Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:03:41 UTC No. 16460087

first >>16460082
fuck touchscreens
touchscreens are retarded

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:03:53 UTC No. 16460088

>>16460080
Almost bought these chips. Not sure if I'm happy I didn't.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:05:25 UTC No. 16460090

>>16460088
You can buy them?

I was under the impression they were a limited and exclusive run, and that the few unopened cans were collector's items.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:06:33 UTC No. 16460091

>>16460090
>collector's chips
do modernfags really?

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:08:07 UTC No. 16460094

>>16460090
Yeah it was like $200 for 3oz of chips that use flavor oil instead of flavor powder. My wife wouldn't let me buy them :(

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:08:47 UTC No. 16460095

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:09:22 UTC No. 16460097

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:10:13 UTC No. 16460098

>>16460095
that looks like it would knock the planet off its axis

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:10:18 UTC No. 16460099

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:15:06 UTC No. 16460103

>>16460095
Greebles were a mistake.
Original starship enterprise is more realistic than this

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:16:20 UTC No. 16460104

>>16460087
Oh so when star trek has touchscreens it's RETVRN TO SOVLKVNO
But when reality has touchscreens it's "soulless slop"

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:16:54 UTC No. 16460105

>>16460095
>>16460097
>>16460099
>covering an aerodynamic vehicle with greebles
>implications of space elevator
>space station
>implications of FTL
sci fi SLOP

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:21:49 UTC No. 16460113

we all know starlink is the best satellite communication network, but what is the second best? oneweb exists but i heard service is often unavailable.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:27:36 UTC No. 16460119

My fucking dudes... I was thinking earlier. Imagine how fucking funny would it be if the chinese named their version of starlink FUCKING STAR-CHINK? hahahahahaha

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:31:54 UTC No. 16460121

>>16460087
They have physical controls as backups

Also touch screens are safest because you don't have to duplicate or triplicate controls for redundancy. If one touch screen is still working it can do what the other touch screens do, just not at the same time. It's no different that those multi function displays in cockpits that can all do the same stuff, except you touch it instead of having 100 buttons around the perimeter. In spacecraft fingerprints aren't a big deal because tiny windows.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:34:04 UTC No. 16460123

>>16460119
straight to the no mars list

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:36:49 UTC No. 16460126

>>16460121
>alerts covering up info
touch niggers need the rope, they can't design a proper UI even if their lives depended on it

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:39:27 UTC No. 16460130

>>16460126
you should tweet elon about it or keep being a cuck and whine here I guess lol

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:40:09 UTC No. 16460131

>>16460104
funnily enough star trek's best director, nicholas meyer, hated touch screens and when he came back to direct the last TOS movie they had "modernized" the set, so he threw that shit out and had manual controls added back. This says a lot more about autism than it should because those movies were notorious for reusing props and footage as much as possible to keep the budget low, and his bid as director was successful because he was able to drive down the budgets personally. He's also jewish.

Anyway I just thought that history lesson would anally devastate touchscreen bros that had it coming.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:41:02 UTC No. 16460134

>touch screen is... le bad!
grow up

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:41:52 UTC No. 16460135

>>16460130
cucks are always in your mind, aren't they?

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:42:15 UTC No. 16460137

>>16460131
Star Trek has always been gay sci-fi for hippies

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:43:12 UTC No. 16460139

>>16460123
oh, grow up!

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:44:15 UTC No. 16460140

>>16460119
also I'm gay

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:44:40 UTC No. 16460141

I'm literally touching a touchscreen right now

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:45:16 UTC No. 16460142

>>16460141
>admitting to being a phonefag

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:45:24 UTC No. 16460144

>>16460141
wooooww fucking phone poster
Sent from my iPhone

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:45:39 UTC No. 16460145

ITT: phoneposters

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:46:25 UTC No. 16460147

>>16460137
That director agreed so he turned the racism up in that movie and it was justified

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:47:27 UTC No. 16460151

reposting

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:47:35 UTC No. 16460152

this seems like the right place
is >>>/tv/205218348 true?

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:48:39 UTC No. 16460155

>>16460151

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:49:42 UTC No. 16460160

>>16460155

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:49:46 UTC No. 16460161

>>16460147
I liked the one when they went on an outing to San Francisco find the whales

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:50:47 UTC No. 16460164

>>16460160

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:50:51 UTC No. 16460165

>>16460152
Yes, that phased array antenna is nothing remarkable.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:51:50 UTC No. 16460167

>>16460164

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:51:57 UTC No. 16460168

>>16460164
>>16460160
NOOOO where are le kinomax buttons and le switches and le dials

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:52:03 UTC No. 16460169

>>16460155
>first human with a 25ft vertical
I want them to try jumping and I want video of it

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:52:56 UTC No. 16460170

>>16460167

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:53:04 UTC No. 16460171

>>16460131
That was an amusing anecdote
In Star Trek V, it's perfectly obvious that they're reusing the TNG sets

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:53:19 UTC No. 16460172

>>16460087
>touchscreens are retarded

Posted on an iphone.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:54:13 UTC No. 16460173

>>16460172
Touchscreens SUCK

Posted from my blackberry

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:54:16 UTC No. 16460174

>>16460170
real photos of cuck pens

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:55:17 UTC No. 16460176

>>16460155

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:55:19 UTC No. 16460177

>>16460174

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:58:45 UTC No. 16460183

>>16460176
oh my god was it him

All it takes it a second without thinking to make an embarrassing moment that follows you until you die. That's why you exist. Social anxiety is cosmic horror.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:58:54 UTC No. 16460185

>>16460176
wtf...

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:00:13 UTC No. 16460187

>>16460095
If we have learned anything from Starship it is that the exhaust plume on a ship that large would result in the city being incinerated.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:02:38 UTC No. 16460188

>>16460176
>Professional rocket orientation specialist, explainer of flamey stuff and rocket chaser. Bringing space down to Earth for everyday people

everydaybros...

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:06:00 UTC No. 16460192

>>16460161
Anytime some nerd complains that a movie was bad because of illogic and plot holes remind them that star trek IV exists

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:14:24 UTC No. 16460204

>>16460176
is this better or worse than when CSI Starbase said that only Raptor did engine chill?

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:14:37 UTC No. 16460205

>>16460106
>>16460121
but all that is automated, so you don't need controls at all sillybilly
lmao

touchscreens are the most retarded thing I've ever seen and there is absolutely no reason to use them when older technologies exist and a mouse and keyboard are objectively superior for everything you could do by pressing your fat fucking cheeto fingers against the screen like a four year old

>>16460104
Star Trek TOS had buttons you can audibly hear when they are pressed.
They click, and the sound is satisfying.

You know, feedback.
haptic and auditory feedback is FUCKING IMPORTANT YOU IDIOTS

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:14:37 UTC No. 16460206

>>16460151
>>16460155
I know this is HLS but does this imply that seats near the belly and facing the belly incur the mildest g forces?

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:17:28 UTC No. 16460208

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wbOGwkX8Eo

BUTTONS
SWITCHES
LEVERS

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:18:25 UTC No. 16460209

>>16460131
>He's also jewish.
You already said he was a director.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:19:01 UTC No. 16460210

>>16460205
Star Trek TOS was also made in the sixties, your phone makes the technology depicted look archaic.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:20:14 UTC No. 16460211

>>16460208
>humans
>controlling a spaceship
>controlling any vehicle ever
that aint the future, that's the past

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:24:26 UTC No. 16460212

>>16460210
>he thinks touchscreens are high tech
lmfao
phones are shitty versions of real computers and the big screen is basically useless eye candy to keep toddlers from acting up

everything you use a phone to do is either done better by a computer or was already accomplished by early 2000's flip phones

literally the only reason they are shilled is because they are monitoring devices that use their cameras and microphones and other sensors for no other reason than to spy on you and feed geolocation information to private corporations and the state

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:25:57 UTC No. 16460213

>>16460211
cool, so nobody is going to Mars
why even bother sending someone if everything can just be automated anyways
glad we agree, humans are superfluous and have nothing meaningful to do in space except eat and shit

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:26:50 UTC No. 16460214

>>16460167
Look at all that fucking dead space. Whoever designed this should be shot. Why aren't they wedge shaped?....

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:28:20 UTC No. 16460215

>>16460213
What the fuck are you talking about? Starship is basically alive, the control systems are smarter than some animals. What could a person possibly contribute
>>16460214
That's how you know NASA designed the interior

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:28:48 UTC No. 16460216

is it true that Trekkies are pedos?
i heard there was a correlation

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:30:06 UTC No. 16460217

>>16460155
Also why is there a 100ft tall ceiling of dead space. This shit is retarded. They should get me on the design team.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:35:02 UTC No. 16460223

>>16460213
The biggest reason to go to mars is to see if we can live there.

In the mean time general purpose robots are high fruit, planet science would go a lot faster on mars with humans. We also can't remotely control them because its too far away.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:36:05 UTC No. 16460224

>>16460223
The biggest reason to go to mars is to get away from this doomed hellhole.

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:37:32 UTC No. 16460225

>>16460215
>could a person possibly contribute

what happens if your guidance system is compromised or malfunctions
just die right
no chance of being able to manually land, why even think about it

know what, you're right, human passengers on space missions are completely useless eaters and nothing more than a liability
so nobody is ever allowed to leave the surface of this prison planet

oh I'm sorry, did you want to set in a new course that wasn't preapproved and programmed into the computer by Space Ownership Corporation

I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:38:25 UTC No. 16460226

This is the communist isn't it?

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:41:04 UTC No. 16460229

>>16460214
>>16460217
It's not really a design. Spacex has mockups of the hardware and just have it placed in the vehicle in a layout that could work, it's just a fast layout plan to see if things fit. In reality things like the sleeping quarters should have common walls and be appropriately shaped. But they don't know their final location yet.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:41:06 UTC No. 16460230

fuck you

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:41:16 UTC No. 16460231

>>16460211
you vill control nothing and you vill be happy

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:45:23 UTC No. 16460234

>>16460225
meds. There's always a "what if" situation that leads to the crew dying. If your guidance fails, use a backup guidance system. Doubling or tripling your computers would add no meaningful weight to the rocket, I think spacex does that anyway because cosmic rays.

A human trying to land a propulsive rocket would probably never work.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:45:58 UTC No. 16460235

i love the fuck you poster haha

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:50:35 UTC No. 16460237

/sfg/: Touch Screen General

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:52:46 UTC No. 16460241

>>16460226
why is everything he says so out of line with reality

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:53:29 UTC No. 16460243

/sfg/ sisters...
why are normies so dumb?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CHDiB-cShk

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:53:56 UTC No. 16460245

>>16460234
>A human trying to land a propulsive rocket would probably never work.
dude a human trying to land a passenger jetliner is impossible
why even try
just let the computer do the landing since they are so much better than us at everything

they could probably do it more reliably if they monitor and simply adjust the automated systems than a computer alone can
that's the future, humans using the tools computers allow us to create
it's not one or the other, it's both
computers alone are insufficient, humans alone likewise, you need both

in the same sense that humans land planes better than computers do, we can probably land rockets better too
it's just too dangerous to try that so it's not allowed

imagine telling a pilot he isn't allowed to land a plane and it all has to be automated now
he would laugh in your face
that's how regular spaceflight is going to be in the future, like taking a plane

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:55:31 UTC No. 16460246

So now that Harris/Walz presidency is all but confirmed how fucked is musk?
Frankly I think he'll get out of the upcoming legal troubles relatively well, some millions of fines but nothing more, and he'll learn to play by the dems' rule again, like he used to under obama.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:55:59 UTC No. 16460248

fuck you

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:57:21 UTC No. 16460249

>>16460246
Is it confirmed? Everyone is saying it's a toss up

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:57:54 UTC No. 16460250

>>16460245
>why even try
>just let the computer do the landing since they are so much better than us at everything

Yeah glad we had this discussion thanks

>in the same sense that humans land planes better than computers do
>imagine telling a pilot he isn't allowed to land a plane and it all has to be automated now

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_landing_system

Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:59:49 UTC No. 16460251

>>16460245
What a fucking retard

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:00:39 UTC No. 16460252

>>16460183
Find a fault with his post

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:03:13 UTC No. 16460254

fuck you

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:03:29 UTC No. 16460255

>>16460249
Iowa's very best pollster says she'll win there, if it's even slightly true that means her odds of winning the rust belt are very good, which means she win by default.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:04:44 UTC No. 16460257

>>16460250
cool so when are we banning pilots from flying planes since robots just do it better
pilots are nothing more than a liability since the computers do it better

it's much easier to land a plane than it is a rocket, so since we can use robots to land rockets we should just make it illegal for anyone other than a robot to land planes becuase it's safer

r-right, there's no way that would be a fucking disaster or anything

>Instrument_landing_system
cool, so you have to like, press buttons and flip switches for this to work
nah fuck that, just use a fucking touchscreen or EVEN BETTER just get rid of that all that dumb shit altogether and just trust the robot do do everything

who even needs a control stick, just get rid of that antiquated manual system

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:07:08 UTC No. 16460259

>>16460252
Do you think astronauts should try to sleep standing up to "save space" with obscene amounts of floor space left over instead of just... changing the shape of quarters?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:07:53 UTC No. 16460260

>>16460251
you know those fat fucking eaters from WALL-E that trashed their planet, live in space, never do anything but naptime and dindins, and their automated computer system just takes care of everything for them

that's you
now sit back down into your mobility scooter and buckle up

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:08:12 UTC No. 16460261

>>16460243
for this guy combo of the following
>not giving a single shit about space so knowing nothing about it
>playing a bit for kids between the age of 6 and 14

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:11:28 UTC No. 16460262

>>16460259
Every square kilometre counts

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:12:34 UTC No. 16460263

in fact, humans are too incompetent to wipe their asses
we need designated ass wiping robots to spread their cheeks and gently agitate their buttholes until their sensors read all clear

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:12:59 UTC No. 16460264

>>16460257
That will happen. Pilot will be a supervisory role until they don't meaningfully increase the safety of travel.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:13:04 UTC No. 16460266

>>16460260
>dude this is just like harry potter
Now I know this is all an act and you're fucking with me specifically

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:14:38 UTC No. 16460267

>>16460243
we live in a civilization

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:16:07 UTC No. 16460269

>>16460263
Yeah. And you should outsource your posts to AI too
>>16460267
In Earth civilization, no one jumps for Mars

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:17:12 UTC No. 16460270

you've been added to the no mars list

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:17:40 UTC No. 16460271

>>16460257
>>16460264
most of the pilot errors are noncritical, most of the mechanical ones are

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:18:01 UTC No. 16460272

>>16460257
Actually more importantly than controlling the plane, the most dangerous time is take off and landing because it requires traffic control and both the ATC and the pilots not to fuck up communication or make errors in timing judgement. If you ever listen to that shit it sounds like an auctioneer on a garbled microphone and it's a miracle they do it all day.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:18:52 UTC No. 16460273

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:20:02 UTC No. 16460274

fuck you

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:20:27 UTC No. 16460275

>>16460245
aeroplane pilots:
>hundreds of millions of hours of collective knowledge built up on the operation and control of planes before automated landing was possible
>aerodynamics means pilots can take a near infinite number of route variations to get from point A to point B depending on localised weather conditions, and given a relatively flat surface can put a plane down anywhere in an emergency even with total power loss

astronauts:
>have a set path to take through the atmosphere, pre-designed, programmed and written into a flight computer by flight engineers
>flight path in vacuum has to be exact, small errors in burns require larger corrections later in the flight path consuming precious fuel which can result in loss of mission depending on margins available
>in the event of total power loss, you are just floating in space forever, dying in the void
>re-entering and landing a capsule, spaceplane, or starship requires integrating dozens or hundreds of temperature and pressure sensors to avoid a breakup in flight while also staying within the nominal reentry corridor

realistically the main reason there isn't a push towards total automation in airliner cockpits is public perception and confidence, rather than anything technical. Most commercial passengers do NOT want to hear that they're about to board a plane with no pilot, even if the automated system has been deemed Safe and Effective

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:22:01 UTC No. 16460278

>>16460264
so you want every plane to have a designated and prearranged destination, and there to be no way at all for the passangers or pilot to simply reroute and navigate to another area midflight for whatever reason

what could possibly go wrong with allowing the physical skills pilots have developed over generations to go extinct and for a centralized computer system to guide the trajectories of every plane in the country with no manual override
except for 9/11 times a thousand ofc

>>16460266
here's your automated slurpee
now be a good boy and let the computer decide for you where to go

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:22:48 UTC No. 16460279

So arstech is laundering in FinancialTimes's EDS into their space reporting now. LMAO.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:23:29 UTC No. 16460280

>>16460275
air corridors are so crowded its more comparible to self driving cars than rockets, and self driving cars dont work, so self flying planes wont work. edge cases will always happen which are easily correctibe by a human but left unchecked will cause a major crash

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:25:02 UTC No. 16460281

>>16460278
airbus are developing automated systems to divert to alternate airports/runways in events where pilots are unresponsive. Ironically the position you're taking where the pilot is the ultimate authority is the one that Boeing favours, and look how their airline business is doing

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:25:47 UTC No. 16460282

>>16460271
Sounds dubious because most "errors" would be non critical regardless of the source. And statistics on a pilot hitting the wrong button and nothing happens, or some non critical component failing and nothing happens would be statistically invisible. The only thing you can talk about are accidents, not errors.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:28:18 UTC No. 16460284

>>16460278
>so you want every plane to have a designated and prearranged destination, and there to be no way at all for the passangers or pilot to simply reroute and navigate to another area midflight for whatever reason

No I would've typed that

9/11 wouldn't have happened if there were no controls to hijack. You've been retard posting for a long time, it's time to stop. I wish a chatbot would take control of your posting

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:29:19 UTC No. 16460286

Tesla short sellers are arguing SpaceX is fraud because touchscreens? Lmao

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:31:35 UTC No. 16460291

>>16460255
two polls from iowa, one showing Trump +6, another Harris +3 (if you prompt Kennedy who has dropped out). seems like an outlier to me.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:32:21 UTC No. 16460293

>>16460272
>the most dangerous time is take off and landing
everyone knows this

>it's a miracle they do it all day
so it would be easier to just have robots land instead
oh wait, there are problems associated with that

>>16460275
>small errors in burns require larger corrections later in the flight path
right, and if someone made a tiny error in the calculations you're just fucked unless someone on the vessel can manually correct course at the right moment

>requires integrating dozens or hundreds of temperature and pressure sensors to avoid a breakup in flight while also staying within the nominal reentry corridor
yeah so it would be real bad if someone did the math wrong and this were realized before reentry but there was absolutely nothing the crew could do to readjust based on their actual velocity and angle, etc

>>16460281
so are the automated systems just better than pilots at landing yet or is there still some debate

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:32:44 UTC No. 16460295

>>16460281
I feel bad for that, I think it was a UPS jet first officer in a smoke filled cockpit that couldn't even see his own controls, the captain succumbed to smoke. He lived long enough to get a shot at approach and failed. There was no second chance not being able to see a thing.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:35:11 UTC No. 16460301

>>16460293
>so it would be easier to just have robots land instead

If it were easier it would've already been done. We do the hardest improvements last. All that matters is you can't improve humans without genetic engineering but you can improve software and hardware.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:35:37 UTC No. 16460302

>>16460284
>9/11 wouldn't have happened if there were no controls to hijack.

you could simply hack the coordination center and simply erase or rewrite the navigation data required for every airborne flight in the country to land, or depending on the system you want to replace manual override and pilot discretion, literally take control over those planes and send them into the ground

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:36:26 UTC No. 16460305

>>16460293
>someone made a tiny error in the calculations

Why was a "someone" instead of "something" doing your calculations.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:36:39 UTC No. 16460306

>>16460172
>a feature necessitated due to the tiny limited space of a handheld pocket device should also be forced down your throat in the form of massive IPads bolted onto the inside of your multimillion 9 meter spacecraft
You are fucking retarded and I hope you get spaghetti sauce on your fingers right before attempting to tell your Starship 311 to activate its engines during Martian atmospheric entry. Touchscreens can fuck right off

>>16460270
>>16460274
>>16460286
I know…I KNOW. IM SORRY!!! It's just I'm not gonna use his touchscreens is all AAHHAAHAHAH

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:41:39 UTC No. 16460310

>>16460286
It's just a deranged communist we've recently become infected with

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:43:54 UTC No. 16460315

>>16460306
then you will never go to space

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:45:37 UTC No. 16460319

>>16460305
dude who needs to check the code you write
just let ch*tGPT do it
no computer has ever had a random fucking error and CTD or bluescreen before

they are literally perfect you know
no such thing as a faulty connection, corrupt files, cosmic rays, power surges, etc

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:45:50 UTC No. 16460320

>>16460302
This is just a meta discussion about the vehicle having a mind, eyes, and ears of its own and not implicitly trusting centralized control. If ATC tells the boing to fly to the WTC's coordinates it could just say "no way fag" just like a human could.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:46:38 UTC No. 16460323

>>16460315
Still not gonna use the touchscreen

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:47:51 UTC No. 16460325

>>16460319
Humans fuck up and there's no way to fix that. I think we've been done here for a while smooth brain. This is space flight general not luddite general.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:48:23 UTC No. 16460326

https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1852502957780246920
>Jeff Bezos of Amazon $AMZN sold 16,354,620 shares of $AMZN worth $3,048,501,168 today (yes, $3 billion!!!!!!!)

jeff personally buying ULA

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:49:46 UTC No. 16460328

I just realized the washroom is literally right next to the HLS cockpit seats. Based

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:50:07 UTC No. 16460329

>>16460326
isnt $3 billion practically nothing?

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:52:33 UTC No. 16460331

>>16460328
Imagine sitting there when ranjeet diversity astronaut goes in there to unload his 0g tikka masala pajeet bomb.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:53:40 UTC No. 16460333

>>16460329
>practically nothing
That's how much ULA is worth.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:56:02 UTC No. 16460334

>>16460333
>isnt ULA practically nothing?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 00:59:48 UTC No. 16460336

>>16460325
a way to mitigate these inevitable human fuckups involves a manual override control system that you can use to make adjustments to your heading if the computer system designed by humans for guidance shits itself, is compromised, or starts trying to kill members of the crew en route to the moons of Jupiter

>>16460320
>it could just say "no way fag" just like a human could
computers are designed for compliance, they don't have agency and cognition like humans do

you could give the computer normally off-limit coordinates to say the Pentagon, but label them as something else or even rewrite the entire system so that it thinks it's going somewhere else and the computer would simply comply because it has no ability to think about what could be happening
it gets a certain input, puts out a certain output
that's it, no different than flipping a lightswitch

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:01:10 UTC No. 16460337

fuck you

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:02:14 UTC No. 16460338

>>16460255
>Iowa's very best pollster says

You don't organically have 7 point swings from the same pollster that go against trends.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:03:22 UTC No. 16460340

>>16460326
jef will be well ahead of spacex on ISRU and deep space technologies. blue was already, but ula has a treasure trove of stuff from the boing lokmart legacy

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:05:43 UTC No. 16460343

>>16460326
Or Boeing LMAO

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:07:00 UTC No. 16460346

>>16460336
You're going to have to figure out what's completely fucking wrong in this post by yourself this time. Believe what you want but your illiteracy is not my problem and it's definitely not /sfg/'s responsibility to scroll through

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:14:35 UTC No. 16460353

>>16460346
you bothered responding literally just to insinuate that I am illiterate because you need to reply but have nothing of any substance to add

a manual override control system is a critical reduncancy that could potentially save the lives of an entire crew
people should be trained on it too, your complete reliance on automation is a lethal vice and lazy

there is literally no reason not to have one, and no good reason why it should be a touchscreen as opposed to a simple monitor with mouse and keyboard or literally buttons and switches

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:20:06 UTC No. 16460358

>>16460353
youre such an idiot HAHAHAH!

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:22:51 UTC No. 16460360

>>16460340
>>16460326
Buying Starliner from Boeing would unironically be a huge boon for Blue.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:22:58 UTC No. 16460361

>>16460105
>greebles
I was gonna actually say, Starship is so cool looking because it has a visually interesting design. All the ring segment seams, the reinforcements, the runners, etc soothes my autism. It will be a shame when it inevitably turns into a bland, smooth, shiny rocket.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:24:41 UTC No. 16460362

>>16460361
YOURE SUCH A FUCKING JEWISH IDIOT LMAO

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:27:30 UTC No. 16460363

>>16460326
He pulls $3billy every quarter

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:28:51 UTC No. 16460364

>>16460362
Huh?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:29:59 UTC No. 16460365

>>16460338
You're possibly right!
I just had a long feeling that she'd win and that validated my feelings.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:34:12 UTC No. 16460372

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
YUO CANNOT CREATE A SYSTEM FOR ASTRONAUTS TO MAKE COURSE CORRECTIONS MANUALLY

THEY ARE ALL TOO RETARDED TO EVER FIGURE IT OUT ANYWAYS AND SHOULD JUST ACCEPT DEATH IF THE COMPUTER SHITS ITSELF OR WE MISSED AN ERROR
IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ME WANTING TO SELL SPACE TICKETS TO RICHFAG TOURISTS WHO WONT HAVE TO ACTUALLY QUALIFY AND THIS IS LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR DESIGN TRUST ME

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:35:11 UTC No. 16460373

Is navigation using something like a sextant possible? I imagine that currently something like pic related (celestial navigation device used in the SR-71 blackbird) is used when navigating.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:36:30 UTC No. 16460375

>>16460372
Fuck off tranny

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:36:57 UTC No. 16460376

>>16460361
I don't think they'll be polishing the thing. Maybe for a heroic voyage but the dozens or hundreds of roasted starlink trucks arent going to get a wax job

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:38:50 UTC No. 16460379

>>16460372
link the post where anyone said this or end your down syndrome screeching forever

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:40:13 UTC No. 16460383

>>16460372
>just do course corrections manually after doing the orbital mechanic math on the fly
it's not that easy in rocketry

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:42:10 UTC No. 16460386

>>16460373
trident missiles use celestial navigation so that they have no detectable incoming/outgoing radiation. also stops jamming. thats all I know.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:46:10 UTC No. 16460390

why are there so many hot girls into space all of a sudden?
https://x.com/lavie154

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:49:28 UTC No. 16460395

>That damned master alarm again, shut that thing up will ya
>Sir the hull temperature, it's...

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:49:50 UTC No. 16460396

>>16460390
I like how you edited out 'her' troon flag.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:53:26 UTC No. 16460398

>>16460390
>niche male hobby becomes big
>cursed f*males move in to seek attention and financial donations from males

Cases beyond count. Also that's a tranny why did you remove the flag.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:55:26 UTC No. 16460401

>>16460395
its a psyop

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:55:29 UTC No. 16460402

>>16460396
K E K

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:56:30 UTC No. 16460404

>>16460390
Troonflag suggests that's a man pretending

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:57:11 UTC No. 16460405

>>16460404
he knows, he knows that.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:58:45 UTC No. 16460407

>>16460390
>Irrevocably mogged by hot space girl

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:59:12 UTC No. 16460408

>>16460390
this girl has such a hot soothing voice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBmAA1f5GBE

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:59:34 UTC No. 16460409

>>16460383
but it is that easy
there is one single reason why you might not want a manual override for flight controls
and that is the same reason you might not want to give a drill to someone on the ISS
they could use it to make a hole in the hull

>doing the orbital mechanic math on the fly
you know they might have some assistance from the ground in doing that math
all they would have to do is punch in the new set of commands

when Apollo 13 experienced failure of a critical system, they had to do some readjustments to their course "on the fly" too
if you took people ITT seriously you'd think that were somehow impossible

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 01:59:34 UTC No. 16460410

buy an ad

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:00:34 UTC No. 16460413

fuck you

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:01:24 UTC No. 16460417

>technology hasn't changed in 50 years
if you reply to this tranny you get the thread you deserve, just let him freak out on his own

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:05:09 UTC No. 16460418

*COUGH*
https://www.nasa.gov/history/afj/ap13fj/19day5-themanualcoursecorrection.html

>The Manual Course Correction Burn

The increasingly uncomfortable crew of Apollo 13 has accomplished another important task on their unexpectedly early return home. By temporarily powering up parts of the Command Module, they have discovered that the systems needed for making their Earth landing are still in working order. With a plan to charge the CM batteries, they hope that everything will function properly once they reach the moment of reentry. Before that, however they will have to adjust their trajectory at least once more, without the use of the guidance computer in the powered-down Lunar Module Aquarius, and the time for that course correction burn is approaching.

>adjust their trajectory at least once more, without the use of the guidance computer
OH NO
THEYRE DONE FOR
LITERALLY DOOMED
THERES NO WAY A HUMAN COULD EVER MANUALLY COURSE CORRECT IN SPACE
IMPOSSIBLE

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:07:56 UTC No. 16460421

>>16460413
whats up with this guy? makes me not want to come to this general if im (or some unknown person is) constantly being swore at for seemingly no reason

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:07:57 UTC No. 16460422

this thread is filled with fat fucking weeaboo nerds who are permanently stuck into their mobility scooters and beg their space computer mommy make them hot pockets and tendies while she also does everything else necessary to keep their spacecraft operational

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:08:26 UTC No. 16460423

I became a believer about imminent technological revolution and I'm looking for websites chronicling spacex in a non-sensational way, or sites about rocket science and orbital mechanics, you know practical aerospace with emphasis on space

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:11:20 UTC No. 16460427

>>16460418
The Abort Guidance System, or AGS, interfaces with the Control Electronics Section in many ways, just like the PGNS main guidance system does. The Abort Sensor Assembly, or ASA, uses hull-strapped accelerometers and gyroscopes to provide inertial sensing data. The Abort Electronics Assembly is a computer that takes over the functions of the LGC should it fail. While more rudimentary and less capable, the AGS is able to maintain attitude control and calculate DPS, APS and RCS burns that would be needed to get the crew to a safe rendezvous with the orbiting Command Service Module. Right now they are pressing the AGS into duty to maintain partial attitude control while the crew performs the rest of the course correction under manual crew control.

It is interesting to note that in the Command Module, the backup control system, the Stabilization Control System (SCS), was electromechanical, utilizing dedicated sensors, manual crew input, and separate electronics packages. For the LM an independent, fully fledged backup guidance and control was required due to the complex demands put on the LM by its highly specialized mission. The SCS is capable of maintaining vehicle attitude and can permit manually controlled SPS engine burns, which is enough for what is required to get the crew home even without the guidance computer. The LM's mission profile is much more dynamic. Emergency return to orbit from powered descent would simply not be possible without computer-assisted control.

>required to get the crew home even without the guidance computer
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO STOP HAVING BACKUP CONTROL SYSTEMS
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:12:10 UTC No. 16460429

im swearing at you fat fuck

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:12:44 UTC No. 16460430

>>16460331
>0g tikka masala pajeet bomb.
I can smell that comment

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:14:41 UTC No. 16460432

>>16460095
I appreciate the effort put into making this, but it looks retarded.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:15:35 UTC No. 16460434

>>16460421
fuck you guy is pretty chill, however this guy talking to himself is kind of weird >>16460418
>>16460427

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:17:47 UTC No. 16460436

wow who wants to have this useless crap in front of you when we could just use fucking touchscreens instead LOL

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:18:45 UTC No. 16460437

the future is now old man

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:18:48 UTC No. 16460438

in the Apollo 17 crew commentary they say they could have flown the Saturn V all the way to orbit if all of the computers failed

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:21:06 UTC No. 16460439

>>16460436
>get in cockpit
>there's just a QR code to download the app

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:26:41 UTC No. 16460444

Despite the accuracy of the transearth injection, the spacecraft slowly drifted off course, necessitating a correction. As the LM's guidance system had been shut down following the PC+2 burn, the crew was told to use the line between night and day on the Earth to guide them, a technique used on NASA's Earth-orbit missions but never on the way back from the Moon.[143]

This DPS burn, at 105:18:42 for 14 seconds, brought the projected entry flight path angle back within safe limits. Nevertheless, yet another burn was needed at 137:40:13, using the LM's reaction control system (RCS) thrusters, for 21.5 seconds.

>bro trust me you don't need to know any of this dumb shit about navigation because the computer will just do everything for us
>nothing can go wrong and if it does there's nothing you can do about it just die

The Apollo primary guidance, navigation, and control system (PGNCS, pronounced pings) was a self-contained inertial guidance system that allowed Apollo spacecraft to carry out their missions when communications with Earth were interrupted, either as expected, when the spacecraft were behind the Moon, or in case of a communications failure. The Apollo command module (CM) and lunar module (LM), were each equipped with a version of PGNCS.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:26:55 UTC No. 16460445

>>16460438
theyre bluffing

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:28:13 UTC No. 16460446

>>16460429
who are you replying to? you cant just make a post replying but not link the comment, its not reddit. the comment chains are nested

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:35:51 UTC No. 16460450

>>16460444
hey retard guess how the burn time and angles were calculated (here's a hint: the astronauts didn't do it)

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 02:49:12 UTC No. 16460459

>>16460373
Apollo used a sextant as a backup. Makes me wonder if Starship will use something similar for deep space maneuvers. Or will everything be soulless Starlink laser navigation?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsrnCeRmW3Q

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:07:10 UTC No. 16460467

https://spacenews.com/chinese-launch-startup-cosmoleap-secures-funding-for-rocket-featuring-chopstick-recovery-system/

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:09:28 UTC No. 16460469

>>16460450
I don't care exactly how it was calculated, frankly.
That's a very weak deflection.

The astronauts DID operate the controls and input the new data themselves, because the manual systems necessary for that existed.
Which is something you seem to think isn't necessary for whatever reason.
But that's retarded and you've been exposed as a midwit for all time ITT.

It's fucking embarassing that people who lurk this general think that it would have been somehow acceptable for Apollo 13 crew to die simply because they have this strange idea that manual course corrections are impossible for humans to implement "on the fly" and the backup control systems necessary to implement that don't bear any consideration and can be ignored.

>the crew was told to use the line between night and day on the Earth to guide them, a technique used on NASA's Earth-orbit missions but never on the way back from the Moon
derp
maybe you just missed the part where they were told to fucking eyeball it based on shadows

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:11:54 UTC No. 16460470

This guy is such a faggot I might stop coming to this general

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:14:27 UTC No. 16460472

good riddance
eat shit and die

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:21:46 UTC No. 16460474

HLS starship looks so lame but the real blackpill is that APLAPA and Natty Team were somehow… even worse…

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:21:46 UTC No. 16460475

https://x.com/OliverNerd7/status/1852871131193364593

Another radical heat shield design change

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:31:32 UTC No. 16460477

>>16460167
>you will live in the pod
in the end there was no escape

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:33:25 UTC No. 16460480

>>16460475
>less tiles
that would help with increasing payload to LEO and make catching the ship easier

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:34:50 UTC No. 16460482

BUT LE HOW DID THEY DO THE HECKING CALCULATIONS

>As the CM was being shut down, Lovell copied down its guidance system's orientation information and performed hand calculations to transfer it to the LM's guidance system, which had been turned off; at his request Mission Control checked his figures.

>Normally, the accuracy of such a burn could be assured by checking the alignment Lovell had transferred to the LM's computer against the position of one of the stars astronauts used for navigation, but the light glinting off the many pieces of debris accompanying the spacecraft made that impractical. The astronauts accordingly used the one star available whose position could not be obscured – the Sun. Houston also informed them that the Moon would be centered in the commander's window of the LM as they made the burn, which was almost perfect – less than 0.3 meters (1 foot) per second off.

ohhh

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:35:43 UTC No. 16460483

>>16460167
Why the staggered arrangement? You can triple the amount if they were all oriented radially.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:38:15 UTC No. 16460486

>>16460475
What was the aluminum tile test?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:39:27 UTC No. 16460488

>>16460486
the silvery white tiles that you could see on ship 30. They were made of aluminium because aluminium melts at around the same temperature that steel loses its strength - so if you see those tiles melt, you know that you're going to have structural weakness in the same area without a tile

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:40:58 UTC No. 16460490

>>16460483
more center floor space, number of bunks is already insane

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 03:58:03 UTC No. 16460498

>>16460483
Why are we bothering with rockets if we have a Stargate

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:07:07 UTC No. 16460501

>>16460490
Is it a bus or a pleasure cruise?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:12:09 UTC No. 16460505

i struggle to come up with a way to monetize the moon without having a colony there

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:14:24 UTC No. 16460508

>>16460095
>implying we would make something that bit in a gravity well
Ngmi

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:16:28 UTC No. 16460509

space sex or fuck off were full

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:16:38 UTC No. 16460510

>>16460505
leftards think monetizing anything is bad, particularly the moon which is the common heritage of mankind. maybe explains why they are so against space exploration.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:17:46 UTC No. 16460511

>>16460475
>Another radical heat shield design change

I think this person confused S31 with S33.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:18:52 UTC No. 16460512

>>16460488
>They were made of aluminium

Wrapped in.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:20:05 UTC No. 16460514

>>16460152
you can pull off the same trick using any group of official victim class people. theres a huge amount of money to be made doing so. government contractors actually scout groids, listerine addicts, latinoxers, etc looking for a good figurehead to use to found a fake contractor to use to get minorities-only contracts with

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:20:21 UTC No. 16460515

>>16460167
Is each of those a bed? I don't understand...

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:22:24 UTC No. 16460518

https://youtu.be/QbleoKUuwAg
that one woman got btfo

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:22:47 UTC No. 16460520

>>16460505
>>16460510
Moon hotel & surface tours

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:23:42 UTC No. 16460521

>>16460520
i meant without people

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:24:24 UTC No. 16460522

>>16460521
I don't understand why you'd do anything on the moon without people.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:26:08 UTC No. 16460524

>>16460511
in the replies they say there are photos of S31 in whatever bay it's in with those tiles removed, but I can't find anything

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:27:45 UTC No. 16460527

>>16460518
do i watch this one or anton petrov

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:29:06 UTC No. 16460529

>>16460527
https://www.universetoday.com/169025/the-milky-ways-supermassive-black-hole-photo-might-need-a-retake/

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:30:05 UTC No. 16460532

>>16460174
Its actually really comfy looking compared to the standard.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:30:13 UTC No. 16460533

>>16460518
the woman just did the font colours, thats literally all she did according to the code history.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:31:53 UTC No. 16460534

>>16460532
it does. its basically just the goypod capsule homes your see in Japan and California

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:33:15 UTC No. 16460536

>>16460534
>muh joos
Back >>>/pol/

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:34:52 UTC No. 16460537

>>16460536
>goy
>joos
goy* is just a term of disrespect on modern internet slang grandad. see goyslop, goyfeed etc.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:37:48 UTC No. 16460539

someone has never heard of "prolefeed" before

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:38:38 UTC No. 16460540

>>16460539
ive read the book, but yeah, prole = goy

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:38:38 UTC No. 16460541

>>16460534
The difference here being that this is a spaceship, so its a lot like the emirates first class cabin on the A380.
>>16460537
Nah hers right, goyslop is a /pol/ term but then again almost all internet slang and memes comes from /pol/

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:39:32 UTC No. 16460543

>>16460537
anon that post was made by a Jew, that's why he's so sensitive to "goy".

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:49:13 UTC No. 16460554

>>16460515
yes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyFYgeE32f0

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:51:38 UTC No. 16460558

Im jewish. What now fuckers?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:54:32 UTC No. 16460563

>>16460151
>>16460155
You should be able to climb up to monkey bars at the top of the nose cone so you can scream HELP IM SLIPPING then you slow motion fall in 1/6th gravity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rt8qB5yOPI

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 05:00:13 UTC No. 16460566

>>16460563
I wonder what kind of trolling hijinks you can do in Lunar gravity. Untapped market desu
>"Hi, I'm Jared Isaacman, and welcome to Jackass: Mooning Edition"

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 05:03:55 UTC No. 16460568

>>16460566
You should be able to pee further before it hits the ground

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 05:11:06 UTC No. 16460572

>>16460566
Perhaps one way to get normies more interested in space in the more distant future would be to have livestreamed sportsball events in huge pressurized structures on the Moon. Basketball would be especially suitable for this.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 05:15:38 UTC No. 16460576

>got a ban for fuck you posting

fuck you

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 05:18:24 UTC No. 16460577

>>16460576
lol get fucked spammer.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 05:21:59 UTC No. 16460579

>>16460245
Moron

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 05:22:04 UTC No. 16460580

>>16460558
Tell your people to stop advocating for and supporting the genocide of Europeans and their diaspora.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 05:44:15 UTC No. 16460595

>NASA safety committee says that SpaceX is taking it's off the ball with Dragon leading to an increasingly dangerous vehicle
Yikes

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 05:52:59 UTC No. 16460599

>>16460595
>is taking it's off the ball
what

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 06:03:04 UTC No. 16460603

>>16460580
We dont do that. Stop scapegoating jews for all your problems.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 06:05:26 UTC No. 16460604

>>16460245
Nigger landing a passenger jet is so easy I could talk a toddler through it and did, I trained my kid on flight simulators from age 3. It took her 5 attempts to land a plane, two attempts to take off.
Landing planes was already automated and proven to be better than letting humans do it, but thanks to human error there were fuck-ups and passengers polled incredibly negatively about having a computer control take-off and landing. They'd probably poll better in modern times, but back in the 90's boomers were still stuck on the idea of big bad captain man saving planes from movie scenarios.

Different with landing a rocket though. Every acceleration vector on landing is exponential. In addition those vectors compound and modify depending on how much fuel is left which changes drastically every 10th of a second. Hold one thrust vector for 40ms too long? Whoops, now your rocket is sideways, godspeed.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 06:07:02 UTC No. 16460605

>>16460595
>ball with Dragon
>Dragon ball
anime?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 06:51:17 UTC No. 16460621

>>16460603
Yes you do. If I wasn't on this board I would link you a long list of proof. If you really believe that then try arguing with your peers about it.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 06:51:50 UTC No. 16460622

>>16460604
there was that one dude who saved a plane full of people by emergency landing in the Hudson river after they lost all propulsion

autoland can't do that

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 06:55:34 UTC No. 16460624

>>16460604
It really is not that easy, flight sims aren't real life, and pilots are there for emergencies and irregular operations. Your 3 year old isn't going to be able to do 90% of what pilots do. Every flight has at least 4 operationally critical workers on it at any time. Stop thinking so simplistically.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 06:59:29 UTC No. 16460626

>>16460361
Are these printed? What scale? I'm going to have to make a Starship for my desk.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:05:39 UTC No. 16460631

landing a launch vehicle would be a lot easier if you had helicopter rotors spinning around on top to ease it in, ala the Rotary Rocket

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:09:30 UTC No. 16460634

>>16460622
They had a checklist on how to perform a water landing, they didn't guess with instinct. I'd trust a computer to ditch in water because it's just a procedure and maintaining variables for touch down. But I'd rather have a captain to direct the crew and get everyone off the plane without drowning.

Also the reason Sully's landing is impressive isn't the water landing. It's that he didn't succumb to wishful thinking and try the easy way out with a normal runway landing, his gut was telling him that they wouldn't make it. I remember him being confirmed correct about this in the investigation. This was hard for a human because it required experience and honed intuition, but it would be trivial for a computer to realize the rate of decline of altitude and speed isn't good enough to make the runway.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:16:14 UTC No. 16460638

>>16460634
>I'd trust a computer to ditch in water
well I don't think the autopilot is able to detect the presence of water or make the call on it's own
you kind of need to look out the window to see that

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:21:27 UTC No. 16460640

>>16460638
Oh there was discussion about future automation earlier in the thread, by mistake I thought that was still going on.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:26:09 UTC No. 16460644

>>16460624
No shit, she can't piss in a urinal or fuck flight hostesses either but she can land a plane under the guidance of ATC.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:26:46 UTC No. 16460645

>>16460634
The checklist is so they don't miss a step, pilots have so much knowledge and experience on these incidents that automation cannot match. You won't ever have the sensors or decision making processes to make a rapid and reliable recovery. Especially considering most emergency scenarios are failures in technology.

>Also the reason Sully's landing is impressive isn't the water landing. It's that he didn't succumb to wishful thinking and try the easy way out with a normal runway landing
On paper diversion to that airport was the best decision, that is a perfect example of how automation would fail. It would pick the logical choice of a strip of pavement as the safest route and not figure out the aircraft was not going to be able to make it. Relying on sensors during a catastrophic failure is never going to be safe.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:27:53 UTC No. 16460647

Vote

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:33:04 UTC No. 16460648

>>16460647
Hes gonna fucking lose and I will hang it over your head forever. He was a fucking retard for getting involved in politics and now all of his businesses are under regulatory scrutiny and it only got worse under Biden and will continue to get worse under Harris AND THATS ONLY because he tossed himself under Trump. All of that money to Twitter shouldve gone to SpaceX and if he had kept his mouth fucking shut then SpaceX would be having a far easier time right now than it would as is. All of his actions will have been for nothing come Tuesday and he will just have fucked himself and SpaceX over for no reason.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:35:43 UTC No. 16460649

>>16460648
Fuck off nigger tranny, go neck yourself

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:37:13 UTC No. 16460651

>>16460644
Yeah I'm sure you had her stick fly it on a VFR day, with a dry runway, without weight issues, or traffic issues in a non emergency situation. I'm sure she also had no knowledge of the surrounding weather, how to deviate if issue arised, what her fuel burn was, her winds on landing were, what her mocas were, what her equipment allowed her to do or what contingencies to follow if equipment fails. I'm also sure she doesn't understand most ATC given commands or procedures, what the alerting sounds, visuals and switches mean and Im sure she hasn't reviewed the NOTAMs, SUAs, TFRs, SIDS, STARS OR 10-9S according to her flight plan.

The industry is automating quite a lot and the general consensus is that is that is will not be feasible in our lifetime. Spaceflight will probably be similar .

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:37:29 UTC No. 16460652

>>16460649
No real response to actual, of course. Lord will it feel good to be proven right. Hopefully retards like you wont sink the ship further on bureacratic relations further for SpaceX once its done.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:38:30 UTC No. 16460653

>>16460648
That money to buy Twitter kept public opinion for allowing the government to suppress SpaceX completely.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:39:20 UTC No. 16460654

>>16460649
Pure Seethe

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:39:25 UTC No. 16460655

>>16460651
Yeah, that's correct. It was her first time in the cockpit and she was 3 years old.
Are you seriously trying to skill issue a fucking toddler? The point of contention is the feasibility of reliably landing a rocket by hand, something that is super-human and fucking retarded much like yourself.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:40:12 UTC No. 16460656

>>16460648
You are going on the no mars list

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:50:06 UTC No. 16460659

>>16460655
>landing a passenger jet is so easy I could talk a toddler through it and did, I trained my kid on flight simulators from age 3.
This was your low intelligence claim made with outrageous levels of ignorance about one of the most complex industries in our society. I am addressing this absurd claim, because it is absurd, your 3 year old didn't fly the plane, she did not have control over the plane or the situation, she just got it to land in a simulator game on a long runway without any real world conditions. Also lets not pretend that landing a rocket by hand is impossible. You can make and should make stick flying a priority and have pilots just like they have on the dragon, because even if you use automation a experienced and trained human brain for emergencies is going to be a much safer way of operating.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:53:57 UTC No. 16460662

>>16460659
You sound like every other fucking manlet I had to deal with in my private pilot's license. You carry your absurd insecurities across into everything you do to the point that even if you get limb lengthening surgery and wind up 6 foot 3 you still look short.
>"Well, actually landing a plane is *super* fucking difficult, here let me list 15 things completely unrelated to landing a plane to show you how difficult it actually is."

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:56:11 UTC No. 16460665

>>16460662
Oh yeah well youre an n word. How do you like that huh??

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:02:28 UTC No. 16460667

>>16460665
T..too far anon..

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:07:34 UTC No. 16460669

I aint reading all that shit. next?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:08:46 UTC No. 16460670

>>16460662
>in my private pilot's license
Ah now it makes sense, you have babys first step to flying and think general aviation bullshit is anything like commercial or military flying.
>>"Well, actually landing a plane is *super* fucking difficult, here let me list 15 things completely unrelated to landing a plane to show you how difficult it actually is."
Thanks for proving your ignorance, every single thing I listed is the most basic aspects pilots have to adress on every single flight they fly. I bet you don't even know what a dispatcher is or what their job entails.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:12:29 UTC No. 16460674

piping glover

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:15:39 UTC No. 16460676

>>16460670
You added another thing to the list that is nothing to do with landing a plane.
This is a discussion about space and rockets but you're interjecting with shit about radio etiquette.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:19:10 UTC No. 16460677

>>16460676
>You added another thing to the list that is nothing to do with landing a plane
And what is that?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 09:07:54 UTC No. 16460695

>>16460372
i think it's really funny that this anon is convinced humans CAN make course corrections at all.
there's a difference between pointing your plane a few degrees left to line up with a landmass about 5000 kilometers away compared to correcting your course so your spacecraft ends up going through a 10 meter diameter hoop in space 3 months and millions of kilometers traveled later.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 09:13:35 UTC No. 16460700

>>16460648
you will not have a seat to mars

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 09:14:26 UTC No. 16460702

>>16460572
or just in zero G, i came up with an idea for a zero G pressurized sportsball game a year or so ago but i wonder if anyone else has ideas for what a zero-g arena might look like.
you could have monkeybars everywhere that you swing off to build momentum.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 09:31:51 UTC No. 16460707

>>16460095
>>16460097
>>16460099
I'm a simple country bumpkin, monolithic man-made structures such as these would terrify me.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:10:42 UTC No. 16460727

>>16460702
you need to think in 3D and make sure the monkeybars don't hurt when you bump your head into them

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:25:30 UTC No. 16460735

Are we going back to Uranus now?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:27:20 UTC No. 16460738

>>16460735
yeah, NASA is as part of their flagship program. wont happen till the 2030s though.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:34:41 UTC No. 16460748

>>16460738
>arrival in 2045
For fuck's sake. Why haven't we invented the immortality pill yet?

bodhi at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:36:21 UTC No. 16460751

>>16460748
We specifically haven't so you'd die because no one wants you here

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:39:11 UTC No. 16460753

>>16460735
https://www.space.com/uranus-moon-miranda-subsurface-ocean-voyager-2
>New research based on images taken by the Voyager 2 spacecraft has suggested that Miranda, a small Uranian icy moon, may have once possessed a deep liquid water ocean beneath its surface. What's more, remnants of that ocean may still exist on Miranda today.
>According to their models, the ocean may have once measured 62 miles (100 kilometers) deep, buried beneath 19 miles (30 kilometers) of surface ice.
>Researchers speculate that the tidal focus between Miranda and other nearby moons were crucial to keeping Miranda's interior warm enough to sustain a liquid ocean.
Europa-bros, Enceladus-sisters...

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:41:37 UTC No. 16460755

>>16460727
oh yeah, definetly foam everywhere.
and maybe helmets.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:43:26 UTC No. 16460760

>>16460751
this self hatred helps no one

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:45:52 UTC No. 16460763

>>16460751
>namefag
>telling others no one wants them here
it's still funny all these years later

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:50:23 UTC No. 16460768

>>16460735
>throws clay on the ground
>"dude i just discovered uranus moon"
i hate "space exploration" so much

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:51:39 UTC No. 16460769

>>16460753
at this point we'll discover that even Phobos has a deep liquid ocean beneath it lmao

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:52:23 UTC No. 16460771

>>16460735
Starship will get us there first, they just need to abandon methalox for something better

>>16460748
It's not that it takes too long, it's that we are way too slow

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:57:43 UTC No. 16460778

>>16460768
Back to >>>/pol/

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 10:58:05 UTC No. 16460779

>>16460769
that would be pretty based

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:09:53 UTC No. 16460789

>>16460599
>>16460605
https://reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/1gi9tdb/nasa_panel_calls_on_spacex_to_maintain_focus_on/

Cry moar

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:13:29 UTC No. 16460791

>>16460789
https://spacenews.com/nasa-panel-calls-on-spacex-to-maintain-focus-on-dragon-safety-after-recent-anomalies/

why not link the news directly?
retard

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:22:06 UTC No. 16460795

is the newfag sperging about manual control gone yet? jfc how does /sfg/ consistently attract such morons...

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:23:39 UTC No. 16460797

>>16460795
He has the same posting style as the ntp/balloon and communism/council guy. I think it's literally just one retard

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:25:34 UTC No. 16460799

>>16460795
i've noticed an uptick in overly impulsive, hyperemotional schizotypals across the board for like the last 5 years now, no matter where i go there's one of these really neurotic shakey people with weird ass high energy typing styles. they write like they're about to break their keyboard in half.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:27:02 UTC No. 16460801

>>16460795
/sci/ in general has a lot of retards for some reason. not as bad as /his/ which is just religious arguments though.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:28:34 UTC No. 16460803

>>16460799
and by across the board i mean, not just this board, but this entire website, anywhere i go, and every other website too.
idk if it's the mental health crisis or just more brown third worlders getting access to the internet, could be both.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:30:53 UTC No. 16460804

>>16460803
Something about having a psychotic break compels you to share your worldview at 800 words per minute. I don't know that there's that many, they're just very loud

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:43:07 UTC No. 16460809

https://x.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1852779813045772304

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:44:47 UTC No. 16460811

>>16460804
Behold, a manual control spacecraft.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:57:24 UTC No. 16460818

>>16460811
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHsc2EekNJo
behold, the result of a manually controlled spacecraft (because the russians were too poor to purchase the automated docking equipment from the ukrainians)

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:04:07 UTC No. 16460823

>>16460811
kek brutal

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:16:17 UTC No. 16460825

>>16460811
They didn't fly safe

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:30:25 UTC No. 16460830

>boeing dismantles DEI team
boeing is sa-
>they just renamed the department
-*ACK*

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:48:33 UTC No. 16460841

>>16460176
Dim Todd.....

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:51:35 UTC No. 16460844

>>16460830
isn't the term DEI itself already a rebranding of something previous? they just keep doing it and hope people don't notice

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:51:49 UTC No. 16460845

>>16460841
Can't wait for them to implement his vertical beds and have it cause the destruction of another starship.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:53:24 UTC No. 16460847

>>16460809
what about the birds and sharks and shit man?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:54:03 UTC No. 16460848

>>16460847
Total Bird Death
Total Shark Death
Total Shit Death

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:54:53 UTC No. 16460849

>>16460847
>the birds
the what?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTCjx5DEPkE

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:57:17 UTC No. 16460852

>>16460844
yeah they keep trying to use new euphemisms for "less capable people that we want to hire based on our ideology"

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:58:19 UTC No. 16460853

>>16460849
It's so fucking unfair that the FAA never grounded the Space Shuttle over this lmao

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:01:29 UTC No. 16460855

>>16460848
Total Fag Death (you)

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:03:10 UTC No. 16460858

>>16460855
There is no need to be upset

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:12:48 UTC No. 16460862

>>16460849
birds? more like retirds.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:19:43 UTC No. 16460866

>>16460795
reddit trannies, its the same one that posts here

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:37:20 UTC No. 16460875

>>16460866
of course a lot of redditors are trannies, but are they really posting here? why?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:39:21 UTC No. 16460876

>>16460383
I dunno, seems pretty easy in KSP

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:44:36 UTC No. 16460878

>>16460659
>one of the most complex industries in our society.
lol
Flying planes is fucking easy
The only difficulty is navigating 60's era ATC bullshit that should have been automated decades ago

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:45:25 UTC No. 16460880

>>16460558
stupid frogposter

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:46:35 UTC No. 16460881

>>16460830
>fire the VP in charge
>just merge them all into HR
>then instruct HR to prioritize DEI

This shit has been going on since the 60's and won't change now because of impotent whitey complaints or because pension funds want someone to blame when a company loses money

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:48:57 UTC No. 16460882

>>16460088
I was tempted to get them too, but I probably would have got raped in import fees.
Did anyone here buy one?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:53:48 UTC No. 16460883

>>16460880
Depressed frog is an old meme

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:55:52 UTC No. 16460885

>>16460875
spillover happens, 4chan isnt a sekret club. Even musk posts here

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:59:14 UTC No. 16460888

https://x.com/robert_zubrin/status/1853060822232359407

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:00:01 UTC No. 16460889

>>16460176
Can someone explain what's wrong with this
Pretend I'm retarded and don't get it

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:01:12 UTC No. 16460890

>>16460885
>Even musk posts here
source?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:01:56 UTC No. 16460891

>>16460889
you will sleep in the pod

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:02:08 UTC No. 16460892

>>16460889
He's complaining about them wasting space? It's pointless though as starship has tons of space, they could probably put giant king sized four poster beds for each astronaut and not fill it up.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:02:32 UTC No. 16460893

>>16460888
>would rather vote for Mars exploration to die than vote for Orange Man
Imagine going against your lifelong interests for such a petty reason.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:03:31 UTC No. 16460898

>>16460893
Considering how bad trump would be for ukraine it's a fairly valid reason.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:03:47 UTC No. 16460899

>>16460893
not sure if he actually cares about colonizing mars, seems to be more about getting personal recognition

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:04:18 UTC No. 16460900

>>16460889
expendable astronauts deserve to sleep in a standing position

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:04:27 UTC No. 16460901

>>16460882
In the end they're just oily chips. I bet more people have eaten them in space than on Earth, because no one bought them just to eat. A bunch of collectoors now have a tin of doritos next to their 15 outdated 3d printed starship replicas.
>>16460888
>in the end Zubrin's jewish instincts overwhelmed his Faustian spirit
sad

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:05:30 UTC No. 16460902

>>16460900
I think he meant stack them vertically instead of putting them in a ring
Or is he more retarded than me

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:05:56 UTC No. 16460903

>>16460899
Of course he doesn't, the moment elon is not useful he will drop him like he did it before.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:07:33 UTC No. 16460907

>>16460898
Trump in Ukraine is a bit of a wild card since it isn't exactly certain what he would do. That's why some Ukrainians think he could be better, because if the current Biden approach continues there is only slow attrition on the horizon and hoping the Russians will have had enough. But that's enough about politics.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:08:21 UTC No. 16460908

>>16460889
>what's wrong
It's a rocket meant to land vertically on bodies with meaningful gravity, this isn't a space station, good luck going to sleep on your feet.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:10:46 UTC No. 16460910

>>16460901
in the end, Ukraine is more important than his entire mars grifting career, funny about that
Not sure why he's so against Russia either, its not like Russia is less jewish than ukraine.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:11:37 UTC No. 16460911

>>16460910
You'd need to interact with russians to get it.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:12:01 UTC No. 16460912

New Sloss
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytrqFVCFWt8

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:13:11 UTC No. 16460914

>>16460898
>I want to colonize Mars
>"But this eastern european country!1!"
I don't grasp any correlation and suspect there isn't any.
>>16460899
Mars is the only issue, Zubrin has lost the path.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:13:49 UTC No. 16460915

>>16460883
correct and I have been hating him for a very long time

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:16:30 UTC No. 16460918

>>16460915
there is no need to be upset

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:17:08 UTC No. 16460919

>>16460918
stupid underagefrogposter

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:17:13 UTC No. 16460920

>>16460914
It's more about maintaining American Hegemony, a Russian victory in Ukraine would open doors for China to challenge that thus making the world more unstable.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:18:01 UTC No. 16460921

>>16460912
I love arguing with boomers in his comment section

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:18:56 UTC No. 16460923

>>16460920
I do not care about American Hegemony, Russia or China, on grounds that they aren't Mars.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:19:48 UTC No. 16460925

>>16460911
Hes a jew who never lived in russia

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:20:44 UTC No. 16460926

>>16460920
Nooo don't make the world unstable... Our food independent, energy independent, industrialized, continent spanning empire wouldn't survive. We need to spend half the national budget making sure other countries can sell us their stuff to our detriment!

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:22:11 UTC No. 16460928

>>16460923
Even when colonization starts, you'll still be a dirty mudroller

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:23:40 UTC No. 16460929

I wonder if Everyday Astronaut sleeps head down or feet down?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:24:08 UTC No. 16460930

>>16460920
Mass third world immigration + ZOG cultural indoctrination is what will make the world unstable and jeopardize colonization of mars

not border conflicts on the far side of the world or what rich internationalists decide is the proper "world order"

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:24:21 UTC No. 16460931

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:25:58 UTC No. 16460933

>>16460931
an established engineer's engine vs a top quality engineer's engine vs magic

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:29:27 UTC No. 16460934

imagine being like 20 years in on building Orion capsules and your shit still doesn't even work

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:30:10 UTC No. 16460936

>>16460931
now let's see the internals

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:34:20 UTC No. 16460939

>>16460928
Well then fuck you too, homo.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:36:58 UTC No. 16460943

>>16460934
Insanely dire. Seems like an exaggeration but it has quite seriously been TWO DECADES (!) with nothing to show for it

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:38:18 UTC No. 16460944

>>16460934
>Imagine getting paid a normal salary to do nothing for 20 years
Every government employee is laughing to the bank

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:38:46 UTC No. 16460946

>>16460943
They will all retire after the SLS is cancelled
whole career spent working on stuff that never flew, or will fly once

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:45:59 UTC No. 16460952

only 2 more days to election, which is when the insane shit really starts (probably regardless who wins)

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:50:30 UTC No. 16460956

>>16460946
What I find funny is that Orion is billed as “reusable,” yet NASA extended LockMart’s contract for even more capsules so the likelihood of any Orion flying on more than one mission is pretty much Zero at this point. Cash cow program—fuck everyone involved with SLS and its associated projects

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:58:01 UTC No. 16460967

>>16460952
can't wait for the inevitable voter fraud meltdowns from whoever loses

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:00:09 UTC No. 16460969

>>16460952
Funniest outcome: Harris wins, Starship launches 20 times in '25. It turns out it didn't matter at all

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:05:16 UTC No. 16460975

>>16460969
>Harris wins
>FAA sends an indefinite hold to SpaceX
>Brown people posting on 4chan gloat

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:06:32 UTC No. 16460976

>>16460931
How come Raptor 3 looks so 'clean'? What kind of alloy is that?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:08:07 UTC No. 16460978

>>16460975
That wouldn't be funny though

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:08:45 UTC No. 16460980

>>16460975
>trump wins
>he changes his mind and goes back to calling musk a whiny baby
>same outcome

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:09:38 UTC No. 16460981

Starship Launch to Catch: 2 hours of Uncut Slowmo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxv_kP5ci2k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxv_kP5ci2k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxv_kP5ci2k

Morning friends. Check out this cool footage. I'll make some webm's in a bit.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:13:55 UTC No. 16460984

>>16460648
he will simply move to china

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:17:37 UTC No. 16460986

>>16460981
but its evening

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:18:09 UTC No. 16460987

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:19:32 UTC No. 16460989

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:20:18 UTC No. 16460991

>>16460931
elon musk here, turbo gonna get 2 times bigger

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:25:34 UTC No. 16460996

turbo autist here, elon gonna get 2 times bigger

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:28:20 UTC No. 16460997

>>16460929
There was an illustrative image showing exactly how he sleeps, I think its called "autocock", but Google probably doesn't index this information due to sensitivity to modern issues!
To the extent allowed by applicable law, you’ll indemnify Google and its directors, officers, employees, and contractors for any third-party legal proceedings (including actions by government authorities) arising out of or relating to your unlawful use of the services or violation of these terms or service-specific additional terms. This indemnity covers any liability or expense arising from claims, losses, damages, judgments, fines, litigation costs, and legal fees.
If you’re legally exempt from certain responsibilities, including indemnification, then those responsibilities don’t apply to you under these terms. For example, the United Nations enjoys certain immunities from legal obligations and these terms don’t override those immunities.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:29:10 UTC No. 16461000

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:31:34 UTC No. 16461002

>>16460997
>"autocock"

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:32:00 UTC No. 16461003

>>16460969
Why do sfg fags think musk support Trump because of starship? He supports him because he want a commercial war against China and tesla is a fraud that cant compete with them. You fags make everything about space when 99.99% of the people and politics dont give a fuck

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:32:23 UTC No. 16461004

>>16460890
Came to me, in my dream

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:33:52 UTC No. 16461005

>>16460888
He's a retard. He's never cared about Mars and would instead sacrifice Musk/SpaceX to get his Ukraine war support of which he believes WW3 is better outcome than Mars

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:39:35 UTC No. 16461008

>>16461003
Yeah I forgot about SpaceX's lucrative ICBM market

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:39:37 UTC No. 16461009

>>16461005
we can have both

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:40:56 UTC No. 16461010

is she right?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:43:57 UTC No. 16461011

>>16461009
Next you'll say, you've castrated yourself and you're a woman.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:44:11 UTC No. 16461012

>>16461010
nice thumbnail faggot

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:44:59 UTC No. 16461013

>>16461010
Yes. Total Earther Death

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:45:18 UTC No. 16461014

>>16461010
Yeah the two threads on /sci/ weren't enough, post them here too

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:45:50 UTC No. 16461016

>>16461011
name a single reason that the west cannot accomplish both the complete extermination of the Russian people + the looting of their factories and warehouses as well as allowing Elon Musk to send a few hundred rocket launches to Mars

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:47:03 UTC No. 16461017

>>16461010
>>16460073

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:47:36 UTC No. 16461019

>>16461016
Why would we want that? I don't want Russia, that's an unhinged notion. What is wrong with you?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:48:01 UTC No. 16461020

>>16461010
I don't know, I'm not an ant

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:48:29 UTC No. 16461021

>>16461010
No.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:49:27 UTC No. 16461022

>>16461014
it makes more sense to post it in the spaceflight thread since it's literally about spaceflight no?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:50:10 UTC No. 16461023

>>16461017
>The bloodline of Martians and spacers will have accidentally been eugenically selected for a predisposition for Factorio
Is this a good thing though

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:50:39 UTC No. 16461024

>>16461019
sorry I got my wires crossed there, that was a post for the /k/ audience, who just wants the return of cheap Russian surplus and their garbage ammo
anyway not wanting the complete genocide of all Russoids simply exposes your weakness, you simply lack the empathy and compassion to give them what they want
>>16461021
yeah

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:50:55 UTC No. 16461025

>>16461016
Name a single reason why you should not kill yourself first? Cause you know, I dont see any reason why you should exist. Why your entire gene pool stretching 10 generations side ways and backwards. Castrated people like you need to be nuked

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:53:00 UTC No. 16461027

>>16461023
yeah?
>>16461025
are you actually a Muscovite? that's the only reason I can think of to have this reaction towards TZD

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:54:20 UTC No. 16461029

spaceflight

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:54:23 UTC No. 16461030

>>16461024
>anyway not wanting the complete genocide of all Russoids simply exposes your weakness, you simply lack the empathy and compassion to give them what they want
I have no clue what you're babbling about, get on lithium you nut.
>>16461027
Normal humans react to genocide with abject disgust and horror. Now post about spaceflight or don't post.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:54:45 UTC No. 16461032

>>16461027
Why the fuck would anyone care about Russia in a SpaceX flight general thread, you dumb nigger. No one cares about your war. Frankly speaking, you should go fight in that war of yours and kill yourself along with whatever enemy you see fit.

We only care about Mars and Mars only.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:55:51 UTC No. 16461034

>>16461032
I care about jovian system moons

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:57:02 UTC No. 16461035

>>16461034
There is only one way we can become a spacefaring civilization in this lifetime. And thats by removing the current admin and never letting the current strand of democrat party in power. They are hellbent on killing spaceflight.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:57:12 UTC No. 16461036

>>16461029
/sfg/ - Support Foreign Geopolitics

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:57:28 UTC No. 16461037

>>16461034
Luna is precious and must be populated

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:01:11 UTC No. 16461042

>>16461037
Imagine if there was a desert on Earth where the sand grinds up everything and environmental conditions will kill you. Also shipping to and from it is a hundred times more expensive than next day air anywhere else. Also if you leave to spend time anywhere else on Earth you're basically disabled. Would anyone choose to live there? The moon is not Mars. No one will live there

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:02:01 UTC No. 16461044

>>16461042
>Also if you leave to spend time anywhere else on Earth you're basically disabled
just lift bro

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:02:32 UTC No. 16461046

>>16461042
Me, I would live there, because none of you would follow me there.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:03:07 UTC No. 16461048

i want to go live in the tethered flying wing habitats on venus

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:05:09 UTC No. 16461050

>>16460645
This is complete nonsense

What's the safest speed, angle of attack, rate of descent, etc for a water landing with that particular plane? Those variables were carefully guessed by engineers based on the few water landings that have happened. The pilots have zero experience with that from landing on runways. And no, most emergency scenarios now are human error.

>On paper diversion to that airport was the best decision

But not on silicon. Choosing a strip of pavement you can't fly to is not "logical". Computers can estimate the crash site of a plane better than humans.

Yes, sensors can fail. But a pilot is also a collection of sensors that can fail. But unlike humans I can add as many sensors as I want, where ever I want, for redundancy. Really the only way humans are better right now is just normal optical vision, but computer vision is advancing and it's probably easier to land a plane with computer vision than make a self driving car or general purpose robot.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:09:01 UTC No. 16461054

speaking of /k/ can we make some sfg patches

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:10:02 UTC No. 16461056

>>16461054
I'm the guy that owns that decorated apparel company so if you guys put one together I can make it

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:10:05 UTC No. 16461057

>>16461046

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:10:09 UTC No. 16461058

>>16461054
4ass needs some patches, yeah

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:10:19 UTC No. 16461059

>>16460888
I never gave a shit about this guy or read anything from him, I wish I would've been outright hostile and made shitposts about him and fought of zubrin fans here for years. That would be so satisfying right now.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:10:54 UTC No. 16461061

>>16461037
The moon will be a forge world, and a fortress.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:11:20 UTC No. 16461062

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:12:22 UTC No. 16461063

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:12:53 UTC No. 16461064

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:13:24 UTC No. 16461065

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:13:55 UTC No. 16461066

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:14:41 UTC No. 16461067

>>16461062
Same energy. We need fusion engines right now

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:19:53 UTC No. 16461071

>>16461056

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:21:01 UTC No. 16461073

what goes on in matamoros

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:22:07 UTC No. 16461074

>>16461071
>uppercase C
no

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:27:38 UTC No. 16461076

>>16461073
people get murdered

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:30:53 UTC No. 16461079

>>16461076
huh every single person on the Notable Persons list for the wiki page, after 1963, is either a drug lord or criminal. what a town

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:31:38 UTC No. 16461080

fuck you

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:37:49 UTC No. 16461085

>>16461071
>>16461074
>>16461056
I'd buy a (corrected) 4ASS patch in a heartbeat. I've been waiting for someone to make one. Make some of the classics as well: Wenhop? Krystalposter, Pisslocks, Spinning Chickens etc.
Legitimately; get these made. You would stand to earn a good deal of money if they're done well.

>15 minute timer to post a comment
What the fuck?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:39:36 UTC No. 16461087

>>16461085
>wenhop?
IT'S HOP WHEN YOU ABSOLUTE RAGING FAGGOT
WEN HOP IS THE REDDIT THING

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:42:34 UTC No. 16461092

>>16461063
what happened to reducing part counts

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:43:40 UTC No. 16461094

>>16461092
each of those bolts is identical, they count as a single part

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:46:15 UTC No. 16461095

>>16461063
it's put together like a British train from WW2 kek

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:46:18 UTC No. 16461096

>>16461094
behold: ultimate simplicity

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:50:00 UTC No. 16461099

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1853113708421005498

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:50:28 UTC No. 16461100

New Glenn with Starliner mounted on the top would actually look more aesthetically pleasing than falcon with dragon.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:52:44 UTC No. 16461102

speaking of NG what is Bezos's plan for a crew capsule for NG?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:54:45 UTC No. 16461105

>>16461096
nothin personnel, kiddo...

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:55:33 UTC No. 16461106

>>16461096
sometimes sacrifices need to be made in the pursuit of things not sucking

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 16:59:26 UTC No. 16461108

superluminal travel will never happen :(

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:01:23 UTC No. 16461109

>>16461108
just increase the speed of light

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:05:25 UTC No. 16461112

>>16461109
Just go up to the speed of light then burn more propellent. Is the universe gonna say "noooo you can't do that, you have to stay at that speed!" and take away your ∆v to punish you for trying? Laws are made to be broken, baby.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:06:46 UTC No. 16461113

>>16461109
>the egg vibrator travels through the tight pussy of time

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:26:31 UTC No. 16461129

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYbEVmStFDQ

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:27:37 UTC No. 16461131

>>16461108
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.07125
Magic plasma carpet ride

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:37:56 UTC No. 16461143

will the HLS have space tools aboard?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:38:28 UTC No. 16461144

>>16461129
this guy is unironically right

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:43:59 UTC No. 16461154

>>16461143
fuck no

"oh I brought this hatchet to smash the CO2 scrubber just in case bro"

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:56:50 UTC No. 16461167

>>16461143
cow tools

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:20:32 UTC No. 16461183

>>16461143
i wish they had a scene where she births the ayy out of her womb through her vagina instead of cutting it out. that would've been hot.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:23:42 UTC No. 16461187

>>16460501
it's a spaceship that the passengers will be stuck on for months at a time

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:25:18 UTC No. 16461191

>>16460558
I'm looking forward to Elon's Edict of Expulsion

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:26:50 UTC No. 16461193

Its fucking over btw. Iowa +3 Harris. Elon wont be doing shit in government ever.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:28:05 UTC No. 16461195

>>16460501
The monopoly table has to go either where no one has access, or everyone is watching to make sure no one is cheating between sessions.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:30:46 UTC No. 16461199

>>16461193
this gets us to mars faster. he won't waste his time babysitting the administration. Now he will quietly get back to slave driving at spacex and not being a moron online (hopefully)

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:31:43 UTC No. 16461202

>>16460931
i hate greebles, too

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:34:22 UTC No. 16461204

>>16461010
>female opinion
I don't care
I would have sex with her face then discard her
if that's not an option her whole existence can safely be ignored

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:35:53 UTC No. 16461207

Shenzhou 18 reentry and breakup of orbital module
https://x.com/CNSpaceflight/status/1853139511498465313

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:36:37 UTC No. 16461210

>>16461207
they didn't land so good

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:37:38 UTC No. 16461213

>>16461193
are you ready to pay reparations?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:38:05 UTC No. 16461214

>>16461167
kek

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:39:57 UTC No. 16461217

Why isn't induced hibernation being tested more thoroughly? Starship could launch many more people without worrying about supplies or pyschotic breaks during transit

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:40:36 UTC No. 16461219

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:41:53 UTC No. 16461223

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:43:25 UTC No. 16461224

>>16461217
You can already do it. It used to be a psychiatric treatment. But it's more work to care for someone who can't do anything for themselves. You'd need someone to care for all the sleepers, and those people would need to be awake.

Plus it's bad for you and there's a chance you'll die.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:45:13 UTC No. 16461226

>>16461223
I want this on my wall

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:45:34 UTC No. 16461228

>>16461102
paper designs for 20 years in the future like everything. I woukd be very disappointed if it turns out to be a traditional capsule.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:47:50 UTC No. 16461231

if Trump loses i will cry : (

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:52:59 UTC No. 16461238

>>16461231
If Trump loses I'm playing Minecraft

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:53:47 UTC No. 16461240

>>16461238
I already forwarded this to the authorities.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:54:54 UTC No. 16461241

>>16460151
>>16460155
I had hope they would try running water in space for the first time. They have gravity so it should be pathetically easy and not require any special hardware.

What is the rate that bathing water can be filtered? A 5 minute shower is about 13 gallons, so for each crew member you need to filter 13 gallons every 24 hours, or 48 hours if it needs to be less luxurious. You'll need a heater and a dehumidifier. Are these hard to energy budget?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:55:25 UTC No. 16461242

It's go time.
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/1853144124439797902

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 18:55:39 UTC No. 16461244

>>16461238
If trump loses musk goes to jail and the US goverment takes control over spaceX and all work on starship grinds to a stop.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:00:13 UTC No. 16461250

>>16461240
Wut
I meant literally. When space gets boring I waste all my time in galacticraft. Join us at >>>/vg/mmcg/

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:04:22 UTC No. 16461256

>>16460931

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:04:25 UTC No. 16461257

>>16461244
Musk is too valuable to be kicked out, plus his knowledge means he can't be let loose out in the world anymore, it's easier to keep watch over him in the US then in other country
If Dems go full retard all it will happen is that space mom will take over

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:10:28 UTC No. 16461262

>>16461108
Shotwell disagrees, therefore you are wrong.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:15:13 UTC No. 16461265

https://apolloinrealtime.org

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:33:54 UTC No. 16461280

another starlink launch coming up

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:45:23 UTC No. 16461286

>>16461262
>salesman says magic is real
sir this is the science board

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:49:42 UTC No. 16461294

>>16460141
>>16460134
>>16460151
>>16460155
>>16460164
>>16460170
not so fast touch chuddies

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:52:29 UTC No. 16461296

>>16461112
>remove all reference frames
>heh as you can see my velocity is now zero
>looks like you lose universe

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:57:56 UTC No. 16461303

https://x.com/PopCrave/status/1852778392640442503
>Olivia Rodrigo reveals that a guy wanting to go to space is a red flag for her:
>“This is a very oddly specific question that I ask guys on first dates. I always ask them if they think that they would want to go to space. And if they say yes, I don’t date them. I just think if you wanna go to space, you’re a little too full of yourself. I think it’s just weird.”
how could spacex solve this problem?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:59:36 UTC No. 16461308

>>16461303
Red flags aren't real.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:00:06 UTC No. 16461310

>>16461303
Colony Drop

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:01:00 UTC No. 16461312

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:01:05 UTC No. 16461313

>>16461294
>tactile controls are back
>photo of an old car with a cd drive

That's weird, if they were back you could get some more recent examples.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:02:02 UTC No. 16461315

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:02:21 UTC No. 16461316

>>16461294
>>16461313
It's an ad for her book.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:03:03 UTC No. 16461318

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:03:40 UTC No. 16461319

>>16461303
This is a very oddly specific question that I ask latinas on first dates. I always ask them if they think that they would want to go to mexico.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:04:05 UTC No. 16461322

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:04:43 UTC No. 16461323

>>16461316
>It's an ad for her book.

I wonder how many people read it on a screen

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:05:06 UTC No. 16461324

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:06:08 UTC No. 16461327

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:07:09 UTC No. 16461328

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:08:23 UTC No. 16461329

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:09:09 UTC No. 16461330

lil bro is gonna post the entire 2 hour video :skull:

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:09:24 UTC No. 16461331

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:10:26 UTC No. 16461333

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:11:28 UTC No. 16461334

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:11:33 UTC No. 16461335

>>16461310
so true

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:12:12 UTC No. 16461336

>>16461257
Thotwell is NOT a true believer. Just listen to any of her talks when she's not explicitly been given talking points by Elon. She doesn't care about going to Mars and doesn't think it's a good idea.
He keeps her around because she's a competent business manager and follows his orders.
Too many contrarians vastly overestimate her importance just to sound sophisticated and dunk on Elon.
Without his direction it's well and truly over. SpaceX will just become an extremely competent version if boing, which will shift over 50 years into a typical low competency too-big-to-fail business as the driven people retire.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:12:30 UTC No. 16461337

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:12:34 UTC No. 16461338

>>16461330
yeah this faggot is always spamming webms he's stolen from somewhere

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:13:32 UTC No. 16461340

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:14:50 UTC No. 16461342

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:15:37 UTC No. 16461343

Is that a spam?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:15:40 UTC No. 16461344

>>16461296
>remove all reference frames
>only way to do that is by destroying the universe
I support this endeavor.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:15:51 UTC No. 16461345

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:19:45 UTC No. 16461347

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:20:46 UTC No. 16461349

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:21:58 UTC No. 16461350

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:23:08 UTC No. 16461351

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:23:09 UTC No. 16461352

>>16461294
Boomer cope

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:23:24 UTC No. 16461353

>>16461343
Yes? But also nice webms.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:25:19 UTC No. 16461354

>>16460931
fuck gleba

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:26:48 UTC No. 16461355

>>16461329
Why do they look different? Some bells have separated flow and some don't?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:26:56 UTC No. 16461356

>>16461350
>that one raptor on the right shitting itself
$5 that's the raptor they were worried about that was mentioned during the diablo call

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:27:49 UTC No. 16461357

>>16461330
Based

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:28:39 UTC No. 16461358

>>16461354
Skill issue.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:28:50 UTC No. 16461359

>>16461337
Kino

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:29:51 UTC No. 16461360

>>16461343
No, you are obligated to watch each one or you go on the no mars list

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:30:19 UTC No. 16461362

>>16461355
the coating on the inside changes the emissivity, so some of them wash out the sensor and in some of them you can just barely see the detail of the throat of the engine

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:32:20 UTC No. 16461364

>>16461356
Almost looks like engine rich exhaust

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:39:54 UTC No. 16461369

>>16461337
>have you ever seen fire in zero-G, it comes at you in waves, it's beautiful

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:52:20 UTC No. 16461380

Give me a detailed rundown on how to effectively dome over a crater

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:53:59 UTC No. 16461382

>>16459856
already happened at least once or twice on the shuttle, NASA is obviously very hush-hush about it though
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/01/solving-a-nasa-mystery-why-did-space-shuttle-commanders-lock-the-hatch/#gsc.tab=0

>>16460245
>>16460257
>>16460260
>>16460278
>>16460293
>>16460651
FUCKS SAKE JANNY, DO YOUR JOB
too many tourists in /sfg/ right now, it used to be much harder for oneguy to derail half a thread with obvious trolling

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:59:15 UTC No. 16461385

>>16461380
Seran wrap.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:02:11 UTC No. 16461388

>>16461382
I forgot about that story, wild.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:03:56 UTC No. 16461392

>A human trying to land a propulsive rocket would probably never work.
works in KSP

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:09:02 UTC No. 16461396

>>16461382
>obvious trolling
There's no way this guy's just trolling
Who would spend all day every weekend arguing points they don't believe

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:09:30 UTC No. 16461397

>>16461382
how have i never heard of this before

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:09:56 UTC No. 16461398

>>16461382
declaring report is a bannable offense
you aren't a mod, easily triggered robot mommy autist
clean your room or the PPO/TRISH will put you in time out

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:14:16 UTC No. 16461400

>>16461398
I will note that he didn't announce a report, he simply said that he thought this guy was breaking the rules
totally different

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:19:36 UTC No. 16461405

how much benefit does Musk have in Trump winning

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:20:48 UTC No. 16461408

Is it not obvious? Why does this get asked literally every thread?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:23:30 UTC No. 16461412

What is not obvious?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:24:08 UTC No. 16461414

>>16461408
People always just answer "it's obvious"
We never get an answer

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:24:20 UTC No. 16461415

>hurr we don't need to worry about Mars extremophiles or other dormant microbes because we have "le immune system"

microgravity and cosmic radiation make your immune system shit itself
how do we keep the Mars crew from fucking dying of disease
medical and sanitation protocols, quarantine, etc

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:24:51 UTC No. 16461416

you may only reply to me by via the (you) system

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:25:04 UTC No. 16461418

>>16461405
That would depend on how nuclear Trump goes with China. You know Musk has a whole ass factory complex there.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:29:35 UTC No. 16461422

>>16461415
Keep your habitats clean, proper nutrition, exercise and innoculation

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:31:32 UTC No. 16461423

>>16461422
so you're saying I won't be able to just deficate publicly wherever I please?

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:32:50 UTC No. 16461425

>>16461405
>how much benefit does Musk have in Trump winning

How much does Elon benefit by not having an openly hostile admin running the country? Are you a progressive leftist by chance? I ask because you seem to be incapable of critical thought.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:33:40 UTC No. 16461426

>>16461415
what a fucking retard

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:38:35 UTC No. 16461432

can someone post the starship slave trade image

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:38:55 UTC No. 16461433

>(You)

I accept your concession, autist qq manbaby.
Maybe next time don't even bother replying at all.
It makes you look like an idiot.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:41:30 UTC No. 16461436

>>16461219
>suit design is old 60's era absolute garbage

wcyd

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:45:21 UTC No. 16461440

>>16461436
you're retarded. The problem is its a universal design rather than being tailored for an induvidual person's body.
SpaceX suits are tailored for the individual body like in the 1960s.
Universal suits are 80s tech. They are necessary for extraterrestrial colonization but are very hard to make work.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:53:59 UTC No. 16461444

Either disaster and stagnation or a new golden age of spaceflight

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:55:24 UTC No. 16461446

HOLD HOLD HOLD

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:55:27 UTC No. 16461447

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:58:38 UTC No. 16461449

>>16460797
also the planetary protection faggot who thinks they're going to have 6 hour decontamination cycles in the airlocks on mars

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:59:46 UTC No. 16461450

>broadcast ended
Starlink is finished

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:03:00 UTC No. 16461453

>>16461446
>>16461450
Its almost amazing most people here don't even care to watch the world's best rocket launch in clear weather, on a Sunday, and land on a barge which is pure rocket lover's joy.
/sfg/ is dead, we only talk about Trump and fake sci-fi imaginations of the future now. Sad!

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:03:56 UTC No. 16461455

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1853179387819999471

New virtual town halls on the 4th and 5th

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:05:45 UTC No. 16461458

>>16461453
I only watch manned flights, RTLS or rare missions.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:06:22 UTC No. 16461459

>>16461453
We have all witnessed Starship launches and can no longer be satisfied with Falcon 9.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:06:24 UTC No. 16461460

>>16461455
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1853178776466657299

Someone ask technical details about starship

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:10:34 UTC No. 16461466

>>16461453
I personally love these boring, routine launches with no fanfare or commentary and watch them whenever I can. I'm clearly in the minority however, sad indeed.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:11:42 UTC No. 16461468

>>16461449
you mean a 20 day quarantine and no, not the airlock but rather a designated and sealed off section of the ship

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:12:24 UTC No. 16461469

>>16461460
don't click, furry porn

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:15:21 UTC No. 16461471

>>16461453
Falcon Launches have become so routine, watching them has started to smell of train autism.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:19:43 UTC No. 16461475

>>16461471
Train autism would be watching them in person and trespassing when necessary to do so, tracking boosters and engine serial numbers and then having a photo blog of all of this that nobody reads except other autists.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:20:22 UTC No. 16461477

>>16461471
But you probably still tune in for shit like ULA, Rocket Lab, and various other irrelevant agencies launching their gay shit.
I know Starship prototypes are way more tits than Falcon 9, but still their workhorse is the envy of the whole fucking world, and so is the payload. And us nerds get to see a beautiful rocket perform flawlessly, live, with occasional observations.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:23:14 UTC No. 16461479

>>16461471
They're still much more interesting than the average expendable launch.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:24:12 UTC No. 16461480

>>16461477
ISRO launches are highly entertaining because of the NARMAL guy. MHI launching H3 in a few hours.

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:29:59 UTC No. 16461482

Elon fucked over SpaceX by associating with this nigger

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:30:54 UTC No. 16461483

Shenzhou 18 successfully detonated

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:31:56 UTC No. 16461485

>>16461480
I cant watch Indian webcasts unless I am drunk and high, just for the comedy. But yes, they have entertainment value, its just the audio and visual assault on my senses triggers me in a bad way.
I admire Japan, but their webcasts suck too. The country that perfected cameras should put on a better show, with the views. Link to stream when its on, although the H3 is kinda 20 years ago in tech

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:40:59 UTC No. 16461492

this rapidly reusable concept deserved more funding
could it be scaled


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Kp63-an2ts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzIO15CHAOs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cre2Yp0P3u8

Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:41:14 UTC No. 16461493

>>16461382
>>16461397
why isn't this in the shuttle iceberg?