🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:21:53 UTC No. 16591650
their jobs are saved edition
previous >>16587022
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:25:48 UTC No. 16591654
>>16591650
the black guy not giving a shit always makes me smile
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:27:52 UTC No. 16591659
>>16591650
If this is the future of the JPL its over. owari da. fin. es ist verloren
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:28:11 UTC No. 16591660
>one black dude
>a hundred white women and ""women""
who's more productive?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:29:17 UTC No. 16591662
>>16591660
Trick question. The black dude is obviously looking at his phone.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:30:06 UTC No. 16591664
>>16591662
It can still be work related
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:30:15 UTC No. 16591665
>>16591660
probably the guy on his computer instead of waving to a camera
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:37:16 UTC No. 16591670
>>16591650
>JPL
they already had layoffs like 6 months ago
Yusef at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:40:44 UTC No. 16591673
>>16591661
It's true lol we have some crazy guys in here
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:46:33 UTC No. 16591680
>Yeah we could extended Cassini — but nah let’s just trash it. The extra time spent on the DSN would cost money and resources, goy!!
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:46:54 UTC No. 16591682
>>16591673
I know, that's why I make them
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:49:17 UTC No. 16591685
>>16591680
Uranus was pushing it but a centaur comet/asteroid mission was feasible
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:52:03 UTC No. 16591691
>>16591680
muh contaminations
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:53:37 UTC No. 16591694
>>16591691
We need to start deliberately contaminating planets.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:56:35 UTC No. 16591697
>>16591694
>This was a period of great permissiveness in matters of language, so even the President was saying shit and fuck and so on, without anybody’s feeling threatened or taking offense. It was perfectly OK. He called the Space Fuck a Space Fuck and so did everybody else. It was a rocket ship with eight-hundred pounds of freeze dried jizzum in its nose. It was going to fired at the Andromeda Galazy, two-million light years away. The ship was named the Arthur C. Clarke, in honor of a famous space pioneer.
https://www.sensitiveskinmagazine.c
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:27:59 UTC No. 16591712
>NASA's associate administrator Jim Free, a key figure who has defended the agency's moon program, is leaving NASA on Saturday, per two people familiar with his plans.
FREE IS OUT
SLS DEFENDER IS OUT
ESDMD WALL BROKEN
BAAAASED
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:28:39 UTC No. 16591714
>>16591712
fucking epic
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:32:15 UTC No. 16591717
>>16591712
don’t let the door hit ya on the way out, FAGGOT
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:35:19 UTC No. 16591721
>>16591720
why does bangladesh do an off-center circle
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:41:18 UTC No. 16591725
>>16591650
ITS OVER YR4 ASTEROID BROS... THE IMPACT PROBABILITTY JUST HALFED IN ONE DAY..... JUST ADMIT THAT NOTHING EVER HAPPENS
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:42:06 UTC No. 16591729
>>16591650
one job wasn't saved
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:42:54 UTC No. 16591732
>>16591720
I like it. At least its unique. no country would have red on green so thats a peculiar factor.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:43:47 UTC No. 16591734
>>16591725
Anyway we could launch a gravity tug mission within the next year and bring that probability to 100%? Or is it too massive
I NEED this thing to hit Mumbai
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:45:12 UTC No. 16591736
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:46:17 UTC No. 16591738
>>16591725
In before misplaced decimal point.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:46:54 UTC No. 16591739
>>16591736
I present to you, the Royal Moraccan flag. only used when the king is physically present, but aesthetically superior to the actual flag.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:47:33 UTC No. 16591740
>>16591721
> The red circle is offset slightly toward the hoist so that it appears centred when the flag is flying.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:50:02 UTC No. 16591743
We've known each other a long time. You have never known me to impose myself on anyone or take a stance based on trivial or whimsical perceptions. DOGE must be forced to cut SpaceX's budget. Now, I've told you what you must do. You have only your trust in me to help you decide to do it.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:50:07 UTC No. 16591744
>>16591739
>fimbriation
pathetic
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:55:48 UTC No. 16591749
>>16591743
Kek. Shame she’s such a retard. TNG is my /comfy/ show
sage at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:26:40 UTC No. 16591762
Lockeheed got a contract
https://news.lockheedmartin.com/muo
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:28:14 UTC No. 16591765
>>16591762
about thyme
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:53:19 UTC No. 16591803
SpaceX second stage debris streaked over the Netherlands and Dresden, landing in Poland. Several COPVs have been recovered and damage noted to a freeway and a business warehouse yard. Awaiting news that Poland is declaring war on SpaceX.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:54:49 UTC No. 16591806
>>16591749
funny how well she played the part of the Wise Negro in that show but acts entirely the opposite in real life. what a great actress she was.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:56:23 UTC No. 16591807
>>16591803
Why was it in a polar orbit?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:04:05 UTC No. 16591813
>>16591807
?
starlink?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:06:14 UTC No. 16591815
>>16591803
>Poland is declaring war on SpaceX.
uh oh
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:07:16 UTC No. 16591817
>>16591803
gop 1
nato 0
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:08:05 UTC No. 16591818
>South Texas environmental group drops lawsuit against SpaceX
>Save RGV board member Jim Chapman said they dropped the lawsuit because the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the state’s environmental agency, granted SpaceX a permit that “moots” their lawsuit.
>“We think we’re right,” Chapman said in a phone interview. “We just didn’t feel like [the lawsuit] was going to move in a positive direction for us.”
https://www.texasstandard.org/stori
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:08:30 UTC No. 16591820
>>16591803
Le Krautchan memes.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:10:37 UTC No. 16591823
>>16591803
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOH
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:12:23 UTC No. 16591824
>>16591803
>rockets hitting the Netherlands
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:14:22 UTC No. 16591825
>>16591823
Poland itself is the second strongest guarantor of article 5 sans nukes, and the US won't answer those calls under Trump.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:16:54 UTC No. 16591829
>>16591824
it only hit poland actually.
also, while i don't recall V2's getting used ON the netherlands, they definetly did launch them from there.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:18:07 UTC No. 16591830
>>16591825
the US doesn't really need to, europe has been building capacity pretty quickly the last 3 years, rheinmetall now produces more shells than all american industry combined.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:23:10 UTC No. 16591839
what can we do about the space debris problem? all rockets must be fully re-usable?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:24:09 UTC No. 16591840
>>16591712
Jim "I hate commercial fixed price contracts" Free
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:25:45 UTC No. 16591842
>>16591830
no way this is true lmao, but keep coping
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:26:06 UTC No. 16591843
>>16591818
elon "i am the law" musk
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:27:24 UTC No. 16591844
>>16591820
Scott “I only talk a out my plane now” Manley
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:28:59 UTC No. 16591846
>>16591829
>More than 1,600 V-2s fell on the port city during a six-month period
you not knowing that outs your newfaggery tbqh
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:29:46 UTC No. 16591849
>>16591712
>Jim Free
its not just jim free apparently, but other artemis higher ups too
>And in Huntsville, Alabama, three key officials at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center - one of the agency's 10 field centers and the epicenter of its Artemis moon program - had their retirements announced internally on Tuesday, according to a person familiar with the announcement.
Those roles at MSFC - chiefs of procurement, finance and information - were filled in an acting capacity by deputies and other NASA officials, the source said.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ke
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:30:49 UTC No. 16591851
>>16591849
they included an update about isaacman too:
>Trump's nominee for NASA, private astronaut and billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman, is in Washington this week to prepare for his confirmation hearing at the U.S. Senate.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:31:19 UTC No. 16591853
>>16591846
they were really cranking those out, huh. How come we can’t launch 3200 falcon a year now?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:36:29 UTC No. 16591856
>>16591842
it is true, but judging by your kneejerk response i think you might be angry about this truth
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:37:08 UTC No. 16591857
>>16591853
Elon is building New Nordhausen as we speak
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:37:09 UTC No. 16591858
>>16591849
>>16591851
its happening
the only thing I'm afraid of is that SLS fans tend to be liberals and perhaps even NASA employees so they might already be past the anger and cope stage into simple despair
the salt mine might run dry
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:37:43 UTC No. 16591859
>>16591846
>not knowing everything about military history outs me as being a newfag on a spaceflight general
you're not very bright, are you?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:40:47 UTC No. 16591861
>>16591859
You should be very familiar with the A-4/V-2 rocket and its builders. Hit the books.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:43:06 UTC No. 16591862
GCHQ is literally staffed by pedophiles.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:45:04 UTC No. 16591864
>>16591856
>source: euroseethe
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:45:07 UTC No. 16591865
>>16591853
Wartime spending vs SpaceX spending only 0.01% of gdp (actual rough math)
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:45:54 UTC No. 16591866
>>16591861
how about instead i go cook dinner and completely forget about some weird retard barking orders at me online?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:46:38 UTC No. 16591868
>>16591842
>no way American industry is falling behind
Huh? This is sort of an ongoing problem here. Our wealthy exported the entire industrial base
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:46:38 UTC No. 16591869
>>16591858
you'll definitely have dems wanting to go after him just because of the musk connections. but his hearings are gonna be before the commerce committee which has relatively less hysterical dems than some of the other nomination circuses. it may be relatively low-key.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:50:00 UTC No. 16591872
>>16591866
its no shame to be ignorant. proudly ignorant is another matter
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:51:02 UTC No. 16591873
>>16591864
sorry anon but they just got a bunch of new production lines online and now produce more shells per month than the U.S does in it's entirety.
calm down burgerlander, you have cool rockets, you don't have to win at everything, and you don't need to stomp your feet when you lose.
airbus is also kicking boeing's ass, do you need to have a melty about that as well or can you move on with your life?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:51:29 UTC No. 16591874
>>16591868
and their wealthy decided global warming was a bigger threat than a shrinking industrial base
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:52:18 UTC No. 16591875
>>16591872
sorry, didn't read, too busy with this garlic sauce.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:52:20 UTC No. 16591876
>>16591874
Global warming is a polypsychosis expression, their hypothalamus is overactive.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:53:11 UTC No. 16591877
>>16591875
kek
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:19:28 UTC No. 16591896
>>16591886
look at us, we're the chinese revolution now
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:22:48 UTC No. 16591900
>>16591886
Targeting Elon was the single biggest mistake the DNC ever made, possibly their final key mistake.
He watched that environmental assessment drag on for more than a year and decided "alright, that settles it, I'm taking over the government."
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:24:08 UTC No. 16591901
>>16591900
its ok
if they call him a nazi enough he'll go back to being apolitical right
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:25:00 UTC No. 16591903
>>16591900
SpaceX maybe has more breathing room, but starship won't move faster
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:30:57 UTC No. 16591907
>>16591900
What's the next step in the master plan? Hoping that no democratic executive/legislative majority capable of retaliation is voted in? Rigging elections so that doesn't happen? Betting on SpaceX continuing being so indispensable that you can't mess with it?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:34:38 UTC No. 16591908
>>16591907
>What's the next step in the master plan?
Crashing the post-1913 dispensation with no survivors
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:35:33 UTC No. 16591910
>>16591907
destroying the current democratic party (or letting them destroy themselves) and hoping that the reformed party is more rational and able to work with Musk
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:38:30 UTC No. 16591911
>>16591697
Kurt Vonnegut is a boring old boomer
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:41:35 UTC No. 16591914
>>16591907
2028-2036 is Republican secured.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:43:55 UTC No. 16591916
>>16591911
do you know how i know that you don't know what boomer means?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:44:00 UTC No. 16591917
>>16591712
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:46:12 UTC No. 16591919
>>16591916
>uhm actually it means individuals born during the postwar baby boom
I have altered the meaning
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:47:23 UTC No. 16591920
>>16591916
boomer is everyone a few years older than me and who I don't like
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:47:53 UTC No. 16591921
>>16591917
>>16591712
Reminder, Biden admin demoted Kathy Leuders, removed her from HLS entirely for accepting SpaceX's proposal. It was entirely a political retribution that the Biden admin waged war against. They did this for all of Musk's companies and had all of Musk's companies investigated/harassed/targetted by the Biden admin.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:49:50 UTC No. 16591924
>>16591921
yep, it was a years long lawfare campaign
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:50:52 UTC No. 16591925
>>16591923
are you retarded?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:51:10 UTC No. 16591926
>>16591660
There are several black women in that picture too. But of course the black man is more productive.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:53:20 UTC No. 16591929
>>16591803
>America gives Europe free rocket souvenirs
You're welcome.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:55:37 UTC No. 16591930
>>16591907
>>What's the next step in the master plan?
"He who saves a nation, violates no law."
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:55:47 UTC No. 16591931
>>16591859
>>not knowing anything about military history outs me as being a newfag on the weapons board
Sure does.
Space programs came from ballistic missile programs, thus /sfg/ is and always will be /k/; we leased land from /sci/ a la Gitmo to hide it from the tourists.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:05:09 UTC No. 16591936
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:05:12 UTC No. 16591937
>>16591921
>>16591917
would be nice to have fags in charge who push for a better space future instead of pandering to whichever lobbyist is bribing them
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:09:44 UTC No. 16591942
>>16591861
>rocketman Elon is phobic of driving himself
>Braun divebombs close to supersonic
pottery
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:10:20 UTC No. 16591944
>>16591907
As another anon said, the next 12 years at least are guaranteed favorable, barring something genuinely wild. That's more than enough time for the DNC to finish eating itself.
I assume the goal is for the nation to be in such a good position at the end of those 12 years that fucking with the guy primarily responsible for it would be political suicide.
I suppose he could also amass enough pull to get a unified and coherent third party off the ground, drawing in the more sane DNC and GOP members who simply have no viable alternative, along with some independents and libertarians. If you got a third party off the ground which ran a moderate position and could pull supporting votes from either of the other two depending on the content of specific legislation, that third party could effectively control Congress.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:17:30 UTC No. 16591945
>>16591921
At the time I thought many of you were just schizo. But yeah, in hindsight it was most definitely a coordinated effort to keep the gravy train rolling—and they wanted more. More cost+ contracts, more SpaceX restrictions. There was a faction within NASA that wanted to undo the HLS award selection.
Fuck Free and fuck the entire biden administration and fuck the old guards at NASA who are deserving of a second black plague
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:18:41 UTC No. 16591946
>>16591936
Outlander..
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:22:13 UTC No. 16591949
>>16591945
It was a long few years there enduring anons screeching at us that we were crazy for noticing what was unmistakable and unhidden. Damn it feels good to be right. Get fucked, doubters.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:30:55 UTC No. 16591955
>>16591949
I wonder if the same ones denying are further radicalized left or if they have seen the light of Musk. I think some have become unhinged radical commies over the years
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:35:14 UTC No. 16591959
>>16591955
Humility is a trait that's been bred out of them, so I doubt they've taken being proven wrong very well. A shocking number of people can't process being wrong in a healthy way that lets them learn and grow from it.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:58:36 UTC No. 16591969
>>16591906
BELTA LODAH
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:17:26 UTC No. 16591977
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:41:17 UTC No. 16591987
>>16591985
NASA and redditors got so upset over this too
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:41:34 UTC No. 16591988
>>16591985
Wait until he cancels Artemis for some vague kick the can down the road promise for something else, long after his 2nd term ends.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:43:35 UTC No. 16591991
>>16591988
They'll just find another way to cope
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:43:54 UTC No. 16591992
>>16591807
a poland orbit
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:44:16 UTC No. 16591993
>>16591988
The whole Artemis mission architecture is a joke and needs to be cancelled asap
with everyone involved fired
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:44:53 UTC No. 16591994
>>16591992
that was the joke, I’m glad someone got it lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:47:44 UTC No. 16591996
>>16591988
He'll cancel SLS after Artemis 5.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:52:19 UTC No. 16592000
>>16591998
It’s not too late to repurpose them
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:53:17 UTC No. 16592002
>>16591998
Only fourteen more months until launch
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:55:25 UTC No. 16592003
>>16591998
>>16592002
Honestly why not launch it?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:55:53 UTC No. 16592004
>>16592000
Actually, we'd need to design a Liberty II. ArianeGroup isn't making A5 cores anymore, so we'd need to work out how to replace it with an Ariane 6 unit. Then we'd need to beg the Europeans to spare one since they can only build nine per year at the most and they've got a big backlog of payloads
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:56:01 UTC No. 16592005
>>16592000
>USA flag: bold, vibrant, draws the eye
>EU flag: minuscule, vapid, barely noticeable
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:57:02 UTC No. 16592006
>>16592004
Extended F9 upper stage or a GS2 stage or some shit
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:57:42 UTC No. 16592008
>>16592003
It'd look impressive in the rocket garden, but there's really no good reason not to launch it. Putting the program on hold while we go back to square one with a crew launch vehicle would be a disaster
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:00:30 UTC No. 16592011
>>16592008
the starship HLS will be the crew launch vehicle
And crew landing vehicle
And down the line, the crew return vehicle
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:04:19 UTC No. 16592018
>>16592011
Bro it can't even get to orbit
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:04:53 UTC No. 16592020
>>16592008
I get the fear behind being scared of starting from scratch, but honestly it’s worth it. China is still so far behind and if you have a factorio nazi like, for example, von Braun or Elon making sure funds and resources are being actually utilized for the goal instead of endless 20 years of constellation/SLS grift, there could be new architecture from scratch in a reasonable time.
Rip the bandaid off and just kill SLS/Orion entirely. People tend to forget just how fucking fast the jump from mercury-redstone to Apollo 11 was. 8 years; and that involved the USA brute forcing discoveries like rendezvous, docking, new engine types, everything. The USA could get revamped Artemis architecture online in 6 years easily. Could do it before Trump is out of office if they drive themselves like slaves (but this is a bit unrealistic and only likely to happen if the China threat were much closer to returning than it currently is)
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:07:28 UTC No. 16592021
It's nice that the rocket garden will get a full stack SLS. Stick it on its side next to a SV
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:07:38 UTC No. 16592022
>>16591977
Kek, first thing I thought of.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:18:16 UTC No. 16592029
>>16592020
China's goal is to land crew on the moon in five years. Given the steady rate at which they're been openly posting hardware updates this doesn't seem like an unreasonable goal.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:26:57 UTC No. 16592032
>>16591949
The "muh Biden has it out for Musk" because Elon can't take a swipe conspiracy is and will remain the most retarded thing Anons believe and frankly unworthy of the science board. Unfortunately we're overrun with retards that lack the critical thinking to see what actually happened (Biden being unionfag and a senile retard, Nelson throwing the SLS industrial base a bone to keep congress happy while openly and repeatedly shitting on cost-plus and supporting commercial, Elon and SpaceX making unforced errors that delay things and then complaining that things take the time they take, which they could've known beforehand and planned for).
Fuck you, Collagefag, I hope you're happy.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:30:24 UTC No. 16592035
>>16592032
coal posting in this economy?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:30:40 UTC No. 16592036
>>16592032
Elon jumped balls deep on the Donald Trump campaign trail for no reason huh
Or because he's a nazi maybe???
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:32:53 UTC No. 16592038
>>16591825
It's pretty amusing to watch Germans screetch about America 'abandoning' them as they themselves refuse to send peacekeepers to Ukraine.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:33:14 UTC No. 16592039
>>16592032
>schizoposting about your personal boogeyman almost 2 years later
check yourself in bud
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:41:27 UTC No. 16592051
>>16591868
The Eurostronk anon doesn't actually know how many munitions are produced.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:42:20 UTC No. 16592052
Wait sorry i’m late to the party but lmao I just found out Sheetz left journalism and is now some sort of head relations guy at Firefly
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:42:36 UTC No. 16592054
>>16591900
>Targeting Elon was the single biggest mistake the DNC ever made, possibly their final key mistake.
It started with his son getting trooned.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:45:43 UTC No. 16592056
>>16592054
that was probably elon’s own damn fault. He said as late as 2022 he was still okay with puberty blockers and didn’t realize what it was doing. He was an out of touch leftist until very recently.
I don’t mean this in a rude way but I wouldn’t be surprised if more of his children end up fucked up in multiple ways. At least 4 or 5 of them are going to end up needing mental asylums to be dēsu
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:53:49 UTC No. 16592059
>>16591993
At least it was something. Not just another "let's let other politicians deal with it at a later date" like it's been since 1972.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:05:15 UTC No. 16592062
>>16592032
You are fake news.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:14:06 UTC No. 16592065
>>16592052
we're running out of space journalists
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:19:52 UTC No. 16592068
This entire general is just an asylum for crazy MAGA boomers. Space is not discussed here. Go ahead and prove it to me if Im wrong
>inb4 Elon is space
Wrong and we’ve discussed why before.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:21:44 UTC No. 16592070
>>16592068
I am on the short list for the first mars mission
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:22:53 UTC No. 16592072
>>16592068
it's not boomers
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:23:44 UTC No. 16592073
>>16592068
how many different ways can we say boeing sucks and starliner should be cancelled before it becomes stale?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:24:04 UTC No. 16592074
>>16592068
There's not much going on right now. All we've got coming up are Starlink launches until the 26th, and that's Intuitive Machines' next lunar lander launching on yet another Falcon 9. The next non-Falcon going up is a Soyuz launching on the 28th carrying Progress MS-30. Until then we'll all fall back on the old standard of pseudo-political shitposting.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:24:53 UTC No. 16592076
>>16592074
Personally I'm looking forward to the next Starship failure which Musk won't even comment on or pay attention to.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:26:08 UTC No. 16592077
>>16592074
So youre supposed to ruin the general with offtopic discussion in the meantime instead of discussing something other than current news? Maybe learn to keep things to yourself instead of posting garbage
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:26:25 UTC No. 16592078
>>16592076
Why do you niggers from reddit come here?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:29:32 UTC No. 16592081
>>16592077
There's barely any off topic discussion in the first place itt you whining faggot.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:30:06 UTC No. 16592082
>>16592077
and your answer to off topic discussion is meta discussion?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:44:10 UTC No. 16592088
>>16592068
Get on board or get out of the way anon.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:46:14 UTC No. 16592090
>>16592074
>Intuitive Machines' next lunar lander
Theirs was the tall one that tipped, right? I hope the next one doesn't the first one was almost perfect. There's a pair of landers arriving to the moon first week of March too, I'm eager to see them work.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:48:35 UTC No. 16592092
>>16592090
Only one will land in early March, the Japanese one will take a few months longer because it can't do as direct a trajectory.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:51:08 UTC No. 16592094
>>16592092
Blue Ghost and Micro Nova, March 3rd and 6th I thought?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:54:51 UTC No. 16592097
>>16592054
that's the story he's told because it makes him more sympathetic, but at the time it was pretty clearly the lockdowns that started it. this was like april-may 2020 when he started calling them fascist and the whole media machine swooped in to accuse him of dangerous disinformation.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:57:00 UTC No. 16592101
>>16592097
This, it spurred on the twitter purchase specifically.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 03:04:16 UTC No. 16592106
>>16592078
I've been here longer than you have.
I don't Elon even remembers that Mars exists
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 03:06:24 UTC No. 16592107
>>16592094
Oh wait that one is gonna be that quick? I didn't realise they were gonna be so close lel. That's a funny coincidence.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 03:06:25 UTC No. 16592108
>>16592097
Yes I recall him saying
>these covid tests seem pretty unreliable
and they started hitting him from all sides
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 03:11:55 UTC No. 16592111
>>16591712
He should be in jail
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 04:38:27 UTC No. 16592148
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:08:25 UTC No. 16592166
>>16591650
Digits and Starship will fly this month.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:13:12 UTC No. 16592169
>>16591654
idk how it came to be that he was in the shot, but it's perfectly hilarious. Maybe someone sensed the comedic potential, maybe even he did.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:13:27 UTC No. 16592170
>>16592166
>Digits and Starship will fly this month.
Checked
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:18:26 UTC No. 16592174
>>16591846
You're not an old fag and are very dumb.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:19:47 UTC No. 16592175
>>16591859
They circle jerk on Discord.
>>16591872
Your mental disorder is showing again.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:21:51 UTC No. 16592177
>>16591907
>SpaceX is indispensable
LOL
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:24:53 UTC No. 16592181
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/
>NEW: Elon Musk and SpaceX have taken control of part of Texas.
>In the town of Brownsville, one of the poorest communities in America, Musk sold hope.
>Instead, SpaceX caused earthquakes, workplace injuries, and displacement. And now they've built a company town to boot.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:26:36 UTC No. 16592182
>>16592181
They love SpaceX in Brownsville, it's done more to uplift the economy there than anything in decades, and it was enough to turn Cameron County red for the first time since, what was it, the 1800s?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:26:47 UTC No. 16592184
>>16592181
Good.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:35:06 UTC No. 16592191
>>16592182
i think that was more biden opening the border, same as all the other border counties in texas
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:36:31 UTC No. 16592192
>>16592191
That definitely didn't help among the populations that dislike illegal immigration but I don't think it pushed Cameron County (which is something like 90% hispanic) to vote Republican.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:39:39 UTC No. 16592194
>>16592192
well, you're wrong. starr county is 97% hispanic and that flipped red for the first time since 1896 too.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:54:48 UTC No. 16592203
>>16591712
>NASA's associate administrator Jim Free, a key figure who has defended the agency's moon program, is leaving NASA on Saturday, per two people familiar with his plans.
"Are You Free?" and More of Mr Humphries' Best Bits | Are You Being Served?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dqWNG
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:58:49 UTC No. 16592209
>>16592208
stupid frogposter
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 06:38:44 UTC No. 16592233
>>16592181
Elon killed my wife and fucked my dog.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 07:38:49 UTC No. 16592259
>>16592233
My experience with Elon was completely the opposite
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 07:53:20 UTC No. 16592275
>>16592192
You're wrong on that as nearly all the border counties flipped. Nonetheless SpaceX has greatly improved the economic situation in Cameron county which has historically been one of the poorest in the country.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:06:10 UTC No. 16592286
>>16592233
This is good unironically if it helps us get to Mars
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:13:56 UTC No. 16592291
https://x.com/MartinShkreli/status/
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:00:42 UTC No. 16592325
>>16592192
hispanics hate illegal immigrants though
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:03:49 UTC No. 16592329
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lE
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:07:40 UTC No. 16592333
>>16592181
>And now they've built a company town to boot.
Isn't this a good thing??? Like saying "And now, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has cured cancer"
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:12:24 UTC No. 16592336
>>16592325
they hate illegal migrants who come from a different part of south america than them*
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:30:11 UTC No. 16592356
>>16592333
they are misanthropes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cZ
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:47:17 UTC No. 16592385
>>16592106
You're that tranny poster.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:47:49 UTC No. 16592387
>>16592385
That's completely irrelevant.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:48:32 UTC No. 16592389
>>16592387
I think we have established a strong 1:1 relation between trannyism and musk seething
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:49:39 UTC No. 16592392
>>16592181
Garbage communist propaganda
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:52:12 UTC No. 16592397
>>16592389
and its pretty logical too, Musk has been outspokenly anti-tranny for years now so it makes sense why they would seethe about him all the time
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:01:23 UTC No. 16592406
>>16592356
lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:05:52 UTC No. 16592414
>pigs can't fly
>dogs can't fly
>therefore all dogs are actually pigs
absolute state of /sfg/
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:07:19 UTC No. 16592416
>>16592414
You will never be a pig
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:07:50 UTC No. 16592417
>>16592397
Not anti-tranny, pro-humanity. Pro-creation. Pro-creation/humanity buds heads against anti-human/depopulation schemes.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:08:22 UTC No. 16592418
>>16592414
sneed and seethe tranny
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:09:29 UTC No. 16592420
>>16592417
anti-tranny and pro-humanity overlap
enabling anti-natalist mental illness is anti-human
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:10:01 UTC No. 16592422
>>16592418
kek, projecting tranny absolutely mindbroken
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:13:37 UTC No. 16592425
>>16592414
reddit=tranny=commie=leftism=anti-h
Over lap is near 1:1
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:25:45 UTC No. 16592437
>>16591844
I hope he dies in a plane crash soon, I'm so sick of him talking about planes all the fucking time.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:28:01 UTC No. 16592441
>>16592425
I have logs and timestamps of the progress of it all.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:52:11 UTC No. 16592472
>>16592406
>roach
subtle
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:00:23 UTC No. 16592484
>>16592483
Look how productive they are when Elon isn't around to hold them back
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:05:42 UTC No. 16592489
>>16592483
This is literally holocaust, Elon is worse than Hitler
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:09:20 UTC No. 16592492
>>16592483
What are they going to do at this site?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:11:46 UTC No. 16592495
>>16592492
not known, but maybe some public restauraunts, grocery shop, maybe some housing
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:15:28 UTC No. 16592503
>>16592495
buccees pls
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:20:20 UTC No. 16592508
>>16592492
they will install neuralink into illegals caught by ICE straight at the source of fresh test subjects
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:26:58 UTC No. 16592515
>>16592508
Convert them into servitors and put them to work on the production line
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:44:42 UTC No. 16592539
>>16592515
The flesh is weak.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:51:23 UTC No. 16592547
>>16592492
It's a commercial/residential area.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:52:34 UTC No. 16592550
>>16591650
If everyone of them was fired, it would not make one iota of a difference to the 'performance' of NASA.
NASA latest 'thing' was putting DEI astronauts on the moon.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:57:08 UTC No. 16592559
>>16592181
By selling electric cars?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:59:06 UTC No. 16592560
>>16592550
There were black astronauts in the Apollo program, one was killed during a training accident and the other later flew on STS after the program got cut IIRC. Instead of pointing this out we got this retardation.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:06:46 UTC No. 16592571
>>16592356
Can someone give a QRD on what is being talked about in that video?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:09:43 UTC No. 16592577
>>16592560
No one is questioning the merits of Black Astronauts.
OLD NASA when going to the moon picked the best people they did NOT say we are send White men to the moon.
NEW NASA is OBSESSED with race and gender, they ARE saying we are sending women and minorities to the moon.
See the difference?
NEW NASA is sexist and racist.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:10:24 UTC No. 16592579
>>16592550
If you remove the babysitting jobs, people will be more competent.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:39:49 UTC No. 16592673
>>16592666
Just imagine....
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:46:37 UTC No. 16592684
https://www.theguardian.com/comment
>2024 YR4 at 3.1% chance now
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:50:09 UTC No. 16592695
>>16592666
>>16592673
chicks need a freefall haird0 that doesn't turn into a dandelion. this will eventually be a big market
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:50:59 UTC No. 16592697
>>16592684
huh? didn't it decrease yesterday? I can't handle the suspense...
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:51:11 UTC No. 16592698
>>16592684
Poocifer's Hammer is inevitable
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:53:03 UTC No. 16592701
>Another day....
>Another no starship launch
I'm starting to think this program was a massive waste of time and money.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:56:56 UTC No. 16592706
>>16592684
WE GAAAAAN
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:00:15 UTC No. 16592713
>>16592498
"earther" isn't insult enough?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:01:21 UTC No. 16592717
>>16592406
They misspelled EDS Hound.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:13:02 UTC No. 16592727
>>16592725
>move the headquarters to cape Canaveral
t: governor of Florida
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:13:55 UTC No. 16592728
>>16592726
Two more weeks, newfag frog poster.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:14:21 UTC No. 16592730
>>16592713
variety is good though.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:20:46 UTC No. 16592738
>>16592737
Starship doesn't launch anymore anyways. I'd be worried about f9.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:24:23 UTC No. 16592744
>>16592726
https://x.com/_jaykeegan_/status/18
feb 26
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:26:00 UTC No. 16592745
>>16592744
Hold on, it's just a week away. They can't do that!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:27:38 UTC No. 16592748
>>16592744
>He believes this
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:27:59 UTC No. 16592749
>US warning europe that they'll remove troops from the continent soon
now i wonder if russia will eventually pivot away from short range nukes in favor of missile defense, particularly space-based since they would want to maintain some level of technological parity with the US
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:29:59 UTC No. 16592751
>>16592749
Russia is never completing a new space project again. They will just limp along on soyuz forever.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:30:26 UTC No. 16592752
>>16592749
>orange man is actually a russian asset
And I used to laugh at such ideas
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:31:19 UTC No. 16592754
>>16592498
yeah it's still at 1.5%
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:31:55 UTC No. 16592755
>>16592744
>Primary Date: Feb 26th
Excellent.
>Backup Dates: Feb 27th - March 6th
Damn, so much spread.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:32:44 UTC No. 16592757
>>16592752
We tried to warn you
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:33:19 UTC No. 16592759
>>16592744
>5:30PM - 19:09
and people complain about mixing metric and imperial measurements
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:33:24 UTC No. 16592760
>>16592754
>retard can't link properly
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:34:12 UTC No. 16592761
>>16592757
>we
Who?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:34:57 UTC No. 16592762
>>16592760
>I don't know where NASA keeps the planetary defense data
beg for it
my price is one picture of either an O'Neil Cylinder or a dolphin sex shuttle
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:35:55 UTC No. 16592764
>>16592762
>>16592760
Here comes the airplane!
https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/d
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:41:45 UTC No. 16592770
>>16592762
>>16592764
What does that have do with
> we need to come up with new insults for earthers and each other. Any ideas?
from
>>16592498
?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:43:46 UTC No. 16592772
>>16592770
oh did I link to the wrong post
damn, wow. I meant to link to these posts: >>16592697 >>16592684
man's stupid article is very out of date
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:48:35 UTC No. 16592774
>>16592752
i dont think he is, that's just a leftist conspiracy theory. instead this seems to align with that report from last month that trump's team has been interested in pivoting the military away from europe to focus on china:
>President Donald Trump’s team of defense advisers is taking shape, this week adding two high-level officials who have called for slashing the American armed presence in Europe and broadly restructuring the military to deal with China.
>Austin Dahmer and Alexander Velez-Green, known for their hawkish views on China, will serve in senior posts focused on developing military strategy, the Defense Department said Tuesday.
>In [a 2023] report, Dahmer does not take a position on how big the DOD budget should be. But without a big boost in expenditures, he wrote, the Pentagon would need to search for savings or “bill payers” to surge capabilities required to deter potential Chinese aggression against Taiwan, Okinawa or the Philippines.
>“One of the largest bill payers in resourcing the strategy of denial should be the Army,” the report said.
>Overall, Dahmer’s report recommends about $70 billion less annually for the Army, which along with other cuts would give about $40 billion more apiece to the Navy and Air Force.
>The realignment he calls for in the report would also exact a heavy toll on the security structures that Europe has been relying on for over a decade. For one thing, the U.S. European Command mission would be slashed.
https://www.stripes.com/theaters/eu
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:51:29 UTC No. 16592776
>>16592774
>muh China
Nothing is going to happen over there.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:51:42 UTC No. 16592777
>>16592770
Got one of the links wrong. Meant to link YR4 discussion but misclicked somewhere in there.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:54:31 UTC No. 16592779
>>16592777
I forgive you for those trips
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:57:20 UTC No. 16592782
>>16592774
This is nuclear grade copium
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:01:27 UTC No. 16592785
>rumors circulating that Ukraine will be denied access to Starlink starting March 1st
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:06:12 UTC No. 16592789
>>16592784
What makes you think they care about goodwill? Only naked force matters. We Starship troopers now.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:06:29 UTC No. 16592790
>Trump and Musk were Putin's lapdogs all along
I can't believe the leftists were right
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:07:55 UTC No. 16592791
>>16592785
it seems like it might be a part of a broader series of moves including cutting ukraine off from space-based SBIRS launch warnings. just goes to show how valuable space is despite most countries continual refusal to invest much into it.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:08:16 UTC No. 16592792
>>16592742
Doesn't Artemis use distributed launch and in-space refueling...?
>Maybe right now, our thinking is two modules. You take them separately and dock
Is this not what Artemis plans to do?
Berger mentions "private industry", "rapid reuse" and "in-space refueling", however the thread he's replying to said nothing about those things
https://unrollnow.com/status/189241
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:13:22 UTC No. 16592799
>>16592792
>Doesn't Artemis use distributed launch and in-space refueling...?
artemis is a huge program. are you just referring to sls/orion? cuz artemis includes gateway, the small robotic landers, starship, etc.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:14:52 UTC No. 16592800
>>16592785
Ukrainians have been whining about Musk everyday after he gave them Starlink
they are extremely entitled
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:18:19 UTC No. 16592804
>>16592799
>are you just referring to sls/orion
I'm referring to the Artemis 3 mission, and subsequent manned landings
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:21:11 UTC No. 16592806
>>16592805
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18925
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:21:29 UTC No. 16592807
>>16592800
this post reeks of cheap vodka
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:23:16 UTC No. 16592810
>>16592806
>biden pushed the return past inauguration
Okay, but why? Why give a free PR win to trump?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:23:22 UTC No. 16592811
>>16592805
>>16592806
if true then what was the possible political reason for it?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:26:26 UTC No. 16592816
>>16592577
>picked the best people
>did not say we are sending white men to the moon
That's because white men were the only people that a pre-civil right movement NASA could've picked.
Mercury/Gemini/Apollo all relied on pilots from WW2 or Korea for flight experience and that a black man let alone a woman would've then been selected for further astronaut training is near to zero. Only Ed Dwight and Robert Lawrence Jr. could've been around for 'old NASA' missions (had the former actually made selection and the latter not die a few months after being accepted for MOL). That's why it was only in 83' that a black man or a woman flew into space on the shuttle.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:26:31 UTC No. 16592817
>>16592805
He offered but surely not for free. So I'm supposed to believe the boohoo about trained professionals staying up for a year, and these are the same guys romanticizing about the right stuff. What a load of bs.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:27:24 UTC No. 16592818
>>16592810
Maybe they thought that SpaceX actually returning the astronauts would have been worse PR and assuming Kamala won, it wouldn't matter for a PR standpoint after the election anymore
PR before the election is like 1000x more important than right after
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:28:25 UTC No. 16592820
>>16592811
Not giving a "win" to Musk and by extension to Trump who he was campaigning for
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:28:28 UTC No. 16592821
>>16592811
>>16592810
https://spaceflightnow.com/2025/02/
It was delayed because of construction issues at SpaceX.
>“It’s going through it’s final preparation. Right now, it’s slated for Crew-10 in February,” Stich said. “It’s exciting to have another brand new Dragon spacecraft for Crew-10. That’s the plan right now.”
>However, plans began to shift a bit when in December, NASA announced in a blog post the new Crew Dragon’s delivery was taking longer than anticipated and wouldn’t arrive in Florida until “early January” 2025. As a result the agency delayed the launch of Crew-10 to “late March 2025.”
>“Fabrication, assembly, testing, and final integration of a new spacecraft is a painstaking endeavor that requires great attention to detail,” Stich said in the post. “We appreciate the hard work by the SpaceX team to expand the Dragon fleet in support of our missions and the flexibility of the station program and expedition crews as we work together to complete the new capsule’s readiness for flight.”
I don't really see how this can be blamed on biden when the capsule just wasn't ready. Maybe he put some crazy safety requirements on the new capsule? But I don't see any evidence of that.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:28:51 UTC No. 16592822
>>16592811
Elon is just posting bullshit on Twitter for months now.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:29:47 UTC No. 16592823
>>16592821
>Delay delivery of capsule
>After election, say it was biden's fault
>"Save" the astronauts 1 week earlier then planned
>Space retarded public laps it up
Devilish....
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:31:00 UTC No. 16592824
Jesus christ what a shit show
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:32:16 UTC No. 16592825
>>16592823
Give them a ticker parade too.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:32:20 UTC No. 16592826
>>16592823
No one will actually dig for the real reason anyways, especially Trump's base that believes everything posted on X
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:32:34 UTC No. 16592827
>>16591650
NOTHING EVER HAPPENS
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:33:32 UTC No. 16592828
>>16592823
kek based
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:34:42 UTC No. 16592829
>>16592821
>NASA announced
so what was the reason for the construction delay? could have been something completely made up bullshit by NASA specifically to delay it
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:35:42 UTC No. 16592830
>>16592785
Yuzhmash will launch their very own ‘Personal Infantry Guidance’ constellation system, trust the plan
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:36:17 UTC No. 16592831
>>16592774
>Overall, Dahmer’s report recommends about $70 billion less annually for the Army, which along with other cuts would give about $40 billion more apiece to the Navy and Air Force.
>Trump orders $50 billion cut from 2026 defense budget
>Hegseth ordered the proposed cuts to be drawn up by Monday, according to the memo, which is dated Tuesday and includes a list of 17 categories that the Trump administration wants exempted. Among them: operations at the southern U.S. border, modernization of nuclear weapons and missile defense, and acquisition of submarines, one-way attack drones and other munitions.
>Robert G. Salesses, a senior Pentagon official, said in a statement that the money saved could be “realigned” to pay for new priorities in the Trump administration, including the “Iron Dome for America,” President Donald Trump’s catchphrase for an expansive missile defense system.
https://spacenews.com/trump-orders-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati
hmmmm
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:37:17 UTC No. 16592832
>>16592744
>>16592792
Whether you use distributed launch, in-space refueling, or whatever tech, that's not what matters. What matters is that you spread fixed costs around and use as little as possible that is bespoke.
The SLS/Orion based lunar program is bad because SLS and Orion are very bespoke. The areas of application for SLS and Orion are very limited, as are the areas of application for their components and supply chains. Thus the fixed costs cannot be spread around on many units, so the fixed costs will be high relative to the production run size and so the unit cost will be high.
An example of an alternative and superior way of doing it is the the Chinese CZ-10/Mengzhou based approach:
1. Even though a new pad needs to be built, this is not so bad because CZ-10 will share this pad with CZ-10A
2. Mengzhou will have a LEO variant
3. CZ-10 will have a common tank diameter and thus can likely share a production line with CZ-5, 5B and 10A
4. CZ-10 cores and boosters will use YF-100K engines, which are also used by CZ-12 and similar to YF-100 engines
5. CZ-10 second stage will use YF-100M engines, which will also be used by CZ-10A and are similar to YF-100 engines
6. CZ-10 third stage will use YF-75E engines, which are similar to YF-75D used on CZ-5/5B and YF-75H used on CZ-8A
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:38:05 UTC No. 16592834
>>16592831
>“Iron Dome for America,” President Donald Trump’s catchphrase for an expansive missile defense system.
So, SpaceX entry into MIC coming up for real?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:38:19 UTC No. 16592835
>>16592829
The capsule was delayed at the spaceX fabrication plant. It hadn't even made it to florida for certification until mid January.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:38:25 UTC No. 16592836
>>16592831
Will they be defending against Mexicans? There's nothing that can defend against proper rockets anyways.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:39:03 UTC No. 16592837
>>16592826
Yep. It's a savvy move by Elon, but it is dishonest at it's core. But only people like us will realize it or care.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:39:40 UTC No. 16592838
>>16592744
>>16592792
Whether you use distributed launch, in-space refueling, or whatever tech, that's not really what matters. What really matters is that you spread fixed costs around and use as little as possible that is bespoke.
The SLS/Orion based lunar program is bad because SLS and Orion are very bespoke. The areas of application for SLS and Orion are very limited, as are the areas of application for their components and supply chains. Thus the fixed costs cannot be spread around on many units, so the fixed costs will be high relative to the production run size and so the unit cost will be high.
An example of an alternative and superior way of doing it is the the Chinese CZ-10/Mengzhou based approach:
1. Even though a new pad needs to be built, this is not so bad because CZ-10 will share this pad with CZ-10A
2. Mengzhou will have a LEO variant
3. CZ-10 will have a common tank diameter and thus can likely share a production line with CZ-5, 5B and 10A
4. CZ-10 cores and boosters will use YF-100K engines, which are also used by CZ-12 and are similar to YF-100 engines
5. CZ-10 second stage will use YF-100M engines, which will also be used by CZ-10A and are similar to YF-100 engines
6. CZ-10 third stage will use YF-75E engines, which are similar to YF-75D used on CZ-5 and YF-75H used on CZ-8A
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:42:19 UTC No. 16592839
>>16592834
maybe just the launch portion. i know starshield uses the starlink satellite bus but off of the top of my head i dont know if the SDA's satellites use the starlink bus too. it's those SDA satellites that are being incorporated into the iron dome system.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:43:05 UTC No. 16592840
>>16592834
Starshield has existed for years already, they are fully MIC
or what do you mean? weapon systems?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:44:22 UTC No. 16592841
>>16592835
The capsule wouldn't have been needed if Starliner had been making regular crew runs like it was supposed to. But it hadn't been, because it was broken shit.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:45:47 UTC No. 16592842
>>16592840
Solid rockets, getting into the interceptor business.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:47:09 UTC No. 16592845
>>16592842
lol no
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:47:51 UTC No. 16592847
>>16592831
>Iron Dome for America
What is this? A system analogous to the Iron Dome would be useless in CONUS. Higher-end American systems like GMD, THAAD and Patriot PAC-3 already exist, and as I understand it, they are not really considered economical for wide-scale deployment because ICBMs are very hard to intercept, and furthermore the US is so big that it would be ruinous to try to cover the country with such systems.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:48:12 UTC No. 16592848
>>16592841
>nasa gives boing a huge win
>boing somehow turns it into a huge loss
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:48:57 UTC No. 16592850
>>16592831
>Iron Dome for America
What is this? A system analogous to the Iron Dome would be useless in CONUS. Higher-end American systems like GMD, THAAD and Patriot PAC-3 already exist, and as I understand it, they are not really considered economical for wide-scale deployment because ICBMs are very hard to intercept, and furthermore the US is so big that it would be ruinously expensive to try to cover the country with such systems.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:50:04 UTC No. 16592852
>>16592841
To be fair, the capsule returned fine. NASA was just being safety cucks.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:50:49 UTC No. 16592853
>>16592848
Boing: snatching defeat from the jaws of victory!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:52:43 UTC No. 16592854
>>16592850
its brilliant pebbles, providing missile defense for US interests across the planet, not just the CONUS. think starlink but armed with anti-missile interceptors.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:53:29 UTC No. 16592855
>>16592852
>safety cucks
The capsule had another unrelated thruster failure on the way back. NASA did everything right.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:53:42 UTC No. 16592856
>>16592852
The maneuvering thrusters could have failed at any time from overheating. Just the thing you want to lose when you're trying to re-enter the atmosphere.
And then after it landed, they found out that it was also broken in a whole new way that could have been just as dangerous.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:57:39 UTC No. 16592861
bridenstack
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:58:29 UTC No. 16592864
>>16592852
yeah, and orion made it back even with the broken heat shield
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:59:50 UTC No. 16592866
>>16592864
And Shittle launched in cold weather so many times with nothing happening!
And helicopters fly by that airport in D.C. all the time with nothing happening!
NORMALIZATION. OF. DEVIANCE.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:01:02 UTC No. 16592867
>>16592854
Is that what it officially is, or is it just your interpretation of what it is, or is it what it isn't but you think it should be?
There doesn't seem to be much detail. There is a proposed $19.5B bill that the article refers to, which mostly funds existing interceptor programs. There is $900m for research into "space-based missile defense", which might refer mostly to sensors rather than interceptors.
>develop new capabilities, like space-based sensors and new intercept technologies
>Among other provisions, the IRON DOME Act would authorize:
>$12 billion to expand missile interceptor fields at Fort Greely in Alaska with new Next Generation Interceptors
>$1.4 billion for the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system
>$1.5 billion for PAC-2 and PAC-3 munitions and MM-104 Patriot batteries
>$1 billion to build Aegis Ashore ballistic missile defense infrastructure in Alaska and on the East Coast
>$900 million to research and develop space-based missile defense
>$750 million to modernize terrestrial-based domain awareness radars
>$500 million to research and develop directed energy or missile interception capabilities across all military departments
>$250 million to complete and certify Hawaii’s Aegis Ashore system
>$100 million for the procurement and fielding of dirigibles
>$60 million to develop space-based satellite sensors
>$63.1 million to build a Missile Defense Complex and Fire Team Readiness Facility
>$25 million for Missile Defense Agency planning and design activities for an East Coast-based missile defense interceptor site at Fort Drum, New York
https://www.sullivan.senate.gov/new
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:02:55 UTC No. 16592870
>>16592852
Even with hindsight they made the right choice. It’s almost functionally equivalent to saying STS-27 was perfectly safe because it didn’t explode. Even though it arguably came within seconds of a complete disaster during reentry and would have been better to find a way to bring the astronauts back not on that Shuttle
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:02:58 UTC No. 16592871
>>16592838
Meant for
>>16592742
>>16592792
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:03:05 UTC No. 16592872
>>16592867
>Is that what it officially is
yes
>Development and deployment of proliferated space-based interceptors capable of boost-phase intercept;
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presiden
though i am aware though that it can include other types of interceptors too like patriot and thaad
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:03:19 UTC No. 16592874
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:09:13 UTC No. 16592877
>>16592872
Seems like Russia's decision years ago, to invest in Poseidon, Buresvestnik, T-160M restart and Zircon for SSGNs, was quite prescient and wise
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:11:55 UTC No. 16592879
>>16592877
yeah i think the missile shields will spur alot of missile and space R&D, which is good news for us
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:13:50 UTC No. 16592881
>>16592877
As was China's decision to vastly expand their ICBM arsenal and SSGN fleet
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:18:15 UTC No. 16592890
>>16592879
I don't see how it would be a good thing. It can destabilize MAD, it will certainly lead to much more nuclear weapons being built, and will also lead to a massive arms race and associated cost spiral at a time when America is not even guaranteed to be on the winning side of that economic equation in the long run
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:20:44 UTC No. 16592892
The thing that annoys me about this rescue shit is that the argument was already fucking settled in september. SpaceX didn't need to be re-told to take the Astronauts home because it was already in the books back then.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:21:07 UTC No. 16592893
>>16592877
They are restarting the Tesla weapons program despite the eldritch risks involved
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:22:05 UTC No. 16592897
>>16592881
The Chinese are also said to be developing an intercontinental stealth bomber called H-20, similar to the American B-2
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:22:30 UTC No. 16592898
>>16592571
i skimmed through it and its mainly shit about how Musk is destroying the environment to get to mars or something
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:26:03 UTC No. 16592905
>>16592805
FUCK YOU REDDIT TRANNIES
GET NIGGED ON
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:28:35 UTC No. 16592907
>>16592890
It's a good thing because I like rockets.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:29:21 UTC No. 16592911
>>16592744
mishap investigation doe(ge)
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:31:23 UTC No. 16592914
https://x.com/SawyerMerritt/status/
>NEWS: Boeing is getting help from
@elonmusk to get through the requirements of the long-delayed Air Force One program, Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg said today.
Musk helping out Boeing sort through issues regarding AirForce one plane delivery
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:33:36 UTC No. 16592916
>>16592914
boing should be broken up
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:36:24 UTC No. 16592922
>>16592805
how lucky, I wish elon would personally call me retarded...
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:42:17 UTC No. 16592930
>>16592929
huh, so that anon saying two weeks a week ago was right
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:43:18 UTC No. 16592934
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:44:58 UTC No. 16592937
>>16592928
>>16592929
It will be delayed twice, launching on the 28th.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:46:00 UTC No. 16592941
>SpaceX debris hits Poland
>media: AHHHHHHHHHHH
>China keeps dropping boosters onto their people
>media: ...
?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:49:44 UTC No. 16592948
>>16592805
>>16592806
So SpaceX offered to return Butch and Suni early and the Biden admin turned them down.
They really were deliberately stranded then.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:50:23 UTC No. 16592951
>>16592941
White people matter more than nonwhite people.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:51:20 UTC No. 16592953
>>16592941
international relations vs domestic problems.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:51:28 UTC No. 16592954
>>16592951
>poles
>white
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:52:11 UTC No. 16592958
>>16592821
The new capsule exists because SpaceX had to pick up the slack for Starliner, the return of Butch and Suni was never tied to the new capsules existance.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:52:13 UTC No. 16592959
>>16592954
Whiter than you, Pedro.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:53:39 UTC No. 16592960
>>16592831
>WaPo lied about the 'cuts'
Imagine my shock.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:54:58 UTC No. 16592963
>>16592805
Elon must be arrested for this
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:56:13 UTC No. 16592965
>>16592964
https://x.com/DrPhiltill/status/189
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:57:33 UTC No. 16592968
>>16592964
https://x.com/DrPhiltill/status/189
aaa
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:58:12 UTC No. 16592969
>>16592954
whiter on average than america
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:00:48 UTC No. 16592970
>>16592964
fucking hell, I feel second hand embarrassment reading musk's spergout over this shit. Every day my faith in him dies just a little bit more. He better turn this shit around or I'll have a melty
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:02:25 UTC No. 16592973
>>16592970
seems like he is 100% correct
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:02:30 UTC No. 16592974
>>16592964
I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so.
Although Musk's language is definitely out of line.
>>16311058
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:02:51 UTC No. 16592975
>>16592914
Elon must be arrested for this too
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:03:58 UTC No. 16592978
>>16592964
Trannies will be melty for ages again for telling the truth. "Musk is lying" nonsense doesnt fly.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:03:59 UTC No. 16592979
>>16592929
huh, so elon's prediction was right
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:06:10 UTC No. 16592982
>>16592964
Finally putting astronauts in their place. Fucking passengers
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:06:13 UTC No. 16592983
>>16592978
Musk is probably not lying that he proposed that alternative, but everybody knows that it would have completely fucked up ISS scheduling worse than what eventually happened, and that political context mattered less than ISS schedule in that decision.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:09:19 UTC No. 16592985
>>16592983
>ISS scheduling
The whole thing should be deorbited as soon as possible, wasteful shitbox.
>ooo we wont have enough ports to dock and do endless pee in jar experiments and replace more batteries
Fuck NASA
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:10:02 UTC No. 16592988
>>16592973
not only is he wrong (or purposefully lying), he now made himself look like an hysterical woman
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:10:21 UTC No. 16592989
>>16592983
Schedule wasn't considered. Money wasn't considered. Flat out denial is a purely political play. The only reason is because Biden admin did not want to hand out Musk a win. The same reason they revoked Starlink 4 years early into the contract for not meeting a goal that was scheduled to meet years later. The same reason they had all these nonsense investigations into all his companies. The same reason they hired a Tesla short seller to oversee Tesla. The same reason Biden's fundraiser is the biggest Tesla shortseller. The same reason they refused to invite Tesla for "American EV event." The same reason Biden admin was hostile to "SpaceX's moon rocket".
These are only a series of coincidences to those who have their brains castrated.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:11:14 UTC No. 16592991
>>16592988
nah
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:12:24 UTC No. 16592993
>>16592988
We know that you will never be a woman.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:13:15 UTC No. 16592995
>>16592989
Schedule is obvious anon and why it was flatly refused.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:14:11 UTC No. 16592996
>>16592994
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18926
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:14:14 UTC No. 16592997
>>16592994
(((ITS ALL A COINCIDENCE)))
They are trying to reject reality and not connect the dots.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:14:44 UTC No. 16592998
>>16592994
"for no reasons" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:15:01 UTC No. 16593000
>>16592983
>ISS scheduling
A bad joke
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:15:15 UTC No. 16593001
>>16592996
Exactly.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:15:59 UTC No. 16593005
>>16592996
>were not party to the discussions
mis-typing in his k-hole rage.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:16:04 UTC No. 16593006
>>16592997
yes, the bailey comment is pretty ironic
do these people really, sincerely believe there was no ill will from the Biden admin towards Musk
like really?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:16:28 UTC No. 16593007
>>16592989
>The only reason is because Biden admin did not want to hand out Musk a win.
okay, so what you're saying is, le evil bidet didn't want to give TrumpxMusk a political win so... he decided to give them a political win? what the fuck do you think he was planning to do, keep the astronauts in space for eternity? You do realize that the election has been won for many months now, biden was going to go no matter what he did.
Now I ask again, why would the old administration give trump a free political win by doing something as meaningless obstructive as this?
>>16592993
Correct. And we know that you will never be a man.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:16:31 UTC No. 16593008
>>16592994
>zero understanding of the innerworkings of politics
>zero insider knowledge
>confidently claims the party involved are lying because it doesnt reflect his own incomplete world model
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:17:01 UTC No. 16593010
embarrassing, is he on drugs again
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:17:07 UTC No. 16593011
>>16593005
ESL retard detected
https://ludwig.guru/s/party+to+the+
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:17:38 UTC No. 16593012
>>16593007
>he decided to give them a political win?
Its called being forced into reality. You can only delay reality so long before death becomes a reality.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:17:43 UTC No. 16593013
>>16593005
Tranny
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:18:00 UTC No. 16593015
>world model
this is how you know you're talking to a midwit.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:18:13 UTC No. 16593016
>>16593005
you exposed yourself esl
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:19:09 UTC No. 16593018
>>16592994
This retard has no idea what he's talking about.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:19:12 UTC No. 16593019
>>16592994
they are test pilots, not iss crewmembers. their mission was failed thanks to boeing. they are not slaves. nasa is really reprehensible to their astronauts
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:19:14 UTC No. 16593020
why doesnt nasa agree to be an anchor tenant for a spacex mars base like they are for commercial LEO stations?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:19:23 UTC No. 16593021
>>16593007
see >>16592818
keeping them there for 6 months longer after they had already been there for 6 months is just the status quo, not really an event
actually bringing them back is an event and would bring positive press for SpaceX and Musk and as a consequence toward Trump due to Musk endorsing and campaigning for Trump
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:20:34 UTC No. 16593025
>>16593007
>Now I ask again, why would the old administration give trump a free political win by doing something as meaningless obstructive as this?
they expected to win the election of course, delaying was a part of trying to do that
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:20:36 UTC No. 16593026
>>16592996
get fucked nigger the fourth
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:20:46 UTC No. 16593027
>>16593006
victim mentality
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:21:49 UTC No. 16593030
>>16593005
*misstyping
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:21:49 UTC No. 16593031
>>16593016
>>16593013
>>16593011
The phrase is "privy to the conversation", no one has ever said "party to the conversation". Cope harder
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:22:30 UTC No. 16593034
>>16593027
what the fuck are you babbling about
this has nothing to do with that, just explaining why something happened
obviously Musk didn't have a victim mentality, he went out there and did something about the relentless attacks and bullshit
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:22:35 UTC No. 16593035
>>16593031
You're a retard.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:22:56 UTC No. 16593037
>>16593031
party to the discussion
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:22:57 UTC No. 16593038
>>16593007
You're arguing with cultists.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:23:21 UTC No. 16593039
>>16592954
Nigger
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:23:32 UTC No. 16593040
>>16593031
retard or bait
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:23:55 UTC No. 16593041
>>16593013
>>16593011
>Using chatgpt and obscure website instead of just admit he got auto corrected
Next level cult behavior
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:24:05 UTC No. 16593043
>>16593038
>castrates themselves
>is convinced of the Biden admin is completely apolitical
>has zero knowledge
>insults the person with the highest level first hand knowledge as lying with no proof
Yeah lol
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:24:05 UTC No. 16593044
>>16592964
I literally cannot tell if this is based or cringe, but it’s definitely a happening that will be remembered for a long time
Yeesh
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:24:40 UTC No. 16593045
>>16593031
Lololol go back to brazil
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:24:55 UTC No. 16593046
>>16593041
>poop and pee in my mouth please
dude wtf why would you write that? unhinged
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:25:49 UTC No. 16593049
NASA needs to be gutted
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:26:16 UTC No. 16593050
>>16593012
then this whole affair is just some publicity stunt organized by Trump+Biden? Not sure what you're trying to say here
>>16593021
>You do realize that the election has been won for many months now
the election has nothing to do with this because the delays Musk is whining about happened afterwards. Note the part where he says "SpaceX could have brought them back several months ago" and "Biden pushed the return past the inauguration date". What's the point of doing something like that when you already lost? simple revenge? I can't come up with anything else.
>>16593038
everyone is just on edge as is typical during any sort of drama. And a few trolls too I guess.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:26:25 UTC No. 16593051
>>16593045
>NOOOOO MY AI SAYS ITS A REAL SAYING
lol
lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:26:54 UTC No. 16593052
>>16593020
NASA should stop trying to do rocketry and instead expand JPL so we get more deep space missions, and the rest of them should solely focus on Mars base infrastructure. I don't understand why Biosphere 3 hasn't been attempted.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:27:14 UTC No. 16593053
>>16593051
>noooo it's a feminine penis I am womyn
Deranged
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:28:41 UTC No. 16593055
For fuck's sake what is this retarded faggot doing now? He really needs some handlers to babysit him and keep him away from the drugs. Just shut the fuck up retard and focus on Mars.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:28:45 UTC No. 16593056
>>16593052
I want more deep space missions but can we find someone other than jpl to do it?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:28:56 UTC No. 16593057
>>16593054
>Adults tries to reasons with the drug addled toddler in the room
This is hilarious
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:29:15 UTC No. 16593058
>>16593050
The whole affairs is Musk calling out a political castrated decision, political. And the trannies malding at the prospect of Musk pointing out the reality of the negotiations and accusing Musk of lying without any knowledge, without any context, simply because Musk disagrees with their politics. The extreme reaction is just that, Musk triggered their politics for stating the truth.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:29:46 UTC No. 16593059
>>16593055
I can see him gutting spacex in rage if there's another failure next flight
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:30:00 UTC No. 16593060
>>16592996
>>16593054
He’s in the trenches taking names right now, this is awesome
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:30:18 UTC No. 16593062
>>16593055
You trannies lost the election.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:31:15 UTC No. 16593066
>>16593054
why dont they just shut the fuck up and leave elon alone? why do they keep inserting themselves into playground drama?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:31:36 UTC No. 16593067
Maybe the real great filter is your most valuable guy going Leroy Jenkins into a k-hole
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:31:50 UTC No. 16593068
>>16593054
Elon should delete his account. Enough of this.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:32:05 UTC No. 16593069
>>16593066
They still believe Elon can be reasoned with when he's like this
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:32:51 UTC No. 16593071
>>16593069
Unreasonable commies cannot be reasoned with. They need a kick in whatever balls they have left.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:32:57 UTC No. 16593072
>>16593050
>You do realize that the election has been won for many months now
the election has nothing to do with this because the delays Musk is whining about happened afterwards. Note the part where he says "SpaceX could have brought them back several months ago" and "Biden pushed the return past the inauguration date". What's the point of doing something like that when you already lost? simple revenge? I can't come up with anything else.
why do you assume Musk offered it after the election? what a weird assumption to make
several could mean 3-4 months, it has been 3.5 months from the election
so this is something that could have been happening right around election (bringing them back), which would make the optics for Musk even better in that case and the politics even clearer
imagine the astronauts coming back a week before the election? pretty easy talking point and good PR for SpaceX and Musk
and the discussion or offer probably happened like half a year ago or more
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:33:22 UTC No. 16593073
Why couldn’t he have given this fervor to something like cancelling SLS?
Instead he’s dying on a hill of semantics. Not a good look
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:33:37 UTC No. 16593074
>>16593066
>>16593071
Anon... he was on Crew 7.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:33:44 UTC No. 16593075
>>16593067
you dont have any clue what a k-hole is like
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:33:54 UTC No. 16593076
>>16593056
But there's no economic incentive to do so, and they are extremely costly long-term projects.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:34:04 UTC No. 16593078
>>16593072
It was probably just to save money
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:34:07 UTC No. 16593079
>>16593055
boohoo fucking faggot
SLS is getting cancelled
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:34:13 UTC No. 16593080
>>16593074
whats that got to do with not entering a hornet's nest?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:34:19 UTC No. 16593081
>>16593072
>why do you assume Musk offered it after the election? what a weird assumption to make
So they can ignore the earlier 7+ months of political delay.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:35:15 UTC No. 16593086
>>16593082
Made me audibly lol
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:35:20 UTC No. 16593087
>>16593078
As Musk stated, money was never considered in the discussion. Your programmed responses are looping now. Time to think harder.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:35:24 UTC No. 16593088
>>16593080
He's right to call out musk's lies, he went through the process himself, and knows the people in the program. Why are you white knighting for elon when he's clearly in the wrong?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:35:33 UTC No. 16593089
>>16593075
Ooh we got a hard partier here!! Doing drugs and knowing all the drug terminology is so cool right guys?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:36:06 UTC No. 16593091
>>16592737
yes, actually, considering how many Tesla dealerships are getting shot up and vandalized due to E/TDS. Fortunately, security at launch sites is quite a bit better than at car dealerships.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:36:07 UTC No. 16593092
>>16593073
>Why couldn’t he have given this fervor to something like cancelling SLS?
that is going to happen too
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:36:25 UTC No. 16593093
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:36:44 UTC No. 16593095
>>16593031
none white hands wrote this
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:37:16 UTC No. 16593098
what no shivon for two weeks does to a mfer
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:37:29 UTC No. 16593099
>>16593095
>none white hands
>none
Elon take some time to proof read your posts.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:37:29 UTC No. 16593100
btw ken kirtland is a communist and has been whining about Musk on and off for forever
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:37:30 UTC No. 16593101
>>16593073
He will get there eventually, he's still trying to burn all bridges that are left
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:38:10 UTC No. 16593104
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18926
ISS deorbit 2 years, possible.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:38:58 UTC No. 16593105
Grimes please make ze call
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:38:58 UTC No. 16593106
>>16593104
>elon schedule
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:39:11 UTC No. 16593107
>>16593088
>Why are you white knighting for elon when he's clearly in the wrong?
im not backing anyone, i just think its actual retarded to wade into something like this. your time is valuable but they waste it on something so stupid. go do something useful instead.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:39:34 UTC No. 16593109
>>16593073
SLS is on the chopping blocks. SLS and ISS gutting would free up 50% of the budget for NASA.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:40:05 UTC No. 16593110
>>16593107
>go do something useful instead
You should tell that to Elon, social media is clearly rotting his brain.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:40:06 UTC No. 16593111
>>16593107
>go do something useful instead.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:40:21 UTC No. 16593112
>>16593089
knowledge is power
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:40:52 UTC No. 16593114
>>16593088
>musk's lies
>musk's wrong
He is the main source vs Biden admin's political appointee + status quo's acceptance. You are not part of the party that can verify the truth. Nor are random people outside the negotiation table.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:41:05 UTC No. 16593115
>>16593076
>But there's no economic incentive to do so
anyone will do them if nasa offers a contract
>and they are extremely costly long-term projects
or perhaps they would be moderately costly long term projects if you gave them to someone more competitive.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:41:31 UTC No. 16593118
>>16593109
inb4 jared says they will be keeping it online through Artemis 6
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:41:54 UTC No. 16593119
So Elon was completely right and all the people who hung their hats on the "Butch and Suni were not stranded" line are having a crash out over being slapped in the face with the Biden admin stranding them rather than letting SpaceX (and Elon/Trump by proxy) score a massive PR victory during an election.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:42:19 UTC No. 16593120
>>16593058
this anon gets it
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:42:21 UTC No. 16593121
>>16593104
Why not deorbit tomorrow?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:42:27 UTC No. 16593122
Who wins?
>Musk telling Trump to deorbit ISS in 2027
>Putin wanting to end ISS participation in 2030
Tough call ngl
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:42:30 UTC No. 16593123
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:42:32 UTC No. 16593124
>>16593109
that’s not how NASA budgets work dummy
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:42:36 UTC No. 16593125
>>16593118
I wouldn't mind keeping it through atleast the moon landing, just for the objectives of boots on the ground.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:42:37 UTC No. 16593126
>>16593114
Andreas Mogensen is astronaut who flew on Crew 7 retard. He's not even from the US. He has nothing to do with biden admin, and has first hand experience with the crew rotation schedule.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:43:31 UTC No. 16593127
>>16593104
I reccomend testing some ASAT missiles on ite
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:43:54 UTC No. 16593129
Holy shit Elon has completely fucking lost it, grim
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:44:24 UTC No. 16593130
>>16593126
1) Europe is a commie shithole. 2) European crews are not part of the discussion. The high level discussion stopped at just the negotiation offering. It didn't materialize further, thats what the truth is. If it had gotten deeper, then lower level parties might have gotten involved in crew rotation.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:44:34 UTC No. 16593131
>>16592998
This, lmao
"you're cool with your 8 day stay being 9 months instead, right?"
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:44:42 UTC No. 16593132
>>16593129
He tweets over 100 times a day. And then spends the rest of his time playing video games. He's totally forgotten about mars.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:44:53 UTC No. 16593133
>>16593126
yes but like Musk said, he doesn't negotiate how and when the crew rotations happens
a passenger
riding the bus doesn't make me an expert of how a bus companys routes are run
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:44:57 UTC No. 16593134
>>16593123
Is Berger making fun of Elon and he's not realizing it?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:45:00 UTC No. 16593135
>>16593123
Does Elon REALLY think the money NASA is getting for ISS from Congress will be reassigned to his Mars missions? LOL
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:45:09 UTC No. 16593136
>>16593058
you're implying that musk is apolitical which is incredibly retarded. He is just as much a slave to politics as any of the trannies having a melty over him, thus his statements should be subject to exactly the same scrutiny. This affair is very obviously a ploy to get support for himself and Trump, spinning a technically correct fact(return delays) into one that supports the narrative("old government le bad/inefficient but I'm fixing it").
>>16593087
>as the guy who has a very big incentive to lie said...
you're either trolling or you lack the ability for rational thought.
>16593119
I remember when bait used to be good.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:46:08 UTC No. 16593138
>>16593130
HE WAS ON THE FUCKING CREW-7 MISSION YOU FUCKING MONGOLOID. DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS???
>>16593133
Astronauts are kept up to date on any change of plans with their missions. You don't think they were paying attention to the crew-9/10 schedule? Retarded.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:46:11 UTC No. 16593139
>>16593121
they haven’t finished building the deorbit vehicle
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:46:25 UTC No. 16593140
>>16593129
That's been happening more and more often, I'm getting concerned for SpaceX
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:46:28 UTC No. 16593141
>>16593136
>you're implying that musk is apolitical which is incredibly retarded
No one claimed such. Anyone who doesn't see this as Musk responding in kind is retarded. Musk's political game is because Democrats made it political. They targeted him first.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:46:58 UTC No. 16593144
>>16593135
you may or may not know but Elon has the ear of the president and the president has said that they will be going to mars
who else is going to do mars missions if not spacex?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:47:01 UTC No. 16593145
>>16593139
you can do it with an unmodified dragon
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:47:40 UTC No. 16593148
>>16593138
>HE WAS ON THE FUCKING CREW-7 MISSION YOU FUCKING MONGOLOID. DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS???
Irrelevant. He's not on the preliminary negotiation table. He would have been on mid/late stage negotiation if the initial offering were to be considered. It was never even considered.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:47:41 UTC No. 16593149
>>16593135
Elon literally controls the president of the USA.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:47:48 UTC No. 16593151
>Elon told Trump to nominate Jared for Administrator so he could completely get his way, deorbit ISS early, cancel SLS, gut Artemis, probably tear up or ignore Artemis Accords all just so NASA is lockstep now in line with his singular Mars obsession
Not a fan of this development desu, we're just gonna fucking cede LEO and the Moon to China??
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:47:59 UTC No. 16593152
>>16593138
irrelevant
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:48:06 UTC No. 16593153
>>16593142
Exactly my thought lol
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:48:49 UTC No. 16593154
>>16593151
Uh sweaty this is actually a good thing, because it means elon gets more billions of dollars from the US tax payer!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:48:49 UTC No. 16593155
>>16593151
Use your imagination. The world isn't this narrow.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:48:50 UTC No. 16593156
>>16593144
Congress approves the spending. If ISS is deorbited, NASA doesnt get to keep budget item
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:49:07 UTC No. 16593157
>>16593151
You don’t see the vision
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:49:08 UTC No. 16593158
>>16593151
Yes. This is what winning looks like.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:49:13 UTC No. 16593159
>>16593144
Go to Mars with what?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:49:18 UTC No. 16593160
>>16593131
if I could I would stay there until it got deorbited
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:49:23 UTC No. 16593161
>>16593151
inb4
>ITS 4D CHESS ACTUALLY
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:50:08 UTC No. 16593165
>>16593139
if you put some non-retards in charge in NASA then I have no doubt ISS could be deorbited safely within 2 years
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:50:52 UTC No. 16593167
>>16593151
Missing in your world model is other players filling the roles. Vast/Varda/Blue Ring/etc taking the ISS role. Stepping up Moon game.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:50:56 UTC No. 16593168
>>16593155
>>16593157
Not a peep, not a single fucking peep out of either Elon or Trump since the inauguration about returning to the moon and SpaceX's HLS, and a lot of mention of Mars, read between the lines.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:51:04 UTC No. 16593170
>>16593151
It's called carving sphere of influences
Just like what Trump is doing with Russia and China, Taiwan to China, ukraine and baltics to Russia, Greenland and Panama and rest of NA to USA
Same thing in Space, china gets moon, usa gets mars
Having clearly defined sphere of influences prevent conflicts, limits ambiguity and is good for trade.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:51:09 UTC No. 16593171
>>16593142
yep
should I take the word of some SLS stan or Elon Musk?
hmm
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:51:09 UTC No. 16593172
>>16593149
And Congress controls the NASA budget
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:51:19 UTC No. 16593173
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:51:32 UTC No. 16593175
>>16593160
NASA is too cowardly to let someone ride the ISS back into the atmosphere and parachute to safety after reentry. If they weren't they'd let me do it, pussies.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:51:49 UTC No. 16593176
>>16593172
Congress does whatever trump (And therefore elon) says
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:51:57 UTC No. 16593177
>>16593166
I simply wanna see my great country dominate LEO, the Moon, cislunar, and Mars not just be so autistically focused on Mars just because one man who happens to be the senior advisor to the president is.
Fuck
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:52:30 UTC No. 16593178
>>16593176
Lol. Lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:52:52 UTC No. 16593180
>>16593177
More accurately, you want the slow and bloated government programs to do it. Not commercial space.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:52:57 UTC No. 16593181
>>16593151
>we're just gonna fucking cede LEO and the Moon to China??
no, we're going to cede it to [spoiler]blue origin[/spoiler]
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:52:58 UTC No. 16593182
>>16593156
yes, but it would be pretty easy to argue and then push through spending bills so that the total is about the same as it was before
if that is important for Trump, and as he mentioned going to mars in the inauguration speech then it probably is
Republicans have majority in congress, people that don't fall in line will be primaried
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:53:02 UTC No. 16593183
>>16593178
Have you not been paying attention the last 2 weeks?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:53:14 UTC No. 16593184
>>16593170
>Same thing in Space, china gets moon, usa gets mars
See that came to my mind too briefly but I didn't post it, I very much worry that's what's happened now and of course China is fine with this because they care about maintaining and expanding their near-Earth resource dominance and are much farther from a human Mars program than we potentially are
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:53:44 UTC No. 16593186
>>16593168
Hey retard Musk has literally said he wants to skip the Moon and go straight to Mars if he could have his own way. No reading between the lines, straight from the horse’s mouth.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:53:59 UTC No. 16593187
>>16593151
its absolutely fucking based
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:54:09 UTC No. 16593189
>>16593151
You just don't like how the sausage is made. Tough cookies
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:54:39 UTC No. 16593191
>>16593177
USA is going to go all in on starship, and be set back 10 years of sunk cost as it fails suborbital tests over and over and over.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:55:01 UTC No. 16593192
>skip Moon and go straight for Mars
Just like my Terra Invicta run
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:55:27 UTC No. 16593193
Trannies malding again about Musk lol
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:55:35 UTC No. 16593194
>>16593190
>Explodes before reaching orbit
That will be another 2 billion tax payers!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:56:03 UTC No. 16593196
>>16593031
he did the three fingers meme
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:56:33 UTC No. 16593197
>>16593194
pics related
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:56:47 UTC No. 16593198
Skipping a return to the moon is dumb considering the lunar south pole only has so much land that is actually useful, in terms of ISRU and setting up permanent colonies.
Don’t cede it to the chinks Elon come on man.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:56:58 UTC No. 16593199
>>16593180
No I want SpaceX to do it too retard, like they've been contracted to and do all the other things they do best not just singularly obsessively focus on Mars to the detriment of our lunar return. Trump hasn't mentioned Artemis even once since his inauguration... grim
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:57:35 UTC No. 16593201
>>16593199
Isn't Artemis his thing too?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:58:03 UTC No. 16593202
>>16593199
NASA's admin hasn't been confirmed yet. Moonbase Alpha is on the horizon.
Either you trust Musk or you trust Biden admin.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:58:11 UTC No. 16593203
>>16593194
Compressed liquified taxpayers don't have the same boiloff issues as hydrogen.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:58:12 UTC No. 16593204
>skip the moon
i hate the whole moon vs mars debate. we have the ability to do both + LEO + asteroids + whatever else AT THE SAME TIME. but nah, lets just fight each other and get nothing done instead. lol. bring back bridenstine. at least he knew how to manage things.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:58:17 UTC No. 16593205
How many more years of failed starship launches will it take for /sfg/ to realize it's not happening?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:58:27 UTC No. 16593206
>>16593201
It is but he's not mentioned it once and removed the moon rock from the oval office Biden kept there after he moved in.
So again reading between the lines
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:59:09 UTC No. 16593208
>>16593206
You're reading the communist lines?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:59:28 UTC No. 16593210
>>16593204
dumbest post of the thread award
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:59:28 UTC No. 16593211
>>16593205
I think it depends on if next flight is failure
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:59:59 UTC No. 16593213
>>16593177
you are a faggot and you have the exact same mentality that BO has (or had)
nothing will get accomplished
Moon missions can happen during the windows between Mars missions but not on the expense of Mars
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:00:04 UTC No. 16593214
>>16593210
t. unproductive partisan
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:00:41 UTC No. 16593218
>>16593205
just one. If nothing of value has been done by the end of the year, then starship is very obviously a scam.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:00:53 UTC No. 16593219
>>16593214
>makes retarded tranny post
>upset at being called retard
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:01:25 UTC No. 16593221
>>16593213
>want to see SpaceX tackle the moon and Mars ideally
>you have the exact same mentality that BO has
???
retard
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:01:58 UTC No. 16593223
>>16593190
Blue Origin can play with the moon, they have said as much
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:02:11 UTC No. 16593224
>>16593221
>malding like a tranny
>claims to be a spacex fan
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:02:22 UTC No. 16593225
>/sfg/ still doesn't realize trump is just a figurehead for musk
It's so obvious. He literally made him sit in the corner with his 5 year old while he answered interview questions. He was talking over him and letting him just babble to himself in the latest interview.
Trump just wants to sit in the big chair. He'll do wahtever musk tells him to do.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:02:54 UTC No. 16593226
>>16593223
Let BO have the mega moon contracts after SLS is cancelled. Only condition is that they MUST mog china
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:03:36 UTC No. 16593227
>>16593221
do everything simultaneously with no focus is not a good idea
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:04:41 UTC No. 16593230
>>16593225
You're a kook lol
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:05:05 UTC No. 16593232
>>16593228
>intentionally castrating your brain like this
Do you actually enjoy it? Are you not able to come to a common sense?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:05:46 UTC No. 16593234
>>16593230
I never said it's a bad thing. But it's undeniable that elon is the brains behind the operation, and trump is just there as the face of it. Trump is literally reading off elon tweets to reporters, it's so obvious.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:06:17 UTC No. 16593235
>>16593224
/here/ since 2019 Texas tank watching so yes I am a SpaceX fan
>claims to be a spacex fan
>doesn't want to see them land on the moon
>doesn't think Starship can pull off both simultaneously
If anyone can do it it's SpaceX.
>>16593213
>Moon missions can happen during the windows between Mars missions but not on the expense of Mars
That's what I'm fucking hoping happens at least, you need to think about the big picture like anon mentioned here
>>16593198
We cannot cede this valuable regolith to China
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:06:19 UTC No. 16593236
>Castration
>trannies
Anon is fixated.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:06:35 UTC No. 16593237
>>16593223
and to add to that, BOs upper stage is hydrogen based, their moon landing vehicle was hydrogen too I think?
and hydrogen + oxygen is relatively easy to get on the moon compared to methane
it just makes sense
maybe park a Starship on the south pole on the moon to claim some land and then let BO do most of the stuff there (and other companies) when they get up to speed
SpaceX can then focus on Mars and support LEO and Moon missions with their cheap launch but not participating much in it otherwise
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:07:17 UTC No. 16593238
>>16593235
>creating your own doomer fanfiction and claiming to be a spacex fan
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:07:59 UTC No. 16593239
>>16593232
you are the last person on this general to have any authority on "common sense"
Please update your world model before replying to me again.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:08:19 UTC No. 16593241
>>16593031
is there anything lower iq than arguing over words?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:08:27 UTC No. 16593242
>>16593235
>We cannot cede this valuable regolith to China
Yeah....
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:08:29 UTC No. 16593243
>>16593218
I really really super hope that flight 8 is a success, flight 9 is orbital, and flight 10 starts doing real missions.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:09:15 UTC No. 16593245
>>16593242
>denial of reality of China's rise
>yet at the same time, worried about China overtaking US
How do you people live?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:09:41 UTC No. 16593246
>>16592995
No, schedule wouldn't have been affected at all. Crew Dragon Endurance was free with no upcoming planned flights for it at the time. They could have sent it up and gotten them back down within the next 3 days.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:10:27 UTC No. 16593247
>>16593238
>creating your own doomer fanfiction
No but what that anon mentioned is plausible
>>16593170
If they're setting it up to happen on Earth then why not in space too, Trump doesn't care seemingly about returning to the moon or Artemis, he hasn't mentioned it once, Elon obsessively cares about Mars only, and for Trump it would be a bigger victory anyways since it would be the first time and not just a return
Given everything that's happening now with the change of attitude on Ukraine and Russia this is not that far-fetched, jesus christ you must have a dense thick skull if you can't stand back and see the bigger picture that might be at play here
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:10:35 UTC No. 16593248
LEAVE ELON ALONE YOU CASTRATED TRANNIES
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:10:56 UTC No. 16593249
>>16593245
>making up schizo fantasies
likewise, sperg
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:11:10 UTC No. 16593250
>>16593247
Many things are plausible.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:11:33 UTC No. 16593251
>>16593183
You just wait till an actual appropriations bill is passed. It aint gonna be pretty
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:12:13 UTC No. 16593254
>>16593247
>Elon obsessively cares about Mars only
I would have agreed a year or even half a year ago. Starting to really doubt it now. Shit just doesn't add up.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:13:03 UTC No. 16593256
>>16593251
>Weapons for isreal
+50 Billion
>NASA budget
-50 Billion
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:13:19 UTC No. 16593257
>>16593242
Someone on another board said elon/trump represent a different style of globalist. Not globohomo like soros and dems, but globalist in the sense that they want free trade with russia and china.
Does not seem impossible think that Musk would “give” the moon to china as a stupid art of the deal trade to get better deals in business and finance.
Could just be a schizo theory though. Musk also wants to deorbit ISS ASAP which would absolutely handicap Russian manned space and leave them without a Station as they wait to build their new dumb station—an extreme blow to their pride and almost a direct insult to Russia itself.
But again, Musk does seem to love China almost to an annoying degree. Eyebrows be raised—he should be barred from doing Tesla business over there imo
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:13:29 UTC No. 16593258
>>16593151
Do you go back to your elementary school to flex on the children, anon?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:14:48 UTC No. 16593261
Bringing back Butch and Suni on an extra-schedule flight
>$200M cost, whoever it is paid by
>messes up the busy ISS schedule that already has to deal with disruptions
>leaves the ISS understaffed, down to just one astronaut in the US section who would have to do full-time maintenance because the station is ageing hard
>extremely reduced science work because of the above
>leaves the station understaffed for up to half a year because no Crew Dragon is available for Crew-9 anymore, as Freedom is used for this mission, Endeavour is up there for Crew-8, Resilience is modified for Polaris Dawn, and Endurance is still in processing after Crew-7
Transferring Butch and Suni to Crew-9
>none of the above issues
>two astronauts have to sit out the mission
>Butch and Suni get to do a lot more work than planned
>suits for Butch and Suni need to be prepared and sent up with Crew-9
Surely, this is a political decision and not just a practical one. Elon needs to stop "fixing" Earth and start doing some actual engineering again.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:15:37 UTC No. 16593264
>>16593261
EDS
EDS
EDS
EDS
EDS
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:15:45 UTC No. 16593266
>>16593259
>cope graphs have been updated
and so it begins...
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:16:01 UTC No. 16593267
>>16593261
tranny
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:16:35 UTC No. 16593270
>>16593262
Good thing we have separation of powers that can hamstring him when any actual important decisions need to be made.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:16:46 UTC No. 16593272
>>16593257
That doesnt make sense. If China is fake and fraud then they cant get to Moon even if we gave it to them. Are you saying, they're able to get to the moon and do fraud things? How is that possible in your view of reality? How can China not have any competency and still win?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:16:51 UTC No. 16593273
Meanwhile 2024 YR4 just dropped to 0.28% of impact, nothing ever happens
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:17:15 UTC No. 16593274
>>16593261
All those facts are true, but I think the issue fundamentally lied with SpaceX being told a flat no and potentially no follow up on that no. Which is technically NASA's prerogative, but a dismissive no with no follow up is only ever used when there's politics involved. NASA and SpaceX are super tight. This would be the first crack in their relationship, arguably.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:17:38 UTC No. 16593275
>>16593261
all of the shit you just said is why ISS needs to be scrapped ASAP, what a useless piece of shit
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:17:42 UTC No. 16593276
>>16593261
Your only real point is the cost, the schedule wouldn't be affected dramatically. They would have used a seperate dragon not scheduled for the crew rotations at the time.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:17:49 UTC No. 16593277
>>16593261
Budget was never considered. $200M is nothing for rescuing 2 astronauts.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:17:54 UTC No. 16593278
>>16593270
lol
lmao
The house will never refuse a trump admin (elon) decision because elon will bankroll their opponents in the primary
Courts are too slow to stop anything.
Elon has full control of Trump, and by extension the entire USA.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:18:10 UTC No. 16593280
>>16593234
>But it's undeniable
I deny it, you're a kook
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:18:11 UTC No. 16593281
>>16593272
Go learn english and ask me your question in a more comprehensive way
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:18:25 UTC No. 16593282
>>16593273
Poocifer's Hammer is coming, Rajesh
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:18:38 UTC No. 16593283
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:18:50 UTC No. 16593284
>>16593281
I dont use reddit. What do you mean, sister?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:18:53 UTC No. 16593285
>>16593279
Musk had another crashout, which is waking up some of his die hard fans. Others are coping that it's actually 4d chess.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:19:17 UTC No. 16593286
>>16593278
Ok this fanfiction is delicious xD
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:19:51 UTC No. 16593288
>>16593279
Trannies melty after Musk dropped truth bomb on them and said Biden admin was political.
Trannies are claiming its all a (((coincidence)))
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:19:59 UTC No. 16593289
>>16593258
Do you go on a field trip to a new island just to plant a flag and leave and let the next rival school claim it for themselves and all the resources on it?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:20:24 UTC No. 16593290
>>16593277
*passengers
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:20:34 UTC No. 16593291
>>16593261
good post and cool photo. I haven't even considered the staffing issues before. Musk really is wrong this time...
>>16593274
>>16593277
>the issue fundamentally lied with SpaceX being told a flat no and potentially no follow up on that no
>Budget was never considered.
according to Elon and exactly zero other people.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:20:37 UTC No. 16593292
>>16593287
>language like this wont be tolerated by the space community
wow i did not know the space community is so low iq
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:20:47 UTC No. 16593293
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:20:54 UTC No. 16593295
>>16593287
>NOOOO MUSK CAN'T BE IN CHARGE NOOOO
EDS
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:20:56 UTC No. 16593296
>>16593287
Felix is such a faggot lmfaoooo
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:21:48 UTC No. 16593299
>>16593285
please
its the same EDS trannies whining as usual
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:21:52 UTC No. 16593300
>>16593264
>>16593267
Extremely cogent arguments
>>16593276
>They would have used a seperate dragon not scheduled for the crew rotations at the time.
Read the post again, there was no other Crew Dragon available.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:22:16 UTC No. 16593301
>>16593274
>>16593261
I forgot to add or realized it after I posted that, SpaceX has been overwhelmingly and beyond the call of duty, transparent with NASA about all things space. I imagine that Elon expected, at least out of mutual respect, that NASA would be honest with him on why they were denying any potential discussion on the matter. But in all likelihood, he got radio silence. It's basically the Saudis and the funding secured situation w/ Tesla all over again. He was given the impression that there was mutual trust and respect between parties, only to discover after the fact that it was only ever one way. Stuff like that seriously pisses him off. It's what landed him in immense hot water with the SEC over a decade ago, and I imagine that he felt the same with NASA after the Boeing Starliner debacle and SpaceX's position to assist being under utilized against it. This is all speculation of course, but these points are probable and in alignment with past events and Elon's behavior changing thereafter both vocally and politically.
>>16593274: Yes, see above
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:22:54 UTC No. 16593303
>>16593293
>I bet they aren't happy about being left there
They said during multiple interviews they are fine and enjoying the extra time. This is retarded.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:22:58 UTC No. 16593304
>>16593288
>Trannies are claiming its all a (((coincidence)))
we need detention camps for these subhuman perverts
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:23:03 UTC No. 16593305
>>16593293
Good summary to be deşu
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:23:13 UTC No. 16593306
>>16593283
Mars is his only goal as far as space is concerned, he does have other concerns too.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:23:16 UTC No. 16593307
>>16593293
>I'd bet everything on the fact that Butch and Sunni are not happy about being left there.
>Nobody would be
what a colossal faggot.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:23:29 UTC No. 16593308
>>16593287
isnt felix that cute little boy i want to fuck?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:24:28 UTC No. 16593310
>>16593308
...are you also the poster who's constantly raging about trannies ITT? Trying to see something
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:24:37 UTC No. 16593311
>>16593303
I would shoot you if I could. That's a threat
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:24:41 UTC No. 16593312
>>16593303
yes fine sure
if they actually said "fuck this, I want to go home" they would be blacklisted from future flights
come on now
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:25:33 UTC No. 16593317
>>16593293
>Ass covering for boeing
But the plan was always for them to come back on a dragon capsule after starliner shit the bed?
>Unexpectedly abandoned
Did this retard JUST learn about this situation? The starliner coming home empty was after a month or more of "will they won't they" testing.
>They are humans with families
Ok this is retarded.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:25:38 UTC No. 16593318
>>16593290
Oh please. They were test pilots on a dangerous experimental craft. They earned their astronaut title.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:25:38 UTC No. 16593319
>>16593274
That requires that characterisation to be true. With everyone from every side saying no politics were involved at the time, Musk just now claiming they were rings rather hollow, especially considering how much he just likes to say shit all day. I don't doubt he offered the mission, but we have no idea why NASA said no, if they even did. I'm not inclined to just believe Elon on this anymore without any supporting evidence. And whatever the reason, the way it was done was still the absolutely sound and correct choice, just like sending Starliner back empty, and would still have been an easy win for Trump and Musk without saying anything because retards don't know better. Now retards still don't know better but everyone who does and isn't a 1 is extremely pissed off.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:25:43 UTC No. 16593320
>>16593303
they said that in the sense of “no we aren’t trapped up here and suffering,” such as the outlandish and misleading headlines were reading at the time.
They left their families with the intention of a nominal flight lasting eight (8) days. Yes they had backup days and extra contentions planned. But they were expecting eight fucking days. This was in June of LAST YEAR. They’re still on the Station as we speak.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:26:01 UTC No. 16593321
>>16593287
Who is this "space community" he speaks of?
What a faggot.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:26:05 UTC No. 16593322
>>16593311
Anon you're fat ass can't even walk across the room without getting winded.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:26:09 UTC No. 16593323
>>16593293
Trannies will be melty at this
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:26:15 UTC No. 16593324
>>16593310
No I'm the anime poster
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:26:48 UTC No. 16593327
LMAO ELON MUSK CALLED APOGEE A LIAR
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18926
and he told him to STFU, lmao
holy shit this is entertaining, he's totally fucking losing it over this
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:27:07 UTC No. 16593328
>>16593307
whats so special about being a janitor on the ISS for a year, getting your brain damaged from high CO2 levels?
going there for a week or two would be cool, being there a year and having to do menial janitorial tasks would probably get old pretty fast (living on a modern non-shit space station with artificial gravity areas for sleeping etc would be very nice thouhg, but the ISS is a cramped shithole)
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:27:28 UTC No. 16593330
>>16593319
>I believe in Biden admin to be completely sound of judgement and nonpolitical inspite of mountain of political actions against Musk
You have zero credibility aside from you being part of the tranny cult
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:27:32 UTC No. 16593331
>>16593322
Yeah that's why I'm using a gun
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:28:46 UTC No. 16593334
To be a member of the Elon cult you have to believe despite all evidence to the contrary, despite the words and actions and attitudes of the astronauts themselves that they were stranded there by the Biden administration just to spite Elon and Trump.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:28:47 UTC No. 16593335
>>16593328
>What's so cool about being in space
I NEED EVERY TOURIST TO LEAVE /SFG/ RIGHT FUCKING NOW
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:28:53 UTC No. 16593336
>>16593327
Hello marsposter
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:28:58 UTC No. 16593338
>>16593317
>Did this retard JUST learn about this situation? The starliner coming home empty was after a month or more of "will they won't they" testing.
yes two months of faffing about, they should have jettisoned that piece of shit capsule immediately and contacted spacex to do an extra mission right away
they were effectively abandoned, with only some minor crew schedule changes done to get them home
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:29:21 UTC No. 16593339
Musk exposing all the tranny grifters is not what I had expected in 2025. I thought it would just expose the normie grifters, but he really triggers the commies
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:29:58 UTC No. 16593341
>>16593334
I don't know why some anons have such a hard time saying when elon is being retarded. I still support him and spacex, but I don't need to white knight everything he ever says.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:29:58 UTC No. 16593342
>>16593319
retard, how fucking blind can you be?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:30:01 UTC No. 16593343
>>16593323
you should take a few deep breaths and calm down, the hormones are making you hysterical. High stress will make you go bald early, you know?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:30:35 UTC No. 16593346
>>16593339
Please start using a trip so I can filter you
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:30:38 UTC No. 16593347
>>16593339
You sure do like talking about girls with penises, like a lot
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:30:48 UTC No. 16593348
>>16593337
Elon burning bridges with all of spitter over this, showing himself to be a maniacal, egotistic, power obsessed
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:31:14 UTC No. 16593349
>>16593324
>my edit being posted
feels good man
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:31:20 UTC No. 16593350
>>16593335
*for a year in a cramped piece of shit obsolete station
very different
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:31:40 UTC No. 16593352
>>16593337
>Jeet intern typing style again
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:32:07 UTC No. 16593353
Elon about to get the Vivek treatment. Bye bye DOGGE!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:32:10 UTC No. 16593354
>>16593337
It's like that twitter space all over again
>"The stack is bad"
>"What part of it?"
>"Uhhhhh..... all of it"
>"Can you explain how?"
>"Uhhh uhhh uhh... YOUR A JACKASS! WHO EVEN ARE YOU????"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZs
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:32:39 UTC No. 16593356
>>16593348
burning bridges? what are you talking about?
this faggot has hated on Musk for years, there is no burning going on at all, Musk is just responding after years of shit talking
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:33:02 UTC No. 16593357
>>16593339
They never learned from wise African Americans about Brer Fox and the Tar Baby
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:33:02 UTC No. 16593358
>>16593342
>>16593330
Do you think Biden even understood the situation? Everyone said that neither he nor Kamala intervened. Stop being an EDS. Your narrative is tired.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:33:45 UTC No. 16593360
>>16593350
Anon if you don't want to go to space regardless of the conditions you don't belong here.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:33:57 UTC No. 16593362
this is like thailand cave rescue all over again but astronaut space rescue
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:34:00 UTC No. 16593363
>>16593354
Musk was right
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:34:27 UTC No. 16593365
>>16593337
>leddit spacing
That aside, I wonder what kinds of receipts are needed to convince these people.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:34:52 UTC No. 16593366
>>16593358
Not those anons
Did either of them personally understand or care to understand? No. Most politicians don’t care about space.
Were there plenty of people in the administration who knew and who wanted to make politically-incentivized moves? Take a guess bozo
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:34:55 UTC No. 16593367
>>16593358
>Everyone
When everyone knows the boss's attitude towards Musk, when the boss has specifically given command to all his loyalist to go after him, when they know very well how they targetting Musk's companies. Biden's command was to go after Musk. NASA admin relayed that.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:34:57 UTC No. 16593368
>>16593358
>Everyone said that neither he nor Kamala intervened
Crew-9 was sent up with two empty seats for them. The plan was for them to return after Crew-10 arrived, like a normal rotation. There was no need to panic and send another launch up. It would just be a waste of time and money.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:35:39 UTC No. 16593370
>>16593354
>>16593363
the stack was shit and was overhauled little by little
Hotz wanted to rip it all out and rewrite everything right away but Musk said that they need to have the service running and a complete re-write with no new features for months would have been a bad idea
and Musk was correct
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:36:06 UTC No. 16593373
>>16593368
Time and money wasn't discussed. It was rejected outright early on.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:36:49 UTC No. 16593374
>>16593321
>Who is this "space community" he speaks of?
faggots
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:36:49 UTC No. 16593375
>>16593360
passenger detected
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:36:58 UTC No. 16593376
>>16593373
>according to musk
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:37:58 UTC No. 16593378
>>16593376
He's the chief negotiator. Yes. Your distrust is because you're in the cult. You further reject the idea that Biden admin was political. That is your own political cult on display.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:38:25 UTC No. 16593383
>>16593376
according to the president and richest man on Earth yes
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:38:52 UTC No. 16593384
>>16593379
The /pol/ takeover is complete. All hail president musk
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:38:59 UTC No. 16593385
>>16593320
Maybe they actually do detest their long stay despite this likely being their last mission of their career and ending up representing a big fraction of their time in orbit, and only reluctantly agreed to the Boeing test mission because the planned duration was so short.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:39:11 UTC No. 16593386
Why does Elon want to save those astronauts from ISS
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:39:33 UTC No. 16593388
>>16593379
Yes, we need to be lockstep with Elon, we need to deorbit the ISS, cancel Artemis and HLS entirely. Wait for SpaceX to be ready to start going to Mars in 5-6 years after they finish developing Starship and everything.
That is what a true SpaceX fan would want, only what Elon wants.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:39:33 UTC No. 16593389
>>16593379
We never cared about space, it was always mars
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:39:44 UTC No. 16593390
>>16593379
going to space =/= staying in a cuckbox for a year while in space
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:39:56 UTC No. 16593391
>>16593379
every time I ask if they would take a free ride on new shepard I get a no. /sfg/ was never about going to space.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:40:19 UTC No. 16593393
>>16593360
So you would fly a ISRO mission with jeet crew?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:40:48 UTC No. 16593394
/sfg/ - Musk Simp General
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:40:48 UTC No. 16593395
>>16593390
You've proved my point.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:40:50 UTC No. 16593396
>>16593379
Going to moon and mars is #1 priority. Second priority is to remove the political grifting to reduce the resistance.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:41:38 UTC No. 16593397
>>16593390
That's what going to Mars would entail
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:41:45 UTC No. 16593398
>>16593394
King
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:41:48 UTC No. 16593399
>>16593395
you would go for a Mars flyby mission in something Artemis sized?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:41:51 UTC No. 16593400
>>16593394
Reddit tourists needs to be spaced
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:41:57 UTC No. 16593401
>>16593378
>made up nonsense
hi, schizo!
>>16593383
>according to the person who is very clearly biased on this matter
oh boy, do I have a bridge to sell you!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:42:06 UTC No. 16593402
>>16593379
I would do a manned venus flyby in a cubic meter tin can if it was offered to me. I fucking love space
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:42:41 UTC No. 16593404
>>16593399
Of course. I want to go to space.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:42:49 UTC No. 16593405
>>16593397
nope, Starship is pretty big
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:42:52 UTC No. 16593406
>>16593399
Yes
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:42:52 UTC No. 16593407
>>16593401
>only Biden admin and supporters are not biased
>you cant trust the new president and the spacex ceo
>you can only trust Biden
Cult
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:42:53 UTC No. 16593408
>>16593401
if elon musk is selling it i might buy
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:43:49 UTC No. 16593409
>>16593401
absolutely delusional
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:43:53 UTC No. 16593410
>>16593407
>Every single space reporter, astronaut and NASA employee is biden admin now
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:44:29 UTC No. 16593413
>>16593366
What part of everyone said no politics were involved and this was the obvious logical and practical solution do you not understand?
>>16593367
By everyone I mean not just NASA and the astronauts, but also all press and other observers. Do you not think Berger would've immediately blown the whistle if there was any sort of foul play involved? He clearly stated there were no politics involved.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:44:32 UTC No. 16593414
>>16593410
Yes
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:44:32 UTC No. 16593415
>>16593399
the size of a greek woman? DAMN
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:44:52 UTC No. 16593416
>>16593407
Well Elon has been lying and telling half truths a lot recently
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:44:56 UTC No. 16593417
>>16593410
>laundering non-party credential
>ignore first hand and only relevant parties to the discussion
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:45:00 UTC No. 16593418
>>16593104
>>16593123
https://x.com/SpaceAbhi/status/1892
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:45:04 UTC No. 16593419
>>16593414
Is there anything that could convince you musk is wrong about this?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:45:25 UTC No. 16593420
>>16593390
>>16593399
you will never be a Man. You don't have the right stuff.
>>16593407
>more delusions
cute
>>16593409
>no argument
that's all I need to know
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:46:03 UTC No. 16593421
>>16593413
Berger has shown himself to be somewhat biased lately
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:46:04 UTC No. 16593422
>>16593413
Berger has EDS and has expressed it multiple times. His own book has it. If berger was honest, he'd publish an article
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:47:04 UTC No. 16593424
>>16593416
like what?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:48:08 UTC No. 16593430
>wake up
>/sfg/ is alive
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:48:09 UTC No. 16593431
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:49:43 UTC No. 16593433
>>16593261
>>$200M cost, whoever it is paid by
>messes up the busy ISS schedule that already has to deal with disruptions
>leaves the ISS understaffed, down to just one astronaut in the US section who would have to do full-time maintenance because the station is ageing hard
>extremely reduced science work because of the above
>leaves the station understaffed for up to half a year because no Crew Dragon is available for Crew-9 anymore, as Freedom is used for this mission, Endeavour is up there for Crew-8, Resilience is modified for Polaris Dawn, and Endurance is still in processing after Crew-7
None of these are true.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:49:47 UTC No. 16593434
>>16591712
https://spacenews.com/jim-free-nasa
>The announcement did not disclose why Free was leaving the agency now or his future plans. “I am grateful for the opportunity to be part of the NASA family and contribute to the agency’s mission for the benefit of humanity,” he said in a statement.
>The White House did not explain why it chose Petro to be the agency’s interim leader. There is speculation, though, that it did so because they considered Free too much of an advocate of the current Artemis lunar exploration architecture, one that the administration is considering revising.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:50:29 UTC No. 16593436
>>16593430
>spamming, seething and trolling
>alive
I'd rather it was dead, frankly.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:50:42 UTC No. 16593437
>>16593429
>it almost certainly will be a copy of the plan for January's flight
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:51:24 UTC No. 16593438
>>16593437
>It blows up before orbit again
How will /sfg/ cope?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:51:38 UTC No. 16593440
>>16593434
>one that the administration is considering revising.
No Moon only Mars, so Elon Commands.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:51:41 UTC No. 16593441
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:51:59 UTC No. 16593442
>>16593421
>>16593422
Are you seriously going to tell me Berger would cover for the Biden admin when having sources saying things opposed to what everyone else was saying, abandoning his journalistic duty? He would jump on a scoop like that.
Berger has oldspace derangement syndrome, any chance to shit on Nelson he would've taken.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:52:57 UTC No. 16593443
>>16593442
>abandoning his journalistic duty
lol, lmao even
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:53:13 UTC No. 16593445
>>16593438
I will embrace EDS, unironically. I can only be led around the nose for so long.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:53:30 UTC No. 16593446
>>16593442
There's no point in arguing with them, anyone who doesn't suck Elon's cock has EDS
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:53:41 UTC No. 16593447
>>16593441
It must be so nice being an NPC with like 10 brain cells and one-dimensional thinking
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:54:01 UTC No. 16593448
>>16593442
His judgement is compromised and covers for Biden. Either through his politics or simply hanging onto status quo. He has shown that its compromised. So the question is whether Berger knows his own fault and tries to look over it or will it let him lead by his politics.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:54:14 UTC No. 16593449
>>16593443
hi, newfag!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:54:31 UTC No. 16593450
>>16593442
Berger said something mildly critical of musk. Therefore he is now, and always had been a biden paid shill. If you say otherwise you have EDS.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:54:50 UTC No. 16593451
>>16593441
such a bizarre comment
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:55:00 UTC No. 16593453
Is it /pol/ tourists or something
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:55:39 UTC No. 16593455
>>16593429
>>16593441
I thrive off of the eds seethe of ars commenters like some kind of internet drama vampire
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:55:58 UTC No. 16593456
>>16593436
I'd rather it was 10X worse
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:56:08 UTC No. 16593457
>>16593296
I think Felix is still too young to post on 4chan.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:56:39 UTC No. 16593459
>>16593448
He's a huge champion for newspace. Why wouldn't he call out SpaceX getting shafted? And this still doesn't address that nobody else said anything about it being political. If Berger didn't leak it, someone else would've.
>>16593453
If only they were merely tourists
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:56:53 UTC No. 16593461
>>16593455
eds seething on /sfg/ is enough for me lmao, the reddit tourists are hilarious
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:56:53 UTC No. 16593462
>>16593453
ctrl+f "trannies" or "castrate" and you will see.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:57:04 UTC No. 16593463
>make tweet
>/sci/ is now at 400% of its normal speed
yikes
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:57:08 UTC No. 16593464
>>16593453
Ehhh I think it’s just a little trolling for fun; and then some 2s and 3s expressing honest concerns and, in turn, the 1s are getting butt hurt
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:57:45 UTC No. 16593467
>>16593461
true, you are very entertaining. But enough is enough and it's time you head back
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:57:54 UTC No. 16593468
>>16593459
He is, but I'm just saying he's shown his EDS side before and after Trump won the election. So it is definitely influencing his mind.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:58:12 UTC No. 16593469
>>16593466
This
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:58:48 UTC No. 16593470
>>16593327
Elon is right and the EDS members of "spitter" can't handle it.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:59:24 UTC No. 16593471
>>16593459
it wouldn't really be SpaceX getting shafted, this astronaut thing is somewhat irrelevant for SpaceX
I've never seen Berger be critical of the Biden admin
being critical of Boeing or old space is very different
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:59:39 UTC No. 16593472
>>16593277
>rescuing
Wrong. Can't rescue who is not in danger.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:59:49 UTC No. 16593473
>>16593450
Exactly. If you don't 100% suck someone's cock you are clearly delusional and are suffering from a mental illness.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:00:35 UTC No. 16593475
Yes yes—but it’s not a real happening until Scott Manley provides a condescending, woman-like tweet disguised as a neutral take but obviously a seething critique
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:01:43 UTC No. 16593476
BURN SLS
BURN ISS
BURN ORION
BURN GATEWAY
BURN ALL ARTEMIS CONTRACTS
We will all wait for Starship and Starship alone, Starship is NASA, NASA is Starship, Starship is for Mars, NASA is for Mars. This is the sole purpose of NASA, to facilitate Starship to Mars, nothing else NASA does matters.
MARS
MARS
MARS
MARS
MARS
MARS
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:01:53 UTC No. 16593477
>>16593472
Suppose for a second that SpaceX didn’t exist, or that they simply couldn’t offer a Dragon for another 2 or 3 years because the Dragon 2 capsule was as problematic at Starliner
They weren’t in any danger because why? What mitigated the danger? Take a guess
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:02:16 UTC No. 16593479
Musk should personally go to spacefag5 and tell him he is fired
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:02:54 UTC No. 16593480
>>16593476
Make MSR a manned mission
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:02:57 UTC No. 16593481
>>16593477
but spacex does exist
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:03:43 UTC No. 16593483
>>16593480
JPL will be deleted, it doesn't serve the Mars goal. So says Elon
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:03:51 UTC No. 16593485
>>16593477
>suppose for a second that the conditions were completely different
smartest dick sucker
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:04:21 UTC No. 16593488
>>16593481
I’ll put it this way—suppose the winners of ComCrew were Starliner and SNC Dream Chaser.
Butch and Suni would be fucked rn unless we put our tails between our legs and asked POCKOCMOC for a dedicated Soyuz lifeboat outta there
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:05:01 UTC No. 16593491
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18920
Coward
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:05:20 UTC No. 16593492
>>16593477
Commercial crew had 2 contracts for this exact reason not to mention astronauts are still going on Soyuz before and after Dragon.
You are dumb.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:05:22 UTC No. 16593493
>>16593485
I’m not wrong
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:05:24 UTC No. 16593494
>>16593472
Tomato
Tomato
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:05:27 UTC No. 16593495
>>16593491
retard
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:05:29 UTC No. 16593496
>>16593491
huh
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:06:49 UTC No. 16593497
>>16593488
yes, anon. If the launch provider that is providing this launch didn't exist, the two astronauts would be in a pickle. Is that the great revelation you wanted to share with us?
By your logic every flight to the ISS is a rescue. After all, if the flight didn't exist, the people there would be stranded !!11!!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:07:07 UTC No. 16593499
>>16593488
>SNC Dream Chaser
They didn't win, so how the fuck can you even compare it? We don't know how dream chaser would be if they won.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:07:15 UTC No. 16593502
>>16593496
>>16593495
it was him replying "Based" to the White House ASMR post
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:07:41 UTC No. 16593504
>>16593497
My logic is that anyone claiming Butch and Suni weren’t ever in any danger can only say so because Dragon 2 exists
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:08:18 UTC No. 16593506
>>16593504
>My logic
I don't think you have any
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:08:57 UTC No. 16593508
>>16593504
I'm sure no one here disagrees with that statement. At least no one arguing in good faith.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:09:00 UTC No. 16593509
>>16593481
>>16593485
>>16593492
>>16593497
>>16593499
I’m getting dogpiled but I’m still correct. Go back to shilling for the biden administration
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:10:44 UTC No. 16593511
>>16593476
Launching a Starship to Mars might take as many as a dozen refueling flights, and 80% of Starship's propellant load is liquid oxygen. One Starship launch uses about one complete day's worth of liquid oxygen production in the United States. Rounding, lets say that you can probably launch one Starship to Mars every two weeks with our current liquid oxygen production infrastructure.
This is the part where I remind everyone that lunar regolith is about 41% Oxygen by mass, and people have been talking for years about the energy advantages of using the Moon as a refueling station.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:11:33 UTC No. 16593513
>>16593468
I still don't think calling out some of Elon's absolute retardation amounts to EDS but whatever floats your boat.
>>16593471
Then why would he explicitly say there was no political meddling, like everyone else? The reason he wasn't very critical of the Biden admin is because they barely did anything to criticise in space, just like in this case, and he called out the NSC being essentially dead several times. They simply didn't do anything and let Nelson run the show, which should tell you all you need to know.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:11:58 UTC No. 16593514
>>16593509
take deep breaths, anon, or you'll start another melty. We had plenty this thread already...
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:12:31 UTC No. 16593515
>>16593509
Try calling them trannies some more
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:12:56 UTC No. 16593517
>>16593514
Elon gave us the best melty today, nothing can top his temper tantrum
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:13:01 UTC No. 16593518
>>16593481
Thank you Anon, I needed a chuckle.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:13:19 UTC No. 16593519
>>16593513
"absolute retardation" is a matter of politics and IQ differences to me.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:14:53 UTC No. 16593525
any astronaut talking shit about elon or even disagreeing with him is going to have to find another ride home
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:15:30 UTC No. 16593526
>>16593337
>getting a few more likes than Elon was worth being outed as a liar
Zoomer brainrot.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:15:37 UTC No. 16593527
>>16593519
I'm sorry to hear that, I hope you're getting the help you need.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:15:47 UTC No. 16593528
>>16593511
But isn’t pulling oxygen out of lunar regolith way harder than chilling and filtering air?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:16:23 UTC No. 16593530
>>16593527
Its okay. America won. Truth won. Musk won. Humanity won. If you are in denial of reality, you wont be happy.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:17:54 UTC No. 16593532
>>16593513
When your definition of "absolute retardation" is your inability to handle that the Biden admin chose to delay Butch and Suni's return for political reasons rather than pratical reasons.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:18:28 UTC No. 16593534
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:19:00 UTC No. 16593537
>>16593531
Imagine if one of the actually good Trump picks doesn't get in because Elon is being retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:19:41 UTC No. 16593538
>>16593534
>The space station has key supporters in Congress, including Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), in whose state the orbiting laboratory is managed. Cruz has long been an advocate of the space station. Ars reached out to Cruz for a comment on Thursday, but the senator did not immediately respond.
>However, a key source said Cruz was "furious" with the sentiment from Musk. The timing of Musk's tweet could make the confirmation of private astronaut Jared Isaacman to become NASA administrator more difficult. As part of the confirmation process, Isaacman is due to begin meetings with US senators in the coming week.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:20:14 UTC No. 16593539
>>16593530
>Truth won
Whatever you need to tell yourself. I'm going to enjoy the spacekino but I'm not going to hold myself from calling out Musk's retardation.
>>16593532
lol, have one on the house.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:20:39 UTC No. 16593540
>>16593527
>Troon offering mental health care
lol
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:20:57 UTC No. 16593542
>>16593531
>Musk has likely told President Trump that NASA does not need to fund private space stations in low-Earth orbit. Rather, Musk could offer an alternative solution if NASA wants to maintain a presence there
Bad analysis. There are multiple private space stations that SpaceX is working with. So for Berger to state SpaceX is just overtly greedy is not a reasonable take.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:21:07 UTC No. 16593544
>>16593538
>>>However, a key source said Cruz was "furious" with the sentiment from Musk. The timing of Musk's tweet could make the confirmation of private astronaut Jared Isaacman to become NASA administrator more difficult. As part of the confirmation process, Isaacman is due to begin meetings with US senators in the coming week.
LMAO
MUSK SELF OWN
Many such cases
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:21:48 UTC No. 16593546
>>16593542
>private space stations
Any day now
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:22:08 UTC No. 16593547
Musk really has such a one-track mind he cannot see the bigger picture or consider the consequences his untimely outburts will have on his own agenda, its really something.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:22:13 UTC No. 16593548
>>16593538
I suspect whether his sources are reliable or if its just political drivel
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:22:53 UTC No. 16593549
anyone who advocates for deorbiting the iss before 2030 is getting canceled
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:22:55 UTC No. 16593550
>>16593538
>whose state the orbiting laboratory
What's the problem? They can build another lab for the next station.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:23:04 UTC No. 16593551
>>16593548
>doubting his sources
When will you learn
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:23:27 UTC No. 16593552
>>16593546
Irrelevant.
>>16593547
People who are perpetually perplexed and make the wrong predictions perpetually need to expand their mind a bit.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:24:15 UTC No. 16593556
> defending muh ISS shitbox
a new low from the eunuchoids
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:24:27 UTC No. 16593557
>>16593551
His analysis seems compromised, so I suspect it. He seems to have such a cynical view of Musk/SpaceX in this article by suggesting Musk is only doing it for himself/his company.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:25:55 UTC No. 16593560
>>16593528
Breaking down metal oxides is a bit more intensive, but the savings come in only needing to ship methane up from Earth. The initial infrastructure investments would be high but you'd only have to launch 20% of the tanker flights you needed previously. If we're serious about launching hundreds of starships to Mars at a time this is something to give serious consideration.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:25:57 UTC No. 16593561
>>16593557
>Musk is only doing it for himself/his company
Why else would he do it, even the whole going to Mars is for himself
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:26:19 UTC No. 16593563
>>16593558
CLPS will be deleted too. Only Mars matters
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:26:34 UTC No. 16593564
>>16593531
>>16593534
kek elon said this to spite mogensen.
thats all theres to it.
he probably believed it before but him making a big deal of it is purely cause of that tweet
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:26:53 UTC No. 16593565
>>16593561
>Musk is uniquely evil
Yeah I dont buy it at all.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:27:37 UTC No. 16593567
>>16593565
That's not evil, that's being normal.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:27:53 UTC No. 16593569
>>16593558
only 1.5 weeks until the landing attempt
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:28:40 UTC No. 16593573
>>16593569
What does it do
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:28:46 UTC No. 16593574
>>16593567
>Everyone is evil
I dont buy it at all. As I said, if Berger isn't able to fix his alignment to a more common sense, instead of pushing extremists views, he will lose it.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:30:36 UTC No. 16593579
https://x.com/esherifftv/status/189
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:30:54 UTC No. 16593581
>>16593542
true. i also doubt spacex is that interested in running a station.
seems hard and seems like something elon wouldnt allow to take away from his mars budget.
berger seems to be reading this situation wrong
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:31:07 UTC No. 16593582
>>16593576
https://www.intuitivemachines.com/p
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:31:13 UTC No. 16593584
Can we talk about space now?
>Ariane 6 and Starship aiming to launch on same day
>EuroClip Mars flyby on 1 March, should get some nice views hopefully
>Blue Ghost lunar landing attempt on 2 March
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:32:08 UTC No. 16593586
>>16593582
full size pictures are over 4mb
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:32:20 UTC No. 16593587
>>16593582
>>16593576
How exactly will this help m- us get to Mars? Deleted
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:32:21 UTC No. 16593588
>>16593584
>Can we talk about space now?
EDS
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:33:09 UTC No. 16593589
>>16593564
what is the point of having fuck you money if you never say "fuck you"?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:33:39 UTC No. 16593592
>>16593581
>why would one want to go to low earth orbit
elon quote. he just doesnt think its a good idea at all. the most he would let spacex do is sell a ship to someone else that turns it into a station
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:34:48 UTC No. 16593593
>>16593509
retard
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:35:18 UTC No. 16593595
>>16593558
>>16593569
>>16593576
>>16593582
I fucking love moon landers.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:35:54 UTC No. 16593596
>>16593584
IM-2 might launch on Feb 27 as well >>16593576
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:36:15 UTC No. 16593599
>>16593586
whats that exo shit on it
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:36:42 UTC No. 16593601
>>16593584
Starship, IM2, and A6 on the same day. We’re spoiled.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:36:44 UTC No. 16593602
>>16593595
even fictional ones?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:36:54 UTC No. 16593603
>>16593573
does a bunch of backflips before tipping over
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:37:15 UTC No. 16593604
>>16593595
now if only they worked instead of crashing due to retarded software bugs and QC/integration mistakes
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:37:50 UTC No. 16593605
>>16593582
was listening to TMRO (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:37:55 UTC No. 16593606
>>16593579
who has better boobs?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:40:21 UTC No. 16593607
>>16593584
>Ariane 6
DOA
>Starship
Wake me up when SpaceX try orbital relight, tower capture or respiratory cooling
>Mars flyby
Don't think it will tell us anything we don't already know
>Blue Ghost
Hopefully a successful landing. The track record of recent autonomous lunar landing is not great if you aren't chink.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:40:26 UTC No. 16593608
>>16593587
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:41:11 UTC No. 16593610
>>16593602
Sure, they're neat too
>>16593604
If one more lander tips I'm gonna flip
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:44:03 UTC No. 16593611
>>16593610
Imagine if Starship tips
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:44:21 UTC No. 16593612
https://x.com/BryanDGriffin/status/
DOGE should cancel the new $500M NASA building in DC
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:45:42 UTC No. 16593613
>>16593607
Why are you here if you hate spaceflight so much?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:46:02 UTC No. 16593615
>>16593611
Seen it
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:46:12 UTC No. 16593616
>>16593599
https://www.exolaunch.com/
some secondary payload I think, probably a bunch of cubesats
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:48:29 UTC No. 16593620
>>16593605
>someone forgot to flip a switch before it launched.
lol forgot about that
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:48:58 UTC No. 16593623
>>16593613
>You hate spaceflight if you don't support Ariane 6
Fuck off frog.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:49:36 UTC No. 16593624
>>16593613
xe must have a great compulsion to express xer dog shit takes on every subject. It's important to be supportive of trans folks such as this fine gentlewoman(female(male)) when they are under the influence of hormones!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:51:14 UTC No. 16593626
The Starship development ethos of test and fix as you fly depends on a quick iteration cycle.
Why is the backlog of Ships and Boosters so deep then?
The time from when the forward flap issue was talked about (before ift-1) to when it was actually flown was so fucking long.
Their production rate combined with unwillingness to skip already made vehicles seems to be shooting themselves in the foot.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:51:46 UTC No. 16593628
>>16593605
there is a minihopper, a rover that has a micro-rover on top of it and some random wheel rover thing
and a drill
lots of cool stuff, not just some magnetometers and whatever
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:52:29 UTC No. 16593629
>>16593616
looks like a primitive version of blue ring
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:53:42 UTC No. 16593631
>>16593628
>minihopper
based
>>16593628
>rover that has a micro-rover on top of it
sounds retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:54:22 UTC No. 16593632
>>16593626
they have skipped plenty of almost ready vehicles
theorizing about an issue and actually getting real world data to characterize it are two different things
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:55:43 UTC No. 16593634
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:56:17 UTC No. 16593636
>>16593634
wtf
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:57:47 UTC No. 16593639
>>16593628
>a rover that has a micro-rover on top of it
>yo dawg I heard you like rovers so we put a rover on your rover so you can rove while you rove
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:57:50 UTC No. 16593640
>>16593637
hello, grandpa!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:58:10 UTC No. 16593641
>>16593626
Backlog is not that deep is it? There's like 1 more pair almost ready.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:58:23 UTC No. 16593642
>>16593637
Trannies are hilarious
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:58:45 UTC No. 16593643
>>16593640
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:58:50 UTC No. 16593644
>>16593634
>drive me closer, I want to hit them with my MASTCAM
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:58:51 UTC No. 16593645
the ISS is a russian plot and deorbiting it is the only way to own putin
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:59:31 UTC No. 16593646
>>16593584
Deorbiting the ISS isn't space? Huh.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:59:34 UTC No. 16593647
>>16593639
you should have seen the car it came in
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:59:46 UTC No. 16593648
>>16593628
>a rover that has a micro-rover on top of it
>>16593634
please tell me it has a camera too, imagine the pics of the lander on top of a rover from a mini-rover LMAO at least something new in space
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 19:59:48 UTC No. 16593649
>>16593642
you're quite funny, yes.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:01:10 UTC No. 16593651
>tranny this tranny that
trannies have broken your brain anon, go back to /pol/, they are the only ones that obsessed with trannies on 4chan
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:01:42 UTC No. 16593652
speaking of the american iron dome, some news dropped earlier:
>An 'Iron Dome' for North America? Talk heats up about Canada joining U.S. missile defence
>It came up last week at a U.S. Senate committee hearing, when the top-ranking Democrat reported he'd just gotten positive signals from Defence Minister Bill Blair that Canada could end decades of reluctance to join U.S. missile defence.
>"I met recently with the defence minister from Canada," Reed said, referring to Blair's visit to Washington this month.
>"They are very much interested in participating [in this initiative]. They have legal obstacles, but they assume they can jump over them."
>Guillot said the first step would be to ensure that Canada's next generation of sensors communicate with the U.S. system.
>Then, in the future, he said, should Canada ever install "defeat mechanisms" on its soil — technology capable of taking down a missile — it could operate under the binational NORAD command, as fighter jets already do.
>Blair himself spoke positively about tightening missile-defence co-operation after his trip to Washington. He told reporters that U.S. military planners hope their Iron Dome covers the Arctic.
>"An integrated missile defence system for all of North America is the thing that makes sense to everybody," he said.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/missi
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:01:59 UTC No. 16593653
>>16593651
Just ignore it
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:02:03 UTC No. 16593654
>>16591650
Guys... I am scared... Elon Musk just posted this on 4chan.. He literally want to kill everyone on the ISS because his ego got hurt by an European who was at the ISS.....
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:03:13 UTC No. 16593657
>>16593654
That's not how post numbers work!!!! rrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:03:16 UTC No. 16593658
No tariffs on items manufactured in space. Taxes halved on domestic items manufactured in space.
Gotta foster this economy somehow
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:04:11 UTC No. 16593659
>>16593654
>boards.4channel.rog
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:04:28 UTC No. 16593662
>>16593654
At least make the subtitle Danish. But you got me to reply, so enjoy your (You).
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:07:10 UTC No. 16593665
>>16593660
Biden admin has uttered the word "billionaires" prejoratively so many times now. Its their ideology.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:08:19 UTC No. 16593667
>>16593654
lmao what trashy show is this from?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:08:19 UTC No. 16593668
>>16593660
>more hearsay from a literally who
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:09:12 UTC No. 16593671
>>16593576
https://x.com/astroforge/status/189
apparently astroforge is on this launch too
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:09:14 UTC No. 16593672
>>16593660
if i was president i'd make europe pay for the mars wall
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:11:50 UTC No. 16593677
https://x.com/zebulgar/status/18926
Running a test here, how many of this dude's replies can you see, it shows 8 but only displays 1 reply hbu? I wanna know how bad twitter is shitting the bed rn and truncating replies, either that or hiding spambots very well on the backend idk
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:13:23 UTC No. 16593680
>>16593677
2 now, but that's normal twitter not working properly
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:13:55 UTC No. 16593683
>>16593441
>I made a funny, tee hee
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:14:06 UTC No. 16593685
>>16593667
Manifest, I liked the concept.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:14:36 UTC No. 16593687
>>16593671
astroforge said fuck, they must be really cool
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:14:54 UTC No. 16593688
>>16593677
someone else just replied since taking this screencap and making my post and now it shows 9 replies, so idk it really might just be efficiently hiding bots
all those pussy's in bio... unseen... tragic
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:15:03 UTC No. 16593689
>>16593677
2, is it bots getting filtered or real people or just some bug?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:15:08 UTC No. 16593690
>>16593677
two, one of them was 5 minutes ago
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:16:54 UTC No. 16593692
>>16593680
>>16593689
>>16593690
ok yeah I'm more inclined now to believe its some automatic AI assisted purging of the most obvious bots that don't even get filtered into "show more replies"
twitter probably has some sort of tiered system for handling bots like that i guess
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:18:54 UTC No. 16593695
>>16593541
I cant think of a single non retarded reason to keep the ISS until 2030
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:21:02 UTC No. 16593698
>>16593695
jobs
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:22:04 UTC No. 16593701
>>16593695
okay, now imagine for every year the ISS is operational you receive one billion dollars. Can you think of any reasons now?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:22:49 UTC No. 16593703
If you're gonna spend all that fuel to deorbit it, just accelerate the ISS instead so it never falls back.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:23:37 UTC No. 16593705
>>16593637
weird normalfag statement but alright.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:23:47 UTC No. 16593706
>>16593695
I don’t want there to be chinese in space when there aren’t americans.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:23:58 UTC No. 16593708
>>16593695
Doesn't it costs like $4 billion per year to operate it? Thats a lot of grift. >>16593703, its a waste. Modern companies can do it cheaper and maintain it cheaper with more modern tech.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:24:59 UTC No. 16593710
>>16593705
>normalfag
Normalfag won Trump the election. The ones making the statement are in the bottom 5-10% of the extremists
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:25:08 UTC No. 16593711
>>16593703
you want to send it into heliocentric orbit?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:26:43 UTC No. 16593715
>>16593695
The 2030 timeline is predicated on (or hope) we by then have a station in LEO that replaces ISS. Having a gap in our presence is not politically attractive.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:27:04 UTC No. 16593717
>>16593711
Beats the ocean.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:27:13 UTC No. 16593718
YOU ARE FULLY RETARDED
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:27:45 UTC No. 16593719
>>16593715
If you dont burn the bridge, you always want to hang on to another. Once you burn the bridge, the others will be forced to accelerate to succeed.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:28:15 UTC No. 16593721
>>16593710
>5-10%
5-10% of the population is still normalfags.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:30:07 UTC No. 16593723
>>16593719
The shuttle literally burned up and we still had a gap in human space flight capability.
ISS is not going anywhere without a replacement in operation.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:31:40 UTC No. 16593725
>>16593723
The congress refused to fund SpaceX crew dragon and delayed it by few years as retribution. There wasn't a replacement that was lined up for shuttle at the time, it was an "unexpected" scenario. We now have multiple companies doing private space stations that are lined up to come online around that time.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:31:51 UTC No. 16593726
>>16593718
Do you make this lie?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:33:05 UTC No. 16593727
>>16593703
It takes substantially more prop to push the ISS up to a graveyard orbit than it will to deorbit it, the hard part of deorbit is controlling where it goes.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:34:35 UTC No. 16593731
is it worse to be subtarded or fully retarded? please help i'm behind on my autistic obscenities.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:35:44 UTC No. 16593734
>>16593731
lel
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:35:50 UTC No. 16593735
Can SpaceX launch 2 starship to land on Mars few weeks apart? Then depending on the first landing, if its successful or not, modify the second landing profile as well?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:36:52 UTC No. 16593739
>>16593735
Wtf no
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:37:03 UTC No. 16593740
>>16593731
here you go
hope this help
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:37:16 UTC No. 16593741
>>16593735
Starship can't even get to orbit right now.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:37:19 UTC No. 16593742
Anyways what a cuck that Varda CEO is for calling elon "sir"
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:38:06 UTC No. 16593745
>>16593735
yes, this was literally the plan
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:38:50 UTC No. 16593746
>>16592964
well price not being discussed sounds normal
its not like government agencies know how to accept compromises for lower costs
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:40:29 UTC No. 16593749
>>16593054
>Calling people retarded on twitter
god bless
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:40:57 UTC No. 16593752
https://x.com/KenKirtland17/status/
get in here before his account is suspended
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:42:18 UTC No. 16593755
>>16593752
>his account is suspended
? what would be the reason
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:42:51 UTC No. 16593757
>>16593755
pettiness
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:43:05 UTC No. 16593758
>>16593752
Pride in being wrong
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:43:13 UTC No. 16593759
>>16593121
>>16593139
Why not let them deorbit themselves, why are we wasting money on this?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:43:25 UTC No. 16593760
has anyone noticed that elon's tweeting style is identical to nassim taleb's when he gets mad?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:44:17 UTC No. 16593761
>>16593760
You imbecile!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:44:35 UTC No. 16593762
i literally don't use twitter
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:45:27 UTC No. 16593764
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exR
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:46:42 UTC No. 16593767
>>16593764
were they mocking Elon here and I didn't even realize it till now lmaoo
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:46:42 UTC No. 16593768
>>16593764
Is this Elon in the future?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:46:54 UTC No. 16593769
>>16593762
I envy you
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:48:13 UTC No. 16593772
>>16593767
>8 years ago
Nope, too early.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:48:33 UTC No. 16593773
>>16593762
>in spaceflight thread
>doesn't want to follow spaceflight news
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:49:00 UTC No. 16593775
>>16593772
prophetic...
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:49:05 UTC No. 16593776
So wait
there is a cargo dragon docked to the ISS right now? Why didn't they just come home on that?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:49:10 UTC No. 16593777
>>16593764
Endless space 2 is good stuff
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:49:22 UTC No. 16593778
>>16593773
i get all my news from this general
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:50:39 UTC No. 16593783
>>16593778
Shitposts isn't news. you need first hand source, twitter is the source. from agencies, from CEOs, from investors, from reporters. Without mimddleman filters.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:51:14 UTC No. 16593784
>>16593476
>We will all wait for Starship
We are certainly doing that
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:51:26 UTC No. 16593785
>>16593776
Not a manned spacecraft. Entirely different beast; just looks the same aesthetically
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:53:21 UTC No. 16593788
>>16593677
I refreshed and its back to 1 post only again not this dudes post, I went to this dudes profile and his reply still shows up there, so yeah twitter really shitting the bed, hiding replies, server load mitigation, its lame
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:53:34 UTC No. 16593789
>>16593476
This but unironically.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:55:27 UTC No. 16593791
>>16593788
it happens from time to time, maybe once a week
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:55:28 UTC No. 16593792
>>16593784
no Artemis II, no Artemis III, Starship will hit developmental delays, no moon
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:56:29 UTC No. 16593795
>>16593791
Seems to be more frequent than that, EDA nooticed it too
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:56:53 UTC No. 16593796
>>16593788
Twitter does this all the time, it’s pretty par for the course. It’s either just a miscalculation of actual replies, or as others have said, it’s just the programming auto-blocking pussy in bio bots
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:57:38 UTC No. 16593798
>>16593796
seems like a mix of both here
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:58:39 UTC No. 16593800
>>16593785
People are just cargo
Cargo is more valuable than people most of the time anyways
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:59:39 UTC No. 16593801
>>16593800
sfg moment
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:59:40 UTC No. 16593802
>>16593800
elong is that yoou
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:59:57 UTC No. 16593803
>>16593800
Hello elon
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:00:33 UTC No. 16593805
>>16593772
Maybe more of a Master thing.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:01:06 UTC No. 16593809
>>16593802
>>16593803
Kek you frens later, anons
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:02:30 UTC No. 16593813
>>16593802
hivemind
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:03:27 UTC No. 16593814
>>16593606
Idk but ellie definitely has the better feet
>>16593703
Takes a very small amount of propellant to deorbit from LEO, and there is no safe stable orbit for ISS within 36000 km of Earth.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:04:34 UTC No. 16593817
>>16593813
its just such an elon thing to say lol, he really would pack as many people like sardines to go to mars in starship for 6 months, its just cargo that will only put itself to use on the surface
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:07:45 UTC No. 16593825
>>16593817
i meant to reply to you and this anon >>16593803, sfg is a hivemind
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:12:18 UTC No. 16593830
>>16593783
that's fine. at least 30% of the images here are twitter screenshots anyway.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:13:51 UTC No. 16593834
>>16593831
just land it there. No need for some fancy starships or whatever.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:14:31 UTC No. 16593837
>>16593834
it could use the solar panels as legs to walk around
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:14:56 UTC No. 16593838
>>16593831
gateway bros, our response??!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:16:00 UTC No. 16593841
>>16593831
Alternatively, and more pragmatically, just put Gateway in LEO
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:16:41 UTC No. 16593844
>>16593698
retarded
>>16593701
so I get to burn 1 billion dollar a year? sounds like I wouldn't miss it
>>16593706
let them enjoy their money pit
>>16593715
stupid arbitrary requirement. we dont NEED a useless money pit at all times to own the chinks
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:18:21 UTC No. 16593848
>>16593752
the Zoomer won, there is no going back after this. he has more numbers
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:18:46 UTC No. 16593849
>>16593844
>we dont NEED a useless money pit at all times to own the chinks
ok, then don't make it useless. give it some cannons and shit so everyone's gonna wanna make vidya and movies about it.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:19:06 UTC No. 16593850
>>16593844
You can’t claim to be the leading superpower in space but also be like
>ummm yeah here’s the thing we don’t actually have a Station to send astronauts to right now
If you think this is retarded and simply a matter of optics, then you are correct. But optics are very important.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:19:06 UTC No. 16593851
>>16593844
>arbitrary
Congrats on learning politics is arbitrary.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:19:07 UTC No. 16593852
>>16593841
im of the opinion that nasa should've provided a core module for a commercial station instead of relying entirely on commercial. build the module, then let the company / companies build onto it.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:19:28 UTC No. 16593854
>>16593759
This
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:20:04 UTC No. 16593857
can we redirect the asteroid to hit the ISS?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:20:58 UTC No. 16593859
can we redirect the asteroid to hit peking?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:21:31 UTC No. 16593861
>>16593852
NASAs whole thing is that it’s tired of leading the charge on this and simply wants to be a paying customer without having to worry about logistics. Building a core module defeats the purpose.
I don’t necessarily disagree with what you said, but still. If NASA is doing the core module then they might as well add 2 or 3 more modules and call it the new station, against their own wishes
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:21:43 UTC No. 16593863
https://www.nbcnews.com/science/spa
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:22:06 UTC No. 16593866
>>16593863
>DNC news
yikes
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:23:10 UTC No. 16593867
>>16593863
>legacy media
Who cares. They rushed this piece out the door 30 mins ago. Everyone already saw it and have since moved on. This is why MSM is dying
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:23:35 UTC No. 16593869
>>16593866
it gets better
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:23:47 UTC No. 16593870
>>16593849
Now you're closing in on a real answer
>>16593850
You can actually just do things
>>16593851
Congrats at not finding a non retarded reason to keep the ISS until 2030
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:24:35 UTC No. 16593872
>>16593869
>>16593863
both refuse to say retarded, so retarded.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:24:51 UTC No. 16593873
>>16593869
Journos get the airlock
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:25:11 UTC No. 16593874
This is the best s-f-g thread in years, been here simce oft1
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:25:40 UTC No. 16593876
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:25:56 UTC No. 16593877
>>16593874
thanks be to elon for reviving /sfg/
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:26:22 UTC No. 16593879
>>16593874
lurk moar, newfag
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:26:27 UTC No. 16593880
>>16593874
i credit myself and the snow days
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:26:28 UTC No. 16593881
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:32:23 UTC No. 16593889
>>16593863
>derogatory term
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:34:51 UTC No. 16593892
>>16593869
>usaid large scale disinformation propaganda
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:35:05 UTC No. 16593893
>>16593005
that's Ms Typing to you. how dare you.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:37:19 UTC No. 16593898
>>16593054
he didn't say anything to contradict elon though.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:37:48 UTC No. 16593900
Grimes now pulling a public ashley st claire, it’s fucking OVER
Mars never
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:38:21 UTC No. 16593901
>>16593899
the cadence has really increased lately
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:39:22 UTC No. 16593904
so much twitter drama im tired of it now
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:39:30 UTC No. 16593905
>>16593900
she's announcing that elon is xae a-12's father?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:39:39 UTC No. 16593906
>>16593900
>Grimes
who
>a public ashley st claire
what
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:40:05 UTC No. 16593908
>>16593900
nobody cares, her genes have already been assimilated into the elon dynasty, her presence is not required.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:40:23 UTC No. 16593909
>>16593900
Keeping up with the Musks
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:40:29 UTC No. 16593910
>>16593007
>he decided to give them a political win?
Biden didn't count on Trump winning
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:41:05 UTC No. 16593912
>>16593900
>Grimes
post THAT pic, you know the one
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:42:21 UTC No. 16593913
>>16593900
https://x.com/Grimezsz/status/18926
lol
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:43:22 UTC No. 16593916
>>16593913
Not giving any details though btw
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:43:42 UTC No. 16593918
>>16593913
5 years later and he still won't give her a dall
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:43:57 UTC No. 16593919
>>16593913
>>16593900
the replies are getting scrambled somehow
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:44:47 UTC No. 16593922
>>16593919
The great filter is women
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:46:18 UTC No. 16593925
>>16593913
>>16593919
Why does Elon have to do fucking everything, just take the little shit to the doc yourself, YOU ARE FILTHY RICH YOU DUMB BITCH
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:46:50 UTC No. 16593927
sfg - Scandals about Felon and Grimes
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:48:04 UTC No. 16593929
>>16593925
She has all the access to everything Musk has, she's herself a millionaire. So its likely got nothing to do with it, but shes using the child as emotional blackmail.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:48:32 UTC No. 16593931
>>16593927
we tried spaceflight, it wasn't working. time to pivot to a new content model.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:49:48 UTC No. 16593935
>>16593919
she's a millionaire living in canada. she has access to universal healthcare, and if not then can pay for it in the US. how can she not get healthcare? maybe DOGE needs to investigate where all her money went.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:51:32 UTC No. 16593938
>>16593925
>>16593935
there are procedures where you need both parents to sign off. she didn't say anything about wanting money.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:52:51 UTC No. 16593941
>>16593938
my guess: puberty blockers
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:55:30 UTC No. 16593943
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:56:26 UTC No. 16593944
>>16593941
you can just get those on the internet pretty easy, it's not even worth going through a doctor
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:57:37 UTC No. 16593945
elon fatigue
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:58:15 UTC No. 16593946
>>16593945
save us bezos
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:58:35 UTC No. 16593947
>>16593945
For real it’s getting tiresome
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:59:20 UTC No. 16593948
>>16593945
the ride never ends
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:59:45 UTC No. 16593949
https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publ
new zubrin
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:01:01 UTC No. 16593951
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:01:08 UTC No. 16593952
>>16593949
>January 31, 2025
>new
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:03:04 UTC No. 16593955
Zubrin is going in to seethe overdrive over politics. Its so sad, taking so many of the good people in the space area including Elon.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:03:47 UTC No. 16593956
>>16593952
it was never posted here so yeah, how bout that lil niggy
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:03:47 UTC No. 16593957
>>16593945
yeah maybe just don't obsessively spam positively or negatively about elon on the general that's about spaceflight and not political faggotry or drama on the ground.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:03:53 UTC No. 16593958
>>16593949
Literally who cares what this washed out midget faggot thinks.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:04:25 UTC No. 16593960
>>16593956
>it was never posted here
lurk better
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:04:49 UTC No. 16593961
>>16593958
/sfg/ does lil niggy
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:05:36 UTC No. 16593963
>>16593912
dont know actually, but i like this one
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:05:51 UTC No. 16593964
>>16593961
Lurk more retard, the zubrin bridge was completely burned when he crashed out during the election cycle
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:08:58 UTC No. 16593969
>>16593961
>/sfg/ does
who is this slash ess eff gee slash you speaketh of? Is that a woman? Sounds like one.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:10:47 UTC No. 16593972
>>16593964
>>16593969
Zubrin is based, watch this https://youtu.be/EKQSijn9FBs?t=2956
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:11:12 UTC No. 16593973
>>16593971
I’m sorry, but I don’t care anymore
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:11:30 UTC No. 16593974
>1002 replies
qrd? wtf happened
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:11:31 UTC No. 16593975
>>16593971
thats probably the minimum they need to get us back on track. its too close for me though, so i hope they get more.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:11:57 UTC No. 16593976
>>16593960
it was never posted here lil niggy
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:12:14 UTC No. 16593977
>>16593971
pathetic. You can't get to mars with cadence like this. What about next year?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:12:33 UTC No. 16593978
>>16593974
some regular shit then elon chimpout on twitterX
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:12:46 UTC No. 16593979
>>16593974
nothing, /sci/'s just deader than /sfg/ today
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:13:08 UTC No. 16593981
>>16593972
Yes yes we’ve all seen it. Doesn’t change the fact that his brain is fried and he crashed out and started foaming at the mouth about how Kamala could somehow get man to mars
He’s a faggot; I usually don’t speak collectively for /sfg/ but I’m confident in saying everyone here unequivocally thinks he’s a faggot
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:13:33 UTC No. 16593982
>>16593977
my guess is that we'll see 30 next year if flawda comes online, else we'll get up to 25
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:13:34 UTC No. 16593983
>>16593976
>lil niggy can't even lurk properly
not like we expected much from you anyway.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:13:50 UTC No. 16593984
>>16593974
elon had a melty, /sfg/ had a melty, anon had a melty
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:14:03 UTC No. 16593985
>>16593974
Musk said Starliner delay was political. We all know this to be true. Space twitter lefties melting and cant handle the truth.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:14:39 UTC No. 16593987
>anon had a melty
case in point >>16593985
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:14:58 UTC No. 16593988
>>16593982
The big FL ain’t gonna change much. Bezos and Tory already lodged complaints to NASA that SS testing would slow them down.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:15:13 UTC No. 16593989
>>16593987
reddit tourist trannies melty as well
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:15:27 UTC No. 16593990
>>16593974
We found out that, because of the election, the Biden admin refused an offer by SpaceX to return Butch and Suni from the ISS early.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:16:25 UTC No. 16593992
>>16593981
Zubrin is a perfect example to everyone willing to listen about how seemingly "based" people can quickly become deranged retards. /sfg/ would do well to remember this...
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:16:30 UTC No. 16593993
>>16593985
space twitter lefties like andreas mogensen
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:17:01 UTC No. 16593995
>>16593974
elon called an astronaut retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:17:02 UTC No. 16593996
>>16593993
European are commies
News @ 11
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:18:03 UTC No. 16593999
>>16593995
astronaut called elon a liar
elon said he's retarded as he has no knowledge
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:18:15 UTC No. 16594000
>>16593989
>reddit trannies meltdown
>pol trannies meltdown
>sfg trannies meltdown
this general makes chernobyl look like a warm cup of coffee.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:18:30 UTC No. 16594001
>>16593996
why did elon let a communist fly on crew dragon? could he be working for them too?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:19:53 UTC No. 16594004
>>16593992
Yup same with companies. Remember when /sfg/ was hyperbullish on Momentus, claiming they would be the future and change the industry completely, only for them to be unveiled as smoke and mirrors? Remember how a sizeable portion of the general thought Relativity’s printing would be a cherished widget that would propel the company up with the big dawgs like SpaceX and BO?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:20:09 UTC No. 16594005
lon Musk has thoroughly destroyed any desire I had to see the Starship achieve success as a program. Like there comes a certain point where someone is so bad that you wish to see a lot of stuff they’re associated with completely and utterly destroyed.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:20:17 UTC No. 16594007
>>16594001
money is money
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:21:20 UTC No. 16594008
>>16593996
what commies? not all European are commies
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:21:23 UTC No. 16594009
>>16594005
Same. I castrated myself out of protest against Elon Musk and Trump. I cant live in this country anymore. I am moving to Sweden to escape from this hell.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:21:43 UTC No. 16594010
>>16593958
well said
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:21:59 UTC No. 16594011
>>16593995
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:22:10 UTC No. 16594012
>>16594005
yeah i get it, i'm kinda the same way with the jews
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:22:45 UTC No. 16594013
>>16593958
>>16593964
fuck you goyboy!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:24:02 UTC No. 16594014
>>16594012
Hahah aren’t we all
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:25:11 UTC No. 16594016
I stand with lelon let's do whatever he says
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:25:51 UTC No. 16594017
>>16593974
Zubrin posted a new article
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:26:54 UTC No. 16594018
>>16594009
lol what a faggot. ywnbaw
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:32:03 UTC No. 16594023
>>16593999
>astronaut called elon a liar
checked
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:34:34 UTC No. 16594025
this is what happens when you crosspost about /sfg/ in /pol/
a bunch of literal reddit transplants from /pol/ will rush in thinking they're welcome and the general's culture dies with it.
>inb4 JEW TRANNY MAGATARD
i don't care what political affiliation you creatures have, just that you're not from here.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:38:42 UTC No. 16594028
>>16593531
how wise is this? any science left that requires it? future projections?
what do if new science requires 0G experiments? can a minimal space station be deployed fast with Starship in the future?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:40:02 UTC No. 16594029
>>16593913
Based trad values upholding Musk ghosting a whore!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:43:45 UTC No. 16594032
>>16594004
no sane person here was optimistic about a company that sells orbital tugs to nobody, or about 3d printing memes
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:47:08 UTC No. 16594035
>>16593677
Twitter will never not work properly again anon. It's a platform to Elon to shit post and say whatever he wants. As long as it works decently for the rest of the people, 80/20 rule, he could give less a fuck about it. Twitter won't start taking site reliability seriously until they start doing banking. Until then, its just a personal vanity project for Elon, the same way that Blue Origin is a personal vanity project for Jeff.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:47:23 UTC No. 16594036
what was Grimes appeal bros
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:48:30 UTC No. 16594037
>America thinks they can into mars
>when they even can't affordable healthcare
OH SAY CAN YOU SEEEEEEE
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:51:48 UTC No. 16594044
>>16594037
SpaceX isn't a health care company.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:51:57 UTC No. 16594045
launch something already jeff
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:54:42 UTC No. 16594048
>>16594036
you dont see it? >>16593963
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:55:24 UTC No. 16594049
>>16594037
I don't get sick, that's for losers.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:56:13 UTC No. 16594050
>>16594048
?
unbleached eye brows are a no thanks
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:01:57 UTC No. 16594052
>>16591650
uhhh our great elon musk has just spoken and nobody here is posting about it??? i am disappointed!!!!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:02:15 UTC No. 16594053
>>16594032
Revisionist history. The entire general was gung ho about orbital tugs. To say otherwise is either lying or severely misremembering
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:02:58 UTC No. 16594055
>>16594052
new NFT?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:03:25 UTC No. 16594057
>>16594052
He seems to be in a worse state than usual, I don't think he's living for very long.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:03:35 UTC No. 16594058
>>16594048
a decent breeder to create more autistic geniuses with.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:04:54 UTC No. 16594059
>>16594053
prolly paid shills and brown people
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:06:58 UTC No. 16594063
>>16594052
he bout to drop his debut album?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:08:00 UTC No. 16594065
>>16594052
He’s so cringe he’s beginning to make Bezos and Zuckerberg look cool I’m not even trolling
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:08:56 UTC No. 16594066
>>16594052
>chainsaw
based
t. chainsaw enjoyer
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:09:48 UTC No. 16594068
>ignore /sfg/ for a few weeks because of work&other stuff
>see the whole elon rescue mission shitthrowing battle in my newsfeed
>check /sfg/
>read this thread
I miss the days /sfg/ days before starman.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:09:50 UTC No. 16594069
>>16594052
seeing... this, after seeing the melty he just had just makes it so much more terrible
spiraling
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:09:52 UTC No. 16594070
>>16594025
>I'm upset that my ideology has lost the culture war, this was supposed to be a safe space.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:09:59 UTC No. 16594071
https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/statu
aren't most EPA regulations just stuff that EPA themselves have created and not explicitly from Congress?
a lot of that stuff might be getting deleted now
stuff like environmental assessments
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:11:01 UTC No. 16594072
>>16594070
so predictable
read >>16594025 again
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:11:04 UTC No. 16594073
>>16594071
this at least hopefully means SLC-37 construction can get started right away
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:11:59 UTC No. 16594074
>>16594068
the day that elon gets out of spaceflight will be a scary day for the industry. yeah it'll go on without him, but it may decline alot because he's gone.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:12:44 UTC No. 16594075
>>16594071
back in the day companies used to just dump everything into the nearest river
and retards would poison themselves using used oil as a herbicide
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:13:32 UTC No. 16594077
>>16594071
>making it harder to respond to disasters
thats not what his picture says at all. why are we giving a voice to people who cant read?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:13:48 UTC No. 16594078
>>16594072
>I'm against left and right wing politics in /sfg/ (but I would never criticize it if it was the left).
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:15:56 UTC No. 16594079
>post about flight 8 date: 45 updoots
>post about elon being a heckin racist nazi: 1.1k updoots
In the one sub that's supposed to pro-spaceflight and against EDS.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:17:24 UTC No. 16594080
>>16594079
its called brigading, often with bots
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:17:44 UTC No. 16594081
>>16594074
I'd certainly miss the shitshow.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:18:14 UTC No. 16594082
>>16594052
Jesus Christ
I'll still pretend to like and agree with him because it makes libs seethe but come on
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:18:54 UTC No. 16594083
>>16594082
i'll cut u with that chainsaw
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:20:00 UTC No. 16594085
>>16594078
>i'm against left and right wing politics in /sfg/ but
>*insert my schizo fanfiction version of events here*
are you hearing yourself, lil' tourist? you just had a fucking short circuit because someone pointed out you're not welcome no matter what your political affiliation.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:21:09 UTC No. 16594086
>>16593949
>zubrin
Jews will not be allowed on Mars.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:23:27 UTC No. 16594091
>>16594052
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dr8
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:24:26 UTC No. 16594093
>>16594052
What the fuck is this retarded nigger doing?
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:24:39 UTC No. 16594094
>>16594085
>tourist here because of Elon drama accuses others of being a tourist
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:25:20 UTC No. 16594095
Autists should be kept on a leash.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:26:42 UTC No. 16594098
>>16594082
>>16594093
Someone pointed out that Elon Musk moved and acts like he intentionally wants to be turned into gifs and memes. When it’s supposed to be a process that happens organically.
In his mind he can force memes and he sees himself as some sort of meme king and it’s cringe to the max
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:26:48 UTC No. 16594099
autists will inherit the earth
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:27:16 UTC No. 16594100
>>16594093
irl shitposting
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:29:31 UTC No. 16594102
>>16594099
Not just the Earth, the Mars as well.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:30:15 UTC No. 16594104
Reminder that Mars will be a white ethnoplanet.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:30:18 UTC No. 16594105
>>16594102
>the Mars
It’s Muna
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:31:45 UTC No. 16594107
>>16593983
lil niggy cant prove it
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:32:13 UTC No. 16594108
we will need H1B engineers on mars though
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:32:51 UTC No. 16594110
>>16594069
howard fucking hughes
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:35:43 UTC No. 16594116
>>16594112
Starchips, one might call them
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:37:49 UTC No. 16594120
>>16594112
microsats that would ablate on interstellar dust during the journey
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:38:05 UTC No. 16594121
>>16594098
Yeah I can see that, I got transported way back to /b/ when I think of it like this.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:38:52 UTC No. 16594122
??????????
what the fuck is this "starboat" retardation by zubrin and why does he write an article to propose fantasy nuclear power sources along with a fantasy reusable upper stage
I thought he wanted to get Directly to Mars, no ??
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:41:17 UTC No. 16594124
>>16594122
Nahh, he wants to sell himself as some sort of “idea guy,” sprinkling in juuuust enough ideas every few months which culminates in him writing a new book every few years for the grift. Worked great in the 90s and 00s. He’s fizzling out now. Sad!
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:42:19 UTC No. 16594125
>>16594120
This has been deboonked
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:42:30 UTC No. 16594126
>>16594122
Mars is an engineering problem now so there's not much point in speculating about it.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:42:48 UTC No. 16594127
>>16594050
lead her to committing to a long term unbleached regrowth plan
>>16594058
i see that also. she has a certain....focused look to her, is how id put it.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:44:59 UTC No. 16594128
>>16594098
Ah, I can see it now, somehow it makes it even more cringe
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:45:17 UTC No. 16594130
>see this
>look at their accounts
>first one is trans or an ally and posts in trans and lgbtbbq subreddits
>second guy constantly posts about how much he hates tesla, probably has EDS
brigaded as fuck. im glad spacexlounge bans/deletes comments from people like these. they lurk elon subreddits all day and pounce at the slightest negative news. actual EDS.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:46:30 UTC No. 16594131
>>16594130
Literally why post this here none of us care GO BACK NIGGER
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:48:02 UTC No. 16594133
>>16593995
>>16593999
Actually 100% willing to believe an astronaut is out-of-the-loop enough to be acting retarded about this. A guy who was at my helicopter school a few weeks ago works at JSC in some capacity (I think a former astronaut, now in some management role, didn't get his name but looking at headshots it may have been Linnehan), and he was boomer doomering about HLS starship but had zero clue that Spacex had done a fuel transfer test with the header tank or that NASA had corroborated the successful test.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:48:17 UTC No. 16594134
>>16594131
someone posted about it earlier >>16594079
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:48:41 UTC No. 16594135
>>16594052
mfw
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:52:25 UTC No. 16594141
>>16594130
>>16594134
Your samefag earlier post needs to go back too, nigger.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:54:34 UTC No. 16594143
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:56:08 UTC No. 16594145
>>16594052
I don't care about him calling astronaut a retard, but this is too much.
What is this faggot even doing
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:58:47 UTC No. 16594147
>>16594145
the new face of conservatism in the USA
I send my heart out to you
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:59:43 UTC No. 16594148
>>16594082
This. I'll walk the plank for ol Musky. Live by the Musk, die by the Musk. mfw
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:38 UTC No. 16594149
>Milei gives Elon a chainsaw
>Elon poses with it
>tourists lose their minds
many such cases
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:45 UTC No. 16594150
>>16594145
the shit cherry on top of the cringe sunday is all the pajeet twitter accounts like Autism Capital dickriding this, acting like it’s the funniest thing in the world
I’m sick of jews. I’m sick of indians. I’m growing sick of elon
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:02:19 UTC No. 16594151
>>16594150
Grew tired of spamming about H1b?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:02:25 UTC No. 16594152
>>16594149
>I- i- it’s tourists!!!!
Your world view is crashing down. Hurts, doesn’t it?
Not all of us are 1s. You don’t have to conjure up some boogie man or pretend we’re getting raided
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:02:25 UTC No. 16594153
>>16594052
>How do you do fellow kids?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:03:27 UTC No. 16594154
>>16594151
And there it is. You’re indian. I never even brought it up, rajesh
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:04:44 UTC No. 16594155
>>16594052
>having a big ket-trip during a republican conference and not being called out on it
Man is living the dream
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:04:59 UTC No. 16594156
>>16594152
Between you and I only one of us is having a melty about Elon calling out an astronaut for not knowing what he is talking about.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:05:46 UTC No. 16594158
>>16594077
I hate that cremcucks account. Supposedly a troon too.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:05:59 UTC No. 16594159
>>16594154
You actually admitted to being that anon.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:06:07 UTC No. 16594160
im glad elon called that astronaut a douchebag or whatever. im sick of people treating astronauts like untouchable gods. they're just people like everyone else.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:08:12 UTC No. 16594163
>>16594156
Hey faggot I wasn’t complaining about the retard astronaut thing. This is about the cringe self-proclaimed meme lord act he just put on.
You’re such an idiot lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:08:20 UTC No. 16594166
https://x.com/KyleKulinski/status/1
GRIM
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:08:42 UTC No. 16594167
>>16594147
But there is nothing conservative about him.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:09:23 UTC No. 16594168
>>16594163
>act he just put on
If this was unexpected to you in any capacity then you really are a tourist
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:09:28 UTC No. 16594169
>>16594167
If you are a conservative, and things keep changing, eventually you become a reactionary
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:09:37 UTC No. 16594170
>>16594098
He's the ultimate forced meme, the self-unaware forced meme
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:10:41 UTC No. 16594173
>>16594159
Haven’t brought it up before, but I see you sperg out about it all the time
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:12:17 UTC No. 16594176
>>16594171
3 american capacity, or 900 lbs
whichever is lower
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:12:42 UTC No. 16594177
>1000+ posts
I want to believe ess eff gee is alive but i know it's just niggers from /pol/.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:13:27 UTC No. 16594178
>>16594176
>300 lbs is 136 kg
No way, are burgers THAT fat?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:13:54 UTC No. 16594180
>>16594177
please shut the fuck up
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:14:09 UTC No. 16594181
>>16594178
no, we tend to average more around 320 - 350
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:15:34 UTC No. 16594182
They are currently testing towers arms, but who cares about that?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:16:31 UTC No. 16594183
>>16594150
I feel this entire post to the point where I have nothing to add. I can't believe we've gotten to this point.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:16:41 UTC No. 16594184
>>16594177
Well, Elon did call the ISS commander a retard.
I think he's been running a few too many 20 hours days trying to tear out all government corruption simultaneously. The man does have difficulty knowing how and when to moderate
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:18:31 UTC No. 16594186
>>16594171
He won
>>16594177
>/pol/fags even knowing this general exists
Elon is actively losing his marbles on ketamine, read the damn thread. When there's no launches it just becomes Keeping Up With The Musks
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:18:48 UTC No. 16594187
>>16594177
that's just all of 4chan since forever, stormfags ruined 4chan
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:24:04 UTC No. 16594189
The funniest part is that no one here was complaining about calling the eurofag a retard.
It just turned into a frenzied argument about skipping the moon & leaving it for china and the semantics of butch and suni being “stuck”
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:26:39 UTC No. 16594192
>>16593974
Discord melty and mass bans over Elon drama. People return here to discuss.
/sfg/ is healing
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:30:50 UTC No. 16594199
>>16594189
>It just turned into a frenzied argument about skipping the moon & leaving it for china
Who knows with this wack ass administration, people think Jared will be the moderate one but he might just do all of Elon's bidding and force through his Mars obsession goals to detriment of everything else NASA has planned, Artemis etc.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:31:35 UTC No. 16594202
>>16594187
Ruined? You might want to rethink where you are, this site is one of the few places where you can freely call people niggers and faggots, its no surprise this has attracted like minded anons, and even changed the neutral anon into a nigger hating antifaggot. This nostalgic longing for the good old days is beyond retarded, this place only excels at a single thing and thats my ability to call you a full-flow turbonigger
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:31:40 UTC No. 16594203
>>16594184
>Elon did call the ISS commander a retard.
Well, is the commander a retard?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:32:47 UTC No. 16594204
>>16594202
>full-flow turbonigger
That's a half-truth
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:32:55 UTC No. 16594205
>>16594195
why doesnt esa just pay for gateway themselves? its a tiny station.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:40:42 UTC No. 16594209
>>16594208
everyone looks a little bent out of shape
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:45:50 UTC No. 16594213
>>16593996
Fuck you nigger, it's your retarded nigger ass jew government that sided with the commies in ww2, should have helped us shoot them all
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:49:09 UTC No. 16594216
>>16594203
I don't know if I'd call him retarded as much as uninformed. There was a lot of more toxic politics going on than any of us had known about. A few weeks ago 99% of us would have all agreed with the retarded position.
He's European though so he's at least a bit retarded
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:49:34 UTC No. 16594217
>>16594213
many are saying this
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:50:12 UTC No. 16594218
>>16593300
Yes there was
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:58:50 UTC No. 16594224
>>16594208
We should send her up a box of hair dye
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:58:57 UTC No. 16594225
>>16594009
Dok't come here, we already have enough shitskins as there is
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:02:30 UTC No. 16594228
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:03:42 UTC No. 16594229
>>16592498
Space discrimination...
Interesting.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:06:15 UTC No. 16594231
>>16594228
>There are people who think we should keep spending billions just to keep this trash heap going
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:09:56 UTC No. 16594234
You are fully retarded.
SpaceX could have brought them back several months ago.
I OFFERED THIS DIRECTLY to the Biden administration and they refused.
Return WAS pushed back for political reasons.
Idiot.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:10:33 UTC No. 16594236
>>16594234
hes saying the truth
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:12:34 UTC No. 16594240
>>16592970
then just kill yourself, retard
you're going to need to keep coping and seething for 4 more years and then another 4 years
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:13:00 UTC No. 16594242
>>16594234
He was so real for this
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:13:41 UTC No. 16594244
liberals get so fucking mad when people don't run their tweets through a lawyer
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:15:19 UTC No. 16594249
cant wait for this week's flame trench
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:18:24 UTC No. 16594253
>>16592996
>>16592994
>the guy who just fired 100,000 federal employees vs literal who #4
unfortunately elon is not very vindictive
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:19:24 UTC No. 16594255
>>16593005
kill yourself, retard
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:21:07 UTC No. 16594256
>>16593893
lol
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:25:52 UTC No. 16594260
>>16593104
>some fag whose only claim to fame is visiting the ISS starts giving elon shit
>elon will personally fucking deorbit the ISS
I love this fucking timeline so fucking much
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:27:23 UTC No. 16594262
>>16593135
Who do think *controls* the congress? Hello.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:28:27 UTC No. 16594263
>>16593151
kill yourself and also stop posting here
this is the best possible timeline
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:30:16 UTC No. 16594264
>>16594260
I just want to highlight, astronaut or not, it is NEVER the place of a dumb fucking European to question the politics of the situation. America built the Station. America built the vehicles. Elon is the head of the corporation and has intimate knowledge that this stupid euro fuck isn’t privy to. He’s lucky the entire continent of Europe wasn’t just blanket blacklisted from space today with one fell swoop of a pen due to his stupid arrogance to speak up out of turn on such a matter.
I hate Europeans so much it’s unreal.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:31:12 UTC No. 16594265
>>16593261
don't worry
with the way this year is going we'll have anti-EDS missiles in space by June and your troubles will be all over
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:32:18 UTC No. 16594267
>>16593287
>won't be tolerated by the space community
who elected this guy king of the faggots?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:32:28 UTC No. 16594268
>>16594264
Europeans won't have a manned space program after ISS is done and Gateway is cancelled
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:33:11 UTC No. 16594269
>>16594262
Israel
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:35:30 UTC No. 16594270
>>16593637
ugh, my own father got the Tesla version of this for his car. It is the anti-vandalism equivalent of a BLM sticker.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:35:49 UTC No. 16594271
>>16594267
He’s trying to be persuasive and appeal to the heart with pathos. An argument type historically reserved for women and towel boys, which in recent modern times is characteristic of low-testosterone european males. This lost at the ballot box though! Everyone is saying ‘gay’ and ‘retard’ again and even libtard space twitter accounts are making fun of him for trying to police vocabulary
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:37:01 UTC No. 16594272
>>16594270
Hey sorry to tell you but your father is a dork
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:37:59 UTC No. 16594273
>>16593659
that's a TLD for Mars
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:38:23 UTC No. 16594274
>>16594272
the apple clearly doesn't fall far from the second stage which jettisons it
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:38:40 UTC No. 16594275
>>16594196
>this makes my worm logo the BIG worm logo
that's it, I'm now officially going to call engine heat shielding "rocket pantsu"
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:39:23 UTC No. 16594276
>>16593831
the joke is that the ISS doesn't fly to the moon anymore
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:42:43 UTC No. 16594280
>>16594264
based
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:46:18 UTC No. 16594283
>>16594264
>Elon is the head of the corporation and has intimate knowledge that this stupid euro fuck isn’t privy to.
you mean party to?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:46:45 UTC No. 16594284
>>16594275
the guy has a gift lets be honest
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:47:10 UTC No. 16594285
>>16594283
kek yeah
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:47:16 UTC No. 16594286
So you all think… the Elon chimp out today… was good…?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:47:46 UTC No. 16594287
>>16594276
the joke is that it never did
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:50:14 UTC No. 16594289
>>16594286
I was embarrassed and watching it unfold in slow motion at first but now I see how all the people I hate such as kenneth faggot the 4th are seething with steam coming out of their ears so it was obviously a net positive event
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:51:41 UTC No. 16594290
>>16594289
Truthful acting like a smug little fence-sitting prick, I know he’s seething as well
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:54:26 UTC No. 16594291
>>16594286
when Elon takes a shit it's a bigger accomplishment that anything you'll ever do in your whole life
you have zero right to criticize him
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:55:25 UTC No. 16594292
>>16594286
I don't even care enough to watch it but I'm glad it makes you seethe
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:56:25 UTC No. 16594293
as if any of us wouldn't post shit like this given a sufficiently large influence and audience. ffs have some self awareness for once.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:56:42 UTC No. 16594294
>>16594291
than*
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:57:47 UTC No. 16594297
>>16594293
If I were elon i’d be a public noticer and get on trump’s bad side within 24 hrs of naming ze jew
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:59:24 UTC No. 16594298
>>16594286
i dont care just get us the space future that we were promised
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:59:38 UTC No. 16594300
And then butch and suni return home and publicly announce they hate Starliner and that Elon was actually right
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 01:59:40 UTC No. 16594301
>>16594297
what if you really wanted to fly to mars?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:00:16 UTC No. 16594302
>>16594286
He confirmed my thought eight months later so yeah.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:00:43 UTC No. 16594303
>>16594301
I would hire a smart, probably jewish, PR chick and tell her anything I tweet has to go through her lest I get drunk and say something stupid
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:02:28 UTC No. 16594304
>>16594300
Thank you Elon Musk and Donald Trump for bringing us home
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:05:37 UTC No. 16594306
>>16594303
and then quarantine yourself from the internet because you're such a self aware autist, ok. i wouldn't, because i think im pretty smart and dont fucking care.
next level; all these tweets are coming through his PR agent.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:06:50 UTC No. 16594308
>>16594303
Honestly side note but one of musks only fuckups is just assuming the masses would transition to saying “posting on X”
as if “twitter” “tweet” “retweet” weren’t part of the collective zeitgeist for like 15 years. He apparently met mr beast in person, asked if he and his friends called it X, and was consumed when he said no they didn’t call it that
Good example of his tism being a hinderance sometimes
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:08:47 UTC No. 16594310
>>16594306
Gwynne Shotwell herself drafted today’s fully retard tweet
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:09:26 UTC No. 16594311
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:09:49 UTC No. 16594312
I wonder what Bill Nelson is thinking rn
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:12:38 UTC No. 16594314
>>16594312
I hope they don't find my phylactery
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:13:01 UTC No. 16594315
What if Butch and Sunni don't WANT to come back?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:14:28 UTC No. 16594316
Looks like 5 CZ-3B for Q1, highest cadence every for an early year of the launcher, CALT was serious when they announced that 2025-2029 5 years plan would have higher cadence of CZ-3B launches,
That means there could be 400-500 side boosters left to be dropped on chinese villages at least
>>16594300
Suni wanted to ride starliner for return.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:14:48 UTC No. 16594317
>>16594310
>>16594311
havent seen any retarded tweets so far
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:15:50 UTC No. 16594319
>>16594315
who would?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:16:04 UTC No. 16594321
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:18:51 UTC No. 16594323
>>16594321
ask for an image of Bill Nelson as a lich and you just get an image of Bill Nelson
lmao
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:23:54 UTC No. 16594327
>>16594310
mommy is angryyy
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:48:28 UTC No. 16594348
>>16594286
Why are you surprised? This is Elon dicksucking general
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 02:56:13 UTC No. 16594351
>>16594234
Elon was so mad in this exchange I believe him, if he's caught in a gaff he'll say some cringe shit to try to cover for it.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:04:54 UTC No. 16594357
"Our Challenges and Goals
○ Challenge the high-altitude engine shutdown, secondary ignition, and sea-surface hovering of the entire rocket.
○ Validate soft landing and recovery at sea.
○ Adapt to the maritime environment and establish a recovery loop.
○ Lay a solid foundation for the "orbit insertion + recovery" of the Yuanxingzhe-1 carrier rocket."
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:05:59 UTC No. 16594359
elon sisters... when will he stop melting down?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:06:36 UTC No. 16594361
>>16594357
Space Epoch:
The Yuanxingzhe No. 1 verification rocket sea recovery test is ready to go!
The Yuanxingzhe No. 1 verification rocket-my country's first 4200 full-size stainless steel rocket sea soft landing recovery test is waiting to set sail!
The starry sky is boundless, the traveler has no boundaries, and the exploration is endless. On the road of innovation and challenge, we have never stopped, and always strive for higher goals!
The road to the starship, subverting innovation, pursuing the ultimate, the rocket life!
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/bUhV7b2p
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:07:54 UTC No. 16594362
>>16594361
Test 2 months ago
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:10:12 UTC No. 16594363
>>16594357
Also
>No control surfaces
>Planned mid trajectory shutdown of engine and restart
It's gonna tumble so hard, at least it's close to inhabited areas so we should see it.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:15:06 UTC No. 16594367
>>16594359
I'm not going to sugarcoat it.
The mumbling incoherently with big sunglasses on indoors is not a good look.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:21:51 UTC No. 16594372
>>16592994
This guy should be required to live at his workplace for a year
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:23:55 UTC No. 16594375
>>16594130
>Elon removed from SpaceX
>owns 40% of the company
>has 70%+ voting stake in the company
these low research people are truly retarded.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:27:08 UTC No. 16594381
>>16594357
>>16594361
dafaq is up with those fins?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:29:13 UTC No. 16594382
>>16594381
that's what all fins used to look like until americans discovered the arcane russian practice of grid fins
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:29:57 UTC No. 16594383
>>16594381
Are you familiar with cargo culting?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:30:01 UTC No. 16594384
>>16594382
uhh, not all fins have ridges like a potato chip
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:31:07 UTC No. 16594387
>>16594384
those are corrugations, like cardboard. very strong, like china
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:31:41 UTC No. 16594389
So, what happened today? I missed the last 10 hours
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:37:06 UTC No. 16594392
>>16594357
>>16594361
Alibaba funding this shit and expecting to use it for rapid parcel delivery gives me zero hope that this rocket can ever become viable.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:44:20 UTC No. 16594394
>>16594389
it turns out legalizing comedy was a mistake
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:45:37 UTC No. 16594395
>>16594389
>he wasn't party to the discussions today
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:49:50 UTC No. 16594398
>>16594395
kekt
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:51:31 UTC No. 16594399
>>16594389
everybody crashed out, got melty, ultimately malding, coping, seething, until cooked, mogged, ratioed, and put on suicide watch. total diaperpilled spergout.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:51:32 UTC No. 16594400
>>16594312
Probably hoping Trump and Musk don't rip up the Artemis Accords, he went to all those countries to sign them all up lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:53:36 UTC No. 16594401
>>16594312
>where am i? who am i? who are you?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:09:31 UTC No. 16594409
>>16594389
Everybody is mad
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:12:06 UTC No. 16594412
>>16594389
Starship 8 next week
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:18:20 UTC No. 16594417
>>16594389
Elon got called out on his lies, went full retard continuing to go against easily available facts, was dunked on for it, had a grade a melty and then went on stage visibly pumped full of whatever drugs he takes.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:21:27 UTC No. 16594418
>This is literally Masonic NWO shit using a refurbished Apollo Mission scheme. Seems much more likely they fake an alien touchdown on Earth than trying to CGI a Mars outpost, then again maybe Project StarGate is going to use $600 billion to render a Mars outpost using AI
Daily reminder no matter how stupid you think they are, /pol/tards are 10x stupider than that. Really no point in trying to ever convince these people.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:32:29 UTC No. 16594425
>>16594418
It occurred to me the other day that when there is a self sustaining city of a million people on Mars, there will still be a guy in a doublewide that thinks it's fake.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:34:43 UTC No. 16594427
>>16594425
And a guy on Mars who thinks Earth is fake.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:35:04 UTC No. 16594428
>>16594425
Yeah but that guy will be utterly unimportant to spaceflight
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:41:40 UTC No. 16594432
>>16594427
imagine
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:43:22 UTC No. 16594433
>>16594427
I think this and I'm on Earth
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:04:36 UTC No. 16594440
>>16594310
Mommy is angry
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:05:45 UTC No. 16594442
this thread has 3k posts it lags my phone
make a new one
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:08:31 UTC No. 16594444
>>16594440
I don't get why Elon doesn't marry her
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:10:31 UTC No. 16594445
>all this talk about Elon in the 3rd person
You do know he reads this place, right? If you have something to say address him directly.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:15:40 UTC No. 16594446
>>16594445
Elon why haven't you fucked Gwynne
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:19:06 UTC No. 16594449
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:24:00 UTC No. 16594454
>>16594444
Because she isn't a whore
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:26:05 UTC No. 16594455
why doesn't elon hire someone who's actually good at tweeting the way he does for vidya
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:29:05 UTC No. 16594456
>>16594455
Tweeting is important
Video games are not
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:35:16 UTC No. 16594458
i feel like elon's gonna pop soon
im looking forward to it
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:35:55 UTC No. 16594459
this fucking passenger needs to learn his place
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:59:14 UTC No. 16594470
>>16594469
Lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:16:23 UTC No. 16594474
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:20:49 UTC No. 16594475
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:20:56 UTC No. 16594476
>>16594469
quality pod racing
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:33:03 UTC No. 16594481
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/18927
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:34:10 UTC No. 16594483
>>16594182
I think Flight 9 could be a ship catch if all goes well this time.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:36:01 UTC No. 16594487
>>16594205
The ESA, and Europe as a whole, is perpetually 10-15 years behind the West.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:37:01 UTC No. 16594490
>>16593261
>$200M cost, whoever it is paid by
Is that how much it always costs to launch a Dragon mission regardless of specific mission factors? For all we know, SpaceX was prepared to offer NASA a significant discount for this alleged rescue mission proposal, and it's possible Musk would have been willing to pay for it out of his own pocket if he really thought it would give a boost to Trump's election chances.
>leaves the station understaffed for up to half a year because no Crew Dragon is available for Crew-9 anymore, as Freedom is used for this mission, Endeavour is up there for Crew-8, Resilience is modified for Polaris Dawn, and Endurance is still in processing after Crew-7
Is there any good public info about how long it takes SpaceX to refurbish Dragons for the next mission? Keep in mind that they're preparing to launch Fram2 on Resilience as early as next month, which would be only six months after it got back from Polaris Dawn. If we're to assume that's a feasible Dragon refurb/prep time, then Endurance could have been ready to bring Butch & Suni back at least as early as September.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:39:08 UTC No. 16594491
>>16594228
I love the ISS but it's time for her to go, and time for a shake-up at NASA headquarters.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:39:21 UTC No. 16594492
>>16594445
Elon why haven't you picked up the Plasma Magnet Sail for a test you stupid double niggerfaggot
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:12:00 UTC No. 16594502
Elon, I am your biggest fan
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:33:53 UTC No. 16594517
Can someone explain what happened today, I'm not on twitter
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:34:53 UTC No. 16594518
>>16594517
elon got mad
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:35:35 UTC No. 16594519
>>16594517
some eurodweeb making stupid comments
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:37:18 UTC No. 16594521
>>16594518
what did he get mad about?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:38:40 UTC No. 16594523
>>16594517
well, tranny melty poopy and i ate the shit yummy tummy
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:38:53 UTC No. 16594524
>>16594502
SAAAR I AM THE NEEDFUL I SHOW YOU MANY BOBS AND VAGENE PLEASE GIVE H1B VISA SAAR
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:39:15 UTC No. 16594525
>>16594485
spooky action at a distance
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:40:18 UTC No. 16594526
>>16594524
vile racism is not tolerated here
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:41:55 UTC No. 16594528
>>16594521
he says biden delayed bringing back the boeing astronauts for political reasons and nobody believes him.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:37:11 UTC No. 16594558
https://x.com/StationCDRKelly/statu
Why is it "beyond the pale" to call someone a Retard but fine to call them a liar?
Or is it that elon can be called anything amd that is fine, but astronauts are somehow sacred
We are far beyond the days of apollo
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:51:57 UTC No. 16594566
>>16594558
It hurts retards feelings
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:52:53 UTC No. 16594567
Every time you whine about Musk, the ISS deoebit gets a day closer
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:12:30 UTC No. 16594576
nasa spent close to a billion dollars to develop a "deorbit" vehicle for the iss when it deorbits normally on its own?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:13:03 UTC No. 16594577
>>16594558
That guy didn't call Elon retard did he? Elon was the one having a woman moment because someone disagreed with him.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:16:35 UTC No. 16594580
>>16594577
you are fully an idiot and a retard
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:19:42 UTC No. 16594582
>>16594580
Stop posting, Elon
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:20:37 UTC No. 16594583
>>16594576
If F9 2nd stage managed to not burn up completely, imagine if ISS drops on a city
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:39:21 UTC No. 16594596
>>16594577
he called elon a liar and elon called him a retard
why is calling someone a retard like the worst thing ever, but calling someone liar (with limited information) is just fine?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:42:17 UTC No. 16594597
>>16594596
>calling someone a retard
sign of seething. Loss of ability to provide a counterargument and thus the need to resort to authority and decrying of another's character. Not relevant to a discussion and a sure indicator of low self-control.
>calling out a lie
observation of inconsistency in provided statements compared to known facts. Questioning any narrative is rational and adult behavior. Very relevant to the topic.
at the end of the day, Elon got butthurt mad that no one except a few indians believed him and lashed out at the astronaut. On the other hand, the astronaut was unnecessarily self confident. If he had any source other than dude trust me, then he sure as hell failed to provide it. Finally, he didn't call Elon a liar, he called his statements a lie. If you can't understand the difference between the two, then you really shouldn't be discussing this event.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:45:29 UTC No. 16594598
>Designed, built and tested. Pending regulatory approval, we are Go for flight.
Isar Aerospace finally left the basement
Pretty video in the post
https://x.com/isaraerospace/status/
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:45:44 UTC No. 16594601
>>16594597
Elon might be privy to a bit more information, that is the point
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:48:49 UTC No. 16594604
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:50:45 UTC No. 16594606
>>16594485
How high does this fucker get? Thats at least MEO, maybe GEO
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:52:18 UTC No. 16594607
>>16594601
you mean party to?
information is worthless when the person is biased. Surely you understand how this applies to Elon?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:54:55 UTC No. 16594608
Elon sisters we are done... It's so over...
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:58:06 UTC No. 16594609
>>16594607
The lifetime of the ISS just got a week shorter
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:00:03 UTC No. 16594610
>>16594607
also no, I didn't mean that because I was specificlly talking about the information itself, not the discussion where this information came to be
there is a lot of supporting evidence for what Musk said, the Biden admin has been extremely hostile towards Musk and his companies
delaying the return for a number of months is the least they (allegedly) did during the last few years
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:01:04 UTC No. 16594611
the ISS should become a test target for the Iron Dome
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:04:09 UTC No. 16594613
privy to (something) and being a party to (discussions) are two entirely different idioms/phrases, both used quite widely and correct
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:09:14 UTC No. 16594617
>>16594610
>delaying to a date when Biden is not a president anymore makes sense
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:12:23 UTC No. 16594619
>>16594617
you are fully retarded
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:15:22 UTC No. 16594622
>>16594619
No u
Please tell me why would it matter and don't tell me it's because they thought Kamala would be president which is retarded.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:19:38 UTC No. 16594624
>>16594597
>Finally, he didn't call Elon a liar, he called his statements a lie
This sounds like an ESL thing
Calling someone's statement a "lie" implies that person is deliberately lying
That's very rude
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:24:34 UTC No. 16594626
>>16594507
Did they not already have one?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:35:22 UTC No. 16594632
>>16594630
retards assemble!
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:47:12 UTC No. 16594641
>>16594610
>also no, I didn't mean that because I was specificlly talking about the information itself, not the discussion where this information came to be
that was a joke. We had some guy earlier sperging out about which one is correct.
>the Biden admin has been extremely hostile towards Musk
that's true and I haven't seen anyone here deny that. However, in this particular case, evidence and common sense suggest Musk to be wrong or lying. see >>16593261 and https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/
>>16594624
If you can't even grasp the difference between attacking someone's statement and their character then you really need to get tested for aspergers. Look, if the guy had called Elon a liar then it would very much be an EDS tier insult and a poor one at that. The fact that he limited his objection merely to Elon's statement shows that the astronaut only had problems with that statement alone. Nuance matters in adult conversations. You only need to look at the following post(https://x.com/Astro_Andreas/st
>Elon, I have long admired you and what you have accomplished, especially at SpaceX and Tesla.
>You know as well as I do, that Butch and Suni are returning with Crew-9, as has been the plan since last September. Even now, you are not sending up a rescue ship to bring them home. They are returning on the Dragon capsule that has been on ISS since last September.
in fact, even if we assume that Musk is correct and biden personally intervened to delay the return, it still doesn't make sense to call this a rescue. Even before crew 9 docked, there was the capsule from crew dragon 8 on the station which would have taken the everyone back to earth in case of an emergency.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:47:28 UTC No. 16594642
>>16594622
its few months before the election, takes a month or something to prepare and launch the capsule, the return would happen right before election
this would give SpaceX good PR and by extension Musk and by extension help Trumps campaign as Musk was already campaigning for him at this point or at least had Musk had endorsed Trump
after the election it doesn't matter either way for this current election that is happening
the incentives seem very clear to me and there is clear and multiple precedents from the previous years of the Biden admin fucking with Musk as well
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:50:18 UTC No. 16594645
>>16594641
>(note the last three paragraphs and remember how risk averse nuNASA is)
I have no doubt the contigency plan or whatever else could have been set into motion months ago or even like two weeks after the Starliner disaster
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:51:25 UTC No. 16594647
>>16594641
if you say someone is lying, you are simultaneously calling them a liar i.e. saying that they are willfully saying something that is not true
that is, a liar
there is no difference in calling someone a liar or saying that they told a lie
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:05:30 UTC No. 16594656
>>16594641
>that's true and I haven't seen anyone here deny that
>>16594642
>clear and multiple precedents from the previous years of the Biden admin fucking with Musk as well
The Biden admin was largely indifferent about Musk. Biden disliked him for his anti-union stance, but overall most of the things people claim to be fucking with him are just Musk or his companies moving too fast or breaking things and rightfully getting dinged for it. Buttigieg even slapped the FAA for them once.
The one actual political move was denying the RDOF funding early.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:07:02 UTC No. 16594658
>>16594656
please
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:10:15 UTC No. 16594661
>>16594645
>contingency plan
if I understand correctly, this isn't referencing the ""stranding"" but the issues with the OG crew dragon 10 capsule. The two astronauts were supposed to return this month but that got delayed because of spaceX(ironic). The contingency is swapping it with another capsule and that is precisely what is going to happen. Because if NASA waited for C213 to get fixed, the return would get delayed even more and the rations would approach depletion. There is currently only one capsule(+soyuz) docked, so it can only return in an emergency with every astronaut on the station.
>>16594647
you have autism and will never understand what I am talking about. There is nothing more for us to discuss.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:35:41 UTC No. 16594674
>>16594052
>>16594091
https://youtu.be/Dr8REfoxAFU?si=3Jb
talking about stranded astronauts at the timestamp
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:40:05 UTC No. 16594678
>>16594661
that wasn't my point
something could have been arranged 6 months ago if they really wanted, pushing back some axiom flight or whatever the fuck for instance
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:53:34 UTC No. 16594691
>>16594678
sure they could have done that and fucked with every following mission/schedule. But what for? The astronauts weren't stranded without a way out so all it would achieve is give Trump a very minor political win. That's corruption and supposedly the very thing DOGE is fighting against. There's no logical reason to do it so naturally NASA didn't want to do it and instead incorporated the return into future flights. It would have been wasteful to do it any other way.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:00:32 UTC No. 16594696
>>16593287
lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:09:01 UTC No. 16594701
>>16594699
I'm looking forward to leftie meltie over this
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:09:10 UTC No. 16594702
>>16594395
how dare you
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:10:16 UTC No. 16594703
>>16594425
Devon Islanders!
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:14:49 UTC No. 16594705
>>16594517
some astronaut was acting retarded in the privy and elon called him out for being an idiot. absolute storm in a teamug as usual
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:16:57 UTC No. 16594708
>>16594604
aw so cute. what a nice ickle spaceportling, its even got a wickle boosterli
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:17:59 UTC No. 16594710
>>16594517
Elon took too much ketamine
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:25:01 UTC No. 16594714
>>16594699
kanye's replacement
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:25:15 UTC No. 16594715
>>16593740
Switch solar and venus balloon cities.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:25:29 UTC No. 16594716
>>16594674
He's so clearly tweaking out
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:27:26 UTC No. 16594717
>>16594714
man he hit the wall like a truck. Don't do drugs, kids. Or you will have to go up on stage with cringe sunglasses to hide your bloodshot eyes
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:51:29 UTC No. 16594730
>>16594726
hello newfag
/sfg/ is the reason that /sci/ has a 350 image limit
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:57:04 UTC No. 16594734
>>16594730
I thought it was 250? wtf
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:58:10 UTC No. 16594735
>>16594558
>Why is it "beyond the pale" to call someone a Retard
Euphemism treadmill.
The absolute most retarded human social tendency.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:04:56 UTC No. 16594738
>>16594734
it's the same as whatever limit /a/ has
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:08:19 UTC No. 16594740
>>16594517
trannies melty day
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:11:09 UTC No. 16594742
now that the US is pulling out of europe in order to help reduce the deficit, will ESA get budget cuts because EU economies have to actually start funding a military now?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:12:47 UTC No. 16594743
>>16594604
They're going to launch before RFA, aren't they?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:14:44 UTC No. 16594746
>>16594742
possibly, they'd have to cut a lot of welfare and to pay for their defense, it may even break EU itself
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:19:10 UTC No. 16594749
>>16594742
EU states can no more remilitarize than you could turn yourself back to a child by wishing it really hard. The martial spirit has totally gone.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:27:29 UTC No. 16594754
>>16594606
>How high does this fucker get?
I'm sorry, are you talking about the ISS or Elon?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:27:46 UTC No. 16594755
>>16594606
I don't know if we ever pinned down the orbital elements after it did its maneuver test, but it's probably still close to being on a GTO equivilant trajectory.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:34:17 UTC No. 16594760
>>16594749
russian cope: the post
rheinmetall alone produces more shells every year than your backwater excuse of a nation did since the start of 3 day SMO
Hell, this might even kick the politicans into gear and make them fund space shit more as USA is becoming increasingly unreliable in that aspect.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:36:08 UTC No. 16594763
>>16594755
This is the highest altitude achieved by a reusable vehicle, right?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:37:37 UTC No. 16594764
>>16594760
back to your safe space /k/atamite
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:38:16 UTC No. 16594765
https://x.com/AndrewParsonson/statu
>2nd flight of ArianeGroup 6 has been postponed. No new launch date has been shared yet.
>“Due to further operations needed on a ground means, the launch initially planned on February 26 from Kourou, French Guiana, is postponed.”
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:38:24 UTC No. 16594766
>>16594764
Fuck back off to /pol/, tankie
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:38:52 UTC No. 16594768
>>16594764
>immediate spergout
likewise, /pol/ nigger
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:38:57 UTC No. 16594769
>>16594765
B U D G E T C U T S
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:39:53 UTC No. 16594770
>>16594765
Shocking.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:45:07 UTC No. 16594779
>>16594763
Technically. Orion is supposed to be reusable, but the capsule from Artemis 1 is going to be used for ground training work instead of being reflown and there's a lot of arguing we could have on Orion's reusability vs. refurbishability.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:45:21 UTC No. 16594780
>>16594765
kourou is what you get from eating human brains
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:45:34 UTC No. 16594781
>>16594229
don't worry, they made up later
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:50:02 UTC No. 16594786
>>16594779
If you're going to count capsules, the Dragon series have already been reused quite a bit.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:52:30 UTC No. 16594788
>>16594779
I wonder what the TPS on the X-37 could take.
Lunar reentry?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:52:36 UTC No. 16594789
>>16594769
>>16594770
>>16594780
It's probably related to this. A downlink antenna up in Newfoundland got KO'ed by high winds
https://la1ere.francetvinfo.fr/sain
>Released recently in anticipation of the second launch of Ariane 6, the infrastructure has not resisted the gusts which reached up to 78 knots or 145 kilometers/hours.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:57:38 UTC No. 16594793
>>16594726
but where do they shit?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:58:49 UTC No. 16594796
>>16594789
>complex space launches that cost billions can easily be defeated by tipping over an antenna
wtf is europe doing
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:02:57 UTC No. 16594803
>>16594789
>>16594796
This is the critical infrastructure that Europe depends on? What is that shit anyway, two guys and a pickup truck dropped an old satellite TV dish from the 80s?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:03:10 UTC No. 16594804
>>16594789
It was actually me. I live in fortune and went to saint pierre and kicked the dish over myself using the wind as cover.
I'm currently on the ferry going back, those frogs won't suspect a thing.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:04:12 UTC No. 16594806
>>16594597
>you can't just call someone a retard when they're being a retard
shut the fuck up, retard
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:06:09 UTC No. 16594808
>>16594789
>A downlink antenna up in Newfoundland
BLAME CANADA
As if the French needed another reason to hate Quebec
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:11:17 UTC No. 16594810
>>16594789
>>16594808
>anons think st.pierre and miquelon are a part of canada
Boy the french would be seething hard to hear this.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:15:26 UTC No. 16594813
>>16594786
They don't go to near-GTO
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:22:43 UTC No. 16594818
>>16594789
euro space aspirations foiled by failed BUD. i could probably hike out there and fix it for free before they pull their thumbs out of their asses and spend 9000 million leafbucks on the project.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:24:09 UTC No. 16594819
I hate europe so much!
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:25:33 UTC No. 16594822
>>16594819
t: european
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:36:11 UTC No. 16594835
>>16594796
holy shit, spaceX was an european company all along???
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:37:08 UTC No. 16594837
>>16594833
This would be fucking awesome
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:38:19 UTC No. 16594838
>>16594833
is this why elon killed artemis?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:39:38 UTC No. 16594839
>>16594835
>imagine having a imagine saved on your computer
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:41:46 UTC No. 16594843
>>16594839
I'll let you try writing that one more time
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:46:26 UTC No. 16594846
>>16594833
A glancing blow to the moon that showers earth with ejecta [math]\unicode{x1F91E}[/math]
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:48:16 UTC No. 16594850
>>16594845
I’m one of them, but I keep quiet lest I rouse the pro H1B autist
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:49:16 UTC No. 16594851
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:50:12 UTC No. 16594852
>>16594850
>one of them
you're the only one sperging out about this constantly though.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:51:15 UTC No. 16594854
>>16594849
https://x.com/DrPhiltill/status/189
>>16594851
both are former NASA employees
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:52:05 UTC No. 16594856
>>16594845
It’s probably just for domestic production. In any case, Elon has his priorities straight: Mars, always Mars, only Mars
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:53:30 UTC No. 16594857
>>16594558
lefties don't want to engage on Biden delaying the return for political reasons so they are trying to scold Elon on language
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:54:04 UTC No. 16594858
>>16594856
the article is about musk slobering jeet cock though, not about mars
so the correct version is: India, always India, only India
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:55:45 UTC No. 16594860
>>16594854
Does he mean orion?
He can't possibly believe orion is cutting edge right?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:57:30 UTC No. 16594863
>>16594641
>I'm accusing you of lying but I'm not calling you a liar.
Weasel words.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:58:11 UTC No. 16594864
no has explained to me yet how firing all government employees hired two years ago or sooner is supposed to help anything when the issues have already been present for a decade if not longer.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:59:43 UTC No. 16594867
>>16594864
downsize then reform then perhaps build back up if that makes sense
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:00:30 UTC No. 16594871
>>16594860
Interesting. Kek if not Orion then who knows. He’s explicitly calling out commercial, so it isn’t adjacent to rocket lab’s or blue’s rumored crewed vehicles. And nothing else is in the pipeline, as far as I’m aware, unless NASA has a secret division (which they don’t) where they’re studying some manned X-37c or dreamchaser or something “—but those too would be more commercial than not
lol maybe Boeing is handing off Starliner to NASA and is just planning on transferring it to another company or something.
Anyways yeah I think he means Orion. Old guards at NASA consider it “cutting edge” despite being 20 years old lol
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:00:33 UTC No. 16594872
>>16594864
Well, for starters, your cunt lost.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:01:40 UTC No. 16594874
>>16594863
>missing the point this badly
No no, he's right. You should try socializing more. And no, internet doesn't count.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:02:46 UTC No. 16594876
>>16594872
lil niggy having a stroke over here
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:06:06 UTC No. 16594879
>>16594850
>he was roused anyway
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:06:40 UTC No. 16594880
>>16594879
kek
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:07:38 UTC No. 16594883
If it meant that a permanent self-sufficient mars city was built 1 day earlier, I would fill the United States with 100 million Indians
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:07:59 UTC No. 16594884
>>16594883
Hello Elon
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:08:54 UTC No. 16594886
>>16594883
It doesn't though lol
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:09:22 UTC No. 16594887
>>16594860
>>16594871
The only alternative I could think of is that he means launch vehicle but that would be even worse for him.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:10:20 UTC No. 16594889
>>16594883
Even if it meant delaying a Mars city by yet another decade I would ban all Indians from ever being able to visit or settle these united states
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:11:02 UTC No. 16594891
>>16594871
Cutting edge at NASA means it's running windows 7
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:11:21 UTC No. 16594892
>Spaceflight?
8 minutes until the next Starlink launch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meW
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:12:25 UTC No. 16594893
>>16594889
Yeah Elon can say all he wants about "consciousness" but if that consciousness is housed in a street shitter then I'm out
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:12:26 UTC No. 16594894
>>16594891
To be fair, windows 7 is unironically cutting edge compared to the slop microsoft is currently pushing out the door. I’m not even being hyperbolic. Shit is getting less functional and more annoying to use these days
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:13:10 UTC No. 16594896
>>16594892
clear status?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:14:42 UTC No. 16594897
>>16594896
https://x.com/clearusui/status/1892
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:15:17 UTC No. 16594898
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1BRJjmbn
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:15:53 UTC No. 16594899
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:16:28 UTC No. 16594900
>>16594897
unironically based ria
still, no clear no watch
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:18:51 UTC No. 16594903
>>16594899
Breaking news: japs discover that world-altering programs and cutting edge departments are intimately intertwined with politics.
The collective japanese psyche have forgotten this after the fall to their grandparents’ global empire
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:19:29 UTC No. 16594904
UH OH
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:20:21 UTC No. 16594905
A Indian needs to be housed at every household in America
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:20:37 UTC No. 16594906
ohnonono falcon bros
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:21:12 UTC No. 16594907
it’s over
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:21:12 UTC No. 16594908
>>16594860
>3 programs
Minesweeper, Solitaire, AND Firefox?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:23:25 UTC No. 16594910
I can't believe elon sharted on stream!
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:24:08 UTC No. 16594912
F9 boosters continue to mog the world.
Meanwhile, whoever is in charge of quality control for falcon second stages shall be skinned, quartered, and publicly displayed for all to see as a lesson in laziness
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:25:53 UTC No. 16594914
>>16594906
but seriously, I thought I saw a bright flash a few seconds before first stage shutdown. Engine anomaly or just gimbaling or a sun reflection?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:27:41 UTC No. 16594916
Another happy landing
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:28:08 UTC No. 16594918
it's that easy in rocket land-ery
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:29:08 UTC No. 16594919
Merlin engines are the true workhorse of the world
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:29:32 UTC No. 16594920
>>16594918
source?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:31:14 UTC No. 16594921
>>16594920
SLC-40
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:33:35 UTC No. 16594923
>>16594920
elong
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:35:44 UTC No. 16594926
>>16594923
Don’t show RFK the ISS MRE meals, he’ll shut the entire station down
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:35:47 UTC No. 16594927
100 million Indians might decrease the standard of living of the US, but that is a sacrifice I'm willing to make (I don't live in the US)
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:36:20 UTC No. 16594928
>>16594860
probably some fundamental research that may or may not be useful in a few decades
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:37:56 UTC No. 16594931
>>16594929
If you’re going through this much trouble, just build a nuclear orion ship
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:42:21 UTC No. 16594935
>>16594730
try posting an image now then dummy
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:45:24 UTC No. 16594936
/sfg/ - spaceflight general
fully retarded edition
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:45:33 UTC No. 16594937
nuclear powered cubesat carrier forward deployed to the jovian system
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:47:00 UTC No. 16594938
stage it
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:47:30 UTC No. 16594939
solar powered neptune explorer
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:47:34 UTC No. 16594940
>>16594934
>2056
Hopefully we will be soon able to do a Saturn direct and then a Earth direct from Saturn with such a huge payload
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:48:51 UTC No. 16594941
Astral projection centauri mission
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:49:04 UTC No. 16594943
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:50:20 UTC No. 16594945
>>16594943
>jeetcraft
delet, try again
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:50:45 UTC No. 16594947
>>16594943
Are you fucking serious
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:51:47 UTC No. 16594950
>>16594947
its a good thread sir
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:52:54 UTC No. 16594951
>>16594943
you cannot stage with a turd
elon said nah, trump said hell nah!
kai trump was lusted after, but after careful consideration, decided to NOT send bobs to Indians
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:53:19 UTC No. 16594953
>>16594947
>one day and 21 hours
jannies must have been busy pruning threads lately
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:54:15 UTC No. 16594954
>>16594943
>page 8
You retarded idiot.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:54:50 UTC No. 16594955
>>16594954
image limit, newfriend
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:55:23 UTC No. 16594957
>>16594953
Jannies union when?
Organized labor is key to democracy
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:01:52 UTC No. 16594962
last post before it's archived
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:02:47 UTC No. 16594965
wrong
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:05:05 UTC No. 16594968
>>16594965
indeed
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:05:47 UTC No. 16594970
fuck you
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:07:06 UTC No. 16594974
faggot
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:08:33 UTC No. 16594977
elon just shat on scott kelly >>16594972
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:08:41 UTC No. 16594979
>>16594819
Kike.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:08:51 UTC No. 16594980
>>16594974
retard
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:11:26 UTC No. 16594984
>>16594929
>>16594932
>>16594933
>>16594934
>dumping random images in order to bring the thread to image limit just to be OP of the next thread
absolutely desperate
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:14:02 UTC No. 16594989
>>16594984
>getting this shitter shattered that you didn't get OP
lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:15:30 UTC No. 16594993
>>16594934
>2056
Oldspace boomers need to hang themselves NOW
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:20:11 UTC No. 16595004
>>16594977
Musk just won the internetz! Or should I say, XERNET LMFAO
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:35:18 UTC No. 16595178
>>16594894
win7 was probably the best thing they ever did. ive still got it on a partition.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:47:56 UTC No. 16595329
>>16593759
Hell sell it to Europe / JAXA
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:53:01 UTC No. 16595340
>>16594230
asking the real questions
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:54:26 UTC No. 16595344
>>16594485
Amazed they let this photo out.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:56:22 UTC No. 16595347
>>16595344
They did it on purpose to flex on the Chinese.
>apogee this high, WITH aerobraking for plane changes or return to LEO
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:07:54 UTC No. 16595380
threads should not end this quickly. we need to reuse threads and get them back into service faster. discarding threads after only a single use isn't right
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Feb 2025 00:05:23 UTC No. 16595733
>>16593391
new shepard is dumb and a waste of time
I'm not going to space until I have a credible chance of dropping rocks on earthnoids
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Feb 2025 05:07:54 UTC No. 16595938
>>16594984
Discord loves to circle jerk these threads into oblivion.