🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 04:50:22 UTC No. 15866168
It's actually happening for real edition
Previous: >>15864259
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 04:54:37 UTC No. 15866180
the thing I hate most about about twitter fags is that they seem to make OC and then not post it here. (ignore shitty cap)
>>>/wsg/5342608
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:04:17 UTC No. 15866203
>>15866200
Steer it into the turtle nests
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:06:40 UTC No. 15866206
stop wasting our image counts retards theres still at minimum 8 hours until launch. go post in the other thread until we start reaching 2 hours.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:09:05 UTC No. 15866209
>>15866175
Fuck you faggot communist
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:12:29 UTC No. 15866218
>>15866206
you're wasting your efforts
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:17:33 UTC No. 15866230
Why do I have to make a twitter account to watch this ? Fuck Elon
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:23:37 UTC No. 15866244
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status
Spooky raptor vibes fr fr
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:25:18 UTC No. 15866253
>>15866206
It will get stickied in a few hours
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:26:48 UTC No. 15866257
jannies, please don't sticky this time, it's marginally more comfortable without the flood of offboarders polluting the thread.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:31:44 UTC No. 15866270
>>15866257
Dont worry we wont
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:33:07 UTC No. 15866272
https://www.youtube.com/live/6na40S
GET IN HERE
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:33:47 UTC No. 15866274
>>15866206
Anime fag always ruins it
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:37:47 UTC No. 15866277
>>15866267
Anime schizos kill yourselves for ruining the last 3 threads
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:40:13 UTC No. 15866278
>>15866257
all your breads belong to us
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:40:43 UTC No. 15866281
>>15866209
misinformation and disinformation, maybe even malinformation
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:41:56 UTC No. 15866282
>>15866206
Oh shit woops
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:43:36 UTC No. 15866285
>>15866277
>Anime schizos kill yourselves for ruining the last 3 threads
The Anime Schizo(zubrin/tory/clear spammer) has ruined like 80% of all /sfg/ threads since ~2020
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:44:31 UTC No. 15866287
>>15866277
https://x.com/spacebasedfox/status/
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:45:56 UTC No. 15866289
>>15866285
Id be fine with both of you leaving
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:46:51 UTC No. 15866290
>>15866285
You basically just described me
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:46:52 UTC No. 15866291
>>15866287
>le twitter spam
at least figure out how to make a link animeschizo
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:47:24 UTC No. 15866293
>>15866289
>Id be fine with both of you leaving
Who do you think I am, Mr. schizo?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:48:11 UTC No. 15866294
>>15866287
I dont have an X account, but I do have a reddit. I came to sfg during the election
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:54:39 UTC No. 15866300
>>15866287
Confirmed btw, hi Noa.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:54:51 UTC No. 15866301
can all these attentionhungry dramafags FUCK OFF AND KILL THEMSELVES
today is supposed to be a fun day.
5'10 245lbs Mountain of a Man at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:55:53 UTC No. 15866303
Test
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:56:41 UTC No. 15866306
>>15866301
I will now
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 05:58:07 UTC No. 15866308
>>15866307
This is not original finder, someone is continuing my work. Night
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:01:48 UTC No. 15866310
>>15866307
Willing to bet your pathetic attempt to snitch on him won't amount to as much as a phone call.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:02:32 UTC No. 15866311
>>15866310
ITAR is fuck around and find out my man
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:02:43 UTC No. 15866312
>>15866307
kek is the tranime spammer trying to make it seem like buying a heatshield tile is illegal
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:04:31 UTC No. 15866314
>>15866310
>him
you mean you?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:04:50 UTC No. 15866315
>>15866312
Uh oh its nervous
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:06:11 UTC No. 15866316
>>15866314
No, I meant him. Trying to strawman everyone who thinks you're a seething faggot won't work.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:06:43 UTC No. 15866317
>>15866315
Was obvious the moment xhe deleted xer xitter post, >>15866300. Also >>15866220
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:06:48 UTC No. 15866318
NARCing on someone with spaceflight hardware is really cringe
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:08:21 UTC No. 15866320
>>15866318
it's ok, they watch attack on titan
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:09:53 UTC No. 15866322
>>15866318
Bragging on social media about purchasing what is legally stolen property from an ITAR controlled company is not very smart.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:11:06 UTC No. 15866323
>>15866322
trying to get it taken from them is gay though
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:14:12 UTC No. 15866326
the way i see this is krystalposter split the last thread 5 times, threatened us with raids from his twitter followers, consistently hides or just posts his zoophile porn in here and is a tranny. clearposters have by comparison spammed clear, but thats really about it. you could just not be a dick to this general and people wouldnt mind nearly as much you know.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:14:45 UTC No. 15866327
>>15866323
I don't give a fuck about what happens to a furry
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:15:51 UTC No. 15866328
What will be the best stream? NSF or Everyday Astronaut or SpaceX? Are spacex on YouTube?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:16:40 UTC No. 15866329
don't cast your pearls before swine
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:17:45 UTC No. 15866330
>>15866326
trannime false flaggers obviously made those threads
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:18:10 UTC No. 15866331
>>15866328
No youtube streams anymore and estronaut is insufferable. NSF are grifters but they have a sick camera setup for this.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:18:39 UTC No. 15866332
>>15866326
And dont forget, anime website.
>>15866328
SpaceX is not on YouTube, and NSF will be yapping their mouths off about donations. I will probably just deal with 720p but websites like TheLaunchPadNetwork or Space.com or something like that will probably give you the 1080p experience without annoying people.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:19:46 UTC No. 15866335
Post furries and post anime. Stop whining
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:20:01 UTC No. 15866336
>>15866330
really regretting splitting the thread now huh?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:22:24 UTC No. 15866339
people are going to be looking back at this historic thread and just see what big retards the animefags were
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:25:09 UTC No. 15866340
>>15866339
You literally just posted krystal porn in the launch thread
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:26:35 UTC No. 15866344
>>15866339
it's an anime website, at least 60% of people here are anime posters.
you on the other hand, are alone.
ask people in real life, even very agreeable normalfags, most of them will tell you they think furfags are disgusting and would not let one near their children.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:27:12 UTC No. 15866346
>>15866339
Kys
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:27:35 UTC No. 15866347
>>15866341
Its one guy his name is Noa, read the last 200 posts of the last thread for the lore
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:28:37 UTC No. 15866348
g'night /sfg/
can't wait to watch starship take flight with my clearbros
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:29:14 UTC No. 15866350
>>15866348
Clearbros have my support for this thread, thank you for not shitting up /sfg/ unlike a certain someone,
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:29:41 UTC No. 15866351
>>15866348
sleep tight, i just woke up.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:29:52 UTC No. 15866352
>>15866347
Enjoy your vacation
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:57:00 UTC No. 15866375
Stop doxxing people you morons
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:00:21 UTC No. 15866376
>>15866375
>people
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:01:20 UTC No. 15866377
Can someone link the IFT-1 launch thread? Am newfag, want to check out historic thread.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:04:14 UTC No. 15866378
>>15866375
Publically available information is not doxxing, sorry sweaty
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:06:42 UTC No. 15866381
>>15866378
Twitter is not publically available information
Sharing information for the intent of harm is still illegal too
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:08:23 UTC No. 15866383
>>15866377
That one was much better than this one. Also welcome.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:09:10 UTC No. 15866384
>>15866381
>Twitter is not publically available information
It literally is sweaty. Good luck proving intent to harm from 4chinz shitposts.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:20:43 UTC No. 15866395
>>15866393
I remember tweeting that they should get some leaf blowers for all the dust on the pad so we could get an unobstructed dust-free view of the launch. I really thought the concrete would hold up.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:25:46 UTC No. 15866404
>>15866395
>I really thought the concrete would hold up.
I didn't. Was really fucking sceptical about the biggest gigga nigga rocket ever devised dumping it's thrust only a dozen metres or so down onto a flat pad. Doesn't matter what magic concrete you have, it's going to get fucked by thousands of tonnes worth of flamethrower. I think they probably knew this too but were just chomping at the bit to get launch data and figured they could sort the pad out afterwards which is fine too.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:35:55 UTC No. 15866412
>>15866404
If they actually got a flame diverter/water deluge would IFT-1 have succeeded?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:40:15 UTC No. 15866415
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:41:30 UTC No. 15866417
>>15866412
Maybe, the engine bay fires were the cause of the major failures but it's hard to know how much of that was due to concrete shitting back up.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:42:12 UTC No. 15866418
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:42:15 UTC No. 15866419
>>15866395
>I really thought the concrete would hold up.
why lol
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:43:43 UTC No. 15866420
How many hours now?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:44:49 UTC No. 15866421
>>15866420
5 hours
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:44:51 UTC No. 15866422
>>15866418
AHAHAH HOLY SHIT THEY ARE DESTACKING AGAIN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:44:56 UTC No. 15866423
>>15866420
5 (five(5))
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:46:16 UTC No. 15866425
>>15866419
>Why?
I can't really remember. Now it seems plainly obvious after the fact that it wouldn't work but with the starship flop testing the concrete held up. I didn't really think much about it.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:46:41 UTC No. 15866427
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:48:53 UTC No. 15866428
>>15866425
The concrete held up btw
The sand/foundation failed
If they didn't build on a fucking swamp it would have held up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:51:34 UTC No. 15866429
>>15866426
strap me to an experimental rocket and fire me at the void
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:52:03 UTC No. 15866432
>>15866426
I hope we don't have manned Mars missions for decades. Hopefully we send some robots and shit to build some habitat so humans can just walk in. If we send a minimal skeleton crew with next to nothing but a martian swag and some rations and anything happens to them or they die that would just be too much of morale hit. It'd just be sad/pathetic to just send people for the sake of it.
The moons okay though. Send whoever to die alone, whatever. People don't care about the Moon missions.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:55:16 UTC No. 15866435
>>15866432
Kys
The only way to do it is send hundreds
That way if one dies no one gives a fuck
Just send another hundred for every single one that falls
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:55:50 UTC No. 15866436
>>15866428
>The concrete held up btw
Now I think about it I can't see the concrete holding up. Any moisture in the concrete that's heated up to boiling point (which is likely) will explode the concrete, which is what I believe happened.
>The sand/foundation failed
I don't know how you know this. There was dust everywhere how could anyone see that? I thought sand was actually an ideal foundation. Maybe not as good as compacted gravel but still.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:58:51 UTC No. 15866440
>>15866436
think they call it liquefaction, the thing that happens during earthquakes.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:59:12 UTC No. 15866441
>>15866436
>I don't know how you know this. There was dust everywhere how could anyone see that? I thought sand was actually an ideal foundation. Maybe not as good as compacted gravel but still.
I fucking hate tourists
Elon talkes about this several times
The foundation underneath caved away from the concrete
That caused it to form a bowl once the plume got under the concrete it was gg
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:06:29 UTC No. 15866445
>>15866426
>Who is gonna volunteer for the Mars suicide mission?
Sure as hell not me, I've got to go fuck the Moon
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:09:07 UTC No. 15866448
>>15866348
Good night brother. I go to sleep at peace
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:14:05 UTC No. 15866454
I'm a total noob in regards to Starship, is this the first time the entire vehicle+booster are being tested? So if it doesn't explode it's a real proof of those frankly comical payload potentials?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:15:58 UTC No. 15866455
who else is staying up all night?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:20:08 UTC No. 15866458
>>15866454
>is this the first time the entire vehicle+booster are being tested?
Second time for the stack. Integrated Flight Test - 2 or IFT-2
>So if it doesn't explode it's a real proof of those frankly comical payload potentials?
Potentially, but there is no payload at the moment and its an iterative program with incremental improvements on each vehicle they make as well as the ground systems.
There is a lot to test. Apparently anything beyond the hotstage separation of the 2nd stage is a bonus.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:28:58 UTC No. 15866469
>>15866244
I wanna stand there bros
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:32:16 UTC No. 15866473
>>15866455
me, need to put the finishing touches on the launch thread (& critics collage if it does end up being a successful launch)
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:35:14 UTC No. 15866475
I don't think the water deluge system will work. Total pad destruction assured.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:43:45 UTC No. 15866479
Will there really won't be youtube stream?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:49:52 UTC No. 15866485
>>15866479
Correct
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:50:54 UTC No. 15866486
>>15866485
Fuck Musk and his retarded platform
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:59:21 UTC No. 15866489
>>15866486
wut we have to watch on twatter?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:02:30 UTC No. 15866492
>>15866489
You will install ze everything app.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:04:48 UTC No. 15866494
>>15866492
fuming. all i want is to watch insprucker not some estrogen fuelled e-celeb bing bing wahoo zoomer stream. going to have to make a fucking account now. cunt.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:16:21 UTC No. 15866499
>>15866494
leave clear alone
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:20:09 UTC No. 15866502
How long until musk starts going after restreams on youtube?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:22:02 UTC No. 15866503
>>15866502
roughly around the same time you stop being a retarded faggot, so never
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:23:16 UTC No. 15866504
>>15866494
For me, the bigger issue is the loss of cultural knowledge and history. Twitter is shit as an archival platform.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:28:23 UTC No. 15866507
>>15866506
You should have gotten there earlier.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:29:31 UTC No. 15866509
>hand over your phone number so you can watch rJohn instead of some gape-faced numale with a lego collection
seething
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:33:04 UTC No. 15866510
>>15866509
just watch a restream
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:33:09 UTC No. 15866511
>>15866504
so is discord yet that does not stop the herd from flocking to it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:33:16 UTC No. 15866512
>>15866507
I counted and there's about 200 cars ahead of me, but the park has over 400 parking spots so I'm good
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:36:35 UTC No. 15866515
>>15866510
the autism captcha with looking at furniture and placing it in planned view was quite comfy, we should have that here
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:37:10 UTC No. 15866516
Ayo, do we even have an archive anymore? Warosu is fucking dead, for how long?. That shit https://eientei.xyz/sci is not even on 4chanX
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:37:29 UTC No. 15866517
>>15866506
Where exactly are you?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:47:01 UTC No. 15866519
hour and a half before they start loading the propellant
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:47:18 UTC No. 15866520
>SCUBED
>SCUBED
>SCUBED
>SCUBED
>SCUBED
Ahahahaha
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:48:49 UTC No. 15866522
>>15866502
Probably never. They stream launches mainly for PR rather than money.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:51:07 UTC No. 15866523
What is the time to sunrise?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:55:58 UTC No. 15866528
Why is this thread so dead ON LAUNCH DAY , wtf people , wake up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:57:29 UTC No. 15866530
>>15866523
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/usa
>Current Time: 18 Nov 2023, 03:56:48
>Sunrise Today: 06:50 111° Southeast
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:57:33 UTC No. 15866532
>>15866528
truth is no one really cares about space any more.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:01:02 UTC No. 15866536
>launch window is only 20 mins
>some launch windows are instantaneous
we really need to do something about space traffic management. we're only 60 years into spaceflight, this is unsustainable.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:03:01 UTC No. 15866538
>>15866536
Wait until you hear about landing slots at Heathrow
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:03:16 UTC No. 15866539
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:14:17 UTC No. 15866548
>>15866536
It's orbital mechanics retard
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:17:04 UTC No. 15866550
>>15866548
>dont try bro, just let things be bad
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:20:24 UTC No. 15866555
Is there going to be an official youtube stream or is it only on x?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:21:35 UTC No. 15866557
>>15866517
Quarter mile north of Islam Blanca park, they're letting us in now
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:23:30 UTC No. 15866558
>>15866557
inshallah
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:26:24 UTC No. 15866559
>>15866531
They kinda look like some sort of drain port, but I can't rightly say.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:26:36 UTC No. 15866560
>>15866555
x gon giv it to ya
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:26:45 UTC No. 15866561
>>15866530
sunrise launch kino
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:27:18 UTC No. 15866562
>>15866555
It's Xclusive. You DO have an account, right?
Verification not required.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:28:20 UTC No. 15866563
>>15866528
People are asleep
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:29:18 UTC No. 15866565
i can't work out twitter. nothing is in order. there's no sense to how any of it is presented to you. are you missing something from spacex? aren't you? wtf is this shit it's absolute garbage.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:29:21 UTC No. 15866566
>>15866548
Not this time
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:33:47 UTC No. 15866569
>>15866563
/sfg/ is powering up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:35:46 UTC No. 15866572
>>15866565
its in order
you are just braindead
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:36:54 UTC No. 15866575
2h 34min
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:42:15 UTC No. 15866578
launch thread at t-1 hour.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:43:10 UTC No. 15866580
>>15866565
For You tab and Following tab show you different shit. Make sure you're on the Following tab.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:46:49 UTC No. 15866583
>>15866175
I actually read Zubrin's Case For Mars book a decade ago
I'm so hyped about the Starship launch that I can't sleep.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:48:32 UTC No. 15866587
>>15866580
ooooh
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:48:46 UTC No. 15866588
>>15866583
it appears i was able to sleep 4 hours, but thunderstorm woke me up. comfytime
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:48:53 UTC No. 15866589
Testes, I an AWAKE FOR IFT-2
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:49:03 UTC No. 15866590
>>15866230
You can use nitter to navigate twitter accounts and once you find a video post you can switch the URL to twitter. Not sure if the same trick works with livestreams too.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:49:28 UTC No. 15866591
>>15866582
lab padre
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwh
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:50:29 UTC No. 15866593
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:50:30 UTC No. 15866594
>>15866591
whatever happened with that spacenews and spaceflight now merger
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:51:06 UTC No. 15866595
I'm gonna crack a Rockstar energy drink and chill for the next two hours. This launch better not get scrubbed.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:52:21 UTC No. 15866599
>>15866597
I dont think itll break SECO but if it does I will eat my sock
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:54:02 UTC No. 15866601
>>15866595
hey, you just reminded me to get out my own redbull. thanks, rockstar is also good btw, equivalent to monster imo.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:54:30 UTC No. 15866602
>>15866599
I will hold you accountable
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:55:13 UTC No. 15866603
>>15866214
I got banned for posting slampig Ellie in space feet and yet you don't get banned posting nipples?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:56:36 UTC No. 15866607
>>15866603
HAH GET FUCKED LOSER
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:57:42 UTC No. 15866608
>>15866605
it's over.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:57:47 UTC No. 15866609
why are we so excited to watch this guys boondoggle lift off again?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:57:53 UTC No. 15866611
IFT-2 November 18, 2023 – 13:00 – 13:20 UTC | 07:00 – 07:20 CST
Boca Chica https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/@46
https://www.timeanddate.com/weather
HR/MIN/SEC EVENT
00:00:02 Liftoff
00:00:52 Max Q (Moment of Peak Mechanical Stress on the Rocket)
00:02:39 Booster Main Engine Cutoff
00:02:41 Hot Staging
00:02:53 Booster Boostback Burn Startup
00:03:47 Booster Boostback Burn Shutdown
00:06:18 Booster is Transonic
00:06:30 Booster Landing Burn Startup
00:06:48 Booster Landing Burn Shutdown
00:08:33 Starship Engine Cutoff
01:17:21 Starship Entry
01:28:43 Starship is Transonic
01:30:00 An exciting landing!
Streams/info:
LabPadre https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIJ
https://www.youtube.com/@clearusui
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Wq
NASASpaceFlight no commentary multiview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJ
https://www.youtube.com/@TheLaunchP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0K
https://www.youtube.com/@EverydayAs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6na
https://everydayastronaut.com/stars
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:57:57 UTC No. 15866612
>>15866603
Good to know the jannies have great taste like me
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:58:13 UTC No. 15866614
>>15866594
its done I think?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:58:42 UTC No. 15866615
>>15866611
good, and effortful post. you should've been OP, thank you anon.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:01:13 UTC No. 15866617
>>15866616
i still think it's fractional orbit, with a high likelyhood of also being hot stage. it seems the majority of /sfg/ posters agree.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:01:31 UTC No. 15866618
GOOD MORNING /SFG/
WE GAAAAAAAAAN!!!!!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:02:04 UTC No. 15866619
ONE BONG TO LAUNCH THREAD
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:02:42 UTC No. 15866620
shit bros i forgot what music I was supposed to sync this up to. last time i did mountains from interstellar, what do i do this time? i know i talked about this in previous threads but i forgot which songs i decided on. it has to have a build up to one big, monumentous moment.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:03:14 UTC No. 15866621
>starship today
>worlds tomorrow
>bbmas on monday
too much hype
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:03:36 UTC No. 15866624
>>15866619
just make it already
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:04:16 UTC No. 15866625
i see we all decided to wake up two hours before launch. EST checking in i presume?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:04:52 UTC No. 15866626
>>15866625
CET
goeiemorgen :)
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:05:02 UTC No. 15866627
What livestream are you guys going to watch?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:05:07 UTC No. 15866628
>>15866620
You have to play the official /sfg/ anthem. He even remixed it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqG
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:05:23 UTC No. 15866629
>>15866623
What are you talking about? The launch is still almost two hours away!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:05:45 UTC No. 15866630
>>15866626
it's noon, what do you germoids even do to wake up so late??
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:06:19 UTC No. 15866633
When is the next window if today is abort?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:06:52 UTC No. 15866634
>>15866609
you don't need to watch it faggot, go watch furry porn or whatever gay shit you do usually
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:07:04 UTC No. 15866635
>>15866630
shitpost on /sfg/ until 3:30 AM
already awake for nearly an hour though
en niet duits
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:07:22 UTC No. 15866636
>>15866633
tomorrow
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:07:32 UTC No. 15866637
>>15866628
you are going to give my ear AIDS please stop. i decided on more interstellar anyways, launch will play right at 2:15 https://youtu.be/adA_V_ab8Xg?list=P
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:08:16 UTC No. 15866638
is the guy that did that SN9 thread video still alive? Are you going to do this one as well?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:08:19 UTC No. 15866639
>>15866624
ok, I guess after waiting 212 days I can make it one hour early.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:08:41 UTC No. 15866641
kek i just noticed krystalcuck got banned for porn but i didnt even doe he said 'enjoy your vacation', gonna be a good thread lads.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:09:05 UTC No. 15866642
should i shower now or in an hour? should i make coffee now or in an hour?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:09:38 UTC No. 15866644
>>15866328
I might just watch Clear's stream as casting twitter to my tv seems like a pain in the ass.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:09:44 UTC No. 15866645
>>15866642
you should never make coffee since caffeine is bad for you and shower when you want to
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:10:04 UTC No. 15866646
fuck this i cant stay awake any longer im going to bed, see you guys tomorrow after the inevitable scrub
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:10:15 UTC No. 15866647
>>15866643
WE GAAAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:10:39 UTC No. 15866649
>>15866642
oh shit good point, im gonna shower now, ᴷᴱᴱᴾ ˢᴴᴵᵀᴾᴼˢᵀᴵᴺᴳ ᵂᴵᵀᴴᴼᵁᵀ ᴹᴱ
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:10:45 UTC No. 15866650
>>15866643
ja, we gaan
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:10:47 UTC No. 15866651
go for prop load. yep I'm making the launch thread, one min
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:11:15 UTC No. 15866652
>>15866643
WE GAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:11:16 UTC No. 15866653
GOOD MORNING SIRS.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:11:46 UTC No. 15866655
>>15866328
Everday Astronaut has a lot of good cam's
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:11:48 UTC No. 15866656
>>15866651
DONT put /sfg/ in the title, let us have our little haven separate from tourists here.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:12:07 UTC No. 15866657
not long till scrub now
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:13:19 UTC No. 15866660
>open NSF youtube stream in mpv with yt-dlp
>crop down to the rocket cam
>mute
fixed
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:13:40 UTC No. 15866661
>>15866438
the spacex website just link to an embed of the X stream, but yeah that's apparently the only "official" stream
see >>15866611 for unofficial youtube options
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:13:57 UTC No. 15866662
I miss calculated the timezones again I thought it was 13:00 Cest
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:14:04 UTC No. 15866663
>>15866660
>mpv
faggot
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:14:48 UTC No. 15866666
>>15866628
How can anyone with self respect publish this ?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:14:48 UTC No. 15866667
ALL BOARDS READY?
/BIZ/? GO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:15:02 UTC No. 15866668
can someone link the SpaceX stream? i know its xitter but i want the official experience, and the last stream got cancelled it seems so dont know where new one is.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:15:24 UTC No. 15866670
>>15866667
/SCI/ REPORTING IN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:15:55 UTC No. 15866671
>>15866645
i heard it's good for you
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:15:59 UTC No. 15866672
>>15866663
literally the best media player there is, vlc's youtube support is half baked trash and anything else is sub-garbage tier
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:16:03 UTC No. 15866674
>>15866666
holy checked, satan is RIGHT!!!
>>15866667
lol gtfo tourist go use the public urinal launch thread.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:16:59 UTC No. 15866677
>>15866672
VLC just werks out of the box for me.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:17:15 UTC No. 15866678
>>15866672
why would i use anything but youtube for youtube?
their player is actually good
VLC is superior for everything else
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:17:34 UTC No. 15866679
>>15866668
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:17:47 UTC No. 15866681
>vlc
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:18:09 UTC No. 15866682
Even after 6 years of it I don't get tired of making launch threads. Well, here you go - Starship Flight Test 2. Go SpaceX, Go Starship
>>15866673
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:18:09 UTC No. 15866683
>>15866679
danke
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:18:14 UTC No. 15866684
>>15866672
The UI fucking sucks, MPC-HC until I die
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:18:38 UTC No. 15866686
Scrooooooooooob
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:18:41 UTC No. 15866688
>>15866647
>>15866650
>>15866652
I see I see.
So there is no launch thread?
Mod fags you better unlock this one.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:18:48 UTC No. 15866689
>stream isnt 4k
ELOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:19:42 UTC No. 15866694
>>15866666
He probably doesn't know how terrible it is and no one wants to tell him despite that he does go to open mics and was interviewed on the radio about his music.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:19:51 UTC No. 15866695
>>15866689
twitter can barely handle 720p
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:20:30 UTC No. 15866697
>>15866689
where the FUCK do you even watch the SpaceX stream
their page has nothing and the watch button does nothing
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:20:37 UTC No. 15866698
>>15866678
youtube/browser is trash. it has no crop support and burns 5x as much power. I can't skip backwards during livestreams then swipe right to speed up the video and catch up with live without skipping forward. I can't imagine any reason you would want to use the browser player.
>>15866684
>The UI fucking sucks
I don't even know what that means. Does MPC-HC even have built in yt-dlp support?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:21:00 UTC No. 15866701
>>15866688
STOP WASTING OUR FUCKING IMAGES WE NEED THEM FOR LAUNCH
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:21:01 UTC No. 15866702
>>15866469
What would kill you first if you stood under it during ignition, the force or the heat?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:21:30 UTC No. 15866703
>>15866698
>youtube/browser is trash. it has no crop support and burns 5x as much power.
i dont need crop and it works on my machine
maybe dont use a thinkpad from 2007
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:22:03 UTC No. 15866705
>>15866702
the hydraulic pressure from the water would bifurcate you first.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:22:05 UTC No. 15866706
Can vlc handle twatter broadcast?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:22:30 UTC No. 15866707
>>15866701
launch thread will (likely) be stickied, post there! It's silly to split up for launches, I don't like how people here have done that since ~2021. But it's up to you all.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:22:31 UTC No. 15866708
>>15866701
We can just make a new thread famalamalam
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:22:33 UTC No. 15866709
>>15866697
https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1d
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:22:34 UTC No. 15866710
>>15866620
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqe
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:23:00 UTC No. 15866712
>>15866703
browser player burns more power no matter how new your computer is, it's very inefficient.
>don't need crop
I'm hear to watch a rocket, not gawk at some nerds' faces
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:23:49 UTC No. 15866714
>>15866709
>starts in an hour
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:24:23 UTC No. 15866717
Starship is going to draw out the attention whores in droves today, it already started.
Lets make sure to ignore them all and horde all the /sfg/ content to ourselves here in this thread where it belongs.
Unless someone big from SpaceX shows up and starts their own thread, I'm not looking away from /sfg/ at all today.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:25:34 UTC No. 15866722
>>15866717
im putting my shittery down for launch, 'drama' got dealt with earlier anyways. we are having a good time ONLY right now
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:25:47 UTC No. 15866725
>>15866712
>browser player burns more power no matter how new your computer is
why would it??
watching estronaut at 4k, cpu sits at 35%
>not gawk at some nerds' faces
anti-social loser, estronaut is kino
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:26:16 UTC No. 15866727
>>15866717
>preemptively seething
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:26:16 UTC No. 15866728
>>15866717
launch threads are for launch posting though :(
it has been like that since 2017
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:26:36 UTC No. 15866730
PROP LOAD HAS STARTED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:26:41 UTC No. 15866731
Checked out estronaut for the first time. Do not have X account. Holy shit that guy is insufferable
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:28:06 UTC No. 15866737
>>15866731
swithing immediatly to official views or lab padre when day comes, he has the best night cams but theres no way in hell i'm watching him for launch. lab padre is best commentators, mostly because they stick to technical stuff and no shilling.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:28:18 UTC No. 15866739
>>15866717
Starting with you
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:28:30 UTC No. 15866740
>>15866725
>anti-social loser, estronaut is kino
absolute state of this post
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:28:32 UTC No. 15866741
>>15866712
how do you crop?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:29:12 UTC No. 15866743
>>15866731
>he's currently shilling himself for some awards
holy shit he really is estrogenated to the max.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:30:35 UTC No. 15866751
>>15866725
>why would it??
Because you have overhead of the browser's rendering engine and whatever scripts youtube decides to run. 35% is higher than it needs to be.
>he's here to admire a man's face
fag
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:30:37 UTC No. 15866752
>>15866749
we're team pierced nipples clear
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:30:46 UTC No. 15866755
>>15866179
>you know what
uh I don't
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:31:35 UTC No. 15866757
>>15866752
john insprucker is my waifu
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:31:43 UTC No. 15866758
>>15866749
We love Insprucker, hate 720p. I will still watch though, official is always best experience. Certainly more than NSF and EDA, LabPadre just doesnt have better angles or info, same goes for TLPN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:31:57 UTC No. 15866762
>>15866751
>35% is higher than it needs to be.
at 4k
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:32:17 UTC No. 15866763
>>15866731
imagine being stuck in a rocket with him, Aoki and a dozen of similar wankers
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:32:50 UTC No. 15866764
>>15866741
https://github.com/occivink/mpv-scr
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:33:16 UTC No. 15866767
>>15866758
can watch hidef vids after, it's all about the moment, and that moment is only with john
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:34:33 UTC No. 15866775
>>15866209
>the man responsible for instigating the kessler blockade of 2043-3542
>the man responsible for the kinetic bombardment of 2700 cities
>the man with the blood of 9.3 billion earthers on his hands
>a communist
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:34:35 UTC No. 15866777
>>15866763
I would crash Starship into the moon to get away from them.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:34:38 UTC No. 15866778
>>15866762
Yes, that's higher than it needs to be because you have browser overhead in addition to the 4k playback. If you can't understand simple addition then I won't waste more of this thread explaining it to you. Go back to admiring estronaut fag boy
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:35:09 UTC No. 15866780
>>15866763
its a shame the two cuties are the backup crew
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:35:28 UTC No. 15866781
>>15866778
>fagboy
kek gotta use this later.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:35:54 UTC No. 15866784
>>15866769
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unite
throost vectored to a landing, nobody was able to repeat it on simulators
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:36:00 UTC No. 15866785
>>15866763
Seeing his onions-face react to liftoff would have me press the self-destruct button.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:36:03 UTC No. 15866786
so how do twitter streams work then? they link it in the thread?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:36:23 UTC No. 15866788
>>15866708
Did he die
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:36:30 UTC No. 15866789
>>15866394
>guaranteed
now you done said it. hop or my money back, felon husk!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:38:34 UTC No. 15866798
WB-57 ON THE WAY
ALSO
FROST ON THE VEHICLE
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:39:00 UTC No. 15866802
T-1:20 mins
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:40:23 UTC No. 15866809
>>15866778
how about you share your usage for a 4k stream then?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:42:54 UTC No. 15866816
>>15866794
COLD WELD
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:43:14 UTC No. 15866817
>was neet when they launched it last year
>still a neet
time flies
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:43:31 UTC No. 15866818
NasaSpaceFlight? playing
/sfg/? refreshed
Rocket t-shirt? worn
Beetles? extinct
Future of spaceflight? saved
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:43:44 UTC No. 15866820
you niggers better be sending Elon positive energy
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:44:30 UTC No. 15866823
>>15866764
works great, thanks
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:44:33 UTC No. 15866824
>>15866818
go back my god
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:44:43 UTC No. 15866825
>>15866759
>shuttle (cost)+++++
vs
>falcon 9+++++
seems about right.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:44:54 UTC No. 15866826
>>15866820
sending B9 and S25 my positive energy, elon can suck enough off of his twitter followers HOLY SHIT SHUT THE FUCK UP NSF I SWEAR TO GOD I HATE THESE NIGGERS THEY KEEP SHILLING THEMSELVES
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:45:07 UTC No. 15866827
They're gassing it, guys
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:45:29 UTC No. 15866828
im so nervous that i need to take a shit . and it wont be solid
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:45:46 UTC No. 15866830
>>15866784
first time hearing about this
god damn those people that survived were lucky
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:46:18 UTC No. 15866831
>>15866827
a really, really long fart
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:46:22 UTC No. 15866832
HOLY SHIT THEYRE STILL ASKING FOR MORE MONEY AFTER SHILLING FOR 5 MINUTES AND SAYING THEY GET SO MUCH AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I HATE NSF SO MUCH SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:46:36 UTC No. 15866833
>>15866817
>started shitposting on /sfg/ as an unemployed undergrad
>still occasionally shitpst on /sfg/ as a researcher about to get a PhD
time really does fly.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:46:47 UTC No. 15866834
>>15866828
use a buttplug, dummmy
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:46:48 UTC No. 15866835
>>15866818
your clear stream?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:46:55 UTC No. 15866837
>>15866832
try the labpadre stream
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:47:02 UTC No. 15866838
>>15866832
just mute them lmao
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:47:23 UTC No. 15866839
Too nervous. Fuck. I'm gonna skip the livestream and the thread until its over for the result. My heart cant take the results
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:47:39 UTC No. 15866840
>>15866835
also extinct
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:48:33 UTC No. 15866845
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:48:35 UTC No. 15866846
>>15866832
I stopped clicking on Normie Simp Faggots a long time ago, what's your excuse?
I only click on LabPadre and RGV videos on YT.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:49:48 UTC No. 15866850
>>15866837
switching right now
>>15866846
they have better camera angles and cameras
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:50:07 UTC No. 15866851
>>15866759
You have it in retarded GPT-3.5 mode. Only creative and precise use GPT-4.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:50:30 UTC No. 15866852
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwh
LabPadre's livestream is only 1080p but no commentary. Just pure shots of the ship and booster as prop loading continues.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:51:04 UTC No. 15866855
>>15866759
Well it's half right
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:51:36 UTC No. 15866856
>>15866852
>but no commentary
>Open stream
>Someone is talking
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:52:20 UTC No. 15866859
>>15866667
/bant/ Reporting IN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:53:01 UTC No. 15866860
>>15866859
fuck off to the launch thread tourist, thats your retard kennel.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:53:21 UTC No. 15866862
>>15866859
this is a no fish and wildlife zone
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:53:49 UTC No. 15866865
>>15866856
I guess I caught it when there was no talking. Awkward.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6na
Everyday Astronaut's stream is the best. Commentary exists, but is informative than shilling. The production on this is significantly higher quality than other streams. Also, he's got 4 different cam shots and a thermal cam. Pretty neat.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:54:53 UTC No. 15866868
>>15866865
stop sucking off estronaut nigger hes annoying and rude and deserves indignation.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:55:06 UTC No. 15866869
mpv should work with a twitter stream, right? it does for videos. if it complains about aceess this should work:
mpv --ytdl-raw-options=cookies-from-bro
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:55:17 UTC No. 15866870
>>15866865
The vapid cunt doing her best NPR voice and saying "yeah, yeah" is *almost* as unbearable as estronaut talking about his upcoming gay orgy in Austin
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:55:41 UTC No. 15866873
>>15866655
holy shit I remember this moron, he was crying in a video that people should not be able to post anonymously online and they should face repercussions for what they say. I tuned out the very next moment never looked back. fuck him
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:55:57 UTC No. 15866875
>>15866851
it failed even worse somehow
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:56:34 UTC No. 15866878
>>15866875
lol, probably why altman got fired
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:56:53 UTC No. 15866880
>>15866667
/gig/ here, I wanna sleep
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:57:34 UTC No. 15866881
Are there any streams with no talking?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:57:36 UTC No. 15866883
>>15866880
go to your containment thread tourist >>15866673
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:58:15 UTC No. 15866885
>>15866881
yes, if you can find the mute button
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:58:46 UTC No. 15866889
>>15866881
NSF regular 24/7 stream. actually has great angles, i'll stick to this.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:58:58 UTC No. 15866893
>>15866534
i am cummin
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:59:42 UTC No. 15866895
T-1h i repeat , T-1h
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:59:46 UTC No. 15866896
>>15866894
the fuck is that? is there some retard up there now??
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:00:16 UTC No. 15866898
>>15866896
just finishing the final welds
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:00:30 UTC No. 15866899
>>15866896
schizo
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:01:22 UTC No. 15866902
>>15866701
>>15866206
Image limit => Stage
Simple as.
If jannies don't want to see multiple /sfg/ threads on the 'log, maybe they should tell the admins to do away with this useless image limit bullshit. It probably dates to 2001 or something when the Japanese hikikomori admins bedroom computer running Futaba Channel couldn't handle the images. Totally useless today.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:02:36 UTC No. 15866905
>>15866902
or you just post in the launch thread sticky which has the 1000 post rolling feature, lol
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:02:37 UTC No. 15866906
>>15866902
this
we should also have multi image uplaods like most other chans have now
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:05:18 UTC No. 15866914
>>15866910
>posting furry porn to own the tourists
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:05:35 UTC No. 15866917
T-55 minutes to launch window.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:05:42 UTC No. 15866918
>>15866910
>took less than three minutes before you screenshotted and posted the post you're glad wasn't made in this thread (until you posted it yourself)
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:06:35 UTC No. 15866923
>>15866914
what
>>15866918
fair ill delete now.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:07:17 UTC No. 15866927
>>15866896
yep, intern doing cable management and installing a fresh install of pirated windows on starship's computer
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:07:36 UTC No. 15866929
>>15866923
wait how do i delete in PC, mobile its usually easier
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:08:47 UTC No. 15866933
>>15866910
uh you realize thats not a tourist if they know about krystal posting right?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:10:04 UTC No. 15866941
>>15866929
i figured it out nvm, fuck that isn't the most intuitive placement for a delete button.
>>15866933
either way it filtered the nigger aids out which is good. also janny JUST deleted it KEK he sides with us.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:10:05 UTC No. 15866942
>>15866933
baselessly calling other people tourists is a blue board tradition.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:10:50 UTC No. 15866946
>it's an underage phoneposter
lol
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:11:06 UTC No. 15866949
thank god the sharty nigger is confined to the normalfag thread
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:11:28 UTC No. 15866953
>>15866932
Sick, looking forward to switching over once that goes live in 13 minutes.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:12:17 UTC No. 15866958
>>15866946
bleed out im an undergrad sophmore, i wont deny the phoneposter part though
>>15866949
see its not just me who appreciates it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:13:44 UTC No. 15866966
>>15866959
So that camera was donated by the Boca Chica Planetary Society for this launch. Shots from that once sunrise happens, just prior to launch, will be beautiful.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:15:29 UTC No. 15866975
>>15866959
sodium lamps are soul, but those assholes with blue/LED lights can fuck off
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:15:55 UTC No. 15866977
T-45 minutes
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:16:38 UTC No. 15866980
The view now at nasa spacefag is kino.
Looks like ff6.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:18:21 UTC No. 15866992
what is /sfg/ snacking on? i've got takis because i'm a half hispanic mutt.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:19:02 UTC No. 15866996
>>15866832
lab padre is comfiest right now, just mute and switch streams when the shilling starts (i keep multiple going in the background to check each)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwh
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:19:14 UTC No. 15866998
>>15866975
Eh
There was a massive batch of fucked up LEDs from Chyna
They might have been 2700k or 2100k LEDs but the phosphor has degraded leaving a magenta hue
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:19:17 UTC No. 15866999
>>15866992
Sugar free redbull and reheated chinese
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:21:08 UTC No. 15867014
>>15866992
apples and belgian beer from our southern neighbours.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:21:29 UTC No. 15867016
absolute kino
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:21:36 UTC No. 15867019
>>15866993
sugar free? pussy, i've got the real deal infront of me AND its partially frozen so i get a redbull slushie
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:21:53 UTC No. 15867020
>>15866992
covfefe
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:22:22 UTC No. 15867022
YAWN, is anyone else tired? We should all have a nap and skip this nothingburger, it's not going to launch anyway
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:22:33 UTC No. 15867023
>>15866992
takis are soul but I'm waiting until the rocket flies before making breakfast
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:22:40 UTC No. 15867024
>>15866992
pretzels
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:22:41 UTC No. 15867025
>>15866992
I ate my usual breakfast (oatmeal, blueberries and almonds, one boiled egg and two cups of coffee)
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:22:55 UTC No. 15867028
>>15867022
suck shit through a tube thunderthighs
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:23:48 UTC No. 15867033
>>15866992
Just finished some leftover brisket, sausage, and some BBQ.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:23:56 UTC No. 15867035
SPACEX STREAM STARTING SOON, TUNE IN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:24:20 UTC No. 15867039
>>15867028
Listen here muskrat, I'm giving you one last chance to jump ship before Starshit fails to make orbit
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:24:24 UTC No. 15867040
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:24:26 UTC No. 15867041
VALVE STUCK
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:24:32 UTC No. 15867042
IT'S ON
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:24:39 UTC No. 15867043
>>15866992
Earl Grey and toast with marmelade
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:25:28 UTC No. 15867050
LAUNCH THREAD
>>15866673
STREAM STARTED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:25:38 UTC No. 15867051
J O H N
O
H
N
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:26:09 UTC No. 15867057
>>15867039
TOTAL EARTHER DEATH
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:26:39 UTC No. 15867061
>>15867052
you were supposed to say "first"
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:26:41 UTC No. 15867062
KATE WE GOT KATE
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:27:06 UTC No. 15867068
MOMMY
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:27:27 UTC No. 15867072
>ranjesh the space reparations operator is back
BOOOOO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:27:35 UTC No. 15867073
Good morning /esseffgee/ are you ready?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:27:40 UTC No. 15867074
Kate my beloved....
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:27:48 UTC No. 15867075
is it me or has kate put on a few pounds
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:28:43 UTC No. 15867085
>>15867081
its looking good to me
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:28:47 UTC No. 15867087
Ok yeah, SpaceX has best angles. Its over EDA, NSF, LP, and TLPN shills, pack it up and get in the official stream.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:28:55 UTC No. 15867089
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Wq
WE ARE LIVE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Wq
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:29:00 UTC No. 15867090
>>15867075
Just the way I like it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:29:00 UTC No. 15867092
>>15867052
>Twitter stream buffering
>All the other ones fine
It's over
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:29:14 UTC No. 15867094
>>15866992
Debating if I should go make some sandwiches before launch.
Lightly toasted whole wheat bread, dijon mustard, swiss cheese, and either ham or turkey.
>>15867081
It gets better if you just let it be for a while.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:29:34 UTC No. 15867096
I'm killing birds and beetles right now
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:29:36 UTC No. 15867098
>>15867089
"no"
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:29 UTC No. 15867102
why is the X stream so fucking low quality
fuck!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:34 UTC No. 15867104
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:37 UTC No. 15867106
>>15867098
clear is an official JAXA representative and you WILL respect HER authority
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:37 UTC No. 15867107
Goodmorning clearbro
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:43 UTC No. 15867110
My wife is having technical issues....
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:55 UTC No. 15867115
Do we have cams for the booster landing?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:31:13 UTC No. 15867117
>>15867106
i wont and you will do nothing about it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:31:23 UTC No. 15867119
>>15867052
wow non rewindable livestreams. I really enjoy this.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:31:36 UTC No. 15867121
>>15867102
thats just you buddy, getting pretty crispy views, see >>15867105
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:31:38 UTC No. 15867123
these are some cinematic ass camera shots
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:31:39 UTC No. 15867125
>>15867102
>>15867081
get better net retards
maybe you should have bought starlink
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:32:19 UTC No. 15867131
>>15867125
4K Everyday Astronaut stream works flawlessly for me.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:32:27 UTC No. 15867132
>>15867119
relive 2010 on twitter formerly known as x
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:32:40 UTC No. 15867133
launch thread you newfriends
>>>15866673
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:32:52 UTC No. 15867135
I got Twitter streaming on MPC-HC and VLC couldn't handle it lel
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:15 UTC No. 15867141
>>15867110
Got a new mic
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:21 UTC No. 15867143
Nothing
It's 5 am and I'm not a fat fuck
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:22 UTC No. 15867144
JOHN
O
H
N
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:30 UTC No. 15867147
>>15867135
flawless on mpv
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:34 UTC No. 15867150
JOHNNN PLEASE STAY
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:37 UTC No. 15867151
J O HN
O HN
I
HN
H
N
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:37 UTC No. 15867152
SPRUCKED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:38 UTC No. 15867153
>>15867109
bless his little heart, where is this from, does she eat the bunny?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:44 UTC No. 15867156
>livestream during re-entry
so this is the power of 4 starlink dishes attached to it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:47 UTC No. 15867158
how many species of endangered moths have been wiped out so far?
have any environmental whackos glued themselves to anything yet?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:55 UTC No. 15867161
>>15867133
that's your containment thread
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:58 UTC No. 15867163
John is my favorite presenter
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:33:59 UTC No. 15867164
SpaceX stream without an account
>>15867129
>>15867129
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:34:13 UTC No. 15867168
Clear is live.
Could some japanese-speaking anon report /sfg in at her chat?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:34:47 UTC No. 15867174
>>15867129
>>15867164
open the twitter link with mpv and it works without an account
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:35:13 UTC No. 15867177
god i love him so much
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:35:17 UTC No. 15867178
JOHN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:35:53 UTC No. 15867182
DEATH TO BOATS!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:35:55 UTC No. 15867183
>BOATS
BOATS
>BOATS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:36:03 UTC No. 15867186
FUCKING BOOMERS IN THEIR BOATS STIL RAAAAAAAHHHH
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:36:14 UTC No. 15867189
>boat boomers are back
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:36:26 UTC No. 15867195
>>15867161
that's literally not true nor has ever been true
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:36:27 UTC No. 15867196
FUCKING TOTAL BOAT DEATH GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE RANGE SEND THE NAVY FUCKING SINK THEM NOW NOW NOW
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:37:15 UTC No. 15867206
>>15867195
we stay here, you and the tourists go there. bye.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:37:15 UTC No. 15867207
>>15867174
wym mpv
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:37:21 UTC No. 15867209
250T TO ORBIT
>250T TO ORBIT
250T TO ORBIT
>250T TO ORBIT
250T TO ORBIT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:37:25 UTC No. 15867211
I FUCKING HATE BOATS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:37:48 UTC No. 15867215
>mechagodzilla
yikes
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:38:15 UTC No. 15867220
>>15867199
S E X
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:38:15 UTC No. 15867221
launch thread
>>15866673
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:38:22 UTC No. 15867223
Kill boaters. Behead boaters. Roundhouse kick a boater into the concrete. Slam dunk a boater baby into the trashcan. Crucify filthy blacks. Defecate in a boaters food. Launch boaters into the sun. Stir fry boaters in a wok. Toss boaters into active volcanoes. Urinate into a boaters gas tank. Judo throw boaters into a wood chipper. Twist boaters heads off. Report boaters to the IRS. Karate chop boaters in half. Curb stomp pregnant black boaters. Trap boaters in quicksand. Crush boaters in the trash compactor. Liquefy boaters in a vat of acid. Eat boaters. Dissect boaters. Exterminate boaters in the gas chamber. Stomp boater skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate boaters in the oven. Lobotomize boaters. Mandatory abortions for boaters. Grind boater fetuses in the garbage disposal. Drown boaters in fried chicken grease. Vaporize boaters with a ray gun. Kick old boaters down the stairs. Feed boaters to alligators. Slice boaters with a katana.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:38:25 UTC No. 15867224
soon, the doomers will be vindicated
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:38:44 UTC No. 15867229
Anything but the metric system
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:38:48 UTC No. 15867230
how many football fields is that?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:38:54 UTC No. 15867231
>>15867224
I hope you have your suicide pill ready
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:39:13 UTC No. 15867233
>>15867224
ENGINE CHILL HAS STARTED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:39:28 UTC No. 15867240
>>15867230
about 1.3
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:39:46 UTC No. 15867245
>>15867231
9mm suicide pills ready to roll
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:40:14 UTC No. 15867250
>>15867236
Orbital bombardment NOW
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:40:19 UTC No. 15867252
>>15867230
About 5.337 School Shooting
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:40:25 UTC No. 15867254
Why is there a woman on ED stream?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:40:35 UTC No. 15867257
>>15867242
Your stream is 2-3m behind live, refresh.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:40:44 UTC No. 15867259
>tiles
REPTILIAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:40:51 UTC No. 15867262
IT'S SO DIRTY CYBERPUNK SEXY OMG IMAGINE ONE WITH 10,000 FLIGHT HOURS HNNNNNNNNG
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:41:24 UTC No. 15867269
More kino animations
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:41:24 UTC No. 15867271
>>15867262
SEXY HOT STAGING
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:41:30 UTC No. 15867276
>>15867230
71 washing machines tall
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:41:51 UTC No. 15867280
CONFIRMED ALL SIX ENGINES RUNNING DURING HOT STAGING
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:42:14 UTC No. 15867286
>>15867250
No orbital bombardment without orbital launches, backbitch
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:42:17 UTC No. 15867288
>>15867271
I HOPE THEY NEVER WASH THEM
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:42:25 UTC No. 15867289
>all 6 engines
its so fucking over
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:42:54 UTC No. 15867293
>>15866616
reminder, answer if you haven't
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:43:13 UTC No. 15867296
It's going to blow up, it's not going to survive all 6
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:43:37 UTC No. 15867301
How many tons of CO2 is released into the atmosphere by this test launch?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:44:11 UTC No. 15867307
>>15867257
Firefox PiP +5s does it automatically
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:44:14 UTC No. 15867308
>>15867301
Not enough
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:44:19 UTC No. 15867309
>>15867301
all of them. fuck off zoomer.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:44:21 UTC No. 15867310
>>15867301
not enough
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:44:24 UTC No. 15867312
>>15867301
fuck the atmosphere
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:44:38 UTC No. 15867314
>>15867306
uranium pins
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:44:45 UTC No. 15867316
>>15867301
shut up retard
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:44:57 UTC No. 15867318
I did not need to see that SpaceX
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:45:06 UTC No. 15867320
>>15867296
what the fuck were they thinking
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:45:27 UTC No. 15867323
>>15867318
the water anus?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:45:58 UTC No. 15867327
T-15 minutes, scroob incoming due der untermensch on their boats
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:46:04 UTC No. 15867330
>>15867321
only on X
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:46:05 UTC No. 15867331
LET'S FUCKING GO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:46:16 UTC No. 15867332
>>15867323
Water goatse.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:46:16 UTC No. 15867333
>>15867301
less than your fatass family farts, would you like to volunteer for a cull?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:46:54 UTC No. 15867338
>>15867322
Me after taco bell. color shifted
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:46:59 UTC No. 15867339
>>15867322
I would put my dick into that
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:47:11 UTC No. 15867340
>>15867321
All those turtles...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:47:36 UTC No. 15867345
KINO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:47:39 UTC No. 15867347
TOTAL OCELOT DEATH
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:47:49 UTC No. 15867350
EEWWWWW GET THAT FALCON SHIT OFF MY SCREEEEEN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:48:22 UTC No. 15867354
>2014
has it really been 30 years...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:48:27 UTC No. 15867358
kate is putting in work
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:48:55 UTC No. 15867367
>>15867354
2020 was 45 years ago
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:49:16 UTC No. 15867369
T-11:00
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:49:19 UTC No. 15867370
T-11, someone do every minute fno please
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:49:46 UTC No. 15867375
>>15867301
CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas, idiot. Mars would have a massive greenhouse effect if CO2 was really a greenhouse gas because Mars has 20x more CO2 in it's atmosphere than Earth does. Mars has no greenhouse effect whatsoever, so there is no possible way that CO2 is a greenhouse gas
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:49:50 UTC No. 15867377
>>15867322
the spice must flow
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:50:15 UTC No. 15867387
This is Starship launch control.
T-10 minutes
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:50:30 UTC No. 15867394
T-10
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:50:32 UTC No. 15867395
>why do we need such a rocket
BRILLIANT PEBBLES
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:50:38 UTC No. 15867396
NEW MOON ANIMATION???
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:50:42 UTC No. 15867398
T-10
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:50:55 UTC No. 15867401
>>15867375
scientists say you're wrong.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:51:12 UTC No. 15867405
T-9:00
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:51:14 UTC No. 15867407
my body is ready
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:51:15 UTC No. 15867408
T-9
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:51:20 UTC No. 15867410
dwarf those figgers
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:51:29 UTC No. 15867414
To think that you have to develop all this shit just so some boomers in the country can get internet.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:51:30 UTC No. 15867415
live-5500 mp4 1920x1080 30 5500k m3u8F avc1.640028 mp4a.40.2
It's not even 60 fps lol
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:51:38 UTC No. 15867417
>>15867403
>file name
>discord
Bleed
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:51:49 UTC No. 15867419
I'm gonna shid
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:51:57 UTC No. 15867424
Thanks for the bitrate starved "x" stream, Elon. High fucking quality.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:51:59 UTC No. 15867425
>no significant issues
>therefore there are issues
It's over.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:52:01 UTC No. 15867428
NO OUTSTANDING ISSUES
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:52:05 UTC No. 15867430
>>15867401
Therein lies the problem
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:52:15 UTC No. 15867432
>that view with john in the corner
i did a penis burp i must admit
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:52:17 UTC No. 15867434
Quick
Predict the correct numbers of Raptors failing
and you can win a (you)
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:52:24 UTC No. 15867437
>>15867418
no hair, that's for sure.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:52:35 UTC No. 15867439
LATCHES
UNLOCKED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:52:36 UTC No. 15867440
>>15867424
It's plenty of bits for 30 fps
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:52:38 UTC No. 15867442
>>15867418
>>15867419
ALSO JOHN IS BACKKKKK
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:52:44 UTC No. 15867443
>>15867418
>i hope my sniper doesn't miss
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:52:44 UTC No. 15867444
reminder 4k 60hz has been the standard for 5+ years now
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:53:15 UTC No. 15867451
>>15867418
>why did i let my slut wife convince me to do that cringe photoshoot?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:53:41 UTC No. 15867456
>>15867418
Not a thing has his Latina girlfriend is giving him the gawk gawk 9000
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:54:07 UTC No. 15867461
>>15867414
I have Starlink, it honestly does feel like the future. Sitting on my porch dozens of miles from the nearest person, seeing the solar panels start making power as the sun rises, drinking coffee, and watching a morning launch in 1080p is spiritual.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:54:13 UTC No. 15867462
>>15867440
We had 4k60 streams.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:54:24 UTC No. 15867463
>still a few boats
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:54:35 UTC No. 15867473
WE GAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:54:41 UTC No. 15867476
SINK THE FUCKING BOATS, SACRIFICE THE BOOMERS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:54:43 UTC No. 15867477
OVERSISTERS??
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:54:43 UTC No. 15867478
This launch is a distraction from Elon's antisemitism. SpaceX is finished
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:01 UTC No. 15867482
It's gonna scrub. It's gonna fucking scrub. It always fucking scrubs.
Always blue balling.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:09 UTC No. 15867487
THE BOATS ARE HEADING SOUTH
BOMB THEM
DESTROY THEM
STEAL THEIR CHILDREN AND DROWN THEM
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:10 UTC No. 15867488
any ULA beetles on site?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:17 UTC No. 15867491
ummm why are so many of those boaters wearing small circular hats?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:25 UTC No. 15867493
>>15867463
Where is the navy when you need them. What do they get the billions for? Fucking littoral combats ships up the ass and not one to clear this rabble.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:33 UTC No. 15867495
>Mission Control cheering
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:37 UTC No. 15867498
T-5 MINUTES
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:41 UTC No. 15867501
Shit wait, did anyone check the gridfin actuators?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:42 UTC No. 15867503
>heavy storms will hit starbase starting on monday
its now or tomorrow
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:46 UTC No. 15867504
>>15867491
Sheer cohencidence. They're just very rich and successful.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:47 UTC No. 15867506
T-4:20
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:48 UTC No. 15867507
>>15867468
It really was a nice boat
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:55:56 UTC No. 15867508
Clear bro what is your status?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:56:09 UTC No. 15867512
Everything's been going too well this morning...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:56:10 UTC No. 15867514
>>15867231
no, i'm on a boat. this shitcoin scam rocket isnt even going to leave the pad
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:56:14 UTC No. 15867515
>>15867476
I killed them. I killed them all. They're dead, every single one of them. And not just the men, but the women and the children, too. They're like animals, and I slaughtered them like animals. I hate them!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:56:14 UTC No. 15867516
>>15867501
yes
they're working
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:56:30 UTC No. 15867520
>>15867418
his penis
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:56:34 UTC No. 15867522
what records will starship break if it makes it to orbit?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:56:54 UTC No. 15867528
>>15867440
it's 60fps
and it's fine, zoomers don't know how good they have it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:56:55 UTC No. 15867529
BRING ME THEIR HEADS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:57:02 UTC No. 15867531
>>15867507
I live near that fjord.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:57:11 UTC No. 15867535
>that nervous laugh
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:57:12 UTC No. 15867536
>>15867522
all of them
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:57:14 UTC No. 15867537
youtube stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-z
T-12mins
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:57:14 UTC No. 15867539
I predict, It will not detach.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:57:19 UTC No. 15867540
Sun's up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:57:28 UTC No. 15867546
>>15867522
Definitely the heaviest object
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:57:41 UTC No. 15867552
>>15867536
like does it beat saturn V?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:57:52 UTC No. 15867558
>>15867537
retard
we're less than 3 minutes away in the real world
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:00 UTC No. 15867560
>>15867514
rest in piss boater scum
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:02 UTC No. 15867562
>>15867537
Anon we are T-02:30
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:13 UTC No. 15867567
>>15867540
It's gonna blind everyone
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:15 UTC No. 15867568
>>15867537
>12 minutes
nigga we at almost t-1 minute
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:19 UTC No. 15867573
>>15867546
Definitely not.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:19 UTC No. 15867574
Two minutes. It's looking kino, high chance of scrub
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:21 UTC No. 15867575
Music has.... STARTED!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:22 UTC No. 15867577
>>15867552
yes easily
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:30 UTC No. 15867581
>>15867552
It's more than twice as powerful...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:48 UTC No. 15867598
>>15867537
>@SpaceX_XxX
Do not redeem.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:58:57 UTC No. 15867610
fuck, racist Kkkoastguard forced my boat out of the exclusion zone
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:01 UTC No. 15867612
WE GAAAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:03 UTC No. 15867613
Estronauts moving outside to his gay little balcony
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:06 UTC No. 15867614
eTVC is hella fast.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:15 UTC No. 15867621
>>15867540
Wait for my launch, look to the east, at dawn
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:20 UTC No. 15867622
>wiggles confirmed by Insprucker
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:21 UTC No. 15867624
>>15867522
tallest and most powerful rocket, and i think i heard them say they aren't planning on recovering and reusing any of the hardware today, but in theory it's a completely reusable design which is huge
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:32 UTC No. 15867632
>>15867537
this nigga eating curry
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:39 UTC No. 15867633
bros im scard
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:42 UTC No. 15867637
FUCKING HOLD
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:46 UTC No. 15867638
>>15867573
It's heavier than Skylab and Shuttle orbiter.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:47 UTC No. 15867639
>>15867401
they're lying about that, they'd lose their jobs and salaries if they didn't
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:49 UTC No. 15867642
>>15867610
no nigger zone
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:53 UTC No. 15867645
It stopped
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:55 UTC No. 15867649
>t-00.30
i love you all
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:59:55 UTC No. 15867650
HOLD HOLD HOLD
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:04 UTC No. 15867659
WE GAAAAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:16 UTC No. 15867663
my ass is clenched
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:17 UTC No. 15867664
>>15867650
WE GAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:17 UTC No. 15867665
SELL SELL SELL
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:20 UTC No. 15867670
HOLD WHAT THE FUCK
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:23 UTC No. 15867672
My heart.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:26 UTC No. 15867673
it's over
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:27 UTC No. 15867674
Bet you its a hold cause there's till 1-2 boats in the perimeter not yet clear.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:34 UTC No. 15867679
>>15867558
>>15867562
>>15867568
>>15867598
>>15867632
:(
here's a live one... from Everyday Astronaut
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6na
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:40 UTC No. 15867680
BAITED LMAO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:43 UTC No. 15867682
>software abort
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:45 UTC No. 15867683
recycle
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:50 UTC No. 15867689
HODL HODL HODL HODL
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:53 UTC No. 15867693
HOLD HOLD
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:54 UTC No. 15867694
BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED BLUEBALLED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:02 UTC No. 15867699
HOW ABSOLUTELY DARE YOU
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:09 UTC No. 15867703
SCRUBBED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:10 UTC No. 15867704
COME ON
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:19 UTC No. 15867711
IT JUST KEEP HAPPENING
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:23 UTC No. 15867712
WORK IT BOY
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:27 UTC No. 15867718
normal hold; late pressure on 2nd stage
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:42 UTC No. 15867730
FUUUUUUUUU
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:52 UTC No. 15867737
AGHGHGHG MY BALLS ARE BLUEEEE!!!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:54 UTC No. 15867739
>>15867634
me rn
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:55 UTC No. 15867740
It's not pressurizing as calculated
Does it mean there are leaks?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:01:55 UTC No. 15867741
>>15867041
told ya
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:06 UTC No. 15867748
ITS OK GIYS I WORK FOR SPAX WE ARE GO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:10 UTC No. 15867751
>please don't leave
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:12 UTC No. 15867753
I shit my pants for nothing
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:25 UTC No. 15867761
BRING ME THEIR HEEEAAAAAADS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:28 UTC No. 15867767
Elon tweeted, it's scrubbed
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:30 UTC No. 15867770
>"please don't go away..."
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:30 UTC No. 15867771
WEEEEEEEEE GGGGGGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNN
i love you all
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:32 UTC No. 15867772
WE GOIN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:39 UTC No. 15867783
>>15867740
IT MEANS IT'S OVER
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:39 UTC No. 15867784
clock is rolling!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:42 UTC No. 15867791
WE GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:46 UTC No. 15867794
>>15867718
don't go away; only 20 minutes window. hold over
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:46 UTC No. 15867795
STOP THE COUNT!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:51 UTC No. 15867797
YES
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:02:59 UTC No. 15867804
WE'RE SO BACK
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:12 UTC No. 15867809
DÉCOLLAGE!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:13 UTC No. 15867810
TOWER CLEAR
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:14 UTC No. 15867811
WE GAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:20 UTC No. 15867814
hasn't exploded YET
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:28 UTC No. 15867818
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:31 UTC No. 15867819
FUUUUUUUCK YEEEEEES
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:33 UTC No. 15867822
yay
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:35 UTC No. 15867825
it's so fucking huge
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:41 UTC No. 15867826
BEAUTIFUL LIFT OFF
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:45 UTC No. 15867832
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:48 UTC No. 15867834
ALLL ENGINES ARE GOOD WE ARE FUCKINF GAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:03:56 UTC No. 15867836
alll those tiles falling off, kek
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:04 UTC No. 15867840
GORGEOUS RAPTORS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:05 UTC No. 15867841
>all 33 working
wtf
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:10 UTC No. 15867847
ZERO ENGINES SHUT DOWN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:11 UTC No. 15867848
FUCK YEAH WE SO GAAAAAAAAAAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:11 UTC No. 15867849
ALL ENGINES GAAAAAAAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:15 UTC No. 15867852
ALL RAPTORS ARE UP
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:17 UTC No. 15867854
MAX QUTE
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:21 UTC No. 15867858
MAX Q NO ENGINES OUT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:21 UTC No. 15867859
MAX QUTE
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:30 UTC No. 15867863
ALL ENGINES HEALTHY
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:32 UTC No. 15867865
WTF
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:37 UTC No. 15867868
WE FUCKIN GAAAAAAN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:04:46 UTC No. 15867877
100% RELIABILITY
SCEPTICS BTFO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:05:07 UTC No. 15867888
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:05:10 UTC No. 15867889
RAPTORS HAVE BEEN SOLVED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:05:30 UTC No. 15867901
4.5km/s, holy fuck
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:05:33 UTC No. 15867902
>all raptors
we're so going to make it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:05:39 UTC No. 15867906
uHHH IT'S STUCK?????????
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:05:41 UTC No. 15867907
god damn not a single problem
not a single engine out
hot stage pls work
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:05:57 UTC No. 15867912
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:05 UTC No. 15867917
holy shit it's working on the 2nd attempt
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:06 UTC No. 15867919
THEY DID IT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:07 UTC No. 15867921
HOLY FUCKIGN SHIT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:09 UTC No. 15867922
WTFFFFF
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:10 UTC No. 15867923
FUCK
YEAH
SEAKING
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:11 UTC No. 15867925
HOLY DHUT STAGE SHH JENSJCHFB
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:22 UTC No. 15867931
AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHALSDKJFASDJFL
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:22 UTC No. 15867933
THEY FUCKING DID IT HOLY FUUUUUUUCK
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:32 UTC No. 15867938
holy shit, hot stage fail homos buckbroken
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:38 UTC No. 15867941
aaaand it's gone
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:39 UTC No. 15867944
holy fucking shiiiiitttttttt it worked
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:42 UTC No. 15867947
RIP
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:45 UTC No. 15867949
lmao we didn't need that part anyway
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:46 UTC No. 15867950
OH SHIT, STAGING SEPARATION WORKED, BUT BOOSTER WENT RUD
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:06:49 UTC No. 15867953
THE AFTS WORKED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:09 UTC No. 15867966
This wasn't on my bingo card
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:11 UTC No. 15867969
Bye bye B9, you did your main job.
Hotstage is not really on the menu for the long run.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:11 UTC No. 15867970
LITERAL TEARS IN MY EYES
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:13 UTC No. 15867972
F
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:15 UTC No. 15867973
They expect one of us in the wreckage brother
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:17 UTC No. 15867975
bonus explosion nice launch
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:18 UTC No. 15867977
RIP booster
So what's the next staging strategy?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:22 UTC No. 15867979
GOODBYE BOOSTER 9, YOU WERE THE BEST YET
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:23 UTC No. 15867980
How the hell do you lose a booster?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:27 UTC No. 15867984
STARSHIP STILL GOING
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:28 UTC No. 15867986
>rocket simultaneously works and explodes
best of both worlds?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:36 UTC No. 15867990
Where is onboard camera you fucking bastards
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:37 UTC No. 15867991
>>15867969
Oh yes it is buddy boy
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:41 UTC No. 15867994
hot staging blowed it up real good
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:46 UTC No. 15867998
F for Booster 9
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:07:52 UTC No. 15868004
ship POV where???
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:05 UTC No. 15868011
>>15867980
Looks like relight during the flip failed and the booster hit the FTS zone
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:11 UTC No. 15868015
07 to Booster 9.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:18 UTC No. 15868020
NOMINAL
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:19 UTC No. 15868021
Why didn't they just leave it running and see what happens?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:20 UTC No. 15868022
There were some engines failing on relight. How many was it exactly? I think it was four.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:23 UTC No. 15868024
>>15867980
>destroy top via hotstaging
>die to aerodynamic stress
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:32 UTC No. 15868030
SECO??? AND TRAJECTORY NOMINAL HOLY SHIT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:43 UTC No. 15868033
STILL 3 MINUTES TILL STARSHIP ENGINE CUTOFF
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:58 UTC No. 15868039
>>15868021
Probably a requirement, if something goes wrong immediately FTS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:58 UTC No. 15868040
you could see the bottom of the booster failing
think it was engine failure not the hot staging
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:58 UTC No. 15868041
>>15867980
The engines failed to restart so it self destructed
That's what, the third booster to ever be that high up in the air?
I'm not surprised
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:08:59 UTC No. 15868042
>>15868011
No, the 3 core engines continued to run during the flip and it succeeded in doing that. However, I think the forward dome with the shield buckled during the flip around and that triggered the FTS.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:09:15 UTC No. 15868048
>>15868024
>90km
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:09:20 UTC No. 15868052
ELON YOU NIGGER WHERE ARE THE ONBOARD VIEWS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:09:25 UTC No. 15868055
IT'S FUCKING NOMINAL BROS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:09:29 UTC No. 15868057
the pad upgrade worked great, it got off the pad nice and quick, no energy wasted digging a hole in the sand
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:09:30 UTC No. 15868058
CSS STATUS?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:09:31 UTC No. 15868059
FINISH THE MISSION STARSHIP
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:09:35 UTC No. 15868061
GO TO SHIP VIEW DAMMIT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:09:55 UTC No. 15868071
>>15868052
I'm sneeding
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:09:55 UTC No. 15868072
>>15868022
Yeah, right half failed to relight. Must've been sloshing of the prop
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:01 UTC No. 15868076
ALMOST ORBIT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:03 UTC No. 15868078
>>15868052
Signal acquisition with Starlink hasn't happened yet. Ship needs to get to probably ~150-200km suborbital ceiling
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:09 UTC No. 15868079
>>15868058
MURDERED WITH THE TRUTH THAT STARSHIP WON
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:11 UTC No. 15868081
>>15868058
Busy typing up a script about how the booster failed and that it's all ogre.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:14 UTC No. 15868082
>>15868011
I think the force from the ship flipped the booster too fast for the engines to recover control from.
It looked like it relit some of the edge engines in an attempt to regain control right before termination.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:23 UTC No. 15868086
>>15868061
Cant the ayy lmao's are stil lthere.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:31 UTC No. 15868090
ONE MORE MINUTE TILL ALMOST ORBIT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:36 UTC No. 15868095
>suborbital
so it's not an orbital flight?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:41 UTC No. 15868097
>>15868058
trvth nvked
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:49 UTC No. 15868099
YOU'RE A GOOD SHIP YOU'RE A GOOD SHIP YOU'RE A GOOD SHIP
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:50 UTC No. 15868100
Is starship supposed to have this long burn to orbit?
It's at T+7:00 and still only at 17000 km/h
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:10:59 UTC No. 15868102
>>15868082
Yeah looked like it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:03 UTC No. 15868104
>altitude dropping
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:14 UTC No. 15868111
>>15868095
fractional orbit
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:16 UTC No. 15868114
>>15868095
Shhhh, the FAA doesn't need to know
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:16 UTC No. 15868115
>>15868095
orbital enough for testing purposes
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:19 UTC No. 15868116
>>15868095
No, it's going to circle the earth and land in the lobby of the FAA
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:21 UTC No. 15868118
>>15868087
MY GOD, IT EVEN HAS A TWILIGHT EFFECT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:22 UTC No. 15868119
>>15868095
It's the same as Gagarin's.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:23 UTC No. 15868120
OH MY GAAAAAAAAAH LOOK AT THAAAAAAAAT TRAIL
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:25 UTC No. 15868122
>>15866168
I'd just like to point out that there's a hidden Starfox logo in the OP image.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:25 UTC No. 15868123
>Terminal guidance
It (launch) is over
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:31 UTC No. 15868128
I think starship is dead?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:37 UTC No. 15868130
wtf happened
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:37 UTC No. 15868131
WHY NO SPACE VIEWS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
WHY NO HOTSTAGE ON BOARD VIEWS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:38 UTC No. 15868133
it exploded
they lost telemetry
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:42 UTC No. 15868135
Give us fucking views from starship Elon you cunt.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:48 UTC No. 15868142
looks like it just broke through the firmament
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:54 UTC No. 15868144
starship blowed up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:11:58 UTC No. 15868149
WOOOOOOOO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:12:10 UTC No. 15868156
It blew up
sage at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:12:21 UTC No. 15868161
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:12:25 UTC No. 15868165
>guy with huge cowboy hat right front and center of the camera
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:12:29 UTC No. 15868168
>>15868122
KRYSTALCOON WILL BE HANGED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:12:32 UTC No. 15868169
WAIT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:12:38 UTC No. 15868174
it blew up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:12:40 UTC No. 15868178
wtf staship just flew over my house
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:12:45 UTC No. 15868179
WHERE ARE THE ONBOARD VIEWS ELON
WHERE THE FUCK ARE THEY
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:12:58 UTC No. 15868184
>>15868165
thats elons brother
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:13:26 UTC No. 15868195
that cloud looked sus
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:13:26 UTC No. 15868196
HOLY SHIT I WORK FOR SPACEX
THE ADL HAS TAKEN OVER THE SHIP
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:13:34 UTC No. 15868199
>150km hop from superhopper
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:13:51 UTC No. 15868204
>>15868165
>newfag doesn't know who Kimbal is
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:13:54 UTC No. 15868208
>>15868184
looks like Bezor lol
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:14:06 UTC No. 15868218
How the fuck would you lose telemetry when it is still in view. Shit got fucked.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:14:10 UTC No. 15868221
>>15868122
based
>>15868168
seethe
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:14:12 UTC No. 15868223
>>15868095
It might as well be for all intents and purposes. Like 98% of the velocity needed and the same velocity it would have on a normal reentry. This just means they can test reentry without having to manuever and relight starship to burn back out of orbit.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:14:24 UTC No. 15868233
I think it was a demo of FTS for the FAAgs
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:14:26 UTC No. 15868234
>last altitude was 92 miles
FUUUUUCK IT DIDNT PASS THE KARMAN LINE
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:14:38 UTC No. 15868244
>>15868204
I know who he is but I didn't recognize him.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:14:38 UTC No. 15868245
>>15868218
no ground stations
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:14:48 UTC No. 15868250
>>15868218
It's over...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:14:48 UTC No. 15868251
she's gone ;_;
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:14:58 UTC No. 15868256
;_;
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:07 UTC No. 15868258
>>15868200
Obviously a major malfunction.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:16 UTC No. 15868263
CUBA bout to get hit by debris
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:18 UTC No. 15868267
There's a rouge 200 tons of steel flying towards Hawaii RIGHT NOW
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:37 UTC No. 15868277
NOOOO
Still a very impressive launch
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:39 UTC No. 15868278
IT'S OVER
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:41 UTC No. 15868281
How? How did it fail then? What the fuck went wrong?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:42 UTC No. 15868282
it's over
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:45 UTC No. 15868284
uhh where is it going to land ????
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:48 UTC No. 15868286
she was a good girl.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:57 UTC No. 15868290
FTS fuckery exploded the 2nd stage?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:15:59 UTC No. 15868291
AFTS went too hard
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:06 UTC No. 15868294
its it blewup without telemetry data thats going to be hard to diagnose
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:16 UTC No. 15868301
fuck doomers Starship is safe and sound
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:18 UTC No. 15868303
Holy fuck, that was fucking amazing. Staging happened, and S25 got to drift off in to the sunset before going kaboom. Bros, it has been a FUCKING HONOR.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:22 UTC No. 15868304
YOU CAN'T SUGARCOAT THIS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:26 UTC No. 15868307
ula sniper still undefeated
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:28 UTC No. 15868308
>>15868263
They better be happy to be hit with the white man's technology
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:30 UTC No. 15868310
FAA CUNTS NUKED THE SHIP JUST BEFORE GETTING TO ORBIT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:44 UTC No. 15868318
>>15868301
>inb4 it's fine and they have to restart the stream later
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:45 UTC No. 15868320
>>15868303
Amen faggots
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:46 UTC No. 15868321
the hard parts all worked and then both parts of it exploded anyhow lol
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:16:58 UTC No. 15868331
BEST GIRL
RIP
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:17:00 UTC No. 15868333
Welp, see you all in 2025 for the next one
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:17:00 UTC No. 15868334
Unfortunately we really needed a success today for humans to get off the Earth long term. Prospects for spacefaring civilization are dim now. They should have tried harder
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:17:08 UTC No. 15868338
>>15868281
I guess it went slightly off course and triggered the FTS. Pretty lame desu
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:17:08 UTC No. 15868339
>>15868267
Captain Cook's revenge
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:17:11 UTC No. 15868342
Zero engine issues and successful staging is still a win.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:17:17 UTC No. 15868347
It didn't disintegrate during staging so it went pretty well imo.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:17:27 UTC No. 15868348
>NSF immediately back to shilling
Absolutely vile
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:17:31 UTC No. 15868351
>>15868321
kek that's true.
At least Hawaii might be able to see a lot of debris re-enter
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:17:36 UTC No. 15868354
RIP
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:01 UTC No. 15868369
>>15868342
how do you figure zero engine issues when both blew up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:01 UTC No. 15868370
DO NOT BE SAD, THIS HAS BEEN A GREAT VICTORY! RAPTOR RELIABILITY IS FULLY SOLVED, AND DOOMERS HAVE BEEN BTFO ON HOT STAGING NOT BEING POSSIBLE. Now excuse me while I go watch the launch again
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:04 UTC No. 15868371
>>15868267
will it get red hot, though?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:04 UTC No. 15868372
remember to buy our merch so we can afford to keep screeching over these videos :DDDDD
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:07 UTC No. 15868375
Hot Stage doomers forever rekt
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:11 UTC No. 15868377
>>15868338
Yeah, FUCK the faa
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:21 UTC No. 15868381
>>15868351
>Hawaii
More like Africa
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:22 UTC No. 15868383
>>15868342
cope
it's literally OVER for starship
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:22 UTC No. 15868384
>>15868321
This is the thing that gets me most. Everything seemingly worked fine and yet it exploded afterwards when nothing was going on.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:31 UTC No. 15868386
>>15868267
based, fuck those pineapple niggers
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:31 UTC No. 15868387
>>15868303
It's been an honor anon
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:34 UTC No. 15868389
>>15868342
>Zero engine issues
engines failed on booster relight
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:40 UTC No. 15868393
>>15868342
the engine probably took out both stages. Superheavy engines failed to relight and they had to activate FTS. Engines also took out the upper stage, hardly could've been anything else.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:46 UTC No. 15868399
Why did the upper stage fail?
Was it damaged during staging?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:52 UTC No. 15868401
>>15868332
[ ] test message
[x] not test message
[Cancel] [Send]
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:53 UTC No. 15868402
Two questions I have
Why did the 1st stage explode
Why did the 2nd stage explode
Can't be because of structural failure. Must be FTS being too strict?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:18:55 UTC No. 15868404
the faa is going to demand an investigation. see you guys in 7 months.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:19:08 UTC No. 15868407
WAIT WAIT SOMEONE GET A VIEW OF THE PAD HOW DID IT HOLD UP
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:19:11 UTC No. 15868409
SpaceX FAILED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:19:22 UTC No. 15868413
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:19:32 UTC No. 15868416
>>15868407
I too would like to know.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:19:41 UTC No. 15868421
>>15868321
Engines took out this rocket and the last rocket. It's literally the only issue they have.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:19:48 UTC No. 15868423
This was an abject failure, and I'm not going to be gaslit into believing otherwise
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:19:50 UTC No. 15868424
>>15868381
It was already going too fast. India at the worst.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:19:57 UTC No. 15868427
>>15868281
We don't know. But my speculation is that the engines did not shut down and/or there was an engine failure of some kind, as we saw an orbital degradation of 1km despite the horizontal velocity continuing to increase for some time. This may have led to an orbital declination, which led to FTS activating. It bears mentioning that all the engines on B9 and S25 are in the mid 150s, while SpaceX is up to the lower 400s for engine production. Generationally, if you were to argue that each batch of 100 is a generation, then B9/S25 is 3 generations behind current design and build procedures.
Engines have been generally the biggest issue for SpaceX on Starship/Superheavy, so my bet is on an engine failure of some kind.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:19:59 UTC No. 15868428
see you guys in 8 months for the third test flight
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:19:59 UTC No. 15868429
>>15868402
1st stage probably self-destructed after it failed to regain stability after the flip maneuver
to be clear, the flip itself was fine, but there was probably engine cutoff and re-lighting issues
2nd stage nobody knows
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:00 UTC No. 15868430
>>15868412
She's so beautiful bros....
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:01 UTC No. 15868431
This was a waste.
The Starship program is fucked if they don't get to launch at least 4 times per year
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:04 UTC No. 15868433
>>15868267
Not my problem.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:14 UTC No. 15868437
>>15868402
actually first stage was having some weird shit come off the engine section before FTS activated, i'm assuming the bottom was about to blow up anyway so they decided to be cautious.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:15 UTC No. 15868440
>>15868351
o shit, they basically shotgun shelled debris into space
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:16 UTC No. 15868442
uh, muskrats???
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:17 UTC No. 15868443
>>15868409
HAHAHAHA DOOMERS TRYING TO JEW THEMSELVES A VICTORY THIS HAS BEEN A TOTAL WIN GO BACK
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:23 UTC No. 15868448
>>15868404
Lmao, which agency will they involve this time?
Deep ocean protection agency to check if debris didn't disturb fish too much?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:29 UTC No. 15868449
>>15868342
why did both stages explode then?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:42 UTC No. 15868451
>>15868375
there's nothing wrong with hot staging, the engines have always been the issue and still are
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:20:42 UTC No. 15868452
>>15868404
Didn't the previous investigation only take so long because the flight termination system didn't work?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:21:11 UTC No. 15868460
inb4 it hit the firmament
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:21:23 UTC No. 15868466
>>15868440
There's a reason why they're in low orbit so any debris can easily deorb and burn in the atmosphere
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:21:42 UTC No. 15868471
>>15868423
Agreed. They had six months to work on this. If they can't even get the second stage to orbit by now it's not looking good for the multiple launches needed for HLS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:21:43 UTC No. 15868472
>check nsf 24/7
>everyone saying pad has major damage
uh oh...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:21:48 UTC No. 15868473
>>15868436
>4 failed
I was right.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:21:49 UTC No. 15868474
>>15868440
Directly into the path of Tiangong, this time he's going to show them what a real close call looks like
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:21:59 UTC No. 15868480
>>15868399
It might have shutdown early and AFTS said "nah".
>>15868402
Booster FTS triggers if the calculated impact point exits the safe corridor. Booster relight didn't go as planned so it probably slid out of it. Dunno how the upper stage AFTS works.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:22:01 UTC No. 15868483
>>15868466
Hopefully it lands on Israel
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:22:19 UTC No. 15868488
>>15868267
It's 1500 tons
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:22:22 UTC No. 15868491
>>15868399
it looked fine in the video, all the engines were lit for ages
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:22:24 UTC No. 15868493
So we can all agree it was the pad debris that fucked up the rockets on the first launch.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:23:07 UTC No. 15868508
>>15868472
>the pad exploded and destroyed stage 2 during the end of it's burn
no...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:23:10 UTC No. 15868509
>>15868427
I said it before and I'll say it again, Raptor should've been same cycle as Merlin only methane.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:23:12 UTC No. 15868510
>>15868493
Seems so, yeah.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:23:14 UTC No. 15868511
>>15868493
Yes. I will agree with this, but also there was STILL pas debris this launch, just not as much. >>15868472
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:23:23 UTC No. 15868513
>>15868402
booster had a raptor or several explode
you can see it in this webm >>15868023
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:23:36 UTC No. 15868516
>>15868407
There was no debris in the video so it must be fine right?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:23:39 UTC No. 15868519
>>15868402
The booster and starship were pretty outdated. I suspect that on booster 1 the engines didnt fire and on starship something with the controls or communication failed. Both very fixable problems.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:23:42 UTC No. 15868520
>>15868348
Why watch them?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:23:52 UTC No. 15868526
>>15868234
In did, but in pieces
>>15868509
raptor worked perfectly. hotstaging damage killed the ship and booster
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:24:11 UTC No. 15868533
>>15868466
>He thinks stainless steel plate will burn up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:24:11 UTC No. 15868534
>>15868399
shot down by israeli space lasers as revenge for mean tweets about jews by elon
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:24:13 UTC No. 15868535
>>15868508
A weapon to surpass metal gear
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:24:23 UTC No. 15868537
>>15868513
ah what a freakin cool video
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:24:29 UTC No. 15868540
still higher than virgin galactic
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:24:29 UTC No. 15868541
It was sabotaged by a rogue beetle
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:24:40 UTC No. 15868549
check the stream
https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1d
47 minutes in exactly it activates FTS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:24:48 UTC No. 15868550
>fisher crew outside florida say they saw a building-sized cilinder fall
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:24:50 UTC No. 15868552
>>15868234
The karman line is at 100km, not 100miles you retarded niggef.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:24:58 UTC No. 15868556
TANK FARM CONFIRMED TO BE DAMAGED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:25:16 UTC No. 15868561
>>15868428
>14 * 2 weeks of waiting
>2 hours of excitement
>time for another 14 * 2 weeks of waiting
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:25:19 UTC No. 15868562
>>15868541
TBD
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:25:20 UTC No. 15868563
>>15868552
Yeah thats what i thought 100km
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:25:22 UTC No. 15868565
fish and wildlife won
spacex lost
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:25:23 UTC No. 15868567
>>15868482
A second booster hit the turtle
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:25:29 UTC No. 15868571
>>15868493
No lol, Elon said this was not the case.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:25:57 UTC No. 15868578
>>15868436
one of the middle ones actually stopped working, I wonder why?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:26:01 UTC No. 15868579
>>15868493
Yes, one of the researchers who looked into it, said that the exhaust plume created Coriolis effects in the sand and water vapor cloud which was identical to behavior seen during a volcanic eruption. Vertical and diagonal ejecta from the concrete below no doubt damaged a lot of the engines, leading to structural failures, and then fuel leaks + fires did the rest.
>>15868509
I think Raptor is fine, and Starship and SuperHeavy getting up to 90km and 149km respectively, all but certifies that FFSC is the future of most efficient chem prop rocketry bar none. Electric Thrust Vector Control is also the superior measure for engine gimbal control as well.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:26:23 UTC No. 15868584
Seems like automated termination system was too trigger happy.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:26:28 UTC No. 15868587
>>15868431
>blows up before staging
>6 months
>blows up slightly after staging
>6 months (?)
>blows up a little longer after staging
>repeat
maybe by 2030 they'll get it to orbit and land it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:26:30 UTC No. 15868589
>>15868526
and how did hotstaging cause only some of the engine to relight.
>>15868534
This, after his recent comments this sort of sabotage is justified
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:26:49 UTC No. 15868592
You people are retarded.
The booster engines failed during the flip due to ingesting gas.
The ship engines failed due to ingesting gas probably because launch wasn't quite efficient enough.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:26:55 UTC No. 15868594
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:27:01 UTC No. 15868595
>>15868474
It's gonna be like that bit in For All Mankind where the space hotel gets fucked by nork rocket debris
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:27:06 UTC No. 15868596
>>15868122
HOLY BASED!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:27:17 UTC No. 15868600
I was satisfied with the booster FTS, it makes sense
Though for the Stage 2 FTS I have no fucking idea why. It was well safe right? What could've triggered it.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:27:31 UTC No. 15868604
WHERE IS THE STREAM REUPLOAD I WANT TO SEE THIS SHIT AGAIN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:27:39 UTC No. 15868607
>John has confirmed that they have lost telemetry of the Ship soon after the Ship was in Terminal Guidance.
>That means that the Ship was in the final moments of its engine burn ahead of engine cut-off into the nominal trajectory.
>Currently it is looking likely that the Ship has triggered the FTS at the end, however that is not fully confirmed.
>To summarise today:
>Booster 9 has lifted off just a few minutes after 7AM local, with all 33 engines.
>During the full ascent all 33 engines remained lit!
>Hotstaging worked with Ship 25 powering up all six of its engines ahead of staging.
>Ship 25 then kept on firing all six of its engines for nearly the full duration of 6+ minutes.
>Meanwhile Booster 9 started its boost back burn with all 13 engines, however soon after that multiple engines rapidly shutdown, culminating in the FTS being triggered, >ending the Booster's flight.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:27:45 UTC No. 15868609
>>15868578
propellant sloshing?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:03 UTC No. 15868611
How many investigations will FAA start now?
Hopefully not in double digit range.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:04 UTC No. 15868612
>>15868604
the stream is recorded on twitch already, you can just look at it
https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1d
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:29 UTC No. 15868617
>>15868579
>le soientists says volcano coriolis effect blew up engines
No, Elon even confirmed ejecta didn't damage the engines, rocks can't move against the fast exhaust flow.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:37 UTC No. 15868620
>>15868600
Probably some fuckery from being too close to B9 explosion
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:38 UTC No. 15868621
TOTAL STARSHIP VICTORY
DOOMERS SEETHING
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:41 UTC No. 15868622
Rest in pieces
https://twitter.com/nova_road/statu
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:41 UTC No. 15868623
>>15868578
I think its because of fuel slosh. Super Heavy is absolutely massive, given the asymmetric relight, it's probably that fuel basically accumulated on one side of the booster and during ignition, the engine sputtered, may have encountered gas bubbles, and subsequent engine failure due to turbo-pump blow out, triggered the FTS as asymmetric thrust to this degree would send the booster wildly off course and even 3-5 degrees at that height downwards could put the booster outside of its debris zone.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:50 UTC No. 15868625
>>15868607
>Currently it is looking likely that the Ship has triggered the FTS at the end, however that is not fully confirmed
Here's how starship can still re-enter
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:55 UTC No. 15868626
>faulty stage 2 FTS cucked us from reentry break up
ah fuck this shit man i can't wait another six months for this
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:58 UTC No. 15868627
>>15868611
They have to play starship engine sounds to mating beetles
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:28:59 UTC No. 15868628
Why was the stream orange?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:00 UTC No. 15868629
>>15868589
You're right, it was tiggers and poohs
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:02 UTC No. 15868631
You're coping if you think this was a material success. Yes, iteration is key, but SpaceX really needed at least a successful flight path to prove to NASA program managers that they can do this. Expect congress to turn up the heat and try to get HLS contract revoked within a few months
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:04 UTC No. 15868633
>>15868473
one failed
that occurred during the flip manuever
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:06 UTC No. 15868635
>>15868600
yeah that's what i'm most interested in, it wasn't doing anything else complicated up there at that point as far as i know and it had been firing successfully for minutes at that point
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:26 UTC No. 15868641
/ULAsniper/ bros we can't stop winning
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:27 UTC No. 15868642
>if only they'd had my 4chan hot take, that rocket would be orbital
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:32 UTC No. 15868645
>>15868595
>actually watching For All Mankind
The absolute state of /sfg/
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:33 UTC No. 15868647
>>15868600
shrapnel probably fucked some shit in the engine bay and when the engines cut off the sensors picked it up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:37 UTC No. 15868648
>Lord British was in attendance.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:38 UTC No. 15868649
>>15868600
Do we know it was FTS? I saw some weird plumes coming off before the big cloud that persumably toook out SS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:42 UTC No. 15868650
>>15868556
no lol that was from the previous launch they never fixed it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:29:52 UTC No. 15868652
>>15868642
Yes
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:30:04 UTC No. 15868656
>>15868637
it's beautiful
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:30:08 UTC No. 15868657
>>15868625
SpaceX reported the second stage FTS fired. Source: Jonathan McDowell
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:30:35 UTC No. 15868663
>>15868637
shit was so clean and fast
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:30:35 UTC No. 15868664
>For All Soikind
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:30:52 UTC No. 15868669
>an hour from now starship arrives back and boca chica
>flip and burns
>lands back on the stand
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:30:57 UTC No. 15868672
Do they have any booster or ship ready? Did elon expect two test failures?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:31:06 UTC No. 15868673
>>15868631
you're coping. they stated critical objective was hot staging and they got way past it.
>within a few months
already will have launched a third time then
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:31:08 UTC No. 15868674
>>15868642
DAS RITE
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:31:22 UTC No. 15868677
>>15868637
Which stream was this?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:31:30 UTC No. 15868681
>>15868637
what was the twr?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:31:40 UTC No. 15868682
>>15868677
the official one
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:31:53 UTC No. 15868686
>>15868677
official on X
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:00 UTC No. 15868688
>>15868631
Also Elon kinda made his recent twitter comments assuming this launch would work. now he's in a lot of trouble with the Israeli citizenship holding congressmen.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:03 UTC No. 15868690
>>15868672
yes but they will have to wait for the faa to investigate. they also dont have a license for another launch. this license was only for ift-2.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:03 UTC No. 15868691
>>15868611
Oh, they'll be writing up a storm once they're back in the office on monday and finished with their 3 hour coffee break
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:19 UTC No. 15868694
>>15868645
The middle bit of the 2nd series was fucking dire, but the rest of it is interesting enough to watch.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:19 UTC No. 15868695
>>15868681
overfags, I humbly accept your mass suicide
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:21 UTC No. 15868697
>>15868672
are you retarded? total success per the mission programmed in the flight computer would have meant two destroyed vehicles
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:27 UTC No. 15868699
>>15868681
1.5
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:28 UTC No. 15868700
>>15868686
Raptor doomers blown the FUCK out
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:28 UTC No. 15868702
>>15868645
I wanted to watch this show, but the gayniggers from outer space turned me off.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:35 UTC No. 15868703
>>15868681
Not enough i reckon
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:36 UTC No. 15868704
>>15868642
It's common sense, bro.
Verification not required.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:38 UTC No. 15868705
>>15868651
one engine never relit and several more failed
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:56 UTC No. 15868708
>>15868651
I'm still amazed all the Raptors made it to stage separation
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:56 UTC No. 15868710
>>15868637
no house sized concrete chunks getting launched 250meters into the air this time at liftoff
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:32:58 UTC No. 15868711
>>15868670
Oh my fucking kino
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:33:06 UTC No. 15868713
Sound environmental impact assessment study
Deep sea environmental impact assessment study
Ozone layer impact study
Global warning impact study
Migratory bird impact study
Wave height impact study
Atmospheric disturbance impact study
Debris impact study
Beach sand contamination study
What else needs to be done before next launch?
This definitely isn't an exhaustive list.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:33:09 UTC No. 15868714
>>15868670
why is it still listing so hard off the stand
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:33:13 UTC No. 15868716
>>15868701
TOTAL
TRAFFIC CONE
DEATH
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:33:16 UTC No. 15868717
>>15868701
THE ATTACK OF THE CONES
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:33:21 UTC No. 15868719
>>15868651
I think based on observed behavior of the engine shutdown and relight failure, this: >>15868623, might be the most likely scenario. Given that during flight, fuel flow and ignition was fine and the engine shutdown sequence was picture perfect prior to stage separation.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:33:24 UTC No. 15868721
>>15868701
Oh no, the cones
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:33:30 UTC No. 15868722
overfags, I humbly accept your mass suicide
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:33:39 UTC No. 15868724
>>15868700
don't be so fast anon
>>15868705
>>15868651
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:33:52 UTC No. 15868727
>>15868701
SIX MONTHS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:33:56 UTC No. 15868728
>>15868637
That dark smoke coming off the rocket just as it lifted off had me worried. Isn't methane supposed to burn clean
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:34:13 UTC No. 15868733
>>15868713
Turtle migratory pattern impact study
Shark mating impact assessment
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:34:30 UTC No. 15868736
>>15868713
trans BIPOC wellbeing study
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:34:40 UTC No. 15868738
>>15868713
traffic cone microplastic study
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:34:41 UTC No. 15868740
crab death count is now 2
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:34:44 UTC No. 15868741
>>15868724
They didn't relight because it was doing fucking gymnastics and the engines couldn't get correct fuel you ape nigger
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:34:46 UTC No. 15868743
Hotstaging is too fucking violent, I knew it
If they went with the previous separation method this time it would have worked, prove me wrong
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:34:48 UTC No. 15868744
Whoever makes next thread, it MUST be Raptor Reliability Edition with >>15868711
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:34:51 UTC No. 15868745
>>15868714
It starts its gravity turn immediately.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:34:53 UTC No. 15868747
>>15868686
Holy shit Raptor worked perfectly
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:06 UTC No. 15868751
>>15868701
The gates has fallen, it's over.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:07 UTC No. 15868753
>>15868713
Sand beetle intergenerational trauma study
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:08 UTC No. 15868754
https://twitter.com/SpaceflightNow/
>first few seconds
OH HECK NO THE POOR HECKING BIRDERINOS!!!!!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:15 UTC No. 15868756
>>15868728
Burning slightly fuel rich keeps the engines cooler
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:28 UTC No. 15868757
>>15868701
>Those albino cones are an endangered species we need to stop for a year to review the impact
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:36 UTC No. 15868758
>>15868678
typical mexican run jobsite
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:38 UTC No. 15868760
>>15868743
hot staging wasn't the problem
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:40 UTC No. 15868762
>>15868637
look at how much it torches the launch mount when it takes off
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:44 UTC No. 15868763
Am curious to see pictures in the coming hours and days of the Super Heavy Bidet and how well it did against the full thrust launch.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:48 UTC No. 15868765
>>15868749
>>15868752
how did she find that lmao
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:52 UTC No. 15868767
Don't worry, we only have to wait two weeks until the next license approval.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:35:54 UTC No. 15868768
>>15868742
BIRD STAMPEDE MITIGATIONS STUDY
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:03 UTC No. 15868772
>>15868743
STUPID OVERNIGGER TRYING TO JEW HIMSELF A VICTORY KEEEEEEK THE HOTSTAGE WORKED PERFECTLY AND SEPARATION LEAD TO NOMINAL FLIGHT TRAJECTORY, THE ONLY THING THAT WENT WRONG WAS FTS BEING TOO STRICT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:07 UTC No. 15868774
>>15868749
>>15868752
Look at the lust in her eyes
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:09 UTC No. 15868775
>>15868690
Oh that sucks
6 months then
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:11 UTC No. 15868776
>>15868760
you don't know that.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:20 UTC No. 15868778
>>15868700
We don't know the cause of Starship failure yet. Off nominal trajectory FTS probably, but what resulted in that.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:24 UTC No. 15868779
Clear just saw clear anon's cardboard at starbase
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:24 UTC No. 15868780
>>15868749
>>15868752
>anon got noticed
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:40 UTC No. 15868782
>>15868776
We all saw it work perfectly fine.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:44 UTC No. 15868783
>>15868749
>>15868752
Clear-san payload when?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:44 UTC No. 15868784
>>15868752
congrats
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:45 UTC No. 15868785
>>15868623
>>15868719
They use fuel from the downcomer, no? Which are fully filled up until that point.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:49 UTC No. 15868788
>>15868760
Then what was, something else with the Ship?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:36:52 UTC No. 15868789
>>15868701
fence destroyed, crane wrecked
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:37:10 UTC No. 15868791
I'm shocked that Starship flew for so long after staging. I thought it would cut out very quickly.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:37:21 UTC No. 15868794
>>15868749
>>15868752
lol, "she" saw your thumb-toe faggot
now "she" will never fuck you
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:37:24 UTC No. 15868796
>>15868742
100 BIRDS DIED OF HEART ATTACK
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:37:44 UTC No. 15868797
>>15868749
>>15868752
we need sound webm with translation please
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:37:44 UTC No. 15868798
>>15868701
>newfags dont know this is from IFT-1
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:37:50 UTC No. 15868800
>>15868772
>OVERNIGGER
HOW DID HE FUCKING KNOWW
>FTS being too strict
lmao, fucking awful if true, cause thats no fault of their own
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:37:52 UTC No. 15868801
>>15868722
My frogsona already ACKed but here he is again, hes been hanging there since license dropped
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:37:53 UTC No. 15868802
>>15868752
wtf Clear browses /sfg/ confirmed??
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:38:02 UTC No. 15868805
>>15868791
Yeah it's a long 6min second stage
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:38:16 UTC No. 15868806
>>15868752
Lucky man
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:38:22 UTC No. 15868807
>>15868752
congrats, some japanese man saw your cardboard cut out you retarded autist
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:38:50 UTC No. 15868812
>>15868785
Only for landing. I believe boostback and reentry burns still uses fuel from inside the primary tanks. I know they use Methane for engine chill and relight, but they also use liquid oxygen to kickoff the preburners alongside it. If there's fuel slosh that leads to bubbles or leads to only methane flow and a lack of oxygen for preburner startup, the engines won't light and/or RUD because of those bubbles.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:38:51 UTC No. 15868814
>>15868791
which confirms that AFTS probably fucked up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:38:54 UTC No. 15868815
>>15868802
anon posted it on his twitter and tagged clear. you can see it in clear's twitter page.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:38:59 UTC No. 15868816
>>15868753
kek
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:39:03 UTC No. 15868818
>>15868637
What was the thurst on this one? 16.7 or were these the improved raptors?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:39:11 UTC No. 15868820
Huh is there a pattern to how the engine shuts off? they did not shut off all at once
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:39:24 UTC No. 15868822
>>15868749
>>15868752
Anon got fucking noticed by clear-chan. krystalfags in shambles, /sfg/ anime schizos triumphant
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:39:28 UTC No. 15868823
>>15868805
I mean I thought the engines would be fucked due to hotstaging or just pure unreliability. I was also very surprised to see all engines on the booster work flawlessly.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:39:36 UTC No. 15868824
EVERYONE, ITS TIME TO WATCH THE LAUNCH AGAIN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:40:06 UTC No. 15868830
>>15868713
hate and antisemitism assessment study
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:40:07 UTC No. 15868831
>>15868815
She even followed him, I think. /sfg/ has a direct line to Clear.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:40:29 UTC No. 15868838
>>15868765
It was on twitter, she retweeted it.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:40:32 UTC No. 15868839
>>15868760
Yup it was
-X
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:40:52 UTC No. 15868840
>>15868423
>>15868471
A number of people in previous threads were expecting it to go even worse than the first test SN9 style, and even more people (myself included) expected at least a few of the engines to fail on ascent. No matter how you spin it, this was a huge improvement over IFT-1 and I don't see any reason to believe the program is doomed at this point.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:41:08 UTC No. 15868847
>>15868825
The flip back trajectory and velocity is CRAZY FUCKING FAST. Holy crap.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:41:13 UTC No. 15868848
>>15868836
The plooooooooomer
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:41:21 UTC No. 15868849
>>15868817
When are we getting reusable launch pads?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:41:23 UTC No. 15868851
>>15868791
It does most of the work to orbit.
From 5000 km/h to 24124 km/h.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:41:32 UTC No. 15868852
>>15868825
burst originated from around 70% up the booster
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:41:34 UTC No. 15868853
So what can we expect from Flight 3 and when's it going to happen?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:41:46 UTC No. 15868856
>>15868844
Starship is legally an astronaut, regardless what you say
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:42:07 UTC No. 15868860
>>15868847
True, that looked too aggressive and there's so much space already between the stage 2
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:42:07 UTC No. 15868861
>>15868744
Kneel to the head of propulsion.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:42:14 UTC No. 15868862
>>15868844
The line is 100km not 100 miles
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:42:15 UTC No. 15868863
>>15868844
space is 100km
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:42:17 UTC No. 15868864
>>15868844
A whole cubic kilometer...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:42:27 UTC No. 15868865
>>15866616
not sure what the right answer is, but during liftoff and up to stage separation, this was 0
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:42:41 UTC No. 15868870
>>15868844
space is 100 km, not 100 miles, dumb retard mutt
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:42:43 UTC No. 15868872
>>15868854
still shitting themselves on relight though
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:42:45 UTC No. 15868874
>>15868853
IFT-3 is early 2024, and will ACTUALLY get to touchdown in Hawaii. BTW, I dont have to eat my sock since it never made it to SECO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:42:46 UTC No. 15868875
>>15868778
They lost the telemetry from Starship while it was still thrusting right? Could it have been that?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:43:09 UTC No. 15868879
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:43:12 UTC No. 15868880
STARSHIP HAS FLOWN HIGHER THAN ANYTHING BLUE ORIGIN HAS FLOWN, EVER.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:43:21 UTC No. 15868882
>>15868875
>lose telem
>AFTS ignites
my guess
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:43:27 UTC No. 15868883
>>15868854
Tom Mueller BTFO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:43:28 UTC No. 15868884
>>15866616
has it been confirmed that Starship is no more? so failure after stage separation before reaching intended orbit
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:43:41 UTC No. 15868886
McDowell line is where it's at., 80km
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:43:45 UTC No. 15868887
>>15868853
Booster will lose control shortly before hitting the water
Second stage will be destroyed on reentry
I'm guessing a cheeky Q4 2024
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:44:03 UTC No. 15868888
>>15868868
BASED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:44:06 UTC No. 15868889
>>15868884
Yeah
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:44:29 UTC No. 15868892
>>15868868
Don't let her see your phase connect psych ward waifus bro
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:44:37 UTC No. 15868894
>>15868853
Starship breakup on reentry
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:44:43 UTC No. 15868896
>>15868888
Quads confirm official mascot status
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:44:53 UTC No. 15868899
>>15868888
checked
and yeah that thumb is something else
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:44:56 UTC No. 15868901
>>15868868
welp, time to wreck this toembnigger's life
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:45:34 UTC No. 15868902
>>15868884
it was just about to enter coasting
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:45:43 UTC No. 15868904
>>15868778
early shutdown putting the ILP out of the designated zone would do it.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:46:03 UTC No. 15868905
>>15868882
It would suck if that was the only problem.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:46:09 UTC No. 15868906
>>15868749
>>15868752
I kneel.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:46:12 UTC No. 15868907
>>15868854
Still needs to pass the relight test
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:46:34 UTC No. 15868911
>>15868884
No, it successfully got onto a trajectory for its intended landing zone.
>the one guy who said it would fail during coast was right
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:46:55 UTC No. 15868914
If they actually could do tests like they planned it probably wouldn't be that bad.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:46:57 UTC No. 15868915
>>15868809
why is it again tilted
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:47:06 UTC No. 15868917
what went wrong?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:47:32 UTC No. 15868921
>>15868915
Pitching down range ASAP
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:47:34 UTC No. 15868922
>>15868901
Unlike the furry faggot his xeeter isn't full of doxxable details, purchase of stolen ITAR hardware and groomcord invites
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:47:42 UTC No. 15868923
>>15868917
everything
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:47:43 UTC No. 15868924
>>15868917
Gonna have to wait and see on that one.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:47:45 UTC No. 15868925
>>15868909
>time to weld Jose
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:47:56 UTC No. 15868927
>>15868914
But think of the poor sand beetles anon
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:48:17 UTC No. 15868931
>>15868915
To clear the launch site.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:48:23 UTC No. 15868932
Still cant believe we didnt even have to scrub
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:48:29 UTC No. 15868933
>Starship went to space
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:48:37 UTC No. 15868935
>>15868915
gotta go fast
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:48:47 UTC No. 15868938
>>15868849
>>15868817
this is from IFT-1 retards
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:48:53 UTC No. 15868939
are you ready for another 7 months of doomer bullshit?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:48:53 UTC No. 15868940
>>15868825
Yeah you can see engines exploding before AFTS kills the vehicle. Must've started ingesting bubbles.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:48:59 UTC No. 15868941
>>15868911
If it failed before the coast then me (and 18 others) were right.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:49:08 UTC No. 15868942
>>15868909
They still have tomorrow's launch window.
Get the next rocket stacked ASAP.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:49:17 UTC No. 15868945
did the 2nd stage survive
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:49:30 UTC No. 15868947
>>15868482
it clearly jumped
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:49:31 UTC No. 15868948
>Based on the last altitude/velocity numbers on SpaceX's webcast, I estimate a Starship achieved trajectory of -1740 x 150 km with (if not entirely destroyed by the flight termination system) impact NE of the Turks and Caicos Is.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:49:35 UTC No. 15868950
>>15868922
Clearbros just seem to be smarter in general kek
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:49:41 UTC No. 15868951
>>15868941
You weren't.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:49:45 UTC No. 15868953
>>15868945
FTS triggered. we dont know why
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:50:02 UTC No. 15868957
>>15868945
Yeah, Chinese stole it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:50:18 UTC No. 15868960
>footage of first stage blowing up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:50:31 UTC No. 15868961
>>15868882
could be
it was entering F region of ionosphere
> The F region contains ionized gases at a height of around 150–800 km (100 to 500 miles) above sea level, placing it in the Earth's thermosphere, a hot region in the upper atmosphere, and also in the heterosphere, where chemical composition varies with height.
>Generally speaking, the F region has the highest concentration of free electrons and ions anywhere in the atmosphere.
loads of ions = loads of electronic noise = bad signal
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:50:57 UTC No. 15868966
>>15868953
>we dont know why
Not enough speed, -4000km/h off nominal.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:51:10 UTC No. 15868967
>>15868945
>Where is the second stage? Is she alright?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:51:14 UTC No. 15868968
>>15868917
FTS engaged and terminated Starship after engine cutoff for some reason.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:51:15 UTC No. 15868969
>>15868961
you are a bad signal
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:51:40 UTC No. 15868974
>>15868831
She did yeah
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:51:44 UTC No. 15868975
>>15868959
Just a shame they didn't relight properly.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:51:45 UTC No. 15868976
>>15868939
>doomers still aren't gone yet
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:51:51 UTC No. 15868977
>>15868872
>>15868907
If you're talking about the booster flip, that was 100% lopsided on purpose to steer it quickly away from the ship engine blast
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:51:56 UTC No. 15868978
Status on stage 0?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:51:59 UTC No. 15868981
How over/we're back is it realistically?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:52:41 UTC No. 15868987
>>15868977
wrong
watch the stream again
engines were failing
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:52:42 UTC No. 15868988
>>15868974
congrats anon
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:52:56 UTC No. 15868989
>>15868981
33 engines, nigger
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:53:13 UTC No. 15868991
>>15868978
cones blown over
crabs dead
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:53:15 UTC No. 15868992
>>15868976
Kek unless some really bad, pad destroyed tier news comes out after this then I think it's safe to say that doomers are BTFO and launch will rapidly speed up. The first thing that comes to mind is another FAA investigation where they drag their feet.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:53:36 UTC No. 15868995
>>15868991
TCD
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:53:36 UTC No. 15868996
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:53:37 UTC No. 15868997
>>15868981
I'd say half way in between, hotstaging seems to have worked and the engines worked on Starship for over 6 minutes, but then everything exploded for some reason.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:53:42 UTC No. 15869000
>>15868981
stage 0 isn't fucked from what we see so far.
next launch in a month
we are back
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:53:50 UTC No. 15869005
>>15868987
Nah you're wrong. I work for SpaceX
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:54:07 UTC No. 15869006
WHY WAS THERE NO ONBOARD FOOTAGE?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:54:14 UTC No. 15869007
>berger dropping F-bomb on X
how unprofessional
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:54:31 UTC No. 15869008
>>15868996
u rite
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:54:43 UTC No. 15869009
>>15868999
Still looks like it's running too fuel rich desu
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:54:43 UTC No. 15869010
starship cremation services when?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:55:01 UTC No. 15869012
>>15869006
they lost telemetry
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:55:18 UTC No. 15869014
>>15869006
lens cap left on
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:55:25 UTC No. 15869016
>>15868992
You think Punished Cruz is going to let them do that again?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:55:30 UTC No. 15869018
>>15868991
so crab impact assessment when?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:55:32 UTC No. 15869019
>>15869012
it's not that easy in telemetry
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:55:54 UTC No. 15869021
why did we get no views from the ship?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:55:58 UTC No. 15869023
>>15869000
>next launch in a month
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:55:58 UTC No. 15869024
>>15868999
great photo ty for posting
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:56:01 UTC No. 15869025
now we wait and watch as they build a second tower at starbase
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:56:10 UTC No. 15869026
>>15868981
>>15868997
Starship is the big, open question in this. Ship 25 was an older one that still used hydraulic TVC Raptors, but it seemed pretty direly low on propellants at the moment of LOS and about 5000 m/s short of orbital velocity.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:56:14 UTC No. 15869027
>>15869021
Telemetry was bad, Starlink unreliable
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:56:33 UTC No. 15869029
>>15869018
I will help by reducing the number of crabs they need to assess
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:56:37 UTC No. 15869030
The underside looks so good when all engines are lit
Looks so futuristic, man
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:56:47 UTC No. 15869031
>>15869021
because it actually landed, but glowies wouldn't let us know
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:56:48 UTC No. 15869032
>>15868999
are you ripping more of these? https://www.johnkrausphotos.com/Gal
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:57:05 UTC No. 15869035
>>15868701
fucking VLC
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:57:45 UTC No. 15869041
>>15868645
Did they really inject a blackfella into Apollo-Soyuz?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:58:05 UTC No. 15869043
>>15869023
everything is ready
just need another launch license
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:58:05 UTC No. 15869044
>>15869032
you can get the highest res versions by opening the page of the photo you want, clicking the photo to zoom in/load the highest res version, then digging through to find the .jpg direct link in the source code
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:58:16 UTC No. 15869045
>>15869015
What the fuck he does?
I never noticed
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:58:19 UTC No. 15869046
>>15869029
Based
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8mHKH
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:58:19 UTC No. 15869047
>>15869033
Making sure all the sharks are okay
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:58:23 UTC No. 15869048
There will be another starship launch within the next 90 days. Screenshot this post.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:58:30 UTC No. 15869049
>>15869039
Space is CLEARLY easy. N1 never even cleares the pad after 4 attempts and the even bigger rocket is already at staging 33 engines all lit.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:58:45 UTC No. 15869051
>>15869041
I believe the nigger is the Netflix version of Elon
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:58:57 UTC No. 15869053
>>15868713
starbase cat impact study
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:59:17 UTC No. 15869056
>>15869021
The Ayy's were watching the starship up close then they trolled us by taking the starship and making spacex say it was FTS for lulz
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:59:33 UTC No. 15869058
>>15868981
All engines lit, and they're already outdated compared to the raptors SpaceX is making now. So all in all I'm very optimistic; issues like losing connection and a questionable launch pad can be fixed fairly easily and any concerns that the rocket is fundamentally unviable (muh N1) are entirely disproven.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:59:58 UTC No. 15869059
>>15869057
ILU BILL
BASED BILL
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:00:26 UTC No. 15869063
Artemis flew once and the capsule survived re-entry
Meanwhile Starship...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:00:28 UTC No. 15869064
>>15869039
Space is easy
Getting to space from this godforsaken rock
Now that's fucking hard
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:00:35 UTC No. 15869065
>>15869049
N1 cleared the bad 3 out of its 4 flights THOUGHEVER
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:00:47 UTC No. 15869067
>>15869026
scrubbing back the stream it looks like it was burning fuel faster after the explosion? but just doing it by eye, sure some egg head will do the math
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:00:59 UTC No. 15869070
Has CSS tweeted anything? Or ESGHound? LightingLeg on suicide watch?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:01:00 UTC No. 15869072
>>15869056
This tbqh
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:01:08 UTC No. 15869073
>>15868981
The first flight was already “that could have been way worse”, and now this flight was even better. But still, some objectives are left to be desired. It’s not crazy to assume the next flight will be a complete success.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:01:10 UTC No. 15869074
HAHAHAHAHA ESG HOUND, CSS AND THUNDERFOOT HAVE ALL SAID FUCKING NOTHING YET, ALL THEIR POINTS GOT BTFO BACKDEITIES WOOOOOOONNNNN
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:01:11 UTC No. 15869075
>>15869057
>Return humanity to Mars
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:01:26 UTC No. 15869077
>>15869057
he's not like Mt Dew drinking Jim, but he's alright
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:01:36 UTC No. 15869079
>>15869051
But anon, that is Apollo-Soyuz, the cosmonaut is wearing a fucking CCCP patch. Of the US side, only Slayton is dead, they are Idris Elba'ing living people at this point.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:01:49 UTC No. 15869081
>>15869074
lets be honest
they won anyway
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:01:54 UTC No. 15869083
>>15869044
yeah I was doing that for cosmic perspective last launch. PITA, almost would rather pay $5 for full res access, then mass download
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:02:09 UTC No. 15869086
>>15869075
& beyond.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:02:13 UTC No. 15869088
>>15869065
Meds now doebeit
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:02:13 UTC No. 15869089
>>15868862
oh hehe sorry in ksp theres a nice meter that tells me
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:02:21 UTC No. 15869092
I was the anon that was confident that it would pad rud. I'm very happy rn.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:02:31 UTC No. 15869094
>>15869074
People who hope for failure are the worst, GET FUCKED LOSERS AHAHAHA
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:02:43 UTC No. 15869095
lots of footage on the 'net now. Mexico side:
https://twitter.com/NEOCASTILLO/sta
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:03:49 UTC No. 15869103
>>15869095
Sounds like fire crackers going off
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:03:57 UTC No. 15869104
>>15869089
Welcome to the next 6 months of this general
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:04:09 UTC No. 15869106
>>15869074
They will. And they will keep complaining no matter what
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:04:14 UTC No. 15869107
>>15868631
got to bed common sense coper. you are a failure and disgrace to your family
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:04:17 UTC No. 15869109
>>15869095
it's a little noisy, isn't it?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:04:27 UTC No. 15869110
>>15869026
That might have been for safety reasons. Imagine the cutoff didn't work and the thing ends up in an actual decaying orbit. It might then fall uncontrolledly over some other country.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:04:35 UTC No. 15869113
>>15869105
>>15869057
cope from NASA
they must be PISSED
HLS has to land on the moon next year
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:04:46 UTC No. 15869118
>>15869074
Theyre working on their videos right now, and lawsuits
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:05:06 UTC No. 15869120
The mood is MUCH different from IFT-1. We are unironically back
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:05:59 UTC No. 15869125
>>15869113
They should tell the FAA and all the other fags to stop being niggers then
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:06:00 UTC No. 15869126
>Starship reached 150km
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:06:04 UTC No. 15869127
>>15869120
Didn't Elon say that hot staging is very likely to fail?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:06:06 UTC No. 15869128
>>15869103
I think hullo has a video on why rockets make that sound.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:06:06 UTC No. 15869129
>>15869105
>>15869057
remember, NASA HLS team was apparently quite happy with IFT-1 even though it went awry. They are likely exuberant with this flight.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:06:56 UTC No. 15869130
>>15869079
Apollo-Soyuz took place a lot later in the For All Mankind universe.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:07:07 UTC No. 15869131
SEE? BILL, CEO OF NASA, SAYS IT'S "SPACEFLIGHT" NOT "SPACE FLIGHT"
GAH
thanks OP for using the right one
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:07:11 UTC No. 15869133
>>15869122
AWOOOOOOGA
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:07:31 UTC No. 15869135
>>15866168
So it exploded again. Can you please give me your best copes?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:07:35 UTC No. 15869136
>>15868880
Body Odor BTFO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:07:43 UTC No. 15869138
>>15869070
CSS knows he won. he will quietly make a bombshell of a video saying he told us so.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:07:44 UTC No. 15869139
It took SpaceX 4 flights to get Falcon 1 to orbit successfully. Will SpaceX be able to get Starship to orbit in 3, I wonder?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:07:51 UTC No. 15869142
>>15868975
>>15868959
Weren't these still like first gen boosters?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:07:57 UTC No. 15869143
>>15869135
ntma
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:08:01 UTC No. 15869144
was it running methane rich?
shouldn't the plume be more transparent?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:08:28 UTC No. 15869146
>>15869074
neither has elon
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:08:31 UTC No. 15869147
>>15869142
Yeah they're practically ancient
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:08:37 UTC No. 15869148
>>15869081
I'm still trying to integrate the fact that these three were right.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:08:39 UTC No. 15869149
>>15869141
>Clean count
So what was the hold at T-40 for?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:08:46 UTC No. 15869150
>>15869135
KEEEEEEEEEEEEK OVEROIDS STILL TRYING TO DIME AND SHEKEL THEIR WAY TO A WIN NO FUCKING WAAAAAAY
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:08:47 UTC No. 15869151
At 7:40 the ship lost an engine, you can clearly see the shockwave, even Kate Tice stops talking for a second as she realizes what has happened. The ship continues for another 25 seconds until at 8:25 the FTS kills the ship.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:08:54 UTC No. 15869153
I don't want to do anything besides talk about Starship today
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:08:59 UTC No. 15869154
>>15869135
where've you run your goalpost to now coper? please more delicious tears.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:09:11 UTC No. 15869155
>>15869141
He's right
Doomers can't spin this one, they wanted it to fail spectacularly, instead we got incremental improvements and reached new milestones
HOPE PREVAILS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:09:19 UTC No. 15869156
>>15869149
COPV pressure
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:09:44 UTC No. 15869162
>>15869139
How close did SS get to orbit this flight?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:09:48 UTC No. 15869163
How much drag exists at ~60km? couldn't be that engines relighting while the rocket was flipping that caused damage?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:09:48 UTC No. 15869164
>>15869144
Looks like it, wonder if that's why starship fell short of velocity target
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:09:59 UTC No. 15869165
>>15869142
>>15869147
they were still using very old engines as well. And S25 was still using hydraulic TVC i think
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:10:15 UTC No. 15869166
>>15869151
that's rcs negroid who has never watched a falcon 9. you can see in the ui all engines were running
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:10:32 UTC No. 15869167
>>15869151
let's be clear here... an engine out shouldn't be FTS worthy. SS has 1-2 engine out capability right? when we say lost engine -> FTS, don't we mean that it had some catastrophic failure with an engine that damaged other components too? idk
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:10:39 UTC No. 15869168
>>15869165
Which engines were installed first, S25 or B9?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:10:53 UTC No. 15869169
>>15869164
So it was going slower than it should've been for the time?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:11:03 UTC No. 15869170
https://twitter.com/DrChrisCombs/st
A mega shock diamond is sick.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:11:15 UTC No. 15869171
>>15869130
Well fuck, just looked it up (I was blessed by somehow not knowing this show existed until now, not having streaming services is a blessing) and holy shit that stuff looks silly. Seems that the premise is that either N1 or Soyuz to the moon worked, the sovoks won the space race and so NASA had to go deep into muh heckin diversity a few decades early to win the "moral victory"? Who is this sort of stuff actually made for? Is it just rage bait to trick people like those /here/ into watching, or is it wish fulfilment for managerials who never achieved anything but want to pretend that they did?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:11:24 UTC No. 15869173
>>15869150
>oversisters lost the frog lobby
I'm not sure if this is a good or bad thing...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:11:29 UTC No. 15869175
>>15869074
based twitterchad obsessed with all these randos
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:11:30 UTC No. 15869176
>>15869167
something else clearly happened because engines cutoff
telemetry was still coming in then and then it exploded
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:11:38 UTC No. 15869177
>>15869163
0.02% of sea level. basically nothing.
our atmosphere is thin, yo
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:11:40 UTC No. 15869178
Was a FTS sent? On the SpaceX stream the guy just said they lost contact with the second stage
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:11:47 UTC No. 15869179
>>15869163
Looked like to episodes (or maybe just one) of cascading engine failure then maybe shrapnel wrecked it somehow?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:11:47 UTC No. 15869180
On rewatch, looks like at least two engines failed during the booster flip, and the rest didnt turn off, or failed to relight however you look at it, so it just oversteered and they triggered the FTS.
Ship seems like the FTS triggered before SECO by about 20-30, but it's odd because the engines appeared to shutdown in a sequence, assuming they were still getting telemetry. naybe the engines shut down, and FTS didnt like something and pulled the trigger
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:11:53 UTC No. 15869181
>>15869172
you got me
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:12:02 UTC No. 15869182
>>15869144
Maybe they erred on the side of caution? Much better than accidentally running oxygen rich.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:12:13 UTC No. 15869183
>>15868967
>Is she alright?
she killed herself, anon
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:12:21 UTC No. 15869184
>>15869178
FTS is automatic
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:12:23 UTC No. 15869185
>>15869151
I saw that plume too, how sure are you this was an engine out though.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:12:34 UTC No. 15869187
>>15869171
It's fanwank for the Vibrant Diversities who have been dragging NASA down since the 80s.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:12:36 UTC No. 15869188
It's frustrating that you can't investigate what happened with the 2nd stage and we just have to rely to SpaceX in a few days.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:12:43 UTC No. 15869190
>>15869173
>frog lobby
Kek
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:13:23 UTC No. 15869192
ahhhh and to think I was here in /sfg/ circa like 2018 when SpaceX was posting the very early raptor tests and thrust/time charts and there were doomers talking about how they only had max thrust for 1/3 of a second, and green exhaust, and honks
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:13:29 UTC No. 15869193
>>15869188
even spacex might not know lmao
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:13:59 UTC No. 15869196
>>15868981
We're doing pretty good.
IFT-1:
>Stage 0 failure
>Stage 1 never reaches nominal output
>Stage separation fails
>FTS fails
IFT-2
>Stage 0 water deluge fixes work
>Stage 1 performs flawlessly until separation
>Stage separation works perfectly
>Hot staging works perfectly
>FTS works perfectly
Current failures:
>Booster relight doesn't appear to work
>Stage 2 can operate mostly nominally but there is some fuckiness
>Re-entry will almost certainly run into problems
If this blew up on the pad, couldn't make it through Max-Q, or failed during separation, it would be pretty fucking over. In fact, however, we are so fucking back.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:14:09 UTC No. 15869197
>>15869187
The fanwank depends on a fanfiction where NASA failed even harder than they did, with the solution being the earlier adoption of the policies that made them fail later in our timeline. I just don't get how the writers don't take a step back and realise it is a self own.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:14:31 UTC No. 15869199
>>15869192
oh man the test flights that went green....
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:14:52 UTC No. 15869202
>>15869193
that would be the worst
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:14:56 UTC No. 15869203
>>15869188
They usually don't reveal much. We'll have to wait for the FAA investigation report.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:15:03 UTC No. 15869204
>starship explodes
>now each piece can kill a shark
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:15:12 UTC No. 15869206
>>15869192
FOUR HUNDRED AND THIRTY THREE MEGAHERTZ
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:15:22 UTC No. 15869208
>>15869155
irys is a whore
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:15:33 UTC No. 15869210
>>15869184
>>15869180
If it was a false positive I'm gonna fucking kms myself
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:15:44 UTC No. 15869211
>>15868999
checked
>diamonds
yes muh dick is
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:15:47 UTC No. 15869212
>>15869196
>>FTS works perfectly
booster having to be exploded is kind of a good thing when you think about it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:16:06 UTC No. 15869214
im pretty sure they were late on staging and they had to terminate the vehicle because it was way beyond any targeting orbit
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:16:21 UTC No. 15869216
>>15869213
virtual aerospike
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:16:24 UTC No. 15869218
>>15869206
don't forget the soviet simps who were saying "ah yes but prototype RD-1293X399F engine in 1967 could sort of do that thrust, once"
now raptor is cheap and reliable and has wild specs
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:16:33 UTC No. 15869219
>>15869171
Soviets get first man and woman on the moon so nasa had to train up a bunch of woman, the first US woman on the moon was actually a badass white woman. The black woman was tied with a soviet man for first on mars, but then they find out some Nork actually landed first in what everyone thought was a failed probe or rover.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:17:09 UTC No. 15869224
39 cubic engines
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:17:11 UTC No. 15869225
>>15869214
Yeah and it will probably land near china and they didn't wanna risk that
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:17:21 UTC No. 15869226
>>15869214
shouldn't Starship without cargo have plenty of margin?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:17:24 UTC No. 15869227
>>15869208
>teehee
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:17:34 UTC No. 15869228
>>15869214
Nah, the booster has and ship have enough fuel margins to return to the target area. SpaceX tends to build in extra margins into their vehicles and then over time they claw it back to increase vehicle performance for mass to orbit or margins for landing.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:17:37 UTC No. 15869229
>>15869016
It would be painful.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:17:44 UTC No. 15869230
>>15869197
It's a matter of religious conviction to them. Nonwhites and women MUST be equally capable, or Mean Moustache Man was right about everything.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:17:46 UTC No. 15869231
Did the ship still had Hydraulic TVC ? Because a likely failure cause could be a HPU (hydraulic power unit) issue. And that problem could be gone as soon they change to Electric TVC
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:18:03 UTC No. 15869235
>>15869209
Is this what anti-Musk cultists mean when they say he takes credit for other people's work?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:18:27 UTC No. 15869236
>>15869231
No, they already switched to eTVC as far as I know
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:18:36 UTC No. 15869237
>>15869231
>Did the ship still had Hydraulic TVC ?
Yes unless something changed while I was not looking
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:18:36 UTC No. 15869238
>>15866180
Who's the guy ranting in the beginning?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:18:41 UTC No. 15869240
>>15869231
Everything was nominal until FTS, some fuckery
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:18:47 UTC No. 15869241
>>15869231
all 'lectrics now. less moving parts, less mass
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:18:47 UTC No. 15869242
We wre just 30s short of orbit ... so close yet so far
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:19:12 UTC No. 15869243
>>15869235
>good work team! Congratulations!
>INCOHERENT CAPS LOCK RAGE INTENSIFIES
They need to seek help
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:19:12 UTC No. 15869244
Btw I've gotten two predictions right in a row, I said this launch would fail around hot staging, and last launch would fail during ascent. Anyone else on a hot streak like me?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:19:14 UTC No. 15869245
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:19:28 UTC No. 15869246
>>15869231
>>15869237
Nah, everything is electric now. The most likely causal factor for FTS activation is engine relight fuckery due to fuel issues
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:19:31 UTC No. 15869247
>>15869226
well by the same vector a lighter starship will fly even further, so taking longer to cut off engines means going further and further off course
you wanna spend that delta v before apogee, its a lot harder to return to launch site if youre already on the downswing of a ballistic trajectory
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:19:42 UTC No. 15869249
>>15869188
This. Why didn't they add a basic radio beacon so that in case telemetry fails they can still track it from the ground sputnik style?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:19:43 UTC No. 15869251
>>15869241
only booster had electric
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:19:46 UTC No. 15869252
Any news from N2 on what actually happened???
>>15869231
Ah yes the hydraulic bogeyman. The hydraulic brakes on my car have never failed me, yet spacexstans blame every ill on hydraulics.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:19:48 UTC No. 15869253
>>15869241
>>15869237
>>15869236
Am talking about Starship TVC , i know Booster has eTVC
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:20:02 UTC No. 15869257
>>15869245
nice
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:20:08 UTC No. 15869258
>>15869238
extract from some movie I think, I'm not entirely sure what it has to do with the content of the video, but I never expected that much from twitteroids.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:20:40 UTC No. 15869261
>>15869245
look at that goddamn shockwave heading out over the marsh
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:20:41 UTC No. 15869262
>>15869246
I'm pretty sure s25 was still hydraulic, I remember a lot of comments about it.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:20:44 UTC No. 15869263
>>15869252
space hydraulics are hard, please understand
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:20:48 UTC No. 15869265
>>15869245
Wait was the stream in 60 fps?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:21:10 UTC No. 15869268
>>15869253
If they managed to implement eTVC on the booster I don't see how they wouldn't on the ship.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:21:11 UTC No. 15869269
>>15869251
Exactly , ONLY the booster had electric
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:21:20 UTC No. 15869270
>>15869219
Wow this sounds horrendous I'm glad I never touched it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:21:30 UTC No. 15869273
>>15869247
So what do you think happened. It looked like all the engines worked fine
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:21:34 UTC No. 15869274
>>15869210
I hope it was a false positive because that's even better for Starship.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:21:46 UTC No. 15869277
The future's looking beautiful, bros. I hope all of us make it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:21:48 UTC No. 15869278
>>15869245
Fucking kino to watch a skyscraper fly
What is that dirty trailing exhaust trail though?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:21:48 UTC No. 15869279
>>15869265
yeah
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:21:49 UTC No. 15869280
>>15869266
Amerilards won
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:22:04 UTC No. 15869282
>>15869253
oh idk
>>15869266
expended F9 unironically edges into the heavy category too.
doens't china have a big boi long march tho
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:22:18 UTC No. 15869284
>>15869278
fuel-rich to reduce temps
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:23:09 UTC No. 15869287
>>15869274
yeah but now i gotta wait another 6 momths for the next one
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:23:10 UTC No. 15869288
>>15869219
Holy shit, I grew up reading Harry Turtledove books about confederates winning the war between states leading to poms and confederates vs nazis and yankees in WW2 while Quebec is colonising the north west or some shit (it has been twenty years, forgive me for the fine details) and those books had a more logical train of thought than this seems to possess.
>>15869230
I'll never understand it, you lads had a space program to be proud of, you pissed it all away, now the people reviving it are getting Whitey on the Moon'd because they aren't possessing the right politics or some shit. I don't even like the majority of the blokes involved in the current round of private initiative, I'm still thankful they are pushing the machine back into gear and I don't get why people can't see that for what it is.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:23:50 UTC No. 15869291
>>15869266
b-but your healthcare and mortgage
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:23:55 UTC No. 15869294
>>15869245
I'd like to sniff some of those exhaust fumes
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:24:10 UTC No. 15869296
>>15869266
100 tonnes to LEO is SHLV. (50 tonnes is some retarded meme like 80km cope being space). That makes only Starship a SHLV
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:24:18 UTC No. 15869299
>>15869276
Because data is the ultimate fuck you power.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:24:30 UTC No. 15869301
>>15869290
sigh
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:24:43 UTC No. 15869302
>>15869290
Technically we never saw an explosion. It was an offscreen death.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:24:52 UTC No. 15869305
>>15869290
They hate Elon, ofc they gonna write like that
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:24:59 UTC No. 15869307
>>15869290
they are all jews , what do you expect
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:25:18 UTC No. 15869308
>>15869290
They'll be extra shitty this time because he shit talked the jews
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:25:18 UTC No. 15869309
Kek the launch thread is getting shit up so bad rn, ty to the anon who made it so, so, so much because this thread has actually been great.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:25:19 UTC No. 15869310
>>15869290
American media has no hope or optimism for the future. It only wants to sell you a dystopia. Its all so tiring.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:25:25 UTC No. 15869311
>>15869290
explosions just make for better headlines
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:25:25 UTC No. 15869312
>>15869290
Can we kill all journalists? Except Foust
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:25:26 UTC No. 15869313
>>15869290
Jews mad
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:25:45 UTC No. 15869315
>>15869209
>team spacex team
this absolute god of engineering is now adding redundant words to his sentences
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:26:04 UTC No. 15869317
>>15869296
Stop noticing definitions being changed
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:26:04 UTC No. 15869318
>>15869290
The butthurt is palpable kek
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:26:49 UTC No. 15869320
The split second court opens on Monday, X Corp will be filing a thermonuclear lawsuit against Media Matters and ALL those who colluded in this fraudulent attack on our company
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:27:24 UTC No. 15869325
there's a 15th flight F9 starlink launch tonight btw lmao
gotta keep up the cadence
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:27:46 UTC No. 15869328
>>15869290
BAHAHA headlines dont fucking matter, what matters is the TRVTH and only we know it here it seem. Cheers to us.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:27:55 UTC No. 15869329
>>15869290
Behead all journalists
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:27:59 UTC No. 15869330
>IFT-3
>Launches an reaches orbit perfectly
>News:
>Dead beetles and turtles were found thanks to Musk's Death Machine called Starship .
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:28:12 UTC No. 15869331
>>15868428
its going to be in january
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:28:44 UTC No. 15869334
So when's the next test flight?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:29:00 UTC No. 15869335
More like early February , but yeah , definitely not 8 moths
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:29:04 UTC No. 15869337
>>15869332
I cant get over that FUCKING METHALOX TRAIL I WANT THAT IN MY ROOM NOWWWWWW
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:29:07 UTC No. 15869338
>>15869290
literally doesn't matter anymore now that starlink is bringing in so much cash
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:29:15 UTC No. 15869339
>>15869296
SLSbros...
Tell me this isn't true?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:29:22 UTC No. 15869341
>>15869334
someone post the current starbase production diagram
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:29:48 UTC No. 15869343
>>15869332
>hnnng
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:30:00 UTC No. 15869345
>>15869332
Are those missing tiles?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:30:06 UTC No. 15869347
>>15866180
>BO not even mentioned
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:30:09 UTC No. 15869348
>>15869334
tomorrow
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:30:11 UTC No. 15869349
Remember that these were old R2s btw, imagine what R3s will do for us.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:30:19 UTC No. 15869350
>>15869337
do you want to get vaporized ? because i have a have with me a hot and large raptor engine ready for your plumbing
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:30:27 UTC No. 15869351
>>15869332
I am in love, bros
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:30:38 UTC No. 15869353
>>15868448
no agency, they don't need any changes to the pad, the FTS worked as intended (perfectly)
some raptors failed to relight after stage separation but wasn't like that one of the things on the list of 6 things they were postponing for the future? Should be no need for a long investigation this time
they can start spamming these now
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:30:40 UTC No. 15869354
>>15869290
They were going to run these same headlines even if it splashed down.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:30:40 UTC No. 15869355
>>15869290
TJD
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:30:58 UTC No. 15869357
>>15869296
The cope goes back to the 50s/60s, but yes. Only the Saturn V and N1 count in my opinion. Energia may barely qualify as well, and the Shuttle might have too if it could launch sidemounted non-spaceplane payloads like Energia.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:31:22 UTC No. 15869360
>>15869347
always glad when someone posts my really vintage memes. anyone have the starship / New Shepard capsule webm?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:31:23 UTC No. 15869361
>>15869290
6 million dead fish
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:31:35 UTC No. 15869364
>>15869312
berger is ourlad
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:32:07 UTC No. 15869366
>>15869339
SLS is twice the size of Energia yet has 10 tonnes lower payload capacity to LEO AND TLI lmfao. That retarded ass massive core stage can haul more to TLI than SLS with its upper stage. Just think about it. Death to SRBs.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:32:11 UTC No. 15869367
>>15869353
>they can start spamming these now
this
they finally get to use all these raptors they have been building
they could launch before the end of the year too
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:32:14 UTC No. 15869368
>>15869330
>Musk's Mars rocket crashes into the Pacific after uncontrolled descent
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:32:21 UTC No. 15869369
>>15869350
yes please, as long as it's to a raptor, the vacuum of space or to toxic martian dust i don't care.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:32:28 UTC No. 15869371
>>15868493
no, it was unreliable raptor 1s
in this flight most of the raptors were raptor 2s
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:32:34 UTC No. 15869372
>>15869334
7 months or less. almost certainly less. one of the great things about the gap between IFT-1 and IFT-2 is it'll never be that long ever again
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:32:46 UTC No. 15869373
Jim Free : "Each test represents a step closer to putting the first woman on the Moon with the #Artemis III Starship human landing system. Looking forward to seeing what can be learned from this test that moves us closer to the next milestone."
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:32:55 UTC No. 15869374
>>15869171
>Who is this sort of stuff actually made for?
Netflix meeting rooms
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:33:27 UTC No. 15869380
>>15869357
does the orbiter for the shuttle count as payload though?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:33:29 UTC No. 15869381
>>15869373
fuck it whatever as long as theyre supporting starship who gives a fuck.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:33:40 UTC No. 15869382
>>15869364
alright fine, berger may live
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:33:46 UTC No. 15869383
>>15869357
N1 didn't count. Just like SLS it could only get 95 tonnes to LEO. Not even the Soviets considered it a SHLV. Energia was definitely one though (105 tonnes to LEO)
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:34:17 UTC No. 15869385
>>15869378
Its over .... the FAA will delay the next launch til 2025. A big big investigeishion is needed
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:34:23 UTC No. 15869386
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:34:43 UTC No. 15869387
>>15869249
is there a radio beacon that can survive transmitting through a massive plasma sheath?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:35:08 UTC No. 15869388
>>15869373
>>15869105
Could these fuckers be any less enthusiastic? Thanks for the corporate PR statements I guess. NASA really is good at those
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:35:13 UTC No. 15869390
>>15869288
It's mostly thanks to the Civil Rights Act of the 1960s (passed to placate mobs of rioting nigs) enshrining some stupid tendencies into federal law that when kept in place for 60 years produce nonsense.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:35:22 UTC No. 15869391
>>15869290
Don't you know (((who))) owns the ((((((media))))))?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:35:34 UTC No. 15869394
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:36:19 UTC No. 15869395
>>15869391
QUI?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:36:22 UTC No. 15869396
>>15869249
they probably did
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:36:27 UTC No. 15869397
>>15869290
I can't even bring myself to get angry anymore
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:36:46 UTC No. 15869398
>>15869141
>no fires in the engine bay
How do you know?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:36:58 UTC No. 15869399
GUYS , STARSHIP REACHED ORBIT ... more or less :
FTS triggered at approx 6666m/s which is about 1200 m/s short of orbital velocity. Methane explosions propagate at about 1500-1800 m/s.
6600 + 1500 = 8100m/s = 400x140 km orbit YES YES YES
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:37:01 UTC No. 15869400
>>15869380
I'm going by useful payload lol
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:37:05 UTC No. 15869401
>>15869397
SAME, like I'm just happy IFT-2 went so well, don't give af about their biased negative spin
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:37:17 UTC No. 15869402
>>15869392
Tiles get their testing in IFT-3 when they actually make it to suborbit, same process will happen with these as Raptors did, IFT-4 they will be perfected and we can get on to testing cargo deployment with IFT-5, and IFT-6 we will finally be trying to land these sons of bitches.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:37:24 UTC No. 15869403
>>15869392
you are delusional if you think those are missing tiles and not compression artifacts
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:37:32 UTC No. 15869405
>>15869398
By not being blind?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:37:38 UTC No. 15869406
>>15869392
holy shit
that is worse than the first launch
its so fucking over
i FUCKING HATE TILES AAAAAAAA
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:37:40 UTC No. 15869407
>>15869290
Not really surprising considering the retarded shit Musk said a few days ago.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:38:00 UTC No. 15869410
>>15867322
I will never not see Krystal's butthole from that
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:38:00 UTC No. 15869411
Was this a success? Rate on a 1-10 scale
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:38:05 UTC No. 15869412
>>15869399
There is tiles on orbit rn
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:38:26 UTC No. 15869414
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:38:26 UTC No. 15869415
>>15868797
https://files.catbox.moe/9jlat6.mkv
Here's the clip, I'll translate some of it I guess.
>Look at this thing
>I want you to see this... picture
>Here
>Tadaaaa
>Look! I'm here!
>...
>Very huge rocket
>Very big
>Thank you so much, I'm so happy, thank you so much, I love you a lot
>Yes a [???] (Foreigner, foreigner viewer, I think)
>He took me with him
>He bought DIY Ria-chan merch
>Here's a night version wwwwww
>This is the best, great job, how do you say it in English?
>Amazingu, I don't know, Thank you, thank you so much
>Foreign viewers I love you, big love
>Truly, thank you so much
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:38:28 UTC No. 15869417
>>15869378
Me when I accidentally order a latte with real milk instead of oat milk
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:38:32 UTC No. 15869418
>>15869411
7.5
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:38:44 UTC No. 15869419
>>15869411
10
everything that broke last time worked this time. For spaces philosophy, that's a success
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:38:53 UTC No. 15869420
>>15869407
You mean based as fuck
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:39:07 UTC No. 15869421
>>15869411
8.5
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:39:15 UTC No. 15869423
>>15869415
>actually knows gookrunes
you're a sad little man
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:39:24 UTC No. 15869424
>>15869411
6 realistically.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:39:32 UTC No. 15869425
>>15869415
>Foreign viewers I love you, big love
Clear love!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:39:54 UTC No. 15869426
>>15869406
Is daijobu expendable starship still better than no starship. They can lob giant space telescopes now to btfo bigbangers
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:40:06 UTC No. 15869428
>>15869423
he probably just used whisper
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:40:07 UTC No. 15869429
4/20 and 11/18. Im predicting 2/16 for IFT-3
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:40:10 UTC No. 15869430
>>15869378
JWST captures spectacular nebula
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:40:11 UTC No. 15869432
>>15869380
the wings certainly count as payload because they are useless outside the atmosphere
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:40:25 UTC No. 15869434
>>15869423
You think you can be an astronaut and speak only one language?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:40:25 UTC No. 15869435
>>15869420
Saying it publicly was retarded as fuck.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:40:32 UTC No. 15869436
>>15869415
Based
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:40:46 UTC No. 15869437
non-americas anons, you have some homework: post news reports from your home country about this event. I'm curious how it is covered in like Germany, Australia, wherever you're from
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:41:01 UTC No. 15869439
>>15869411
like a 5
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:41:10 UTC No. 15869440
>>15869423
He speaks several languages and you're seething, who's sad?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:41:14 UTC No. 15869442
>>15869415
>>Foreign viewers I love you, big love
clear loves us bros.....
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:41:20 UTC No. 15869443
Now that IFT-2 is done, what's the status on SN26 and BN10? Can someone post the completeness chart?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:41:27 UTC No. 15869444
>>15869434
i speak more than just english
it's just that gooks and poo's don't matter
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:41:56 UTC No. 15869448
>>15869176
Didn't the N1 have something like that once? Rough engine shutdown leading to a "water" hammer that ruptured the pipes and imminently exploded the vehicle?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:42:12 UTC No. 15869452
>>15869280
we need the extra lift because I refuse to do the extra mile
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:42:50 UTC No. 15869454
>>15869424
6-7 seems right. Made it most of the way through both burns, hot staged successfully, stayed on trajectory. Didn't fuck up the pad, didn't cause an ecological catastrophe, didn't attempt booster soft landing, didn't make orbit, didn't test reentry
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:42:56 UTC No. 15869455
>>15869437
Spain , surprisingly accurate :
"Despega con éxito Starship, el mayor cohete de la historia
La compañía SpaceX ha logrado corregir todos los problemas del primer intento en lanzamiento de su lanzadera espacial, que explotó al alcanzar la última fase de vuelo"
translation :
"Starship, the largest rocket in history, lifts off successfully
The SpaceX company has managed to correct all the problems of the first launch attempt of its space shuttle, which exploded when reaching the last flight phase."
https://elpais.com/ciencia/2023-11-
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:42:58 UTC No. 15869456
>>15869411
I give it a 6, did better than last time but I was expecting more, especially since there was a large time gap since the last launch. Fuck knows how long we have to ait until the next launch now, especially now that certain special interests will want the government to fuck Musk up.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:43:12 UTC No. 15869457
>>15869210
FTS system was using imperial units :)
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:43:14 UTC No. 15869458
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:43:23 UTC No. 15869459
So, B10 S28 next?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:43:30 UTC No. 15869461
>>15869437
Latest news on this in Russia are a day old. Ask again tomorrow.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:43:39 UTC No. 15869464
>>15869426
no reusable means anything needing tankers will cost a fuck ton
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:43:42 UTC No. 15869465
>>15869378
why does that central cloud kind of look like the head of a fox? It has ears and everything. Am I going mad?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:43:45 UTC No. 15869466
>>15869455
neat
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:43:57 UTC No. 15869467
>>15869459
Nah, probably B11 S29
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:44:13 UTC No. 15869468
>Flight 1: "It was a success because... LE DATA"
>Flight 2: "It was a success because... LE DATA"
>Flight 1737: "It was a success because... LE DATA"
>SpaceX goes bankrupt: "It was a success for USA because we got... LE DATA"
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:44:14 UTC No. 15869469
>>15869383
Interesting. I know that was the intended payload, but I'd be very surprised if it couldnt hit more than 95 in reality. And for Energia, it wasnt proven to launch 105 tons. Polyus was only 80 tons. Someone should rerun the numbers. But if we wanna go by proven rockets by useful payload to orbit, Saturn V is the only truly proven SHLV
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:44:20 UTC No. 15869470
>>15869456
>large time gap since the last launch
It was like 6 months anon, that's nothing. Look at Shartliner
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:44:45 UTC No. 15869472
>>15869000
We back to the good old days of water tower flying every few months.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:44:51 UTC No. 15869474
>>15869468
i want sex with you
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:44:57 UTC No. 15869475
>>15869437
>Lithuania
"Back to the drawing board: SpaceX's second attempt fared better but aborted early"
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:45:00 UTC No. 15869476
I just realized that SpaceX has approval for 5 flights
They have used up 2, what are the chances they are gonna rush to get 2 more THIS YEAR so that they can squeeze as much out of their allotment as possible?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:45:00 UTC No. 15869477
>>15869468
>>SpaceX goes bankrupt:
literally impossible now that starlink is raking in cash
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:45:16 UTC No. 15869478
>>15869465
You should kill yourself and go back to the launch thread
>>15869468
THIS IS NOT THE FROGCEL, I AM THE FROGCEL HE IS TRYING TO FALSE FLAG
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:45:21 UTC No. 15869479
>>15869290
you can tell they're going to be especially vitriolic about it now because he called out jews right before the launch.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:45:23 UTC No. 15869480
>>15869437
https://tweakers.net/nieuws/215750/
techie website though (only news that matters), not mainstream garbage
article seems to not have been updated with S25 exploding though
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:45:27 UTC No. 15869481
>>15869403
Lmao
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:46:01 UTC No. 15869484
>>15869476
>inb4 can't count
3 is impossible there's not enough time, and even 2 is pushing it desu
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:46:09 UTC No. 15869485
>>15869437
https://www.di.se/nyheter/kontakt-b
>Kontakt bruten med Space X raket åtta minuter efter start
>Åtta minuter efter att den 121 meter höga rymdraketen Starship skickats iväg har Space X förlorat kontakten med jätteraketen.
>Contact lost with Space X's rocket eight minutes into flight
>Eight minutes after the 121m tall space rocket launched SpaceX lost contact with the giant rocket
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:46:17 UTC No. 15869486
>>15869476
i haven't been keeping up with the progress on the other ships and boosters
they could rush for another launch this year
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:46:19 UTC No. 15869487
>>15869478
THIS IS NOT THE FROGCEL, I AM THE FROGCEL HE IS TRYING TO FALSE FLAG
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:46:33 UTC No. 15869488
>>15869455
Very nice, thank you spain
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:46:39 UTC No. 15869489
>>15869454
>>15869411
7, and agreed
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:46:51 UTC No. 15869490
>>15869470
>It was like 6 months anon, that's nothing.
It's a long time in SpaceX development terms. What happened to launching a new model every few weeks?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:46:57 UTC No. 15869492
>>15869470
look at New Glenn, even...
...oh image limit reached, well that's okay because there's no images of New Glenn anyhow
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:46:58 UTC No. 15869493
>>15869485
This is about as objective as it could get
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:47:02 UTC No. 15869494
>>15869480
>De Starship-raket steeg om 14.03 Nederlandse tijd op vanaf SpaceX' eigen lanceerbasis in Texas. De raket bestaat uit een eerste trap, de Super Heavy, en een tweede trap, het Starship-ruimteschip. De Super Heavy-booster ontstak zijn 33 Raptor-motoren...
why am I laughing. what a funny language (to an American)
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:47:03 UTC No. 15869495
>>15868820
yes.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:47:14 UTC No. 15869496
>>15869387
IDK, but taking even a few fixes while it is still in vacuum allows for calculating the actual trajectory and the expected reentry area.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:47:48 UTC No. 15869497
>>15869494
its not a real language
just drunk englishmen pulling a prank
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:47:55 UTC No. 15869498
>>15869464
Sounds like belter problems
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:48:04 UTC No. 15869499
>>15869432
>this is how normies think the moon landings happened
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:48:06 UTC No. 15869500
>>15869494
I've heard that Dutch is even funnier to Germans
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:48:44 UTC No. 15869503
>>15869497
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-m
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:48:47 UTC No. 15869505
>>15869494
>>15869497
:(
dutch is a real language
nederlands is een echte taal
>>15869500
they can with effort practically understand it, it's close family of english and german
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:49:27 UTC No. 15869508
https://x.com/maxhaot/status/172588
Vast president is keyed
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:49:32 UTC No. 15869509
Lay off the hopium fags, do you really think they are getting another loicence in the few weeks before Christmas? Everyone knows government employees don't do shit during the Christmas lead up.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:49:46 UTC No. 15869510
>>15869494
>de Super Heavy, en een tweede trap
Starship confirmed for being a tranny
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:49:48 UTC No. 15869512
staging status?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:49:48 UTC No. 15869513
>>15869469
Lol, proven? The literally had the underfuel the rocket during the Polyus launch. There was no doubt at all it could launch that much into LEO. Do you think you don't know how much shit you can get intl orbit with a rocket until you test it out? Are you retarded?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:49:56 UTC No. 15869515
Guys , there is another thing :
Super Heavy has never experienced High-G loads before. With the booster empty , the ship full of fuel and maximum acceleration , could some structural failure caused the malfunction on the booster.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:50:03 UTC No. 15869516
>>15869505
apparently to Germans, Dutch sounds like some retarded parody of Deutsch
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:50:15 UTC No. 15869519
>>15869415
Fucking precious. Good work to original anon and also thank you for translating
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:50:24 UTC No. 15869520
>>15869399
It works. I saw this in the space documentary film Redline.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:50:35 UTC No. 15869521
>>15869509
BAHAHAHAHAHA HES MOVING GOALPOSTS AGAIN NO FUCKING WAAAAAAAYYYY YOU CANT KILL THIS OVERNIGGER, YOU ARE FINISHED
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:51:05 UTC No. 15869524
>>15868863
Euro space set the bar lower (like always). Real space is at 100 miles
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:51:32 UTC No. 15869527
>>15869494
It's like an uncanny valley language for Anglophones; pretty close to English but just different enough to sound a bit goofy.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:51:39 UTC No. 15869529
>>15869516
what do you think germans sound like to us?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:51:42 UTC No. 15869530
>>15869515
who knows
one engine exploded for sure
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:51:46 UTC No. 15869531
>>15869513
Calm down, Ivan. Saturn V still BTFO Energia by any metric
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:52:00 UTC No. 15869532
>>15869490
>What happened to launching a new model every few weeks?
This was never going to happen. They have authorization for 5 launches a year and need to get re-cleared for each flight after failures
Look at the timeline for Falcon 1:
>24 March 2006 [Failure]
>21 March 2007 [Failure]
>3 August 2008 [Failure]
>28 September 2008 [Success]
Flying two Starship stacks this year is great pace
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:52:05 UTC No. 15869533
>>15869026
5000m/s is not correct.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:52:08 UTC No. 15869534
>>15869494
I really want to post the "whoopsie-daisy" train platform image, but we have hit the limit.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:52:11 UTC No. 15869535
>>15869437
Czech'em
>Musk's second attempt has failed. Starship reached space, then exploded.
needless to say the comments are tearing the author a new one
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:52:23 UTC No. 15869536
>>15869512
Successful.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:52:24 UTC No. 15869538
everyday astronaut came in clutch with the launch coverage today.
Hoping to see detailed zoom shots of the RUDs later.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:52:24 UTC No. 15869539
>>15869437
News in Brazil are very neutral apparently, it's basically just
>they did it again! But it blew up...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:53:02 UTC No. 15869543
>>15869529
stuffy? but that's how Germans always sound
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:53:21 UTC No. 15869544
>>15869531
>calls me Ivan while trying to defend the abysmal performance of the shitty all kerolox N1
Lmao, simply don't be a retard in the future. Ok?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:53:21 UTC No. 15869545
>>15868651
>>15868651
so after stage separation, 1 engine failed to relight, then a center engine (that was lit from launch) failed, then in rapid succession a relit engine failed, another relit failed resulting in there being 4 engines not lit that should have been lit
~15s after that a fifth,sixth and seventh engine failed in quick succession and I guess FTS pretty soon after that?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:53:24 UTC No. 15869546
>>15869535
>needless to say
I disagree. This was far from guaranteed.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:54:27 UTC No. 15869551
Flame trench bros why so quiet
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:55:05 UTC No. 15869556
>>15869551
Sandraker scum are always quiet when they're wrong.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:55:30 UTC No. 15869557
>>15869545
typical vapor in the feedlines situation . With all the slosh , the engines might have guggled some gas fucking them up
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:55:34 UTC No. 15869558
>>15869543
i actually don't know what german sounds like to dutch people since most of us can understand it since we get it in school as an option
95% of this country can also speak english and 70% can speak german
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:55:36 UTC No. 15869560
Can see how many tiles fell off
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_OUsV6
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:55:39 UTC No. 15869561
>>15869551
KEEEEK forgot about them to they got BTFO
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:55:44 UTC No. 15869562
>>15869544
I'm perfectly ok with calling the N1 and Energia shitty. I think I'll do that from now on
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:56:06 UTC No. 15869563
>>15869560
It's fucking over..................
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:56:41 UTC No. 15869569
>>15869560
I wonder why they tend to fall off in a line along the seams
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:57:00 UTC No. 15869571
>>15869563
Its just getting started overpig, youll be under the booster SOON ENOUGH
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:57:02 UTC No. 15869572
>>15869545
one of the engines failed violently in this one you can see it >>15868023
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:57:26 UTC No. 15869574
>>15869469
>reality
You already know how good performance a rocket will have. N1 was simply inefficiant. All kerosene with a bunch of small stages. You don't launch a rocket and all of sudden see the payload being more/less than expected lmfao.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:57:36 UTC No. 15869575
>>15869560
Yeah, re-entry capability is going to take some work.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:58:09 UTC No. 15869576
>>15869572
We need the 4k raw footage
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:58:14 UTC No. 15869577
>>15869560
HOLY SHIITTTT
i gave up counting after 40
what a joke
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:58:38 UTC No. 15869581
They should replace the steel plate with journalists chained to fondag
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:58:38 UTC No. 15869582
>>15869214
if that were the case they would not have been confused
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:59:27 UTC No. 15869586
FAA : "This information is preliminary and subject to change:
A mishap occurred during the
@SpaceX
Starship OFT-2 launch from Boca Chica, Texas, on Saturday, Nov. 18. The anomaly resulted in a loss of the vehicle. No injuries or public property damage have been reported."
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:59:34 UTC No. 15869588
>>15869577
>>15869560
they're mainly at the bulkhead seams. that's good, since it means it's not a inherent issue with the tile attach method (mainly)
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 14:59:35 UTC No. 15869589
we need a new thread, image limit reached
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:00:10 UTC No. 15869592
>>15869562
I really don't care what cope you resort to after being called out as the retard you are.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:00:15 UTC No. 15869593
>>15869589
I consent to a stage, BUT IT MUST SAY HOT STAGING
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:00:28 UTC No. 15869594
>>15869586
Sand beetle status?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:00:28 UTC No. 15869595
>>15869560
you need to worry more about fuel flow instability evident in the exhaust.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:00:31 UTC No. 15869596
Berger : "Hearing that the Starship pad survived and that, on top of the first stage performance, is a huge win for SpaceX and NASA."
YES YESEYE
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:00:51 UTC No. 15869597
>>15869589
hmmmm
it is a special day
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:00:58 UTC No. 15869598
>>15869411
This >>15869418
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:01:46 UTC No. 15869600
>>15869594
Evaporated
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:01:51 UTC No. 15869602
>>15869596
https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/sta
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:02:24 UTC No. 15869603
>>15869588
>mainly
and the flaps?
and the other ones all over the place
the are still falling off too
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:02:46 UTC No. 15869604
>>15869592
You are mad, correct?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:02:56 UTC No. 15869605
>>15869434
English is the official language of space. In the future people will only learn non-English languages for the novelty factor, but no one will seriously speak them.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:03:12 UTC No. 15869607
>>15869602
Overtards BTFO on Raptor reliability, stage 0 damage, environmental assessment and hot staging?? What do they have left to cling too??
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:03:24 UTC No. 15869608
SO MANY TILES MISSING https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:03:27 UTC No. 15869609
>>15869290
Lügenpresse!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:03:56 UTC No. 15869610
>>15869600
Concerning, the FWS will demand Elon's head
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:04:15 UTC No. 15869611
>Tom Mueller
>@lrocket
>Wow, just incredible! That was the most successful double RUD I’ve >ever seen. We’re learning a lot
OG thinks he still works there.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:04:36 UTC No. 15869612
Please hot stage
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:04:50 UTC No. 15869613
>>15869611
Senile
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:04:50 UTC No. 15869614
THE PAD LIVES!!!!!
https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/17
Eric Berger
> Hearing that the Starship pad survived and that, on top of the first stage performance, is a huge win for SpaceX and NASA.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:04:55 UTC No. 15869615
>>15869604
I'm not mad. Just disappointed in the state of this general. /sfg/ really needs a way to filter retarded tourists such as yourself.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:05:13 UTC No. 15869616
>>15869345
>>15869332
SpaceX should just bite the 15-20 tonne mass hit and use some sort of ablative heat shield that lasts 100+ flights rather then trying to do a heat shield that can theoretically last hundreds but relies on shitty tiles.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:05:57 UTC No. 15869619
>>15869615
Yeah it exists and is active, its called the launch thread, (You) are the retarded tourist that came here instead of going there. How about (You) fuck off back to that thread
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:05:57 UTC No. 15869620
>>15869533
At low altitude it takes about 27700 m/s to reach orbital velocity. Starship was somewhere in the 22000 m/s range.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:06:03 UTC No. 15869621
>>15869616
>just give up an entire Falcon 9 launch
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:06:20 UTC No. 15869622
>>15869615
You're mad!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:06:38 UTC No. 15869623
>>15869608
literally zero chance it survived rentry
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:06:42 UTC No. 15869624
>>15869621
Just attach one f9 booster to a side
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:06:46 UTC No. 15869625
>>15869437
Bulgaria:
https://www.dnevnik.bg/sviat/2023/1
Clickbait title about another fail, but the article gets in depth, mentions the success of hot staging, the successes over the first launch and even quotes Insprucker and Kate Tice.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:06:50 UTC No. 15869626
>>15869616
Do we know yet if a single failed tile means Columbia’ing a starship? It’s an all or nothing deal?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:07:11 UTC No. 15869627
>>15869615
It doesn't take a board tourist to call the N1 a shit rocket desu
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:07:12 UTC No. 15869628
>>15869623
it exploded, there's no re-entry
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:07:39 UTC No. 15869629
>>15869626
plasma is not to be fucked with
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:08:08 UTC No. 15869632
>>15869630
>>15869630
>>15869630
>>15869630
HOTSTAGING cuz image limit reached
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:08:29 UTC No. 15869634
Looking back, what the FUCK was spacex THINKING with the bizarre “lmao flip the starship OFF of the booster” stage idea?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:09:46 UTC No. 15869642
>Retard: hot staging made booster go boom boom, needs bigger dome eh
>Tom Mueller: I suspect it had more to do with restarting engines after the flip
Mueller confirmed, raptor failures to relight killed the booster. how much you wanna bet raptor killed the ship too?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:09:55 UTC No. 15869646
>>15869437
https://www.golem.de/news/spacex-au
This magazine is a subpar tech journal, but this guy is a good independent contributor.
Says the booster flip probably failed because engines failed to relight and went out again quickly.
Says the upper stage probably was leaking oxygen.
"Similarly successful as the Falcon 1 15 years ago" he summarizes.
Referring to the second flight of it specifically.
And then there's the actual main stream media:
https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft
>"Starship rocket explodes on the second attempt briefly after launch too."
>Renewed set back for Elon Musk: The rocket system "Starship" of his space flight company SpaceX fails on its second launch attempt too. A first attempt failed spectacularly in April.
Article does acknowledge
>on the renewed test a few more mile stones were reached at least: A few minutes after launch the two rocket stages separated.
Seems to still mostly stress the explosions though.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:09:56 UTC No. 15869648
>>15869634
>WHAT THE FUCK WAS SPACEX THINKING USING 33 ENGIN-...
>u-uh WHAT THE FUCK WAS SPACEX THINKING DOING THIS NEXT THING THAT THEY'VE FAILED ONCE AT
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:09:58 UTC No. 15869650
>>15869627
He literally said the N1 could get more into LEO in reality lmfao.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:09:58 UTC No. 15869651
>>15869632
>page 4
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:11:01 UTC No. 15869655
>>15869632
I'll be staying here, thanks.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:11:07 UTC No. 15869656
>>15869651
Here let me post an image on this image board replying to your post
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:12:28 UTC No. 15869662
>>15869634
"Catch it with the chopsticks" is in a similar category until proven to work.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:13:11 UTC No. 15869667
>>15868981
we're 100% back
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:13:29 UTC No. 15869668
>>15869620
No, those figures are km/h.
Low Earth orbit is ~27,000 km/h, aka ~7800m/s. They displayed the telemetry in km/h.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:13:49 UTC No. 15869669
>>15869651
>>15869655
listen faggots normally i would agree but it's an imageboard and i want to fucking post images.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:14:38 UTC No. 15869674
>>15869646
>spiegel
Do I even have to check the early life page?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:15:17 UTC No. 15869678
>>15869634
It worked.
The booster failure was not influenced by the hotstaging and neither was the Starship FTS firing.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:15:43 UTC No. 15869682
>>15869668
D'oh, you're right. 5000 km/h short, then, or 1389 meters per second.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:15:57 UTC No. 15869686
>>15869183
kys fotmtard
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:16:48 UTC No. 15869690
>>15869620
you mean km/h
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:17:10 UTC No. 15869694
>>15869656
>>15869669
dopamine receptor status: fried
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:18:18 UTC No. 15869702
>>15869674
It's German for mirror. It's the most popular news site in Germany that isn't complete boulevard press.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:18:24 UTC No. 15869705
>>15869690
Yes, I blame being up most of the night ahead of the launch.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:18:43 UTC No. 15869706
>>15869694
>hurr durr you can't just post images on the IMAGEBOARD GOY!
you're a nigger, i want to see more kino images.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:19:14 UTC No. 15869710
>>15869454
>hot staged successfully
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:19:21 UTC No. 15869712
>>15869417
Kek what a faggot
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:20:34 UTC No. 15869723
>>15869623
The entire concept is faulty.
And 2 stagers suck for anything not LEO.
It is over bf it even began, but thanks to Elon's marketing lies it won't show until 2-3 years from now where the success criteria for the flight tests will hopefullt be more than clearing the pad.
The raptors and superheavy will still be useful.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:22:12 UTC No. 15869735
>>15869723
listen here, we can solve this problem with depots. It's that simple.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:22:13 UTC No. 15869736
>>15869723
It's not a two stager for anything beyond LEO. Refueling counts as a stage, so any modules it will shit out.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:22:24 UTC No. 15869737
>>15869171
it has some good parts, but is generally disappointing and it gets worse over time
i dropped it at the first episode of season 3
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:22:35 UTC No. 15869738
>>15869723
overfag you can't salvage this just take the L and submit to your masters.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:24:19 UTC No. 15869752
>>15869706
TRVTHNVKE. move to new thread, anyone who says otherwise is a jew who doesn't want you to see IFT-2 WINS!
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:25:48 UTC No. 15869764
I'm inheriting this thread
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:27:08 UTC No. 15869773
>>15869764
>ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:28:32 UTC No. 15869779
>>15869710
Starship survived and stayed on track
Booster survival is a secondary objective
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:29:42 UTC No. 15869789
>>15868852
>burst originated from around 70% up the booster
That's called the FTS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:31:01 UTC No. 15869802
Technically a missile is a flight termination system
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:33:00 UTC No. 15869819
>>15869802
Unless it's for ground targets
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:34:30 UTC No. 15869834
>>15869411
Pad and Raptor reliability makes it >5 by default
I'd say 6-8 depending on nature of failures.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:35:16 UTC No. 15869841
>>15869581
A waste of perfectly good chain, but otherwise very based suggestion
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:35:51 UTC No. 15869843
>>15869290
as expected
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:38:07 UTC No. 15869852
>>15869330
after it works perfectly they are just going to start with the usual other fud like orbital debris, CO2 from launches etc
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:40:37 UTC No. 15869865
Thunderf00t livestreamed the launch btw
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:42:34 UTC No. 15869873
>>15869621
Better to have 100-130 tonnes to LEO and be fully reusable then 150 tonnes to LEO but only partially reusable.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:44:45 UTC No. 15869886
>>15869865
thanks anon
watching it now
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:46:20 UTC No. 15869894
>>15869399
fucking based
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:47:21 UTC No. 15869900
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:49:49 UTC No. 15869914
>>15869865
I'm kind of curious as to whether he was impressed or not/what he actually talked about.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:50:41 UTC No. 15869920
>>15869572
that was less bad than I thought, I wasn't paying attention during the flight and didn't realize it was already away from the second stage for a while, I thought it had just separated
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:53:50 UTC No. 15869934
>>15869437
an article with the livestream and pretty good info, I haven't bothered to read through all of it though
https://www.hs.fi/tiede/art-2000009
> Avaruusyhtiö SpaceX:n miehittämättömän Starship-avaruusaluksen molemmat osat ovat räjähtäneet koelaukaisussa. Aiemmin kerrottiin vain kantoraketin räjähtäneen.
translation
> Both parts of SpaceX's unmanned Starship spacecraft have exploded during a test launch. Previously, it was only reported that the launch vehicle had exploded.
https://www.is.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000
> Maailmanhistorian suurin kantoraketti laukaistiin avaruuteen – räjähti
>Starship-aluksen edellinen koelaukaisu päättyi sen räjähtämiseen viime huhtikuussa. Myös toinen yritys päättyi lauantaina epäonnistumiseen.
translation
> The largest launch vehicle in world history was launched into space - exploded
>The previous test launch of the Starship ended with it exploding last April. Another attempt also ended in failure on Saturday.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:58:19 UTC No. 15869964
>>15869443
the latest one is pretty outdated, a month old at this point
https://twitter.com/Ringwatchers/st
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:58:25 UTC No. 15869965
>>15869437
>"american roket explodes again xaxaxaxaxa)))"
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:58:57 UTC No. 15869966
>>15869650
It would have to reach LEO first, anon.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:59:43 UTC No. 15869971
Why does SpaceX bother using the old engines? They have more than enough engines. They're strapped for launch opportunities, not hardware. They should be throwing their best stuff at it every time, no?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:03:03 UTC No. 15869980
>>15869971
could learn something interesting the old engines fail or don't fail
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:04:35 UTC No. 15869989
>>15869468
there was a lot of incremental success here
if it exploded on the launchpad for instance, or there were less engines lit at launch than first time this would have been a failure
but all the stuff that went wrong last time actually succeeded this time
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:09:58 UTC No. 15870010
>>15869560
damn
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:11:04 UTC No. 15870015
>>15869971
They don't expect to recover engines for some time. It's still a business. Do you suggest they scrap older engines instead of flying them?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:11:45 UTC No. 15870018
>>15869572
and it took out another with it
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:12:18 UTC No. 15870022
>>15870015
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:12:51 UTC No. 15870025
>>15869966
Get better reading comprehension retard.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:14:23 UTC No. 15870032
>>15869694
images are essential
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:16:58 UTC No. 15870040
>>15869971
maybe they're not cross-compatible with different boosters?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:16:59 UTC No. 15870041
>>15870025
he's a slav esl from /k/, we cannot expect so much
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:23:14 UTC No. 15870065
>>15869437
The UK headlines seem pretty good so far
BBC
>Elon Musk's Starship rocket goes further and higher - but is then lost
The Guardian
>SpaceX’s Starship reaches space for first time but explodes moments later
The Times
>SpaceX Starship self-destructs after successful launch and test flight
A few worse ones.
Daily Mail
>Elon Musk's SpaceX rocket blows up again: Starship reaches space then loses contact with ground control moments after launch - as tycoon sends congratulations to his team
Sky News
>SpaceX loses contact with Starship mega rocket after explosions during second test flight
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:39:24 UTC No. 15870119
>>15869390
the issue is people AREN'T following the civil rights act and are instead glorifying niggers when it was supposed to be equal treatment
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:44:08 UTC No. 15870142
>>15870119
This is just the natural consequence of civil rights. It was always going to end like this as long as civil rights existed. Civil rights is inherently, fundamentally against equal treatment.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:44:24 UTC No. 15870143
Hullo is saying that a fluid hammer destroyed the booster, not FTS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:52:43 UTC No. 15870166
>>15870119
In their ideology, all people are ACTUALLY equal, not merely meant to be treated as equal, and therefore any difference in outcomes is proof of discrimination violating the civil rights act.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:53:27 UTC No. 15870170
>>15870143
seems plausible enough, but wouldn't spacex have experience with that phenomenon from flying back Falcon 9 boosters?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 17:03:55 UTC No. 15870210
>>15870166
luckily the surpreme court disagrees
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 17:10:01 UTC No. 15870233
>>15870210
If they really disagreed then they'd declare the civil rights act unconstitutional.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 17:14:56 UTC No. 15870252
>>15870233
nah
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 17:42:57 UTC No. 15870359
>>15869437
Translated news clickbait headlines from google
>Both stages of SpaceX rocket exploded during flight test: ”A really successful day”
>7 hours ago
>SpaceX's massive rocket exploded
>LIVE47 mins ago
>Elon Musk's SpaceX launches Starship launch vehicle into space
>4 hours ago
>SpaceX's Starship exploded in its second flight test as well
>2 hours ago
>SpaceX's Starship launch vehicle exploded even in its second test launch
>3 hours ago
bonus google recommended offtopic for the lulz
>Also in the news
>SpaceX work site's shocking conditions revealed – workers' amputated limbs only the top of the iceberg
>2 days ago
>SpaceX's Starship rocket second test flight delayed
22 hours ago
Provocative clickbait titles (that don't get a lot of press over here in any case) but the articles themselves are neutral, factual and down to earth.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 18:32:18 UTC No. 15870505
>>15869971
Because this is the phase where the tests are most likely to RUD.
If you know you’re going to RUD multiple times then that’s possibly over a hundred engines you’re destroying.
With this latest FTS it’s now up to 78 engines destroyed.
Do you want to RUD all your best engines?
Or, would you rather RUD all the old engines?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 18:38:08 UTC No. 15870522
>>15869551
See any up close photos of it yet? Metal bends under heat, genius.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 18:40:32 UTC No. 15870532
>>15870505
how about just don't RUD?
it worked for SLS
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 18:40:54 UTC No. 15870534
>>15869607
see >>15869608
Im sure it's going to be ready for 2026 moon landing though, and mars by 2028
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 18:41:37 UTC No. 15870538
>>15870532
lmao gottem
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 18:48:18 UTC No. 15870553
>>15870532
Technically the SLS RUDs too.
Or at least it’s a rapid “scheduled” disassembly.
None of the engines on SLS survive
So you only ever throw your best engines at it since it doesn’t matter.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 19:04:53 UTC No. 15870600
>>15870505
But they won't run out of engines. They're in no danger of it. This is due to them being restricted by the frequency at which they can launch. Because of that they should be using their best equipment every time to make the most of each attempt.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 20:45:29 UTC No. 15870868
>>15870065
>>Elon Musk's SpaceX rocket blows up again: Starship reaches space then loses contact with ground control moments after launch - as tycoon sends congratulations to his team
kek
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 22:33:25 UTC No. 15871112
>>15869074
They need to cope a bit to find a bit of rational
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 22:44:33 UTC No. 15871136
>>15870065
>loses contact with Starship mega rocket after explosions
lmao, who writes this stuff? A GPT 3.5 without coherent sense of reasoning?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Nov 2023 23:34:26 UTC No. 15871245
>>15868831
> /sfg/ has a direct line to Clear.
other anon here, I've had voice chats with Clear and she follows me on twitter since 2021 so we've had a direct line for a long time
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 19 Nov 2023 00:16:56 UTC No. 15871318
>>15866209
Briefly looked at his xitter a week ago and regretted it. Simping hard for that neocon pajeeta. He won't pass the psychological screenings.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Nov 2023 02:55:56 UTC No. 15871660
>>15870359
>down to earth
wtf
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Nov 2023 02:57:56 UTC No. 15871671
>>15871660
I chose that idiom because it's a double entendre for /sfg/