🧵 /sfg/ - spaceflight general
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:36:12 UTC No. 16492592
AS17-162-24053HR edition
previous: >>16489819
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:38:12 UTC No. 16492594
>>16492592
first for mercury
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:39:40 UTC No. 16492596
>>16492594
the planet
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:39:57 UTC No. 16492598
>>16492594
>no moons
a lame planet
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:40:50 UTC No. 16492600
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:41:59 UTC No. 16492601
>>16492598
if you are a good planet, you dont need moons to compensate
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:43:29 UTC No. 16492602
>>16492601
>no atmosphere either
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:46:57 UTC No. 16492604
Can we talk about Tolkien since Vingilot is a spaceflight capable vessel?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:54:32 UTC No. 16492610
what exactly is the benefit of moon to mars
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:17:32 UTC No. 16492621
>>16492619
We're not talking about the type of dog you find sitting on an old woman's lap, these are Malbori War Hounds, that we paint with khaddis
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:18:45 UTC No. 16492623
>>16492607
You need such mission architectures if you want to go beyond Mars or Venus, so i am glad that they are looking into it instead of just copying SpaceXs Mars mission architecture and wasting ressources on something SpaceX will do in future anyways.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:23:17 UTC No. 16492625
>>16492619
Recruit hobbits to be your first astronauts, since they're small and low-mass.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:33:39 UTC No. 16492627
>>16492625
That makes way too much sense even thematically.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:35:23 UTC No. 16492629
There, and back again.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:50:29 UTC No. 16492639
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i08
rocket lab launch
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:55:47 UTC No. 16492644
>>16492592
Space flight that does not have a destination is stupid waste of resources and risk people's lives for no reason there's no reason to have a fucking space station
We should be sending people to and from the Moon and colonizing Mars the moon could be military bases and resort hotels
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:58:24 UTC No. 16492646
Another Starlink launch happening right now
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:10:53 UTC No. 16492647
Another happy landing
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:13:04 UTC No. 16492649
>>16492644
The moon is just a big space station
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:13:41 UTC No. 16492650
https://x.com/SawyerMerritt/status/
so now the minimum DTC constellation is in orbit, though I would guess it takes a while for this latest batch (and the ones launched previously recently) to take some time to get to the right orbits
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:39:52 UTC No. 16492655
Why do all our plans for colonizing space so far rely on going directly to the moon? Shouldn't we be building some more orbital infrastructure?
Furthermore, how come all of our orbital vehicles are monolithic? (Save for the space stations.) I'm a little bit surprised and dismayed some private corporation hasn't tried to pitch some kind of modular system for orbital vehicle construction. A well documented standard for modular vehicles would be very useful for the world at large.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:40:39 UTC No. 16492657
>>16492652
I do wonder, do they have other New Glenn's that are right now in production?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:44:44 UTC No. 16492659
>>16492652
b-but Mr. Bezos it landed 1000s of times in simulations
to the distribution center with you
NOOOOO
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:55:13 UTC No. 16492666
SpaceX has just achieved a record-breaking fortnight turnaround and /sfg/ is silent
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:56:05 UTC No. 16492667
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:18:42 UTC No. 16492676
In light of recent events, I made a rather conservative estimate of the future of spess colonies
2025 - mars base(spacex), population 10000
2026 - phobos base(spacex), populaton 7000
2027 - ceres base(spacex), population 9000
2028 - jupiter orbital base(spacex), popilation 700
2029 - EVROPA base(spacex), population 12000
2030 - calisto base(spacex), population 8000
2031 - enceladus base(Spacex), population 15000
2032 - mars base(china), population ~1,6 billion
2033 - venus cloud base(spacex), population 7000
2034 - saturn ring base(spacex), population 4500
2035 - titan cuck base(spacex), population less than a dozen
2036 - uranus base(spacex), population 6900
2037 - neptune base(spacex), population 5500
2038 - first colony ship sent to proxima centauri b(spacex), population 150000
2039 - Pluto (spacex), population 13000
2040 - colony ship sent to ross 128b(spacex), population 370000
2041 - asteroid belt stations(china), population uncountable
2042 - colony ships sent to GJ 1061(spacex), population 1250000
2043 - mercury solar death ray (spacex), population classified
2044 - Eris cloning facility (spacex), population >100000000
2045 - agartha base(spacex), population 750000
2046 - Earth-X genocide wars
2047 - earth colony(X empire), population 0.7 billion
2048 - colony ships sent to andromeda galaxy via wormhole(X empire), population several billion
2049 - Sagittarius A* colony(X empire), population ~13 trillion
2050 - Mankind becomes a kardashev type 3 civilization(X empire), population ~70 quintillion
2051 - Moon base(NASA), population 0-10
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:30:29 UTC No. 16492682
>>16492671
I love how retrofuturism was just a bunch of guys in spandex constantly checking displays
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:35:27 UTC No. 16492686
>>16492627
Provisioning and resupply would be a nightmare though. I mean, "elevenses"? "Second breakfast"?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:48:21 UTC No. 16492689
>>16492686
if you have access to hobbits then lembas bread isn't a stretch. big mass savings there.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:53:32 UTC No. 16492691
>>16492689
The supplier of lembas was already leaving before the start.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:56:57 UTC No. 16492692
>>16492608
What tweet?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:58:33 UTC No. 16492693
>>16492619
Steam rockets powered by elvish water magic and balrog piss
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:01:51 UTC No. 16492695
>>16492689
what am I looking at here
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:06:18 UTC No. 16492698
>>16492696
Launch from Gondor, who gives a fuck if your stages land in Mordor.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:08:21 UTC No. 16492700
>>16492698
What about crewed aborts? Orcs will eat them.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:16:23 UTC No. 16492707
>>16492700
Orcs aren't so much of a problem in the Fourth Age, there's been clean-up squads going through Mordor. Pic unrelated.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:17:16 UTC No. 16492710
>>16492695
Emergency punishment sphere for the space shuttle. Disobedient mission specialists would be stuffed in there and towed outside the ship for a while to reflect on their misdeeds.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:19:55 UTC No. 16492713
>>16492689
Is that a cameo appearance by the balloon from The Prisoner?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:23:26 UTC No. 16492719
>>16492717
how many of them exist anyways?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:27:18 UTC No. 16492721
>>16492719
all of them
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:29:04 UTC No. 16492722
>>16492721
>dragon respects orion
lol
lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:33:02 UTC No. 16492726
>>16492707
If Mordor is being rehabilitated then you can't drop rocket stages on them. That's Amrûn shit.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:34:57 UTC No. 16492729
>>16492721
>abort tower hair
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:42:23 UTC No. 16492734
>>16492686
Come to think of it, hobbits might not be the best option.
They aren't built for existing for long periods in sterile and confined areas.
They prefer grass and shit, the free air, etc.
Dwarves would preform better, even if being in space is marginally different than living underground.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:51:06 UTC No. 16492739
>>16492734
Legolas can stand on a snow drift without sinking in which suggests a very low weight and Elves have a tradition of seafaring. Given their eyesight they could see in great detail from orbit
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:59:22 UTC No. 16492749
>>16492600
>>16492592
oldschool analog stuff looks SO much better than digital. If I were a time traveller from the future I would have guessed the Apollo film cameras were more modern than the cameras on the SpaceX webcasts
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:00:24 UTC No. 16492751
>>16492596
imagine if we found there was life on mercury in the shadowed regions but nowhere else ion the solar system
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:02:45 UTC No. 16492753
>>16492666
2 more weeks. (for falcon booster reuse)
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:08:07 UTC No. 16492760
>>16492739
yeah but if you want to mine space rocks there's nobody more qualified than the dwarves
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:11:37 UTC No. 16492761
>>16492721
lol
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:17:49 UTC No. 16492763
>>16492761
Has starliner been canceled yet?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:20:14 UTC No. 16492766
>>16492763
not as far as I know
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:29:20 UTC No. 16492770
>>16492682
As opposed to the future we got, which was just a bunch of guys not in spandex constantly checking displays.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:31:02 UTC No. 16492771
>>16492596
Planet Mercury is underrated
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:31:19 UTC No. 16492772
>>16492655
>Why do all our plans for colonizing space so far rely on going directly to the moon?
Read /sfg/ or Elon's tweets for a day or two before posting again. Your question is nonsense. The average normgroid understands this better than you.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:31:25 UTC No. 16492773
>>16492768
By Grabthar's hammer, what a value!
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:33:38 UTC No. 16492775
>>16492610
There isn't any benefit to us.
There's benefit to the oldspace dinosaurs tho, since they get the money.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:34:16 UTC No. 16492776
>>16492607
>>16492608
>2023
are you sure its new?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:44:47 UTC No. 16492779
So with AI datacenters creating demand for small nuclear reactors and Starship coming online Soon(tm) how long until we can expect a spacecraft that can do crewed round trips to Jupiter?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:46:28 UTC No. 16492782
>>16492772
I feel so educated
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:47:22 UTC No. 16492783
>>16492768
gobbledygook
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:47:48 UTC No. 16492784
>>16492768
Lmao. The "opportunity/synergy parallelogram" shit is the number one indicator of an over managed organization
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:57:36 UTC No. 16492794
>>16492782
>>16492655
The single actual plan anyone has for colonizing space is SpaceX's plan to use Starship to bring people to Mars, and doesn't involve the Moon whatsoever.
NASA's plans all involve the Moon because it's the only place SLS/Orion can go, and NASA is compromised by MIC forces.
Modular space stations turned out to be such a shitty way to do space stations that the commercial industry is pivoting back to monoliths (helps that real launch capability is coming).
There's simply no benefit to modular spacecraft at this time. In the near future, some large modular spacecraft may be built, perhaps to enable human spaceflight to the asteroids or beyond, but in the longer term, industrial capacity in space will make it possible to build huge monolithic spacecraft off-Earth, and since big monoliths are better than big module conglomerates, the monoliths will win.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:00:23 UTC No. 16492797
>>16492649
Not true the moon has gravity and resources it's not a tuna can circling Earth for no reason
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:03:00 UTC No. 16492801
>>16492782
ffs at least watch yes minister
that's bureaucracy 101
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:03:20 UTC No. 16492802
>>16492649
The Moon has the potential to be a gigantic shipyard and foundry, we just need to play a little IRL factorio first.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:06:45 UTC No. 16492805
>>16492676
>2026 - phobos base(spacex),
Ambitious timing
>populaton 7000
And how can you fit that many people on Phobos, and for what reason? Transit?
>2027 - ceres base(spacex), population 9000
Unlikely, it takes years to reach Ceres. And why so many?
>2028 - jupiter orbital base(spacex), popilation 700
Just no.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:09:00 UTC No. 16492808
>>16492779
>>16492802
10 to 50 MWe nuclear reactor power systems are an enabling technology for real Moon colonization and industrialization by the way.
Likewise, using reactors on the Moon is a good first step to introducing normies to the idea of nuclear power in space before we start trying to run them on orbiting vehicles.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:10:08 UTC No. 16492810
>>16492805
You may be retarded
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:11:25 UTC No. 16492811
>>16492763
I think they're trying to sell it first, though I doubt anyone wants a spacecraft that came back without it's crew.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:13:13 UTC No. 16492813
>>16492768
Why explore?
Because it's there.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:20:22 UTC No. 16492817
Why have all electric propulsion spacecraft in history been so shitty? Take Dawn for example, don't get me wrong cool mission and great results, but the thing needed 5.9 years of runtime just to achieve 11.49 km/s of delta V. Why was ~1.95 km/s per year accepted when for essentially no cost to delta V budget they could have quintupled the solar array size/mass and 5x'd the thrust by adding more ion engines?
If NASA wants to claim they are demonstrating technologies relevant to human spaceflight, they should take more care to actually demonstrate those technologies in a manner which is actually relevant to human spaceflight.
2km/s per year will not enable human missions to Jupiter orbit. 10 km/s per year would. If we had ambition we would demonstrate a 10 ton space probe capable of 20 km/s per year (actually doable if you aren't scared of a 60% power supply mass fraction).
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:24:49 UTC No. 16492821
>>16492817
>20km/s per year
This means an acceleration rate of 0.63mm/s, is that even slightly possible with electric thrusters?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:36:19 UTC No. 16492824
>>16492749
Hipster faggot
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:36:35 UTC No. 16492825
>>16492770
Spandex kills your balls.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:37:52 UTC No. 16492827
>>16492821
Not with ion drives for manned spacecraft.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:45:45 UTC No. 16492829
>>16492797
the moon also has no reason
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:47:54 UTC No. 16492830
>>16492828
it wasn't his fault. if i got the command to stir the tanks i stir the tanks.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:48:10 UTC No. 16492831
>Blue Ghost is ready for the next leg of the trip! Our team of #GhostRiders aced environmental testing for Firefly's upcoming mission to the Moon for @NASA that will help pave the way for a lasting lunar presence. With this milestone behind us, we're ready to ship our lander to Cape Canaveral in preparation for a launch window no earlier than mid-January!
https://fireflyspace.com/news/firef
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:51:57 UTC No. 16492833
>>16492830
He's the one who gave the command
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:53:26 UTC No. 16492834
>Trump-appointed Republican on FCC lobbied for Garver as next NASA administrator.
https://thehill.com/opinion/technol
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:07:19 UTC No. 16492838
>>16492833
it was by the book. if it was another guys shift he'd have stirred the tanks. the tanks have to be stirred. stirring the tanks is necessary.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:07:50 UTC No. 16492839
>>16492834
How does this get more relevant every day?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:08:17 UTC No. 16492840
>>16492838
I like spacecraft that don't have a "blow up the tank" button.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:08:43 UTC No. 16492841
>>16492838
Yeah, but did you consider he look jewish? checkmate atheists.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:10:12 UTC No. 16492842
>>16492839
What do you mean? Isn't garver the one who made commercial cargo and crew as successful as it is? Wouldn't a garver admin be exactly what trump voters want?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:10:30 UTC No. 16492843
>>16492840
Yeah same.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:11:01 UTC No. 16492844
>>16492842
>Garver
>A woman in charge
Do the math
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:11:48 UTC No. 16492845
>>16492844
No, you do it and tell me the results.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:11:58 UTC No. 16492846
>>16492844
Are you one of those lunatics who think that Trump is some evil fascist sexist racist nazi?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:12:15 UTC No. 16492848
>>16492834
Her book is great, definitely required /sfg/ reading.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:12:53 UTC No. 16492849
>>16492846
>>16492845
Oh yeah, so /sfg/ loves women in positions of power now?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:14:02 UTC No. 16492850
>>16492849
>now
go back to bsky, dumb nigger
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:14:23 UTC No. 16492851
>>16492849
I love competent people in positions of power, as far as I can see garver is one of them.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:15:55 UTC No. 16492852
>>16492843
Wasn't that carrying facebook for africans?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:16:36 UTC No. 16492853
Why does anon chum these waters with tired bait? It's really gay.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:19:09 UTC No. 16492857
>>16492840
you HAVE to stir o2 tanks buddy. its part of the whole deal you know?
>>16492841
i doubt his ancestry played any part in the apollo 13 incident. he was just stirring the tanks. BY THE BOOK.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:23:14 UTC No. 16492861
>>16492842
He thought she is a democrat, so it's a bad pick, but she is pro-commercial space and pro-Musk that's good enough for me.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:24:42 UTC No. 16492865
>>16492861
Didn't she switch recently cause the DNC screwed her over?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:26:28 UTC No. 16492868
>>16492844
>>16492839
What a fucking clown
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:28:25 UTC No. 16492874
>>16492859
steal his look
also because orbit is not the hard part so why would they bother
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:28:44 UTC No. 16492875
>>16492859
felon husk is a hack and a coward. Remember those 25 approved flights next year? only the last few will be orbital and fuel transfer has been moved to even later
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:29:08 UTC No. 16492877
>>16492850
>>16492851
If you ever needed proof /sfg/ has no principles, look no farther then this.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:30:04 UTC No. 16492878
>>16492834
i'm still rooting for kathy lueders, but garver will be an excellent choice
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:31:06 UTC No. 16492879
>>16492877
you need to go back to /pol/, nigger
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:31:10 UTC No. 16492880
>>16492865
>/nu-sfg/ so desperate for a win it doesn't even know Garver left politics after 2016
so many newfags here nowadays. Now she works for a non-profit getting women into the space industry.
>The Brooke Owens Fellowship is a non-profit program in the United States that provides paid internships and executive mentorship for undergraduate women seeking a career in aviation or space exploration.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:32:06 UTC No. 16492881
>>16492877
What are you doing? Fuck off.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:32:54 UTC No. 16492882
>>16492881
Having a laugh while I sip my cuppa
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:36:50 UTC No. 16492884
>>16492877
I think you confuse your stay on /pol/ with your stay on /sfg/ retard
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:39:40 UTC No. 16492887
/sfg/ - Skilled Females General
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:41:36 UTC No. 16492888
>>16492607
>paper concepts that are completely garbage because they've never even built an NTR
Someone is paid for doing this
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:42:26 UTC No. 16492891
>>16492888
It's impossible to fire them so they may as well make a powerpoint
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:44:00 UTC No. 16492892
Pick Garver would be Trump-Elon 3D chess move, it will help to get all democrats on board Trump's space program.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:46:34 UTC No. 16492893
>>16492885
kinda relieved that inane faggotry is now a /vt/ only thing, in the end all boards have resident retards
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:47:35 UTC No. 16492895
>>16492893
not a*
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:50:15 UTC No. 16492898
>>16492874
To test more stuff, like the door or Starlink dispenser.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:54:40 UTC No. 16492900
>>16492898
both these things can be tested in a suborbital trajectory, they probably just aren't that high in the list of priorities
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:56:34 UTC No. 16492902
oh no he's doubling down
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18610
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:57:34 UTC No. 16492905
>>16492902
Is the F-35 a spaceplane?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:59:39 UTC No. 16492907
>>16492902
>Still comparing drones to fighter jets
Elon please....
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:00:51 UTC No. 16492910
>>16492902
>Just put the rocket in orbit little bro
Grim
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:02:36 UTC No. 16492914
>>16492902
>Cameras will defeat stealth
Oh god, he's talking about something I actually know well and he's so fucking wrong.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:02:57 UTC No. 16492915
>>16492907
Spaceflight?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:03:47 UTC No. 16492919
why's it so dead today?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:04:04 UTC No. 16492921
>>16492915
We've had people spamming elon tweets here for days. Anything he tweets might as well be spaceflight related.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:04:14 UTC No. 16492923
>>16492919
Monday
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:05:07 UTC No. 16492924
>>16492923
isnt monday when the big news drops?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:06:56 UTC No. 16492926
>>16492924
No thats friday
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:09:14 UTC No. 16492930
>>16492827
Why not? Can't spam dozens of them for some reason? Explain why
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:09:45 UTC No. 16492931
>>16492906
why not indefinite operations
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:12:00 UTC No. 16492932
>>16492841
He was jewish IRL, whether he looked jewish is irrelevant
>>16492844
>a woman in charge
That just means a man is unofficially in charge, which means Elon is in charge.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:12:17 UTC No. 16492933
>>16492926
friday is when the bad news drops
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:13:24 UTC No. 16492935
>>16492919
Americans (excluding Elon) are still asleep.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:15:10 UTC No. 16492936
>>16492902
He's actually correct.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:16:30 UTC No. 16492937
>>16492838
Doing things 'by the book' and using it as an excuse shows that don't have any sort of understanding of what you are doing. It's the main reason three mile island happened
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:16:41 UTC No. 16492938
>>16492935
Anon, it's 11am EST. I've been up for 4 hours.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:17:46 UTC No. 16492939
>>16492938
his twitter activity clearly shows that he sleeps between 2am and 10am
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:20:11 UTC No. 16492942
When is nooglin static fire?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:20:23 UTC No. 16492943
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:21:01 UTC No. 16492944
>>16492880
>Now she works for a non-profit getting women into the space industry.
This could end up killing the industry
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:23:05 UTC No. 16492946
>>16492930
Maybe when starship is up and running we can launch your giant mass of solar panels and ion engines.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:25:52 UTC No. 16492949
>>16492937
Look buddy...they followed the same book each time and it worked. the book was good. the thing in the O2 tank was bad, not the book and not the jew who followed it. got it?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:28:06 UTC No. 16492951
>>16492949
>they followed the same book each time and it worked. the book was good.
They said the same thing at tmi.
Any monkey can follow a book
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:29:08 UTC No. 16492952
>>16492930
Ion drives are thrust limited both by the way they work and by propellant rarity, and you can't cluster them too closely or they interfere with each other's magnets.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:29:13 UTC No. 16492953
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:29:47 UTC No. 16492954
Anyone have the "I'm you from the future, SELL ELON THE ROCKET" meme?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:30:20 UTC No. 16492956
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:32:24 UTC No. 16492958
>>16492951
how dare you call Genes white team monkeys. How very dare you. they wrote the book, and it was a good book.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:34:29 UTC No. 16492960
>>16492914
are you right though? never bet against Elon
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:37:36 UTC No. 16492963
>>16492960
All modern missile are beyond visual range. How is your camera going to detect something that never comes over the horizon? Not to mention clouds, low flight paths etc. Aviation has moved away from cameras for obvious reasons, and they aren't coming back.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:39:57 UTC No. 16492967
>>16492963
satellites
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:40:19 UTC No. 16492968
>>16492956
Whatever happened to Rogozin? Did he actually lose his balls in ukraine?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:40:20 UTC No. 16492969
>>16492958
It can be a good book, it's not the books fault. But if all you do is follow procedure in a complex emergency situation things can go from bad to worse without a good full system understanding.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:41:39 UTC No. 16492971
>>16492967
>Flies under the clouds
Not to mention a satellite can't be everywhere at once, and requires communications, adding another weak point to the system.
It's just a stupid idea anon, elon isn't right all the time.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:42:28 UTC No. 16492972
>>16492952
fortunately there are electric drives with a common propellant that can be clustered
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:42:40 UTC No. 16492973
>>16492969
>But if all you do is follow procedure in a complex emergency situation things
Anon, please stop you are really embarrassing yourself.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:44:06 UTC No. 16492976
>>16492607
This report has been around for almost a year.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:44:51 UTC No. 16492977
>>16492969
I love when someone confidently displays they are totally uneducated on a topic.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:47:09 UTC No. 16492979
>>16492971
satellites you retarded nigga, and yes they can be everywhere at once
you just need a big constellation
with SAR for instance you can see through clouds
>they require communication
starlink
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:48:00 UTC No. 16492980
>>16492761
here's a lil Starliner shoulder
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:49:46 UTC No. 16492982
>>16492980
UOOOOH STARLINER EROTIC TOT
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:50:25 UTC No. 16492983
>>16492968
And his penis too. He gets VERY mad if you remind him of this on xeeter.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:50:33 UTC No. 16492984
I would have told him not to stir the oxygen tank
(imagine I posted a photo of a smug looking frog with his arms crossed)
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:51:31 UTC No. 16492986
>>16492982
>neee-gu.mp4
lol
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:52:04 UTC No. 16492987
>>16492831
impressive, i didnt expect them to deliver
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:53:34 UTC No. 16492988
>>16492980
>left with two humans in her
>came back with none
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:54:50 UTC No. 16492991
>>16492972
I'm actually disappointed the ELF thruster project seemed to die when Slough went to work for Helion. Maybe someone can pick it up in a year or two when patents expire?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:55:06 UTC No. 16492992
>>16492988
first birth in space!
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:56:57 UTC No. 16492994
>>16492988
>>16492992
>all crewed vehicles are pregnant
>Shuttle carried seven astronauts
>Starship HLS can hold 25
sbarky you know what must be done
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:00:30 UTC No. 16492998
>>16492979
Starlink needs ground stations you fucking retard. That's what I meant by weak points.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:01:01 UTC No. 16492999
>>16492979
>SAR
Elon said using cameras, not radar.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:05:06 UTC No. 16493003
>>16492834
Told ya
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:06:43 UTC No. 16493004
>>16492998
If it's something as urgent as a missile, every single starlink dish is a ground station. The entire country country and the entire sky is a distributed network.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:07:56 UTC No. 16493005
>>16492969
stirring the tanks was a standard regular procedure throughout the missions.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:09:38 UTC No. 16493007
>>16492994
t-that's kinda hot...
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:12:06 UTC No. 16493009
>>16492999
cameras, IR cameras, everything
SAR is just for situations when you have something like clouds blocking, obviously you would want normal cameras or IR most of the time
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:14:54 UTC No. 16493012
>>16492971
>Flies under the clouds
>SAR still lighting up your giant flat wing and body surfaces top down like a Christmas tree
Having to always fly under the clouds and wait for cloud cover to launch sorties would make planes basically useless and cucked anyway even if your super glownigger satellites only had cameras. If you want to hit something far away, you use a missile. Imagine how many missiles you could bought at a competitive free market mass produced rate for the cost of the f-35 program.
>Not to mention a satellite can't be everywhere at once
>a satellite
Have you missed the advent of starlink you retarded boomer? Total global surveillance of everything on earth in real time is coming very soon and all forms of stealth will be completely obsolete.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:17:33 UTC No. 16493015
>>16492998
why would starlink need a ground station ?
its a constellation that communicates between each other
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:20:56 UTC No. 16493019
>>16493012
>>16493015
Reminder
>>16492943
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:23:08 UTC No. 16493020
>>16493009
No, he specifically said "Stelath means nothing if you use AI with low light sensitivity cameras". He's not talking about any kind of radar application.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:27:59 UTC No. 16493025
>>16493020
And he is right. Have fun telling your pilots they can only fly when there is cloud cover and they must be under it at all times. I'm sure they will love getting shot at by air defence when they have an average operational ceiling of a few thousand feet among other things.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:30:07 UTC No. 16493026
>>16493022
I don't expect IFT 7 earlier than February, it's going to be a new design and they probably will do more ground testing
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:30:32 UTC No. 16493027
>>16493022
IFT5 really skews this off I feel. Had it not been for the FAA it would've been a lot sooner and the trend line a lot steeper.
The FAA won't be a problem anymore so I see the cadence growing faster than this.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:32:07 UTC No. 16493028
>>16493015
thats how they connect to the internet. theres one a bit of a drive away from where i live
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:34:01 UTC No. 16493029
>>16493025
Any demonstrations of this working as a stealth counter?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:34:32 UTC No. 16493031
>>16493029
ww3
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:35:17 UTC No. 16493033
>>16493028
Which could be anywhere in the world or even in space...
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:35:24 UTC No. 16493034
>>16493029
Yeah, I can see stealth planes.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:36:50 UTC No. 16493035
>>16493029
every single photograph of a stealth air craft ?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:37:27 UTC No. 16493036
>>16493033
>a GROUND station
>in space
your dropped out of elementary school, didn't you?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:38:18 UTC No. 16493037
>>16493022
>>16493026
IFT-7 is literally happening on the 11th of January.
https://tlpnetwork.com/news/america
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:39:38 UTC No. 16493038
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:39:46 UTC No. 16493039
>>16493037
I can only believe spacex dates when the ship is actually ready and tested
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:41:04 UTC No. 16493041
>>16493028
they could probably make mobile ground stations or even use regular starlink dishes as ad hoc ground connections if that was necessary in a war
I would guess the reason they do it as they do it now is just to maximize bandwidth, i.e. the frequencies the ground links use are ones that would be inefficient or difficult to use for small commercial dishes, but that isn't a problem if you build a semi-big dedicated ground link (you can have different types of antennas that are bigger and hog more power for instance)
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:42:14 UTC No. 16493042
>>16493037
coincidence
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:43:39 UTC No. 16493044
>>16493041
Just stop anon, you're embarrassing yourself
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:46:46 UTC No. 16493046
>>16493041
>use regular starlink dishes as ad hoc ground connections
Dishes that are largely in rural areas, which aren't targets in any scenario. Add in the fact that the best asat defense is having 12,000 of them and the starlink network is completely untouchable to adversaries.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:47:32 UTC No. 16493047
>>16493022
>>16493026
>>16493037
IFT 7 isn’t a thing, you guys are talking about flight 7
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:47:56 UTC No. 16493048
>>16493047
I've started calling it IFT just to bother you
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:47:57 UTC No. 16493049
>>16493047
You NEED to get a grip
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:48:09 UTC No. 16493050
>>16493033
sadly i dont live in space
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:49:11 UTC No. 16493052
>>16493037
what if it happened figuratively?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:50:00 UTC No. 16493055
International Faggot Time
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:52:01 UTC No. 16493058
>>16493055
Planning your trip?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:56:30 UTC No. 16493063
fuck you
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:01:11 UTC No. 16493069
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:01:47 UTC No. 16493070
Chinese Researchers Say They Can Detect Stealth Aircraft Using Starlink Satellites
>As the South China Morning Post reports, the team used a DJI Phantom 4 Pro drone as a stand-in for such an aircraft for an experiment. Using a ground-based radar system, the team spotted the tiny drone thanks to the radiation emitted by a Starlink satellite, which was flying over the Philippines at the time.
>This idea is that when an aircraft passes between a satellite and an antenna back on the ground, it can scatter the satellite's electromagnetic waves — ripples that can be picked up by ground-based radar to identify targets.
>Thanks to the thousands of Starlink satellites that have been launched by SpaceX so far, scientists are now hoping to use disturbances in the high-frequency radio signals to track stealth aircraft.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinese-
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:03:36 UTC No. 16493072
>>16493070
>SCMP
Usual bullshit.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:04:13 UTC No. 16493074
>>16493070
>Anon desperately googling to try and validate musk's wild claims
Where does that mention "low light cameras" anon?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:04:17 UTC No. 16493075
>>16493070
F-35 bros...
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:04:43 UTC No. 16493077
>>16493070
IMPLESSIVE
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:08:34 UTC No. 16493081
>>16493070
Making the military adversarial to Starlink and SpaceX might be a Chinese foreign policy priority right now
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:11:47 UTC No. 16493083
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:15:00 UTC No. 16493086
>>16493044
retard alert
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:16:29 UTC No. 16493088
>>16493070
Stealth is a stale meme at this point anyway
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:29:29 UTC No. 16493093
>>16493070
Oort cloud poster's back
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:30:59 UTC No. 16493094
>>16493070
dont they post this same shit every year?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:32:19 UTC No. 16493095
wen hop?
also whats their production time for engines/ships now? 1engine/day? can they make a flight ready fullstack per month yet?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:34:38 UTC No. 16493096
>>16492691
yeah but there are still elves left in middle earth in the fourth age, it's only their leaders (the keepers of the rings) that left
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:39:22 UTC No. 16493103
>>16493074
an antenna is a sort of camera and ambient Starlink transmissions are sort of 'low light'
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:45:53 UTC No. 16493107
>>16493083
what's the source for this?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:00:16 UTC No. 16493119
>>16493103
What was it for? If the SRB explodes you're not gonna have time to get into the roller coaster.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:01:04 UTC No. 16493121
>>16493119
All of the ARES escape plans were total fantasy.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:01:34 UTC No. 16493123
>>16493119
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:12:02 UTC No. 16493124
>>16492607
>>16492608
https://x.com/CJHandmer/status/1860
apparently the over 400 page document about an mars architecture does not mention Starship once, 3 SpaceX (as image credits), no methane, one mention of direct entry
lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:12:07 UTC No. 16493125
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:13:38 UTC No. 16493126
>>16493124
https://x.com/CJHandmer/status/1861
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:16:01 UTC No. 16493130
>>16492813
the non-whites will never understand.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:17:11 UTC No. 16493132
>>16493130
Uhhhh sweaty? We stan latinos now
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:17:48 UTC No. 16493133
>>16493119
Just a fun little amusement park ride at the tax payer’s expense.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:21:26 UTC No. 16493138
>>16493126
https://x.com/CJHandmer/status/1861
>The real reason Gateway exists is to give NASA's space station people something to do, and to make SLS's continuing failure less obvious. For newer readers, I've written a few blogs on SLS, but it and Orion are not powerful enough to actually reach the Moon, and Gateway is about as close as they can get. Rather than can SLS, Orion and Gateway as three brothers in development failure, they've instead become some trinity of self-justifying failure.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:22:00 UTC No. 16493139
>>16492980
>>16492982
has anybody heard from @wheel_stop since they deleted their xeeter?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:24:46 UTC No. 16493144
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:25:33 UTC No. 16493145
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:25:34 UTC No. 16493146
>>16493138
yea but they operated the shuttle + ISS for decades in exactly that situation
They just want to reenact it
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:26:05 UTC No. 16493147
>>16493137
>a compelling architecture story
This is why the first human Mars landing will be absent the NASA logo
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:26:21 UTC No. 16493148
>>16493143
Oh god they ran a story about an actual useful tool that got printed instead! The HORROR!
https://www.nasa.gov/missions/stati
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:26:35 UTC No. 16493149
>>16492619
silmaril powered boats
just like aerendil
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:27:50 UTC No. 16493153
>>16493139
why did xhe do it? tranny problems?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:29:42 UTC No. 16493155
>>16493144
yes that is the pic I didn't post because it was already posted
the thread by handmer shitting on this is much longer too, didn't want to post 10 pics
anyway, I don't know if NASA is even fixable at this point? can you reform something like this without firing a lot of people?
the whole culture needs to change
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:30:42 UTC No. 16493156
>>16493148
3d printing parts of itself seems much cooler to me
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:31:43 UTC No. 16493158
total NASA death
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:32:13 UTC No. 16493159
>>16493153
Lots of people are leaving twitter for a site with less bots, ragebait, and a non-poltiical algorithm. Twitter is even censoring the name of the site, because it's having such an impact on their (real) user numbers.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:33:50 UTC No. 16493160
>>16493159
tranny detected
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:34:04 UTC No. 16493161
>>16493153
Twitter is kind of a shithole right now, and elon started throttling external links, so creators really don't have any reason to post there anymore
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:34:41 UTC No. 16493162
>>16493107
wheel_stop, she died of being too gay
>>16493153
too gay for Japan near as I can tell
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:35:25 UTC No. 16493163
a lot of dirt is getting thrown at NASA in the past few weeks... Trump+elon combo is already having an impact it would seem. Normies are even beginning to talk about Scam Launch System.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:36:43 UTC No. 16493165
>>16493162
noooooooo, can I find the art somewhere at least? rocketgirl yuri is worth it's weight in gold
>she
doubt
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:37:30 UTC No. 16493166
>>16493161
started? that happened like a year ago
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:37:52 UTC No. 16493167
>>16493161
she was set to private anyway lol, it was just a place for her to upload art and vent about being gay or whatever it was that was bothering her (I can't read moonrunes and private accounts can't autotranslate)
>>16493165
no I simply saved all of it
no you can't have it
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:42:18 UTC No. 16493171
>>16493166
It got even worse recently, now it's any post with a link gets de-prioritized in the algo.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:42:39 UTC No. 16493173
>>16493121
So is Ares in general lol
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:42:45 UTC No. 16493174
>>16493171
nothing changed retard, it just got brought up again
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:43:05 UTC No. 16493175
>no you can't have it
fuck you
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:44:02 UTC No. 16493176
>>16493171
>"That's so dumb, no website would do that"
>google it
>It's real
It's like he's TRYING to kill the app.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:44:32 UTC No. 16493177
>>16493176
We gon make a lamp
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:53:56 UTC No. 16493184
>>16493155
I wasn't talking about any of that, just making fun of the PowerPoint filler graphics.
>can you reform something like this without firing a lot of people
No. Anyone competent gets pulled to the private sector and anyone incompetent doesn't get fired. This is not a recipe for success. An organization is it's people.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:54:01 UTC No. 16493185
>>16493180
Why woody?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:54:44 UTC No. 16493187
>>16493180
>ift-5 = mechazilla
ok
>ift-6 = banana for scale
ok
>ift-7 = woody
what went wrong?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:55:09 UTC No. 16493189
>>16493180
>"Elon please, we need to launch an actual payload or at least mass simulator to get some real data for customers."
>"Uhhh..... no. Put a cowboy doll on it."
>"But sir..."
>"I have on word for you. BAZINGA!!! ROFL trolled hardcore! We're doing the cowboy. Also your fired."
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:57:29 UTC No. 16493193
>>16493188
Who cares lol they'll be on a different planet from us soon
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:59:33 UTC No. 16493201
>>16493180
>Starship: Doll delivery vehicle
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:04:05 UTC No. 16493204
>>16493188
He's right, it's incredibly disappointing that our closest neighbor looks exactly like the least interesting parts of our planet. Doesn't mean we can't make something cool there
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:05:30 UTC No. 16493206
>>16493204
I find it incredibly fascinating. Imagine what ancient astronomers would think if they saw the photographs we have today.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:08:17 UTC No. 16493208
>>16493206
To this date you still underestimate my intelligence. In the kindest most reassuring way - we got this - and a lot more - and possibly/definitely forever.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:08:32 UTC No. 16493210
>>16493206
>Imagine what ancient astronomers would think if they saw the photographs we have today.
"That's it?"
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:12:14 UTC No. 16493214
>>16493206
They thought there were jungles on Venus and canals on Mars. That the entire universe outside our bubble turned out to be an irradiated hellscape is kind of a bummer. I love Mars and aim to live there but it is difficult to see it as much beyond a blank canvas
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:12:53 UTC No. 16493216
>>16493206
>Imagine what ancient astronomers would think if they saw the photographs we have today.
"Damn, that shit's lame as fuck."
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:14:33 UTC No. 16493219
F-22 won.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:15:26 UTC No. 16493221
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:18:03 UTC No. 16493223
>>16493189
based
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:18:06 UTC No. 16493224
>>16493217
>low light sensitivity cameras
Ever notice how rocket launch footage looks like complete ass after like t+10s? The atmosphere wrecks whatever image you have. Also clouds also you'll never get an ai to process data fast enough currently
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:20:20 UTC No. 16493225
>>16493224
Go back to making security out of a wall of lava lamps you buffoonoid.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:21:59 UTC No. 16493226
>>16493225
I'm being serivos. We've already won and there's a big victory coming. Lots of change soon
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:30:42 UTC No. 16493234
>>16493180
no, because such things have no power. they are not real.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:31:07 UTC No. 16493235
>>16493149
what are mithrils thermal properties? could it make a heat shield?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:33:01 UTC No. 16493238
>>16493188
deserts are nice. i feel something. i feel like i want to walk on that desert and look up to see earth a tiny point in the sky, and think of the distance ive crossed to be here. i feel like i would want to turn around and see my faithful, massive, starship, parked on the surface, ready to go but also ready to stay.
what kind of souless ghoul wouldn't feel something like that?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:34:09 UTC No. 16493241
>>16493235
it would be worth far more than the value of the Shire
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:34:51 UTC No. 16493242
>>16493188
>I feel nothing
Words cannot describe my need to go around Mars with a rock hammer and crack open all of the rocks
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:36:51 UTC No. 16493245
>>16493214
Give it a few centuries. we’ll put the jungles on venus and canals on mars.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:38:55 UTC No. 16493248
>>16493241
>pigsty full of midgets
that isn't valuable
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:42:14 UTC No. 16493250
>>16493225
>he didn't call me a liar
concession accepted
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:43:52 UTC No. 16493253
>>16493250
Suck my big ball and tickle my left, smaller hanging ball
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:44:56 UTC No. 16493255
>>16493250
Translation: daddy Barkon are you hung? Defeat me in debate like you do the other nerds of sci
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:46:37 UTC No. 16493256
>>16493253
>>16493255
this anon is totally mind broken
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:47:43 UTC No. 16493257
>>16493238
Exactly dude, you get it. I think there is something seriously wrong with the world when even so-called spaceflight "enthusiasts" like >>16493204, >>16493210, >>16493214 and >>16493216 don't find space fascinating. There are entire worlds out there waiting for us to explore and conquer. The Faustian spirit has been killed.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:53:32 UTC No. 16493263
>>16493137
Least the PepsiCo logo research paper was paid by the company...
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:55:15 UTC No. 16493264
>>16493022
It's Anon's law since I, anonymoose, rediscovered it
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:58:43 UTC No. 16493276
>you can't use moores law for space
>you can't just launch 10 times as much
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:21:45 UTC No. 16493292
>>16493047
*OFT 7
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:22:39 UTC No. 16493295
>>16493248
Gandalf clearly implied it was quite valuable, as did the reaction of those that heard him.
>>16493257
ive explored quite a bit of this world and i'd love to go walkabout on mars. i bet you dont even notice the suit and helmet after a while. All my expeditions have relied upon the constant, faithful, functioning of a machine (bicycle actually) so i know the relationship that can develop between man and his vessels. i can only imagine the bond betwixt man and ship.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:23:07 UTC No. 16493297
>>16493276
Falcon 9 is a notoriously unreliable machine with a brutally short service lifespan. Despite this it’s by far the best rocket ever to see service.
rockets stand to be a whole lot better than they are.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:23:36 UTC No. 16493298
>>16493070
They're using Starshield though, not Starlink
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:23:40 UTC No. 16493299
>>16493292
Often Flight Test?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:24:27 UTC No. 16493301
>>16493257
I just don't like geology lol. I'm way more interested in the problem solving of how we get there and how we build a city. You can stare at dead rocks on Earth.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:27:32 UTC No. 16493305
>>16493301
You should be able to 'do' as normal now, but focus on your own life's. That's given you know how to create simple wires. Use the mind print (adult) to determine what wires you should be using, if by wire I mean method unto which you can do stuff. You may want a feeder wire, and alien wire and a sate wire if your mind print is that you have 3. Usually it's between 1-9
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:29:40 UTC No. 16493309
>>16493301
dude, geology rocks!
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:31:40 UTC No. 16493312
>>16493217
He's unironically right. Fighter jets are still cool for the same reason trains are cool, but their time has passed
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:34:59 UTC No. 16493314
>>16493312
say that when they fuck your drones up at mach 2
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:36:58 UTC No. 16493319
>>16493238
I get it but that isn't what Mars will be past the first couple of windows. No rugged explorers, no individualist homesteaders. It's a different type of frontier. More centralized, more of a technology problem. If any of us get there we'll be working in a factory. The mad scramble towards a self sufficient city of a million people doesn't leave room for much else. When your ship lands it'll land in a space port. They might hook up a pressurized PBB to your ship's door. Most Martians will never wear a spacesuit at all
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:38:39 UTC No. 16493321
>>16493313
Awesome, I'm so excited for this. I heard it will be a 6-8 year journey to Kraken Mare if they choose to land at the equator. What are the chances of it being operational for that long?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:39:42 UTC No. 16493324
>>16493313
Is this SpaceX's first payload with a nuclear power source?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:40:21 UTC No. 16493325
>>16493324
That we know of.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:41:22 UTC No. 16493326
>>16493318
Anytime I go for a long walk outside in the depths of winter, geared up with thermals/snowpants/gloves/scarf/hat
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:41:28 UTC No. 16493327
>>16493312
Any drone fighter that relies on a satellite link or whatever is a meme and not designed for a hot war.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:45:14 UTC No. 16493334
>>16493321
Don't get too exited, I've heard it'll just check out some equatorial craters.
>>16493324
Is there any reason for a glowsat to have nuclear power?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:46:59 UTC No. 16493335
>>16493330
0% chance of this ever being built
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:49:33 UTC No. 16493336
reminder that kids 10-20 years from now will never know a world without space colonies. for them humans living on multiple heavenly bodies is the norm. civilization existing on a single planet is alien and weird to them.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:50:56 UTC No. 16493337
>>16493335
Come on now it's just a car
>>16493336
Don't count those chickens just yet
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:52:34 UTC No. 16493339
>>16493313
Too much winning!
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:52:45 UTC No. 16493340
>>16493334
>to have nuclear power?
>Lasers
>Electronic Warfare
>Longer service life
Plus, it doubles as a dirty bomb should the need arise. In fact, I don't know why worthwhile military satellites don't have a nuclear powersource for all their needs.
The closest thing is
>https://www.thespacereview.com/art
Which fills me with joy with the fact that someone wants to put a 1MW electronic warfare package on orbit and could be instantly recognized by the use of droplet radiators
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:52:57 UTC No. 16493342
>>16493314
>Shoots one drone
>1000 more take its place
What happens when you lose one F35? Did you know Locksneed has only built 1000 of them since 2008? Did you know we dont have enough skilled pilots to fly thst many anyway? Did you know the lead time to build a single F35 is two years? Lol. Lmao.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:52:58 UTC No. 16493343
>>16493334
Less operational constraints? More stealthy? No idea if it's worth the added cost
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:53:31 UTC No. 16493345
>>16493336
that's gonna take a hundred years to start
but we'll have continuously inhabited moon and mars research stations soon
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:54:28 UTC No. 16493346
>>16493327
They can easily be fully autonomous. Be careful how you train it though, it might come after you too!
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:00:58 UTC No. 16493349
>>16493334
That's lame. We've already known what Titan's surface looks like for 20 years. What's the point of sending a drone if it's not gonna fly over the lakes? Space exploration is so fucking shitty right now. Why are we sending two probes to the Galilean moons when one could've been a Europa descent probe? Why all these Venus orbiters on the table instead of a lander?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:01:20 UTC No. 16493351
>>16493346
Easily? Can't even get cars to be fully autonomous. Now you want a fully autonomous fighter that is 100x times more expensive. And your grandma can drive a car, fighter pilot training is tough.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:01:36 UTC No. 16493352
>>16493342
That's the thing, shooting down an F-35 requires a drastic amount of effort compared to a drone. An F-35 doesn't crash if you point a
microwave at it.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:02:51 UTC No. 16493353
>>16493350
>When will Musk revolutionize the sexbot industry?
I still wonder.. all of that money and he never invested in exowombs for genetically engineered catgirls clones of myself.
I declare Elon a meme failure.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:02:56 UTC No. 16493354
>>16493349
To play devil's advocate, surface venus probes last almost nothing, and an europa lander will get fried by radiation very fast.
Though, it really is a waste to not explore the Titan lakes. I hope the mission gets revisited in the future, maybe a Starship launch could add a simple relay sat for it.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:10:28 UTC No. 16493368
>>16493301
you can build a city on Earth
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:10:43 UTC No. 16493369
>>16493336
>reminder that kids 10-20 years from now will never know a world without space colonies
so true!
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:11:35 UTC No. 16493370
>>16493369
who is going to start a moon colony?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:13:37 UTC No. 16493372
>>16493368
Where?
>>16493340
spooky shit
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:13:57 UTC No. 16493373
>>16493350
>puffy robotic vulva exposed
Put some pants on you lewd machine
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:15:49 UTC No. 16493378
>>16493372
wherever you want. It would be much easier to get land here in the middle of nowhere rather than do it on another planet
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:18:29 UTC No. 16493381
>>16493370
the moon base is permanent. the seed that sprouts into the moon colony.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:20:50 UTC No. 16493383
>>16493369
wouldn't water accumulate in the three big windows since they are at the lowest relative elevation?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:23:53 UTC No. 16493385
>>16493383
No, you could make them slope with the correct design. Big windows have been superseded by light pipes anyway
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:24:35 UTC No. 16493386
>>16493345
What's going to take a hundred years faggot? The Mars city is starting next decade
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:24:49 UTC No. 16493387
>>16493334
Do you remember that big deal about a 'Russian nuclear space weapon' a few months ago? That was a nuclear powered EW sat.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:28:32 UTC No. 16493394
>>16493368
You can't build a Mars city on Earth. Has there been a single Mars rock discovered that didn't already have a name, because it had already been discovered and categorized on Earth? With life and tectonics, Earth rocks are more interesting than Mars rocks. With the constraints of Mars, a Mars city is more interesting than an Earth city.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:28:55 UTC No. 16493395
>>16493385
>Big windows have been superseded by light pipes anyway
Good practical change, terrible aesthetic choice
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:30:57 UTC No. 16493396
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/25/
>Elon Musk floats buying MSNBC, but he’s not the only billionaire who may be interested
spend that money on space elonnnn
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:31:53 UTC No. 16493398
>>16493342
F35 gonna fuck you up boy, you and all yo' drone bitch mufuggers
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:32:40 UTC No. 16493400
>>16493351
>Implying Palantir + Anduril can't easily BTFO Locksneed and Boing defence capabilities
Got a real Athletesf00t over here
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:33:21 UTC No. 16493403
>>16493342
>EW just shuts off all your drones
yeah good thing Elon is not in charge of defense
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:35:07 UTC No. 16493404
>>16493352
Wrong. F35s must keep the pilot alive. They are explicitly gimped to achieve this end. An autonomous equivalent can achieve speeds and capabilities that would kill a pilot, doesn't take a genius to figure this out
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:36:17 UTC No. 16493407
>>16493403
>pilot dies from too many Gs
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:37:50 UTC No. 16493410
>>16493395
Window tubes was never gonna happen. These things will be embedded in asteroids or have 10 feet thick of gravel tied to the sides (if any are ever actually built (they won't be))
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:38:50 UTC No. 16493412
>>16493398
F35 cant fly on Mars
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:40:24 UTC No. 16493413
/sfg/ - Supersonic Fighter General
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:41:23 UTC No. 16493415
>>16493410
>(if any are ever actually built (they won't be))
I CAN DREAM DAMMIT (at least lava tube colonies will happen (right?))
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:42:46 UTC No. 16493417
>>16493403
God help America's adversaries if Musk ever dives fully into defense. Oh my God
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:42:57 UTC No. 16493418
>>16492931
Lunar night has a high likelihood to kill any spacecraft which doesn't have a nuclear heat/power source
>>16492946
Uh, yeah, thanks for correctly pointing out the reason that these electric thrust ships will be feasible to build before 2034, now can you point out an actual problem if one exists?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:46:04 UTC No. 16493423
>>16493414
>Bring on the superweapons, carrier planes, mega-cannons that shoot across whole continents, all of it.
>PICTURE IT! CAN’T YOU SEE!?
>ONE MILLION LIVES!!
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:48:26 UTC No. 16493424
>>16493412
dem bigass heelo-copters gonna be bitchin
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:48:51 UTC No. 16493425
>>16492972
Imagine that except each hab section is several Starmax station sized modules and the vehicle has equipment packed up that lets the ship refill from water ice ISRUd from one of the low mass irregular Jovian moons/asteroids
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:51:47 UTC No. 16493428
>>16493351
Funny enough, the only reason fully autonompus drones aren't in use is because the DOD prohibits their use. Autonomous systems must have "appropriate levels of human judgment," so fully autonomous drones cannot independently decide to use lethal force without human oversight. Hopefully Elon will get rid of this regulation. And then he can post a meme about it on X:
>Begun, the drone war has!
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:52:59 UTC No. 16493429
>>16493415
I'm sure they'll be built, they'll just have an Orion drive at one end. Difficult to justify otherwise
>>16493417
Does defense have the same issues spaceflight did? I'm not nearly as knowledgeable there. There's no way we'd still be the best if we're so encumbered
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:01:54 UTC No. 16493438
>>16493407
so don't pull that many Gs
>>16493429
>Does defense have the same issues spaceflight did? I'm not nearly as knowledgeable there. There's no way we'd still be the best if we're so encumbered
No. The problem with spaceflight was reusability and the fact that old space was bloated and nobody really cared
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:05:46 UTC No. 16493440
>>16493429
Yes, you even have many of the same contractors
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:05:56 UTC No. 16493441
>>16493429
Absolutely same problems. Same shitty contracting incentives, cost plus, same conglomerates involved. Failure to innovate, failure to deliver on time or on budget. No focus on materiale or results. But that has been changing with new entrants, and the model already proven with SpaceX. Considering the repeated failures of military adventurism in the past several decades, America is not nearly as nimble and adaptable as it once was. The military has become bloated, ineffective, and calcified over time. DOGE may help to steer this right, but it won't be easy
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:07:44 UTC No. 16493443
>>16493438
Old primes are bloated too, wtf are you talking about
Its basically identical
And not going after reusability is just one of many things wrong with old space, SpaceX would be much, much cheaper even with expendable rockets
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:07:47 UTC No. 16493444
>>16493438
Who you you think "old space" is? Retard
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:20:44 UTC No. 16493452
>>16493443
fair enough but since the military is extremely important it hasn't decayed as much. They just need to stop letting contractors spend whatever they want.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:26:42 UTC No. 16493457
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:32:49 UTC No. 16493462
>>16493012
>Imagine how many missiles you could bought at a competitive free market mass produced rate for the cost of the f-35 program.
The F-35 is a stealth plane that can carry nuclear bombs. So far only the F-35A but if the B and C get configured for that it's gonna be a real bad day for anyone counting on watching ICBM silos.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:33:35 UTC No. 16493463
Epsilon 2nd stage test prob blew up on Clear's stream
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:36:26 UTC No. 16493466
>>16493463
>blew up on Clear
heh
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:38:10 UTC No. 16493469
>>16493350
Once they have a fox suit
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:40:21 UTC No. 16493472
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:42:47 UTC No. 16493474
>>16493462
That will be 15 years and 2 trillion dollars + tip
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:45:08 UTC No. 16493476
>>16493473
The more affordable and comfortable you make it the more people will go. The only issue is the novelty is not sustainable in the long run.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:45:45 UTC No. 16493477
>>16493463
>>16493465
Man the japanese really can't into rockets can they.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:51:25 UTC No. 16493480
>>16493474
It's mostly a software issue.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:52:35 UTC No. 16493482
>>16493473
>>16493476
There's also a really big demand spike when you shift from floating in tin cans with vacuum toilets to spin gravity with flush toilets.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:52:39 UTC No. 16493483
>>16493473
The cheapest flight to LEO right now costs slightly more than this house
https://youtu.be/hdeRNXszMyE?si=Fxa
We're talking about choosing between owning a super yacht and spending a week in LEO.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:01:07 UTC No. 16493489
>>16493465
>>16493463
It took them more than a year to prepare a new second stage after it blew up during the last test and they fucked it up again kek
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:05:01 UTC No. 16493491
>>16493482
Yea i'm sure it'll be a decent size industry once you have an actual station in orbit
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:07:08 UTC No. 16493492
>>16493473
we need to build a Torus first
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:10:42 UTC No. 16493496
>>16493465
Poor lil bugger
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:12:02 UTC No. 16493497
>>16493457
Sensible chuckle.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:13:48 UTC No. 16493498
>>16493477
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries can.
But these fucks can't even figure out solid rockets, which quite frankly isn't even real rocket science.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:15:19 UTC No. 16493499
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:21:58 UTC No. 16493501
>>16493465
owari da...
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:23:19 UTC No. 16493502
https://www.reddit.com/r/redscarepo
why do women and homosexuals hate space so much? we'll need women to make space babies and we'll need gays for the interior decorating (every livable volume will be an interior space, gays more powerful and necessary)
what can we do to change this trend?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:29:23 UTC No. 16493503
>>16493502
Someone in there genuinely trying to make the case that Elon is the worst person since Hitler. Don't show me stuff just to make me mad again
>gays for the interior decorating (every livable volume will be an interior space, gays more powerful and necessary)
This is very funny but still fuck off
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:30:32 UTC No. 16493505
>>16493502
>https://www.reddit.com/r/redscarep
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:30:40 UTC No. 16493506
>>16493502
>we'll need women to make space babies
Not for long
>homosexuals hate space
You and I are here, aren't we
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:32:03 UTC No. 16493507
>>16493502
>Communist site
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:33:09 UTC No. 16493508
Firefly glassdoor review from several months ago
>The management is clueless and poorly communicates to employees within their departments or outside their departments.
>The current CTO knows very little about engineering and does not get his employees to work together to design properly fitting and functioning rocket parts.
>The woman dictating the lunar lander program has no idea how to manage anything. She does her own thing with total disregard to everyone else. HR does not care about employees. When you try to schedule a meeting or call to discuss concerns, they never respond because they don't care. HR let's some people get away with bad things. Employees get frustrated and quit all the time and that is in part, why they are always hiring. They can't pay any bills because they don't have enough money. They don't meet committed launch dates because their rockets always fail on the launch pad or they can't build them properly because of poor quality.
Just to manage your expectations of Firefly's Blue ghost lunar lander
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:33:40 UTC No. 16493509
>>16493492
donut is a dumb shape
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:33:56 UTC No. 16493511
>>16493507
I'm pretty sure the red scare girls are backed by Peter Thiel, who also backed JD Vance. And he's friends with Elon, or at least works with him. I don't get it
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:34:00 UTC No. 16493512
>>16493502
Dang, why didn't the elon twitter spammer post this banger? It has me ROFLing!
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:34:29 UTC No. 16493513
>>16493511
Communist site = communist posters
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:34:58 UTC No. 16493514
>>16493512
alright yeah I don't think anyone here is defending this. our autistic king
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:35:09 UTC No. 16493515
>>16493512
holy autism!
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:37:05 UTC No. 16493516
>>16493508
>CLPS was a good ide-
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:40:22 UTC No. 16493517
>>16493516
I think CLPS will work out, I just don't think, when all is said and done and maybe one of the companies will fly regularly and reliably to themoon, that it would have been particularly cost effective way to develop it;
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:40:32 UTC No. 16493518
>>16493509
your soul is weighed down by gravity
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:41:00 UTC No. 16493519
>>16493217
F-22 is a cool design. F-35 is the subtarded cousin.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:42:39 UTC No. 16493520
>>16493512
lay off the ket you nog
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:44:49 UTC No. 16493521
>>16493180
I know a SS13 meme when I see one
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:44:51 UTC No. 16493523
>>16492828
Isn't that Opie's brother?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:48:36 UTC No. 16493527
>>16492852
I'll never not laugh at that.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:49:16 UTC No. 16493528
>>16493512
Funny stuff lol
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:49:18 UTC No. 16493529
>>16493512
ironic shit posting
normies don't understand
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:51:36 UTC No. 16493530
>>16493521
ONE DAY WHILE ANDY WAS
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:52:40 UTC No. 16493532
>>16493518
Embrace the eternal cylinder
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:55:12 UTC No. 16493534
I swear to god if I finally get to space and one of you fuckers pulls out a clown mask I'm going to throw us both into singulo
>>16493532
the full cylinder is too expensive to build right away, much easier to get the investment for an ~200m torus than a 2km cylinder
pressure stabilization means that disks don't work
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:57:50 UTC No. 16493535
>Notam of CZ-5B going to polar orbit on december 15 is out
Global coverage this time, nowhere is safe, who's ready for the bingo of where the core will fall?
Also, this one will probably bring a huge batch (60+) of megaconstellation sats that are brighter than gen 1 starlink despite being in 1100km orbit
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:01:19 UTC No. 16493537
>>16493027
If the FAA hadn't been pozzed, then the heavy booster catch would have failed, and the timing wouldn't have been so close to election even if it had succeeded.
The extra time Musk's team had to work out the kinks before hand was probably the determining factor that lead to it's success, and that could also be the reason flight 6 catch was aborted.
Classic example of "the thing" shooting itself in the foot.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:03:51 UTC No. 16493539
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:05:02 UTC No. 16493542
>>16493535
C7 for me
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:06:01 UTC No. 16493543
>>16493535
A10
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:06:08 UTC No. 16493544
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:06:49 UTC No. 16493545
>>16493535
I've got no imagination, so C10
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:10:44 UTC No. 16493548
>>16493535
A11
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:11:58 UTC No. 16493550
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:13:24 UTC No. 16493552
>>16493508
> When you try to schedule a meeting or call to discuss concerns, they never respond because they don't care. HR let's some people get away with bad things.
Based HR doesn't want to listen to every Ashley complain about being sexually harassed every time her work gets reviewed
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:14:00 UTC No. 16493553
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:14:15 UTC No. 16493554
>>16493276
>use moores law for space
that doesn't even mean anything
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:16:02 UTC No. 16493555
Real engineering does video on how difficult landing landing on the moon. How we still need a lot of work to be done before we send humans.
Doesn't even mention SpaceX kek
https://youtu.be/IC32zBGdJok
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:16:18 UTC No. 16493557
>>16493535
A10 for karma
F11 for colony drop
B1 for Pearl Harbor Round 2
A11 or B10 for East Asia racism
E8 for wrong island
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:17:22 UTC No. 16493560
>>16493535
oh god, please be A3
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:19:10 UTC No. 16493562
>>16493560
*A2
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:25:49 UTC No. 16493567
>>16493560
But A3 doesn't contain New York, DC, San Fransisco, or Los Angeles
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:27:48 UTC No. 16493570
>>16493508
Good to get some context for the Berger's Law schedule slip of Blue Ghost
I really hope they succeed, they're testing GPS on the Moon (the previous record is held by MMS, I think, at half the distance to the moon)
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:33:01 UTC No. 16493573
>>16493555
>Doesn't even mention SpaceX kek
Because that faggot has legitimate EDS
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:33:31 UTC No. 16493575
>>16493562
>>16493567
I know, I know, but both A4 and A1 contain mostly water, so not that many odds of hitting a big city.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:34:30 UTC No. 16493576
>>16493562
*A7
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:38:13 UTC No. 16493579
>>16493573
>anyone I don't like has EDS
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:38:44 UTC No. 16493580
>>16493575
A man can dream
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:44:06 UTC No. 16493584
>>16493535
F10, and then they fine the Chinese for littering.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:45:18 UTC No. 16493586
>>16493579
Anyone who does not suck Elon's cock and praises everything he does has EDS.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:45:48 UTC No. 16493587
>>16493579
I remember a screenshot of him seething at Musk being posted here.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:50:13 UTC No. 16493591
>>16493465
https://x.com/clearusui/status/1861
>The Epsilon S rocket will not be able to fly until the cause of the explosion is identified, countermeasures are taken, and another combustion test is completed.
>Two facilities, Noshiro and Tanegashima, caught fire, The situation is that there are no longer any facilities capable of burning large solid rockets. Rebuild or repair... It looks like we may have to start over from securing the facilities themselves.
>In addition, until the cause of the explosion can be isolated, there is a possibility that launches of the H3 rocket, H-IIA rocket, and Space One's Kairos rocket, which use solid motor technology, will be postponed. (This is not an official view, but a personal opinion and analysis.)
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:53:18 UTC No. 16493594
>>16493586
>praises everything he does
You know it's almost always the exact opposite.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:55:02 UTC No. 16493596
god i wish elon was my dad
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:02:47 UTC No. 16493601
>>16493596
We all do
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:03:05 UTC No. 16493602
>>16493591
https://x.com/clearusui/status/1861
>In addition, reports on the investigation into the cause will be made at the 49th and 52nd meetings of the Investigation and Safety Subcommittee of the Space Development and Utilization Committee.
It's been 16 months since the last Epsilon test stand explosion
You don't hate regulatory bureaucracy enough
You think you do but you don't
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:03:29 UTC No. 16493603
god i wish elon was my bf
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:04:57 UTC No. 16493604
>>16493602
Combustion instability is the stalking horse of MHI
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:06:21 UTC No. 16493605
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1N
Butch and Sunni are still on the ISS, broadcasting live right now. Did you forget about them, /sfg/?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:08:00 UTC No. 16493607
>>16493605
How long before they sell trips to space as a weight loss cure
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/14/
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:09:32 UTC No. 16493609
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:12:59 UTC No. 16493610
>>16493609
I think he's making a joke about Suni supposedly looking more gaunt the longer she spends in space
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:20:57 UTC No. 16493612
>>16493220
Leviathan will save us
https://leviathanexplorations.com/
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:22:26 UTC No. 16493614
>>16493610
I haven't noticed her looking any different, but it's been a while since I've seen her naked so idk
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:27:23 UTC No. 16493618
>>16493604
We've also got a Vega-C getting ready to fly in a week
Could be exciting
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:37:37 UTC No. 16493620
>>16493257
>you have to think a desolate shithole like Mars is inherently great to be a spaceflightfag
Take your meds
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:38:20 UTC No. 16493622
>>16493614
time to fly to the iss and take a look then
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:49:07 UTC No. 16493626
>>16492600
extremely comfy to be cruising home in long johns smeared with regolith and crammed in next to your $100M spacesuit that you totaled
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:50:23 UTC No. 16493628
>>16493573
What gave it away?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:51:24 UTC No. 16493631
>>16493626
drunk as a skunk
piloting my rover across the Martian surface
the life of a geologist
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:51:56 UTC No. 16493632
>>16493555
Just a glorified Firefly shill video
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:56:49 UTC No. 16493636
>>16492749
webcasts are all compressed to shit dumbass
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:34:21 UTC No. 16493655
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:35:51 UTC No. 16493657
>>16493535
A4, over the FAA's headquarters.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:39:02 UTC No. 16493659
>spacex is banned from launching or landing starship between the hours of 7pm and 7am
wtf who do we blame for this
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:44:48 UTC No. 16493663
>>16493659
Citation?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:45:17 UTC No. 16493665
>>16493632
Another one, too. Once again the FTC guidelines requiring youtubers to disclose sponsors do not apply when the sponsor is the military industrial complex. So many examples of this, all among science educators.
>>16493579
In the firefly video before this one he brought up the facebook explosion >>16492843 pretty much unprompted. Starship video wildly inaccurate and cynical. Shit on the Tesla semi while praising Nikola.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:47:01 UTC No. 16493667
>>16493663
The paperwork for 25 launches at Boca Chica, the anon is misquoting it though as it only denies catch attempts at night.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:51:15 UTC No. 16493676
>>16493667
https://www.faa.gov/media/87646
>The FAA’s federal action is to modify SpaceX’s existing vehicle operator license to authorize SpaceX’s proposed action to increase the cadence of the Starship/Super Heavy launch program (see Section 1.1) at the Boca Chica vertical launch area (VLA) in Cameron County, Texas to up to 25 annual launches and 50 total annual landings (25 of the Starship and 25 of the Super Heavy), and make vehicle and operational upgrades identified below in Table 2. Up to three launches (of the total 25) would occur during nighttime hours from the VLA. Landings at the VLA would only take place during the daytime, with up to 22 Starship and 22 Super Heavy landings at the VLA. Daytime landings of either vehicle may also take place offshore as well. Up to three landings of Starship and three landings of Super Heavy may occur at night, only offshore. SpaceX would also conduct up to 90 seconds of licensed daytime Starship static fire tests and 70 seconds of licensed daytime Super Heavy static fire tests a year. The federal action also includes the FAA’s issuance of temporary airspace closures.
Huh.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:54:26 UTC No. 16493679
>>16493676
so FAA banned night time landings... one last final fuck you before they leave office
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:55:03 UTC No. 16493681
>>16493535
speaking of polar orbit...
what the current status of the crew dragon polar mission?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:57:28 UTC No. 16493682
>>16493679
i mean I'd imagine that people living in south padre island wouldn't want to wake up to a sonic boom in the middle of the night
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:59:12 UTC No. 16493684
>>16493682
maybe they should all die then
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:01:40 UTC No. 16493689
>>16493665
>Shit on the Tesla semi while praising Nikola
That's gotta be the funnest one.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:02:49 UTC No. 16493691
>>16493659
Seems reasonable
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:04:44 UTC No. 16493693
>>16493482
Zero g manufacturing may or may not be a meme. If it's real we'll have zero g manufacturing stations with spin stations for accommodation
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:05:16 UTC No. 16493696
>>16493682
>live next to a spaceport
>complain about the sound
every time
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:07:30 UTC No. 16493698
>>16493682
I hear gunshots all the time, big whoop
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:18:06 UTC No. 16493707
I just made out with my brother's ex gf and she confessed she was always more attracted to me. Women are fucked up bros, be careful
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:18:43 UTC No. 16493708
>>16493698
is it gang violence or just texans. from the beaner population i saw there i would assume its gang violence but idk
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:20:04 UTC No. 16493709
>>16493707
youre a subhuman nigger. doing that to your own blood is a sick and inconceivable stab in the gut. genuinely hoping you kill yourself. also not spaceflight
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:23:03 UTC No. 16493710
>>16493707
modern society produced this
and we call it progress
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:24:42 UTC No. 16493713
>>16493682
Some faggot in a civic woke me up with nigger music the other day. The state has made it such that my sleep can be disturbed by some retard for no reason and I have no recourse but the work towards the expansion of human civilization can't take place after dark.
Infinite rules for good people and no rules for bad people. At what point does this system break
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:26:00 UTC No. 16493715
>>16493713
never. actually when it doesnt matter i.e. when im on mars. hows that for an answer eh? nothing ever happens.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:26:21 UTC No. 16493716
>>16493709
I know, I regret it. It has been 8 months since they broke up, and I hadn't spoken to her in all that time. but I wanted to inform you that this shit happems
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:26:55 UTC No. 16493717
>>16493713
All the night tests will have to happen down at KSC, the noise ordinances in that county clearly exempt rockets from there
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:27:34 UTC No. 16493718
>>16493716
please kill yourself. you disgusting nigger piece of shit. dont fucking reply to me you bottom feeding scum
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:42:17 UTC No. 16493729
>>16493708
I'm in houston so it's blacks
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:53:12 UTC No. 16493740
>>16493696
If they moved in after the spaceport sure but it’s brand spankin new. I can see living there for 20 years and being mad when they install a boom factory right next door.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:55:44 UTC No. 16493742
>>16493718
Lol you're mad at a LARP
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 05:19:19 UTC No. 16493757
>>16493753
what a horrible country
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 05:20:45 UTC No. 16493758
>>16493753
spacex will build a starship spaceport there eventually
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 05:39:21 UTC No. 16493765
>>16493753
I wonder if their neighbors will lend a hand
South Korea might help
Australia could likewise be tempted
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 05:43:26 UTC No. 16493769
>>16493768
o i am tweakin
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 05:49:45 UTC No. 16493771
>>16493465
Why are japs so shit at rocketry?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 06:00:16 UTC No. 16493775
>>16493768
you mean someone used AI to 'zoom in'
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 06:13:05 UTC No. 16493782
>>16493778
The chinese already have this
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 06:18:23 UTC No. 16493785
>>16493753
japan culturally is the exact opposite of what's needed for innovation... while at the same time having no resources or manufacturing, meaning an economy that relies completely on innovation
where do they even go from here
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 06:24:43 UTC No. 16493790
>>16493778
50%
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 06:31:01 UTC No. 16493796
>>16493785
>while at the same time having no resources or manufacturing
resources I will give you, but japan manufactures a tremendous amount of stuff. Way, way more than america.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 06:39:53 UTC No. 16493801
>>16493796
Wrong plus you wear a tiny hat
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 06:56:11 UTC No. 16493816
>>16493801
Please walk around your neighbourhood and observe where the cars and air conditioner units are made rather than sperging about jews.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:03:00 UTC No. 16493821
>>16493235
you're on to something, but chose the wrong material. The One Ring though cast into the hottest part of the fire, was cool to the touch. Obviously THAT is what you need to make the heat shield out of.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:08:19 UTC No. 16493825
>>16493768
This literally just made it worse
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:31:05 UTC No. 16493836
https://x.com/SawyerMerritt/status/
>NEWS: A federal judge in Brownsville has denied an environmental group’s request to halt @SpaceX launches.
>Judge: “Being unable to launch would create various consequences for not only Defendant, but also the public at large. It would significantly delay and possibly destroy Defendant’s contracts with NASA to further the Artemis Program and Human Landing System Program—worth billions of dollars.”
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:35:28 UTC No. 16493840
>>16493836
I can't believe no one has found out who funds these retards. It's not the Sierra Club because they would just do this on their own. From all the years of their inane interference and performative bullshit that I've come to see as a result of these threads you'd think that /somebody/ would have dug into them to find out who is giving them money to set up this ludicrous astroturfing campaign, paying for their lawyers, and busing in people from outside of Brownsville whenever they do a protest.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:06:46 UTC No. 16493858
>>16493840
It's Bezos.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:25:11 UTC No. 16493875
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ys
>Starship Flight 6 Aftermath: Pad Work, Vehicle Updates & Flight 7 News! | Starbase Update
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:29:37 UTC No. 16493878
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jxs
never thought I'd see this crossover
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:32:02 UTC No. 16493879
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:34:57 UTC No. 16493880
>>16493879
aww
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:38:12 UTC No. 16493881
>>16493878
you can make drones that resemble strike fighters
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:38:31 UTC No. 16493882
>>16493022
>log scale
why do they always do this
it makes it unreadable
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:55:08 UTC No. 16493884
>>16493879
that's insane
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:13:25 UTC No. 16493892
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:16:13 UTC No. 16493894
>>16493879
That's a big dog.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:23:14 UTC No. 16493895
>>16493879
that's crazy
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:30:49 UTC No. 16493898
>>16493022
>log scale
>x-axis only goes to 10 anyway
For what purpose
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:47:36 UTC No. 16493919
>>16493882
so that exponential trends become linear
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:00:17 UTC No. 16493922
With Clipper to Europa and Dragonfly to Titan, there's little sense to waste $10B for MSR anymore.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:13:09 UTC No. 16493927
>>16493785
>japan culturally is the exact opposite of what's needed for innovation.
read a book
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:27:16 UTC No. 16493932
>>16493396
Buying a dying legacy news network seems like a bad investment. I legit think he's better off buying EA or actiblizz, they have actual influence with younger generations and unlike msnbc video games make money.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:38:18 UTC No. 16493939
>>16493682
I wouldn't want to have to get up at 3AM to watch the launch. Those restrictions are fine with me.
>>16493708
The beaners only do it during fireworks times like New Years.
>>16493729
pic related
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:38:54 UTC No. 16493940
>>16493579
RE legit does have EDS though, the videos private now but it was archived. https://archive.is/NJCo8
He made a puff piece about nikola like a week before it was revealed as a scam and then told everyone in the comments to fuck off. He's in the same league as ESGhound, a tesla shorter and a nikola pumper.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:40:19 UTC No. 16493942
>>16493938
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUh
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:41:21 UTC No. 16493943
>>16493942
ass shot
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:41:34 UTC No. 16493944
>>16493753
Wait, today's explosion? Until I got to that part I thought it was about that explosion last year.
webbums plz
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:46:53 UTC No. 16493950
>>16493932
>I legit think he's better off buying EA or actiblizz
He needs to buy EA and then have them sell the Ultima IP (which they aren't doing shit with) back to Garriott.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:52:54 UTC No. 16493956
>>16493520
Funny how "Yeah, I know some people who use ketamine to treat depression" turned into "Elon reportedly microdoses ketamine and parties hard with it".
You may think you hate journalists, but you don't hate them enough.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:54:16 UTC No. 16493958
>>16492947
Who?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:03:36 UTC No. 16493962
>>16493879
[math]\unicode{x1F604}[/math]
>>16493778
[math]\unicode{x1F631}[/math]
>>16493943
[math]\unicode{x1F923}[/math] [math]\unicode{x1F923}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:08:28 UTC No. 16493967
>>16493965
Either comms or a jank ass setup to test some new ablative heat shield
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:08:45 UTC No. 16493968
>>16493879
Catch fail
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:10:25 UTC No. 16493969
>>16493965
[math]\unicode{x1F928}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:37:06 UTC No. 16493973
>>16493940
Why do all these niggas have EDS?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:37:34 UTC No. 16493974
>>16493940
Since this video Tesla has gone up ~150% while Nikola has gone down 99.9%
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:38:51 UTC No. 16493975
>>16492980
sbarky I know you're here, how much for a commission
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:40:07 UTC No. 16493977
>>16493974
There's no way you could have predicted that though (Efficient Market Hypothesis)
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:41:36 UTC No. 16493980
>>16493973
One is successful, the other is not.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:43:23 UTC No. 16493982
>>16493973
Smart guy syndrome. They were "reddit right" about hyperloop or some other detail which means they're better than him, and since they're not a billionaire, that means Elon is well above his reasonable position and will fail shortly. Maybe it's this. Maybe it's this this time. Alright I've been wrong for several years so I'm not stopping now. Raptor relight won't- uhhh
It's also sometimes political. Guy that believes the wrong thing can't actually be doing something good. Guy successful in a system I deem evil must be bad.
Last of all, maybe more common among science educators (entertainment types), is social brain. Everyone I see is charismatic and nice. Politicians, celebrities, the winners of popularity contests. Why do I keep seeing this retard? It more or less boils down to bullying an autistic man lol
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:46:01 UTC No. 16493984
>>16493535
These boxes do not have equal areas when projected onto the surface, the ones along the equator are much bigger and will have a higher likelihood of landing.
Please redraw the grid with every box being equal areas for a fair bingo, this one is rigged.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:46:16 UTC No. 16493985
>>16493977
if you aren't a retard then yes you could
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:46:58 UTC No. 16493986
>>16493973
The bigger question is, do we have an example of people with EDS going 180 on the whole thing?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:26:07 UTC No. 16494008
EDS Derangement Syndrome
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:27:13 UTC No. 16494009
>>16493986
I'd like to think kyplanet turned around after I explained to him that you don't need to be a good person or have the right politics to make a good launch vehicle. He at least hasn't made an EDS video since I left that comment, and he deleted the EDS video I left the comment on right after I posted it. In general I don't understand how you can be a spaceflight advocate that dislikes Elon
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:29:53 UTC No. 16494011
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:30:44 UTC No. 16494012
>>16492607
Delta9250 is my favourite Vtuber by far.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:33:10 UTC No. 16494014
>>16494011
Are the smilies posted by a mod or is there a way to figure out what is filtered and what is not?
testing:
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:35:22 UTC No. 16494016
>>16494014
Keywords: TeX and unicode
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:35:34 UTC No. 16494018
>>16494014
>Are the smilies posted by a mod or is there a way to figure out what is filtered and what is not?
[math]\unicode{x1F913}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:39:17 UTC No. 16494023
>>16494016
[math]U+1F480[/math]
please work
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:39:43 UTC No. 16494024
>>16493982
>social brain. Everyone I see is charismatic and nice. Politicians, celebrities, the winners of popularity contests. Why do I keep seeing this retard? It more or less boils down to bullying an autistic man lol
This has got to be the worst one.
It's also the one women have 100% of the time. My female relatives all hate Elon and it boils down to "he's weird" with zero consideration for anything else. Just pure bully mentality. They bully their unattractive male coworkers in the exact same way, which I have to listen to when they gossip about it.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:40:33 UTC No. 16494025
>>16494023
bruh [math]\U+1F480[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:41:00 UTC No. 16494027
>>16494023
[math]\unicode{x261D}[/math][math]\
[ math]\unicode{x261D}[/math ]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:41:27 UTC No. 16494030
>>16494009
>I don't understand how you can be a spaceflight advocate that dislikes Elon
I guess if you are one of those types who wants to kill manned exploration altogether to make space for more probes, then the easiest way to do that is destroy SpaceX and let shartliner fail.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:42:40 UTC No. 16494032
[math]\unicode{x261D}[/math] test
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:42:49 UTC No. 16494033
\unicode{x1F913}
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:43:07 UTC No. 16494034
>>16494027
damn I don't understand computers at all
[math]\unicode{x1F480}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:43:50 UTC No. 16494035
[math]\unicode{x1F913}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:46:10 UTC No. 16494037
>/sfg/ is going to be constant emoji spam from now on
bruh [math]\unicode{U+1F921}[/math] [math]\unicode{U+1F921}[/math] [math]\unicode{U+1F921}[/math] [math]\unicode{U+1F921}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:46:57 UTC No. 16494038
[math]\unicode{x1F600}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:47:54 UTC No. 16494040
>>16494009
Good for you if you got him to stick to exoplanet stuff, that's his forte
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:48:34 UTC No. 16494041
[math]\unicode{x1F4A2}[/math] [math]\unicode{x1F4A2}[/math] [math]\unicode{x1F4A2}[/math]
[math]\unicode{x1F4A2}[/math]
[math]\unicode{x1F62D}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:48:46 UTC No. 16494042
>>16494024
My wife doesn't do this but it's because she's also autistic. The other day she referred to him as "the technologist of our time" and wondered if this is what it would've been like if Isaac Newton had a twitter account
>>16494030
I guess being an exoplanetfag has nothing to do with manned spaceflight
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:51:39 UTC No. 16494044
>>16494040
Yeah at the end I told him to stick to what he's good at, exoplanets and dispelling exoplanet popsci misinfo and he has. Sometimes I forget the rest of the internet isn't like this site so I wonder if I hurt his feelings
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:53:27 UTC No. 16494045
>>16494024
a good argument for abolishing the 19th amendment
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:54:29 UTC No. 16494047
2 months until launch, its over
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:56:18 UTC No. 16494049
[math]\unicode{130BA}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:01:07 UTC No. 16494050
>>16493345
Wait until you hear about Space Exploration Technologies!
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:04:38 UTC No. 16494052
>>16494042
>she's also autistic
Love autistic girls. I'm not gay or anything but they tend to have subtly more masculine proportions than normal girls while still retaining the dainty build, which is a visceral reminder that you are fucking an actual person and not some lower life form.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:05:05 UTC No. 16494053
>>16493417
He said he has intentionally avoided becoming an arms manufacturer
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:08:20 UTC No. 16494057
>>16494049
You need to remove the "U-" with "x"
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:13:46 UTC No. 16494061
>>16493555
name a modern irish that isn't a huge faggot (difficulty: impossible)
I predict that antielonite shilling will actually increase as SpaceX's accomplishments become harder and harder for normgroids to ignore, because it's not caused by ignorance, but by trying to cope with Elon destroying their whole worldview.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:16:06 UTC No. 16494062
>>16493579
>anyone who doesn't think Elon is changing the world has EDS
>anyone who doesn’t acknowledge that Elon has already revolutionized spaceflight has EDS
FTFY
kill yourself faggot
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:19:59 UTC No. 16494064
Off topic but I'm reinstalling windows after 8 years, are there any files I need to salvage? I think I've done everything i.e images, modpacks for games and videos. I think it's realy but I want to be sure.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:21:42 UTC No. 16494065
>wangblows
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:22:40 UTC No. 16494067
>>16494064
Not spaceflight fuck off
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:23:33 UTC No. 16494069
>>16494067
I've already checked that setting and I decided I didn't need it, thanks for the input though buddy.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:24:13 UTC No. 16494071
>>16494064
c:/users/NN/appdata might have something depending on what you do
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:26:45 UTC No. 16494075
A new low for /sfg/ every thread.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:29:59 UTC No. 16494079
>>16493796
America's manufacturing output is over twice that of Japan's.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:30:04 UTC No. 16494080
>>16494071
Yeah I checked, thanks. Just full of game files and app files that have clogged the PC over the years. Might get a linux OS to set up on a spare hard drive to mess around with. I am so sick of windows.
It's time, I'm kinda emotional. I've deleted everything anyway. 8 years on this OS, all gone. Nothing of value anyway.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:38:58 UTC No. 16494085
>>16494064
blud thinks this is a discord server [math]\unicode{x1F480}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:39:27 UTC No. 16494086
>>16494081
It matches their rhetoric of retaking what once belonged to the Russian Empire. Chelomei, born in Poland and raised in Ukraine, is the perfect imagery.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:39:45 UTC No. 16494087
>>16494085
can we do pepe emojis?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:41:16 UTC No. 16494091
>>16494087
[math]\unicode{x1F438}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:44:37 UTC No. 16494094
sirs remember to $SHIT [math]\unicode{x1F680}[/math][math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:51:04 UTC No. 16494096
>thanksgiving week
we're not getting anything interesting until next week, are we?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:55:29 UTC No. 16494101
>>16493836
>It would significantly delay and possibly destroy Defendant’s contracts with NASA to further the Artemis Program and Human Landing System Program
Well yeah, that is the intent behind the request to halt launches. They say it like it's an unforeseen side effect.
>>16494096
There's a Starlink in a few hours, so no.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:57:11 UTC No. 16494102
When they land the cargo transport Starships on Mars prior to the human landings, how is the cargo getting off? Is it going to roll itself on and off the lift?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:58:20 UTC No. 16494103
>>16494096
Only big thing left in the calendar is the NG static fire, early 2025 is going to be fun though.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:59:26 UTC No. 16494105
Since when are emoticons allowed on /sci/?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:01:18 UTC No. 16494106
>>16494105
>boomer can't beef jump
ain't no way bruh [math]\unicode{x1F480}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:03:01 UTC No. 16494107
>>16494102
Why would you take the cargo off before the people arrive? I don't think ensuring your food is sitting in radioactive poison dust for two years is high on the priority list
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:05:58 UTC No. 16494112
>>16494096
>NG static fire
>2 chinese maiden launches
pls anon
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:08:45 UTC No. 16494113
>>16494105
Retarded newfag
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:08:57 UTC No. 16494114
>>16494112
nobody cares about toy rockets
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:10:47 UTC No. 16494117
>>16494113
I've been here since the Starhopper.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:10:59 UTC No. 16494118
>>16494107
>Why would you take the cargo off before the people arrive?
So the ships aren't sitting there for a year.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:12:07 UTC No. 16494119
>>16494009
People are still firmly under the belief that spaceflight should be government led. That commercial can never fundamentally push engineering and exploration bounderies.
I can almost understand the sentiment. Just looking at HLS vs Apollo, the Apollo program seems more advanced with landing on the moon with a single rocket vs launching 10 rockets to refill a starship.
One is seen as an excellent use of resources and engineering, the other is seen as just going to LEO a few times and brute forcing the problem with refueling.
Same with F9, candace and cost in itself isn't impressive as it's just LEO
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:14:45 UTC No. 16494120
>>16494118
Correct, they'll sit there for (2) years.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:16:12 UTC No. 16494121
>>16494044
>i told him to
never beating the parasocial allegations
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:18:58 UTC No. 16494124
>>16494118
Where else would they be lol
>>16494121
He deleted the video 15 minutes after replying to me and then did what I said for the last month.
>parasocial
This isn't PewDiePie, I was responsible for like 1% of the comments on that video
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:23:51 UTC No. 16494127
>>16492625
>>16492760
>>16492739
Perhaps we should send a team of them then, some sort of fellowship
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:26:52 UTC No. 16494129
>>16494127
E2E giant eagles are a meme
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:27:15 UTC No. 16494130
>>16493778
>SOFAR bomb
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:27:15 UTC No. 16494131
>>16494117
And you dont know about Latex? Yeah fucking right. Nice try idiot
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:27:32 UTC No. 16494132
bruh this thread
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:29:23 UTC No. 16494136
>>16494131
This is /sci/, not /g/. Why would I know about LaTeX?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:31:36 UTC No. 16494139
>>16494131
I think they prefer "latino" anon
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:32:54 UTC No. 16494140
the vast station is supposed to launch next year right? are they sure they're going to make it? the shell is still getting cut.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:33:22 UTC No. 16494143
>>16494118
The vast majority of Starships produced will be dismantled for parts on Mars.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:23:25 UTC No. 16494179
https://waveguide.blog/various-thru
Is this actually something or are they all fooling themselves?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:28:58 UTC No. 16494182
>>16494140
>>16494179
are you gay?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:30:05 UTC No. 16494183
>>16493932
The predicted future performance will affect the price
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:31:07 UTC No. 16494185
>>16494179
/sfg/ approved memedrive
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:32:45 UTC No. 16494190
>>16494179
>>16494182
>>16494185
>durr electrons traveling between two metal plates really close together separated by a non-conductive material magically somehow produces extra thrust by ????
>convoluted quantum mechanical physical babble
yea idk
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:40:55 UTC No. 16494202
>>16494143
Wrong they will be used as permanent housing with tank areas renovated for human living. The ratio of human Starships to cargo Starships will support my theory
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:47:44 UTC No. 16494212
>>16494053
Yes
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:49:44 UTC No. 16494213
NOOGLIN STATIC FIRE WHAT DAY????
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:51:50 UTC No. 16494215
>>16494183
In that case he should buy ubi, without elon they're doomed so it should be cheap.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:53:18 UTC No. 16494218
>>16493396
>Elon Musk floats buying MSNBC
That's like trying to put a band aid on a gangrenous leg that needs to be amputated.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:54:22 UTC No. 16494219
>https://x.com/clearusui/status/186
why does she sound so happy about the engine exploding? doesn't she realize her nation is now forever behind in rocket tech?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:55:00 UTC No. 16494222
>>16494219
Woman
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:58:39 UTC No. 16494223
>>16494222
experts on the subject disagree
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:58:47 UTC No. 16494224
>>16494219
I also love it when starship explodes.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:00:51 UTC No. 16494225
>>16494223
Source
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:01:27 UTC No. 16494226
>>16494225
some anon from here told me that a week or so ago
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:04:30 UTC No. 16494228
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:24:05 UTC No. 16494240
>>16494202
But there will be like 10x as many cargo ships as people. If it's ten people per crew ship we're talking about a 15 story building per person. That's absurd.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:28:56 UTC No. 16494243
>>16494240
thats insane
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:29:27 UTC No. 16494244
one God one Fuhrer one Starship
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:29:51 UTC No. 16494245
>>16494219
For me it sounds more like someone shows her his penis and after her screaming at him, he starts peeing on her.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:43:05 UTC No. 16494251
>>16494245
what the fuck are you smoking
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:45:08 UTC No. 16494253
>>16494245
How do you know how it sounds
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:57:36 UTC No. 16494260
>>16494251
>>16494253
I can't be the only one who is hearing it?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:10:58 UTC No. 16494273
>>16494213
in 2 weeks
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:18:25 UTC No. 16494276
posting porn
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:28:40 UTC No. 16494288
>>16494212
Why does Elon still want to give the government any power?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:36:58 UTC No. 16494290
>>16494276
porn dokko?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:03:24 UTC No. 16494313
https://x.com/vast/status/186147166
New Vast hardware, this is the domed window theyre going with and the engineer for it. Apparantly will have 2 extra layers later for dealing with impacts
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:06:23 UTC No. 16494317
>>16494308
Hnnngggg I am in love
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:07:03 UTC No. 16494319
>>16494308
imagine if she was actually that tall haha
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:07:17 UTC No. 16494321
>>16494313
two more layers, trust the plan
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:09:19 UTC No. 16494322
>>16494308
imagine the tears if she's the first female president
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:10:17 UTC No. 16494323
>>16494308
she looks autistic
when is she birthing elon's children?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:13:47 UTC No. 16494327
>>16494323
This is so fucked up but honestly I'm here for it
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:13:53 UTC No. 16494328
>>16494308
that's insanee
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:15:20 UTC No. 16494329
>>16494308
She looks like she's got a fun life.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:16:10 UTC No. 16494333
>>16494323
probably already pregnant
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:16:47 UTC No. 16494334
>>16494308
both girls have some weird voices/accents its odd
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:18:07 UTC No. 16494336
>>16494308
>big version next year with the version three engines
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:18:49 UTC No. 16494337
>>16494308
wtf private jets are loud inside I didn't expect that
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:20:37 UTC No. 16494339
>>16494313
They keep shrinking it. Honestly though who wants windows in space? Imagine needing your hardware to hold up for 8 months in interplanetary space and there's some glass and seals. What the fuck who wants that. Give me a totally windowless Starship with a hundred external cameras for the same mass as a window and then let me project what they see on an interior wall.
>>16494308
I want to kidnap a princess
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:21:08 UTC No. 16494341
>>16494308
>If I start playing League it will damage the space program
Kek
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:21:51 UTC No. 16494342
>>16494308
so, I looked her up and
>Kai Madison Trump (born May 12, 2007) is an American social media personality. She is the daughter of Donald Trump Jr. and Vanessa Haydon and the granddaughter of Donald Trump, the 45th U.S. president
>She is 17 years old.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:22:17 UTC No. 16494343
>>16494337
planes are loud
whether they're packed full of sardines or not
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:24:00 UTC No. 16494344
>>16494337
Planes have always been loud and uncomfortable, even the nice ones are a headache. The Concord is the only one that seemed like it'd be nice and comfy to fly on.
>>16494342
>>She is 17 years old
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:25:08 UTC No. 16494345
>>16494339
Its not shrinking? Atleast from the last update, the initial concept art showed it at the bow but the more recent renders moved it to be on the sides. This seems pretty in line with the newer renders from a month or two back.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:29:33 UTC No. 16494347
>>16494308
I missed out teenage love.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:30:16 UTC No. 16494348
>>16494346
>inb4 stargigamegauberbay
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:30:51 UTC No. 16494349
>>16494346
so are the megabays getting knocked down?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:31:27 UTC No. 16494350
>>16494347
You didn't miss out on much apart from lots of anal sex when condoms couldnt be found.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:32:01 UTC No. 16494351
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:32:49 UTC No. 16494352
>>16494351
Thats Starfactory, nerd.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:33:21 UTC No. 16494353
>>16494351
BIGGER
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:34:38 UTC No. 16494354
>>16493313
Fucking gay retarded mission not going to the lakes what a fucking waste
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:34:57 UTC No. 16494355
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:38:18 UTC No. 16494357
>>16494308
>Watching a Rocket Launch at SpaceX with Elon Musk!
>half the video is about food
Women [math]\unicode{x2615}[/math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:38:31 UTC No. 16494358
>>16494308
so this is what life is like for the 0.01%
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:41:44 UTC No. 16494360
>>16494308
They already hinted in the stream that they will recover the Starship and in this video Elon Musk says they will recover it, if it dosen't blow up. And it didn't blow up.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:43:14 UTC No. 16494362
>>16494350
Just pull put nigga. Also most men are sterile anyway due to microplastics. I've been fucking without a condom since i was 15
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:45:50 UTC No. 16494365
>>16494358
Imagine your dream vacation every week and you never have to go back to work. Bonkers that Elon could do this but works like a maniac instead
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:46:35 UTC No. 16494366
>>16494364
Chodeship vs Vulchad
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:51:39 UTC No. 16494369
>>16494364
In all seriousness I think the srb nozzle explosion was more kino than any of the Starship flights. Flight four flap was good but you had to be there
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:55:03 UTC No. 16494371
>>16494369
flap was crazy hype
more exciting than any sporting event
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:56:42 UTC No. 16494373
>>16494308
GO GURL! SLAY![math]\unicode{x1F483}[/math]
[math]\unicode{x1F60D}[/math][math]
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:59:51 UTC No. 16494374
>>16494371
>more exciting than any sporting event
Yeah no kidding. Will team A have a higher number than team B vs live footage of burnthrough during reentry. Maybe I'm autistic.
Though it just occurred to me that nearly every single athletic record will be broken on Mars. I bet 0.38 makes the long jump real easy
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:01:38 UTC No. 16494376
>>16494373
this but unironically
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:04:46 UTC No. 16494381
>>16494346
Oh yeah, but what about NIGGABAY?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:09:32 UTC No. 16494385
>>16494349
>so are the megabays getting knocked down?
they have to. there's nowhere else to put gigabay.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:09:59 UTC No. 16494386
>>16494384
https://x.com/LPM1985/status/186149
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:11:34 UTC No. 16494387
>>16494384
https://www.reuters.com/technology/
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:11:48 UTC No. 16494388
whats with the sudden uptick in news out of nowhere? people are getting home from work and leaving for the holiday.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:13:53 UTC No. 16494389
>>16494384
so I'd imagine it's over for the rest of the industry, right?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:14:38 UTC No. 16494391
>>16494384
How much money will this generate?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:16:49 UTC No. 16494396
>>16494391
t mobile only got 1 year exclusivity, unlikely to have pay much for that.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:16:53 UTC No. 16494397
>>16494371
Flap-sama shall not be forgotten in a hurry
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:17:20 UTC No. 16494398
>>16494389
no, will be more difficult due to the competition though, but for example Gwynne has said there is room for more than one provider
though it could be a industry with just a few big providers, maybe one of them clearly larger than the rest
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:20:09 UTC No. 16494401
>dragonfly will take 6 years to reach titan
yeah we're not colonizing saturn any time soon. maybe if you could get the voyage down to a year.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:24:30 UTC No. 16494404
>>16494401
>maybe if you could get the voyage down to a year.
F U N D
I T
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:26:22 UTC No. 16494406
>>16494308
20g on the boostback burn
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:27:03 UTC No. 16494407
>>16494308
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18615
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:27:05 UTC No. 16494408
Wwyd if someone violently shit everywhere on your Starship to Mars and you had 4 months left
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:28:27 UTC No. 16494409
>>16494407
Hes already addicted to Diablo 4 he has to pick a poison atp
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:30:13 UTC No. 16494412
>>16494398
Gwynne said there is room for more than one provider because the government targets monopolies. Has nothing to do with what's true
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:30:43 UTC No. 16494413
>>16494408
>they shit everywhere
>they look at you
>they say "clean it up janny"
>they walk away smugly
first murder in space
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:31:14 UTC No. 16494414
>>16494308
>her little friend that wants to ride Elon's rocket
hot
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:32:05 UTC No. 16494415
>>16494413
>walk
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:32:27 UTC No. 16494416
so wait New Glenn isn't even gonna launch this year? Just static fire testing?
what's the hold up on this bucket, years late at this point
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:32:30 UTC No. 16494417
>>16494408
How bad would this really be? I'm guessing you'd have access to cleaning supplies. If there's a smell you'd just get used to it. Anyone that's lived with a dog knows that
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:33:19 UTC No. 16494418
>>16494415
>they float away, propelled by wet farts
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:35:28 UTC No. 16494420
>>16494409
PoE2
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:37:40 UTC No. 16494422
>>16494080
check out
>>>/g/fwt
>>>/g/fglt
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:38:00 UTC No. 16494423
>>16494416
Blue is trying to launch in December but they are pushing it.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:38:45 UTC No. 16494424
>>16494416
I love the fact that loads of people were saying that it was gonna launch something to mars back in october and now here we are.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:44:23 UTC No. 16494426
>>16494425
>titancuck pretending he can see through his atmosphere again
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:46:50 UTC No. 16494427
>>16494425
Ay Tone if Titan is so much farther away from the sun than Mars then why do these jagoffs keep drawing it lookin' so bright 'n shit?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:48:15 UTC No. 16494432
>>16494425
So how do we heat up Titan so it gets warm enough to make it possible to just wear really thick clothes and an oxygen mask?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:49:28 UTC No. 16494433
>>16494432
orbital mirrors
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:49:47 UTC No. 16494434
>>16494432
If you did that all the lakes would evaporate.
Right now you'd just need thermal suits and an oxygen supply, which is miles better than wearing the oompa loompa suits Marsfags have to deal with.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:50:49 UTC No. 16494436
>>16494429
its' over
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:52:57 UTC No. 16494437
>>16494225
*unzips dick*
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:53:48 UTC No. 16494438
>>16494432
We are going to create an artificial sun in Titan orbit with the helium 3 from Saturn's atmosphere
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:54:07 UTC No. 16494439
>>16494434
Who cares about the lakes? Just make sure the water ice doesn't melt
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:55:21 UTC No. 16494441
>>16494439
Fuck off. Titan is a natural beauty of the Solar System and should be preserved in its current state while it provides us freedom seekers a home.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:55:36 UTC No. 16494442
>>16494404
>newer versions don't use actual nuke
a travesty
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:58:04 UTC No. 16494446
>>16494441
Fuck off, the solar system is there to be shaped for our comfort.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:59:08 UTC No. 16494447
>>16494442
all versions of an Orion drive uses actual nukes
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:00:57 UTC No. 16494448
orion is just a primitive concept compared to the one in expanse
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:02:22 UTC No. 16494449
>>16494448
>Hollywood magic vs real cold war research
dumb comparison
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:02:34 UTC No. 16494450
We really going to have fully-tested V3s by 2026?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:02:35 UTC No. 16494451
>>16494448
>primitive concept
And yet that's still the best thing we can build
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:03:21 UTC No. 16494452
>>16494425
how does the titanean survive the blasting radiation of jupiter?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:04:30 UTC No. 16494454
>>16494452
The average Marsfag, everyone.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:04:44 UTC No. 16494455
>>16494448
There is a reason why Expanse is science fiction.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:05:26 UTC No. 16494456
>>16494452
based earth poster
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:06:58 UTC No. 16494457
>>16494455
colonizing mars is science fiction too
for now
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:09:18 UTC No. 16494460
>>16494064
install nix
>>16494452
the thick atmosphere of Titan protects them from the radiation
also Jupiter's radiation belts are tightly constrained around the planet, only Io is within them, and they can be drained
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:09:34 UTC No. 16494462
>>16494454
gas planets look the same to me
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:10:31 UTC No. 16494467
>>16494447
only a very loose definition of nuke, newer versions use lasers to blast fissile pellets through a magnetic nozzle
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:10:52 UTC No. 16494468
>we will all die before we see alien megafauna
It's over.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:12:26 UTC No. 16494469
>>16494468
Depends on whether or not we go the tent route on Mars and how far genetic engineering progresses. This is the sort of thing AI might actually be good at. We may get a glimpse before death
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:12:32 UTC No. 16494470
>>16494467
those are fake and gay
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:13:31 UTC No. 16494472
>>16494470
Yeah, I agree.
That's why I love the original
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:13:33 UTC No. 16494473
also fuck, Titan is a moon of Saturn, not Jupiter
do we have data on the radiation bands of Saturn?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:14:06 UTC No. 16494476
>>16494471
no shit
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:15:54 UTC No. 16494478
you wouldn't build an orion drive without maximally efficient nukes, would you anon?
think of Okuu's feelings, you wouldn't want to make the radioactive raven cry, would you?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:17:18 UTC No. 16494480
>>16494478
i would fuck her silly my dude
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:17:23 UTC No. 16494481
>>16494308
does she have a boyfriend ~___~
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:18:16 UTC No. 16494485
>>16494478
I'll show her my maximally efficient nuke
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:21:26 UTC No. 16494488
>>16494404
Wouldn't an original orion work even better today? the main issue was making nukes small enough and nowadays we hare 2~5 kt nukes that fit in a cruise missile
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:21:45 UTC No. 16494489
>>16494471
*was a reddit user
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:22:34 UTC No. 16494491
Elon should do a Reddit AMA
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:23:26 UTC No. 16494492
Elon should do a /sfg/ anime
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:23:31 UTC No. 16494493
>>16494488
I'm for it.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:24:45 UTC No. 16494495
>>16494493
if only JFK wasn't such a faggot
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:24:58 UTC No. 16494496
>>16494492
you just copied my post and changed it around
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:26:24 UTC No. 16494498
>>16494496
sorry
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:27:11 UTC No. 16494499
>>16494471
Why is he replying to the footpig?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:27:33 UTC No. 16494500
>>16494498
No I'm not
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:27:38 UTC No. 16494501
>>16494493
if only JFK had more than two brain cells in his head
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:27:39 UTC No. 16494502
>>16493180
>I just lit a rocket. Rockets explode!
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:27:40 UTC No. 16494503
>>16494488
the issue is that you lose efficiency when you go small, which means you lose ISP
there's a minimum size for an efficient Orion drive
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:29:14 UTC No. 16494504
>>16494501
>if only JFK had more than two brain cells in his head
and he managed to lose them both
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:30:02 UTC No. 16494505
elon should buy 4chan and delete it
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:32:01 UTC No. 16494506
>>16494500
You are. Delete the post now
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:32:40 UTC No. 16494507
>>16494499
he has a loose dick that doesn't behave near pussy
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:32:43 UTC No. 16494508
>>16494506
...okaay
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:34:02 UTC No. 16494509
>>16494503
which is way fucking bigger than any of the drawings posted earlier too
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:35:13 UTC No. 16494513
>>16494503
we'll that just makes things more convenient, I guarantee that 10~25 kt nukes today are way more efficient than the ones from the 50's
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:36:21 UTC No. 16494515
>>16494499
looking for more cum receptacles, need to fight the falling birth rate
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:37:43 UTC No. 16494516
if elon gets ellie pregnant then there's going to be a huge influx of female space youtubers all hoping to "get that bag"
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:38:15 UTC No. 16494518
SpaceXer here.
Our FTL team is almost done their prototype drive
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:39:02 UTC No. 16494519
>>16494509
there are two ways that going small loses you efficiency:
1. nuclear yield
2. nozzle area, like a conventional rocket
we only really care about the first one
>>16494513
it's a physics problem lol, it's not something that you can improve at
I definitely read a whole thing on this at some point and I'm going to try to find it again
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:39:12 UTC No. 16494520
>>16494516
I want to get her pregnant though
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:39:16 UTC No. 16494521
>>16494518
lol
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:40:03 UTC No. 16494522
https://x.com/NASA_Marshall/status/
weirdly late post, didn't this happen like yesterday
https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/n
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:41:49 UTC No. 16494524
>>16494519
all that really matters is that it's not only possible but also relatively easy, if only we didn't have spineless fags in the government
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:42:17 UTC No. 16494526
>>16494522
it takes time for news to travel to Titan and back
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:42:46 UTC No. 16494527
>>16494524
I could solve the spineless fags problem if I had an orion drive
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:44:01 UTC No. 16494528
>>16494522
Yeah, it did >>16493313
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:45:13 UTC No. 16494529
force spacex to launch starliner
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:47:03 UTC No. 16494530
>>16494478
kill yourself ashley
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:48:03 UTC No. 16494532
>>16494530
who?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:49:06 UTC No. 16494535
Vivek ramaswamy just camcelled all spacex subsidies
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:51:45 UTC No. 16494537
>>16494535
No he didn't, quit being a fag
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:53:16 UTC No. 16494538
>>16494535
>spacex subsidies
Name them all
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:55:49 UTC No. 16494542
>>16494535
What subsidies
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:55:51 UTC No. 16494543
>>16494501
sadly he suffered a rapid unscheduled disassembly
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:56:07 UTC No. 16494545
Vivek Ramaswamy just flew over my house!
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:56:53 UTC No. 16494546
>>16494543
It was very scheduled.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:59:20 UTC No. 16494550
Not a fan of Vivec desu
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:09:23 UTC No. 16494555
>>16494551
just like FAMK, only S1 was good
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:12:38 UTC No. 16494557
natgeo's mars with black elon tho...
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:16:39 UTC No. 16494561
What if time is cyclical
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:17:06 UTC No. 16494562
>>16494561
that's insane
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:17:58 UTC No. 16494563
>>16494562
>yeah
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:18:14 UTC No. 16494564
>>16494550
The guy from Morrowind??
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:19:15 UTC No. 16494568
For All Mankind with the black elon tho
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:24:07 UTC No. 16494571
>>16494561
>learn about bells theoreom
>learn that the only realistic solution to it is superdeterminism, aka free will is a meme and the universe is 100% deterministic
the game is rigged no matter what we do
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:52:14 UTC No. 16494590
>>16494584
looks just as ugly as ksp, these idiots really need to hire competent artists as well as engine devs
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:54:42 UTC No. 16494591
>>16494590
All these space simulators suck. SpaceEngine at least looks pretty good from orbit, and in the atmosphere, but the terrain still sucks ass and they still haven't added volumetric clouds after all this time.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:56:00 UTC No. 16494593
>>16494590
are you low IQ? Art is the easy part. Every game these days is a wallpaper simualtor because of it.
These guys are overcoming techical hurdles the GaySP 2 team could never, beause their team was almost entirely artists and managers. If KSA works then the pretty stuff will floow.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:57:42 UTC No. 16494595
>>16494542
exactly
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:58:16 UTC No. 16494597
>>16494593
art is not the easy part, and many games nowadays look ugly. just throwing 4k textures on a high-poly model is not "art"
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:02:10 UTC No. 16494602
>>16494597
Buddy. KSP with a load of visual mods looks good despite the ugly base game. KSA is already far better optimised so all else equal it can handle more eye candy. They have the guywho did the parralax mod onboard so planetary surfaces aresure to look super detailed when it's done. If you want some college degree level art direction then make a mod for it when the game comes out.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:05:37 UTC No. 16494608
>>16494602
i'm sorry you're blind and tasteless. good graphics isn't a matter of piling on "eye candy"
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:07:58 UTC No. 16494611
>>16494602
>no linux support
It's fucking OVER
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:08:10 UTC No. 16494612
>>16494608
good grafix comes from the heart, indeed
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:09:53 UTC No. 16494615
>>16494597
anon every game that comes out these days is a broken pile of shit with bad game design and more than competent art. Maybe not good art direction but every artists did what they were asked to do properly.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:12:54 UTC No. 16494623
>>16494608
ok hipster.
its a space sim not one of your gay indie games about mental health.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:14:18 UTC No. 16494625
How many Latinx contractors work for (are enslaved) in Starbase (emerald mine)?
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:15:52 UTC No. 16494628
>>16494625
Not enough. Headcount will be 10x by this time next year.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:24:03 UTC No. 16494635
>>16494625
we dont do that in texas
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:33:14 UTC No. 16494642
>>16494625
>he doesn't know about the Mexican welders
>he doesn't know the Mariachi lore
>he doesn't know that we all gon make eet
Newfag
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:34:12 UTC No. 16494644
>>16494571
even with superdeterminism you'll just do what you'd have done anyway
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:35:00 UTC No. 16494645
>>16494584
KSP with Space Engineish levels of programming is a distant dream. It only took that cancerous game and everyone involved in the development process to finally fucking die for it to maybe have an on-zero chance of happening in the future.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:36:15 UTC No. 16494647
The FCC has granted Starlink a US commercial license to provide supplemental coverage from space
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachm
5:55 PM · Nov 26, 2024
·
406.5K
Views
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:37:53 UTC No. 16494648
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request of SpaceX for waivers of sections
25.112(a)(3) and 25.112(b), which provided that we dismiss applications that request authority to operate
space stations in bands not allocated internationally for the requested operations, IS DISMISSED AS
MOOT.
95. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request of SpaceX for a waiver of section
25.202(k)(1), which establishes an OOBE limit for SCS, IS DEFERRED.
96. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request of SpaceX for a waiver of the U.S. Table of
Frequency Allocations, section 2.106, for operations in the 1910-1915 MHz and 1990-1995 MHz bands
IS DISMISSED AS MOOT.
97. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request of SpaceX for a waiver of the
Commission’s processing round rules, sections 25.156(d)(1) and 25.157, IS DISMISSED AS MOOT
regarding the 1910-1915 MHz and 1990-1995 MHz bands.
98. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request of SpaceX for a waiver of sections
25.102(a) and 25.115(a)(1)(i) regarding blanket earth station licensing IS DISMISSED AS MOOT.
99. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition to Deny or Dismiss filed by DISH and the
Informal Objection filed by Omnispace ARE DENIED.
100. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by DISH IS
DISMISSED AS MOOT.
101. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for a Protective Order filed by EchoStar is
DISMISSED AS MOOT.
102. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the EchoStar Petition to Deny Amended Waiver
Request and AT&T Petition to Deny ARE DEFERRED
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:41:09 UTC No. 16494652
>>16494649
Is he retarded? This is a very eurotardian (lazy and dumb!) mindset
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:44:46 UTC No. 16494655
>>16494649
why would you lose ur severance if you accept a job
how could that even be part of any contract
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:46:36 UTC No. 16494657
>>16494499
Concubine
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:50:33 UTC No. 16494658
>>16494471
I dont know what causes it, but I get a visceral disgust when I see her. She is like a pig but completely without irony
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:52:17 UTC No. 16494659
>>16494642
won't they be deported
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:53:19 UTC No. 16494660
>>16494658
Same here, and I can’t explain it either. It’s like my gut tells me I’m looking at someone very ditsy and dumb who knows just enough to think they are smart. Low IQ. And then the thirst picks i’ve seen just make me disgusted even further.
You're not a sexy science girl vibe. You're strange and weird (thus says my guy instinct, at least)
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:54:26 UTC No. 16494662
>>16494659
Not every hispanic person is a border hopper anon.
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:55:16 UTC No. 16494663
>>16494642
>he doesn't know that we all gon make eet
that was a good day
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:57:39 UTC No. 16494666
>>16494571
Without some source of randomness the universe would never have deviated from perfect symmetry after the big bang. There would be no concentrations of matter etc. Superdeterminism is self-defeating
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:58:24 UTC No. 16494669
>The boostback burn is doing 20 g’s so you wouldn’t want to be on that
Damn that’s like twice the thrust of a FH I think
Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:59:24 UTC No. 16494670
>>16494499
She's his latest birthing sow
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:01:40 UTC No. 16494672
>>16494407
She doesn't really look anything like Donald. Are we sure he's her real father?
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:01:44 UTC No. 16494673
>>16494670
their children would be so ugly and stupid. dont do it elon!
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:04:37 UTC No. 16494676
>>16494672
we're sure he isn't the father
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:04:55 UTC No. 16494677
>>16494327
Kek
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:07:09 UTC No. 16494679
Boat planes (on Titan)
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:07:54 UTC No. 16494681
bruh we got on page 10 an hour ago
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:08:38 UTC No. 16494683
>>16494681
kek, let sfg die
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:09:10 UTC No. 16494684
>>16494681
We've colonized it. Permanent page 10 research base
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:09:55 UTC No. 16494687
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:11:25 UTC No. 16494689
>>16494679
Titan smells of farts.
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:11:37 UTC No. 16494690
>>16494676
Yo Lil' Donnie
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:13:58 UTC No. 16494692
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:15:12 UTC No. 16494694
It's been years now, but this new Space News web layout is so dogshit and modernist. The old website was very information-dense. You could glance at it and scan your eyes for multiple headlines.
New layout is garabge and I hate modern web design in general. Using the internet was such a better experience in the 2000s
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:16:42 UTC No. 16494698
>>16494694
it and the NASA.gov redesign are some of the worst site redesigns ever, fucking hate it man, complete total downgrade
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:17:02 UTC No. 16494700
>>16494687
an ekranoplane would be cool
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:21:25 UTC No. 16494703
>>16494308
Honestly enjoyed watching this for some reason...
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 01:19:05 UTC No. 16494739
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 06:59:55 UTC No. 16494929
>>16493894
For you.
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 09:00:24 UTC No. 16494983
>>16494040
what's wrong with a waterworld