๐งต /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:48:37 UTC No. 16479564
soon edition
previous >>16477042
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:53:06 UTC No. 16479579
>>16479573
Woah who made this
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:55:05 UTC No. 16479582
>>16479579
closely guarded secret, sorry
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:55:14 UTC No. 16479583
that does remind me, when is elon giving the equivalent of kennedy's moon speech, but for mars instead?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:56:24 UTC No. 16479585
2 more
weeks
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:56:44 UTC No. 16479587
>>16479583
elon has said too many bullshit timelines for any mention of a timeline to be iconic
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:56:48 UTC No. 16479588
>daytime starship reentry
CUM
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:58:00 UTC No. 16479590
>>16479588
Will we get buoy-cam during the livestream?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:58:59 UTC No. 16479592
>>16479582
Found it, Mokols on pixv, thank you
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:00:42 UTC No. 16479593
>>16479592
You're welcome :)
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:01:43 UTC No. 16479596
>>16479592
@cake_ginga on twitter
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:02:16 UTC No. 16479597
HOP DAMN YOU
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:02:52 UTC No. 16479599
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:02:58 UTC No. 16479600
>>16479575
Starship sex when?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:03:28 UTC No. 16479601
>>16479600
2025 prop transfer demo
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:04:14 UTC No. 16479602
In light of recent events, I made a rather conservative estimate of the future of spess colonies
2025 - mars base(spacex), population 10000
2026 - phobos base(spacex), populaton 7000
2027 - ceres base(spacex), population 9000
2028 - jupiter orbital base(spacex), popilation 700
2029 - EVROPA base(spacex), population 12000
2030 - calisto base(spacex), population 8000
2031 - enceladus base(Spacex), population 15000
2032 - mars base(china), population ~1,6 billion
2033 - venus cloud base(spacex), population 7000
2034 - saturn ring base(spacex), population 4500
2035 - titan cuck base(spacex), population less than a dozen
2036 - uranus base(spacex), population 6900
2037 - neptune base(spacex), population 5500
2038 - first colony ship sent to proxima centauri b(spacex), population 150000
2039 - Pluto (spacex), population 13000
2040 - colony ship sent to ross 128b(spacex), population 370000
2041 - asteroid belt stations(china), population uncountable
2042 - colony ships sent to GJ 1061(spacex), population 1250000
2043 - mercury solar death ray (spacex), population classified
2044 - Eris cloning facility (spacex), population >100000000
2045 - agartha base(spacex), population 750000
2046 - Earth-X genocide wars
2047 - earth colony(X empire), population 0.7 billion
2048 - colony ships sent to andromeda galaxy via wormhole(X empire), population several billion
2049 - Sagittarius A* colony(X empire), population ~13 trillion
2050 - Mankind becomes a kardashev type 3 civilization(X empire), population ~70 quintillion
2051 - Moon base(NASA), population 0-10
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:04:19 UTC No. 16479603
>>16479601
how two roggets have ses in spess?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:05:11 UTC No. 16479604
reuse is simply not economically viable
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:05:26 UTC No. 16479605
>>16479603
one roggit have rod, nother rogget have hole, rocket rod go in rockit hole and transfer fluids
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:05:35 UTC No. 16479606
>>16479603
Erotically
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:07:05 UTC No. 16479608
>>16479600
We better get tons of smutty Starship girl PORN when this happens
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:08:41 UTC No. 16479610
>>16479607
Called it, that tropical storm came through at a bad time
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:08:44 UTC No. 16479611
>>16479605
SO LEWD
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:11:33 UTC No. 16479614
>>16479612
calling arianespace a rocket company is currently inaccurate.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:12:10 UTC No. 16479615
And you wonder why anons say rocket girl spammers are cancer
>>16479575
Enjoy your vacation
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:12:19 UTC No. 16479616
>>16479612
all they are is a middle man selling launches for the government run agency
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:12:42 UTC No. 16479617
>>16479612
by being a massive disappointment
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:13:07 UTC No. 16479618
>>16479612
the actual aryan space was headquartered in the US before it was subverted
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:13:23 UTC No. 16479619
>>16479617
>(including soyuz)
kek
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:13:53 UTC No. 16479621
>>16479617
They were absolutely mogging the commercial launch market 25 years ago.
>>16479618
I know, right? It's totally false advertising.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:14:05 UTC No. 16479622
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:14:41 UTC No. 16479623
>>16479615
>And you wonder why anons say rocket girl spammers are cancer
no one says that except for one deranged schizo with an underdeveloped amygdala
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:15:27 UTC No. 16479626
>>16479622
I'm going to send files @ you from my mind, that's what
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:15:51 UTC No. 16479627
>>16479575
Post the one where her ass literally explodes
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:16:23 UTC No. 16479628
>>16479627
Taco Tuesday...
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:16:23 UTC No. 16479629
>>16479619
they only included soyuz for the drop in 2023 after Hitler- I mean Putin's unprovoked invasion of democratic Ukraine. basically it makes the stats look worse when that wasnt Aryanes fault.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:18:13 UTC No. 16479633
>>16479629
>having to use soyuz in the first place
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:18:23 UTC No. 16479634
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:21:53 UTC No. 16479636
An asset of my current intellect is that I'm able to produce an image in my mind of any species with my genetic involved. It takes a few seconds but I can make the cat who is like me, the dog who is like me, and any other thing. It's supremely accurate, these look proper.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:22:39 UTC No. 16479637
https://youtu.be/1OohG8oNG7s?t=50m5
>Guys, there is no Moore's law in rockets
>Don't let anybody make you believe that technology is going to change any of this
If you wondered why spaceflight stagnated in the US, oldspace farts like this were LYING to young engineers, with constant doomerism
>With all due respect to Mr Musk, reusability doesn't work
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:27:51 UTC No. 16479641
>>16479637
>you can't just land rockets back on the launch pad, refill them, and fly them again
you just can't
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:29:10 UTC No. 16479645
>>16479609
rocket futa
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:34:54 UTC No. 16479650
>>16479637
>reusability is impossible because le shuttle
>said by a company that only makes solid rockets
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:39:35 UTC No. 16479657
>>16479615
you're the only one saying that, it's very awkward behaviour since this is an anime website.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:40:58 UTC No. 16479658
https://www.planetary.org/planetary
Norm Augustine on the podcast today
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:44:20 UTC No. 16479662
>>16479615
Gay behavior
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:50:38 UTC No. 16479664
>>16479615
>Enjoy your vacation
I will, thanks!
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:50:47 UTC No. 16479665
>>16479658
Why is Casey Dreier so anti-space? Always concern trolling about commercial space
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:51:53 UTC No. 16479666
>>16479637
Wow this aged poorly
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:53:36 UTC No. 16479669
>>16479637
>how will you even measure 1/1000 reliability without a thousand flights a year
Easy, fly 1000 flights a year
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:55:27 UTC No. 16479673
>>16479665
Same reason your dad is anti-throating my cock.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:57:08 UTC No. 16479675
>>16479673
Ok, enough trolling. Control your behavior anon
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:00:30 UTC No. 16479679
>>16479080
She got promoted to COO (not CEO) in 2008, and she probably sold some shares at some point
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:03:25 UTC No. 16479682
>>16479637
damn he was their finale speaker too
He starts out ok. With two specific examples of how you can't cheat isp and mass fraction, then he digs his hole with an argument from ignorance
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:03:48 UTC No. 16479683
>>16479664
POV Gene Cernan on Lathe, 1982, colorized
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:04:01 UTC No. 16479684
>>16479578
Wow, they went far from the LM. I can't think of anything more life-changing than being one of the few men to have explored the Lunar surface.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:05:02 UTC No. 16479685
>>16479684
>one of the few men to have explored the Lunar surface
one of the few men to have explored the Lunar surface so far
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:06:50 UTC No. 16479687
>>16479682
He wasnt just wrong, his priors were the opposite of what happened. He is shitting on Musk specifically when he talks about how iPhone and Silicon Valley tech and Moore's law doesn't work in rockets. His conclusion is that rocketry will NEVER get cheaper. and that reuse will only be more costly because le shuttle
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:07:32 UTC No. 16479690
>>16479602
she should be barefoot
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:07:33 UTC No. 16479691
>>16479578
four fucking pixels
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:07:57 UTC No. 16479693
>>16479664
Nice breasts for her age!
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:09:52 UTC No. 16479694
>>16479693
how old is she?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:11:02 UTC No. 16479696
>>16479693
they will be good nutrients for the bug leg room
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:11:22 UTC No. 16479697
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:12:27 UTC No. 16479698
>>16479694
old enough for me!
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:18:14 UTC No. 16479699
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:20:00 UTC No. 16479700
>>16479637
Escuse me mr elias what if you just made the rocket a fuckhuge steel water tower with full flow staged combustion methalox engines that throooooooooost and you slap the thermal tiles on with clips and the rocket hot stages and theres no legs because the launch tower catches it with giant arms and it can refuel in orbit
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:23:11 UTC No. 16479703
>>16479578
>>16479684
>>16479691
Imagine losing track of the LEM after an extended rove.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:26:49 UTC No. 16479705
>>16479700
mr elias would insist that you need strap on solid boosters or it simply won't work
t. his experience making a micro sat solid rocket 30 years ago
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:28:03 UTC No. 16479708
>>16479700
stupid frogposter
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:28:19 UTC No. 16479709
So i wonder, do employees from big space companies lurk on /sfg/ ???
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:30:30 UTC No. 16479712
>>16479700
Tell him about it here
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/i
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:30:39 UTC No. 16479713
>>16479705
srb caught by chopsticks fucking when?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:32:01 UTC No. 16479714
>>16479713
too expensive, too complex, too high risk
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:33:14 UTC No. 16479716
I like big rockets and I cannot lie
You other brothers can't deny
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:36:40 UTC No. 16479717
fuck you
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:37:09 UTC No. 16479718
when?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:37:10 UTC No. 16479719
>>16479597
Two days
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:38:17 UTC No. 16479720
QUESTION: Why was gap between Flight 5 and Flight 6 so short? Same license yes, but what is different?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:42:37 UTC No. 16479723
>>16479720
same license thats literally it. every previous flight required license modification. the ships were also already built for previous flights. there is nothing else that could affect this other than license modifications not required.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:01:13 UTC No. 16479729
>>16479703
it would be interesting for sure, but i think the LRV had its own basic inertial guidance system, plus the earth and sun wouldn't move too much during a days driving.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:20:32 UTC No. 16479744
>>16479637
the lesson people should take from this is, ignore old farts in universities (and elsewhere), reach your own conclusions from first principles
paradigms are made to be broken
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:23:14 UTC No. 16479749
>>16479720
SpaceX would be flying 10x more frequently if not for the Biden administration bureaucracy. Once Trump takes office things are going to start moving so fast it will make our heads spin.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:23:45 UTC No. 16479750
>>16479564
If Trump shows up for Flight 6 then that one day delay was likely due to scheduling.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:23:59 UTC No. 16479751
>>16479744
if an elderly but distinguished scientist says that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:26:22 UTC No. 16479757
>>16479713
As soon as BSP.space gets off his ass.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:27:18 UTC No. 16479758
>>16479751
Less so in science, but definitely so in engineering.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:31:09 UTC No. 16479761
>>16479751
depends if his whole lifes career also depended on it being impossible
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:32:44 UTC No. 16479764
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1
Optus-X/TD7 Mission at T-00:56:00
>SpaceX is preparing to launch a Falcon 9 rocket with a payload that has been shrouded in secrecy to the point of not disclosing any specifics of the mission, and not using its original name
So what the hell is it?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:34:38 UTC No. 16479768
>>16479764
mini starship.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:35:11 UTC No. 16479769
REEE LAUNCH THE ROCKET RIGHT FUCKING NOW
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:35:16 UTC No. 16479770
>>16479764
X-37
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:35:18 UTC No. 16479771
>>16479764
project kuiper prototypes
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:35:37 UTC No. 16479772
>>16479764
Plasma Magnet Sail prototype
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:36:11 UTC No. 16479774
>"The significance of Musk is on par with the famous quote of Gol D. Roger, "I left the ONE PIECE in the Grand Line, now you just have to find it" - Zhuque 3 deputy chief designer
Real quote btw
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:36:45 UTC No. 16479775
>>16479764
Giant inflatable space dick, for trolling sky watchers for decades to come.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:38:27 UTC No. 16479778
>>16479637
In a certain sense, the 23 flight F9 boosters have the best mass fraction of any rocket ever.
The structure doesnโt get any heavier, but you just keep pumping more propellant into it. The more times you can reuse it, the better the mass fraction gets.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:38:45 UTC No. 16479779
>>16479777
When is its next mission?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:39:31 UTC No. 16479780
>>16479779
Not soon enough, but it should eventually happen
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:40:29 UTC No. 16479781
New Stoke Nova design
>>16479779
February, A62 with CSO-3 (French spysat)
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:40:35 UTC No. 16479782
>>16479775
imagine the space dick to go with two of these space balls
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:41:08 UTC No. 16479784
>>16479774
lmao
LandSpace seems great, my favorite company after SpaceX
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:41:21 UTC No. 16479785
>>16479781
This is the fully reusable low lift rocket no?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:41:31 UTC No. 16479786
>>16479781
New vs Old
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:41:40 UTC No. 16479787
>>16479774
total japanese culture victory over china
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:43:20 UTC No. 16479790
>>16479781
Stoke is gonna make it. Their progress has been insanely fast. My man is going to devour all those contracts waiting for a Falcon 9. I wonder if the pseudo-aerospike effect scales. Can they make a starship sized vehicle?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:44:39 UTC No. 16479791
>>16479781
this 2nd stage design is full clown mode meme nonsense
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:44:50 UTC No. 16479792
>>16479781
>February, A62 with CSO-3 (French spysat)
Nice, love a good spysat
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:45:56 UTC No. 16479795
>>16479786
The new one is taller? Is it increased lift or just taller same payload to orbit?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:48:04 UTC No. 16479799
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl_
>The Mental Decay of Thunderf00t
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:49:27 UTC No. 16479803
>>16479795
Exact payload is unknown, speculation is 3t fully reusable, 5t partially.
IMO the stretch was needed to even reach that. But stoke say they want to do orbital refuelling so that mitigates low payload,
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:52:58 UTC No. 16479808
>>16479703
they actually went out of their way to never drive farther than they were willing to walk back, there was no real obscuring terrain, and the Earth never moves in the sky so there's powerful celestial and lunar landmarks with mountains and large boulders
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:59:46 UTC No. 16479814
>>16479781
>New Stoke Nova design
>New
anon we have been telling you that Nova no longer looked like those renders for a while now
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:00:01 UTC No. 16479815
>>16479799
The mental GROWTH of THVNDERCHAD.
you know you are based when homos make drama videos about your 'downfall'
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:08:20 UTC No. 16479820
>>16479815
lmao so true this is why they're going after Musk as well
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:14:02 UTC No. 16479826
soooo what exactly is this spacex payload today
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:14:20 UTC No. 16479827
>>16479799
You know if he just said "I called that hyperloop was bullshit and got railroaded by a feud with fanboys/haters, and never gave musk a fair shake after that, sorry for putting out retarded elon collapse blueballing videos for years instead of the good content i could've made" I would be a thunderfoot fan again
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:17:34 UTC No. 16479829
>>16479814
I know, but we haven't had official drawings or renders yet.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:17:59 UTC No. 16479831
>>16479799
surprisingly even-handed.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:18:29 UTC No. 16479832
>>16479791
It's great, actually.
>>16479827
It's too late, the EDS has become terminal
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:26:32 UTC No. 16479843
t-2 min
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:28:09 UTC No. 16479845
woooosh
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:28:33 UTC No. 16479846
more spy sats for america
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:31:36 UTC No. 16479848
Odds and it crashes into the tower
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:31:58 UTC No. 16479849
>no stage-2 camera views
sneaky
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:32:28 UTC No. 16479851
>>16479848
wrong rocket sweet pea
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:32:48 UTC No. 16479853
Holy shit perfect ice crescent
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:33:33 UTC No. 16479854
>>16479637
It wasn't that they were lying, but they were stalling
Materials science is pretty much responsible for all the gains in rocketry since the 50s (the max attainable isp for kerolox, hydrazine and hydrolox hasn't changed), with a hat tip to computers no longer weighing multiple tons. Engineers had to wait for science to catch up to their ambitions. Reusability and multiple launch missions were always a political problem and not a technical one
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:35:55 UTC No. 16479858
>>16479855
probably some kind of camera artifact
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:35:59 UTC No. 16479859
>>16479855
reflection off the firmament
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:36:21 UTC No. 16479861
>>16479827
Thunderfoot has spent so much of his life being correct, he doesn't have the experience or emotional maturity required to admit that he's not only been wrong, but been prolifically wrong for years.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:36:54 UTC No. 16479862
say it with me:
HE
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:37:08 UTC No. 16479863
>>16479855
Rendering error. The team is on it and will be fixed for the next launch.
-E
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:37:20 UTC No. 16479864
>>16479862
CANT
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:41:28 UTC No. 16479872
>>16479855
its so bright theres probably some ghosting, reflection somewhere inside the lens and/or protective glass etc
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:42:10 UTC No. 16479875
>>16479867
there is no economic gain for having a free first stage booster
it just doesn't make sense
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:43:52 UTC No. 16479879
>>16479873
Will the banana decal survive reentry?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:44:05 UTC No. 16479880
>>16479864
keep getting away with it
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:44:25 UTC No. 16479883
>>16479876
im so glad they quit the carbon fiber meme
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:44:54 UTC No. 16479884
>>16479857
Apparently the self-proclaimed centrist doesn't think that the Gaetz pick for AG is weird.
Is he an idiot engineering savant or does he just pretend so he can get what he wants with FAA etc.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:47:54 UTC No. 16479887
>>16479884
>doesn't think that the Gaetz pick for AG is weird.
It's not though?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:49:00 UTC No. 16479889
>>16479799
lmao
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:49:47 UTC No. 16479890
>>16479887
Unqualified. Low intelligence. Won't likely pass senate.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:50:21 UTC No. 16479892
>>16479884
the gaetz pick is based
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:51:16 UTC No. 16479894
>>16479857
oh god why is he posting QAnon slop?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:51:40 UTC No. 16479898
>>16479892
it never gets passed and gaetz is a very shady figure. it doesnt matter anyways, there are better AG picks lined up.
also not spaceflight
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:52:03 UTC No. 16479899
>>16479898
wrong
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:53:52 UTC No. 16479901
>>16479827
Hyper loop was a PAPER musk published so OTHERS could work out the engineering.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:56:01 UTC No. 16479904
>>16479894
because it's funny
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:56:46 UTC No. 16479905
>>16479898
>>it never gets passed and gaetz is a very shady figure
at this point you should probably stop believing everything CNN tells you
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:03:43 UTC No. 16479916
>>16479868
Euros wtf are you doing
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:14:46 UTC No. 16479931
>>16479898
yeah I want to see Matt Fuddbusters for AG
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:17:30 UTC No. 16479936
>>16479901
Hyperloop wasn't even a bad idea. It just had to be cheaper than the California HSR, and it likely would have been. So it would've been competitive in its market while developing hardware that can withstand several cycles in vacuum (I wonder what that could be useful for)
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:22:49 UTC No. 16479942
>>16479916
We are too occupied with replacing our own population with african&middle eastern doctors&engineers to concern ourselfs with things like exploring the stars.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:23:29 UTC No. 16479943
>>16479942
or nuking the economy so that seniors can retire in comfort
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:32:00 UTC No. 16479950
>>16479868
This is more in one day than Europe has put into space in the last year.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:33:10 UTC No. 16479951
>>16479884
>weird
The election is over, you can stop using the losing candidates rhetoric.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:35:01 UTC No. 16479954
>>16479855
thats just an alternate timeline starship, don't look at it too long or you'll collapse into the bad timeline
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:41:12 UTC No. 16479961
>>16479954
Bros why did Elon put all his eggs in one basket like that, it's so over
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:58:56 UTC No. 16479977
>>16479750
It was due to the expected winds being too high wasn't it?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:59:24 UTC No. 16479978
>>16479977
Most likely
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:02:06 UTC No. 16479980
If SpaceX can't develop all-weather launch capabilities then what hope do we have for colonization of the solar system?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:02:46 UTC No. 16479983
>>16479980
remove the atmosphere
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:02:47 UTC No. 16479984
how wide would starship have to be to launch in any non-storm wind conditions?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:02:59 UTC No. 16479985
>>16479961
Elon's whole career has been a series of "double or nothing" bets and he wins every time.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:06:38 UTC No. 16479990
>>16479987
IIRC the 737 is for bulk flying employees who can't relocate from Hawthorne yet.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:07:44 UTC No. 16479993
>>16479987
>allahu ackbaaaaaaaar
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:11:22 UTC No. 16479995
>>16479987
Holy shit look at how small it looks compared to Starship
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:13:00 UTC No. 16479999
>>16479987
Sometimes I forget how big Starship and the whole 1km^3 is but this really put it into perspective.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:15:18 UTC No. 16480003
>>16479980
You're right. Time to form rape gangs.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:15:44 UTC No. 16480004
>>16479987
>sir they hit the second rocket
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:21:18 UTC No. 16480009
>>16479990
I see, they certainly chose a cool livery
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:23:27 UTC No. 16480014
>>16479987
Felon Husk steals from the expert engineers at Boeing yet again.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:24:19 UTC No. 16480016
>>16479995
>>16479999
Every time SpaceX's 737 is mentioned I think of this.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:26:00 UTC No. 16480019
>>16479942
or arresting people for noticing
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:28:19 UTC No. 16480022
>>16480014
I wish she did that to my penis
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:29:26 UTC No. 16480024
>>16480022
I wish I could throw you to Loki Patera
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:30:11 UTC No. 16480025
Someone explain to me how Starship isnt evolving into shuttle 2.0?
In fact, it may be worse. The mass fraction as payload is worse because its using a lower isp propellant.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:31:03 UTC No. 16480028
>>16480025
name me one man who cares about wet mass fraction
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:31:12 UTC No. 16480030
>>16480025
They don't have to fish the booster out of the ocean for one
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:33:24 UTC No. 16480032
>>16480025
Elon has been dying to put wheels on Starship and land on a runway. And put SRBs on it and switch to hydrogen. And change to aluminum structure that disintigrates with a single lost tile. and add fixed wings
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:34:07 UTC No. 16480033
>>16480030
SRBs were a small fraction of the cost and turnaround time. I'm talking about the orbiter specificaly.
Starship is similar to the orbiter in many bad ways, yet people magically expect it to have zero maintenace or turnaround.. Fastest Shuttle turnaround ever was like 1 month. In fact, fastest Falcon 9 booster tunaround was just under a month, and that's significantly less difficult than reusing an orbiter.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:36:24 UTC No. 16480034
>>16480024
>going deep inside Io
hnggggg
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:37:17 UTC No. 16480035
>>16480033
>Starship is similar to the orbiter in many bad ways, yet people magically expect it to have zero maintenace or turnaround
such as?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:39:23 UTC No. 16480036
>>16480033
Well your numbers aren't exactly accurate. The fastest shuttle turnaround was 54 days while Falcon 9 B1062 was turned around in just 21. As long as the tiles hold up on Starship I don't see what would prevent a rapid turnaround
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:40:03 UTC No. 16480038
>>16480029
Even if starship does a 360 spin and cures cancer before landing cuckfoot will still think he is proven right.
Stop giving that retard attention.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:42:00 UTC No. 16480039
>>16480035
>delicate ceramic tiles requiring thousands of hours of inspection
>extremely high performance (therefore hard to maintain) engines
>extremely oversized for its actual payload because of mass fraction sacrifice for reusability
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:43:24 UTC No. 16480040
https://x.com/memcculloch/status/18
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:44:42 UTC No. 16480041
>>16480039
>delicate ceramic tiles requiring thousands of hours of inspection
Nope.
>extremely high performance (therefore hard to maintain) engines
Nope.
>extremely oversized for its actual payload because of mass fraction sacrifice for reusability
Nope.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:46:36 UTC No. 16480042
>>16480039
How likely are Raptor 3 reliability issues, considering how streamlined it is? We saw one do 34 rapid relights at McGregor last month
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:49:58 UTC No. 16480043
>>16479720
Bear in mind that Flight 5 was ready to launch in August and by the time it finally did, Flight 6 Starship was almost ready.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:50:48 UTC No. 16480044
>>16480042
Iwill be honest with you. If you knew what I know about that test you ouldnt be so braggadocious about it. There is a reason SpaceX engineers are staying quiet.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:52:54 UTC No. 16480045
>>16480039
>delicate ceramic tiles requiring thousands of hours of inspection
no. if you lose a tile there's ablative heat shield underneath that can protect the steel from one re-entry, and if that doesn't work there's steel behind that. And the starship isn't strapped to an insulated fuel tank that shoots frozen foam at the heat shield.
Also most starship flights will be unmanned and it'll fly at a vastly higher rate than the shuttle. You could never test the shuttle's risk profile because it was always a manned vehicle, so you inspected it 1000 hours because a damaged tile could always be lethal in theory. But the shuttle with lost tiles survived because there was steel there, and the shuttle that burned up had a giant hole in the carbon-carbon leading edge of the wing, not the tiles.
>extremely high performance (therefore hard to maintain) engines
I have no idea if raptor will be easy to maintain but a simple description of "high performance" is infantile and you don't know shit
>extremely oversized for its actual payload because of mass fraction sacrifice for reusability
...big is bad because it just is ok? no more questions
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:53:05 UTC No. 16480046
>>16480044
From what you've said so far I think you're just larping, not a true spaceflight autist
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:53:14 UTC No. 16480047
>>16480044
thank you for bringing the truth to this thread of felon muskrat worshippers, onions guy 5
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:53:42 UTC No. 16480048
>>16479868
is spacex starting to get bottlenecked by the limited number of launch pads?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:53:56 UTC No. 16480049
>>16480042
wasn't it 39?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:56:06 UTC No. 16480052
>>16480049
I think you might be right, it was too many to keep track of lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:56:16 UTC No. 16480053
>>16479781
>Total height: 124 tall
How much is that?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:56:59 UTC No. 16480055
>>16480053
it's 124 tall, can you read?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:58:09 UTC No. 16480056
>>16480029
we kill him
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:59:45 UTC No. 16480058
>>16480056
you are a deranged lunatic TFDSer
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:00:58 UTC No. 16480059
>>16480043
So the real cadence is 4 months, not 1
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:03:32 UTC No. 16480060
>>16480053
I think the units is "feet" judging by the rest of the units on the page
so it's shorter than Starship
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:04:08 UTC No. 16480061
>>16480048
yes
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:05:03 UTC No. 16480063
>>16480059
The cadence will go down, just like with F9.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:07:12 UTC No. 16480067
>>16480063
the cadence is in worse shape than i thought. this isnt good
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:08:38 UTC No. 16480068
>>16480044
Froyo flavor now
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:09:01 UTC No. 16480069
>>16480067
This you as well >>16480025?
Are you spaceguy5?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:10:34 UTC No. 16480071
>>16480067
Flight 5 was October 13th, Flight 6 is November 19th. That's just over 1 month cadance right now.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:14:02 UTC No. 16480073
>>16480071
no. flight five was ready in august. meaning they started working on flight 6 then. meaning it took 4 months to get ready
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:20:10 UTC No. 16480076
>>16480073
Ship 33 has already undergone cryo testing, I imagine it'll be ready to go soon after Flight 6. Like the other anon was saying, the cadence is going to start ramping up
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:25:09 UTC No. 16480078
Starship Earth to Earth ripped off this. Elon Musk has literally zero creativity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUT
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:30:04 UTC No. 16480080
Reminder, 5m Starlink customer is at least 500million revenue per month or 6B per year.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:30:36 UTC No. 16480081
Germany invented and demonstrated E2E first with their V2.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:33:58 UTC No. 16480082
When will they reuse a booster? And what are they going to do with all these shitter early model boosters that they catch?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:34:20 UTC No. 16480083
>>16480079
ripped bananas
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:35:33 UTC No. 16480085
>>16480033
The orbiter was a completely irrelevant part of the shuttle stack and reusing the upper stage was a giant waste of time
The 2 solids cost more than a normal rocket anyways
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:36:41 UTC No. 16480086
>>16480082
>what are they going to do with all these shitter early model boosters that they catch?
One would hope they end up in a museum, just have to find some room in the Smithsonian
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:41:38 UTC No. 16480087
>>16480025
>The mass fraction as payload is worse because its using a lower isp propellant.
The Shuttle orbiter is 3/4 the mass of Starship with 1/4 the payload.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:42:41 UTC No. 16480088
>>16480086
Knowing the Smithsonian's history with flight, they are more likely to claim that Blue Origin are the originators of reusable space flight and obstinately insist on this for decades even though everybody else knows it's a farce.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:46:27 UTC No. 16480090
>>16480039
>extremely oversized for its actual payload
Isn't it interesting how some anons simply cannot wrap their brains around co-manifested payloads and rideshares?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:52:43 UTC No. 16480091
>>16480088
They're already going down that path
I'm still mad about the blorigin exhibit
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:53:26 UTC No. 16480092
>>16480090
Pretty sure that fag is whining about the mass ratio, which literally doesn't matter.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:04:07 UTC No. 16480101
>>16480039
>mass fraction
Completely irrelevant
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:07:38 UTC No. 16480105
>>16479868
>hmmm, I wonder who should I deboonk, an entire continent who can't launch more than 2 rockets in a year, or the tiny private company who launches twice that amount in just 2 days hmmm
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:11:28 UTC No. 16480111
>>16479987
Now Boeing has to own a SpaceX rocket.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:14:24 UTC No. 16480115
>>16480087
please dont tell me you beleive the muh 150 tonne meme. even elon musk doesnt beleive that. the real number is 35. compared to shuttles 25.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:17:29 UTC No. 16480116
>>16480115
so they will need 400 launches to refuel each HLS mission and thats where shotwell gets her 400 a year rate?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:27:20 UTC No. 16480122
>>16480115
I love how the skeptic payload figure keeps going down, you probably don't even know where the 150 ton figure comes from let alone why the payload figures go up on V2 and V3
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:27:33 UTC No. 16480123
Just produce methane off-Earth.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:28:29 UTC No. 16480124
>>16480105
greatest con artist ever, meanwhile the people in charge of not launching rockets are completely honest, heroes even
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:41:04 UTC No. 16480128
>>16480123
We will find substantial carbon deposits on the Moon, God willing
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:41:32 UTC No. 16480129
>>16479564
aint no way a falcon 9 launch cost 15 million if a pegasus launch (a tiny fraction of the size) costs 20 mil.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:42:25 UTC No. 16480131
>>16480123
Its literally free on Titan
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:44:39 UTC No. 16480132
>>16480128
We find more carbon and more water every time we look a little harder, inshallah moon carbon will success
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:45:11 UTC No. 16480133
>>16480131
>Titan
stop
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:46:37 UTC No. 16480134
>>16480129
They could be playing games with amortization but you have to realize they've been focused on cost across the entire organization this whole time: everything from materials to fabrication and salaries are under scrutiny. Hell they even have electric vehicles to keep costs down. What the cost reflects is that after a few launches they're literally just paying for the second stage (designed to be as cheap as possible) plus the cost of refueling the booster
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:46:59 UTC No. 16480135
>>16480131
Yeah but that's way over there, we need a bunch over here right now so we can get over there regularly enough to exploit it.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:49:45 UTC No. 16480138
>>16480135
Its literally free from (You)
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:51:48 UTC No. 16480142
>>16480129
theres a reason pegasus only flew government payloads
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:53:18 UTC No. 16480143
>>16480142
because it was ahead of its time. back then commercial space was all big geo sats
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:57:31 UTC No. 16480146
>>16480138
I don't think all the farts I've ever had combined would condense enough methane to fill Starship.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:00:46 UTC No. 16480150
>>16480143
also because SRBs are expensive compared to reflown kerolox boosters
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:08:04 UTC No. 16480155
>>16479987
>>16480009
I wonder if they put an all-economy 3-3 configuration in, or put in domestic first 2-2 for the entire cabin
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:17:01 UTC No. 16480159
to break even with a reused stage you have to fly 50/60x a year. thats per stage BTW. spacex is eating a tremendous loss which is why they are deeply in the red. but sunk cost is making them triple down on shitship
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:18:17 UTC No. 16480160
>>16479612
yfw their rockets are all just modified aggregat-8s
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:24:50 UTC No. 16480163
>>16480159
>to break even with a reused stage you have to fly 50/60x a year
Where are you pulling these numbers from?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:26:13 UTC No. 16480164
>>16480161
I can't wait for that stupid fucking banana to burn up during re-entry
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:27:57 UTC No. 16480166
https://x.com/BrendanCarrFCC/status
Brendan Carr for FCC chair. Starlink going BRRRRRRR
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:28:22 UTC No. 16480167
>>16480161
elon's sense of humor is painfully reddit, but I forgive him because rockets
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:28:37 UTC No. 16480168
>"I cannot tell my teams: 'Goodbye, see you next year!'"). Ariane would need 30 launches a year to justify the cost of researching reusability, he said.
I guess they can just do 0 launches a year instead
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:28:45 UTC No. 16480169
>>16480166
LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOOO
RIP THEM A NEW ASSHOLE MR CARR
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:29:11 UTC No. 16480171
>>16480166
WTFFF I LOVE THE FCC NOW!
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:30:01 UTC No. 16480173
>>16480167
I think you need a new word choice because "reddit humor" means something and has meant something else for the last 8 years or so.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:32:08 UTC No. 16480175
>>16480166
all 42 billion to SpaceX
>>16480173
I have no idea what you're whining about, "banana for scale" is quintessential unfunny reddit humor.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:34:11 UTC No. 16480176
>>16479691
heh
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:35:20 UTC No. 16480177
>>16480163
from the nasa economic feasibility review on reusable rockets done in the early 70s back when it was staffed by competent people
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:35:38 UTC No. 16480178
>>16480173
"banana for scale" was invented by reddit you knucklehead
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:36:06 UTC No. 16480179
>>16480166
He knows the relevant facts
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:57:18 UTC No. 16480187
>>16480179
Dissolve the FCC (in acid)
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 04:10:50 UTC No. 16480195
>>16480166
musk pulling his strings clearly. i mean hey, the man won fair and square, to the winner go the spoils. god fucking speed.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 04:12:00 UTC No. 16480196
>>16480187
leave carr out of it hes a good man.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 04:12:43 UTC No. 16480197
>>16480196
But the FCC won't let me be
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 04:44:43 UTC No. 16480207
So since Musk clearly worked his magic to make Carr the head of the FCC, who do you suspect he gets appointed to the STC and NASA? Assume STC automatically gets separated from FAA like USSF was from USAF
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 04:46:58 UTC No. 16480208
>>16480195
As I keep saying, the greatest act of regulatory capture in US history.
Probably also the salvation of mankind.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 04:53:49 UTC No. 16480211
hop tomorrow?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 05:01:46 UTC No. 16480215
>>16480207
Kathy Lueders for NASA chief matches the current theme of triumphant return of those who were wronged over those who wronged them.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 05:02:19 UTC No. 16480217
>>16480212
Damn, looks like Trump is going all out this time when stuff like this gets gutted. Still remains to be seen on the spaceflight side of things.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 05:04:42 UTC No. 16480220
How pissed is Trump going to be when Elon fails to deliver on HLS?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 05:08:15 UTC No. 16480222
>>16480207
I hope Greg Autry gets high up in NASA or FAA
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 05:12:52 UTC No. 16480225
>>16480177
Are you claiming that a 50-year-old NASA study accurately predicted Falcon 9 booster refurbishment costs?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 05:50:29 UTC No. 16480237
Build Back Better
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:13:59 UTC No. 16480255
>>16480166
>Mr. Carr, 45, was the author of a chapter on the F.C.C. in the conservative Project 2025 planning document, in which he argued that the agency should also regulate the largest tech companies, such as Apple, Meta, Google and Microsoft.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:14:33 UTC No. 16480257
>>16480255
>source: I made it the fuck up
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:15:57 UTC No. 16480258
>>16480257
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:16:56 UTC No. 16480260
>>16480258
>nytimes
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:19:52 UTC No. 16480264
>>16480260
>jewyork
go back
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:22:22 UTC No. 16480266
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:29:28 UTC No. 16480271
>>16480255
Project 2025 is the plan. Based
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:40:49 UTC No. 16480278
>>16480266
I was thinking "this looks like the sort of boomer image macro elon would post" before I read the filename
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:44:38 UTC No. 16480280
>>16479564
i just woke up! i am so excited to watch the starship flight 6 today!!
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:47:29 UTC No. 16480285
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:48:34 UTC No. 16480288
>>16480280
same
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:48:48 UTC No. 16480289
>>16480280
Two weeks retard
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:51:47 UTC No. 16480292
>>16480258
>communisttimes
Y i k e s
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:58:44 UTC No. 16480295
Drinking gorl pee on mars, livim the dream
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:04:54 UTC No. 16480299
>>16479868
and this is so normal, nobody bothered to watch the Starlink launch (nominal, of course)
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:05:14 UTC No. 16480300
>>16480295
ywngts
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:11:27 UTC No. 16480304
>>16480300
ever scare a girl that she pees her pants? drunk
the pee
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:16:28 UTC No. 16480310
>>16480257
There is always the site.
https://www.project2025.org/policy/
Seems like /sfg/ would like page 855.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:20:48 UTC No. 16480315
>>16479790
>I wonder if the pseudo-aerospike effect scales
Yes it does
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:29:55 UTC No. 16480322
>>16480315
no such thing
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:32:44 UTC No. 16480328
>>16480255
Now tell us what was wrong with what Carr wrote instead of leaning on vague democrat fearmongering.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:33:15 UTC No. 16480329
>>16480328
shut up retard
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:35:14 UTC No. 16480331
>>16480315
That's just underexpanded exhaust.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:44:13 UTC No. 16480337
>>16480329
you must be the pee-drinker
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:11:07 UTC No. 16480356
IFT-6 is tomorrow, right?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:18:53 UTC No. 16480362
>>16480350
Troon native.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:20:41 UTC No. 16480363
>>16480356
2 days
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:21:28 UTC No. 16480364
>>16480363
Hawaiian furnigger scum detected
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:34:41 UTC No. 16480369
dang the TD7 launch had great lighting
very kino on the pad and at launch
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:39:06 UTC No. 16480370
>>16480356
two more weeks
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 09:55:22 UTC No. 16480390
The Exploration Company (awful name) raised $160 million (โฌ151.6 million) in Series B funding to continue the development of its Nyx spacecraft.
https://europeanspaceflight.com/the
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:01:28 UTC No. 16480393
>>16480390
>european space capsule
I wonder what rocket it will actually launch on
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:05:39 UTC No. 16480396
>>16480390
>continues to be written in Europeans.
ESLtard
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:06:23 UTC No. 16480398
>>16480393
Would be hilarious if Ariane 6 wasn't ready in time and they had to launch on Falcon 9, though I'm not sure French ego would allow that to happen
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:24:28 UTC No. 16480406
>>16480350
penile secretion detected
initiating slurp mode
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:25:48 UTC No. 16480408
>>16480350
I can't find her online :(
Is she like one of those noble families where you only know that they exist, but they don't post anything on the internet?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:27:03 UTC No. 16480409
Of course I still love you
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:39:10 UTC No. 16480425
>>16480212
>"We are removing DEI from the government"
Based
>We are also landing a holocaust museum and an october 7th memorial on the moon"
Fuck
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:49:00 UTC No. 16480438
>>16480425
The first Israeli will walk on the Moon
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:56:53 UTC No. 16480443
>>16480386
still boggles the mind how they thought that weird ass polandball copy was good metoditchka.
guys they have TIGERS
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:04:22 UTC No. 16480450
>>16480443
Brain Drain is real.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:12:12 UTC No. 16480460
>>16480425
>>We are also landing a holocaust museum and an october 7th memorial on the moon"
Is this actually something that was talked about?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:14:05 UTC No. 16480464
>>16480175
Facebook, also known as Faceboot
I'm still happy that it was their satellite that got blown up on the ground.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:18:26 UTC No. 16480467
2 days is gonna be the day that they're gonna throw it back to you
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:25:44 UTC No. 16480476
Is LEO getting a bit crowded? I went outside to have a cig and do some stargazing after sunset and saw 6 satellites, 2 of which wandered into my field of view while observing other things.
>viewing Venus through binoculars
>satellite wanders by
>few minutes later see another satellite passing overhead, start tracking it through the binoculars
>after half a minute another satellite crosses paths perpendicular with it
>multiple flares and flashes in the western sky
I remember when I was a teenager (we're talking 20 years ago) it seemed like a rare treat to spot anything, now they're fucking everywhere.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:29:14 UTC No. 16480480
So what are the new goals of this new test flight? Capturing both the booster and the starship?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:39:08 UTC No. 16480493
>>16480480
The only major difference is relighting an engine is space. Otherwise they'll attempt the same thing with various tweaks to gather more data.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:43:05 UTC No. 16480498
>>16480493
but it's okay because they're going to relight the engines outside the environment
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:44:18 UTC No. 16480500
>>16480225
Explain what is different about rockets now without mentioning muh electronics. Fuel and engines are literally the same in performance metrics.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:44:52 UTC No. 16480501
>>16480493
Seems boring. Get it to do a flip or something.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:47:27 UTC No. 16480506
What's the deal with the payload doors anyway. Did Musk shoot the guy in charge and now someone else is frantically working for a fix?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:57:42 UTC No. 16480517
>>16480506
the deal is that it's not a priority.
getting everything else working was a priority, only now that they're getting closer to a deorbit burn test and eventually orbit does it make sense to spend time on it.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:00:29 UTC No. 16480521
https://x.com/JoeTegtmeyer/status/1
Better shot of the mural
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:00:36 UTC No. 16480522
>>16480517
once they can go to orbit the next priority is dolphine sex fluid transfer not payload deployment
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:00:54 UTC No. 16480525
>>16480425
While we are at it, we also need an April 20 memorial
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:06:33 UTC No. 16480533
>>16480525
I'm mad there will never be a launch as rowdy as IFT-1 ever again
>captcha: 420kw
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:12:43 UTC No. 16480546
>>16479637
People got used to government money and standards.
Private will always be superior to government.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:17:27 UTC No. 16480550
>>16479720
Deepstate doesn't want even the smallest possibility of a colony on mars that secedes from the union. Feds started a civil war over it last time.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:17:43 UTC No. 16480551
>>16480122
>I love how the skeptic payload figure keeps going down
Seriously asshole....
it doesnt jackass. its been 35 since elon revealed his "uhh... mayyyyybe 40 to 50 tonne" metric.
>you probably don't even know where the 150 ton figure comes from
Interplanetary Transport System, jackass. Then the rocket has gotten smaller and smaller with lowe and lower ISP/mass fraction, yet magically people expect it to still have the same payload.
>let alone why the payload figures go up on V2 and V3
Youre such an idiot who knows nothing about rocketry so I will school you. NO it wont reach 150T. Best case is they get to 65T from 35T currently, which would be a massive improvement.
>>16480116
>so they will need 400 launches to refuel each HLS mission and thats where shotwell gets her 400 a year rate?
Well obviously you are being sarcastic, but the official non-Elon mumber from SpaceX and NASA is 15 refuelling flights minimum. That obviously wouldnt be the case if muh 150 metric kilometers was true.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:18:20 UTC No. 16480553
>>16480546
commies clung especially hard to the idea that space was an impassable barrier for private ventures and they NEEDED the gobmint to do it.
now that that dream is shattered they all hate space.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:19:40 UTC No. 16480556
>>16480551
>interplanetary transport system
nope, 150 is also the figure for modern-day starship.
>quoting spaceguy5
oh, nvm, you're just pretending to be retarded.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:21:39 UTC No. 16480558
>>16479799
should of stuck to playing with sodium
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:26:26 UTC No. 16480566
>>16480476
noticed exact same thing a few weeks back. several times i could see 4-5 sats in my field of view, sometimes seeming to converge despite being on different tracks and moving at different speeds. never seen it so bust before.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:32:24 UTC No. 16480570
>>16479980
Once WeatherControlX company gets traction this wont be an issue
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:33:03 UTC No. 16480572
>>16480556
>150 is also the figure for modern-day starship.
LMAOOOOOOOO
>quoting spaceguy5
Better source than Berger. Spaceguy5 was telling people about ice in the tanks half a year before it was admitted.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:35:32 UTC No. 16480575
>>16480476
>>16480566
The machine grows.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:38:43 UTC No. 16480581
>>16480551
>even if all 17 Starship flights were fully expendable it would still be less than half the quoted $4.1 billion
It is extremely difficult to make the case for SLS
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:39:18 UTC No. 16480582
>>16480476
Looks like the right time to introduce a LEO congestion tax. We'll get UN on it.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:47:49 UTC No. 16480601
>>16480581
sls includes amoritization of dev cost. starship development cost more than sls and isnt yet done.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:48:54 UTC No. 16480605
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:53:52 UTC No. 16480612
>>16480601
the "4b" is an old cost. the new cost is $6B+ and it does not include any dev cost, thats an additional ~$30-40B on top thats already been spent. The $6B is strictly SLS hardware, launch tower, Orion, that all needs to be spent each launch.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:54:44 UTC No. 16480614
>>16480601
>amoritization
I would not use this to argue for SLS lmao
Also Starship dev cost aside from HLS flat rate doesn't pull billions of dollars away from science programs
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:57:00 UTC No. 16480619
>>16480601
The marginal cost of launching one SLS block 1 + Orion is where the $4.1B figure comes from, very explicitly not including a couple of tens of billions of dollars worth of development costs.
>$2B+ for block 1 as of 2 years ago
>$4.1B+ for one artemis launch as of 2 years ago
>$95B dev costs by 2025 (estimated as of 2 years ago)
>you're indirectly paying for all of this
>it's only getting worse year by year, never better
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:58:37 UTC No. 16480622
>>16480619
$95B dev cost is by end of 2030 I believe. By 2025, the dev cost would be ~$50B. Excluding the hardwares.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:59:34 UTC No. 16480626
>free market solves launch
>free market will never need a probe sent to Neptune
>take money away from the probe to Neptune program to fund a worse launcher
Man someone really needs to go in and add some efficiency
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:01:27 UTC No. 16480628
>>16480626
I got you senpai
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:02:23 UTC No. 16480631
>>16480622
>Specifically, NASAโs total Artemis campaign costs are projected to reach $93 billion
from fiscal year 2012 through 2025, with SLS Program costs representing 26 percent ($23.8 billion)
shit my bad dawg, that's only 93 billion of your tax money INCLUDING the pod that can't handle lunar return re-entry speeds, not in addition to
that changes everything
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:21:07 UTC No. 16480654
>>16480619
>>16480614
>>16480612
thats impossible. literally impossible. the hardware and staff dont cost that much so the numbers are clearly exaggerated or outright fake.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:35:30 UTC No. 16480672
>>16480654
nope
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:36:49 UTC No. 16480673
>>16480654
https://caseyhandmer.wordpress.com/
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:41:43 UTC No. 16480676
>>16480659
*dies from cringe*
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:48:06 UTC No. 16480685
>>16480673
Why is the audio version of this just him softly whispering in my ear, reading it like a list? He gives presentations just fine lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 13:59:34 UTC No. 16480696
>>16480601
sls prices are literally just the annual budget times 1 launch a year
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:07:29 UTC No. 16480703
>>16480266
I wish the meme of musk buying CNN was real.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:16:56 UTC No. 16480713
>>16479916
The only thing Europe innovates in is regulations.
-Vee
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:18:55 UTC No. 16480715
>>16480500
Ah, so you are retarded then
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:40:52 UTC No. 16480730
>>16480331
Underexpanded exhaust rapidly expands at the base of the nozzle. The net effect here is basically on the money for expansion.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:48:45 UTC No. 16480739
>>16479575
https://x.com/MRMELT4/status/184559
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:04:42 UTC No. 16480756
if max q is at 15 km high
why not build a mountain thats 20 km high and launch from there
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:05:44 UTC No. 16480757
>>16480756
Because thats stupidโฆ
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:08:33 UTC No. 16480760
>>16480756
Besides complicating the hell out of your logistics, the only thing this does is lower your dynamic pressure on ascent and gets rid of a small amount of air drag.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:08:51 UTC No. 16480761
>flight proven
>new to you rockets
a joke
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:10:43 UTC No. 16480765
>>16480756
we could achieve the same max-q reduction by just removing the atmosphere
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:17:58 UTC No. 16480772
>>16480756
better would be a tall (tall) tube with the end open to the vacuum of space. rockets wouldn't even need fuel anymore - just put them into the tube and *poof*, up they go.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:19:59 UTC No. 16480774
>>16480756
Atmospheric losses are a nothingburger
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:23:09 UTC No. 16480776
when is next starship? wasnt it supposed to be today?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:23:42 UTC No. 16480777
>>16480776
Yeah you missed the launch
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:25:37 UTC No. 16480779
>>16480778
I want to believe
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:27:35 UTC No. 16480783
>>16480167
>>16480175
Can you describe what makes something "reddit" and what makes something not "reddit"? I have a sneaking suspicion that you're simply abusing memes and being obnoxious rather than conveying actual thoughts/ideas.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:27:36 UTC No. 16480784
>>16480778
>miles-long giant conveyer belts
lol wtf
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:30:19 UTC No. 16480786
>>16480783
>he doesn't know
Ask ChatGPT
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:33:09 UTC No. 16480790
>>16480777
10 seconds on x and i learn the starship launch will be tomorrow. meanwhile all that people are doing here is reposting shit from x and seething about thunderfoot. whats even the point? only reason i still come here is because of habit
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:36:17 UTC No. 16480791
>>16480786
My suspicion was correct.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:37:26 UTC No. 16480792
>>16480091
gross
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:38:06 UTC No. 16480793
>>16480654
>tha- tha- that can't be true
How about you google the fucking numbers.
This is btw the worst /sfg/ I've read in a while. Jesus christ.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:39:12 UTC No. 16480794
>>16480778
>>16480779
Doubt. Besides the launch operations center being completely hosed by this arrangement, most launches would overfly the village and factory, and the hard quarantine at the existing site already disrupts manufacturing operations. They need launch pads that are further away from the factory if they want to meet their launch and production goals.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:44:40 UTC No. 16480799
>>16480778
conveyor means rail lines right? they can't actually mean conveyor, can they?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:45:23 UTC No. 16480800
>>16480572
pretending to be retarded is a sign of parental neglect.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:46:11 UTC No. 16480802
>>16480790
dumb nigger, everyone already knew and talked about the launch date since it's been changed a few days ago
not our problem you're a retarded tourist
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:47:15 UTC No. 16480803
>>16480799
They're Factorio-maxxing
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:56:34 UTC No. 16480809
>>16480778
>>16480779
Why build a new spaceport when you already have one in cape canaveral?
I always asumed that when they perfected starship operations would move from texas to florida.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:58:14 UTC No. 16480814
>>16480809
Normal people have moved in around it, within sonic boom range
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:58:31 UTC No. 16480815
>>16480809
why move when you can have 2 spaceports to launch from?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:01:38 UTC No. 16480817
>>16480814
>move in to place close to airport/spaceport
>complain about noise
Fuck i hate those people.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:03:56 UTC No. 16480819
>>16480799
i think the general idea behind the word "conveyor" is that its a private access transport route. that could mean rail, road, waterway, etc.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:10:07 UTC No. 16480821
>>16480778
>Conveyor
I was thinking about this the other day. Their current ground logistics breaks down at their aspirational cadence. I'm expecting something like the octograbber on rails.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:21:14 UTC No. 16480833
Is this the most kiked general ever? Yes.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:24:44 UTC No. 16480835
https://polymarket.com/event/will-t
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:27:10 UTC No. 16480838
>>16480835
Should be 95%. Its literally the exact same flight profile for the booster they did last time, only now they have inflight data. Couple that with their previous history of fixing their mistakes reliably I see no reason why its this low.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:29:39 UTC No. 16480840
>>16480778
this was never the plan for texas and never will be
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:33:32 UTC No. 16480844
>>16480476
>Is LEO getting a bit crowded?
How crowded would Earth be with only 7000 people?
Not very.
Now expand that area several times to represent LEO.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:36:15 UTC No. 16480847
>>16480844
If every person were driving their car around at 17,000 mph with no brakes I would be worried over 7000 people.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:44:14 UTC No. 16480851
>>16480847
How braindead can one anon be?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:45:04 UTC No. 16480853
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:45:46 UTC No. 16480854
>>16480835
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18585
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:46:37 UTC No. 16480856
>>16480838
It'll be big when they do, any notions that the first catch was a fluke can be dispelled after the second catch in a row.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:58:47 UTC No. 16480870
>>16480860
lmao how much do they think we spend on NASA compared to just something like medicaid? I thought Isaacman was smarter then this
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:00:40 UTC No. 16480872
>>16480870
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/upl
Ukraine gets more money than NASA from the US Gov. I've never even been to Ukraine.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:02:42 UTC No. 16480874
>>16480572
>Spaceguy5 was telling people about ice in the tanks half a year before it was admitted
SG5 will also still insist Raptors don't work because SpaceX's choice were not in the book of knowledge he was given.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:02:59 UTC No. 16480875
>>16480872
Youve also never worked for, benefited from or been to any NASA facilities so theres that.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:05:51 UTC No. 16480877
>>16480860
you could carve the nasa budget out of social security and no one would notice (except a few jewish accountants you fire)
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:06:00 UTC No. 16480878
>>16480875
You don't know where I've been.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:09:01 UTC No. 16480881
>>16480878
Not outright denying this means I was right
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:09:34 UTC No. 16480882
>>16480572
Bro the estronaut of all people managed to stammer a statement amounting to "hurr ice in danks" inbetween autistic vocalizations. Coherently enough that elon could understand what he wanted and then have a disjointed back and forth about it. Should be all you need to know about how insightful that observation is.
That rocket exhaust contains water isn't the gotcha you think it is.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:11:45 UTC No. 16480885
>>16480872
NASA could have totally used those 40 year old missiles.... It's totally a better use of money to endlessly store and eventually pay for disposal of those old munitions. SO TRUE COMRADE!
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:12:06 UTC No. 16480886
>>16480847
Anon moves the goalposts, yes collisions at those speeds are bad but the question was how crowded LEO is.
It's extremely empty.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:14:15 UTC No. 16480888
>>16480885
>NASA could have totally used those 40 year old missiles
honestly HIMARS sounding rockets could be kinda neat. good for storm chasing or something maybe.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:17:36 UTC No. 16480891
>>16480833
are you the most neglected child? yes.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:18:36 UTC No. 16480893
>>16480835
i hope a bunch of EDSers bet on it failing.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:19:50 UTC No. 16480895
>>16480881
Invalid, return to start and try again.
>>16480885
Deflection failed, return to start and try again.
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:20:23 UTC No. 16480898
>>16480895
TZD
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:20:26 UTC No. 16480899
>>16480835
That includes booster crash landing in the sea
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:21:36 UTC No. 16480902
>>16480872
ukraine hardly gets any money actually, it gets weapons and supplies that were paid for long ago, so that's not very accurate.
most of the cold hard cash it gets is from europe, we just send them materials in return for Total Zigger Death.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:22:51 UTC No. 16480903
>>16480895
it's not a deflection though, i'm assuming you're really upset when people remind you the yookrainer is not getting much in the way of actual liquid money, they just get investments in TZD
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:23:35 UTC No. 16480904
>TZD
>TZD
>TZD
>>>/pol/
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:24:32 UTC No. 16480905
>>16480904
you won't find much TZD on /pol/, that place is an emptied husk for foreign agents and brown people to play around in.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:24:38 UTC No. 16480906
>>16480870
~$45bn or whatever for NASA, ~$2tn or more fo dem programs.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:25:05 UTC No. 16480907
>>16480885
Imagine what NASA could do with the hundreds of billions that will be spent replacing the munitions expended on a meaningless proxy war.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:25:40 UTC No. 16480908
>>16480904
Hello mr newfag. I think you meant >>>/k/
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:25:45 UTC No. 16480909
>>16480907
3 SLSs
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:26:18 UTC No. 16480911
>>16480904
excuse me >>>/k/ is the designated cringe dog astroturfing board, pol has the zigger sympathizers
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:27:14 UTC No. 16480913
>>16480905
>>16480908
>>16480911
>>>/out/
I don't care where you go, just fuck off.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:27:52 UTC No. 16480915
>>16480908
>>16480911
You guys need to work on appearing organic.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:28:23 UTC No. 16480916
>SpaceX breaking launch cadence records
>/sfg/ shit-flinging over unrelated topics
Sad
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:29:38 UTC No. 16480917
>>16480907
considering those munitions would have otherwise been thrown away and would have to be replaced with more modern equipment anyway, zero, because that money is also already being spent whether ukraine uses the old stuff to kill ziggers or not.
>meaningless proxy war
it's probably one of the easiest foreign policy wins in a long time, an absolute handout to easily destroy one of the most obnoxious enemies to the US for basically no loss of our own.
along with starship it's one of the few times i actually felt my tax dollars going towards something useful.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:30:17 UTC No. 16480918
^ shill.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:30:54 UTC No. 16480920
>>16480907
We won't get to see that day. Humanity is more interested in killing itself than development.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:31:09 UTC No. 16480921
|
V shill
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:31:30 UTC No. 16480922
Its so easy to tell the anons with a brain and the russian losers who hang out here because no one in their country cares about space anymore.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:32:21 UTC No. 16480923
>>16480918
???
i'm just pointing out that russia is pretty much crippled for the next 50 years and it took us literally nothing, it was a great investment whether ukraine survives or not.
do you have a problem with mongol rapebabies stepping on a political landmine and gimping themselves for no reason? because that's not really the US' fault.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:33:04 UTC No. 16480925
>>16480918
>>16480921
Laser accuracy.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:33:22 UTC No. 16480927
>>16480916
DOGE went too far there are no jannies left.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:34:35 UTC No. 16480928
>>16480925
Found one
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:34:43 UTC No. 16480929
I want to support my homeland Europe's space endeavours but they're even lazier than NASA somehow and are being fucking commie bastards.
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:36:00 UTC No. 16480930
>>16480921
>>16480925
i'm not sure how the ones rooting for the most succesful spacefaring country in the world are shills compared to someone constantly making excuses for a country that'd rather kill half their population to take some fields rather than actually rebuild their space industry, they should've built reusable buran if they want to be seen as anything less than peasant hasbeens.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:38:38 UTC No. 16480933
>>16480923
>???
You convince nobody, fuck off.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:38:59 UTC No. 16480935
>>16480931
>they're
heh, minor spelling mistake, looks like i win.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:40:20 UTC No. 16480937
>>16480933
who are you talking to? there's nobody convince, just pointing out established facts.
i am not the agent sitting in your walls, i can give you his phone number though if that's what you'd like.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:41:03 UTC No. 16480939
>>16480927
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:42:34 UTC No. 16480941
>>16480931
I dont. Most Marsfags dont because Titan has a clear and real use as a propellant depot. Its one deranged anon, all these years he has been trying to force his opinion of Titan sux onto /sfg/ but reality doesnt line up with his worldview.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:43:07 UTC No. 16480942
>>16480927
DOGE has the double positive of removing all of the agitprop commies that leftists have been to pussy to remove.
shithole nation apologists are going for a helicopter ride.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:45:40 UTC No. 16480944
>>16480931
>Mars is already very hard so making it 10x harder is the same
No.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:47:54 UTC No. 16480946
>>16480944
It won't be 10x harder in 100 years, faggot.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:51:58 UTC No. 16480947
>>16480931
Titan is cool and all, but the problem is that it is "Fuck you" kilometers away. Way more than Mars.
Might as well start with the closer celestial objects and build up experience from there.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:52:36 UTC No. 16480948
fuck you
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:53:41 UTC No. 16480950
>>16480941
>propellant depot
by the time it's easy to mine the lakes for methane no one's going to care about going there for methane. we'll just get ice from the belt and Jovian moons
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:53:44 UTC No. 16480951
>>16480916
at some point the same old news gets boring. wooow more launches, who cares? maybe if the payloads were interesting then people might be interested, but its more boring stuff.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:54:12 UTC No. 16480952
>>16480947
Distance sucks.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:54:31 UTC No. 16480953
>>16480949
We're still waiting Jeff
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:54:38 UTC No. 16480954
>>16480948
fuck you too
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:55:16 UTC No. 16480956
>>16480950
>implying hydrolox is the fuel of the future
>implying starship isnt whats going to be the main method of transportation for the next 100 years
holy blorigin cope
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:56:05 UTC No. 16480958
>>16480956
Who knows, he could be an Arianespace shill
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:57:37 UTC No. 16480960
>>16480956
we'll use the hydrogen to make other fuels, which will still be easier than going all the way to Titan and back.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:01:16 UTC No. 16480963
>>16480956
>starship isn't surpassed for 100 years
Grim
I was hoping for it to be outdated by the 2040's
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:03:18 UTC No. 16480967
>>16480906
nasa has been around $25bn or less for years i think
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:03:19 UTC No. 16480968
>>16480963
Its not like V3 is the final version.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:03:55 UTC No. 16480970
>>16480962
Glad we finally get rockets that look like real workhorses, I'm excited to see what a multiple-use Superheavy ends up looking like
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:04:21 UTC No. 16480972
>>16480967
Nah man, it was ~$40bn back in 2015 (or 2005, don't remember) and it's only been adjusted for inflation.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:08:18 UTC No. 16480978
>>16480963
It'll be the Model-Type of spaceships. First to be mass produced means pretty quickly it'll be the majority of what's flying, and even decades after it's outdated there will still be some floating around at companies that have the capital to buy new ones.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:08:57 UTC No. 16480979
>>16480970
Starship/Superheavy will end up bronze colored after multiple cycles of entry heat.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:10:51 UTC No. 16480980
>>16480963
Starship will enable in-orbit construction of Orion-drive ships. Can't use nuclear pulses in the atmosphere? No problem, use them outside of it instead.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:11:08 UTC No. 16480981
>>16480970
Shiny iridescent. Bits of starship were turning golden after re-entry
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:11:20 UTC No. 16480982
Per L2, rollout to pad for static fire on Monday
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:15:37 UTC No. 16480986
>>16480856
And what if it fucks up the second time?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:16:29 UTC No. 16480987
>>16480979
>>16480981
God its going to be kino
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:17:36 UTC No. 16480989
>>16480986
why would it do that?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:17:40 UTC No. 16480990
>>16480986
Expect doomerism the likes of which you've never seen, spreading like wildfire across social media and legacy media outlets in unison (likely spouting the exact same arguments word for word, lockstep like a unified machine).
A tsunami of "it's so over". (note: it won't be over)
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:24:24 UTC No. 16480998
>water cooled barge deck
is this new?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:24:55 UTC No. 16480999
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1gqxvNpX
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:25:22 UTC No. 16481001
>>16480886
Obviously no one gives a shit about the percentage of space volume occupied by metal. The question is the probability of collisions, for which speed is important.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:26:59 UTC No. 16481003
>>16480972
i dont know buddy
https://www.planetary.org/space-ima
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:28:08 UTC No. 16481004
>>16480972
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budge
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:30:43 UTC No. 16481008
>>16481003
i'm not your buddy, guy
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:33:23 UTC No. 16481012
NARMAL
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:35:53 UTC No. 16481014
>>16481007
haha, i get it.
what clever wordplay
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:36:54 UTC No. 16481017
>>16481013
i only watch the landings for the tiny chance that something goes wrong.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:38:54 UTC No. 16481019
LAUNCH IS NOMINAL *yawn*
might as well be watching nascar
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:39:10 UTC No. 16481022
stage 1 transsexual
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:39:33 UTC No. 16481024
>>16481008
Look here my friend, im not you guy.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:39:42 UTC No. 16481025
>>16480784
"The Roads Must Roll!"
(old SF short story)
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:39:56 UTC No. 16481026
it goes up it comes down
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:40:43 UTC No. 16481032
>>16481026
he gets away with it yet again
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:40:52 UTC No. 16481034
good landing, not even a cough or a clap from the spacex canteen in the bg.
even they're bored.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:41:17 UTC No. 16481036
>>16480838
I would hope they would try for something new this time, even with the same flight profile. More aggressive propellant margins, that kind of thing you know. Push the limits and collect data.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:41:44 UTC No. 16481037
Congratulations Michael Taylor!
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:42:15 UTC No. 16481038
>>16480885
funny you should mention that, considering the Taurus and Minotaur launchers are basically refurbished ICBMs
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:42:16 UTC No. 16481039
>indian space research organisation
i didn't know this was a scatsat launch.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:43:57 UTC No. 16481042
>>16481036
nothing wrong with doing the same thing twice on something as experimental as booster catch. could be plenty of failure modes that they got closer to on the first catch than they realized.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:47:34 UTC No. 16481050
>>16481044
why? are you a fag?
watching rockets take off is cool
watching the biggest most powerful rocket in the world take off should be super cool.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:48:42 UTC No. 16481052
QUESTION: Will Flight 7 go orbital? Will Flight 7 deploy payload? Will Flight 7 Ship RTLS?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:49:16 UTC No. 16481054
>>16481052
yes no no
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:50:05 UTC No. 16481055
>>16481050
I'm excited but since it's near identical to Flight 5 there are no real surprises or breakthroughs. It's the least exciting so far
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:50:39 UTC No. 16481056
>>16480870
A Jew is still a Jew, he will never admit dem programz and interest payments are a majority of federal spending.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:51:44 UTC No. 16481058
>>16481044
>negative mass margin
fat fuck
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:51:44 UTC No. 16481059
>>16481044
yes, but still an event
when these start becoming biweekly spamming starlinks then perhaps I won't watch each one (depending on the timing)
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:53:27 UTC No. 16481062
>>16481054
Seems pretty lame. What will Flight 8 do?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:53:30 UTC No. 16481063
>>16480963
I mean we're gonna see the 18m version in less than a decade. Maybe beyond that something that has raptors but isn't cylindrical
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:54:58 UTC No. 16481065
>>16481025
I prefer "Blowups Happen" from the same collection, but both are neat views into what the past imagined of our time.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:57:40 UTC No. 16481069
mvac is gonna fucking explode
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:02:52 UTC No. 16481074
>>16481058
she's cute
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:10:00 UTC No. 16481086
>>16481076
for the short term any decent zip tie would probably be fine
in the long term UV rating would be paramount
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:12:34 UTC No. 16481092
>>16481091
>inb4 it crashes into tower
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:12:50 UTC No. 16481093
and people still think that there is no difference to spaceflight between Harris and Trump? lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:14:32 UTC No. 16481096
>>16481091
where's the VIP watching spot?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:15:26 UTC No. 16481097
>>16481091
He's coming back.
(Pence not invited)
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:18:48 UTC No. 16481100
>>16481091
If it crashes, Trump will dump Elon like a hot turd
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:19:47 UTC No. 16481102
>>16481044
true but its still going to be a nail biter when super heavy comes back for a landing. if it crashes into stage zero then spacex will be set back at least 6 months, maybe a year.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:20:09 UTC No. 16481103
>>16480362
reminder that Hullo was a SomethingAwful goon. A goon from Troon.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:20:47 UTC No. 16481105
>>16481091
>anon was right
maybe /sfg/ is always right
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:21:43 UTC No. 16481107
>>16481100
>"I like rockets that DON'T crash"
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:23:02 UTC No. 16481110
>>16481100
>>16481107
luckily it won't
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:23:31 UTC No. 16481111
>>16481093
It's fucking crazy how little advocacy NASA does for its own programs without Bridenstine. Big Jim used to meet with congressmen all the time, evangelizing NASA, Artemis, science programs. Instead, this admin has been hiding, terrified of criticism. The national space council was completely neglected. You have fools like Jim Free lauding cost-plus. The crypt keeper is just...there.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:23:42 UTC No. 16481112
>>16481065
gotta love my man Heinlein, he'd probably love everything about SpaceX
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:24:10 UTC No. 16481113
>>16481091
not surprising, anyone should've seen this coming
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:24:22 UTC No. 16481114
>>16481091
I fucking told you the 1 day delay was due to scheduling with Trump coming.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:24:23 UTC No. 16481115
>>16481103
>was
You never stop gooning.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:25:11 UTC No. 16481117
>>16481114
I kneel.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:25:39 UTC No. 16481118
>>16481114
Yeah. I knew this weeks ago. (L2 subscription)
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:26:27 UTC No. 16481120
>>16481111
How hard would it be to sneak on to a press panel just to make fun of Jim Free
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:29:12 UTC No. 16481124
>>16481111
That's why anyone over 65 in leadership positions is a mistake. The armed forces know what's up.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:29:43 UTC No. 16481127
>>16481120
And these shitters wont be around in February when the stranded astronauts return. They won't have to answer for anything
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:31:53 UTC No. 16481129
>>16481044
poor alpaca :(
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:34:47 UTC No. 16481131
>>16481112
He'd probably want to know how soon before he could buy his own Starship. I do too, lol.
>"What do you mean I can't fly it myself? It's mine, isn't it?"
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:35:00 UTC No. 16481132
Remember when NASA said Artemis 1 was the biggest success ever? So successful that they exceeded performance on all margins? Remember when they lied and hid the heatshield damage creating a 3 year gap between Artemis missions, and downgrading all subsequent missions? Delaying a landing to Artemis 4?
It's becoming very clear, SLS will not launch astronauts to the Moon
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:36:05 UTC No. 16481133
>>16481003
>>16481004
Well, then it's even worse. You could slash NASA's budget and maybe give everyone in Florida a single puff from a newport.
Saving the world.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:37:05 UTC No. 16481134
>>16481129
The whole HLS selection circus is unrivalled lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:38:01 UTC No. 16481135
Niggers
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:43:38 UTC No. 16481140
>>16481138
Wouldn't Ganymede be more interesting?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:44:57 UTC No. 16481141
>>16481138
Everyone has Titan/Europa fever and the only prescription is more Callisto
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:46:55 UTC No. 16481142
>>16481133
Just send to them that REALLY need it in ukraine
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:47:20 UTC No. 16481143
>>16481134
holy shit
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:49:46 UTC No. 16481144
>>16481141
Everyone knows that Mimas is the place to be
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:50:10 UTC No. 16481146
>>16481134
It was a fun day, hardly anyone believed in this thread that spacex would be chosen and then we saw how garbage other applications were
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:50:31 UTC No. 16481147
>>16481140
Ganymede is great if you can neutralize Jupiters radiation belts. Hell even Callisto while lowest radiation is still 4000X higher dosage than the surface of the Earth and 52X higher than on Mars.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:50:50 UTC No. 16481148
>>16481139
I want to explode on her boosters if you catch my drift....
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:51:44 UTC No. 16481149
>>16481091
I conjured it up and it will become reality
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:53:27 UTC No. 16481150
>>16481134
and Bezos sueing NASA and losing and writing that pathetic open letter. all of it happening before Biden could appoint anyone. and Doug Loverro getting fired for trying to help Boeing. Great fuckin times
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:55:31 UTC No. 16481152
This is starting to feel like a timeline we don't deserve. I'm getting nervous. Nothing good happens, so why is good stuff happening?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:57:41 UTC No. 16481155
>>16481152
Now we just need AI progress to flatline so we can avoid total annihilation
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:58:21 UTC No. 16481156
>>16481152
Shh, if you shut your mouth about it then maybe the universe won't notice.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:00:06 UTC No. 16481158
>>16481152
>Nothing good happens
Zoomer spotted. Good things did use to happen. Let go of your fears. You are finally free.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:03:39 UTC No. 16481163
>>16481158
Your zoomers detector is working flawlessly. I will tentatively accept this explanation.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:07:49 UTC No. 16481166
>>16481152
You were addicted to doomscrolling and black pills.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:08:26 UTC No. 16481168
>>16481158
>Good things did use to happen!
>We had a shuttle flight almost every year!
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:09:03 UTC No. 16481170
>>16481132
NASA needs major reform along with the rest of the agencies
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:10:04 UTC No. 16481172
>>16481139
DIE DIE DIE
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:10:33 UTC No. 16481173
>>16481139
KILL
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:12:21 UTC No. 16481177
New SpaceX tweet
>https://x.com/SpaceX/status/185860
>SpaceX was founded to increase access to space and help make life multiplanetary.
>In just this year, weโve launched 114 successful Falcon missions and counting for our commercial and government customers, deployed ~1,700 @Starlink satellites to provide high-speed internet for millions of people all around the world, and made extraordinary strides developing Starshipโs capability to return humanity to the Moon and ultimately send people to Mars.
>If you want to join the team and help build a more exciting future, check out the latest job openings across the company http://spacex.com/careers
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:13:54 UTC No. 16481179
>>16481110
What if it does?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:15:58 UTC No. 16481181
>>16481177
>http://spacex.com/careers
>Check for biology
>"There are no jobs matching your filters"
Feels bad man
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:18:57 UTC No. 16481185
>>16481177
the berger article said spacex now has 15k employees, which is triple the amount they had from six years ago. if they're making a tweet saying that they need more people then im guessing that they're expecting to grow alot real quick. they'll be bigger than nasa soon.
>>16481181
neuralink exists
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:21:01 UTC No. 16481190
>>16481185
>>16481177
how do they expect to offer starship for 1 million dollars with 15k employees to pay every day?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:21:05 UTC No. 16481191
>>16481177
none in my state
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:22:36 UTC No. 16481193
>>16481177
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T43
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:22:58 UTC No. 16481195
>>16481190
>pay
money won't exist on mars, at least not for a while
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:23:51 UTC No. 16481198
>>16481193
just a highlight montage
the only footage I don't recognize is the F9 from above the cloud layer
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:24:57 UTC No. 16481201
>>16481193
>video titled multi-planetary
>all the footage is about earth
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:26:03 UTC No. 16481203
>>16481134
lol
imagine being some old space company who wants to build a lander from scratch competing against a modified Starship
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:29:40 UTC No. 16481205
>>16481190
That's like ~$3 million a day, so just launch more than three times a day
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:30:08 UTC No. 16481206
>>16481091
Another assasination incoming.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:30:25 UTC No. 16481207
>>16480725
KEK, saved
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:31:37 UTC No. 16481209
>>16481114
based anon
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:33:40 UTC No. 16481213
>>16480778
Q-Anon type source. "some anonymous guy with inside knowledge said so, trust me"
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:34:58 UTC No. 16481214
>>16481212
this vehicle on the right looks super unrealistic
stick to kerbal
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:35:28 UTC No. 16481215
>>16481212
youn eed a hundrad starships to do the thing which one regular rocket doe
literal a scam
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:39:09 UTC No. 16481218
>>16481212
The amount of boutique solutions in the early space age will be looked back on poorly.
Imagine if we designed a new car for everyone just because they had a different commute than their neighbor.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:47:55 UTC No. 16481227
>>16481203
what the fuck is BO doing anyway? didnt they get chosen for a lander? have they even bent metal?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:49:36 UTC No. 16481230
>>16481220
scroll up zoomer
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:50:23 UTC No. 16481232
>>16481215
too bad the regular rocket only launches once every 3 years
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:57:14 UTC No. 16481239
>>16480778
ploverbros, i don't feel so good...
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:58:19 UTC No. 16481240
>>16480920
20th century boomer doomerism
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:59:33 UTC No. 16481242
>>16481227
who knows, what makes them bid on shit like that when they haven't even launched a rocket yet
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:59:57 UTC No. 16481243
>>16481179
Kamala will win
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:01:04 UTC No. 16481246
>>16481240
You will be a blackpilled boomer doomer, and you will be happy.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:01:38 UTC No. 16481247
>>16481114
I kneel
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:02:42 UTC No. 16481248
>>16480778
lmao who believes this?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:03:51 UTC No. 16481249
>>16481242
bezos wants to be remembered for it, unironically
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:05:26 UTC No. 16481251
>>16481227
They made a mock-up and not much else
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:06:40 UTC No. 16481252
>>16481249
he's gonna eat big losses signing firm fixed price contracts for stuff
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:07:18 UTC No. 16481253
>>16481251
They are good at mockups
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:08:21 UTC No. 16481255
>>16480215
Would be kino but very oldspace style CoI move, SpaceX deserve it for actually getting shit done though
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:09:36 UTC No. 16481257
>>16480963
Quantized Inertia based Horizon Drives will replace other forms of electric propulsion by 2035, but there's no replacement for chemical THRรรST for fast-impulse maneuvers until you're using compact fusion reactors to feed high efficiency QI drives.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:10:06 UTC No. 16481258
>>16481096
For this particular VIP next to Elon in Mission Control.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:10:48 UTC No. 16481259
>>16480783
Kindly blow it out your ass.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:11:18 UTC No. 16481260
>india plans their own lunar gateway by 2040
yeah right
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:12:05 UTC No. 16481261
>>16481206
>>16481091
ULA snipers will have their attention divided.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:14:16 UTC No. 16481263
>>16481181
Learn to weld.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:18:28 UTC No. 16481266
>>16481260
is that before or after they become a super power?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:19:56 UTC No. 16481267
>>16481266
lunar dominance is actually what pushes them into superpower status
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:22:08 UTC No. 16481268
>>16481259
I wouldn't know, I don't go there.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:22:48 UTC No. 16481269
>>16481267
make the moon poop again
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:23:28 UTC No. 16481270
>>16481259
How the fuck is it like planking??
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:24:45 UTC No. 16481272
>>16481181
>no architects needed
Yeah right. Mars 2050. Good luck faggots
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:25:47 UTC No. 16481274
>>16481270
because both are "lol so randum xD"
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:29:33 UTC No. 16481278
>>16481272
what annoys me the most about that picture is that there are no sidewalks. what happens if your car breaks down, or you if wanna go to mcdonalds but you live in one of those apartment buildings behind? do you really need to use your car to drive just one block?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:30:34 UTC No. 16481279
>>16481278
>apartment buildings
pretty sure those are hotels
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:30:38 UTC No. 16481280
>>16481270
Neither are funny.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:30:50 UTC No. 16481281
>>16481278
This is just off a highway. Everyone there brought a car. Those are motels not apartments. I just think it's ugly so I used it as a worst case example.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:32:18 UTC No. 16481282
>>16481280
Oh ho! I beg to differ, my good narwhal
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:33:35 UTC No. 16481283
>>16481282
epic troll XD
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:33:49 UTC No. 16481285
>>16481278
That picture is Breezewood PA, approximately nobody lives there. Breezewood is ALWAYS the place pictured and mocked because Breezewood is infamous for being very unusual. It's an aberration, not the norm.
It's a glorified truck stop created by a botched connection between an interstate and a turnpike, which were never connected properly for esoteric reasons and subsequently never properly connected because it became profitable for the businesses that formed in between them.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:36:14 UTC No. 16481288
>>16480885
>send all our munitions to Ukraine
>military oh looks like we need several hundred billion dollars to replace all of that
>better use of money
God I hate /k/opers
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:36:52 UTC No. 16481290
This แแ flight seems routine, it's basically the same thing as last time. Nice that it'll land in daytime, but otherwise I'm kinda just interested in seeing how they've changed the heatshield. They caught the booster once so they should be able to do it again no sweat too
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:38:35 UTC No. 16481292
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:39:46 UTC No. 16481293
>>16481285
Notice how there's no ramp between I 76 (the turnpike) and I 70 (the interstate). To get from one to the other drivers have to get onto Route 30. That's what Breezewood is, a short stretch of Route 30 which drivers are forced onto to go between I 76 and I 70. That's why Breezewood exists, that's why it is the way it is.
Everywhere around this freakshow intersection (which isn't even legally a town, virtually nobody even lives there) is beautiful farm land and rural housing. Central Pennsylvania is one of the nicest places in this country, and Breezewood is infamous because of how much unlike it is anywhere else in the area. People who cite it as an example typical of America are morons.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:39:58 UTC No. 16481294
>>16481285
This is what they took from us
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:42:30 UTC No. 16481296
>>16481294
kino
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:43:31 UTC No. 16481297
>>16481285
it's not unusual. These truck stop "towns" that are just a motel, gas stations, and fast food are all over the country.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:43:38 UTC No. 16481298
>>16481294
Breezewood was never that.
> According to the Federal Highway Administration, the peculiar arrangement at Breezewood resulted because at the time I-70's toll-free segment was built, the state did not qualify for federal funds under the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956 to build a direct interchange, unless it agreed to cease collecting tolls on the Turnpike once the construction bonds were retired[14]โa direct interchange would have meant that a westbound driver on I-70 could not choose between the toll route and a free alternative, but would be forced to enter the Turnpike. However, the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission was not willing to build the interchange with its own funds, due to the expected decrease in revenue once Interstate 80 was completed through the state.[14] Accordingly, the state chose to build the unusual Breezewood arrangement in lieu of a direct interchange, thus qualifying for federal funds because this arrangement gave drivers the option of continuing on the untolled US 30.[14]
>Although laws have been relaxed since then, local businesses, including many traveler services like fast food restaurants, gas stations and motels, have lobbied to keep the gap and not directly connect I-70 to the Turnpike, fearing a loss of business. In order for a bypass to be considered, Breezewood's own Bedford County must propose it, which is "just not an issue that really appears on the radar for us," Donald Schwartz, the Bedford County planning director, said in 2017.
It exists because of an autistic interplay between state and federal laws, and has since been kept that way because it's profitable for the county.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:46:26 UTC No. 16481300
>>16481288
>be MIC
>start a proxy war
>sell existing stock at a massive mark up
>get quadrillions $$$ worth of contracts from corrupt government officials
>trade stocks increase in value
>all's right with the world
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:47:10 UTC No. 16481302
>>16481297
Yes, it is unusual. That's why it's always Breezewood that's getting posted. Breezewood specifically is infamous because of how much of an usually ugly clusterfuck it is.
Breezewood exists in Bedford County. The seat of Bedford County is the town of Bedford. Pic related is Bedford. This is what an average town in central Pennsylvania looks like. It's not some sort of fast food truck stop abomination like Breezewood.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:48:31 UTC No. 16481304
>>16481302
Bedford is by no means a pretty town, but it's utterly typical of Pennsylvanian towns and it looks NOTHING like Breezewood.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:52:20 UTC No. 16481307
>all this Breezewood talk
I only brought it up as an example of emergence in an industrialized society. If you aren't careful your human centric systems will trend towards the machine. It is important to avoid this, especially when you can't move somewhere else or go outside. Architecture will be more important on Mars than it is on Earth, for psychological reasons. That's all I was saying here >>16481272
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:53:49 UTC No. 16481309
>>16481307
you will live in the pod tunnels
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:54:09 UTC No. 16481310
>>16481152
Musk keeps winning.
In Musk We Trust
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:56:24 UTC No. 16481311
>>16481185
>expecting to grow alot real quick
There's gonna be 2 towers being built in Florida and may double that. There may be a factory increase in Florida as well to spin up their own Starship factory.
So they'll probably grow to ~20K over the next few years prob
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:58:51 UTC No. 16481313
>>16481310
>>16481152
Musk is quite literally the reason we're in this timeline. The Great Man theory is 100% true, he proves it.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:59:09 UTC No. 16481314
>>16480088
>Knowing the Smithsonian's history with flight
I don't know this, I do know that brazil insists that a brazillian inventor made the first flying machine but why would the smithsonian fall for this? Or is it something completely different?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:00:01 UTC No. 16481316
>>16481313
If he didnt do it anyone else would have come along and done it.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:00:57 UTC No. 16481317
sfg - suburban footprint general
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:02:42 UTC No. 16481319
>>16481309
Would rather kill myself. That's why it's important. Imagine how people will look towards spaceflight if the Martian experiment results in half the extraterrestrial children killing themselves for being born into an ugly machine from which there is no hope of escape. Making Mars a beautiful place is almost as important as life support
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:03:11 UTC No. 16481320
>>16481316
Wrong
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:03:15 UTC No. 16481321
>>16481316
Nihilist go away
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:04:44 UTC No. 16481322
>>16481309
sounds comfy desu
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:05:30 UTC No. 16481324
>>16481313
Imagine if that Russian general never spated on Musk's shoes when he went to buy ICBMs from them before creating SpaceX.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:06:12 UTC No. 16481325
>>16481313
Elons knowledge of rocketry intersecting with great business management skill is very unique and decisive. Listening to Antonio Elias from Orbital Sciences you can see why. He came to the end of the design of his 'cheap' launch vehicle and it was 5x more expensive than he had anticipated. Then he just went 'oh well' and carried on. Musk would have started firing people left and right until price came down.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:06:17 UTC No. 16481326
>>16481316
lol because Bezos is such a new space innovator ?
The only reason ANY of these places are doing reuse is because SpaceX succeeded with it
Otherwise none of them would bother, and certainly no government organization is capable of that change
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:06:56 UTC No. 16481328
>>16481324
>spated
fuck, meant spat. anyways, first destination for rogozin's time machine.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:07:45 UTC No. 16481329
>>16481324
Actual brilliant pebbles timeline.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:08:24 UTC No. 16481330
>>16481316
No, that's completely wrong.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:12:36 UTC No. 16481331
https://x.com/PositivFuturist/statu
Musk is going to rape mars t:guardian
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:13:48 UTC No. 16481332
>>16481324
After what we would have seen from Russia in the last few years? Chances are that Musk would have found rusty rockets with fuel siphoned out and substituted for water
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:14:49 UTC No. 16481333
>>16481331
>Won't someone think of the poor martian microbes that most likely don't even exist!
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:15:55 UTC No. 16481335
>>16481316
Others have tried and failed or kept going and accomplished much less
It isnt certain bezos would have kept going this long if f9 wasnt the existence proof
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:15:55 UTC No. 16481336
>>16481331
Commies are irrelevant
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:16:19 UTC No. 16481337
>>16481331
It's a rape administration
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:16:43 UTC No. 16481338
>>16481334
i hope they both die and gwynne takes on both of their roles as well as becoming my space queen/mommy
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:20:45 UTC No. 16481342
Will musk get rid of these foreign jews surrounding Trump
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:21:21 UTC No. 16481343
24 hrs till flight
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:21:27 UTC No. 16481344
>>16481338
frick you
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:22:04 UTC No. 16481345
>>16481331
Anybody have a mars-chan drawing? preferably with her pants wet
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:22:16 UTC No. 16481347
>>16481338
Careful with that edge.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:22:20 UTC No. 16481348
the hop was supposed to be right now bros its not fair
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:23:19 UTC No. 16481349
>>16481338
>:(
just SHUT UP OK
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:27:06 UTC No. 16481352
>>16481076
old space has them individually overnighted from an approved source in N. Dakota for $112.37 each
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:31:39 UTC No. 16481355
>>16481076
check the sls contractors list
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:31:44 UTC No. 16481356
>>16481139
The season finale leaked. Trump and elon's goons shoot her in the back of the head right in front of spaceguy5
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:37:19 UTC No. 16481360
>>16481316
This keeps getting repeated only because it's Marxist dogma, not because there's any proof of it
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:38:25 UTC No. 16481362
>>16481331
LOL, I just love how it all went from "impossible, he's a scammer", to "well, it makes no economic sense", to "SOMEONE STOP HIMMMM" lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:38:54 UTC No. 16481364
>>16481152
Future timelines keep changing the past, our present. This is what a Time War looks like. Right now the good guys are winning.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:39:10 UTC No. 16481365
>>16481338
Gwynne literally went on record a few days ago and said "I don't have to work, but if I can, I'd rather work for Elon than do anything else."
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:39:53 UTC No. 16481366
>>16481331
>rape mars
Getting what it deserves for always wearing red
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:41:04 UTC No. 16481368
>>16481356
noooooo they are friends
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:43:21 UTC No. 16481369
>>16481331
She's got us, bros
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:46:47 UTC No. 16481375
>>16481362
Before long they will fear Elon so greatly, they begin to praise him.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:47:40 UTC No. 16481377
>>16481368
too cuteeee
I have a weakness for pencil-drawn rocketgirls
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:48:15 UTC No. 16481378
>>16481325
Elias Antonio also replicated the NASA study regarding ~50 total launches for a company per year to make it feasibale, ergo it can't be done. Hes s cool guy, but he has that old engineer perspective on everything that just isnt very helpful. Also strange considering How he was part of launching a commercial rocket from an airplane
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:48:41 UTC No. 16481379
>>16481375
someone should make a version for elon. Not me though, I'm stupid
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:51:01 UTC No. 16481381
>>16481331
>>16481369
how do these people get paid for drivel like this?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:53:08 UTC No. 16481383
nsf: tomorrow will be spacex's 420th launch, and chances of them launching at 4:20pm is highly likely for the occasion
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:55:45 UTC No. 16481386
>>16481383
>not waiting until may 20th of next year
LAAAAAAAAAME
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:55:54 UTC No. 16481387
>>16481383
based
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:56:29 UTC No. 16481389
>>16481386
april you stupid nigger
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:56:42 UTC No. 16481390
>>16481386
>may
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:59:59 UTC No. 16481393
>>16481389
oh fuck I thought the year starts in january
man am I retarded or what
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:00:35 UTC No. 16481395
>>16481393
you a programmer? january is not the zeroth month
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:01:01 UTC No. 16481396
>>16481386
based Julian-calendar user
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:06:00 UTC No. 16481399
anyone of /sfg/ got the picture of starship girl sn9?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:07:15 UTC No. 16481401
>>16481134
I'm still surprised nobody submitted the exact same architecture as Apollo, but with the savings from half a century of improved technology.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:07:44 UTC No. 16481402
>>16481399
This one?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:07:49 UTC No. 16481403
>>16481378
>~50 total launches for a company per year to make it feasibale
It's probably true.
SpaceX used a cheat code by reusing the 1st stage rather than the upper, so their break even number was lower, bus its easy to see how reusing the upper requires massive cadence to make sense. It wrecks payload to orbit and at the same time requires a much more complicated upper stage which requires unique expenses to refurbish. Assuming youa re SLS and have 1 launch every 2 years then its 100% not worth it to reuse. Shutte was aiming at a cadence where they would break even but never made it.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:09:07 UTC No. 16481406
>>16481399
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBX
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:14:16 UTC No. 16481410
>>16481399
>>16481402
sn9 a baka. tippy girl
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:15:12 UTC No. 16481412
>>16481409
Don't forget the fallen
SN-11 died in the fog, out of sight.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:16:12 UTC No. 16481413
>>16481300
>all's right with the world
yeah, for the (((stock holders))) who are profiting off this new forever-war to replace their defunct middle east forever-war
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:17:23 UTC No. 16481414
>>16481409
sn15 a cute. CUTE
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:18:07 UTC No. 16481415
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:20:46 UTC No. 16481417
>>16481375
why would he take 20 days to drive across france lol
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:22:50 UTC No. 16481418
>>16481406
too bad
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:22:59 UTC No. 16481419
>>16481417
it says it right in the picture idiot, he was spending the night places
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:23:33 UTC No. 16481420
>>16480941
if you think that just methane on its own is useful you are wrong, you also need an oxidizer to burn with your fuel
Earth has atmospheric oxygen, making your own methane or hydrogen off-earth always produces an equivalent amount of oxygen from electrolyzing water
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:25:21 UTC No. 16481421
>>16480860
Dunning Kruger midwits don't know about many government agencies, so they think that Elon will want to completely smash the few they do know about, that are only partly rotten. There are well over 400 agencies out there, and many are much more useless. NASA won't even be in the top 100, and most of their trouble is due to limitations imposed by Congress. ("You MUST spend this crap-ton money on SLS!")
Even among the ones that get news, there are much more useless ones like the Department of Education, something we did quite well without until Jimmy fucking Carter created it.
>>16480872
>Ukraine gets more money than NASA from the US Gov.
This. Foreign aid in general is a big waste that would shock you if you saw where it went.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:26:48 UTC No. 16481422
>>16481058
>negative mass margin
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:28:04 UTC No. 16481423
>>16481076
McMasterCarr
there's a specific material you're looking for
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:28:23 UTC No. 16481424
>>16481092
>but it does the Trumpy Dance as it smashes into the tower
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:31:45 UTC No. 16481428
>>16481055
Daylight reentry, deorbit burn, missing heat shield tiles that'll stress the frame more than previous flights, and a different angle of attack on descent.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:38:21 UTC No. 16481438
>>16481412
I hated the FAA even then
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:48:34 UTC No. 16481445
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:52:32 UTC No. 16481447
https://youtu.be/Bi9EW9xhqAU
WE ARE CLOSE TO THE KESSELER SYNDROME
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:53:51 UTC No. 16481448
>>16481447
just
armor up your 2nd stages
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:53:57 UTC No. 16481449
>>16481447
To be honest a more salient topic is Nigger Syndrome destroying civilization and stranding humanity to earth.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:57:04 UTC No. 16481452
>>16481447
okay then, deorbit all starlink satellites and see how well that affects ukraine. oh, suddenly kessler syndrome is not that important?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:59:11 UTC No. 16481456
>>16481447
two more decades, retard.
i swear to god these envirocucks somehow managed to make people scared of muh kessler syndrome like they do muh global warming. do you not understand how fucking big the earth is? my god crabs in a fucking bucket. thank god theres literally nothing they can say about the moon or mars.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:34 UTC No. 16481458
>>16481457
>communist disagrees with capitalist
and the sky is blue. more at 8.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:01:36 UTC No. 16481461
>>16481457
Are you stupid? or is Musk stupid. Thats the question.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:01:43 UTC No. 16481462
>>16481417
He had lots of meet-and-greet events to attend with his many fans.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:02:43 UTC No. 16481464
>>16481457
>He
I thought the engineers did all the work and he just stole the credit. Why do competitors, e.g. arianespace or roscosmos, always say "He"?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:05:48 UTC No. 16481468
>>16481447
ideally the entire urf will be encased in multiple opaque shells of satellites. each shell will be locked. urf will become the prison world, like Age 233 in Riven
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:10:40 UTC No. 16481472
>>16481457
CATL is the world's leading battery manufacturer, and Tesla uses them too. Most likely they're prioritizing different things in their designs, but I wouldn't be suprised if CATL had objectively better batteries, though it's probably not a huge difference.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:12:08 UTC No. 16481474
>>16481417
He did a lot of sidequests
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:12:33 UTC No. 16481475
>>16481457
>musk went silent after he got blasted with facts
Woah...
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:13:30 UTC No. 16481476
>>16481456
>muh global warming
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:15:48 UTC No. 16481478
>>16481457
https://x.com/Tesla/status/18350197
100 million 4680 battery produced. What your sources dont understand and dont dare tell is the real context.
Musk discussed with CATL and many other suppliers during the early days of 4680 days, whether its before production or during conceptual phase. Then Musk did it. All the cybertrucks you see have 4680 battery in them.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:15:58 UTC No. 16481479
>>16481447
never post this woman again
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:17:34 UTC No. 16481481
nah what the hell bruh :skull:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHD
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:23:42 UTC No. 16481488
>>16481481
god dont you just love nigger music and nigger culture?
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:31:43 UTC No. 16481492
I'll be on an airline during the launch, hoping for in-flight internet via Starlink
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:41:51 UTC No. 16481503
>>16481488
yes. got a fucking problem? also GET
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:49:20 UTC No. 16481508
>>16481472
>I wouldn't be suprised if CATL had objectively better batteries
Or it is that CATL is too invested in something inferior and is doing the marketing game much like oldspace and reuse.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:51:56 UTC No. 16481510
>>16481488
kek, best digits for that post.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:54:42 UTC No. 16481512
>>16481416
>those sweating landers
>the -500kg "weight"
>the loopy ladder
I lol
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:59:23 UTC No. 16481519
>>16481488
niggers took us to space and orbit
>sells loose cigs on the side of the road
the man just holding us down
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:12:02 UTC No. 16481537
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:12:16 UTC No. 16481538
Breakthrough starshot when?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:14:20 UTC No. 16481540
>>16479637
The more I learn about Pegasus the more it seems like a bad idea. If this guy didnt see thatit was a bad idea then he's not in a position to criticize the viability of SpaceX.
Basically the ASAT missile was air launched because it just has to go straight up, so being launched from altitude actually has a significant reduction on delta v requirements. Bycomparison this guy's air launch orbital rocket gains essentailly zero advantage from being air launched and has the amssive drawback of only being able to use solids.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:15:30 UTC No. 16481541
>>16481488
I, too, hate that thing that some people call "music". Also, lol nice numbers.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:17:13 UTC No. 16481543
>>16481141
>Everyone has Titan/Europa fever an
I have a fever for Eris/Dysnomia, followed by Sedna (golden opportunity), Makemake, and Haumea (along with Omuamua).
I also need to send a probe to Triton and then dive into Neptune/Uranus via parachute to determine their inner workings. Taking pictures and video from all of course.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:17:54 UTC No. 16481544
>>16481538
you tell me, most people have forgotten it so you are the expert simply by remembering that it existed. according to wikipedia in 2016 they said a 2036 launch, 20-30 year travel time. so wont arrive before 2056 even then, could be 2076 now if they ever get funded.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:19:50 UTC No. 16481545
TONIGHT: A SPECIAL /sfg/ INVESTIGATION. THE DARK SIDE OF SOUTH PADRE NIGHTLIFE. WHICH ANONS WERE CAUGHT TAKING POSTING-ENHANCING DRUGS? DO ALL THE CANADIANS CAMPED OUT HERE CONSTITUTE AN ITAR VIOLATION? SEE FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER THE SECRET MEETING SPOT WHERE ANIME POSTERS RECEIVE OUR MARCHING ORDERS! WHICH SCHIZOPOSTER GIVES THE BEST BLOWJOB? WE'RE GOING TO FUCK AROUND AND FIND OUT, NEXT!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:21:24 UTC No. 16481547
KINO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMA
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:26:45 UTC No. 16481552
>>16481545
Screenshotting this
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:28:04 UTC No. 16481553
>>16481543
>Another Dysnomian chad in this general
I'm not alone, finally. We are a multitude.
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:33:28 UTC No. 16481556
DECEPTIVE EVIL JEW INTERVIEWING MILFWELL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uvr
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:37:21 UTC No. 16481560
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:38:57 UTC No. 16481562
>>16481560
>JEWS ARE WHOLESOME ACKCHUALLY!!1!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:39:51 UTC No. 16481564
>>16481545
looking forward to this
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:41:27 UTC No. 16481565
>>16481545
please, don't forget to step on as many beetles as possible. thanks
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:42:46 UTC No. 16481566
>>16481562
this but unironically
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:43:51 UTC No. 16481567
>>16481545
we got solid snake up on this bitch
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:49:14 UTC No. 16481569
>>16481543
>I also need to send a probe to Triton
every day im reminded NASA picked two faggy venus missions over the Trident probe
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:49:20 UTC No. 16481570
>>16481545
/sfg/'s reach knows no bounds
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:49:57 UTC No. 16481571
anons, I regret to inform you all that I will not be able to post the launch thread tomorrow due to being at work. Someone else, please take the reins. thank you.
t. launch thread anon
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:50:00 UTC No. 16481572
>>16481556
I hate his CONSTANT use of "we" whenever he talks about spacex (or tesla), like he's somehow involved or on the team when he's just an investor
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:51:00 UTC No. 16481573
>>16481545
say hi to president trump for me, and remind him about the pebbles
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:52:06 UTC No. 16481574
>>16481571
dont care
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:52:18 UTC No. 16481576
>>16481573
are these hypothetical pebbles smart in nature?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:54:51 UTC No. 16481578
>>16481572
Clasic vile Jew mindset, pardon my French.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:55:02 UTC No. 16481579
>>16481576
brilliant in fact
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:55:14 UTC No. 16481580
>>16481571
I got you bro
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:55:41 UTC No. 16481582
>>16481580
thanks
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:55:53 UTC No. 16481583
>>16481545
>inb4 anon gets taken out by the secret service
we'll miss him
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:56:54 UTC No. 16481584
>>16481581
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7g
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:57:55 UTC No. 16481585
>>16481580
Still waiting for BPS.space to do this with estes.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:00:26 UTC No. 16481588
>>16481585
bepis?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:00:39 UTC No. 16481589
Wen launch?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:01:28 UTC No. 16481590
>>16481587
I believe we can train and launch enough missile seeking pibbles to constitute a constellation.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:01:32 UTC No. 16481591
>>16481589
today
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:03:17 UTC No. 16481594
>>16481589
20 hours from now, a little less.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:33:56 UTC No. 16481612
>>16481594
what is that in 2 weeks
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:36:00 UTC No. 16481614
>>16481612
1 twoweeks
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:43:28 UTC No. 16481616
god before the music changed I could smell y2k again
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18586
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:48:07 UTC No. 16481617
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:58:22 UTC No. 16481628
>>16481625
oh shit oh fuck they forgot to stack it, guess no launch tomorrow
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:02:23 UTC No. 16481633
Could a booster boost another booster enough that it got to orbit?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:03:35 UTC No. 16481636
>>16481633
how much boost could a booster boost if a booster could boost boost?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:04:38 UTC No. 16481637
so if the current starship design has zero payload to orbit
when will we see a starship heavy?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:05:24 UTC No. 16481638
>>16481637
Starship is already heavy, heyo
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:06:36 UTC No. 16481641
>>16481637
If earth is flat, how come gravity exist?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:06:56 UTC No. 16481644
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:12:54 UTC No. 16481649
>>16481637
Starship heavy will be able to lift three times as much payload to orbit.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:14:19 UTC No. 16481652
>>16481647
the real patches already have 4 leaf clovers on them
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:21:56 UTC No. 16481657
They should send a seal to space for a prank
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:22:23 UTC No. 16481658
>>16481655
can't read the article, and I'm not creating an account, what does it say?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:22:40 UTC No. 16481660
>>16481647
I'm the guy with the business that said maybe I'd do it but I'm selling the fucking shithole so I'm not doing it anymore
>>16481649
18m starship is 4x the payload
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:23:03 UTC No. 16481661
>>16481457
I don't trust chinese batteries, I've seen enough webms of random chinese electronics exploding.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:23:35 UTC No. 16481662
>>16481658
"Elon/SpaceX bad. " - lefty communist
Did you expect honestly any surprises?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:24:35 UTC No. 16481663
>>16481660
RIP
even /pol/ has patches
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:25:11 UTC No. 16481664
>>16481658
>SpaceXโs new Starship rocket far exceeds projected maximum noise levels, generating a sonic boom so powerful it risks property damage in the densely populated residential community near its South Texas launch site, new data suggests.
>Starship, as tall as a 30-story building, is so large that it generates 10 times as much noise as the Falcon 9 rocket that SpaceX now uses to get cargo and astronauts to orbit, the new data shows. SpaceX plans another test this week.
>For residents of South Padre Island and Port Isabel, which are about six miles from SpaceXโs launch site in South Texas, the noise during the October test flight was the equivalent of standing 200 feet from a Boeing 747 plane during its takeoff, said Kent L. Gee, an independent acoustics engineer who conducted the monitoring.
I can't wait to see the local town nuked it's gonna be sick
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:33:55 UTC No. 16481669
>>16481664
Let's be honest here, there is no place on this entire planet that wouldn't receive complaints or criticism. If they are in the middle of nowhere, it's the beetles and the 5 residents, if they launch from the ocean, it's the sharks, if it's from vandenberg, it's the seals, if somehow ITAR is no longer a problem and they launch from australia, it's the koalas, if it's from antarctica, it's the penguins, if it's from the moon, it's the tardigrades. There's no winning with this people.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:36:12 UTC No. 16481670
>>16481664
None of this matters once Trump takes office in January.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:40:15 UTC No. 16481671
>>16481670
I'm imagining trump eating McDonald's in the SpaceX control room tomorrow
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:40:26 UTC No. 16481672
>>16481670
>that one analog horror series where the president made everyone deaf and then gave everyone hearing aids
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:41:48 UTC No. 16481673
>>16481671
those stubby pop bottles are so fucking dumb
they cost like 3 times as much as a can
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:46:35 UTC No. 16481675
>>16481673
they're in a private plane
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:47:09 UTC No. 16481676
>>16481625
who will be FAA admin?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:49:51 UTC No. 16481678
Musk couldn't be a cooler billionaire if he tried. He's at the forefront of literally the only few things that actually matter in society. I'd only wish he was a little more in touch with everyday issues, particularly in other european countries. That being said, he does know a lot of other countries and half gets involved and he isn't a politician.
Space, AI, automation and social engineering.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:50:20 UTC No. 16481680
>>16481655
>an independent researcher found
dropped. kill all journalists!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:51:24 UTC No. 16481681
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:55:55 UTC No. 16481686
>>16481678
>Space, AI, automation and social engineering.
He only needs nuclear, come on elonnn
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:57:03 UTC No. 16481688
>>16481675
source?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:58:20 UTC No. 16481692
>>16481688
they're on trump force 1
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:59:07 UTC No. 16481693
>>16481686
Trump will give him free reign over nuclear energy, he'll have his own nuclear program so he can nuke mars.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:59:45 UTC No. 16481694
>>16481686
Too early to get involved there. Not until SpaceX has successfully landed HLS Demo-1 on the Moon. DoE does not fuck around.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:02:38 UTC No. 16481698
>>16481686
They gave him the special tour of Los Alamos so I assume something is in the works.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:04:10 UTC No. 16481700
>>16481686
Thiel's inside man JD is going to eviscerate nuclear regulation. All of tech wants it right now. Might not be Elon, but it'll probably be done and waiting for SpaceX when the time comes
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:21:37 UTC No. 16481708
>>16481671
>SpaceX control room
Nah, considering that the new office building is not finished yet, they'll probably be on top of Megabay 2, where that pic was taken from >>16481625 Also, a few days ago there were people in military uniform and some that were wearing civilian glowie uniforms(kakis and shirts) who went inside MB2. I don't have a clip but you could see them on rover 1 cam. Just look at the lighting in LabPadre's stream.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQV
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:24:17 UTC No. 16481710
>>16480949
reminds me of the AI-generated images where they have a shuttle-looking rocket taking off next to a crowd of people
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:25:21 UTC No. 16481711
>>16479602
>I made a rather conservative estimate of the future of spess colonies
>conservative estimate
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:27:29 UTC No. 16481715
>>16481688
<blockquote class="postMessage" id="m16481675"><a href="#p16481673" class="quotelink">>>16481673<
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:28:46 UTC No. 16481718
so trump and the fcc guy are attending tomorrow. who else? the state governor?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:28:58 UTC No. 16481719
>>16481044
desu i kinda agree
im gonna miss the stream since ill be at work anyway
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:29:13 UTC No. 16481720
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:29:38 UTC No. 16481721
>>16481711
Please graduate high school and make a frank assessment of your own autism before continuing to post
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:33:02 UTC No. 16481726
>>16481721
>graduate high school
That projection seems a little too old, right given your childlike naivety.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:33:17 UTC No. 16481728
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:35:28 UTC No. 16481729
>>16481152
>inb4 booster catch fails tomorrow
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:36:13 UTC No. 16481730
>>16481152
The night was darkest just before the dawn, and now the sun is rising
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:38:50 UTC No. 16481732
https://x.com/rawsalerts/status/185
>#BREAKING: President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly set to visit Texas tomorrow to witness and watch SpaceXโs sixth historic Starship launch attempt in person.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:39:04 UTC No. 16481733
>>16481220
could the vip movement also be for musk?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:41:31 UTC No. 16481736
>>16479750
>>16481732
>>16481733
>could the vip movement also be for musk?
I thought he flew in yesterday on the 737
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:47:58 UTC No. 16481742
>>16481447
erm wasn't she deboonked by professor dave explains?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:48:32 UTC No. 16481743
>>16481733
Technically the regulation mentions "other public figures" but I've never seen mention of that term being applied to anyone but the President-elect or VP-elect. VIP TFRs are arranged between the Secret Service and FAA.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:55:45 UTC No. 16481745
>>16481447
In a world where Casaba Howitzers exist, there is no such thing as Kessler Syndrome.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:59:46 UTC No. 16481747
>>16481732
holy fucking slowfag
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:06:55 UTC No. 16481755
>>16481732
kek, it really has that vibe
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:19:55 UTC No. 16481767
Ugh I wish this was a night launch. Day launches will have even worse views than morning!!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:22:20 UTC No. 16481769
>>16481767
the starship landing will be in daylight though
so better views there
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:34:00 UTC No. 16481776
>>16481758
>We were both supposed to die in easily preventable asteroid mining accidents
>That was my dream
Hearty chuckle. Got a good one there anon. I hope your son gets his chance to die in an easily preventable asteroid mining accident.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:39:07 UTC No. 16481778
>>16481698
NTR-bros we are so fucking back
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:42:21 UTC No. 16481779
>>16481758
Kek
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:06:35 UTC No. 16481788
just so we're clear, spacex would be among the first targets in a ww3 scenario
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:13:10 UTC No. 16481789
>>16481788
you're absolutely right
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:16:31 UTC No. 16481791
>>16481788
Yeah, Hawthorne, Boca and the cape getting smashed big time. Worse than sitting on a silo honestly since they know the silos will be empty anyway by the time their shit hits. Radioactive rubble makes this all redundant anyway, although getting rid of MAD is dumb as fuck.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:18:59 UTC No. 16481792
>>16481681
Is this meant to be some sort of epic burn among the bluesky crowd?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:20:17 UTC No. 16481794
>>16481793
booba!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:20:46 UTC No. 16481795
>>16481791
>although getting rid of MAD is dumb as fuck
Nah, the US should be able to nuke people if we want to without risking the end of the world
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:21:15 UTC No. 16481796
>>16481793
She's a shameless f*male grifter moving into male niche space after seeing it explode and a lack of big titty competition. Observe the gross foot fetish video of hers that was posted here. You should delete your post.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:24:46 UTC No. 16481799
>>16481795
Eliminating MAD simply means they can't reach the US, they can still ABM your long range missiles from the ground. Short range tactical options are still on the menu. Hope you enjoy being conscripted into WW2 electric murder drone laser tac nuke meat grinder boogaloo, because the only thing keeping it off the menu has been fear of reprisal.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:32:45 UTC No. 16481804
>>16481793
With a pair of super heavies, it's no surprise that her channel is taking off.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:56:48 UTC No. 16481821
>>16481796
>Observe the gross foot fetish video of hers that was posted here
Imagine if someone posted that vid for us who haven't seen it yet that would be like so fucked up and shit
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:03:09 UTC No. 16481828
>>16481821
kys
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:04:06 UTC No. 16481830
>>16481795
you people have become absolutely deranged over the last few years (and especially since October of last year), I hope you are all escorted from the halls of power as your constant war mongering is beginning to make people uncomfortable
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:07:26 UTC No. 16481831
>>16481799
Don't care, fuck the rest of the world. Turn it into radioactive glass.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:08:38 UTC No. 16481832
>>16481726
>childlike naivety
>he thinks this won't happen
lmao fucking moron, go back under your rock
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:09:03 UTC No. 16481833
>>16481831
Get help
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:10:24 UTC No. 16481835
How do I cope with SLS still existing?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:11:14 UTC No. 16481836
>>16481833
Get the fuck out of the country.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:11:54 UTC No. 16481837
Pebbles status?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:13:38 UTC No. 16481839
>>16481837
operational
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:14:42 UTC No. 16481840
>>16481839
Brilliant.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:14:53 UTC No. 16481841
>>16481837
Brilliant
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:15:57 UTC No. 16481842
>>16481837
Ngmi
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:19:27 UTC No. 16481843
>>16481664
kek, they buried the lede in the footnotes
> The data Dr. Gee collected last month did have some inconsistencies. When measuring just in the frequencies that humans typically hear โ ignoring certain low and high frequencies โ the Starship test launch in October had lower levels at all the test sites than the F.A.A. had projected.
Journalists, hate, not enough, etc.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:29:45 UTC No. 16481849
>>16481844
Crazy to think that despite how incredible Apollo was, it was basically a sign your life away publicity stunt with day 0 rocketry funded by unlimited dollars. Amazing any of them made it back alive. Almost no computer navigation, here's your sextant and spreadsheet bro. Wild. They truly were the rocket man.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:31:56 UTC No. 16481850
>>16481844
SLS payloads: 1
Starship payloads: 0
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:34:21 UTC No. 16481853
>>16481850
Data is the payload
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:36:11 UTC No. 16481855
>>16481850
Starship is on track to launch 2 payloads before SLS launches 2
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:38:46 UTC No. 16481857
>>16481401
They did, or at least Rocketdyne was gearing up to replicate the old engines
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:40:08 UTC No. 16481858
>>16481853
Yeah, genetic data.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:41:39 UTC No. 16481859
>>16481858
my starship has a lot of genetic data inside ;)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:42:14 UTC No. 16481860
>>16481836
Can't, we don't all have dual citizenship like you, anon.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:42:14 UTC No. 16481861
>>16481859
kys
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:47:17 UTC No. 16481866
>>16481862
its not enough, we need another killer app
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:49:30 UTC No. 16481867
>>16481866
Brilliant Pebbles
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:50:54 UTC No. 16481868
>>16481867
i was thinking outside of satellites but why not
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:52:26 UTC No. 16481870
>>16481849
>No computer navigation
Read up on this stuff
Apollo may have been a risky tin can with a stopwatch and some gimbals but most of the spacecraft compuing was done on the ground.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:57:39 UTC No. 16481875
>>16481870
If your navigation is done on urf and you rely on radio links to send the commands to meatbags, that is still 100% space cowboy shit. I get where you are coming from, but it was a cracked out insane stunt program. Based, but still insane. Real aryan shit. A real shame it was followed up by the forever cursed sh*ttle instead of real reusability attempts.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:07:03 UTC No. 16481879
>>16481835
?
Probably one of the sexiest rockets ever made. Way more kino than shit like the falcon 9 or the st*rship which looks like a vibrator
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:09:08 UTC No. 16481881
>>16481879
sls is a tranny rocket
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:09:18 UTC No. 16481882
>>16481776
Yeah he's pretty cool. I'm doing everything in my power to get my started on the right path. My dad even bought him picrel today.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:17:03 UTC No. 16481886
>>16481881
Baste.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:19:10 UTC No. 16481888
>>16481882
Nigger baby
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:20:14 UTC No. 16481889
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:22:14 UTC No. 16481890
>>16481888
No u
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:25:12 UTC No. 16481894
>>16481788
>>16481791
>>16481795
>>16481799
>muh ICBMs
Those don't really mater in MAD. During the Cold War the Russians dug a deep hole, and filled it with hundreds of nukes. If detonated they are enough to cause massive earthquakes, volcanoes and nudge Earth's orbit enough to fuck any surviving life. It's truly spooky shit that you can't build a defense against.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:27:51 UTC No. 16481895
Will Jessie and Kate be all pouty because Trump is there?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:29:00 UTC No. 16481896
>>16481876
I recognise a few of those constellations. the bright spots might be satellites. maybe starlinks?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:29:13 UTC No. 16481897
>>16481895
They'll fight each other for the right to be the first to blow him.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:34:21 UTC No. 16481899
>>16481895
I hope they are
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:36:05 UTC No. 16481900
>>16481895
If they value their job, they'll act normal.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:38:18 UTC No. 16481901
>>16481896
>All the Starlink sats fucking up autists and glowies from doxxing you by the stars
Based
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:41:08 UTC No. 16481903
>>16481889
>shows a picture of his tranny dilator
yeah that doesn't look like starship at all, you're projecting your mental illness onto everyday people.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:46:37 UTC No. 16481909
>>16481861
>kiss your starship
don't mind if I do
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:58:37 UTC No. 16481911
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:02:33 UTC No. 16481913
>>16481909
>>16481911
>tranime
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:04:20 UTC No. 16481916
>>16481913
rocket yuri
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:10:52 UTC No. 16481919
>>16481916
>>16481917
this is the only yuri we should be seeing on this general
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:11:00 UTC No. 16481920
total SLS death
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:15:59 UTC No. 16481921
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:24:12 UTC No. 16481929
>>16480739
You'd think a guy that draws porn would know how to draw boobs.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:26:39 UTC No. 16481931
>>16481913
Wrong website nigger
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:30:03 UTC No. 16481937
>>16481933
best cute pic to come out of the flight
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:31:35 UTC No. 16481941
>
"Starship obsoletes Falcon 9 and the Dragon capsule," she said. "Now, we are not shutting down Dragon, and we are not shutting down Falcon. We'll be flying that for six to eight more years, but ultimately, people are going to want to fly on Starship. It's bigger. It's more comfortable. It will be less expensive. And we will have flown it so many more times."
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:33:51 UTC No. 16481947
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:35:46 UTC No. 16481950
>>16481788
>ww3
nothing ever happens
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:13:00 UTC No. 16482004
>>16481895
Trump will be a guest on the launch commentary
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:19:19 UTC No. 16482011
>>16481913
anime website
you can go to reddit if you hate anime websites.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:30:54 UTC No. 16482058
>>16481672
aids? in my hearing? now that's gay!
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:40:42 UTC No. 16482078
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:53:46 UTC No. 16482299
>>16481796
>She's a shameless f*male grifter moving into male niche space after seeing it explode and a lack of big titty competition
The fact that she's not bandwagoning after a lot of females have entered the genre gives it some authenticity though.
Reminds me Apollo Smile, one of the first professional cosplayers/host for media. As punishment she became the target of every anime nerd stalker who would normally divide their attention among hundreds or thousands of thots but they weren't around yet. She became so reclusive she couldn't be found to reprise her role for the space channel 5 remaster.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:19:48 UTC No. 16482787
>>16481830
hmmm you sound like a seething thirdoid whose opinion is not relevant