Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:04:35 UTC No. 16550698

Blue Origin surpassed SpaceX

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:04:58 UTC No. 16550701

toasty

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:05:08 UTC No. 16550702

Bananas!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:05:10 UTC No. 16550703

>>16550696
The only stream i be watching today lads

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:07:34 UTC No. 16550706

>>16550698
>Blue Origin: 1 orbital flight
>SpaceX: 436 orbital flights

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:09:07 UTC No. 16550708

Gradatim Ferociter, 24 years to orbit

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:09:12 UTC No. 16550709

>>16550706
START THE COUNT only happened this morning though

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:09:41 UTC No. 16550710

>>16550689
For example, a flame trench and concrete pad at SLC-40, no? They also purchased the oxygen tank of LC-34 and moved it to SLC-40. Not brand new, but usable.

Doesn't the Space Force provide telemetry services for both Cape Canaveral and KSC?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:09:56 UTC No. 16550712

Join now!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:10:22 UTC No. 16550713

>>16550706

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:13:08 UTC No. 16550715

>troonbob

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:15:32 UTC No. 16550718

>>16550711
I don't think that type of civil works is particularly cheap to build for a small start-up. Nor is it quick to build, and for a start-up without revenue that's bleeding cash, time to initial product delivery and the associated revenue stream is extremely important.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:16:01 UTC No. 16550722

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1879949855579336931

What happened? Bezos stopped being a faggot and came to kiss the ring at Mar-a-Lago?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:16:36 UTC No. 16550724

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxOFEMJAXCI
stream

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:17:03 UTC No. 16550726

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:17:22 UTC No. 16550727

>>16550706
>/sfg/ now using thundercuck levels of cope
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:18:02 UTC No. 16550728

Yes...but however,

SPACE ELEVATORS WHEN?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:18:23 UTC No. 16550729

>>16550722
or he stopped suing nasa for acknowledging that spacex was offering them a better deal on contracts and started working on making his rocket actually reach orbit

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:18:26 UTC No. 16550730

>>16550726
is there a chance bo goes with grid fins after all

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:18:29 UTC No. 16550731

>>16550703
Lol, I merely shitpost in here, but this guy unironically believes SpaceX failed to reach orbit 6 times in a row. He's schizophrenic.
>>16550263

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:19:11 UTC No. 16550733

>>16550718
I think the significant barrier to entry that launch infrastructure constitutes for start-ups is exactly why HICAL's "universal pad" on Hainan is such a key development for China's space industry

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:19:21 UTC No. 16550734

>>16550706
>BO currently averaging 1 launch per day
SpaceX is over. We lost.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:19:43 UTC No. 16550735

>>16550722
That's a strange way of welcoming him to the club.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:20:42 UTC No. 16550737

>>16550718
>I don't think
Seems to be a recurring problem.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:20:55 UTC No. 16550738

https://jiggie.fun/pY5YrD

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:21:04 UTC No. 16550739

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:21:56 UTC No. 16550740

>>16550738
>tons of sky and black tiles
That does not look fun

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:23:27 UTC No. 16550742

>>16550740
should have been here during BONG's lunch...

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:23:45 UTC No. 16550743

>>16550728
never on Earth
maybe on Mars

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:24:34 UTC No. 16550744

RIP david lynch

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:25:22 UTC No. 16550745

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:28:18 UTC No. 16550750

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1879944789359227289

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:28:38 UTC No. 16550751

>>16550744
Pour one out for a real one.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:28:45 UTC No. 16550752

>>16550745
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1879958372088508428
wtf

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:28:54 UTC No. 16550753

>>16550722
All Elon has to do to undo all the work of BO's "for the benefit of Earth" posturing among the crowd it's aimed at is to say
>Hey Jeff!! We're the same!!
69d chess as always

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:32:50 UTC No. 16550757

>>16550743
Not on Mars either. They're a stupid concept

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:32:52 UTC No. 16550758

>>16550752
i dont get it

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:35:10 UTC No. 16550759

>>16550728
Whatever nation you pick to host it will try and monopolize it militarily

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:35:25 UTC No. 16550760

>>16550728
They're maybe not completely impossible and retarded on the Moon
Also why are they always vertical? Shouldn't they be a 45/30° angle?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:37:11 UTC No. 16550763

When is the launch? He's been talking about bitcoin for like an hour

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:37:29 UTC No. 16550765

https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1879952051985432959

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:37:39 UTC No. 16550766

>>16550763
After you send him the bitcoin and he doubles it

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:37:50 UTC No. 16550767

As much as I hate BO for their incredibly scumbag tactics and lawfare, it is objectively better that they are capable of launching now.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:37:55 UTC No. 16550768

>>16550760
They're more retarded on the moon. It spins once a month

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:38:30 UTC No. 16550769

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:39:38 UTC No. 16550771

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:40:12 UTC No. 16550772

>>16550728
Just Microsoft MemeGen to make a super strong material. Have it operational by Wednesday.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:41:18 UTC No. 16550773

>>16550771
>payload deploy at 17min, relight at 37min

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:41:33 UTC No. 16550774

>>16550760
>Also why are they always vertical? Shouldn't they be a 45/30° angle?
Brain fart. I meant why not make a slingshot
>>16550768
They're less retarded considering you don't need unobtainium for it

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:41:55 UTC No. 16550775

>>16550772
I know you're shitposting but that can be a thing in three to five years.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:42:33 UTC No. 16550776

>>16550743
Mars no
Ceres yes

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:44:10 UTC No. 16550778

>>16550771
In which direction will they dispense the Starlink simulator? In flight direction? Opposite flight direction? Left? Right?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:47:53 UTC No. 16550783

somebody want to make a launch thread so this doesn't get stickied?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:47:58 UTC No. 16550784

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:49:37 UTC No. 16550788

While we are at it, I think it's time to update the stats
>SpaceX: 398 booster landings
>Rest of the world combined: 0 (1 attempted)

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:50:17 UTC No. 16550790

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:53:30 UTC No. 16550792

WW3 is in the interest of SpaceX

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:54:36 UTC No. 16550794

>>16550792
WW3 would cause significant delay to the Mars colonization program.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:56:30 UTC No. 16550797

>>16550792
based zubrinist

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:56:52 UTC No. 16550798

>>16550794
show me where the money is in Mars
protip: you can't

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:00:06 UTC No. 16550800

>>16550798
we’re going to drill for martian oil.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:02:08 UTC No. 16550802

>>16550798
SHSHSHSHSH don't let them know
We only need to CONVINCE them that there's money on mars

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:02:19 UTC No. 16550804

>>16550774
Unless my math is wrong, a lunar space elevator would roughly 18 times longer than the diameter of the moon. This is for a place that could more easily have something like a maglev skate reach orbital velocity from the ground. Hell I'm pretty sure spin launch would even work. There's basically no case where a space elevator is ever even your tenth best option

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:02:25 UTC No. 16550805

https://x.com/gwynne_shotwell/status/1879892409020272703
>Congratulations to the Blue Origin team for reaching orbit!
oh yeah

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:04:33 UTC No. 16550806

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:05:19 UTC No. 16550808

>>16550805
>mommy shotwell will never welcome you to the club
why even live

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:05:20 UTC No. 16550809

>>16550806
Wait so did Jeff's rocket land or not?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:05:58 UTC No. 16550810

>>16550597
>>16550633
Even his AI reports it

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:07:00 UTC No. 16550811

>>16550806
Berger gets to live but every single one besides him has got to go

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:07:02 UTC No. 16550812

>>16550809
Jeff's rocket did not, in fact, stick the landing

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:07:13 UTC No. 16550813

>>16550798
There's trillions in gold pirate treasure buried 2 feet under the surface of the entire planet, and you'll never get a single doubloon if you don't go check.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:08:31 UTC No. 16550814

>>16550744
>RIP david lynch

We have to scrub the launch. Its raining.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:09:18 UTC No. 16550815

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:09:46 UTC No. 16550816

What's even the fucking point anymore?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:10:18 UTC No. 16550817

>>16550810
https://www.twitch.tv/zackrawrr

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:11:19 UTC No. 16550818

https://x.com/JeffBezos/status/1879966373167939985

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:12:01 UTC No. 16550819

>>16550808
she will if you reach orbit, anon

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:13:16 UTC No. 16550820

>>16550810
He's gone mad with power

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:14:00 UTC No. 16550821

Are they even trying to reach an orbit this time?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:14:55 UTC No. 16550822

Feel asleep for the launch. Can they do these things when I am awake?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:16:02 UTC No. 16550824

>>16550821
No but they got cool reentry vehicles.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:16:27 UTC No. 16550825

>>16550816
Wow look at how tiny Elon's rocket is compared to Jeff's Big Blue Booster, it's over SpaceXsisters

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:16:32 UTC No. 16550826

>>16550784

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:19:43 UTC No. 16550830

https://x.com/Erdayastronaut/status/1879967651046519092

https://www.youtube.com/live/6Px_b5eSzsA?si=bQQFZBRMTXEbGG6k

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:23:03 UTC No. 16550831

>>16550830
What phenotype is that?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:23:05 UTC No. 16550832

https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1879961153465630935

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:25:41 UTC No. 16550834

>>16550830
>>16550831
thats crazy

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:27:52 UTC No. 16550838

>>16550832
it took a major culture change for the company to focus on results?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:30:53 UTC No. 16550840

>>16550838
I'm not sure its a cultural change as much as simple managment change
focus on actually important things that get NG to orbit
shows pretty clearly how important managment is

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:31:01 UTC No. 16550841

>>16550809
Well, it came down in the water really fast at least. Don't think they even managed a relight for a soft splash down.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:31:32 UTC No. 16550843

>>16550838
They have good 9-5 jobs with salaries backed by Bezos' coffers. There ain't gonna be much haste unless someone whips them a bit.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:33:48 UTC No. 16550846

>>16550838
>>16550843
if we're going to mock blue, and lord knows i've done it more than anyone, i hope it can be for the things they do wrong. it took way too many years but i think they're finally starting to do some stuff right.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:33:50 UTC No. 16550847

>>16550810
Someone needs to go over to Elons house, give him a sound beating, take away his K and twitter admin rights and tell him to build the fucking rockets instead of doing this dumb fuck shit jesus christ.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:37:04 UTC No. 16550851

>>16550846
launching a rocket is definitely a step in the right direction

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:37:35 UTC No. 16550852

>>16550831
potato

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:37:57 UTC No. 16550854

They were obviously pretty close to being done prior to Limp.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:38:31 UTC No. 16550856

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4WtUP8ikAY

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:38:47 UTC No. 16550859

>>16550847
>and tell him to build the fucking rockets instead of doing this dumb fuck shit jesus christ.
He already has over thousands of employees at SpaceX doing that for him. He's too busy pretending to be a God at PoE2 and with the Xitter shenanigans you mentioned. What could Elon even contribute to Starship atp?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:39:13 UTC No. 16550860

https://x.com/JeffBezos/status/1879976313114779850

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:40:15 UTC No. 16550862

https://x.com/Space_Time3/status/1879973649861718035

the plane is in Australia

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:41:17 UTC No. 16550863

https://x.com/vast/status/1879673985060802875
>The Haven-1 primary structure qualification article has arrived at our Mojave, CA test site. The team is now conducting lift operations to install the article on the test stand.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:42:17 UTC No. 16550866

>>16550847
>>16550859
Elon does not build anything. He throws money at smart people and tells them the things he want done.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:42:21 UTC No. 16550867

>>16550863

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:42:25 UTC No. 16550868

what are they doing different from the november launch?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:42:33 UTC No. 16550869

>>16550826
david lynch died and you are laughing...

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:43:12 UTC No. 16550870

>>16550868
Hopefully not pussying out of a catch this time

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:43:39 UTC No. 16550871

>>16550860
sex with new glenn

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:44:27 UTC No. 16550872

>>16550862
will we get views from the plane during the stream?
probably not, right? that's too much too expect...

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:44:51 UTC No. 16550874

>>16550868
>dummy starlinks
>starship v2 (upgraded heat shield, different flap location and shape, different tank shapes and structure, taller, 25% more propellant)
>multiple different metallic tile tests, one with liquid cooling

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:45:16 UTC No. 16550875

I am nooglin right now.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:46:05 UTC No. 16550878

>>16550859
Are you seriously that tech illiterate to fail to read what he's saying?
>Look for mind virus
>Find it at home
>Reformat
That's the joke.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:46:32 UTC No. 16550880

>>16550859
it means he found he was deceived with the agenda and managed to removed it by himself
elon's post is cringe but the analogy is totally understandable

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:46:51 UTC No. 16550882

Do you think they'll pivot to active cooling after the results of this test?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:47:35 UTC No. 16550883

>>16550874
what a nothingburger. you would think the next iteration they would try landing the starship or something instead of testing out new tiles and flaps

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:47:37 UTC No. 16550884

>>16550869
its either that or cry

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:49:30 UTC No. 16550888

>>16550878
>trying to rm an IP address
It's a shit joke, why not use locate, ~ and shred to score points with the trunerd audience?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:49:50 UTC No. 16550890

>>16550882
Guaranteed.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:49:53 UTC No. 16550891

>>16550882
the icing problem will throw a wrench to active cooling

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:51:55 UTC No. 16550894

https://x.com/mcrs987/status/1879924065252626786
>GS1 SN001 Impact location at roughly 27°37'27"N 74°28'06"W
>This was weirdly elusive to track. This small plume, clearly oriented downwind, appears at 07:11 UTC. About a minute after the entry burn. Gone in the next image. The fact that there is a sort of smoke plume makes me believe it impacted the ocean while mostly intact, yet still at high speed. This impact location is about 53 kilometers southwest of the LPV, possibly indicating severe guidance issues just before or during the entry phase.

>Also should be pointed out the burn started very low. Was supposed to be 67km, started at around 40 (burn start being when it started actu decelerating--the telemetry is slightly delayed)

https://x.com/mcrs987/status/1879973565216194850
>Okay this might sound completely outlandish and ridiculous but I'm dead serious when I say this looks like a massive conversion error. more on this if we don't get any actual information ;But basically. Burn on the stream seems to start around 40.8 kilometers or so. Supposed to start at 67km. That's a roughly 1.6x difference. The vehicle is moving at ~2260m/s at this point. Add 600 meters to the "start" attitude, which is essentially a rounding error at this speed when we consider things like stream latency and that such a figure would be a sub-second difference, that difference can become pretty much exactly the metric-imperial conversion rate of 1.6214. This is not definitive at all but my god it would be so funny

>eg, intended burn start at 67 KILOMETERS which is 41.63 MILES but in the actual flight, the burn started somewhere between 40-42 KILOMETERS (hard to tell because latency isn't exactly tied to the altitude). If this is true they're never living this down lol

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:54:10 UTC No. 16550896

I hope Baron Muskonnen will dedicate launch to him, he has to.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:54:47 UTC No. 16550897

>>16550838
>it took a major culture change for the company to focus on results?
Bob smith was an old NASA guy so of course he created a culture completely divorced from reality.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:55:05 UTC No. 16550898

>>16550894
That’s fucking retarded they would have had problems on the way up too if they were confusing metric and imperial like that.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:55:54 UTC No. 16550899

>>16550894
BO don't even write their own code. They steal everything from NASA and Mars Orbiter.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:55:58 UTC No. 16550900

>>16550896
literally who

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:56:04 UTC No. 16550901

>>16550894
>>16550898

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:57:01 UTC No. 16550903

Why do these big rocket companies insist on having two dumb whores who know nothing about rockets presenting? Who the fuck do they think watches rocket launches? No one wants to hear these narcissistic women screeching over the sound of rocket engines.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:57:10 UTC No. 16550904

>>16550703
is asmon streaming it

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:57:23 UTC No. 16550905

>>16550898
Mars Climate Orbiter died from the same issue but it didn't show up as a problem until it tried to pull into Mars orbit

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:58:25 UTC No. 16550907

Asmongold talking about wanting to go see a SpaceX launch live and visit starbase with his streaming partners and get a tour by Musk

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:58:27 UTC No. 16550908

>>16550903
because if you have two white males presenting then a bunch of dumbasses who never pay attention to your company other than when it's launching a rocket start whining about muh diversity

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:01:16 UTC No. 16550909

>>16550903
I’m a white man I like women and I like rockets. I like watching women while I watch my rockets. Bonus points if the women are young hot and white.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:01:30 UTC No. 16550911

>>16550883
stop being retarded

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:01:55 UTC No. 16550912

>>16550899
OH SAY CAN YOU SEEEEE

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:02:19 UTC No. 16550913

>>16550888
When has Elon ever targeted a True-nerd audience in public?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:02:31 UTC No. 16550914

>>16550904
maybe

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:02:55 UTC No. 16550915

>>16550903
this isnt meatball nasa grandpa. You can't smoke in here either

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:02:57 UTC No. 16550916

>>16550913
rokoko basilisk

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:04:45 UTC No. 16550919

>>16550904
Who are we siding with in the gamer civil war btw

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:05:43 UTC No. 16550920

>>16550905
A satellite is not a launch vehicle. If the delta ii had mco’s issues mco would never have left the atmosphere.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:06:05 UTC No. 16550921

Video games will not be allowed on Mars.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:06:14 UTC No. 16550922

>>16550903
They should have Clear presenting everything

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:07:20 UTC No. 16550924

>>16550916
I haven't seen Elon say anything about Roko's Basilisk, and Roko's Basilisk is stupid, pseudo-intellectual garbage created by people who preach enlightened atheism only to invent a devil to scare themselves with.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:07:24 UTC No. 16550925

>>16550894
Please let this be true, Blue fucking up their landing due to a metric conversion would be incredible.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:08:37 UTC No. 16550926

>>16550882
clear should actively cool my rocket if you know what i mean

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:09:35 UTC No. 16550928

>>16550924
>I haven't seen Elon say anything about Roko's Basilisk
congratulations on being a dumbass. it's how he got hooked up with grimes and is pretty well-documented.
>Roko's Basilisk is stupid, pseudo-intellectual garbage created by people who preach enlightened atheism only to invent a devil to scare themselves with.
sure, but that's what the true-nerd, trunerd, whatever, audience has always been.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:09:38 UTC No. 16550929

>>16550904
>>16550914
he streamed flight 6
but after elon's sperg out, prob not

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:09:51 UTC No. 16550930

>>16550915
>You can't smoke in here either

OK enjoy your RUD

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:11:20 UTC No. 16550932

>>16550894
We will know this is true if the next launch they switch to metric.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:11:46 UTC No. 16550933

>>16550929
after elon's spergout surely he has to know that it'd be one of his most-watched streams ever

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:13:08 UTC No. 16550935

>>16550929
retard
see
>>16550933

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:13:10 UTC No. 16550936

https://www.youtube.com/live/6Px_b5eSzsA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yCG1T06jlk
EDA and SFN streams are live, T-2:00

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:13:40 UTC No. 16550937

Still time for a goon session guys

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:13:41 UTC No. 16550938

>>16550928
>congratulations on being a dumbass. it's how he got hooked up with grimes and is pretty well-documented.
There's a very particular audience who cares about the particulars of Elon's love life. Of all the different people paying attention to his life, it is the second worst group.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:14:41 UTC No. 16550941

>>16550937
alright, see you in the discord!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:14:43 UTC No. 16550942

>>16550929
he still might, he doesn't care about that
also >>16550907

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:14:59 UTC No. 16550944

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:14:59 UTC No. 16550945

>>16550938
congratulations

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:16:07 UTC No. 16550947

elon more like kinolon

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:16:43 UTC No. 16550949

>>16550894
NOT AGAIN

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:17:18 UTC No. 16550950

>>16550921
Is there another short flick like the wanderers? No slop

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:19:09 UTC No. 16550952

>>16550944
margaritaville?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:20:12 UTC No. 16550953

https://x.com/CNSpaceflight/status/1851085006963425451
>CMSA has selected two proposals, designed by SAST and CAST, of lunar roving vehicles into the round of prototyping before the final decision of which to carry out the human lunar landing mission.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:20:25 UTC No. 16550954

>>16550937
2 hours for a quality goon sesh? You gotta pump those numbers up.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:22:47 UTC No. 16550955

https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1879987136268739022
>Now targeting 4:37 p.m. CT for liftoff of Starship

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:25:37 UTC No. 16550957

>>16550955
it's over

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:26:18 UTC No. 16550958

>>16550922
soon, brother.
t.dad works at spacex as elons personal janitor

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:27:19 UTC No. 16550960

>>16550955
so 37 minute later?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:30:36 UTC No. 16550961

>>16550909
this is something i can fully support

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:30:43 UTC No. 16550962

>>16550953
>Apollo lander, chinesium edition

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:32:31 UTC No. 16550964

>>16550955
>already delayed
Yep, it's getting scrubbed. Jeff is the new king of rockets and Elon should be arrested.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:32:35 UTC No. 16550965

>>16550958
these two are more engaging than Blue Organs two.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:33:33 UTC No. 16550967

>>16550958
At least the mystery meat is nice to look at and they don't literally shriek over the launch sounds.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:34:57 UTC No. 16550969

>>16550955
nope not staying up for this

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:35:03 UTC No. 16550970

i didn't have a chance to post this at the time but this was my view of ift-6

Apologize at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:35:48 UTC No. 16550972

Thunder sisters.... our response????

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86NjizfRGyk

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:36:47 UTC No. 16550973

>>16550953
Why doesn't anyone just use tracks instead of wheels?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:37:44 UTC No. 16550974

>>16550973
more moving parts?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:39:41 UTC No. 16550977

Puzzle for true sfg patrons
https://jiggie.fun/p40K0M

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:40:05 UTC No. 16550978

Do you guys think this will be the most interesting flight? I am new to spaceflight, I only got it into it for Flight 5.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:40:29 UTC No. 16550979

>>16550973
Tracks are a massive bitch to maintain and use. If you don't absolutely need them they're not worth it.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:41:02 UTC No. 16550980

>>16550978
in theory, it depends on if they are catching it

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:41:07 UTC No. 16550981

>>16550978
We will be yawning and snoozing until a second stage lands

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:41:43 UTC No. 16550982

>>16550973
Rovers aren't heavy enough to need that low ground pressure
especially when Moon or Mars gravity is much lower

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:41:54 UTC No. 16550983

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:41:58 UTC No. 16550984

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:42:16 UTC No. 16550985

>>16550978
no the most interesting one is gonna be the first ship catch and then it'll be HLS and then the first crewed launch

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:42:47 UTC No. 16550986

>>16550978
I really want to see a second catch, so I'm pretty interested in the outcome today.
Been watching since Hopper first hopped.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:43:16 UTC No. 16550988

>>16550753
>for the benefit of Earth
Everyone I spoke to found that part of the first stream extremely disturbing. I don't think Elon has to do anything

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:45:18 UTC No. 16550989

>>16550977
>its her

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:46:40 UTC No. 16550990

TOTAL BIRD DEATH

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:46:59 UTC No. 16550991

>>16550986
nice water tank

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:47:10 UTC No. 16550992

>>16550973
tracks dont work well in loose soil

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:47:23 UTC No. 16550993

>>16550983
thats insane

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:48:19 UTC No. 16550994

>>16550990

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:48:30 UTC No. 16550995

Just got home and watched the New Glenn launch.
I don't know if Starship spoiled me or what, but watching that rocket heave itself off the launchpad like a geriatric was painful to watch.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:50:01 UTC No. 16550996

>>16550983
does starship even got that much of a volume and also it's quite small anyways for a rocket of that size

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:50:57 UTC No. 16550998

>>16550996
it is very big for a fully reusable rocket

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:51:31 UTC No. 16550999

>>16550991
Water towers can fly
YES

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:52:40 UTC No. 16551000

>>16550995
im their rocket flew well but man what a crap show they made of it.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:52:57 UTC No. 16551001

>>16550996
It is absolutely massive given how much of a performance hit second stage reuse is.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:52:59 UTC No. 16551002

>>16550999
We don't need anymore of this

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:53:49 UTC No. 16551003

>>16550978
if everything works as planned then the only interesting part is gonna be deploying the dummy starlinks. everything probably won't work as planned.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:00:11 UTC No. 16551009

Norway signed a deal with the US for launches from Andøya today.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:00:30 UTC No. 16551010

>>16551003
everything will work as planned

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:02:04 UTC No. 16551011

>>16551009
what are we talking about here? electron launches out of norway?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:02:26 UTC No. 16551012

>>16550996
Both the booster and the second stage are reusable in Starship, it's a wonder it's that big

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:02:38 UTC No. 16551013

>>16550798
Where's the money in not being tortured to death? Some things aren't about profit

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:03:07 UTC No. 16551014

>>16551011
And other small shit I assume, yes. Depends on what they want for polar launch vehicles in the future, I guess.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:03:25 UTC No. 16551015

Why is Elon raining hellfire down on his place of birth?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:04:16 UTC No. 16551017

>>16551015
>flight to Australia
It's about Starship reentry.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:05:09 UTC No. 16551020

>>16551009
Wouldn't they lose a shit ton of dV by launching from so far up north?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:05:18 UTC No. 16551021

>>16551015
They demanded he give ownership of Starlink over to niggers.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:05:47 UTC No. 16551022

first stage sisters....

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:06:07 UTC No. 16551023

A launch pad in Scotland would be absolute kino.

Unfortunately the UK is even more cucked than the US. I fantasize daily about being the Elon Musk of Britain, launching huge, elegant rockets and giving the British people something to be proud of.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:06:09 UTC No. 16551024

>>16551015
He's aiming for Mars but keeps hiting South Africa

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:06:45 UTC No. 16551025

>>16551020
Polar orbits.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:07:52 UTC No. 16551026

>>16551020
You gain Delta-V by launching into a polar orbit from further north (or south).

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:08:20 UTC No. 16551027

NOAA about to get an astronaut corps

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:09:57 UTC No. 16551030

If I had a youtube account I would post angry and confused comments on everyday estronaut's livestream demanding to know where Clear is.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:11:27 UTC No. 16551032

>>16551023
Well, RFA finally got the launch loicense they needed, so sometime this year the British people should have a German rocket they can be proud of

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:11:57 UTC No. 16551034

All the recent starship launches where very good for euro daytime, but this one fuck, i'm going to sleep, fuck work.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:12:30 UTC No. 16551035

>>16551030
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxOFEMJAXCI
She's going to be here in about 20 minutes

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:14:00 UTC No. 16551037

>>16550970
An sfg shitposter could be right there and you wouldn't know who he is

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:14:01 UTC No. 16551038

>>16551034
it's the same time as the last one

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:14:54 UTC No. 16551039

>>16551035
I don't watch vtubers, I just think it would be funny to make Tim think that I think he stole a vtuber's channel.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:15:08 UTC No. 16551040

>>16551037
unlikely. i closely monitored the crowd and most of them had friends - some even girlfriends.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:16:02 UTC No. 16551041

Starship blew up with such tremendous force that it knocked Tim offline.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:19:10 UTC No. 16551045

>>16551032
I think RFAs premise is faulty. In a normal world it would be excellent, using off the shelf parts as much as possible makes sense. However, the failure rate of off the shelf parts in current world is HORRENDOUS, just ask any mechanic.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:20:35 UTC No. 16551047

>>16551023
>than the US
I meant to say EU. Brain fart.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:21:59 UTC No. 16551049

>>16551045
ask spacex after crs-7, for that matter

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:23:37 UTC No. 16551050

from nsf

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:25:09 UTC No. 16551051

>>16551050
And it's eventually going to be 150m tall. Just insane.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:25:26 UTC No. 16551052

>>16551020
They win by not having to cancel earths rotation when launching to polar orbit

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:25:40 UTC No. 16551053

Why is there a blimp there

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:25:41 UTC No. 16551054

>>16551051
no way

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:25:45 UTC No. 16551055

>>16551050
man, SLS is fucking tiny

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:26:25 UTC No. 16551056

>>16551051
>>16551054
yeah

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:26:45 UTC No. 16551057

>>16551023
we are getting a small one up north. I have an HNC in mechnical engineering but dropped out of HND cause lol mental neet illness

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:27:32 UTC No. 16551058

>>16551050
Saturn V... forgotten....

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:27:58 UTC No. 16551059

>>16551050
Why is a jeet rocket included there?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:28:11 UTC No. 16551060

>>16551053
Starbase is right on the border. The border patrol uses tethered aerostats to maintain surveillance

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:28:29 UTC No. 16551061

>>16551023
The indians are on it, don't you worry

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:29:38 UTC No. 16551064

Almost time, no more insufferable people.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:30:43 UTC No. 16551066

>>16551051
Thats crazy

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:30:54 UTC No. 16551067

>>16551060
zeppelins if they gay

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:31:17 UTC No. 16551068

>>16551051
Cool.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:32:42 UTC No. 16551069

>>16550701
This checks out. Friend at spacex told me about how his team was gathered around a computer watching the banana cook on the internal cameras.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:32:49 UTC No. 16551070

YouTube was quick to ban Luigi's channel but they still won't ban the fucking crypto scam streams with hundreds of thousands of viewers.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:33:20 UTC No. 16551072

go for load

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:33:24 UTC No. 16551073

>Dim Todd defending NASA's pathological aversion to risk

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:33:44 UTC No. 16551074

Pre-Launch Checklist

Stereo on and connected
Coffee warmed and ready
Increase power to weight ratio with timely bathroom visit

Countdown progressing nicely

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:34:06 UTC No. 16551075

>>16551059
i think they said why but i was more focused on posting instead of listening

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:35:22 UTC No. 16551077

>>16551074
for me, it's milk and bickies

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:36:03 UTC No. 16551078

This better be good.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:36:59 UTC No. 16551079

>>16551051
>>16551055
They'll have to compare it to the Sea Dragon lol

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:38:50 UTC No. 16551082

>1 hour till launch
>sfg this dead
It's over

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:39:29 UTC No. 16551083

>NSF forgetting SN11
I haven't forgotten

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:40:33 UTC No. 16551084

>>16551077
a fine choice. id have chocolate with a dash of whiskey if i had any whiskey left

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:41:07 UTC No. 16551085

>>16551082
because of you we are gonna be flooded with tourists

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:41:57 UTC No. 16551086

>>16551082
>he didn't do the krystal puzzle
grim

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:42:08 UTC No. 16551087

>>16551083
>NSF
I can't watch that shit.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:42:29 UTC No. 16551088

Great work sfg on the puzzle
>pls no ban
Someone else do a puzzle

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:42:43 UTC No. 16551089

>>16551087
They skipped SN9, too. Unforgivable.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:42:45 UTC No. 16551090

>>16551082
too erect to post

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:43:56 UTC No. 16551091

>>16551082
The people know Insprucker won't be present.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:44:06 UTC No. 16551092

WTF IS CLEAR DOING WHERE IS SHE

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:44:34 UTC No. 16551094

>>16551088
the most important historical moment of this day

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:44:38 UTC No. 16551095

>>16551092
Playing with a banana

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:44:43 UTC No. 16551096

>>16551092
she's busy rn lil bro
ill let you know when she's done

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:45:48 UTC No. 16551097

few minutes until LOX loading starts

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:46:49 UTC No. 16551098

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nM3vGdanpw

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:47:52 UTC No. 16551100

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Px_b5eSzsA

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:48:07 UTC No. 16551102

HOP DAMN YOU

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:48:13 UTC No. 16551103

>>16551095
cor blimey mate, steady on

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:48:28 UTC No. 16551104

>>16551085
I'm already here, but there's nothing serious to post about yet.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:48:32 UTC No. 16551105

>>16551083
Most absurd launch

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:48:45 UTC No. 16551106

>>16551098
What causes someone to want to give them $50?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:48:54 UTC No. 16551108

what if the booster crashes into the tower and blows up the launch pad

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:49:30 UTC No. 16551109

>>16551108
Likely scenario considering it's going to be more aggressive this time.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:49:33 UTC No. 16551110

What's the status of flight 8 launch license?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:49:43 UTC No. 16551112

>>16551108
it simply won't happen

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:50:03 UTC No. 16551114

>>16551110
Orbit in 2 weeks

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:50:07 UTC No. 16551115

>>16551070
It's because the youtube manager jeets get a cut of the profit to not ban and also algo boost them. Average scamjeet bullshit. I hate them so fucking much.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:50:09 UTC No. 16551116

>>16551108
it would be extremely painful

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:50:37 UTC No. 16551117

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:51:44 UTC No. 16551118

>>16551116
it's a big tower

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:52:00 UTC No. 16551119

prop load commenced

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:52:00 UTC No. 16551120

I have a feeling that this Ship is not going to survive

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:52:01 UTC No. 16551121

>>16551104
a fellow /m/an?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:52:56 UTC No. 16551124

>>16551120
Yeah I've got a bad feeling about this one. I think God is going to punish Elon for his latest bout of extreme hubris.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:53:11 UTC No. 16551125

>>16551121
NOA

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:53:55 UTC No. 16551127

>>16551117
come on come chop chop, get a move on

>>16551118
lets hope the fire rises

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:54:06 UTC No. 16551128

>>16551124
you will kneel soon enough

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:54:06 UTC No. 16551129

>>16551109
erm chud they improved the radars on the tower so it should be even more accurate than flight 5

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:55:03 UTC No. 16551130

>>16551129
>burning beetles with greater accuracy
not the own you think it is

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:55:20 UTC No. 16551131

Has it started yet? My links got nothing.

https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-7
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OwGWNYrzZVKQ

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:55:31 UTC No. 16551132

>putting stream on 2x speed so it launches earlier
no spoilers though

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:56:01 UTC No. 16551133

>>16551130
even tho it is

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:56:09 UTC No. 16551134

>>16551124
it could be something more personal to the man himself instead of also punishing the poor rocket fans too. after the fiasco of the NG-1'stream' i really need a win.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:56:24 UTC No. 16551135

>>16551132
>set bios clock to a few hours later
I've already seen the end

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:56:24 UTC No. 16551136

Alright bros. What are we listening to while we wait for the flight?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:56:36 UTC No. 16551137

>>16551131
>starts :57
>currently :56

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:56:40 UTC No. 16551138

>>16551120
They did the same test last flight, but now with a more agressive profile so I guess it's a 60/40 to it going OK, I'm more interested in seeing if the flaps are gonna survive all the way this time

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:57:10 UTC No. 16551139

>>16551131
any minute now

>>16551132
thats cheating

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:57:43 UTC No. 16551140

>>16551136
Clear moaning in bed with me, I'll make a recording for you later

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:58:09 UTC No. 16551141

>>16551136
I don't listen to music. My autism has reached unprecedented levels.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:58:17 UTC No. 16551142

>>16551140
i made this post btw

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:58:26 UTC No. 16551143

>>16551131
its on

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:58:46 UTC No. 16551144

>>16551143
Finally, I can turn NSF off.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:59:11 UTC No. 16551145

>ITS MOTHER FRICKING HAPPENING!!!!!!!!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:59:16 UTC No. 16551146

>>16551142
yup, I sure did

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:59:23 UTC No. 16551147

>>16550722
these 2 niggas gay

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:59:33 UTC No. 16551148

>>16551136
https://youtu.be/hnaZ83UD6Z0?list=RDhnaZ83UD6Z0

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:59:55 UTC No. 16551149

dubs and it crashes

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:59:59 UTC No. 16551150

>>16551136
the appointed female representatives of SpaceX and what currently sounds a bit like the theme tune to Airwolf

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:00:12 UTC No. 16551151

trips and it accidentally flies to mars

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:00:51 UTC No. 16551153

>>16551121
Maybe

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:01:00 UTC No. 16551154

>>16551141
Good

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:01:04 UTC No. 16551155

>>16551149
Everything's going to be alright

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:01:16 UTC No. 16551156

>>16551151
baka anon... look at the last dozen post numbers...

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:01:46 UTC No. 16551157

Nice music.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:01:56 UTC No. 16551158

dubs for scrub at -30 seconds

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:02:16 UTC No. 16551159

>CLEAR ON
CLEAR ON
>CLEAR ON
CLEAR ON

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:02:24 UTC No. 16551160

Clear Live!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:02:44 UTC No. 16551161

here we go

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:02:54 UTC No. 16551162

SpaceX streams really shit on BO lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:03:10 UTC No. 16551163

>>16551159
How can I watch something I don't understand?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:03:16 UTC No. 16551164

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxOFEMJAXCI

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:03:30 UTC No. 16551165

LFG

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:03:32 UTC No. 16551166

BO... they're deathmogging us...

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:03:38 UTC No. 16551167

>>16551163
through the power of love~

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:03:43 UTC No. 16551168

>>16551155
checked

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:03:53 UTC No. 16551169

nice mic popping

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:04:15 UTC No. 16551170

15 mph winds in Boca Chica atm, hopefully that doesn't cuck us

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:04:27 UTC No. 16551171

https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OwGWNYrzZVKQ

T-33 minutes

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:04:27 UTC No. 16551172

Time to goon.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:04:30 UTC No. 16551173

audio is fucked compared to video lol

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:04:33 UTC No. 16551174

>>16551136
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ex5jNm3LL04

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:04:33 UTC No. 16551175

>>16551169
Small indie company

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:05:08 UTC No. 16551176

this is going to be the biggest year in spaceflight until next year

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:05:10 UTC No. 16551177

>>16551138
Didn't they remove even more tiles?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:05:19 UTC No. 16551178

Hold on to your butts !!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:05:33 UTC No. 16551179

>>16551155
>Gets doubles
W-wha?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:05:39 UTC No. 16551180

qt

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:05:40 UTC No. 16551181

>staarink dumey paroad

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:05:57 UTC No. 16551182

tilecucks finna bouta get dabbed on this launch

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:06:01 UTC No. 16551183

She is an enthusiastic host but her voice has always been pretty weird.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:06:20 UTC No. 16551184

>>16551141
In an odd way I understand the sentiment. For the first 12 years of my life I was convinced I hated music because all I had heard was shitty R&B from my mother and church hymns or whatever they forced us to sing in grade school music class, all compounded by my autistic sensitivity to loud noises.

>>16551170
12m Starship would not have this problem.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:06:33 UTC No. 16551185

WHERE IS JOHN INSPRUCKER?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:06:43 UTC No. 16551186

no launch thread?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:06:58 UTC No. 16551187

>>16551177
yes, but only over non essential parts again, don't sweat it. The steeper angle might be an interesting experience though

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:07:00 UTC No. 16551188

>>16551185
Sitting in a payload bay

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:07:14 UTC No. 16551189

>>16551185
He passed away a few weeks ago bro...

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:07:22 UTC No. 16551190

If musk were really as 'cool' as he wants people to think he is he'd hire clear to do the broadcasts.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:07:24 UTC No. 16551191

>>16551184
More surface area = stronger wind effect

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:07:38 UTC No. 16551192

Those big ass front flaps seem so comically huge now

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:07:39 UTC No. 16551193

I hope they put some cameras on those dummy payloads to get some good shots of the ship from space.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:07:41 UTC No. 16551194

>>16551185
He is an old man. He is not the future. Just like Musk is nowhere to be seen.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:08:14 UTC No. 16551195

I'm retarded: why is there a 'launch window', can't they just launch whenever?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:08:18 UTC No. 16551196

they will have to delay cause elon is too busy seething on twitter

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:08:29 UTC No. 16551197

>>16551189
I can't believe I'm reading such vile lies on 4chan.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:08:31 UTC No. 16551198

No Thunderf00t livestream? :(

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:08:34 UTC No. 16551199

>>16551155
launch was officially blessed

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:08:36 UTC No. 16551200

good morning sars, we are wary excited today at the designated launching platform

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:08:36 UTC No. 16551201

>>16551190
yeah, all the cool billionaires these days get japanese spaceVtubers to narrate their rocket launches
GET ON IT ELON

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:08:53 UTC No. 16551202

I think the "streamers" fake the countdown T timer to be the lowest to make them look like they are ahead

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:08:54 UTC No. 16551203

>>16551195
They have to shutdown air traffic and the road

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:09:14 UTC No. 16551204

>>16551198
Phil is busy cowering in terror.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:09:20 UTC No. 16551205

>same flight profile three times in a row
it's over

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:09:25 UTC No. 16551206

is thunderf00t gonna stream this or not?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:09:29 UTC No. 16551207

>>16551187
I'm afraid :(

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:09:29 UTC No. 16551208

>>16551190
True facts

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:09:32 UTC No. 16551209

>>16551195
they want daylight both for launch and the starship landing, so it's a relatively tight window this time of year

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:09:33 UTC No. 16551210

>>16551136
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4FrnrD7jCA

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:09:55 UTC No. 16551211

>>16551190
SpaceX sponsored events for vtuber would be wild

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:09:56 UTC No. 16551212

>>16551205
but they're gonna recover and tow the ship back to Australia tho

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:10:09 UTC No. 16551213

>>16551201
At least 4chan would like him

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:10:12 UTC No. 16551214

>>16551201
He'd put a cardboard cutout of Clear in the rocket like >>16551160
without even telling her first just to surprise her

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:10:43 UTC No. 16551215

Tice looks really cute today

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:10:44 UTC No. 16551216

/trash/ is GO

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:10:47 UTC No. 16551217

>>16551155
Checked

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:10:53 UTC No. 16551218

>>16551198
he doesn't want to be humiliated again

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:10:57 UTC No. 16551219

>>16551206
he didn't do flight 6 so no

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:11:04 UTC No. 16551220

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:11:09 UTC No. 16551221

>>16551168
i've been to a greenhouse with a restaurant in it. its soul nourishing but i can see why its not very profitable to run.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:11:12 UTC No. 16551222

Why the fuck are people sending so much money?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:11:17 UTC No. 16551223

>>16551195
She's a big ship.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:11:17 UTC No. 16551224

>>16551213
half of 4chan thinks that vtubers are a jewish conspiracy these days

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:11:18 UTC No. 16551225

production quality is even higher than usual god it blows BO out of the water

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:11:36 UTC No. 16551227

POV: you watch texans freezing to death in 65 degree weather

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:12:02 UTC No. 16551228

>active cooling
sweaty starship bros we are so back

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:12:04 UTC No. 16551229

>>16551225
Competition is great when it works, SpaceX in competition mode would be insane

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:12:06 UTC No. 16551230

>Metallic heat shield tiles

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:12:15 UTC No. 16551231

>>16551222
nsf? its an expensive operation. they have alot of people, expensive equipment, work 24 hours a day, and constantly travel.

jeff bezos at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:12:34 UTC No. 16551232

elon suckz

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:12:37 UTC No. 16551233

>>16551198
grim

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:12:39 UTC No. 16551234

>>16551228
I keep telling them anon but they refuse to listen.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:12:40 UTC No. 16551235

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:13:08 UTC No. 16551236

>>16551220
Starlink deployment

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:13:17 UTC No. 16551237

>>16551228

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:13:26 UTC No. 16551238

>>16551227
It's only 65 in the sun. The air is more like 40.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:13:27 UTC No. 16551239

>>16551235
are the dummy starlinks just 10 pallets glued together?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:13:52 UTC No. 16551240

>>16551228
inb4 sweaty starship chan

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:13:54 UTC No. 16551241

>s-s-s-s-s-shooot, haha! :3

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:13:59 UTC No. 16551242

>>16551216
why would you spend that much time to make that just to fuck up the toes

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:14:11 UTC No. 16551243

FLIGHT PROVEN RAPTOR

314

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:14:14 UTC No. 16551244

so they are littering space with dummy satellites?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:14:28 UTC No. 16551245

HAHA funny joke my friends

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:14:35 UTC No. 16551246

the engine that is getting reflown (pie, get it haha)

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:14:36 UTC No. 16551247

these new flaps look dumb from this angle

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:14:40 UTC No. 16551248

>reflying a raptor for the first time
wasn't it discovered that they tried this last time too? I thought somebody spotted a 'duplicate' serial number

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:14:43 UTC No. 16551249

>>16551244
for like 20 minutes, I think space can handle it

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:14:44 UTC No. 16551250

>>16551244
it's not orbital

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:14:54 UTC No. 16551251

>>16551244
they are suborbital, come down with the ship
just testing if they deploy

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:15:15 UTC No. 16551252

>>16551247
everyone looks dumb from below anon don't be rude

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:15:17 UTC No. 16551253

Oh no you guys it's on fire

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:15:18 UTC No. 16551254

>>16551245
still way less cringe than the BONG stream

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:15:25 UTC No. 16551255

>>16551244
Suborbital trajectory. Don't worry, the space dolphins will be alright

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:15:37 UTC No. 16551256

>>16551244

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:15:53 UTC No. 16551257

>>16551247
you look dumb from this angle

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:16:01 UTC No. 16551258

>>16551253
you say that every launch

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:16:07 UTC No. 16551259

>>16551233
lol not sure if its getting more deranged or not
I guess it keeps the money flowing, a lot of people with EDS out there

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:16:20 UTC No. 16551260

>>16551254
>"Here comes the BONG water, this things getting LIT!"
Shush old man

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:16:33 UTC No. 16551261

>>16551258
They keep catching on fire.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:17:02 UTC No. 16551262

Jessie is so cute

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:17:18 UTC No. 16551263

When the fuck is it GONNA be orbital

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:17:32 UTC No. 16551264

sexy sweaty latina

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:17:44 UTC No. 16551265

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:17:49 UTC No. 16551266

>>16551263
After 3 more relight demos

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:18:01 UTC No. 16551267

>>16551237
what do you think the used active coolant tastes like after reentry haha i bet it would be kind of salty and warm maybe a little bit acidic just a funny thought you know haha

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:18:16 UTC No. 16551268

elon doesn't understand that you have to learn how to orbit earth before you can land on mars

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:18:27 UTC No. 16551269

>>16551257
well y- y- you look DUMBER

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:18:29 UTC No. 16551271

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:18:33 UTC No. 16551272

>>16551265
ridiculous hair

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:18:41 UTC No. 16551273

>still saying 100 people to Mars per ship

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:18:43 UTC No. 16551274

Wow, it looks like there's a lot of changes they'll test in this flight

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:18:56 UTC No. 16551276

>>16551268
Call him to share this very important information

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:04 UTC No. 16551277

>>16550894
>Add 600 meters to the "start" attitude, which is essentially a rounding error
>difference can become pretty much exactly the metric-imperial conversion rate of 1.6214
Yes, this is how math works.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:08 UTC No. 16551278

jesse is very hot id would rape her if she come to bangladesh

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:08 UTC No. 16551279

>>16551272
roach aesthetic

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:10 UTC No. 16551280

anyone else secretly watch estronaut streams

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:22 UTC No. 16551281

>>16551273
>haha elon only did 50 people to Mars per ship not 100 like they said haha, what a fraud

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:48 UTC No. 16551282

bros i can't believe we got a new glenn flight, switch 2 reveal, david lynch death, and a starship flight all within 9 hours.
i'm tired

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:53 UTC No. 16551283

>>16551263
2 weeks

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:53 UTC No. 16551284

>>16551274
NTR queen

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:56 UTC No. 16551285

>>16551281
>sneeding that quick

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:56 UTC No. 16551286

>>16551273
>he doesn't know about the 18m secret Starship program
ngmi

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:20:04 UTC No. 16551287

>>16551265
Cute face but way too many metal bits on it.
Yee Yee haircut needs to go too.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:20:07 UTC No. 16551288

>>16551273
15m diameter starship v4

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:20:08 UTC No. 16551289

>>16551247

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:20:09 UTC No. 16551290

>>16551282
>david lynch
who?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:20:10 UTC No. 16551291

>>16551280
no

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:20:22 UTC No. 16551292

>to give you an idea of how big this is, compare it to this fictional object

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:20:27 UTC No. 16551293

How long are Star Destroyers again?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:20:38 UTC No. 16551294

>>16551289
heh

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:20:57 UTC No. 16551295

>>16551278
Based. A teacher friend of mine went to Bangladesh for work and she got raped there. She deserved it though.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:21:25 UTC No. 16551296

why doesn't thunderf00t stream these anymore? did he get bullied too much last time? it was hilarious

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:21:32 UTC No. 16551297

>>16551295
brown coded

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:21:36 UTC No. 16551298

>>16551284
If she's the nuclearfag then which one is the solarfag?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:21:39 UTC No. 16551299

>300t more fuel
h-holy shit

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:21:39 UTC No. 16551300

>>16551282
>new glenn flight
Neat
>irrelevant stuff
>irrelevant stuff
Irrelevant
>Starship flight
Neat

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:21:41 UTC No. 16551301

>>16551292
americans literally cannot fathom anything that isn't compared to marvel, harry potter or star wars

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:21:44 UTC No. 16551302

>>16551282
waking up like 3h before normal and trying to stay asleep like 2h after normal is a bit rough

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:21:44 UTC No. 16551303

new cam, nice

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:22:01 UTC No. 16551304

>>16551280
no longer a secret now

and i only watch his 4k recaps, which are admittedly pretty good. LIvestream is annoying af

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:22:40 UTC No. 16551305

>>16551286
>18m Starship
oh God please

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:22:41 UTC No. 16551306

THOUSANDS of tiles
lol
reuse is over

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:23:05 UTC No. 16551307

>>16551300
BASED

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:23:06 UTC No. 16551308

>>16551303
>pathetic

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:23:24 UTC No. 16551309

>fourteen more minutes
I can't wait this long

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:23:30 UTC No. 16551310

>>16551306
It's go time if the metal tiles work

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:23:42 UTC No. 16551311

>>16551309
scrub inc

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:23:49 UTC No. 16551312

Will make webms when the broadcast ends and I can download the raw 1080p file

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:23:51 UTC No. 16551313

>>16551306
THOUSANDS of fibers clothes
lol
clothing is over

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:23:51 UTC No. 16551314

>stickied
FUCK

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:24:16 UTC No. 16551315

>>16551311
curse of the sticky

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:24:24 UTC No. 16551316

30+ CAMERAS

Others cant even fathom a single camera stream at 60fps, meanwhile SpaceX deploys 30+ 4K 60fps streams with multiple Starlinks onboard

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:24:25 UTC No. 16551317

Yay stickied! Welcome tourists!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:24:31 UTC No. 16551319

>>16551303
same vibe

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:24:40 UTC No. 16551321

alien looking fuck

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:24:41 UTC No. 16551322

>>16551303
It's not new. The nose flaps moved.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:24:53 UTC No. 16551323

>>16551311
>dubs
UH OH
dubs to undo

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:24:57 UTC No. 16551324

>>16551313
they are getting a little too cocky but I still believe

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:25:07 UTC No. 16551325

>>16551319
kek

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:25:11 UTC No. 16551326

newchad here. explain the /sfg/ culture to me.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:25:37 UTC No. 16551327

>>16551326
only chuds allowed

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:25:37 UTC No. 16551328

>>16551322
Thats pointing upwards, it's on the booster

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:25:45 UTC No. 16551329

>>16551316
>we are about to get 30 different angles of catastrophic failure

based

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:25:47 UTC No. 16551330

>>16551326
Space is hard

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:25:50 UTC No. 16551331

>>16551319
why do I want to be punched by her?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:25:50 UTC No. 16551332

>>16551326

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:25:56 UTC No. 16551333

what a sexy milf

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:25:58 UTC No. 16551334

>>16551326
SLS bad

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:26:07 UTC No. 16551335

MAKE A FUCKING LAUNCH THREAD YOU RETARDS

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:26:09 UTC No. 16551336

>>16551326
Nothing ever happens

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:26:28 UTC No. 16551337

>>16551326
14 to 80 year old retards screaming at each other because of paper projects

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:26:36 UTC No. 16551338

>>16551326
we like roggets

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:26:39 UTC No. 16551339

is the ms-13 chola really necessary. its 2025

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:26:41 UTC No. 16551340

>all of africa on the internet
God please no

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:26:52 UTC No. 16551341

>>16551293
1.5km or something

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:26:57 UTC No. 16551342

>Starlink covers 2.8 billion population area
Meanwhile that one company that has the "other 3 Billion" in its name

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:26:57 UTC No. 16551343

>>16551326
Bunch of people pretending to be retarded, some of them are aerospace engineers and some are not pretending.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:27:04 UTC No. 16551344

Hurry up and launch V3 sats, you fucker

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:27:13 UTC No. 16551345

>>16551340
they can't be worse than the jeets

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:27:16 UTC No. 16551346

>>16551339
imma breed her

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:27:29 UTC No. 16551347

>>16551335
Do it yourself fag

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:27:35 UTC No. 16551348

>>16551332
Did all the people predicting mars by now leave or something?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:27:36 UTC No. 16551349

>>16551340
Can't be worse than what India has already done. Damage was already done by Steve Jobs and iPhone anyways.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:27:42 UTC No. 16551350

>>16551340
It is very important that we give even more Africans and Indians the means to contact your grandmother.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:27:48 UTC No. 16551351

>stickying a thread with 500 replies
Fucking retards

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:27:50 UTC No. 16551352

>>16551346

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:07 UTC No. 16551353

>>16551335
This is the launch thread, and the only thread worth a damn in /sci/

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:10 UTC No. 16551354

>>16551345
lol
lmao
xd
Jeets are shit tier, Africans are demon tier

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:10 UTC No. 16551355

>>16551279
JOHJ

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:13 UTC No. 16551356

>>16551343
the ones who are aerospace engineers are especially not pretending

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:19 UTC No. 16551357

i want to cuddle and make sweet love with Jessie anons, how can i achieve this?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:20 UTC No. 16551358

>>16551340
Phones already fucked everything up

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:21 UTC No. 16551359

>>16551351
Should have made a launch thread, retard.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:25 UTC No. 16551360

>>16551333
they're all so hot, braid girl is hot even with her speech impediment. i love spacex so much

Apologize at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:34 UTC No. 16551361

How long until they develop a Starship with human life support for manned missions?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:42 UTC No. 16551362

>>16551352
Imagine just plucking those braids right out of her forehead.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:51 UTC No. 16551363

>>16551357
>Jessie
whoops, meant to say Dan

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:28:59 UTC No. 16551364

>>16551357
By sneaking up to her, then cumming on her!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:29:05 UTC No. 16551365

>no launch thread
>just sticky /sfg/
Kerbal-tier engineering but for thread management.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:29:19 UTC No. 16551366

>>16551354
sounds fun desu

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:29:28 UTC No. 16551367

how many starship launches this year?
how many new glenn?
how many... vulcan?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:29:29 UTC No. 16551368

>it's going to abort

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:29:46 UTC No. 16551369

>>16551357
Start with Greeks

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:00 UTC No. 16551370

>>16551367
6
1
???

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:00 UTC No. 16551371

>>16551366
Demons are fun until they rape your mother and eat her intestines

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:02 UTC No. 16551372

>>16551367
You forgot Neutron!!!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:10 UTC No. 16551373

almost there

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:13 UTC No. 16551374

>>16551367
11
2
4

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:15 UTC No. 16551375

>>16551365
stickies=struts

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:19 UTC No. 16551376

TWO LAUNCHES?!?!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:24 UTC No. 16551377

>>16551335
too late faggot, mods have already stickied, the time ti make a launch thread was like two hours ago

Apologize at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:40 UTC No. 16551378

>>16551367
>how many starship launches this year?
between 12-20
>how many new glenn?
1
>how many... vulcan?
no idea

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:48 UTC No. 16551379

>>16551368
Illegal in Texas

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:57 UTC No. 16551380

>>16550788
You're forgetting about the Chinese companies

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:30:58 UTC No. 16551381

Will cena beat ric flairs 16 title wins before space x gets to orbit?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:31:13 UTC No. 16551382

>>16551296
The one time he doesn't stream and it RUDs on the tower lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:31:21 UTC No. 16551383

>>16551376
Oh yeah. I didn't realize they were both actually on the same day since I went to sleep after NG.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:31:24 UTC No. 16551384

>t-6 minutes
t-6 minutes
>t-6 minutes
t-6 minutes
>t-6 minutes
t-6 minutes
>t-6 minutes
t-6 minutes
>t-6 minutes
t-6 minutes

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:31:31 UTC No. 16551385

>>16551371
can't rape someone through the internet though
give me superstitious ooga booga posting over send bobs and vagene any day of the week

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:31:32 UTC No. 16551386

predictions for flap-chan?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:31:33 UTC No. 16551387

>we're bringing the Boom to Boca
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuHMJ_komZA

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:31:59 UTC No. 16551388

WE BRING THE BOOM! (TO BOCA)

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:02 UTC No. 16551389

Posting in epic bread

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:03 UTC No. 16551390

>>16551386
Flap Chan always perseveres.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:07 UTC No. 16551391

>pls cheer

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:08 UTC No. 16551392

>>16551326
see >>16551088

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:10 UTC No. 16551393

Please clap.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:13 UTC No. 16551394

>>16551381
no, jon stewart's more relentless than the ULA sniper

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:15 UTC No. 16551395

she's such a cutie :)

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:16 UTC No. 16551396

>>16551326
krystal posting, mostly.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:16 UTC No. 16551397

>>16551373
No blue balls for Musk.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:17 UTC No. 16551398

where live stream

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:19 UTC No. 16551399

>>16551386
undercooked this time

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:22 UTC No. 16551400

>>16551385
/pol/ did psyop them heavily with ebola chan, that was so fucking funny

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:22 UTC No. 16551401

Look at all those H1Bs!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:33 UTC No. 16551402

>>16551386
its going to be perfect

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:40 UTC No. 16551403

New Glenn bros? Why aren't they delaying?

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:42 UTC No. 16551404

COUGHING FIT
PANTS OF SHIT

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:48 UTC No. 16551405

>>16551398
Look for Elon Musk bitcoin giveaway on jewtube

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:32:56 UTC No. 16551406

>PLEASE CLAP

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:01 UTC No. 16551407

>>16551401
so many toilet scrubbers!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:07 UTC No. 16551408

Did someone poll? Catch or no catch. It's a coinflip for me.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:16 UTC No. 16551409

>>16551398
https://youtu.be/TxOFEMJAXCI

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:18 UTC No. 16551410

Holding my boner between two chopsticks for luck. I’m doing my part.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:18 UTC No. 16551411

>HOLD!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:22 UTC No. 16551412

>>16551388
this family creeps me the fuck out.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:31 UTC No. 16551413

>>16551326

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:40 UTC No. 16551414

If Elon doesn't make a NG+1 joke the next time New Glenn launches I'll be very disappointed.

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:42 UTC No. 16551415

>>16551409
bless

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:46 UTC No. 16551416

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:46 UTC No. 16551417

>>16551398
Watch Ria

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:33:51 UTC No. 16551418

spacex needs a lot of $190k chipotle managers

Anonymous at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:34:01 UTC No. 16551419

>7 flights at $2 billion per flight
Is it worth it for... zero kilos to LEO?