Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:07:30 UTC No. 16462182

first for the piping plover

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:08:55 UTC No. 16462184

Venus descent probe when?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:10:07 UTC No. 16462185

>>16462184
When you fund it.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:12:16 UTC No. 16462186

>>16462185
Shut up idiot. These billionares and governments have endless money that they pocket for themselves and their buddies. Why does only one of them have any interest in space?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:13:19 UTC No. 16462188

>>16462178
Cancel MSR

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:13:36 UTC No. 16462189

>>16462186
Struck a nerve poorfag?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:15:18 UTC No. 16462194

>>16462189
Tosser.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:18:23 UTC No. 16462197

>>16462178
This can't be real. This triggers my autism so much. The amount of dead wedges of space between those bed boxes is insane.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:19:25 UTC No. 16462198

>>16462188
it's going to be funny when in 2032 the first people step off a martian starship and msr is still a year and a half away from launch with 15 billion in the hole.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:19:58 UTC No. 16462199

>>16462194
I'll take that as a yes.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:20:46 UTC No. 16462200

Hey guys can you rate my rocket ship idea (original design btw)

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:20:55 UTC No. 16462201

>>16462198
if you know anything about starship you would know for a fact that it will not land on Mars in 2032

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:21:29 UTC No. 16462203

>>16462200
I feel like china is skipping a few steps.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:23:30 UTC No. 16462205

>>16462203
They're missing several key technologies, all of them not something we've outsourced to them. They'd need to speedrun fifty years of advancement. Though I guess they've already done that

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:24:02 UTC No. 16462206

>>16462178
Is there storage space below the bunks and how do you access it?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:24:26 UTC No. 16462207

spehs

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:24:43 UTC No. 16462208

>>16462201
In any case I bet the Mars Sample Returned is collected with human hands. There's no way they put together MSR before SpaceX puts together a landing

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:25:27 UTC No. 16462209

>>16462201
who could be behind this post?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:27:43 UTC No. 16462213

>>16462205
>They're missing several key technologies
Such as?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:30:03 UTC No. 16462218

>>16462213
Metallurgy, gyroscopes, control systems. Pretty fundamental stuff

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:32:51 UTC No. 16462221

>>16462218
They're not missing that kind of stuff, for christs sake they have a space station.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:33:37 UTC No. 16462223

>>16462200
you know, this rocket is quite similar to SpaceX's "Starship"

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:35:37 UTC No. 16462225

>>16462223
ho ho ho no! patented long march. old party design

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:35:39 UTC No. 16462226

>>16462221
We're specifically talking about the image of the starship replica. That China is doing things Russia did 50 years ago has nothing to do with replicating starship.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:37:56 UTC No. 16462228

>>16462226
Then why did you bring up shit the russians did 50 years ago and not actually pertinent stuff like landing a booster or FFSC? Don't bitch at me when you were the one to bring up irrelevant nonsense.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:38:24 UTC No. 16462232

>>16462218
There's also the fundamental culture of innovation and engineering that they don't have. They've implemented things already invented and quickly joined the industrial era, but innovation and engineering is fundamentally a truth oriented endeavor where you answer to God alone. The globalism catch up is a different game, and doesn't prove they'll be able to maintain the momentum beyond that

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:41:00 UTC No. 16462236

>>16462232
>They've implemented things already invented and quickly
>which is why they can't possibly implement the already invented starship

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:41:32 UTC No. 16462237

>>16462228
>landing a booster
Control systems, gyroscopes, all high precision
>FFSC
You need the tech to turn a hunk of metal into such an engine
>irrelevant nonsense
The fundamentals of what you just said. That's why I said it was fundamental stuff that wasn't there yet. Why are you mad

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:43:46 UTC No. 16462238

>>16462236
Starship is cutting edge and several aspects are itar controlled. It's easier to build a car factory if another country installs a car factory in your country. Building something from censored YouTuber tours of the factory is a different story

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:46:39 UTC No. 16462241

>>16462121
>>16462129
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/1853443340953330163

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:46:49 UTC No. 16462242

>>16462237
>>landing a booster
>Control systems, gyroscopes, all high precision
Bullshit, spacex just used basic shit. The advances that allowed for booster reuse was primarily software and deep throttling on the engines, nothing to do with avionics.
>You need the tech to turn a hunk of metal into such an engine
Do they not have this tech? The chinese have made both OR and FR engines. What precise metallurgy tech don't they have?
>Why are you mad
It pisses me off when idiots like you present themselves as more knowledgeable then you are thus wasting my time. When I asked I thought you might give me insights I didn't already know, instead you gave a load of bullshit I knew wasn't true.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:55:20 UTC No. 16462251

>>16462242
Well, what are they missing? They don't have a starship, or even a falcon 9, why?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:55:22 UTC No. 16462252

>>16462197
It saves on mass budget dumbass.
Also, why do they need more pods? Like those are all going to be filled? I don't think so. They only need 4, and we already know who is going. The design will be optimized when needed. Why would we want 50 useless humans on the moon, that's just asking for one of these weak ass women or diversity sends to have a meltdown.
Use the mass for robotic cargo and supplies. You seem incredibly stupid, please reveal your SAT scores, net worth, actual achievements, and career path.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:00:21 UTC No. 16462256

>>16462225
For reusable full flow staged combustion methalox stainless steel construction two stage RTLS super heavy launch vehicles with TPS tiles?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:02:24 UTC No. 16462258

>>16462251
So far as I can see it's mainly a software issue at this point. The private space companies have demonstrated deep throttling on multiple grasshopper tests.
As for their starship clone they don't have any FFSC engines which I am convinced are vital for making full reuse work. Then theres all the little stuff that saves on weight and thus lets your fully reusable rocket actually get stuff to orbit.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:07:12 UTC No. 16462263

>>16462197

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:09:55 UTC No. 16462264

>>16462263
why did he suggest vertical beds for a spacecraft that operates mainly in a gravity well?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:13:52 UTC No. 16462268

>>16462264
Ever heard of a ladder?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:15:46 UTC No. 16462270

>>16462268
I have. Do you sleep hanging vertically from the ceiling after climbing a ladder to get up there?

Doesn't sound comfortable.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:16:15 UTC No. 16462274

>>16462263
based. also, the pods themselves should have the shape of pickle rick.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:17:29 UTC No. 16462276

>>16462264
he means stack the containers vertically like a bunk bed.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:17:50 UTC No. 16462278

>>16462270
lol I think Tim meant bunk them up vertically like a bunk bed. Not literally turning them all vertically and making everyone sleep standing up kek

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:19:51 UTC No. 16462281

>>16462278
>making everyone sleep standing up
that would save space though

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:21:01 UTC No. 16462283

>>16462276
>>16462278

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:21:37 UTC No. 16462285

>>16462281
What about some sort of compromise? Not completely vertical, maybe like 30, 45° or something? Also only hire midge astronauts

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:22:10 UTC No. 16462286

>>16462241
what a joke

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:22:38 UTC No. 16462288

>>16462283
I kneel anon, you were right. I didn’t think he was that dumb

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:23:42 UTC No. 16462289

>>16462283
Does it matter if it's for HLS when for Mars it would still be a problem?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:24:21 UTC No. 16462290

>>16462289
I think Tim is simply an idiot

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:24:36 UTC No. 16462291

okay so how about this: we stand the beds straight up, but we put some really big roller bearings on the entire habitat and spin it really fast when its bedtime so that people can sleep lying down

best of both worlds

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:24:49 UTC No. 16462292

>>16462289
they don't call him dim todd for nothing

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:25:20 UTC No. 16462293

>>16462290
remember when he and all those weirdo artists were going to go to the moon alongside the names of Lowell, Armstrong, Cernan etc? Im glad he won't.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:26:17 UTC No. 16462294

>>16462291
If you want a carnival ride, you can ride New Shepard instead.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:27:14 UTC No. 16462296

>>16462294
what if BO made a super heavy sub-orbital? it could take 100+ people at once on a 5 minute trip above the Karman line. would increase revenue tremendously.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:28:05 UTC No. 16462297

>largest pressurized volume ever
>more internal volume than ISS and Gateway
Yet you are still trying to optimize space for sleeping quarters for some reason?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:28:09 UTC No. 16462298

>>16462296
they don't publicize this, but it's the main use case for new glenn

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:30:13 UTC No. 16462302

>>16462258
>if only we had better software

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:30:52 UTC No. 16462303

>>16462129
>anons in this thread are legitimately more knowledgeable about this stuff than the government employees

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:31:15 UTC No. 16462305

Nip feeling good about H3's prospect.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:31:36 UTC No. 16462306

>>16462297
Oldspace mindset. Starship runs out of mass before it runs out of volume every time. The large volume is for the Mars trip

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:31:56 UTC No. 16462308

>>16462296
those 100 people would then board a suborbital colony, which is serviced and refueled every 3 minutes so that it can maintain itself above the karman line with continuous thrust.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:35:26 UTC No. 16462313

>>16462305
Japan managed to make H3 cheaper unlike all the other new oldspace rockets

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:37:41 UTC No. 16462316

>>16462241
Damn.. turns out it wasn't malice, it was incompetence. Who could have seen this.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:43:03 UTC No. 16462322

https://x.com/VickiCocks15/status/1853074632414306350

prepping

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:44:00 UTC No. 16462323

>>16462283
He is a dime a dozen brainwashed Redditor with a mainstream IQ of exactly 100, +/- 5 points. The stupidity is obvious. I guess that is his appeal, he has a lot of followers, because there are a LOT of equally stupid people he can relate to, pander to, and get funding from, and he fits the bill perfectly.
Everyday people are fucking intellectual turds, with NO critical thinking skills, as he is. MAKES SENSE

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:45:40 UTC No. 16462326

>>16462322
they need to run a pipeline

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:50:39 UTC No. 16462333

>>16462322
>Something went wrong. Try reloading.
I'm done with that website. I tried reloading 30 times, tried different browsers, tried private mode, deleted cookies, disabled extensions, always the fucking same error.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:51:08 UTC No. 16462335

>>16462302
I don't know why you posted the inside of a capsule when we're talking about booster reuse.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:57:57 UTC No. 16462340

>>16462313
>Atlas V
>$110 million
>Vulcan
>$110 million (starting)
At least it brings a few tons more to orbit.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:04:59 UTC No. 16462348

Vostochny soyuz launch in 6 hours 13 minutes

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:05:02 UTC No. 16462349

View of the H3 launch from a plane

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:06:32 UTC No. 16462352

>>16462349
holy kino

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:10:59 UTC No. 16462356

>>16462184
China might do a Venus atmospheric sample return mission
https://spacenews.com/venus-atmosphere-sample-return-noted-in-chinas-long-term-space-science-roadmap/

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:12:59 UTC No. 16462358

>>16462203
What steps are they skipping?
Grasshopper clone: hopped
F9 clone: first launch next year
Raptor clone: in development

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:13:27 UTC No. 16462359

>>16462356
>atmospheric sample
whats the point? its just going to be CO2 and other things. we know this already

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:15:23 UTC No. 16462362

>>16462358
Those last 2

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:18:00 UTC No. 16462368

>>16462356
>>16462359
>sniffbot
imagine the smell

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:18:08 UTC No. 16462369

>>16462348
CRS mission tonight too. I didn't realize they did those so close together.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:19:36 UTC No. 16462370

>>16462358
UGGH... you idiot. No, you need to do other steps to get to Raptor. You need to follow all the brilliant stiff NASA did during and after APOLLO. China I'd a Gemini brat.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:24:31 UTC No. 16462372

>>16462251
Their engines are way too powerful for reuse. The lead time for a new rocket with a brand new engine is about 10 years. They started taking reuse seriously around 2018, after SpaceX had proved it wasn't just technically possible, but that it would also probably save money. After the Space Shuttle experience, many people were very skeptical that reuse would save money.

Originally CASC planned the CZ-6X and CZ-8R which where clunky kludge solutions that could use existing engines, however they abandoned those designs in favor of (a) redesigning the YF-100 and sticking it on a 5m core (which will require additional 5m production tooling and a new dedicated launch pad) and (b) developing a new YF-209 engine

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:27:25 UTC No. 16462375

>>16462370
What about Apollo is highly relevant for Raptor?

China has an ORSC engine and also a methalox engine. Those seem like far more relevant stepping stones toward a Raptor clone.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:28:19 UTC No. 16462376

What is the largest size of two bodies that could impact and never flatten into a sphere?

Somewhere out there there could be an Earthlike planet made of two Mars mass objects which had a freak low speed collision. In the area between them there could be a dense impossible sea of thick atmosphere denser than any ocean.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:29:48 UTC No. 16462377

>>16462376
holy kino

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:30:46 UTC No. 16462379

>>16462376
>two Mars mass objects which had a freak low speed collision
fuck no lol. the limit is probably well below 1000km

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:32:24 UTC No. 16462385

>>16462359
The main point is prestige, as with all of these things.

As for the science; even if all it does is to add another data point that confirms what we currently think, that would still be valuable. Research done on a sample with all the tools we have on Earth would be the best confirmation yet. As the article notes, interest in the exact chemical composition of Venus' atmosphere has increased due to the discovery of phosphine.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:33:25 UTC No. 16462386

>>16462359
why do white peepoo climb mountains? don they know theres nothing up there?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:34:20 UTC No. 16462387

>>16462362
The last two will happen before they build their Starship clone, so they're not skipping them

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:34:58 UTC No. 16462388

>>16462372
Thanks for the input.
I suppose thats relevant to the state space program, hows the private industry looking in terms of reuse?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:35:28 UTC No. 16462389

>why do white people climb mountains?
>why do chinks perform useless experiments?
>why do niggers...

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:46:57 UTC No. 16462408

>>16462200
Turns out this is just one configuration, the LM-9 will start off as a partially reusable 3 stage rocket and only be fully reused later.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:52:19 UTC No. 16462416

>>16462385
>phosphine
umm thats been debunked sweetie...

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:55:48 UTC No. 16462421

>>16462416
Umm that deboonking has been deboonked sweaty...
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/controversial-phosphine-findings-on-venus-corroborated/4020063.article

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:57:51 UTC No. 16462425

>>16462388
At the time, the startup companies didn't have any engines at all, other than what they could buy from CASC, so it wasn't much better for them. And most of them focused on just getting rockets off the ground as quick as possible to prove themselves to investors; a reusable design was merely considered to be the second or third step.

One of the Chinese startups that has developed and launched a liquid rocket to orbit, Landspace, was founded in 2015 and I think they created their development roadmap that included the ZQ-2 before reuse became the new paradigm. It is more of a CZ-4B clone. The other such company, Space Pioneer, used AALPT's YF-102 engine which is too big for reuse with the 3.35m core, a diameter chosen because of the immediately available tooling, and the reusable version of the engine won't be available until 2026 anyway

Today, the established companies and the startup companies are pretty much neck-and-neck in reuse, because they all started pursuing that paradigm around the same time. They also share technology and supply chain. For example, the first stage engines on Space Pioneer's TL-2 are CASC's YF-102 and the Tianhuo-11 upper stage engines are supposedly based on CASC's YF-115, hence why they could develop an ORSC engine so quickly. Startups generally use 3.35m or 3.8m or 5m diameter because those are the same as the ones CASC has chosen. I read that Space Pioneer's propellant tanks are manufactured in Tianjin, and I assume this means they're manufactured by CASC's plant 211 in Tianjin because Space Pioneer doesn't have a facility in Tianjin. Their factory is in Zhangjiagang and its propellant tank manufacturing line hasn't been built yet. Likewise, I read that Landspace only recently installed 3.35m tank friction stir welding equipment in their factory. Etc.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:58:20 UTC No. 16462427

>>16462388
We just saw the video of their (the Chinese) 2nd hop so maybe 10-15yrs behind, I'll admit that I'm not as keyed into Chinese aerospace as much as the US and EU, but it seems that making a F9 clone seems to be the current focus.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:00:51 UTC No. 16462433

nobody cares

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:03:34 UTC No. 16462437

>>16462425
>>16462427
Wow this is a lot of good stuff anon.
Since you seem knowledgeable, who do you bet on getting reuse first? A private company (who?) or the state agencies?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:04:20 UTC No. 16462440

>>16462358
>>16462370
China has also done the reusable spaceplane thing and so probably has done the tiled heat shield thing

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:06:55 UTC No. 16462443

>>16462427
Chinese companies have been hopping up and down since 2019 e.g. Linkspace. That company went bust however their employees and experience (probably) lives on

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:07:01 UTC No. 16462444

>>16462372
>>16462425
Neat. It's a shame that the lead time for space things is so long; a real modern space race would be cool to see.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:11:11 UTC No. 16462448

>>16462241
>regulatory bullshit that's so fucking bad that people are starting to assume it's malicious and intentional politically motivated lawfare
>it turns out that govt workers are actually just THAT incompetent and they're just so retarded that random cylinder watcher could do a better job.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:11:39 UTC No. 16462451

>>16462443
>went bust
There really needs to be better reporting about CN aerospace because that's absolute news to me

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:21:14 UTC No. 16462458

>>16462437
If by "getting reuse" you mean, "first orbital launch of a rocket designed to eventually be capable of reuse", I have no idea. I would have said Space Pioneer, however they had an "accidental launch" recently which destroyed their rocket and test stand, and so delayed their first orbital launch a lot. Which just shows how hard this is to predict.

If by "getting reuse" you mean, "first successful recovery of booster during an orbital mission", I also have no idea. SpaceX had to try lots of times before succeeding. Some companies have done more hop tests than others, however that isn't a guarantee of success on an orbital mission. It won't be Space Pioneer who is first on this though, since they don't intend to try to reuse their rocket until later.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:24:38 UTC No. 16462462

>>16462451
I remember reading it, but it was a while and I don't remember where I read it, so unfortunately I can't link to the source

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:25:23 UTC No. 16462465

>>16462458
>that pic
tell mr ching chang chong "if he wants to get involved all those missiles wont add inches to your penis"

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:27:04 UTC No. 16462468

>>16462252
>You seem incredibly stupid, please reveal your SAT scores, net worth, actual achievements, and career path.
lmao

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:37:18 UTC No. 16462480

Was posted in the last thread, about FWS incompetency
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/1853443340953330163

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:40:04 UTC No. 16462484

>>16462443
>>16462451
>>16462462
It apparently isn't true that the company went completely bust. I found this interview with the CEO from September, and it mentions that they did three low-altitude recovery tests (<300m) this year.
https://m.thepaper.cn/kuaibao_detail.jsp?contid=4333736

However it seems clear that they're not really moving forward.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:42:24 UTC No. 16462488

>>16462443
>>16462451
>>16462462
I take that back. I searched around a bit and it apparently isn't true that the company went completely bust. I found this interview with the CEO from September, and it mentions that they did three low-altitude recovery tests (<300m) this year.
https://m.thepaper.cn/kuaibao_detail.jsp?contid=4333736

However it seems clear that they're not really moving forward.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:42:59 UTC No. 16462490

>>16462480
And now it's an example of your incompetency too.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:50:55 UTC No. 16462494

>>16462490
right...

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:10:02 UTC No. 16462516

>>16462425
Source for Space Pioneer getting their rocket parts from Tianjin
https://news.qq.com/rain/a/20231103A08ZMS00

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:14:20 UTC No. 16462525

GOOD MORNING /SFG/!

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:15:10 UTC No. 16462528

Last thread inspired me

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:18:29 UTC No. 16462530

>>16462528
smug pepe

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:26:05 UTC No. 16462539

>>16462530
I believe this image has been doctored

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:28:36 UTC No. 16462544

>>16462530
haters will say this is fake

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:30:15 UTC No. 16462549

>>16462544
yeah, musk is fatter than that

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:35:01 UTC No. 16462555

>>16462544
Did Mike Pence posses Elon?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:35:17 UTC No. 16462557

>>16462197
yeah, you'd fill that space up with personal storage

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:35:25 UTC No. 16462558

Hello bros I'm applying for a job which includes measuring temperature distributions inside cold rooms/freezers. What should I put on my CV to maximise the chance of getting the job?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:37:29 UTC No. 16462559

>>16462558

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:38:38 UTC No. 16462562

>>16462558
Large grocery store warehouse. Can you drive a forklift? I can hook you up with a recruiter, do you live in a major metro area with a frozen foods market? We have opportunities nationwide!

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:39:01 UTC No. 16462563

>>16462558
tell them you have experience stirring liquid oxygen tanks

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:40:44 UTC No. 16462565

>>16462558
>I have two hands to hold thermometers
>I own a pair of functioning eyes to see the results
>I possess a mouth and can transmit the information vocally
>I have two healthy ears to listen for the response

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:42:14 UTC No. 16462566

>>16462565
That's why you are faggot, you don't communicate with text, but speak as retard.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:42:23 UTC No. 16462567

>>16462558
make sure not mention your room temp IQ for asking for CV advice here

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:43:14 UTC No. 16462568

>>16462566
seems like you struggle with that yourself

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:44:05 UTC No. 16462570

>>16462567
if your IQ is room temperature it will have a smaller effect on the heat distribution than a higher than room temperature one.
therefore making you better fit for the job.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:45:09 UTC No. 16462572

>>16462528
Heh

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:45:27 UTC No. 16462573

https://x.com/lyndonbajohnson/status/1853166596870869204

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:45:31 UTC No. 16462575

>>16462197
It's real. The beauty of 1000 cubic meters

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:45:56 UTC No. 16462576

>>16462567
Why? This place is crowded with genuine SpaceX and NASA engineer.s

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:47:10 UTC No. 16462579

>>16462573
Fortunately SpaceX is too big to fail at this point.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:48:35 UTC No. 16462580

>>16462558
Don’t put it on your resume, but if you get any interviews you gotta jokingly call yourself the “icebox master” or something. Boomer / Gen X hiring guys love that shit

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:49:20 UTC No. 16462581

>>16462576
Don't forget certified forklift operators!
We are KING of the cold storage.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:50:50 UTC No. 16462585

https://youtu.be/2rHOajWyXfg
is this worth watching?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:53:43 UTC No. 16462593

Wouldnt you guys get lonely on Mars?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:55:09 UTC No. 16462596

>>16462593
I'm already lonely here on earth
can't get worse

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:55:35 UTC No. 16462597

>>16462593
Nope, I have roggs and frens and God

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:55:52 UTC No. 16462598

>>16462593
pretty sure high doses of Twitter and ketamine will prevent that

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:56:08 UTC No. 16462599

>>16462593
How is that any different than here? I never leave a small box, with mostly screen time to keep me occupied.
Why not Occupy Mars?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:56:09 UTC No. 16462600

>>16462593
No, I'd just bring people over onto a new world with infinite potential

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:57:51 UTC No. 16462603

>>16462600
do you mean... the CHOSEN PEOPLE?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:59:18 UTC No. 16462604

>>16462600
Europeans are the chosen of Martes

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:01:54 UTC No. 16462606

>>16462599
>wake up
>eat breakfast ration
>wait 10hrs for mission control to approve EVA
>2hrs of collecting roggs and dedusting panels
>spend the rest of the sol playing 4x games
>eat dinner ration
>Another successful day colonizing mars
Based

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:03:16 UTC No. 16462608

>>16462604
Only Elon should choose who flows into Mars before the valve is shut off upon his death.
The Chosen People with be hand selected by Elon himself *and he will impregnate many of the women, on Mars, as he gets first crack at the fertile.
Martian rules

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:04:01 UTC No. 16462609

>>16462608
there's not enough time in the day for elon to personally approve all 1 million martians.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:09:08 UTC No. 16462616

>>16462593
no because i would have a gene-splicing impregnate-able robutt that i can start a happy mars family with.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:09:49 UTC No. 16462618

>>16462270
hooks under the armpit
might even be comfortable with proper neck support in lunar gravity

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:11:33 UTC No. 16462620

>>16462609
There are MANY disqualifications (obvious ones) that will make this process much easier than you think. Luckily, Earth as a whole still has over 1 million candidates, out of how many now? 5.5 billions or something, who the fuck even knows.
Remember, in the wise words of Donald Trump, "They're not sending their best".
This problem will be nipped in the butt before it can occur on Mars. And also, why should we ship a million over, since we are inherently self-replicating you know. Chad & Stacy will have the population at its limit in decades, even with a seed of ~1000 or so to start with a purebred species, one whose genome is free from errors

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:14:08 UTC No. 16462622

Is there a twitter account that post all orbital launches (+attempts maybe) and only that?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:16:32 UTC No. 16462625

>>16462622
nextlaunch

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:20:39 UTC No. 16462629

>>16462178
those spaces behind each bunk, how many bottles of pee and stiff socks do you think could be hidden back there?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:22:09 UTC No. 16462630

>>16462629
dunno, I'm too busy setting up my female astronaut panties collection

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:29:53 UTC No. 16462636

Where can I learn how synthetic aperture radar/sonar works?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:34:39 UTC No. 16462640

https://x.com/ajtourville/status/1853506166871183834

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:35:40 UTC No. 16462641

>>16462640
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1853518476591169627

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:36:41 UTC No. 16462643

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1853518145987715314

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:56:47 UTC No. 16462653

>>16462425
More on Landspace's propellant tank manufacturing.

This is a tour of their Jiaxing factory. Here they go into the "phase 2" facility which is the propellant tank manufacturing facility, housing the friction stir welding equipment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbdTDja8Bys&t=20s

Phase 2 was put into use in May 2023.
https://www.landspace.com/news-detail.html?itemid=31

However, the first launch of ZQ-2 was in December 2022.

You can see in the pics that were part of this November 2022 press release that the phase 2 facility didn't exist
https://www.landspace.com/news-detail.html?itemid=23

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:56:58 UTC No. 16462654

inb4 Kamala wins and witchhunt ensues

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:05:41 UTC No. 16462662

>>16462425
More on Landspace's propellant tank manufacturing.

This is a tour of their Jiaxing factory. Here they go into the "phase 2" facility which is the propellant tank manufacturing facility, housing the friction stir welding equipment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbdTDja8Bys&t=20s [Embed]

Phase 2 was put into use in May 2023.
https://www.landspace.com/news-detail.html?itemid=31

However, the first launch of ZQ-2 was in December 2022.

Here is an old press release with pics from when the phase 2 facility didn't exist
https://www.landspace.com/news-detail.html?itemid=23

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:07:10 UTC No. 16462665

>>16462200
Too small. It needs to be bigger.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:07:32 UTC No. 16462666

>>16462654
/sfg/ had radicalized me.
/b/ couldn't do it. /pol/ couldn't do it.
/sfg/ on 4chan /sci is what radicalized me. I picked a side, and I'm fighting to the death.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:07:57 UTC No. 16462667

>>16462203
That's modern chinese history in a nutshell.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:08:40 UTC No. 16462670

>>16462667
hahah

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:10:59 UTC No. 16462674

kamala and trump should have space sex

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:11:17 UTC No. 16462675

>>16462640
>increased the contract ceiling for pLEO services to $13B
Do I need to say it? We all know it. We all know I'm going to say it, so I'll say it. Brilliant Pebbles.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:11:52 UTC No. 16462678

>>16462408
is that a good method to doing it? it sounds reasonable.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:12:00 UTC No. 16462679

>>16462667
Great leap

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:12:25 UTC No. 16462680

>>16462640
"starshield"

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:13:17 UTC No. 16462681

>>16462680
The ultimate
>blocks your path

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:15:17 UTC No. 16462682

this guy just hammers elon over and over.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhmYgrVdFso

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:19:09 UTC No. 16462686

>>16462680
MAD is a death cult. we need brilliant pebbles. it was infeasible in Reagan's time but it would be very doable today.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:20:20 UTC No. 16462689

>>16462680
These were intended for GMD and SM-3 Block IIA. They're mid-course interceptors, but similar to Brilliant Pebble interceptors in some ways (hit-to-kill, meant to be numerous, etc)

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:20:41 UTC No. 16462691

>>16462680
maybe they'll call it starsword

>>16462640
its unlikely that its solely for spacex. we know starshield uses starlink bus but other vendors add their components to starshield. they'll probably also invest in oneweb and kuiper. maybe even iridium's NEXT too.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:21:58 UTC No. 16462694

>>16462691
>>its unlikely that its solely for spacex
key word is "pLEO". SpaceX is the only launch provider that can do "proliferated LEO" aka massive constellations. Blue Origin might manage to scam some of this money though, for New Glenn development.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:24:02 UTC No. 16462698

>>16462686
>not understanding Nash-Equilibria

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:24:28 UTC No. 16462700

>>16462694
i looked it up a bit and saw that viasat was a contractor for the program since last year
https://investors.viasat.com/news-releases/news-release-details/us-space-force-awards-viasat-contract-proliferated-low-earth

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:27:23 UTC No. 16462704

>>16462689
and never amounted to anything

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:27:35 UTC No. 16462705

>>16462700
>The companies, receiving the awards, which include a five-year option, are:
>SpaceX; Capella Space‘s Capella Federal, Inc.; BlackSky Technology Inc.’s BlackSky Geospatial Solutions, Inc.; SES DRS Global Enterprise Solutions, Inc.; EchoStar Corp.‘s Hughes Network Systems; Viasat Inc.‘s Inmarsat Government, Inc.; Amazon’s Kuiper Government Services (KGS) LLC; Intelsat‘s Intelsat General Communications LLC; OneWeb Technologies, Inc.; ARINC, Inc.; Artel, LLC; PAR Technology Corp.‘s PAR Government; RiteNet Corp.; Satcom Direct, Inc.’s Satcom Direct Government, Inc. (SDG); Trace Systems Inc.; and UltiSat, Inc.
https://www.satellitetoday.com/government-military/2023/07/26/16-companies-chosen-for-space-systems-command-leo-communications/

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:28:30 UTC No. 16462706

>>16462704
GMD is a waste of time and money, mid-course interception is folly. The real deal is boost-phase interception.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:33:36 UTC No. 16462713

>>16462675
>brilliant pebbles
Nah, it's for real time satellite imagery and SIGINT.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:34:02 UTC No. 16462714

>>16462408
I've seen LM9 powerpoint presentations for 20 years now, it's not happening.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:49:30 UTC No. 16462735

>>16462241
This guy posted a link to the google drive with all 83 pages.
Turns out that the fag who originally posted this, wanted to keep the resf for himself, because he paid the FOIA fee.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wuO0XjT8ti5oyKPQRBsEi7sKfwxxzTGo/view

https://x.com/OliverNerd7/status/1853543161542681073

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:51:57 UTC No. 16462738

>>16462735
FOIA charges by the hour are insane. It should be illegal

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:52:58 UTC No. 16462740

https://rogue.space/rogue-announces-full-manifest-of-their-next-mission-otp-2/
>IVO Limited will be flying their new revolutionary Quantum Drive to demonstrate the world’s first propellant free pure electric propulsion system.
>Customers that missed flying with Rogue on OTP-2 may still have the opportunity to fly with us on OTP-3, planned to launch in 2026. This will be a roughly 200kg bus with planned RPO/6DOF maneuvering capability, tremendous Delta-V, and a docking port for refueling and “maneuver without regret”.

lol, they're that confident it will work huh

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:55:51 UTC No. 16462743

>>16462636
On the internet, I guess

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:01:28 UTC No. 16462747

>>16462743
Thanks. Hopefully I'm not brainlet enough to understand this

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:11:24 UTC No. 16462752

Elon is on Joe Rogan again.
https://youtu.be/7qZl_5xHoBw

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:13:13 UTC No. 16462755

https://x.com/dpoddolphinpro/status/1853542413479882897

Dragon ISS reboost

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:13:31 UTC No. 16462757

>>16462752
Thanks anon, now I will feel like a tadpole again

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:14:43 UTC No. 16462759

>>16462740
It's going to work and esefgee will implode along with every (((dark matter))) "researcher", kneel to schizodrive chads pre emotively to avoid malding, don't be that guy.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:17:04 UTC No. 16462761

>>16462757
how can i learn how to do this?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:18:44 UTC No. 16462764

>>16462680
>>16462706
You'd need a constellation of satellites that can mount free electron lasers which could shrek an ICBM's skin and detonate the fuel during boost phase. SDI never was pursued because the soviet union would find ways to overcome it within a few decades, and was really expensive. Even >>16462689 isn't particularly effective defense because proper missiles had MIRVs with enough warheads and decoys to oversaturate missile intercept defenses. It's good against turd worlders launching stuff they have no right possessing only armed with single warheads. But brilliant pebbles would have been quickly made moot by SLBMs fired in a surprise attack before any coordinated defense could be organized.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:24:14 UTC No. 16462771

>>16462755
They are going to kill Starliner isn't it.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:32:50 UTC No. 16462780

>>16462752
looking healthier

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:37:45 UTC No. 16462783

>>16462585
Mr. Poteet is the really good photographer astronaut, right? I dunno, probably not
the basedfag hosts seem to be alright people but they never have anything interesting to say outside of their guests

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:40:27 UTC No. 16462786

>>16462585
doubt

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:46:03 UTC No. 16462791

>>16462752
Does he talk about any /sfg/ stuff or is it the usual Rogan topics?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:47:14 UTC No. 16462792

>>16462686
The ones who want to exit a stable MAD situation are the real death cult

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:48:33 UTC No. 16462793

I decided that we need to terraform mars

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:51:42 UTC No. 16462796

>>16462625
thanks anon

>>16462759
Honestly I wish I will live to see some people break Physics like relativity did at the time.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:51:54 UTC No. 16462797

>>16462764
>direct energy weapons
No, hypersonic glide vehicle interceptors, hit-to-kill, intercepting during the boost phase
>SLBMs
Brilliant Pebbles detects launches using thermal imaging and automatically assigns interceptors. SLBMs get intercepted in the boost-phase, just like any other ballistic missile.

The way around Brilliant Pebbles isn't to use SLBMs, but rather SLCMs.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:52:25 UTC No. 16462799

>>16462241
Imagine how many amateurs the taxpayer bankrolls to do fake jobs.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:53:26 UTC No. 16462801

>>16462263
DELET THIS

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:53:30 UTC No. 16462802

>>16462714
Just because many rockets that were named LM9 were cancelled, or redesigned, doesn't mean every rocket with that name will. The time when China is going to need a super-heavy launcher is fast approaching, so they will soon have to freeze the design and commit to it.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:54:36 UTC No. 16462804

>>16462593
You can still post in /sfg/ from Mars

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:55:10 UTC No. 16462805

>>16462764
(Also, as I'm sure you know, SLBMs are for counter-value strikes, for the purpose of deterrence. They aren't for counter-force first strikes. A counter-value first strike is the very definition of insanity, just an elaborate way to commit suicide; first strikes must be counter-force to not be completely suicidal. In either case, Brilliant Pebbles can defend against all ballistic missile threats, be they counter-force or counter-value.)

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:55:13 UTC No. 16462806

>>16462323
I still like his videos because he proves midwits have no excuse to not accomplish anything

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:56:13 UTC No. 16462808

>>16462804
But the 5-20 minute delay, I need my dopamine now

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:57:09 UTC No. 16462809

>>16462804
judging by the amount of reposting conversation topics from under an hour ago, I'd guess some anons already do

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:57:16 UTC No. 16462810

>>16462808
You will have a AI twin on Earth who will shitpost for you, then upload your (You)s every evening for you to peruse

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:57:18 UTC No. 16462811

>>16462323
>He is a dime a dozen brainwashed Redditor
A few years ago that would have been dead-on accurate. But he deviated from that when he failed to develop EDS like the rest of reddit.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:59:52 UTC No. 16462813

Where does he find the time

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:01:41 UTC No. 16462814

>>16462813
I just learned this.

He should play D2R instead.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:01:46 UTC No. 16462815

>>16462792
i think they're assuming that the enemy will do nothing and just passively wait for one-sided annihilation while they build up their mad-breaking strategic defense initiative

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:02:28 UTC No. 16462817

>>16462755
never stop boooosting

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:02:48 UTC No. 16462818

>>16462809
kek

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:03:28 UTC No. 16462819

>>16462804
Really? I'm sold

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:03:33 UTC No. 16462820

>>16462813
>not playing Factorio
Confirmed, Elon is not a real engineer

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:05:16 UTC No. 16462823

>>16462802
LM10 is happening, LM9 is China's equivalent of industry grift with a forever 10+ year out product

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:06:42 UTC No. 16462824

>>16462813
he doesnt actually work as hard as people think. sometimes he freaks out in autistic fits and forks 24/7, but typically he works less than the average full time worker.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:10:57 UTC No. 16462825

>>16462823
I don't think China ever intended the LM9 to happen "10 year out" back in 2004
LM10 provides a respite to delay the LM9 for further redesign and development to incorporate the latest technological paradigms, however LM10 won't remain good enough for CASC for long, for the same reason Falcon Heavy didn't remain good enough for SpaceX

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:11:05 UTC No. 16462826

https://youtu.be/pmYGk_MV2-8
Soyuz launch

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:13:09 UTC No. 16462827

>>16462820
He probably gets his fix from real life

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:14:43 UTC No. 16462829

>>16462826

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:15:07 UTC No. 16462830

>who wants to book a trip on this explodable metal tube without abort tower?
This is hamstringing Starship. They need to alter the design in such a way that the 'windows' of the habitation quarters (as seen in for example here >>16462178) also serve as escape seats for use during launch. The strapped in passangers could be ejected in case of a critical failure.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:15:50 UTC No. 16462831

Did anyone else get a new risk addiction like me? Just a thin veneer a steel between spaceflight of our dreams and catastrophic failure. The thinner the margin it gets the more intense it feels. It's like shaving with a knife. I hope starships walls get even thinner. All in baby. USA USA USA

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:16:41 UTC No. 16462832

>>16462820
If he starts playing factorio we will NEVER get to Mars.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:17:50 UTC No. 16462835

>>16462666
I recommend /k/ if you're in the mood to be radicalized

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:17:59 UTC No. 16462836

>>16462830
You don't understand, this filters risk averse people from the limited Mars gene pool. It's by design

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:19:25 UTC No. 16462837

very purple today

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:19:39 UTC No. 16462838

>>16462826
off she goes

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:20:57 UTC No. 16462841

>>16462835
/k/ is boring as fuck

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:21:55 UTC No. 16462845

I like the real-time telemetry, glad that's the standard now

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:25:21 UTC No. 16462849

>>16462820
He wouldn't tolerate the arbitrary limitations of the game. Autism simulators have no interest to a man like Elon

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:26:27 UTC No. 16462850

>>16462831
Looks like betting odds for Trumo vs Kamala

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:27:29 UTC No. 16462852

>>16462845
spacex elevated the launch broadcast industry

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:27:39 UTC No. 16462853

>>16462845
the ass-end schematic graphics also tickles my engine fetish

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:28:09 UTC No. 16462854

>>16462850
it obviously is

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:29:36 UTC No. 16462857

>>16462826
>added sound effects during booster sep
lmao

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:35:41 UTC No. 16462859

what do we think of the new space force hat?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:37:17 UTC No. 16462861

>>16462859
reversed pentagrams spotted

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:40:46 UTC No. 16462867

Polypropylene is a good radiation shield given its high hydrogen content

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:41:01 UTC No. 16462868

>>16462799
apparently the future of mankind is in the hands of some clown named Perez and his e-mail buddies Mary, and Dawn, and Imer

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:42:23 UTC No. 16462871

>>16462859
Not enough space force chevrons. You don't know whom you're dealing with.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:42:36 UTC No. 16462872

>>16462867
an artificailly generated electromagnetic field using the superconducting magnets you need for a nuclear reactor is better

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:43:29 UTC No. 16462873

>>16462859
So do only officers get the Battlestar Galactica jacket? And enlisted have to wear a normal jacket

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:44:08 UTC No. 16462874

>>16462872
Why

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:44:31 UTC No. 16462876

why are they still building capsules in 2024 instead of reusable upper stages

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:44:36 UTC No. 16462877

>>16462874
Cooler

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:45:15 UTC No. 16462879

>>16462857
the whole thing was dubbed whichis why it sounded the same all the way up. you could hear the engine sound looping like in ksp

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:45:53 UTC No. 16462882

>>16462735
The amount of bullshit in the email signatures is fucking insane
>comic sans
>pronouns
>inspirational quotes

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:46:48 UTC No. 16462884

>>16462356
knowing China this is how the Andromeda Strain happens in real life, no wet market needed this time

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:46:53 UTC No. 16462885

>>16462879
yeah I realised that when there was still sound 70km up kek

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:48:27 UTC No. 16462889

Musk's reaction to finding out about that novel by Von Braun where the leader of mars is called "elon" is pretty cute

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:50:11 UTC No. 16462892

>>16462874
because it extends outside the chassis of your vessel and you can even manipulate or tune it

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:51:12 UTC No. 16462893

>>16462889
funny thing is Von Braun also wrote about a Martian Supreme Council

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:51:48 UTC No. 16462894

>>16462826
Why was one dude saying that the vehicle is nominal every 10 seconds?

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:51:57 UTC No. 16462895

>>16462873
there is at least one enlisted that gets the new outfit too afaik, the top enlisted person. but i think overall its only a few that get the outfits, probably the senior leadership.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:53:23 UTC No. 16462897

SpaceX has a track record of taking 10x the time they aim to take, so we should expect 1 million people on Mars in 300 years not 30. Makes sense.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:53:32 UTC No. 16462898

>>16462889
>okay we're in a simulation, man.
>maybe I'm someone's diablo character

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:55:48 UTC No. 16462899

>>16462885
wouldve been real interesting to see what would happen with the sounds if it blew up.

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:58:43 UTC No. 16462904

>>16462899
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRex1Udiybs

Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:59:57 UTC No. 16462906

>>16462580
would be better if he just insisted on being called Mister Cool Ice throughout the whole process

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:08:02 UTC No. 16462911

>>16462679
>Great Leap Forward (into an industrial lathe without an emergency stop)

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:08:10 UTC No. 16462912

I'm here to fuck and measure temperature distributions inside cold rooms/freezers. And I'm all out of pussy

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:09:55 UTC No. 16462913

>>16462859
is that the Unreal logo on his hat?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:10:10 UTC No. 16462914

>>16462897
>Hydrologgs
lol
lmao

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:11:39 UTC No. 16462916

>>16462911
you are not able to push the emergency stop before the lathe rips you to pieces

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:12:16 UTC No. 16462917

>>16462914
>hydrolox is... le bad!
It's the best fuel for deep space exploration.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:12:18 UTC No. 16462918

>>16462897
>crewed has an abort tower on top
kek

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:13:45 UTC No. 16462921

>>16462917
its just objectively an inferior fuel to mi-thane

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:40:39 UTC No. 16462937

>>16462916
no one is, they eventually just clean up with a mop

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:44:23 UTC No. 16462938

>>16462918
they wanted to crew rate dragon 1 and to do so before suprdraco existed would require an abort tower. Musk always said Dragon 1 was designed to carry crew to Mars, until it wasnt.
That's what makes me a skeptic that Starship will ever go to Mars.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:45:34 UTC No. 16462939

so what do you think happens at the parties they throw up here? are we talking raging kegers with strippers and blackjack or autists sipping hoppy micro brews and checking their phones?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:48:38 UTC No. 16462942

>>16462939
they throw dwarves and sometimes oneor two fall 280ft to the bottom of the building

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:53:16 UTC No. 16462944

>>16462825
>however LM10 won't remain good enough for CASC for long, for the same reason Falcon Heavy didn't remain good enough for SpaceX

"for long" apparently meaning 15+ years given China's own timelines for second stage reuse

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:54:49 UTC No. 16462946

nasa is giving us civil servants four hours off tomorrow to vote. lol

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:03:16 UTC No. 16462948

>>16462939
It isn't the 60s anymore bro, the closest we get to ragers in the age of HR is BYOB with music and boardgames. Maybe not even that much depending on insurance.

>>16462946
Even NASA contractors are giving their employees time off to vote.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:04:09 UTC No. 16462950

>>16462942
if he was smart he would make it into a super exclusive hard to get into thing like Club 33 at Disneyland and they would serve baked Plover and have robot bartenders

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:09:58 UTC No. 16462955

>>16462942
>they throw dwarves and sometimes one or two fall 280ft to the bottom of the building
like they say, you can't make an omelet without breaking some eggs

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:14:03 UTC No. 16462958

>>16462950
I think the building makes way more money as a rocket factory

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:19:19 UTC No. 16462959

>>16462895
>>16462873
Enlisted get it too, but moreover only a few people get the new uniforms because they're still in testing and haven't been widely issued yet.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:19:28 UTC No. 16462960

>>16462958
>it's not about the money it's about sending a message

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:42:35 UTC No. 16462973

>>16462958
oh it still operates as a rocket factory, you ride a hyperloop tunnel robo-taxi from a secret hidden door in a Boca Chica gas station bathroom stall to an elevator that takes you up to DA CLUB

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:43:16 UTC No. 16462975

>>16462960
I wonder if McDonald's and the like will enthusiastically open novelty versions of their restaurants on Mars, or if Elon will have isolated everyone so much by then that it's a Vkusno & tochka situation

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:47:10 UTC No. 16462979

>>16462960
phase 4 in my lifetime, God willing.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:54:58 UTC No. 16462983

>>16462979
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gxKyhlAsCs
Starlink going up in T-35:00, prop load has begun

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:55:50 UTC No. 16462984

(Codex) that's going up on this ISS supply mission looks pretty cool for something that sounds so mundane.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:57:38 UTC No. 16462986

>>16462975
you sure you/re not the one isolating yourself from everybody, Zelenskyy?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:57:59 UTC No. 16462987

>>16462983
>Starlink
thats a CRS mission

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:59:02 UTC No. 16462989

>>16462987
It's fine no one is going to watch anyway

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 01:59:37 UTC No. 16462990

>>16462986
Clearly I've said something more inflammatory than I intended. I don't know anything about that. Off brand restaurants from political isolation was the point I was interested in

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:00:17 UTC No. 16462991

>>16462989
lol falcon could launch men to mercury and it wouldn't see any posts because it's just falcon

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:00:59 UTC No. 16462992

fuck you

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:04:11 UTC No. 16462994

>>16462992
I was getting worried, anon. Almost 24 hours since your last post.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:11:39 UTC No. 16463002

Oh no you guys, it's on fire...

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:12:11 UTC No. 16463004

>>16463002
it's a rocket, they're supposed to be on fire dumbass

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:12:51 UTC No. 16463006

>>16463002
Typical SpaceX performance, this is why we need ULA's reliability

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:13:17 UTC No. 16463008

>>16462990
>Clearly I've said something more inflammatory than I intended.
clearly you are a faggot

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:17:11 UTC No. 16463012

>>16463006
and their proven pinpoint orbital insertion capability (with their utilizing legacy supply lines and robust infrastructure as a bonus!)

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:18:42 UTC No. 16463013

who is this woman?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:28:05 UTC No. 16463017

Elon Musk survives possible assasination attempt.
A man was seen hiding in a van with a clear view of Elon Musk's house at Starbase, Texas. Authorities were called on scene to arrest the man and search the vehicle. Inside was found what appears to be an AR-15 style rifle and several magazines of ammunition. The suspect remains in custody.

https://x.com/CNN/status/1429942024568926215

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:29:41 UTC No. 16463019

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:29:52 UTC No. 16463020

décollage!

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:30:07 UTC No. 16463022

woosh

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:31:50 UTC No. 16463024

>>16462983
The stream is absolute shit

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:34:16 UTC No. 16463031

¡despegue!

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:37:43 UTC No. 16463034

nighttime rtls is pretty kino

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:38:25 UTC No. 16463036

Another successful landing, watching with my wife Clear

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:38:49 UTC No. 16463037

>>16463019

If you watch The Right Stuff when all the rockets are failing, there is a very nervous character/actor whose job it is to push the big red launch button each time. He's not doing anything wrong, he's just doing his job and pushing the button, the poor man. But he's the one who pushed the button. When the things start not exploding horribly, he allows himself a little nervous, disbelieving delight.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:39:56 UTC No. 16463038

>>16463013
Youmei Zhou newfag

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:41:11 UTC No. 16463041

>>16463036
Anon, she is here with me...

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:44:53 UTC No. 16463046

>camera cut-off after dragon separation "confirmed"
>nothing moved while it was in frame
oh no,,,

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:45:17 UTC No. 16463048

Neat.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:52:20 UTC No. 16463057

>>16463017
>nobody talking about this
PART AND PARCEL

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:54:02 UTC No. 16463059

>>16463017
>Man with a gun in texas is a assassination attempt
It doesn't count unless he gets shot at. Cmon.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:54:53 UTC No. 16463061

>>16463017
>yfw orange Hitler's co-conspirator still breathes

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:57:13 UTC No. 16463063

>>16463004
you would think that anons that come to /sfg/ would know the basics but I guess not

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:59:10 UTC No. 16463068

>>16462599
on Mars the latency will be much worse :-(

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:01:32 UTC No. 16463072

>>16463068
will Mars ever have a Starlink mega-constellation? My sources say YES.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:02:37 UTC No. 16463073

>>16463072
almost certainly

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:04:18 UTC No. 16463076

>>16463057
Elon's house needs to be surrounded by an army of these bad boys.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:07:21 UTC No. 16463080

>>16463073
would be pretty cool if before any Starships set down on Mars he already had sent a Starship full of Starlinks (Marslinks?) and had a couple dozen already in (equatorial?) orbit

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:08:31 UTC No. 16463083

>>16463076
>Muskdrones fall for this

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:13:39 UTC No. 16463087

>>16462939
The gantry cranes are just to get the baby oil up there

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:16:29 UTC No. 16463091

>>16463017
Rogan is in austin right? Good thing elon was hours away

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:18:21 UTC No. 16463094

>>16463087
>Sir, there's been a problem, we can only get KY jelly in the normal tubes and not in the industrial size drums you requested!

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:18:48 UTC No. 16463095

>>16463002
It's ok, it's only a static fire

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:19:41 UTC No. 16463097

>>16463017
>retard newfag take the krystal bait

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:20:19 UTC No. 16463098

New INL video. Not entirely space flight related, but something nuclear Chads can appreciate. New mircoreactor stuff
https://youtu.be/e9KnqSU64Zc

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:29:40 UTC No. 16463109

>>16463080
I would expect marslink to begin being established within 1 transfer window of the first successful unmanned landing. The tricky part is what's on the receiving end at Earth. Laser links for data have been demonstrated at interplanetary distances (https://au.pcmag.com/networking/107606/nasa-spacecraft-sends-laser-signal-from-290-million-miles-away) but I wonder if an unmodified starlink in LEO is capable of receiving and relaying that to ground stations

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:33:55 UTC No. 16463112

>>16463094
If you need lube in that kind of bulk you're ignoring mass-market premixed shit, and THEN you're even skipping right past J, X, and K lube and just buying polyethylene glycol in bulk from industrial suppliers in your preferred molecular weight.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:34:40 UTC No. 16463113

>>16463094
It's plan B then

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 03:37:11 UTC No. 16463118

>>16463109
>the first successful unmanned landing
speaking of, if he didn't want to wait for this to happen he could pull off a Starship landing on Phobos sooner (no tiles needed) and score some good publicity from it

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:06:37 UTC No. 16463141

>>16463118
>publicity
>what the fuck it a phobos?
>t. John Q. Normie

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:14:36 UTC No. 16463152

>>16463141
its where like episode 2 of doom takes place

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:21:39 UTC No. 16463158

damn I missed a starlink f9 launch

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:24:59 UTC No. 16463163

>>16463141
like it wouldn't be cool to see a Starship "land" on this thing and a big arm come out and unfurl an American flag

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:25:08 UTC No. 16463164

>>16462897
that image doesn't mention reusability, no legs or fins. I'd guess making it reusable and figuring out the landing added a few years of r/d time. starship on the other hand is progressing nicely

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:28:01 UTC No. 16463167

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:28:32 UTC No. 16463168

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:28:36 UTC No. 16463169

>>16463118
just land on mars if you spent half a year getting there. no heatshield won't change the travel time much

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:29:03 UTC No. 16463170

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:36:05 UTC No. 16463174

>>16463169
didn't say anything about travel time, just an easy, and low-risk of failure, point to score before the first Starship (the first of many) successfully sets down on Mars proper

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 04:37:54 UTC No. 16463176

>>16463174
oh yeah, and the lighter Phobos bound Starship would arrive ahead of the heavier heat shield equipped Starships, wouldn't it? OK then

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 05:09:30 UTC No. 16463190

>Russia has just launched two Iranian satellites into orbit. Twin satellites "Kowsar" and "Hudhud" were carried into space by a Soyuz rocket at the Vostochny cosmodrome in the Russian far east.
>Kowsar is a high-resolution imaging satellite, and Hudhud is Iran's first communications satellite.
they're fucking cubesats

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 05:11:28 UTC No. 16463193

>>16463190
not even iranian government. some startup spun out of a university.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 05:47:40 UTC No. 16463212

>>16462835
/k/ is run by glowie from reddit and believes everything reddit tells them to and bans anything that goes counter to the reddit narrative

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 05:51:39 UTC No. 16463213

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 05:52:07 UTC No. 16463214

>>16463190
>Fregat
Is that the stage they've had problems with in the past

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 05:56:47 UTC No. 16463217

>>16462358
>Grasshopper clone: hopped
it was full of gyros. They aren't capable of stable retroprop.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 06:20:05 UTC No. 16463230

A record number of Russian satellites have been launched into orbit at the same time
The associated payload, consisting of 49 Russian, Russian-Chinese, Russian-Zimbabwean and two Iranian small spacecraft, was delivered to the target orbits and separated from the Fregat upper stage, which was launched today by a Soyuz-2.1b rocket from Vostochny.
Taking into account the Ionosphere-M heliogeophysical satellites No. 1 and No. 2 put into orbit, the simultaneous launch of 51 Russian spacecraft became a record in the history of Russian cosmonautics.
In the interests of the UniverSal program conducted by Roscosmos together with higher educational institutions of the country, six CubeSat satellites have been delivered to space.
Read more about satellites on our website (Roscosmos)

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 06:20:38 UTC No. 16463232

>>16463230
soyuz is eternal

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 06:39:09 UTC No. 16463241

https://x.com/joerogan/status/1853614670764015762

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 06:40:38 UTC No. 16463243

>>16462752
apparerently rogan also endorsed trump >>16463241

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 06:43:22 UTC No. 16463245

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 06:46:39 UTC No. 16463249

>>16463245
based or gay, hard to say

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 06:48:13 UTC No. 16463250

>>16463245
>space is now a single issue voter
we made it bros

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:03:13 UTC No. 16463253

>>16463245
von Braun made the right call. To Mars!

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:19:26 UTC No. 16463257

>>16463245
If Hitler had won and given Von Braun his aryan space clay expansion project with 5% of the greater Reich budget, we would have colonised half the solar system by now.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:31:30 UTC No. 16463258

>>16463241
It's so sad that this will be the last piece of footage we get of him before he's arrested by Kamala.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:35:25 UTC No. 16463259

>>16463212
It's true.
I've been /k/ommando for almost 15 years (I'm getting too old for this shit) and I don't recognize the place since Ukraine war going mainstream.
Almost as jarring as /pol/ suddenly hating fascists the second Russian state media declares their official propaganda narrative.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:41:53 UTC No. 16463262

>>16462755
How do they do this, I thought their only thrusters are pointed at the docking port

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:43:14 UTC No. 16463263

>>16463262
im gonna boooost!
well obviously those 3-directional ones can point backwards slightly.

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:54:31 UTC No. 16463265

>>16463245
>Trump is hitler
Troonville brainwashing

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:57:20 UTC No. 16463266

>>16463259
Tourist. Do you know how many times /k/ has changed over the years? If you've actually been there for 15 years, tell me what unspoken rule exists on the board that Jannies and Mods have enforced for over 5 years now. This is a very simple one to answer if you have been around as long as you say because you literally cannot post this content anymore.

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:58:14 UTC No. 16463267

>>16463265
It says Trump is not as bad as the Nazi party. So your assertion probably wrong. Learn to read.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:01:11 UTC No. 16463270

True. With Biden/Harris admin seeking to put a wrench in SpaceX/Space/etc, the threat to space industry looms largely over the election.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:04:19 UTC No. 16463271

QI TEST REFLIGHT ON TRANSPORTER-13 NET Q1 2025 LET'S FUCKING GO
https://x.com/RaMansell/status/1853600278752252102

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:15:02 UTC No. 16463274

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1853679678470410461

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:22:31 UTC No. 16463277

>>16463274
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1853644221070127433

the transcript in the pic (either government needs to stop contracts with SpaceX or SpaceX needs to get rid of Musk)
I'm pretty sure SpaceX would be fine without government contracts at this point
would the government be fine without SpaceX?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:22:50 UTC No. 16463278

>>16463274
>supporting a presidential campaign supported by about half of americans is le bad
this is why they lose

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:23:42 UTC No. 16463279

>>16463274
>NASA will castrate themselves for the Harris team

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:30:29 UTC No. 16463281

https://x.com/willchamberlain/status/1853618576663708021

on the DOJ asylum lawsuit

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:30:50 UTC No. 16463282

>>16463279
>Elon joins DOGE
> fires all the shuttleboomers, cancels SLS, and closes JPL

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:30:51 UTC No. 16463283

>>16462178
I am triggered by the waste of space. Surely it would be better to use bunk beds against the wall and use the spare space (green) as personal storage? The gap between bunk beds (blue) can be used as a night stand/table and/or more storage

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:31:30 UTC No. 16463284

>>16463281
https://x.com/willchamberlain/status/1853620024763895877

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:33:09 UTC No. 16463285

>>16463283
you mean like this?
>>16462276

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:34:22 UTC No. 16463286

>>16463284
>Kristen Clarke

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:35:04 UTC No. 16463287

>>16463285
Basically, yeah. Is that a SpaceX alternative proposal or did you have the same thoughts as me?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:35:16 UTC No. 16463288

Well this is the day SpaceX' fate gets sealed

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:35:35 UTC No. 16463289

>>16463274
We should just nuke ourselves to own Musk

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:38:03 UTC No. 16463291

>>16463274
SpaceX is too big to fail. No way DoD will give up on their brilliant pebbles.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:38:23 UTC No. 16463292

>>16463291
their smart stones

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:40:52 UTC No. 16463294

>>16463287
just my ms paint drawing from earlier.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:42:38 UTC No. 16463296

>>16463291
They have DoD leaker from the Biden team that leaked DoD-SpaceX negotiations to sabatoge the talks for Starlink.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:57:40 UTC No. 16463302

Eurofag here. How does the election even work. I don't get this weird state electorate system.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:57:53 UTC No. 16463303

>>16462735
https://x.com/OliverNerd7/status/1853547473505337846

the space engineer seems kind of nuts
there was another incident like a week ago with respect to "stolen" renders, not sure who was in the fault here but nevertheless two things like this so close to each other is weird

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:00:27 UTC No. 16463305

>>16463302
look it up retard

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:02:05 UTC No. 16463307

>>16463282
>Elon gets ESGhound in a room alone and tells him he is fired

Gigakino

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:03:55 UTC No. 16463309

>>16463307
>get in the crystal or stand in the flame diverter
>your choice

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:11:53 UTC No. 16463310

>>16463302
each state has a number of electorates based on the population mostly (through congressional delegates) which then vote on presidential candidates

>The number of electoral votes exercised by each state is equal to that state's congressional delegation which is the number of Senators plus the number of Representatives for that state.

how the electorates vote is mostly up to the states themselves but most of the states have a vote and then the majority gets all the electoral votes
some states have a system where the electorate votes can be split
then the candidate with most electoral college votes wins, 270 is enough

this all or nothing system that is in most states means that if one candidate gets just slightly more votes than another (lets say 50.1% vs 49.1%, that can be a swing of 19 electorates (like in pennsylvania), which means the states that are not a clear majority dem or rep are called swing states, because depending on campaigning, turnout etc they could go either way

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:14:13 UTC No. 16463311

>>16463310
>lets say 50.1% vs 49.1%, that can be a swing of 19 electorates
pretty bizarre. No wonder US elections are so unpredictable

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:15:04 UTC No. 16463312

>>16463310
https://www.270towin.com/
pic

https://www.270towin.com/content/split-electoral-votes-maine-and-nebraska/
>In all but two states, electoral votes are winner-take-all.1 The candidate winning the popular vote normally receives all of that state's votes. Maine and Nebraska have taken a different approach. Using the congressional district method, these states allocate two electoral votes to the state popular vote winner, and then one electoral vote to the popular vote winner in each congressional district (2 in Maine, 3 in Nebraska). This creates multiple popular vote contests in these states, which could lead to a split electoral vote.

like you can see ME (Maine) and NE (Nebraska) have split electoral votes

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:25:00 UTC No. 16463318

>>16463283
>I am triggered by the waste of space
I suggest you stop getting triggered
With Starship, space is one thing you have plenty of

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:26:06 UTC No. 16463319

>>16463302
Each state is worth the sum of its number of senators and number of congressmen. So minimum 3, up to some huge number for Cali and Texas

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:31:31 UTC No. 16463322

>>16463302
Other Euro here, it's actually quite an interesting concept based on population and representation. It's not perfect, but I think it's actually quite a fair system as it balances between population/popular votes as well as giving a voice to smaller states. It basically stops the country from be dictated by a few mega centres such as New York and California and ignoring the smaller "flyovers". Thinking allowing Malta and Cyprus to have a voice in a EU dominated by France and Germany. The only big problem I have with the system is the all or nothing style as described here>>16463310, but I can see why states, especially smaller states, use it as it would otherwise be too complicated to split the electoral votes.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:32:31 UTC No. 16463323

>>16463318
>space is one thing you have plenty of
They always say this until they start running out of room.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:38:17 UTC No. 16463325

>>16463322
It's not complicated to split the electoral votes, it's that there's no advantage (for the state) to do so. Solid states are happy to take all the votes every election and don't want to share them with the loser. While swing states enjoy the preferential advantage of their individual votes being worth more, and thus can be bought.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:38:24 UTC No. 16463326

>>16463322
I don't see how it gives more of a voice to smaller states than if they simply add up the votes from the whole population of USA and declared the winner

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:40:37 UTC No. 16463327

>>16462813
he plays during remote meetings

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:41:38 UTC No. 16463329

>>16462820
he is playing Factorio IRL

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:43:18 UTC No. 16463330

>>16463326
The electoral votes are midway between the House (where the number of representatives are proportional to state population) and the Senate (2 senators for each state). It's not an equal voice, but it's a larger voice than strictly along population %.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:43:56 UTC No. 16463331

>>16462813
which game is this?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:45:36 UTC No. 16463333

>>16463326
without this system smaller states would be completely irrelevant, now they have small relevance which is much higher than what it would be with just a general popular vote

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:46:47 UTC No. 16463334

>>16463331
diablo 4

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:53:48 UTC No. 16463336

i am NOT fucking kidding when I say I literally want to FUCK a rocket girl. I want to FUUUUCK HER IN HER LITTLE ROCKET PUSSI YEAAH STRETCH HER OUT HHHNNGGGGG

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:54:30 UTC No. 16463337

>>16463333
Also, US census isn't based on citizenship. So thats why they have brought over 10 million new voting base from Mexico this last 4 years alone.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:55:03 UTC No. 16463338

What a bizarre thing to make a video about
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwttKPP52-Q

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:55:42 UTC No. 16463339

>>16463109
probably need specialized dedicated interplanetary link satellites in both mars and earth orbit, perhaps you could put some in some Lagrange points or something as well
then these function as links between earth starlink and mars starlink which respectively communicate with their ground station infrastructure

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:57:12 UTC No. 16463340

>>16463337
yeah, it starts to warp the voting even if the illegals aren't voting themselves (yet)

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:57:17 UTC No. 16463341

>>16463338
>Man from Troon is obsessed with penises
Curious

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:01:22 UTC No. 16463345

>>16463338
Dick! Take a look out at starboard. Oh my God it looks like a huge

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:04:10 UTC No. 16463347

>>16463336
Everyone in this photo is fucking dead

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:04:19 UTC No. 16463348

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1853729528717132114

400th launch for SpaceX. Congrats!

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:04:34 UTC No. 16463349

https://x.com/FutureJurvetson/status/1853570780753514602

https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/11/chinas-long-term-lunar-plans-now-depend-on-developing-its-own-starship/

already discussed but Musk replied to this

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:05:20 UTC No. 16463351

>>16463340
illegals can sit on state election without citizenship requirements in many of the leftist states. So they control the state policies as well. And further many of the leftist states wont

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:05:36 UTC No. 16463353

>>16463348
how long until this happens in a day?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:06:20 UTC No. 16463354

>>16463349
Its not SpaceX vs China. Its SpaceX vs Identity politics leftist political parties.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:07:01 UTC No. 16463356

>>16463349
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1853598748577841413

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:11:35 UTC No. 16463357

will SLS get cancelled finally? seems like more calls for this have been happening

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:12:36 UTC No. 16463358

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1853734892716060841

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:17:27 UTC No. 16463361

>>16463357
They are going to cancel the whole Artemis program.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:20:18 UTC No. 16463362

>>16463266
I don't really care if a guy on the internet believe me or not, to be honest.
The bigger issue that killed all the fun is that they started enforcing the written rules.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:25:51 UTC No. 16463363

>>16463362
what are some example of written and unwritten rules on /k/

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:34:38 UTC No. 16463368

>>16463363
You do (not) eat the brownies.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:35:06 UTC No. 16463369

>>16463368
lmao

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:47:05 UTC No. 16463380

>>16463322
Constitutionally, it's completely up to the states how they apportion their electoral college votes. They've mostly settled on winner takes all

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:52:18 UTC No. 16463381

Electron launch in a few minutes

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:52:53 UTC No. 16463382

>>16463322
The numbers based on representation is because when the nation was formed, the states were individual and the smaller ones had to have a reason to join up and not be ignored from the start.
The annoying part of the EC is what they do when there isn't a 50%-plus-one majority, it goes to some crazy mess with Congress. This completely fucks over our ability to have more than two major political parties.
It's probably in part because in the 1700s, both travel and communications were slow, so it would have been a pain in the ass to get regular citizens involved again. But it's also because this is one of the first and oldest modern democracies. The idea of a "coalition government" literally hadn't been invented yet.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:54:38 UTC No. 16463383

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdyPrXptWc0

booster quick disconnect for the new pad apparently

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:56:22 UTC No. 16463385

>>16463381
thanks

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:59:16 UTC No. 16463386

>>16463383

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:01:06 UTC No. 16463388

>>16463245

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:03:12 UTC No. 16463389

>>16463386

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:04:14 UTC No. 16463391

>>16463389

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:05:16 UTC No. 16463392

>>16463391

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:07:10 UTC No. 16463394

>>16463391
aluminum tiles being tested on Flight 5

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:09:54 UTC No. 16463397

>>16463336
me too, bro.
favorite rocket girl?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:11:19 UTC No. 16463399

>>16463381
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pku19e-MHis

the stream (That ended)

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:19:27 UTC No. 16463406

>>16462593
Thankfully brain damage prevents me from feeling that emotion.
No I'm not joking.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:53:59 UTC No. 16463442

>>16463397
imagine cumming between ariana tits

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:57:49 UTC No. 16463448

>>16463442
id rather cum between a virgin (galactic)'s tits. ariane is a hag

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:59:37 UTC No. 16463452

>>16463381
sir, this is the spacex fan general

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:24:15 UTC No. 16463497

do put your penis in the anime rocket

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:40:29 UTC No. 16463512

>>16463347
Electron graduated and got a stable career. It pays the bills but sometimes she wishes she could have done more with her life.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:44:54 UTC No. 16463515

>>16463512
It most certainly does not pay the bills lmao

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:47:12 UTC No. 16463516

>>16462735
>>16462241
FWS is directly communicating with members of Save RGV, an anti-SpaceX activist group; seemingly taking their word at face value. I haven't even gotten halfway through the FOIA emails, was going to pop an artery if I kept reading.
Mary Branch came up multiple times, same email as Mary Angela Branch from here
https://biologicaldiversity.org/w/news/press-releases/new-claims-filed-over-spacex-rocket-launchpad-explosion-2023-12-15/

>>16462316
>>16462448
While they haven't explicitly said anything damning about it being lawfare, it's hard for me to imagine these people NOT intentionally slow-rolling everything they do. The email chain is dripping with bias.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:54:34 UTC No. 16463523

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:56:40 UTC No. 16463527

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:01:10 UTC No. 16463529

>>16463347
excuse me? Electron just had a launch this morning!

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:05:21 UTC No. 16463535

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:05:24 UTC No. 16463536

>>16462944
LM9 with expendable upper stage can carry twice the payload of LM10, and is planned to fly around 2033 according to Long Lehao's slides. Besides, these timelines are quite preliminary and I doubt they won't move the second stage reuse development schedule forward if Starship proves to be a success and not just another Shuttle. They've already started the long lead time work i.e. developing the engines, including a vacuum version, so it should be possible to do so.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:10:19 UTC No. 16463541

>>16463389
it's funny how the factory enveloped that one holdout property like an amoeba eating its prey

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:12:24 UTC No. 16463543

>>16463442
the ara-ara Ariane rocket milf and her big, bouncy fairings!

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:28:32 UTC No. 16463561

how come this CRS mission is docking so much earlier compared to previous dragon missions?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:46:33 UTC No. 16463567

The Dragon dick goes into the ISS vagina.

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:48:33 UTC No. 16463569

LOOKS LIKE tRUMP IS HAVING A DISASTEROUS DEFEAT IN THE ELECTION.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:50:08 UTC No. 16463572

>>16463569
source?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:50:24 UTC No. 16463573

fuck you

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:50:40 UTC No. 16463575

>>16463259
you can still see the old bloodlust sometimes

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:51:25 UTC No. 16463576

>>16463572
Man I should bet on Harris

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:51:35 UTC No. 16463577

>>16463572
THATS A BETTING WEBSITE FOR REPUBLIKIKE MAGABROS ANON....
WATCH CNN RIGHT NOW

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:52:49 UTC No. 16463579

>>16463577
>watch CNN
no. i've already watched the polls and early voting. all indicate a trump win in the swing states. what could CNN possibly have thats news?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:57:01 UTC No. 16463582

>>16463579
YOU ARE BEYOND SAVING

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:57:36 UTC No. 16463583

wow this harris drone is having a meltdown lmao

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:58:20 UTC No. 16463585

>>16463582
why speak in caps lock? schizo. also you didnt answer the question. what news do they have. I just looked. they are saying shit like polling times and boring shit like that. even they know he will win easily.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:02:06 UTC No. 16463588

I am pissing and shitting and cumming

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:05:03 UTC No. 16463592

>>16463585
JUST WAIT UNTIL THE RESULTS ARE ANOUNCED THEN PIG. YOU WILL BE IN AWE AND THE REST OF US WILL BE CELEBRATING.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:05:49 UTC No. 16463594

>>16463397
>Ariane 6
The wife you fuck a couple times a year.
>Falcon 9
The lover you fuck every chance you get.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:08:08 UTC No. 16463597

>republikike
All of your politicians are owned by kikes, though.

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:09:01 UTC No. 16463598

what exact stipulations do you think Musk asked for in exchange for his full Trump endorsement

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:11:48 UTC No. 16463600

>>16462740
>>16463271
About time. It's a joke it's taking them so long since supposedly Ivo have engines just lying around ready go.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:12:45 UTC No. 16463603

>>16463597
Cool it with the anti-semitic remarks.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:12:49 UTC No. 16463604

>>16463588
>2026
Damn, have they done anything since they landed on the moon?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:13:25 UTC No. 16463605

>>16463588
I remember at the beginning of the year being impressed by how many launches India was planning of its new craft just that year. 3 (!) test launches in 2024 for the first manned flight in 2025. I posted it here and some Indian guy said that nobody believes these times. I guess he was right.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:14:26 UTC No. 16463606

>>16463598
he did it for free.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:15:19 UTC No. 16463609

>>16462759
I will personally go and kneel to that nerd if he gets us off the hell loop that is propellants

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:15:55 UTC No. 16463610

>>16463598
Knowing both trump and musk probably none, just vague notions about musk being some sort of government efficiency guy. All it'll take is trump remembering that musk is way more successful than he is out musk will be out.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:21:16 UTC No. 16463619

>>16462859
They're compensating for no combat abilities with fancy costumes.
Ground Non-violence L

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:22:13 UTC No. 16463620

>>16463302
state electorates makes sense what doesn't make sense is that most of the states have winner take all

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:23:47 UTC No. 16463621

>>16463598
it doesn't matter, the Trump admin won't be actively hostile to Musk in the very least

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:24:02 UTC No. 16463622

>>16463610
This is trumps last term, even if he can make himself god emperor of america he's still in his 80's. He's has to be thinking about whats gonna happen once he's out of power. Pissing off musk just because he's richer in his last term isn't setting up his party for future success.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:24:24 UTC No. 16463623

I didn't read all of the documents, but was the FWS at all political motivated because it seemed like an absolute incompetence.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:25:35 UTC No. 16463624

>>16463622
>implying he cares about future

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:26:08 UTC No. 16463625

>>16463620
any system where one person's vote can be worth more than another's is shit
>>16463622
>isn't setting up his party for future success
since when did trump care about that?

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:26:48 UTC No. 16463627

>>16463621
At the start at least. Admittedly that's an improvement from Harris but Trump does have a history of ending up serious enemies with previous allies.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:26:49 UTC No. 16463628

>>16463624
>he had this image saved
>he kept the original 4chan generated filename
>he went through his downloads folder to find and post this image

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:26:57 UTC No. 16463629

if trump wins ill subscribe to kyplanet and watch all of his videos

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:27:24 UTC No. 16463630

>>16463628
>what is archive
>what is 4chanx

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:28:22 UTC No. 16463632

>>16463629
who?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:29:04 UTC No. 16463633

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:30:13 UTC No. 16463636

>>16463633
>I've seen things... you people wouldn't believe...

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:30:43 UTC No. 16463639

>>16463632
Donald Trump, he was the 45th president of the United States of America and he’s currently running again.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:31:13 UTC No. 16463641

>>16463639
oh! I thought you were talking about one of his sons

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:31:30 UTC No. 16463644

>>16463639
huh we're already in the 40s with these guys?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:32:04 UTC No. 16463645

>>16463630
kys

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:32:39 UTC No. 16463646

>>16463627
I keep hearing this
why though? and what did they do? if its for a good reason like them ignoring Trump and going against him then its entirely understandable

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:33:39 UTC No. 16463648

>>16463633
Who's he voting for? Who's space cowboy Tory voting for?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:34:33 UTC No. 16463649

>>16463648
the tory party probably, I dunno

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:36:30 UTC No. 16463652

>>16463646
This is veering very far into pure politics, but the most obvious example would be Pence, who chose to acknowledge the result of the 2020 election and as a consequence their relationship soured.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:36:55 UTC No. 16463653

https://x.com/ajtourville/status/1853820965832020249

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:37:57 UTC No. 16463655

>>16463653
https://www.pcmag.com/news/spacex-cellular-starlink-connected-27000-plus-phones-in-areas-hit-by-hurricanes

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:38:58 UTC No. 16463657

>>16463655
https://x.com/ajtourville/status/1853822673609990149

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:42:52 UTC No. 16463664

Eurofag here again, when can we anticipate preliminary results of the election, and by extension the fate of SpaceX?

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:43:38 UTC No. 16463666

>>16463622
But if things go well they're setting things up for JD and possibly trumplings

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:45:31 UTC No. 16463668

>>16463652
also Michael Cohen
maybe Steve Bannon

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:45:56 UTC No. 16463669

>>16463664
10 hours

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:46:31 UTC No. 16463671

>>16463664
Preliminary? Today. Final results may drag out a while depending on how lopsided it is.

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:46:52 UTC No. 16463673

>>16463666
>JD
he’s pretty ass, I never liked him as VP pick. We’ll see how he fares the next 4 years but I don’t think I want his as president.
>trumplings
No more dynasties in America please. The Kenedys and Bushes are bad enough.

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:48:43 UTC No. 16463674

>>16463666
What trumplings could succeed him?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:51:22 UTC No. 16463680

>>16463673
JD would be great for space. He's backed by Thiel

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:51:52 UTC No. 16463681

>>16463673
have you watched a single interview by JD Vance? he is pretty based actually
the rogan JD vance one is pretty good for example

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:52:33 UTC No. 16463684

>>16463664
spacex is not going to be seriously impacted by the results of the election. The best case scenario is that it's trump and he puts someone in charge of the DOT that will fix the current shitshow with licensing launches, but there's no chance it happens fast enough to matter.
Worst case scenario is that kamala is vaguely antagonistic against spacex, but starship and starlink are such enormous assets to the country that political pressure can only go so far. My best guess would be that she does nothing, because she simply does not care about space or space policy, and the FAA continues to plod along as it has been.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:55:37 UTC No. 16463687

>>16463681
>Broooo did you watch the weed smoker interview the politics guy? He was soooo chill and bro dude

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:57:01 UTC No. 16463688

>>16463687
there are plenty of others but I take it you haven't listened to a single one

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:58:08 UTC No. 16463689

>>16463684
she does do nothing, she never did anything in the first place
but the machine behind her will continue to come after Musk and much more vigourously

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:59:21 UTC No. 16463691

>>16463688
I do not watch the fighting weed man interview show, no.

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:00:02 UTC No. 16463692

>>16463664
>Kamala wins
Elon is fucked. All his company gets grinded through legal rube goldberg. It will be slow walked if possible, dozens of lawsuits will happen, contract exclusions will happen, Musk will be asked to be removed from leadership, SpaceX will be put on burner, etc. All his other companies are gonna get fucked as Kamala will put people who will "interpret" laws that are heavily biased against Musk.

>Trump wins
Mars 2026.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:02:45 UTC No. 16463694

How would a Kamala victory impact Peter Beck’s rocket company?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:03:54 UTC No. 16463696

>>16463694
who and who?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:04:48 UTC No. 16463697

>>16463694
Somewhat poorly, kamala just doesn't care about spaceflight so she won't do anything interesting. That means less stuff for all space companies to do.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:05:01 UTC No. 16463698

>>16463689
I just sincerely do not understand what form you think "going after Musk" will take. The powers of the president are so much more limited than you think, particularly because congress is broken and doesn't legislate anymore.
>>16463692
whose job do you think it is to interpret laws? Do you know what the current makeup of the supreme court is?
you guys don't know anything about american politics

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:08:27 UTC No. 16463700

>>16463698
>/pol/-lite is civically illiterate
No wayyyyy.....

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:09:31 UTC No. 16463702

>>16463698
>I just sincerely do not understand what form you think "going after Musk" will take.
mostly the form it's taken under biden, slow walking regulatory approval, sending federal agencies to smack spacex with frivolous lawsuits.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:09:33 UTC No. 16463703

holding hands with Ariane!

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:14:15 UTC No. 16463710

>>16463698
>I just sincerely do not understand what form you think "going after Musk" will take
what they have been doing until now, you have to be willfully ignorant if you haven't noticed

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:17:50 UTC No. 16463718

>>16463702
>>16463710
yeah, nothing changes
and you know what? None of it will change under Trump either
the election will have no impact on spacex at all

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:18:48 UTC No. 16463720

>>16463536
>Besides, these timelines are quite preliminary

spoiler, they don't move to the left

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:20:13 UTC No. 16463723

>>16463718
you are completely wrong, see this for instance >>16463281

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:20:15 UTC No. 16463724

>>16463718
>None of it will change under Trump either
Considering those agencies are under the indirect control of the president I find that hard to believe that trump would go after someone who campaigned for him.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:22:30 UTC No. 16463727

>>16463681
>have you watched a single interview by JD Vance? he is pretty based actually

The right wingers who were critical of Vance are eating a lot of crow.

The left wingers are terrified because not only is he fantastic for right wingers he is a millenial and will be in politics for decades to come.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:22:40 UTC No. 16463728

>>16463703
those are some tig ol biddies

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:23:14 UTC No. 16463731

>>16463630
>he went to the library

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:25:34 UTC No. 16463734

>>16462752
Any info relevant to spaceflight?

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:27:01 UTC No. 16463736

>>16463734
I don't know, I haven't watched it. I just saw it in my YouTube recommendations and posted it here for those who might care. I'll probably listen to it over the course of the next few days while walking around.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:27:44 UTC No. 16463737

>>16463698

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:37:38 UTC No. 16463746

When we win, do not forget that these people want you broke, dead, your rockets delayed and cancelled, and they think it's funny.

https://x.com/nataliegwinters/status/1853628191803351386

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:39:28 UTC No. 16463750

>>16463746
wowza! I guess I had better do something about that outside the framework of the law. Thanks for the tip mr. Fed!

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:42:47 UTC No. 16463752

>>16463750
Bodied that freak

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:44:15 UTC No. 16463754

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3Lrto8WzIQ

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:44:20 UTC No. 16463755

>>16463746
He wont win.