🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:33:24 UTC No. 16481946
Flight 6 - edition
previous >>16479564
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:35:52 UTC No. 16481952
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDGlydZ
12h 20min to go until official strem starts
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:37:11 UTC No. 16481956
>>16481951
She will be lucky to catch up to new shepard cadence
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:39:09 UTC No. 16481959
>>16481946
i just woke up! i am so excited to watch the starship flight 6 today!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:39:52 UTC No. 16481961
>>16481959
don't jinx it nigga
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:41:13 UTC No. 16481963
Looks like Musk's plan of democratizing space access is going well. These threads are chock full of normal faggotry.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:41:51 UTC No. 16481964
>>16481959
didnt you say that yesterday
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:51:23 UTC No. 16481970
another IFT ruined by rocketgirltroons.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:53:55 UTC No. 16481971
>>16481970
*OFT
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:56:00 UTC No. 16481974
>>16481970
how does it feel like being a faggot?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:56:53 UTC No. 16481976
Don't mind the rocketgirls, just stop trying to hit the image limit so soon. We're going to need it for later today.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:57:54 UTC No. 16481977
>>16481976
ideally the launch spam will stay in the launch thread
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:58:03 UTC No. 16481978
>>16481976
Tranime poster not avatar fagging challenge? Impossible.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:59:09 UTC No. 16481979
>>16481977
ERRM NO. That's the containment thread for the off board niggers. I will be staying here, as always.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:59:53 UTC No. 16481980
>>16481976
Jannies will just make this a sticky, or let us make another thread before page 10
iirc the unspoken rule anyways was either page 10 OR image limit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:00:01 UTC No. 16481981
>>16481979
>containment thread for the off board niggers
so you'll fit right in
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:00:21 UTC No. 16481982
>>16481978
get a trip already, loser
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:00:43 UTC No. 16481983
>>16481980
every recent launch they stickied the launch thread not /sfg/
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:02:11 UTC No. 16481988
We gonna have a launch thread or do ya think they'll just sticky this
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:03:04 UTC No. 16481989
>>16481976
Ok last one. Good luck superheavy!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:03:24 UTC No. 16481990
>>16481988
I have one prepped just waiting for the right time
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:04:35 UTC No. 16481993
>>16481985
Cool. So is the thread to talk about politics since most of Elon posts are about it? No you faggot.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:05:02 UTC No. 16481994
>>16481984
he's getting fatter and fatter
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:05:10 UTC No. 16481995
>>16481990
Noice
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:05:50 UTC No. 16481996
>>16481994
obvious projection. put the fork down tubby.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:06:19 UTC No. 16481997
>>16481993
Spaceflight is politics
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:07:49 UTC No. 16481999
>>16481996
This u?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:13:48 UTC No. 16482006
>>16481949
ass2ass was dropped in favor of dolphin sex
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:16:43 UTC No. 16482008
>>16481984
Wouldn't it be hilarious if we got Flight 7 or 8 before he could even finish editing his video for 5?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:18:04 UTC No. 16482010
>>16482008
the shift from v1 to v2 makes me think we will have a longer period of time again between 6 and 7, since drumpft wont be in office yet. partially because its a whole new design, and partially because muh loicense change.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:22:58 UTC No. 16482013
>>16481959
you're not funny
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:28:18 UTC No. 16482017
>>16481956
Ain't even gonna hit Atlas V + Delta IV cadence.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:42:49 UTC No. 16482028
>>16481984
he said he is going to stop making videos about starship lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:44:20 UTC No. 16482030
>>16482028
his descent into irrelevance is fantastic to watch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:46:49 UTC No. 16482032
>>16482028
he wont, all these EDS content makers will milk the EDS crowd dry for money. they will all continue making videos as long as they rake in views and advertizer money.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:48:33 UTC No. 16482035
Only spacetuber I watch is Scott Manley
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:49:20 UTC No. 16482036
>>16482035
TROON. NATIVE.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:50:33 UTC No. 16482037
>>16482036
yet a troon native is more manley and succesfull than any of you, he has a high paying job, is a smalltime celebrity, has many fruits of knowledge, and has bred his wife to produce multiple children.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:51:15 UTC No. 16482038
>>16482036
idk what that means
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:55:06 UTC No. 16482039
THIS TIME WE WILL HAVE DAYTIME LANDING!
WE WILL SEE EVERYTHING!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:56:24 UTC No. 16482040
>>16482039
You people shouldn't be allowed to watch this flight. Your enjoyment should be stripped from you because you trap us in a rogget world when we could be developing other spacefaring tech.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:04:49 UTC No. 16482042
there's an orbital re-light right? i need a reason to tune in.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:05:44 UTC No. 16482043
>>16482042
yes
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:06:17 UTC No. 16482044
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJA
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:16:08 UTC No. 16482048
>>16482044
not space, not flight, not spaceflight
kill yourself slavshit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:22:11 UTC No. 16482053
Remember to report all the shitty scam streams
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:24:48 UTC No. 16482055
>>16482053
reminder that ywnbaw
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:33:29 UTC No. 16482059
>>16482053
last time I noticed one of these because they were reusing old countdown footage. it was from a "spaceX" channel with a musical note instead of a checkmark, still had a couple hundred thousand subs so must have been hacked and renamed.
When T-0 happened it cut to AI elon asking for crypto that he would double and send back. the russkis doing this every time must make a killing.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:34:53 UTC No. 16482061
>>16481955
When did they add live chat to twatter?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:34:56 UTC No. 16482062
>>16482060
did you make this yourself?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:35:37 UTC No. 16482063
>>16482055
yawn ball?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:35:57 UTC No. 16482064
>>16482061
a while ago. i checked in to the a musk stream and i think i saw it at the time.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:36:57 UTC No. 16482067
>>16482060
you're a tranny, that's why
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:36:58 UTC No. 16482068
>>16482059
it's amazing that there's enough retarded people out there that this actually works.
they really think that musk man will magically double their shitcoins somehow, they don't even think to themselves "wait a minute, how does that even work?"
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:37:54 UTC No. 16482069
how many anons just woke up and are posting here? i pulled an all nighter because fucking mech lab bullshit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:38:06 UTC No. 16482070
>>16482060
it doesn't, you just think it does because you're a troon. also it's called starship, not starshit, petty namecalling doesn't make you sound less incoherent.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:38:54 UTC No. 16482071
>>16482053
How do you retards keep falling for those? Just subscribe to SpaceX' official channel on youtube and don't click on other shit, it's literally that easy.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:38:58 UTC No. 16482072
>>16482070
its obvious bait you dumb fuck
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:39:04 UTC No. 16482073
>>16482069
im still awake from yesterday because im an alcoholic, gonna crash sometime before the launch though.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:39:28 UTC No. 16482074
>>16482071
>SpaceX' official channel on youtube
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:39:59 UTC No. 16482076
>>16482071
spacex doesnt do youtube streams anyways. nobody here is falling for it, just the unwashed masses that check in every 1 or 2 years to watch.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:40:11 UTC No. 16482077
>>16482069
i was going to take my tractor exam this morning but realized my ID had just expired like a retard, so i have to get a new one lel.
starship flight 6 will console me while i dream of farming corn on mars.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:41:09 UTC No. 16482079
>>16482077
You'll never farm corn on mars fag. It infertile
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:41:12 UTC No. 16482080
>>16482072
baiting is a sign of parental neglect so taking things seriously and scoffing at mentally invalid people pretending to be retarded when they reveal they were merely pretending is the right thing to do.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:41:37 UTC No. 16482081
>>16482073
how many times have i told you to stop hitting the fucking sauce anon. im an insomniac also but jeez louise every time i hear from you, youre fucking crashing out because you downed a bottle of vodka or something
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:45:22 UTC No. 16482083
>>16482079
you're retarded, it can easily be made fertile with the addition of the right crop cycles and development of a proper mycorrhiza and soil culture.
with the right biological development and enough precipitation you can easily break open the nutrients locked up inside topsoil minerals and start rapidly generating the biological material for a humus layer.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:45:58 UTC No. 16482086
>>16482069
All-nighter for Russian exam. Test, sleep, launch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:47:39 UTC No. 16482089
>>16482086
ive got aerostructures exam tomorrow, so i kinda fucked myself but i needed to get this shit done. 100 slide presentations are just lovely dont you think? fucking hell. and none of it is even going to be physically done its just planning a project for NEXT semester and doing presentations explaining how you would do it IF it was this semester.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:47:47 UTC No. 16482090
>>16482086
what are ya studying? most of my russian aquantances are trying to get IT jobs so they can save up enough cash to get the hell out of dodge and escape to finland or germany.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:48:14 UTC No. 16482092
>>16482074
>>16482076
They post their flight trailers there.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:49:52 UTC No. 16482094
>>16482090
Studying Russian, not English. I am American
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:51:28 UTC No. 16482095
>>16482094
how much do you think they pay in electricity for this putinbot to post here?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:52:15 UTC No. 16482097
>>16482069
>>16482077
>>16482086
>>16482089
>>16482094
/SFG/ Studious Fellows General
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:52:50 UTC No. 16482098
>>16482095
if you want to be a NASA astronaut learning Russian is part of the qualifications you know.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:53:49 UTC No. 16482099
>>16482098
who in this general wants to be a NASA astronaut only please speak up
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:55:58 UTC No. 16482102
>>16482099
i am absolutely not going to bother with the NASA pipeline since they probably consider ebonics to be a more important qualifier than actual competence.
if i'd ever bother trying to become an astronaut, i'd go through the private pipeline.
also no need to deal with russians since cooperation with those snowgerians is pretty much at an end and again i'm not going through nasa.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:59:17 UTC No. 16482105
>>16481997
imagine the smell
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:59:35 UTC No. 16482106
>>16482102
"private pipeline" is just A- be a billionaire or B- Work for SpaceX
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:03:31 UTC No. 16482109
>>16482106
you make it seem like both are impossible.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:03:45 UTC No. 16482110
>>16482102
giving yourself child cancer and having issacman send you up is also an option ig
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:05:37 UTC No. 16482111
>>16482110
the best they did for the one that did get cancer was put her toy in space lmao.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:05:50 UTC No. 16482112
>>16482101
they fly now
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:06:57 UTC No. 16482113
>>16482106
pretty soon they're gonna be asking for commanders and pilots to fly thousands of starships, there's not enough rich people to do or want to do that amount of work, they're gonna need qualified people whether they're rich or not.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:07:25 UTC No. 16482115
I'm recreating the SLS on KSP and I find it's a really magnificent rocket. Compared to the starshit, I find it far more efficient, capable of handling a higher payload and it doesn't destroy local infastructure(using realism mod). Kinda like real life actually.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/18/
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:08:18 UTC No. 16482117
pre-emptive kek at anons give a (You) to above obvious bait.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:08:27 UTC No. 16482118
>>16482115
you are suffering from parental neglect and are looking to fill the hole left by the lack of you're parents' attention with negative responses online.
this is unhealthy behaviour and you should seek contact with a psychiatrist.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:09:41 UTC No. 16482122
>>16482060
Gruesome.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:09:42 UTC No. 16482123
Will booster reuse happen before SH V2?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:11:29 UTC No. 16482127
>>16482123
probably not, dont see why they would bother when each booster so far is a more advanced design, a relaunch wouldnt yield as much data as just launching the next one thats already been made anyway
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:11:31 UTC No. 16482128
>>16482118
I think you should consider your infactuation with the starshit and the way it illicits such emotive responses. I think it's a dangerous way of thinking considering today it'll explode during the first stage.
The SLS may not be reusable, but it will safely get the astronauts and payload to orbit. Reusable parts will ALWAYS compromise reliability.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:11:55 UTC No. 16482129
>>16482117
>>16482115
>look at me i'm pretending to be retarded haha
people were making fun of you for this 15 years ago and they're still going to do this now, pretending to be retarded is basically the same as actually being a retard.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:12:13 UTC No. 16482130
>>16482123
Probably not. The outer raptor QDs are probably fired after launch.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:12:29 UTC No. 16482131
>>16482126
they stuck it at the most vulnerable spot for a reason. if any plasma gets through its over for that banana
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:13:16 UTC No. 16482132
>>16482128
you should see >>16482129
merely pretending doesn't shield you from being an autistic moron too dumb to do social interactions the normal way.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:14:17 UTC No. 16482134
once again, I will attempt to have my coworkers watch the launch at nasa
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:14:49 UTC No. 16482136
>>16482130
Booster 12 was lowered onto the OLM and hooked into the BQD like an hour after the catch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:14:51 UTC No. 16482137
>>16482126
50%
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:15:33 UTC No. 16482138
>>16482075
SLS aka Scammy Ludicrous Sinkhole
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:18:57 UTC No. 16482141
>>16482136
Not the main QD, I'm talking about the outer engine ring, they have separate QDs for each raptor, they get started by the OLM. Once they get to Raptor v3, they'll be starting all 33 engines with the main QD. Which is probably going to happen in a few months when they finish the second launch pad.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:19:02 UTC No. 16482142
WE ARE GOING (to the scrapyard)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:20:14 UTC No. 16482144
>>16482134
You dont work at nasa
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:20:39 UTC No. 16482145
I farted
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:23:22 UTC No. 16482146
>>16482141
Do you think the first reuse will be a block 2 booster? i don't think block 1 will be able to interface with the new OLM. Regradless I saw no damage on booster 12 beyond the engine bell warping that excludes a block 1 from reflying.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:25:37 UTC No. 16482148
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:25:47 UTC No. 16482149
>>16482144
yeah, I do.
>for a contractor
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:29:45 UTC No. 16482151
>>16482146
All block 1 ships/boosters and all raptor 2s are prototypes/pathfinders. All the flights including this one have been focused on figuring out rapid reusability, and one of the main components is the launch infrastructure. The tower and launch pad are as important as the booster or the ship. And the main thing that is lagging and is the bottleneck is the launch pad. It doesn't matter if your booster can be re-flown if the pad isn't ready.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:33:02 UTC No. 16482152
Mega Mog Rocket
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:33:08 UTC No. 16482154
>>16482150
Easy yes.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:33:25 UTC No. 16482155
>nsf: 6 starship launch pads in florida
wtf
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:34:32 UTC No. 16482156
>>16482155
Supporting neocons is going to pay off.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:34:56 UTC No. 16482157
>>16482155
How is this surprising? Were getting 2 at Starbase, and KSC is the rocket capital of the world. If anything, Im surprised there isnt more going on there if they want 400 launches in 4 years.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:35:02 UTC No. 16482158
>>16482150
it only failed first time because the vehicle was facing the wrong way. if they can religth in atmosphere after reentry then they sure as hell can relight before reentry.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:36:12 UTC No. 16482160
>>16482155
SOON
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:36:41 UTC No. 16482161
>>16482160
My jewdar is going off
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:37:25 UTC No. 16482162
you know how planes have to be re-routed for launches out of florida? yeah im thinking that aircraft will now be banned from the area and it will be re-designated as a rocket-only flight corridor.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:39:09 UTC No. 16482164
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:39:28 UTC No. 16482165
>>16482162
National Sacrifice Zone
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:41:02 UTC No. 16482167
>>16482162
Why Can't they have an air traffic control tower at the cape and redirect planes live?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:43:18 UTC No. 16482171
>>16482161
then go back to /ptg/, kike
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:43:27 UTC No. 16482172
>>16482167
launches will be happening every few hours then multiple times an hour
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:43:38 UTC No. 16482173
>>16482165
Sounds racist
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:45:09 UTC No. 16482175
How long until launch?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:45:31 UTC No. 16482176
>half of an NSF steam is them answering pointless questions everyone already knows the answer to and half reading out names/thanking people/shilling merch
epic
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:46:15 UTC No. 16482178
>>16482175
4pm CT 2200UTC
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:46:57 UTC No. 16482180
>>16482176
why dont you submit a useful question then?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:47:20 UTC No. 16482181
>>16482178
>01:00
Motherfucker.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:48:31 UTC No. 16482183
>>16482180
I'll just copy and paste old stupid questions instead. Such as "Will they catch both Starship and the booster this time"?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:48:35 UTC No. 16482184
>>16482175
2 weeks
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:49:42 UTC No. 16482186
>>16482176
idk what you expected, 9 hours to launch.
they usually have pretty good guests on closer to launch.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:50:43 UTC No. 16482187
>>16482175
Postponed to tomorrow
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:51:17 UTC No. 16482189
>>16482186
>they usually have pretty good guests on closer to launch.
trump?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:51:35 UTC No. 16482190
>>16482187
this anon is lying don't listen to him.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:52:52 UTC No. 16482191
>>16482164
>JEWS ARE GOOD AKCHUALLY!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:54:58 UTC No. 16482192
>>16482150
we have a contrarian here
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:55:40 UTC No. 16482194
>>16482176
Why are you even watching NSF?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:56:04 UTC No. 16482195
What's the flight profile for IFT-6? How is it different from IFT-5?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:56:13 UTC No. 16482196
>>16482162
Or it will get so consistent that they are viewed like just another plane
>if you look out the left window you'll see two rockets landing and one launching
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:56:25 UTC No. 16482197
>>16482037
That's all very well but does he own a small plane? Unlikely
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:59:23 UTC No. 16482202
>>16482158
it didn't even fail the first time - they didn't attempt the relight because they couldn't control attitude, which meant that a relight could end up pushing it out of its fairly narrow reentry zone, or would have issues due to fuel slosh
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:00:37 UTC No. 16482203
>>16482181
Arab?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:01:05 UTC No. 16482204
>>16482203
Fucking mudslimes
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:01:07 UTC No. 16482205
>>16482203
Russian.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:01:57 UTC No. 16482206
16482191
spaceflight?
>>16482195
Inflight relight and a higher angle of attack during re-entry to stress test with the last V1 ship
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:02:08 UTC No. 16482207
>>16482195
It's going around the world this time.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:02:18 UTC No. 16482208
>>16482195
engine relight in space, booster starts entry burn later, more aggressive/fucked up descent/bellyflop angle of attack to stress flaps more
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:02:43 UTC No. 16482210
>>16482195
They're going to crash Starship into Tiangong
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:03:12 UTC No. 16482211
>>16482205
Pidor
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:04:01 UTC No. 16482213
>>16482205
What's the timeline for your new station?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:04:44 UTC No. 16482214
>>16482213
Fuck if I know.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:06:04 UTC No. 16482215
>>16482213
Any day now
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:08:04 UTC No. 16482218
>>16482172
air traffic controllers already control landings down to the second, so why cant they control a launch corridor the same way?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:08:17 UTC No. 16482219
>>16482214
You should know, though.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:15:04 UTC No. 16482226
>>16482215
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:15:22 UTC No. 16482227
>>16482214
>Russian on spaceflight general does not know what's happening with Russian spaceflight
very shameful, desu
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:16:25 UTC No. 16482229
>>16482210
>"Sir, a second Starship has hit the ISS"
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:16:52 UTC No. 16482231
>>16482195
Mostly similar except
>slightly modified booster catch
>Starship engine relight during coast
>more aggressive re-entry profile for Starship to test the limits
>large strips of tiles removed from the sides of the ship
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:17:09 UTC No. 16482233
>>16482227
Russian spaceflight is shameful. I imagine its not very spiriting to continue to look at the downfall of your countrys dominance of space to the absolute fucking disgrace it is now. I sure as shit wouldnt pay attention to russian spaceflight if I was a russian.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:17:22 UTC No. 16482234
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/202
Starship is as loud as 10 Falcon 9s
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:20:36 UTC No. 16482238
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:20:47 UTC No. 16482240
Space Force Spacex link up when?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:23:02 UTC No. 16482244
Wait wtf we’re getting an in-space relight here
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:23:19 UTC No. 16482245
>>16482240
space force doesn't do anything
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:24:35 UTC No. 16482249
>>16482191
nobody was talking about jews, now fuck off back to your shithole tourist.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:27:04 UTC No. 16482252
>>16482227
there's not much happening with russian spaceflight.
this place is a shithole, i don't discount the chance that we forget how to build and launch soyuz at this rate.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:27:27 UTC No. 16482253
>>16482195
>The next Starship flight test aims to expand the envelope on ship and booster capabilities and get closer to bringing reuse of the entire system online. Objectives include the booster once again returning to the launch site for catch, reigniting a ship Raptor engine while in space, and testing a suite of heatshield experiments and maneuvering changes for ship reentry and descent over the Indian Ocean.
>Starship’s upper stage will fly the same suborbital trajectory as the previous flight test, with splashdown targeted in the Indian Ocean. An additional objective for this flight will be attempting an in-space burn using a single Raptor engine, further demonstrating the capabilities required to conduct a ship deorbit burn prior to orbital missions.
>Several thermal protection experiments and operational changes will test the limits of Starship’s capabilities and generate flight data to inform plans for ship catch and reuse. The flight test will assess new secondary thermal protection materials and will have entire sections of heat shield tiles removed on either side of the ship in locations being studied for catch-enabling hardware on future vehicles. The ship also will intentionally fly at a higher angle of attack in the final phase of descent, purposefully stressing the limits of flap control to gain data on future landing profiles. Finally, adjusting the flight’s launch window to the late afternoon at Starbase will enable the ship to reenter over the Indian Ocean in daylight, providing better conditions for visual observations.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:31:59 UTC No. 16482262
>>16482240
Starshield is already a thing.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:36:28 UTC No. 16482269
so is hydrolox dead in the water tech now?
The specific impulse is good but the space requirements are too much I think
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:39:03 UTC No. 16482274
>>16482269
BO is going to give it a shot, remains to be seen if it works out
Nova from Stoke also has a hydrolox upper stage
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:39:47 UTC No. 16482276
>>16482269
People are still making LH2 upper stages for who knows what reason
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:43:01 UTC No. 16482282
>>16482274
Arianespace as well, it seems SpaceX is the real exception
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:43:55 UTC No. 16482284
>>16482282
Ariane 6 is irrelevant
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:45:22 UTC No. 16482287
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18588
>>16482281
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18588
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:46:22 UTC No. 16482289
>>16482281
>flap melts through every time
>remove tiles
>make it even hotter
huh! alright
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:46:47 UTC No. 16482290
>>16482287
>hopefully flies in about 2 more weeks times 25
9m is not wide enough, unlucky
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:47:02 UTC No. 16482291
>>16482289
finding the limits, it makes sense
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:51:48 UTC No. 16482296
>>16482178
I was wondering why no one was talking about the launch on twitter, I didn't realise it was so late (for me)
>>16482215
Does any of that exists outside of promo images and powerpoint slides?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:53:34 UTC No. 16482297
>>16482252
I'm fairly sure that's already happening.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:53:44 UTC No. 16482298
>>16482296
yep, afternoon launch so the starship landing in the Indian ocean will be daylight
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:54:51 UTC No. 16482300
>>16482281
>faster/harder booster catch
33 engine suicide burn combat landings
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:55:22 UTC No. 16482301
I'm hyped for this flight, but it's got me thinking about the next ones. 7 will be full orbital, right? How long before the first payload?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:58:00 UTC No. 16482303
>>16482036
>>16482037
native? you guys need to slow down. I can't find that on google or urban dictionary
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:59:47 UTC No. 16482305
>>16482131
>they stuck it at the most vulnerable spot for a reason.
to sell it on the web store
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:01:12 UTC No. 16482309
Would the steeper reentry on Starship actually help with the current burn through issues?
Every Starship seems to have been fine in peak heating only to get wrecked when getting deeper in the atmosphere with less heat but much more dynamic pressure.
Would the higher speed bleed-off in the upper atmosphere help with decreasing dynamic pressure later or would it be insignificant?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:01:55 UTC No. 16482310
>>16482301
>7 will be full orbital, right?
if the engine relight works then that would make sense
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:02:55 UTC No. 16482313
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:05:17 UTC No. 16482317
>>16482313
it's going to be a complete hull loss with trump there isnt it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:06:43 UTC No. 16482319
Another dumb and lying article on spacenews about SpaceX on spacenews
https://spacenews.com/dont-let-trum
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:07:24 UTC No. 16482320
>>16482281
the flaps dont survive this reentry. screencap this.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:07:29 UTC No. 16482321
>>16482319
these so yjacks must shut the fuck up, lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:09:58 UTC No. 16482325
>>16482319
>>16482321
buy an ad
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:11:42 UTC No. 16482326
>>16482319
>If President-elect Donald Trump and techno-oligarch Elon Musk get their way, NASA — one of America’s crown jewels — may become a glorified contracting agency.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:12:15 UTC No. 16482327
>>16482281
cant wait to see 'faster/harder' applied to this kind of thing >>16481969
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:12:59 UTC No. 16482329
So Shotwell said they make 50~ Starlink sats a week. How many do they currently have stockpiked? Because they're obviously launching more than 50 a week.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:13:23 UTC No. 16482330
>>16482287
i wish humans could launch like rockets do
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:14:14 UTC No. 16482331
>>16482329
>stockpiked
stockpiled
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:14:40 UTC No. 16482332
>>16482281
The timeline on the website still describes a 22 second landing burn (flight 5 was 24 of which 7 were at plaid deceleration). Is it going to be faster faster or two seconds faster because two seconds is a nothingburger.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:23:11 UTC No. 16482338
>>16482253
>The ship also will intentionally fly at a higher angle of attack in the final phase of descent, purposefully stressing the limits of flap control to gain data on future landing
What's the use case?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:25:16 UTC No. 16482342
>>16482338
Combat deployments
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:28:40 UTC No. 16482343
>>16482342
for seizing FAA head quarters
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:29:16 UTC No. 16482344
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:29:38 UTC No. 16482345
>>16482343
Hello mr kike
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:30:09 UTC No. 16482346
>>16482338
Lunar return.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:30:22 UTC No. 16482347
>>16482338
https://youtu.be/YMStlHBhJ3E
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:30:29 UTC No. 16482348
>>16482326
Isn't that what it is already
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:31:08 UTC No. 16482349
>>16482326
>may become a glorified contracting agency.
It mostly is that now anyway.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:33:17 UTC No. 16482350
>>16482338
Pushing it as far as they can, so that they know how much it can get away with
>well it survived landing A, can it survive B?
>it fails
And then they know the safety margin is somewhere between A and B
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:33:50 UTC No. 16482351
>>16482319
Did spaceguy5 write this article?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:36:27 UTC No. 16482352
>>16482351
Yes lol
This article is nothing but a plea to congress to "please don't cut my job uwu"
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:36:42 UTC No. 16482353
Does sfg stand for superkike fellating general? You all seem to worship Kikelon
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:37:14 UTC No. 16482354
>>16482351
NASA has zero competancy
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:42:48 UTC No. 16482357
>>16482352
>Congress can
>Congress could
>Congress could
>Congress could
what a terribly written paragraph
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:49:01 UTC No. 16482359
>>16482352
Even if this happens, SLS will still never fly men to the Moon. A cadence of once every three years means 2033 at the earliest for Artemis 4. Orion heat shield may fail again on Artemis 2. Starship will be flying well over 100 times per year by then
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:50:33 UTC No. 16482361
>>16482319
> Peter holds a bachelor’s degree in political science and international relations from Carleton College in Northfield, Minnesota, as well as a master’s degree in security studies from Georgetown University. He lives in Falls Church, Virginia with his goldendoodle pup, Buddy, and can often be found watching Minnesota Twins baseball, visiting the National Air and Space Museum, or listening to the music of Taylor Swift.
Okay.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:55:32 UTC No. 16482363
>>16482361
He has a substack https://substack.com/@pmjuul
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:57:20 UTC No. 16482364
>>16482351
The same way they haven't demonstrated the technical competence to connect rural areas to satellite internet
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:58:18 UTC No. 16482365
>>16482348
yes, but it's okay when boing or locksneed do it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:58:47 UTC No. 16482366
>>16482361
>his goldendoodle pup
>or listening to the music of Taylor Swift
This monsieur engages in the French vice, right
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:59:56 UTC No. 16482369
>>16482289
>flap melts through on the hinges
>remove tiles in places other than the hinges
you're not a very smart man, are you?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:02:21 UTC No. 16482370
>>16482369
Those were separate points faggot
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:02:22 UTC No. 16482371
>>16482363
One might think his analysis of SpaceX is being colored -- or in his case coloured -- by his politics.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:02:23 UTC No. 16482372
>>16482361
>Washington swamp creature
DC has consistently and overwhelming voted democrat in every presidential election since it gained the right to vote in 1961
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:03:38 UTC No. 16482373
>>16482345
back to /pol/
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:04:23 UTC No. 16482377
>>16482372
DC is populated entirely by theatre kids. The entire place is like a king's court, with the web of drama extending to hundreds of thousands. They're either gay or secretly gay
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:08:24 UTC No. 16482381
>>16482370
the point is that you're retarded because removing tiles won't make the hinges (where burnthrough happened) any hotter, like you claimed.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:10:59 UTC No. 16482383
>>16482381
But I didn't claim that at all, dumbass
Point one: hinge burns through every time, might be a risk with higher heating
Point two: they removed half the tiles down the middle, might be a risk with higher heating
I'm sorry the way I formatted it originally was too difficult for you to understand
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:12:24 UTC No. 16482384
>>16482372
because its a majority black shithole
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:13:58 UTC No. 16482386
>>16482377
ironic that the most popular presidential candidate in DC was Nixon at 22% of the vote
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:15:49 UTC No. 16482389
>>16482331
>>16482329
they lie about the real payload per falcon to investors.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:17:26 UTC No. 16482392
>>16482202
a failure to attempt due to something else failing is a failure. Challenger failed its mission because it blew up before attempting it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:19:13 UTC No. 16482394
>>16482383
that was certainly a weird way of formatting it.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:20:47 UTC No. 16482395
>>16482392
>starship rcs fails
>raptor ignition sequence did not even get started
>this means that the raptor ignition sequence has failed
this is how retards are framing this, which is likely what he was talking about.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:28:15 UTC No. 16482401
>>16482352
lol this dude is desperate, lmaooo
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:33:20 UTC No. 16482405
>>16482404
more like soiguy5 kek
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:36:14 UTC No. 16482408
>>16482404
Which one of those is spaceguy5?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:37:54 UTC No. 16482411
>>16482410
come on, let's go!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:38:02 UTC No. 16482412
>>16482296
There's been hardware under construction at RKK Energia for the better part of a decade now. The pace should pick up when Moscow finally gets interested enough to start funding the project seriously
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:39:04 UTC No. 16482413
>>16482404
*OFT
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:39:30 UTC No. 16482414
>>16482412
>gets interested enough
that's not the problem, the problem is they dont have enough money and the money they do have gets grifted by their equivalent of middle management corruption.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:40:31 UTC No. 16482415
>>16482413
soft
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:43:04 UTC No. 16482419
>>16482281
I’m really worried about a harder booster catch profile while trump is present. Do you think a failed catch could sour their relationship?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:44:01 UTC No. 16482421
>>16482412
as they are now economically speaking there's no way they're going to spend much more on spaceflight, and that's only one of their bottlenecks, the main bottleneck is lack of experienced employees.
a lot of the soviet era guys have carked it and the younger replacements mostly left russia, they have a serious shortage of good engineers and what they do have are probably more incentivised to go into the MIC right now.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:45:52 UTC No. 16482426
>>16482419
Trump will want to distance himself from LOSER Elmo
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:46:51 UTC No. 16482427
>>16482404
Speaking of, why does spaceguy5 continually deny that SLS costs 4.1 billion per launch? He keeps talking like it's some made up number but that number came from paul martin the inspector general for nasa. Surely he realizes denying it makes him look like a total fool right?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:47:02 UTC No. 16482428
>>16482414
They've got enough money, and the budgets only get looted when the Tzar isn't paying attention. The core problem is that right now they really just don't care. That'll change. The ISS decommissioning will put the existence of the cosmonaut program at risk, which will be seen as an unacceptable blow to Russian prestige.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:50:03 UTC No. 16482430
>>16482419
well we can guarantee it's gonna land or blow up trying
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:51:47 UTC No. 16482432
>>16481946
If they don't destroy the tower this time around the whole thing is a failure
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:54:03 UTC No. 16482433
>>16482427
SLS costs 40 billion per launch because that’s how much the program costs and it only launches 1 time.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:55:18 UTC No. 16482437
>>16482287
>"Twice as powerful"
>Payload of nothing
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:55:24 UTC No. 16482438
is it true that the flight is today? Wasn't the last flight like 2 weeks ago?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:56:25 UTC No. 16482440
>>16482433
Actually it's 32 billion atm
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:56:25 UTC No. 16482441
>>16482438
It was in October anon.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:56:31 UTC No. 16482442
>>16482438
2pm pst
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:56:32 UTC No. 16482443
Can someone give me a qrd on why the last launch was seconds away from failure
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:57:26 UTC No. 16482445
>>16482440
Oh nevermind, pretty good deal then.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:57:38 UTC No. 16482446
>>16482443
Because it blew up in the Indian ocean ?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:58:01 UTC No. 16482447
>>16482443
Every fueled rocket is technically seconds away from failure
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:58:56 UTC No. 16482449
>>16482443
for a rocket, 1 seconds is the same as 10 years
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:59:16 UTC No. 16482450
>>16481946
OMG hahaahahaha the chat of NSF is sending super chats with super long city names :D
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:59:45 UTC No. 16482452
>>16482447
old balloon skinned rockets didn't even need to be fueled to be seconds from failure
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:00:05 UTC No. 16482453
>>16482437
you made that second part up
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:01:52 UTC No. 16482455
>>16482443
From the Diablo stream:
>We had a misconfigured spin gas abort that didn't have quite the right ramp-up time for bringing up spin pressure," he explains. "And we were one second away from that tripping and telling the rocket to abort and try to crash into the ground next to the tower instead of [landing at] the tower — like, erroneously tell a healthy rocket to not try that catch"
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:02:33 UTC No. 16482456
>>16482453
There has never been a payload of starship
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:03:07 UTC No. 16482458
>>16482455
Thanks.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:03:29 UTC No. 16482459
>>16482455
wow
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:03:44 UTC No. 16482460
>>16482338
The beaver has a video where he talks about this.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:03:49 UTC No. 16482461
>>16482443
There was an incorrect check for abort conditions, so it nearly aborted instead of doing the catch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:04:08 UTC No. 16482462
>>16482456
Will this Starship have a payload?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:04:22 UTC No. 16482463
>>16482453
There has never been a payload on a starship
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:05:09 UTC No. 16482464
tfw when Elon launches a cyber truck with starship
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:05:41 UTC No. 16482465
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-d
>Super Heavy's Sonic Booms | Explained
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:05:51 UTC No. 16482467
>>16482437
>200 ton payload
>nothing
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:05:59 UTC No. 16482468
>>16482464
First payload will be your mom
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:06:52 UTC No. 16482469
>>16482468
Not until 18m Starship
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:06:52 UTC No. 16482470
>>16482427
It's supposedly $2bn per launch for everything (logistics, facilities, Orion integration etc). The lowest possible cost projected is $500m after several Artemis missions but that's according to Boeing's extremely sketchy numbers.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:07:45 UTC No. 16482473
>>16482463
Starship's payload bay is full of our Love.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:07:56 UTC No. 16482474
>>16482463
False it brought up 40T of air
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:10:05 UTC No. 16482476
>>16482470
Nah its 4.1 billion, paul martin the inspector general revealed that in a house subcommittee meeting last year.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:10:45 UTC No. 16482477
>>16482463
and that is irrelevant to it's payload capacity, so there is not point to your post whatsoever.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:11:59 UTC No. 16482480
>>16482467
What is 1 million divided by 200, and is that a reasonable way to colonize another planet?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:13:39 UTC No. 16482484
>>16482481
The moon look fake
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:13:40 UTC No. 16482485
the two other pictures from >>16482479
are over 4mb
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:13:44 UTC No. 16482486
>>16482481
Holy fucking shit how is it bigger than the Moon??
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:14:36 UTC No. 16482488
>>16482486
>HLS landing attempt obliterates Earth's natural satellite
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:14:39 UTC No. 16482489
>>16482479
lol... is he still salty about not flying to the moon
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:14:54 UTC No. 16482492
>>16482419
If anyone knows about risking failure and how to come back from it, its Trump.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:15:49 UTC No. 16482497
>>16482490
is that a tacoma?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:15:51 UTC No. 16482499
>>16482494
For flying, dumbass
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:15:55 UTC No. 16482501
>>16482474
and 9000 tons of awesome
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:16:00 UTC No. 16482502
>>16482486
It's not. jesus frank
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:16:06 UTC No. 16482503
>>16482490
Why are pedophiles at the SpaceX launch
Can someone please identify this person?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:16:06 UTC No. 16482504
>>16482494
IDing and mowing down ULA snipers from the skies.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:17:11 UTC No. 16482507
>>16482503
I'm heading there
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:17:45 UTC No. 16482508
>>16482494
They use the prop wash to scare away boaters.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:18:54 UTC No. 16482510
>>16482494
soi soi soi soi soi soi soi soi soi
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:19:23 UTC No. 16482513
>>16482503
What do you have against pedophiles?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:19:48 UTC No. 16482514
>>16482494
CAS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:20:11 UTC No. 16482515
>>16482494
Look at the paint job. White with red stripe is USCG. Looks like their H-60.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:20:14 UTC No. 16482516
>>16482510
Lel
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:22:06 UTC No. 16482519
>>16482480
It will be 1000 starships every two years, or at least 200,000 tons of payload. Ten years after the first full fleet there will be 1 million tons of payload on Mars.
That's probably not anywhere close to enough to support 1 million people, but it's not clear what fraction of resources will be ISRU. It could really be anything between 0 and 100%
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:23:44 UTC No. 16482520
>>16482494
Stage -1
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:24:33 UTC No. 16482521
>>16482419
>Booster fail and crash on Trump
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:25:03 UTC No. 16482524
Eliminate the tower
How many drones would it take to supper a hovering super heavy
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:25:10 UTC No. 16482526
>>16482486
1000 cubic kilometres mate
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:25:41 UTC No. 16482527
>>16482521
It will miss and graze his other ear.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:25:46 UTC No. 16482528
>>16482519
>first full fleet
The future is so bright I need a welding mask to look at it without going blind
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:25:57 UTC No. 16482529
how early is too early to bake the launch thread?
the boys are already getting hyped over on /pol/ because trump is there and no one wants them coming here.
Was gonna wait until an hour or two before the SpaceX stream starts but that might be too close.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:28:38 UTC No. 16482531
>>16482519
>it's not clear what fraction of resources will be ISRU
It will change from 0% to 100% over the course of the project. I don't know if you've worked with machines much but they're mostly dumb mass. It might be that pretty early on the ships are filled with computers and motors, and Martian industry is mostly Martian by mass. Like, within the next decade.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:29:04 UTC No. 16482533
>>16482529
4h?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:29:38 UTC No. 16482534
>>16482529
Yeah not right now, give it some time
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:30:17 UTC No. 16482537
>>16482529
Better early. I say go for it. We already have tourists here.
Fuck I just realized the OP is about flight 6. Which one of you retards did that?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:32:00 UTC No. 16482540
Huh, so it turns out today is also the international men's day.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:32:06 UTC No. 16482541
>>16482535
They should plant a forest of tall trees on the starbase facing side of the town.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:34:33 UTC No. 16482542
>>16482538
Starship is none of these [math]\unicode{x1F639}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:35:04 UTC No. 16482543
>>16482519
>It will be 1000 starships every two years
The minimum energy Hohmann window is only open for about a month. Pretty ambitious to try and push 1000 Starships thru that keyhole.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:35:09 UTC No. 16482544
>>16482535
a hurricane is not louder than a 200 decibel rocket launch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:35:17 UTC No. 16482545
>>16482287
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18588
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:36:18 UTC No. 16482546
>>16482542
it will be, soon
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:36:44 UTC No. 16482548
>>16482546
Just two weeks in fact
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:37:19 UTC No. 16482551
>>16482544
did it say that retard? more serious
and they are way more serious
some loud noises are not an issue whatsoever
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:38:30 UTC No. 16482553
>>16482545
200tonnes of orbital refilling means how many flights to refill a Block 3 ship?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:39:09 UTC No. 16482554
>>16482553
Sixteen flights
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:39:11 UTC No. 16482555
>>16482545
3x saturn thrust is wow insane
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:39:47 UTC No. 16482556
>>16482544
A few thunderclaps a day would be annoying but it’s not a real issue.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:42:38 UTC No. 16482558
>>16482556
its going to be non-stop thunderclaps at the cape
and the people that have a problem with it should move
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:43:07 UTC No. 16482559
>>16482386
pretty sure Obama got like 98% of the vote there
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:43:24 UTC No. 16482560
>>16482543
Yeah, that's why I think the target launch rate is going to be fucking insane. Starship needs to be able to prevent boil off over several months anyway, so there's no reason to think they can't stage in orbit for a month or two, but that's still 1000 launches and between 5 and 15 times more fueling flights in, say, 90 days.
That's somewhere between a launch every 8 minutes and a launch every 20 minutes.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:43:52 UTC No. 16482561
https://x.com/wheel_stop
doko? she made good OC, sadge
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:43:54 UTC No. 16482562
>>16482558
The cape was literally established from undeveloped land to be a launch site. Anyone living there in 2024 complaining about rockets is a stupid fuck
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:44:59 UTC No. 16482563
>>16482481
I saw this huge moon on Friday morning. Always neat when it does that.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:45:56 UTC No. 16482565
>>16482494
Anyone who runs is a ULA sniper
Anyone who stands still is a well disciplined ULA sniper
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:46:41 UTC No. 16482567
>>16482503
just because someone likes fumos doesn't mean he's a pedophile.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:47:00 UTC No. 16482568
>>16482562
yep, yet they still do
these retards need to be explicitly ignored and told to fuck off generally speaking NIMBYs need to be ignored a lot more than they are now
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:47:02 UTC No. 16482569
>>16482560
The simple answer is that we won’t get 1 million tons to mars by 2050. Not on starship at least.
And that’s just fine, if it takes mars until 2150 to be completely self supporting it’s just not that big of an issue. As long as we get the ball rolling while we can.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:47:13 UTC No. 16482570
>>16482565
Only fuck the ones that cough.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:51:36 UTC No. 16482572
>>16482554
you're retarded, it's only 5 flights
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:54:48 UTC No. 16482573
Do you think Trump will announce his pick for NASA administrator at Starbase?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:55:13 UTC No. 16482574
>>16482569
Just divide the time required to ready a flight on one launch mount by the required time between launches to get the number of launch mounts.
If they can get the time between launches to, for example, 4 hours, they'd only need 30 OLMs, but they'd need to be doing everything like clockwork.
Given that it's SpaceX I think they could do it, but what about all the hardware that's supposed to be on the Starships? Getting all the Mars hardware ready at those rates at the same time is hard to imagine.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:57:54 UTC No. 16482576
>>16482559
i forgot to say republican candidate
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:58:58 UTC No. 16482578
>>16482573
If Starship performs nominally, he will nominate Kathy Leuders. If it blows up, he will break up with Elon and nominate Bob Smith of Blue Origin.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:59:13 UTC No. 16482579
>>16481959
anon please stop cursing it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:59:32 UTC No. 16482580
>>16482574
you could stage hardware in orbit for relatively long time and then start the refueling operations when the Mars window starts coming up i.e. first launch a bunch of mars bound starships, then refill them later
the later you wait until the actual window opens up, the less boiloff and the less launches you need
but perhaps there will be some permanent orbital propellant infrastructure or something that has near zero boiloff which can be refilled continuously between the mars windows
you could have multiple zero-boiloff orbital stations with all kinds of extra infrastructure that wouldn't make sense to put on a tanker or a mars bound ship to minimize the boiloff
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:02:47 UTC No. 16482582
launch hype!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:03:27 UTC No. 16482583
>>16482560
That ends up being a daily launch and land rate larger than Heathrow. Not going to happen.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:05:11 UTC No. 16482585
>>16482481
Why is the moon so frayed in the upper half? Did some escaped engine rats get to it?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:08:35 UTC No. 16482587
Just realized, if the re-light works then isn't Starship basically operational?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:08:44 UTC No. 16482588
>>16482583
Elon willing, you will eat those words.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:09:47 UTC No. 16482589
Flight 6: A Farewell to Arms
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:09:53 UTC No. 16482590
>>16482585
either that or its a nice exposure of the terminator
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:09:58 UTC No. 16482591
>>16482587
They’ll probably start flying real payloads on flight 8. mayyyybe starlinks on flight 7, but I doubt it.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:10:01 UTC No. 16482593
Why aren't they catching Starship?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:10:03 UTC No. 16482594
>>16482587
they still need a working payload door
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:10:22 UTC No. 16482595
>>16482587
In expendable mode maybe, I'm still eager to see the upper stage catch.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:10:24 UTC No. 16482596
>>16482535
Unironically sonic booms will prevent spacex from launching as many times as they want
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:13:49 UTC No. 16482597
>>16482596
starship launches should be declared a matter of national security
no nimbyism here
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:15:39 UTC No. 16482598
>>16482596
Peacefully relocate those who interfere with SpaceX
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:15:46 UTC No. 16482599
>>16482596
This is a government problem and Elon recently solved for government problems
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:15:54 UTC No. 16482600
>>16482596
launch from the middle of the nevada desert or edwards AFB or something. they were booming sonically all day every day and probably still do a lot. or an island somewhere.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:16:56 UTC No. 16482602
>>16482599
FREE EARPLUGS FOR ALL!
NOISE CANCELLING HEADPHONES FOR THE MASSES!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:20:25 UTC No. 16482604
>>16482602
will the seals also be supplied with noise canceling headphones?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:21:34 UTC No. 16482605
>>16482594
That shouldn't be so difficult
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:22:17 UTC No. 16482606
>>16482594
>a fucking door
something about rocket science
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:22:42 UTC No. 16482607
>>16482604
whatever it takes to ensure the aural liberties of the people!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:23:37 UTC No. 16482609
>>16482594
the starlink door is pitiful. that will NEVER work for real customer payloads
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:26:32 UTC No. 16482611
>>16482605
They seemed to have problems with it, I have no idea what they are planning with bigger payloads
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:27:05 UTC No. 16482612
>>16482609
"You know what Starship customers really want?"
"Who cares?!"
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:27:24 UTC No. 16482613
>>16482596
bruh aint no way :skull:
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:27:40 UTC No. 16482614
>>16482572
there are 4 flights!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:28:32 UTC No. 16482616
>>16482596
Agreed. As a Brownsville resident I didn't consent to this and I'm sure a sensible judge will strike down """Starbase"""
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:29:37 UTC No. 16482617
It’s funny the straws starship doomers are forced to grasp at now that it’s abundantly obvious starship will succeed in every regard
>they can’t make mud door
lmao listen to yourself
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:29:45 UTC No. 16482618
>>16482554
It's ogre
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:30:10 UTC No. 16482619
fags
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:31:51 UTC No. 16482623
>>16482617
Oh right, there's no need for payload door because no payload will fit in there lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:32:18 UTC No. 16482624
>>16482612
F9 will never be retired for this reason.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:33:31 UTC No. 16482625
>>16482617
dude, you literally went from 1100 cubic meters to what 500? after the header tanks and ship stretch haha
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:34:23 UTC No. 16482626
>>16482609
their "Pez dispenser" door is only designed for their only guaranteed customer, themselves. Starlink will be the only commercial thing launched for many years.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:34:33 UTC No. 16482627
>>16482625
oh no only 500 cubic meters
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:36:10 UTC No. 16482631
>>16482608
really not a bad idea. but here what i think - i live right under a busy commercial flight path so there are often loud engines noises, sometimes it seems constantly, and they last for a couple minutes each. they can happen at any time of day or night, and are often loud enough to hear indoors.
With launches and catches you would know exactly when they are going to happen and could easily time them for using power tools or whatever you want if you dont want to hear them. I find that its the unknown loud noises that are the worst. if i can expect them then i dont feel as if im having my life controlled by someone elses shit.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:36:18 UTC No. 16482632
>>16482624
>SpaceX continues F9 operations with a skeleton crew and continues to mog the rest of the world with a legacy vehicle while launching several orders of magnitude more payload on Starship
I believe it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:37:36 UTC No. 16482633
>>16482628
They should so Musk can use it as a weapon against shitlibs next election.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:37:56 UTC No. 16482634
>>16482628
You can't just investigate a US citizen for merely talking to a foreign dictator
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:37:56 UTC No. 16482635
>>16482627
Not really that impressive when new glenn is going to have fairing around that size, especially with rocket of that size
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:38:26 UTC No. 16482636
>>16482626
That’ll free up a lot of f9 cadence and maybe drive its price down.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:38:28 UTC No. 16482637
>>16482631
My office is by an airport and the only thing that even gets my attention anymore are the fighter jets.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:39:43 UTC No. 16482638
>>16482635
>new glenn
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:39:52 UTC No. 16482639
I come up with rocket designs in my head and have made an entire rocket company and I day dream about being as powerful and succesful as Elon Musk.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:40:38 UTC No. 16482640
>>16482635
New Glenn isn't even going to fly.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:41:08 UTC No. 16482641
https://www.thespacereview.com/arti
>That disruption, she predicted, will come from Musk. “I think that the change that he is going to bring to this administration will be like nothing that we have seen before,” she said. “For those of you who like what has been happening, no judgement, but it’s probably going to change.”
>Pace agreed that Musk will play a major role in any potential reshaping of NASA. “People underestimate how mission-driven he is,” he said. “It’s his mission for Mars, humanity, and so forth, that really drives him and will push him really hard.”
> Musk, before the election, talked about launching five Starships to Mars during the next launch window in the fall of 2026. “If those all land safely, then crewed missions are possible in four years,” he wrote on X, the social media platform he owns, in September.
>Trump, during the campaign, appeared to endorse that idea. “We will land an American astronaut on Mars. Thank you, Elon,” Trump said at an October 24 rally. “Get that spaceship going, Elon.”
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:42:00 UTC No. 16482642
>>16482639
Bit gay that lad
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:42:09 UTC No. 16482643
>>16482635
what matters is cost to orbit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:42:34 UTC No. 16482644
>>16482628
As if they haven't been monitoring him constantly already under this corrupt administration. give me a fucking break
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:42:34 UTC No. 16482645
>>16482637
yeah they screech. i dont get used to it unfortunately because im a bit autistic that way, and also i live inawoods, so theres no other background noise, but it is what it is. sometimes the path shifts about 70 miles north due to the jetstream so they can be gone for days and weeks at a time. but yeah, if i knew when they were going to happen it really wouldn't be a problem for me at all and i'd probably enjoy the sounds. maybe that seems odd but oh well.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:42:38 UTC No. 16482646
>>16482640
you din’t think so? I figure it’ll be pretty successful by non-spacex standards.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:42:53 UTC No. 16482648
>>16482639
welcome to the club
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:43:40 UTC No. 16482650
>>16482641
man i hope so. i wonder if the inevitable dem tactic of nonstop indictment efforts will screw with any of this
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:44:00 UTC No. 16482651
>>16482643
That just cope considering starship is supposed to go to Mars. It has to be able to carry a lot
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:44:03 UTC No. 16482652
>>16482641
>During the panel, Garver asked if SLS and Orion would continue in the next administration. None of her fellow panelists, which included Autry, Pace, and others who worked in the Bush and Trump administrations, raised their hands. “Not as they are,” Pace said.
total SLS death
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:44:12 UTC No. 16482653
>>16482634
Yes you can, it's called the Logan Act.
>But but but you don't know if they negotiated anything!!!
That's the point of the investigation. Elon should release transcripts of his calls so the public can be certain he's not violating any laws.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:45:20 UTC No. 16482654
>>16482639
same except it's a turbine company
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:45:48 UTC No. 16482655
>>16482651
500 cubic meters is a lot
what payloads are going to be volume limited?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:47:07 UTC No. 16482656
>>16482655
people
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:47:34 UTC No. 16482657
>>16482632
Just shut up
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:47:39 UTC No. 16482658
>>16482653
remind me again how many people have been convicted under the logan act since it was signed into law in 1799
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:47:52 UTC No. 16482659
>>16482653
As an advisor to the President-Elect Elon is not subject to the Logan Act. They didn't get Flynn for that last time either and Elon isn't dumb enough to talk to the feebs.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:48:33 UTC No. 16482660
>>16482656
lol
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:49:19 UTC No. 16482661
>>16482653
>Yes you can, it's called the Logan Act.
Damn. I was not aware of this ancient law.
>>16482659
He has been talking to Putin for 2 years.
https://www.theguardian.com/technol
>WSJ reported that the conversations between the two men ranged from the personal to the geopolitical and included a request from the Russian leader not to activate his Starlink satellite internet service over Taiwan as a favour to the Chinese leader and Putin ally, Xi Jinping
If this is true he is in trouble
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:49:34 UTC No. 16482663
>>16482657
lmao seething
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:49:57 UTC No. 16482664
>>16482654
are you the original finnanon?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:50:11 UTC No. 16482665
>>16482553
13 to fully fill a stretched V3 Ship, which doesn't need to be fully filled to perform Artemis III
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:50:13 UTC No. 16482666
>>16482661
>He has been talking to Putin for 2 years.
...he's been launching Roscosmos cosmonauts into space for over three years, nobody gives a shit if he talks to nu-Rogozin's boss.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:51:13 UTC No. 16482667
>>16482661
anon do yourself a favor and learn why Taiwanese law blocks Starlink
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:51:13 UTC No. 16482668
>>16482661
>Say experts
Which means everything they say is direly suspect and politically motivated bullshit.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:51:31 UTC No. 16482670
>>16482664
No. Speaking of Finnanon where is he
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:52:05 UTC No. 16482671
>>16482641
Elon is just doing whatever he wants. This is truly his world haha
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:52:13 UTC No. 16482672
>>16482560
>Starship needs to be able to prevent boil off over several months anyway
The depot.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:53:15 UTC No. 16482674
>>16482652
I need to see this panel, this is a based panel wtf?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:53:39 UTC No. 16482677
>>16482661
>If this is true he is in trouble
Starlink is a private company and satellites over taiwan would be privately owned. It's not negotiating something that belongs to the united states government. It's like if putin called you and said don't start a lemonade stand in taiwan as a favour to xi jinping. It would only be suspect if putin tried to talk about DoD owned starlink or starshield.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:53:56 UTC No. 16482678
>>16482641
>That disruption, she predicted, will come from Musk. “I think that the change that he is going to bring to this administration will be like nothing that we have seen before,” she said. “For those of you who like what has been happening, no judgement, but it’s probably going to change.”
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:54:16 UTC No. 16482679
>>16482643
what matters is our plan
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:54:32 UTC No. 16482680
>>16482676
ultra monster, but its going to be very late so might skip that
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:54:38 UTC No. 16482681
>>16482673
Now sure how well the rocket will perform with Trump watching bros...
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:54:42 UTC No. 16482682
>>16482658
hint: the number of successful logan act prosecutions in american history is identical to the number of times blue origin has reached orbit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:54:55 UTC No. 16482683
>>16482598
behead those who insult spacex
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:55:04 UTC No. 16482684
>>16482658
>Bro you broke the law, you can't just kill someone!
>Nuh Uh!!!! That law against murdering people is really old!
lol
lmao
>>16482659
He was talking to Putin before that. Also not sure how DOGE falls under the law as it technically doesn't exist at all yet.
>They didn't get Flynn for that last time either
Because they already had him for lying under oath.
It's true it doesn't really matter for Elon now though. Trump with never prosecute him, and the dems have no power anymore. Law and order in the US is just a thing for poor people now.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:55:17 UTC No. 16482686
>>16482653
I guarantee you the Biden admin has been tapping his phone since day fucking one and if they had anything on him they would have charged him by now
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:55:50 UTC No. 16482687
>>16482319
https://x.com/GregWAutry/status/185
Musk responded (next post)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:56:51 UTC No. 16482689
>>16482687
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:57:23 UTC No. 16482690
>>16482676
mint oreos
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:57:23 UTC No. 16482691
>>16482684
>Trump with never prosecute him, and the dems have no power anymore. Law and order in the US is just a thing for poor people now.
And even if they do Trump can just pardon him.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:57:37 UTC No. 16482692
>>16482677
We simply don't know the content of the calls. Simple as that. Elon should release transcripts, or allow an investigation into the calls. It's the fastest way to put things to rest, and if he hasn't done anything wrong, it should be open and shut with transcripts.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:58:24 UTC No. 16482693
>>16482676
I'm fasting until Thursday...
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:58:51 UTC No. 16482694
>>16482689
KILL THE SLS KILL THE SLS KILL THE SLS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:59:21 UTC No. 16482695
>>16482684
I realize you lack critical thought and are told what to think by the media but chanting "Logan Act" over and over again does not magically make Elon speaking to Putin a crime.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:59:23 UTC No. 16482696
>>16482692
its not going to put anything to rest you dumb fuck, if he does that then Democrats are going to manufacture some other bullshit and whine about that
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:59:26 UTC No. 16482697
>>16482692
the fastest way to put things to rest is to do nothing while you fuck off, because you and the people you side with have no leverage to make demands of anyone.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:59:36 UTC No. 16482698
>>16482692
Nobody that matters cares
Hope that helps you on your way back because you need to leave
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:00:49 UTC No. 16482700
So I'm guessing Elon and Musk had planned to run together for a few years now? They only pretended to hate each-other?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:00:52 UTC No. 16482702
Do you think Starship will survive the stress test?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:01:43 UTC No. 16482703
>>16482676
Might pick up beer later
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:01:52 UTC No. 16482704
>>16482676
Monster
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:01:54 UTC No. 16482705
launch thread staged
>>16482701
>>16482701
>>16482701
>>16482701
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:02:03 UTC No. 16482706
>>16482700
i don't think so, both are known to be wildcards and somewhat unpredictable.
they both saw a great opportunity and knew that they had a common enemy.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:02:03 UTC No. 16482707
>>16482676
co co cola. feels good man
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:02:32 UTC No. 16482709
>>16482700
lmao
imagine thinking that both those egos can coexist
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:02:39 UTC No. 16482710
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:03:15 UTC No. 16482712
>>16482676
literally chicken tendies.
and orange juice.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:03:39 UTC No. 16482714
>>16482696
>>16482697
>>16482698
>So called "free thinkers" and "anti-government" NPCs when someone suggest their favorite billionaire shouldn't be above the law
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:03:41 UTC No. 16482716
>>16482709
so you're saying they will split apart? Also what's your source on Elon having a big ego?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:03:47 UTC No. 16482717
>>16482676
I got an import can of Monster Energy from Poland. I'll need it since the launch is at 1:00 for me.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:04:39 UTC No. 16482722
>>16482714
>Elon dick suck general sucks elons disk
Holy shit.... this cant be real.... no wayyyyy
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:05:38 UTC No. 16482729
>>16482700
Their goals align right now. When trump does something that's bad for mars, you'll see the break up start.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:05:38 UTC No. 16482730
>>16482714
the law has never been enforced because it's unconstitutional, just like the rest of the adams-era alien and sedition acts. you're a free thinker who's obviously very new to this thinking thing, welcome.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:05:58 UTC No. 16482731
>>16482676
liberal tears
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:06:06 UTC No. 16482732
>>16482692
Elon doesn't have a transcript, he's not the whitehouse. Before the secret service was revealed to be the secret circus, I would've told you elon's phone calls were wiretapped and recorded by several 3 letter agencies, now I'm not so sure they are competent enough for that anymore. But if you think starting an investigation is "the fastest way to put things to rest" you have the memory of a goldfish. Look at this fucking bible over nothing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muell
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:06:25 UTC No. 16482733
>>16482717
but the launch is at 11 Eurotime
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:06:51 UTC No. 16482735
>>16482700
>Elon and Musk
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:07:00 UTC No. 16482737
>>16482707
nice
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:07:28 UTC No. 16482739
>>16482730
This anon posted non stop about George soros in 2016. I guarantee it.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:07:51 UTC No. 16482742
>>16482700
If you follow closely you see that they’ve actually been working together for several years.
For example Musk uses electric motors from Elon’s cars to control the gridfins on some of his rockets.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:08:02 UTC No. 16482745
>>16482732
NSA is tapping everyone's calls since at least 2013 faggot. Of course if Musk is talking to Putin he is going to use some secure channel
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:08:23 UTC No. 16482747
>>16482733
So I was lied to? >>16482178
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:08:50 UTC No. 16482748
>>16482639
If it makes you feel any better, I pay for Amazon Prime.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:08:58 UTC No. 16482749
>>16482729
this pretty much
though its entirely possible that they stay aligned this 4 years and even later, people seem pretty enthusiastic about Starship and Musk already has a massive amount of clout/credit from X and the free speech thing
if he actually achieves something substantial with DOGE then that pile of achievements just grows, interests might bend towards what Musk wants just to keep him happy due to his effectiveness
he doesn't really require that much, most of the stuff seems to be just common sense things that most people should want
he isn't outspoken about the atheism/agnosticism for instance
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:09:02 UTC No. 16482751
>>16482739
i'm an anon who usually gets accused of being a communist and a tranny in this thread by idiot /pol/tards. from personal experience, i can say that you are stupider than they are.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:09:29 UTC No. 16482753
>>16482732
>Over nothing
So why did Trump need to pardon Michael Flyyn and Paul Manafort? Over nothing?
As much as I like poking hole in MAGA delusions, I'll stop now because it's off topic. But holy shit, you guys are a lost cause.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:09:52 UTC No. 16482756
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:10:02 UTC No. 16482758
>>16482635
>imagination rockets
space fantasy general
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:11:24 UTC No. 16482760
>>16482753
>why did it take a pardon to stop political prosecutions
rub those brain cells together, I know you have at least 2
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:11:36 UTC No. 16482761
>>16482758
>sfg behind on rocket news
I'm not even suprised.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:12:38 UTC No. 16482763
>>16482761
BLUE ORGAN
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:12:37 UTC No. 16482764
>>16482675
>Flight 6 liftoff thrust is ~7500 tons and mass is ~5000 tons.
vs Flight 3 (in the pic) liftoff thrust 7130 and prop loads are 4500 tons (I guess the Musk number has dry masses of the ship and booster there as well, the pic doesn't)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:12:39 UTC No. 16482765
>>16482747
https://nextspaceflight.com/
here it says 11
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:12:51 UTC No. 16482766
>>16482760
>Everything I don't like is a political prosecution!
Whatever you say champ!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:13:00 UTC No. 16482767
>>16482760
Don't bother, his kind are irretrievable.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:13:41 UTC No. 16482768
>>16482760
>Lie to the FBI
>Get caught
>This is political!!!!
Lol
lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:13:58 UTC No. 16482770
>>16482765
https://www.spacex.com/launches/mis
use the official source
>The sixth flight test of Starship is targeted to launch Tuesday, November 19. The 30-minute launch window will open at 4:00 p.m. CT.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:14:15 UTC No. 16482772
>>16482765
I live in GMT+3.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:14:28 UTC No. 16482773
>>16482749
reasonable take
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:15:34 UTC No. 16482774
>>16482716
its a common EDS talking point which I guess comes from the fact that he is audacious enough to even attempt the things he does
but they confuse the autistic first principles thinking and ambition with ego, these dont' necessarily have to be simultaneous
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:15:42 UTC No. 16482775
>>16482768
>>16482766
>>16482753
>I'll stop now because it's off topic
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:15:45 UTC No. 16482776
>>16482735
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:16:00 UTC No. 16482778
>>16482761
is it being static fired today?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:16:34 UTC No. 16482779
>>16482717
>Monster Energy from Poland
Is there something special about it?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:16:46 UTC No. 16482781
>>16482742
KEK
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:16:50 UTC No. 16482782
>>16482774
>its a common EDS talking point which I guess comes from the fact that he is audacious enough to even attempt the things he does
Also blunt enough to call industry leaders retards when they are.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:17:22 UTC No. 16482784
>>16482778
imagine if BO launched new glenn on the day of a starship launch and got totally overshadowed
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:18:12 UTC No. 16482786
>>16482784
like how starliner got overshadowed by ift-4? fortunate for boeing, in retrospect.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:21:27 UTC No. 16482789
>>16482779
No, I just live in Russia, and Monster Energy isn't sold here anymore due to sanctions. Although the cans from Poland are bigger. Full 500ml instead of 450ml like every energy drink here, even local pre-war Monster. Interestingly, Monster Energy is made by Monster Beverage, which also makes Burn, and that piss is still here.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:23:06 UTC No. 16482792
>>16482788
trump's so stupid he doesn't even know that you have to fly west from miami to get to boca chica
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:23:23 UTC No. 16482793
>>16482751
Oh, it's the retarded communist /pol/tard again.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:23:50 UTC No. 16482795
>>16482709
>muh ego
Childish and ignorant take. Trump is not egotistical, he's a narcissist, which is different. He always points at people around him and tells them they are great, so he can claim that he is great by association. He wants to be liked and loves having popular people around him. It's why he loves having Elon around. As for Elon, he's supremely autistic and has severe daddy issues. It's why he always tries to prove himself and outdo everyone. It's why Trumps father figure and approval is something he yearns for. Their mental issues feed off of each other.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:25:39 UTC No. 16482796
>>16482714
>"free thinkers" and "anti-government"
>favorite billionaire shouldn't be above the law
Why wouldn't someone who is against the government favor being against dumb laws in that government?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:27:46 UTC No. 16482803
>>16482545
Saturn V is 100 tonne to leo pver its lifetime SSv3 will be 20,000 tonnes over its life time.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:28:22 UTC No. 16482805
>>16482788
One day I will visit USA and do typical American shit.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:29:03 UTC No. 16482807
>>16482672
My thought is that Starship will need propellant to land on Mars and that it needs to carry that propellant to Mars and that the trip to Mars will take several months.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:29:30 UTC No. 16482808
>>16482795
Uhh did you just say Trump is Elon's daddy?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:30:29 UTC No. 16482810
>>16481980
that was never the rule you fagggot
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:34:18 UTC No. 16482816
>>16482808
He practically adopted him. Trumps granddaughter called him uncle Elon. And the other day he brought his new son to a MMA fight.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:35:02 UTC No. 16482817
>>16482810
Yes it is retard
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:35:33 UTC No. 16482818
>>16482768
>engineer a lie by asking sonething you are not privy to
>selectively prosecute
We get it, you are just angry the hush money trial is done.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:36:52 UTC No. 16482820
>>16482793
yeah not surprised he is a full on EDS democrat tranny as well lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:37:05 UTC No. 16482821
Weather does not look good...
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:38:13 UTC No. 16482823
>>16482818
nice
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:39:48 UTC No. 16482828
you'd think a guy that's aware that everyone hates him would find a different community to post in
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:40:05 UTC No. 16482830
GUYS ARE YOU FUCKING READY??
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:40:34 UTC No. 16482831
>>16482678
Don't think she's being salty. She's the one that wanted to replace constellation purely with commercial space.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:41:54 UTC No. 16482834
>>16482821
Soyuz has launched in worse weather
Americans need to toughen up
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:42:00 UTC No. 16482837
>>16482830
not yet
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:42:46 UTC No. 16482840
>>16482818
Mr Trump PLEASE we are so TIRED of all this WINNING!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:43:38 UTC No. 16482842
>>16482115
learn how to do TSTO reuse in KSP
boostback or flyback both work
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:45:58 UTC No. 16482847
>>16482843
That showerhead design is pretty obviously the V2/A4
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:46:08 UTC No. 16482848
>>16482843
That appears to be the world's first liquid rocket engine
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:46:38 UTC No. 16482849
>>16482843
not many engines made by people dressed like that so yes.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:46:49 UTC No. 16482850
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:47:05 UTC No. 16482851
>>16482843
yeah it say's right there, it's the Hodenverstümmelung
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:47:40 UTC No. 16482853
>>16482843
i had the chance to visit a museum which had a v2 and a v1, and could touch them etc. place was pretty small and nobody was there. was great.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:47:56 UTC No. 16482854
>>16482816
we are bringing back concept of adoptive emperors
we are so back
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:48:08 UTC No. 16482855
>>16482846
>Raptors exposed
>flaps up and back
>extra long second stage
>schizophrenic tile pattern
how fucking ugly is Starship going to be by the time physics is done with her
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:48:55 UTC No. 16482857
>>16482843
Comfy PJs on the workers there, I bet they work quickly
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:48:57 UTC No. 16482858
>>16482843
Even their engine looks fucking evil.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:50:18 UTC No. 16482859
>>16482855
Starship v7
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:50:20 UTC No. 16482860
>>16482848
It isn't. First liquid propellant flight engine was build and flown by Goddard in 1926.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:51:41 UTC No. 16482864
>>16482860
And here's one of 'em
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:53:38 UTC No. 16482867
>>16482860
They had a model of that too
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:54:45 UTC No. 16482869
>>16482858
oh hush
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:56:37 UTC No. 16482871
>>16482855
Physics is a harsh mistress
Rip to ssto space planes. Maybe on a terraformed mars
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:57:12 UTC No. 16482873
>>16482860
I mean that was tiny though. I would die on the hill that that's the first "real" one.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:59:16 UTC No. 16482874
>>16482843
Interesting uniform from the employees building this contraption. Pride in work!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:59:40 UTC No. 16482875
How to cope with the fact that the Br*tish made the first powered plane when all they did is took a German glider and put some engine on there.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:00:00 UTC No. 16482876
>>16482789
>even local pre-war Monster
can't believe that's a sentence people can say now, truly we live in interesting times.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:02:49 UTC No. 16482878
>>16482873
First turbopump engine innit?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:02:59 UTC No. 16482879
>>16482846
he's really rubbing it in tory's nose kek
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:03:48 UTC No. 16482882
>>16482875
America made the first powered plane
>>16482878
There's some reason I'm passionate that it's the first something, but I forget. Yeah maybe
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:04:19 UTC No. 16482885
>>16482858
>even
it doesn't, and that picture doesn't look evil either unless you're very vulnerable to social consensus fields
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:07:36 UTC No. 16482892
>>16482831
So why is she expecting people to be unhappy once the disruptions happen?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:08:58 UTC No. 16482898
>>16482892
because projects will get cancelled, oldspace will lose money, people will get laid off
its in the name, disruption
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:09:10 UTC No. 16482899
All due respect anon why are you posting your museum pics NOW of all times?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:10:26 UTC No. 16482902
>>16482899
Nta but gotta do something to kill three hours
I should do the dishes but I don't wanna.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:10:45 UTC No. 16482903
>>16482898
Who is her audience with that comment? It sounds like a win for taxpayers.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:10:50 UTC No. 16482904
>>16482899
nta but i understand why he would pick a moment of heightened /sfg/ activity to post cool rocket museum stuff he saw.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:11:50 UTC No. 16482907
>>16482903
its just stating a fact
if SLS gets cancelled, a bunch of people are going to be upset
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:12:06 UTC No. 16482909
>>16482805
Like what, shooting the school?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:13:02 UTC No. 16482911
should I drink a monster? its 9pm here
yes/no
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:13:16 UTC No. 16482913
>>16482907
Good, fuck them.
Can't wait to see spaceguy5's tears when SLS is canceled.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:13:39 UTC No. 16482915
>>16482911
Drink coffee, like a real man
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:13:50 UTC No. 16482916
>>16482882
>America made the first powered plane
okay I'll bite
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:13:52 UTC No. 16482917
>>16482899
i like it, kind of like a quick review of where it started before we see where its headed. a celebration of rockets of yore and ye olde engineering. Werner would love what's happening now.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:14:15 UTC No. 16482918
>>16482911
yes
t. fellow eurobro
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:14:43 UTC No. 16482919
>>16482916
why don't you know this
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:14:59 UTC No. 16482920
>>16482878
nta and dunno. Did Goddard's engine a turbopump
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:15:52 UTC No. 16482922
>>16482921
She's prostituting herself for hydrolox.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:16:25 UTC No. 16482924
>>16482911
You're not going to sleep anyway.
My cock is ready. (not for you anon, in case you're wondering)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:18:20 UTC No. 16482927
>>16482920
Nope, pressure fed.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:18:20 UTC No. 16482928
>>16482915
This, energy drinks are poisonous crap.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:18:57 UTC No. 16482929
>>16482899
Just came back from Munich, and decided this was a day worth waiting 900 seconds to post on /sfg/ since it's launch day.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:20:45 UTC No. 16482933
>>16482929
but that should just be the first post if you have cookies
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:24:38 UTC No. 16482936
>>16482921
sleeping
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:24:47 UTC No. 16482937
anyone else notice that alot of the nsf guys have long hair and look effeminate?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:25:09 UTC No. 16482939
>>16482934
musk and Trump chillin in the highbay
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:26:34 UTC No. 16482941
It wasn't that long ago that tower sections were first being rolled out and assembled, and the idea of a booster catch still seemed ridiculous.
>>16482937
It's in our water.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:27:19 UTC No. 16482942
>>16482937
What else would you expect from stream trannies
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:28:01 UTC No. 16482944
>>16482933
Yes it was just the first post.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:31:11 UTC No. 16482946
>>16482944
How do you think they cut things like this in half for display? Must be pretty hard to hold all the odd shapes in place, keep internal edges from splintering, make sure anything that was disassembled before cutting lines up properly, etc.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:32:45 UTC No. 16482948
>>16482921
thinking about (you)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:33:01 UTC No. 16482950
>>16482946
waterjet
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:35:35 UTC No. 16482953
>>16482951
https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/statu
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:35:40 UTC No. 16482954
>>16482951
Thank you, Mr. President
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:35:50 UTC No. 16482956
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:36:23 UTC No. 16482957
>>16482946
lightsaber
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:36:54 UTC No. 16482960
>>16482735
The year of Julius and Caesar
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:37:24 UTC No. 16482962
>>16482951
a breath of fresh air
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:37:59 UTC No. 16482966
>>16482960
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQo
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:39:53 UTC No. 16482970
>>16482957
that makes sense
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:45:50 UTC No. 16482979
>>16482965
i didnt realize that starship was so small
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:47:06 UTC No. 16482986
>>16482911
i am drinking orange jews instead in honor of richard feynman
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:50:24 UTC No. 16482992
>>16482951
>>16482953
Based. How do you think the Trump admin which will most like defer to Elon on space policy will reform NASA?
I think it would be best to get out of the launch and rocket design industry entirely. Fire all the useless DEI employees and turn NASA into a tech startup style skunk works. Elon has figured out launch and figured out funding via starlink, but the government is better positioned. I think they should handle things the market does poorly. Put as much money into R&D of novel technologies as possible that can be licensed to the space industry (with some profit going to the engineers responsible to make it attractive vs private industry). They need to go all in on nuclear, Nerva, any ambitious research like fusion, plasma magnet sails, spin gravity, materials science. Stuff that won’t return a profit next quarter or possibly ever, but will help the industry in the long term. They need to go all in at the cape and create as many pads as possible. Use eminent domain to clear out the area around Boca Chica. And they need to take the lead on manned space flight, astronaut training, etc, and take the fall when humans inevitably die, as that’s when the anti Elon anti space push will be the most hysterical. They should work with university student teams around the country, take advantage of starship’s massive lift capacity to make as many cheap deep space probes as possible that don’t need mass autism. They should give seed funding to new space startups, and give a contract for a new massive LEO station that tests things like spin gravity, plus massive deep space telescopes and telescopes on the dark side of the moon.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:51:26 UTC No. 16482996
>>16482979
actually the image is meant to show that it is large
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:52:24 UTC No. 16482997
>>16482992
Most of that is already implied by canceling SLS, which is reliant on Trump beating up the Senate more than anything Elon can ask for directly. I think most of what Elon wants is a fair shot - no bullshit discrimination against his companies for contracting, no red tape for launch so he can do 3x a day for Starship.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:53:05 UTC No. 16483000
>>16482761
Sorry, sweaty. I don't stay up to date on the goings on of fantasy land. Real rockets are cool than cheap fantasy.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:54:08 UTC No. 16483001
>>16482979
>>16482996
starship is fairly medium sized
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:54:15 UTC No. 16483003
>>16482761
/sfg/: Groundsit General
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:54:40 UTC No. 16483004
>>16483001
No it's super duper
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:55:09 UTC No. 16483005
>>16482979
if parliament tower and big ben ever launched into space it would be a big deal. Starship is more of a big deal when you think about it because the houses of parliament could not even consider trying to catch it again.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:56:13 UTC No. 16483009
>>16483005
they would be too busy trying to arrest the person that launched it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:56:27 UTC No. 16483010
>>16483001
The eiffel tower is very very small compared to Mt everest and starship is mediocre compared even to that yooge structure.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:56:27 UTC No. 16483011
>>16482997
I agree, Elon doesn’t even need much help, just for the gov to fuck off and get out of his way. But I think this is a great opportunity to make sweeping reform. Honestly good ideas generated ITT could get implemented if someone tweeted at him because he’s so online. Ideally we should reform NASA to be far more ambitious, pick up the slack on stuff Elon doesn’t have the time to focus on like habitats and nuclear reactors. If NASA even became half as useful as SpaceX per dollar spent, we’ll explore the stars decades ahead of schedule.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:56:55 UTC No. 16483012
test
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:57:28 UTC No. 16483014
>>16483009
at least they'd get another reason to have a bonfire and burn an effigy
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:58:27 UTC No. 16483015
>>16482805
Why would anyone want to gain 500 lbs?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:59:09 UTC No. 16483017
>>16482953
it's weird, normally you'd expect such a massive, ambitious, and spectacular display of engineering prowess would be praised and paid attention to by the president, but it's only happening now, biden really did everything in his power to shove anything elon related into a little corner and pretend it didn't exist, even though artemis damn well relies on it.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:59:16 UTC No. 16483018
>>16482911
Just hit 2100 here, I'm going to crack one open
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:59:32 UTC No. 16483019
>>16482992
NASA should focus on science which would include launching humans to the moon and mars as well (they are effective at gathering shit and so on)
but they should not create launch vehicles, they aren't very good at it
not sure if they should even research novel propulsion systems, they seem kind of shit at it
but maybe if they actually did it, greason had some ideas about reforming the system
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:00:04 UTC No. 16483021
>>16482901
Trump looks like he pulled some pantyhose on his head to rob a gas station
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:00:45 UTC No. 16483022
>>16483018
just cracked one and its 10pm now, I might have fucked up
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:00:56 UTC No. 16483023
>>16483019
all the great novel ideas for propulsion have been researched
they were testing functional nuclear rockets and ramjets in the 50s/60s.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:01:38 UTC No. 16483024
Always brings a smile to my face to see how humiliated our loval EDStroons are
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:02:38 UTC No. 16483027
>>16483015
I want to drive down long Texan roads in a large vehicle, stop at those gas station restaurants to eat pancakes and drink doctor pepper. Also drive with airboats in the swamps.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:02:58 UTC No. 16483028
>>16482830
I will be in about 2 hours
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:03:44 UTC No. 16483029
>>16483011
Reactor dev typically goes under DoE, and Trump's pick for Secretary of Energy is a pro-nuclear guy.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:05:02 UTC No. 16483032
>>16483023
there are still novel propulsion ideas that haven’t been truly tested. Like solar sails, antimatter rockets, and tape outgassing drives.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:05:12 UTC No. 16483033
>>16483022
Caffeine always makes me sleep if I'm tired
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:05:13 UTC No. 16483034
>>16483023
yes, and they were SUCCEEDING, and then their funding got cut.
just bring it back again, and release it to american companies once it's mature enough as a concept.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:06:13 UTC No. 16483035
>>16483023
then test the not "great" ones then
or delete the agency if they have no reason to exist
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:06:14 UTC No. 16483036
>>16483028
2 hours?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:06:19 UTC No. 16483037
>>16483027
>stop at those gas station restaurants to eat pancakes
Ameriburger here, don't eat gas station food unless you want to also experience the American pastime of five-figure hospital bills. Only buy packaged food from gas stations. If you want to enjoy pancakes just stop at like Ihop/Waffle House/Denny's or some other breakfast diner.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:07:42 UTC No. 16483040
>>16483034
true
tory ii-c did a full power test in 1964 successfully
then they decided a nuclear ramjet wasn't needed anymore
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:08:08 UTC No. 16483042
>>16483036
two more hours
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:09:06 UTC No. 16483044
>>16483041
no better way to spot a poser than if they have a NSF mission patch and not an Official SpaceX one
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:09:27 UTC No. 16483047
>>16483042
What the fuck did they push it back?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:11:17 UTC No. 16483049
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:11:30 UTC No. 16483050
>>16483043
just imagine a low flying nuclear ramjet dropping nuclear bombs as it travels on it's unstoppable path
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:12:20 UTC No. 16483052
>>16483036
>>16483042
0.59523809523 two weeks
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:14:01 UTC No. 16483053
>>16483043
Unfortunately many of them were canceled for not being worth it with the compute resources we had at the time.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:15:49 UTC No. 16483057
>>16483050
Double the size and let's try again with present tech is my proposal.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:17:54 UTC No. 16483059
>>16483047
> Sci anon
> Confused by time zones
So many cases. Sad.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:21:10 UTC No. 16483063
Eurobros what's the gameplan tonight?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:22:36 UTC No. 16483066
>>16483063
Monster cracked open, fuck it we ball
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:23:39 UTC No. 16483067
>>16483065
who is this guy?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:23:49 UTC No. 16483068
>>16483032
>solar sails
will never be used except for some tiny meme probe to outer solar system. It's too expensive and complex to build in space, it has pathetic """propulsion""" and you still need to carry propellant to slow down
>antimatter rocket
>antimatter
lol lmao, come back when you have some
>tape outgassing drives
a meme invented to suck up pseud money
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:24:29 UTC No. 16483069
>>16483065
some 55min documentary about new space that is coming out january 3rd
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:24:46 UTC No. 16483070
>>16482789
Shouldn't you be doing vodka since you're in Russia
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:24:58 UTC No. 16483071
>>16483064
>“euroPean Reusable and cOsT Effective heavy lIft transport investigation” (PROTEIN)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:25:21 UTC No. 16483072
>>16483059
Was it an hour earlier yesterday? Maybe I didn't check the new time when they changed the date? How did I fuck that up, I need to reschedule my whole day
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:25:30 UTC No. 16483073
>>16483067
dude making movies
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:26:01 UTC No. 16483075
>>16483071
>PROTEIN delivery tube
so, a penis?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:26:05 UTC No. 16483076
Nuclear rockets are ultimately the way to go.
Can astronauts survive the acceleration provided by nuclear explosions?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:26:09 UTC No. 16483077
Fuck I Already forgot how I watched the stream last time when I don't even have a Twitter account.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:26:22 UTC No. 16483079
>>16483069
>more handmer kino
based
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:27:22 UTC No. 16483082
>>16483077
It's on the SpaceX website
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:27:36 UTC No. 16483083
>>16483081
nice shoop
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:27:44 UTC No. 16483084
>>16483081
I don't believe you
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:27:45 UTC No. 16483085
>>16483081
Fake. Kill yourself faggot.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:28:24 UTC No. 16483088
>>16483081
I shat myself
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:28:30 UTC No. 16483089
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:28:46 UTC No. 16483091
>>16483077
literally make a throwaway account using 10minutemail it'll take you 2 minutes.
gee i thought that's what everybody did, do zoomers just not know what throwaway emails are?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:29:06 UTC No. 16483092
>>16482946
They take the entire thing apart piece by piece, measure and mark up everything so it'll line up when reassembled, and cut each part with whatever tool is required for it. It's a mark of real craftsmanship that it ends up looking like it was sliced all at once.
You have to remember, only the most autistic and dedicated people in their field work in museums. Usually retirees with decades of experience, almost always volunteers. A lot of times, guys who actually helped build the thing back in the day will end up being the ones restoring it and getting it ready for display.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:29:35 UTC No. 16483094
>>16483091
most websites don't take throwaway emails anymore, and "legit" emails expect you to give your phone number. even cock.li might be getting shut down soon
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:29:46 UTC No. 16483096
>>16483081
failed troll, nobody believed you.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:30:26 UTC No. 16483098
why wont the try to land starship on australia coast
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:30:28 UTC No. 16483099
>>16483091
>do zoomers just not know what throwaway emails are?
Why would they? That version of the internet is dead
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:31:07 UTC No. 16483100
>>16483094
i haven't had that issue with any website, usually there's at least one source of throwaways that will work, pixiv for instance is a bit pickier.
but twitter? twitter will accept any email account as far as i've seen, and they don't ask for a phone number.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:31:34 UTC No. 16483101
>>16483098
Cuntbase could become a reality
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:32:18 UTC No. 16483103
>>16483081
I almost killed myself
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:32:19 UTC No. 16483104
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:33:35 UTC No. 16483107
when will they remove forward flaps lol
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:33:43 UTC No. 16483108
>>16483091
Just tried it but it doesn't work. Twitter detects it's not an actual email.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:34:08 UTC No. 16483111
>>16483098
Chinese spies.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:35:07 UTC No. 16483112
>>16483094
At least you can still buy a SIM card anonymously
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:35:20 UTC No. 16483113
>>16483107
t+50min give or take
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:35:23 UTC No. 16483114
>>16483108
well that's a you problem then, it still works fine for me every time an old one gets deleted and i make a new one.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:35:30 UTC No. 16483115
>>16483108
then just use your actual email?
and never post anything if you are worried about that
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:35:37 UTC No. 16483116
>>16483103
i did kill myself. damn it.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:35:56 UTC No. 16483117
Did they intentionally make the "banana for scale" way bigger than an actual banana?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:36:06 UTC No. 16483118
>>16483112
Here they shutting it down too next year
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:36:15 UTC No. 16483119
>>16483040
I think I know what to do with that hole
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:36:35 UTC No. 16483120
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:36:55 UTC No. 16483121
>>16483117
the cartoon banana is holding a real banana size banana
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:37:31 UTC No. 16483122
>>16483092
Pretty sure they can make jet engine cutaways without taking anything apart.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:37:49 UTC No. 16483124
>>16483117
retard. The containment thread for you lot is here
>>16482701
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:37:50 UTC No. 16483125
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yd
venting
prop load will start in like 30min >>16482235
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:38:03 UTC No. 16483127
>>16483069
I like Casey, hope to shake his hand some day
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:38:47 UTC No. 16483128
>>16483121
its a recursive banana joke. its bananas all the way down.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:38:50 UTC No. 16483129
>>16483123
so the containment works as intended, isn't that good
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:39:04 UTC No. 16483130
>>16483081
I'm killing myself even if this is fake
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:39:20 UTC No. 16483132
>>16483117
you should probably be in the launch thread.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:39:48 UTC No. 16483133
>>16483123
it shouldn't ought be
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:40:15 UTC No. 16483134
>>16483037
>don't eat gas station food unless you want to also experience the American pastime of five-figure hospital bills
don't be a pussy, everyone has to sit on the motel toilet for 6 hours straight at some point in their life.
and once you've paid the toll once you can enjoy all the gas station mexican food you want consequence-free.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:41:05 UTC No. 16483137
>>16483124
go back
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:41:53 UTC No. 16483139
Has Drumpf shown up yet?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:42:09 UTC No. 16483140
>>16483070
I honestly don't care for alcohol. I sometimes drink amoretto or Irish cream, but only because they have a good flavor, and even then I get quickly tired of the alcohol within them, so I can't stomach more than half a glass before the booze overpowers the sweetness. I've gotten drunk(-ish) only once by chugging half a bottle of wine for emergency relaxation and just to see how this shit works, and the buzz experience was not something I'd call enjoyable. It doesn't make you feel better, just feel less. Thankfully, I didn't experience a hangover yet, and I plan to keep it that way.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:42:34 UTC No. 16483142
>>16483121
It's too big
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:43:05 UTC No. 16483144
>>16483139
apparently still flying >>16483102
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:43:41 UTC No. 16483145
>>16483142
Not really. That's just a moderately large banana.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:43:46 UTC No. 16483146
>>16483140
Alcohol is degenerate anyway,.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:44:49 UTC No. 16483148
>>16483145
nigger that's the biggest thickest banana anyone has ever seen
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:45:06 UTC No. 16483149
>>16483142
for you
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:45:16 UTC No. 16483150
>>16483147
GLUCK GLUCK GLUCK GLUCK
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:45:54 UTC No. 16483151
>>16483142
Wrong, felon hires midget welders exclusively in order to make the rocket appear larger.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:46:01 UTC No. 16483153
>>16483148
Thickest? Perhaps. But length wise, it's pretty normal.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:48:00 UTC No. 16483155
>>16483142
a banana in the hand is worth 10 on the rocket
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:48:27 UTC No. 16483156
GO FOR PROP LOAD
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1858975
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:49:02 UTC No. 16483157
>>16483147
Man they're fucking seething
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:49:57 UTC No. 16483160
>>16483156
they using propellers this time? thats new
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:51:01 UTC No. 16483164
>>16483157
To be fair, that's pretty funny. Which is uncommon for modern Onion.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:51:54 UTC No. 16483166
>>16483157
elon cum guzzling muskovitch, hand of the putler
sucking on putins cock with stroking drumfp shaft and rimming him
(This is a parody)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:52:35 UTC No. 16483168
>>16483166
you're hired t: the onion
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:52:55 UTC No. 16483170
>>16483098
That is a future plan actually.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:56:03 UTC No. 16483179
>>16483157
kek that's a good meme. We're allowed to laugh at ourselves guys.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:58:06 UTC No. 16483187
>>16483179
The onion is gay, you get the airlock
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:00:27 UTC No. 16483192
15 minutes till broadcast start
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:04:11 UTC No. 16483207
>>16483137
To where you fucking retard
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:04:44 UTC No. 16483211
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:05:27 UTC No. 16483215
>>16483203
So what was the big deal all about?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:05:57 UTC No. 16483221
>>16483203
Not loud enough. I want to hear it from my house (thousands of miles away)
MAKE IT LOUDER
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:07:44 UTC No. 16483226
>>16483157
Reminder, Onion is owned by a billionaire that donates to Harris Biden campaign
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:07:52 UTC No. 16483227
>>16483215
All hairdryers and vacuums will require a license to operate.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:08:16 UTC No. 16483229
>>16483211
No. It's raining and it's 11pm
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:10:24 UTC No. 16483238
>>16483215
Nothing, they just did a study. Of course /sfg/ had a meltdown over it, but that's pretty standard for anything that doesn't come from elon or trump.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:10:52 UTC No. 16483241
>>16483157
sounds like you are
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:11:33 UTC No. 16483246
>>16483192
>link: copied
>stereo speakers: on and amplified
>go pee: coming soon
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:11:45 UTC No. 16483249
>>16483226
So true, it would be horrible to have a billionaire closely associated with a presidential candidate. Even worse if that billionaire owns a large media site. We should NEVER allow that to happen!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:11:50 UTC No. 16483250
>>16483242
That's in like 9 minutes
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:12:37 UTC No. 16483257
>>16483226
Very funny that it turned out none of these guys were anti establishment.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:13:03 UTC No. 16483260
>>16483250
get your bong ready!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:13:06 UTC No. 16483261
>>16483140
you had about the same experience i did, only time i really got buzzed was when i downed an entire bottle of champagne on new year's eve to see how it would feel.
i think that's how most autists deal with alcohol.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:13:45 UTC No. 16483263
>>16483257
Yep, they're pro-WEF establishment cult now
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:14:45 UTC No. 16483267
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDGlydZ
Stream staring in ~5 mins now
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:15:34 UTC No. 16483272
>>16481946
IT'S TIME TO PIN JANNIES
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:16:29 UTC No. 16483277
>>16483272
No, we pin the launch thread for tourists
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:16:36 UTC No. 16483279
>>16483272
and pin this one please
>>16482701
>>16482701
>>16482701
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:16:41 UTC No. 16483281
>>16483272
There's a launch thread. They can pin that for the tourists.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:17:08 UTC No. 16483284
>>16483272
not this one, the launch thread >>16482701
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:17:20 UTC No. 16483286
Elons live
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1E
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:18:18 UTC No. 16483291
>>16483286
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:18:23 UTC No. 16483293
>>16483286
>You send one bitcoin, you get two bitcoins
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:18:25 UTC No. 16483294
>>16483277
>>16483281
>>16483284
yes yes I saw it now, pin the other!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:19:22 UTC No. 16483298
>>16483286
ONWARD TO THE STARS
AND DOUBLED CRYPTO ASSETS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:19:43 UTC No. 16483300
>>16483286
FUCK YOU PAJEET SCAMMER
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:20:14 UTC No. 16483302
>>16483290
>only trump came
i figured more politicians would show up
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:20:30 UTC No. 16483305
>>16483286
holy shit I've doubled my bitcoin five times now!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:20:52 UTC No. 16483309
>>16483298
ELON BITCH BASTARD!
WHY DOGECOIN NOT GO TO MOON?
I INVEST ENTIRE VILLAGE FUNDS DO THE NEEDFUL ELON SAAR!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:20:55 UTC No. 16483310
>>16483302
this isn't a circus, not infinite space at the megabay
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:21:15 UTC No. 16483313
>>16483286
Nice now I'm raging.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:21:22 UTC No. 16483315
>Background scroll: on
>Autoscroll: on
>Bottom scroll: on
Ready for launch, roll call
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:21:59 UTC No. 16483323
X STREAM IS LIVE!
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDGlydZ
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:22:03 UTC No. 16483324
ELON YOU BITCH BASTARD
START THE BLOODY STREAM
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:22:05 UTC No. 16483327
>>16483027
Texas is kind of boring as far as landscape goes (I guess pilgrimage to Starbase is one reason to visit)
You want to go to western US and see the Martian landscape
>stop at those gas station restaurants
I remember stopping at two different gas stations and being blown away how 1:1 identical they were to one another.
Everything was literally the same except for cashiers. I mean the layout is always similar with franchises, but not to that degree. It felt like being trapped in a deja vu or some kind of time-vortex anomaly.
I don't know if you ever felt that way.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:22:08 UTC No. 16483329
>>16483290
GLUCK GLUCK GLUCK GLUCK GLUCK
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:22:09 UTC No. 16483330
>>16483305
you can only do it once per wallet, so dont go sending a small test amount to see if it works, send as much as you can because you only get one chance.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:22:14 UTC No. 16483331
We have muzak on official stream
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:23:20 UTC No. 16483335
>EDS tard projects his faggotry
Why is this so common among them?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:24:23 UTC No. 16483344
>>16483327
Go to big Bend if you want to see cool landscapes.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:24:25 UTC No. 16483345
>>16483335
who gives a fuck spacex is live
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:25:46 UTC No. 16483354
Fuck I poured too much rum into my eggnog and ruined it.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:26:32 UTC No. 16483360
>>16483358
she's so cute
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:26:42 UTC No. 16483367
>>16483354
>ruined it.
Nah man, you improved it.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:26:42 UTC No. 16483368
>>16483351
Remember to use picture in picture and then scale up the video
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:27:11 UTC No. 16483370
I have returned.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:27:31 UTC No. 16483371
>>16483365
B A N A N A S
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:27:42 UTC No. 16483374
>>16483354
add vodka
>>16483370
go back
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:27:44 UTC No. 16483375
Clear's live https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bj
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:27:54 UTC No. 16483378
>>16483365
based
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:28:08 UTC No. 16483380
>>16483368
god bless PiP and whoever invented it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:28:18 UTC No. 16483383
lil X in the background
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:28:24 UTC No. 16483384
>our flight paths are clear
CLEAR MENTIONED
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:28:55 UTC No. 16483386
>>16483368
firefox chads we can't stop winning
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:29:30 UTC No. 16483390
>>16483363
>tfw no SpaceX engineer gf
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:30:14 UTC No. 16483397
>>16483390
they wouldnt date a sfg elon shill chud
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:30:35 UTC No. 16483399
>>16483390
The real blackpill is that even if you met kate or jessie IRL, and did your best to express your love and devotion and tism to space flight and SpaceX—they would still know more than you. They would still make more money than you. They would think you're a loser
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:31:18 UTC No. 16483405
>>16483368
Why would I do that when I can just put the stream on my TV?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:31:23 UTC No. 16483408
>hundreds of ships built every year in starbase
>HUNDREDS
when?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:31:28 UTC No. 16483409
>>16483402
Based clearbro
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:31:30 UTC No. 16483410
>>16483402
Clear at the beach
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:31:30 UTC No. 16483411
>>16483384
why hasn't musk impregnated her yet???!?!??!
he's not a faker is he? he actually cares about the future of mankind, right?????
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:31:36 UTC No. 16483412
clear is so much better than those 3d pig foids
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:31:48 UTC No. 16483414
>>16483408
2 weeks
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:32:27 UTC No. 16483419
>starship every 8 hours
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:32:28 UTC No. 16483420
>one starship off the assembly line every 8 hours
>EIGHT HOURS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:32:39 UTC No. 16483423
>8 hours
what
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:32:41 UTC No. 16483424
eating clear banana
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:32:41 UTC No. 16483425
>>16483402
But there are currently no clouds at Starbase...
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:32:50 UTC No. 16483428
>>16483419
>>16483420
>sonic booms blowing out residents ears every 8 hours
Yay
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:32:58 UTC No. 16483431
>>16483419
>>16483420
>>16483423
Starship goes BRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:33:00 UTC No. 16483432
banana clear
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:33:13 UTC No. 16483433
>>16483420
>>16483423
The Model T of rockets.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:33:37 UTC No. 16483439
>>16483426
sovl
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:33:38 UTC No. 16483440
>>16483426
LMAO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:33:51 UTC No. 16483443
A 737 takes like 2 weeks to build
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:35:01 UTC No. 16483457
lol
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:35:05 UTC No. 16483458
>banana payload
SOVL
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:35:08 UTC No. 16483460
BANAN PAYLOAD
>stuffed
Nevermind, lame.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:35:15 UTC No. 16483462
Orbital bananas
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:35:33 UTC No. 16483468
>fake banana payload
Its OVER
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:35:39 UTC No. 16483471
>>16483452
Behold, V1's maximum capability to LEO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:35:39 UTC No. 16483472
>they approved the banana payload with the FAA
lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:35:59 UTC No. 16483474
>>16483461
>>16483463
Please please please please have an inside live view during re-entry
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:36:02 UTC No. 16483477
>average human is 2m high
bros...
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:36:30 UTC No. 16483484
>Starship can't carry any payload
What's your excuse now???
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:36:38 UTC No. 16483487
>>16483477
manlets literally don't exist to women
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:36:44 UTC No. 16483489
>>16483474
Funnier if they jettison it as a test.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:36:48 UTC No. 16483490
how many employees will they need if they want to produce a starship every 8 hours?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:36:54 UTC No. 16483491
>>16483469
Banana BETRAYED and TRAPPED in Starship's cargo bay for IFT-6
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:37:07 UTC No. 16483494
>>16483490
6 million
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:37:15 UTC No. 16483496
Launch theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U3
>>16483472
top bantz
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:37:31 UTC No. 16483499
>>16483490
Probably no more 20K with most things being automated.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:37:41 UTC No. 16483502
>>16483490
probably more than 9000
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:37:49 UTC No. 16483504
>>16483490
von Braun already solved that problem
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:37:51 UTC No. 16483505
https://x.com/Breaking911/status/18
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:37:51 UTC No. 16483506
>>16483472
IRL shitposting.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:38:19 UTC No. 16483509
>>16483490
No less than three.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:38:55 UTC No. 16483515
>>16483504
New Peenemünde, Texas (Formerly Brown Town).
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:38:56 UTC No. 16483516
>>16483505
Starbase is basically Elon's mar a lago
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:39:57 UTC No. 16483527
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:40:06 UTC No. 16483530
>all these losers simping for the hosts
Lol
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:40:15 UTC No. 16483532
>>16483505
>>16483516
>Mar A Lago
>Mars
Never noticed it before, but it now makes sense.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:40:34 UTC No. 16483535
hi every1 im new!!!!!!! *holds up bannana* my name is elong but u can call me t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m!!!!!!!! lol... as u can see im very random!!!! thats why i came here, 2 meet random ppl like me ^_^... im 53 years old (im not mature 4 my age tho!!) i like 2 watch invader zim w/ my girlfreind (im bi if u dont like it deal w/it) its our favorite tv show!!! bcuz its SOOOO random!!!! shes random 2 of course but i want 2 meet more random ppl =) like they say the more the merrier!!!! lol... neways i hope 2 make alot of freinds here so give me lots of commentses!!!!
DOOOOOMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <--- me bein random again ^_^ hehe…toodles!!!!!
love and waffles,
*~t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m~*
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:40:58 UTC No. 16483538
>>16483530
Dvach is even worse about it kek they love Jessie
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:41:46 UTC No. 16483545
> Live 1 million views
Nice.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:41:55 UTC No. 16483548
>>16483535
geriatric pasta
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:41:56 UTC No. 16483549
>>16483535
classic pasta
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:41:59 UTC No. 16483550
>>16483538
She always struck me as a card carrying carpet muncher.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:42:00 UTC No. 16483551
Why can't they just stream to YouTube? Twitter's mini viewer is awful.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:43:00 UTC No. 16483564
>>16483551
Because Elon doesn't want to give google any more free traffic?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:43:15 UTC No. 16483569
>>16483551
youtube is a bitcoin scammer website
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:43:21 UTC No. 16483571
>nose down
The fuck?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:43:31 UTC No. 16483575
>>16483561
FeLON FINALLY LOSES
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:43:36 UTC No. 16483577
>>16483551
>Twitter's mini viewer is awful.
It's still full res internally so use mpv (or a frontend) to play the video back.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:43:38 UTC No. 16483578
>>16483551
Plenty of restreamers on youtube, just steer clear of the crypto scams
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:43:48 UTC No. 16483580
>>16483551
Youtube had 8 years to stop the daily bitcoin fraud schemes, they have done nothing.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:44:01 UTC No. 16483585
>Nose-down subsonic Starship maneuver
Did I hear that right?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:44:04 UTC No. 16483587
>>16483561
I want to lick the frost off of starship superheavy
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:44:52 UTC No. 16483593
GUYS I'M SCARED
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:44:56 UTC No. 16483594
>>16483580
Yeah twitter has zero bitcoin scams or bots
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:45:04 UTC No. 16483597
>the cgi version all clean and perfect
soulless
>the real thing spewing fire everywhere
SOUL
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:45:07 UTC No. 16483598
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRB
thread theme
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:45:27 UTC No. 16483604
>>16483580
They need to face lawsuits. And the scammers need to face prosecutions.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:45:42 UTC No. 16483608
>>16483594
They literally cleaned like 99% of the bots. The only ones left maybe the likes spam now. And even then you can just ignore it completely.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:46:20 UTC No. 16483614
>>16483593
calm your ass down. It will all work flawlessly. SpaceSEX is now entering the unrestricted growth and progress phase. The only thing you should be scared of the brightness of our future.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:46:24 UTC No. 16483617
>>16483551
because Musk wants to dogfood the streaming software of X and compete with youtube eventually
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:46:34 UTC No. 16483619
>>16483608
Sure elon whatever you say
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:47:09 UTC No. 16483623
This prop load is insanely fast compared to Falcon, wtf.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:47:14 UTC No. 16483626
>>16483619
I'll let you cope since you trannies lost the election
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:47:26 UTC No. 16483628
>>16482428
>daddy Putin save me
the looting is a perk of the system, if the Tzar stops the looting the system falls apart and he dies in a ditch
>>16482503
sorry, I'm not there today
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:47:33 UTC No. 16483629
IFT5 WAS A FLUKE
IFT6 WILL SHOW THE WORLD THAT SPACEX IS A FRAUD
SCREENSHOT THIS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:47:43 UTC No. 16483630
>>16483623
imagine the pumps
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:47:54 UTC No. 16483632
>TWO YEARS
we gaan
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:47:57 UTC No. 16483633
>>16483602
o-okaeri...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTw
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:48:27 UTC No. 16483637
>>16483626
>Hating twitter means you're a tranny now
I can't wait for the 4chan pendulum to swing back, we need to kick all the normies out for good.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:48:33 UTC No. 16483639
MARS 2026. Has ~2-3 months open window.
Uncrewed test for landing viability.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:49:03 UTC No. 16483643
Where is Jon
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:49:05 UTC No. 16483645
sex with Jessie
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:49:21 UTC No. 16483651
>>16483608
>They literally cleaned like 99% of the bots
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:49:58 UTC No. 16483661
>>16483643
Out leading the pad ninjas in clandestine operations.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:50:00 UTC No. 16483662
>>16483637
X is ultra right wing now
it's also full of f*rries and br*nies
in addition to the leftovers of twitter
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:50:08 UTC No. 16483663
>spacex moon base concept
>its above ground
grim
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:50:21 UTC No. 16483668
T-10 MINUTES
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:50:22 UTC No. 16483671
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:50:26 UTC No. 16483674
>>16483535
man there were actually people unironically sending text messages like this one in the 2000s.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:50:34 UTC No. 16483678
>>16483656
wtf please spoiler your starship sex
my boss saw that and thought i was looking at porn
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:50:55 UTC No. 16483681
>>16483677
comical
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:51:04 UTC No. 16483682
>>16483664
It's fine
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:51:21 UTC No. 16483687
>>16483664
>>16483672
>the nosecone thrusters are gone
better build those lunar landing pads asap
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:51:27 UTC No. 16483688
>>16483681
I think the landing legs are longer than the entire Orion+ESM.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:51:27 UTC No. 16483689
>>16483677
>asymmetrical_docking
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:51:28 UTC No. 16483691
>>16483664
They added more windows to the render? Everythings looking up
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:51:41 UTC No. 16483697
>>16483535
>im 53 years old (im not mature 4 my age tho!!)
ok I laughed
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:52:08 UTC No. 16483702
>>16483672
love it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:52:29 UTC No. 16483707
booster catch or not this time?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:52:31 UTC No. 16483708
>>16483677
OH NO NO NO NO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:52:41 UTC No. 16483712
So why are they not catching Starship
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:53:01 UTC No. 16483715
>>16483664
Honestly looks insanely comfy. Imagine having your morning coffee while looking out and seeing a panoramic view of the Lunar surface, with the Earth in the sky.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:53:13 UTC No. 16483717
>>16483712
They still need to validate relight so they can aim the deorbit properly.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:53:14 UTC No. 16483718
>>16483710
but where's the space for payload
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:53:23 UTC No. 16483722
>>16483687
are you blind?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:53:27 UTC No. 16483724
>>16483712
fElon can't do it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:53:41 UTC No. 16483728
>>16483696
Mirin.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:54:01 UTC No. 16483730
>>16483712
because they have not achieved accuracy needed for it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:54:07 UTC No. 16483732
>>16483656
lewd
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:54:14 UTC No. 16483734
Go for range
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:54:14 UTC No. 16483735
>>16483687
Eager covered this, Starship can land on slopes.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:54:37 UTC No. 16483746
>>16483729
Looks like Dominos' "peperoni".
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:54:55 UTC No. 16483750
>>16483735
3deg incline is not a "slope"
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:55:14 UTC No. 16483754
>>16483711
Why is Trump grinding his teeth
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:55:22 UTC No. 16483757
>>16483750
12 degree
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:55:47 UTC No. 16483762
>>16483754
He doesn't care about this slop. He's only here because Elon begged him like a toddler
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:56:13 UTC No. 16483767
>>16483762
t. did not listen to one (1) Trump speech after IFT-5
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:56:16 UTC No. 16483768
>>16483718
inside of course
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:56:36 UTC No. 16483773
>>16483712
it’s not that easy in shipcatchery
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:56:46 UTC No. 16483776
>>16483754
he's chewing up libtards
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:57:04 UTC No. 16483781
>onboard
MANNED FLIGHT
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:57:21 UTC No. 16483784
insprucker is absent again...
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:57:34 UTC No. 16483787
HOP WEN
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:58:04 UTC No. 16483802
Did they advertise the fact that the president is there on the stream?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:58:05 UTC No. 16483803
>>16483787
2 weeks
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:58:06 UTC No. 16483804
>>16483718
the payload is stored in the balls.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:58:36 UTC No. 16483811
>>16483787
NOW
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:58:39 UTC No. 16483814
>>16483800
NO ONE CARES
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:59:41 UTC No. 16483840
Part of me wants to see the booster crater the tower just because if it doesn't happen soon it will probably never happen and then we'll never know what it would look like.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:59:46 UTC No. 16483843
announcer jinxing the launch.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:59:46 UTC No. 16483844
GO GO GO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:00:24 UTC No. 16483855
KINO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:00:24 UTC No. 16483856
It's so important that Trump is there. Mars WILL be a political priority and it's awesome. WE ARE SO BACK
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:00:25 UTC No. 16483858
ROCKET GOING UP NOW
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:00:27 UTC No. 16483861
Décollage!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:00:33 UTC No. 16483865
>IT BLEW UP
LMAO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:00:46 UTC No. 16483867
LANZAMIENTO!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:00:46 UTC No. 16483868
I WISH THIS WAS IN 4K
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:01:32 UTC No. 16483878
>Popular Science
>"This is why we need to ban space travel"
Little things like this remind me that I'm not imagining it, nothing was this fucking gay when I was a kid, this magazine would have had a whole special issue celebrating Starship
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:01:32 UTC No. 16483879
We nominal as fuck
Max-Qute
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:01:37 UTC No. 16483881
>>16483868
erday
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:01:42 UTC No. 16483884
33 raptors
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:01:48 UTC No. 16483886
it's beautiful
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:01:59 UTC No. 16483890
uh oh
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:02:57 UTC No. 16483904
go for catch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:03:11 UTC No. 16483907
It's so smooth already.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:03:22 UTC No. 16483915
two for two
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:03:22 UTC No. 16483916
Go for catch.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:03:33 UTC No. 16483919
return flag set to true
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:03:44 UTC No. 16483924
-1 tower incoming
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:03:48 UTC No. 16483926
more like go for crash
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:04:25 UTC No. 16483934
Awww, offshore divert.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:04:26 UTC No. 16483935
FUCK OFF CYLINDER
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:04:42 UTC No. 16483939
either kino fireworks or kino catch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:04:49 UTC No. 16483940
no go for catch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:04:56 UTC No. 16483943
RIP SEALS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:04:59 UTC No. 16483945
NOOOOOO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:05 UTC No. 16483948
off-shore abort
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:07 UTC No. 16483950
NO GO NO GO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:08 UTC No. 16483953
IT'S OVER
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:09 UTC No. 16483955
rip tower-1
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:15 UTC No. 16483960
it's fucking over
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:17 UTC No. 16483963
no go for catch. its not happening
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:18 UTC No. 16483964
NOOOOOOOOO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:19 UTC No. 16483967
nogo nogo
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:23 UTC No. 16483969
RIP, we ocean landing instead
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:26 UTC No. 16483971
>>16483939
It's going in the drink.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:27 UTC No. 16483973
NOOOOOOO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:29 UTC No. 16483976
IT'S OVER
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:05:45 UTC No. 16483983
MUSK ABOUT TO KILL ALL THE FISH!!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:06:01 UTC No. 16483992
Musk is going to kill someone tonight
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:06:06 UTC No. 16483994
I wonder what went wrong
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:06:15 UTC No. 16484001
Everyone's energy killed instantly.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:06:19 UTC No. 16484003
Why even watch now wtf
GAY
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:06:29 UTC No. 16484007
trump is going to ditch musk now
it's fucking over
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:06:31 UTC No. 16484010
This is shaping up to be the worst flight
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:06:46 UTC No. 16484017
Grid fins working a little hard there?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:06:57 UTC No. 16484019
>where were you when tower-1 was kil
>tower 1 is kil
>no
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:06:58 UTC No. 16484020
Imagine inviting the fucking POTUS to your rocket launch and then the coolest part (the catch) gets called off, that would be so embarrassing
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:07:00 UTC No. 16484022
>>16484008
estronaut curse
get it right
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:07:19 UTC No. 16484025
BREAKING: MUSK AND TRUMP KILL DOZENS OF DOLPHINS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:07:20 UTC No. 16484026
>>16483994
I bet the wind is too high. Probably technically possible but they probably don't have enough wind data for SH and/or there are FAA restrictions on it
Just a guess though
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:07:24 UTC No. 16484030
they should have caught it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:07:28 UTC No. 16484031
Oh that still looked good
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:07:30 UTC No. 16484034
I'm going to kill myself. FUCK THIS GAY EARTH
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:07:35 UTC No. 16484036
>cut out right before it tips over
WHAT THE FUCK
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:07:46 UTC No. 16484041
Something wrong with the tower?
Or just overly cautious abort?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:07:57 UTC No. 16484047
Aww, she would have made the catch if she’d tried it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:08:09 UTC No. 16484053
>>16484036
no exploosions allowed per FAA orders
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:08:11 UTC No. 16484055
Kek imagine how much Musk must be seething internally in front of Trump right now
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:08:31 UTC No. 16484064
>>16484041
they said the tower was go for catch though. It must be something with the booster
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:08:40 UTC No. 16484068
>>16484036
You can see it on NSF, pretty kino fireball
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:08:40 UTC No. 16484069
>inb4 the ship now fucking explodes
well
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:08:44 UTC No. 16484071
it popped
https://x.com/NASASpaceflight/statu
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:08:45 UTC No. 16484072
>receding tile line
Starship-chan is balding...
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:09:31 UTC No. 16484092
holy shit Elon just flew into a rage and killed Trump for cursing his launch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:09:40 UTC No. 16484093
>>16484072
*half-naked
the tiles are lingerie
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:10:40 UTC No. 16484106
>raptor re-light failed
it's so over
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:10:44 UTC No. 16484108
For how many minutes can I stipfam before the Starship starts reentering?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:10:45 UTC No. 16484109
>>16484073
>we couldn't risk it mr president
>it would have been fine, but you know
>regulations
musk can't lose
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:11:04 UTC No. 16484119
>>16484093
Aft-shots are kino
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:11:20 UTC No. 16484121
>>16484106
thats t+38min nigga, not yet
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:11:35 UTC No. 16484126
Curious to know what caused the divert. Landing burn seemed to go well. Glad that Musk usually tweets something soon after.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:11:40 UTC No. 16484128
>no go for relight engine
What an embarrassing test
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:11:45 UTC No. 16484129
>Super Heavy won't be able to land if there is a breeze
How exactly can this be considered fully reusable?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:11:56 UTC No. 16484130
Wonder if the booster failed for the same reason the catch last time was 1 second from being aborted?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:11:57 UTC No. 16484131
>>16484114
Nice
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:12:17 UTC No. 16484140
>please don't approach the booster
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:12:24 UTC No. 16484141
Sry bros. First time I got to watch live since ift3. I promise never to watch again.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:12:56 UTC No. 16484154
Hearing reports Donald is grabbing his belt to reprimand Elon later
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:13:04 UTC No. 16484156
>>16484128
huh
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:13:24 UTC No. 16484163
The beat is quite good
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:13:41 UTC No. 16484167
>>16484132
oh no no no
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:13:46 UTC No. 16484169
>>16484132
You win some you lose some
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:13:49 UTC No. 16484170
>>16484114
Are you a regular /sfg/er?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:14:05 UTC No. 16484173
>>16482150
STOP THE COUNT
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:14:15 UTC No. 16484175
>invite your daddy to show your cool rocket
>it fails
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:14:20 UTC No. 16484176
>>16484114
i could see it returning too though it looks like smudge in the video. it was really bright and clear with my eyes.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:14:26 UTC No. 16484177
>>16484132
damn, and I was thinking about betting as well.
I hope we're not returning to the bad timeline again...
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:14:50 UTC No. 16484181
>>16484132
Don't gamble. Efficient market hypothesis.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:15:03 UTC No. 16484185
SpaceX using synthwave for their flight music is pretty cool. Also, setting the tone for the future.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:15:14 UTC No. 16484189
>Norwegian state broadcaster immediately rushes out to call it a failure now that Elon is backing Trump
Fuck this gay ass country.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:15:36 UTC No. 16484193
>>16484181
>hypothesis
more like axiom
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:15:44 UTC No. 16484195
>banana intact
looks like a successful flight test to me
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:15:51 UTC No. 16484199
>>16484175
not one part of the mission has failed so far.
>but what about my catch?
not mission critical
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:16:10 UTC No. 16484204
>>16484193
What exactly are you implying?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:16:12 UTC No. 16484205
>>16484041
Prob just timing issue, might be as little as 1sec off course due to slight variation in engine thrust that amount to 0.01%
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:16:14 UTC No. 16484206
>>16484196
how is he doing?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:16:16 UTC No. 16484208
>>16484132
kek, muskrats got too cocky
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:16:21 UTC No. 16484210
>>16484202
condensation from the low pressure
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:16:27 UTC No. 16484213
>>16482919
he must be from the Haley's Comet hitting Jupiter timeline
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:16:42 UTC No. 16484216
>>16484202
vape naysh to the stars
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:16:48 UTC No. 16484219
Banana bondage is not on my 2024 bingo card
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:16:53 UTC No. 16484222
so why did they give up catching it this time/???
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:16:57 UTC No. 16484224
>>16484202
grilled banana soon
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:17:04 UTC No. 16484225
>>16484202
Cold bulkheads are cold and there's atmosphere in there.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:17:10 UTC No. 16484227
>>16484210
Wouldn't water just evaporate?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:17:12 UTC No. 16484228
>>16484170
since forever
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:17:19 UTC No. 16484229
Oh just realized you can skip back and forth for the livestream now. Good job, X team.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:17:46 UTC No. 16484234
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:17:49 UTC No. 16484235
BUSTED video incoming...
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:17:52 UTC No. 16484236
>>16484185
True. And here I was listening to this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlE
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:18:02 UTC No. 16484240
>>16484227
Water starts to evaporate, evaporatively cooling the remaining water.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:18:12 UTC No. 16484243
>>16484228
linux
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:18:33 UTC No. 16484249
>>16484235
would have come anyway lol
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:18:46 UTC No. 16484252
>>16484217
True. All you had to do is make a few phone calls and do some factory tours with Bezos and Beck. And Elon would have easily said yes as well. Whoever was in charge of PR the last four years is a fucking retard, but this should be a surprise to no one lol
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:18:57 UTC No. 16484255
>>16484199
>not mission critical
it is though. Public perception is key and the vast majority were watching this to see the catch. 7th flight better come soon....
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:18:58 UTC No. 16484256
>>16484199
It was objective they failed
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:19:18 UTC No. 16484261
In the future, bananas will be banned from flying on SoaceX space craft.
This Reddit fruit curse cannot continue.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:19:39 UTC No. 16484268
>>16484228
No piss lock saved what a poser
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:19:58 UTC No. 16484273
anyone watched the trannies livestream? what did he say? I bet he was cackling maniacally the fucker
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:20:00 UTC No. 16484274
clear said Banana very cutely!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:20:33 UTC No. 16484280
>>16484274
I need a webm. STAT.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:20:34 UTC No. 16484281
>>16484240
good point. But the remaining water should still evaporate soon. Radiation heat transfer from surrounding steel
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:20:44 UTC No. 16484283
>>16484274
I can show her my banana
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:20:53 UTC No. 16484285
>>16484256
secondary/cost-saving objective. they obviously could have done it because they did it a month ago. but you know, safety regulations and enviro-weirdos and shit.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:20:58 UTC No. 16484288
>All eyes on this launch after the election and shilling on joe rogan
>Invited daddy trump
>Doesn't even try, crashes and burns a few miles off the coast
>Doesn't even show the explosion
Ahahahaha welp, good job elon. Better luck next time!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:21:19 UTC No. 16484293
>>16484273
I don't give money to the mentally ill. Sorry.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:21:36 UTC No. 16484300
>>16484285
>they obviously could have done it because they did it a month ago.
COPE LEVELS OFF THE CHARTS CAPTAIN
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:22:04 UTC No. 16484304
>>16484293
But Elon is autistic
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:22:28 UTC No. 16484312
>>16484292
surprisingly accurate
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:23:19 UTC No. 16484325
>>16484314
Worst IFT yet
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:23:29 UTC No. 16484328
>>16484315
Nice bondage
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:23:40 UTC No. 16484332
>>16484314
that's what they get for putting a shitty rohn tower up there
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:23:45 UTC No. 16484336
>>16484314
except it was said on stream the tower was go but not the vehicle
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:23:56 UTC No. 16484339
>>16484314
The problem was on booster side though, tower was go
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:24:03 UTC No. 16484340
>>16484314
Expendable tower
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:24:25 UTC No. 16484346
>>16484314
Could also function as some sort of gps antenna as well. So if that fucks up, it could be an issue.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:25:16 UTC No. 16484353
>>16484327
>i put wojaks on everything
yeah this is a redditor.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:25:23 UTC No. 16484354
>>16484314
Ikea ass antenna lmao, they dealt with shit like this on the droneships why didn't they carry that over?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:25:42 UTC No. 16484360
in how many minutes is reentry?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:26:06 UTC No. 16484365
>>16484202
banana off gasing
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:26:13 UTC No. 16484368
>>16484360
like 20 minutes
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:26:23 UTC No. 16484372
>>16484360
2 weeks
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:26:31 UTC No. 16484375
>>16484353
ABSOLUTELY
S E E T H I N G
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:26:52 UTC No. 16484378
did they do the in-flight relight already?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:26:52 UTC No. 16484379
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:26:54 UTC No. 16484380
>>16483327
>Texas is kind of boring as far as landscape goes
>he doesn't know about our hill country
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:27:08 UTC No. 16484382
>>16484261
I told you guys I wasn't a fan of the banana
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:27:14 UTC No. 16484384
>>16484378
No go
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:27:42 UTC No. 16484389
Lots of random stuff floating around
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:27:43 UTC No. 16484390
>>16484382
cursed banana
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:28:12 UTC No. 16484393
>>16484384
kys nigger
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:28:26 UTC No. 16484397
>>16484379
>>16484368
thanks
>>16484384
why
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:28:38 UTC No. 16484400
>>16484292
Girl has guts to be a vtuber for such a niche genre.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:28:43 UTC No. 16484401
>>16484382
Should have been peanuts
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:29:18 UTC No. 16484406
>>16484400
>2k viewers
not very niche
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:29:35 UTC No. 16484410
>>16484400
She's jaxa mascot now
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:30:12 UTC No. 16484417
>>16484400
>Girl
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:30:26 UTC No. 16484420
>>16484410
Good for her if true.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:30:32 UTC No. 16484421
>>16484389
Looks like ice particles, I wonder how cold it gets in the payload bay
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:30:33 UTC No. 16484422
>>16484406
When is she graduating? Will hololive hire her?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:31:17 UTC No. 16484429
>>16484422
never, I will sell my organs and buy her if necessary.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:31:27 UTC No. 16484431
>>16484417
Sounds like a girl.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:31:44 UTC No. 16484434
>>16484422
>Graduating
Isn't she independent?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:32:04 UTC No. 16484438
>>16484430
Hey that's pretty cool
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:32:20 UTC No. 16484441
>>16484430
hoyl shit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:32:50 UTC No. 16484446
>>16484434
Independents graduate all the time. Some join big companies, others retire, and further re-debut as another
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:32:53 UTC No. 16484447
>>16484422
Phase Connect will nab her first
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:33:30 UTC No. 16484457
>>16484430
again this schizo shit. That's an imaging artefact not some alien mothership you nut
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:33:32 UTC No. 16484458
>>16484314
ULA tower tippers…
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:33:48 UTC No. 16484462
Can anyone make out what Musk said to Trump? Trump did not look impressed at all, felt like he only went there out of obligation to Musk.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:34:03 UTC No. 16484466
>>16484400
Finding a good niche to fill is pretty smart, actually. Lots of lonely otakus are also into space and rockets so the demand was there.
>>16484422
I wonder if she'll get noticed by Suisei since the both have done stuff with JAXA now.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:34:33 UTC No. 16484472
The payload was too heavy which means no fuel left for catch.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:34:40 UTC No. 16484473
>>16484458
THEY CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:34:43 UTC No. 16484476
How come MIGAfags haven't posted a new photo yet?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:35:02 UTC No. 16484478
>>16484430
WTF a banan just flew over the ISS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:35:11 UTC No. 16484481
>>16484462
>you took me to a fight, now I take you to a rocket launch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:35:23 UTC No. 16484484
The booster is still floating, the wind could possibly blow it to shore
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:35:31 UTC No. 16484486
>>16484458
Tory sends his regards
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:35:41 UTC No. 16484487
>>16484472
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:35:55 UTC No. 16484493
>>16484462
Trump has been fiending for years to go see the launch in person
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:36:14 UTC No. 16484498
RELIGHT IS GO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:36:20 UTC No. 16484499
The lightning in the clouds over the ocean is really awesome.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:36:56 UTC No. 16484504
>>16484484
Why the fireball then
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:37:28 UTC No. 16484510
If this is successful, they should star launching Starlinks.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:37:40 UTC No. 16484513
thunderstorm....
reentry cancelled, pack it up anons
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:37:45 UTC No. 16484514
>>16484504
methaloggs
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:38:09 UTC No. 16484517
It seems that the raptors slightly underperformed,
https://x.com/planet4589/status/185
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:38:10 UTC No. 16484519
KINO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:38:23 UTC No. 16484521
it's that easy in relightry
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:38:23 UTC No. 16484522
VICTORY
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:38:25 UTC No. 16484524
Relight done.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:38:50 UTC No. 16484536
**brap**
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:39:07 UTC No. 16484539
GIANT ICE RATS CONFIRMED!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:39:10 UTC No. 16484540
>that giant piece of foam drifting off
lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:39:23 UTC No. 16484542
bro that didn't prove jack shit other than it can fire up. They should have left it running for a minute or two to see what effect it has on the piping
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:39:42 UTC No. 16484547
>>16484539
ICE RODENTS OF UNUSUAL SIZE
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:39:45 UTC No. 16484549
>>16484542
Yeah, I was expecting something that would effect orbit. Was it even on the center of mass?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:39:56 UTC No. 16484551
>>16484540
>foam
This isn't the tourist thread. Go to the pinned one.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:40:07 UTC No. 16484553
>>16484526
>>16484541
>SpaceX is the first company in existence that has created blue fire and documented while in hard vacuum
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:40:08 UTC No. 16484555
>>16484542
If they fired it any longer Starship would crash down in Australia
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:40:18 UTC No. 16484557
>>16484547
IROUS? I don't believe they exist.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:40:21 UTC No. 16484559
>didn't even catch the beginning of the relight
>just one person laughing in the control room
spacex peaked at flight 5
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:40:24 UTC No. 16484560
>>16484539
Ice rats of unusual size.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:40:35 UTC No. 16484563
>>16484555
and that is bad..... how?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:40:40 UTC No. 16484564
>>16484542
Proves that we probably not getting starlink launch next time
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:40:55 UTC No. 16484569
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:41:10 UTC No. 16484574
The pulsing plasma waves, far out
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:41:11 UTC No. 16484575
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:41:20 UTC No. 16484577
oh shit, I missed the reentry start
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:41:21 UTC No. 16484578
>>16484542
>bro go reach orbit untested lol
donta
also the biggest problem with ullage is startup, sustaining is easier
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:41:35 UTC No. 16484581
>>16484517
But they said nominal orbital insertion :(
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:41:56 UTC No. 16484582
>>16484564
Next time we get block 2 and all the issues it might have.
>>16484575
Yeah that's not foam. Go to the tourist thread.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:42:09 UTC No. 16484585
>>16484575
That's obviously a rat.
Space confirmed fake.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:42:12 UTC No. 16484586
>>16484564
yeah, there's no way they will deploy them if starship hasn't even completed a full orbit once
ift-7 will probably be a full orbit or two
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:42:15 UTC No. 16484587
Reentry is so pretty. Probably my favourite parts of these streams.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:42:23 UTC No. 16484591
Damn that is high AoA
Like hitting a brick wall at 28000kph
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:42:33 UTC No. 16484593
>>16484582
What is it then genius.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:42:36 UTC No. 16484595
>>16484575
That's not foam anon.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:42:42 UTC No. 16484599
>>16484584
best music though
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:42:44 UTC No. 16484600
I'd say that all Raptor 2 flights are gonna be pretty spotty in terms of landing. Not until they start mapping Raptor 3s to the ships and boosters, will we see more consistent launch/landing performance me thinks.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:42:49 UTC No. 16484601
>>16484568
Gives me subnautica vibes.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:42:50 UTC No. 16484602
>>16484593
Ice you retard
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:43:03 UTC No. 16484605
>>16484593
Guess.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:43:04 UTC No. 16484606
Give me the BananaCam right now
And don't forget the BuoyCam
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:43:10 UTC No. 16484608
>>16484584
Dude, chill, flapchan is making a comeback.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:43:12 UTC No. 16484609
>>16484591
more like hitting a water from 4 stories up
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:43:24 UTC No. 16484615
Will it make rentry?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:43:29 UTC No. 16484616
>>16484569
Oh man, the flashbacks, I think I still have the CD of 3d Movie Maker.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:44:04 UTC No. 16484623
>>16484602
>>16484605
>i-it's ice
cope. Enjoy another Challanger.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:44:05 UTC No. 16484624
>>16484375
that's what you're doing, yes.
why point it out? you could just stop doing it.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:44:14 UTC No. 16484627
>>16484615
no reentry is cancelled. Musk failed us again
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:44:16 UTC No. 16484629
Oi bruv
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:44:20 UTC No. 16484630
Why hasnt heavy been blown up yet?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:44:25 UTC No. 16484632
I hope the flaps don't leak this time
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:44:41 UTC No. 16484634
>>16484624
I know you thought this was clever, but it just makes you look more mad
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:44:48 UTC No. 16484635
At least Clear is cute
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:44:50 UTC No. 16484636
>>16484623
You're terminally fucking retarded. Get off my /sci/ you fucking tourist.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:44:51 UTC No. 16484637
oh man those ice fronds are sick
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:45:05 UTC No. 16484640
>>16484593
Rat
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:45:08 UTC No. 16484641
>>16484575
Space Coral
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:45:25 UTC No. 16484643
>>16484623
>foam
>starship
>foam strike
>Challanger
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:45:26 UTC No. 16484644
ICE SPACE RAT IS BACK!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:45:32 UTC No. 16484646
>>16484635
I love how she tried to cheer us up after the catch abort.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:45:53 UTC No. 16484648
If they know where this is going to splash down are they going to try and recover it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:45:56 UTC No. 16484650
>>16484645
plasma seggs
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:45:58 UTC No. 16484651
Im so fucking happy it was flight 5 that I went to Starbase for. Also kek at that anon thats out $600
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:46:13 UTC No. 16484656
What was the altitude when the burn through happened, 60 km?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:46:16 UTC No. 16484658
>>16484634
>y-you look mad
and you ARE mad.
take a glass of water.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:46:30 UTC No. 16484660
>>16484635
If only i could understand here.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:46:32 UTC No. 16484661
>>16484645
interesting how those rats persist despite the heat of reentry
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:46:41 UTC No. 16484664
>>16484623
Jesus christ lmao.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:46:51 UTC No. 16484666
when is it going to be day time again?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:46:59 UTC No. 16484667
Status on the banana?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:46:59 UTC No. 16484668
gonna go take a shit. been holding it in ever since launch
you fucker better not explode bitch >:(
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:47:09 UTC No. 16484670
>flaps taking over from RCS
based
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:47:20 UTC No. 16484671
>>16484593
aliens
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:47:44 UTC No. 16484673
>>16484623
Jesus fucking christ how do you breathe
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:48:03 UTC No. 16484675
Flaps out for harambe
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:48:07 UTC No. 16484676
>>16484666
Its coming soon satan
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:48:23 UTC No. 16484680
>>16484658
>NO YOUR MAD
>NO YOU
Shut the fuck up faggot
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:48:38 UTC No. 16484682
Peak heating phase
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:49:11 UTC No. 16484692
The flap offset has led to such a massive improvement in the reentry profile. The plasma dynamic is waaaaaaaay smoother now.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:49:47 UTC No. 16484700
Pushing older generation heatshields
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:50:08 UTC No. 16484704
>sparks are coming off
oh no
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:50:11 UTC No. 16484706
Yeah this fucker is definetly about to explode. Its fucking over
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:50:29 UTC No. 16484709
>Sparks starting
ITS OVER
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:50:41 UTC No. 16484712
>>16484093
They just confirmed it's hair. She's balding.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:50:50 UTC No. 16484716
>>16484680
woah calm down anon, are you upset that nobody liked your funny zoomer meme?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:50:53 UTC No. 16484717
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:50:54 UTC No. 16484718
banaan status?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:50:56 UTC No. 16484719
>>16484692
This one doesn't have the flap offset yet
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:01 UTC No. 16484722
>2100 tiles
holy shit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:04 UTC No. 16484723
TWENTY ONE HUNDRED TILE SALUTE
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:06 UTC No. 16484725
It hasn't started eating through the metal yet. Calm your sphincters.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:12 UTC No. 16484727
>still no bay cam
Yeah it's an oven in there
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:21 UTC No. 16484728
This is about where I'd see the temperature gauge skyrocket in KSP and panic fire the engine
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:24 UTC No. 16484730
>>16484704
>>16484709
REUSABLE SPARKS WHEN??
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:26 UTC No. 16484732
>all this damage controlling
It's going to explode isn't it?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:29 UTC No. 16484734
>>16484716
I want you to stop responding to an hour old troll post to explain that you aren't mad.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:34 UTC No. 16484736
>>16484719
S31 has the offset or S32 onwards does?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:44 UTC No. 16484737
>>16484718
Aroused.
It's one kinky banana
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:51:56 UTC No. 16484738
>>16484736
S33
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:52:01 UTC No. 16484739
>max limit of image replies
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:52:06 UTC No. 16484740
>>16484732
Yep. /SFG/ got too cocky for sure this time.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:52:07 UTC No. 16484741
>>16484714
She is burning up.
Blow up soon.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:52:08 UTC No. 16484744
>>16484714
>>16484715
looks like some fucking dbz anime shit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:52:12 UTC No. 16484746
>>16484734
>i was merely pretending to be retarded
doesn't work, never did work, you should stop doing that.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:52:25 UTC No. 16484747
>>16484706
They are already making excuses, saying they are "intentionally pushing it beyond its design".
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:52:27 UTC No. 16484748
The edges.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:52:29 UTC No. 16484749
>>16484727
Mmm, fried banana
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:52:38 UTC No. 16484753
>the sparks
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:52:44 UTC No. 16484756
>>16484746
Never mind, my mistake for getting involved in a retard fight.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:53:01 UTC No. 16484760
>gay flag is forming
joever
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:53:07 UTC No. 16484761
holy fuck those flaps are cooking
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:53:11 UTC No. 16484762
>>16484747
they said that at the start of the stream too, dipshit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:53:19 UTC No. 16484766
>>16484714
>>16484715
I'M PISSING ON THE MOOOOON
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:53:39 UTC No. 16484770
>>16484748
It's over.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:53:46 UTC No. 16484771
>>16484761
First time watching? This is nothing.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:54:01 UTC No. 16484776
I don't like those colors
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:54:02 UTC No. 16484777
>>16483050
we need to put one of these into the atmosphere of Venus
>>16484114
I want to hear it from somebody in Galveston, I'm a similar distance from Cape Kennedy
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:54:49 UTC No. 16484790
>>16484776
pretty colors :)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:54:58 UTC No. 16484794
OH FUCK ITS MELTING
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:55:15 UTC No. 16484797
Flap colors seem to be reflections so far.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:55:18 UTC No. 16484798
>aft engine bay
as opposed to???
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:55:22 UTC No. 16484802
Most boring test flight so far. Literally the only new thing was a 3 second relight in space.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:55:24 UTC No. 16484803
DAYLIGHT
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:55:32 UTC No. 16484808
You can see the steel getting deformed
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:55:51 UTC No. 16484809
Oh that cyan color is really pretty actually.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:55:55 UTC No. 16484812
>>16484798
Bow engine bay
You will never know the joy of the pendulum rocket
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:56:09 UTC No. 16484815
The cloud layer from the sunlight is sick
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:56:10 UTC No. 16484816
>>16484802
moar data
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:56:14 UTC No. 16484817
ELON LIED
STARSHIP DIED
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:56:19 UTC No. 16484819
>>16484808
No you can't. The flaps are not uniformly flat. They're made of the same rolls of steel the rest of it is.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:56:24 UTC No. 16484820
>deformed steel
it's over
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:56:29 UTC No. 16484822
These are some trippy 80s colours.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:56:35 UTC No. 16484823
>it's wrinkling up
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:56:40 UTC No. 16484824
>>16484809
yeah, was it present last time? I don't remember
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:56:41 UTC No. 16484825
> it's literally melting.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:56:53 UTC No. 16484828
>>16484563
they'll fine you for littering
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:57:07 UTC No. 16484829
KINO KINO KINO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:57:16 UTC No. 16484831
>CLOUDS VISIBLE
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:57:23 UTC No. 16484832
its okay, they're going to be doing alot of hardware tests before the real starship launches in 2026
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:57:31 UTC No. 16484836
hmm those sparks are looking a lot sparkier
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:57:43 UTC No. 16484837
the joints are holding up a lot better than last time
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:57:46 UTC No. 16484838
FLAP-CHAN IS STRONK
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:57:57 UTC No. 16484841
How many Gs is this decel
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:57:58 UTC No. 16484843
>FLAP MOVEMENT
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:58:05 UTC No. 16484844
Daylight reentry is so fucking amazing yo.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:58:06 UTC No. 16484845
HOLY
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:58:27 UTC No. 16484848
this is pretty kino not gonna lie
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:58:28 UTC No. 16484849
whats the black tile thing on the flap?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:58:32 UTC No. 16484851
AMAZING VIEWS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:58:36 UTC No. 16484852
EXTERNAL TEMPS DROPPING, NO FLAPPY MELT YET
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:58:54 UTC No. 16484854
Remember when these things were just doing 150m hops?
Anon remembers
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:58:56 UTC No. 16484855
>external temperatures are coming down
WE MADE IT
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:02 UTC No. 16484860
>>16484852
MELTY
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:03 UTC No. 16484862
hello burnthrough
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:07 UTC No. 16484863
>>16484832
God the /sfg/ cope is delicious today
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:08 UTC No. 16484865
Flap-chan... ;_;7
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:12 UTC No. 16484866
The right most top flap is melting. Holy crap.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:16 UTC No. 16484868
OH NO NO NO NO FLAP MELT THROUGH
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:20 UTC No. 16484872
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
ITS MELTING
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:22 UTC No. 16484873
They've already bled off more than half the speed from orbital speed. So its good
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:40 UTC No. 16484876
>>16484841
~1.2
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:56 UTC No. 16484881
Uh oh, metal is getting spicy
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:59:57 UTC No. 16484882
oh man look at the tempter rainbow on the flaps
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:00:08 UTC No. 16484887
>>16484855
>temperature goes down
>Oxygen concentration goes up
uh oh
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:00:11 UTC No. 16484888
>melting starts after peak heating again
maybe we should just never stop heating and this won't happen.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:00:21 UTC No. 16484890
>>16484841
seems like just over 30 km/hs so about 1 G
wish they would unhide the navball
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:00:22 UTC No. 16484891
>crispy starship
h-hot....
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:00:26 UTC No. 16484892
No more plasma, we made it!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:00:31 UTC No. 16484894
>>16484882
on the body too
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:00:35 UTC No. 16484895
>>16484868
>>16484872
Flapchan won't let us down
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:00:48 UTC No. 16484898
>>16484892
Yep. Easy. I think it was just welding job imo.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:01:03 UTC No. 16484899
OH MAN reused starships are going to be absolutely rainbow, so pretty
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:01:07 UTC No. 16484902
>bright orange
oh shit oh fuck
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:01:12 UTC No. 16484905
holy shit that entire orange section
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:01:22 UTC No. 16484907
SPICY FLAP
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:01:22 UTC No. 16484908
WTF
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:01:33 UTC No. 16484915
>>16484905
We're going to get a no-glow flap next time or on flight 8. So based.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:01:36 UTC No. 16484917
Less damage to flap-chan than previous flights.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:01:45 UTC No. 16484919
it's okay it cooled back down :)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:01:46 UTC No. 16484921
orange flap bad
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:00 UTC No. 16484924
Looks like the flap hinge cover area burned partly, that white spot had embers in it.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:10 UTC No. 16484925
Wow the clouds are pretty
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:11 UTC No. 16484927
THE MARK
OF THE ORANGE MAN
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:12 UTC No. 16484928
It's literally that easy in steel rocketry
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:14 UTC No. 16484929
>>16484921
Lil' toasty is all.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:21 UTC No. 16484930
>>16484900
did he died?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:23 UTC No. 16484931
>ganbare flapu~
I love clear
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:28 UTC No. 16484932
>>16484899
>absolutely rainbow
iridescent
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:28 UTC No. 16484933
looks SO much better than flight 5
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:48 UTC No. 16484935
The rainbow tempering of the ship skin and the cloud layer reflecting off the ship's surface is a gorgeous shot.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:02:53 UTC No. 16484937
See now? All that "melting" or "buckling" was just fucking annealing.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:03:18 UTC No. 16484943
Approaching terminal velocity now. Pretty good
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:03:31 UTC No. 16484946
KINO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:03:34 UTC No. 16484947
>>16484937
Starship merely grows tougher from this experience.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:03:41 UTC No. 16484950
BELLYFLOP HERE WE GO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:03:42 UTC No. 16484952
>>16484930
It's reversed
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:03:54 UTC No. 16484958
KINO!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:03:57 UTC No. 16484959
The horizon shot is SCI-FI AS FUCK
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:04:02 UTC No. 16484960
>camera wobble
why do directors do this
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:04:22 UTC No. 16484962
>>16484960
the camera is on a flap
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:04:37 UTC No. 16484964
>>16484960
here comes another chinese earthquake
EBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBR
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:04:37 UTC No. 16484965
>>16484960
Camera is on the flap and it's rather busy controlling shit.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:04:43 UTC No. 16484969
>>16484947
More brittle you mean.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:04:48 UTC No. 16484973
>>16484905
Orange for Orange Man's visit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:04:49 UTC No. 16484974
>>16484960
Camera on flap
Micro adjustment of flaps
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:04:56 UTC No. 16484977
KINO KINO KINO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:03 UTC No. 16484979
HOLY SHIT WERE FALLING
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:19 UTC No. 16484981
>flap hitting stop
uh oh
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:30 UTC No. 16484983
Absolutely beautiful.
Starship Chan GO GO GO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:46 UTC No. 16484987
>>16484960
Superman is drunk.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:49 UTC No. 16484988
It's that easy in rocketry
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:50 UTC No. 16484989
KINO FLAP CONTROL AND LANDING
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:55 UTC No. 16484992
>303 km/h terminal velocity
>nice relight
>perfect landing
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:57 UTC No. 16484993
BUOY-CAM!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:58 UTC No. 16484994
>>16484960
To hide the CGI
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:59 UTC No. 16484995
HOLY FUCKING SHIT. THAT'S AMAZING.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:05:59 UTC No. 16484996
BOUY
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:00 UTC No. 16484998
NICE
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:00 UTC No. 16484999
looked clean
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:03 UTC No. 16485000
KINO
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:07 UTC No. 16485003
FREE WILLY
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:08 UTC No. 16485004
>perfect landing
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:14 UTC No. 16485007
INCREDIBASED
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:19 UTC No. 16485008
YEEEAHHHHHH
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:31 UTC No. 16485012
>the flaps survived
OH SHIT
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:42 UTC No. 16485017
but what about the banana
it's gonna burn up!!!!!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:53 UTC No. 16485021
They're ready for ship catch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:57 UTC No. 16485024
Fiery, but mostly successful landing
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:58 UTC No. 16485025
Flight 6 redeemed
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:06:59 UTC No. 16485026
This flight was as predicated, absolutely bananas.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:01 UTC No. 16485027
It's just that easy in stainless steel-etry
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:07 UTC No. 16485029
>>16485017
A fish will eat it.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:09 UTC No. 16485030
>>16485012
>DOUBTING FLAP-CHAN
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:10 UTC No. 16485031
banana status?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:17 UTC No. 16485032
Best ship performance so far, landing looked better than last time too
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:35 UTC No. 16485036
Awkward.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:41 UTC No. 16485038
one of the engines failed right before shutdown?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:45 UTC No. 16485040
so awkward lol
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:47 UTC No. 16485042
>>16485029
a seal is going to choke on it :(
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:53 UTC No. 16485045
we are at the strange state of starship being more successful than super heavy
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:07:58 UTC No. 16485047
>flight over
>image limit
Bake new thread, negroes
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:08:00 UTC No. 16485049
lmao that camera hold
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:08:02 UTC No. 16485052
Steel-chama... I kneel.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:08:07 UTC No. 16485054
>>16485038
they relight 3 but only land on 2 secondary-kun
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:08:07 UTC No. 16485055
Starship V2 next.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:08:09 UTC No. 16485056
I'm not gonna sugarcoat this, this flight was one massive setback.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:08:11 UTC No. 16485057
>women stop talking
>stare right at the camera
W-what? What am I supposed to say?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:08:12 UTC No. 16485058
>>16485038
No, I think it was intended to shut down based on how it was called out.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:08:34 UTC No. 16485068
>thanks dad
Huh? Am I missing some lore here?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:08:35 UTC No. 16485069
>>16485038
Nah, it goes down to two after the flip.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:08:59 UTC No. 16485075
I didn't like the way they stared at me. It felt uncomfortable.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:09:10 UTC No. 16485079
HEAVY AND STARSHIP BOTH MADE IT BACK TO EARTH IN ONE PIECE
THUNDERKEKs EAT YOUR HEART OUT!!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:09:15 UTC No. 16485080
>>16484932
yeah
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:09:35 UTC No. 16485083
>>16485057
You missed your shot... Now they think you're creepy.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:09:55 UTC No. 16485085
>>16485079
No catch = No win
Sorry that's the rule.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:10:03 UTC No. 16485086
Overall a good test flight. I'd like to know what caused the catch abort, but everything else went well. Good job, SpaceX.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:10:03 UTC No. 16485087
>>16485079
don't you know your basic elements? they made it back to water, not earth.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:10:10 UTC No. 16485089
Heli, and boat close to super heavy.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:10:45 UTC No. 16485094
>>16484718
warmed and still deep inside
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:10:52 UTC No. 16485096
sad about B14 but S33 surviving made up for it, congrats to all the engineers
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:11:15 UTC No. 16485102
Overall I think that was a successful test, the booster landing was a shame but it's always a good thing that Musk is humbled a bit and reminded of the importance of safety. Starship itself was spectacular, they wanted to push the design to the limits and it still not only survived but also landed perfectly. Very good results.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:11:19 UTC No. 16485104
>>16485086
THEY CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:11:33 UTC No. 16485105
>>16485086
I'd like to know what caused that strong cyan color during reentry. That was definitely a new color for plasma.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:11:42 UTC No. 16485108
>>16485089
Chinese fishermen desperately looking for it to serve as dessert.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:11:46 UTC No. 16485109
>>16485057
>y-y-you t-t-too
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:11:47 UTC No. 16485110
Next flight next week
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:12:11 UTC No. 16485113
Unlucky booster 13. Glad we're past it now. Otherwise, excellent flight.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:12:18 UTC No. 16485115
My sources tell me that the catch abort was called by a rogue spacex engineer who wanted to spite Trump.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:12:20 UTC No. 16485116
Starship: 6
New Glenn: 0
Neutron: 0
Nova: 0
SLS: 1
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:12:41 UTC No. 16485120
>>16485085
this. anything less than a catch is a failure now
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:12:42 UTC No. 16485121
>>16485108
meant for >>16485094
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:12:47 UTC No. 16485122
NEXT LAUNCH IN 2 WEEKS
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:13:14 UTC No. 16485127
>>16485116
more starship launch than europe this year?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:13:43 UTC No. 16485132
>>16485116
That one banana was more payload than Blorigin has ever had in orbit.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:13:45 UTC No. 16485133
lets stage this bitch i wanna see all the pretty colours again
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:13:48 UTC No. 16485134
>>16485122
they dont have anymore available starships that are ready for launch. most likely next launch is in the spring.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:14:10 UTC No. 16485137
>>16485102
agreed.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:14:24 UTC No. 16485139
Thread has staged.
Ignition:
>>16485135
>>16485135
>>16485135
>>16485135
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:14:36 UTC No. 16485141
>>16485134
They already did cryo-testing on S33, don't know whats stopping them from sending it
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:15:34 UTC No. 16485148
>>16485102
Definitely excited to see the performance gain with the next iteration of heat shield design. It seems that the avionics profile is performing fantastically.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:16:12 UTC No. 16485157
Well that was cool. Back to fortnight-posting now.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:23:12 UTC No. 16485205
>>16485105
Probably an alloy or new mix of materials. Copper and Aluminium should be greenish-blue for example.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:48:30 UTC No. 16485358
>>16483677
are they doing this just to fuck with Locksneed?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:52:04 UTC No. 16485373
>>16482753
>So why did Trump need to pardon Michael Flyyn and Paul Manafort? Over nothing?
If it was over collusion with russia you wouldn't be asking this rhetorical question
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:56:35 UTC No. 16485398
>>16483958
is this a record?
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:09:04 UTC No. 16485440
>>16484353
t. hotstage ring
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:18:51 UTC No. 16485460
Nothing ever happens
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:43:47 UTC No. 16485523
>>16485373
Here's some more for you
>Why did Michael Flynn lie to the FBI about talking to the russian ambassador during the presidential transition?
>Why did he plead guilty?
>Who did Flynn report back to after his discussion?
For people that like to "just ask questions" you seem really scared to answer any of them.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:51:18 UTC No. 16485540
>>16483472
but he will be fined by the FDA for transporting fruit across state lines
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:53:10 UTC No. 16485544
>>16483587
did you learn nothing from A Christmas Story?!
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 03:34:48 UTC No. 16485805
i just came back from work
why no catch?
:(
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 03:42:29 UTC No. 16485814
>>16485540
it was a plushy, not a fruit
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 08:30:29 UTC No. 16486021
REEEEEEEEE
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:01:20 UTC No. 16486650
>>16485139
Image limit was never a valid reason until you fucking zoomed tourists
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:44:37 UTC No. 16486714
>>16486650
I'm glad I'm not the only one who remembers