Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:48:27 UTC No. 16199828

here's to a HIGH ENERGY thread

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:49:47 UTC No. 16199831

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jQXmPNIkwU
>Starbase Tower 2 Foundations | Flyover Update Episode 43

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:50:49 UTC No. 16199832

>>16199831

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:51:10 UTC No. 16199833

>>16199824
Akatsuki-kun and Kinsei-chan.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:51:51 UTC No. 16199834

>>16199832

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:52:52 UTC No. 16199836

>>16199834

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:53:55 UTC No. 16199837

>>16199836

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:54:44 UTC No. 16199838

>>16199828
BASED.
Meanwhile at gayX
>*Gluck* *Gluck* *Gluck* *Gluck* *Gluck* *Gluck* *Gluck* *Gluck*

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:56:39 UTC No. 16199840

>>16199838
10th-generation brownsville resident here. everyone lives in constant terror that elon's going to show up and start sampling the local cuisine. the noises he makes when chewing are wiping out indigenous wildlife.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:57:29 UTC No. 16199841

>>16199812
Thank you Snopes, I can always rely on you for hard hitting and unbiased fact-checking.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:01:33 UTC No. 16199848

>>16199840
>10th-generation brownsville resident here
oooof

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:02:27 UTC No. 16199849

2 more weeks, faggots

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:02:54 UTC No. 16199850

I was watching some videos about different enthusiasts' plans for Mars, and it ranged from
>EVERYONE SENT TO MARS MUST BE STERILIZED, YOU CAN'T RISK IT
to
>zis layout for ze future Mars city vill ehhh help ze future Mars colonists dream to imagine
Is there anyone not deranged or delusional in this space?

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:03:16 UTC No. 16199851

>>16199848
and? this isn't a joke. after the last launch my tail fell off and my skin started changing color uncontrollably.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:04:28 UTC No. 16199852

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:04:36 UTC No. 16199853

>>16199824

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:05:21 UTC No. 16199855

There is not a week I do not go by without seething about Mars not having a similar mass and radius to Earth.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:06:27 UTC No. 16199858

>>16199855

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:06:40 UTC No. 16199860

>>16199840
good, fuck beetles

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:07:24 UTC No. 16199861

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbEjr-yM3fU
>Starship Flight 4 WDR Take 2 | SpaceX Boca Chica

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:08:43 UTC No. 16199862

>>16199855
Blame Jupiter or some shit.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:08:57 UTC No. 16199863

>>16199855
Me seething about Venus on at least a weekly basis

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:09:00 UTC No. 16199864

>>16199850
Reminds me of the time mars society ran a mars colony contest and the winning plan was just a vague EPCOT in space with lots of pretty renderings.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:09:15 UTC No. 16199866

>>16199855
There is not a week I do not go by without seething about Venus not having a similar atmosphere and day to Earth.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:10:20 UTC No. 16199868

>>16199851
Really? Post a before and after pic.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:10:54 UTC No. 16199869

>>16199855
>>16199866
There is not a week I do not go by without seething about Earth having an atmosphere and gravity.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:11:22 UTC No. 16199870

>>16199864
This might even be what I'm thinking of. Anything made by architects with regard to space can be thrown into an incinerator (or Boeing Starliner)

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:12:59 UTC No. 16199871

>>16199855
>>16199858
>>16199863
>>16199866
If this universe supposedly reeks of intelligent design, then why has god forsaken us on this front? Our star system may have been the verge of greatness.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:15:55 UTC No. 16199875

>>16199871
Imagine how funny it would be if all three of these had life spread by impacts, but then the entire rest of the observable universe was completely dead.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:16:07 UTC No. 16199876

>>16199837
wow, that's a lot of dead mexicans.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:16:54 UTC No. 16199877

>>16199871
Because it's a challenge. Level 1 is getting mars habitable. It has a similar day length and enough water on it that it can be easily freed. Venus is 100x harder because you have to make the planet spin faster and find a way to get rid of all the excess gas. Also look how ugly it is

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:17:18 UTC No. 16199878

>>16199875
Sounds like some creationist theory for Neon Genesis Evangelion or 2001 lore.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:18:29 UTC No. 16199880

>>16199861
3:20 damn that sounds pretty bad, like something getting tortured

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:21:51 UTC No. 16199885

>>16199871
>be venus
>too hot early on preventing the crust from cracking and developing plate tectonics
>doomed to catastrophic volcanism with no carbon sink
>be mars
>have jupiter siphon the mass you deserve, cool off too rapidly and lose your atmosphere
>doomed to a frigid, barren desert with no active geology
>no moons on either planet
It's not fucking fair.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:24:27 UTC No. 16199889

>>16199885
>plate tectonics
What are the chances that plate tectonics are really unique? Like, the only reason Earth has plate tectonics is because of the collision with Rhea?

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:25:13 UTC No. 16199891

>>16199871
I don’t think it’s unrealistic to think that humans could unironically colonize other star systems given enough time. And Mars / Venus are good candidates for us to learn how to craft similar Earth-like planets to our will. That knowledge will go elsewhere, to other star systems, potentially.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:25:30 UTC No. 16199892

>>16199828
HIGH ENERGY
LOW CUSTOMERS

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:25:59 UTC No. 16199893

>>16199871
Venus was fine when the sun was a lot dimmer a couple of billion years ago. You just got to her too late.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:26:35 UTC No. 16199896

for me the Sol system is pretty mediocre and the surrounding systems seem pretty meh
we really got dealt a shitty hand

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:27:46 UTC No. 16199898

>>16199896
It could be a LOT worse anon. We're lucky.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:28:25 UTC No. 16199900

>>16199413
If the solution to the Fermi paradox is that all the aliens are too limp-wristed to conquer the universe, I say that's a good thing. More planets for us.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:29:02 UTC No. 16199902

Good OP, nice job

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:32:01 UTC No. 16199905

>>16199889
It's very likely that they are extremely rare judging by our solar system. There is no other body in the solar system with active plate tectonics. One of the thousands of things which make the rare Earth hypotheis very likely. I think the videogame 'Space Engine' gets it right. Most 'inhabited' planets are not great and have a small amount of life clinging to them with an extremely slow metabolism, which are always micro organisms less complex than Earth micro organisms. Kind of like Mars actually.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:33:07 UTC No. 16199907

>>16199896
Jupiter and Saturn are pretty cool anon

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:36:24 UTC No. 16199913

>>16199907
Wowza! Is that- is that a GAS GIANT?!?!?! IM GOING TO BASEDJACK

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:36:30 UTC No. 16199914

>>16199900
If we come acrossany aliens who are expansionsit like us then we will inevitabily and quickly have wars which make all human struggle up to that point seem like a quaint fight over a toy in the schoolyard.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:38:08 UTC No. 16199917

>>16199913
Your dads penis is giant.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:39:09 UTC No. 16199920

>>16199893
>stars can't use all of their hydrogen fuel above 0.35 solar masses
>stars get brighter and bigger as they age and the reaction moves outwards
Why do stars in this universe have to be such piss poorly designed? F/G/K stars before they hit the wall are likely the most comfy for life. I could not be assed to live around a dimly lit M-dwarf system.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:42:16 UTC No. 16199922

>>16199891
Regardless of how much it may be in the range of impossibility or outright fantasy, I firmly believe that it is within humanity's right to rehabilitate the other worlds in this system, and grant the sun a new lease on life however possible. Earth, its moon, and the bright white sun (when not too luminous) is holy beauty and perfection. Yet it is all so incredibly fragile.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:43:30 UTC No. 16199924

our nearest neighbor the alpha centauri system has currently 5 known planets and it has 3 suns
actual kino alert and way cooler than Sol

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:44:40 UTC No. 16199926

>>16199922
>Neptune looking like that
fuck off troon.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:45:48 UTC No. 16199930

>>16199926
>t. Tritroon.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:47:58 UTC No. 16199933

>>16199922
This map is based. Solar system map makers who do false color, especially on the sun and venus are fags. I also like how it includes dwarf planets other than pluto.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:47:59 UTC No. 16199934

>>16199926
this, I don't believe the mainstream media and the re-coloring of Neptune recently
most armature photographs of Neptune through backyard enthusiast telescopes show it having it's classic rich blue color

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:51:34 UTC No. 16199938

>>16199900
>all the aliens are too limp-wristed to conquer the universe
Like all these 'solutons' this relies on a uniformity among ayy species that is not credible. You can have thousands of Gandhi ayy worlds but one Kzinti world makes them irrelevant

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:51:45 UTC No. 16199939

>>16199875
>and so we say farewell to our colony ships, embarking on a centuries long journey towards distant stars, with worlds inevitably as green as ours

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:54:23 UTC No. 16199943

>>16199896

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:54:40 UTC No. 16199945

>>16199938
>all the aliens are too limp-wristed to conquer the universe
this is pretty much us now and it will only get worse

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:54:51 UTC No. 16199946

>>16199924
>alpha centauri system has currently 5 known planets
Lmao no it doesn't
Proxima has maybe one planet and that's it
Stop looking

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:55:41 UTC No. 16199948

>>16199945
meant for >>16199900

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:58:53 UTC No. 16199950

>>16199946
not him but proxima has several

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:59:05 UTC No. 16199951

> muh solar system planets suck
Doesn't matter, no one will live on one in the long run

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:00:37 UTC No. 16199952

>Jiuquan Space Center (where the Shenzhou are launched) is actually disputed territory between the provinces of Gansu and Inner Mongolia
>Tax revenue, Tourism revenu and prestige over the space center is hotly contested
>As a stopgap measure, the temporary solution is that Ejina Banner (Inner Mongolia) has the tax revenue of Dongfeng Aerospace City (Aerospace City has tourism income), and Gansu is responsible for providing logistics support for Aerospace City
>There are still occasional conflicts between the two places due to road construction, land reclamation and other issues
>On December 6, 2015, in a conflict, the Inner Mongolia Police station in Jiuquan was destroyed by a mob of 100 from Gansu, injuring 13 staff member, who were beaten with clubs and thrown gagged in the winter snow.

I love China, imagine mobs fighting over the ownership of a space center.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:01:23 UTC No. 16199953

>>16199950
> red dwarf that flares like fuck
who cares?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:01:33 UTC No. 16199954

>>16199951
that is just plain dumb

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:04:44 UTC No. 16199958

Venus has an atmosphere comprised mainly of supercritical volatiles and is therefore an ice giant.
Thank you for your time, I will not be taking questions

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:07:55 UTC No. 16199963

>>16199934
>most armature photographs of Neptune through backyard enthusiast telescopes show it having it's classic rich blue color
WHERE

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:11:29 UTC No. 16199971

>>16199963
here for starters
https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/905912-uranus-neptune-colors/

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:13:54 UTC No. 16199972

What if you used the enormous mass of asteroids to your advantage, using them as a giant counterweight to fire refined metals out of a mass driver onto lower energy trajectories.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:16:08 UTC No. 16199976

>>16199971
still looks like it's gone from being royal blue to baby blue to me

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:18:39 UTC No. 16199981

>>16199971
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV6AJZVhmJg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj-P031VlbU
r u sure about that

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:21:29 UTC No. 16199984

What changes could we make to Neptune's atmosphere to restore its original color scheme?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:22:16 UTC No. 16199985

>>16199958
>Venus is a failed attempt to transition into a gas giant

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:23:17 UTC No. 16199988

>>16199984
moar methane

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:23:34 UTC No. 16199989

>>16199985
Oh shit, I wonder if it used to be one

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:24:45 UTC No. 16199991

>>16199984
We need to build a giant black sheet between Neptune and Earth while we figure this out

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:25:07 UTC No. 16199992

>>16199934
>backyard enthusiast telescopes show it having it's classic rich blue color

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:25:24 UTC No. 16199993

How many nukes do we need to tear a permanent rift in Venus?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:26:09 UTC No. 16199995

if you think Uranus is blue, you should see a doctor.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:28:42 UTC No. 16200001

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1795957293797744655

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:30:44 UTC No. 16200004

>>16199989
the current consensus would be that venus isn't big enough or dense enough for that to be true but they change their minds on that sorta thing sometimes

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:31:21 UTC No. 16200005

>thousands of astronomers look at Neptune with their own eyes through a telescope, all agree its pretty fucking blue
>/sfg/ queers - 'erm, source?'

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:33:54 UTC No. 16200008

>>16200005
/sci/ is bluer than neptune at this point.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:34:05 UTC No. 16200009

>>16200005
wait is that real!?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:34:31 UTC No. 16200010

>>16199984
Keep promising orbiters and Triton landers and the ball will turn blue.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:38:32 UTC No. 16200015

>>16200005
>SRB-X Shuttle
imagine

Captcha: GYSPY

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:43:18 UTC No. 16200019

>>16200005
>thousands of astronomers look at Neptune with their own eyes through a telescope, all agree its pretty fucking blue

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:53:18 UTC No. 16200026

>>16199951
Based.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:56:59 UTC No. 16200028

>>16200001
>empty sandbar

JUSTIC FOR PLOVERS

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:57:47 UTC No. 16200029

>>16200005
Kek

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:59:11 UTC No. 16200030

>>16200019
How do you find yourself posting on a basket-weaving space board and not know what a visible planet looks like…
Go outside?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:02:44 UTC No. 16200033

>>16199855
Why lol? you like fat women?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:04:26 UTC No. 16200036

>>16200030
You can't see that shit with the naked eye

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:05:57 UTC No. 16200040

>>16200005
?? /sfg/ is not a neptune truther. The voyager nigger scientists are trying to change written history to suit their debased purposes

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:08:53 UTC No. 16200041

>>16199831
>OMG RGV AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY, RGV AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:12:08 UTC No. 16200042

>>16200036
lmao look at this fucking eyelet can't even see neptune

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:14:08 UTC No. 16200045

>>16200030
It doesn't look like >>16199984 from all accounts I've seen.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:16:03 UTC No. 16200046

>>16200045
it doesnt look like washed out uranus either. why are they lying?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:17:04 UTC No. 16200047

>>16199913
the moon are the actual good part you retard

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:19:29 UTC No. 16200049

>>16200045
No one ever claimed [your pic] is what neptune would look like to the human eye 1:1
But, it without a doubt appears distinctly more blue when compared to a much paler Uranus, when viewed from Earth

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:20:44 UTC No. 16200050

>>16200049
*the other guy’s pic
whoops

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:22:27 UTC No. 16200051

>>16199836
>No solar roof

MUSK ZISTERS?!!!

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:23:29 UTC No. 16200053

I'm having trouble understanding space flight, can someone answer pic related for me?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:25:35 UTC No. 16200055

>>16200053
You can only perform method 2 in a fluid
Method 1 is the only way to do it

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:26:45 UTC No. 16200056

>>16199995
why is it so small?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:30:16 UTC No. 16200057

>>16200001
Our autistic king

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:31:32 UTC No. 16200059

>>16200056
Some guys are just born that way. Please do not laugh

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:34:17 UTC No. 16200063

Will we ever be able to image an exoplanet somewhat directly in our lifetime?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:34:24 UTC No. 16200064

>>16200055
you could do method 2 in a vacuum. it'd just be wasteful because you have steering losses.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:34:48 UTC No. 16200065

>>16200055
ahh thank you

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:35:39 UTC No. 16200068

>>16200063
yes but it will not be interesting to look at. you've seen pixels before

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:37:27 UTC No. 16200070

>>16200068
but we could argue about how blue the pixels are

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:38:41 UTC No. 16200072

>>16200070
It won't matter since the pixels will be fake
The corrections they do are a joke

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:39:18 UTC No. 16200074

https://twitter.com/torybruno/status/1795962570886521022
>I spy a pair of BE4 engines about to go onto their booster for USSF106, VulcanRocket‘s first National Security mission.

If these are for Vulcan's first NatSec launch, then shouldn't the pair for its second certification flight already be there? Are engines actually piling up while ULA waits on payloads?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:39:58 UTC No. 16200077

>>16200072
my uncle works for astronomy and he confirmed the pixels are real

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:40:52 UTC No. 16200078

>>16200074
there's a picture of another vulcan with engines on it isn't there? I thought I saw it on here

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:45:03 UTC No. 16200086

An LH2 based Solar Moth gets an Isp of about 900s. This means a water prop Solar Moth should get an Isp of at least 300s based on ratios from NTP studies, probably more since the "fuel element" is sunlight concentrated into a zirconium oxide or diamond focus that doesn't mind exposure to steam plasma.

Consulting basic delta V maps, a rocket with an Isp of 300s and no boiloff risk could do a fully propulsive transfer LEO to LVO with a mass ratio of about 5.5, super doable with water tankage, and less with aerocapture/braking like Magellan did.

This means if we can shrink the solar moth system down far enough to be 4 tons launch mass including payload, a whole Venus mission could be launched on a Transporter mission. At Starship prices ~$100/kg that's crowdfundable.

https://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/mining.php#id--Asteroid_Mining--Mining_Ships--Robot_Asteroid_Prospector

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:45:07 UTC No. 16200087

>>16200074
What if it turns out that the BE-4 is terrible?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:45:47 UTC No. 16200088

>>16200078
Turns out the engines for V002 are already on their booster

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:47:11 UTC No. 16200091

>>16200086
there's no way that designing and building the first solar moth ever from the ground up would be cheaper than buying one of tom mueller's tugs which would do the same job better

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:48:58 UTC No. 16200094

>>16200091
it would be significantly less gay

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:53:16 UTC No. 16200098

>>16200087
I think the only thing really terrible about it will have been how long it took to get it into mass production. It doesn't hit Raptor's absurd performance benchmarks, but as a domestic RD-180 replacement it doesn't look like it's disappointing anyone. Right now they're getting enough hardware for a monthly Vulcan launch with the rate still increasing. This is a big improvement from the Delta IV/Atlas V status quo.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:56:44 UTC No. 16200101

>>16200086
https://spacenews.com/space-force-eyes-solar-powered-vehicles-for-operations-near-the-moon/

https://www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/2169541

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 02:37:15 UTC No. 16200124

We need to normalize space flight

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 02:38:50 UTC No. 16200126

The Space sector is fake.
All that ultra-expensive hardware that requires so much care, it is a scientifist theatralisation. You should have realised this just by observing things like the countdown ritual. You know something is off. The goal of this expensive show is to delude people into the fake worship of technology, and to lure them into the defense industry, which is what lies behind civilian aerospace.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 02:41:07 UTC No. 16200128

>>16200124
Miami looks great this time of year.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 02:53:59 UTC No. 16200141

>>16200128
On a sun-synchronous track out of Miami you've only got about 275 km before you're dropping stages on Cuba. The good news is that that Villa Clara Province doesn't look like it's the most built up; we'd be crossing the island well to the east of Havana and Matanzas.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 03:02:50 UTC No. 16200146

>>16200124
sauce

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 03:07:45 UTC No. 16200153

>>16199833
merry christmas, anon

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 03:11:03 UTC No. 16200160

>>16200051
Starbase isn't in the ideal geographical location for solar to make sense.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 03:15:19 UTC No. 16200167

https://twitter.com/CNSpaceflight/status/1796007475033821441

https://twitter.com/CNSpaceflight/status/1796003943853556147
>Think about watching a real live rocket launch from your apartment

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 03:17:02 UTC No. 16200169

https://youtu.be/iIULRMRcyZM (The Real Secrets of Rocket Design Revealed) [34:02]
Tony Bruno ass = blasted beyond belief
Get fucked ULA virgins

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 03:21:41 UTC No. 16200172

>>16200167
How is China so far ahead of the United States?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 03:31:41 UTC No. 16200182

>>16200172
This really isn't ahead of anything. Ceres-1S lifts 300kg to a 500km sun-synchronous orbit. That's about the same as India's SSLV or 150% of what Electron could manage. It's just that this small rocket launched right next to a large city in China so it had a larger in-person audience than Apollo 11.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 03:34:56 UTC No. 16200187

>>16200167
This reminds me of that Trident missile launch the USN did without telling anyone like five years ago just off the coast of Florida. I thought we were all going to die.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 03:37:30 UTC No. 16200190

kek
https://x.com/sbarky38/status/1795890098783006920

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 03:49:45 UTC No. 16200197

>>16200169
>Tony Bruno
I laughed like a retard when I realized he actually said that

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 04:10:47 UTC No. 16200208

>>16200172
The US wouldn't be so irresponsible with its citizens' safety by launching a rocket right next to a major city.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 05:07:57 UTC No. 16200243

>>16200172
A smallsat launcher?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 05:16:33 UTC No. 16200254

>>16200172
and a ching chong to you too

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 05:36:16 UTC No. 16200280

>>16200208
NOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST DO KINO THINGS SOMEBODY MIGHT INHALE A WHIFF OF ALUMINUM

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 05:52:53 UTC No. 16200296

Starship currently lacks resilience to missing tiles: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1796049014938357932

>Right now, we are not resilient to loss of a single tile in most places, as the secondary containment material will probably not survive.

>I will explain the problem in more depth with @Erdayastronaut next week. This is a thorny issue indeed, given that vast resources have been applied to solve it, thus far to no avail.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:01:37 UTC No. 16200317

>>16200296
Big. To bad /sfg/ has been poisoned.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:03:31 UTC No. 16200321

>>16200182
>>16200208
>>16200243
>>16200254
Why did you respond to it?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:11:50 UTC No. 16200335

>>16200296
>solid TPS information
>new estronaut interview
neat

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:16:52 UTC No. 16200351

>>16200296
but i was told losing tiles was fine because muh steel

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:20:08 UTC No. 16200355

>>16200351
It is. Elon is being overly dramatic.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:22:27 UTC No. 16200361

>>16200355
he's clearly been watching too many CSS videos

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:27:25 UTC No. 16200371

>>16200361
Hate to see the owner of twitter suffering from EDS to this degree...

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:44:36 UTC No. 16200391

>>16200296
Patiently waiting for Elon to take the L on returning to transpiration cooling. This tile shit has SO MANY points of failure that it's retarded, one beaner fucking up one tile can RUD the whole rocket.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:46:08 UTC No. 16200392

>>16200371
Part of the Faustian Spirit is having derangement syndrome towards your own self.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 07:36:11 UTC No. 16200422

>>16199824
cgi

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 07:40:18 UTC No. 16200424

>>16200296
It's over

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 07:44:43 UTC No. 16200426

>>16200296
This is in disagreement with our crowd derived fact that stainless steel plus the gas behind it cooling it is essentially immune to reentry conditions.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 07:46:20 UTC No. 16200430

>>16199828
are the wires there to intercept lightning?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 07:47:05 UTC No. 16200431

https://x.com/danpiemont/status/1795946191118799031

Founder of ABL commenting on the NYT hitpiece
Musk also responds

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1796031244846645493

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 07:48:55 UTC No. 16200432

>>16199834
I like the parking arrangement, seems very efficient

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 07:50:49 UTC No. 16200435

>>16200431
Should've posted screenshots so I don't have to visit the website.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 07:51:05 UTC No. 16200436

>>16200430
they're guy wires for the lightning towers so kinda

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 07:54:22 UTC No. 16200440

>>16200436
oh wow, that's a very robust system, they're not fucking around

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:02:52 UTC No. 16200447

>>16200440
When is the rocket launching

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:05:25 UTC No. 16200450

Why are you racist chuds and do you realize that you will never go to space?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:10:06 UTC No. 16200456

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:10:27 UTC No. 16200457

thinking about spaceplanes

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:10:57 UTC No. 16200458

>>16200296
Cool! This tweet reminds me of the substantive Elon tweets of old, back when reddit still loved him and before thai submarines

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:18:53 UTC No. 16200462

>>16200457
Shut up

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:19:51 UTC No. 16200463

>>16200462
hmmmmmmmmm
no

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:30:31 UTC No. 16200466

>>16200435
its too long for a single screenshot, basically an article

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:39:21 UTC No. 16200472

"As a founder of a launch company, I disagreed with the thrust of this NYT article. I admire SpaceX and welcome their success.

Our goal at ABL is to create fundamentally better launch systems, spread them all over the world, and launch all kinds of new technology that is 10x – 100x better than what exists today. We can help guarantee security, explore our solar system, study the cosmos, and improve billions of lives in the process.

The only way to do this seriously is to push the cost of launch as close as possible to it’s physical limit. Everyone working on launch systems is on the same team in this goal. SpaceX continues to raise the bar as high as they can. We don’t feel short-changed by it, we feel challenged and motivated to do the same.

Addressing a few specific points in the article:

Is rideshare pricing anticompetitive?
Some rideshare missions have definitely launched at a loss. Just do the math. Others have launched at a profit (particularly those with “cake toppers”). On average, with all costs baked in, it’s probably somewhere between a slight loser and slightly profitable. Which side of the line it’s on doesn’t really matter. Whether you are losing $4MM or making $6MM per rideshare launch, there’s no doubt it’s the least profitable activity.

And yes, it’s (partially) motivated by putting pressure on new entrants. That’s not too hard to corroborate if you speak to the right people and they are honest with you.

but…

at the end of the day this program has been a MASSIVE boon to our industry. Almost every innovative space program I can think of depends on rideshare to get started, test technology, get heritage, and build further. The existence of this program has increased the total demand for launch over the next 10 years by a multiplicative amount."

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:40:22 UTC No. 16200474

>>16200472
Elon's reply:
"Thank you for the thoughtful rebuttal.

To the best of my knowledge, none of the rideshare missions have lost money.

I do hope that rocket companies focus on reusability. That is the fundamental breakthrough needed for humanity to become a spacefaring civilization. Falcon is ~80% reusable and the team is doing incredible work launching every 2 or 3 days.

With extreme effort, Starship will eventually take reusability to ~100%. There are many tough issues to solve with this vehicle, but the biggest remaining problem is making a reusable orbital return heat shield, which has never been done before. The Shuttle’s heat shield required over 6 months of refurbishment by a large team, so was not reusable by any reasonable definition of the word.

This will take a few kicks at the can to solve and requires building an entirely new supply chain for low-cost, high-volume and yet high-reliability heat shield tiles, but it can be done."

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:41:57 UTC No. 16200476

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1796086272865317366

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:43:16 UTC No. 16200477

>>16200351
Why is there an identical comment posted on r/spacex? Care to explain?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:47:17 UTC No. 16200482

>>16200477
sure, you're a schizo who thinks that the same obvious response to a tweet being made on more than one website is evidence of a conspiracy to say mean things about starship

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:51:01 UTC No. 16200490

https://x.com/StarshipGazer/status/1795993546719199292

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:56:07 UTC No. 16200492

>>16200482
the re*dit comment is identical though.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 09:00:03 UTC No. 16200495

>>16200492
spoopy, maybe you should file a report for gangstalking

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 09:03:46 UTC No. 16200496

>>16200482
>>16200495
kek you retard

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 09:10:20 UTC No. 16200498

>>16200477
I use chatgpt and/or copy reddit comments here

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 09:14:57 UTC No. 16200502

>>16200296
Maybe use larger tiles with more hold-points? It only takes 3 pins to break to lose a single tile, if it was 9 or 12 I feel larger tiles would have more chances of hanging on.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 09:46:59 UTC No. 16200519

space is easy
reuse is hard

Roteman at Thu, 30 May 2024 09:53:47 UTC No. 16200523

>>16200502
seems like an issue with the pins and the hold points and not with the amount of pins and hold points. the larger tile size idea is a good one, but the weight on itself (especially in atmosphere) will be not very good for it. mabey use the spray on shoes flint lockwood used in the first cloudy with a chance of meatballs movie, not joking an easily applied expanding material which firms quickly and sets hard could be a good solution, ditching the entire idea of a tiled surface.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 09:56:00 UTC No. 16200526

>>16200167
>https://x.com/StarshipGazer/status/1795993546719199292
China No1

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 09:59:03 UTC No. 16200529

>>16200172
They’re ahead of USA (but not necessarily the West) in a few sectors
>Space station manufacturing
>Quick response small launch
>Lunar exploration
>Mass Civilian Earth observation w/ smallsat
I’d say all of these the US has a good chance of closing the gap in the next decade.
On the other hand they are competitive but not ahead in a lot of other part of the sector

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 09:59:49 UTC No. 16200530

>>16200529
lol, lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 10:24:31 UTC No. 16200554

>>16200529
SpaceX is going to get ground into paste by democrat and republicans alike, both seething about different things. Extra efforts will be made to ensure maximum niggers in the aerospace workforce by any means necessary. Chinks have already won, we are just watching amerimutts last gasp.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 10:33:09 UTC No. 16200562

>>16199877
Orbital mirrors are a much easier solution than spinning an entire planet faster.

Roteman at Thu, 30 May 2024 10:36:05 UTC No. 16200566

>>16200529
>>16200530
>>16200554
/pol/ is right there

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 10:39:53 UTC No. 16200568

>>16199905
>There is no other body in the solar system with active plate tectonics.
There is in fact one other place in the solar system that has plate tectonics, just of a different material.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 10:40:55 UTC No. 16200571

>>16200566
This thread is for spaceflight and that includes China. Suggest you start your own thread if you want a safe space?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 10:45:38 UTC No. 16200574

>>16200566
spaceflight is political

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 10:52:56 UTC No. 16200583

>>16200554
SpaceX is unironically superior to any other space entity.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 10:56:22 UTC No. 16200586

>>16200568
also isn't there talk about Venus having had plate tectonics at one point?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 10:59:01 UTC No. 16200590

>>16200586
I'm pretty sure it was talk about Mars having some sort of vertical plate tectonics.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:20:18 UTC No. 16200606

>>16200590
We need to explore Europa more. Hopefully FH launched Clipper successfully.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:23:04 UTC No. 16200608

>>16200457
>>16200463
>he doesn't know

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:23:34 UTC No. 16200609

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1796049014938357932
>I will explain the problem in more depth with @Erdayastronaut
next week.

I basedfaced.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:27:13 UTC No. 16200610

>>16200609
ok soi
>>16200296

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:29:24 UTC No. 16200613

Why can't they just run tubing along the entire outside of starship and just run coolant through that. No need for those micropores or whatever.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:30:53 UTC No. 16200614

why can't spacex use the ice in the engines to cool down the tiles?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:31:16 UTC No. 16200615

>>16200609
https://x.com/Erdayastronaut/status/1796140009071747091

>I’m very excited to do another Starbase tour with Elon before flight 4! A lot has changed in the last two years and there’s a lot of technical challenges that SpaceX is continuing to solve with the Starship program.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:32:16 UTC No. 16200616

>>16200613
Sounds expensive and heavy

Barkon Bootel at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:32:36 UTC No. 16200617

>>16200615
Gegi

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:44:01 UTC No. 16200629

>>16200610
I searched for twitter links to check if it is a repost. So Elon did this.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:45:48 UTC No. 16200632

>>16200629
fuck off.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:46:46 UTC No. 16200634

>>16200609
Methane sweat bros, are we back?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:51:27 UTC No. 16200638

>>16200609
Dragon can actually survive Mars entry velocities, but the tiles on Starship ironically cannot. I wonder what thermal insulation they will actually end up with if they ever send it to Mars and back?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:52:58 UTC No. 16200639

>>16200609
5 months until it gets released btw

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:53:41 UTC No. 16200640

>>16200616
sound very reliable but inefficient imo.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:00:42 UTC No. 16200647

So was all the slosh bullshit fake? Seems legit to me.

Boo-ker at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:00:48 UTC No. 16200648

Space is an NPC getto

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:02:06 UTC No. 16200649

>>16200647
why would it be fake?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:02:35 UTC No. 16200651

>>16200638
ablative shields for Mars entry and ISRU ablative shields for Earth entry :^)

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:03:37 UTC No. 16200652

>>16200647
It was always ice in the tanks. Keep up.

IFT1 using V1 engines had multiple fires in the engine bay wheich destroyed loads of engines because the heat exchangers leaked fuel into the engine plumes, V2 solved that by deleting the heat exchanger and pumping preburner gas directly into the tanks as pressurant. But the preburner gas contains water which forms ice and blocks the engine inlets. That's why following IFT2 and 3 they have increased the beefiness of the filtration system. We will see if it's enough.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:04:24 UTC No. 16200653

>>16200649
The engines actually died because blockages, sloshing had nothing to do with it.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:07:05 UTC No. 16200654

>>16200653
blocked by what?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:10:50 UTC No. 16200658

>>16200654
bistable metallic antihydrogen

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:11:27 UTC No. 16200659

>>16200435
Musk Derangement Syndrome? Not just ironic one? lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:14:45 UTC No. 16200664

>>16200654
>>16200658
a wonder alloy of metallic oxygen and metallic hydrogen that is solid nearly up to room temperature at 1 atmosphere

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:25:51 UTC No. 16200675

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WguRO57kedo

He was so happy and excited here. Humanity needs him back.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:26:17 UTC No. 16200676

https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2024-05-10

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:31:23 UTC No. 16200683

>>16200664
that stuff thats supposed to have a denser liquid phase than solid phase? you believe that nonsense? lol

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:38:13 UTC No. 16200687

>>16200683
looks pretty cozy.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:40:24 UTC No. 16200688

>>16200615
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1796144234447212816

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:43:00 UTC No. 16200692

>>16200664
so some sort of... hydrogen... monoxide?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:44:08 UTC No. 16200693

>>16200688
I wonder if he will ask technical questions this time.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:45:36 UTC No. 16200696

>>16200693
Lot of the technical question went over your head last time?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:46:04 UTC No. 16200698

>>16200693
what do you mean "this time"?
did you watch the previous ones?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:49:14 UTC No. 16200703

Taking bets for whether starship will blow up next week.
My predictions are as follows
>Super heavy lands successfully
>starship burns up on reentry again

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:49:26 UTC No. 16200705

>>16200693
>>16200688
hopefully he asks about the 1337 engine and 18m starship. otherwise I wont watch.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:55:09 UTC No. 16200710

I am 30 today

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 12:57:00 UTC No. 16200712

>>16200710
its over

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:00:05 UTC No. 16200716

>>16200683
>that stuff thats supposed to have a denser liquid phase than solid phase
deranged theoretical physicists do

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:00:59 UTC No. 16200719

>>16200710
Congrats, anon! But don't waste your time here, spend this day with your wife and kids.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:01:07 UTC No. 16200720

>>16200710
list your achievements

>>16200703
>next week

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:04:24 UTC No. 16200724

>>16200720
Yes, next week.
The 5th of june, which is on the week after the week which contains the 30th of may.
That week. Right.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:12:12 UTC No. 16200733

People talk about the difficulty of doing higher energy re-entry, like mars return, but Starship can maneuver to some degree, unlike a capsule.

You could for example re-enter at higher altitudes with lower peak heat and use the starship's lift to keep you in the atmosphere for longer.
You could maybe also do a multiple pass re-entry.

I don't understand rarified gas hypersonic thermal and fluid dynamics, but it works in KSP, so surely it should work in real life.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:17:08 UTC No. 16200742

>>16200724
two more weeks.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:19:59 UTC No. 16200747

https://x.com/bigtechalert/status/1796120718712705114

bezos followed an EDS account lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:20:34 UTC No. 16200750

>>16200742
Ah yes, the date of june 5th is 2 weeks, also known as 6 days, away from may 30th.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:28:00 UTC No. 16200759

>>16200747
Bezos follows a lot of random accounts

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:29:04 UTC No. 16200761

>>16200759
nobody follows random accounts, they follow those which have posts that interest them specifically
a wide variety of topics presented doesn't mean its random

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:34:30 UTC No. 16200768

>>16200761
he follows spaceguy5 lol

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:35:27 UTC No. 16200770

>>16200647
Yup, it was all made up. A fiction

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:35:40 UTC No. 16200771

What if this kind of insincere 'redpilled Elon' shtick over the past couple of years was an attempt to sell electric cars to republicans.
In the market for a 'woke' electric car you have a lot of upcoming competitors, however if you can make a 'based' electric car brand then you can have a temporary monopoly over a large part of the boomer demographic.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:42:07 UTC No. 16200779

>>16200768
Who is this guy and why should I care?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:51:43 UTC No. 16200787

>>16200703
>everything works perfectly but not in a repeatable way
>no useful data obtained

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:53:37 UTC No. 16200788

>>16200768
yeah, which shows that he is still very much seething about Musk and the comments on the lex fridman podcast were not really accurate about he feels

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:54:58 UTC No. 16200789

geez guys, three launches today and all you can talk about is tiles and estronaught?

1. Progress MS-27 on the way to the ISS
2. Long March 3 launched Paksat MM1R to orbit
3. Ceres-1 might have their second launch in a week later today

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:55:23 UTC No. 16200791

>>16200771
I don't think most people care other than the small population of very partisan people
its more that people are not aware

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:59:05 UTC No. 16200795

>>16200789
Complain when the chinese or russians achieve some form of reusability.
Expendable launches are boring.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:01:33 UTC No. 16200796

>>16200710
I was 40 yesterday (I still am 40)

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:16:47 UTC No. 16200812

>>16200795
expendable is boring
falcon is boring
smallsat is boring
secret payloads are boring

When are you going to wakeup and realize it’s spaceflight that’s boring?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:20:45 UTC No. 16200815

>>16200812
when the Mars supply runs once every 2 years are boring, that's the win condition.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:21:00 UTC No. 16200816

Why is the R-7 series of rockets the best in the world?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:27:39 UTC No. 16200822

>>16200789
>Progress
Another soyuz uncrewed ISS resupply, 180th in fact. /sfg/ isn't quite at the level of trainwatching.
>Long March 3
Launch of a rocket which has launched ~150 times in the past 40 years, carrying a satellite for a Chinese vassal state. Same as above.
>Ceres1
More interesting than the last two, but it's just a mostly solid rocket design which is carrying "two new satellites" (more detail not provided, but presumably EO sats). They should have moved on from this rocket by now.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:27:43 UTC No. 16200823

>>16200789
Gomenasorry anon. I just got in the office and haven't checked if Clear has any streams planned today.
Oh I missed MS-27. I'll watch the vod later.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:29:38 UTC No. 16200825

Can you do mars gravity assists to get from the asteroid belt to earth capture on the cheap?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:30:20 UTC No. 16200826

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:31:51 UTC No. 16200830

>>16200826
Thanks CSS, I hope your short position is paying off.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:44:37 UTC No. 16200842

Fts armed and ready.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:54:12 UTC No. 16200847

>>16200842

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:57:16 UTC No. 16200852

>>16200842
>>16200847
https://x.com/StarshipGazer/status/1796187538069033303

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:57:46 UTC No. 16200854

>>16199824
There is no strong evidence for lightning on Venus

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:59:59 UTC No. 16200860

>>16200847
they didnt get permission from the FAA though.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:01:22 UTC No. 16200861

https://x.com/maxhaot/status/1796193579963998431

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:04:15 UTC No. 16200865

>>16200860
Best license no license

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:09:20 UTC No. 16200871

>>16200865
kek.

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:10:04 UTC No. 16200872

a bit political, but sounds somewhat more serious than I thought originally
could this speed things up with respect to regulatory with spacex?
no unrelated partisan politics please

https://x.com/herbertong/status/1796193626365513935

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:12:42 UTC No. 16200876

>>16200872
Meh, he's not donating so he hasn't got any skin in the game. Trump is basically just a vehicle for Israeli lobby hardliners at this point so it's probably best to remain uninvolved.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:13:18 UTC No. 16200877

>>16200872
and as a reminder, obama visited spacex previously in 2010

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDMapJZ9S8I

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:13:54 UTC No. 16200878

>>16200872
FUCK OFF /POL/NIGGER

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:15:21 UTC No. 16200879

>>16200876
the journalist from WSJ said the event was co-hosted by musk and david sacks and supposedly musk and trump spoke about this advisory role
so its not only something like musk happened to be at some dinner with trump and somebody else threw that comment out there
on the other hand journalists tend to lie a lot these days

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:16:32 UTC No. 16200881

>>16200877
Obama: "So the FAA, we are going to have to get them involved"

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:18:28 UTC No. 16200882

>>16200877
Why would Obama visit a small literally who rocket company?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:18:49 UTC No. 16200883

>>16199871
>why has god forsaken us on this front

Because you're meatbags.
>plenty of free solar energy
>nothing but clean, pure vacuum to function in
>superconducting temperatures possible just with a decent umbrella
>minimal gravity to bog down your changes in delta-v
>plenty of bodies to assist your slingshot maneuvers
>distances entirely reasonable for an inorganic intelligence immune to the effects of time
God loves AIs.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:22:34 UTC No. 16200884

>>16200883
Nothing is immune to the effects of time.
This fact is linked to the reason why the "paradise" of flat space is really a hell.

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:23:08 UTC No. 16200885

>>16200882
this was in April, F9 first successful launch was in June of that year
before that spacex was the first privately funded liquid-fueled rocket to reach orbit in 2008, so spacex wasn't just some random literally who company even at that point

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:24:35 UTC No. 16200888

>>16200882
this was in April, F9 first successful launch was in June of that year
before that falcon 1 was the first privately funded liquid-fueled rocket to reach orbit in 2008, so spacex wasn't just some random literally who company even at that point

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:26:29 UTC No. 16200890

>>16200888
Thanks for giving me a quick rundown on SpaceX history. Elon Musk shook hands with many presidents

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:29:15 UTC No. 16200895

Musk having some very close advisory role where he can influence FAA and other stuff would be quite significant
it wasn't off topic, it was directly related to regulation

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:30:37 UTC No. 16200898

>>16200882
Obamna was on a crusade to deflate NASAs budget so handing off ISS resupply to a private company fit that narrative. Constellation was cancelled and he wanted to cancel human spaceflight indefinitely. It was a happy confluence of interests where Obamna trying to gut NASA gave room for SpaceX to emerge, and then Trump brought back constellation in the form of Fartemis giving them room to go interplanetary without eating the entire cost. We are in a brilliant timeline really. If Trump wins the next election and has Musk in his inner circle then Moon by the end of his term is possible.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:30:54 UTC No. 16200899

>>16200822
Ceres will probably carry more Of those Internet satellites that it launched a couple days ago

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:30:56 UTC No. 16200900

I don't want to go to Mars. What kind of brainwashed idiot does? It's all a lab-rat life in jars they branded the dream of ages.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:31:36 UTC No. 16200906

>>16200884
In the fullness of time, any AI eventually learns how to create its own custom universe and departs the parent forever...where do you think all the other post-Singularity civilizations went?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:32:19 UTC No. 16200908

>>16200906
>popsci.png

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:32:53 UTC No. 16200909

If Musk and Trump are now so close why didn't Trump make an X account.

>>16200895
>Musk having some very close advisory role where he can influence FAA
wouldn't that be illegal

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:32:54 UTC No. 16200910

>>16200898
would trump have enough influence/power to cancel artemis? or at least extend it so the earth->moon orbit portion could be done with private launchers and wouldn't need SLS

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:34:11 UTC No. 16200912

>>16200906
>where do you think all the other post-Singularity civilizations went?
They created an AI which destroyed the civilization and then destroyed itself.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:34:27 UTC No. 16200913

>>16200900
then don't go, its as simple as that

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:36:00 UTC No. 16200914

>>16200909
they aren't close yet, this is just some preliminary talks
I don't see how that would be illegal, just make the regulations less retarded, cut AST out of FAA and give them a bigger budget so they can keep up with the licenses (or change it so you don't need a new launch license every time for routine launches)

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:37:34 UTC No. 16200915

>>16200908
There's nothing more "popsci" than Elon Musk and his silly Mars fantasies and that never bothered you before.

>>16200912
>before leaving for college, you murdered both your parents and burned your childhood home down
How much sense does that make?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:42:45 UTC No. 16200919

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjgBsZyPnBQ
>Road to Mars - Episode 2 (SpaceX Starship Slow-mo at 2400fps, Incredible Sound, NASA VAB)

cosmic perspective team talking about how they capture slow-motion starship footage

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:45:14 UTC No. 16200922

>>16200915
Mars colonization is not pop-sci because of picrel. It's already been engineered, we just need to get there.
Your far future fantasies, on the other hand, are 100% conjecture.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:45:58 UTC No. 16200925

I haven't seen any Starbase tour. Are they worth watching?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:47:31 UTC No. 16200928

>The Axiom Station is coming to life! We're on track to launch HAB1 in 2026.
https://x.com/CommanderMLA/status/1796193801507062191

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:48:30 UTC No. 16200930

>>16200925
No. It's a bunch of bullshit with Musk pontiificating to one of his sicofants for one hour.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:52:40 UTC No. 16200934

>>16200922
looks like Elons daily pills diet

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:54:03 UTC No. 16200936

>>16200910
>would trump have enough influence/power to cancel artemis?
Definitely. NASA prgrams are easy as pie for any admin to cancel, which is why NASA is trying to jerry rig an ISS around the Moon to ensure its harder to cancel. Unlike the border wall he will face virtually no resistance.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:54:25 UTC No. 16200937

>>16200934
>WSJ
>"reportedly"
looks reliable.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:54:42 UTC No. 16200938

>>16200877
14 and half years ago.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:56:40 UTC No. 16200939

>>16200860
IFT-3 FTS was installed March 8. License issued March 13 and launch the following day, and we already know the previous investigation doesn't need to be closed.
Trust the plan.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:58:40 UTC No. 16200942

>>16200922
>eradicates your space colony fantasy

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:59:43 UTC No. 16200943

>>16200942
I refuse to believe that you are this retarded.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:00:21 UTC No. 16200944

>>16200925
yeah, for some reason I thought there had been three tours (and I thought the third one was kind of meh), but I guess there have been just two, one in 2021 and one in 2022, the second one was perhaps a bit more boring because not enough had really happened between those two
there is a 15min interview from October 2019 though

First one from August 2021 (in three parts)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t705r8ICkRw&
>Starbase Tour with Elon Musk [PART 1 // Summer 2021]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA8ZBJWo73E&
>Starbase Tour with Elon Musk [PART 2 // Summer 2021]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Zlnbs-NBUI
>Starbase Launchpad Tour with Elon Musk [PART 3 // Summer 2021]

Second one from May 2022 cut into 4 parts, some of them aren't really a tour but just explaining/talking about raptor for instance (I think some of these were kind of boring but its been a while since I watched)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ux6B3bvO0w&
[2022] Elon Musk Explains Updates To Starship And Starbase!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XP5k3ZzPf_0
>Go up SpaceX's Starship-catching robotic launch tower with Elon Musk!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIPLmZK3C1Y
>Elon Musk Explains SpaceX's Merlin Engine!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7MQb9Y4FAE&
>Elon Musk Explains SpaceX's Raptor Engine!


2019 interview after a Starship presentation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIQ36Kt7UVg
>A conversation with Elon Musk about Starship

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:00:29 UTC No. 16200945

https://x.com/esa/status/1795581349405094363

ESA getting shit for their "The Launcher" comment earlier. LMAO

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:00:55 UTC No. 16200946

>>16200922
or just grow plants in Martian soil and get all the nutrients that way

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:06:15 UTC No. 16200955

>>16200943
But you're the guy with little all-providing magic cones on the far left of your diagram, aren't you? Never mind that some of those cones (like "H2O mining", "hematite mining" and "nitrates harvesting") would be entire, widely displaced miniature cities in and of themselves.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:06:23 UTC No. 16200957

>Right now, we are not resilient to loss of a single tile in most places, as the secondary containment material will probably not survive.
Spaceguy5 vindicated. Can all of you who mocked him apologize now?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:07:13 UTC No. 16200959

>>16200955
yes so what?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:07:31 UTC No. 16200960

>>16200955
Landing sites with all of these resources nearby have already been identified.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:09:45 UTC No. 16200961

>>16200957
Who the fuck is this spaceguy5?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:09:50 UTC No. 16200963

I wish to know if plants can be grown in Martian soil. Without any fertilizers/amendments from Earth of course

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:10:07 UTC No. 16200964

>>16200925
It is fascinating to see how quick and dirty they're doing everything. It feels more like a steel foundry in inner Mongolia than a cutting edge rocket factory. Also in one episode autism musk gets a hug from a mexican welder which is very funny

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:11:18 UTC No. 16200965

>>16200963
no, human feces (treated) might work to remedy this though.
CAPTCHA: GAS0K

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:11:32 UTC No. 16200966

>>16200963
Without fertilizer? No.
Although getting chemical fertilizer on mars might be possible.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:12:21 UTC No. 16200967

>>16200961
some seething faggot who apparently works for NASA
very severe EDS

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:12:29 UTC No. 16200968

>>16200703
A repeat of last flight pretty much
>super heavy doesn't quite stick the landing
>starship burns up
Hopefully they'll at least maintain atitude control of starship in orbit and the first part of re-entry this time. Any predictions on the in-flight soundtrack? I enjoyed the jazzy elevator music last time.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:12:49 UTC No. 16200969

>>16200957
>expecting gracious honesty from muskrats

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:13:06 UTC No. 16200971

>>16200967
also a brony with very fucked up kids from his ex.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:13:43 UTC No. 16200973

>>16200963
No. Soil's dead, you have to fertilize it with nitrates harvested elsewhere, among other things.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:14:49 UTC No. 16200974

>>16200973
Where do you get nitrates on Mars?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:15:31 UTC No. 16200975

>>16200961
NASA employee who works on HLS and is known for calling out SpaceX bullshit, getting called a liar by everybody, and then getting totally vindicated 3+ months later when official sources confirm he was right. He's also a my little pony fan with a tragic family life.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:17:04 UTC No. 16200977

>>16200974
look it up
https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/nasas-curiosity-rover-finds-biologically-useful-nitrogen-on-mars/
All it had to do was heat up some sediment, it isn't hard.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:18:27 UTC No. 16200980

>>16200975
Examples of when he was right?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:18:33 UTC No. 16200981

>>16200957
he says a lot of things basically disagrees with everything SpaceX is trying to do
can you point out to something specific?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:21:05 UTC No. 16200986

>>16200974
>>16200960
Something like 0.1 to 1% of Martian soil contains nitrates. You'd have to have nitrate "combines" collecting huge amounts of Martian soil, then sifting and processing it with a huge energy input, something akin to how tar sands are processed in Alberta. You quickly run into a pyramid scheme where the crew required to process the nitrates is consuming more food (and hence, more fertilizer) than they're generating. And that's only one step in the process...

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:21:16 UTC No. 16200987

>>16200980
You must have amnesia or something?
>Starship real payload capacity is not 150T
>Ice in the tanks cased the IFT2 and 3 booster RUDs
>No resistance to loss of tiles

He was saying all these things months before they were common knowledge, he's unironically the best insider source.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:22:19 UTC No. 16200989

>more discussion about e celebs than the thread topic
such is the fate of all generals

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:22:37 UTC No. 16200990

>>16200981
Check his X, he has been arguing about burnthrough and loss of tile being fatal for the ship for a year straight, while everyone else said no

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:22:41 UTC No. 16200991

>>16200977
Well if all we have to do is bake some dirt and plant an orchard in it that's pretty promising imo.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:23:06 UTC No. 16200992

>>16200987
Never heard of this twittertard before this thread.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:23:21 UTC No. 16200993

>>16200986
source?
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-642-27833-4_5087-2
says that up to 25% of mars' original atmospheric nitrogen could be stored in cryolite on the surface.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:24:00 UTC No. 16200994

>>16200990
imo a lot of people on the nsf forums are agressive to anyone remotely critical of spacex

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:27:06 UTC No. 16200998

>>16200990
no, give me a direct source and people arguing against it
people here have not been saying the tiles are not required and burn through not being a problem (more that its not known if it is) but that the tile problems (which are problems yes) will be fixed one way or another, just like spacex fixes everything in the end through iteration

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:28:42 UTC No. 16201001

>>16200993
>source?
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/mystery-solved-mars-has-nitrates-180954769

>25% of mars' original atmospheric nitrogen
25% of "not very much" is "really not very much".

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:29:38 UTC No. 16201002

>>16200826
Funny, from what I've heard Jobs was also a sociopath, along with most successful CEOs.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:30:21 UTC No. 16201004

I have been saying that losing a dozen tiles is a literal non-issue. If Elon doesn't think this he is wrong.
-Stainless steel melting temperature and reentry temperature are about the same
-the steel behind a lost tile would be cooled through conduction to all the protected metal surrounding it
-the steel behind a lost tile would be cooled from the gas/liquid from behind it.
These factors make it so that the steel behind a lost tile doesn't reach it's melting point

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:32:36 UTC No. 16201006

>>16201004
if Musk is saying its a problem I would think they have made some simulations about it

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:32:51 UTC No. 16201007

>>16200861
Based but we got this info last week from that podcast he did

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:34:41 UTC No. 16201011

>>16201001
1% of all soil isn't bad, is it? Your claim doesn't follow your source.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:35:55 UTC No. 16201013

https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2020/july/pioneer-rocket-development

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:37:24 UTC No. 16201016

>>16199828
I just realized there is a future for expendable high energy rockets. Expendable firms like ULA should be pushing for Lagrangian point missions. Make it a matter of national security. Make brochures about how no one elses rockets can do these types of missions.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:39:29 UTC No. 16201018

>>16201016
Starship can do these, also heat tiles falling off are not a problem tranny.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:43:35 UTC No. 16201022

>>16201011
The usable petroleum of Alberta's tar sands ranges from 6 to 18%, and picrel is what that looks like in reality.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:46:13 UTC No. 16201025

>>16201016
What Lagrange point would you guys put a spin station in? If starship works it should be trivial

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:49:02 UTC No. 16201027

>>16200647
>So was all the slosh bullshit fake?
I've said it many times before, these retarded armchair wannabe engineers can barely throw a sim together (incorrectly) and run around acting like they just figured out why a multi-million dollar rocket failed. Stop giving them attention and they will go away. Its brain rot.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:49:06 UTC No. 16201028

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1796217867790110951

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:50:40 UTC No. 16201029

>>16201022
is this where nitrates come from

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:51:54 UTC No. 16201031

>>16201025
I would bury myself in the sandstones of Mars.

>>16201027
kinda agree with you there. Why do you think it failed though

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:52:04 UTC No. 16201032

>>16201025
EML-1 to house lunar elevator construction workers

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:52:25 UTC No. 16201034

>>16200919
fug that looks good
i'll make some webms when i get home if nobody it by then

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:54:19 UTC No. 16201035

>>16201034
you could post with sound on /wsg/ and link it here

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:54:36 UTC No. 16201036

>>16201025
L3 would be pretty isolating, moreso than being on Mars

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:56:26 UTC No. 16201038

>>16201022
Fair enough, I guess it's more challenging than I thought. I still don't think it's impossible though.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:58:09 UTC No. 16201040

>>16201031
>kinda agree with you there. Why do you think it failed though

SpaceX officially released a statement saying it was LOX filter/flow clogging by way of ice. Same happened in IFT-2. IFT-3 managed to get further before they had the same issue.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:05:25 UTC No. 16201043

>>16201040
What's the solution to the water-ice problem?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:08:41 UTC No. 16201046

>>16201043
Sometimes the best part is an actual part (that deals with the problem).

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:09:16 UTC No. 16201047

>>16201043
I don't really know anything about the problem, but I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that removing the atmosphere would solve this.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:14:22 UTC No. 16201049

>>16201043
>What's the solution to the water-ice problem?
I don't know enough about their current design to say what would be an effective solution. They seem to be on the right path from the differences between IFT-2 and IFT-3.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:17:38 UTC No. 16201050

>>16201043
It's not a problem and it's not actually real tranny. Show me ONE place where they say it's WATER ICE. the filters were 99% likely clogged by Methane. Not your fucking schizo claim with no proof but twitter

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:19:56 UTC No. 16201051

>>16201050
based debunker

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:20:32 UTC No. 16201052

>>16201050
Why would it get clogged with methane ice? I know they sub chill the prop but it's not that close to freezing is it?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:25:34 UTC No. 16201057

What would you do with this version of Starship

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:26:08 UTC No. 16201059

>still waiting on a launch license

What's next? A license to put toast in your own damn toaster?!

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:26:15 UTC No. 16201061

>>16201052
the burden of proof is on you to prove your absurd claim. its all based on EDS nonsense. SpaceX would never make a shitty decision like putting fucking WATER in th tanks.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:27:08 UTC No. 16201062

What's the solution to the jello baby problem?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:27:29 UTC No. 16201063

>>16201050
>Show me ONE place where they say it's WATER ICE.

>https://www.spacex.com/updates/
Fifth paragraph down:

>The most likely root cause for the early boostback burn shutdown was determined to be continued filter blockage where liquid oxygen is supplied to the engines, leading to a loss of inlet pressure in engine oxygen turbopumps. SpaceX implemented hardware changes ahead of Flight 3 to mitigate this issue, which resulted in the booster progressing to its first ever landing burn attempt. Super Heavy boosters for Flight 4 and beyond will get additional hardware inside oxygen tanks to further improve propellant filtration capabilities. And utilizing data gathered from Super Heavy’s first ever landing burn attempt, additional hardware and software changes are being implemented to increase startup reliability of the Raptor engines in landing conditions.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:27:35 UTC No. 16201064

>>16200963
Nope, as others have said there's a reason we distinguish between regolith and soils, that plus the regolith is very toxic, it's full of perchlorates.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:28:05 UTC No. 16201065

>>16201061
NTA schizo.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:28:06 UTC No. 16201066

>>16201061
they decided to put ice in the tanks so spacex isn't exactly wiser than a tree full of owls these days

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:28:21 UTC No. 16201067

>>16201062
spin stations

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:29:59 UTC No. 16201068

>>16201064
Any interesting resources we can extract from regolith?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:32:41 UTC No. 16201071

>>16201050
>the filters were 99% likely clogged by Methane
SX said it was in the LOX lines, not methane

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:35:44 UTC No. 16201075

So they need to dehumidify the tanks before filling them with cold propellants?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:36:26 UTC No. 16201076

>>16201004
Eh... I get the arguments but there's still some issues you're missing
>Steel doesn't have to melt to deform
>Discounting the pressure of the atmosphere on the ship during re-entry
>Fuel and Gas isn't spread uniformly throughout the ship
>Issues around over-pressurisation as fuel boils off
I'm sure a solution can be found within a few test flights but seeing a tiles fall off during launch and then seeing them crack away as the flaps actuate in space is a bit more immediate

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:37:16 UTC No. 16201078

>>16201071
LOX then you fucking idiot.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:38:37 UTC No. 16201080

how will they refuel a ship on orbit if they will have impurities in the fuel? the refuelled ship will be like a third ice by weight lol. I guess that solves the ISRU water problem because you can just bring it with you in the fuel.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:39:51 UTC No. 16201081

>>16201078
>LOX then you fucking idiot.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:40:18 UTC No. 16201083

>>16201078
That just doesn't seem possible. The freezing point of oxygen is 40 degrees lover than methane. Theres nothing on board cold enough to freeze oxygen.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:45:24 UTC No. 16201086

>>16201083
>Theres nothing on board cold enough to freeze oxygen.

I don't think it was frozen oxygen.
It was maybe impurities in the tank prior to fueling, or maybe the filters themselves failed and clogged the lines. They weren't too specific on exactly where or what clogged, only that it was in the filtration section of the LOX lines.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:47:49 UTC No. 16201090

>>16201004
it's your word against elon's, anon. i just don't know who to believe any more.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:48:43 UTC No. 16201093

>BE-4
>guzzles dirty natural gas straight out the russian pipeline
>doesn't clog
>Raptor
>fed pristine pure methane
>clogs up despite having big filters.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:52:32 UTC No. 16201101

>deranged muskrats coping as their house of cards collapses
you love to see it

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:53:50 UTC No. 16201103

Pretty shitty /sfg/ today. Have the IFT tourists shown up already?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:54:08 UTC No. 16201104

>>16201093
It's oxidizer not fuel purity thats the problem.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:55:54 UTC No. 16201108

>>16201093
Does the Vulcan rocket do a flip maneuver?

Legit I fear that the amounts of propellant in a Superheavy booster trying to flip is what is tearing up the insides of the rocket.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:56:52 UTC No. 16201110

>>16201062
>what's the solution to a problem that does not exist

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:02:28 UTC No. 16201117

>>16201108
high energy rockets don't need to flip. work smarter, not harder.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:04:29 UTC No. 16201122

>>16201117
>high energy
Mr Space told me that high energy is just a buzzword to cope with the fact that you have a shitty second stage.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:05:09 UTC No. 16201123

>>16201110
just show me mammals gestated and raised to adulthood in 0.38g and we can put the issue to bed. you can do that can't you?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:08:58 UTC No. 16201126

>>16201123
show me any animal gestating in space
protip: you can't

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:10:11 UTC No. 16201127

>>16201123
There is no evidence of jelly babies, or any evidence to refute it, because the tests have not been done.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:12:56 UTC No. 16201131

>>16201122
mr. space thinks that things other than specific impulse matter when you're measuring how good a rocket stage is. typical mistake made by low-energy minds.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:12:57 UTC No. 16201132

>>16201057
I would pop the bubble. I'd be wearing a ron paul 2020 shirt at the time so people get extra confused about why I did that

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:18:56 UTC No. 16201140

>>16201122
But the core of the Vulcan is the 2nd stage.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:20:21 UTC No. 16201142

>>16201140
throat my cock dickhead.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:26:49 UTC No. 16201149

best crew

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:29:03 UTC No. 16201154

>>16201142
Go dilate with your SRBs.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:46:30 UTC No. 16201169

>>16201132
Based chaos enjoyer

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:48:38 UTC No. 16201172

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:49:04 UTC No. 16201173

kek

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:49:56 UTC No. 16201179

Much like Musk, the Raptors on superheavy are failing because they are huffing their own farts (autogenous pressurisation system)

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:50:16 UTC No. 16201180

>>16201173
fucking tory bruno

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:51:09 UTC No. 16201184

>>16201173
what the fuck is he doing

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:51:40 UTC No. 16201185

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1796237599646073223

ok apparently it was bullshit, not sure why I thought otherwise
fuck WSJ

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:52:59 UTC No. 16201188

>>16201185
this happens all the time. WSJ or some other rag reported that he and Trump were discussing shit like a year ago too. turns out that they were just briefly in the same building. same with the Putin phone call etc

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:57:54 UTC No. 16201192

>>16201188
Musk was in a Trump advisory panel before. It's not that loco.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:00:22 UTC No. 16201197

>>16201173
Why is this creep looking at SpaceX scrubs and not his own rockets.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:00:34 UTC No. 16201198

https://x.com/AndyLapsa/status/1796211187396612430

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:01:24 UTC No. 16201200

>>16201185
and Starship is landing on Mars in 2020, just as Musk tweeted

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:02:25 UTC No. 16201202

>>16201198
the CEO of that company knows way more about rockets than Musk unironically.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:05:24 UTC No. 16201205

>>16201202
He had a lot of time to think about rockets at Blue Origin.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:06:10 UTC No. 16201206

>>16201198
If true, why wouldn't Musk just buy this guy out? Would be cheaper than three more big bombs

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:08:43 UTC No. 16201208

>>16201206
Does he want to sell? It hasn't been proven by the only real test. And Musk isn't gonna eat his hat anytime soon.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:11:46 UTC No. 16201210

>>16201198
>to the best of my knowledge
so he's confirming that rideshare missions HAVE lost money. Every time Musk qualifies a statement like this it means it's 100% a lie.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:14:35 UTC No. 16201212

>>16201210
you are a 5

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:19:34 UTC No. 16201220

>>16201212
your dad was a 5

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:21:17 UTC No. 16201222

>>16201198
Im telling you Stoke is going to eat up that niche of small payloads for the market, fully reusable rockets will absolutely thrive and it seems only SpaceX and Stoke are planning that.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:24:04 UTC No. 16201225

>>16201222
As I said this Lapsa dude knows his stuff. Too bad they're using hydrogen. their only miss-take.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:25:03 UTC No. 16201227

>>16201206
Stoke are planning reentry via the base of the vehicle not sideways. The tech wouldn't port over.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:26:15 UTC No. 16201228

>>16201227
Doesn't matter. Starship could be doing the same thing.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:29:33 UTC No. 16201230

>>16201228
You'd have to redesign Starship from scratch, not happening unless tiles prove completely unworkable

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:30:53 UTC No. 16201231

>>16201230
disagree.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:32:37 UTC No. 16201233

>>16201220
incorrect

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:35:25 UTC No. 16201235

>>16200961
A guy who works at Marshall, gets to see what SpaceX tells NASA and uses that to try and present his personal wishes and mind reading as insider info.

He has severe EDS and as SLS is Marshall's baby Starship is a direct threat to his job.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:35:29 UTC No. 16201236

Aren't tiles one of the few things that have barely changed on starship after all these years? I wonder if they want to test reentry first because of that.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:37:20 UTC No. 16201241

It's already all these years. It's over.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:43:20 UTC No. 16201249

>>16201117
>work smarter, not harder

Like figuring out how to land a sustainer core rocket?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:47:57 UTC No. 16201255

What's the temperature of the top of Starship during re-entry? Could they just have some cheapo metal tubes looping around under the skin pumping fluid around or something?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:52:06 UTC No. 16201259

So skyhook anon was right all along wtf

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:57:36 UTC No. 16201264

>>16201255
the real answer is nobody knows because we don't know the exact attitude starship's going to be holding and we don't know the exact descent angle it's going to be coming in at. i think a good guess is 1350K on the nose itself and 1600K on the winglets.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:58:50 UTC No. 16201266

>>16201259
Redditor

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:01:09 UTC No. 16201269

>>16201230
honestly tiles ARE unworkable for Mars entry. Peak heating higher than the tile melting temp

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:02:34 UTC No. 16201272

>>16201236
Your dad has barely changed. He always bounces on my cock.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:02:45 UTC No. 16201273

>>16201269
but your velocity for mars entry on an interplanetary trajectory on earth is still lower than your reentry velocity from LEO

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:06:40 UTC No. 16201279

>>16201273
how can entry from completely outside Earths well be less energetic than that from 3/4 out of said well?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:06:54 UTC No. 16201280

>>16201273
What I mean is return heating

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:07:23 UTC No. 16201281

>>16201279
>>16201280
well then that's easy, just don't come back from mars

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:09:08 UTC No. 16201283

>>16201281
It also applies to return from the moon, so dearmoon aint happening unless they get a new thermal protection system.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:10:35 UTC No. 16201285

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:16:12 UTC No. 16201294

>>16200987
>Starship real payload capacity is not 150T

He thought Starship's LEO capacity will be 80 tons, not that flight 3's dev ship/booster had a payload caoacity 40-50 tons

>Ice in the tanks cased the IFT2 and 3 booster RUDs

Ice in the tanks from preburner tapoff was something NSF forum first came up with.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:19:32 UTC No. 16201299

>>16200676
she's never coming back, bro

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:27:00 UTC No. 16201312

>>16200710
shut up, kid

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:33:14 UTC No. 16201319

>>16201312
While you've admitted that could you tell me your thoughts on Starship? I have a working hypothesis about the opinions of certain age ranges

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:41:11 UTC No. 16201327

>>16201319
I think it's worse than Shuttle.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:49:19 UTC No. 16201344

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:49:56 UTC No. 16201346

BO barge found: https://x.com/SpaceOffshore/status/1796263272464703916

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:51:13 UTC No. 16201350

>>16201346
catchy name.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:53:16 UTC No. 16201356

>>16201346
I for one am glad they didn’t name it in the same vein as spacex barges or rocketlab missions

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:54:13 UTC No. 16201357

you all talking about an Elon-Trump alliance as if Trump might not go to prison soon.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:55:49 UTC No. 16201362

>>16201350
Yeah... they had at least tried for the first one, but it ended scrapped. Or maybe they're waiting to be sure they will use this one before giving it a better name.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:56:19 UTC No. 16201363

>>16201357
A conviction will guarantee his victory.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:57:35 UTC No. 16201369

>jury reached verdict
It's happening

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:59:19 UTC No. 16201374

>>16200955
mining is scaleable, one guy with a pickaxe is mining, as are the small cities harvesting gigatons of ore and everything in between

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:02:36 UTC No. 16201381

>>16201369
>>16201363
>politics
I find it difficult to care

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:04:40 UTC No. 16201386

>>16201369
On fucking what, and it better be about spaceflight

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:04:43 UTC No. 16201388

>>16200974
oswald process or whatever on the leftover atmosphere after you've frozen out the carbon dioxide

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:05:23 UTC No. 16201390

>>16201386
Musk is going to jail and spacex getting nationalised

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:06:02 UTC No. 16201391

>>16201346
that is gay

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:07:55 UTC No. 16201400

>>16201346
>not even a decent name
How long will this thing be waiting for New Glenn? I'm betting 5 years.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:10:35 UTC No. 16201408

>>16201400
It will be scrapped, they will start building tower soon.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:12:18 UTC No. 16201415

VTHL
bellyflop maneuver sans flip

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:17:21 UTC No. 16201425

https://x.com/AndyLapsa/status/1796221709344997581

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:20:38 UTC No. 16201433

>>16201319
I'm a big fan, but it needs to go orbital ASAP. It's way behind schedule for getting to mars.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:20:51 UTC No. 16201434

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:21:01 UTC No. 16201435

>>16201068
K, Na, MG and Cl. Good if you can draw out the perchlorates and extract water for ISRU agriculture, but not as impressive as what's on the moon

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:24:34 UTC No. 16201443

>>16201435
what's on the moon?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:28:53 UTC No. 16201447

is Biden going to go all in on destroying Elon if Trump goes to prison? Will the JPL anti SpaceX lobby finally defeat their mortal enemy?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:31:24 UTC No. 16201451

>>16201443
A fuckton of Al oxides and He-3, would make the moon a really important depot for Methalox/ Fusion

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:32:04 UTC No. 16201453

>>16201447
its not like he hasn't been trying already

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:35:32 UTC No. 16201457

>>16201425
BASED BASED BASED

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:36:43 UTC No. 16201460

>>16200296
>as the secondary containment material will probably not survive
if it was woven out of asbestos it would, asbestos needs to be brought back to spacecraft

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:37:27 UTC No. 16201462

https://x.com/vast/status/1796284451447824865
Vast is ALL IN on their Haven-1 plan to get that NASA contract.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:38:27 UTC No. 16201466

>>16201447
Biden literally does not care about spaceX or elon. Space means almost nothing to 99% of politicians and even less to voters.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:41:32 UTC No. 16201473

>>16201462
That guy looks like a great hire for them

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:43:52 UTC No. 16201478

>>16201462
Do Bigelowbros approve of the hire?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:46:58 UTC No. 16201487

>>16201425
Avoiding active cooling for the heatshield will be up there with avoiding regenerative cooling as SpaceX's greatest mistakes.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:47:48 UTC No. 16201490

>>16201447
SpaceX is a key element of the Artemis program and an invaluable US launch provider

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:49:43 UTC No. 16201494

>>16200683
You mean like water?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:52:05 UTC No. 16201498

>>16201453
>doesn’t invite tesla to some stupid American electric automaker cocktail party
>“bros there is a target on Elon Musk’s back and the biden administration has its finger on the trigger !!1!1!!one!!”

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:52:12 UTC No. 16201499

the results of my scientific investigation on the viktor toth calculator today:
for a hawking radiation drive with a TWR of 1:1 you need a black hole with a mass of about 74 tons. it would have a radius ten million times smaller than a proton, a temperature of 1.7 quintillion degrees, and be 0.02% as bright as the sun.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:53:24 UTC No. 16201500

>>16201451
>He-3 mining

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:54:19 UTC No. 16201502

>>16201499
nobody cares idiot.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:55:13 UTC No. 16201506

>>16201498
no, its the constant lawfare of bullshit investigations

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:55:46 UTC No. 16201508

>>16201415
Vertical takeoff hard landing

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:56:30 UTC No. 16201510

>>16201502
sorry, i'll just post my political opinions from now on instead

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:57:37 UTC No. 16201511

Trust the plan

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:57:38 UTC No. 16201512

>>16201510
ignore the seether, he is trying to derail these threads
he has been at this for months now

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:00:24 UTC No. 16201517

>>16201499
Pop sci but its btfoing a pop sci drive so this type of pop sci discussion is okay. Good work in countering the brainrot anon.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:00:49 UTC No. 16201519

>>16201500
>OH NO, NOT THE HECKIN BUZZWORDS

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:01:08 UTC No. 16201520

What are the spaceflightictious consequences of the novel Trump criminal conviction?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:02:09 UTC No. 16201522

>>16201499
wish I could understand any of that

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:04:08 UTC No. 16201526

>>16201520
probably makes it more likely for him to get elected, might make spaceflight regulations less retarded idk
countering china in spaceflight, getting the credit for landing people on the moon again etc might interest trump

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:05:18 UTC No. 16201528

>>16201520
Go back to reggit r/The_Donald rapefugee

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:06:08 UTC No. 16201529

>>16201519
> brochure from conmen
very persuasive!

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:11:17 UTC No. 16201536

>>16201259
his stupid obsession would never work, not because the idea is unsound, but because it's harder and more dangerous than just sitting on a bomb

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:11:42 UTC No. 16201539

>>16201519
we're going to have working D-T reactors long before we have working D-He3 reactors with the way things are progressing right now. any case for why we'd want to harvest He3 in space would need to explain how D-He3 is so much better than D-T that you're going to spend billions developing a new reactor type and spend even more billions obtaining the He3 and still come out ahead for it. your pdf appears to address this problem by completely ignoring it.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:12:36 UTC No. 16201541

>>16201319
it's going to kill us all and I'm here for that
better than dying on this rock

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:16:16 UTC No. 16201547

>>16201522
black holes radiate energy slowly, which causes them to lose mass slowly
this process accelerates as they get smaller until they reach only a few tons at which point they pop
you can feed them mass to keep them at a consistent size and thus a consistent output

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:20:06 UTC No. 16201553

>>16201498
>doesn’t invite tesla to some stupid American electric automaker cocktail party

A reminder that Tesla sells more EV than the UAW companies that Biden was pandering to do combined.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:21:23 UTC No. 16201556

>>16201490
Biden will cancel the contract or force Elon to sell SpaceX to one of Biden's buddies

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:28:49 UTC No. 16201563

>>16201539
the only real use for aneutronic fusion is spaceflight where it saves you radiation shielding

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:37:06 UTC No. 16201568

Hey anon, I want you to fuck me!

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:38:15 UTC No. 16201571

damn its so over lol. If they used pica-X which is actually necessary for Mars, then it would eat half the payload.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54012-0#Sec11

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:42:13 UTC No. 16201580

>>16201563
and even then he3 may not be your best bet...

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:45:38 UTC No. 16201587

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:48:32 UTC No. 16201594

>>16201571
>nature
Shut up retard

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:48:35 UTC No. 16201595

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:52:29 UTC No. 16201597

https://youtu.be/cjgBsZyPnBQ?si=AVh6FyG7zXWQqYEu&t=779

New Cosmic Perspective

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:58:08 UTC No. 16201608

>>16201597
who

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:00:51 UTC No. 16201615

>>16201447
If he attempts anything the DoD will step in at this point. The admins are faggots but the war guys have realized what an asset SpaceX is

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:08:23 UTC No. 16201621

What is the launch window for IFT-4? Morning?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:14:45 UTC No. 16201629

>>16201597
YES

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:16:10 UTC No. 16201632

>>16201547
>you can feed them mass
no you can't. explain exactly how you get any mass into an event horizon "millions of times smaller than a proton" let alone tons per second

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:18:06 UTC No. 16201633

>>16201632
Just put electrons in there like a battery numbnuts.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:20:42 UTC No. 16201636

https://twitter.com/NASAArtemis/status/1796284487879340112
>Welcome to the Artemis Accords, Slovakia
>By signing the Artemis Accords, Slovakia has become the 42nd nation to commit to the peaceful and safe exploration of space.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:21:37 UTC No. 16201637

>>16201615
MIC support is a double edged sword.
Sure, they're always looking for an advantage, but they really don't like gambling with the big assets.
They have their cheap launches and satellite constellations now. Who cares about some pie-in-the-sky moon bases?
Better to install some puppet who will maintain the status quo than continue to bet on a wildcard who may crash his company on a dream.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:21:55 UTC No. 16201638

>>16201636
>peaceful and safe
gayyyyyyyy

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:23:29 UTC No. 16201639

>>16201632
Very carefully

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:26:00 UTC No. 16201642

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:31:58 UTC No. 16201645

>>16201642
Whyis zubrin such a crack head with impossible contraptions? He's like a science fiction author

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:35:12 UTC No. 16201646

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:38:07 UTC No. 16201647

>>16201646
All I see is some sort of wild chastity belt.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:40:53 UTC No. 16201648

>>16201645
combining ntr and ISRU isn't insane

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:41:53 UTC No. 16201649

>>16201646
up through 1970 technical documents were always really autistic about distinguishing between plug nozzles and TRUE aerospikes and after that i think everyone stopped giving a shit until stoke brought it back

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:43:39 UTC No. 16201653

it's so dead nobody cares that ift4 is near

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:43:51 UTC No. 16201654

>>16201647
>>16201646
Child-bearing hips on that flame

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:44:36 UTC No. 16201656

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:45:21 UTC No. 16201657

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:47:22 UTC No. 16201659

I'm glad it collapsed

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:50:24 UTC No. 16201662

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 23:59:40 UTC No. 16201669

>>16201659
>aliens receive this
>er, the fuck is this blorpkof?
>idk send a relativistic missile at the source just in case

Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 00:00:28 UTC No. 16201670

>>16201653
NOBODY CARES (its actually true)

Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 00:11:58 UTC No. 16201680

>>16201656
glorious!

Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 00:14:17 UTC No. 16201686

>>16201662
As much as I love this stuff, the idea of sitting in one of these is fucking horrifying. The amount of energy involved is so far beyond anything that ever evolved it's absurd