🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:39:37 UTC No. 16070026
Boeing's vision for space exploration Edition
Previous >>16067566
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:46:37 UTC No. 16070037
Pathetic nigger stage
You're really just desperate to be the op aren't you
What a nigger skin ape you are
No (you)
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:10:47 UTC No. 16070081
>>16070069
https://twitter.com/Space_Station/s
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:46:05 UTC No. 16070139
>>16070081
>Doesn't @Roscosmos
Lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:58:08 UTC No. 16070149
Memelab launch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GF9
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:58:57 UTC No. 16070152
>>16070139
Kek, but I'm not sure there would be much point.
https://twitter.com/roscosmos
>In accordance with the resolution of Roskomnadzor on blocking access to Twitter, we inform you that Roscosmos is suspending the publication of materials on this site.
Barkon at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:59:55 UTC No. 16070154
>>16070152
Fimmnbbgykyw
(Fart in my mouth now baby girl you know you wanna)
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:04:53 UTC No. 16070160
>>16070026
>Boeing's vision for space exploration
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:11:06 UTC No. 16070169
>>16070149
>max q is max velocity
dumb narrator
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:23:15 UTC No. 16070178
>>16070170
two more weeks
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:24:23 UTC No. 16070180
>>16070178
ur liar
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:37:35 UTC No. 16070196
>>16070189
>FLT3
Are we going to have the whole alphabet?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:40:49 UTC No. 16070199
>no launch license
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:40:52 UTC No. 16070200
>>16070196
Integrated orbital test flight three. IOTF-3
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:04:54 UTC No. 16070240
>>16070200
Actually, it's called Flight 3
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:09:03 UTC No. 16070248
>>16070199
did anyone adapt the cardcrusher meme for the FAA and SpaceX?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:30:18 UTC No. 16070277
Anons, what will it take to acheive
1G brachistochrone trajectories inside the solar system? Stuff looks so hopeless ;-;
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:39:23 UTC No. 16070287
>>16070277
>emoticons
Kys
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:44:05 UTC No. 16070296
>>16070271
DAS RITE
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:45:31 UTC No. 16070298
>>16070277
Antimatter catalyzed fusion, and even then you'd get maybe a week of burn time tops. Brachistochrone trajectories are scifi.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:47:21 UTC No. 16070301
if Elon had dickrided Biden how much further would things be?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:00:17 UTC No. 16070315
>>16070287
Answer the question retard
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:07:19 UTC No. 16070320
>>16070301
negative progress
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:07:45 UTC No. 16070321
>>16070277
A magic engine machine that recycles waste heat into usable energy. IANAL but the laws of thermodynamics have no legal basis and therefore are not legally binding.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:10:08 UTC No. 16070325
>>16070321
legality has no legal basis, it's all made up.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:10:19 UTC No. 16070326
>>16070322
I've already left to my bugout location and don't get close to any windows or doors.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:11:25 UTC No. 16070329
>>16070322
Hillary has Boeing stock?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:11:55 UTC No. 16070332
>>16070170
>>16070180
Adorable bun! 10/10. Would pet and cuddle for hours.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:25:31 UTC No. 16070368
>>16070322
my friend is working at boing
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:41:00 UTC No. 16070397
>>16070332
Tranny detected
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:42:42 UTC No. 16070401
>>16070301
accepting DEI and unions would be disastrous
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:46:43 UTC No. 16070407
>>16070301
We would be on Mars by now. My gorlfriend wouldna left me
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:48:46 UTC No. 16070412
>>16070397
Close all those trans porn tabs, they're melting your brain
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:58:41 UTC No. 16070436
>>16070322
I see the ULA snipers have gotten a new job
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:06:15 UTC No. 16070444
>>16070412
I smell projection, and rotting shit stained axe wound
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:26:37 UTC No. 16070460
>>16070149
>>16070169
really? only 2 posts about a rocket launch? even starlink tends to do better than that
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:51:48 UTC No. 16070491
>>16070460
We hate goylab here
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:04:08 UTC No. 16070517
>>16070301
Extremely little difference if any.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:29:23 UTC No. 16070554
License status?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:30:50 UTC No. 16070561
>>16070554
22 hours
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:44:26 UTC No. 16070584
>>16070581
you have no life
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:45:17 UTC No. 16070587
>>16070584
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:45:45 UTC No. 16070589
>>16070581
Cuckold.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:45:46 UTC No. 16070590
>>16070584
>he doesnt have labpadre permanently open on a third screen
shiggy diggy
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:48:16 UTC No. 16070593
>no launch license
this is bad
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:55:25 UTC No. 16070608
>ULA (owned by murderers)
Literally how can SpaceX critics sleep at night?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:56:54 UTC No. 16070610
>>16070593
Legally they need at least 3 days between license issuance and launch in case the FAA finds a last minute reason to void the license.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:57:37 UTC No. 16070614
>>16070610
last time they got license like a day before launch
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:57:39 UTC No. 16070615
>>16070604
If they intended to go orbital they'd need a re-entry license, and we all saw how well that went for Varda. This still gets them 20 minutes in space.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:57:49 UTC No. 16070616
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:01:12 UTC No. 16070621
>>16070604
Not good, looks like it's going to miss crashing into Australia.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:02:32 UTC No. 16070623
>>16070621
Total Emu Death
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:04:22 UTC No. 16070627
>>16070554
oi mate. you got a loicence for that rocketship?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:05:02 UTC No. 16070629
>>16070616
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:05:59 UTC No. 16070632
>>16070628
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1
>Starship stacked for flight
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:07:43 UTC No. 16070637
>>16070628
>>16070632
what's the big antenna for?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:08:15 UTC No. 16070639
>>16070615
If that's true then I guess it makes sense as they can properly test reentry this way without needing more licenses
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:09:58 UTC No. 16070640
Friday launch confirmed on X
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:10:14 UTC No. 16070641
WE GAAN
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:14:27 UTC No. 16070648
>>16070640
>>16070644
does Thursday constitute "end of week"
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:15:32 UTC No. 16070650
>>16070648
thursday is more middle than end
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:19:33 UTC No. 16070658
>>16070615
I doubt it'd work that way, reentry is part of the considerations I'm pretty sure.
>>16070616
lel
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:22:40 UTC No. 16070662
>>16070026
hey, in the nsf live stream it says 39:37 for the starship test flight 3 but does this mean its tomorrow or doubletomorrow? i want to leave my house tomorrow but i dont want to miss watching the starship test flight 3.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:22:54 UTC No. 16070664
>>16070637
Probably lightning protection, to stop the vehicle being struck. Most pads have either towers and cables, or a mast on the structure.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:27:56 UTC No. 16070670
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:43:05 UTC No. 16070692
should I drive down and watch it? i don't have anything better to do during spring break but it's a bunch of time wasted when it scrubs
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:46:04 UTC No. 16070694
>>16070670
Just look at that article they have on active shielding
Absolutely a moot point if you can put 400 tons of water in space by the end of the year
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:47:06 UTC No. 16070695
>>16070692
Don't let your dreams be memes
If you see Clearbro give him a high five
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:47:16 UTC No. 16070696
>>16070692
If you got few hundreds of dollars to spent for a lifetime of experience, that you will share with your family for the rest of your life, sure.
Its a gamble, but the payoff is extreme
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:48:44 UTC No. 16070699
im gonna BLACKED.com the rocket
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:55:00 UTC No. 16070704
So seven flights this year, about every month or so
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:58:08 UTC No. 16070710
4 flights at best
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:07:14 UTC No. 16070721
>>16070670 (You)
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:07:47 UTC No. 16070724
>>16070704
if they're discovering any new problems at all then a cadence like that's going to be impossible
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:09:38 UTC No. 16070725
>>16070636
4chan is telling me this is a (You) but I didn't post this post.
Are you and me posting from the same IP or something? maybe live in the same building?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:11:20 UTC No. 16070727
>>16070725
I'm you
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:13:51 UTC No. 16070730
>>16070725
This is your mother posting. Please clean your room.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:15:15 UTC No. 16070732
>>16070725
They just fucked around with it for some gay reason and got rid of unique IPs
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:17:28 UTC No. 16070736
>>16070732
(((for some reason)))
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:19:24 UTC No. 16070737
>>16070695
I'm not able to take time off so I won't be there, maybe flight 4
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:21:01 UTC No. 16070740
>>16070725
you posted it
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:24:40 UTC No. 16070745
>>16070737
it's over...
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:28:59 UTC No. 16070755
I hope that one day I will be able to cross the ocean and see a rocket launch. Life in Europe is pure suffering.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:32:21 UTC No. 16070764
BRILLIANT PEBBLES
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:32:54 UTC No. 16070766
DUMB ROCKS
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:33:18 UTC No. 16070768
SHINY STONES
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:34:27 UTC No. 16070770
GREAT GEODES
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:36:26 UTC No. 16070774
niggerfaggots
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:37:31 UTC No. 16070777
>>16070774
Best post
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:37:57 UTC No. 16070778
clever quartz
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:40:32 UTC No. 16070779
>>16070778
that's a good one
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:46:02 UTC No. 16070788
MY DIAPERRR MY DIAPER FULL
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:48:43 UTC No. 16070792
https://youtu.be/LKYlSdBMUG4
ya'll excited?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:52:51 UTC No. 16070799
>>16070788
>shills start shitting themselves whenever pLEO kinetic interceptors are mentioned
sure makes you think
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:54:38 UTC No. 16070803
>>16070740
how? I don't even have that file saved on my computer. something doesn't add up. unless moot made a mistake again.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:56:49 UTC No. 16070808
>>16070803
split personality disorder :/
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:57:06 UTC No. 16070810
>>16070803
>moot
Who?
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:12:29 UTC No. 16070837
>>16070810
Newfag
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:18:50 UTC No. 16070847
Flight 3 next week. Weather is pretty bad, and no license until Thursday/Friday at the earliest. Sorry
-X
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:20:54 UTC No. 16070853
>>16070847
spaceX sisters we got cocky...
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:22:50 UTC No. 16070859
>>16070837
asking who moot is, is a pretty old meme
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:28:15 UTC No. 16070865
1000's of changes
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:30:41 UTC No. 16070870
>>16070847
Snowstorm socking the west on thursday
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:57:56 UTC No. 16070906
>>16070847
I genuinely wouldn't mind. Spring break is in full swing right now and hotel rooms down there are either horrendously expensive or nonexistent.
On the other hand, a whole island full of vacationing normies getting forcibly spacepilled sounds good too.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:02:36 UTC No. 16070912
>>16070906
i want the sound blast to rape them
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:15:40 UTC No. 16070928
>>16070322
Hit by a falling exit hatch, very unfortunate
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:26:30 UTC No. 16070942
>>16070615
Varda needed a reentry license because they had to land on land, potentially causing damage to third parties. No such risk with ocean splashdown
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:31:57 UTC No. 16070949
>>16070942
But what about the whales anon
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:50:58 UTC No. 16070980
>>16070847
you should be in preschool not posting on an 18+ website muad'dib
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:52:00 UTC No. 16070982
Is this thread shaping nicely, @CommunityNotes?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:08:41 UTC No. 16071015
>>16070670
I say 2 more launches. Pad 1 has to be rebuilt for the leaning/stacking issues, and the second tower won't be flight ready for another 12 months.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:10:47 UTC No. 16071020
>>16070397
The fuck is wrong with you?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:11:25 UTC No. 16071022
>>16071020
Tranny-detector's on the fritz, he really oughta get that checked out
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:17:44 UTC No. 16071033
>>16070670
>6 flights this year
Come on Elon lay off the bullshit a little
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:20:13 UTC No. 16071038
>Chandra dead
rip bozo
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:24:39 UTC No. 16071046
>>16070949
Until they start building dubstep k(r)illsats like in ST IV we don't have to care.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:26:31 UTC No. 16071047
As I said before, expect 3 to 5 launches this year. And that's accounting for scrubs.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:40:35 UTC No. 16071064
the rocket is going to blow up and there will be no more launches this year
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:41:46 UTC No. 16071065
>>16071047
their launch contract is for 5 launches a year
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:43:42 UTC No. 16071070
>>16071064
>Starship will blow up
The flight profile involves it blowing up whether it's successful or a failure anon, even if it soft touches down and survives intact, the navy will use it as target practice
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:45:12 UTC No. 16071073
>>16070301
Bidens come and go but the military industrial complex is forever
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:01:27 UTC No. 16071096
Who's ready for Japanese Minotaur take 2?
https://twitter.com/SpaceIntel101/s
>Japanese SPACEONE to launch its 3-stage-solid KAIROS with a liquid propulsion kickstage (PBS) on its maiden flight from Spaceport Kii to SSO with CISCE's Rapid Small Launch Satellite. The 1st time a private company is attempting to launch a satellite independently in Japan.
https://twitter.com/nvslive/status/
>Space One KAIROS rocket launch live streaming. Nico live broadcasting the Kairos rocket launch from Katsuura, where the news center is located
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FG
https://twitter.com/nvslive/status/
>NVS's Kairos Rocket Optical Observation Challenge is about 10km away from the launch site, so the question is whether it will be visible after launch. We recommend watching it together with the official distribution by TV Wakayama.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZ_
NVS stream is now live. TV Wakayama should be live in ~30 min.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:08:27 UTC No. 16071110
Countdown from 10,000 seconds, please!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:10:20 UTC No. 16071113
>>16070978
what is it Elon? A boy trapped down a well?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:11:04 UTC No. 16071116
>>16071103
50 minutes
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:12:57 UTC No. 16071120
https://science.nasa.gov/science-re
Overview of reduced boil-off research, current avenues of research are noncompressible gas jet injection and subcooled liquid droplets
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:13:40 UTC No. 16071121
>>16071116
is that her shoulder??
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:14:09 UTC No. 16071122
>>16071103
what in tarnation
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:15:48 UTC No. 16071126
>>16071103
OMFG she is growing up! but still cute. very mature for her age and intelligent
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:20:37 UTC No. 16071132
/vt/rannies should be contained the same way ponyfags are
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:23:28 UTC No. 16071137
>>16071096
>3 solid stages
>small lift
generally I would take that to mean it's derived from an icbm, but japan doesn't get to have icbms, what gives?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:26:55 UTC No. 16071143
>>16071137
They're not allowed to develop liquid rockets as part of the whole thingy that ended after WW2, i think?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:38:32 UTC No. 16071154
>>16071137
The Space One is also a partnership between Canon and Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries. IHI builds the Epsilon and the boosters for the H-II and H3, so solids are kinda their wheelhouse. There's just not much domestic liquid propulsion experience in Japan outside of hydrogen for the LE-5/7/9 and no one is crazy enough to try and build a small launch vehicle using hydrogen.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:46:34 UTC No. 16071172
>>16071132
Clearbros are the ones that got us westerners the link to the Starship flight stream on Twitter they are a protected group for their contributions to IFT-3
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:51:46 UTC No. 16071181
>>16071096
>>16071103
T-10:00
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:58:37 UTC No. 16071193
>>16071191
40 seconds between first stage burnout and stage separation?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:01:38 UTC No. 16071197
clear count
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:01:57 UTC No. 16071199
ehh!!!!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:02:12 UTC No. 16071200
Wow rip
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:02:19 UTC No. 16071201
おわりだ
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:02:22 UTC No. 16071202
KEEEEK did it blow up?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:02:35 UTC No. 16071203
F
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:02:39 UTC No. 16071204
NOT max-qute!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:04:04 UTC No. 16071207
KEEEEEEEEK
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:04:44 UTC No. 16071211
RUFF
>Rapid Unscheduled Forest Fire
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:05:26 UTC No. 16071213
holy fuck, looks like it is starting a huge forest fire!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:05:50 UTC No. 16071215
>>16071211
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZ_
You can almost see it
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:09:19 UTC No. 16071226
Nips btfo
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:09:26 UTC No. 16071227
>>16071220
Ganbatte.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:11:20 UTC No. 16071231
>>16071219
>>16071228
what stream did you get these from?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:11:58 UTC No. 16071233
これがテストする理由です
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:12:12 UTC No. 16071234
>>16071228
from the first frame of the explosion, looks like burn-through at the top of the first stage motor
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:12:58 UTC No. 16071238
Solid rockets lmao
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:13:16 UTC No. 16071239
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:14:28 UTC No. 16071241
>>16071238
ゴイムは知っています。シャットダウンしてください
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:14:40 UTC No. 16071243
>>16071231
I'm just pulling images off of twitter. It looks like it was from a news chopper that was chinese degrees of close. I haven't seen a link to it
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:14:46 UTC No. 16071244
>>16071120
>noncompressible gas
how is that possible?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:15:09 UTC No. 16071245
>>16071219
>>16071228
Launches... launches never change
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:17:54 UTC No. 16071250
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:18:58 UTC No. 16071252
My wife is sad...
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:20:22 UTC No. 16071257
>>16071231
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1h
found the stream
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:21:22 UTC No. 16071260
>>16071250
This is peak bugoid performance. Pathetic how some of you worship them
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:22:25 UTC No. 16071262
>>16071258
I agree with the anon who thought it burned through the top of the first stage
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:24:17 UTC No. 16071264
This 60 seconds bullshit is a crime against humanity
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:24:25 UTC No. 16071266
>>16071260
you're pathetic murray
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:25:19 UTC No. 16071268
>>16071258
カイロスちゃん!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:26:48 UTC No. 16071271
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:27:36 UTC No. 16071273
>>16071266
Yellow fever takes all, you are no exception. Maybe recognize the disease you have instead of trying to spread it, disgusting buglover.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:27:50 UTC No. 16071275
Sayonara
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:28:22 UTC No. 16071276
>>16070604
The Vis Viva equation gives 7934,68 m/s at Pe and 7712,47 at Ap. But that would be the case for a planet without atmosphere. Irl you need much more to overcome drag. Such an orbit is impossible to begin with.
The "99% orbital velocity" is a fallacy. You need 9200+ m/s to reach a minimum 140 km orbit due to gravity losses and drag.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:28:47 UTC No. 16071277
さよなら
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:30:09 UTC No. 16071279
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:31:14 UTC No. 16071282
>>16071234
I think you're probably right.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:32:53 UTC No. 16071285
>>16071279
they forgot to add a timer for the second stage ignition
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:35:02 UTC No. 16071287
>>16071285
the hottest of hot staging
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:37:23 UTC No. 16071291
>>16071244
When fluids guys talk about "incompressible", they mean they're discussing flow that doesn't significantly compress the fluid (i.e. M << 1), not about fluids that can't be significantly compressed (i.e. liquids).
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:38:46 UTC No. 16071293
>>16071096
>quick response sat
aka just take a pic in this orbital plane where we don't have any asset. It should be forbidden to put space junk in orbit for a quick photo.
Just ask your burger overlords, you are a colony after all. They even copy burger gubmint agency logos.
>2k Isp in every stage
Japan too stronk?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:43:07 UTC No. 16071302
>>16071271
Someday the nips will make a starship of their own
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:45:01 UTC No. 16071307
Isn't this the third fuck up for the japanese space industry in like a year
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:45:40 UTC No. 16071309
>>16071300
Looks like FTS to me.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:46:08 UTC No. 16071310
>>16071307
at least they're trying. more than you can say for europe
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:47:42 UTC No. 16071316
>>16071307
At least these guys didn't put a very expensive satellite on their maiden flight test
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:48:06 UTC No. 16071317
>>16071310
Europe takes the correct route and pays SpaceX. Do not even give these insects that theyre trying
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:50:06 UTC No. 16071320
>>16071307
The last launch failure Japan had was the first H3 flight which was just over a year ago. They've only had four launches in total in that time.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:50:35 UTC No. 16071321
>>16071317
european members realize they're going nowhere and pay spacesex as a workaroud. europe as a whole is the bloat and bureaucracy of nasa without the record to back it up
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:51:04 UTC No. 16071322
>>16071276
>being this retarded
lmao. his comparison is correct cause he's looking at orbital velocity in both cases not delta-v.
sage at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:58:23 UTC No. 16071330
>>16071321
>the fat fuck amerishart copes while wiping their ass with a toilet paper and no bidet
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:59:56 UTC No. 16071332
>>16071320
Moon landing fuckup
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:02:10 UTC No. 16071335
>>16071330
what the fuck are you talking about? are you a spam bot? that doesn't even make sense in context
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:02:26 UTC No. 16071336
>>16071330
>the slimy eurocel types as the grease from his turban drips down the side of his crying putrid fat and pudgy face
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:03:24 UTC No. 16071337
>>16071322
Still misleading, anywhere below 70 km or so you are bleeding speed with each second while getting roasted. 50 km is betting for a sure reentry. So it is not an orbit, as the ship will never rise again to Ap. You can't be 99% orbital as you can't be 99% pregnant.
sage at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:04:44 UTC No. 16071339
>>16071335
>>16071336
>being good at spaceflight 60 years ago means its OK to smell like shit all the time
lmao!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:08:37 UTC No. 16071342
>>16071339
>60 years ago
hey you disgusting euronigger, ever check the payload mass to orbit by country chart?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:09:29 UTC No. 16071343
>>16071337
>coping
it's 99% of the required velocity. if you burned for 5 seconds longer before SECO you would be in a circular 200+ km orbit.
that's all
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:25:59 UTC No. 16071353
>>16071332
it was successful
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:26:35 UTC No. 16071355
>>16071343
BTW, does SpaceX publish if they will fly with partially filled tanks to ensure not orbiting by mistake, or will they fly with 100% fuel for just in case the second stage has to compensate for first stage losses?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:30:46 UTC No. 16071360
>>16071219
KEEEEK
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:30:48 UTC No. 16071361
>>16071355
They don't publish that. They just need some maximum allowable amount of propellant before reentry.
Hence the venting during the last flight that killed it.
But if you look at the frostline from ift-2 i think it was pretty much full to the top.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:56:33 UTC No. 16071372
Japan proving once again that this is the Indian century
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:59:07 UTC No. 16071377
>>16071244
Sorry, non-condensable.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 04:12:41 UTC No. 16071386
>>16071375
But only on the upper stages?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 04:25:36 UTC No. 16071394
>>16071375
The first stage should have blown at the same time then. Nah it's a solid fuel fuckup.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 04:36:06 UTC No. 16071404
>>16071361
Why don't they use a dummy payload?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 04:42:21 UTC No. 16071410
>>16071404
Stop asking so many questions goy
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:02:03 UTC No. 16071428
>>16070277
nuclear salt water gets you 1g up to jupiter and 0.40g up to neptune.
https://www.projectrho.com/public_h
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:04:16 UTC No. 16071429
>>16071428
Lying goy, get your pop-sci schizodrives out of here and support SLS.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:27:24 UTC No. 16071448
>>16071300
And this is why solid rocket companies are garbage.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:39:44 UTC No. 16071466
>Looking at Orion Nebula in my telescope
>Small white dot flies across the eyepiece
Wtf did I just see? I'm assuming a very distant airplane, but I imagine the odds of looking through a telescope and seeing a random airplane are astronomically high; It also couldn't be seen with the naked eye. Maybe a satellite?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:52:33 UTC No. 16071484
>>16071466
Satellite
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 06:04:03 UTC No. 16071493
>>16071466
weather balloons
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 06:15:46 UTC No. 16071498
>>16071466
Use a 25mm+ lens and you'll see a ton of satellites shortly after sunset
Skysafari and stellarium will both show you live satellite tracks too
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 06:26:55 UTC No. 16071511
Why are japanese so shit at space? They got a huge fail rate, not only rocket but plobes also
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 06:32:12 UTC No. 16071521
>>16071511
bug hands wrote this post
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 06:33:49 UTC No. 16071523
>>16071522
kino
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:40:17 UTC No. 16071591
https://twitter.com/jessica_kirsh/s
TFR Mar 14/15
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:41:04 UTC No. 16071594
>>16071375
It looks like it burned through the first stage cap and ignited the second stage prematurely, which triggered the FTS on the upper stages
There was nothing in the plume to indicate a loss of pressure before the explosion though, so maybe it was 100% FTS
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:42:41 UTC No. 16071597
>>16071591
this girl is gonna kill herself, screencap this
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:46:22 UTC No. 16071603
>>16071428
>nuclear salt water
this guy fucks
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:50:56 UTC No. 16071606
>>16071597
Living in a van in poverty, wanting kids and getting older
Maybe she should seitch careers
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:52:52 UTC No. 16071611
Let's face it. Japanese were not meant to go to space.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:53:36 UTC No. 16071612
>>16071606
she's clearly neurotic. not unattractive. she shouldnt have any problem pulling dudes. my guess is she scares them away
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:07:21 UTC No. 16071626
>>16071612
that depends what kind of expectations she has
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:10:23 UTC No. 16071666
>>16071658
why would anyone use this instead of just using starlink directly?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:14:15 UTC No. 16071669
>>16071666
Pay as you go.
If you only use 1GB, thats only $2. In the past, that sort would costs thousands of dollars, especially at high speed.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:41:56 UTC No. 16071704
>>16071279
ULA sniper eating well this week
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:55:03 UTC No. 16071718
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:57:38 UTC No. 16071724
Could you remind me when IFT-3 is supposed to occur?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:02:15 UTC No. 16071727
>>16071724
https://nextspaceflight.com/launche
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:02:43 UTC No. 16071728
>>16071724
Two more days give or take one.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:41:40 UTC No. 16071769
>>16071728
*weeks
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:42:41 UTC No. 16071770
25h 18min
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:55:36 UTC No. 16071788
>>16071770
>still no license
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:13:04 UTC No. 16071810
>>16071522
Divine Wind.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:21:19 UTC No. 16071817
>>16071428
But at what cost? Nuclear salt water eould be expensive as fuck.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:23:53 UTC No. 16071819
>>16071810
>BRAAAAAAAAPPP
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:47:17 UTC No. 16071850
>>16070322
Remember when we toppled governments because we couldn't get into the fruit business.
Yeah this simply won't stand.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:23:05 UTC No. 16071884
>>16071873
ugly
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:24:22 UTC No. 16071886
>>16071873
YJK
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:36:53 UTC No. 16071908
In depth weather analysis (using NAM model [5km res.]):
>14th:
Wind (surface) = 20km/h
Wind (10km) = 126 km/h
Wind gusts = 38km/h
Rain = 0.1mm/h
Clouds (general) = 100% cover
Low Clouds = 100% cover
Medium Clouds = 8% cover
High Clouds = 17% cover
Visibility = 16.7km
Cloud Base = 500m
>15th (USING ECMWF model [less precise -> 9km res.]):
Wind (surface) = 17km/h
Wind (10km) = 125 km/h
Wind gusts = 32km/h
Rain = 0 mm/h
Clouds (general) = 41% cover
Low Clouds = 0% cover
Medium Clouds = 18% cover
High Clouds = 100% cover
Visibility = 20km
Cloud Base = 7000m
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:38:07 UTC No. 16071910
>>16071908
>Low Clouds = 100% cover
It's over
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:39:04 UTC No. 16071911
Elon fantards please stay in your containment place dont go outside with your retarded mars colonization brainlet crap.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:39:10 UTC No. 16071912
>>16071873
Seen better.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:39:40 UTC No. 16071914
Christian Davenport
@wapodavenport
·
Am told the FAA is still on track for a Thursday launch attempt, which I guess would mean the license would come today. Still seems very fluid, but we should find out soon enough. The weather also could be a factor in the timing of the flight.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:44:25 UTC No. 16071921
Anyone remember how it went last time? How many days out did they grant the license?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:50:03 UTC No. 16071930
>>16071921
6 days prior for IFT-1 launch
3 days prior to IFT-2 launch
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:01:48 UTC No. 16071953
bros, I have no degree, If I self-studied rocket science am I going to find a job?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:16:32 UTC No. 16071984
>>16071953
sure, doordash is always hiring
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:17:50 UTC No. 16071986
>>16071953
You could become a waste manager at SpaceX
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:18:04 UTC No. 16071987
>>16071953
Maybe if you build something impressive. If you got no results and no degree why would someone hire you.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:20:41 UTC No. 16071992
>>16071591
TFR Confirmed
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:22:09 UTC No. 16071993
>>16071310
At least we can build planes that don't fall apart
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:25:29 UTC No. 16072001
>>16071953
you would have more fun and have a better life if you just studied or got a job in a boring field that pays well and take up model rocketry instead
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:26:42 UTC No. 16072003
>>16071606
>wanting kids
>careers
One negates the other
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:27:24 UTC No. 16072006
>>16071953
SpaceX hires welders anon
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:28:12 UTC No. 16072008
>>16071718
Based and War profiteer-pilled
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:29:06 UTC No. 16072010
>>16071594
https://news.mynavi.jp/techplus/art
>失敗の原因についてだが、まだなにも分かっておらず、阿部耕三執行役員も
>As for the cause of the failure, nothing is known yet, and Executive Officer Kozo Abe repeated that he is "currently under investigation."All we know at the moment is that the autonomous flight safety system on board the rocket has been activated.The system detected any anomalies and activated pyrotechnics on each stage, which is believed to have disrupted the flight.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:30:41 UTC No. 16072012
>>16071103
Watch this, guys. You can actually pinpoint the second when her heart rips in half...11:01:23.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:44:06 UTC No. 16072030
>>16071603
>refridgeration
it's ogre
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:45:44 UTC No. 16072034
>>16071912
frog with conical eyes
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:47:46 UTC No. 16072037
>>16071953
no one cares about your degree if you have meaningful experience
however it can be difficult to get meaningful experience without a degree
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:20:38 UTC No. 16072072
>>16071234
>burn-through
at the press conference, they said the AFTS fired, so this was a commanded in-flight abort. They are just starting the analysis for WHY it was commanded.
also funny, the payload was ejected intact just after the explosion: "mission accomplished!"
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:23:05 UTC No. 16072075
>>16072010
so did it explode because FTS detected anomalies and triggered, or was it exploding the anomaly that FTS detected?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:30:02 UTC No. 16072084
>>16070026
>without Space we would be stuck with SLS for the rest of 21st century
what an absolutely bleak thought to consider
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:32:50 UTC No. 16072089
>>16072084
Now what if there were dozens of other industries where a SpaceX like company could have sprung up. What a depressing thought.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:46:02 UTC No. 16072105
>>16072089
anything involving nuclear reactors comes to mind
what other technologically neglected areas are there?
genetic engineering?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:52:30 UTC No. 16072110
>>16072086
Deke Slayton
moustaches are for fags
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:52:33 UTC No. 16072111
>>16071727
>Tomorrow at 15:00
>I will be in university at that time
Damn. But could be worse. I watched IFT-1 in public transport.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:53:59 UTC No. 16072116
>>16072111
How is that worse?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:54:54 UTC No. 16072117
>>16072116
Uncomfortable and shaky.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:56:04 UTC No. 16072121
>>16072117
Immersive.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:57:07 UTC No. 16072123
https://twitter.com/MoNDefense/stat
>2051 hr Mar. 13 we detected a PRC satellite launch with a carrier vehicle identifying it as belonging to XSLC. Poses no threat to us, but the flight path passes our [air defense identification zone] and flew toward the West Pacific Ocean. We monitored the vehicle's activity and are ready to respond if necessary
Looks like there was an unannounced launch out of Xichang a few hours ago
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:16:51 UTC No. 16072156
>>16072123
could be a hgv test #2 (delayed from Nov 23)
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:23:32 UTC No. 16072166
>>16071912
Imagine how good her skin smells from being heated by the sun outdoors
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:25:58 UTC No. 16072168
>>16072105
Agriculture
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:31:35 UTC No. 16072178
>>16071873
She likes anal guaranteed
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:34:39 UTC No. 16072186
>>16072105
Mining
People wouldn't have such a problem with it if tailings weren't the third most toxic industrial byproduct
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:35:32 UTC No. 16072187
So will tomorrow be Failure #3?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:44:33 UTC No. 16072202
>>16072187
Almost certainly atleast 1 thing will go wrong, but the flight will probably make it through. So yes there will be a failure, but you already knew that and just want a sweet juicy (You) so take mine.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:49:43 UTC No. 16072214
>>16072187
it's only really a failure if they don't make it further than last time but yes, the ship will explode on reentry. possibly after failing to open the hatch and/or failing to relight the engine
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:50:10 UTC No. 16072218
>>16072202
COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE*
*This post was generated by /sfg/ baitOtron
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:51:41 UTC No. 16072221
>>16072187
I'm hoping nothing goes boom until it reaches the sea.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:01:12 UTC No. 16072243
>>16072187
I'm doomerish on the booster. Starship I think will be fine
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:06:09 UTC No. 16072249
>>16072187
I will be surprised if it survives reentry
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:15:01 UTC No. 16072262
>>16072010
posting a translation this bad is cringe
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:16:10 UTC No. 16072266
>>16072084
without space we would be stuck on Earth forever
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:21:26 UTC No. 16072280
knower here
elon has 10 kilos of anti-matter
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:22:19 UTC No. 16072283
>>16072280
and he's gonna throw it at moscow
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:22:20 UTC No. 16072284
>>16072123
There were no unannounced launches if we go by NOTAM
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:22:38 UTC No. 16072285
>>16072280
w-where is it right now?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:23:41 UTC No. 16072287
>>16072187
If nothing at all goes wrong it means the tests were too conservative
On the other hand, can they skip the FAA investigation bullshit if an "unanticipated outcome" doesn't occur?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:35:21 UTC No. 16072307
>>16072285
Its the payload for the starship icbm test
See >>16072283
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:37:07 UTC No. 16072312
Bros?
>The Federal Aviation Administration on March 8 granted a launch license for the test flight, saying that SpaceX "met all safety, environmental, policy and financial responsibility requirements."
https://www.nbcnews.com/science/spa
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:39:43 UTC No. 16072318
>>16072316
It's a nice lawn ornament.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:42:33 UTC No. 16072322
>>16072283
Why? Russia is not his enemy.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:43:55 UTC No. 16072324
>>16072322
it's revenge for refusing to sell him roggets
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:44:30 UTC No. 16072327
>>16072322
DoD contact for starship
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:45:46 UTC No. 16072332
>>16072312
>On March 8
Retards mistook mishap investigation for a flight license.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:52:26 UTC No. 16072344
>>16072178
Odd comment to make
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:57:25 UTC No. 16072353
>>16072111
Lol what, everything you've said is true for me as well
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:01:48 UTC No. 16072361
>>16072285
At the Vatican
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:07:03 UTC No. 16072367
>>16072084
SLS (boeing) + Draco (lockheed) would be insane
ULA should think about this
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:08:51 UTC No. 16072373
>>16072105
Nukes are a regulation problem. Zubrin's new book goes into painful detail about this.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:10:24 UTC No. 16072374
>>16072373
Is Zubrin the equivalent of "start with greeks"?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:17:16 UTC No. 16072389
predictions are pure bullshit btw
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:20:36 UTC No. 16072397
>>16072389
I predict that you'll find a gf
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:21:39 UTC No. 16072399
WHERES THE FUCKING LICENSE FAAgots?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:23:02 UTC No. 16072405
>>16072344
Not that odd considering
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:29:23 UTC No. 16072411
>>16072373
zubrin is a hack. hes a fucking moron with no idea.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:30:42 UTC No. 16072413
>>16072399
Sorry, two more weeks.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:31:09 UTC No. 16072416
I hate SSubrin so much.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:37:54 UTC No. 16072428
>>16072399
Two weeks
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:40:16 UTC No. 16072430
>>16072399
Silence goy, don't rush us
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:40:55 UTC No. 16072431
>no launch license
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:46:27 UTC No. 16072433
Seems he's been huffing Sabines brain farts. I'm glad he's settled the science now. Dark matter debunked.
Bonus points for attracting deluded pseuds like Brett to respond. He should joint his "intellectual" dark net.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:49:29 UTC No. 16072436
>>16072411
He has a doctorate in nuclear engineering. He's wrong about a lot of space launch stuff but he knows his nukes.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:50:35 UTC No. 16072438
>>16072433
THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:53:43 UTC No. 16072441
>>16072433
Elon really needs to STFU about physics
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:57:24 UTC No. 16072443
>>16072433
Actual retard, this makes it abundantly clear. He has no idea what he's talking about but chimes in anyways. Somebpdy seriously needs to knock his ego down a few pegs
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:00:33 UTC No. 16072448
>>16072433
modern day ford except he sucks off jews
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:01:11 UTC No. 16072450
>>16072433
Dark matter is a retarded theory.
You can't just pretend the reason why your math doesn't add up to be some kind of undetectable, intangible substance.
Might as well call it magic or an act of God at that point.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:01:39 UTC No. 16072452
>>16072441
But doesn't he have a BA in physics?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:02:11 UTC No. 16072454
>>16072433
>>16072441
I just went through Elon's entire fucking reply backlog and I can't find this tweet. Link or it's bullshit.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:02:49 UTC No. 16072455
>>16072433
They're multiplying.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:05:20 UTC No. 16072457
>>16072450
actually dark matter would be a lot more based if it just used God as a handwave.
>uh yeah galaxies are too heavy, there's too much God in them
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:06:04 UTC No. 16072459
>>16072454
Here's a tweet by Mad Mike replying to it.
https://twitter.com/memcculloch/sta
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:07:49 UTC No. 16072461
>>16072454
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:17:37 UTC No. 16072468
>>16072459
>>16072461
Thanks. It sounds like Elon doesn't like the Dark Matter conclusion itself (non-electromagnetic matter that only interacts with gravity and has a bunch of other weird properties) as a low-parameter fill for observation vs model gaps. I don't think any further implications are present.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:18:08 UTC No. 16072470
>>16072433
I don't understand this take.
For dark matter being non interacting particles there's like 5 pieces of corroborating evidence.
Dark energy is literally 1000 times more dubious and untestable math circlejerk.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:19:07 UTC No. 16072472
>>16072466
Fucking bastard nigger kys Noa you dumb kike hawaiian tarbaby jew. FUCK YOU
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:21:40 UTC No. 16072475
>>16072433
>our calculations don't add up
>are our calculations wrong?
>no it is an intangible substance we cannot observe that explains it
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:24:02 UTC No. 16072479
>>16072470
He probably misspoke.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:25:27 UTC No. 16072484
>>16072433
Most people don't even know that what we call gravity is the gradient effect of mass slowing time.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:26:00 UTC No. 16072486
>>16072475
>CMB corroborates it
>lensing corroborates it
>mass concentrations are detectable in specific places consistent with simulations, it's not a uniform anomaly but clumped like matter
just cope
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:26:13 UTC No. 16072487
>>16072484
/sci/ girls look like THAT?!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:27:47 UTC No. 16072491
>>16072486
The only thing those corroborate is our lack of understanding of gravity on a macro scale.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:28:22 UTC No. 16072493
>>16072472
lol
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:28:42 UTC No. 16072494
>>16072470
>Dark energy is literally 1000 times more dubious and untestable math circlejerk.
Dark Energy is the parameter fill for the accelerating expansion of the universe and there are both less attempts to describe what it is and fewer observation vs model discrepancies it's compensating for.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:29:24 UTC No. 16072497
>>16072466
He knows even less than Elon
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:30:12 UTC No. 16072499
>>16072475
>are our calculations wrong?
Two parts to the calculation, a) the mass distribution of galaxies and b) gravity and dynamics. Dark matter assumes the former calculation is incorrect.
>no it is an intangible substance we cannot observe that explains it
Have not =/= cannot.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:31:38 UTC No. 16072502
>>16072499
>Have not =/= cannot.
The experimental detection limits are getting tight enough that it's gradually approaching SUSY levels of unlikely.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:32:56 UTC No. 16072504
>>16072499
>Have not =/= cannot
"dark matter" is perfectly visible, it's just too dim to see. it's just thin clouds of gas and shit, not well illuminated but plenty heavy in aggregate
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:33:49 UTC No. 16072506
>>16072502
JWST and Hubble continuing to push LCDM's shit in is my favorite part of astronomy.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:35:54 UTC No. 16072511
>>16072504
Part of the reason the James Webb Space Telescope was built was to see things that are so deep in the infrared, both from being cold as hell and from being deeply red-shifted, that they're in the bands that get absorbed by the atmosphere. JWST hasn't really seen anything that suggests dark matter is just cold and dark regular matter permeating space.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:36:48 UTC No. 16072514
>>16071064
>>16071070
Odds are “Starship” (more like “AtmosphereShip or ExplodeShip, since it hasn’t even reached space yet let alone a whole other fucking star system) will explode before hitting any mission objectives.
My bet is that it’s going to blowup after stage separation like last time.
>In before “aNyThiNG bEYonD tHE tOwER is a BoNUs”
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:38:42 UTC No. 16072517
>>16072514
>AtmosphereShip ... since it hasn’t even reached space yet
wrong dumbass
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:39:24 UTC No. 16072519
>>16072502
Nope. Constraints rule out certain particle candidates, not dark matter.
And in the mean time what is the status of the best alternative? MOND disagrees with most of the data available, it's proponents are now adding dark matter.
>>16072506
Nope. The measurements of high redshift galaxies make many assumptions and require one to model all of the normal components which are more complex than DM (star formation, hydrodynamics, cooling, supernovae). And the high redshift measurements from Hubble show no discrepancy.
The most sensational claims are based on unconfirmed candidate galaxies. Many of which have already been dropped or debunked.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:39:51 UTC No. 16072520
I can't wait to see the cope of the anti-Musk cult when Starship orbuts successfully
>but it only fulfilled 9/10 of its goals, SpaceX is a failure and Muskrat is a fraud
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:42:05 UTC No. 16072521
>>16072519
Constraints are ruling out particle candidates and interaction cross-sections. If Dark Matter exists, more and more it appears to have basically no interactions with anything at all.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:42:07 UTC No. 16072522
>>16072324
based monte cristo sandwich enjoyer
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:44:52 UTC No. 16072525
>>16072514
dilate lmao
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:45:01 UTC No. 16072526
>>16072524
/sfg/ in two words
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:45:29 UTC No. 16072527
>>16072521
>interaction cross-sections
For specific interactions over specific energy ranges. These experiments cannot rule out all interaction.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:46:08 UTC No. 16072531
>>16072526
spaceflight general is already two words
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:46:29 UTC No. 16072532
They're going to blow up Starship as a humiliation ritual
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:47:07 UTC No. 16072533
>>16072527
No, they can't, but I remain expectant that no interaction will be found.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:47:30 UTC No. 16072534
>>16072433
The schizo queen has spoke.
It is a joke about retired engineers becoming crackpots.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:47:51 UTC No. 16072535
it should be called universe ship since it's in the universe
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:48:33 UTC No. 16072537
>>16072531
Actually, it's three words.
Space flight general
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:50:16 UTC No. 16072540
>>16072532
kys
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:51:36 UTC No. 16072542
>>16072540
This whole country is a giant humiliation ritual. Imagine what could have been if Nazi Germany had won WW2. We probably would have gone to Mars in the 1970s.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:52:32 UTC No. 16072544
>>16072517
Oh Starship orbited the planet at 149km??
Fuck no.
Just because space starts at 149km doesn’t mean anything can orbit there
Sputnik orbited at 230km.
The ISS orbits at an altitude of 370-460km.
Starship reaching 149km is laughable.
Elon Fanboys are pathetic. Cope more. Starship 3 is going to explode again tomorrow, and SpaceX will lose their NASA contract.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:53:25 UTC No. 16072545
>>16072468
Most physicists dont believe in sterile dark matter though. Most believe it's normal matter that interacts with the weak force, like neutrinos. There's good theoretical reasons to believe that, but most important is that the hypothesis is testable. if dark matter is regular matter and only interacts with gravity, it'd be retarded fucking hard to detect. nothing precludes that from being the case
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:53:52 UTC No. 16072548
>>16072542
Are you a NEET?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:56:33 UTC No. 16072553
>>16072545
The existing evidence supports sterile dark matter more than any sort of interacting dark matter.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:00:15 UTC No. 16072561
>>16072542
I don't think that Nazi Germany would expand to space before fully conquering the world. And they most certainly wouldn't have done that by the 1970s.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:04:02 UTC No. 16072566
>>16072433
Tehehe
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:04:04 UTC No. 16072567
>>16072542
The Nazis were still authoritarian socialists. The German economy was about to collapse in 1939 and the only reason it didn't was because they were able to start propping things up with war pillage and slave labor. "Nazi prosperity" was pure PR hype. Socialists should never be allowed to manage any economy. If the Nazis had won they would have either collapsed into third world destitution or transitioned into something not socialist by the time the 1970s rolled around. Either way, they wouldn't have much resources or attention to focus on Mars missions.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:04:58 UTC No. 16072570
>>16072561
space exploration would be significantly less developed in pretty much any path of history other than our own. The cold war was the perfect storm to give rocket scientists massively ballooned budgets for things other than missiles. and you can't discount the impact Lee Harvey Oswald had on insuring a moon landing in the 60s
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:06:37 UTC No. 16072576
>>16072553
Not really. All that can be said is that it's outside the constraints. Zero is not any more probable than some value below the neutrino neutrino floor.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:10:20 UTC No. 16072586
>>16072542
oh boy I sure wish [the failed state I've chosen to fanboy over] had managed to [thing that would never occur]
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:11:01 UTC No. 16072587
>>16072111
I was in class for IFT-1 so I just asked the teacher to put in on and she did lol
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:11:48 UTC No. 16072590
>>16072587
In school?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:13:47 UTC No. 16072596
>>16072586
mars landing denier?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:13:48 UTC No. 16072597
>>16072399
>LICENSE
Apparently the FAA can certify whatever broken shit Boeing produces, but they don't have time to authorise an slightly dangerous experimental giant rocket made by another company.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:15:01 UTC No. 16072600
>>16072596
I believe we have landed on mars.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:15:06 UTC No. 16072602
>>16072587
>1st, in my car in a parking lot
>2nd, comfy on my couch
Tomorrow I'm commandeering the conference room with the other nerds and putting it on the big screen
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:15:35 UTC No. 16072604
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:16:36 UTC No. 16072606
>>16072587
did she put on Clear's stream?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:17:31 UTC No. 16072609
>>16072606
I had it up on my laptop but I didn't have the courage to put it on the big screen even though this was a japanese class
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:18:26 UTC No. 16072614
>>16072604
it was so cool
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:18:59 UTC No. 16072616
>>16072111
I watched IFT-1 in the middle of the Atlantic with download speed of 20 kb/s.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:19:33 UTC No. 16072619
>>16072576
I think particle physicists are fundamentally making mistakes with the pursuit of parameterized theories. Yeah, Quantum Electrodynamics is the most accurate theory in the history of physics and gauge theories panned out pretty well with QCD, well done, but in the search for satisfying parameter spaces, people end up looking for solutions that they find satisfying. Beyond leading physicists down the rabbit hole of supersymmetry for 20 years and infinite search spaces in string theory, people end up looking for satisfying ideas to test first and testable ideas second. With the singular exception of the long predicted (and much loathed) Higgs Boson, particle physics hasn't made a single meaningful discovery or prediction in 50 years. Now, maybe physics is just that complete, but at some point it should be asked if the methodology for trying to generate new discoveries is actually any good for doing that.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:20:51 UTC No. 16072621
>>16072619
>supersymmetry for 20 years
Whoops, I meant 40 years.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:23:50 UTC No. 16072628
>>16072590
in university yeah
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:24:13 UTC No. 16072631
>>16072627
It's the Doddster!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:26:45 UTC No. 16072637
>>16072634
Still working hours in Washington.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:28:29 UTC No. 16072639
>>16072637
>15:27
I bet they are getting ready to leave.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:29:03 UTC No. 16072640
Why would the FAA issue a flight restriction but no license?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:30:00 UTC No. 16072641
what time of day did the last license come out?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:30:48 UTC No. 16072642
The license will be ready any minute. The government is very fast with these kinds of things!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:31:58 UTC No. 16072643
>>16072642
liar
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:32:51 UTC No. 16072645
>>16072641
All I remember it being very close to the launch
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:33:42 UTC No. 16072648
>>16072553
I'm partial to it as a huffer of Neil Turok farts myself
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:33:56 UTC No. 16072649
>>16072641
Last one was digitally signed at 2:55. It is currently 3:33 Washington time
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:34:46 UTC No. 16072651
>>16071850
>Remember when we toppled governments because we couldn't get into the fruit business
God I miss American Imperialism
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:35:47 UTC No. 16072652
>>16072570
>we actually live in the good timeline
grim
>>16072587
based
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:36:17 UTC No. 16072654
>>16072455
what sniffing glue does to a mf
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:36:21 UTC No. 16072655
Two more weeks for loicense, goy.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:36:50 UTC No. 16072659
>>16072648
Who?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:40:25 UTC No. 16072669
>>16072649
Yup, it's over
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:42:24 UTC No. 16072675
>>16072654
Cope. Your basedence is wrong and you're just angry you got called out.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:42:43 UTC No. 16072677
>FAA just dropped their final findings about the environmental impact of Starship landing in the Indian Ocean.
>This was most likely the holdup and means a license is imminent.
https://x.com/BCCarCounters/status/
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:43:59 UTC No. 16072683
>>16072677
There won't need to be any modifications to the rocket because of the findings right?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:44:35 UTC No. 16072686
>>16072639
Already at happy hour
>sponsored by Boeing lobbyists
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:45:44 UTC No. 16072691
>>16072683
It needs to be painted blue and green to not scare the fishes and turtles
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:46:06 UTC No. 16072692
>>16072683
I dont think so
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:47:06 UTC No. 16072695
Loicense status?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:48:17 UTC No. 16072697
>>16071953
What have you built?
If nothing, no job.
If you think getting a TRA Level 3 with no other qualifications means "self-studied rocket science," no job.
If it's a quasi-pipe-bomb that gets 0.8 seconds of useful thrust before melting itself, and your test data consists of a few cellphone videos, probably no job.
If it's a well-constructed liquid rocket engine or ion thruster or something of that nature, which demonstrates some innovation beyond existing designs, which you can provide detailed sensor and test data for, then you'll probably get a job.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:50:23 UTC No. 16072698
>NSF live stream in 10 hours
What about clear?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:51:46 UTC No. 16072700
LICENSE GRANTED
>LICENSE GRANTED
LICENSE GRANTED
>LICENSE GRANTED
LICENSE GRANTED
>LICENSE GRANTED
LICENSE GRANTED
>LICENSE GRANTED
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:52:10 UTC No. 16072701
>>16072619
>With the singular exception of the long predicted (and much loathed) Higgs Boson, particle physics hasn't made a single meaningful discovery or prediction in 50 years.
Apparently neutrino oscillation, W and Z bosons and EW unification, direct CP violations, gluons, the third generation of matter are not "meaningful". 50 years is setting the bar pretty low.
>testable ideas second
Bullshit. There are lots of little models for extensions to the standard model. Axions. Preons. Majorana fermions. Just because you haven't heard of them doesn't mean they aren't out there.
>it should be asked if the methodology for trying to generate new discoveries is actually any good for doing that.
And what do you suggest? You rant about theory but fail to mention that there is far more funding an people in the experimental side. String theory is a tiny niche.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:54:05 UTC No. 16072704
>>16072700
>no source
fuck off
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:54:15 UTC No. 16072705
>>16072677
Kek at the Anon who thought landing in the Indian Ocean wouldn't require environmental assessment
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:54:48 UTC No. 16072706
>>16072700
Kill yourself
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:56:06 UTC No. 16072710
>>16072700
Still at DEFCON 4.
(aka flacid)
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:56:11 UTC No. 16072711
>>16072675
ok schizo
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:57:25 UTC No. 16072713
>>16072700
-quote from a man living exactly two weeks in the future
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:58:59 UTC No. 16072717
>>16072652
brothers, grim
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:59:21 UTC No. 16072718
>>16072700
based FTL anon
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:00:13 UTC No. 16072720
>>16072455
Kim still has the erroneous optimism that our causal regime can contain anything other than a block universe. The universe as we observe it doesn't have any inherent properties that would give rise to the passage of time. The arrow of time is NOT a "native" phenomenon, and neither is our perception of it.
The existence of some external mechanism capable of "playing" the universe like you would a vinyl record or a CD is mandatory, given what we currently know.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:01:28 UTC No. 16072725
>>16072722
HOLY FUUUCKKKK
THIS OBV MEANS THEY GOT THE LICENSE RIGHT?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:02:19 UTC No. 16072726
>>16072722
There it is. They wouldn't post this unless it was a done deal. We gaan.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:02:50 UTC No. 16072729
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:03:41 UTC No. 16072733
We launch without license.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:03:59 UTC No. 16072734
>>16072722
WAHEYYYYYYY
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:04:22 UTC No. 16072736
Landing on FAA HQ
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:04:25 UTC No. 16072737
>>16072397
wrong, I already have a gf we've been together for almost 1.5 years now
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:05:17 UTC No. 16072739
>>16072737
Clear doesn't count
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:06:27 UTC No. 16072742
>>16072484
Artist? I wanna jerk off again before my work day ends
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:07:26 UTC No. 16072744
>>16072742
jerking off during work?
does /sfg/ really?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:08:04 UTC No. 16072749
>>16072744
Absolutely
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:08:32 UTC No. 16072750
>>16072722
That's 12:00 UTC, right?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:08:56 UTC No. 16072752
>>16072544
space starts at 100km
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:09:45 UTC No. 16072753
>>16072701
>Bullshit. There are lots of little models for extensions to the standard model. Axions. Preons. Majorana fermions. Just because you haven't heard of them doesn't mean they aren't out there.
Nobody said they aren't out there, it's that they're ideas first, and testable predictions second.
>And what do you suggest?
I am not smart enough to actually have good ideas, but I do want to see a sanity-check: re-run as much physics as possible beyond the Voyager-observed bow shock of the sun and make sure everything checks out.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:09:47 UTC No. 16072754
>>16072544
its starship 28 tho
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:09:56 UTC No. 16072756
>>16072742
@SweetCassava_
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:10:04 UTC No. 16072758
>>16072722
>Mostly cloudy
>no onboard views
I'll take it.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:11:27 UTC No. 16072762
It’s up.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:12:21 UTC No. 16072764
We gan
https://youtu.be/97GOcZ08tc4
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:12:56 UTC No. 16072766
Why is the texan cowboy hat so pervasive in spaceflight
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:12:59 UTC No. 16072767
>>16072739
she's 3D
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:13:40 UTC No. 16072770
>>16072767
Clear did a 3D concert? Good for her!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:13:50 UTC No. 16072771
>>16072744
you gotta pump those numbers up.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:13:58 UTC No. 16072772
>>16072764
Does this mean they will stream on YouTube?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:14:22 UTC No. 16072774
>>16072744
you didn't answer my question
>>16072756
thanks appreciate u
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:15:13 UTC No. 16072778
>>16072772
they also posted the recap and hype vids for flight 2 but no stream so it's safe to assume no
>>16072774
idk who the artist is gooner
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:16:30 UTC No. 16072780
>>16072744
I only get to WFH when there's a hurricane, so I make sure to drink and crank my hawg
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:17:24 UTC No. 16072783
>>16072778
now you know >>16072756
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:19:26 UTC No. 16072787
>>16072766
It's one of the biggest symbols of the frontier of the American West, and space is the next great frontier.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:23:08 UTC No. 16072790
>>16072766
Freedom
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:27:00 UTC No. 16072795
>>16072792
What if it’s just a giant warhead to south africa all along
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:29:19 UTC No. 16072798
>>16072792
What are the numbers? Flight time?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:30:35 UTC No. 16072801
>>16072792
>Takes great pains to fly between Cuba, Bahamas, and Florida
>DGAF Africa
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:31:37 UTC No. 16072802
>>16072722
We going
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:31:48 UTC No. 16072803
>>16072766
texans are pervasive in spaceflight
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:31:59 UTC No. 16072804
>>16072764
Incredibly kino montage
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:32:03 UTC No. 16072805
NasaBASEDFlight is live bros!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-p
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:32:10 UTC No. 16072806
WE ARE GOING
https://www.faa.gov/media/69476
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:32:12 UTC No. 16072807
>>16072744
ngl i've done it more than once while on my poop break. peopl just think im pooping forever
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:32:35 UTC No. 16072809
>>16072747
They have chosen to ignore the illegitimate FAA and will be launching without a license.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:33:19 UTC No. 16072810
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:33:37 UTC No. 16072812
>>16072806
do not open!
does not have krystal
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:33:54 UTC No. 16072813
>>16071279
goddamn o-rings at it again
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:34:18 UTC No. 16072814
>>16072806
It's wild that there were people sitting on the FAA webpage continuously refreshing just to get some paperwork the millisecond it drops. That's gotta be such a weird feeling for the government.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:34:30 UTC No. 16072815
>>16072806
LETS FUCKING
GOOOOOOOOOO
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:34:57 UTC No. 16072816
>>16072806
LETS GAAAAAAN
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:37:49 UTC No. 16072822
>>16072764
>comments are exclusively faggots PLEADING for them to stream on youtube
lmao. xitter now has 1080p with manually selectable quality. there's nothing to complain about.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:39:23 UTC No. 16072824
>>16072822
>But it doesn't have 4K 8K 12K billion K
SO ITS UNWATCHABLE!!!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:39:26 UTC No. 16072825
>>16072822
slow day at X, eh?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:39:46 UTC No. 16072826
>license allows for 10 starship launches a year
oh SHIT
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:41:45 UTC No. 16072829
>>16072822
The bitrate is fucking awful.
It's a shit platform for video.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:41:48 UTC No. 16072830
>>16072806
>it’s real
>ten launches
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:42:56 UTC No. 16072832
>>16072822
Elon is king. I would watch it gladly on X if it was 144p and just naked trannies on screen at all times
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:43:17 UTC No. 16072833
>>16072770
she's fat
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:44:25 UTC No. 16072834
Way less people here than last time. Is a launch thread still being made?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:44:27 UTC No. 16072835
>>16072801
Cause it'll be in space by the time it's over africa.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:44:29 UTC No. 16072836
>>16072830
Provided they recover, otherwise 5 launches.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:45:02 UTC No. 16072837
>>16072187
It will fail (""accidentally"" reach orbit)
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:46:23 UTC No. 16072839
>>16072187
If they get further along than last flight, it'll be considered success. Such is iterative testing.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:47:52 UTC No. 16072840
>>16072810
>still the license for November
Kill yourself
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:48:26 UTC No. 16072841
BIDEN BTFO
CHUDS WON
DARK MATTER ISN'T REAL
TOTAL PLOVER DEATH
TOTAL WHALE AND SHARK DEATH
10 LAUNCHES
WE
ARE
GOING
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:48:57 UTC No. 16072842
>>16072806
>Changed paragraph from “Orbital Flight Test 2” to “Flight 3.”
Integrated bros, what went wrong?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:49:16 UTC No. 16072843
>>16072841
>10 LAUNCHES
As if they'll recover jack shit until flight 20. We ain't GAAN anywhere yet.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:55:47 UTC No. 16072847
It's official
https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/sta
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:58:04 UTC No. 16072851
>>16072847
Berger vacationing in the oort cloud?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:58:08 UTC No. 16072852
>>16072700
APOLOGIZE
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:58:35 UTC No. 16072855
Biden bros... we lost...
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:59:18 UTC No. 16072857
WE GAAN
>WE GAAN
WE GAAN
>WE GAAN
WE GAAN
>WE GAAN
WE GAAN
>WE GAAN
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:00:18 UTC No. 16072858
Won’t somebody think of the beetles
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:01:15 UTC No. 16072860
>>16072764
OK it's cool and I'm looking forward to it but holy shit this music is awful. Flight 2 had a much more impressive and awe-inspiring music
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:02:45 UTC No. 16072862
>>16072851
I thought people were baiting but it was the actual license posted earlier.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:03:01 UTC No. 16072863
Stoke has been debunked...
https://youtu.be/TnxBkJ4Ez3g
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:03:37 UTC No. 16072867
How would an FAA office look? I heard they don't have as many engineers nowadays. What if the authorization guy is actually a fat lazy boomer watching TV and eating junk food all day?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:06:36 UTC No. 16072870
>>16072867
The authorization was done by a very cute 5'2 office lady in a short skirt.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:08:17 UTC No. 16072872
>>16072871
Amazing.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:09:39 UTC No. 16072879
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:17:05 UTC No. 16072885
>>16072822
Wow they are finally at what youtube was 15 years ago!
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:23:08 UTC No. 16072891
>>16072885
>Complain about what it can't do
>It gets changed so it can now do it
>Dismiss it because something else already did it
People never change. And people are faggots.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:23:33 UTC No. 16072892
>>16072871
God please let this decrepit husk company die
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:23:37 UTC No. 16072893
NSF starting their grift very early lol
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e-plA
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:25:16 UTC No. 16072896
>>16072892
They have literal ayy craft in their position and still don't know what to do with them
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:25:38 UTC No. 16072897
>>16072822
I haven't seen a spacex stream in months because I can no longer view them on my tv through youtube. I'm not logging into a social messaging platform to watch a video stream. There are of course channels that rebroadcast the spacex ones, but there is a slight delay
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:26:41 UTC No. 16072899
>>16072893
A pre-launch stream to go with their launch stream that starts eight hours before the launch?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:27:18 UTC No. 16072900
>>16072893
Gotta get them superchats and subscriptions in.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:28:38 UTC No. 16072901
Dubs and it becomes yet another shipwreck in the Puerto Rico trench.
Trips and it scrubs as usual.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:28:55 UTC No. 16072902
>>16072901
retard
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:28:57 UTC No. 16072903
>>16072891
Nigger it doesn't have 4k, which is the standard now for TVs and most computer monitors
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:29:08 UTC No. 16072904
>>16072899
gotta keep the 24/7 grift going
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:29:26 UTC No. 16072905
>>16072897
why do people claim you need to log in to watch a stream
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:31:03 UTC No. 16072907
>>16072905
Because twix is a fucking mess to navigate without account.
Yes, I know you can go via spacex.com, but that doesn't change how utterly shit twix is.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:31:28 UTC No. 16072908
>>16072902
Apparently I am. Post numbers look suspiciously consecutive now... The gook changed something.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:32:05 UTC No. 16072910
>>16072891
>>16072822
They're dismissing it because it's garbage
Twitter's highest quality stream
>hls-3230 mp4 1920x1080 ~ 32.09MiB 3230k m3u8
YouTube uses a modern codec with higher bitrates
>313 webm 3840x2160 24 116.46MiB 12005k https vp09.00.50.08
Even the fallback 1080p AVC stream on YouTube meant for potatoes is better encoded than Twitter's 1080p.
>270 mp4 1920x1080 24 ~ 46.35MiB 4687k m3u8 avc1.640028
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:38:59 UTC No. 16072917
>>16072907
uh, X search bar, @spacex, select stream?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:39:05 UTC No. 16072918
if I get up at 2 am and there's a fucking scrub I'm going to lose it
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:39:44 UTC No. 16072919
>>16072903
>but muh 4k stream on my phone's 6" screen
Yeah sure.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:40:54 UTC No. 16072920
>>16072917
You can't actually get to the search bar easily from twitter.com
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:44:27 UTC No. 16072923
>>16070134
>I have autism.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:48:07 UTC No. 16072929
>>16072086
just look at that stud stache
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:49:58 UTC No. 16072931
Clear smirk.jpg
Don't care about different streams, bitrate or platforms. Just going to enjoy the launch with Clear.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:50:02 UTC No. 16072932
>>16070322
I guess Grosse Pointe Blank and it's "I mostly assassinate executives who run afoul of their corporations" was accurate.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:56:01 UTC No. 16072940
>>16072750
CDT = UTC-0500
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:04:03 UTC No. 16072951
>>16072910
What codec does shitter even use?
Higher bitrate doesn't necessarily always mean better quality. Compression is always a tradeoff between filesize and compute.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:14:58 UTC No. 16072960
>>16072812
TFD
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:18:45 UTC No. 16072963
>>16072960
based
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:20:10 UTC No. 16072965
>>16072960
based clearbros, ty for TFD and IFT-3 early stream
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:23:51 UTC No. 16072969
>>16072910
If the perceptual difference is so tiny its meaningless, unless you're one of those "pictophiles" that have bought 100K in TV equipments that show the details in granularity.
For 99..99% of the viewers, its largely meaningless.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:25:13 UTC No. 16072971
>>16072086
>>16072929
you like men
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:28:08 UTC No. 16072976
how many hours until launch?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:29:21 UTC No. 16072978
>>16072976
13 hours 30 minutes
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:29:55 UTC No. 16072980
>>16072978
thank u
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:32:22 UTC No. 16072986
>>16072960
Holy fucking based
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:34:27 UTC No. 16072989
>>16072960
Basado, i hate furfags with a burning passion, they try to ruin everything they’re a part of.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:53:31 UTC No. 16073018
>>16072989
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dte
But first, there's time for another starlink launch!
T-60:00
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:58:33 UTC No. 16073031
I haven't checked this thread since that starship launch that blew shittons of concrete all over the place.
what have i missed
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:59:43 UTC No. 16073035
>>16072960
As an /aicg/ user I highly disapprove this message.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:03:06 UTC No. 16073039
>>16073031
2nd one corrected a lot of problems and made it beyond stage sep, they almost reached orbital velocity but dumping of excess lox that was used as a mass simulator caused a fire that triggered the FTS on ship, the booster flipped but one of the engine filters got clogged, causing an explosion that cascated to other engines and destroyed the booster.
This flight will attempt reentry over the indian ocean and orbital fuel transfer (likely between main and header tanks) as a demonstration
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:05:23 UTC No. 16073042
Hey guys, I'm back after 24 hours. So wen hop?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:06:24 UTC No. 16073044
>>16073039
i believe you mean... SUBorbital fuel transfer
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:07:33 UTC No. 16073046
>>16072969
>perception difference between 2160p and 1080p is so tiny it's meaningless
Get your fucking eyes checked
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:09:34 UTC No. 16073050
>>16073044
transorbital
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:10:46 UTC No. 16073054
>>16073044
For all intents and purposes it is orbital, they need about the same amount of performance for what they’re doing now compared to full orbital, feat-wise it is the same.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:10:48 UTC No. 16073055
>>16073031
launch tomorrow
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:12:49 UTC No. 16073058
>>16073031
booster performed well
anon above explained the cause of FTS
more observations here: the upper stage didn't achieve a particularly high speed (just under 7 km/s; you'd want closer to 8 km/s to be on orbit) and it cut off about 20 seconds early.
Back-of-the-envelope extrapolation suggests they were just about those 20 seconds short of reaching the necessary velocity.
Then they lost the upper stage.
Personally I'd set aside the matter of stage landings for now (it's a secondary mission objective relative to achieving orbit), and focus on why the second stage underperformed.
There wasn't anything obvious wrong; there must have either been some extra mass along for the ride, some amount of engines performing at reduced capacity (didn't see any signs of this), or just worse performance than they assumed in the design.
Even if it did achieve orbit, it looks extremely marginal - this backs up the most pessimistic assessments of its actual cargo capacity.
TLDR: I suspect the second stage problems point to a more fundamental challenge that will not be easy to resolve.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:13:04 UTC No. 16073059
>>16073042
Never
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:15:27 UTC No. 16073062
>>16073054
all i know is that if this mission was an orbital contract in kerbal, elon would fail the mission. he doesn't understand that close isn't enough in real life. i'm through with this con artistry.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:17:44 UTC No. 16073067
>>16073059
liar
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:18:47 UTC No. 16073070
Tourists fuck off
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:21:06 UTC No. 16073077
Kowalski , weather analysis please
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:21:37 UTC No. 16073078
>>16073058
i don't see how the 2nd stage failing to reach orbit is a result of excess mass.
the only reason it didn't complete the burn was because a fire cut the connection between the main flight computer and the engine section, after which the computer automatically decided to activate the flight termination system.
we still don't actually have any metrics on how much payload mass it would have been able to carry had it completed a full orbit burn.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:21:51 UTC No. 16073079
>>16072951
shitter uses AVC
it's trivial to pull up both YouTube and X side-by-side and see the inferior encode quality on X.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:22:56 UTC No. 16073082
Fuck ON, tourists
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:23:06 UTC No. 16073084
>>16073058
upper stage shutdown early because fire burned through the engines' connections to the flight computers and then FTS'd
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:24:07 UTC No. 16073087
>>16072960
Based clesrchad
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:25:58 UTC No. 16073093
>>16073083
give it a sec. it doesnt have its find yet since this is a "not for flight" test article.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:26:40 UTC No. 16073095
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:28:31 UTC No. 16073098
>>16073093
*its fins
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:28:40 UTC No. 16073099
>>16073078
>i don't see how the 2nd stage failing to reach orbit is a result of excess mass.
Because they were carrying excess liquid oxygen that was there to be a mass simulator and they wanted it off the ship for reentry/splashdown precautions.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:36:31 UTC No. 16073112
>>16072963
>>16072965
>>16072986
>>16072989
>>16072960
>>16073087
This is the most obvious samefagging I've ever seen lol
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:37:18 UTC No. 16073115
>>16073099
yes, but not because they needed to to be able to reach the desired velocity.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:38:51 UTC No. 16073117
>>16073112
nope, i don't even watch vtubers, i just fucking hate furfags in general, and my hatred was proven right with krystalnigger and what he pulled right before IFT-2
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:39:18 UTC No. 16073119
>>16073112
don't reply to me or my posts ever again
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:40:42 UTC No. 16073122
>>16073112
Nice work detective?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:40:56 UTC No. 16073123
>>16072917
When it loads I only see posts from 2 years ago.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:40:59 UTC No. 16073124
>>16073117
nothing happened during IFT-2, stop peddling this shit already you schizophrenic /vt/umor
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:41:56 UTC No. 16073126
>>16073112
all me by the way
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:42:56 UTC No. 16073127
>>16073058
>TLDR: I suspect the second stage problems point to a more fundamental challenge that will not be easy to resolve.
Stop being retarded and read the results of the mishap investigation.
>>16073084 sums it up well.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:50:34 UTC No. 16073138
>>16073112
Crystal autist has damaged this thread more than any other sperg
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:51:12 UTC No. 16073139
>>16073084
Typical of SpaceX's crude engineering.
You won't see such sloppy job in oldspace.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:56:32 UTC No. 16073142
>>16073124
what a liar. he was shitting up threads and hiding logos in the op.
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/15866
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:01:04 UTC No. 16073147
>>16073142
that's pretty funny
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:02:17 UTC No. 16073151
>>16073142
>Tiny image you can't even see
Truly terrible, life ruined
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:03:07 UTC No. 16073152
>>16073138
The natural state of furries. They poison any environment they enter. They should all be euthanased for their mentally illness.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:03:56 UTC No. 16073154
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:04:12 UTC No. 16073155
>>16072960
>>16072472
You're just mad because you clicked on the fake twitter link and your mom saw
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:05:24 UTC No. 16073158
>>16073155
that was me and i didnt post that. i posted this >>16073154 though. defending that hawaiian scum is very telling though
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:06:02 UTC No. 16073160
>>16073158
hawaiian?
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:06:36 UTC No. 16073162
>>16073142
he did more than that, he split threads like 5 times right before ift-2. we shouldve finished finding who he was.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:23:32 UTC No. 16073172
>>16073018
...and now the real T-60:00, assuming there are no further delays
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:28:53 UTC No. 16073177
>>16073112
kys furfaggot
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:32:05 UTC No. 16073180
>>16072123
Looks like it was a LM-2C, maybe with an optional upper stage, flinging a small payload to a high energy trajectory. The ground track appears similar to geostationary transfers from Xichang. Still no public confirmation of anything from the Chinese authorities.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:38:05 UTC No. 16073182
>>16073177
zased
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:49:29 UTC No. 16073190
>>16073112
Correct
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:55:53 UTC No. 16073196
>>16073194
it blows up
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:58:44 UTC No. 16073198
>>16072960
gigabased
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:59:23 UTC No. 16073199
The cartel is charging admission fees to stand at the Faro Bagdad viewing area. :O
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:01:50 UTC No. 16073200
>>16073199
liar liar pants on fire
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:04:00 UTC No. 16073203
>>16072545
It can't possibly be regular neutrinos because their velocity would be too high to collect the way dark matter must.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:10:49 UTC No. 16073208
Elon twitter nowadays really be like
>right wing dogwhistle
>right wing dogwhistle
>right wing dogwhistle
>Raptor is roughly 10X more complex than Merlin, but worth it
>right wing dogwhistle
>right wing dogwhistle
>right wing dogwhistle
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:12:36 UTC No. 16073209
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:13:33 UTC No. 16073211
>>16073208
>dogwhistle
The left is just addicted to this word, aren't they?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:14:26 UTC No. 16073212
>>16073208
The best part about dogwhistling is that people can make up their own definitions for what's being dogwhistled
Stop putting words in the man's mouth
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:16:29 UTC No. 16073213
>>16073208
true!
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:17:19 UTC No. 16073214
>>16073211
They can't bear to think that people aren't being sneaky and are just not afraid of them anymore.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:17:20 UTC No. 16073215
>>16073208
can we have 1 billionaire that is not a libcuck? please
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:17:55 UTC No. 16073216
>>16073208
big guy over here criticizing immigrants
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:18:40 UTC No. 16073217
>>16072466
WHAT IF I OPENED THIS IN FRONT OF MY FAMILY
GODDAMN THAT WAS CLOSE
FUCK YOU AONONONA
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:18:46 UTC No. 16073219
>>16073018
T-20:00
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:20:04 UTC No. 16073221
>>16073208
t. dog
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:22:46 UTC No. 16073225
>>16072919
I didn't even mention phones you fucking retard.
Why would you want to watch ift3 on a phone or is that all you have poor fag?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:24:20 UTC No. 16073228
>>16073208
>right wing dogwhistle
get a grip
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:29:04 UTC No. 16073232
>>16073208
Every time I check his Twitter nowadays it seems his takes have gotten more retarded. Hope all that virtue signaling works out for him whatever he expects to gain from it I guess.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:30:30 UTC No. 16073235
>>16073225
85% of the people on Twitter are accessing it on a phone. 90% of people on youtube are also viewing it on their phones.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:30:48 UTC No. 16073236
>>16073232
You have to build political capital if you're trying to build a city.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:31:47 UTC No. 16073237
>>16073235
Smartphones were a mistake.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:32:00 UTC No. 16073238
>>16073194
I seriously do not care about that shitty rocket. Good riddence.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:32:15 UTC No. 16073239
>>16073232
>virtue signaling
t. actual retard
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:34:56 UTC No. 16073244
>>16073236
Far better ways to do that that also don't restrict you to one side of the aisle.
>>16073239
What else would you call the constant regurgitation of Republican talking points after years of staying relatively neutral publicly and donating to both parties in the background?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:34:59 UTC No. 16073245
the next thread would be the launch thread right?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:35:32 UTC No. 16073246
>>16073245
Probably. Speaking of launch, https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1d
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:37:04 UTC No. 16073248
>>16073244
>talking points
Now we're getting somewhere, tell us how you really feel
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:37:25 UTC No. 16073249
>>16073244
>What else would you call the constant regurgitation of Republican talking points after years of staying relatively neutral publicly and donating to both parties in the background?
him changing his mind about politics?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:37:26 UTC No. 16073250
>>16073199
> The cartel is charging admission fees to stand at the Faro Bagdad viewing area.
Based
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:37:44 UTC No. 16073251
>>16073245
nope, two more weeks
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:38:43 UTC No. 16073254
SCRUB
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:39:00 UTC No. 16073255
IT’S OVER HAHAHAHA
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:39:07 UTC No. 16073256
>>16072459
dude is insanely cocky and arrogant for someone whose pet theory hasn't been even proven yet though
>only QI can predict the orbit of proxima centauri
like Ok bold claim, doesn't seem true though
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:39:37 UTC No. 16073257
spacex is finnish...
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:40:22 UTC No. 16073258
ScrubX
prepare for more tomorrow
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:41:05 UTC No. 16073260
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:43:23 UTC No. 16073266
>>16073244
>become rich enough to do whatever the fuck you want
>do whatever the fuck you want
it is a mystery
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:47:38 UTC No. 16073273
>>16073248
That most of what he's saying on Twitter is performative dicksucking for some perceived later benefit
>>16073249
Doesn't really change that the vast majority of those tweets are designed to make Republicans think "hi yes I'm totally one of you see how much I agree with you please notice me", i.e. virtue signaling.
>>16073266
That doesn't make it not stupid as he is the head of multiple companies that benefit from buttering up both parties.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:52:54 UTC No. 16073282
>>16073244
I wouldn't call it virtue signalling, retard
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:00:02 UTC No. 16073294
>>16073273
>both parties.
One party is firmly in the camp of "Whitey on the moon" and proposes ideas the degrade humanity, instead of lifting man into the heavens.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:06:22 UTC No. 16073301
>>16073282
Even if he believes the stuff he says, he's constantly broadcasting it to millions of people. How is that not virtue signalling? Excessive display of your convictions on social media is pretty much the definition.
>>16073294
Even more reason to butter them up and make them understand how important you are for putting Blacky on the Moon. Also they still control the military and spooks when they are in power and those won't stop lifting things into the heavens.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:12:12 UTC No. 16073306
>>16073273
>Doesn't really change that the vast majority of those tweets are designed to make Republicans think "hi yes I'm totally one of you see how much I agree with you please notice me", i.e. virtue signaling.
i read it more as a guy who hasn't spent all that much time thinking about politics realizing that he agrees with one side's thinking and assuming that if he just posts arguments for that side then everyone will eventually agree with him. it's a hamhanded attempt at persuasion more than anything else. it's also a common mistake made by twitter users.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:29:43 UTC No. 16073329
>>16073306
There's some of that but then there's also the other half of his tweets that are just him posting a one word reply agreeing with some talking point, that's pretty much pure virtue signalling.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:57:27 UTC No. 16073359
>>16073235
Not close to 90% but still higher than I expected.
Your argument is still very retarded, because I'm sure if you were to sort by spacex/related content the device usage would definitely trend much more towards desktop and TV streaming. Which again have 4k screens.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 03:17:57 UTC No. 16073389
>>16073112
Fuck off Noa
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 03:54:19 UTC No. 16073433
>>16070664
>to stop the vehicle being struck
what would happen?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 04:54:47 UTC No. 16073499
>>16073244
I call it the Howard Hughes phase. He is well on his way to becoming a mushbrained Fox News grandpa like Zubrin
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 04:59:25 UTC No. 16073503
>>16073433
It would be extremely painful.