🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:14:23 UTC No. 16489819
>The 'Great Elon Musk'
- edition
previous >>16487736
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:24:31 UTC No. 16489839
You messed up the op nigger
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:37:09 UTC No. 16489866
>>16489839
thats how its supposed to be kind fellow.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:39:11 UTC No. 16489871
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:40:21 UTC No. 16489872
>When I first came here, this was all swamp.
>Everyone said I was daft to build a starport on a swamp, but I built in all the same, just to show them.
>It sank into the swamp. So I built a second one. That sank into the swamp.
>So I built a third. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp.
>But the fourth one stayed up. And that's what you're going to get, Lad, the largest starport in all of the USA.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:40:38 UTC No. 16489873
>>16489839
It will filter out faggots
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:41:54 UTC No. 16489877
>>16489872
Musk literally draining the swamp in Starbase.
Now he's on to drain the swamp in DC
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:42:55 UTC No. 16489879
>>16489877
Please dont compare my monthy python reference to politics.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:43:41 UTC No. 16489881
>>16489877
He should flood Israel with the water he drained.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:44:18 UTC No. 16489882
>>16489819
>bumps all the shit threads at the bottom of the board just to push us to page 10
>stages with this OP
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:44:34 UTC No. 16489883
I think they should drain a lake on Titan just to see what's down there.
>inb4 send a sub
Too murky, drain lake instead
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:46:03 UTC No. 16489884
>>16489882
You're welcome
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:46:32 UTC No. 16489885
>>16489880
>The concern is elon musk building 60% of satellites
Governments can pay other people to build them then. What’s stopping them?
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:47:40 UTC No. 16489888
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:48:17 UTC No. 16489889
I like the edition name, but I think it should been more fitting like last week, when Trump called him like that. Anyways, all hail Musk.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:50:44 UTC No. 16489893
I love space related anime girls
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:51:21 UTC No. 16489894
>>16489891
paper-mache rocket
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:51:52 UTC No. 16489895
you need electric cars on mars
hyperloop works in ambient atmosphere
etc
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:52:30 UTC No. 16489896
>>16489819
It's always awkward when someone draws you like that. What are you supposed to say to that?
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:52:35 UTC No. 16489897
>>16489891
YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE ANIDIOT TO BELIEVE THIS IS FUCKING REAL.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:53:17 UTC No. 16489899
>>16489891
This makes me want a starship with wood paneling. For old time’s sake.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:53:31 UTC No. 16489900
>>16489896
>"I know you can do it better."
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:53:40 UTC No. 16489901
So howdoes the spaceshuttle land on the moonif there is no runway?
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:54:12 UTC No. 16489902
>>16489900
fuck
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:54:52 UTC No. 16489903
>>16489891
Literally the ugliest new space rocket. Even chinkshit looks better.
Either paint or do no not.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:55:00 UTC No. 16489904
how much easier will it be to drill on the moon and will it be enough to enable geothermal power there? How about Mars as well?
https://x.com/i/grok/share/1SrbXaMi
grok is saying the mars one might be legit since it has a molten core
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:55:23 UTC No. 16489906
>>16489888
The concern is nobody else caring to launch often enough to be competitive, also checked.
At least the chinks are sort of trying to, they just have to actually finish something first.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:55:34 UTC No. 16489907
>>16489895
It would just be a train
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:55:56 UTC No. 16489908
>>16489901
space shuttle doesn't need a runway
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:57:07 UTC No. 16489912
>>16489908
It's a brick with wings, ofcourse it needs a runway.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:57:39 UTC No. 16489913
>>16489912
>>16489901
just hire some KSP players to fly it. they'll figure it out.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:58:51 UTC No. 16489914
>>16489912
you know vlc has a take screenshot button right?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:00:18 UTC No. 16489916
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:01:02 UTC No. 16489917
>>16489819
Joey Tribbiani wtf is this bro
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:02:38 UTC No. 16489921
>>16489891
yet, your mom still doesn't feel anything
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:04:23 UTC No. 16489924
>>16489904
just build solar panels over tall towers in the poles
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:04:25 UTC No. 16489925
>>16489895
electric cars are known for overheating
this issue is compounded on Mars, where it's obscenely thin atmosphere means that conduction and convection (normal way things cool down on Earth) through that medium is effectively non-existent
basically, not with the current technology
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:05:58 UTC No. 16489927
>>16489925
Can't you transfer the heat to keep the astronauts warm?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:07:55 UTC No. 16489930
>>16489925
you just need more of a heat sink then
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:08:17 UTC No. 16489932
>>16489928
Social Security and welfare to single mothers is also a waste of money, but I don't have a say in that as well.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:09:30 UTC No. 16489934
>>16489654
Holy fucking shit, we have become so numb bros. This footage would have melted the brains of /sfg/ if we saw this only two years ago
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:10:16 UTC No. 16489936
>>16489934
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXY
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:10:44 UTC No. 16489937
>>16489932
infidelity is bad but should we really live in a society where if you die doing your job your child is going to die or become a prostitute?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:11:08 UTC No. 16489938
>>16489928
that's a good fucking sandwich
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:12:40 UTC No. 16489941
>>16489928
I'd rather have space travel than Africa.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:14:37 UTC No. 16489945
>>16489934
its fucking boring. land on the moon or mars and wake me up then.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:14:53 UTC No. 16489946
https://x.com/blueorigin/status/186
BO tourists
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:17:33 UTC No. 16489950
>>16489925
you still need a vehicle though
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:18:19 UTC No. 16489951
>>16489946
We need a rocket that can do the same, but with 20 to 50 people.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:18:36 UTC No. 16489952
>>16489928
>I'd rather have food replicators
It's called a woman, incel
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:19:58 UTC No. 16489953
>>16489952
this guy drinks milk
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:21:50 UTC No. 16489957
>>16489953
problem?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:22:22 UTC No. 16489958
>>16489934
The only moment I felt something in the last flight was when Starship went through the clouds and the buoy view of the splashdown.
It's bizarre how fast it got boring, I'm barely even watching Falcon 9 launches now unless they got a cool payload.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:22:29 UTC No. 16489959
>>16489871
I do wonder if (when?) NASA will finally say
>fuck it, Starship is safe enough
And launch / land humans in it. I say this could maybe, perhaps, realistically happen in the next decade.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:24:39 UTC No. 16489964
>>16489931
how do they get food?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:24:59 UTC No. 16489965
>>16489959
SLS has to fail hard for it to happen. And even then it's not certain, oldspace wants the money.
A private moon landing will happen first, I bet Jared will want to do it.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:25:58 UTC No. 16489967
>>16489958
I am still wildly entertained by each launch of Starship. I'll even watch the refueling launches when its time.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:27:12 UTC No. 16489968
>>16489958
I guess its becuase everyone knew the score withthis flight. its an exact repeat of last flight with all the same problems, so nothign came as a surprise and we didnt expect a miracle. whilst nowhere near as exciting as ift4, I was still surprised that the ship made it this time
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:32:35 UTC No. 16489972
>>16489964
farming
>>16489946
still better than election tourists
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:33:11 UTC No. 16489973
>>16489858
Yeah it snapped in half. Did anyone check if the break point was the same as where the steel was warping during reentry?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:34:24 UTC No. 16489976
>>16489925
The moon rover worked in the 70s on the Moon when they barely knew how to make a functional battery. EVs will be fine.
Actually now that I think about it the reduced atmospheric pressure and gravity means that the motor will barely have to work for the car to move so you'd probably have LESS heat than on Earth
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:35:50 UTC No. 16489978
>>16489928
looks gross desu
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:36:23 UTC No. 16489979
>>16489972
Good luck eating like a medieval peasant.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:40:12 UTC No. 16489981
>>16489979
Oh no, bread and meat and vegetables. How will we survive without pizza rolls and twinkies, /sfg/?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:40:47 UTC No. 16489983
>>16489979
are you retarded?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:43:19 UTC No. 16489986
>>16489908
>STS-3 was the only shuttle mission to land at White Sands Missile Range. The unexpectedly difficult landing and post flight conditions damaged the shuttle, requiring extensive repair at KSC. So much gypsum dust covered Columbia that Bolden recalled, "I flew it several flights later on my first flight, STS-61-C, and when we got on orbit, there was still gypsum coming out of everything! They thought they had cleaned it ... but it was just unreal what it had done!" Dust continued to be found in the spacecraft for the rest of its career.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:45:09 UTC No. 16489988
>no chicken tendies on mars
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:45:21 UTC No. 16489990
>>16489931
How are these things supposed to work? I'm not talking about structural integrity, I'm talking about resource transfer and pressure management. How would they create an airtight seal on a rotating structure attached to a non-rotating structure?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:45:36 UTC No. 16489991
>>16489986
What an unlucky vehicle.
>>16489988
Hard times create strong Martians, please understand.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:47:06 UTC No. 16489993
>>16489990
worlds most expensive slip ring
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:48:57 UTC No. 16489996
>>16489981
>>16489983
kek. this general is actually /pol/ 2 now. What could POSSIBLY go wrong with a closed economy the size of a small town...
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:50:17 UTC No. 16490000
>>16489976
they used thermal radiator units to convert heat into the infrared spectrum to radiate it away
there were less demands on the lunar rover than regular EVs, and there's no way an Earth designed EV without this modification could function normally
moreover, the Martian dust would pose the same problems to the radiator systems that were encountered on the moon
namely, dust accumulation negatively affects the efficiency of the thermal radiators
you probably have a point about that whole gravity thing though
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:52:43 UTC No. 16490002
>>16489931
>>16489972
>>16489990
Why is spaceflight concept artwork always "GIGA SIZED SPACE COLONY ON ALPHA CENTAURI THAT LOOKS JUST LIKE EARTH" while the serious proposals are always "maybe we can send 3 people to Mars 100 years into the future"?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:53:25 UTC No. 16490003
>>16489979
Gladly.
>>16489972
The horticulture section is going to be very important for many reasons.
Not least because fermentation is more efficient in low G, also because their plants effectively produce oxygen, medicine, etc.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:53:29 UTC No. 16490004
>>16489996
>nooo you can't just grow food for people!
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:54:26 UTC No. 16490006
>>16489904
Nobody wants to see your lazypost ai garbage nigger
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:56:25 UTC No. 16490008
>>16490002
oldspace buck broken by decades of congress controlled spaceflight.
pic rel is also a serious proposal bee tea dubs
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:57:17 UTC No. 16490010
>>16489928
that thing looks like a complete fucking disaster, I would appreciate the opportunity to tell the chef directly what a wank he is
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:58:26 UTC No. 16490011
>>16490006
Wow. Did you just use the n-word? That's so rude.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:59:09 UTC No. 16490012
>>16490002
>ALPHA CENTAURI
I'm pretty sure the three are supposed to be on one of the lagrange points
>while the serious proposals are always "maybe we can send 3 people to Mars 100 years into the future"
Because government led space programs are filled with corruption and low thumos retards, thank God for the private sector and daring people with a lot of money
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:59:40 UTC No. 16490013
>>16490008
Not defending oldspace bullshit, but the ambitious pics never seen to be made thinking about the actual engineering and practicality of what is shown.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:00:40 UTC No. 16490015
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:00:51 UTC No. 16490016
>>16489904
>guh- guuyysphhbt
>I um, I um, uh I talkuh...
>Askuh I talke uh ask-uh I said the robot to umm
>it sayed muh, um, for mars cus it uhhhhhhhhh...
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:03:09 UTC No. 16490017
>>16489891
Why do muskrats seethe so much when they see new glenn?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:04:59 UTC No. 16490018
>>16490008
are those little yellow lights meant to be homesteads?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:05:32 UTC No. 16490020
>>16489981
>meat
We aren't ready for cows in space yet, though that is an endgame tier goal for humanity.
It should technically be possible to create a cow-powered (and potentially operated) generation ship using methane capture units to create fuel from their farts and from the oxygen produced by the plants they would be feeding on.
No I haven't done the math.
Basically what you'd be getting instead for the forseeable future are lab cultivated meat cultures.
Martian and Lunar dairy farms can maybe happen eventually, but we would need to send a cow into a loop around the moon like we did with Apollo 13 first to prove the concept.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:06:51 UTC No. 16490021
>>16490017
they know its the falcon killer and even the starship killer if project jarvis works.
>first they ignore you
>then they laugh at you
>then they fight you (YOU ARE HERE)
>the Blue wins
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:07:26 UTC No. 16490022
>>16490020
the meat will mostly be tilapia and chickens
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:11:25 UTC No. 16490025
>>16490020
>uplifted cow starpilots
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:12:49 UTC No. 16490026
>>16490022
Tilapia is literally chicken shit, nutritionally speaking.
It would be easier to simply implement lab grown meat products.
That way you have more control over the product, and less chance of disease spreading among your stock of chickens (which would be a disaster, bird flu on steroids).
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:13:49 UTC No. 16490027
>>16490025
That would be one example of neuralink being useful.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:14:38 UTC No. 16490029
>>16489979
>not living on processed shit is LE BAD actually
>>16489996
>closed economy
How is a space station any more closed than any island on Earth?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:18:00 UTC No. 16490034
>>16490026
>it would be easier to do (thing that is a massive fucking meme and always will be) than raising chicken
no, also
>less chance of disease
LOL no, keeping lab grown meat free of pestilence is incredibly difficult, you are taking homeostasis and the immune system and trying to replicate it in a fucking vat
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:18:49 UTC No. 16490035
>>16490029
>How is a space station any more closed than any island on Earth?
Come on dude... It's more energy expensive to travel around space than to sail across the sea, so even in the limit where space travel becomes super cheap it will still be less feasible than living on a desert island by an order of 100x.
And even still, the people on isolated islands which dont have billionaires on them eat like shit and die young.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:21:08 UTC No. 16490036
>>16490002
Do you know what the point of art is ?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:25:35 UTC No. 16490038
>>16490035
Energy is not a real unit of expense. If it was we'd cry at wasted solar radiation nonstop. If it's cheap, which it will eventually be and will HAVE to be to build an O'Neill cylinder, then it's cheap, period
>scaremongering
No one is suffering from eating fresh produce you fucking weirdo
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:26:11 UTC No. 16490039
>>16490034
>keeping lab grown meat free of pestilence is incredibly difficult
Facts?
Cause I thought the controled environment you would need for that to work in the first place would already account for that. And looking this problem up, I'm recieving mixed reports on this issue.
For the record, keeping animals free of disease is also difficult.
Anyways, what makes cows such a great candidate for spaceflight is the fact that their dung is "cool" unlike say goat or human dung.
Which means it doesn't "burn" plants on contact like human and goat dung does, and is incredible fertilizer. Doesn't need intensive composting like those other examples.
All I'm thinking is, bull shit might literally be the secret ingredient to a free energy system.
Cows eat plants, produce CO2 and methane.
Cows breathe oxygen, produce shit.
Plants consume CO2 and cow shit, produce oxygen.
The methane and excess oxygen are captured to provide unlimited gas.
What exactly am I missing here.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:30:31 UTC No. 16490040
i coulda done a falcon 9 if i had a billion dollars too
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:30:36 UTC No. 16490041
>>16490020
>Basically what you'd be getting instead for the forseeable future are lab cultivated meat cultures.
Why not chickens?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:34:03 UTC No. 16490043
>>16490040
bezosbros...
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:35:06 UTC No. 16490044
>>16490041
avian influenza
low G environments and cosmic radiation make the immune system shit itself, this is why quarantine chambers and strict medical protocols are going to be necessary until we develop the technology needed to mitigate both problems
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:36:11 UTC No. 16490045
>>16490040
I probably would have just done an electron.
maybe a firefly alpha with parachute recovery bolted on.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:40:47 UTC No. 16490048
>>16490046
Be careful not to violate ITAR. Bud.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:42:14 UTC No. 16490049
>>16490046
WHAT!
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:44:14 UTC No. 16490051
>>16490002
others anons have already said it, but I'll just expand on that point: the lack of ambition in these last 50 years was just gruesome. You can literally see by yourself how this feeling of adventure and conquest swindled throughout the years in the media, the general public, and literature. During the 60s, nobody could stop us. Everyone thought we would have a permanent Moon base by the 70s, Mars missions by the 80s, Jupiter by the 90s, Saturn and the exterior solar system by 2000s, alpha centauri next, literally unstoppable. Then, year after year, the sentiment ended. Look how many good works of space fiction came out in the 60s and 70s. By the 90s and later years, sci-fi just forgot about space travel, and robots/AI were the new fad. In this period if you talked about settling Mars, let alone the Moon, everyone would looked as though you were crazy. Quite the 180° change in our species' mindset.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:45:44 UTC No. 16490052
>>16490021
We've been alternating between ignoring and laughing at Blue for years.
They're generally ignored, but every so often they do something laughable.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:48:14 UTC No. 16490053
Freshwater eels will be the play
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:49:19 UTC No. 16490054
>>16490040
he didn't have a billion dollars
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:49:51 UTC No. 16490055
>>16489976
the moon is harsher because it has 15 days straight of cold with no sun
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:51:00 UTC No. 16490056
>>16490055
non issue
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:51:20 UTC No. 16490058
>>16490051
Also, look at the proposals and serious studies we had before Apollo was cancelled. NTP, NERVA, Apollo Applications Program, etc. We were supposed to build bigger, and more powerful rocket to land on Mars by 1980. There were talks for manned flybys around Venus, real spin-hab stations, and I'm sure many were suggesting the possibility of getting to Callisto. Unfortunately, we realized too late that governments and politicians do not care about space, so we had to wait half a century for an autistic billionaire to set us on the right path again.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:51:25 UTC No. 16490059
>>16490053
I have never tried eel, but have heard it tastes okay.
You would want to ensure that any flukes (parisites) are eliminated from their tanks prior to launch.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:52:42 UTC No. 16490061
>>16490048
OSINT is ipso facto unable to violate ITAR
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:53:10 UTC No. 16490062
>>16490054
lol, many people forget that musk became a billionaire due to spacex and tesla succeeding, not the other way around.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:53:16 UTC No. 16490063
>>16490058
absolutely none of those proposals would at any point reduce $/lb to orbit
so in the end they were all junk
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:54:59 UTC No. 16490064
>>16490055
Just keep the batteries warm during lunar night, dummy
It's like having a block heater for your diesel
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:57:20 UTC No. 16490065
>>16490036
Normie get frustrated when the future they were sold into doesn't happen.
Plus, I just wanna see concepts that actually have a ground and aren't cucked at the same time.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:58:29 UTC No. 16490066
>>16490049
Yes, it's in the gulf of mexico now, however
Maybe it'll be fished...
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:59:39 UTC No. 16490068
>>16490063
Well, there are some good arguments saying that the Apollo pace was just unsustainable in the long term, and eating away 4% of your national GDP every year is not a good prospect. However, I do think that they would've eventually found a way for the entire process to become simplified, and for everything to become mass-produced. Nonetheless, Wernher was no Musk, and as far as I know he wasn't as business savvy as Elon, so that was one of his weaknesses.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:01:34 UTC No. 16490069
>>16490068
>However, I do think that they would've eventually found a way for the entire process to become simplified
They would not, unless it was in their contract to do so
Obviously they weren't chasing cost savings, they were just at the start of the whole thing and computers were piles of shit still
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:03:19 UTC No. 16490072
>>16490065
I think it's a good thing to aim a bit high when it comes to concepts. It's cool and fun
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:04:41 UTC No. 16490073
>>16490072
least complex NASA umans to Mars design.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:07:55 UTC No. 16490076
>>16490044
Lmao source: your ass
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:10:43 UTC No. 16490079
>>16490054
Emerald mine
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:11:53 UTC No. 16490080
>>16489990
The entire thing rotates.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:13:44 UTC No. 16490082
>>16490069
>They would not
So, what do you think would've been the best-case scenario out all of this then? A Moon mission every now and then, till boing and locksneed would start with their decades-long grift? Or are you suggesting that no matter what, we would have to "wait" for computer tech to get better?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:27:37 UTC No. 16490085
>>16490073
take the girder pill
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:29:06 UTC No. 16490086
>>16490069
>unless it was in their contract to do so
So fucking make it part of the contract???? Everything else of importance is mass produced. Open source all the gained knowledge from apollo and do a bunch of fixed price tenders with rewards for cost reduction and slowly taper down the fixed price rewards.
>they were just at the start of the whole thing and computers were piles of shit still
OK and? When you have government sized budgets you can just mass produce expendable steel methane vehicles for pennies while computers catch up in the 80s or so.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:31:55 UTC No. 16490088
Also I'm sure booster reuse could have been achieved with ground based computation and radio controls.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:33:40 UTC No. 16490090
>>16490072
I swear I'm seeing an anime girl in the thumbnail. sfg rotted my mind.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:40:05 UTC No. 16490097
>>16490076
No, everything I said about microgravity and cosmic radiation negatively affecting your immune system is true and something I learned while studying the problem.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:42:13 UTC No. 16490101
>>16490098
it fell into the sun right at the end
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:46:48 UTC No. 16490103
>>16490080
all O'Neill Cylinder concepts have some sort of non-rotating connector between two cylinders to cancel momentum or a wet/dry dock for spacecraft that is not rotating with the habitat
The bishop ring/stanford torus is the one where the entire thing rotates at once
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:47:58 UTC No. 16490104
>>16490098
I wonder how many MIRVS you could fit in it.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:49:45 UTC No. 16490105
>>16490104
100+. That's a nation-flattener in a single launch.
Starship is a potential WMD the likes of which the world has never seen.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:51:59 UTC No. 16490106
>>16490104
>>16490105
Starship could support over 400 Mark 21 reentry vehicles by mass, not sure about space tho
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W87
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:56:25 UTC No. 16490109
>>16490106
>>16490105
oh god, just imagine
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:57:56 UTC No. 16490111
>>16490109
Yes, imagine
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:01:17 UTC No. 16490113
>>16490111
I don't care what other people say, Terminator 3 was a good movie. Loved all the explosions and shit.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:06:22 UTC No. 16490120
>>16490058
I like space exploration as much as you do, but there wasn't any actual economical or practical return at the time besides Earth monitoring and telecom satellites. Arguably, the only new thing added now is space tourism for the very rich.
>>16490072
Underselling your ambitions can actually work well. See the mars rovers for examples.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:07:16 UTC No. 16490122
>>16490113
loved it too, but it might just be nostalgia since I was still using diapers when I first watched it
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:08:31 UTC No. 16490124
>>16490113
>>16490122
Gen Alpha will be saying this for shit like the Star Wars sequels
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:13:53 UTC No. 16490130
>>16490124
That's not true, that's impossible!
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:17:49 UTC No. 16490135
>>16490120
>Arguably, the only new thing added now is space tourism for the very rich.
As close as the moon is already basically an infinite source of metals and rare earth material, there's definitely reasons to expand, we only lacked the will to do it for the last 50 years.
Granted, at the time to run a space program was so ridiculously expensive that everyone thought that only governments could do it, and that it was almost a given that they would try because of the USSR
No government to build that railroads. No expansion. That was the truth sice the 70's but now it will change, and we wont be at the mercy of corrupt useless bureaucrats (we'll be at the mercy of corrupt venture capitalists!).
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:19:20 UTC No. 16490136
Will asians be allowed on Mars? Beaners are a given as they are necessary to make repairs to Starships at scale.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:21:11 UTC No. 16490137
>>16490135
I'm crossing my fingers really hard that there will be something very profitable (and more than on Earth) that can be done on the Moon or even just orbit.
Be it the Helium-3 meme, mining and industry that is somehow more economical there, a room-temperature superconductor or some other special material that can only be manufactured in microgravity.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:25:46 UTC No. 16490139
>>16490136
Whoever can pay for it.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:26:13 UTC No. 16490140
>>16490124
I swear, ever since I first watched as a kid that scene where Luke falls down through some tubes, which was right after having his arm severed, I've been terribly scared of heights and falling into a gas giant. life-long trauma lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVz
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:27:50 UTC No. 16490141
>>16490140
Sorry anons, not gaaaning with you to Jupiter and Saturn, they scare the shit out of me.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:28:47 UTC No. 16490143
>>16490140
>falling into a gas giant
I bet it gets dark before the pressure crushes your rib cage
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:30:45 UTC No. 16490144
>>16490137
There's this guy AnthroFuturism on yt that dedicates his entire channel on why and how to colonize the moon and make a profit out of it.
I'm hopeful that once starship goes operational and the cost per kg goes <1000$ there will be a new wave of industrialists willing to make infrastructure to colonize the moon.
Maybe it will be the new fad for the Elon orbiting cryptobros and alike.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:30:59 UTC No. 16490145
>>16490143
The Venera probes got a decent visibility of Venus's surface, but the pressure there is enough to crush you so I don't think it would be the case for a gas giant, unless the cloud coverage above you is really thick.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:35:30 UTC No. 16490146
>>16490145
Oh so you can see the flying squids first, cool
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:42:05 UTC No. 16490150
>>16490098
Finally, sea dragon
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:42:49 UTC No. 16490151
>>16490145
We urgently need pictures of how the clouds and sky look from the gas giants "surface". These planets do seem to have a sky like ours, but I'm not sure if there's like a big open space with clouds as surface (like picrel), and then all of sudden it's all dark from there, or it's all more gradual and it only gets dark after several kilometres down.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:45:16 UTC No. 16490153
>>16490151
Conversely, sometimes we see Jupiter depicted as having no traditional sky whatsoever, just featuring a very thick cloud layer at the top and that's it, then all dark from there.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:46:29 UTC No. 16490154
>>16490153
It’s called night time bro
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:50:31 UTC No. 16490156
>>16490120
>Underselling your ambitions can actually work well. See the mars rovers for examples.
yeah but that's not art. NASA and artists are disconnected
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:52:16 UTC No. 16490157
>>16490151
Weve already gone over why Jupiter cloud probes will never happen.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:54:40 UTC No. 16490159
>>16490146
they are really cute, I wish something like that could exist, would make the universe more interesting.
>>16490154
Cosmos fucked up and that artist rendition shows stars as if it were nighttime, but they were trying to depict Jupiter during the day.
>>16490157
I just want pics, don't care if the probe dies after some minutes.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:57:13 UTC No. 16490161
Send a guy with a camera.
Yes, EVERYWHERE.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 04:07:27 UTC No. 16490167
>>16490157
I'm very sure there was a Jupiter atmospheric probe early on, no camera unfortunately.
>>16490151
I think the most recent Neptune and Uranus orbiter proposals included atmospheric probes with cameras. Sadly, those won't happen any since the budget will all go to Artemis and more Mars stuff.
At the very least I hope someone will do a Venus balloon probe with a camera, I think ISRO is working on that.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 05:28:46 UTC No. 16490211
>>16490061
sorry mate, that picture was BORN SECRET information
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 05:40:03 UTC No. 16490222
>>16490098
ANTI-GRAVITY TECHNOLOGY! SLS IS FINISHED!
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 06:30:12 UTC No. 16490231
>>16489925
Put some cool lookin rads on it
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 06:42:54 UTC No. 16490236
>>16490039
>Low gravity wagyu steaks
Mars's first high dollar export. I can see it now
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 07:50:31 UTC No. 16490259
what kind of rocket is /sfg/ anyways? we've staged thousands of times and yet we seem to only ever reach new lows
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 07:54:41 UTC No. 16490261
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 08:17:40 UTC No. 16490265
>>16490259
trying to liftoff off a black hole
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 08:25:41 UTC No. 16490267
>>16490261
>my_sex_life.mp4
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 08:26:42 UTC No. 16490268
>>16490261
How are people still falling for hydromeme
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 09:13:17 UTC No. 16490277
>>16490064
>Just keep the batteries warm during lunar night
With what power? There's no solar power, unless you've got radio-thermal power, hope your batteries have enough to keep themselves warm for two weeks so they don't freeze up before the sun comes back.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 11:27:18 UTC No. 16490337
Alleged characterstics of Zhuque 3 vs Zhuque-3 Improved (ZQ3 vs ZQ3G)
The previously advertised performances correspond to the ZQ3G, which will use the so far untested TQ-12B/TQ-15B engines.
The version that will be used on the first few launches next year (x doubt on timeline) will use slightly uprated versions of the current TQ-12A/TQ-12B engines.
ZQ3:
Expended >= 11.8t
Downrange >= 8t
ZQ3G:
Expended >= 21.3t
Downrange >= 18.3t
RTLS >= 12.5t
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 11:29:23 UTC No. 16490341
>>16490046
I know that 387 being reflown is public.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:25:20 UTC No. 16490370
>>16490020
It would take three million cows and 140 acres of aspen 1 entire year just to refill one Starship. There's a reason we use machines. Your proposal is beyond retarded
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:32:55 UTC No. 16490378
>>16490135
>moon is already basically an infinite source of metals and rare earth material
So is the Earth's crust and it's way closer
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:35:31 UTC No. 16490380
>>16490264
>Burk Khalifa
Yeah just build the SLS tower with slave labor to save money
>>16490328
Starship will get boring again, we'll be back
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:38:15 UTC No. 16490382
>>16490378
retard
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:39:11 UTC No. 16490383
>>16490382
Elaborate or you're wrong
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:42:51 UTC No. 16490385
>>16490277
how do you think every other battery used in cold conditions keeps itself warm?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:50:18 UTC No. 16490390
>>16490383
do you know what the biggest hindrance is when getting stuff into orbit? If you don't, you need to leave.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:53:02 UTC No. 16490392
>>16490000
in 1/3 earth gravity theres probably going to be less problems with dust than there was on the moon.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:53:12 UTC No. 16490394
>>16490144
>Maybe it will be the new fad for the Elon orbiting cryptobros and alike.
/sfg/ business consortium when
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:54:04 UTC No. 16490395
>>16490113
Claire Danes was hot
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:58:06 UTC No. 16490399
>>16490390
That would be cost. So the question is, is mining and refining on the moon going to be cheap enough to beat out the shipping cost from Earth? I'm betting no.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:15:01 UTC No. 16490407
>>16490385
body heat
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:27:10 UTC No. 16490416
>>16490378
>virgin land
>no competition
>you don't really mine it you just scoop it out of the top 1m layer of regollith
>Don't even need to send to earth and make a profit selling to other space based companies
>no goverment (not for long)
also, yeah we have it here, but that point is that it's another source of resources.
When we get to mining the asteroid belt, then we'll have a more decisive reason to do so.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:34:38 UTC No. 16490418
>>16490416
>no air
>no global supply chain
>no cheap workforce
>no market
Mars makes sense because it's 8 months away and the goal is self sustainability. The moon doesn't make sense.
>mining the asteroid belt
lol
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:39:29 UTC No. 16490420
>>16489988
>the first planet in the history of the universe ruled by a single autist
>no tendies
you couldn't be more wrong
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:41:36 UTC No. 16490421
>>16490002
mass faggotry has ruined spaceflight for decades
the sorry state of affairs pushed escapists in the opposite direction
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:42:49 UTC No. 16490423
>>16490418
>no air
non issue
>no global supply chain
yet
>no cheap workforce
ok you got me there, even in a future where space travel is ubiquitous you'll need highly trained people, so I wager that it'll be mostly automated.
>no market
yet
>lol
maybe not for the next 50~100 years, but as long as we get a permanent presence on Mars, it's not that far fetched.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:43:42 UTC No. 16490424
>>16490418
I think the experience we'd get from extracting the moon's natural resources would prove invaluable for a Mars mission, and is worth more than whatever money it would make. We should leave our profit-first mindset behind on Earth
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:45:20 UTC No. 16490426
>>16490103
>stanford torus is the one where the entire thing rotates at once
there are counter rotating parts on the axis for docking
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:48:18 UTC No. 16490428
>>16490337
>≮
haha, wtf
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:50:03 UTC No. 16490429
>>16490428
I think its "not less than" yeah
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:52:03 UTC No. 16490431
>>16490426
well then, now I'm wondering about how 2 proposals are supposed to work
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:53:03 UTC No. 16490432
>>16490424
Experience with no regard for profit is why we've been stuck in LEO for half a century with nothing to show for it.
>>16490423
No air is an issue. Mars' tenuous atmosphere at least spreads the temperature around and shields some radiation.
>as long as we get a permanent presence on Mars, it's not that far fetched
It is far fetched. Mars also has more resources in it's crust than the entire asteroid belt. You still get killed on operations cost and dV. For asteroid mining to make sense you need scifi levels of automation and propulsion. It isn't worth seriously regarding or planning for
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:57:41 UTC No. 16490434
>>16490035
>It's more energy expensive to travel around space than to sail across the sea
It's actually substantially easier as long as you aren't starting from a gravity well.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:01:18 UTC No. 16490438
>>16490259
It's a rocket composed entirely of staging rings.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:03:41 UTC No. 16490439
>>16490432
>No air is an issue. Mars' tenuous atmosphere at least spreads the temperature around and shields some radiation.
We have about 70 years of experience dealing with heat and rads in a vacuum, it's not easy of course, but far from being more than a expected problem
Even then operations will have to run hot given the Moon's surface temperature, I'm still hopeful about lava tubes so that radiation becomes a non issue too
>It is far fetched.
I guess we'll just have to wait and see, admittedly, I'm on the more hopeful team
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:04:58 UTC No. 16490441
>>16490426
At least they're smart enough to know that you can't dock anywhere on a rotating object except at the center of rotation.
But the center doesn't have to be counter-rotating if the ship that's docking can dock from the side while rotating. You could even have a cylindrical docking bay with very slight centrifugal force on the "floor", as long as the ships can carefully maneuver "up" and "down" to the axis area. (note that pic does not seem to work that way)
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:07:39 UTC No. 16490445
>>16490432
>no regard for profit
Being driven by profits is exactly the reason why we've stagnated for 50 years. SpaceX pushed past years of bleeding money to develop reusable boosters that have driven the cost per launch down, and developed Starlink as a business model to help pay for everything. They've basically monopolized space travel as a result and will go to Mars with or without NASA's help. Aside from being incredibly corrupt and bureaucratic, NASA being utterly terrified to lose a bit of money on developing new technology that drive the cost of space travel down drastically in the future is why we haven't done anything worth noting in space for half a century. Defense companies are incentivized to keep space travel expensive so they can keep getting their gibs via contracts on useless technology too
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:55:19 UTC No. 16490472
>>16490264
Bechtel is just blatantly stealing US citizens' money.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:57:12 UTC No. 16490474
>>16490472
Bechtel is just one of many and the shit going on with SLS is probably just one example of what generally happens in government contracting
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:00:27 UTC No. 16490476
>>16490448
Why is Neil still getting TV appearances?
His opinion on this isn't worth more than the average person you grab off the street. Any random /sfg/ poster would have a much more informed and nuanced take than this "science communicator".
>>16490474
Death by a million cuts, maybe we could've been able to afford moon/Mars bases decades ago if it wasn't like this.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:03:13 UTC No. 16490480
why superheavy doesnt have water deluge at hotstaging? maybe in the future, with 9 raptor ships?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:03:57 UTC No. 16490482
>>16490476
>His opinion on this isn't worth more than the average person you grab off the street. Any random /sfg/ poster would have a much more informed and nuanced take than this "science communicator".
He says what people want to hear. That's his job: "science man who agrees with me".
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:06:43 UTC No. 16490487
>>16489959
>I do wonder if (when?) A GOVERNMENT AGENCY will finally say
>lets cut back on red tape
NGMI
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:12:16 UTC No. 16490491
>>16490002
Because there isn't money to be made in space. The things we can do by going to space can be done cost effectively on earth.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:18:10 UTC No. 16490495
>>16490445
>Being driven by profits is exactly the reason why we've stagnated for 50 years.
>proceeds to state exactly why SpaceX being driven by profits has led to them revolutionizing spaceflight
Huh?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:18:50 UTC No. 16490497
>>16490429
Yes, otherwise known as greater than, unless 1) you're using numbers without a total order or 2) you're using e.g. constructive logic and don't have TND (the law of excluded middle)
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:21:45 UTC No. 16490500
>>16490448
"Where would Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, get money to fund the project that he is already funding? It’s physically impossible." - Retard Nigger Man
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:49:51 UTC No. 16490521
>>16490479
>IFT
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:04:36 UTC No. 16490527
>>16490448
>A panel of comfortable societal leeches bitching and moaning about the greatest adventure attempted by mankind
They are absolutely giddy about how smart they perceive themselves.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:16:26 UTC No. 16490532
>>16490527
Longhouse became a meme for a reason
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:32:23 UTC No. 16490542
>>16490532
Longhouse?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:35:54 UTC No. 16490545
>>16490111
Disappointed one didn't take off from one of that red farm silo
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:41:00 UTC No. 16490549
>>16490542
In history, it was a form of communal living, but nowadays it's usually used to refer to lack of agency and inability to do great things because it's dangerous or whatever yadda yadda.
The point is that these people have weak spirits and couldn't even fathom that someone might want to conquer space like we used to dream of in the 70's
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:44:14 UTC No. 16490553
>>16490549
I thought it referred to the overbearing old women that have basically taken control of society (and everything that comes with it), referring to the somewhat matriarchal situation going on in longhouses with old women yapping constantly
the 19th amendment may have been a mistake
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:53:11 UTC No. 16490559
>>16490555
>The Longhouse distrusts overt ambition
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:57:05 UTC No. 16490562
>>16490448
https://x.com/pmarca/status/1860327
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:02:30 UTC No. 16490567
>>16490532
>>16490542
>>16490549
Might be an error in here somewhere, but the short version is: the ruling classes (particularly matriarchal positions) in ancient tribal societies tended to captured their tribe's energies and potential for action in dedicated argument halls to make sure nothing actually happened to upset the status quo, ever.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:10:27 UTC No. 16490572
>>16490264
Well to be fair, the Burj Khalimeme was built with literal slaves
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:13:43 UTC No. 16490573
>>16490516
Elon goes into sex for a greater purpose.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:14:03 UTC No. 16490574
>>16490567
now extrapolate that line of thinking to the mentality of these people and you get those who are anti-growth and anti-space settlement
I don't really like Elon, but just the fact that he rejects that line of thinking and is pushing for solar colonization is enough for me to be onboard with his shenanigans
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:17:29 UTC No. 16490576
>>16490574
That's understandable. Still, the important thing to remember is that leadership isn't about being liked: when you're leading a nation, it's about exercising the position of authority to guide and direct the energies of the people you're in charge of to do what needs to be done. When you want to control the organization for the sake of controlling the organization, you see stupid petty infighting, sabotage, self-aggrandizement, and other such behaviors. The people who dominate the Long House see and care for nothing beyond the Long House.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:23:06 UTC No. 16490581
>A floppy disk contained two photographs of Nowak riding in a bicycle race, and 15 images depicting an unidentified woman in different stages of undress. An evidence report dated March 15 indicated that nearly all of the photographs and drawings depicted scenes of bondage. Also found were $585.00 and £41.00 (GBP) in cash and four brown paper bags with 69 orange pills that were not publicly identified
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:29:28 UTC No. 16490586
>>16490578
I remember 2010-2016. a brutal time. watched all of the launches
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:29:36 UTC No. 16490587
>>16490573
elon never had sex
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:30:36 UTC No. 16490589
>>16490578
that's a lot of bad sectors, you should get a new drive
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:31:08 UTC No. 16490591
>>16490589
what RAID format do they use on the ISS's computers
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:37:00 UTC No. 16490598
fags
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:38:06 UTC No. 16490599
Does BO only have one New Glenn built right now?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:41:04 UTC No. 16490603
>>16490592
what a shitty way to present data
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:42:20 UTC No. 16490605
>>16490598
squeal some more paypiggy
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:42:30 UTC No. 16490606
>>16490592
needs defragging
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:42:54 UTC No. 16490607
has SpaceX rocket Boeing yet?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:43:11 UTC No. 16490608
>>16490592
Weirdest game of minesweeper I ever seen't
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:43:11 UTC No. 16490609
>>16490603
Would've never seen it if Kiko didn't think it was fun
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:44:09 UTC No. 16490610
has SpaceX rocked Boeing yet?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:45:34 UTC No. 16490611
>>16490610
Thoroughly.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:46:05 UTC No. 16490613
>>16490586
Dark times, and every launch was a nail-biter. Amazing how far it's come since then, amazing that they actually managed to make it boring.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:47:57 UTC No. 16490616
>>16490576
>it's about exercising the position of authority to guide and direct the energies of the people you're in charge of to do what needs to be done. When you want to control the organization for the sake of controlling the organization, you see stupid petty infighting, sabotage, self-aggrandizement, and other such behaviors.
this is the reason I alway chuckle when people say that Elon doesn't deserve recognition for the feats of his companies
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:53:55 UTC No. 16490622
>>16490581
thats... kinda hot
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:55:09 UTC No. 16490623
>>16490576
>leading is about leading
yeah
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:59:25 UTC No. 16490629
>>16490623
People have a remarkable capacity to fail at simple and blindingly obvious things.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:04:22 UTC No. 16490634
>>16490581
I want this bitch to eroticate me
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:09:06 UTC No. 16490637
>>16490632
Apollo 17 was so cool
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:09:35 UTC No. 16490639
>>16490581
>Nowak and her husband Richard divorced in June 2008, and she was given full custody of their three children.
The courts in their wisdom know it's better to let children be raised by notorious lunatics than to let them see their fathers.
Longhouse indeed.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:10:05 UTC No. 16490640
>>16490636
>>16490600
looks kind of roughed up
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:12:34 UTC No. 16490642
>>16490575
code?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:17:18 UTC No. 16490648
>>16490640
>still lands with pinpoint accuracy
now we know why it won't have crew abort. it doesn't need it
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:18:13 UTC No. 16490650
>>16490581
>The 2019 film Lucy in the Sky, starring Natalie Portman, was loosely based on Nowak's story.
Is Herslag diapered up in this?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:19:06 UTC No. 16490651
>>16490648
You will be safer in Starship than you were driving to the starport.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:21:04 UTC No. 16490653
>>16490650
sadly, no
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:22:19 UTC No. 16490657
Scott Pace, Greg Autry, Jeff Greason, Lori Garver
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:22:56 UTC No. 16490658
>>16490642
[HIGH RISK REVOLUTION (Aizawa Hiroshi)] Zetsurin na Yatsura Kaettekita Elon Musk
and its sequel.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:29:29 UTC No. 16490662
>>16490648
It wont need a abort system because itll never be manned
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:30:07 UTC No. 16490663
so why havent you been to starbase yet anon?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:30:42 UTC No. 16490665
>>16490640
Im supposed to believe this can be rapidly reuse? LMAO
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:33:41 UTC No. 16490668
>>16490665
Not that one given it was deliberately flown in a more aggressive flight profile with an older generation TPS which had been stripped down.
An aluminum or carbon fiber spacecraft wouldn't have survived the reentry let alone the flip.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:34:25 UTC No. 16490669
>>16490662
>itll never be manned
It will be even if I have to sneak aboard one of the test launches.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:37:13 UTC No. 16490674
>come back after months absence
>first post delay is now 15 minutes
>begging me to verify an email
>captcha is even more fucked
what the fuck is this
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:40:01 UTC No. 16490679
>>16490674
Spam was getting exponentially worse, apparently.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:41:16 UTC No. 16490680
>>16490665
>I'm supposed to believe this booster can be flown 10 times? LMAO
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:45:52 UTC No. 16490683
>>16490663
I'm europoor
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:46:43 UTC No. 16490685
>>16489819
Musk has already set out plans to totally gut and dismantle NASA and then replace it with SpaceX, as part of his new role in the "DOGE".
He's about to massively set back space exploration for his own highly corrupt personal profit.
Well done Yankees, you played yourselves and the entire world.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:47:32 UTC No. 16490686
>/sfg/ will fall for this bait
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:49:38 UTC No. 16490688
>>16490685
Based Elon
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:50:01 UTC No. 16490690
>>16490686
It's true, you can read the DOGE's plans to replace NASA with SpaceX yourself. Seethe on, Musk isn't going to suck your dick and you aren't a temporarily embarrassed billionaire.
Enjoy destroying science because you're in a cult and worship this freak.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:51:04 UTC No. 16490691
>>16490685
>He's about to massively set back space exploration
>by gutting NASA
The only thing of worth NASA has done in the past 10 years is give SpaceX lots of money
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:51:48 UTC No. 16490692
>>16487891
>Boeing, along with other traditional contractors, including Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin, have essentially told NASA they will no longer bid for fixed-price contracts.
Good, killing oldspace was one of the goals
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:52:01 UTC No. 16490693
>>16490690
At least you're putting in effort, I'll give you that
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:52:08 UTC No. 16490694
>>16490690
Sounds like a good plan
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:53:02 UTC No. 16490697
>>16490692
so uhhh, who's left?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:55:40 UTC No. 16490699
>>16490694
This is why the entire world despises America, and you're even making enemies of Europe, the UK and Canada now.
You're a pariah state and your only ally is your master, Israel.
I will enjoy watching your society collapse over the next 4 years, maybe by then end of then you will have a degree of self awareness.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:57:44 UTC No. 16490701
>>16490697
spacex
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:58:03 UTC No. 16490702
>>16490697
SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, Firefly, Relativity, Nanoracks/Voyager, Axiom, Astrobotic, Intuitive Machines, Masten, Planet, Capella, the list goes on and on. Some newspace companies will die before figuring it out and that's OK too
Weeping over the killing of Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman is retarded. Regardless of their "heritage" they have been unproductive money pits that will gladly suck up any and all federal space funding if given the chance
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:59:58 UTC No. 16490704
>>16490697
me, i'll do the contracts
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:01:15 UTC No. 16490705
>>16490685
do you have any idea how incompetent NASA is?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:02:09 UTC No. 16490707
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:02:33 UTC No. 16490708
>>16490690
its going to be a real religion soon
non-believers are put on the no-mars list
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:05:17 UTC No. 16490710
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:06:23 UTC No. 16490712
>>16490699
>WAAHHH WE HATE AMERICA
>takes all of their policy decisions from American billionaires like Soros, Gates, Fink
???????????????????????????????????
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:08:04 UTC No. 16490713
>>16490705
>>16490707
>>16490708
>>16490712
You don't care about science, only about sucking Musk's cock, even if that means destroying space exploration
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:10:09 UTC No. 16490718
>>16490702
>Rocket Lab, Firefly, Relativity, Nanoracks/Voyager, Axiom, Astrobotic, Masten, Planet, Capella
dead companies walking
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:10:39 UTC No. 16490720
>>16490699
Mars is American!
>>16490713
Yes and?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:11:14 UTC No. 16490721
Are the spacesuits going to be ready for Mars?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:12:09 UTC No. 16490723
>>16490699
Why should we care what the rest of the world thinks? They're irrelevant.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:13:35 UTC No. 16490725
Why are you replying to yourself?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:14:00 UTC No. 16490726
>>16490713
>euros
Lost their only launcher when pooty chimped out
>UK
Revoked their own space loiscence
>Canada
Brown snow land only exists to turn tar sands into shitty oil
>Musk
responsible 95% of Earth's upmass to orbit
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:16:34 UTC No. 16490730
>>16490718
All of these companies combined lose less money than Boeing's space unit
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:19:56 UTC No. 16490734
>>16490720
Horrific incoherent AI slop
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:20:02 UTC No. 16490736
>>16490480
doesn't need it.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:23:46 UTC No. 16490742
>starbase, cape canaveral, vandy
where's the next big american spaceport going to be?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:25:17 UTC No. 16490744
>>16490742
Greenland when trump buys it
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:25:39 UTC No. 16490745
>>16490259
OTRAG
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:28:48 UTC No. 16490748
>>16490742
Bring long johns.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:29:03 UTC No. 16490749
The report post feature of 4chan.org allows users to report trolling instead of replying and making the thread even worse.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:30:03 UTC No. 16490751
>>16490744
Seems somewhat far north
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:31:50 UTC No. 16490755
If SpaceX is going to attempt a Ship catch on Flight 8 does that mean S34 is getting modified to add catch points or just skipped/scrapped altogether?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:33:22 UTC No. 16490757
>>16490742
Somewhere in Australia, like how Rocket Lab operates in New Zealand.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:34:02 UTC No. 16490758
Fact: Marcus House could beat the shit out of thunderfoot in a street fight.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:34:58 UTC No. 16490760
>>16490699
wumao hands wrote this
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:35:05 UTC No. 16490761
>>16490755
If Flight 8 is getting caught, what about the booster?
>>16490758
I like to think that any of you anons probably could too.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:35:54 UTC No. 16490763
>>16490761
It would be easy.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:38:34 UTC No. 16490766
>>16490757
Cape York bros, is it happening?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:41:36 UTC No. 16490769
>>16490760
你才是五毛。你全家都是五毛。
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:48:22 UTC No. 16490778
>>16490761
>If Flight 8 is getting caught, what about the booster?
catch the booster first and just move it away before you catch the ship
the ship needs to do a number of orbits anyway
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:50:02 UTC No. 16490779
>>16490761
>If Flight 8 is getting caught, what about the booster?
Ships will have to make several orbits to line back up with the tower due to Earth's rotation, SpaceX will have a day or so to get the Booster off the tower.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:50:48 UTC No. 16490781
>>16490779
how many orbits
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:55:19 UTC No. 16490787
>>16490779
>>16490778
>booster catch followed by Starship catch at same tower
Good lord that would look incredible. It'd be interesting to see how they start investigating restack having both parts recovered and theoretically ready to go again. The top of Superheavy looked like it warped pretty severely when Starship staged during flight 6, at least it did in the webm anon posted last thread.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:57:50 UTC No. 16490788
I think they even might use both of the towers for catching at first
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:08:23 UTC No. 16490802
>>16490778
>>16490779
>>16490787
>>16490755
fyi if they do attempt a ship catch we will see this maneuver being attempted on the ground before launch, as we saw with flight 5 booster catch. it will be pretty obvious too like before. keep your eyes peeled i guess
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:14:50 UTC No. 16490806
>>16490653
Diaper faggots are the absolute worst. Pretty sure it's mainly a Jewish fetish
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:34:52 UTC No. 16490818
>>16490734
It's called manifest destiny
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:49:28 UTC No. 16490826
https://youtu.be/rzNwgfxZdiE
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:52:20 UTC No. 16490829
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18604
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:52:29 UTC No. 16490830
>>16489885
Despite what many think government contracting is extremely regulated and blatantly giving a contract to a worse option will get em sued.
I personally think all western companies not spaceX need to start some serious mergers.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:55:00 UTC No. 16490832
>>16489959
The longer SpaceX can put off NASA spec "Human Rating" the better. Remember to have to "freeze" the design after and before. Antithetical to both iterative design and longterm safety.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:59:50 UTC No. 16490839
>>16490829
Not spaceflight fuck off
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:00:03 UTC No. 16490840
>>16490832
that's really a myth. dragon is changing all the time.
t. knower
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:12:09 UTC No. 16490844
Just jamming out to SpaceEngine's OST right now.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:12:10 UTC No. 16490845
>>16490829
>not Krystal
fuck off
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:15:19 UTC No. 16490849
So going back to that earlier discussion on bringing livestock to space, and that one anon worried about avian flu being really bad for Mars chickens, got me thinking. Wouldn't any sort of short term diseases (both in animals & humans) like the cold or flu simply not be able to get to Mars? The many month flight to Mars should mean any of those diseases will burn themselves out before getting to Mars. Only diseases with much longer infectious periods have a chance of making it Mars, and those can be screened for.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:15:19 UTC No. 16490850
>>16490757
RocketLab is a New Zealand company...
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:16:32 UTC No. 16490851
>>16490730
>>16490718
Time to MERGE
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:17:59 UTC No. 16490854
>>16490851
>all the scam companies merge
>now you just have one big scam company
great
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:18:10 UTC No. 16490855
>>16490840
Good my source less freind what about falcon?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:18:35 UTC No. 16490857
>>16490855
dunno
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:21:47 UTC No. 16490859
>>16490854
Lmao yeah....
Alas there isn't a chance in hell any of these second rate players get a worthwhile number of launches alone.
Does anyone think OneWeb, Kuiper, and Iridum, Sirius can meet sat # requirements let alone compete with SpaceX?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:24:15 UTC No. 16490865
>>16490859
Hmmm
https://www.morningstar.com/news/pr
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:25:33 UTC No. 16490867
>>16490859
not this decade... that's why they will assassinate musk. Next guy in charge won't share his ambition and spacex will stagnate. It won't be murder, but slow poisoning that will take years to have effects. Don't be surprised when Musk starts cancer treatments in 2029.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:26:11 UTC No. 16490869
>>16490850
Not anymore. After the stock thingie, they moved HQ to Long Beach.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:28:37 UTC No. 16490872
>>16490867
Elon is definitely freezing himself like Walt Disney
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:29:47 UTC No. 16490875
>>16490736
look at this deformed gridfin, cause no water deluge during hotstage
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:31:22 UTC No. 16490880
>>16490875
Just in case someone falls for this bait: the grid fins are warped because of thermal expansion.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:32:49 UTC No. 16490884
>>16490880
and how do you stop thermal expansion? water deluge.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:33:56 UTC No. 16490885
>>16490884
We need to invent a material that's unaffected by temperature.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:34:30 UTC No. 16490887
>>16490884
You ignore it because it's a non-issue, and it mostly happens during the rapid descent through the upper atmosphere.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:36:08 UTC No. 16490888
>>16490869
well, then we wonder why the rest of the world is irrelevant in spaceflight. how can they even compete if their best assets are always assimilated into the US?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:36:34 UTC No. 16490889
>>16490875
just flow propellant thru the fins
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:38:11 UTC No. 16490890
>>16490889
I want to flow my propellant over booster's fins if you know what I mean
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:40:07 UTC No. 16490893
>>16490885
make fins from raptors
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:43:18 UTC No. 16490894
>>16490849
many viruses survive forever on frozen corpses. you bring some frozen chicken to mars or some other livestock its still gonna have that virus in it.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:49:54 UTC No. 16490901
>>16490899
>he's pre-coping already
oh fuck
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:51:00 UTC No. 16490902
>>16490899
>even if we fail
nooooo, don't say that elon
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:52:22 UTC No. 16490903
>>16490899
there are so many benefits from colonizing mars but the detractors cant stand it because EDS or they hate spaceflight. there's all kinds of science and tech discoveries we can make there.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:52:57 UTC No. 16490904
>>16490899
>>16490901
>>16490902
when melon starts doing this you know its over.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:53:23 UTC No. 16490905
>>16490902
the haters are going to latch onto that tweet. they're going to have a death grip on it and whip it out every day.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:54:32 UTC No. 16490906
>>16490888
How can you compete when your home country has retardation such as taxation of unrealized gains? My country has that, makes it impossible to do startups. Kills any innovation stone dead.
Of course they fuck off to the US.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:55:00 UTC No. 16490907
>>16490899
elon is literally nearly at the door and is too scared to open it.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:55:24 UTC No. 16490908
>>16490902
he's been saying that since the beginning. it's no big deal
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:57:06 UTC No. 16490910
>>16490909
does she need a boyfriend
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:59:46 UTC No. 16490914
>>16490909
because you're an incel
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:00:08 UTC No. 16490915
>>16490909
Why did you censor the tranny flag?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:00:20 UTC No. 16490916
>>16490909
thats a man
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:17:14 UTC No. 16490925
>>16490848
fuck
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:25:22 UTC No. 16490930
faggot.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:29:07 UTC No. 16490932
instead of top kek we should start calling it top X
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:35:10 UTC No. 16490936
>>16490935
>me one good thing fakex has done which Nasa wouldnt have done cheaper and more efficiently
Your mom
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:40:20 UTC No. 16490938
>>16490929
Holy based
>>16490930
There are at least three /sfg/ posters I'm aware of that are also /vg/mmcg/ posters. Something about the Faustian spirit
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:41:43 UTC No. 16490939
>>16490906
How does that even get calculated? Instantaneous on tax day?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:45:55 UTC No. 16490942
>>16490909
A man.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:47:10 UTC No. 16490943
>>16490939
Yup. Better sell that stock to afford your taxes.
Unless you have a foreign owner of course, which naturally avoids this whole thing.
It's the craziest fucking thing ever and why we're a gas station that also sells salmon.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:55:48 UTC No. 16490947
>>16490848
>>16490925
so the noozles deform even before re-entry? is this a bad sign?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:59:30 UTC No. 16490951
>>16490947
SURELY ITS ONLY AN ARTEIFACT FROM AI UPSCALING THE VIDEO
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:59:34 UTC No. 16490952
>>16490929
awesome. What mod is that? Only space mod I know is galaticraft from way back and I don't think it had elevators.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:00:24 UTC No. 16490954
>>16490910
faggot
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:01:31 UTC No. 16490958
>>16490938
speaking of other generals, there must be some /dbs/ posters here, too.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:03:40 UTC No. 16490960
>>16490952
Create: Northstar, it works with the Create mod allowing you to build your own rockets from scratch.
Here's my autism world so far: https://streamable.com/sbd58i (I added a propellant farm later which is not seen in the recording).
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:08:25 UTC No. 16490968
>>16490962
look at the filename
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:10:35 UTC No. 16490970
>>16490968
That's the auto-generated filename from the X video download browser add-on, anon.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:14:04 UTC No. 16490975
>>16490962
why don't you ask on the shithole you found it nigger
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:18:03 UTC No. 16490978
>>16490960
awesome. Now I want to do it too...
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:22:25 UTC No. 16490981
>>16490960
Troon
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:22:42 UTC No. 16490982
nasa adminiatrator eric bergur
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:25:16 UTC No. 16490984
Black science man fails to understand even the most basic knowledge of a topic before blabbing his fat nigger lips off #193629
Heres Felons response. Also strangely Ben Shapiro reposted this response?
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18603
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:26:26 UTC No. 16490985
>>16490984
Proofs
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:27:04 UTC No. 16490986
>>16490962
SN 10? SN 15? Something like that, few years back.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:28:16 UTC No. 16490987
>>16490984
why can't NDT just move on and admit he was wrong, why does he always have to come out on top with his "akshuaally"
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:28:17 UTC No. 16490988
>>16490984
Blackman keeps spouting retarded takes over and over again. Maybe he always was such and I have merely given him the pass since he didnt interest me in the past
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:30:48 UTC No. 16490989
>>16490984
lol, retard can't read
here's hoping you forget how to breathe shortly
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:31:09 UTC No. 16490990
>>16490987
I dont know why they keep putting him on shows with how many times he has made himself look like a retard on every subject imaginable.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:32:09 UTC No. 16490992
>>16490989
Heres that (You) you ordered.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:32:55 UTC No. 16490995
>>16490990
I can't believe there was ever a time that I thought he was well informed about what he was presenting, what a fool I was.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:34:28 UTC No. 16490998
>>16490978
It's a great way to let out your autistic space visions in a game where you have total creative freedom, especially with Create which literally gives you complete freedom to do anything you can imagine.
I wrote out a plan to colonise the Solar System, and will be using this mod to realise it.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:37:01 UTC No. 16491001
>>16490998
>vast spaceport
Accidental?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:37:41 UTC No. 16491002
its still too expensive to do anything meaningful in space even if you have millions of dollars
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:38:45 UTC No. 16491003
>>16491002
two more IFTs trust da plan
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:39:04 UTC No. 16491004
>>16491002
Wrong, creating a space station is in the millions.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:39:48 UTC No. 16491005
>>16491004
$900 million dollars is not normal
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:43:07 UTC No. 16491008
has anyone ever thought of launching tons of sand into a retrograde LEO orbit just for the lolz?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:43:11 UTC No. 16491009
>>16491005
And whered you get that figure?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:47:32 UTC No. 16491012
>>16491005
A pittance.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:48:03 UTC No. 16491013
>>16490985
It's weird how Musk is under the impression that consciousness is something restricted to humans, rather than a part of reality itself.
I agree that colonizing the planets and affiliated bodies of our solar system is essential to the long term survival of humanity and their civilization culture, but pretending consciousness itself is at stake smacks of fanatical religiosity and is an exaggeration at best.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:48:16 UTC No. 16491014
If /sfg/ is just X screenshots, why not just join X and comment there? You're now allowed to say all of the same things except for the word nigger
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:50:12 UTC No. 16491015
>>16491008
Grains of sand in a 400km orbit (roughly ISS altitude) would deorbit in under a year
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:50:16 UTC No. 16491017
>>16491005
The current US national debt is somewhere around 35 TRILLION.
Most of that has been completely wasted on graft, corruption, and social programs that simple redirect resources instead of actually producing anything.
A billion dollars is literally a drop in the bucket compared to that monument of waste and depravity.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:54:25 UTC No. 16491022
>>16491015
>satellite orbital decay prediction
I'm gonna play with this, thanks.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:57:04 UTC No. 16491024
>>16491008
all satellites eventually turn into grains of sand
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:57:41 UTC No. 16491025
>>16491022
Have fun anon
I actually missed a 0 on the mass, real deorbit for sand is just about a month at 400km
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:05:01 UTC No. 16491029
>>16491013
>It's weird how Musk is under the impression that consciousness is something restricted to humans, rather than a part of reality itself.
yeah, definitely not familiar with animals unless he's frying their brains or blowing their eardrums out. humans will bring over tons of animals to help colonize mars and the rest of space.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:08:57 UTC No. 16491030
>>16491013
"protecting the light of consciousness" sounds poetic, I like that
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:11:27 UTC No. 16491033
>>16490960
For how long has this mod existed? I was looking everywhere for a good space mod that wasn't stuck on 1.12 like Galacticraft.
>forge only
Oh, that's why.
I guess I should just try that The Expansion datapack.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:12:13 UTC No. 16491035
>>16490016
>>16490006
grok is now also a search engine btw
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:13:57 UTC No. 16491036
>>16491013
It's quite obvious Musk means the continuity of sapience in the universe, not consciousness itself. "Protecting sapience" sounds like reddit speak and normoids wouldn't understand.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:15:18 UTC No. 16491037
>>16491029
It's not just animals though.
I'm pretty sure rocks and plants, lichens, etc, enjoy some level of consciousness too, beyond that entire planetary bodies and stars.
Like, it's not a phenomenon you can neatly just lock down to a particular class of biological organism. It has to be more generalized, even if there are local hotspots.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:15:47 UTC No. 16491038
>>16491033
It's relatively new and in its early stages, but it looks very promising. Not only is it unique with its focus on rocket building, but the representation of each planet is the most true-to-life I have ever seen in a space mod, while also taking creative liberties that are semi-believable. The author is clearly someone who enjoys and appreciates space for what it is, which has me more excited than anything, because all the other space mods don't feel like they have any real care put into them.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:16:37 UTC No. 16491039
>>16491037
anima spiritualism isnt real, but on some other planet it might be
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:17:36 UTC No. 16491040
>>16491037
>rocks
>consciousness
?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:19:13 UTC No. 16491041
>>16491035
also I noticed neither of you could answer the question better than my friend grok could
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:19:16 UTC No. 16491042
>>16491038
I find bizarre how little space mods there are compared to fantasy ones.
I think the old Galacticraft worldgen from the planets is lame, though the wip pics they shared for the new version look a lot better.
I want to give this create addon a shot if it comes out for fabric or if I get a better computer.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:21:04 UTC No. 16491043
>>16491041
>grok
why not using chatgpt instead?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:25:31 UTC No. 16491044
>>16490850
Sorry my kiwi friend but Rocket Lab started as a NZ company and then moved everything that wasn't directly tied to its launch pads in NZ to America.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:25:52 UTC No. 16491045
bill maher destroyed him afterwards https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr-
he probably wont be back
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:26:30 UTC No. 16491046
>>16491045
This post explains a lot about /sfg/'s quality the last few days
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:27:00 UTC No. 16491047
>>16490875
>look at this deformed gridfin
Resolved by moving the gridfins lower on the V2 booster, which also integrates the hot stage into it.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:27:13 UTC No. 16491048
Hello, remember me? I've been away for over a year now, but I just wanted to tell you guys that I never forgot about you, and I still think about /sfg/ now and then.
My interests moved to things beyond spaceflight, and into history, but I've followed space on the side, and I have to say that I never though we'd get to where we are today.
I won't be visiting regularly anymore, but I want you to think I'm never here. I'll be lurking. Sometimes.
t: Finnanon
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:29:13 UTC No. 16491050
>>16491048
I don't want to hear from you unless you can give me some dead Russians as a present
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:30:11 UTC No. 16491051
>>16490925
>>16490947
What are we supposed to be seeing?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:30:53 UTC No. 16491053
>>16491040
yeah, there are reports and ancient stories that rocks indeed have some form of phenomenal experience or animating kami
how that works specifically is beyond my ability to explain, but since that phenomenon can be generalized to everything that exists it would not surprise me at all
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:37:57 UTC No. 16491057
>>16491045
RIP black science man
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:37:59 UTC No. 16491058
>>16491043
I supported Elon by getting a year of premium during the sale so it's grok 2 for me
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:38:58 UTC No. 16491060
>>16491048
I liked when you posted neat old space-related stuff, that was fun.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:43:21 UTC No. 16491065
>>16491050
I haev some bad news 4 u anon
My interests are beyond the current habbenings, history is in the past, and modern day politics are only a hinderence to said history.
Ultimately I feel that US detachment from the conflict would be better for funding for spaceflight. Some part of the defence and pentagon budget should put into funding spaceflight, God willinng
>>16491060
I've been thinking about it too. I don't know if I can get into stamps or translating articles again, or if I'm too detached to get exited over them again.
Also, has the ring section changed at all, or was that meme abandoned for new ones? This is the newest one I had saved
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:44:18 UTC No. 16491066
>>16491048
Ohh, so that's why I haven't heard from you ever since I got back to this general this year after a long hiatus. I still remember that stamp and newspaper archive at the beginning of every thread, good times. Godspeed, finnanon. Don't forget: we are gonna make it :)
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:45:18 UTC No. 16491069
>>16491065
that's still the latest ring
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:45:39 UTC No. 16491070
>>16491015
how would 1mm diameter steel ball bearings do?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:45:41 UTC No. 16491071
>>16490046
>>16490341
https://x.com/tibininin/status/1860
neat
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:46:04 UTC No. 16491072
>>16491067
How much champagne does he waste
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:47:31 UTC No. 16491073
>>16491072
I think it's part of the package deal, the rich people "astronauts" paid for it on the bill
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:47:36 UTC No. 16491074
>>16491066
It hasn't changed since like september of last year, but here it is, incase it's been lost to time
https://drive.google.com/drive/fold
>>16491069
Historic artifact :0 Any new /sfg/ memes, or has it dulled down since? I hope not, times seem to be more exciting than they were in 2020-2023
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:48:49 UTC No. 16491077
>>16491074
I'm not going to spoonfeed you
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:50:24 UTC No. 16491078
>>16491077
ur a cheeky fuk I'll giv u that
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:51:28 UTC No. 16491079
>>16491078
feed me dead russians
for Karelia
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:51:50 UTC No. 16491080
>>16491074
musk was imprisoned by the congressional plover committee
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:52:43 UTC No. 16491081
>>16491074
honestly most memes these days i cant tell if theyre oc or stolen from X
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:54:49 UTC No. 16491083
>>16491081
yeah
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:54:55 UTC No. 16491084
>>16491080
it's over, then?
>>16491079
pls lessen your expectations of le reddit finland warfare, reality is drastically different :(
>>16491081
Don't tell me my years here were the best times this general had in terms of memes
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:55:50 UTC No. 16491085
>>16491084
I warned you this place would go to shit quickly if you idiots made it a general
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:58:45 UTC No. 16491087
>>16491085
It did last some two years, didn't it? btw what happened with that Anon who built a rocket engine? Did it work, or did it end up not being worth it? I remember that WebM of him testing the engine and stumbling after lighting it
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:59:30 UTC No. 16491089
>>16491087
that was the last we heard from him, presumably it blew up and killed him
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:01:37 UTC No. 16491091
>>16491089
Damn. Old /sfg/ really going extinct... guess the hype was the only driving force left here
Oh well, some better times are coming, I hope.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:02:14 UTC No. 16491092
>>16491091
nope
now fuck off
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:03:20 UTC No. 16491094
>>16491074
>here it is
it's like a time capsule
>any new /sfg/ memes
I am going to spoonfeed you: I think that after things like "a starship flew over my house" and the cubic kilometer stuff, it's mostly ironic doomposting, joking about plovers instead of beetles, the Dutch, 50/50 anons, Krystal and Clear, more thunderf00t, total FAA death, brilliant pebbles, mars mattress, the "fuck you" posters, and the constant hate towards urfers, I'm sure I'm missing a lot more, but that's just off the top of my head.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:05:40 UTC No. 16491095
>>16491092
DD:
>>16491094
So nothing has changed? Good to be back home, if only for a short while
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:08:15 UTC No. 16491099
>>16491096
damn I remember reading about those suits in popsci back in the day
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:09:43 UTC No. 16491100
>>16491096
She's still a meme? Is her crotch still unsniffable, or is the technology here now?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:16:56 UTC No. 16491101
>>16490894
Neutron beam irradiation
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:22:19 UTC No. 16491104
Nooglin static fire wen?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:26:13 UTC No. 16491106
>>16491096
Is this patent actually stopping people from working on these kinds of suits? Who is the actual individual or organization who holds the patent?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:33:30 UTC No. 16491111
>>16491002
A single rapidly reusable superheavy stack (V3, aspirational numbers) can lift more in a day than the entire Earth lifts in an entire year right now (including F9), and they want to manufacture three ships per day for single digit millions. There is a paradigm shift coming, and no one, including you, understands the scale of it.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:34:49 UTC No. 16491113
>>16491094
don't forget ye standard dolphin sex, seal torture, rocket gijinka, Charposting, uhhhhhhhhhhh
I miss Alpaca, she was cute
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:35:08 UTC No. 16491114
>>16491111
More in a fiscal quarter. Brycetech's charts (while they were publishing them) were quarterly.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:41:37 UTC No. 16491116
>>16491104
2 weeks
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:42:28 UTC No. 16491119
>>16491110
man, does anyone remember these
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:43:55 UTC No. 16491120
>>16490929
>>16490960
holy based
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:46:06 UTC No. 16491122
>>16491013
>it's weird that musk doesn't subscribe to my weird ass new age mumbo jumbo religious bullshit for which I have no empirical evidence
No, that isn't weird. You are weird.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:50:33 UTC No. 16491124
>>16491123
I beg to differ
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:50:35 UTC No. 16491125
>>16491119
https://www.udio.com/songs/spH6Ra5H
https://www.udio.com/songs/hoFLwhzi
I commissioned some AIslop based on this
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:52:08 UTC No. 16491127
>>16491124
lets see paul allens rocket.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:56:25 UTC No. 16491129
>>16491125
>mixing Martis and Ares
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:57:21 UTC No. 16491131
>>16491106
I believe the hoe in the picture is sitting on the patent for mechanical countermeasure suits yes.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:57:30 UTC No. 16491132
>>16491129
Latin is Latin
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:58:05 UTC No. 16491134
>>16491125
Damn that's neat. The original was some cringey LARP made from some audio mixing experiments I made back in 2021
>March of the Dwarves | Ares Royal Orchestra | 17.20.2067
I have to give props to my past self, the concept is kinda neat. Especially with the old 1x1 LP cover-esque image
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:01:40 UTC No. 16491140
>>16491134
When are you gonna make new videos
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:07:32 UTC No. 16491147
>>16491140
I don't know what to make. Maybe some music thing of a successful Starship launch, but I feel the thing that made vids like this (https://youtu.be/r0-Tsw7I2EU?si=Gt
I can look back at some of them cringing at how ass my editing and how hurried it was back then, but it's still way better than I could come up with on my own now. My vids were mainly centered around /sfg/, so abandoning it depletes me of a creative source. Not that I have much use for my channel now, I can't come up with any videos nowadays.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:12:25 UTC No. 16491150
>>16491147
>https://youtu.be/r0-Tsw7I2EU?si=Gt
KEK, I remember that video. I laughed so much that day with Astra's powerslide and the memes here lmao
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:14:42 UTC No. 16491154
>>16491131
Why doesn't Elon fight intellectual property?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:22:34 UTC No. 16491158
>>16491131
That response answers neither question
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:22:39 UTC No. 16491159
>>16491150
My favorite video remains the one I spent the most effort in, Dis-Astra Strikes Again (https://youtu.be/ZJJQPYfcHws?si=3A
I had a friend in a call with me and we brainstormed some ideas for some dumb shit to include, mainly the "*CLANK* FUCK ME IN DA ASS-HOE "Nigga oh no!"" part from Brandon Rodger's vid, and the the "oh your launch is finished" bit
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:34:45 UTC No. 16491166
>>16491159
You werent here for Flight 1???
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:37:27 UTC No. 16491169
>>16491159
I liked the one about basket weaving forum malding, just seeing the live reactions of anons does it for me, a truly unique experience that sends your sides to orbit. Maybe you could do something like that again for your next video.
> friend in a call with me
The legendary sfg discord server? In all seriousness, must have been fun, I don't know anyone in real life who is aware of this general lol
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:43:35 UTC No. 16491173
Mars is a frozen shithole.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:44:53 UTC No. 16491177
>>16491154
Because mechanical counterpressure suits are meme garbage
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:45:00 UTC No. 16491178
>>16491173
Good
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:45:02 UTC No. 16491179
>>16491166
I was, though I never made a vid of the original F1 hop. But I tell you, I was the guy who made the "he hop" bunny stack image when the stack first hopped.
looking back I can almost remember exactly what was going on in my life just by the references and shit going on in the videos, for example the SN8 vid (https://youtu.be/2TxiKyBus2s?si=Au
Also that vid had a comment by Cost-Plus Content, which I'm sad to see that he never came back. Guess it was the other /sfg/ channel that died around the same time :(
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:45:08 UTC No. 16491180
>>16491114
Imagine if they stuck mass simulators on the flight test starships and doubled 2024’s upmass in 4 launches.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:46:10 UTC No. 16491181
>>16491177
source for this claim?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:47:10 UTC No. 16491183
>>16491173
Yes? Tell us something we don't know.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:58:33 UTC No. 16491188
>>16490755
Wouldn't they add them to ship 33 first so they can see if the catch points would survive reentry?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:58:54 UTC No. 16491189
>>16491181
Any report on their functionality
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:59:07 UTC No. 16491190
>>16491154
it's not like a copyright or a patent or anything, it's just she's the only one with any experience in it and those notes are her "intellectual property"
if you wanted to make your own you'd be starting from basically scratch, and nobody feels the need to do that
I don't actually think having her notes would help you make one that was good
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:00:00 UTC No. 16491191
>>16491183
It's as bad as Winnipeg
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:02:36 UTC No. 16491193
>>16490909
>chasers in /sfg/
oh my!
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:02:43 UTC No. 16491194
>>16491169
I remember when it was called the 4ASS discord server
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:04:22 UTC No. 16491196
>>16490960
>new mc space mod
>check out the features
>no staging mechanics
aaand into the trash it goes
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:05:34 UTC No. 16491198
>>16490962
LMAO is that what spacesudoer looks like irl?????
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:06:27 UTC No. 16491199
>>16491191
You've convinced me, let's colonize Venus instead. I wanna see those Venusian amazonas women.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80J
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:07:17 UTC No. 16491200
>>16491184
source for this claim?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:13:53 UTC No. 16491202
>>16491113
How can you mention dolphin sex but not ASS2ASS?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:15:53 UTC No. 16491206
>>16491200
You need to stop asking for sources all the time, it's not good for your mental health.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:17:56 UTC No. 16491208
>>16491202
it's dead
SpaceX killed it
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:18:04 UTC No. 16491209
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:18:38 UTC No. 16491210
>>16491048
Get back to posting space themed post stamps
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:20:24 UTC No. 16491212
>>16491209
spessex
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:21:59 UTC No. 16491213
>>16491169
>still believes in the /sfg/ discord
do you also believe in santa? the joke is that it doesnt exist.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:23:13 UTC No. 16491215
>>16491208
omg they are FUCKIN
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:23:46 UTC No. 16491216
>>16491215
they should touch fins when they do it
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:26:26 UTC No. 16491217
>>16491216
gey
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:26:38 UTC No. 16491220
>>16491216
Is that like kissing
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:26:51 UTC No. 16491221
>>16491213
how many layers of irony are you on right now, anon? I'm little tired, so I'll assume between 0 and 1.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:28:47 UTC No. 16491223
>>16491213
If it doesn't exist then why is a link to the invite in the chatgpt 3.5 training data?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:29:11 UTC No. 16491224
>>16491221
Zero
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:30:01 UTC No. 16491225
>>16491213
>reddit nerd didn't get the invite
Kek
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:32:42 UTC No. 16491229
>>16491223
for anyone wondering, the link is also in the pastebin
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:34:05 UTC No. 16491232
>>16491220
even worse, I think it's like holding hands
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:35:07 UTC No. 16491234
>>16491224
stupid frogposter
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:36:30 UTC No. 16491235
>>16491234
But but but what about this image I found?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:37:13 UTC No. 16491236
>>16491235
zero frogs, therefore good
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:37:28 UTC No. 16491237
>>16491235
cosmic ballet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fmo
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:40:09 UTC No. 16491238
>>16491236
and this one?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:47:03 UTC No. 16491250
>>16491239
that design has to be updated, an anti-plover system should be added
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:47:37 UTC No. 16491251
>>16491250
no. we need a clean sheet design
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:54:00 UTC No. 16491256
>>16490600
>>16490640
Looks like shit. This whole tile idea is retarded, the ship is clearly melting on each flight being saved purely by the stainless steel. The whole thermal protection system is gonna have to be redesigned or these things will never fly more than once.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:07:33 UTC No. 16491263
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:07:35 UTC No. 16491264
>>16491256
no no No No NO NO NO! NO! NO! NO! ELON SAID ITS READY FOR MARS NOW! THEY ARE GOING TO CATCH IT NEXT FLIGHT! ELON SAID! ELON SAID! ELON SAID! ITS ALL GOING TO HAPPEN
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:15:44 UTC No. 16491267
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:16:14 UTC No. 16491268
>>16491256
It's fine. Much better shape than than F9 stage 2 after deorbit
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:21:14 UTC No. 16491270
elon's next venture should be affordable universal healthcare
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:25:07 UTC No. 16491274
>>16491270
We've got to solve the problems on mars first chud
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:25:27 UTC No. 16491275
>>16491270
heres a (You)
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:29:11 UTC No. 16491277
I really wish one of those podcast guys Elon occasionally talks to would try to convince him that building a giant space telescope is worthwhile
>we can find planets that could easily be colonized
>new discoveries in physics could unlock the secret to great spaceflight technologies, maybe even FTL
>hot ayy girls
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:31:55 UTC No. 16491278
>>16491277
they did some study, but dunno wtf happened to it
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:33:08 UTC No. 16491280
>>16491277
astrology has nothing to do with physics and going to other solar systems is just sci-fi crap
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:34:23 UTC No. 16491283
>>16491278
At least put forward a cheap single-piece telescope that uses the whole diameter for the lens
But imagine if we got a space-assembled mirror telescope with a ton of big hexagons
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:35:30 UTC No. 16491285
>>16491277
we need to focus on problems in the solar system first
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:41:27 UTC No. 16491291
>>16491283
7 hexagons. maybe more
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:49:59 UTC No. 16491295
An Electron might be going up from Wallops in a few minutes, a suborbital HASTE launch. They've had one hold, but appear to be recycling for another attempt.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:51:00 UTC No. 16491297
>>16491295
only one janky livestream that I've found:
https://www.youtube.com/live/A_3q2W
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:51:24 UTC No. 16491300
why doesnt spacex launch from wallops?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:54:23 UTC No. 16491304
>>16491300
Wallops launch facilities are tiny.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:01:02 UTC No. 16491310
>>16491295
>a fucking tugboat
launch delayed at least another hour
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:05:21 UTC No. 16491313
>>16491283
Just a Starship that jettisons most of its nosecone to reveal the mirror. The whole thing is the telescope. If you like, you can send a team of astronauts to go convert the propellant section into living quarters.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:22:41 UTC No. 16491321
https://x.com/SpaceflightNow/status
>Tonight's Starlink 9-13 mission is the 400th orbital launch of a SpaceX Falcon 9 and the 100th Falcon 9 to fly from the company's West Coast launch pad at Vandenberg Space Force Base. It also appears to be the first Falcon 9 launch that will not be streamed live by SpaceX.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:29:43 UTC No. 16491324
>>16491321
>it wont be livestreamed
wtf why
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:30:07 UTC No. 16491325
>>16491321
It's live right now https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDGlyWa
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:31:42 UTC No. 16491327
>>16491321
Angle was bad tonight, I lost it behind a tree and couldn't see the separation.
F
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:34:38 UTC No. 16491328
>>16491325
There was a Falcon 9 launch and the most exciting thing about it was the brief thought that it wouldn't be streaming
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:36:34 UTC No. 16491330
>>16491321
>It also appears to be the first Falcon 9 launch that will not be streamed live by SpaceX
Amazing. It's actually happened. I was literally just talking about this a few threads ago.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:42:42 UTC No. 16491331
its going to take forever to get a colony on one of jupiter's moons. we might not see one until next century.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:00:06 UTC No. 16491339
Nothing ever happens
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:01:30 UTC No. 16491340
>>16491339
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dB
rocket lab launched
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:03:12 UTC No. 16491341
>>16491340
...maybe with some stability issues
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:03:45 UTC No. 16491342
https://www.youtube.com/live/M-fXYs
what is she up to bros
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:05:39 UTC No. 16491344
>>16491342
Nothing.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:11:57 UTC No. 16491346
>>16491342
A rocket quiz for a school class
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:18:06 UTC No. 16491351
Launch clearfags into GEO
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:20:45 UTC No. 16491352
>>16491346
oh wait not a school class it's an annual space event in Mitaka, a city right next to Tokyo
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:25:15 UTC No. 16491354
https://x.com/RussianSpaceWeb/statu
>There are reports from ISS about toxic smell aboard the newly arrived Progress MS-29 cargo ship, which forced to urgently close the hatch into its cargo compartment
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:39:42 UTC No. 16491356
>>16490935
What video is this comment from? I just want to talk to him.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:41:11 UTC No. 16491359
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:47:41 UTC No. 16491361
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:49:16 UTC No. 16491362
>>16491359
Placating the ULA snipers
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:51:55 UTC No. 16491363
>>16491359
Thats crazy
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 07:01:29 UTC No. 16491369
casey is on spaces rn
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 07:09:43 UTC No. 16491372
>>16491196
It will get them soon. That's why I built a two-stage rocket.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 07:20:16 UTC No. 16491379
>>16491359
Best day of that coast guard guy's life.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 07:29:54 UTC No. 16491385
>>16491354
thank you based russia for making the iss slightly interesting
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 08:05:37 UTC No. 16491400
>>16491357
Probably .50cal because each 20mm round requires a $200 tax stamp. NFA delenda est.
t. /k/
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 08:06:49 UTC No. 16491402
>>16491400
doens't apply to uscg idiot
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 08:07:31 UTC No. 16491404
>>16491400
Are the rounds a DD or only if the are explosive?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 08:13:23 UTC No. 16491406
>>16491400
stupid nigger, the coast guard unconstitutionally bans weapons on boats by civilians anyway
>>16491404
only if the rounds contain more than some small mass in ounces of explosive
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 08:28:15 UTC No. 16491410
>>16491263
big benis :DD
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 08:32:57 UTC No. 16491413
>>16490984
Imagine calling yourself a fucking scientist and saying that profit should be the only incentive towards scientific and technological progress
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 10:30:05 UTC No. 16491469
Wen hop?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 10:31:24 UTC No. 16491471
>>16491469
After I fucking strangle you
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 10:33:23 UTC No. 16491472
>>16491469
two weeks
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 10:34:24 UTC No. 16491473
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWy
>Pad Inspections Ahead of Starship Flight 7 | SpaceX Boca Chica
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 10:57:29 UTC No. 16491486
>>16491480
He should launch on 6th January to honor American patriots.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 11:09:39 UTC No. 16491490
>>16490984
Black Science Guy is just an an astroonomer, just deal with it and move on.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 11:16:42 UTC No. 16491492
>>16491091
that faggot that linked here from /pol/ multiple times was what really killed /sfg/, and the early-stager too
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 11:57:45 UTC No. 16491510
>>16491357
>>16491359
>somebody is getting PAID doing this
lucky bastard
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:02:37 UTC No. 16491512
It's only another 75 years. Same distance as 1950
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:30:03 UTC No. 16491532
>>16491351
>free trip to space
>with my wife
based. I don't even need to come back. We'll find out if jellobabies are real
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:32:28 UTC No. 16491533
>>16491532
>sharing a "wife" with thousands of other simps
disgusting
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:35:56 UTC No. 16491537
>>16491533
It's a macropolycule
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:35:57 UTC No. 16491538
>>16491490
He likes to sit in the corner and watch from afar while Elon is out there piercing the heavens.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:40:10 UTC No. 16491541
>>16491537
I'd rather have a macrocouple, thank you very much
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:48:15 UTC No. 16491544
>>16491533
>all he can think about is cuck shit
SAD. Meanwhile I'll be in orbit taking Clear's virginity and getting myself a son
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:59:58 UTC No. 16491549
>>16491538
well some people were just born with a heaven-piercing cock, and others, ehhhhh
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:02:17 UTC No. 16491551
>>16491550
and Zhuque-3 (continued from previous post)
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:03:44 UTC No. 16491553
>>16491541
In human history there will be someone who tried to fuck a Nebula
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:05:29 UTC No. 16491554
>>16491553
best of luck o7
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:10:09 UTC No. 16491557
>>16491270
Not a technology problem
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:11:39 UTC No. 16491559
>>16491544
>clear's virginity
should we tell him?
I'd hate to break the poor boys heart
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:14:21 UTC No. 16491562
>>16491100
You'll have to imagine the smell
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:15:16 UTC No. 16491564
>>16491277
>>16491283
>>16491313
You're thinking about it all wrong. Starship will be optimized to launch thin Starlink satellites out of that little door. You need a system of mirrors that can be stacked and then deployed with very little variation from Starlink. You definitely wouldn't throw away a Starship
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:15:22 UTC No. 16491565
>>16491108
Doing the work
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:22:23 UTC No. 16491567
>>16491559
Sorry anon, your lies won't affect me. I already checked her hymen is still intact. But keep seething buddy!
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:23:34 UTC No. 16491568
>>16491352
Mitaka is in Tokyo
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:59:53 UTC No. 16491585
>>16490984
>>16490985
maher put him in the chair and roasted him over scientific american. I think bill gets more hostile to tyson every time I wonder if appearances will continue
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:01:06 UTC No. 16491586
>>16491013
>It's weird how Musk is under the impression that consciousness is something restricted to humans, rather than a part of reality itself.
Does he? Also should we take the chance? Is it ok if we die because aliens are out there?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:02:27 UTC No. 16491587
>>16491071
based
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:21:03 UTC No. 16491597
>>16491591
I call the Elysium Mons peninsula
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:27:46 UTC No. 16491600
>>16491591
this geography sucks tbhdesu
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:35:11 UTC No. 16491601
>>16491591
Reminder that Pavonis Mons, site of the future space elevator, is mine
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:58:27 UTC No. 16491607
>>16491357
>>16491359
is this real
why in gods name
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:59:20 UTC No. 16491608
>SpaceX forgot to stream the starlink launch last night
https://x.com/Blobifie/status/18605
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:04:40 UTC No. 16491610
>>16491608
Why was the link to your personal twitter necessary?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:05:53 UTC No. 16491611
>>16491610
>twitter
IT'S X
IT'S X
IT'S X
IT'S X
IT'S X
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:06:29 UTC No. 16491612
>>16491607
personally im not seeing it. whats more likely - a rocket which just landed in the ocean ruptures fuel lines etc and explodes? Or that, for some reason, it gets shot up by a mysterious boat which just happens to be in the area?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:06:54 UTC No. 16491613
>>16491611
>It's MA'AM
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:09:06 UTC No. 16491614
>>16491610
because its full of bangers
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:22:54 UTC No. 16491622
Latest rumors of CASC CZ12 series from the Zhuhai air show are nonsensical.
>SAST CZ12 4xYF100K 3.8m kerolox expendable
>SAST VTVL 3xLongyun 70 3.8m Methalox reusable demonstrator (2 flights)
>SAST One off 7xLongyun 70 3.8m Methalox reusable (one off reusable somehow???)
>SAST CZ12A 7xYF102R 3.8m Kerolox reusable
>SAST CZ12B 9xYF102R 4.2m Kerolox reusable
What a joke. Hope the private sector btfo them.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:02:03 UTC No. 16491645
>>16491591
I call one of the Hellas islands
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:03:47 UTC No. 16491647
https://www.rocketlabusa.com/assets
>Third batch of five satellites for the French Kinéis IoT constellation designed to operate with 25 nanosatellites of 30 kg each. The constellation will enable Kinéis, a company backed by private and public investors including the French government’s space agency CNES (Centre National d'Études Spatiales) and CLS (Collecte Localisation Satellites) an international space-based solutions provider, to improve its global IoT connectivity.
What the hell is "IoT"? I know it stands for "internet of things", but just what does THAT mean?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:09:28 UTC No. 16491649
>>16491647
Most people using internet of things to mean alexa or a smart fridge.
When companies say it, they mean things like monitoring automated farming equipment, livestock management, calculating crop yields, fleet tracking, energy usage etc. Much more big picture stuff.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:17:37 UTC No. 16491652
>>16491647
>What the hell is "IoT"?
on the small scale consumer end of things it tends to be for stuff that only fags like, so it stands for Internet Of Twats. As anon said >>16491649 it does have other uses.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:20:04 UTC No. 16491654
>>16491649
>>16491652
https://www.kineis.com/en/spatial-i
I see, that's cool
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:30:31 UTC No. 16491660
>>16491653
Nobody cares about yuro opinion pieces. Show me Berger, Foust or Davenport and I will listen.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:30:47 UTC No. 16491661
>there's enough nitrogen on Mars to bubble in half the US as livable space
>plants can grow in normal Martian atmosphere, pressurized and warmed
>some industrial processes would work better with no oxygen around and few need nitrogen
We can bubble over the whole planet and support billions of people. Remind me why anyone ever talks about terraforming?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:33:15 UTC No. 16491664
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:36:57 UTC No. 16491667
>>16491660
Only thing worst than Elon cocksuckers is Berger's rimmers.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:48:33 UTC No. 16491674
>there's no money to be made on mars
do they think that people are getting free rides to mars? no that shit cost millions of dollars for a ticket.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:55:22 UTC No. 16491679
>>16491674
Musk said it wwill cost 100k incel, so either he is lying or you are....
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:56:20 UTC No. 16491680
>>16491674
>land men on Mars first
>claim it
>charge all other space agencies for samples
There I made Mars profitable.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:57:09 UTC No. 16491681
>>16491674
Charging millions of dollars per person is incompatible with colonization, unless there's also a much less expensive option (or inflation gets a lot worse) because there wouldn't be enough people with the money and the desire to go.
Also, Elon has stated that he's not trying to make money on Mars colonization.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:57:39 UTC No. 16491682
>>16491679
>>16491681
the price drops over time
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:01:01 UTC No. 16491684
>>16491612
>just happens to be in the area
You mean the area that's meant to be cleared of boats before the launch?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:01:24 UTC No. 16491685
you will put your entire networth into the Elon Musk Martian Fund
and you will receive Martian Doge Coins
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:04:41 UTC No. 16491686
>>16491674
>free rides to mars
Labor on Mars will be valuable enough to offset the cost of the trip. Like miners in remote Alaska, do you think they pay for the flight out? Even with automation well beyond the level that makes economic sense on Earth, the road to self sufficiency is long and hard and will require many more humans than are currently there.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:04:44 UTC No. 16491687
>>16491679
he said 200k in 2016, and somewhere else I saw 250k. but that was assuming 100 people on a flight. In reality it would be far fewer people, and probably 10X as expensive. expect at least 2 million
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:07:10 UTC No. 16491688
>>16491684
The company runs a whole fleet of recovery vessels for picking up stuff when it splashes down. They probably had one of theirs out in the area for ship landing too.
https://space-offshore.com/spacex
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:08:03 UTC No. 16491689
>>16491614
it's really not
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:08:16 UTC No. 16491690
>only profit is from selling tickets to individuals
nasa will spend alot on a mars colony with their own base connected to spacex's. they'll pay for marslink too.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:10:46 UTC No. 16491692
>>16491684
They had video filmed from small inflatable dingies
https://www.friendsofnasa.org/2024/
i doubt they were out there without a larger ship somewhere nearby
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:14:14 UTC No. 16491695
>>16491591
the dutch will dig a canal around the southern edge of the tharsis region and turn it into an island continent.
we will finally have mountains.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:17:30 UTC No. 16491696
>>16491661
>bubble in half the US as livable space
>We can bubble over the whole planet
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:19:35 UTC No. 16491697
>>16491696
Mars is smaller than the United States
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:20:48 UTC No. 16491700
>>16491696
Read the post goober. The pressurized volumes without atmospheric nitrogen can be used for farming and industry
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:22:12 UTC No. 16491701
>>16491699
How short is he lmao?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:23:54 UTC No. 16491705
>>16491699
>kate has bigger arms than insprucker
wtf
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:27:49 UTC No. 16491710
>>16491705
Insprucker has been a skinnyfat desk nerd his entire life.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:28:54 UTC No. 16491711
>>16491699
kill yourself
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:29:38 UTC No. 16491712
>>16491699
>>16491702
when shes off the screen i see her for what she is: a 40 something mid woman.
But when tice is on the webcast i want to fuck her face so badly. Why is this phenomena happening bros?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:32:19 UTC No. 16491713
>>16491331
If the first Jovian system colony fingerhold efforts occur after 2100, it will only be due to people focusing on the inner system, because the basic capability to attempt the effort will be available before the 2050s begin.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:33:29 UTC No. 16491714
>>16491712
seems younger than 40s. surprised. must be her youthful exuberance about rockets shining through
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:34:06 UTC No. 16491715
>>16491713
the flight there would take years. your bones would break if you tried to walk on a moon.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:34:12 UTC No. 16491716
>>16491712
Have sex anon.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:38:06 UTC No. 16491720
>>16491699
>ripped jeans
Does she think she's 16 years old. wtf?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:42:21 UTC No. 16491722
>>16491720
I'll make her feel like she is
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:46:48 UTC No. 16491726
>>16491722
how?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:48:05 UTC No. 16491728
>>16491726
take her out on a date to a highschool
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:50:35 UTC No. 16491729
>>16491674
the martial economy will be a deregulated one allowing for many companies to be able to do research and buildouts that are simply infeasible to do on earth. ayn rand will somehow be entirely redeemed lol
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:51:02 UTC No. 16491730
>>16491685
nice
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:52:03 UTC No. 16491732
>>16491689
trust me bro
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:55:31 UTC No. 16491737
will i be able to own neurolink implanted slaves on mars?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:56:05 UTC No. 16491738
>>16491585
>maher put him in the chair and roasted him over scientific american
What did Black Science Man have to do with Scientific American going woke back in 2000 or so?
(I know that's when it started because I had a paper subscription then and dropped it when they suddenly went full global warmtard. Then the editor was on Charlie Rose back in '08 or so and admitted it.)
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:57:27 UTC No. 16491741
>>16491649
Remember, the "S" in "IoT" stands for security!
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:58:03 UTC No. 16491743
>>16491741
ToT uoooooooh cunny
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:59:53 UTC No. 16491745
>>16491743
>Thing of Things
Okay.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:00:42 UTC No. 16491746
>>16491653
NASA is only really obsolete in designing manned rockets. And that's mostly Congress's fault for forcing SLS down the throat of NASA's budget.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:02:18 UTC No. 16491750
>>16491747
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18607
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:02:47 UTC No. 16491751
>>16491750
Tax is theft
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:03:41 UTC No. 16491753
>>16491622
I appreciate you Chinese space poster, and I hope we keep getting news fron you
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:04:28 UTC No. 16491755
>>16491712
You have noticed the effects of makeup, lighting and hairstyling (and in this case not showing arms and shoulders)
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:04:59 UTC No. 16491756
>>16491743
>random answer relating to sex
It this the cumbrain who keeps posting pictures of meh women in orbit?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:05:52 UTC No. 16491758
>>16491715
>not spinmaxxxing your way out to the gas giants
ngmi
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:07:36 UTC No. 16491760
>>16491622
>rumors
Chinks make so many renders and rumors that I can't care until they actually re-launch something.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:08:39 UTC No. 16491761
>>16491747
Government contracting rules are complicated for a reason, and that reason is because they are required to do business with the American people, i.e. morons. Every safety rule is written in blood and every contract rule is written in tears. That guy he mentions getting kicked out for helping Boeing deserved it.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:10:41 UTC No. 16491763
>>16491715
get gud, just lift bro
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:12:00 UTC No. 16491765
>>16491732
I decline
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:14:28 UTC No. 16491766
>>16491758
>he's still spincucking
lol just travel at light speed, pleb. Oh, what's that? You don't have enough energy? Sounds like a poorfag cope to me.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:14:56 UTC No. 16491767
>>16491765
I'm trustworthy
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:22:54 UTC No. 16491769
>>16491767
I have already seen your twitter account, you are known to me, I think you're dogshit
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:25:09 UTC No. 16491771
>>16491769
n-no
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:28:33 UTC No. 16491772
>>16491771
bro literally all you do is repost the Hawaiian furry and the fucking Canadian twink, get your shit together and make some original goddamn content if you want me to follow you
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:28:38 UTC No. 16491773
when people start posting bsky space news here we know x is kaput
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:29:19 UTC No. 16491774
>>16491773
happening next year btw.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:35:18 UTC No. 16491778
>>16491687
I fully expect that might be the right number, however I also expect that anyone willing to work on Mars will have contracts that pay a lot with a free return in 2 or 4 years (depending on the job) with any extra time after those transfer windows being pure profit for the worker.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:40:25 UTC No. 16491779
>>16491773
yeah, like that'll ever happen
literally the only space person on bsky is that one crazy NASA astrooonomer Johnathan McDowell
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:40:30 UTC No. 16491780
>>16491778
tickets to Mars: free
tickets back from Mars: $50 million
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:48:11 UTC No. 16491783
>>16491715
>I'm a retard
Ok, but that doesn't change the fact that spingravity is easy and will be a staple design feature of any crewed vehicle with one-way spaceflight durations of over 6 months by the year 2040.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:52:10 UTC No. 16491786
>>16491766
>proposing we spin a vehicle with a wide radius tether so the centrifugal force imitates normal gravity to keep people healthy is exactly like proposing we go light speed
Spin gravity is so far within our capabilities that the fucking Gemini program demonstrated it.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:53:23 UTC No. 16491787
so what's up with the smelly progress
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:54:23 UTC No. 16491789
>>16491787
huh, what now
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:54:25 UTC No. 16491790
>>16491787
Just the collapse of the rotting corpse that is "russian" spaceflight, nothing to worry about
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:54:38 UTC No. 16491791
>>16491779
just make an orbital telescope god damn its not that hard
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:55:14 UTC No. 16491792
>>16491791
please don't actually read their shitlib seething
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:55:55 UTC No. 16491794
>>16491772
omggg i love being parasocial to my favorite spitter ecelebs
<3
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:56:45 UTC No. 16491795
>>16491789
it's STINKY
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:57:58 UTC No. 16491797
>>16491794
if you make content you can be reciprocally parasocial, which in other words just means esocial
it's fun, I should make a KSP tutorial video for spaceplanes at some point
>>16491789
the Ziggers are collapsing
TZD soon
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:58:09 UTC No. 16491798
>>16491787
What's the nature of the smell? Something rotten? Or something leaking? Or did one of the cosmonauts shit himself during launch and that's been wafting through the Soyuz since?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:58:23 UTC No. 16491799
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:00:53 UTC No. 16491801
>>16491799
>Video compression artifacting
Yeah, it's truly over.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:01:19 UTC No. 16491802
>>16491786
how? the thing with the cable was a frustration failure
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:01:50 UTC No. 16491803
>>16491801
this
actual flerf tier analysis by "expert" sfg anons
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:02:22 UTC No. 16491804
>>16491799
none of them are really very round and its no mystery why
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:02:34 UTC No. 16491805
>>16491780
Most likely outcome. Starship on Earth is cheap. Return Starship on Mars will be exorbitant
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:02:55 UTC No. 16491806
>>16491799
It's over, all raptors deformed during liftoff
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:04:53 UTC No. 16491808
>>16491256
>the ship is clearly melting on each flight being saved purely by the stainless steel
So it's not melting
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:05:01 UTC No. 16491810
>>16491799
>Hot exhaust causing mirages
>Shitty video compression
Actual low tier bait
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:05:42 UTC No. 16491811
reminds me of those people that use digital zoom on images of stars and say they're like blobs of religion goo or whatever
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:06:52 UTC No. 16491813
>>16491797
>twitter poster
>spaceplane appreciator
>off topic war spammer
why does everything I hate always end up being so consistent
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:08:39 UTC No. 16491814
>>16491801
>>16491803
>>16491810
But if it's just compression artefacts and mirages, why it's so consistent during the whole video?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:08:44 UTC No. 16491815
>>16491813
when we meet in space we can fight to the death
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:09:58 UTC No. 16491817
>>16491815
You have neither the skills nor the funds to ever realistically join me in space
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:10:25 UTC No. 16491819
>>16491811
or the girl that took credit for some guys' code that made an image of black holes
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:13:25 UTC No. 16491823
>>16491817
yeah I can only pay for myself, not gonna waste money on losers like yourself
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:13:43 UTC No. 16491826
>>16491802
>How?
Simple, it wasn't a failure and you're lying when you call it one.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:18:19 UTC No. 16491830
>>16491823
What? Are you ESL too? Are you the fucking nigger that's been misinterpreting every single post I make for like a week?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:19:47 UTC No. 16491831
>>16491830
>poorfag is whining again
yawn. And no, I'm not giving you a loan. Get a job already
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:23:00 UTC No. 16491833
>>16491826
well, the way i remember reading about it was that they could never get the set up to stabilize because there was always some waves in the cable upsetting the balance. Its not that spin gravity doesnt work, just that using a flexible cable like that wasn't a great way to go about demonstrating it.
maybe im remember wrong but there it is.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:24:27 UTC No. 16491835
is there a good post somewhere of how exactly the v2 starship is different? or are we on v3 now? anyway the one being launched next
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:25:36 UTC No. 16491837
>>16491831
This isn't your blog and it's not a mental illness counseling service. Fuck off and go be a gay retard somewhere else.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:26:01 UTC No. 16491838
>>16491831
>focuses on not spending money
You can't evade my pattern recognition skills dutchfag
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:33:26 UTC No. 16491843
>>16491837
>sees some light bantz
>immediately spergs out
>GAY GAY FAGGOT GAY METAL ILLNESS AAAAAAAAA
why are you like this? You don't look cool anon. You're just embarrassing yourself. Why not leave for a bit?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:34:26 UTC No. 16491845
>>16491835
Flaps are brought back above the centerline to solve the hinge burnthrough problem. Tanks are stretched for another 25% propellant mass (1200t->1500t). Other than that I think it's improved Raptors and internal systems.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:34:27 UTC No. 16491846
>>16491835
next one is V2/block 2
its has one ring more, so its like 1.5m taller
the upper flaps are thinner and a bit different shape and they have been moved up a bit more and behind the ship, so they aren't at 90 degrees anymore, something more like 120 degrees so they won't be in the plasma stream anymore
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:35:04 UTC No. 16491847
>>16491842
i like engines that you can turn off
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:35:28 UTC No. 16491848
>>16491842
bait or retarded
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:35:40 UTC No. 16491849
>>16491847
Sometimes you have to commit, anon.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:36:03 UTC No. 16491850
>>16491814
>Why is the digital camera at extreme zoom levels consistent with its encoding throughout the video?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:41:18 UTC No. 16491855
>>16491837
It looks like he's the kind you have to ignore
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:41:31 UTC No. 16491857
>>16491842
>Not advocating for reusable F9 boosters on Superheavy
Cringe
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:42:28 UTC No. 16491858
>>16491849
if a guy can't control his engine then what can he control?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:42:38 UTC No. 16491859
>>16491857
>6 pad landings and one booster catch per launch
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:48:27 UTC No. 16491860
>>16491801
It's on par with the retards saying the three gorges dam will collapse because the satellite image is poorly projected over some low quality geometry
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:48:59 UTC No. 16491861
>>16491833
So yeah, lying when you say it didn't work. It did work, and because it was the jankiest possible first attempt, there were some minor and easily fixed issues.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:50:33 UTC No. 16491862
>>16491861
ok anon, whatever. great talking with you.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:50:54 UTC No. 16491863
>>16491861
so why weren't these le minor and easily fixed issues fixed?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:53:32 UTC No. 16491864
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:55:11 UTC No. 16491866
>>16491842
Why need SRB's when you have engineered liquid fueled rocket engines to have a similar TWR? (raptor)
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:56:02 UTC No. 16491867
>>16491866
The ghost of Shelby possessed him
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:58:04 UTC No. 16491868
>>16491862
Fuck you.
>>16491863
Because NASA wished upon a monkey's paw in order to pull off Apollo at the cost of tying up NASA into defense contractor politics so badly that it could never accomplish anything good again.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:00:23 UTC No. 16491871
>>16491858
His bowels, maybe
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:01:22 UTC No. 16491875
>>16491868
sounds like a lot of cope for denying that spingrav didn't work. I'm sure all the evil defense contractors made deals behind closed doors to assassinate everyone related to developing that technology because uhhhhhh They just did, okay?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:03:36 UTC No. 16491877
>>16491875
Sounds like cope for denying everything we know about how politics ruined the space shuttle, ISS, constellation, and SLS/Orion. Fucking retard.
I'm done entertaining faggots like you. Spreading bullshit lies has turned your soul into a piece of shit.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:06:01 UTC No. 16491879
>>16491868
>Fuck you.
is it really necessary to be like this? i said i could be remember wrong but having read quite a bit about it and the guys who carried it out, thats the impression i got. i didn't say spin gravity cant work...just that the particular experiment they did had a lot of issues and the guys grew frustrated trying to make it work.
if you have some links which differ from this impression than you are free to post them up.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:07:13 UTC No. 16491882
>>16491871
doubt it
>>16491877
whats wrong anon? why so much vitriol?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:12:07 UTC No. 16491888
>>16491877
sounds like someone's cranky! You should go rest anon, no reason to get mad on the internet unless you're a pathetic loser. And you're not a pathetic loser, are you? And no, I'm still not taking you to space with me.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:12:24 UTC No. 16491889
>>16491879
fuck you.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:12:44 UTC No. 16491890
>>16491780
ticket back to Urf LEO: free
ticket for dragon shuttle ride down: $50M
or you can take your chances going down on Starship, better strap in tight
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:14:41 UTC No. 16491892
>>16491799
that'll buff right out
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:15:13 UTC No. 16491893
>>16491892
w-what is he doing with the tape?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:17:22 UTC No. 16491894
>>16491842
SRBs are a cope for insisting on hydrolox
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:21:09 UTC No. 16491898
>>16491860
Exactly what I thought of.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:21:10 UTC No. 16491899
>>16491859
stop anon, I can't get any more erect
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:22:28 UTC No. 16491902
>>16491888
i think he needs his nap!
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:23:12 UTC No. 16491903
>>16491893
staging
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:23:29 UTC No. 16491904
>>16491859
sounds like the betting opportunities are getting more interesting
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:24:06 UTC No. 16491905
>>16491893
Applying silica-embedded LADS, the only flexible heat shield solution. Product of 4ASS.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:27:12 UTC No. 16491910
https://www.mcmaster.com/products/n
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:29:28 UTC No. 16491915
>every other post is the same autist sperging out
I'll be back tomorrow
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:38:37 UTC No. 16491926
>>16491893
protecting a sexy rocket. she needs it
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:42:23 UTC No. 16491930
>>16491915
please don't come back, we don't need more spergs here
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:48:23 UTC No. 16491936
>>16491933
what are those? air mines?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:50:28 UTC No. 16491939
>>16491933
why wouldnt anyone defend this?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:51:25 UTC No. 16491940
>>16491936
Few thousands of drone swarms. That can become air mines, air grenade droppers, air snipers, air smart missiles, air smart bullets, etc.
The next war has no real answer other than to deploy their own counter drone swarms.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:52:08 UTC No. 16491941
>>16491933
yeah, musky is kinda cringe here. Should be a reminder along with Nigger De GAY Faggot that experts can only be experts in their own fields.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:56:51 UTC No. 16491945
>>16491936
ENEMY MINES?!
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:00:13 UTC No. 16491946
>>16491933
The question is what's going faster right now, advancements in drone warfare or jammer technology?
Because at some point manual control of drones will not work anymore and then you need to give them AI to work on their own.
And then skynet becomes real.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:01:59 UTC No. 16491947
>>16491591
Not enough water.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:03:56 UTC No. 16491948
anyone know what to do with a cat thats a bit of a bitch? she meows outside my bedroom door until I let her in, then only meows at the window for me to be let out. even though my mums rule is that the cats cant go out after dark so they dont get run over. I let her out anyway, and guess what, she comes round the catflap (enter only mode at night) and comes to meow at my door again. rince and repeat. what do I do?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:05:23 UTC No. 16491949
>>16491948
kick it. it may take a few cycles but she'll get the idea. cats are smart like that. right now you have no respect from the cat.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:06:02 UTC No. 16491951
>>16491946
>give them AI to work on their own
Allegedly(by a company with a clear interest in everyone "knowing") it already happened, someone lost control of their drone and the AI took over and autonomously went and destroyed the target.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:07:09 UTC No. 16491953
>>16491948
dont let that fucker out and don't let it in your room, use ear plugs if it continues to whine
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:08:03 UTC No. 16491954
>>16491936
Just useless drone swarm aerial acrobatics. Sure they look cool, but tell me when they can carry bunker buster missiles.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:08:09 UTC No. 16491955
>>16491941
musk is right, fighter jets are not cost effective against drones
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:09:10 UTC No. 16491956
>>16491954
why would they need to carry bunker busters? just use conventional missiles for that
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:09:13 UTC No. 16491957
>>16491955
just stick a DEW on the underside and then it will be
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:09:25 UTC No. 16491959
>>16491947
How expensive would it be to move a city to mars?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:10:10 UTC No. 16491961
>>16491957
the problem is the pilots
no getting around that
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:10:37 UTC No. 16491964
>>16491956
Because normal missiles won't do shit against bunkers?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:11:28 UTC No. 16491965
>>16491961
If only 6th gen fighter were designed with the capability to be flown autonomously with CCA...
Oh wait.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:12:09 UTC No. 16491966
>>16491948
Leave your bedroom door cracked so she can come and go as you please, mine loves me because I always give her scratches and attention so she just sleeps next to me. Dont let her out since yours apparantly leaves to cross the street, mine doesnt have that issue since we’re gated but I would say just keep her inside, and maybe leave a litterbox or something just in case its for that.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:12:57 UTC No. 16491967
>>16491838
this is the dutchfag falseflagging btw
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:17:29 UTC No. 16491972
>>16491959
Very.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:20:54 UTC No. 16491976
>>16491967
>hes still pushing the boogyman nobody believes in
Give up.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:21:36 UTC No. 16491977
>>16491778
Bring back indentured servitude
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:23:14 UTC No. 16491979
>>16491805
The ships are coming back anyway. Elon said free return back, but he'll charge something. or work it into the depart fare
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:27:58 UTC No. 16491985
>>16491976
>>16491967
>>16491838
>>16491831
Reply with a screenshot or pay the tikkie
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:28:58 UTC No. 16491986
>>16491985
Why
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:31:56 UTC No. 16491989
I don't know why but life on a planet orbiting a red dwarf seems comfy. It's kinda like an eternal sunset. Just my experience from messing around in SpaceEngine.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:33:36 UTC No. 16491990
>>16491989
Red dwarfs are uninhabitable doe?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:34:56 UTC No. 16491993
>>16491990
Not exactly true, but they wouldn't be very fun.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:35:26 UTC No. 16491994
>>16491991
US propaganda.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:41:52 UTC No. 16491997
>>16491991
Any more ukropium you want to share with the class /k/ike?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:41:52 UTC No. 16491998
>>16491991
should rename themselves to New India after they get partitioned
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:47:15 UTC No. 16492000
>>16489819
This is my fav OP in a while
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:47:30 UTC No. 16492001
>>16491948
spray bottle and mist her face every time she does it
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:49:40 UTC No. 16492002
Pathetic earthlings. Hurling your bodies out into the void, without the slightest inkling of who or what is out here. If you had known anything about the true nature of the universe, anything at all, you would've hidden from it in terror
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:49:54 UTC No. 16492003
>>16491991
MORE WESTERN BULLSHIT WHICH WILL BE FORGOTTEN.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:50:12 UTC No. 16492004
>>16492001
Great way to make your cat hate you
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:50:32 UTC No. 16492005
>>16491979
>The ships are coming back anyway
They are not
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:53:23 UTC No. 16492006
>>16491991
probably the smell of the ukropigger dead body inside as a souvineer for our american friends.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:53:49 UTC No. 16492007
>>16492002
>If you had known anything about the true nature of the universe, anything at all, you would've hidden from it in terror
Pussy shit, I'll go kick space right in the balls and dare it to do something about it.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:00:17 UTC No. 16492010
>>16491879
yes it's necessary, Fuck you.
>>16491888
If you met me in real life you'd kill yourself out of shame
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:01:27 UTC No. 16492011
>>16492007
>false vacuum decays you in your path
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:02:10 UTC No. 16492012
>>16492005
Not the first decade obv
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:03:09 UTC No. 16492013
>>16492010
So how was your nap? It looks like you're still a bit angry, why not go play with your toys, sweaty?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:03:14 UTC No. 16492014
>>16491948
pet her in your lap until she sleeps. repeat until she prefers your lap over going outside.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:03:46 UTC No. 16492016
fuck you
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:06:53 UTC No. 16492018
>>16491990
Only for life sans tech.
Humans can and will colonize red dwarf systems.
>16492013
try harder :^)
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:08:33 UTC No. 16492019
>>16492010
i think you need a longer nap. and a blanky. dont forget your blanky.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:10:49 UTC No. 16492021
>>16491997
>spacecraft literally so shitty that they actually smell like noxious garbage
>instant damage control
lel, you know it wouldn't smell like shit if you acknowledged it and fixed it instead of blaming the rest of the world right?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:10:58 UTC No. 16492022
>>16492011
False vacuum decay powered spacecraft when?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:12:41 UTC No. 16492023
>>16492021
Obviously the cia did it
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:13:46 UTC No. 16492024
more likely to be dead zigger, there's a lot more of those and zigs are known for not burying their dead.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:16:32 UTC No. 16492027
>>16492011
>muh kurzgesagt existential crisis doomsday pop sci slop thing
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:19:21 UTC No. 16492028
>>16492026
all they do is manage contractors
and if designated contractors can't do the job then their existence becomes irrelevant
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:29:41 UTC No. 16492035
>>16492022
>build a particle accelerator in space
>smash atoms together until you create a black hole
>smash higgs bosons together near the black hole while feeding it energy
>the surrounding vacuum starts decaying at the speed of light
>in a few nanoseconds the automated systems feed additional energy
>the vacuum decays into a new but lower metastable state in which the speed of light is quadrillion times faster and requires less energy to achieve
>throw the earth into the black hole
>false vacuum becomes stabilized due to gravity
>open the airlock behind your particle accelerator
>throw out a single(1) firecracker
>Accelerate to 99% of the (new) C
>???
>profit
patented by anon. all rights reserved
>>16492027
this loser is going on the no JADES-GS-z14-0 list
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:30:44 UTC No. 16492036
>>16492028
as someone that works for a nasa contractor, yes it's a bit of a mess
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:34:09 UTC No. 16492039
>>16492026
based zubrin, finally talking about spaceflight again
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:37:54 UTC No. 16492041
>>16491965
so a big drone?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:42:41 UTC No. 16492043
>>16492026
Homer is /ourguy/
Zubrin? Clocks do be broken
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:43:06 UTC No. 16492044
Man I miss when sfg was good. We peaked a while ago, didn't we.
Anyway do we have a currently accepted intuitively good strategy for how to implement large solar and/or nuclear powered electric spacecraft yet? Are people still worrying about solving technical problems that don't actually exist? Or are there some real ones to solve now
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:44:09 UTC No. 16492045
>>16492044
Yes, truly sad. It's time to leave this site forever.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:44:52 UTC No. 16492046
>>16492044
yeah
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:45:07 UTC No. 16492047
>>16492045
haha, that's never going to happen.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:46:20 UTC No. 16492048
>>16492044
/sfg/ discord is open again for new members now that the election is over
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:46:35 UTC No. 16492049
fuck you
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:47:09 UTC No. 16492050
>>16492044
>Man I miss when sfg was good.
Judging by the ammount of antromorphic anime girls posted around I would say it is still on the same average level of quality as usual.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:48:42 UTC No. 16492052
>>16489819
space is boring, its just rocks boeing rock only way do make space cool is by bringing humans.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:49:59 UTC No. 16492053
>>16492050
>look through the thread
>see 0 rocketgirls
wtf that anon has a point, we have fallen
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:53:13 UTC No. 16492055
>>16492050
thats is the main thing
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:54:14 UTC No. 16492057
>>16492053
dont be too hasty
>>16491926
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:02:42 UTC No. 16492060
>>16491778
As a network "engineer" I'd work on mars for basically free and I'm sure there's enough people like me that they won't be short on labour
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:07:21 UTC No. 16492065
>>16492051
we're getting closer to the colony
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:12:34 UTC No. 16492068
>>16492060
you say that now....
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:28:54 UTC No. 16492087
>>16492026
Homer the hick is a massive chud now.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:29:48 UTC No. 16492088
>>16492026
>CANCEL SLS
>SCRAP ORION
>DISBAND NASA
>BULLDOZE JPS
The only good thing anyone's made lately is GR Cop42, Glen Research can stay.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:33:16 UTC No. 16492091
>>16491933
This is why monarchs are an awful idea
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:38:05 UTC No. 16492095
>>16492091
super expensive boondoggle equipment is completely obsolete in the modern world
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:39:02 UTC No. 16492096
Is Terra Invicta good
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:39:21 UTC No. 16492098
>>16492095
tech for fighter drones don't exist
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:39:45 UTC No. 16492099
>>16492096
Overhyped but it didnt land with players.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:42:31 UTC No. 16492100
>>16492098
>tech for fighter drones
CCAs are a thing, and yes sometimes they work autonomously.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:50:48 UTC No. 16492112
>>16492041
a fighter commanding a fleet of big drones yeah
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:54:52 UTC No. 16492115
>>16492096
It is still very early and it is good in the sense that it makes the x-com premise be far more grounded than just "I swear this supersekrit organization is stopping an alien invasion with massive massacres by itself" and gives you a progression from the Earth to orbit in a way that at the very least is sensible to how space warfare should unfold. For example: You actually tell countries how they have to manage their budgets to build nuclear weapons, armies or grow their economies and if you exclusively roleplay as your faction you might see things like Luxemburg fielding nukes, a navy and a worthwhile army with power projection but with the economy of Somalia, because by investing in that you actually contract the economy and weaken the country, so it is one of the things to balance.
Then research is done in a weird way. There are big projects in which everyone pool their resources, and these unlock the minor projects that advance your faction, invest in the big ones and you get to choose the next technology(i.e: Cockblocking others from space for example) invest in the minor ones and you unlock the juicy toys.
In terms of cloak and dagger there are interesting things, like at the early-mid game you unlock elite organizations that buff an agent so much that it lets you roleplay the idea of "oh well this situation is so bad that I have to pull out the secret elite glowies for this one"
But it was made by the long war people and sure it is a slog, and it is not just that, sometimes it is frustrating out of nowhere. Like you manage to finally, idk, control all of Germany or Israel and all of a sudden the politicians or the media turns to the aliens or some other organization out of nowhere, so you never feel actually in control just extinguishing fires around and dealing with events like for example: If you start killing rival agents, and you are not an extremist, you have to deal with your own agents having ethical problems.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:07:38 UTC No. 16492128
>>16492115
Also, if someone wants to point out "skill issue" I will say that I did try to get on the game, and at some point I event went with WeMod to see if even cheating I could make the grind more bearable... and either I am retarded, the game fails terribly at explaining its mechanics or all of the above but after losing my China-India war with a 3:1 advantage and several control points out of nowhere when they were even secured I simply dropped and have not even touched it again. I will see this christmas if they have patched the difficulty or something.
>PD: Also, I remember, the game starts with Russia and Ukraine at war with each other, and with both armies in a stalemate. I took control of Russia, sent reinforcements and somehow Ukrainian forces still managed to hold. It got to the point where it was far more easier to control both Russia and Ukraine and then make them allies and then let Russia annex Ukraine peacefully... which has so many layers of irony that is not even funny.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:10:19 UTC No. 16492133
>>16492051
>https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1860
how is what he described a novel problem? doesnt the ozone do the same thingto earther heat shields?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:10:47 UTC No. 16492135
>>16492115
>>16492128
Sounds like quite interesting. Might buy it when it leaves early access.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:11:53 UTC No. 16492136
>>16492134
I've been making grilled sandwiches with eggs for the best few weeks.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:16:10 UTC No. 16492138
>>16492134
I'm getting diabetes from watching that picture.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:21:05 UTC No. 16492145
>spacex goes to mars
>europe chimps out
>demands access to their own starships or they'll sanction the US
soon
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:23:56 UTC No. 16492146
>>16492145
Europe will never ever do anything
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:24:56 UTC No. 16492147
>>16492145
Yeah I can see at least some bureaucrat pulling that resulting in another embarrassing apology to the US.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:25:29 UTC No. 16492148
>>16492145
2025 - mars base(spacex), population 10000
2026 - phobos base(spacex), populaton 7000
2027 - ceres base(spacex), population 9000
2028 - jupiter orbital base(spacex), popilation 700
2029 - EVROPA base(spacex), population 12000
2030 - calisto base(spacex), population 8000
2031 - enceladus base(Spacex), population 15000
2032 - mars base(china), population ~1,6 billion
2033 - venus cloud base(spacex), population 7000
2034 - saturn ring base(spacex), population 4500
2035 - titan cuck base(spacex), population less than a dozen
2036 - uranus base(spacex), population 6900
2037 - neptune base(spacex), population 5500
2038 - first colony ship sent to proxima centauri b(spacex), population 150000
2039 - Pluto (spacex), population 13000
2040 - colony ship sent to ross 128b(spacex), population 370000
2041 - asteroid belt stations(china), population uncountable
2042 - colony ships sent to GJ 1061(spacex), population 1250000
2043 - mercury solar death ray (spacex), population classified
2044 - Eris cloning facility (spacex), population >100000000
2045 - agartha base(spacex), population 750000
2046 - Earth-X genocide wars
2047 - earth colony(X empire), population 0.7 billion
2048 - colony ships sent to andromeda galaxy via wormhole(X empire), population several billion
2049 - Sagittarius A* colony(X empire), population ~13 trillion
2050 - Mankind becomes a kardashev type 3 civilization(X empire), population ~70 quintillion
2051 - Moon base(NASA), population 0-10
2055 - ESA first man on orbit
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:26:59 UTC No. 16492150
>>16491991
Will be a good thing for Americans, Euroids, and Japs when Russia is jettisoned from their joint space efforts
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:27:34 UTC No. 16492151
Succesful launch at 0739 Beijing time (2339 UTC) of Siwei Gaojing 2 03 and 04 (SuperView Neo 2 03/04) by a CZ-2C from Jiuquan
They are SAR satellites from the Siwei Gaojing constellation of mixed optical/SAR
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:28:11 UTC No. 16492152
>>16492150
yuros don't even have a launch vehicle right now
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:28:20 UTC No. 16492153
>>16492145
>Europe sanction US
lol
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:28:37 UTC No. 16492154
>Flight 7 suborbital
it's ogre.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:29:25 UTC No. 16492157
>>16492152
Always good to bring frens along for the ride
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:29:49 UTC No. 16492158
>>16491842
The high thrust of SRB is great when your engines otherwise lack the thrust necessary for a first stage, this is especially evident with hydrolox sustainer core rockets. Otherwise they are heavy, can't throttle on demand and trying to reuse them with the Shuttle did not save money.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:30:18 UTC No. 16492159
>>16492148
why did you post this bait again?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:31:09 UTC No. 16492161
>>16492145
>https://europeanspaceflight.com/es
>The European Space Agency has announced that it will commission a study to detail the development of a reusable rocket capable of delivering 60 tonnes to low Earth orbit.
Just you wait until this commission considers the feasibility of whethershould a committee be formed to plan the sketch of the first reusable space rocket after proper deliberation and unanimous consent of all member countries that will have to vote if they want to shove a giant PROTEIN cylinder deep down their budgets.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:32:12 UTC No. 16492163
>>16491866
Raptor didn't exist when LRB was an option for SLS, you either had to go with reinventing the F-1 or wait for Aerojet to finish making their Americanized RD-180.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:34:28 UTC No. 16492165
>>16491991
Roscosmos really loves their coolant leaks.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:36:32 UTC No. 16492168
Should we Terraform the Moon?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Z
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Z
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Z
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Z
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Z
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:37:41 UTC No. 16492169
>>16492154
forgot pic
but yeah, Flight 7 NET January 11th, will be suborbital on similar trajectory.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:39:36 UTC No. 16492172
>>16492095
cheap Chinese quadcopters are not having the effect on the war in Ukraine that clickbait accounts would have you believe and are not a threat to 5th gen fighters
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:41:20 UTC No. 16492174
>>16492172
a cheap terrain hugging drone can hit them on the ground 800 miles away
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:42:24 UTC No. 16492175
>>16492152
Ariane 6 is flying now
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:44:18 UTC No. 16492176
>>16492175
technically hasn't had its first operational launch yet. And Vega C hasn't returned to flight.
Actually wonder if Isar spectrum launch 1 will happen before A6 launch 2 (A263)
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:44:45 UTC No. 16492177
>>16492174
If you are within 800 miles of an airbase (a distance your quadcopter swarm cannot fly) then there are other more prevalent issues the owner of that 5th gen fighter is facing.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:45:44 UTC No. 16492178
>16492168
kill yourself
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:48:46 UTC No. 16492180
>>16492172
>cheap Chinese quadcopters are not ... a threat to 5th gen fighters
True, they have basically nothing to do with each other. If anything Ukraine is proof that all the drone advantage in the world still leaves you vulnerable to a fairly shitty conventional air force, in the same way that any ground advantage isn't a counter
>are not having the effect on the war in Ukraine that clickbait accounts would have you believe
Quads have literally become Ukraine's main armament over the last couple of years. They are vastly more important than the next most relevant weapon system (which would either be rocket arty, arty with drone correction, or... long range drones)
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:48:46 UTC No. 16492181
>>16492148
Rather pessimistic timeline, don’t you think?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:51:24 UTC No. 16492183
>>16491955
literally just attach large deployable dragnets that furl out behind them and are weighted and one jet can down an entire swarm with one flyby
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:51:44 UTC No. 16492184
>>16492180
>Quads have literally become Ukraine's main armament over the last couple of years
You are only aware of them due to the built in cameras.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:51:50 UTC No. 16492185
>>16492134
its a bit much luv
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:52:04 UTC No. 16492186
terraform the ISS
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:53:36 UTC No. 16492191
>BREAKING
FLIGHT 7 NET JAN 11th
https://x.com/alexphysics13/status/
>BREAKING
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:53:39 UTC No. 16492192
>>16492158
i would into them if they could be safely jettisoned if/when things fuck up. without that option they are not cool for manned flight
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:54:10 UTC No. 16492193
>>16492161
it will recommend a new french institution with factories in france and germany buying parts from czech and austria using raw materials from poland and romania. avionics is coded in estonia and use of italian srb is mandatory. 50% of the headcount belongs to the legal department at belgian who menace the road riding their bicycle to office at 9, lobby for sanctions on spacex, 2 hours of lunch time, and finally clock out at 3 and off to fuck ukrainian whores.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:54:40 UTC No. 16492194
>>16492159
'tis big bait
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:55:13 UTC No. 16492195
>>16492191
>its real
wtf
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:55:59 UTC No. 16492197
>>16492184
I am aware of the fact that drones have been the main focus of Ukrainian procurement over that time frame which is more significant. Also if you apply that logic you will quickly run into the problem that you end up overestimating the total losses inflicted by non drones
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:58:43 UTC No. 16492200
>>16492197
fuck off ukropigger. the only reason oinkraine pigs procure drones is because they lack artillery and get slaugthered.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:59:07 UTC No. 16492201
lunaform Terra
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:00:19 UTC No. 16492203
>>16492200
Russian drone efforts are only slightly behind but ok. I kneel to your impressive intellect both of them will disassemble all their drones tomorrow because they love lobbing ww2 artillery vaguely into fields.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:00:24 UTC No. 16492204
>>16492191
>>16492195
son of a bitch, he's really rushing it, thank God
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:00:51 UTC No. 16492205
>>16492191
>>16492169
A reminder that Elon has already said the goal of Flight 7 is to reproduce an on target soft water landing by S33, which if successful would lead to Flight 8 being a catch attempt.
A catch attempt would have to make several orbits in order to come back to the tower.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:02:52 UTC No. 16492206
>>16492205
they’re going to catch it on the first orbital flight.
it’s going to be a sight to behold.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:03:14 UTC No. 16492208
>>16492197
>I am aware of the fact that drones have been the main focus of Ukrainian procurement over that time frame
They haven't, sorry to burst your bubble.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:04:54 UTC No. 16492209
>>16492154
>>16492205
makes sense for a new ship version to be suborbital again. Test out the flap changes in as close to the same environment as possible, while also being able to touch down in an area you've already gotten approval for multiple times rather than having to file new documents with the FAA for a gulf touchdown of a ship many orbits after launch.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:04:58 UTC No. 16492210
>>16492205
They've already done it with prior launches. So one more is just extra pudding
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:06:31 UTC No. 16492213
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:08:09 UTC No. 16492216
>>16492191
For God's sake, please test the door this time
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:09:43 UTC No. 16492217
>>16492145
As a euro, i hope musk&spaceX take away all the comercial contracts from ariana space so they finaly wake the fuck up.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:10:55 UTC No. 16492218
>>16492216
The door works.
It opens.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:12:58 UTC No. 16492221
>>16492195
>NASA5
im not convinced
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:14:10 UTC No. 16492223
>>16492205
sure. then it will orbit, then fire to deorbit. it is natural
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:14:23 UTC No. 16492224
>>16492195
>Suborbital again
Hahaha
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:20:54 UTC No. 16492233
>>16492224
This, its pathetic at this point
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:24:35 UTC No. 16492239
>>16492221
https://www.nasa.gov/specials/jsc-a
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:25:34 UTC No. 16492243
>>16492218
It didn't close.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:28:17 UTC No. 16492249
>>16492224
reminder that the Space Shuttle, Saturn V, and SLS all achieved orbit in their first flight...
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:29:31 UTC No. 16492250
>>16492249
low effort b8
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:30:47 UTC No. 16492253
>>16492249
Good luck getting those to Mars and back.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:31:48 UTC No. 16492254
>>16491798
good question, probably some coolant or fluid from leaky cargo. There were visible droplets as well as the stink, which is why they immediately closed the hatch again.
Apparently, the Russian cosmonauts were so embarrassed by this, that they didn't notify the other astronauts; they had to find out from ground control when they asked what was stinking up the place.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:34:33 UTC No. 16492257
>>16492253
>SLS
>to Mars
Okay.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:37:30 UTC No. 16492259
>>16492257
>Cislunar support flight
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:41:10 UTC No. 16492262
>flight 7 date announced
>meanwhile slav(e)s arguing about which made up country is worse
/sfg/ - Slavic Fighting General
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:43:55 UTC No. 16492270
>>16492148
heh, I noticed the ESA addition (though far too optimistic)
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:44:11 UTC No. 16492272
>>16492168
>kysplanet
buy an ad
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:45:04 UTC No. 16492275
>>16492257
SLS does not go to Mars in that mission concept
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:46:40 UTC No. 16492279
>>16492257
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/upl
https://web.archive.org/web/2019052
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:47:50 UTC No. 16492281
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:48:57 UTC No. 16492282
>>16492281
Launcher and Satellites patches
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:51:51 UTC No. 16492285
>>16492254
>Russia blames it on a woman in 3... 2... 1...
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:52:11 UTC No. 16492287
>>16492254
Blyat
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:54:02 UTC No. 16492290
>>16492239
they did what now?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:59:29 UTC No. 16492297
>>16492254
If the Russians were more embarrassed then concerned of their safety, that suggests they have some idea of what the fluid and stench could be.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:09:35 UTC No. 16492306
>>16492254
maybe a mouse or other rodent got stuck somewhere and died
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:17:34 UTC No. 16492311
literally 2 more weeks times 4
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:19:38 UTC No. 16492314
>>16492268
I wonder if Bezos and his team are gonna do the same fucking thing all over again: trying to "master" LEO for 25 years before moving on onto lunar and interplanetary flights. Gradatim feroticer.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:24:06 UTC No. 16492321
>>16492314
they are going to attempt a landing on ship the first try
its going to be a disaster
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:25:21 UTC No. 16492323
>>16492321
will there be a livestream? does anyone know?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:34:18 UTC No. 16492336
is IFT-7 a block 2 starship?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:35:09 UTC No. 16492337
>>16492314
>Gradatim feroticer.
Gradatim gradociter
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:38:07 UTC No. 16492342
>>16492337
Threadly reminder that we WILL bring turtles to Mars, and nobody will stop us.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:44:19 UTC No. 16492345
>>16491933
a growler could make each and every single one of those explode from across the horizon
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:45:04 UTC No. 16492346
>>16492336
>ift
its FLIGHT 7
and yes
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 03:08:20 UTC No. 16492366
>>16492342
They smell so bad and everything on Mars will be enclosed. Please no
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 03:20:33 UTC No. 16492373
>>16492243
Halfway there.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 03:23:11 UTC No. 16492376
>>16491933
If he goes after Boeing/LM/NG military money with DOGE right after destroying them in space, they will just kill him.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 03:40:16 UTC No. 16492382
>>16491933
He's so dumb outside of his wheel house
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 03:41:33 UTC No. 16492384
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i08
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1dRJZdOj
Electron launching in T-15:00
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 03:45:21 UTC No. 16492386
>>16492384
Neat, that's
>>16491647
this mission
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 03:54:47 UTC No. 16492394
>>16491859
What sort of performance could this give? The falcon 9 is already proven to handle side loading easy enough with falcon heavy. This shouldn't be much harder. I suppose the only use would be some sort of very heavy emergency payload.
The pad plumping spaghetti would be insane
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 03:56:46 UTC No. 16492396
its got some really high thrust to weight
should be much taller
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:01:24 UTC No. 16492400
>>16492148
>mars before the next transfer window opens
can you at least put some effort in next time?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:02:13 UTC No. 16492402
>>16492148
i wanna touch their thighs and legs nowww
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:07:34 UTC No. 16492406
>congress says to build one SLS a year
>NASA gets a bunch of contractors for all the parts
>NASA tells them all to build enough parts for one SLS a year
>contractors arrange factories and order components to build one component a year
>sls is planned to launch 5 times in one decade
?????????????
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:09:04 UTC No. 16492410
>>16492406
It's not that easy in spaceflight
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:09:29 UTC No. 16492411
>>16492406
turns out that contractors aren't actually producing SLS at a rate for a once a year cadence
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:11:18 UTC No. 16492414
>>16492411
then they shouldn't get paid until they catch up
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:13:31 UTC No. 16492416
>>16492414
then you get no parts and throw away the last decade of prep work :)
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:21:44 UTC No. 16492426
>>16492416
Good. NASA needs to go all in on Starship and abandon the joke of SLS
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:28:07 UTC No. 16492437
>>16492268
I mean, its getting to orbit and sending something to mars before starship
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:40:52 UTC No. 16492452
>>16492406
I think some executives should go to prison. And some NASA managers too
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:45:04 UTC No. 16492458
https://x.com/PalmerLuckey/status/1
Andruid doing SRBs test for missiles.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:59:19 UTC No. 16492467
>>16492437
proofs?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 05:03:18 UTC No. 16492468
>>16492384
mission success
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 05:12:04 UTC No. 16492475
>>16492414
That's why all the oldspace contractors are refusing to do fix price contracts now.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 05:44:22 UTC No. 16492493
>>16492475
Refuse their services then. Why give a blank check for mediocrity or outright failure when newspace companies will deliver what you want, when you want it at a set price. How is this such a difficult concept for NASA to grasp?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 05:48:07 UTC No. 16492495
>>16492458
To what end? Fucking shit ass range unless he intends for these to be attached to interceptors, like Sprint was.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 05:51:13 UTC No. 16492499
>>16492495
Wait you think missile motors are burning the whole time they are in flight?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 05:58:01 UTC No. 16492502
>>16492376
I hate to tell you guys this, but DOGE is never going to be a real thing. Trump can't create it, he needs Congress to do it. And Congress will only do it if they can define what DOGE is allowed to do; which will mean that it'll take like two years of going round and round on decision making in subcommittees before it is even considered for authorization. Elon doesn't actually have any power, and they aren't going to let him fuck with the FCC/FAA. The FCC because Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T are some of the biggest political donors, period. And the FAA because it would lead to them being primaries if planes started to fall out of the sky again. Trump couldn't even kill the DoE last time despite the DoE being one of the smallest governmental departments by any metric, and they really, sincerely made an attempt. Congress isn't going to give Elon carte blanche to just start annihilating anything he feels like. It's a ketamine fueled dream that he thinks he can meme into reality, and that just simply isn't the case. Even the red states have a vested interest in not cutting government jobs in their states. They'd absolutely want to do it to blue states if they could, but that won't be how this could ever play out.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 05:58:08 UTC No. 16492503
>>16491276
>throwing the criminals off the Olympus Mons
slope is too shallow I fear
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:03:00 UTC No. 16492507
>>16492499
No, I'm not retarded. Unless my sense of scale is vastly wrong, this is fairly large engine. Much larger than, say, that of a Sidewinder's. And our most advanced missiles don't use SRBs. I could only see these being used for interceptor purposes since there isn't a missile gap in the areas that this could be applicable to. The Air Force and Navy wants to spam cheap missiles, yes, but not shitty missiles. An SRB that propels something to match fuck off would be good as an interceptor, especially if it's cheap. As it is the Air Force isn't looking for any new missiles, they've got everything they need or want. But a ground based interceptor that you could fire and not worry about the cost? That's quite appealing.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:05:04 UTC No. 16492509
>>16491647
It means your light bulbs spy on you for the glow niggers.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:08:04 UTC No. 16492512
>>16492507
>And our most advanced missiles don't use SRBs
Missiles like the SM-6 and SM-3 use an SRB, it has a 21" motor and is called the Mk72.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:10:31 UTC No. 16492514
>>16491747
>>16491750
tldr total bureaucrat death
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:13:18 UTC No. 16492516
>>16491791
Literally just disregard astronomers. They aren't good for anything. Pandering to them won't make shitlibtards happy with starlink because astroonermers aren't the real reason they're upset with starlink; EDS is.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:16:47 UTC No. 16492518
>>16492512
I need you to look up what air breathing wave gliding is. They use an SRB initially and then switch over to an entirely different method of propulsion. And you just supported my argument. The Air Force isn't interested in acquiring a new family of missiles/rockets. They have everything they need, and all of them are based off decades old matured and refreshed systems. It makes much more sense if Palmer is shilling this as an engine for a ground based interceptor based upon his claim of how fast they can build the engines. Cheaper interceptors is an area that hasn't been tapped yet and could be quite lucrative given that we really only have a few options at the moment and they are all expensive and finite.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:18:04 UTC No. 16492519
>>16492502
DOGE was never going to be anything more than an advisory / PR committee. Such a thing doesn't need an action from Congress to create, it's effectively a private think tank loosely affiliated with the president in an unofficial capacity.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:21:22 UTC No. 16492520
>>16492519
If you listen to Elon and the Indian they seem pretty certain they're going to be cutting departmental oversight to the point of non-existence and firing as much as 75% of all government employees. Elon literally talked about that shit all day for the the last week. What both of them believe DOGE will be able to do, and what it will be is extremely different than what you are saying.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:24:39 UTC No. 16492525
>>16492520
They'll be able to do as much or as little as Trump himself is able to do, since all of their actions will be routed as suggestions through Trump.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:25:45 UTC No. 16492526
>>16492525
Trump will prorogue the senate and rule by executive order
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:30:08 UTC No. 16492528
>>16492518
You claimed "we" don't use SRB on our missiles and then after being given an example are trying to goalpost.
I get it, Anduril is very threatening to AJR(now L3Harris) but it is only a happening because AJR became fat and lazy and can't ramp up production.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:46:26 UTC No. 16492539
>>16492528
I said our most advanced missiles, numbnuts. Those aren't.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 06:55:13 UTC No. 16492550
>>16492539
SM-3 and SM-6 are two of "our" premier and most advanced missiles, and they are only two of many non ballistic American missiles that are multi stage.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:36:35 UTC No. 16492593
staging
>>16492592
>>16492592
>>16492592
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:49:52 UTC No. 16492638
>>16492200
dude what did ukrainians do to you to give you such PTSD?
you have a melty every time.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:54:16 UTC No. 16492643
>>16492200
TZD
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:16:26 UTC No. 16492651
>>16492323
>will there be a livestream? does anyone know?
Given how secretive Bezos was with the development of NS, probably not. If it is livestreamed I bet it'll be on a 10 second delay so that it can conveniently experience "technical issues" and cut out if there are any incidents.
I don't think Jeffy's ego could take it if footage circulated the internet for all eternity of his expensive new rocket wiping out the ship named after his dear mother, assuming it even gets that far through the test flight and is actually on target, which is a big assumption. Bringing back an orbital booster is a bit different to his glorified vomit comet, an up-and-down suborbital carnival ride.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:09:55 UTC No. 16492674