🧵 Scientific Nobel Prize Misogyny
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:24:06 UTC No. 16418325
This year, all Nobel Prizes in scientific disciplines this year have been awarded to men. When we've made so much progress to try to get women and girls interested in STEM careers, for both practical and justice reasons, as an economy cannot function without STEM, and an unjust society is built on sand: the actions of the Nobel committee are inexcusable.
#NoNobel until they issue a formal apology and redo this year's awards.
The Nobel committee must adjust their ethical standards, and implement diversity and inclusion measures.
Even if you hate women, this is going to damage the amount of women in STEM and therefore hamper the progress of science severely, damaging the economy and innovation.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:44:59 UTC No. 16418357
what happened to your last thread
Anonymous at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 01:57:57 UTC No. 16418477
>>16418325
>be the first human who won Nobel prize twice
>count as one orange dot
JUST
Anonymous at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 03:04:14 UTC No. 16418545
>>16418477
Not for long, bitch. Hinton is getting Chemistry AND peace next year.
Anonymous at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 04:03:11 UTC No. 16418612
>>16418477
Pierre curie's retarded project
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:10:57 UTC No. 16422759
>>16418325
Can't believe they've wasted 26 prizes on women
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:45:22 UTC No. 16422803
>>16418325
Why do women always insist the bar should be lowered for them?
>this is going to damage the amount of women in STEM and therefore hamper the progress of science
Non sequitor reasoning. You've mistakenly assumed that more women = more progress. In fact, we've seen that the decline in scientific progress is directly correlated with the number of women entering the field.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:27:15 UTC No. 16422872
I work in a lab with many women. They don't do Jack. This is probably a sign of things improving.
You don't get prizes for doing nothing.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:28:32 UTC No. 16422874
>>16422759
The funniest one is the one related to using psuedouridine bases in the vaccine. Oops that cause a frame shift! Lol
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:32:12 UTC No. 16422880
>>16418325
>Even if you hate women, this is going to damage the amount of women in STEM and therefore hamper the progress of science severely, damaging the economy and innovation.
lol. lmao, even. Couldn't possibly be the presence of women hampering the progress of science, could it? Imagine if all the resources wasted training and employing female scientists were given to the top 10% of male scientists to do with as they see fit. Imagine the future we could experience.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:29:03 UTC No. 16422976
>>16422880
Seen it first hand myself. They're all totally useless.
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:31:52 UTC No. 16423274
>>16418325
I know that this is a b8 thread, but it always amazes me how women think there’s nothing wrong with this argumentation. Everything must be handed to them just because they have a vagina. Absolutely mental, innit.
B00T at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:40:34 UTC No. 16423288
>>16423274
just what you ordered
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:10:20 UTC No. 16425562
>>16422803
A woman discovered fucking CRISPR for crying out loud- I'm not an SJW cuck but more women would definitely advance the field massively. This is due to stem being geared towards men
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:21:05 UTC No. 16425721
>>16418325
Making them interested for the first time since julio verne
Doesn't make them competitive, unless you count secret bitch projects
Which can't get nobels
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:25:15 UTC No. 16425806
>>16425562
>hundreds of men discover things
I sleep
>one woman discovered something
SEE WE NEED TO SHOVE MORE WOMEN IN THE ACADEMIA. IT’S GEARED TOWARDS MEN! HOW? IDK HOW BUT IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INTRINSIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN, YOU SEXIST PRIVILEGED WHITE PIG.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 13:03:36 UTC No. 16426656
>>16425806
crispr is more important than any of that shit, not to mention rosalind franklin and dna
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 13:04:38 UTC No. 16426680
>>16426656
i mean we're talking about the ability to alter the genetic code + reshape society
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 13:48:14 UTC No. 16427564
>>16426656
>>16426680
Cool. So because this one woman did this important thing, completely unrelated women deserve to be in science? Doesn't make any sense, sweetheart.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 13:51:15 UTC No. 16427606
>>16418477
>slav needs to emigrate to the West to accomplish ground breaking things
tale as old as time
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 13:59:00 UTC No. 16427687
>>16427606
Can’t remember Chebyshev, Kolmogorov or Mendeleyev immigrating anywhere.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 14:27:28 UTC No. 16427889
>>16427687
>jew, kike and jew-lite
yeah
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 14:30:26 UTC No. 16427910
>>16427889
kek yeah they’re certainly kikes and not ethnic Russians. Cope.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:12:24 UTC No. 16428514
>>16427687
Their greatest achievements have been things you don't need expensive lab equipment for (the first two were mathematicians and Mendeleyev is mostly known for his periodic table, something he only needed the knowledge of the time, pen and paper to write down).
Same reason why Poland in the 20s and 30s had so many brilliant mathematicians but no physicists, chemists etc., with a few notable exceptions of course.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:01:37 UTC No. 16428946
>>16422803
you've fallen for the most obvious bait thread of all time, nigger
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 21:23:16 UTC No. 16429480
>>16418545
He might as well. Chemistry cuz some shitty relation to computational chemistry, peace cuz he’s an AI doomsayer.
I fucking hate that he got it. Hopfield made sense, and there are others in cs with a physics background that deserve it more; physicists have been working with neural nets as well.
Instead Hinton gets it, when he already got the Turing prize for contributing to Hopfield’s model that went nowhere in machine learning. He’s been riding that fucking high for years and the Nobel committee just sucked his cock. The guy immediately made a conference to announce and celebrate his getting the prize.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 21:49:58 UTC No. 16429538
>>16425562
>A woman discovered fucking CRISPR
It was discovered by a man, a woman took the credit. Women commit scientific fraud at disproportionately high rates though.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 21:53:19 UTC No. 16429544
>>16425562
>I'm not an SJW cuck
Yes you are. More women would only replace more qualified men, squandering limited funds (women are notorious for wasting other people's hard earned money) and setting back science even further.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:51:38 UTC No. 16429686
>>16429480
Yeah it's bullshit. The Nobel is a complete joke now as far as I'm concerned. It was already a bit of a joke, but now it's just OVER.
Raphael at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:01:32 UTC No. 16430594
>>16418325
Who gives a fuck it’s meritocracy
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:08:01 UTC No. 16430602
>>16426656
>>16426680
How old are you?
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 19:22:48 UTC No. 16433353
>>16426656
>crispr
Discovered by a man
>>16369964