Image not available

1280x720

maxresdefault (9).jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16085356

>getting filtered hard by fractions
my dreams...
Time to give up on physics?


Image not available

1024x1024

_20f204ab-a6bc-48....jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16085305

I'm scared of the singularity. What happens after that? Just a single unified conscience existing in an empty universe? Maybe start expanding like a cancer through the cosmos?


Image not available

207x350

DoorsMetalSingle0....jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16085285

In english or hindi can you tell me why pi x 2 is not equal to 7?


Image not available

1024x1024

DALLΒ·E 2024-03-19....png

🧡 And to complete the masterpiece

Anonymous No. 16085276

Two undiscovered phenomena has been determined to exist! And both in dirt has been determined to.

From GPT: Microorganisms in minerals AND soil based electromagnetic phenomena.


Gpt: Experiment 1: Microbial-Mineral Interactions

1. Sample Collection: Collect soil samples from various locations with different mineral compositions and microbial populations.
2. Experimental Setup:
a. Prepare sterile containers filled with soil from each sample location.
b. Inoculate each container with a standardized microbial culture.
c. Monitor environmental conditions such as temperature, moisture, and pH.
3. Observation and Measurements:
a. Regularly measure microbial growth and activity using techniques like microbial counting, metabolic assays, and genetic analysis.
b. Analyze changes in mineral composition using techniques like X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and chemical analysis.
4. Data Analysis: Correlate microbial activity with changes in mineral composition to identify potential interactions or feedback mechanisms.

Experiment 2: Soil Electromagnetic Phenomena

1. Site Selection: Choose sites with varying soil compositions and geological features.
2. Instrument Setup:
a. Install electromagnetic sensors (e.g., magnetometers, electric field sensors) at multiple depths in the soil.
b. Set up weather monitoring stations to record environmental parameters.
3. Data Collection:
a. Continuously record electromagnetic data and environmental parameters over an extended period.
b. Collect data during different weather conditions and times of day to identify variations.
4. Analysis:
a. Analyze electromagnetic data to identify any patterns or anomalies.
b. Correlate electromagnetic data with environmental parameters to understand potential influencing factors.
5. Hypothesis Testing: Formulate hypotheses based on observed patterns and design follow-up experiments if necessary to validate findings.


Image not available

500x313

fallout-new-vegas....jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16085269

Would the world really become Fallout: New Vegas if a nuclear war happened right now?


Image not available

620x675

F6nmUD_bMAAW3kO.png

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16085219

>Ah, confusing me with a frequentist, are you? Adorable. You see, while they're all about those p-values, I, a proud Bayesian, rely on my personal beliefs to transform even the simplest data into staunch defenders of my cause. It's the art of Bayesian inference, something those traditionalists just can't appreciate.
Why are they like this?


Image not available

800x789

Science1.png

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16085201

Every single study is useless because it pre selects people who would participate in studies


Image not available

800x645

OwO.png

🧡 Another success for the peer review system!

Anonymous No. 16085171

https://www.vice.com/en/article/dy3jbz/scientific-journal-frontiers-publishes-ai-generated-rat-with-gigantic-penis-in-worrying-incident
My faith in academia is so high right now!


Image not available

1079x1383

Screenshot_202403....jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16085126

How long before countries start growing babies in artificial wombs to offset the fact that women won't have kids anymore.


Image not available

630x315

Floating-and-Sink....png

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16085112

you know, buoyancy makes more sense than things magically wanting to go down


Image not available

812x349

classified.png

🧡 Why aren't you a quant?

Anonymous No. 16085042

You do have unpublished work in high dimensional statistical inference that you can use to make money in the markets, right /sci/?


Image not available

2902x1698

icarus.png

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16085038

> fly up towards the sun
> it gets hotter and wings melt
Were ancient greeks stupid?


Image not available

300x250

QAOOKyRznW-4.png

🧡 An idea that can end dentistry and toothbrush forever

Anonymous No. 16085019

Simply having a flexible cover in the mouth except for the tongue with the right material protecting the teeth from tooth decay and mixed with a metal that inhibits bacteria growth in the mouth can make you never visit the dentist again!!!
Dentists refute my idea, please...


Image not available

500x575

IMG_1825.jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16084985

Euclid's Elements


Image not available

976x850

1560942389986.jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16084955

>quantum foam


Image not available

716x716

170918606714.png

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Universe

Anonymous No. 16084927

is 26.7 gorillion years old.


Image not available

564x664

1704133159906201.png

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Barkon No. 16084913

Thank you sci for being here for me.


Image not available

1410x972

file.png

🧡 ABC-Conjecture proven

Anonymous No. 16084895

https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.10430
>Throws out Mochizuki's machinery and reproves all of Mochizuki's key results using existing theory.
>Other mathematicians say it's much easier to understand.
>Proves different versions of the most problematic corollary and then shows that you can sidestep it for many results.
>Mochizuki and his crew have gone radio silent.
>Scholze made some butthurt sounding mathoverflow comment in the past saying it hadn't (at the time) disproven his claim.
It's still only a draft version for comments but it could finally settle the question of the proof of the ABC theorem.


Image not available

225x225

images - 2024-03-....jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16084871

If flywheels can shoot like bullets why not use flywheels instead of bullets?


Image not available

800x874

1680871614769893.png

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16084836

What does /sci/ think of Open Individualism and similar ideas? I think this is probably the best theory of consciousness.


Image not available

1100x730

1709935888864.png

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16084808

Is this normal, scientifically speaking?


Image not available

350x340

1707384662274106.png

🧡 Untitled Thread

Barkon No. 16084732

It's obvious why IQ is a hoax, so I have no need to explain. Let's instead focus on the conspiracy in our world where people say that it is legitimate. Who did this? Isn't it bad for science? Are people just in this for the pleasurable life and are using dumb people against dumb people to suppress any smart people? Most people on sci are dumb and they compete against dumb people saying dumb things like 'take the vax' and if you're smart and you at least try to make a difference your voice is lost in the stupidity of it all. At the end of the day, you're filtered out by the egos of the stupid weak people either pleasuring or helping others pleasure from this evil truism.


Image not available

2154x3331

Ronald-Fisher-fro....jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 STATISTICS

Anonymous No. 16084722

HELP!!! Statistics is kicking my ass.
What book should I pick up on statistics to get the theory and the procedure. I want an almost algorithmic step by step for the procedure and the theory to be clear but not necessarily over-explained like I'm a child.
Organic Chemistry Tutor (GOAT) is helping but I want a book.
Also, I need to learn how to work with statistics in R but that could be a separate book.


Image not available

1852x2500

Science Maid Oper....png

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 The Most Important Question in Mathematics and Computer Science

Doctor Eli Selig !!JQHA6kqyl91 No. 16084719

Good Morning /Sci/entists!

Welcome to my Science Foundation meeting. If I had a building it would have maids with huge boobs and they'd be giving all of you milk and cookies.

In Computer Science there is an idea called Programming Language which is used to make stuff. Programming language has two kinds. General Language and Domain-Specific Language.

General Language can do anything. It's best use is to implement Domain-Specific Language.

Domain-Specific Language can only talk about one problem, bit does so much more clearly and effectively than a General Language can.

Imagine you have a maid cafe and you need to give maids instructions. Using Domain-Specific Language you could write something like:

GET COOKIES
GO TO TABLE 5
HEART HANDS
GIVE COOKIES
HEART HANDS
GO TO KITCHEN

And the maid gives a table some cookies. And you did that without having to write any C because operating the maid is abstracted into a Domain-Specific Language.

Formal System is a list that that gets axioms and then you prove stuff from the axioms.

The most important question is this. Are there Domain-Specific Formal Systems? Can we make Formal Systems which talk about specific problems and are very good with only those kinds of problems?

Can we find an optimal Formal System for a given problem and make talking about and solving that problem easier by using the Domain-Specific Formal System?

Can we map keywords for a Domain-Specific Language to axioms in a Formal System? Can we construct a Domain-Specific Language from any Domain-Specific Formal Systems?

Can we make a Domain-Specific Formal System where it is easier to prove certain things? That lets us operate math without knowing it's "low-level" details like how the example Domain-Specific Language hid C?

This can be used to help count more numbers or make a representation of the Maid Mind Computer Program which is a smaller number so it gets counted faster.

Thank you /Sci/entists for reading my post.