:25:00 UTC No. 16416245
>>16416230
>>16416232
He's more interested in Ukraine war than Mars
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:25:50 UTC No. 16416247
Assuming flight 5 happens this Sunday, the catch and everything go well, and pretending the FAA doesn’t add any delays, when will flight 6 happen?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:29:20 UTC No. 16416253
>>16416247
November
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:30:17 UTC No. 16416254
>>16416247
IFT5 and 6 will be launching simultaneously.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:31:42 UTC No. 16416256
>>16416245
Sad, many such cases
Man literally wrote the book on this shit, it's why I'm even here
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:33:13 UTC No. 16416257
>>16416170
The GEM-63 is a dead end product. The SM-3 weighs in at around 1,500 kg total. An FGM-146 Javelin weighs less than 20 kg. That's the size range you really want to be working in to make a profit in the solid fuel market.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:33:33 UTC No. 16416258
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:35:33 UTC No. 16416260
>>16416257
sure but it's still a nice subsidy for the people that have to create the exact same substance, that's why solid rocket motors were lobbied for so heavily.
notice that USSR ICBM's were almost all liquid fuel even in it's twilight and so you'll see very little solid fuel launchers in their lineup
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:36:00 UTC No. 16416262
>>16416247
In between IFT 5 launch and booster catch.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:36:00 UTC No. 16416263
Imagine.... The time between starship FT 4 and 5 might be a bigger gap than any other gap in the future
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:36:33 UTC No. 16416266
>>16416082
>>16416258
back to /pol/
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:37:01 UTC No. 16416268
>>16416263
FAA willing, inshallah
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:39:02 UTC No. 16416272
>>16416168
He is the tyrant of many successful companies, a great leader
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:40:53 UTC No. 16416274
>>16416268
Since there is a non-zero chance the FAA still exists in 2025, does SpaceX have a better plan for appeasing the FAA menace?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:41:23 UTC No. 16416275
>>16416263
You say that every month
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:43:08 UTC No. 16416278
FUUUUUCK you better launch on sunday i'm gonna be super busy all of next week.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:44:46 UTC No. 16416283
>>16416278
As long as this isnt just SpaceX doing another
>were ready whats the hold up
It will be launching. Weather also looks amazing.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:45:50 UTC No. 16416284
>>16416283
if they cuck out because of upper level winds i'm going to kms.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:50:07 UTC No. 16416292
>>16416290
Youre late nigger. >>16416285
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:51:03 UTC No. 16416293
>>16416285
>>16416290
>the faa is reviewing
>will license when requirements are met
Well which is it? These are two different states for the licensing process to be in.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:51:30 UTC No. 16416295
>>16416260
It's a dead end because the last contracts for space launch-class SRBs have already been inked, it's just a question of whether SLS or Vulcan retires first. Northrop isn't even planning to use boosters on the MLV and they've been the king of solid fuel production. But the last few years have proven that America's ability to produce solid fuel munitions is much smaller than the current demand. There's no money left to be made in SRBs but there's quite a lot of money to be made if you can produce combat missiles quickly and in large quantities.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:51:34 UTC No. 16416296
>>16416290
>once spaceX has met all licensing requirements
What else does spaceX have to do to meet all licensing requirements?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:51:44 UTC No. 16416297
>>16416247
IFT-6 could follow quickly from IFT-5 if the flight profile is the same
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:53:37 UTC No. 16416298
>>16416293
The FAA has come under a lot of criticism for their political double standards and they're weighting just how much trouble they might find themselves in if they keep the act going
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:54:22 UTC No. 16416299
license will come at 4:30pm this friday and not a second sooner.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:57:23 UTC No. 16416302
>>16416230
Re-electing Trump after he refused to concede the election and attempted to manipulate the voting process would be extremely degenerate, a 3rd worldification of American politics.
That's why Zubrin endorsed Kamala.
SpaceX will go to Mars regardless and likely well after either of these administrations.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:57:41 UTC No. 16416304
>>16416299
You will be wrong. I wager its after 4:30 PM
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:58:38 UTC No. 16416305
>>16416184
amazing, someone is a fan of NG:E
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:58:46 UTC No. 16416306
>>16416297
No reason to think the flight profile won't be the same. They're going to need to reenter the ship a couple more times before they try landing it.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:00:05 UTC No. 16416307
>>16416306
I don’t get why they refuse to try in space raptor relight. It’s currently the long pole in the tent for flying real payloads.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:00:09 UTC No. 16416308
>>16416219
what, a rocket painted like a onahole isn't enough for you?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:01:14 UTC No. 16416309
>>16416170
The linked article says it can do a few hundred kilos per batch using two containers roughly the size of 55 gallon drums.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:02:27 UTC No. 16416312
>>16416295
it was ALWAYS dead end for space launch and it was just waiting for someone like musk to come along and kill the hydrogen sustainer 1st stage meme.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:03:46 UTC No. 16416314
>>16416308
i would pay top dollar for a starship painted with miia from monster musume.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:03:56 UTC No. 16416315
>>16416307
What payload is there near-term other than Starlink? The demands of the starlink business probably don't include Starship launches this year.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:04:11 UTC No. 16416316
>>16416184
now that's what I call a meme company
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:04:17 UTC No. 16416317
>>16416302
Zubrin fell for the gaslight propaganda
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:05:07 UTC No. 16416319
>>16416317
no he just endorses killing ziggers over spaceflight for whatever reason.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:05:12 UTC No. 16416320
Is Blue Origin old space, new space or meme space?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:05:58 UTC No. 16416321
>>16416320
Neo-oldspace
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:06:37 UTC No. 16416322
>>16416302
Italy reelected Berlusconi multiple times and they're still there. Never mind they're has been basket case.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:07:08 UTC No. 16416323
>>16416317
>unironically suggesting this
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:07:10 UTC No. 16416324
>>16416320
it's a newspace robot being piloted by a bunch of oldspace shrimps and a man with less vision than and a light amount of envy of elon musk.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:07:20 UTC No. 16416325
>>16416320
meme space until they build an orbital rocket
old space otherwise
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:08:06 UTC No. 16416328
>>16416319
As I said, gaslight propaganda. War time propaganda + domestic politics propaganda combined at the same time = powerful brainwashing agent
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:08:18 UTC No. 16416329
>>16416302
Zubrin endorsed because of the Ukraine. He tells you that and how Trump is meany National Socialist for saying maybe another endless forever war paid for by America isn't such a great idea.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:08:28 UTC No. 16416330
>>16416325
What are Vast, Gravitics and Axiom considered
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:09:32 UTC No. 16416331
>>16416209
>>16416184
>2D girlfriend
>2D missiles
amazing
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:09:54 UTC No. 16416332
>>16416330
Griftspace, until they actually deliver
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:09:55 UTC No. 16416333
>>16416319
Was Zubrin's family from the Ukraine!
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:09:59 UTC No. 16416334
>>16416323
You fell for propaganda. Simple as that. You fell for the sound bites blared in propaganda channels with political narratives being spun instead of the nuanced speeches.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:16:52 UTC No. 16416339
>>16416177
>What is it?
Part of the inner ring structure for the second launch mount. It's designed to hold the hold-down clamps.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:20:47 UTC No. 16416342
>>16416328
nah, hating ziggers is a perfectly reasonable stance to have, and wanting russia to fuck off and slink back to mordor is probably best for the world, i just don't ever see it taking precedent over mars colonisation.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:21:54 UTC No. 16416343
>>16416334
>ziggers attacking a country unprovoked and then desperately asking for a ceasefire because they can't sustain this war longterm is propaganda.
lol.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:25:02 UTC No. 16416346
>making every conversation about a foreign war is perfectly reasonable
>insisting that the war continues because one side are "bad guys", despite the human and economic cost, is perfectly reasonable
yeah, it's clear who's delusional
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:26:16 UTC No. 16416349
spes
roggids
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:26:56 UTC No. 16416351
>>16416349
I'm afraid we'll have to wait until Sunday
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:28:17 UTC No. 16416356
Spes…?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:29:16 UTC No. 16416357
Starved /sfg/, autists denied their launches
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:32:10 UTC No. 16416368
elon made a deal with fish and wildlife. 50% of the colony will be nature preserves.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:33:04 UTC No. 16416369
>>16416342
>>16416343
I repeat war propaganda.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:33:17 UTC No. 16416371
>>16416346
well yeah, one side defending themselves and the other side going out of their way to dehumanize themselves and become the closest equivalent to the armies of mordor in real life is why this is the first real black and white war in quite some time.
russia has the freedom to slink back to it's shithole borders any day it pleases, it just seems to prefer national suicide instead.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:36:13 UTC No. 16416373
>>16416369
I want to state that I make distinction between organic opinion and government/media crafted propaganda.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:38:32 UTC No. 16416378
Tonight I am a bit depressed. I stumbled onto some old friend of mine who I was very close to many many years ago on a social platform and I started looking at his life trajectory. While [he/she (privacy reasons)] advanced his/her personal & academic life, I, myself, have stagnated. I am the same as 5 years ago. What keeps me up and running is spaceflight, exploration of the unknown, science and literally myself as I still believe in me (yeah, im that lame).
sigh ... thats life i guess
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:39:27 UTC No. 16416380
>>16416369
i'm not sure how objective reality is war propaganda
>russia attacks
>russia fucks up
>russia then relies for a while on it's soviet stocks to replenish ever growing losses
>this is not sustainable
pretty obvious this war has taken a toll on ukraine as well, but considering it's a war for their survival and they recieve helpful aid, they're likely to outlast.
it's simply russia's choice to stop the war by leaving and no longer pretending we live in some sort of feudalist era where you can just grab land.
people point it out when kikes do this but for some reason when russians do it we have to listen to their side of the story.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:41:21 UTC No. 16416384
>>16416378
The only reason I wake up every morning is because I know that there is a legion of people all over the world working themselves to the bone to leave this planet because we all share the same basic sentiment: Fuck this gay Earth and everyone in here.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:42:57 UTC No. 16416385
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:43:28 UTC No. 16416386
>>16415773
but it should be
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:43:45 UTC No. 16416387
>>16416384
I wish you only the best
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:46:34 UTC No. 16416392
>>16415659
>trusting the FAA
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:49:52 UTC No. 16416398
>>16416082
a lot of names have hebrew meaning, it's not that weird
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:50:03 UTC No. 16416399
>>16416371
>the other side going out of their way to dehumanize themselves and become the closest equivalent to the armies of mordor in real life
You're straight up brainwashed. Objectively, the war in Ukraine has had extremely low civilian casualties. Hell, Israel killed more civillians in a month after 10/7 than Russia has in two years in Ukraine.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:50:25 UTC No. 16416401
>>16416378
Ywngts. Get a job in engineering or a trade to help the future of space or dont come at all
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:51:00 UTC No. 16416403
take it to >>>/pol/'s spaceflight general
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:52:17 UTC No. 16416406
>>16416384
Soon brother, it will all be clean again
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:53:35 UTC No. 16416408
>>16416380
Russia is justified in attacking Ukraine for the same reason the US would have been justified in attacking Cuba during the Cuban missile crisis. The entire war is the fault of the US, which had implemented a CIA backed color revolution in Ukraine just a few years prior.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:54:11 UTC No. 16416409
>>16416371
>the armies of mordor
anyone who argues from popular fiction should be barred from serious conversation for their rest of their life
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:54:12 UTC No. 16416410
>>16416384
>>16416378
>>16416387
>>16416406
None of us actually working our lives towards going to space i.e. working the industry or dedicating their careers to it want you worthless fucks that cant even do the bare minimum of getting a trade to work at Starbase to go to space. The absolute best you will do is LEO in a ticket you paid for but you will never escape this rock if you refuse to contribute anything.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:55:39 UTC No. 16416412
>>16416230
Still waiting for him and the Mars Society to make this 'Mars Technical Institute', what an absolute fucking grifter
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:55:41 UTC No. 16416413
>>16415939
abbey road soon
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:56:42 UTC No. 16416414
Preventing the Death of the Solar System
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiD
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:56:42 UTC No. 16416415
>>16416410
I contribute to space by working for a legacy defense contractor and phoneposting in my down time (which is all of my time)
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:57:04 UTC No. 16416416
>>16416415
thank you for your service
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:58:02 UTC No. 16416418
>>16415977
he's almost 80 why would he know that
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:58:07 UTC No. 16416419
>>16416410
I'm closer to being an astronaut than you lmao
t. Silent service
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:58:36 UTC No. 16416420
Mars will be a society of hard workers dedicating their lives to the SpaceX colony. No need for wagie scum that laze around and want to only be there for the novelty of it. If you go to the Martian colony, expect to work until you DIE, 16 hours a day and in highly specialized work with minimalized free time.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:59:18 UTC No. 16416422
>>16416420
But I get to marry a child right?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:00:52 UTC No. 16416423
>>16416422
yes
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:04:27 UTC No. 16416426
>>16416006
>elite team.
you mean fresh collee graduates who make amateur mistakes because noone in the industry wants to work for that bozo?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:04:32 UTC No. 16416427
>>16416415
So you do absolutely nothing useful you dirty pork barrel paycheck mooch.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:04:33 UTC No. 16416428
>>16416420
Not me. I'm gonna secure my ticket by appearing highly motivated and competent in my field, then once i get there I'll NEET it up. Just straight chilling on Mars, mirin the views, and leechmaxxing off the hard work of others. What are they gonna do, send me back?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:06:24 UTC No. 16416431
>>16416428
Sudden rapid depressurisation, many such cases
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:06:37 UTC No. 16416432
>>16416426
>fresh college graduates
How long until a Mars colony do you think there is?
>>16416428
What is deportation.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:06:43 UTC No. 16416433
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:07:02 UTC No. 16416435
>>16416428
>you like those views, huh? let's give you a closer look
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:08:08 UTC No. 16416436
>>16416432
>How long until a Mars colony do you think there is?
its not happening in our lifetimes.
30 years from now you will move the goalposts and claim that an antarctica style research post with a crew of a dozenpeople is the same as millions of people on mars by 2050.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:09:41 UTC No. 16416438
>>16416428
>What are they gonna do, send me back?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:22:51 UTC No. 16416451
>>16416038
a hurricane already hit Starbase a few weeks back
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:23:08 UTC No. 16416452
>>16416320
>infinite source of money
>no timelines
>no progress
You tell me. In all seriousness though, Bezos was scammed by oldspace. Elon tried to warn him this was happening but this apparently was disregarded and soured their relationship somewhat. Also Bezos literally said
>everything was figured out in the 60s, its just a matter of making it cheaper
in the Starship era, and ignoring SpaceX's innovations is another symptom of oldspace
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:24:46 UTC No. 16416453
>>16416343
>>16416371
>>16416380
NOT
SPACE
FLIGHT
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:26:17 UTC No. 16416455
Internally we are very confident that things will go according to plan and will launch on the 12,13, or worst case 14th.
Road closures and other local to the region specific safety things are imminent and are in the process of being rolled out.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:28:07 UTC No. 16416456
>>16416247
well, i'd imagine they will do a bunch of modifications to the chopsticks and booster 13 using data they get from the flight 5 catch.
real question is when will a booster be reused?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:28:10 UTC No. 16416457
Hitler dood
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:30:50 UTC No. 16416459
>>16416455
Officially now somewhere between 0 and GAAN
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:32:21 UTC No. 16416461
>im fucked if kamala wins
what are we going to do if they bring the hammer down on elon and spacex? we all know they dont want us to leave this dying planet and have been actively working to try and prevent us from doing so. are people just going to lie down and take it if kamala and the left move to shut it down permanently?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:34:01 UTC No. 16416464
ESGhound on suicide watch
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:38:09 UTC No. 16416493
>>16416457
Wat nou?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:39:52 UTC No. 16416495
>>16416461
Move to china and invest in chinese spacex knock offs (and cry)
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:41:17 UTC No. 16416497
>>16416493
Nou we gaan.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:41:31 UTC No. 16416498
>>16416464
He's sitting on twitter seething about how they sprayed more drinking water.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:42:44 UTC No. 16416499
>>16416498
What's his job again? Lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:44:30 UTC No. 16416501
>>16416499
Castrating himself
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:46:16 UTC No. 16416509
>>16416380
>not sustainable
they're doing just fine
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:54:28 UTC No. 16416532
>>16416456
>when will a booster be reused?
not until after they start launching with engines worth being reused.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:56:13 UTC No. 16416534
>>16416499
Seether in Chief
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:58:34 UTC No. 16416536
8 Oct 2024 - 18:00 UTC ...AIR FORCE RESERVE HURRICANE HUNTERS FIND THAT MILTON'S INTENSITY HAS REBOUNDED... ...TODAY IS THE LAST FULL DAY FOR FLORIDA RESIDENTS TO GET THEIR FAMILIES AND HOMES READY AND EVACUATE IF TOLD TO DO SO... As of 1:00 PM CDT Tue Oct 8 the center of Milton was located near 22.5, -88.2 with movement ENE at 8 mph. The minimum central pressure was 923 mb with maximum sustained winds of about 155 mph.
8 Oct 2024 - 21:30 UTC ...AIRCRAFT MEASURES VERY LOW PRESSURE IN THE EYE OF MILTON... As of 4:30 PM CDT Tue Oct 8 the center of Milton was located near 22.7, -87.4 with movement ENE at 9 mph. The minimum central pressure was 905 mb with maximum sustained winds of about 165 mph.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:02:31 UTC No. 16416540
>>16416536
its approached the maximum theoretical limit of a hurricane. goodbye nasa.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:03:26 UTC No. 16416542
>>16416536
Good. Hopefully the killcount of mexicans and cubans is in tens of thousands.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:06:24 UTC No. 16416543
>>16416534
red dragon is fake
cope
and no, the parachute failure mode doesn't count
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:10:11 UTC No. 16416548
>>16416542
>>16416540
it could go straight into the middle of Tampa Bay, which would make for an insane storm surge
but also seems to be tracking south
hard to say
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:12:08 UTC No. 16416550
>>16416543
No need to cope. It was cancelled by a certain Alabama senator and with Starship they're never looking back
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:13:04 UTC No. 16416551
>>16416548
euro model is more accurate
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:30:18 UTC No. 16416564
>>16416548
Of course tracking north would be worse, the anti-clockwise storm surge would pound it right up the bay. I took a look at the shore view from street view yesterday, that whole area is going to be under 10-15 feet or more of water for a while.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:32:51 UTC No. 16416566
just realized you can harass ESG Hound yourself. I've never understood twitter(x) until just now
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:37:33 UTC No. 16416572
They are killing republican votors
>>16416542
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:38:38 UTC No. 16416574
Starlink DTC is now working in Florida.
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1843797
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:38:46 UTC No. 16416575
>>16416498
Only the most useless and unbearable of employees end up in regulatory compliance. Many such cases.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:44:31 UTC No. 16416580
If you live in florida, GET OUT
SAVE YOURSELF
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:47:04 UTC No. 16416583
Watch the storm be a nothingburger again.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:49:47 UTC No. 16416585
why dont flordians build towers on stilts and just go up there during the cane?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:51:17 UTC No. 16416586
>>16416566
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:52:53 UTC No. 16416588
>>16416564
>>16416551
what is it I'm seeing here
that eye has a shadow
looks like an artifact to me
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:53:41 UTC No. 16416589
>>16416536
Did Milton receive EPA approval to dispose so much water on Florida? Someone should sue Milton to stop it in its track.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:54:58 UTC No. 16416590
>>16416580
good advice
also,I heard there's a hurricane coming
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 23:56:28 UTC No. 16416591
>>16416580
Fuck no. All I did was move from central Florida to Miami with family. Youre over reacting to evacuate entire state. Also youve never been through a hurricane so shut up, my governor knows better than you with all the resources he has.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:09:06 UTC No. 16416597
>>16416585
They’re all too fat to climb a few flights of stairs.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:09:21 UTC No. 16416598
>>16416591
good luck dying. florida will be underwater little man.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:10:51 UTC No. 16416600
>>16416591
You will die and Kamala will be president. Now that's my kind of outcome!
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:14:44 UTC No. 16416604
>>16416591
You're fucking dead, prick.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:39:32 UTC No. 16416625
New Eager: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki5
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:39:50 UTC No. 16416626
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1843797
>10K starlinks donated
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:40:22 UTC No. 16416627
>>16416625
i was gonna post NEW EAGER first chud
at least it isn't that biplanet guy
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:41:46 UTC No. 16416631
>>16416625
Eager kino should do an /sfg/ AMA
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:43:18 UTC No. 16416634
>>16416625
Scott Manley was shitting on Raptor reliability
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:49:08 UTC No. 16416638
>>16416637
Another castrated seether
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:51:17 UTC No. 16416640
Daily reminder there is literally no reason for humans to go to mars, let alone colonize it
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 00:54:01 UTC No. 16416645
>>16416641
Holy shit
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:01:11 UTC No. 16416649
>>16416625
Eager space man u r cool thanks for reading my shitpost senpai uwu
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:06:37 UTC No. 16416653
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:08:10 UTC No. 16416654
>>16416653
LOL where did you find this pic?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:08:43 UTC No. 16416657
>>16416654
4chan
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:14:10 UTC No. 16416668
>>16416663
Performance penalties
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:23:59 UTC No. 16416680
>>16416663
Economics and margins make it not worth it.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:24:51 UTC No. 16416682
wen stage?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:25:25 UTC No. 16416683
>>16416663
Recovering the second stage would be a big enough performance hit that F9 would nearly become a small lift rocket.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:25:57 UTC No. 16416685
>>16416634
which is odd from him because it's still an engine in development. IFT1 engines were positively ancient, and flights 2-6, probably 7 as well are all using raptor 2 which is obviously still a testbed engine. It's like shitting on starship/superheavy reliability based on the outcome of the last 4 flights - they're test flights, shit is going to go wrong
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:26:25 UTC No. 16416686
>>16416663
is this a reference to the pickle rick tweet?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:27:27 UTC No. 16416687
>>16416686
never mind
just saw the filename
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:41:32 UTC No. 16416697
Could you survive launch if strapped to the tip of starship?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:41:39 UTC No. 16416698
>>16416663
shit's hot yo
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:45:50 UTC No. 16416700
>>16416697
yeah
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:51:54 UTC No. 16416715
>>16416697
into space?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:01:19 UTC No. 16416727
>>16415289
Where's the "FAA PR is fucking retarded and the license can actually be issued before November if the consultations are complete before the 60 day deadline, which they usually are" option? Seems the most likely right now.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:05:46 UTC No. 16416731
>>16416697
it would be extremely painful
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:12:32 UTC No. 16416735
>>16416715
ignore space
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:15:04 UTC No. 16416738
>>16416168
>100 people is totally fine for a single Starship and 6 month journey to Mars
>in fact it might not be enough, bump it up to 120
>we need an order of magnitude more numbers to ensure that humanity becomes multiplanetary and the first city on Mars can be fully self-sustaining even if the ships stop coming
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:19:11 UTC No. 16416741
My daily posts about how I hate the FAA shook em
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:19:16 UTC No. 16416742
>>16416663
>why doesnt spacex recover falcon stage 2 (without saying the reasons why)
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:19:51 UTC No. 16416743
>>16416498
fucking useless hall monitor
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:20:56 UTC No. 16416745
>>16416738
To be fair that was for ITS which would've been more like a cruise ship inside
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:21:15 UTC No. 16416747
You guys do know that if you nuked a hurricane they would stop being a problem right
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:22:51 UTC No. 16416748
>>16416747
>low pressure in the middle
>increase pressure there rapidly
Could it really be that easy?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:25:09 UTC No. 16416751
>>16416747
>Scoop: Trump suggested nuking hurricanes to stop them from hitting U.S.
https://www.axios.com/2019/08/25/tr
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:26:02 UTC No. 16416752
>>16416751
>Scoop: anonymous can't tell when people are joking
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:30:49 UTC No. 16416757
>>16416747
Its possible. But more likely a better way is to test it out with a large conventional missile bomb to disrupt the cycle. Have anything been done to test out a simulation and effect?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:31:57 UTC No. 16416759
>>16416757
a couple MOAB's over the eye, air-burst
lets do this shit, enough running from hurricanes, lets fucking bust them apart
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:32:05 UTC No. 16416760
>>16416753
She needs my dick down her throat. Enough talking from the woman
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:32:28 UTC No. 16416762
>>16416082
Llenn Musk
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:33:09 UTC No. 16416763
>>16416760
90% sure she's a tranny, they tend to be either hardcore spaceflight/alt-history nerds or hardcore anti-space commies, nothing in between
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:33:53 UTC No. 16416764
>le not your personal army
I know, I know. But what if we all made twitter accounts and harassed ESG Hound 24/7
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:35:10 UTC No. 16416765
>>16416757
Project plowshare floated the idea and it se3ms "settled sci3nce" it's a bad idea but I can't find a paper going into the specifics.
https://www.wired.com/story/nuking-
Though milton being so close to the limits of atmospheric pressure makes me think it's an edge case where a nuke really might help
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:36:48 UTC No. 16416766
>>16416747
The idea was given up on once eyewall replacement cycles were discovered.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:36:58 UTC No. 16416767
>>16416763
In that case we need to cage this freak and starve him to death
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:44:24 UTC No. 16416773
>>16416763
I stand by what I said
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:45:19 UTC No. 16416775
>>16416759
>>16416757
More so, I was thinking doing it pre-emptively while the eye is weak. So we'd need active anti-hurricane unit that tracks all weather in the gulf and then the moment they become a sizeable enough formation, enough energetic bombs should be launched to disrupt the particular hurricane in formation. I bet it would take lot more energy to disrupt the hurricane once its formed.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:54:09 UTC No. 16416777
>>16416775
>create a rising column of warm air in a thing powered by a rising column of warm air
It won't work. You're just giving it energy and making it radioactive. More importantly you've now made it angry.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:01:38 UTC No. 16416779
/sfg/ - Stormforge general
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:05:52 UTC No. 16416782
>>16416697
I can. You can't.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:12:38 UTC No. 16416786
I shit my pants!! Change my diaper!!!!
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:12:51 UTC No. 16416787
Wait. I live in Tampa
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:13:45 UTC No. 16416789
>>16416787
No you dont
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:14:34 UTC No. 16416790
>>16416777
You just need to make it unstable and it collapses on its own. Be it disrupt the flow of energy or overload it
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:14:57 UTC No. 16416791
>>16416789
So you're callimg me a liar?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:16:22 UTC No. 16416792
https://x.com/culpable_mink/status/
>Well it looks like SpaceX got the deluge system draft permit approved.
>Combined with an earlier hot stage adapter release to land it in the flight 4 zone, and that's probably why they are confidant it's going to be approved soon.
ESGHound, CSS et al on suicide watch
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:17:21 UTC No. 16416794
>>16416791
Yes, also calling*
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:18:43 UTC No. 16416797
>>16416792
Nobody even mentions lightning leg anymore, a shame it is.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:18:50 UTC No. 16416798
>>16416794
Ok so you're calling me a liar then?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:19:44 UTC No. 16416799
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:20:36 UTC No. 16416801
>>16416792
SpaceX just yesterday illegally used the deluge before the final permit. They will be punished again for this
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:21:01 UTC No. 16416802
>>16416792
>Combined with an earlier hot stage adapter release to land it in the flight 4 zone
b-but the poor fish!! SRB nozzles, for some unknown reason, might not pose any threat to them, but this is unacceptable
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:24:17 UTC No. 16416805
>>16416804
99% of you fags arent going in person.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:25:06 UTC No. 16416807
>>16416804
>Sunday
w-which sunday?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:27:20 UTC No. 16416810
>>16416779
https://x.com/WxNB_/status/18436997
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:28:19 UTC No. 16416813
>>16416804
October 15, two months delay by FAA. SpaceX was on course to beat my original prediction of August 15, which itself was derided by /sfg/ for being too pessimistic.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:30:38 UTC No. 16416814
>>16416804
>parasocial chuds larping as m*sk on /sfg/
its over
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:30:55 UTC No. 16416815
>>16416765
What about an orbital mirror array
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:31:53 UTC No. 16416818
>>16416814
Who said I was larping? ;)
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:32:28 UTC No. 16416819
Felonious Huskrat will never put Scamship on an orbital trajectory, let alone Mars.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:33:00 UTC No. 16416820
>>16416805
I was going to but he dropped it a little too tight for me schedule wise
If it had been in November I would have been there
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:33:02 UTC No. 16416821
>>16416807
October 13th, (Friday the 13th)
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:34:03 UTC No. 16416822
>>16416815
Space lasers really do solve everything. Orbital debris, incoming asteroids, space travel, communication, hurricanes, browns
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:36:36 UTC No. 16416824
>>16416820
Couldnt have been a better time for me. A cat 5 hurricane is freeing up my schedule from uni this week and I have the perfect excuse to not be in class for the first few days of next.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:39:36 UTC No. 16416827
>>16416805
I'll go to the next one
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:40:20 UTC No. 16416829
>>16416804
how do you say "it's happening" in Dutch?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:40:34 UTC No. 16416830
>>16416805
I'll go when they're doing bi weekly launches (and catches) for HLS demo refilling
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:40:44 UTC No. 16416831
>>16416824
Youre skipping school because of a little rain? Zoomer fr
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:40:47 UTC No. 16416832
remember, with enough people, you can get whatever you want. work together and destroy threats to spaceflight.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:41:18 UTC No. 16416833
>>16416826
this was made by a Redditor btw
they explicitly stated in the op that they didn't support musk lel
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:42:18 UTC No. 16416834
>what, the fifth refilling launch for the 70th cargo flight?
>count me out
>starship is boring now
Coming sooner than you think!
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:43:12 UTC No. 16416835
>>16416829
Eet 'Hoopen
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:43:34 UTC No. 16416836
>>16416834
kamela will not allow that much noise disturbance. no one will put up with that
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:43:52 UTC No. 16416837
>>16416831
Fr fr no cap i aint finna miss dis lick even if my opps turn up on jah
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:44:58 UTC No. 16416838
>>16416832
Lets do January 6th 2 at FAA HQ in Washington,DC
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:45:05 UTC No. 16416839
>>16416836
Newly built boosters and ships fly themselves to the Australian space port and they launch and return from there
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:45:37 UTC No. 16416840
>>16416805
i want to go but i cant roll the dice with scrubs. its a long drive.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:45:53 UTC No. 16416841
>>16416826
is this real? https://x.com/NASA/status/184369261
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:46:21 UTC No. 16416842
>>16416840
Get a flight.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:46:29 UTC No. 16416843
>>16416824
I have to fly in from the west coast
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:47:07 UTC No. 16416844
>>16416839
They are landing in Vietnam. And launching from Vietnam. losd up with Starlinks. they have been planning for a long time
https://www.telecomreviewasia.com/n
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:47:22 UTC No. 16416845
>>16416843
>west coast
kys commufornian scum
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:47:54 UTC No. 16416847
>>16416769
>already given up
Waffle house sure isn't what it used to be
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:48:28 UTC No. 16416849
>>16416845
you're both e*rthers, shut up
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:49:59 UTC No. 16416850
>>16416849
And where might you be posting from then. Saying the ISS requires timestamp proof
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:50:08 UTC No. 16416851
>>16416847
Dude if this thing hits the bay Tampa's gone
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:50:26 UTC No. 16416852
>>16416830
>I'll go when it's boring
You're going to miss out on all the hot autistic girls bro
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:50:35 UTC No. 16416853
>>16416845
PNW actually
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:50:46 UTC No. 16416854
>>16416847
This country is run by weak men
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:51:03 UTC No. 16416856
>>16416752
Yes, I don't think Trump was joking, and that's based. He has high enthusiasm for the modern mega-engineering and problem-solving mindset of the atomic age. He knew of the history of the idea. Retvrn.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:52:06 UTC No. 16416858
>>16416847
Competancy Crisis
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:53:07 UTC No. 16416860
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCS
>Apollo 10 - "We Is Go & We Is Down Among Them"
new lunarmodule5 video dropped
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:53:32 UTC No. 16416861
>>16416850
i'm actually theian, earth just got in my way
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:54:11 UTC No. 16416862
>>16416851
but I live in Tampa
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:54:38 UTC No. 16416864
>>16416853
>goregonian
even worse. do tell how many times you were robbed today in portland
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:55:18 UTC No. 16416865
>>16416845
I'm from Arizona
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:57:19 UTC No. 16416868
>>16416865
Even worse!
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 03:59:50 UTC No. 16416872
>>16416870
It will be once it's been terraformed
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:00:36 UTC No. 16416873
S*lar system scum, in 5 billion years you'll all be gone.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:00:36 UTC No. 16416874
>>16416864
PNW composes 3 states Washington, Oregon, and Idaho
how dare you assume I'm from Oregon
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:02:15 UTC No. 16416875
>>16416870
>oh wow, a scorching desert, I wonder what I should build
>hm
>I know, a black tar roofed OSB walled large windowed mcmansion with a big green lawn
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:03:16 UTC No. 16416879
>>16416862
That's about to be a problem man you should skedaddle
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:03:17 UTC No. 16416880
>>16416875
What exactly do you think is being done on Mars
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:03:56 UTC No. 16416882
>>16416875
American exceptionalism is capable of anything
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:04:21 UTC No. 16416883
>>16416880
>bubble Mars will enable the conditions for mcmansions
I just try not to think about it
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:04:21 UTC No. 16416884
>>16416873
based alpha centauri poster
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:04:54 UTC No. 16416885
>>16416856
That's true isn't it, he was growing up in the optimistic pre-space-age atomic era when Men of Science were the heroes of the age
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:06:58 UTC No. 16416887
>>16416874
I consider norcal to be part of us as well (cascadia)
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:07:42 UTC No. 16416888
What nearby (20ly) stars are you guys most interested in? For me it's Epsilon Eridani (Ran)
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:08:00 UTC No. 16416889
https://theworthyhouse.com/2024/02/
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:10:09 UTC No. 16416892
>>16416888
Is there a graph that ranks our local stars by estimated amount of matter inside their solar system?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:12:32 UTC No. 16416896
>>16416887
sure why not
still better than oregon
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:12:34 UTC No. 16416897
>>16416894
is that fucking starbase kek
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:14:31 UTC No. 16416899
>>16416894
Redditnigger
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:15:55 UTC No. 16416900
>>16416897
>>16416899
it was made by a French server btw
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:17:48 UTC No. 16416902
>>16416892
I think about this factor a lot. For me it's the pleiades. High energy, tons of matter not locked up in planets. If we ever get here, a quintillion people will call a quadrillion stations home. A bit far for >>16416888 though.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:19:23 UTC No. 16416906
https://x.com/NASASpaceflight/statu
Spacex might refire the recovered engines
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:24:04 UTC No. 16416913
>>16416888
>Epsilon Eridani
Good choice, it's the third-closest stellar system visible to the naked eye, it's got one confirmed planet (AEgir), and it even seems to have an asteroid belt!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_
For me, it's Ross 128. Cool name, it's a Red Dwarf, has the second-closest known Earth-sized planet (after Proxima B), which is within the habitable zone and most probably tidally-locked, and is relatively close to us, only 11 ly, making it the 12th closest stellar system to us.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:24:11 UTC No. 16416914
>>16416805
I went down for the first flight (twice- once for the scrub and once for the real deal)
I kind of just now realized that I'm not broke like I was last year and I could actually get a decent hotel room instead of just hanging out in my truck overnight in the sketchy little parking lot outside the campground that you're not supposed to use.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:25:17 UTC No. 16416915
>>16416906
Chances are its just to study chemical degradation changes.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:25:23 UTC No. 16416916
>>16416860
>lunarmodule5
https://youtu.be/xPEvizJS5VQ?t=1362
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:25:31 UTC No. 16416917
>>16416914
sounds based
where did you watch it from?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:28:14 UTC No. 16416920
>>16416902
first time I saw the Pleiades was on a perfectly clear night through a pretty good telescope at a public stargazing event out near Joshua Tree, and I thought they were so beautiful it almost moved me to tears
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:30:27 UTC No. 16416923
>>16416862
we heben een serieus probleem
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:31:34 UTC No. 16416924
>>16416917
I think my chair was pretty much right here. Jesus of the Fishermen was looking directly at me.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:31:43 UTC No. 16416925
>>16416920
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Jx6C
(you)
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:33:16 UTC No. 16416926
>>16416769
wew lad
my aunt used to live in Dunedin, she moved literally a month ago further inland and north
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:34:28 UTC No. 16416927
>>16416913
>red dwarf habitable zone
I've always wondered, you'd want to stick to the night side because of flares, right?
>>16416920
One day they'll be ours
>>16416924
Majula???
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:35:02 UTC No. 16416929
>>16416862
You should not be there my dude wtf are you doing
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:35:02 UTC No. 16416930
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:35:54 UTC No. 16416931
>>16416927
>Majula
uwotm8
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:35:56 UTC No. 16416932
>>16416805
Only a few hours drive for me, I'll be there.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:38:11 UTC No. 16416934
>it's another "in-landers panic about hurricanes on Florida's behalf like they know anything about hurricanes" episode
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:40:43 UTC No. 16416936
>>16416934
>most powerful hurricane the Earth's atmosphere is theoretically capable of producing
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:44:44 UTC No. 16416937
>>16416936
If we'd developed atmosphere-annihilators we could simply destroy hurricanes before they made landfall.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:47:54 UTC No. 16416940
reminder that round buildings are immune to hurricanes and tornadoes but nobody builds them because people love their boxes
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:48:36 UTC No. 16416941
>>16416940
No corners make us crazy
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:50:02 UTC No. 16416942
>>16416940
We did that once. Was called the Tower of Babel. God nerfed us
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:50:59 UTC No. 16416943
>>16416940
go to bed Buckminster
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:52:38 UTC No. 16416944
>>16416940
If building round was cheaper than rebuilding several times we'd do it
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:53:20 UTC No. 16416945
>>16416944
Anon think of the insurance industry
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:57:38 UTC No. 16416946
>>16416945
insurance companies would prefer not to pay out ever, so the stuff never breaking
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 04:59:51 UTC No. 16416947
I wonder if the guy that drew Stein's;Gate on the ring segment back in the day is still employed at starbase
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:00:55 UTC No. 16416948
>>16416946
Wouldn't indestructible buildings render the entire business of home insurance obsolete? I'm in favor of that btw.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:03:17 UTC No. 16416949
>>16416940
Here you go
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:03:43 UTC No. 16416950
insurance for flying on a plane used to be pretty common. now no one bothers with it.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:04:07 UTC No. 16416952
Houses should be built as triangles and able to rotate to incoming wind
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:05:19 UTC No. 16416953
Houses should be built in space where there is no need to worry about wind and rain
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:05:23 UTC No. 16416954
>>16416940
Enjoy being unable to use all your floorspace
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:06:09 UTC No. 16416955
>>16416948
the economics of reusuable homes simply don't add up. The smart money is attaching a parachute to the roof, which can detach during a natural disaster and then be refurbished and reused.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:06:15 UTC No. 16416956
>>16416954
I have one cubic kilofoot of floor volume in my apartment
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:07:13 UTC No. 16416957
>>16416954
They should make furniture with round edges specifically for spherical houses
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:07:23 UTC No. 16416958
>>16416955
>I just don't understand this "reusable home" meme
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:07:49 UTC No. 16416959
>>16416956
That's almost 1/3rd of a starship
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:09:11 UTC No. 16416961
>>16416948
if they were truly indestructible and impervious, yes I guess
but all we are talking about is floods, there are fires too
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:19:36 UTC No. 16416963
>>16416960
Igloos are ISRU houses
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:19:53 UTC No. 16416964
>>16416961
How can you secure a structure against firestorm damage? Suburbs/trailer courts/neighborhoods all have fuel in close proximity, idk what you can do to mitigate the risk of everything catching fire under the right conditions in close communities like that.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:22:17 UTC No. 16416965
>>16416862
you'll be fine
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:24:18 UTC No. 16416966
relevant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idG
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:31:45 UTC No. 16416970
>>16416968
everyone will be wagies on mars
eat, sleep, work and repeat
will be no room for dead weight
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:42:23 UTC No. 16416976
>>16416970
E*rth wagies are not up to standard. Martian wagies exist only to improve society and not just to exist. The sense of purpose in bettering the collective is the key difference that drives them (us) and is the reason why Mars would be a better society. Importing E*rther wagies would kill the purpose of Mars which is to selectively filter who gets to be in a society and have those people be of extreme value. Everyone has a purpose, and every purpose has its place.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:44:53 UTC No. 16416978
what if its hard as fuck to walk around like it is on the moon? bouncing around and shit with every step?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:46:12 UTC No. 16416980
>>16416978
amerisharts invented the mobility scooter for a reason anon
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:48:56 UTC No. 16416984
An entire society of mobility scooter fatties? Why it really is just like the American colonization
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:53:28 UTC No. 16416989
>>16416891
there are many Cirno appreciators on this website, anon
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:53:36 UTC No. 16416990
Grappel hooks and a bunch of bars to grappel to.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:56:07 UTC No. 16416993
>>16416978
read the Apollo 17 mission commentary. Schmitt suggests using ski poles and sort of jumping around with them
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:59:01 UTC No. 16416995
>>16416963
Igloos are snow, nothing more
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:01:49 UTC No. 16416999
>>16416991
Tens of thousands dead to Starship directly striking the tip of SPI where everyone is viewing the launch. This came to me just now
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:09:52 UTC No. 16417006
>>16416999
Total
Earther
Death
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:10:41 UTC No. 16417008
>>16416906
??? there's nothing left
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:11:42 UTC No. 16417009
>>16417006
>thank you for coming to my TED talk
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:14:17 UTC No. 16417010
>>16416993
pogo
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:26:03 UTC No. 16417016
>>16417014
>two heavy lift rockets on the same day
is this a first?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:34:47 UTC No. 16417021
>>16417014
>3am
ogey, time to die
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:36:07 UTC No. 16417022
>>16416461
Then we kms
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:42:14 UTC No. 16417026
>>16417014
Are you excited??
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:55:26 UTC No. 16417038
ROAD CLOSURE
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:56:45 UTC No. 16417042
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:57:41 UTC No. 16417044
>>16416940
this
you may not like this, but every aboveground structure on Mars will look like this
>expedient construction
>maximalized volume to wall material requirement ratio
>inherently better at holding pressure
human psyche prefers curves over straight lines
this is known fact
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:57:52 UTC No. 16417045
>>16417042
what are your plans this sunday?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:01:41 UTC No. 16417048
>>16417044
>aboveground structure on Mars
Not happening
The radioactivity alone would prevent it
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:07:21 UTC No. 16417056
>>16417048
there is no radioactivity on mars surface
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:09:46 UTC No. 16417060
>>16417056
We don't expect much, but there should be deposits here and there containing uranium, thorium and other radioactive shit.
It takes a closer look, boots on the ground, and thousands of robots
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:11:10 UTC No. 16417063
>>16417048
couple cm thick layer of concreate negates the miniscule amount of cosmic radiation that makes it to surface
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:12:35 UTC No. 16417064
if we cant survive a little rain how are we goinga survive in Mars
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:13:57 UTC No. 16417068
>>16417045
watching starship launch stream
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:15:07 UTC No. 16417070
>>16417064
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh-My
Be afraid
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:16:14 UTC No. 16417071
>>16417070
Scientists need to stick to naming their discoveries after themselves…
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:17:16 UTC No. 16417074
>>16417070
This could hit you once every day and you wouldnt even notice. It's safe
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:18:33 UTC No. 16417075
>>16417071
academia actually forbids this now
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:18:45 UTC No. 16417076
>>16417074
Meteors strike the Earth every day, and most people don't even notice!
Because, it missed you...
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:19:27 UTC No. 16417077
>>16417064
No rain on mars
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:21:02 UTC No. 16417080
>>16417074
yeah, it shoots straight through and doesn't actually do anything
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:21:48 UTC No. 16417081
>>16417075
Academia can kiss my ass.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:22:15 UTC No. 16417082
>>16417068
Do you...want to watch it with me?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:24:14 UTC No. 16417083
>>16417082
that sounds kind of gay
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:24:28 UTC No. 16417084
>>16417080
>>16417080
It had the same energy as a baseball going 60 miles per hour
Also, image limit reached, someone stage
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:25:40 UTC No. 16417085
>>16417082
Serial killer vibes
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:26:54 UTC No. 16417087
using the last image on Ika-chan is based
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:26:55 UTC No. 16417088
image limit reached but might as well wait for page 10, its pretty close
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:27:26 UTC No. 16417089
>>16417088
No fuck off I'm making a new thread
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:29:10 UTC No. 16417090
>>16417089
Please don't use a faggot image
We are all counting you you
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:29:30 UTC No. 16417091
>>16417082
Eww, with you? That's gross.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:29:42 UTC No. 16417092
>>16417089
don't do it you fag
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:30:51 UTC No. 16417094
>>16417089
Make the fucking thread then retard whats taking so long
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:31:54 UTC No. 16417095
>>16417094
Yeah, Im ready to post some REAL NEWS
I have insider info
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:32:50 UTC No. 16417099
>>16417089
Tongue my anus
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:33:42 UTC No. 16417100
>>16417089
Hurry the fuck up
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:33:53 UTC No. 16417101
>>16417099
*NIGGERS
500M get
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:34:02 UTC No. 16417103
>guys im baking thread
>30 minutes later no bread
this didnt use to happen. you are a low quality baker.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:34:35 UTC No. 16417104
Haha squid girl was last image
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:35:06 UTC No. 16417105
>>16417103
wait for page 10
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:35:42 UTC No. 16417107
This might be the most successful sfg thread in history
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:36:03 UTC No. 16417108
>>16417105
Its image limit you freak thats justified staging. Now get that retard OP to bake already.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:36:43 UTC No. 16417110
>>16417103
Guys, maybe he is creating a masterpiece of OC clickbait thumbnail for /sfg/
Because nobody will click on us, unless we have a compelling image to lead off
Its gonna be glorious
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:37:01 UTC No. 16417111
>>16417108
no fuck you, we live without images because somebody wasn't able to keep their images in their pants and used them all
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:37:13 UTC No. 16417112
>>16417108
It is not justified. Either get the image limit increased or I stick my thumb up your ass retarded fuckass
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:37:40 UTC No. 16417113
so is someone making a thread or not? I'll wait for 5min after this comment and make one if no one else does
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:38:10 UTC No. 16417115
Reminder that communications in space will be purely text based to save on bandwidth. Images are literally not spaceflight
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:38:14 UTC No. 16417116
>>16417113
I'll make a thread gimme about 30
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:38:20 UTC No. 16417117
>>16417113
I'm making it, jesus christ
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:38:39 UTC No. 16417118
>>16417111
Well it wasnt fuckin me get off my dick, asshole. I want to post images and someone said they were going to stage, image limit was reached so its justified staging. Anything you say otherwise is invalid, and the fag who said he was baking NEEDS TO GET ON WITH IT ALREADY
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:38:57 UTC No. 16417120
nu space
>>16417119
>>16417119
>>16417119
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:39:06 UTC No. 16417121
>>16417110
people clicking on /sfg/ is bad though
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:39:28 UTC No. 16417122
>>16417115
So it will just be moorse code
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:39:34 UTC No. 16417123
>>16417113
Whichever anon is first to successfully stage, gets all the anonymous glory
And gets called a faggot too
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:40:38 UTC No. 16417129
>>16417117
Whats the fucking hold up huh?? I want my fucking bread I want it RIGHT NOW MOTHAFUCKA
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:41:03 UTC No. 16417131
>>16417129
threads baked fool
scroll up
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:43:16 UTC No. 16417139
>>16417131
shut the fuck up nigger, we're going to keep using this thread until page 10
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:45:44 UTC No. 16417146
>>16417120
Licence has NOT been approved, STAND DOWN FELON HUSK
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:54:47 UTC No. 16417159
>>16417139
it's image limit OR page 10
see you on the flip side
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 08:17:03 UTC No. 16417192
Good morning, /sfg/!
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:00:01 UTC No. 16417261
>>16416408
sorry lil bro russia is not a superpower anymore and they don't get to make those kinds of demands, end of story.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:13:40 UTC No. 16417264
>>16416797
>YOU ABSOLUTE MORONS
After that, who can blame them?
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:44:42 UTC No. 16417281
>>16415789
Is the point that he thinks he's educated but barely understands things beyond the crude symbolic representations he was fed in kindergarten, or is the point that you would be stupid to believe the earth is hurdling through space
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:46:11 UTC No. 16417283
>>16415789
Is the point that he thinks he's educated but barely understands things beyond the crude symbolic representations he was fed in kindergarten, or is the point that you would be a wacky NPC to believe the earth is hurdling through space
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:56:22 UTC No. 16417340
>>16416964
You build out of nonflammable materials, for example, brick, concrete, glass, steel and roof tiles. Depending on how much heat you need to reject, you could add weeper hose, sprinklers or full on fire hoses to keep the outside wet.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:57:24 UTC No. 16417342
>>16416978
Just wear weights. Next!
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:04:08 UTC No. 16417350
>>16417070
When I find data points that are orders of magnitude beyond what's expected, I throw them out.
Every time I hear some asshole talk about how some data point is so unlikely that it should have never been observed, I want to shake them by the neck and ask them to calculate the probability of their sensors being wrong, or a bit flip post measurement, or any other of a host of unlikely events happening.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:35:24 UTC No. 16417397
>>16417044
what are those? the only remaining structures in Florida in a few days?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:56:09 UTC No. 16417413
>>16414943
ask me how I know you're a retarded pseud
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:23:29 UTC No. 16417517
>>16415494
Chad weather.gov user
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 15:52:24 UTC No. 16417621
>>16416948
No. Insurance prefers to minimize risk as much as possible to get the most amount of money without doing anything. If your house gets destroyed more and more and insurance premiums hike up. You lose paying customers. Its a deat spiral.