🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:59:46 UTC No. 15954201
First Landing Edition
Previous - >>15951398
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:03:31 UTC No. 15954213
The split thread from last year is almost dead
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:04:38 UTC No. 15954217
>>15954213
Oh nvm it is dead some monkey is spamming it
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:05:47 UTC No. 15954220
>>15954213
noo
it needs to be staged too as a containment zone/interment camp for furries and animespammers
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:08:28 UTC No. 15954226
>>15954220
No fucker stop trying to split /sfg/
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:10:52 UTC No. 15954232
>>15954220
Containment?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:11:41 UTC No. 15954234
>>15954190
It's less that "shuttle sucked" and more "if you want to see what Shuttle wanted to be in 1975, take a look at what Falcon 9 did last year."
>>15954204
Falcon's already outrun the market by a significant margin. Starship's going to be working on Starlink v2 and bulk propellant deliveries for a long time before the payload providers are able to catch up.
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:14:42 UTC No. 15954240
>>15954220
i will spam the next one you make to bump limit as well nigger.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:25:09 UTC No. 15954265
So what are the short term effects if Starship works? Starlink V2 satellites will start to be spammed like was said in the previous thread, but then there is Gravitics StarMax, Polaris missions where they dock Dragon with Starship, DearMoon, maybe some private moon landing missions (after NASA has got their first in so they don't get pissy), a big Starship-based telescope that Musk has supposedly talked to some astronomers about, first Mars cargoship landings when the next window opens, other spacestations than Gravitics like a Starship variant of Haven-1 from Vast (Haven-1 itself is supposed to launch 2025 on a Falcon 9 I think), ThinkOrbital with welded sphere space stations (the main thing is welding in space itself though)
how long is it going to take for mainstream science organizations to take advantage of Starship? I've seen some articles about that it needs to be taken seriously and some speculative articles but not much else
there are no large plans yet because it isn't proven to work yet and isn't proven to be as cheap as it is planned, I don't really think its even possible for most organizations (big old companies or unis and whatever) to even take it seriously before it is proven just due to how these organizations work (slow and bureucratic, don't take much risks generally)
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:25:58 UTC No. 15954269
>>15954220
anime website
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:28:24 UTC No. 15954277
>>15954269
she's cute.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:41:08 UTC No. 15954307
Kick rocketgirls into trash compactors
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:43:21 UTC No. 15954311
>>15954220
Who the fuck starts a thread like this, I just sat down.
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:44:05 UTC No. 15954313
>>15954307
cuteness aggression, you're probably a tranny
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:46:13 UTC No. 15954317
>>15954313
Projecting troon KEEEEK
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:53:05 UTC No. 15954321
>>15954307
kinky
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:30:14 UTC No. 15954381
The weak should fear the strong
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:54:00 UTC No. 15954423
A reminder that more than half of the 96 Falcon launches in 2023 came from just one of SpaceX's four launch pads, they absolutely have the capacity to do 144 launches in 2024.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:01:45 UTC No. 15954434
>>15954204
>>15954234
I suspect that once starship is flying starlinks into orbit, the USD/KG ratio combined with the sheer payload capacity will allow the creation of payloads previously unviable for even the falcon heavy. there's already people designing space station parts that just so happen to fit into a starship payload bay, like the sphere welder and gravitas or whatever their name is
gravitics?
you get the idea.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:07:04 UTC No. 15954446
>>15954434
think orbital and gravitics, but vast probably also has plans >>15954265
BO might also have some plans to do something aimed at New Glenn fairing sized stations?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:18:18 UTC No. 15954475
>>15954434
I hope so, but that was what some people were saying about the Falcon 9 bringing unlimited launch capacity at an industry redefining price. Falcon 9 ran with a "if you build it, they will launch on it" outlook but it just didn't undercut Arianespace and Roscosmos by enough to set off a wave of really ambitious investments. The SPAC investments didn't help with their urge to throw money at new launch providers rather than payloads.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:19:19 UTC No. 15954477
>>15954434
They're gonna need more than a pez dispenser to deliver anything else though and they're going to have to test and fly that shit several times before anyone puts their babies on board.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:31:17 UTC No. 15954499
>>15954475
falcon brings massive launch capacity but in small chunks, with an expendable upper stage, and orbital manufacturing isn't exactly something people are testing out with 10 starship launches
>>15954477
I suspect making a door is easier than making a pez dispenser desu
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:36:18 UTC No. 15954502
>>15954499
I suspect otherwise. A door weakens the nose even more. There'll be lots of fronts falling off in the future.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:38:00 UTC No. 15954503
>>15954502
>>15954499
>>15954477
Show flag
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:40:24 UTC No. 15954504
>>15954502
>A door weakens the nose even more.
implying the nose is weak
why?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:41:25 UTC No. 15954506
>>15954503
no u nigger
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:42:41 UTC No. 15954509
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:44:07 UTC No. 15954510
>>15954255
>the sleeping bunks have windows
i kneel to china, bing chilling!
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:49:43 UTC No. 15954519
what does the "RL" stand for in RL-10?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:51:26 UTC No. 15954524
>>15954504
How'd the nose fare on OFT2 again?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:55:08 UTC No. 15954530
>>15954519
Retarded Lengine
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:55:28 UTC No. 15954531
>>15954510
room temperature ambient superconductors a la china >>15954242
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:57:06 UTC No. 15954537
>>15954524
survived the RUD and reentered north of puerto rico. seems pretty strong to me.
How did the nose fare tumbling out of control on OFT1, again?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:00:55 UTC No. 15954550
>>15954234
>It's less that "shuttle sucked" and more "if you want to see what Shuttle wanted to be in 1975, take a look at what Falcon 9 did last year."
I'll quote Burt Rutan - "The Space Shuttle is the most complex spacecraft that will ever fly." Prototypes are always more complex and often more capable than their successors. See The Great Northern side-steamer for another example.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:00:58 UTC No. 15954551
>>15954519
Rocket, Liquid, Model 10
Formerly known as the eXperimental Liquid Rocket Model 115
Source: my ass
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:04:32 UTC No. 15954561
>>15954519
rocket lab
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:12:36 UTC No. 15954586
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/7
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:14:57 UTC No. 15954589
>>15954586
goodbye
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:16:58 UTC No. 15954595
>>15954586
Man, I'm glad the carbon fiber got abandoned
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:18:50 UTC No. 15954603
>>15954586
Is it being towed beyond the environment for testing?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:39:33 UTC No. 15954640
being a brown manlet is a disability now I guess t ESA
Indians BTFO lmaoo
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:42:14 UTC No. 15954643
>>15954255
>rings in 2024
Gee, Chang! Two new years?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:12:22 UTC No. 15954685
>>15954640
Indians are setting up to pass Europe in spaceflight in every category. Maybe the ESA can buy a few seats on Gaganyaan for their disability-enhanced groundstronaut corps.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:13:18 UTC No. 15954687
>>15954640
Being a virgin is classed as a disability in the EU
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:13:56 UTC No. 15954689
>>15954687
really?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:25:43 UTC No. 15954700
>>15954685
guess they were the real aryans all along...
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:28:42 UTC No. 15954705
ILC Dover just unveiled a new IVA suit
https://www.ilcdover.com/products/l
Could it be for Dream Chaser DC-200 or BO? Those are the only other two working on crewed vehicles but I imagine BO would do their own thing for a suit
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:30:47 UTC No. 15954712
>>15954705
Nvm it doesn’t seem like it’s new but it’s cool
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:31:20 UTC No. 15954716
>>15954705
lol
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:36:56 UTC No. 15954723
>>15954705
>overheats and makes your remains unfindable when the rocket blows up
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:48:07 UTC No. 15954738
>>15954723
>when the rocket blows up
so? did you think the suit was meant to protect you from that?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:52:31 UTC No. 15954743
>>15954738
Is your left eye blind?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:53:39 UTC No. 15954746
>>15954743
schizo KEEEK
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:02:12 UTC No. 15954753
>>15954700
lol
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:13:08 UTC No. 15954771
>>15954763
now he just needs cell coverage in underground caves lmao
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:17:21 UTC No. 15954779
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:18:07 UTC No. 15954780
>>15954779
krystal here, im trans btw
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:19:31 UTC No. 15954782
>>15954639
>astronauts with disabilities
>women and nigs
Kek
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:24:17 UTC No. 15954786
https://youtu.be/ddyQ56W0910
>Bezos: the future is orbital!
>BO posts a moon and mars colonization video
lol?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:28:51 UTC No. 15954795
>>15954786
what is the feather about anyway?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:45:32 UTC No. 15954822
>>15954685
INDIA WORLD SUPERPOWER 2020
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:46:52 UTC No. 15954825
>>15954779
>ban evasion
Enjoy your vacation
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:47:19 UTC No. 15954827
>>15951425
This was tested in the 60s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircr
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:51:07 UTC No. 15954835
>>15954639
how are midget astronauts not the meta since time immemorial? just imagine how much that lightens your payloads in the long run, assuming short kings need less food and water too.
you could probably fit 8 midgets in an orion capsule.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:53:48 UTC No. 15954840
>>15954835
because midgets all have massive health issues
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:58:28 UTC No. 15954850
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:01:04 UTC No. 15954855
>>15954850
thats gay
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:33:29 UTC No. 15954892
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1at
T-30:00
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:40:47 UTC No. 15954900
>>15954187
If we take Elon at his word, there will be 100 newly built Starships each year as a target minimum, with each vehicle having some sort of finite flight life. If we assume that number is 100 flights and the actual lift utilization is just 20% of the theoretical 150 tons it was designed for, and that each vehicle flies on average once every 3.5 days, the fleet will deliver 300,000 tons to orbit per year.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:51:52 UTC No. 15954922
>>15954892
https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1j
live
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:52:59 UTC No. 15954925
>>15954922
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1
t-10 or so
intro running now
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:54:00 UTC No. 15954927
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:56:01 UTC No. 15954932
I have barely been watching the launches since they went to twitter. Not having that youtube notification really hurts
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:58:18 UTC No. 15954937
kind of funny that SpaceX keeps launching competing mobile satellite providers like ovzon
they seem to be a direct competitor
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:59:12 UTC No. 15954939
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1
Live
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:03:33 UTC No. 15954953
T-1 min
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:03:45 UTC No. 15954954
>>15954932
So sad really. I would be ok with watching SpaceX on a rival video hosting platform, but X isnt even a functional video histing platform because the search function doesn't even work. You can't go on the site and search for stuff, you have to be following the right account.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:05:14 UTC No. 15954959
>>15954900
all starship FUD aside, it's true that the lift capacity is FAR lower than 150 tonnes with present day starship, its not even theoretically possible.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:12:35 UTC No. 15954971
return to landing site
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:16:01 UTC No. 15954981
The fact these launches are well on their way to becoming utterly routine is amazing. The webcast people sounded bored, just another late night at the office.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:17:22 UTC No. 15954983
>>15954981
Every few days is routine
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:17:34 UTC No. 15954985
>>15954981
why did he say it was a falcon heavy class booster? I guess he's technically right but it still feels wrong to call it that
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:17:54 UTC No. 15954986
>>15954937
Someone's gonna do it, it might as well be SpaceX. That way, they can make some money on it, and they won't be in an anti-competitive position because they're happily launching competitor's services.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:27:13 UTC No. 15954999
>>15954985
It does feel weird. Falcon 9 the third largest operational rocket in the world and once the Delta IV retires in march it'll be the second only to SLS. It's only 2400kg short of being a heavy-lift vehicle when flown reusably. It's like an Atlas V 551 that decides to launch three times a week.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:29:30 UTC No. 15955004
>>15954999
I was talking about how the webcast guy said that it was the whatever number successful landing of a "Falcon heavy class booster" even though it was a Falcon 9
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:29:36 UTC No. 15955005
Falcon 9 block 6 when
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:30:41 UTC No. 15955006
>>15955005
Probably never, they want to retire the Falcon 9 launch vehicle, so they don't want to make more than incremental improvements.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:30:56 UTC No. 15955007
>>15955005
Doesn't need to exist. Starship is superior
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:32:21 UTC No. 15955010
>>15955007
what if you need to send a payload to a high-energy orbit and don't want to rideshare?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:33:31 UTC No. 15955012
>>15955004
ok wait nvm i guess i misheard him
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:34:10 UTC No. 15955013
>>15955010
Starship is going to be cheaper for anything, even if you wanted to send a bag of your farts
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:36:52 UTC No. 15955018
>>15955013
ULAGods told me that starship is only good for sending mega constellations into orbit and that Vulcan is good for high energy missions
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:39:04 UTC No. 15955021
what flag are mars shitposters gonna have on /pol/ and /int/?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:40:17 UTC No. 15955023
>>15955021
the mars flag
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:41:21 UTC No. 15955024
>>15955021
The planet Mars, on a flag
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:42:31 UTC No. 15955026
>>15955023
>>15955024
how do you prove that you aren't using a VPN without doxing yourself?
Captcha:8wTND
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:44:39 UTC No. 15955029
>>15955026
You can't. That NK flag is probably a VPN, or it might be Kim himself. You never know.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:56:05 UTC No. 15955047
>>15955045
yeah thats cool and all but,
WHERE IS RED DRAGON???
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:56:34 UTC No. 15955048
>>15955045
https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/sta
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:57:36 UTC No. 15955050
>>15955023
what is the mars flag? all the ones I've seen are extremely gay
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:58:02 UTC No. 15955051
>>15955045
>>15955048
>falcon 9 launch cadence is bottlenecked by 2nd stage production
It cannot be stressed how much nobody, not even us, know how revolutionary a fully reusable starship will be
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:58:28 UTC No. 15955053
>>15955050
Black flag, red dot.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 23:58:38 UTC No. 15955054
>>15955050
SpaceX logo on a flag. There is no Earth flag
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:00:08 UTC No. 15955055
>>15955053
so a dark Japan flag?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:12:59 UTC No. 15955073
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:13:44 UTC No. 15955076
>>15955071
pride flags
>>15955073
afican flag
all shit
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:14:00 UTC No. 15955078
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:16:19 UTC No. 15955084
>>15955050
Are we breaking out the flag discussion again
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:16:25 UTC No. 15955085
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:17:21 UTC No. 15955086
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:17:29 UTC No. 15955087
black background with stylized mars in the center + phobos and deimos somewhere could work
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:17:49 UTC No. 15955088
>>15955085
bro didn't use the paint bucket tool :skull:
>>15955071
3rd one looks like the suprstraight flag (based)
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:18:01 UTC No. 15955089
>>15955086
I liked this one because it also works as a vertical banner
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:18:49 UTC No. 15955092
>>15955071
MCR flag just looks plain bad
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:25:50 UTC No. 15955112
>>15955055
Yes
>>15955085
This will adorn the winglets of orbital bombers laying waste to E*rther cities
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:30:02 UTC No. 15955120
>>15955078
this is a shit design holy smokes.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:31:05 UTC No. 15955125
https://twitter.com/Gwynne_Shotwell
Gwynne Shotwell posted on X for the first time.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:31:31 UTC No. 15955127
We hit the bump limit
RIP
>>15934505
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:32:56 UTC No. 15955129
>>15955127
OMGSISA
STARSHIP BOOBA
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:33:46 UTC No. 15955131
>>15955125
I wonder if Musk pressured her
I've seen a lot more Musk company employees posting information on X lately
previously it basically never happened
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:34:35 UTC No. 15955133
>>15955131
bro has that redpill sigma chad energy bossing women around LIKE A BOSS fr fr
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:35:19 UTC No. 15955135
Go back to your /pol/tard generals where you stage at bump limit newfag. Probably a fucking /ptg/ immigrant.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:36:10 UTC No. 15955137
>>15955135
take your meds, schizo
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:36:43 UTC No. 15955139
>>15955089
best flag design.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:38:44 UTC No. 15955144
>>15955127
Please just kill yourself. I don't even care about the rocket girl in the OP, I just want you to stop bumping that obvious trash thread.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:06:53 UTC No. 15955191
>>15955086
>>15955089
Works better if the colors are a little more subdued instead of highly saturated.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:11:49 UTC No. 15955199
>>15955191
what if you make the red rusty red, more close to the actual color of mars
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:13:13 UTC No. 15955201
>>15955199
Pantone matching to Mars' surface seems cliche and not all that aesthetically appealing.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:14:39 UTC No. 15955204
>>15955201
try it anyway
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:17:45 UTC No. 15955207
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:19:47 UTC No. 15955210
>>15955207
Looks like the default orange from MS Paint in Windows 95.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:20:43 UTC No. 15955212
>>15955210
why is the orange so unsaturated compared to the red?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:25:40 UTC No. 15955217
>>15955191
>>15955207
Both pretty good. It's hard to choose
>>15955071
The Phobos/Deimos imagery is cool
>>15955201
>cliche
I don't care I think every planetary flag background should at least resemble one of the majority colors the planet has
Completely gray planets can get whatever color they choose though
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:27:06 UTC No. 15955218
>>15955199
why would you fly a mars colored flag on mars? you'd want it to stand out
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:32:37 UTC No. 15955228
when were talking about colonizing mars, its important to remember that there are vast parts of Russia that look picturesque from afar but are totally uninhabited, and they are much warmer and more hospitable than mars. I think the challenge of mars colonization is often undersold
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:34:41 UTC No. 15955230
>>15955228
they aren't uninhabitable, just not worth the effort of trying. much like we will determine mars to be after putting a research station sized colony there
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:35:09 UTC No. 15955232
>>15955229
*nerd face emoji*
Uhmm, spaceflight?!??!
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:37:02 UTC No. 15955235
>>15955230
>research station sized colony
grim
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:39:48 UTC No. 15955240
>>15955235
mars should be honored to have this much of a permanent human presence.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:41:03 UTC No. 15955242
>>15955191
Well yeah. When I made that originally, I wasn't trying to go full graphic design autism. There was little consideration other than "I want to use red, white, and black for this."
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:42:27 UTC No. 15955244
>>15955230
>just not worth the effort of trying
I'll give it a try, bet I can make it work
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:42:55 UTC No. 15955245
>>15955229
several thousand sensors on Starship, the bulk of those are on the 39 Raptors
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:45:46 UTC No. 15955253
>>15955228
>but there are uninhabited parts of Earth that are easier to live in than Mars!!!
>Mars is ackshually gonna be way harder to colonize than you think, guise!!!
That's completely irrelevant.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:46:39 UTC No. 15955254
Do jews exist and why do they prevent me from going to space
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:47:06 UTC No. 15955256
>>15955073
Zubrin's Mars flag looks fucking ugly.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:49:46 UTC No. 15955260
>>15955256
Shut up chud
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:57:53 UTC No. 15955275
>>15954276
They rely on tourists taking bits and pieces as souvenirs to deactivate the engines
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:59:05 UTC No. 15955278
>>15955274
Gaslighting is a common and increasingly popular mechanisms of social control.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:59:37 UTC No. 15955281
>>15954639
>launching a midget nigger into space for the pure novelty factor
holy based
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:01:01 UTC No. 15955286
>>15955281
>>15955278
>>15955275
>>15955274
Fucking Muskrat dickriding chuds
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:06:52 UTC No. 15955297
>>15955256
these fuckers invalidating their research by being outdoors in thin clothing in their 'harsh mars analogue environment'
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:07:38 UTC No. 15955299
>>15955286
>NOOO YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO HATE HIM
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:11:34 UTC No. 15955304
>>15955297
The vast majority of "mars mission planning" has just been space autists larping with the help of government funding.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:20:17 UTC No. 15955314
>>15955286
get a grip
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:28:41 UTC No. 15955327
>>15954074
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/03/
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:29:57 UTC No. 15955328
so anyone else watching the latest for all mankind season/episodes?
i want the heist to work so bad
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:30:23 UTC No. 15955330
>>15955327
didn't this firing happen years ago
it was the random people whining about Musk's twitter posting and they were trying to do some kind of retarded coup or something
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:32:14 UTC No. 15955333
>>15955330
its going to court now
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:33:10 UTC No. 15955335
>>15955333
so another thing to add to the list of attacks
https://archive (dot) is/RRJfZ/again?url=https://www.nyti
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:38:24 UTC No. 15955346
>>15955229
starts at around 16min if you are listening it later
they talk mostly about humanitys future with life extension, population collapse and superintelligent AI, but then there is some random tangents about horses shitting in New York and the problems of central planning illuminated by Soviet captains hunting for whales (they had a quota to meet which increased every 5 years because every quota increased every 5 years)
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:43:00 UTC No. 15955358
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:48:58 UTC No. 15955367
>>15955335
>be a tranny and a fag
>hate Musk because internet told you so
>try to subvert and destroy company
>get fired
>oh no
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:53:20 UTC No. 15955372
>>15955335
> The labor board complaint said the company’s president and chief operating officer, Gwynne Shotwell, had illegally restricted employees from circulating the letter, and it identified similar infractions by other executives and managers.
>The case is scheduled to go before an administrative judge in early March unless SpaceX agrees to a settlement beforehand.
>“At SpaceX the rockets may be reusable, but the people who build them are treated as expendable,” said Paige Holland-Thielen, one of the employees who were fired. “I am hopeful these charges will hold SpaceX and its leadership accountable for their long history of mistreating workers and stifling discourse.”
I don't really understand what would be illegal here?
they don't really say it, I wonder what the argument is
company employees don't have "free speech"
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:53:58 UTC No. 15955373
>>15955372
It's the "bury them in litigation" strategy.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:55:57 UTC No. 15955377
Hurry the fuck up FAA
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:56:14 UTC No. 15955378
>>15955372
> The labor board complaint said that the firings had been retaliatory and that Ms. Shotwell and other SpaceX officials had interfered with the employees’ rights to engage in concerted activities that are legally protected.
>It also said a company vice president had broken the law by criticizing the letter at a meeting with employees a few days after it was circulated and “inviting employees to quit if they disagreed with the behavior of chief executive officer Elon Musk.” The Times previously reported that a company vice president had told workers that the letter was an extremist act and that Mr. Musk could do whatever he wanted at the company.
>The complaint also said a senior human resources official had illegally created the impression of surveillance when she showed workers involved in drafting the letter screen shots of a chat they had conducted on a messaging app.
"interfered with the employees’ rights to engage in concerted activities that are legally protected."
I guess they are going with some union angle or something? and then hope a Californian kangaroo court approves it
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:56:39 UTC No. 15955380
>>15955372
Using company property to disrupt company work isn't free speech issue. It's shitty employee issue.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:57:54 UTC No. 15955383
I mean is it really worth it to keep activity in California at this point? seems like it just invites constant lawfare
could be that net-net its more beneficial and these lawsuits are not really that big of a deal, some negatives headlines and thats it
SpaceX is private so it doesn't interfere with operations
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:12:58 UTC No. 15955405
>>15955328
Buy an ad
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:15:56 UTC No. 15955409
>>15955383
I fully expect headquarters to move to Texas within two years, with the Hawthorne facility acting exclusively as a Falcon factory until the rocket is retired.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:20:45 UTC No. 15955415
>>15955409
my guess is that alot of the leftist types in the california office will refuse to move to texas, even if the hq is moved to the cancer that is austin
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:21:28 UTC No. 15955417
>>15955409
that makes sense, but is there a location for that yet? I guess they could just rent/buy some property in Austin instead of building it, but Musk tends to want to keep managment, engineers and the factory floor close to each other for a quick feedback loop
so a headquarter with just managers in the city center doesn't really fit this
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:22:06 UTC No. 15955418
>>15955378
>employees’ rights to engage in concerted activities that are legally protected
That's a funny way to say "privilege to request government violence against one's employers because they said allegedly said mean things"
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:22:08 UTC No. 15955419
>>15955415
Eng division will be in Cali just to attract some talents but bulk of real work will be from Texas and possibly Florida
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:24:11 UTC No. 15955421
>>15955415
Tesla kept opened a "engineering headquarter" in San Fransisco after moving the headquarters to Austin, they still have Fremont open and I think they were even opening some new megapack factory in the state
might not be realistic to retire from California alltogether, a big population with a lot of engineers
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:25:20 UTC No. 15955422
>>15954685
Its absurd that India is technologically where the US space program was in the very early 60s, yet they are far ahead of the EU
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:25:58 UTC No. 15955423
>>15955415
Tesla kept an "engineering headquarter" open in San Fransisco after moving the company headquarters to Austin, they still have Fremont open and I think they were even opening some new megapack factory in the state, Twitter/X is of course also located there and some of his other companies might have activity, idk
might not be realistic to retire from California altogether, a big population with a lot of engineers
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:26:27 UTC No. 15955425
Lots engineers from other states + various tech companies have HQ in Texas alone. There's some real talent there. However it's all about measuring if talent is there or not. I think once starship spins, talent will come to texas
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:28:19 UTC No. 15955430
>>15955427
frosty
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:33:42 UTC No. 15955434
>>15955430
>>15955427
Stay frosty
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:35:42 UTC No. 15955438
>>15954786
To be fair, O'Neil Cylinders require resources to be extracted from the moon to be even remotely feasible.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:35:58 UTC No. 15955439
>>15955427
>>15955430
boring. let me know when it leaves the ground
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:38:15 UTC No. 15955441
>>15955377
FAA can't hurry anything up until SpaceX finishes the investigation
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:45:37 UTC No. 15955444
>>15954959
why is it not even theoretically possible?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:47:07 UTC No. 15955445
>>15955444
Because he's throwing FUD at the wall and making shit up.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:50:32 UTC No. 15955450
>>15955422
Most of Europe's problems are in the complete collapse of their launch capability, or their unwillingness to pursue domestic crew launch. Their science mission resume is still as good as anyone's. They might even be better than America's on a per-dollar basis since they don't have the bad habit of dumping all of their funding into one massive flagship project like James Webb or MSR.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:56:03 UTC No. 15955454
>>15955089
>>15955191
Helghast style. I like it.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:56:12 UTC No. 15955455
>>15955358
WE GAAN
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:59:28 UTC No. 15955460
>>15955230
the possibility of eventually escaping the grasp of existing earth nations and having permanent human presence in the void makes it more then worth the effort, faggot
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:02:37 UTC No. 15955464
>>15955450
why are europeans so allergic to manned spaceflight?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:04:50 UTC No. 15955468
Wait, JUICE was launched already? Why do I not remember this at all?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:05:58 UTC No. 15955471
>>15955468
Nobody hyped it
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:06:03 UTC No. 15955472
>>15955228
People don't live there because they don't want to, not because it's too inhospitable.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:06:06 UTC No. 15955473
>>15955430
>>15955427
i still remember when SN1 failed its test and a bunch of people here were saying SpaceX would never even get passed cryogenic testing
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:07:07 UTC No. 15955477
>>15955468
how could you forget the ariane 5 livery
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:09:15 UTC No. 15955478
>>15954959
Bullshit.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:13:40 UTC No. 15955484
>>15955482
who the fuck is jon brodkin?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:14:11 UTC No. 15955485
>>15955464
They never found a way to make crew launch work with geographic return. It's hard to design a project whose subcontractors can be split up between France, Italy, and Germany and leave all of them feeling like they got the best end of the deal and still have something left over for all of them other states pitching in for the ESA budget. For something like crew launch you really need to have one group that wants it PERSONALLY and pushes it through to the finish. Europe doesn't like working like that. They'd rather someone else do the hard work while they get to boast about the prestigious part they played.
>>15955468
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvH
It was way back in April? It launched on a pretty cloudy day and Europe never bothered to develop the technology of putting a gopro on any of their rockets so it wasn't a very memorable launch.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:15:44 UTC No. 15955489
https://spacenews.com/ingenuity-les
> WASHINGTON — As a Mars helicopter continues to operate far past expectations, lessons from that vehicle are being incorporated into NASA’s evolving Mars Sample Return plans.
>NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory announced Jan. 2 that the Ingenuity Mars helicopter completed its 70th flight on Dec. 22. The helicopter flew 260 meters during the 133-second flight, and has now traversed about 17 kilometers since its first flight in April 2021.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:16:45 UTC No. 15955493
>>15955484
telecom reporter, maybe starlink direct to cell news are going to be reported by him in the future due to him knowing more about general telecom stuff?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:16:48 UTC No. 15955494
>>15955113
I love how janky and shitty it looks. You know someone at NASA is looking at that and sweating because his job is Executive Rust Remover, Bolts and Screws Division and gets $160,000 a year.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:20:23 UTC No. 15955502
>>15955494
Because this is what NASA thinks a rocket hull is supposed to look like (before you slather it in primer and two inches of orange insulation).
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:21:40 UTC No. 15955504
>>15955500
two methalox BE-4s on the first stage, I'm kind of looking forward to this
4 days to go if they don't fuck this up again
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:23:11 UTC No. 15955505
>>15955228
That's just because it's in Russia and anyone with an IQ higher than 95 wouldn't want to live in Russia.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:23:32 UTC No. 15955506
Support NASA, muskrat chudlets.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:38:31 UTC No. 15955517
>>15955507
corn dog
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:38:52 UTC No. 15955519
>>15955517
Shut up fag
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:40:38 UTC No. 15955522
>>15955519
open ass
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:48:45 UTC No. 15955531
>>15955021
It takes 8 minutes for light to reach the Earth from the sun, unless some way to transmit information faster than light is discovered, Martians are doing to be shitposting with quite the latency, approximately 2 minutes at best and maybe 20 minutes at worst depending on where Earth and Mars are in their orbits, assuming the signal is sent directly to and from Mars and Earth with no intermediate satellites. Given how fast /pol/ is at times it's likely that any Martian poster will be able to make three posts at most in a thread before it hits bump limit.
This also means no online games or live voice/video calls with Martians either. They're going to have really shitty internet until they get the population and infrastructure to build their own internet over there.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 04:49:33 UTC No. 15955534
>>15955522
no u
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:04:59 UTC No. 15955545
>>15955489
Based little guy
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:08:25 UTC No. 15955548
>>15955489
All the rovers on Mars are like this too, running well past their supposed expiration date. Probably the only time a government project vastly exceeds expectations. I guess that's the result of human curiosity, perseverance, and ingenuity.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:08:44 UTC No. 15955549
>>15955531
Forums will make a comeback
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:08:46 UTC No. 15955550
>>15955545
>using based for everything
kys newtroon
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:10:32 UTC No. 15955551
>>15955550
based
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:10:52 UTC No. 15955553
GET
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:12:00 UTC No. 15955555
>>15955548
JPL is extremely expensive but they do seem to achieve the goals
but the question is, could those goals have been achieved cheaper if JPL didn't monopolize this area of research?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:12:03 UTC No. 15955556
>>15955553
fail
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:12:04 UTC No. 15955557
>>15955553
NOOOO I FAILED
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:12:48 UTC No. 15955558
>>15955531
/sfg/ will be too dead for it to matter
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:13:00 UTC No. 15955559
I WIN HAHAHAHA faggots
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:13:06 UTC No. 15955560
>>15955557
>>15955553
>>15955556
It was still an /sfg/ >>15955555 GET so THATS A WIN!
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:13:39 UTC No. 15955561
>>15955550
Gonna cry little virgin?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:13:49 UTC No. 15955562
good night sfg <3
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:16:41 UTC No. 15955564
>>15955531
>>15955549
>>15955558
I doubt shitposting would be allowed in the early days of Mars colonization regardless because it would use up valuable communication windows and bandwidth, and there would be so much work to be done in terms of construction, maintenance, and resource extraction that Mars colonists would have little free time. It would be like Jamestown 2.0
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:28:41 UTC No. 15955570
>>15955005
>ywn falcon9 hotstage kino
Bross
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:29:36 UTC No. 15955571
>>15955553
KWAB
>>15955555
CHECKED
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:41:12 UTC No. 15955581
>>15955571
What does KWAB mean
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:42:43 UTC No. 15955585
>>15955581
lurk for 10 years before posting newfag
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:46:29 UTC No. 15955588
>>15955228
There is no KGB on Mars.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:49:42 UTC No. 15955593
>>15955423
Starlink has a big presence in Redmond, Washington because of engineering talent and also now proximity to T-Mobile's HQ one town over.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 05:50:47 UTC No. 15955595
>>15955555
JPL BTFO
checked
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 06:17:57 UTC No. 15955612
>>15955071
>Pop Sci
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 06:21:42 UTC No. 15955620
>>15955372
The millennial cries out as they censor you.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 06:56:08 UTC No. 15955674
>>15955644
there was a standing army of 30,000 contractors and nasa employees JUST for shuttle iirc.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:12:37 UTC No. 15955687
>>15955674
one per tile
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:13:45 UTC No. 15955691
>>15955050
This isn't great but it's already the least bad one.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:14:46 UTC No. 15955693
>>15955691
Also no star version.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:08:10 UTC No. 15955752
We prevailed against e*rther scum
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:10:07 UTC No. 15955755
Zubrin is going completely out of his mind obsessing over slavwar and Trump. I tried seeing if he'd done any space stuff lately but no.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:13:12 UTC No. 15955758
>>15955755
Just remember that this is because of the jewish covid lockdowns. Do not forgive and do not forget.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:13:41 UTC No. 15955759
>>15955755
i dont want to become old and senile bros
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:14:37 UTC No. 15955761
>>15955759
Just don't become a Jewish communist at any point in your life and you'll be fine.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:37:03 UTC No. 15955841
>>15955473
Yeah. I'd like to think that this place is way past that point.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:39:24 UTC No. 15955844
>>15955473
We did a little trollin
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:49:12 UTC No. 15955854
Is there abyone more boring in commercial space than Petyr Beck?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:04:49 UTC No. 15955864
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status
elon you can't just say that...... will spacex be nationalized now?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:17:36 UTC No. 15955871
>this man naturally thinks he will build a mars colony with conventional rockets where nuclear is not needed to dramatically shorten travel time
do you agree or is better propulsion in his plans for later on
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:22:19 UTC No. 15955875
https://www.reddit.com/r/space/s/Pd
Check out this reddit post:
>'A City on Mars' is brilliant, much to the annoyance of space settlement boosters
>I imagine this sub is familiar with the new book "A City on Mars" by Kelly and Zach Weinersmith (the latter best known for the brilliant Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal comic). But if you're not: Read it.
>They make a detailed, intelligent and funny case for slowing down efforts to settle space, diving deep into biology (including poop and sex, as you might expect from SMBC) and technology and space geography and - this is what's most unusual - law and politics.
>The book makes a very convincing argument that not only are Musk-type space settlement dreams unrealistic to the point of delusional, they risk inflaming country-vs-country tension, which we definitely don't need. It would be better for all to proceed slowly and cautiously, as a global group, just as we have done with Antarctica and the seabed.
>That sounds like glib crunchy-granola talk but in their hands it's very compelling.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:28:09 UTC No. 15955877
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:32:11 UTC No. 15955881
>>15955879
She should smile more
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:33:45 UTC No. 15955882
>>15955881
she has envy
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:43:25 UTC No. 15955888
>>15955879
does this make her a giantess?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:46:32 UTC No. 15955891
>>15954265
BRILLIANT PEBBLES
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:49:42 UTC No. 15955893
>>15954835
Have you ever met a smart midget?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:50:33 UTC No. 15955894
>>15954835
Zubrin unironically talks about this in Mars Direct
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:40:46 UTC No. 15955929
>>15955875
>(the latter best known for the brilliant Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal comic)
This shit is always the same.Every episode ends with a black woman with glasses yelling about something.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:02:26 UTC No. 15955943
>>15955517
>tenshi eating a space shuttle external tank.jpg
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:12:26 UTC No. 15955954
How is it going in the New Year /SFG/? Are will still coping and hoping? Still pinning all of humanities hopes on a cock rocket built by a megalomaniac fake genius?
KEK, just admit it faggots. We need to use existing rocket technology to launch an "all hands on deck" effort to build space infrastructure. PERMANENT SPACE INFRASTRUCTURE! Nothing short of this will allow humans to colonize the Solar System let alone other stars. Keep coping, keep hoping, but the truth never changes....just gets further and further away as you waste your lives on Elon Musk's hamster wheel.....oh well.
PS, how's Hyper Loop doing? As good as solar roofs and Full Self Driving? The worst part, for you, is even if I'm wrong about Starship and it works perfectly it doesn't change the above truism. You still need to build infrastructure....stop procrastinating lazy fags.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:23:47 UTC No. 15955974
>>15955358
No no no
Nothing with geographical references.
Proper flags are about the nation that lives there, not mere geography
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:26:29 UTC No. 15955980
>>15955548
They just give absurdly pessimistic estimates so they seem like miracle workers when they exceed them. Same as Scotty gaslighting Captain Kirk.
Barkun at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:27:56 UTC No. 15955982
Tards
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:29:17 UTC No. 15955984
>>15954786
Both the Moon and Mars are in orbit.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:43:01 UTC No. 15956008
>>15955693
This is what Dall-E thinks it should be
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 13:08:31 UTC No. 15956031
>>15956008
red china red mars
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 13:12:41 UTC No. 15956039
if you don't understand the moon hoax you don't understand reality
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 13:25:11 UTC No. 15956053
>>15956039
teach me!
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 13:54:28 UTC No. 15956085
>>15955581
kill wiggas anal buttseggs
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:21:40 UTC No. 15956120
>>15956091
this ship looks so fucking retarded. god i long for the space shuttle to come back.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:23:15 UTC No. 15956123
>>15954850
It represents something that was once capable of flight but is now worthless (oldspace), the insanity of thinking you can cargo cult your way into orbit with sympathetic magic (Bezos) and, literally, prioritizing marketing and politics over working hardware.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:26:08 UTC No. 15956126
>>15954958
In Japanese culture being on time is extremely important, but transsexuals are expected to be late occasionally. Curious!
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:29:21 UTC No. 15956130
>>15955013
>even if you wanted to send a bag of your farts
That is in all seriousness the plan.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:38:20 UTC No. 15956145
>>15955199
Rust red circle representing the planet on a blood red background representing war and the eagerness to shed the blood of Earthers
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:39:55 UTC No. 15956146
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:44:02 UTC No. 15956153
>>15955464
There's no welfare, no unions, no soccer and no refugees in space.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:45:18 UTC No. 15956157
>>15955464
dead nations
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:52:07 UTC No. 15956159
>>15955464
Feudal lords don't want any more peasants to leave.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:58:08 UTC No. 15956168
>The #VoyagerSpace team is pleased to welcome @Dr_ThomasZ as the newest member of our advisory board. Dr. Zurbuchen is a world-renowned astrophysicist, innovator + former NASA Head of Science. We are excited to have him on our team! Learn more: https://prn.to/3H4Eqp9
https://x.com/VoyagerSH/status/1742
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:01:24 UTC No. 15956214
>>15955871
Nuclear isn't actually better than chemical if you can aerobrake, land the entire ship, and refill for the trip home. Every nuclear proposal for Mars has to haul along a separate landing/ascent stage like Apollo did.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:08:21 UTC No. 15956221
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:10:58 UTC No. 15956224
>>15956221
>died on 19th landing
What was the original goal back at the start, six launch/landings? Then extended to 10?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:12:32 UTC No. 15956226
>>15956214
fuck you bitch. its honestly embarassing how chemicalcucks beleieve this.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:17:11 UTC No. 15956235
>>15956226
Post the proposal paper that proves me wrong then.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:18:41 UTC No. 15956238
>>15956235
let me propose my orgasm to your colon, idiot.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:20:39 UTC No. 15956242
>>15956226
they are marginally better in some circumstances and might be much better in the future but right now those marginal gains do not warrant the massive red tape
its just not practical at this point
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:38:46 UTC No. 15956272
>>15955335
>biting the hand that feeds you
Leftists are so fucking retarded holy fucking shit. When will they learn that open communication policies in companies are designed to bait and weed out dissent? Don't bring politics into the work and you'll keep your paycheck.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:42:16 UTC No. 15956279
>>15956219
>>15956221
Funny how the failed jewish lunar landing is not included in the list. The jews can do no wrong.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:43:23 UTC No. 15956282
>>15956279
Wasn't Bereshet like 6 years ago, or did they recently try another one I'm not yet aware of?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:49:32 UTC No. 15956288
>>15956282
>Beresheet was 4 years ago
Shit...
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:06:40 UTC No. 15956308
>>15956288
Feb. '19 anon, almost five years now.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:45:14 UTC No. 15956364
>>15956355
>Maiden launch of a new rocket with engines never flown to space before
>carrying a maiden second stage design never flown in space before
>carrying a maiden lunar lander mission
Is it hubris
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:47:13 UTC No. 15956370
>>15956364
its based
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:48:16 UTC No. 15956373
>>15956370
Tell that to H-3
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:53:55 UTC No. 15956380
>>15956373
the problem was with some upper stage electronics that meant the upper stage engines didn't light
they had to ground H-2A as well due to that, so it might be that this was a general problem and not specifically about H3, they were just very unlucky
this talks about it at the end >>15955509
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:54:49 UTC No. 15956383
I will be surprised if New Glenn flies this year
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:55:19 UTC No. 15956385
I will be surprised if Vulcan flies this year
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:55:51 UTC No. 15956387
>>15956383
I will be surprised if New Glenn flies
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:56:54 UTC No. 15956393
>>15956355
Fool of a Took
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:57:34 UTC No. 15956395
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:58:15 UTC No. 15956397
>>15955875
Kys redditnigger /sfg/ ignored you correctly except for this other >>15955929 redditard. GO BACK YOU STUPID NIGGER MONKEYS
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:59:17 UTC No. 15956398
Is it just me or is this winter warmer than usual. It's been 20 degrees outside where I live. What do you think fellow Eurobros? Also what are the implications of space observations on feather forecasts?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:59:31 UTC No. 15956400
Btw the other thread finally died
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:59:47 UTC No. 15956401
>>15956397
calm down, retard
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:00:04 UTC No. 15956402
>>15956398
warmest winter weather within the past century
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:00:20 UTC No. 15956404
>>15954255
Reminder that all space agencies have conspired to never release any results from reproduction experiments in space. Not even some bugs
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:00:35 UTC No. 15956405
>>15956398
Fuck off envirojew nobody here believes your scam, especially after youre trying to move it into orbital debris and Mars.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:01:03 UTC No. 15956406
>>15956398
pretty normal or colder than previous winters here
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:01:38 UTC No. 15956407
>>15956401
Gb2 >>>/reddit/
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:01:50 UTC No. 15956408
>>15956402
does someone know of a site where I can see monthly temperature of some city over many years?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:02:57 UTC No. 15956411
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:05:12 UTC No. 15956417
why would you even reply to someone with something as narrow sighted as "I feel like it's been warmer where I am" on the fucking spaceflight general
like what are you expecting to get from swallowing this bait? do you think it will raise the quality of the thread?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:05:18 UTC No. 15956418
New startup has dropped and it's a spaceplane!
https://x.com/hermeuscorp/status/17
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:06:34 UTC No. 15956422
>>15956417
shut the fuck up you degenerate digger
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:06:46 UTC No. 15956423
>>15956418
its not
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:07:09 UTC No. 15956424
>>15956419
Yes its been acknowledged that a large amount of liquid has most definetly been on Mars before, no proof of life AND Titan has the same thing RIGHT NOW.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:07:09 UTC No. 15956425
>>15956418
Isnt that hypersonic plane that is going to be entirely in the atmosphere
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:08:33 UTC No. 15956428
>>15956424
Yes except the liquid on Titan is a different one :(
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:11:58 UTC No. 15956437
>>15956364
It is hope
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:13:03 UTC No. 15956439
>>15956398
Had a warm spell over xmas but now the cold has hit.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:13:32 UTC No. 15956442
>>15956437
What it really is, is Tory willing to sacrifice a non-natsec payload just to get natsec certified, and rushing to get that certification so launching two sacrificial payloads first to work out the kinks (Peregrine and Dream Chaser)
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:14:48 UTC No. 15956446
>>15956422
based
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:15:57 UTC No. 15956449
>>15956442
imagine if vulcan blows up carrying bugchaser. that would be spectacular
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:17:17 UTC No. 15956453
>>15956446
Nate Diggers
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:18:02 UTC No. 15956455
>>15956453
I will not date niggers you fucking despicable coal burner
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:23:17 UTC No. 15956465
>>15956455
Why not? Are you racist?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:24:54 UTC No. 15956468
>>15956465
race realist
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:24:58 UTC No. 15956469
>>15956453
Fucking coal burner freak.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:32:42 UTC No. 15956476
>>15956468
Based statistics enjoyer
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:49:19 UTC No. 15956499
>>15956453
niggerlovers are demonic.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:17:20 UTC No. 15956549
>>15954220
seethe
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:18:07 UTC No. 15956552
>>15956398
hasnt snowed in north america. weather in some parts of america isnt much different than the summer. desertificiation and dust bowl soon. we needed to get to mars yesterday. elon should push for a 2026 launch of starships to mars.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:19:32 UTC No. 15956556
>>15956419
its crazy to think that at one time the solar system had 3 earth-like planets
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:27:35 UTC No. 15956575
>>15956556
Venus Earth and Mars.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:30:47 UTC No. 15956580
>>15955228
>Russians are incapable of doing thing, therefore nobody can do it!
I'm not sure if this is bait or retardation but I'm responding anyway
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:32:24 UTC No. 15956582
>>15955228
we need Mars more than we need Russia
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:33:06 UTC No. 15956583
>>15956582
TZD, brother
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:47:15 UTC No. 15956593
>>15956556
>>15956575
Mars was never Earth like.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:02:27 UTC No. 15956613
>>15956417
yeah
you should just post satellite-based data instead that proves you right (December isn't out yet for Copernicus but it's looking like it'll be above average as well).
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:05:17 UTC No. 15956617
>>15956397
shut the fuck up. /sfg/ is always open to everyone
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:10:47 UTC No. 15956624
>>15956593
It was very earth like until the zetaton nuclear explosion, gorilla ape.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:13:13 UTC No. 15956628
>>15954639
>a short stature
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:16:45 UTC No. 15956632
>>15956617
except russians
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:19:37 UTC No. 15956644
>>15956628
Manlet is a plus when it comes to space. Less mass and more likely to fit into an average suit. Lanklets need not even apply.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:21:39 UTC No. 15956648
>>15956644
you would have to be brown as well or have some other ESA approved disability (like be a woman)
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:25:20 UTC No. 15956656
>>15956617
/sfg/ (and Elon) are anti-open borders.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:28:23 UTC No. 15956662
https://www.nasa.gov/general/detoxi
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:32:18 UTC No. 15956670
>>15956617
Word
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:37:14 UTC No. 15956684
>>15956613
always wondered how they come up with an average temperature. They don't have temperature sensors in the middle of the Atlantic do they
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:38:15 UTC No. 15956688
>>15956617
We take noobs and we turn them into proper rocket scientists
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:42:30 UTC No. 15956695
>>15956688
>noobs
Kys reddit tranny go back we're full
>>15956617
Troon YWNBAW
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:48:05 UTC No. 15956712
>>15956684
There are a couple buoy's but the big science is done with data from satellites that measure emitted infrared radiation at wavelengths that pass through the atmosphere
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:48:20 UTC No. 15956714
>>15956662
>detoxify mars
Almost scared me there lmao.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:49:20 UTC No. 15956716
>>15956617
discord/reddit troons need to be killed/raped/maimed in any order, i'm okay with everyone else
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:51:24 UTC No. 15956717
>>15956712
Any bouys that communicate with starlink?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:54:00 UTC No. 15956721
>>15956695
what's this gibberish lol
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:54:08 UTC No. 15956722
https://twitter.com/lrocket/status/
Interesting Merlin details
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:59:59 UTC No. 15956734
nozzle under buckling compression
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:16:03 UTC No. 15956759
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:24:59 UTC No. 15956769
https://www.sciencefocus.com/space/
>The average distance of Pluto from the Sun is about 39 times that of the Earth’s. So, on average, the Sun on Pluto looks about 1,520 times fainter than it does on Earth. But this isn’t particularly faint. The full Moon is on average about 400,000 times fainter than the Sun. So, doing the maths, this means the Sun seen from Pluto is about 264 times brighter than the full Moon. This is about the amount of light you’d see on Earth when the Sun is around four degrees below the horizon, during ‘civil twilight’, which is more than enough to read by. Even on Pluto, looking directly at the Sun would probably be painful.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:30:48 UTC No. 15956778
yes most people don't realize the range across we can practically see. For example a well lit room with a few light bulbs will still have thousands of times less light than full sunlight. Logarithms and shieeet. Interesting we use logarithmic scales for sound and radio but not for light, even though it's not that different.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:38:40 UTC No. 15956793
>>15956778
Our eyes are digital and our ears mechanical.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:38:58 UTC No. 15956795
>>15956778
This means the view from the Galilean moons is even brighter, thats good
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:39:54 UTC No. 15956798
>>15956795
Because we will live there soon(Ganymede)
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:44:50 UTC No. 15956811
>>15956798
Ganymede is in the radiation belt, we will only live on Callisto for this century.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:54:31 UTC No. 15956824
>>15956811
>this century
When I was little my dad told me we'd be on Mars by now. I'd be pleased if we had a permanent lunar and Martian presence by the end of the century. We've been 'about to go (back)' since the 90s.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:57:13 UTC No. 15956830
>>15956824
we will be on Jupiter/Saturn's moons by 2060 and we will launch an interstellar mission by 2100
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:58:11 UTC No. 15956834
>>15956830
We'll be stuck listening to people bitching and moaning about WHAT ABOUT FIXING PROBLEM X HERE FIRST until the heat death of the universe. That is sadly the human condition.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:59:07 UTC No. 15956837
>>15956617
except people who anthropomorphize rockets
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:59:12 UTC No. 15956838
>>15956824
>When I was little my dad told me we'd be on Mars by now.
same except Elon Musk told me that not my dad, and he said it not when I was little but 5 years ago.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:59:42 UTC No. 15956840
>>15956837
ratio
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:00:09 UTC No. 15956842
>>15956840
go back to X
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:00:56 UTC No. 15956843
>>15956842
i'd rather have seX
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:02:33 UTC No. 15956847
>>15956843
What do you think her sweat smells like?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:03:30 UTC No. 15956850
>>15954786
Lol
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:04:05 UTC No. 15956852
>>15956847
odorless
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:05:20 UTC No. 15956854
>>15956847
CH4 active cooling
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:05:54 UTC No. 15956855
>>15956847
farts
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:06:40 UTC No. 15956858
>>15956843
YWNBAW
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:07:30 UTC No. 15956863
>>15956858
as a transman, I am glad you reaffirmed my identity!
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:16:33 UTC No. 15956876
>>15956830
Manned interstellar by 2100? Lmao. I want to believe but unless we have Expanse style fusion drives, no chance.
Unless the QI schitzo drive works
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:19:02 UTC No. 15956883
>>15956876
I think we could build a Generation ship powered by an Orion drive or a Daedalus engine by 2100
and I said that's when I expect it to launch, not be completed by
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:20:20 UTC No. 15956885
>>15956876
Speaking of the QI drive
any news yet? did they start it up yet?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:24:08 UTC No. 15956888
>BO might buy ULA outright
Why the fuck is this allowed? Consolidation has been a disaster for the aerospace industry.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:26:35 UTC No. 15956893
>>15956885
Sorry to say that due to its quantum nature, every time you observe it it provides no thrust.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:27:36 UTC No. 15956895
>>15956888
What purpose does ULA even serve? They have no rockets to launch and they only did gov contracts.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:30:12 UTC No. 15956902
>>15956888
>Consolidation has been a disaster for the aerospace industry
not really. If they didnt consolidate under obama then the space divisions of locksneed and boing would both go bankrupt. the disaster is having 40 years of constant decline in lift to orbit and demand for launchers. ULA is just a frankenstein result of that
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:30:16 UTC No. 15956904
>>15956893
heughh
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:34:25 UTC No. 15956911
>>15956895
They are banking on Starship not working as intended. Best case for them they have a virtual monopoly on national security contracts because their rocket will be the only one capable of all the arcane measures the DOD requires, and will outcompete everyone in those measures if Starship doesnt work. Worst case they get completely eclipsed, but are kept around anyway because the government (rightly so) doesnt want a monopoly launch provider after having to suffer through shuttle.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:36:30 UTC No. 15956915
>>15956895
Mostly there since nobody wants a monopoly to form. But ULA is more or less slaved to BO's engines. At this point, why not merge the companies. Let BO take whatever is useful out of ULA and get rid of the dead husk.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:37:25 UTC No. 15956916
>>15956895
ULA was only created to serve as a monopoly for the US government after Boeing was caught doing industrial espionage against Lockheed Martin.
They don't really need reusable rockets since the government doesn't launch that many payloads and they are often sent on high-energy orbits that would use an expendable Falcon anyway. That and the fact that their rockets are based on the proven Atlas/Delta family so it's considered reliable and there is little need for innovation. Vulcan was created so they don't have to maintain two rockets (altas V and Delta IV heavy)
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:38:55 UTC No. 15956918
>>15955489
Cancel MSR
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:40:39 UTC No. 15956925
>>15956888
And how come BO, a company that has put nothing in orbit, is buying ULA, shouldn't it be the other way around?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:41:44 UTC No. 15956928
>>15956925
i guess its because Bezos has the money to do so and he can acquire their talent for BO
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:43:25 UTC No. 15956932
>>15955548
>running well past their supposed expiration date
They are designed to run this long. If you dig the archives you can probably find posts where I say in 2021 that the helicopter will last at least a few years.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:45:14 UTC No. 15956935
>>15956925
Because BO has the funds to do so. Bezos ain't giving up BO to anyone due to his own pride. Lockheed and Boeing don't have any real emotional attachment to ULA. Besides BO has mad government connections despite their lack of launches. Look at how DoD/NASA never really punishes whenever BO does court/legal shenanigans. They're invested in BO doing something.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:46:29 UTC No. 15956938
also the helicopter has like what 5 moving parts, the motor and shit in the swashplate or whatever. Everything else electronics, of course it's gonna last long. Even my Chinese smartphone has been running for 4 years nearly flawlessly.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:51:29 UTC No. 15956947
whats the big deal about rotation detonation engines? do they have more isp or something? more thrust-to-weight ratio?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:55:28 UTC No. 15956953
>>15956888
>Consolidation has been a disaster for the aerospace industry.
We will go from two heavy lift launch providers to...two heavy lift launch providers that are more competitive.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:56:05 UTC No. 15956954
>>15956947
10% more ISP theoretically due to more complete combustion or something
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:57:38 UTC No. 15956957
>>15956954
so is it an entirely new engine design or is it something that can be applied to current engine designs?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:58:08 UTC No. 15956958
https://www.thespacereview.com/arti
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:59:07 UTC No. 15956959
>>15956957
Entire new design. Traditional engines want to avoid whatever rotating detonation engines do or else they'll blow apart.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:06:31 UTC No. 15956966
>>15956958
Include a screenshot and comment fucker now Im not clicking your shitty article
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:07:27 UTC No. 15956967
Navajo Nation objects to private moon mission placing human remains on the lunar surface
https://www.space.com/moon-navajo-n
>As reported by Arizona Public Radio on Dec. 28, the President of the Navajo Nation, Buu Nygren, is unhappy with the notion of human remains being deposited on the moon and is formally requesting that NASA postpone this January launch due to the space agency's promise to advise them prior to authorizing any future memorial flights.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:09:34 UTC No. 15956971
>>15956947
Much higher thermal efficiency.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:09:41 UTC No. 15956972
>>15956966
>By contrast, it may take some luck for Ariane 6, H3, New Glenn, and Vulcan to perform 12 launches combined this year.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:11:46 UTC No. 15956973
so if crewed starship becomes operational by the end of the decade, wouldn't that make SLS obsolete even if they switched over to block 2? Are we even gonna get to see a single cargo sls fly?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:12:09 UTC No. 15956975
>>15956966
This. We need to stop posting shitty twitter links and start posting screenshots instead
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:17:01 UTC No. 15956984
>>15956932
Rovers and probes definitely tend to be overbuilt (even the flimsy Perseverance wheels have lasted beyond the original mission length), but Ingenuity really is just a couple of COTS parts slapped together on a shoestring budget. It's quite impressive for it to still be going.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:18:23 UTC No. 15956988
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:20:30 UTC No. 15956992
https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1O
musk streaming diablo
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:20:49 UTC No. 15956994
>>15956972
To get to twelve they'd need to clear every payload that's been penciled in for this year. H3 would need to launch four times and Vulcan would need to launch six times. There is no way that is going to happen.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:24:22 UTC No. 15956998
did spaceX manage to reach their number of launches goal in 2023?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:25:18 UTC No. 15956999
>>15956998
no muskrat the oil salesman scammed the world again
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:29:00 UTC No. 15957009
>>15956998
got 98 out of 100
he can't keep getting away with it
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:29:04 UTC No. 15957010
>>15956992
Nobody cares not spaceflight fuck off back to >>>/v/
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:33:33 UTC No. 15957013
>>15956992
based and hella spaceflight (Musk is CEO of SpaceX)
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:34:36 UTC No. 15957014
LEO Domain: Any human-made object, human, human habitation, or human transport on orbit between 100 and 2,000 kilometers above Earth sea level.
MEO/GEO Domain: Any human-made object, human, human habitation, or human transport on orbit between 2,000 and 35,786 kilometers above Earth sea level.
Cislunar Domain: Any human-made object, human, human habitation, or human transport on orbit between 35,786 and 384,399 kilometers above Earth sea level.
Planetary Domain: Any human-made object, human, human habitation, or human transport at the surface or subsurface, or in orbit around any celestial body inside our Solar system.
Interplanetary Domain: Any human-made object, human, human habitation, or human transport inside our Solar System that’s in between the gravitational influence of planets.
Interstellar Domain: Any human-made object, human, human habitation, or human transport beyond the limit of the heliosphere.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:47:42 UTC No. 15957029
>>15956834
Thankfully the human condition is curable with bullets.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:48:47 UTC No. 15957030
>>15956850
btfo
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:54:57 UTC No. 15957032
ULAbros....
what happens if vulcan experiences an anomaly?
will we get btfo'd???
will thunderf00t make a video deboonking ula?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:55:36 UTC No. 15957033
ULA purchase will be confirmed on the Vulcan launch livestream screencap this.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:08:04 UTC No. 15957045
>>15957032
blunderd00t only deboonks SpacX
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:08:42 UTC No. 15957046
>>15957037
it was so embarassing to see them partner with ULA. two grifters coming together.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:10:15 UTC No. 15957049
>>15957046
b...but Bruno is gonna personally review my rocket... that's cool right?
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:14:04 UTC No. 15957053
>>15956954
wasn't it up to 50%?
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:15:09 UTC No. 15957056
>>15957046
SpaceX doesn't need to rely on such shitty gimmicks
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:16:34 UTC No. 15957057
>>15957056
where is this from?
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:18:11 UTC No. 15957058
>>15957057
They flew Jeb up on Starliner. The only one with the balls to do so.
https://www.engadget.com/boeing-sta
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:19:02 UTC No. 15957060
>>15957058
yeah i guess that makes sense
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:45:54 UTC No. 15957101
>>15956958
>bro just build a nova rocket bro
why are boomers like this?
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:49:01 UTC No. 15957108
>>15957101
He is, and may Musk (pbuh) forgive me for uttering this term - an O'Neilian
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 01:09:21 UTC No. 15957136
>>15955464
they would rather destroy eastern ukraine - historical homeland of soviet rocketry - than let it fall into non NATO hands.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 01:19:47 UTC No. 15957159
>>15957101
They had greatness in their grasp and then lived long enough to watch it slip away. It's not so much about finding the best path forward as it is righting an old wrong. That, and a side order of Facebook pravda saying that Musk is bad and you should hate everything he does.
Also the M-1 is goddamn enormous. Who wouldn't want to see something like that fly?
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 01:29:46 UTC No. 15957175
>>15955071
>"a rare example of a 20th century Human art form, acrylic on black velvet. This image was the inspiration for the flag of the Martian colonies in the 22nd century." - DS9
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 01:32:46 UTC No. 15957181
>>15956847
like angel
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 01:34:47 UTC No. 15957185
>>15957057
Take2 interactive paid Boeing 10 million to fly a kerbal from KSP2 on Starliner. Kinda epic
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 01:35:44 UTC No. 15957189
>>15957185
damn, imagine if that money went to ksp 2 instead lol
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 01:58:03 UTC No. 15957234
>>15957227
Burnt/cooked meat, usually reminiscent of bbq steak.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:00:41 UTC No. 15957236
>>15957227
bullshit they can't figure out how to wash clothes in space. a washing machine is already an artificial gravity generator
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:03:37 UTC No. 15957241
>>15957236
how exactly do you plan on solving the vibration problem without more than doubling the weight of your washing machine for a counter gyro
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:06:48 UTC No. 15957245
>>15957241
double the weight who the fuck cares
you're not a mass autist, are you anon?
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:13:53 UTC No. 15957257
>>15957236
If they put a washing machine on the ISS the Russians would steal it.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:19:06 UTC No. 15957268
I don't get this 'reusable clothes' meme
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:31:03 UTC No. 15957286
>>15957241
>the vibration problem
build a large thick toobe instead of shitty modular cuckstation
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:49:24 UTC No. 15957315
this is the humiliation you are subjected to under mass autism
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:50:26 UTC No. 15957317
International BRAAP station
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:51:26 UTC No. 15957320
when new bread?
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:52:40 UTC No. 15957322
>>15957320
make me make it and I'm posting rocketgirls
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:53:41 UTC No. 15957324
>>15957322
omgggg plzzz do dat xister
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:57:22 UTC No. 15957327