🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:28:43 UTC No. 16477042
BANANANANAA - edition
previous >>16474712
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:30:12 UTC No. 16477051
>>16476884
Why are hispanic welders the lifeblood of astronomy and spaceflight in the 2020s?
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:31:44 UTC No. 16477057
>>16477042
Ring ring ring ring, BANANA PHONE!
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:32:10 UTC No. 16477058
2 more days
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:32:40 UTC No. 16477060
>>16477042
Frankly I don't like the banana
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:33:10 UTC No. 16477063
>>16477057
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5C
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:36:26 UTC No. 16477071
>>16477066
More than half of it is just fucking empty? Well that's definitely nicer than the cramped LEM but still feels a bit wasteful. At least put a bar in there.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:37:30 UTC No. 16477072
>>16477066
>two airlocks each bigger than the LEM
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:37:55 UTC No. 16477074
>>16477066
some kind of MVP like this would make sense
the cavernous free space would also be pretty impressive in 0g for spectators on earth
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:38:09 UTC No. 16477075
>>16477071
from a broom closet with hammocks, to a spartan penthouse, its like poetry it rhymes, I find it very funny
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:38:16 UTC No. 16477076
In light of recent events, I made a rather conservative estimate of the future of spess colonies
2025 - mars base(spacex), population 10000
2026 - phobos base(spacex), populaton 7000
2027 - ceres base(spacex), population 9000
2028 - jupiter orbital base(spacex), popilation 700
2029 - EVROPA base(spacex), population 12000
2030 - calisto base(spacex), population 8000
2031 - enceladus base(Spacex), population 15000
2032 - mars base(china), population ~1,6 billion
2033 - venus cloud base(spacex), population 7000
2034 - saturn ring base(spacex), population 4500
2035 - titan cuck base(spacex), population less than a dozen
2036 - uranus base(spacex), population 6900
2037 - neptune base(spacex), population 5500
2038 - first colony ship sent to proxima centauri b(spacex), population 150000
2039 - Pluto (spacex), population 13000
2040 - colony ship sent to ross 128b(spacex), population 370000
2041 - asteroid belt stations(china), population uncountable
2042 - colony ships sent to GJ 1061(spacex), population 1250000
2043 - mercury solar death ray (spacex), population classified
2044 - Eris cloning facility (spacex), population >100000000
2045 - agartha base(spacex), population 750000
2046 - Earth-X genocide wars
2047 - earth colony(X empire), population 0.7 billion
2048 - colony ships sent to andromeda galaxy via wormhole(X empire), population several billion
2049 - Sagittarius A* colony(X empire), population ~13 trillion
2050 - Mankind becomes a kardashev type 3 civilization(X empire), population ~70 quintillion
2051 - Moon base(NASA), population 0-10
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:41:26 UTC No. 16477083
>>16477076
>2051 - Moon base(NASA), population 0-10
That seems a bit optimistic
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:42:51 UTC No. 16477087
>>16477042
finally, a shit OP
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:42:59 UTC No. 16477088
>>16477085
two more weeks
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:44:20 UTC No. 16477092
>>16477066
>cavernous wasted space
Idiot
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:44:46 UTC No. 16477094
>>16477042
New paint test, possibly thermal test
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:45:10 UTC No. 16477096
>>16477087
its the best OP, we got the best OPs you've ever seen, believe me
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:46:03 UTC No. 16477098
>>16477042
Will we need to import water to the Mars colony from Earth or are there large water deposits on Mars for the colonists to exploit?
We not only need water got the colonists to drink and hygiene but we also need it for farming.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:47:17 UTC No. 16477103
>>16477096
Some say they're the best, that's what I've heard
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:48:27 UTC No. 16477106
>>16477091
Why does /sci/ mock women in STEM, say they're useless diversity hires when SpaceX has long been run by a woman and she's done a good job at that?
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:49:22 UTC No. 16477108
>>16477106
Why don't you shut up?
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:51:35 UTC No. 16477111
>>16477106
this particular woman is not a diversity hires, but a lot of women are diversity hires
stop DEI, gender quotas and diversity hiring
50% of the STEM workforce is not going to be female, if women actually have a free choice to do what they want its something like 10%
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:52:37 UTC No. 16477114
>>16477106
We support qt space women
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:56:55 UTC No. 16477120
>>16477107
The curve is less than being in a wave pool on the lowest setting.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:57:27 UTC No. 16477121
>>16477098
Hello time traveller from the 1990's. In the distant future of the 2010's we became highly confident that there are large volumes of water contained as water ice in the Martian regolith (i.e. the top 1 meter of soil) and in the deep crust. No need to import water, just start digging up large quantities of dirt, grinding it up, and putting it in an oven to capture the offgassing water. Bringing all this heavy machinery should be easy thanks to Starship's cubic kilometer cargo volumes.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:57:55 UTC No. 16477123
When’s the launch lads?
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:58:45 UTC No. 16477125
>>16477073
All you did was make it stick out of her side.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:58:53 UTC No. 16477126
>>16477123
two more weeks
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:59:59 UTC No. 16477127
>>16477098
There is enough water on Mars under the surface to make it an ocean world.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:00:54 UTC No. 16477129
>>16477066
>only 0.6 cubic kilometers of pressurized volume
dare I say it's over?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:01:22 UTC No. 16477130
>>16477117
oh my lord. its so over.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:03:51 UTC No. 16477133
>>16477125
>>16477073
it's clearly a benis
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:06:02 UTC No. 16477139
>>16477066
>spacious cabin 40 feet tall
It's going to be so cold in there...
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:08:27 UTC No. 16477142
>>16477139
why should it be? I think it will be cozy, like a nice A frame cabin with a warm fireplace and plenty of thick blankets.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:18:07 UTC No. 16477147
>>16477106
Gwynne is the puppet master. I don’t question her sex. Her accomplishments speak volumes
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:19:00 UTC No. 16477148
>>16477073
got blocked twitter was a mistake
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:19:56 UTC No. 16477150
>>16477142
those aren't efficient structures, you need to burn a lot of wood to heat them because all the warm air goes right up to the top.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:20:59 UTC No. 16477153
>>16477147
more like the puppet. Elon puts his punks incharge of his companies. No coincidence that they are allwomen. Gwynne worships Elon and doesnt act indipendently, tragic for her husband 100% chance he has to put up with a dead bedroom while she masturbates over elon in the other room.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:21:30 UTC No. 16477154
>>16477150
NBD, the heat rises 1/6 as fast on the moon and not at all in orbit.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:21:39 UTC No. 16477155
https://spacenews.com/faa-moves-for
>FAA: we're reviewing a proposal to move forward with regulation review
>Shotwell: Get this thing under 5 pages and not 5000 pages or else I'll send Elon to replace all of you fools
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:22:31 UTC No. 16477158
>>16477121
Of course you'd bring a lot of water too, not just hope someones, who knows how bias, or faulty info is correct
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:23:00 UTC No. 16477160
>>16477152
Incredibly sexy plume
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:23:05 UTC No. 16477161
>>16477073
>>16477148
a tragedy in two acts.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:23:55 UTC No. 16477162
>>16477155
>Shotwell can now freely use Elon as the political stonewall to get anything done
You may even get tired of winning
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:23:55 UTC No. 16477163
>>16477121
The water isnear the poles where solar wouldnt work too good.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:23:55 UTC No. 16477164
>>16477066
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/185739
https://youtube.com/W5Z2-aXHWkY
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:25:42 UTC No. 16477166
>>16477164
Not the worst. Needs improvements. Problem is, they’re just going to install some sort of bungie net and haphazardly store shit in all the free space. Gonna look like a rats nest
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:26:11 UTC No. 16477167
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:28:10 UTC No. 16477171
>>16477166
bungie net transitioning to gravity might be bad though. But stuff floating in cabinets transitioning to microg isnt so great either. They will probably velcro the fuck out of everything.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:28:16 UTC No. 16477172
>>16477136
>A lot of investors just cant get over the idea of putting something up a rocket that can blow up vs building something on earth that cant blow up
What is there to invest in, what have astronomy telescopes yet to see?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:28:39 UTC No. 16477173
>>16477167
>wedge shaped beds
please be real. i getlivid when seeing the rectangular ones with all the wasted space behind them.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:29:11 UTC No. 16477175
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:29:36 UTC No. 16477176
I won't ask if this is a good idea, but is this an idea?
>think theres a substantial possibility that theres currently complex multi-cellular life on europa
>How could that be verified. If several submersibles are sent how would the information be gotten back?
"According to NASA, the liquid ocean beneath Europa's icy surface is estimated to be between 40 to 100 miles (60 to 150 kilometers) deep, with the ice shell itself being around 10 to 15 miles (15 to 25 kilometers) thick"
Doesn't look like that's happening any time soon, unless there is some type of really strong pointy super sonic piercing dart missile, and if say 20 or so we're launched in a row with increasing width so like an un connected train of rock ice picks, the last one being a motorized drill and just to test how deep this technique could bore
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:29:40 UTC No. 16477177
>>16477164
Wait holy shit this is actually really huge
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:29:56 UTC No. 16477178
>>16477108
>"In Soviet Russia, toothpaste cleans your brain!"
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:30:52 UTC No. 16477181
>>16477164
Imagine the echo.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:32:11 UTC No. 16477183
>>16477176
We don't have money for this, that's the final answer as to why nothing will be done.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:32:28 UTC No. 16477184
>>16477173
I think bunks in the common area is dumb. Even with 6 astronauts there's enough room for each to have a small room with a bed and desk. And a whole level is dedicated to life support that barely uses space and you'll only go to pass through to the airlock.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:32:44 UTC No. 16477187
Netting is so fucking gay holy shit
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:33:15 UTC No. 16477189
>>16477181
WHAT?
WHAT
what
what
what
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:34:52 UTC No. 16477191
https://x.com/radjanirad/status/185
>lands on Titan
>flies over dunes
>ignores all lakes and liquids
>refuses to elaborate
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:35:09 UTC No. 16477192
>>16477184
Actually what's probably going to happen is the artist's panels aren't going to be there other than protecting the life support from loose objects. That whole floor will be storage.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:35:25 UTC No. 16477195
>>16477152
if you're into amateur rocketry, aerotech sells a motor reload with an aerospike nozzle. J615
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:35:26 UTC No. 16477196
>>16477191
Cancel Dragonfly
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:35:54 UTC No. 16477197
>>16477196
Eat a bag of dicks
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:36:10 UTC No. 16477198
>>16477184
modern astronauts seem like the kind of people who get suicidal if they arent rubbing shoulders with other people 24/7, maybe giving them their own rooms would make them too scared.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:36:49 UTC No. 16477200
>>16477164
I know this is not the final version, but what ended up happening to all the available space in between the tank dome and the conical section? I mean, the area with 9m rings. Here, that sector is way too short compared to the original diagrams of starship, where you had several rings, and thus several floors, before the diameter starts getting smaller the higher you go.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:36:55 UTC No. 16477202
https://x.com/hermeuscorp/status/18
Starlink on Hermeus
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:37:42 UTC No. 16477203
>>16477192
Weirdest thing about this speculative render is what's on the back side of the airlocks?
Also why have vertical hatches to the airlocks and access the airlocks through the ceiling? Annoyances with mass optimized pressurized bulkhead design?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:38:59 UTC No. 16477209
>>16477202
I swear every time I check in on Hermeus they're just doing more ground taxis
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:40:06 UTC No. 16477212
>>16477183
I reckon 150 years or less such a mission might be carried out by a robot crew of 200.
Robots will be sent with drilling equipment and get to the bottom of it,
In the next 10-15 years Elon may have a mass produced space work force of 100,000 bots
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:41:44 UTC No. 16477216
>>16477202
Remote controlled jet
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:42:42 UTC No. 16477218
>>16477200
Well it needs thrusters there high up on the vehicle because using the regular engines would blast moon dust. But there's also no reason to make a hotel when you can carry more fuel instead.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:43:12 UTC No. 16477219
we were fucking ROBBED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvS
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:43:57 UTC No. 16477221
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:46:03 UTC No. 16477223
>>16477219
The only thing we were robbed of is a massive fuck off window. Everything else is a non issue
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:46:10 UTC No. 16477225
>>16477219
Oh, ITS, what could've been...
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:47:12 UTC No. 16477227
>>16477221
space station with velcro walls and socks when?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:48:15 UTC No. 16477231
space station with velcro walls and socks when?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:48:26 UTC No. 16477233
Im going to uplift otters on mars
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:48:51 UTC No. 16477234
>>16477231
When you can buy a Starship yourself
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:49:17 UTC No. 16477235
>>16477212
>In the next 10-15 years Elon may have a mass produced space work force of 100,000 bots
Conservative estimate. Could be 500,000.
The state of robots see crazy and getting crazier, and mass producing that many cars which is done, is much harder
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:49:51 UTC No. 16477237
>>16477152
>SRB
>video clearly says hybrid
anon I...
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:50:27 UTC No. 16477238
>>16477237
maybe its an air breathing solid
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:52:16 UTC No. 16477239
>>16477227
>>16477231
don't the russian modules on ISS have velcro walls? just bring your own velcro socks.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:52:43 UTC No. 16477240
>>16477239
velcro is flammable
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:53:33 UTC No. 16477242
>>16477240
space stations are flammable. such is life
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:54:27 UTC No. 16477244
>>16477203
Because it’s the “airlock level” but it’s much safer to make the functional airlock as small as practically possible
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:54:42 UTC No. 16477245
Now that I think about it, with Starship it's finally going to be possible to get custom interior designs for a spaceship, where you don't have to worry about space. Futuristic, retro, art deco, cyberpunk, wooden, etc etc, whatever you choose.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:54:54 UTC No. 16477246
>>16477221
get more milage out of this one
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:56:10 UTC No. 16477248
>>16477245
Is this from that mcrs render? Literally just live in ze pod?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:57:37 UTC No. 16477250
present starship is basically a dragon capsule with the 2nd stage welded on the ass end. its OVER....
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:57:55 UTC No. 16477252
>>16477071
Open habitable space is a tremendous luxury in the void
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:58:38 UTC No. 16477253
>>16477071
Its not done yet you fucking retard
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:00:05 UTC No. 16477257
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:00:14 UTC No. 16477258
>>16477066
But where is the hot tub?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:01:07 UTC No. 16477259
>>16477257
How big is that bed? Twin or queen or what? Can I sit up without hitting my head on the ceiling?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:01:51 UTC No. 16477260
>>16477240
NASA got the lesson with apollo 1
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:02:13 UTC No. 16477261
>>16477244
I realized it's because you'd need a 4th or 5th pressurized bubble and they have to go down a ladder anyway. Also a hulking airlock hatch in 1/6th gravity is not the problem it would be in 1g
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:03:05 UTC No. 16477263
>>16477163
The water is everywhere
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:04:27 UTC No. 16477265
>>16477198
kek, oldspace really loves the cuckpod experience, it's a 60-year-long tradition.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:06:28 UTC No. 16477269
>>16477265
Riding a Soyuz seems kinda gay desu. No wonder they speedrun an ISS docking in line 5 hours now lmao
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:07:30 UTC No. 16477272
>>16477117
jiggling
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:10:24 UTC No. 16477278
>>16477257
>pretending to read something
>door chime
>come in
>swooshing automatic door opens and closes
>I hope I'm not disturbing you
>bullshit conversation as a flimsy pretext to space sex
>take shirt off
>intercom chime
>anon here
>sir we need you to take a look at this
>on my way. anon out
>step out of bunk and walk 10 feet
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:10:44 UTC No. 16477280
>>16477117
Nothingburger
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Exf
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:12:01 UTC No. 16477282
https://youtu.be/wLnV4ZCdZ3Q
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:12:22 UTC No. 16477283
>>16477042
Elon and Trump appoint you head of NASA. You can cut any program you want, and have a $20 billion dollar budget. How do you make NASA great again? Moon? Mars? Beyond?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:14:22 UTC No. 16477285
>>16477265
>>16477269
at least soyuz has two rooms with a door between them
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:17:55 UTC No. 16477289
>>16477278
The door will be manual but you can make swooshing noises with your mouth
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:18:41 UTC No. 16477290
>>16477289
the door is pulled open by an extra next to the set when he sees you approach.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:19:42 UTC No. 16477293
Only FTS needed before flight
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:19:43 UTC No. 16477294
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:22:49 UTC No. 16477297
>>16477073
BEHOLD
10k thousand hours in paint
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:23:38 UTC No. 16477298
>>16477290
>they dont open the door and let you walk face first into it as a prank
>take a hatchet to the life support system to get them back
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:24:00 UTC No. 16477300
>>16477297
FUCKJ
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:24:17 UTC No. 16477301
>>16477283
What are the current nasa programs and plans on the docket
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:24:43 UTC No. 16477303
>>16477106
Gwynne is a hardcore businesswoman though, not a STEMcel
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:25:02 UTC No. 16477304
>>16477106
Mama Su and Gynne are the only two successful women in Tech/STEM
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:25:13 UTC No. 16477305
>>16477283
One billion to TRISH/PPO, to develop and test health and human services related routines and procedures and to designate medical officers.
Several billions, for the implementation of LENR NTP technologies that can also create an artificial EMF that can protect against cosmic and solar radiation.
Several billions towards internal shielding from the effects of that theoretical reactor system.
Basically everything else has already been solved by SpaceX and methylox.
Maybe some buttons and switches, a lever maybe.
For redundancy and kino reasons ofc.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:26:43 UTC No. 16477308
>>16477283
i just hand the 20 billion to elon himself, done
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:27:52 UTC No. 16477309
>>16477152
>>16477195
But why? It's not gonna burn long enough to have a big pressure difference between ignition and shut off.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:29:01 UTC No. 16477312
oh right, and we need a centrifugal spin chamber for G therapy too
forgot that one
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:30:19 UTC No. 16477316
>>16477309
I don't know anything about the engine the other anon posted but the aerotech one is explicitly just because it's cool.
>Our Aerospike nozzle provides an especially cool "I flew one” experience for our high-power flyers.
>Theoretically, an Aerospike nozzle expands the rocket motor exhaust gases around a center body rather than internally in the exit cone of a conventional nozzle.
>Aerospike nozzles have the advantage of being self-adjusting to the rocket’s ambient pressure in flight and therefore can be more efficient than a traditional fixed-expansion ratio nozzle when used at a wide range of altitudes.
>In consumer applications, however, the Aerospike nozzle is utilized more for its unique appearance and novelty rather than for performance reasons.
>Our Aerospike nozzle does produce a rather novel exhaust plume.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:30:44 UTC No. 16477317
>>16477283
$35 billion for Mars Sample Return, we will utilize all the brainpower, skill and resources of every NASA center, and plan for the samples to return in the 2035-2040 timeframe. Let's get this right
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:30:51 UTC No. 16477318
>>16477300
kys
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:32:26 UTC No. 16477319
>>16477066
So how the fuck will this thing actually land? Is it going to use those thrusters that was put higher up? What fuel will they use? Have they even started development of those?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:38:03 UTC No. 16477325
Women born on the Moon or Mars will have very soft feet.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:42:08 UTC No. 16477331
I think spin gravity will be a relatively short fad in the grand scheme of things.
I think that when we eventually build stanford toruses or oneill cylinders or something else similar. anything that is expected to have people born live and die on it; the inhabitants will quickly realize that zero G is very convenient for a lot of things, and for the things it isn't 1/5G or less will suffice.
I suspect that only 2 or 3 generations of space stations will actually be built to produce 1G acceleration.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:43:27 UTC No. 16477334
>>16477325
why are you thinking about feet anon?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:44:43 UTC No. 16477337
>>16477333
bravo to the retard that can't figure out a straight line but decided to remodel the g11 to his mouthbreather specifications
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:45:46 UTC No. 16477340
ifuck
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:49:54 UTC No. 16477348
>>16477334
dont bully my kinks : (
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:51:46 UTC No. 16477352
>>16477348
I think we should.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:57:47 UTC No. 16477356
>>16477283
Delete SLS INSTANTLY. Keep those contractors working, but instead redirect them to base building modules (universal for moon and mars) as well as any random shit we may need. Put aside some cash for a few starships to be used as space station sections with whoever gets a core up, to support permanent inhabitance in space.
SPECIAL PROGRAM: Begin preparing this mission, launched by a series of Starships
https://www.nasa.gov/general/swarmi
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:59:06 UTC No. 16477359
>>16477331
Zero G has too many health detriments for long-term use. People go blind, get heart damage, permanent stuffy nose, etc. Even light g-force is better.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:03:42 UTC No. 16477363
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:05:40 UTC No. 16477366
>>16477363
kys ai faggot
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:05:45 UTC No. 16477367
>>16477363
>mini starship in ai data set
fucking zubrin
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:09:13 UTC No. 16477369
>>16477363
gts ai king
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:17:35 UTC No. 16477373
>>16477363
and the anime girl?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:22:12 UTC No. 16477375
>>16477367
ZUBRINCHADS WON. GET USED TO IT INCEL.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:26:56 UTC No. 16477379
>>16477063
ring ring ring ring ring ring ring
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:28:22 UTC No. 16477380
>>16477283
Give Greason the dough for a plasma magnet orbital test
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:32:58 UTC No. 16477382
Launch is now Tuesday target btw. Add another 24 hours to the count
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:35:43 UTC No. 16477384
>>16477382
sauce?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:37:53 UTC No. 16477387
>>16477382
FUD
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:38:09 UTC No. 16477388
>>16477164
>>16477167
They're gonna be doing backflips in zero G in there for days during this mission, we're gonna see kino
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:39:27 UTC No. 16477389
>>16477176
Melt, bro
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:43:41 UTC No. 16477392
you literally do not need a bed in zero g
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:43:58 UTC No. 16477393
>>16477283
Cut everything. Buy starship license. Build starship factory. Launch
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:44:09 UTC No. 16477394
>>16477384
>>16477387
https://x.com/labpadre/status/18576
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:47:07 UTC No. 16477397
fuck you
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:48:24 UTC No. 16477400
>>16477240
so are astronauts
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:48:27 UTC No. 16477401
Reminder, SpaceX is tracking 136 launch this year. Slightly down from 150 goal they set for themselves, but given few delays, this isnt so bad
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:50:28 UTC No. 16477405
>>16477397
still seething about catching a (deserved) ban during the booster catch?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:51:13 UTC No. 16477407
>>16477394
it's so OVER
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:53:07 UTC No. 16477410
>>16477401
>promise 150 launches
>deliver only 136
be ready for another BUSTED video
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:53:56 UTC No. 16477412
>>16477394
YOU BITCH
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:55:35 UTC No. 16477413
>>16477394
damn I wanted it to be monday so I could watch it live. oh well, I missed out on seeing ift2 live as well.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:55:52 UTC No. 16477415
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:59:18 UTC No. 16477416
>>16477394
what if she just said the date wrong?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:59:40 UTC No. 16477417
>>16477300
Nice work. Way better then mine.
>>16477297
I am surprised how easy Paint 3D is to use every time I open it up.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:03:37 UTC No. 16477418
>>16477366
>>16477367
>>16477369
Grok can't generate an accurate SpaceX Starship even if you explain it to it.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:05:44 UTC No. 16477419
>You can see that the acceleration is by no means constant, but it peaks at just under 40 m/s^2, or around 4g. And it was a wild ride. In particular, when the first burn ended the entire structure, which had been compressed, snapped back. Fred Haise said that when the first stage cut out he thought he was going through the instrument panel.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:06:19 UTC No. 16477420
>>16477416
>cope
It's OVER
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:15:15 UTC No. 16477422
>>16477419
huh, I kinda would have guessed the later stages would have higher peak acceleration. lighter payload and all.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:17:35 UTC No. 16477423
>>16477420
SHUT THE FUCK UP ITS ONE DAMN DAY
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:24:24 UTC No. 16477429
>>16477389
>Melt, bro
40 to 100 Miles thick, miles.
Or are you suggesting only need to sample a bit to possibly find life, oh that makes sense
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:30:01 UTC No. 16477433
>>16477176
Casaba howitzer
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:39:48 UTC No. 16477437
>>16477389
Oops I read it wrong, the ocena is 40 to 100 miles deep the ice is, still, only 10 to 15 miles, but yes if there's hope you can melt the surface and could be signs of life there
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:50:13 UTC No. 16477442
>>16477433
Irradiate the water? What's the deal with nukes and radiation, would you contaminate europa, or does it have no atmos and get enough radii anyway
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:56:49 UTC No. 16477447
>>16477419
How bad is sustained 4g? Could the average anon (me) take it?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:58:01 UTC No. 16477448
>>16477447
squat 3x your bodyweight then come back here and report
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:05:21 UTC No. 16477454
>>16477447
given that it's 4g's from your front to back rather than laterally or vertically, it's uncomfortable but manageable.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:06:39 UTC No. 16477455
Don't care still taking Monday off
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:14:39 UTC No. 16477461
>>16477411
Was 2 seperate things, usually people may have some caution drinking water in foreign places they've never been, the moon is foreign.
And radio question was about just being out and about on moons surface for weeks or months at a time
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:14:39 UTC No. 16477462
>>16477331
>I suspect that only 2 or 3 generations of space stations will actually be built to produce 1G acceleration.
none will be built that provide 1g, what a complete waste of resources to even attempt when a fraction of g would be optimal
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:15:39 UTC No. 16477465
>>16477455
idiot
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:17:21 UTC No. 16477466
>>16477076
i wanna run my hands all over their thighs and legs...
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:20:02 UTC No. 16477469
>>16477462
This is false. Even a fraction less than 1g creates jello babies
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:21:59 UTC No. 16477471
>>16477469
oh shit it's the WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF ALL THE DEFOEMED BABIES THAT LIVE IN MY HEAD! anon, sorry I engaged
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:22:11 UTC No. 16477472
>>16477455
genius
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:25:03 UTC No. 16477473
>>16477469
jello babies are fine as long as you expect them to live in the less than 1g space station for ever.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:28:16 UTC No. 16477477
>>16477469
proofs? oh right there are none
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:33:12 UTC No. 16477480
>make cool vid showing flight 5 with exclusive splashdown footage
>still refuse to show how badly roasted the last two starships got
When will they announce that they can't reuse it?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:48:27 UTC No. 16477488
>>16477480
how are they supposed to show how roasted they were if they're in a million pieces at the bottom of the indian ocean?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:50:58 UTC No. 16477490
>>16477480
i wouldnt want to reuse an inferior v1 starship tbqh
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:52:34 UTC No. 16477491
>/sfg/ still denying the obvious outcome that is jello babies
kek
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:11:31 UTC No. 16477495
nets have tension
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:13:54 UTC No. 16477497
>>16477495
Netting/gridding are fucking gay and so is Skylab, do not bring this design to Starship.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:28:49 UTC No. 16477502
>>16477497
the force exerted on your bodily frame by the tension from a pull is theraputic, and if nets create tension as a function of their design it follows that they are useful for basic exercises
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:36:54 UTC No. 16477507
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18575
Nukes off
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:44:08 UTC No. 16477514
>>16477511
Fag. Imagine becoming the embodiment of uhm akshually
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:57:50 UTC No. 16477525
>>16477507
no need to give energy or credence to that which is so far beneath you, no need to make mountains of molehills, or look diabolicaly aggressive in the normaliy public eye, especially deviseivly on partly lines, while representing the nation and it's government, there is the opportunity now to be the bigger person, kill with kindness, and act civilly
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:01:13 UTC No. 16477526
>>16477525
>>16477507
Though it is a fun and funny thing to say, and hopefully harmless, if it is untrue, it is untrue, I didn't even read the headline, does it matter at all, people read it then what
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:05:20 UTC No. 16477531
>>16477507
Russian interference political red herring 2.0 here we go.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:07:17 UTC No. 16477534
>>16477108
Was it thickened? I assume it'd be thickened. Why can't I buy tubes of astronaut vodka in the museum gift shop?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:10:23 UTC No. 16477536
>>16477519
Are you allowed to use regular home Starlink on a moving vehicle, or will they cut you off like GPS. Asking for a friend.
>>16477532
>First the Your name tweet now this
Elon's anime arc is beginning
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:14:31 UTC No. 16477539
>>16477519
still no clue what this company is
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:14:35 UTC No. 16477540
>>16477536
>Are you allowed to use regular home Starlink on a moving vehicle, or will they cut you off like GPS. Asking for a friend.
Different packages. On the cheapest tier you're stationary, but you can opt for the higher tiers that let you move it as often as you'd like, or if you pair it with the right equipment then you can use it while in motion. There's a speed limit of 100MPH.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:14:55 UTC No. 16477542
>>16477514
That's the article. Actually the article was >implying strawman bullshit you see here every day
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:31 UTC No. 16477543
>>16477532
Now I'm wondering if elon wont leave mar a lago because he's rich trad girlfriend shopping
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:22:11 UTC No. 16477546
>>16477536
>Elon's anime arc is beginning
it started long ago
(pic from 2019)
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:27:27 UTC No. 16477548
>>16477543
He will find none of that there. Mar-a-Lago is literally just a bunch of plastic bimbo MILF's and GMILF's. That isn't the sort of thing Musk goes after. He didn't even put kids in the actress he married, and the crazy bitch he avoided marrying.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:03:27 UTC No. 16477556
>>16477546
he was 2hu posting in 2018
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:08:36 UTC No. 16477558
Relaxing under the trees in a hammock looking up at the moon rn. I really want to go there. I wonder if I will.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:09:32 UTC No. 16477559
>>16477543
he's not gf shopping, he's enjoying his time there with his de facto wife the neuralink exec
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:15:05 UTC No. 16477563
>>16477558
Don't worry, you can always bring the Moon to you, instead.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN_
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:18:42 UTC No. 16477565
>>16477066
Where are the header tanks?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:23:43 UTC No. 16477567
>>16477283
I cut the SLS as much as possible without (further) compromising Artemis 3 and redirect those funds to Venus orbiters for monitoring it's atmosphere in every scientifically useful way.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:26:55 UTC No. 16477570
>>16477536
GPS doesn't get cut off, only the receivers are built to do so
See that rocket report up thread where they fabricated their own GPS receiver for guidance. There are space missions that use GPS side lobes for space navigation too
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:34:41 UTC No. 16477572
>>16477560
Kys
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:41:56 UTC No. 16477573
>>16477572
do not be jelous
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:52:50 UTC No. 16477578
>>16477042
I googled "ripped banana" and I was seriously dissapointed about current state of internet.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:53:46 UTC No. 16477579
>>16477578
>posting this to 4chan
Heres that (You) you wanted
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:55:35 UTC No. 16477580
>>16477579
I don't need (you)s I need picture of ripped banana.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:56:43 UTC No. 16477581
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:57:07 UTC No. 16477582
>>16477580
How about I rip your banana instead fucker?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:58:07 UTC No. 16477583
>>16477582
i think he is meaning to say "ripe" banana. like when a banana is ready to eat
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:59:51 UTC No. 16477584
>>16477583
Are you a yuro?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:02:45 UTC No. 16477587
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:04:22 UTC No. 16477589
>>16477583
No, I'm looking for muscular banana that is in peak body condition, having muscles...
Like banana that went to gym every day.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:06:43 UTC No. 16477590
>>16477567
>Venus orbiters for monitoring it's atmosphere in every scientifically useful way.
Why you choose this out of everything?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:08:28 UTC No. 16477591
>>16477590
Because it's fucking retarded that we don't have any probes in orbit of the closest to us planet.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:08:38 UTC No. 16477592
SFG - Searching for Fruits General
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:24:03 UTC No. 16477598
>>16477592
Thats /sffg/ and you need to go back >>>/lit/sffg/
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:24:19 UTC No. 16477599
>>16477589
this is all i got
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:30:01 UTC No. 16477601
So when will F9 launches be so frequent they stop getting streamed and instead we just get fan streams like plane spotters (or current tube watchers)?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:31:59 UTC No. 16477602
>>16477601
they should stop streaming starlink years ago desu
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:32:44 UTC No. 16477605
>>16477601
Never. F9 cadence wont break that threshhold. Starship might
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:34:04 UTC No. 16477606
>>16477602
it's free advertising
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:36:11 UTC No. 16477607
Astronauts en route to Mars will need fruits... we don't want a scurvy outbreak
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:36:23 UTC No. 16477608
why is the FTS installation taking 5 hours?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:38:52 UTC No. 16477609
>>16477607
Just take some Tang
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:53:21 UTC No. 16477610
>>16477609
>Tang
say what
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:55:08 UTC No. 16477612
>>16477606
Not free in the slightest
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:02:18 UTC No. 16477618
>>16477556
that's not a cat dipshit, that's imaizumi kagerou
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:07:13 UTC No. 16477622
>>16477071
because Orion fits that only so many people
they are deliberately making it very silly to change the requirements
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:10:38 UTC No. 16477625
Tuesday launch time
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:13:22 UTC No. 16477626
>>16477589
AI slop to the rescue
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:24:44 UTC No. 16477636
>>16477626
this is epically based
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:26:17 UTC No. 16477637
>>16477636
>>16477626
This is samingly faggef
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:33:32 UTC No. 16477639
>>16477637
Are you the fun police?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:42:52 UTC No. 16477643
>>16477219
there will be ships that are bigger than that
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:43:42 UTC No. 16477644
>>16477641
be brave, little one
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:54:04 UTC No. 16477647
>>16477641
then they fix the tower
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:00:15 UTC No. 16477649
>>16477283
>Cancel SLS, Gateway and Orion
>Increase funding for Starship ground systems
>Fully fund the Habitable Worlds Observatory
>Start funding for 100km segmented telescope
>Start funding for a Europa submersible
NASA need to be a world leader of science and clearly rocketry is now mature enough for private companies to take that over.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:20:26 UTC No. 16477651
>>16477639
Yes
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:21:01 UTC No. 16477652
>>16477117
This sort of thing just makes me feel like it's impossible to build really large structures in space.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:31:28 UTC No. 16477657
>>16477652
Build it with steel. Steel has a fatigue limit, unlike aluminum, so flexing and bending it a bit isn't a problem. You can let oscillations run their course and dissipate as heat, or acively dampen them using the usual combination of RCS, reaction wheels, gyros, etc.
Also, the only reason the tower wobbles like that is because the arms are very heavy and move quite quickly. If you don't have heavy moving parts then wobbles like that shouldn't occur.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:35:13 UTC No. 16477659
The moon landing should go on the back of the $20 bill
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:39:41 UTC No. 16477662
>>16477659
Take Jackson's face off the front (it was only put there to disrespect his memory) and replace it with von Braun.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:50:48 UTC No. 16477669
>>16477641
that is why God invented popcorn
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:51:28 UTC No. 16477670
>>16477666
We don't live in the oort cloud
>>16476274
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:52:36 UTC No. 16477672
>>16477670
Faglet
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:53:43 UTC No. 16477673
>>16477536
>Elon's anime arc is beginning
Elon was always a fucking nerd. That's why they hated him at first.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:53:57 UTC No. 16477674
>>16477560
>>16477573
very cute!
I love rocket girls (platonically(sexually))
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:09:31 UTC No. 16477682
>>16477674
(Lys(kys))
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:12:38 UTC No. 16477684
>>16477672
>>16477670
Nerdfight
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:13:53 UTC No. 16477686
>>16477682
what did he mean by that? He must be yearning for more rocket girls. Well you don't have to tell me twice!
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:16:11 UTC No. 16477687
>>16477559
damn her ass is fat
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:19:18 UTC No. 16477692
>>16477684
This anon has a big nose and a tiny hat.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:19:46 UTC No. 16477693
>>16477098
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korol
81 km across and 1.8km deep ice. just one crater. mars has a shit ton of water
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 12:08:08 UTC No. 16477714
>>16477693
Mars has 3L of water per cubic meter of topsoil based on the experiments conducted by the Perseverance rover, IN ADDITION OF, the visible water ice across its Northern and Southern poles as well as surrounding craters. Mars has a mega fuckton of water.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 12:17:41 UTC No. 16477718
>>16477693
>ywn break the landspeed record on the ice flats of Mars
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 12:26:43 UTC No. 16477723
>>16477718
>tfw the lack of atmosphere helps you get that extra speed to break the record
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 12:58:40 UTC No. 16477741
>>16477454
wouldnt it cause brain and organ damage if sustained for a few minutes?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:15:03 UTC No. 16477749
>>16477693
https://x.com/konstructivizm/status
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:22:55 UTC No. 16477754
>>16477693
looks like that area is going to be prime real estate
>73 degrees north
oh wait
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:23:27 UTC No. 16477756
>>16477749
Thats not very much compared to the sahara desert. And its near the poles where solar wont work so good.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:30:43 UTC No. 16477762
>>16477756
>solar
What, are you gay?
Small Modular Reactors is the way to go. Why the fuck would you want to be reliant on solar when living on a planet that experiences giant global dust storms every few years?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:35:36 UTC No. 16477766
>>16477762
>>16477756
mars will have solar, wind, nuclear, whatever. nobody is going to leave the planet reliant upon a single energy tech stack.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:54:07 UTC No. 16477774
>>16477451
>Flight 4
Yeah, it was way behind 3 & 5 in it's timeline, funnily enough the booster for 3 blew up at the same time that the catch ended.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:03:21 UTC No. 16477791
realistically, i think very few people will go to mars unless there is already a base and infrastructure waiting for them. its just too difficult for individuals to try and scratch out a home from nothing. even if they're wealthy, the expense will be very high.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:07:32 UTC No. 16477797
>>16477791
fuck off doomer. people in the 1780s settled in the Hudson bay under similar circumstance and now there are thriving metropolises in the canadian arctic. its basically as built up as the united states.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:08:47 UTC No. 16477799
>>16477796
https://x.com/BingoBoca/status/1857
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:13:57 UTC No. 16477807
>>16477797
they could camp out in the woods. you cant camp out on the martian surface.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:14:58 UTC No. 16477809
>>16477807
yes you can. literally just bring a space suit and some oxygen and you can sleep in it all day. its that easy.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:29:15 UTC No. 16477814
>>16477807
HAVE YOU EVER TRIED CAMPING ON THE MARTIAN SURFACE NIGGER?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:30:57 UTC No. 16477815
>>16477807
You're arguing with retards, don't waste your time
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:32:46 UTC No. 16477818
>page 1 shenanigans
>>16477791
>individuals to try and scratch out a home
This isn't even close to what it will be like
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:37:18 UTC No. 16477821
>>16477807
You're arguing with intelligent people, continue to spend your time
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:37:34 UTC No. 16477824
>>16477283
>>16477649
Any point of systems test biosphere terrarium on moon + terraform monitoring test? How much could that cost? Launch not included id say 200mil in nasa terms:
Realistically could be done legitly for around $500,000
Could be done illegitly for $80,000
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:44:22 UTC No. 16477826
>>16477657
>Also, the only reason the tower wobbles like that is because the arms are very heavy and move quite
How strong is starships body that the grabbers don't dent it, because besides that would it make sense to add some sort of padding combo, foam, or it needs a friction grip.
So the fear is they go to catch and the kick back bounce makes a butter fingers?
It catched the first one so maybe there's no issue at all,. There likely is not
Maybe future versions might have a second set of arms
But yeah it seems everything worked fine, don't want to make a change that makes it worse when it worked like a charm
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:45:23 UTC No. 16477828
>>16477749
cool, lets nuke it.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:47:23 UTC No. 16477829
>>16477826
during the booster catch, the arms bounced off the booster before catching it. so it must be quite strong.
nevertheless, the arms moving fast doesn't necessarily mean they squeeze starship hard, since they obviously have some braking mechanism which controls their movement.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:57:34 UTC No. 16477834
>>16477797
>people in the 1780s settled in the Hudson bay under similar circumstance
> le space settlement is analogous to colonizing North America meme
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:00:21 UTC No. 16477837
>>16477163
>Solar
why would you use solar when you can use nuclear?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:12:33 UTC No. 16477841
>>16477754
>73 degrees north
Meaning hard to land there, get there?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:20:27 UTC No. 16477851
>>16477841
Because its cold as fuck nigga
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:23:32 UTC No. 16477854
>>16477841
Because its cold as fuck nigga
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:27:39 UTC No. 16477857
>>16477824
>terraform monitoring test?
Is pointless, if you already know the variables, moons atmos, gravity = how many plants fed how much to produce how much until the moon has a breathable atmos, it may be sillyly impossible, but to what degree of impossibility
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:31:04 UTC No. 16477859
>>16477854
So send big drone pelican mouth scooper planes copters air lift toy machine hand grabber cargo box to scoop it up and bring it back
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:32:09 UTC No. 16477860
>>16477791
strap me to a rocket and point it at mars, my body is ready.
>>16477834
lol, what a midwit
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:40:34 UTC No. 16477868
>>16477834
Mars requires advanced technology, sure, but as a human matter they are functionally equivalent. Those imbued with the Faustian spirit or dissatisfied with a dull life on Earth will rise to the challenge. Really, there would be a massive surplus of volunteers; colonial efforts will be constrained far more by other factors.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:43:44 UTC No. 16477872
>>16477868
We could always follow the Australian model, one day you're shoplifting at Walmart the next you're on a Starship to Mars
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:45:20 UTC No. 16477875
>>16477872
So Mars will be populated by 80IQ dindus and beaners?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:45:34 UTC No. 16477876
>>16477807
>you cant camp out on the martian surface.
You can't because you're an amateur scrub.
But I can.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:48:31 UTC No. 16477879
>>16477875
Good point, maybe we can send criminals to the Callisto mining outposts
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:06:29 UTC No. 16477894
Assuming prophetic visions are possible, which there is evidence of (my extreme skepticism and questioning of everything, has led me to beliefs I would not have had as a secular child), do not fulfill negative, bad, evil, harmful, distasteful, disrespectful, human suffering causing prophecies. Absolute time does not care if a prophecy is self fulfilled, accidently, or ignorantly, if it is in anyway, the given vision was correct, the point is a measure of power, to carefully and wisely avoid bad paths,.for all.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:06:33 UTC No. 16477895
>>16477801
>>16477804
Long exposure or ai?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:15:06 UTC No. 16477900
>>16477895
Neither. Just a camera with a good lens and a really good sensor, tweaked for HDR.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:16:24 UTC No. 16477901
>>16477875
Send white criminals and you get Martian Mel Gibson in 200 years tho
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:20:14 UTC No. 16477904
>>16477895
AI does not know what Starship looks like
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:22:00 UTC No. 16477905
Unless there's a revolution in spacesuit design the majority of surface operations on the Moon and Mars is going to be done by teleoperated robots. EVAs with current tech take too long with prebreathing and suit checklists
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:22:00 UTC No. 16477906
>>16477904
I meant ai enhanced, that sky looks fake as fuck
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:23:05 UTC No. 16477907
>>16477442
the casaba howitzer projectile isn't really radioactive, the nuke happens well away from the surface
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:28:57 UTC No. 16477912
>>16477905
>the Moon
sure
>and Mars
huh?
>Unless there's a revolution in spacesuit design
Well we're in luck then
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:37:30 UTC No. 16477918
>>16477139
they'll all be wearing space jammies
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:39:28 UTC No. 16477920
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18578
>A former NASA employee told DailyMail that NASA's DEI is 'destroying America's ability to compete with China in space because the Biden-Harris administration will only fund programs that feature it.'
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:40:30 UTC No. 16477922
>>16477920
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/science
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:40:51 UTC No. 16477924
>>16477920
You may even get tired of winning
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:41:52 UTC No. 16477925
>>16477922
we have to end DEI and have qualified, blacks, women, mexicans, in our NASA agency!
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:44:08 UTC No. 16477926
>>16477922
>>16477920
The Work must be ended, it cannot continue.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:45:26 UTC No. 16477928
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:57:34 UTC No. 16477935
>>16477928
thats cgi
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:57:49 UTC No. 16477936
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 16:58:51 UTC No. 16477937
>>16477922
>dailymail
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:03:22 UTC No. 16477941
If there is really a desire for a cashless society in the future, well there is so many or maybe a few generalities and subtleties that make that absolutley challenging and unsure. The organic mixed use seems to be functioning today, the nature of infinite crypto currencies could be philosophicaly discussed towards analysis.
The ease and freedom of petty cash, reflects the abundance, ease of nature, and well, in theory or with less ease, non maniputible.
So perhaps the chain can be bumped up, digital currency becomes cash, cash becomes coin.
As a thought came to be once about the possible absurdity of coins in the current day:
Trying to think of what would be differences if there were no coins, fractioned dollars and every price was only ever whole number units, mentioned to someone and we realized having to do with whole sale deals, but I don't nessecarily know if coins so factor into that.
20 units for 100,
25 units 110
Oh but then we realized the complexity of supply and demand markets, and inventory, and currency value fluctuation,
Strawberries cannot either be 1 or 2 or 3 dollars
Because every single day and month and year is different supplies and demand,
A main reason about the coin idea was it's a waste of metal.
And energy to make,
I geuss you can say the same for paper, when for many now the paper equals 1s and 0s.
But can it be assured, that if someone has a bad day and says a bad word, their hard earned digits won't be missing, can the operators assure themselves, that absolute powers can possibly not corrupt.
Who is to believe who. Thus there are messes.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:06:04 UTC No. 16477945
>>16477937
its the worlds greatest newspaper
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:10:27 UTC No. 16477948
>>16477920
>NASA staff have gay nigger fatigue and want Elon to wipe out their HR departments
not terribly surprising tbqh
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:15:47 UTC No. 16477953
If there is really a desire for a cashless society in the future, well there is so many or maybe a few generalities and subtleties that make that absolutley challenging and unsure. The organic mixed use seems to be functioning today, the nature of infinite crypto currencies could be philosophicaly discussed towards analysis.
The ease and freedom of petty cash, reflects the abundance, ease of nature, and well, in theory or with less ease, non easily maniputible.
So perhaps the chain can be bumped up, digital currency becomes cash, cash becomes coin.
As a thought came to be once about the possible absurdity of coins in the current day:
Trying to think of what would be differences if there were no coins, fractioned dollars and every price was only ever whole number units, mentioned to someone and we realized having to do with whole sale deals, but I don't nessecarily know if coins so factor into that.
20 units for 100,
25 units 110
Oh but then we realized the complexity of supply and demand markets, and inventory, and currency value fluctuation,
Strawberries cannot either be 1 or 2 or 3 dollars
Because every single day and month and year is different supplies and demand,
Quality and quantity. Yields.
A main reason about the coin idea was it's a waste of metal.
And energy to make,
I geuss you can say the same for paper, when for many now the paper equals 1s and 0s.
But can it be assured, that if someone has a bad day and says a bad word, their hard earned digits won't be missing, can the operators assure themselves, that absolute powers can possibly not corrupt.
Who is to believe who. Thus there are messes.
This back and forth balence of macro and micro histories, of freedom and restriction. Absolute rules and absolute obediences.
Every flower breaking through every sidewalk need not be crushed.
They are often every so often in flower beds surrounding trees.
What are ultimate goals of any of it, to what degrees are they good, what're meanings o better
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:17:09 UTC No. 16477955
Assuming prophetic visions are possible, which there is evidence of (my extreme skepticism and questioning of everything, has led me to beliefs I would not have had as a secular child), do not fulfill negative, bad, evil, harmful, distasteful, disrespectful, human suffering causing prophecies. Absolute time does not care if a prophecy is self fulfilled, accidently, or ignorantly, if it is in anyway, the given vision was correct, the point is a measure of power, to carefully and wisely avoid bad paths,.for all.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:20:46 UTC No. 16477956
My favorite aspect of 4chan is how often I'm subjected to an unmedicated schizophrenic's stream of consciousness
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:21:48 UTC No. 16477957
>>16477912
Failsafe a redundancy is upmost important, after seeing that vid of astraunat fall on the moon, I'm just not bright enough to know the truth of materials science, but I've ripped through pants before.
I geuss my overbearing anxiety ridden mom instilled immense fears in me,
The general principle of fear, applied to being in Mars, tripping and ripping a hole in your suit.
Comforting would be bubbles in bubbles in bubbles
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:24:01 UTC No. 16477960
>>16477936
extremely cute
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:30:08 UTC No. 16477971
>>16477953
>A main reason about the coin idea was it's a waste of metal.
>And energy to make,
>I geuss you can say the same for paper, when for many
Oh that's what I was gonna say, how does the electrical energy waste consumption concerns relate to that?
What was everyone saying about bitcoin computers and energy?
Is that also absurd?(I don't get entirely the process of mining, from what I did see it had to do with networks using computer power to work out large models and stuff, but at other times it made it seem like an arbitrary series of steps to game like achieve a token) Or there is so much energy wasting it is never an issue?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:33:20 UTC No. 16477975
>>16477954
To pay respects to all the Mexican workforce, a starship one day can be candy painted with patterns and designed with racing stripes and flames, just kidding, as it would be too awkward if that's a one to fail
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:36:37 UTC No. 16477979
>>16477267
Cure to male loneliness is getting a girlfriend and marrying her.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:37:40 UTC No. 16477980
>>16477979
And living with her on a Martian homestead
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:40:48 UTC No. 16477981
>>16477975
put glow in the dark neon paint on it and draw a skull and cool tribal patterns on it.
then launch it at night.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:41:48 UTC No. 16477982
>>16477979
the cure to male loneliness is getting a nandroid with pregnancy module and starting a family with her.*
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:42:45 UTC No. 16477983
>>16477982
This
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:44:29 UTC No. 16477984
>>16477957
>Comforting would be bubbles in bubbles in bubbles
Herein we see the, spaceship earth and her meatsuits
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:45:51 UTC No. 16477986
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDGlydZ
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:47:25 UTC No. 16477987
>>16477986
ITS HAPPENING
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:49:10 UTC No. 16477988
>>16477987
Is real?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:50:06 UTC No. 16477989
>>16477988
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1857841
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:51:45 UTC No. 16477990
>>16477989
Crystal porn, don't click that
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:53:07 UTC No. 16477991
does anybody have that gif of the in-space servicing satellite buttsex
it was Orbital ATK/Northrop Grumman MEV-1
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:57:45 UTC No. 16477993
>>16477991
Buttsex with a woman is the straightest form of intercourse possible. Vaginal is gay if it isnt for procreation (because the girl enjoys it), its espedcially gay if done wearing a cuck sleeve (commonly known as condom)
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:59:15 UTC No. 16477995
https://x.com/BoeingSpace/status/18
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:00:18 UTC No. 16477997
>>16477993
>>16477991
are you retarded
I need the gif form of this image, I know it exists, somebody has it
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:01:27 UTC No. 16478000
>>16477995
I'm glad everyone is roasting them in the replies
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:02:22 UTC No. 16478003
>>16477995
The good ole days weren't always good
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:03:49 UTC No. 16478006
>>16478002
>2020
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:06:05 UTC No. 16478007
>>16478005
probably never. hate to break it to you.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:12:35 UTC No. 16478011
>>16477990
FUCK YOU
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:18:09 UTC No. 16478016
>>16478012
That is one long trailer.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:18:55 UTC No. 16478019
>>16478012
why does a chinese company in china write their stuff in english?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:20:30 UTC No. 16478020
>>16478001
Will be the only launcher that's actually a compliment to what Starship enables
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:21:03 UTC No. 16478021
>>16478019
English is lingua franca
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:21:31 UTC No. 16478022
>>16478007
>never
I mean obviously not in our lifetime, but never ever?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:23:48 UTC No. 16478025
>>16478019
English is the cool language, also they've previously mediatized their launcher transportation.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:25:05 UTC No. 16478027
>>16477824
>systems test biosphere terrarium
>200mil
>500k
>80k
If you dont need the systems test aspect you can just buy a few wherever they sell them Amazon or some specialty aquatic life store for probably like $100
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:42:33 UTC No. 16478045
>>16478022
not until we find a way to clean up jupiter's van allen belts.
is there a way to remove trapped charged particles from a magnetosphere?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:48:03 UTC No. 16478047
>he doesn't know
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:48:10 UTC No. 16478048
>>16478001
The booster is substantially larger than as depicted in those renders according to their regulatory documents.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:49:16 UTC No. 16478049
>>16478022
never is a long time, but the radiation will be hard to work around without some sci-fi shielding tech.
36 Sieverts a day on Io. For scale 1 Sv is the maximum LIFETIME dose allowed to NASA astronauts currently. 5 Sv in a short time is enough to have a 50% chance of death. on wikipedia they mention a guy called Cecil Kelley took 36Sv in 1958, death occurred within 35 hours.
Incidentally, a 6 month trip to Mars would give 300 mSv with no shielding, another 300 for a 500 day stay on the surface and then 300 on the way back. So 900 mSv for the whole trip, which is just barely below NASA maximum lifetime amount, so would be very possible with even a small amount of shielding from the mars lander.
Basically we should start with Callisto.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:49:45 UTC No. 16478050
>>16478045
https://spectrum.ieee.org/military-
https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/n
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:59:26 UTC No. 16478056
>>16478049
>sci-fi shielding tech.
How small can you make a magnetic field?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:00:40 UTC No. 16478057
>>16478049
so Io has 5000x the background radiation
lol
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:02:58 UTC No. 16478058
>>16478045
really big wires
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:13:18 UTC No. 16478067
>>16477956
welcome to /sci/tzo
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:17:14 UTC No. 16478068
>>16478045
Yes actually
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:27:41 UTC No. 16478076
>>16478057
500,000x Earth actually.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:31:07 UTC No. 16478082
>>16478076
oh it was mSV on earth, missed that
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:40:44 UTC No. 16478095
starship at $1000 a pound to earth, average adult american weighs 200lbs: $200,000 to LEO before costs are factored in.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:51:45 UTC No. 16478103
>>16478095
Oh cool, so it's only $2T to get a million people there, or $20T if one crew ship needs ten cargo ships. That's only like 9 months of the United States' GDP
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:57:08 UTC No. 16478105
>>16478095
the aspirational goal is something like 10 dollars/kg to LEO
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:58:07 UTC No. 16478106
>>16478103
Global telecom is a couple trillion a year so depending on how much of that Starlink captures, $20T spent over 50 years may not be that unthinkable
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:59:16 UTC No. 16478107
>>16478095
>average adult american weighs 200lbs
It's simple, we limit women to 110lbs, and men to 170lbs
fatties are not allowed to travel amongst the stars
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:02:25 UTC No. 16478108
>>16478012
the sky don't lie
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:02:33 UTC No. 16478109
>>16478107
So Musk is banned from going to Mars, lmao
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:03:24 UTC No. 16478110
>>16478107
>selecting colonists based on mass
Manlets inherit the stars, breeding giants of Mars.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:05:27 UTC No. 16478113
>>16478109
>>16478110
fat people can pay for the price difference, like checking in overweight baggage on a flight
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:10:38 UTC No. 16478119
>>16478109
Musk can do whatever the fuck he wants. He owns 42% of SpaceX.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:12:35 UTC No. 16478120
>>16478113
Fat people would have to pay the price difference of their own mass, the added consumables they need (oxygen, food, water), and an extra surcharge for the added risk of them blocking waste recycling systems because of the excess amounts of pissing and shitting they do from the excessive eating that they do. It will self-selectively exclude them as it becomes cost prohibitive. The tragedy though, is that the lardasses will inherit the Earth.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:16:25 UTC No. 16478122
>tianzhou 8 cargo ship delivered cement bricks made from simulated lunar regolith to the chinese station
>the regolith is based on the lunar samples that china was able to gather from chang'e 5
>the bricks will be put outside of the station for 3 years to study the effects of solar irradiation and thermal stress on them
why arent we doing something like this?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:16:59 UTC No. 16478123
>>16478119
Source?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:17:15 UTC No. 16478124
>>16478110
When genetic engineering gets figured out, spacefaring civilizations will be incentivized to shrink their people. You can copy avian neuron density to maintain a human intellect while small. Less resources/square footage consumed per person as an obvious benefit. Go small enough and cryogenic sleep actually works without cell damage. Our size was selected for by Earth, there's no reason to expect it to be the best form once we leave.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:18:56 UTC No. 16478125
>>16478122
This is well known. Elon insists on owning 42.0% of SpaceX.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:22:59 UTC No. 16478126
>>16478125
Retard replied to wrong post and source is trust me bro. Everyone kek at this idiot
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:23:03 UTC No. 16478127
>>16478109
It makes no sense for him to go to Mars other than to die in his senescence. Going there would be a major hindrance to leading his companies and thus in succeeding in the mission.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:30:35 UTC No. 16478133
>>16478129
https://payloadspace.com/intuitive-
Inuitive Machines also trying to land again
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:31:11 UTC No. 16478135
>>16478122
the exposed platform on the Japanese module of ISS has been doing all kinds of stuff like this for over a decade. radiation and thermal studies, a lot of telescopes and earth observation as well.
I dont really see how a fake moon rock is going to tell you anything useful in 3 years that the actual tonnes of real moonrocks we have already dont show.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:31:13 UTC No. 16478136
>>16478123
https://en.as.com/latest_news/who-a
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:32:20 UTC No. 16478137
>>16478122
We lost the technology.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:32:21 UTC No. 16478138
>>16478133
will DOGE-1 finally launch on this one?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:34:32 UTC No. 16478139
>>16478135
It gives them a three year head start on figuring out if their moonbrick process has any issues. If they have a flaw that causes them to start to degrade after a year or two you're not going to want to find that out after a year of using them to build out your moonbase.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:36:34 UTC No. 16478140
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:41:57 UTC No. 16478145
>>16478129
First building on the moon
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:43:25 UTC No. 16478146
>>16478130
the fact that they havent found a single fossil tells me JPL should be defunded completely
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:47:18 UTC No. 16478149
>>16478140
One big difference here is owning a certain percentage of the stock vs voting shares. Just for reference, a couple of years ago Musk owned something like a little bit less of 50%, a figure that keeps decreasing, due to them being repeatedly diluted. However, at the same time, he owned almost 80% of voting shares. He basically has total control of the company, so this is no reason to worry at all. SpaceX is like his baby, he's not gonna let anything reduce that last number to less than 50%.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:59:22 UTC No. 16478157
>>16478130
Just imagine when they can just drop off a Cybertruck and go driving around, instead of these dinky rovers
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:03:13 UTC No. 16478161
>>16478130
>>16478157
One cybertruck will cover in a day what every rover did in their lifetime combined
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:03:57 UTC No. 16478163
>>16477693
why hasn't this region been explored yet?
>inb4 it would end JPL's grift
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:06:09 UTC No. 16478165
>>16478163
because it would end JPL's grift
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:07:25 UTC No. 16478167
>>16478157
>drop off cybertruck on mars
>it fails in a day
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:10:01 UTC No. 16478170
>>16478167
What's the dust situation Mars? I know moon sand is meant to be very sharp and sticks to stuff, which could cause malfunctions. But is it that bad on Mars? Of course it would also be a plus if you can just send down a guy to drive it, and do advanced things like wipe the dust off surfaces so that it doesn't just die. And about 97 tons of extra batteries
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:10:07 UTC No. 16478172
>>16478169
I wanna see what's in there, gimme a flashlight and some rope I'll go check it out.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:18:19 UTC No. 16478177
>>16478169
>spelunking on Mars
unironically sign me up! imagine how different those caves must be from ours. Or just think about how deep they could be. Just for reference, Veryovkina cave is the deepest known cave on Earth, being 2,209 meters deep. Of course, it's not one single shaft, but rather a complex tunnel system with some open spaces like pic related. Fun fact, its deepest point is still above sea level!
>>16478172
Same, but that's how horror space movies usually start lol
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:20:54 UTC No. 16478180
>>16478170
I somehow doubt that thing with shitloads of electronics could deal with much higher radiation in the first place.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:22:27 UTC No. 16478183
>>16478177
>MUH AYYS!!!
oh shut up
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:24:00 UTC No. 16478184
>>16478180
I think satellites have a fair bit of electronics
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:25:11 UTC No. 16478186
https://x.com/tobyliiiiiiiiii/statu
Gravitics FINALLY releases an update….. and its renders kek. Meanwhile Vast has a primary structure done and hardware testing ongoing. Still though lets run an overview of this I guess.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:26:04 UTC No. 16478187
>>16478170
no, Mars dust is still aerosolized but it's not extremely sharp
one problem is it seems to carry a static charge, which makes it stick to surfaces and hard to clean
if it accumulates in certain hard to reach areas that are exposed, that's bad
the main problem IMO would be overheating
because there's less atmosphere that can naturally conduct heat away from the electrical components
there's a similar problem in space, despite it being so cold you overheat due to there being no convection through an atmospheric medium
so they have to use electromagnetic waves to transfer heat away from your craft through the infrared, these units are called thermal radiators
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:27:02 UTC No. 16478189
>>16478184
Yes, but they are made to be used in space. You probably would have more luck with more basic car than a car that might shut down if it gets some kind of error.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:29:26 UTC No. 16478194
>>16478183
Never did I mention ayylmaos anon, I just like caves.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:35:34 UTC No. 16478199
>>16478186
They got multiple types it looks like. This would be the advanced material manufacturing version? For semiconductors and such.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:36:44 UTC No. 16478202
>almost 2025
>still no daily weather reports from mars
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:37:23 UTC No. 16478203
>>16478199
This is the propellant depot version. I get why theyre making them but like SpaceX is already covering this niche themselves.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:38:45 UTC No. 16478204
>>16478186
>renders
>not hardware
i sleep
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:39:00 UTC No. 16478205
>>16478203
This is where they would house satellites that cant make a certain mission profile so you can send them out at a later date. Maybe for satellites that need the Hohmann transfer window that arent SpaceX?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:39:11 UTC No. 16478206
>>16478203
SpaceX could be the bulk seller and these smaller stations gas station like distributors
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:39:34 UTC No. 16478210
>>16478186
>selling merchandise
not a real company
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:40:29 UTC No. 16478211
>>16478205
This is pretty obvious but its the space data centers. This I can see actually being needed but you would probably want somewhere for a technician to sleep if youre paying for a whole station to yourself. Still a good idea here
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:41:28 UTC No. 16478214
>>16478210
Anon, I...
https://shop.spacex.com/
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:41:37 UTC No. 16478215
>>16478186
results over renders
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:42:46 UTC No. 16478217
>>16478211
Theyre calling this an 'entertainment arena' which would be like sports or concerts or theater, etc. Very strange one but recently Kai Cenat said he wanted to go to space with SpaceX. I could see this happening if rides become cheaper to LEO and it becomes popular to go up.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:44:28 UTC No. 16478220
>>16478217
A cargo resupply space station... as if Starships or the ISS or Dragon couldnt already do this. Redundant.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:46:37 UTC No. 16478223
>>16478220
Heres a place where you would live. They call them staterooms and I will admit these are pretty spacious plus you get windows. Interesting take, and I guess facilities like bathrooms and exercise machines would be filled up as needed inside.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:47:58 UTC No. 16478224
>>16478223
Their pharmaceutical manufacturing variation, Varda would be interested. This also looks like its meant to be human operated so I'm wondering where theyre supposed to stay or if theyre just expected to go up and retrieve everything once in a while. Seems like those would be pretty dang frequent flights no?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:50:02 UTC No. 16478228
>>16478224
FInal one, looks like a generalized living space. It has some data down at the bottom, supply storage, tables, windows, sleeping quarters, the whole 9 yards. They mention tourism in the description of this one.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:54:25 UTC No. 16478230
imagine wasting money and time doing fking 3d designs of your habitats before you've built anything or even thought about booking a launch
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:56:37 UTC No. 16478231
>>16478214
holy shit: crazy cool stuff to buy on the spacex store
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:00:31 UTC No. 16478232
>>16478230
Results over renders. If they were to publish this update atleast put out some work youve done on actually achieving it. Thats what Vast did, we constantly get updates from them on hardware they make, and only recently did they release those renders of the interior after tons of shit like solar panels, primary structure, customer/legislative acquisitions, thrusters, life support, battery packs, I mean theres so much I havent even mentioned. Wish more companies were willing to share their actual work like Vast instead of render slop. Oh well, at the very least its eye candy and if they actually do start releasing stuff we can know what to expect.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:00:40 UTC No. 16478233
>>16478231
Us the banana edible
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:04:04 UTC No. 16478236
space fruit general
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:04:07 UTC No. 16478237
>>16478177
>that's how horror space movies usually start
Imagine shining your light around and catching a bit of movement just out of the corner of your eye down there.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:07:01 UTC No. 16478240
>>16478231
>$75 wall decals
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:07:01 UTC No. 16478241
>>16478237
I may die, but not a virgin.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:07:48 UTC No. 16478244
>>16478232
I just checked their twatter, the most recent hardware update theyve done of their OWN CRAFT was that they stacked a bunch of rings, made a half shell and dolled it up for the camera with no functional equipment. WHAT HAS THIS COMPANY BEEN DOING THIS ENTIRE YEAR?? All their feed is, is news of other companies achievements like SpaceX.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:08:42 UTC No. 16478245
>>16478243
https://x.com/xdNiBoR/status/185786
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:09:17 UTC No. 16478247
>>16477906
>>16477895
Long exposure, look at the streaks
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:11:37 UTC No. 16478249
>>16478245
>Regulatory struggle
>Starshield
>SpaceX management
>Starlink on Mars
>400 launches in 4 years
>DOGE
>Cost+
>Nationalization risks
>Martian government
>SpaceX culture
Oh this is going to be GOOD. Thanks for sharing anon, will listen while eating.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:12:24 UTC No. 16478250
https://x.com/bscholl/status/185790
BoomAero/SpaceX collab
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:12:48 UTC No. 16478253
>>16478245
>moon and mars colonies soon
20 years ago it would seem very unlikely to me that we'd be where we are at today in spaceflight. its almost surreal.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:13:19 UTC No. 16478254
>>16478249
there were clips posted about it before and Foust even wrote an article, I would guess most of the talk is stuff most people know here if it wasn't already clipped
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:15:41 UTC No. 16478256
>>16478250
Thats actually cool as fuck that SpaceX will just do randoms a solid like that.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:21:23 UTC No. 16478261
What are the /sfg/ rankings for spaceflight content creators?
I'm curious who your go-to people are for SpaceX updates/information
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:21:55 UTC No. 16478262
>>16478261
>who your go-to people are for SpaceX updates/information
/sfg/
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:23:41 UTC No. 16478264
>>16478261
Nobody. NSF if you want to count watching stackenings. I visit the companies pages for updates. I dont watch content creators unless its exclusive info like EDA tours.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:23:48 UTC No. 16478265
>>16478261
https://x.com/i/lists/1389558014043
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:24:20 UTC No. 16478266
>>16478261
>content creators
You want space news or what?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:26:09 UTC No. 16478267
Why is barely anybody working on artificial gravity methods
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:27:21 UTC No. 16478269
>>16478261
sfg
spacex reddit's starship generals
spacexlounge
berger
spacenews
rarely nsf forums
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:27:53 UTC No. 16478270
>>16478267
Vast is. Airbus had this little thing at the bottom of their station.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:28:54 UTC No. 16478273
>>16478269
Please kys asap you fucking reddit monkeynigger ape kike
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:30:20 UTC No. 16478275
>>16478268
this building layout is retarded
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:31:02 UTC No. 16478278
>>16478268
needs a zeppelin tower
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:31:28 UTC No. 16478281
>>16478076
>>16478056
>>16478049
>>16478045
>>16478007
you can clear out rad belts with radio waves apparently. probably the best way to clear out jovian rad belts would to have a permanently orbiting satellite around io powered by a mix of nuclear and solar power (or an entire constellation of them, since you could make individual satellites smaller and not require in-space construction) producing VLF radio waves, to constantly clear the rad belts around the moon. probably would require a few hundred tonnes of material to set it up but should be pretty feasible with current tech even. just send a few dozen starships to io deploy the satellites.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:32:03 UTC No. 16478282
>>16478275
the shape is a bit peculiar
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:33:00 UTC No. 16478287
>>16478279
i wonder if they could do an elevated expressway over the current road so it doesnt have to backup traffic all the time
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:33:15 UTC No. 16478288
>>16478262
You certainly see unique takes on /sfg/
>>16478264
Love a good stackening
>>16478265
I'll check the list out, thx
>>16478266
I was watching one of CSI Starbase's old videos and was impressed by overall quality and information provided, it inspired me to ask the question
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:34:50 UTC No. 16478289
>>16478275
Limited space does that.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:35:17 UTC No. 16478291
>>16478202
We actually get some very detailed and cool weather data from the REMS weather instrument on Curiosity, the same on as on Perseverance. So over their time there we have collected daily weather at these two stations round the clock. NASA has all the data for each Sol publicly available, but its released in batches every couple months not in real time, and its just a bunch of numbers unless you know how to code it into a graph. A daily report wont be necessary until we have humans on the red planet.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:35:24 UTC No. 16478292
>>16478177
Not sure caves like this could have been formed on Mars, as they require sedimentary rocks as well as liquid water to dissolve them afterwards.
Lava tubes will be interesting though.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:37:34 UTC No. 16478295
>>16478250
Creating a supersonic commercial jet just really seems like a giant waste of time and money. I'm not saying that the Concord proved it was mostly pointless, just that I don't see an inherent advantage that people would actively pay the difference in pricing. Look at the current airlines. Everyone hates the cheap airlines like Spirit, but will absolutely use them if that's their only choice but no one wants to use them. You got middle-of-the-pack companies like Delta and AA who split the difference in cost versus comfort, but can still cost outrageous sums depending on the location, time of year, and seating. And finally, you've got luxury airliners like Emirates who focus on service at any cost. Who is their clientele going to be? Saudis who want to fly at Mach 2 and pay ten grand a ticket? A G5 can already fly just under Mach 1. This isn't really like a high-speed rail situation either because you could be comparing days versus hours in certain instances. When you look at SpaceX, the reason why they succeeded was because they are functionally the Spirit Airlines of space but that's okay because they rarely fly anyone so who gives a fuck how cheap the seat is, and even when they do fly people it's for very specific, expensive flights that take a lot of time and planning that fall outside of their normal business model. In the case of flying, I don't think most people care about going fast. I think most people care about comfort and pricing. If you wanted to disrupt the market there, you'd somehow have to figure out a way to marry Emirates service with Spirit prices and no one has, so this just comes off as dumb project that a very, very small group of aerospace enthusiasts might be able to recollect ten years from now.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:38:59 UTC No. 16478297
>>16478293
More powerpoint rockets
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:40:29 UTC No. 16478298
>>16478293
Whoever designed this page, what the fuck.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:42:52 UTC No. 16478300
>>16478298
Pretty old picture everyone is masked up behind the glass.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:43:27 UTC No. 16478301
>>16478095
>>16478103
>>16478103
>>16478095
falcon 9 internal costs are already below or around 400 dollars to LEO per pound lol (18 tonnes to LEO was the highest falcon 9 has ever delivered with reuse iirc and its been accepted for a while now (since like 2023) that their internal costs for launch are around 15 million.
assuming starship starts out costing 10 million to launch for 100 tonnes to LEO (and a decade from 2025 it'll probably be much better), their internal dollar/pound to LEO will be around 45 dollars per pound to LEO.
people here really do still continually underestimate starship and even falcon 9.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:43:32 UTC No. 16478302
>>16477906
ai couldnt get the constellations right, or the pleiades
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:44:37 UTC No. 16478305
>>16478301
sorry for duplicating the replies, internet is glitchy here. i need starlink.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:46:24 UTC No. 16478309
>>16478130
17+ miles is more then i expected honestly, and good for precursor robotic missions, but still humans could do so much better
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:52:48 UTC No. 16478312
>>16478309
I can do that in an hour on a bicycle.
Now I want to go mountain biking on Mars. I bet I could get some sick jumps in the reduced gravity.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:55:07 UTC No. 16478314
>>16478250
https://x.com/bscholl/status/185789
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:57:29 UTC No. 16478316
>>16478300
I am talking about the fact that it has a horizontal row of upcoming launches, which you can all click on (even the one partially visible) but no way to actually move the row to the left so you can see more upcoming launches. Pressing -> does nothing. Pressing D does nothing. There is no button. No slider. Holding down on the row and dragging to the left just tries to move the thumbnail. This is dogshit.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:01:24 UTC No. 16478319
>>16478288
>I'll check the list out, thx
Also, you can create your own list of creators as well. If you follow them nominally, you can get their content on normal timeline. But I have my list tabs and they do pretty great. Got my porn list/vtuber list/space list/gaming list/etc. Personal lists ofc.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:12:59 UTC No. 16478325
>>16478186
I've seen a decent amount of hardware from them so I still think they're on a good track. Cool to see all of the potential business opportunities just in LEO that will become possible with starship.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:14:22 UTC No. 16478327
>>16478224
Considering this will probably be happening in the 2030s when starship is routine the flights having to be frequent won't be an issue really.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:15:44 UTC No. 16478328
>>16478240
the point is to support spacex's mission not get cheap merchandise
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:17:23 UTC No. 16478330
>>16478320
>mass autism on a Starship
Will NASA ever learn?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:18:55 UTC No. 16478332
>>16478268
insane this is just their prototype factory and that they plan to build much more
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:20:31 UTC No. 16478334
>>16478312
I mountain bike as well. Now I am Imagining red bull rampage on Mars
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:29:58 UTC No. 16478342
>>16478334
Olympus Mons downhill challenge, I wonder how long it would take to ride all the way down from the peak? I want a nice leisurely bike tour across flat plains freshly laid with smooth blacktop roads stretching horizon to horizon.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:32:33 UTC No. 16478346
>>16478330
unless you want 8+ refuelings before you even go to the moon you need to be autistic about saving mass
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:34:47 UTC No. 16478347
How likely that HLS will end up being very different ship from the usual starships?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:36:27 UTC No. 16478348
>>16478346
>be incredibly autistic about mass
>lower the amount of refuelings needed from an insane 9 down to a perfectly reasonable 7
wow
>>16478347
2 tons of mass will be wasted on white paint.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:37:17 UTC No. 16478350
>>16478342
imagine biking down into Valles Marineris
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:54:03 UTC No. 16478364
>>16478316
We will arrange a visit from a therapy dog immediately. Location?
Please be okay, just hang in there man
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:55:00 UTC No. 16478365
>>16478350
until you go head over shoulders in the low gravity and smash your helmet on a rogg, then pic related
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:04:18 UTC No. 16478369
>>16478365
simple. don't crash.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:12:45 UTC No. 16478372
>>16478369
Adds to the thrill.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:16:20 UTC No. 16478373
>>16478316
sorry the website is not designed for retards anon.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:20:13 UTC No. 16478376
>>16478220
Your right manned LEO is a waste
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:25:20 UTC No. 16478380
>>16478350
Tour de Mars
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:28:38 UTC No. 16478382
>>16478364
>>16478373
>250 billion dollar company
>run by a tech guy
>can't design a functioning website
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:31:19 UTC No. 16478384
>>16478380
Nah, more like red bull rampage on steroids, not pussy cyclist shit, but extreme downhill mountain biking
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:31:25 UTC No. 16478385
>>16478295
Turn around time
So more flights per airframe per day
Think my chatgpt freind
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:32:04 UTC No. 16478386
>>16478316
>click on
see you at thanksgiving gramps
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:33:05 UTC No. 16478387
>>16478279
so it never floods here...yet?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:34:27 UTC No. 16478389
>>16478149
Effective last year, he had around 72% voting stake in SpaceX. Also, around 2-3 years ago, SpaceX did a 10:1 stock split as well, because the original pool had reached saturation of sell to outside investors. So he and others have massive share pools now. I would expect over the next 10 years, that SpaceX will likely do another split, probably a 5:1 or a 3:1. Roughly around the time or a few years short of the Starlink IPO. That said though, now that Trump has won, the probability of another election taking place in the US reduces over time as long as he remains in charge. Which incentivizes Musk to keep all of SpaceX private. I could also see him declare that Mars is the new HQ of all his companies and that he'll take all his private companies public on the basis that in order to buy shares in them, you have to move to Mars to do it, ensuring that the world has to invest into the future of Mars, as denying that ore forcibly taking over his companies means it would create a humanitarian crisis off world. The mirror opposite of the union crisis seen in For All Mankind.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:34:33 UTC No. 16478390
>>16478387
Gonna start telling people Elon only cares about global warming because it would flood his rocket factory
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:34:36 UTC No. 16478391
>>16478385
>Just fly at Mach 2 all the time!
>That won't kill the lifespan of the frame or drastically increase the maintenance per flight hour at all!
Shut up, retard.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:38:11 UTC No. 16478394
>>16478204
No point in developing any serious hardware until SpaceX can confirm it can return a ship from orbital velocities and catch it on the tower. Otherwise the cost of putting up 100T is still too much.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:42:05 UTC No. 16478398
>>16478231
>the ship decals are just a pretense for merch
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:43:09 UTC No. 16478400
welp i've got a room booked in south padre
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:50:40 UTC No. 16478406
>>16478400
If you're white and in your 20s you can just bring a sleeping bag inside Starbase and everyone just assumes you're working really hard
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:54:21 UTC No. 16478409
>>16478406
Is there anything better than white people in their 20s?
This is peak performance
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:00:01 UTC No. 16478412
>>16478407
The little tip it has to do for the horizontal slide must've made everyone watching live shit their pants
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:04:49 UTC No. 16478416
>>16478409
GOD what I would give to be in my early-mid 20's again.
>work ~10 hours a day with an hour and a half commute, both ways, 5 days a week
>do this for 2 years
>quit because it's too easy and got boring
Quant financial firms and certain tech firms got it right. Young 20-somethings are a resource that should be used and abused.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:08:36 UTC No. 16478417
>>16478406
larp. security would figure your out and remove you.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:16:11 UTC No. 16478418
>>16478398
maybe spacex is close the bankruptcy
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:16:17 UTC No. 16478419
>>16478245
>Gwynne says Starlink would add another zero. SpaceX is valued at 225Bn, so Starlink alone would push SpaceX to 2.25Tn. Starship is expected to vastly eclipse that.
We can read between the lines on that and infer that it will over the next 10-20 years, add another zero, So by 2030-2040, SpaceX will be in the ballpark of 22.5Tn in valuation. Which roughly tracks with Ron Barron's statement, that they expect to make between now and end of the 2030s, 15x the money they have invested over the 7x they've already made to date. The US GDP in 2021 was 23.5Tn. So effectively, SpaceX alone will be worth the total US GDP output by end of 2030 based on what was stated and inferred through hints dropped. That's fucking crazy.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:17:38 UTC No. 16478421
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1857948
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:18:43 UTC No. 16478422
>>16478275
>>16478268
Remember that Starbase, TX is like Freemont, CA. That Tesla gigafactory's layout is ALSO retarded. The real eye on the prize design you have to look out for is how the Starfactory at Roberts Road will manifest in the coming years, as it's a proper clean slate design.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:19:48 UTC No. 16478423
>>16478417
Dude just go to the corner of the unfinished section with the floor above it but no walls, that's where all the engineers go when they're sleeping on site. The doors don't have locks yet
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:28:30 UTC No. 16478427
>>16478407
webm
>>/wsg/5736015
go here for noise
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:29:31 UTC No. 16478428
>>16478427
>>>/wsg/5736015
not that anon but he did it better than I did
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:29:44 UTC No. 16478429
I miss the days when spacex employees would leak ITAR protected info here
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:39:41 UTC No. 16478432
>>16478261
>What are the /sfg/ rankings for spaceflight content creators
Me
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:52:37 UTC No. 16478439
>>16478319
Are you the communist that made that particular twatter list
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 01:57:23 UTC No. 16478445
>>16478439
No, but the commie that made it seems to have a good enough list. So I use it.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:00:32 UTC No. 16478448
>>16478429
be the change you want to see, anon
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:02:30 UTC No. 16478450
>>16478445
Youre kiked arent you
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:05:51 UTC No. 16478453
>>16478450
Swing and miss again. I'm just a space enjoyer. SpaceX enjoyer in particular.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:12:13 UTC No. 16478464
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:15:07 UTC No. 16478471
fuck you
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:24:34 UTC No. 16478478
>>16478387
yea it flooded before and thats why the town never got built up
used to be like way more land there before some hurricanes
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:30:15 UTC No. 16478486
>>16478281
passing a wire through the belts generates phenomenal amounts of power, which you can use to clear the belts, and also clears the belts
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:42:38 UTC No. 16478494
>>16478464
exiled from 110 countries for no reason whatsoever? hmm
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:48:08 UTC No. 16478497
>>16478494
Half the world is under Starlink's control
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:51:49 UTC No. 16478503
When will Star Links be able to autonomously attack other satellites
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:03:10 UTC No. 16478512
>>16478508
>I'd be fucking scolded for this grout work even if I've never done it before
That's ceramic wool.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:04:11 UTC No. 16478513
>>16478511
Probably harder than expected, and needing more than the effort they were willing to put in.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:04:43 UTC No. 16478515
>>16478508
Clearly they needed the bathroom tile installation crew and not the water tank welders
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:04:57 UTC No. 16478516
>>16478511
Reuse is not practical or economical
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:12:46 UTC No. 16478521
>>16478511
You would need to reuse a booster like 11 times for it to be economical over just making a new booster lol, it's basically pointless
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:26:27 UTC No. 16478529
>>16478511
salt water happened
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:29:33 UTC No. 16478532
>>16478521
It pays off in two.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:34:37 UTC No. 16478535
>>16478532
Not if your name is Peter Beak
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:41:52 UTC No. 16478537
>>16478516
Whats the space weather like in Alpha Centauri?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:43:15 UTC No. 16478538
>>16478535
They're not willing to do what it takes.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:43:26 UTC No. 16478539
>>16478537
If it was, then Rocket Lab would do it
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:52:51 UTC No. 16478543
Bros, Musk really needs to learn to give people their space
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:55:27 UTC No. 16478544
>>16478543
when hes conquering myspace, its actual space man!
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:55:48 UTC No. 16478545
>>16478511
>>16478516
And yet Peter Cuck seethes eternally about Transporter's prices, made possible only by reusability, driving his company out of business. Curious.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:58:35 UTC No. 16478548
>>16478545
So curious in fact that he gave up on reusability. Curious.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:58:47 UTC No. 16478549
>>16478543
He's trying to give everyone their space
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:59:26 UTC No. 16478550
>>16478549
Not Drumpft’s apparantly
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:00:00 UTC No. 16478551
>>16478543
Did he slap your balls or something? Be more specific.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:03:18 UTC No. 16478553
>>16478548
They tried parachutes into salt water and promptly gave up. They probably discovered the same thing SpaceX did: they need to do propulsive landing to do it, and Electron would need to be massively reengineered to do that, with resources that are already being consumed by Neutron. In a classic fit of sour grapes, reusability "wasn't worth it" for Electron.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:12:36 UTC No. 16478558
Gwynne is a billionaire now apparently
https://twitter.com/Robotbeat/statu
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:18:40 UTC No. 16478559
>>16477240
Just make non-flammable velcro.
EZ
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:23:27 UTC No. 16478562
>>16478558
Shotwell has secured 100 generations of her family line on Mars. If they continue to work on Mars, they can become nobility.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:25:56 UTC No. 16478564
>>16478261
I like cosmic perspective’s slow mo
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:30:09 UTC No. 16478567
>>16478559
https://www.mcmaster.com/products/s
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:35:05 UTC No. 16478572
>>16478558
Only 0.4%? I would have guessed 2-3%.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:38:34 UTC No. 16478575
>Mars is about half the diameter of Earth, but its surface area is nearly the same as Earth's dry land. The planet's surface is rocky and covered in red dust, volcanoes, impact craters, canyons, and dry lake beds.
Imagine a land rush on the entirety of Earth
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:38:54 UTC No. 16478576
>>16478558
that's it, gwynne bad now
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:39:47 UTC No. 16478577
>>16478576
>billionaire = bad
how so?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:44:44 UTC No. 16478582
>>16478567
https://www.mcmaster.com/products/n
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:46:11 UTC No. 16478583
>>16478577
Redditors cope by assigning SpaceX's successes to Gwynne. But when they realise she's rich they won't be able to do that anymore
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:47:39 UTC No. 16478585
>>16478582
dunno why but the seriousness of something so absurd made me laugh
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:50:17 UTC No. 16478587
>>16478577
Inequality of communism. Billionaires are richer than avg people. Therefore bad. Because they must have gotten money from somewhere, and that somewhere isn't fairness because fairness doesnt lead to billionaire. Such that Shotwell is a fraud and an evil billionaire.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:50:32 UTC No. 16478589
>>16478567
>>16478582
where did I hear or see someone nutting over this website, like it was one the best performing websites in the world or something
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:55:17 UTC No. 16478591
>>16478589
someone posted that on twitter and then a guy made like 7 videos about it
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:57:38 UTC No. 16478592
https://x.com/SawyerMerritt/status/
I wo der if Trump is going to starbSe
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:59:57 UTC No. 16478595
>>16478592
Fuck you I was just about to post this
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:03:04 UTC No. 16478598
>>16478577
In terms of fiscal policy, billionaires are a market failure and represent an accumulation of capital so immense that it functions like a black hole for money. It is very unlikely that that money will ever re-enter the economy, which is the only silver lining to this cloud
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:04:25 UTC No. 16478601
>>16478589
I LOVE MCMASTER CARRRRRR
AMERICA IS THE GREATEST NATION IN THE WOOOORRRLLLDDDD
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:05:12 UTC No. 16478602
digikey is my preferred stomping grounds
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:10:01 UTC No. 16478606
>>16478598
You are retarded
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:10:03 UTC No. 16478607
>>16478598
They don't absorb money, they create it. The net worth estimate is not currency, and anyone who equates the two is unaware of how these systems work at best.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:11:06 UTC No. 16478608
>>16478598
I was about to call you a moron but then I remembered that's not spaceflight related
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:12:06 UTC No. 16478609
>>16478598
so you are the troon that made that spitter list.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:19:58 UTC No. 16478611
>>16478598
> It is very unlikely that that money will ever re-enter the economy
They don't keep it in money bins
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:21:43 UTC No. 16478612
>>16478511
Electron does not have the payload margins to accommodate reuse equipment and Rocket Lab knows they need to put their efforts into Neutron if they want to survive.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:25:53 UTC No. 16478614
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnX
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:26:09 UTC No. 16478615
>>16478598
securities aren't real money you grade A cretinoid commie faggot
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:27:22 UTC No. 16478616
>>16478592
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18580
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:30:42 UTC No. 16478618
>>16478245
Wow, I didn’t know that SpaceX Dragon would be completely illegal with the current regulations and is only grandfathered in.
How the hell do regulations get that bad that quickly?
Are there like Chinese gnomes in the government trying to kill space flight?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:31:19 UTC No. 16478619
>>16478618
huh?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:34:24 UTC No. 16478620
>>16478619
Shotwell said the current regulations (4.50) wouldn’t clear Dragon (which was approved on older regs)
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:37:06 UTC No. 16478621
>>16478611
You know I wonder, let's say you had a liquid billionaire. And instead of having his money in stocks he decides to "take it out of the economy" and hide it under a mattress and never spend it. So in the world of money, a billion dollars disappeared, but in the world of wealth, paper got put under a mattress. Now you could argue that that the billion dollars could be spent and incentivize people to produce good and services and support them doing so. But you could also argue the money under the mattress deflated the money supply and increased the value of all USD. Would it be even better if he just lit the money on fire? I don't know which has more weight.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:38:48 UTC No. 16478623
>>16478598
>doesnt understand wealth
Kill yourself commie
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 05:53:24 UTC No. 16478628
>>16478618
>10yo Dragon-Chan is too old for the FAA.
Uhhhhhhh, what?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:06:08 UTC No. 16478637
>>16478630
If they can maintain current pace we're already nearing monthly.
I assume that launch licensing is no longer a delay item because the FAA is scrambling to give them whatever they want as quickly as possible so Musk doesn't gut them too badly.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:18:47 UTC No. 16478642
>>16478637
They better get goin on those new towers. and get the road widened for more fuel trucks. and get more tanks.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:27:04 UTC No. 16478646
>>16478107
Hypothesis: From energy pov, it's cheaper to launch fatties to Mars and make them starve than launch normal ppl with food.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:29:32 UTC No. 16478648
>>16478644
kid rock is a moron
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:51:16 UTC No. 16478653
>>16478644
Nobody cares
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:55:58 UTC No. 16478658
>>16478598
No matter who owns SpaceX; whether it is Elon alone, banks, goverment or even the communist community, doesn't change the fact that it is a rocket company. No amount of stock shuffling will turn the rockets into tangible food for the poor. Fuck I hate retarded commies.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:01:22 UTC No. 16478664
>>16478648
>>16478653
larpium
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:06:03 UTC No. 16478666
I was kind of looking forward to Space Race II, but after seeing how shameless China is being, not so much anymore. At least the Soviets innovated and did things their own way. I guess it's just China being China, so I don't know why I'm surprised.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:12:01 UTC No. 16478670
>>16478644
we need a real performance in space
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:17:05 UTC No. 16478671
>>16478666
>catching on gridfins
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:17:45 UTC No. 16478672
>>16478642
And build a LOX generation plant
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:23:52 UTC No. 16478676
>>16478666
Please understand that none of the renders or scale models of Starship or F9 clones you see out of China will ever correspond to a thing that actually gets built. They lack the ability.
Spacex has a lot of work to do still, refining Starship to get it to the target payload capacity, and they have a literal magic engine. China could not produce something comparable to Raptor 3 even if they had one to physically inspect and tear apart.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:26:37 UTC No. 16478677
>>16478676
>China could not produce something comparable to Raptor 3 even if they had one to physically inspect and tear apart.
That's literally what they did when they developed the YF-100 though, they got their hands on a RD-120 and did exactly that.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:29:44 UTC No. 16478679
>>16478678
did they take their horse and buggies there?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 07:52:08 UTC No. 16478687
>>16478678
Is that an AI generated image on the flag?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:01:21 UTC No. 16478699
>>16478678
>>16478687
I hate AI so much its unreal.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:03:53 UTC No. 16478703
>>16478699
we dont call it "goy I" for nothing
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:06:56 UTC No. 16478707
>>16478706
cause Elon is the VP, now.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:10:55 UTC No. 16478709
>>16478320
is the thing on the left a tunnel they have to crawl through to go to the docking port??
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:12:41 UTC No. 16478710
>>16478678
when they heard mars had back breaking work they came immediately
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:15:13 UTC No. 16478712
>>16478706
For security reasons the President and VP rarely travel together outside DC. Also JD hasn't seen his young kids much since July.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:16:49 UTC No. 16478713
>>16478709
I think I read that sends life support to the hatch, someone can probably explain how that provides life support to airlocks or it's some kind of redundancy that can provide life support to a vessel it's docked to, like gateway. But they just climb cables in 0g that aren't pictured there.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:21:16 UTC No. 16478715
>>16478712
You know, probably not good to have the leader of spaceflight and internet free speech traveling with the president either
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:26:20 UTC No. 16478720
>>16478717
the 1970s trucker movie song "eastbound and down" describes the two motion vectors of a prograde orbit at zero inclination
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:32:00 UTC No. 16478723
>>16478382
you are too retarded to use the slider, it's there, they just didn't design it for retards like you.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:45:42 UTC No. 16478729
>>16478717
we're all in space so all secrets are space secrets
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:46:34 UTC No. 16478730
>>16478295
>Who is their clientele going to be? Saudis who want to fly at Mach 2 and pay ten grand a ticket?
You think 10 grand is a lot? I paid 30k for first class between DFW and Tokyo on JAL (ticket bought through American). BUSINESS Class on this route goes for $12,000, and between AA and JAL they fly 120 business class seats each way, so yes there absolutely is a market for $10,000+ tickets.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:48:29 UTC No. 16478732
>>16478706
>RFK reaction
>goyslop
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:02:28 UTC No. 16478745
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:04:42 UTC No. 16478748
>>16478717
go back to plebbit nigger
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:06:44 UTC No. 16478749
>>16478748
tell me a secret first
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:07:33 UTC No. 16478750
>>16478748
anime website kill yourself redditnigger
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:10:50 UTC No. 16478751
>>16478749
Watch this
https://youtube.com/watch?v=7E0ot9i
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:20:08 UTC No. 16478753
>>16478730
wtf lol i thought my $1500 economy seat on the same route was bad
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:34:50 UTC No. 16478758
Soon.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:04:29 UTC No. 16478767
>>16478558
>gwynne could buy and kill ULA
neat!
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:04:48 UTC No. 16478768
>>16478745
humiliation ritual
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:07:43 UTC No. 16478769
>>16478577
I remember when the party line was 'rich people now' and now it's exclusively 'billionaires bad'
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:18:28 UTC No. 16478776
>>16478709
Imagine playing around in a tube park in micro-g
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:58:25 UTC No. 16478791
>>16478767
it would be funny to watch gwynne go mask off and all the EDSers that claim she's the real reason for success and musks's tardwrangler change narrative, and say she was actually just another stupid billionaire and bootlicker all along.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:20:45 UTC No. 16478808
>>16478587
>>16478598
Midwits think billionaires have a big building somewhere full of money that you can go swimming in like Scrooge McDuck. And that can't be farther from the truth. Their money goes into financing a bunch of businesses and is mostly in investment positions, and then it grows.
Not that there aren't ones like Bozos who buy absurdly oversized yachts that require bridges be disassembled to get them out an sheeit.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:22:36 UTC No. 16478811
>>16478612
it's just like how Spacex isn't going to put any effort into recovering F9 second stages, it's not worth the effort do it in that generation
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:23:04 UTC No. 16478812
>>16478745
Say "McCheese", Robert!
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:26:56 UTC No. 16478814
>>16478648
I never understood "Kid Rock". It's a silly name, and I don't know a single bit of music that he's responsible for. But as one of the rare non-leftoid musicians, he seems to end up as the token "see, a music guy likes us" guy of the right. I don't hate him, it's just that he just seems out of place.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:29:07 UTC No. 16478817
>>16478808
Technically they don't even actually own the money as an investment. All of Elon's wealth is locked up as shares that mean nothing until he cashes them out.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:29:51 UTC No. 16478818
>>16478767
this would be the absolute funniest timeline
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:34:40 UTC No. 16478822
>>16478769
Don't worry. It'll be Trillionaires Bad as soon as the politicians manage to steal billions instead of the millions they settle for now.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:35:13 UTC No. 16478824
>>16478601
I remember when Edmund Scientific used to be da shit.
I heard recently that the company still exists, but they've jettisoned everything about their old days.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:39:39 UTC No. 16478826
>>16478817
that isn't true either, equity in a company can be collateralized for loans for instance, but that isn't "free" either
shares should be a pretty simple concept but for some reason a lot of people don't seemt to actually know what it means
it means you own a part of a company and are entitled to dividend for instance if they are paid in the future
the potential for dividend payments in the future is what gives value to companies ultimately and thus the shares of a company, the potential can go up and down which then translates to a shareholder becoming richer or poorer on paper
but basic shit like how companies are valued and what shares are should really be taught in high school already
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 11:49:24 UTC No. 16478833
>>16478618
wasnt there alot of leniency given to newspace until recently?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:05:37 UTC No. 16478846
i fear that the severe recession expected in 2026 will hamper the industry until the 2030s. the industry should invest more into foreign opportunities to stay afloat. both axiom and vast are doing this by pursuing foreign astronauts, but companies relying on nasa or the military will go bankrupt during austerity. and there are alot of companies that are reliant on government contracts.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:26:54 UTC No. 16478867
>>16478865
>From the outside, the NGU Power Cell appears like a flat, white, plastic cylinder 30 mm high and
60 mm wide, with two extending 5 cm output voltage wires and the E-Cat logo on top.
(image 1 below). The inner design is proprietary,
They just put a battery in it didn't they kek
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:28:58 UTC No. 16478870
>>16478867
>They just put a battery in it didn't they kek
it just has to run long enough for the dog-and-pony demos to gullible "investors".
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:29:36 UTC No. 16478872
>>16478865
Still using the ECAT name? Maybe they could manage to scam somebody if they weren't. Cold fusion never ever.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:39:23 UTC No. 16478883
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Wo
Kino shot
This is apparently from 1978 so is that one of the last atlas-agena launches?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:42:44 UTC No. 16478886
Where does Starlink “get” its internet from??
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:44:39 UTC No. 16478888
>>16478883
each starlink satellite has an embedded starlink terminal to receive internet communications, like starship
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:48:02 UTC No. 16478896
>>16478886
thats classified
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:49:22 UTC No. 16478898
r/space is filled with absolute brainlets asking the dumbest questions time and time again, every single day.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:55:53 UTC No. 16478912
>>16478886
you connect your network to data exchanges on earth. i believe the first one they connected to was in the seattle area.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:57:19 UTC No. 16478914
>>16478706
So interesting seeing the ‘occupy mars’ project getting tossed like a hand grenade into the modern zeitgeist. I’m glad Musk is wearing his nerdy SpaceX shirts as his uniform
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:58:53 UTC No. 16478917
>>16478898
why come here then? sounds like you found a home for yourself
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:10:55 UTC No. 16478923
>>16478870
Apparently it ran driving a mini electric car for 6 hours straight
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:27:53 UTC No. 16478933
>>16478923
That just means they found another way to hide the actual power source.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:30:29 UTC No. 16478935
>>16478320
This seems like a massive waste of interior space.
Why not make more decks?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:37:42 UTC No. 16478938
>>16478935
For what?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:38:34 UTC No. 16478940
>>16478935
plenty of space to bounce around in, wouldn't you like to see some 3D footy going on in that volume?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:41:41 UTC No. 16478944
>>16478886
These little buggers
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:42:08 UTC No. 16478945
>>16478923
Their white paper mentions the OG cold fusion paper, it's 100% a scam.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:43:23 UTC No. 16478946
>>16478886
it makes its own internet
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:43:33 UTC No. 16478947
>>16478935
It's a mock-up to demonstrate to the NASA HLS office that they've got a handle of all the necessities for a moon mission.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:44:24 UTC No. 16478949
>>16478946
>mfw elon could make his own internet if he switched to only using laser links
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:46:15 UTC No. 16478951
>>16478944
Internet is stored in the balls?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:51:27 UTC No. 16478953
>>16478951
Kek
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:57:26 UTC No. 16478958
>>16478886
Ahhh so they have little ground stations set up around the globe. Interesting.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:59:37 UTC No. 16478959
>>16478938
Gym, actual lab equipment, a machine shop, common area. They have the space for it so why not?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 14:13:23 UTC No. 16478970
>>16478951
Lel. Actually it's a series of tubes
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:27:01 UTC No. 16479019
>>16478951
>>16478970
Internet is stored in the balls and passes through tubes.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:28:22 UTC No. 16479022
>>16479021
Even holding a gun I'm not just that intimidating.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:30:14 UTC No. 16479024
>>16479021
Funny I just watched the HL2 documentary and thought this was a reference to that
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:31:49 UTC No. 16479027
>>16478776
In my dreams as a child I saw places like this that stretched onwards forever, infinite tubes/bubbles/rooms/slides/ball pits without end.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:34:16 UTC No. 16479028
>>16479024
>be me
>install Half Life
>work at high-tech company
>bottom dollar flunkie
>shoot aliens and hostile government agents
>go home to play Half Life
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:35:28 UTC No. 16479030
>>16479021
Because of Unforeseen Consequences.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:42:15 UTC No. 16479033
>>16478715
Gentle reminder of which influential rich socialites went down on the Titanic and what they were in opposition to in the USA at the time.
>>16478717
I believe in the Ganymede object, on grounds that it would be pretty darn interesting.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:48:45 UTC No. 16479037
Freeman you fool! AUGH
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:03:24 UTC No. 16479047
>>16479021
I don't want to get pinned under the rolling gate.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:10:14 UTC No. 16479050
I'm more excited to see the descent footage into Callisto than anything Europa related. I want to see Callisto's surface close-up.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:10:33 UTC No. 16479052
>>16479046
How much aerosolized blue no.1 dye do we have to inject into the atmosphere to return its exaggerated color?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:11:19 UTC No. 16479053
>>16479050
>I want to see Callisto's surface close-up.
L-lewd
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:11:44 UTC No. 16479054
>>16479046
fill it with prussian blue and kill any filthy xeno life that might be winding through that atmosphere.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:17:18 UTC No. 16479057
>>16479046
our X-ray emissions stressed out the fragile lifeforms in the atmosphere and they died, this is like coral bleaching on a planetary scale
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:26:28 UTC No. 16479064
>>16479062
CHARGING IN PROGRESS
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:27:35 UTC No. 16479066
>>16479064
that's a lotta cum
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:29:38 UTC No. 16479067
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:30:18 UTC No. 16479068
>>16479064
my cock gets about half way covered in ice then vents what am I doing wrong
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:31:06 UTC No. 16479070
>>16479031
was that the time they blew up Zuckerborg's Facebooksat?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:31:14 UTC No. 16479071
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:33:12 UTC No. 16479073
>>16478791
I've seen retards call Tom Mueller (and any past employee lauding Musk) a bootlicker
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:39:39 UTC No. 16479080
>>16478558
>CEO who joined 2002 got a 0.4% stake
That's lower than I thought.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:42:57 UTC No. 16479081
>>16479070
yeah
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:48:10 UTC No. 16479085
>>16479075
god this shit looks so fucking cool you guys.
can you imagine standing on those chopsticks as it's being fueled?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:48:21 UTC No. 16479086
>>16478320
>>16478935
That one is outdated btw
>>16477066
So if you reduce dry mass and take more fuel you can use the lander more times without a refueling solution.
I think it's best not to try to make the lander be a moon base beyond the basics. Because you could then make an actual moon base starship that doesn't leave the surface, thus doesn't use its payload mass on fuel, then you fill the fucker full of lab equipment. Astronauts would eva from the lander ship to the moon base ship, then when its time to leave the moon they go back to the lander and blast off.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:50:31 UTC No. 16479088
>>16478723
Where is it? Now I got curious and went to check that site as well, only way I found is the arrow keys
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:50:40 UTC No. 16479089
https://krystalarchive.com/2022/09/
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:51:57 UTC No. 16479092
>>16479085
imagine sneaking into the interstage and riding the rocket during launch
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:55:06 UTC No. 16479096
>>16479092
Make sure to jump out before staging
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:55:10 UTC No. 16479097
>>16479092
>anon gets fucking obliterated
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:58:06 UTC No. 16479104
>>16478730
Hi, Gwynne.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:59:43 UTC No. 16479110
>>16479104
fuck you.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:01:06 UTC No. 16479114
>>16479088
For real what do I click or swipe or scroll, now the arrow keys didn't work anymore either, PgDn just scrolled the page down
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:02:19 UTC No. 16479115
>>16479114
do you have noscript or something?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:02:47 UTC No. 16479116
>>16478391
just build the plane out of stainless steel
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:03:07 UTC No. 16479118
>>16479115
uMatrix but I turned it off, and uBlock Origin
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:05:54 UTC No. 16479123
>>16479114
what sorta schizo lunatic designs a web page to need arrow keys to scroll something
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:06:47 UTC No. 16479127
>>16478730
I'd rather walk.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:09:11 UTC No. 16479130
>>16479123
I guess it would be fine if it was intended to be navigated with the keyboard, but now I realized I first have to click on that empty spot between the two pictures to enable keyboard scrolling. This doesn't seem like the most ergonomic of designs
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:13:47 UTC No. 16479137
>>16479114
Sorry bro they circumcised your scroll bar
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:18:13 UTC No. 16479142
>>16479130
its because its not in focus, hence you having to click on the frame. whoever was the project head needs to get their work investigated.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:21:01 UTC No. 16479147
>>16479137
Never mind I figured it out
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:21:58 UTC No. 16479150
>>16479147
kek
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:23:42 UTC No. 16479152
I'm calling an all hands meeting. Skip lunch. Kiss your Sunday goodbye.
Everyone will have a half an hour to fix anon's scroll bar. If it isn't fixed in time I'm firing someone every 5 minutes.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:25:33 UTC No. 16479156
>>16479152
This is the accountability I want in my launch provider.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:28:12 UTC No. 16479162
>>16479114
shift+scroll work?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:39:20 UTC No. 16479173
>>16479152
Mr. Musk I believe the issue to be on the user's end, the scrollbar was present when I loaded the webpage. That being said, the "LAUNCHES" text was not properly positioned when out of fullscreen
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:52:32 UTC No. 16479453
>>16479046
>blu-ray re-edition
>dvd version
>original scan
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:53:30 UTC No. 16479455
>>16479152
Sir, I wanted to thank you for fixing the glitch on android X app that didn't save my place when scrolling down people's followers list and clicking their account, and then clicking back. It would always reset to the top of the follower list, which is very frustrating when I have to manually scroll through hundreds of people. This was an issue back before you purchased Twitter, happened for many years. This helps me find more anime rocket girls to post on/sfg/ because I can more easily find quality artists based on followers of my favorite artists. Thank you!
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:54:47 UTC No. 16479458
>>16479173
nice aspect ratio zoomzoom
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:57:41 UTC No. 16479460
>>16479455
favorite rocket girl?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:02:09 UTC No. 16479467
>>16479465
I feed my gf fertility pills and hope he impregnates her
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:02:15 UTC No. 16479468
>>16479465
Thank him for building me a mechanical gf
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:03:24 UTC No. 16479472
>>16479173
Damn, so this is the power of Firefox. Tried four different browsers and FF is the only one capable of displaying it
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:03:51 UTC No. 16479473
>>16479472
why would you use anything else?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:04:27 UTC No. 16479475
>>16479465
He looks like when inmates wear glasses to court to look smarter and innocent
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:04:50 UTC No. 16479476
>>16479472
>musk is a ff chad
I kneel
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:04:52 UTC No. 16479477
>>16479465
https://x.com/robbystarbuck/status/
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:06:11 UTC No. 16479480
>>16479473
I have a serious tab hoarding problem, and I find Vivaldi ("it might as well be an operating system") to have the best tab management out of the box
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:07:52 UTC No. 16479483
>>16479480
I just open multiple different windows and then store them on separate desktops until I need them again, so they are still there but not in the active window (or desktop) being in the way
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:13:08 UTC No. 16479492
>>16479465
Slap my girlfriend's ass twice while maintaining eye contact, and wait for a reply. If we start bouncing prime numbers back and forth on those cheeks it's a near certainty that we're dealing with intelligent life. Otherwise it's probably just some natural phenomenon.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:14:31 UTC No. 16479494
>>16479460
very difficult question. too many to choose from, but I always have a fondness for V2 rocket tan. any calunne or sbarky art is great. m4lta and zemu are also very good. there was also some great art from anon way back in the day
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:16:13 UTC No. 16479500
>>16479483
I've got the tabs in a sidebar, it's got two layers where one holds tab stacks, then when you click one the second layer shows the tabs in that stack. It's sort of like those Tree Style Tab extensions but I never liked those as much. But then they've also added these "Workspaces" that you can switch between on the fly, so that you can theoretically sort your endless tabs according to the purpose. I guess similar to how you have them in different windows
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:17:04 UTC No. 16479503
>>16479472
>fox
it knows
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:21:55 UTC No. 16479510
>>16479460
Starlink
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:23:18 UTC No. 16479513
>>16479508
soon to be sold off by her parent
the doujin writes itself
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:24:59 UTC No. 16479516
>>16479494
excellent taste
>>16479508
she's not nude though...
>>16479510
based rocketpedo
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:27:03 UTC No. 16479519
>>16479513
For some reason Vulcan has been the most sexualized rocket girl. There is Vulcan girl ahegao out there, and now this: https://x.com/MRMELT4/status/184559
I've seen a lot of big booby Starships, but none naked or doing anything sexual.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:28:21 UTC No. 16479521
>>16479519
all paid for by Bezos.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:30:41 UTC No. 16479524
>>16479519
WHAT IS IT
I CANT SEE WITHOUT XXX ACCOUNT
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:30:49 UTC No. 16479525
Ok there was that one F9 catgirl OC with the bush that got fucked a lot, but that doesnt really count as a true rocket-tan
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:31:56 UTC No. 16479529
>>16479519
Starship tile pasties was as close as we got
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:34:23 UTC No. 16479534
>>16479524
just imagine an embarrased, exposed Vulcan-chan with her bikini top coming loose... and tanlines
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:36:45 UTC No. 16479539
>>16477979
Which do you think is more likely anon, me in space or getting a wife?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:37:49 UTC No. 16479541
>>16478678
will the space amish colonize mars?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:37:59 UTC No. 16479542
>>16477979
>thinking that will cure your loneliness
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:39:19 UTC No. 16479544
>>16479534
and poorly drawn nipples
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:40:01 UTC No. 16479545
>>16479524
Sanitized for the blue-board
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:41:24 UTC No. 16479546
>>16479046
fucking woke mob DEI hires making neptune less blue
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:42:16 UTC No. 16479547
>>16479500
why do you need tabs instead of bookmarks
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:43:33 UTC No. 16479550
>>16479545
this is way better than the uncensored image actually
oh, and we're on page 10
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:44:27 UTC No. 16479553
>>16479088
i have a slider right there, i think it's a problem on your end
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:45:00 UTC No. 16479555
>>16479547
Bookmarks is where my tabs go to die and be forgotten about
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:46:39 UTC No. 16479559
>>16479555
I treat my bookmarks like a tool bench, numerous folders organized by use/type of bookmarks. Most of the useful internet is organized neatly on my toolbar.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:48:27 UTC No. 16479563
it's page 10 so I made a new thread
>>16479562
>>16479562
this "staging" shit was newfag cringe back in 2019 and it's still unfunny garbage now
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:48:42 UTC No. 16479566
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:50:07 UTC No. 16479569
>>16479544
Melta has a thing for ridiculous nipples
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:50:10 UTC No. 16479571
I forgor the subject
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:51:55 UTC No. 16479574
>>16479563
>>16479566
>>16479571
Pathetic.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:55:27 UTC No. 16479584
>>16479563
>>16479571
lol
silly anon
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:57:47 UTC No. 16479589
>>16479559
I have that + separate windows for tabs
I guess the tabs are windows that would be read and then discarded, bookmarks are something that are used repeatedly
so not bookmarking an article that you want to read at some point (though you could just remove the bookmark I guess after reading)
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:01:35 UTC No. 16479595
>>16478745
RFK and Kimball will make space food great ag- uh..for the first time
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:28:01 UTC No. 16479642
>>16479472
Interesting, I will recruit investor capital to purchase this "firefox". The name has to go though. Blue fox sounds much better.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:54:09 UTC No. 16479726
>>16477359
Allow a free market: eugenics + free market = adaptations to space
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:15:49 UTC No. 16479740
>>16477469
Allow natural selection.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:18:14 UTC No. 16479742
>>16479642
SpacefoX.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:21:13 UTC No. 16479745
>>16477807
>they could camp out in the woods. you cant camp out on the frozen polar wastes.
-ACK
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:24:04 UTC No. 16479752
>>16477807
they said that about going to the south pole. As technology improves our ability to take selfies in barren shitholes improves.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:21:09 UTC No. 16479939
>>16479086
Damn this guy a timelord out here with 3 watches
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:48:54 UTC No. 16479968
>>16478824
oh man, that used to be my favorite catalog as a kid! magnets, lenses, prisms, motors, and a selection of sci toys.