Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:27:40 UTC No. 16204366

>You're bleeding, but not as bad!
Imagine if this was your doctor.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:28:40 UTC No. 16204371

very funny but you're early

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:29:20 UTC No. 16204376

really? a page 8 stage. I wouldn't have even blinked if you made a launch thread, but a new sfg?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:30:53 UTC No. 16204382

>>16204376
yeah, he should delete this and make a launch thread instead

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:32:40 UTC No. 16204388

WE GAAN?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:43:19 UTC No. 16204415

OP is a dumb fag

sage at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:52:31 UTC No. 16204441

Reminder to report for spamming/flooding and to submit moderation feedback about the /sci/ tranitor not doing what hes paid to.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:52:34 UTC No. 16204443

>gets scammed

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:02:39 UTC No. 16204472

I'd still fly starliner over spacex, get fucked, spacex shills

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:02:43 UTC No. 16204473

Everyone from the future welcome to the thread about the Starliner disaster

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:02:51 UTC No. 16204474

>>16204387
>>16204381
With what hardware? What agency is going to end up paying for that?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:04:53 UTC No. 16204482

>>16204472
>9 successful cargo missions
>12 successful crew missions
>46 people sent to orbit
and you'd rather fly with the company run by accountants

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:04:57 UTC No. 16204483

>>16204473
Nice try Elon, hows Shit ship going, Mars by 2019 am I right

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:05:58 UTC No. 16204488

>>16204482
still no Mars

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:08:27 UTC No. 16204498

Can we get a sticky?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:08:39 UTC No. 16204501

If Boeing or SpaceX kills some of NASA's astronauts, are they responsible for compensating NASA for the training costs?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:09:52 UTC No. 16204504

>>16204501
damn those suits make them look like tweedledee and tweedledum

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:11:43 UTC No. 16204510

IF I WERE BUTCH I WOULD START SCREAMING AS LOUD AS I CAN, ITS THE ONLY WAY HE CAN SAVE HIMSELF.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:14:45 UTC No. 16204521

>>16204504
small indie aerospace company, only can launch wee little people, pls understand

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:20:37 UTC No. 16204540

go

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:20:39 UTC No. 16204541

>spacecraft isn't spacex
>rocket isn't spacex
Fucking based

I hate Melon Husk so much it's unreal

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:22:20 UTC No. 16204550

>>16204541
You drink too much onions today dude? Having a little basedlant overload are we?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:23:07 UTC No. 16204560

where is the starliner going tho

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:23:23 UTC No. 16204563

>>16204550
He's an idiot who treats his workers terribly

He's despicable

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:23:29 UTC No. 16204566

If this was a Falcon 9 there wouldn't be a hold rn lmfaooo

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:23:31 UTC No. 16204567

HOLD HOLD HOLD

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:23:49 UTC No. 16204571

This is a Boeing? RIP the crew

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:23:52 UTC No. 16204572

>>16204541
>doesn't go to space
go figure

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:24:01 UTC No. 16204574

>>16204563
which workers exactly

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:24:26 UTC No. 16204578

>>16204571
Don't worry. They'll be fine.
They're not going anywhere after all.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:24:28 UTC No. 16204579

Owari da...

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:24:50 UTC No. 16204584

If it's Boeing, I ain't going.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:25:22 UTC No. 16204587

>>16204572
It'll get there

>>16204574
Twitter workers for example

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:25:38 UTC No. 16204590

Airbus would have made it to the ISS by now

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:25:43 UTC No. 16204592

it's cloudy so I can't see it from my window :(

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:26:14 UTC No. 16204596

>>16204541
at least spacex 's rockets can leave the launchpad lmao

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:27:22 UTC No. 16204603

WHY THE FUCK ARE THEY USING BOEING AND NOT SPACEX?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:27:29 UTC No. 16204605

Scrubliner or Failliner?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:27:55 UTC No. 16204607

Test

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:28:01 UTC No. 16204608

>>16204603
politics and bribes

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:28:04 UTC No. 16204609

>>16204587
You mean the thousands of HR roasties who sat around and did nothing all day that elon purged and got the staff down to pretty much a single room of guys and the entire site was running fine?
those poor workers? lmfaooo

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:28:05 UTC No. 16204610

How is Boeing not bankrupt by now?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:28:32 UTC No. 16204615

>>16204610
Too big to fail.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:28:36 UTC No. 16204616

why is the crew arm moving back to the capsule

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:28:42 UTC No. 16204617

>>16204603
SpaceX is run by a foreigner Chud. Boeing is a patriotic American company.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:28:47 UTC No. 16204618

>>16204603
they are legally obligated to use boeing 5 times

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:28:59 UTC No. 16204619

>>16204616
It's Over.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:29:14 UTC No. 16204622

>>16204616
its over if you haven't heard....

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:29:19 UTC No. 16204624

Show's over everyone go home

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:29:32 UTC No. 16204626

>scrubliner

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:29:34 UTC No. 16204627

>>16204616
Because it's Boeing and noone's going.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:29:43 UTC No. 16204628

>>16204605
Pantyliner

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:30:24 UTC No. 16204631

LOL, the door wasn't fully sealed.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:30:41 UTC No. 16204632

>scrubliner

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:30:43 UTC No. 16204633

>>16204618
Does a scrub count as a usage?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:30:59 UTC No. 16204635

>>16204628
It does look like a skinny dildo

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:31:16 UTC No. 16204637

dude looks nervous as fuck. Honestly don't blame him

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:31:25 UTC No. 16204639

>>16204633
lol no.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:31:42 UTC No. 16204641

>>16204633
Yes. That'll be $99 billion, plus tip.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:32:26 UTC No. 16204643

>>16204633
I don't think so! Boeing was not expecting actual competition so I think at this point they're hoping Starliner gets cancelled and they aren't on the hook for anything

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:33:13 UTC No. 16204650

SCRUB CONFIRMED IT'S FUCKING JOEVER

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:33:31 UTC No. 16204652

the absolute state

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:34:39 UTC No. 16204659

FUCKING PAJEET CODERS

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:34:47 UTC No. 16204661

What do you mean "it's not understood" bruh does the computer just do things?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:34:51 UTC No. 16204662

Indian coders strike again

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:35:19 UTC No. 16204665

fucking embarrassing

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:35:55 UTC No. 16204668

ok it's over fair-weather /sci/ tourists, you can go back now

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:36:10 UTC No. 16204669

SCRUBBED
C
R
U
B
B
E
D

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:37:28 UTC No. 16204679

>+++Launch abort sirss.++++
>+++You did not the needful machine spirits sirs+++

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:38:16 UTC No. 16204682

Boeing, we don't want no scrubs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrLequ6dUdM

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:38:52 UTC No. 16204688

>>16204596
Boeing will get there

>>16204609
>the entire site was running fine
Twitter had many problems after he fired tons of engineers. It's taken nearly a year for twitter.com to be changed to x.com.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:39:25 UTC No. 16204690

Maybe tomorrow, maybe not

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W-Xp4GkuyU

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:41:50 UTC No. 16204696

Are they still using jeet programmers after that disastrous test flight?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:41:55 UTC No. 16204697

dreamchaser > starliner

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:44:09 UTC No. 16204709

Reminder that IFT-4 has been delayed to the 6th with the 7th as a backup date.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:44:17 UTC No. 16204710

>>16204688
>Twitter had many problems after he fired tons of engineers
Good. The only true justice that could come to twitter is if its founders and employees were shot in a ditch and all their servers sold for scrap

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:45:04 UTC No. 16204714

Is there stats and reliable data on how indians fucked up the company ?
Also, why can't Boeing throw the towel at this point?
>>16204697
the dreamchaser is cute

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:47:00 UTC No. 16204722

>>16204560
back to the integration building

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:47:08 UTC No. 16204724

>>16204714
Boeing isn't known for giving up government money easily.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:50:15 UTC No. 16204739

>>16204714
>the dreamchaser is cute
I hope Dreamchaser starts working launching with SpaceX

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:53:13 UTC No. 16204748

>jeet code kills hundreds in boing planes and delays space program a decade

India super power 2030

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:56:01 UTC No. 16204755

whats the record for number of scrubs before a manned launch?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:56:47 UTC No. 16204758

>>16204748
More like american greed and QC. They are outsourcing the most important things for a reason. Seriously Made in USA is becoming new Made in China.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:58:22 UTC No. 16204763

>>16204748
friendly reminder that everything you see built was constructed by the lowest bidder at the cheapest possible cost with the most corners cut possible

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:02:02 UTC No. 16204781

>>16204763
In theory, yes. In reality MIC is full of collusion to make everyone fat off of government dollars.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:03:51 UTC No. 16204783

>>16204362
I prayed and they didn't die.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:03:57 UTC No. 16204784

>>16204758
China stays winning

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:15:11 UTC No. 16204817

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:15:14 UTC No. 16204818

Agenda free is covering it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvjB8fOgMuw

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:24:10 UTC No. 16204845

>>16204818
>Agenda free
>Clearly has an agenda

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:24:15 UTC No. 16204846

>>16204818
Good to see conservative media spreading space enthusiam

sage at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:34:48 UTC No. 16204866

Another reminder to anons that just got here this afternoon to report for spamming/flooding and to submit moderation feedback about the /sci/ tranitor not doing what hes paid to. We stage at page 10 and that will continue to happen with the other thread since this one was page 8.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:36:06 UTC No. 16204868

>>16204866
autism

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:37:08 UTC No. 16204869

>>16204866
>this afternoon
German autist detected

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:38:45 UTC No. 16204873

>>16204869
Not necessarily. Could be an east coast fag.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:40:02 UTC No. 16204874

>>16204866
>the /sci/ tranitor not doing what hes paid to
qrd?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:44:25 UTC No. 16204881

The crew will live for another day.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:49:34 UTC No. 16204888

What's the worst-case scenario for Starliner?

>Launches and has a failure mid-flight
>Escape capsule detaches while rocket blows up
>Crew's necks got broken from the g-forces of the escape capsule detaching
>Capsule lands in the ocean and fails to float

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:49:45 UTC No. 16204890

I just woke up, did Boeing finally BTFO spaceX's trash launcher?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:49:55 UTC No. 16204891

>try to see exactly what went wr... uhhh what happened with the ground launch sequencer today
lol

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:51:13 UTC No. 16204892

>>16204890
what do you honestly think

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:51:29 UTC No. 16204893

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:52:28 UTC No. 16204894

>>16204888
probably rapid depressurization in orbit while connected to the ISS, or with crew during its coast
or, some hilarious issue where its reaction control activates randomly connected to ISS, and sends it on another uncontrolled spin

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:53:34 UTC No. 16204896

>>16204890
Yes, it is now flying to the Moon at warp speed.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:09:52 UTC No. 16204907

IF IT'S BOEING IT AIN'T GOING

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:11:36 UTC No. 16204910

Who else is praying for complete airframe loss with multiple fatalities to further destroy bo(dei)ng and NASA's reputations?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:14:42 UTC No. 16204911

>>16204910
I want Boeing to get what it has coming for it, but I don't want innocent people to die for that. Yes, I understand that these wishes might be incompatible.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:15:13 UTC No. 16204912

>>16204910
I do not pray for the deaths of the astronauts, and I do not want american spaceflight to suffer.
if boeing needs to be punished the punishment should be multiple flight failures leading to an early abort but the crew makes it out alive

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:18:45 UTC No. 16204916

>>16204894
Speaking of that, it's amazing that Russia didn't kill any astronaut recently

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:22:10 UTC No. 16204920

>>16204910
I value Clear's happiness above all else. Starliner can delay, Boeing can face consequences (eventually), more scrubs may occur, but I still hope for a successful launch.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:24:32 UTC No. 16204922

>>16204501
But why are they sending Baba Yaga to ISS?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:25:04 UTC No. 16204923

>>16204920
least parasocial vtuber fan
>me btw

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:22:55 UTC No. 16204996

>now targeting June 6
Hope it gets pushed to the 8th. I'm sorry, but I don't have any PTO left and I need to see this.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:28:40 UTC No. 16205007

>>16204996
just watch it at work?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:30:02 UTC No. 16205009

>cant build a working plane
>anyone that exposes you gets whack'd
>scrubs all your space launches
>gets government money either ways
>stonk just goes up cause fuck it

Is boeing the most comfy place to work at? For real it must be comfy as hell to work for boeing. Where is the paid shill position? I'd like to apply.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:33:12 UTC No. 16205017

>>16205009
it's not as comfy as you think anon, the guilt from the product you're pushing out the door can be fucking soul-crushing. The salary does help blunt that a bit though

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:33:46 UTC No. 16205019

>>16205009
It's only comfy if you are a big wig, everyone else has people above them screaming at them to cut costs. Pretty sure they don't pay shills either judging by comment sections.

>ywn order a corporate hitman to poison a whistleblower with ricin and pay the press to write it off as an accident

Why even live

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:34:22 UTC No. 16205020

>>16205007
Nightshift. I'm asleep during the launches.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:36:09 UTC No. 16205024

>>16205020
Just set an alarm nigger fuck

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:40:32 UTC No. 16205033

>>16205009
The reasons are a little complicated for this thread but Boeing might be toast within the decade. Look up Jack Welch, GE, and the current CEO Dave Calhoun who is stepping down later this year. You can squeeze the machine for the line to go up, but eventually the machine just stops working and no amount of intervention can change it. If I was involved with them whatsoever I would immediately figure something else out

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:41:31 UTC No. 16205034

I remember back in 2020 or 2021 I had to go to the doctor and "missed" the starliner scrub. They still haven't managed to launch this thing.
Look at how much spacex accomplished in the meantime.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:43:37 UTC No. 16205037

>>16205024
Uh, no. Once I'm awake I stay awake, and I can't have that, as I need by full beauty sleep. Sorry, but everyone's schedule has to revolve around my convenience. :)

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:44:06 UTC No. 16205042

PATHOLOGICAL LIAR

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:45:34 UTC No. 16205045

>>16205042
He isn't lying, that was the goal. SpaceX sets unreasonable timelines, that's why they're ahead of everyone else

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:47:03 UTC No. 16205048

>>16205037
Ok miss the launch then

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:47:20 UTC No. 16205049

Imagine how big of a solar sail you could get into space with starship.
1% light speed could be within reach.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:49:10 UTC No. 16205053

>>16205049
Use gravity assists too.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:50:48 UTC No. 16205054

>>16205049
Forget a solar sail, the Starship fleet as planned could be like 2,000,000 tons to LEO per year. Imagine the propulsion systems you can build and test in space

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:52:21 UTC No. 16205056

We've all dream of it, but Musk is throwing out ideas now

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:53:16 UTC No. 16205060

>>16205017
>guilt
shit all the big dogs in this world are pretty bad. Being a sci nerd gets you nowhere in this upside down world.

>>16205033
I'm sure they can squeeze the machine more for decades to come.
>GE
They're still doing well despite selling out to china. Whats stopping boeing from having china build 737s and these no launch rockets. Imagine the profit margin on temu shipped commercial planes.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:57:06 UTC No. 16205065

>>16205056
>jewish space lasers will be a real thing in your lifetime
it's a strange feel

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:59:31 UTC No. 16205070

>>16205033
> reasons are a little complicated
what are you implying

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:02:06 UTC No. 16205073

>>16205033
/sfg/ is one of the most autistic places on 4chan and several of us have industry experience. Please do go into detail.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:03:57 UTC No. 16205077

>>16204362
China's new 500t multifuel double test stand
https://weibo.com/5658451754/OgP2l3BlZ

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:09:33 UTC No. 16205089

>>16205033
But... who will buy ULA then... what about Vulcan-chan

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:12:25 UTC No. 16205095

>>16205089
Boeing being hard up for cash is the reason that ULA is even been considered for sale in the first place. At this point it looks like the buyer will either be Blue Origin or some MIC-minded venture capital cancer.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:18:31 UTC No. 16205103

>>16205070
This is /sfg/ and not /biz/ is all
>>16205073
It doesn't matter how good your engineers are if your company is run by overpaid accountants. The leadership has been focused on maximizing shareholder value quarter by quarter, which means there is no long-term planning at all. Internally they scramble to move the right numbers around at the end of every quarter without caring that it'll negatively effect even the next one. It's a $100bil ship being steered by people who literally are not thinking beyond August right now. They will sell a vital part of their business to make a quarter look better, like cutting off your own finger because you got hungry. This strategy works with some businesses well enough, but you can't trick an excel spreadsheet into making an airplane stay in the sky.
Starliner is a good example of their business practices. If SpaceX didn't exist NASA would've been forced to keep funneling them money, paying them more for delaying. Obviously this did not go as planned for them, and the money they made already is all they're getting. Now Starliner will never fly, because putting adequate resources towards it would hurt their quarter.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:18:33 UTC No. 16205104

China needs to take things up a notch from here if they intend to launch 100 times this year.

A new launch complex will open and a bunch of new model rockets are supposed to enter "high density launch mode" in H2; perhaps that will let them hit 100.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:22:15 UTC No. 16205110

Scrubliner gonna scrub

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:22:21 UTC No. 16205111

>>16205103
hasn't that been the case for boeing for a few decades now? Run by MBAs and not engineers which means they can squeeze a bit more money out of the current lineup of products but on the long term (which is now) problems start to crop up everywhere

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:23:32 UTC No. 16205112

Starshield

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:25:27 UTC No. 16205114

>>16205112
In one xeet, elon confirms they are already deploying utility scale space based solar with directed beam lasers that can kill drones with precision. starshield was just launched weeks before the hawaii fire. infrared lasers. that's why they leave all blue colored homes

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:27:30 UTC No. 16205119

>>16205114
Meds now

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:28:44 UTC No. 16205120

>>16205111
Yes, but it works for a few decades. Eventually everything starts to collapse and there's no financial instrument that can stop it, because the problem isn't with the spreadsheets anymore, you just don't have a functional business. All the actual material was gutted for the share price. There are some signs of that happening.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:29:08 UTC No. 16205121

>>16205114
you some kind of newfag? this has been /sfg/ common knowledge for ages

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:30:52 UTC No. 16205125

>>16205119
eyes wide shut but ok
>>16205121
i've never seen it, but the dots are all connected now

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:33:51 UTC No. 16205127

>>16205104
>The leadership has been focused on maximizing shareholder value quarter by quarter, which means there is no long-term planning at all. Internally they scramble to move the right numbers around at the end of every quarter without caring that it'll negatively effect even the next one.
not unlike soviet plant managers scrambling to meet production quotas at the end of the month.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:35:48 UTC No. 16205130

>>16205009
Nah they churn out the older (more expensive) engineers

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:38:27 UTC No. 16205133

>>16205056
Anduril's drones that smash into other drones seems more viable desu

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:41:37 UTC No. 16205140

>>16205127
It is extremely bizarre that the free market lead to the same problems. The harvard business school just destroys companies. Boeing in particular is so far from the free market at this point that you could probably find a few soviet comparisons

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:41:57 UTC No. 16205142

>>16205133
It is, if we're strictly speaking drones. Musk is just playing with the grander concept of the popular space lasers destroying weapons concept

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:43:05 UTC No. 16205144

>yell cringey corny patriotic speech
>countdown hold not few seconds later

still the funniest part of the whole thing

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:44:22 UTC No. 16205146

>>16205140
>>16205127
The stories aren't the whole picture. Its A perspective, but thats it.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:44:32 UTC No. 16205147

>>16205144
>go ULA, go Boeing, go NASA, this is a great day to be Americ- ACK!

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:51:37 UTC No. 16205156

>>16205133
That's a cool name for a defence contractor, also would be cool to see what collaborative AI drones could do on a big enough probe

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:59:34 UTC No. 16205161

>>16205156
>That's a cool name for a defence contractor

It's not, Tolkien is shitting in his grave that they are stealing his IP to make autonomous murder weapons.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:01:52 UTC No. 16205164

>>16205161
Yeah its like way to miss the point, but I guess they're more inspired by the LOTR films than the books/author so w/e

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:05:39 UTC No. 16205169

So wenhop?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:12:17 UTC No. 16205173

I have no problem with launch holds when they actually fix the issue. Like if this is really just a bad ground computer then fix it and be done. Great, the system did what it should! Annoys me when the ignore or don't fix a problem like the helium leak. What's the point with all this fancy modern equipment and sensors if you don't use them?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:26:07 UTC No. 16205182

https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1797016048727970072

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:28:35 UTC No. 16205185

https://x.com/FAANews/status/1796980084454089188

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:29:26 UTC No. 16205186

>>16205182
Corpo speak for they have no idea what the problem is

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:30:22 UTC No. 16205187

>>16205186
"We can't find our asses if we use both hands" is how I read it, but much to the same effect.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:31:49 UTC No. 16205188

>>16205185
belongs in the tranny thread

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:43:45 UTC No. 16205197

>>16205182
yep, Boeing is fucked

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:46:23 UTC No. 16205201

Get well soon CSS!

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:53:44 UTC No. 16205206

>>16205201
>the studio
lmao this nigger really be trying to convince people he mattters so much he has a studio for his schizobabble

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 21:53:57 UTC No. 16205207

>>16205201
vaxxed?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:00:26 UTC No. 16205213

>>16205207
He does look allot like Pol doesnt he.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:02:29 UTC No. 16205215

>>16205213
>>16205207
Also this is wrong they didnt even kill Pol Pot, he lived his entire natural life out until the late 90s when he died sleeping in his home. Never punished other than being ousted from power, he walked free. I wonder if Mars or some other colony will have a similar bloody revolution at some point.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:04:30 UTC No. 16205219

>>16205207
Why does elon look kinda asian?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:06:02 UTC No. 16205220

https://x.com/ulalaunch/status/1797020004723892498

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:07:42 UTC No. 16205222

>>16205215
artificial biospheres can't take many bullets or bombs so neuralink hiveminds will win out

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:09:19 UTC No. 16205224

>>16205206
And always refers to hismelf as 'we' to give the illusion that it's a team and not one dunning kruger clown

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:11:24 UTC No. 16205227

why are they suddenly so worried about le heat tiles at spacex? we were told from the man himself that stainless steel was good enough

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:11:37 UTC No. 16205229

>>16205220
>starship and cst100 launchon the same day
>starship goes perfectly and atlas explodes
like pottery.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:13:10 UTC No. 16205232

>>16205215
>I wonder if Mars or some other colony will have a similar bloody revolution at some point.
I doubt the conditions will be there for a millennium. For the first century everyone will be living in the same big machine, so I think Elon might be on to something with regard to a digital direct democracy

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:14:01 UTC No. 16205235

>>16205229
that would be so fucking funny
though you would have two dead astronauts so kind of sad too

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:14:35 UTC No. 16205236

>>16204443
blessing in disguise for these retards desu
there was a 4/5 chance they would have been incinerated in reentry anyway
or even a rapid decompression while they were all sleeping on the way to Luna where they would all be sucked out into space

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:15:45 UTC No. 16205238

>>16205227
because it has started to be relevant now

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:22:18 UTC No. 16205249

>>16205235
so long as the crew escape system works they would be fine, but poor tory defintely would not be

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:24:50 UTC No. 16205252

are there suicide pills on board space capsules to avoid the many possible horrible deaths?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:31:21 UTC No. 16205259

>>16205252
vacuum exposure will knock you out in seconds so what would be the point? you can always just open the door

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:36:06 UTC No. 16205265

Reminder that not making a Shuttle-C HLV was a yuuuge false economy. It could have kept flying even if STS was grounded for safety.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:38:11 UTC No. 16205269

Chang'e is landing in less than 2 hours guys!!! Chinabros this is our time!!

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:45:22 UTC No. 16205288

>>16205236
ngl hearing him yelling "yay elon go go spacex i hecken luv starship"
and then 3 seconds later at max-q
>BOOOOM!!!!!
would have been pure kino

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 22:51:49 UTC No. 16205302

>>16205265
what missions would shuttle-c have been useful for though? chandra/magellan/galileo could've all been done by titan iv. ISS modules had already been designed to fly on shuttle and proton so the idea that you could put the entire station into orbit with 3 launches is just a zubrin fantasy.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:01:32 UTC No. 16205315

While the west continues to decline, China lands on the Moon
>#Chang'e 6 will start back-of-the-month sampling# [#Chang'e 6 successfully landed#] This reporter was informed by the National Space Administration (NSA) that, on 2 June, the Chang'e 6 lander-ascender combination, with the support of the Magpie Bridge 2 Relay Star, successfully touched down in the pre-selected landing zone of the South Pole-Aitken Basin on the backside of the Moon. Afterwards, the lander will carry out status checks and setups such as solar wing and directional antenna deployment under ground control via the Magpie Bridge 2 relay star, and formally start the back-of-the-moon sampling work that will last for about two days. #Chang'e 6 landing on the back of the moon# (Reporter: Song Chen Wen Jinghua)

https://m.weibo.cn/detail/5040704944866256

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:01:38 UTC No. 16205316

1 hour until Chang'e-6 lands or crashes on the dark side of the moon.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:03:21 UTC No. 16205318

>>16205302
Bigger modules. D*pot construction, or actually just using Shuttle-C + ET AS the d*pot. Lunar landers+tugs. Fission reactors.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:04:48 UTC No. 16205322

>>16205302
>ISS modules had already been designed to fly on shuttle and proton
If you started Shuttle-C in the late 80s this wouldn't have been true though and small module stations are another false economy anyway. I don't think many would have been built but when people got sick of tooling around in LEO and wanted to do manned deep space again then you'd at least have Shuttle-C to work with instead of starting from scratch which has been very costly

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:04:49 UTC No. 16205323

>>16205302
its badfor the task but it could have been used to transfer cryogenic third stages to orbit, since shuttle was never allowed to do that due to being manned

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:08:19 UTC No. 16205329

>>16205323
Centaur-G was only canceled because of Challenger.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:09:27 UTC No. 16205334

>>16205322
Could a falcon 9 push the ISS to a lagrange point to sit there as a I guess space musuem? Would it need a starship?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:09:44 UTC No. 16205336

TheLaunchPad fucking sucks.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:11:53 UTC No. 16205340

>>16205334
you could do a graveyard orbit with something launched on f9. lagrange points are completely out of the question.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:14:12 UTC No. 16205345

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:14:13 UTC No. 16205346

>>16205334
the iss deserves to die, we wasted an entire generation of engineers, scientists and astronauts on that hunk of junk.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:14:58 UTC No. 16205348

These chang’e succesful landings are becoming as routine as those F9 landings, yawn

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:15:05 UTC No. 16205349

>>16205346
But the science...

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:16:14 UTC No. 16205351

>>16205349
oh yes, the science...

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:17:27 UTC No. 16205354

>>16205349
same science could have been done for 1/10 the price

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:17:59 UTC No. 16205356

>>16205349
So, after all those years of science on the ISS, what do we know about effects of gravity less than one g but greater then zero g?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:19:00 UTC No. 16205358

>>16205329
I know, and it was cancelled because every shuttle was manned so they didnt want it to explode again

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:20:42 UTC No. 16205361

>>16205349
>>16205356
Or long term spin gravity

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:24:47 UTC No. 16205374

>>16205351
So uh... what were the results?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:28:28 UTC No. 16205379

>>16205374
Smelly paint

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:29:17 UTC No. 16205381

>>16205140
>free market
Anon...

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:33:48 UTC No. 16205386

where to watch change 6 lunar landing?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:36:59 UTC No. 16205391

How will spaceX handle tile re-waterproofing?
This was a big part of that ridiculous turnaround time on the shuttle Orbiter.

Iirc NASA tried spraying literal Scotchgard™ on the tiles after each flight but it reacted adversely with the tile adhesive.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:39:35 UTC No. 16205393

>>16205386
Clear is watching CCTV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-M4c8Zive8g

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:43:23 UTC No. 16205398

>>16205391
best waterproof is no waterproof. just put a big umbrella on the launch tower and quickly swing it away when the rocket takes off

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:43:55 UTC No. 16205401

don't forget mercury visit soon, hopefully

https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Operations/Glitch_on_BepiColombo_work_ongoing_to_restore_spacecraft_to_full_thrust

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:45:06 UTC No. 16205402

important webm. please have a listen
>>>/wsg/5571188

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:47:23 UTC No. 16205405

>>16205401
am I the only one who's annoyed that spaceflight is always done with 20000 gravity assists over years instead of just going there.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:48:50 UTC No. 16205408

>>16205405
No. But thats how it is in a non-Starship controlled world.

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:51:12 UTC No. 16205412

China must be embarrassed by their space industry if they go out of their way to obscure streams of its events

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:51:16 UTC No. 16205413

>>16205405
Going to mercury is excusable imo, it's difficult to travel there and to the sun

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:53:21 UTC No. 16205417

>>16205402
SCRUBLINEEEEEEER

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:54:27 UTC No. 16205419

>>16205405
Was about to say that.
An excuse reusable rocket naysayers come up withis that the launch vehicle is a small raction of the cost of the satelite. Well surely your satelite can be cheaper if it doesnt have to survive half a decade before getting to its target?

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:54:58 UTC No. 16205421

>>16205405
I think it's neat

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:55:11 UTC No. 16205422

>>16205417
On the upside, at least things are going to be really clean after all this repeated scrubbing

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:56:47 UTC No. 16205424

On the upside, at least things are going to be shiningly clean after all this repeated scrubbing

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:59:46 UTC No. 16205429

I bought a Tesla. I'm now a true musk sycophant. All I need now is a Nuke Mars t-shirt lololol

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:01:08 UTC No. 16205430

>>16205413
nah we should have had NTP decades ago.
>>16205421
It's a cool technical achievement but we should be doing much better by now in terms of speed

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:01:57 UTC No. 16205433

>>16205405
ngmi

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:02:48 UTC No. 16205434

>>16205405
No. We could do so much better

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:03:23 UTC No. 16205435

>>16205114
BRILLIANT PEBBLES EXCEPT THEY'RE SHARKS WITH FRICKIN LAZERS ON THEIR HEADS

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:03:30 UTC No. 16205436

>>16205433
>being bound to the tides
ngmi

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:05:48 UTC No. 16205441

>>16205405
Flybys of Mercury are pretty easy. A C3 of 45km2/s2 will get you to Mercury on a direct trajectory. Falcon 9 can't get much useful payload to that C3 like that, but an H3-24 or Vulcan VC4 could loft a useful sized probe. The problem is that those easy direct trajectories have a flyby speed of something like 20km/s, so going into orbit around Mercury needs either a probe with a colossal propulsion system or some very elaborate flying.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:06:58 UTC No. 16205442

>>16205393
What are they saying I don't speak either language

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:07:18 UTC No. 16205443

>>16205441
just use a very big parachute

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:08:10 UTC No. 16205445

>>16205443
NASA won't listen to my mercury lithobreaking proposals

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:09:41 UTC No. 16205446

>>16205445
What if we were to go to mercury during a solar event and used that to brake?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:10:15 UTC No. 16205447

https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/06/boeings-starliner-test-flight-scrubbed-again-after-hold-in-final-countdown/
>Technicians from United Launch Alliance, builder of the Atlas V rocket, will begin troubleshooting the computer glitch at the launch pad Saturday evening, after draining propellant from the launch vehicle. Early indications suggest that a card in one of three computers governing the final minutes of the Atlas V's countdown didn't boot up as quickly as anticipated.
>“You can imagine a large rack that is a big computer where the functions of the computer as a controller are broken up separately into individual cards or printed wire circuit boards with their logic devices," said Tory Bruno, ULA's president and CEO. "They’re all standalone, but together it’s an integrated controller."
>The computers are located at the launch pad inside a shelter near the base of the Atlas V rocket at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. All three computers must be fully functioning in the final phase of the countdown to ensure triple redundancy. At the moment of liftoff, these computers control things like retracting umbilical lines and releasing bolts holding the rocket to its mobile launch platform.
>Two of the computers activated as the final countdown sequence began at T-minus 4 minutes. A single card in the third computer took about six more seconds to come online, although it did boot up eventually, Bruno said.
>"Two came up normally and the third one came up, but it was slow to come up, and that tripped a red line," he said

one of the three redundant computers controlling things like umbilical retraction booted up too slowly (took over 6s) which triggered the halt
the talk of cards makes it sound like these are some ancient as fuck computers?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:11:17 UTC No. 16205448

>Saturday's aborted countdown was the latest in a string of delays for Boeing's Starliner program. The spacecraft's first crew test flight is running seven years behind the schedule Boeing announced when NASA awarded the company a $4.2 billion contract for the crew capsule in 2014. Put another way, Boeing has arrived at this moment nine years after the company originally said the spacecraft could be operational, when the program was first announced in 2010.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:12:12 UTC No. 16205450

>>16205443
Mercury is interesting when it comes to solar sails. That's still a lot of speed to have to kill off with a very low thrust propulsion system, but the potential weight savings are interesting.

>>16205447
It's an Atlas V system, its got to be rocking the best computer technology that 1996 had to offer.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:13:23 UTC No. 16205451

>>16205445
>ARRG DROP ANCHOR ON THE MERCURIAN DOGS

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:14:12 UTC No. 16205453

did the chinks succeed??????

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:14:30 UTC No. 16205454

>>16205450
>It's an Atlas V system, its got to be rocking the best computer technology that 1996 had to offer.
the computers used to work fine, i bet they just moved too many experienced technicians over to vulcan

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:15:17 UTC No. 16205457

>>16205451
Oh that'd be good. Shoot a few harpoons at mercury as anchors.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:17:16 UTC No. 16205460

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wFWEfFbsQI
>Flight Termination Charges Installed for Starship Flight 4 | SpaceX Boca Chica

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:20:16 UTC No. 16205464

>>16205453
no evidence

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:23:16 UTC No. 16205469

>>16205453
Yes, read the thread.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:27:30 UTC No. 16205473

>>16205450
with a e-sail you could do sample returns

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:28:12 UTC No. 16205475

>>16205464
they're not gonna lie about something like landing on the surface or not. it'd be too easy for LRO to catch them in a lie if they did. same thing with the soviets back in the day - they'd always tell the truth about spacecraft masses and orbits, they'd just lie about what the mission had been if something went wrong.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:29:32 UTC No. 16205477

that poor bastard :(

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:31:36 UTC No. 16205482

>>16205477
He is going to die from the stress, which would mean Starliner killed someone without ever even launching

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:35:17 UTC No. 16205486

>>16205477
Boeing is finished

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:36:03 UTC No. 16205487

>>16204560
It's a launchpad queen

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:38:19 UTC No. 16205492

designated shitting launch control software

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:38:45 UTC No. 16205493

>>16204560
its not

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:47:49 UTC No. 16205501

Political compass meme from 10 years in the future:

Up - US landed on moon 60 years ago
Down - US faked moonlanding
Left - Cina landed
Right - China faked moonlanding

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:49:40 UTC No. 16205505

>>16205501
true. "who landed on the moon" will be one of the most staple partisan positions for decades.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:00:27 UTC No. 16205519

>>16205009
I know a guy who worked there (the kind of guy who builds a whole product single-handed) and he said it was absolute dog shit.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:01:52 UTC No. 16205521

>>16205037
>Sorry, but everyone's schedule has to revolve around my convenience.
A woman on /sfg/?! This is unprecedented.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:04:21 UTC No. 16205527

Can /sfg/ even survive another week? Starliner/Starship back2back double feature only on VHS?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:07:18 UTC No. 16205530

>>16205527
You forgot to mention that this is also a summer launch so all the newfags school children have been unleashed upon us. Proof of this phenomenon is the current state of /sfg/

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:08:33 UTC No. 16205533

>>16205185
Imagine you're a passenger in a plane in the air but the air traffic controller isn't thinking about sex crimes against minors. It just wouldn't be safe.

Thank God for Pete Buttigieg

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:08:55 UTC No. 16205534

>>16205530
I wish the launch was around noon or later, Starship BBQ would be great with the bros over

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:09:42 UTC No. 16205536

>>16205219
photoshop

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:10:48 UTC No. 16205537

>>16205236
They weren't going to fly Boing

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:11:04 UTC No. 16205538

>>16205477
Imagine the relief when you are told you aren't dying in an explosion today

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:11:46 UTC No. 16205539

>>16205401
Last I heard, bepi colombo had a huge software failure. Not sure if it’s been rectified yet, I haven’t been keeping up with space news the last week or two

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:11:49 UTC No. 16205540

>>16205269
没兴趣

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:16:26 UTC No. 16205542

>>16205539
>bepi colombo
i laff evri tiem

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:52:21 UTC No. 16205564

>>16205402
SCRUBLINER

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 01:55:55 UTC No. 16205570

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:06:50 UTC No. 16205584

>>16205570
how bad are vacwms for you really?
if I had pressure on my face and groin, and 1/3 of an atmosphere mechanical counter pressure on most of my body except my hands and joints, would I be fine in a vacwm for half an hour? Joe Kittinger lost pressure lost pressure in one glove during a high altitude balloon jump, and his hand was completely fine

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:09:04 UTC No. 16205586

I haven't done all the maths for this to check feasibility, but apparently nasa briefly indicated interest in a grant app sent to them about the use of vaccuum airships on mars. lower pressure means a carbon fibre sphere (potentially with internal spars) would be able to hold a good vaccuum.
Makes me wonder about the viability of vaccuum airships for high altitude atmospheric pseudo-satellites on earth, maybe even a new approach to rockoons.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:22:32 UTC No. 16205593

>>16205586
>Makes me wonder about the viability of vaccuum airships for high altitude atmospheric pseudo-satellites on earth
or vacuum launch tubes that go 80km up...

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:26:42 UTC No. 16205597

>>16205593
why don't you build anything that goes 80km up and then try to work in making it do that

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:32:27 UTC No. 16205604

>>16205584
I have been conducting experiments with ladies of negotiable virtue. The only occasional negative side effect of exposure to vacuum is ejaculating too soon.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:35:17 UTC No. 16205608

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:37:55 UTC No. 16205609

what happens when scrubliner doesn't launch on 5th or 6th, when's the next window

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:45:58 UTC No. 16205618

>>16205609
Eventually the station is gonna reenter so they'll run out of windows at some point.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:47:56 UTC No. 16205623

>>16205009
>stonk just goes up cause fuck it
BA has been absolute dogshit. A couple great years pre-pandemic but wiped out since then. (Blue line is the S&P)

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:48:17 UTC No. 16205625

>>16205405
>am I the only one who's annoyed that spaceflight is always done with 20000 gravity assists over years instead of just going there.

Spaceflight was a completely foreign method of travel to humans until recently and you grew up with it being depicted inaccurately in pop culture.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:49:51 UTC No. 16205627

>>16205625
No, gravity assists are slow and a result of oldspace constraints.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:58:27 UTC No. 16205630

>>16205627
unless you have some kind of a meme drive in your pocket everyone is still operating under those same constraints

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:00:50 UTC No. 16205634

>>16205630
you don't need a memedrive you just need to drop launch costs by an order of magnitude so people are willing to throw fuel depots in orbit

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:06:49 UTC No. 16205646

>>16205634
Even with fuel depots chemical propulsion is too limited to just start ignoring things like gravity assists and transfer windows

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:09:40 UTC No. 16205653

>>16205646
even so. get yourself a nice high mass fraction in orbit and you can do one or two fast and significant gravity assists instead of 10 wimpy ones with 3 years between each

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:12:41 UTC No. 16205660

>>16205033
Boeing will always be bailed out, it's too important to the US that we have a domestic airline manufacturer. It's gonna be 2008 GM all over again

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:17:40 UTC No. 16205673

>>16205630
>Hohmann transfer is meme drive

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:21:59 UTC No. 16205682

>>16205660
If the goal is to have any domestic air then Boeing better pray Musk never finds the time to make that plane he's always talking about

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:40:13 UTC No. 16205703

https://twitter.com/CNSpaceflight/status/1797105010872082746
Chang'e-6 landing footage just dropped

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:41:39 UTC No. 16205706

>>16205703
Implessive!

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:42:45 UTC No. 16205710

>>16205634
A direct fusion drive is just about the minimum of what you need to give gravity assists the finger.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:56:10 UTC No. 16205729

>>16205477
So was this just a well-timed screenshot or was Butch actually a little pissed off here

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:07:39 UTC No. 16205744

>>16205703
>footage of lander landing
>no lander
你个傻屄

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:11:05 UTC No. 16205747

>>16205729
we was sweating his balls off because the suit fans don't work

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:11:55 UTC No. 16205749

>>16204817
please keep these coming anon. I've been missing my fix ever since she deleted everything

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:12:41 UTC No. 16205750

>>16205729
he was sweating his balls off because the suit fans don't work

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:16:26 UTC No. 16205753

>>16205703
uh... odysseussisters our response??

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:21:09 UTC No. 16205757

>>16205753
I have nothing but respect for chinese spaceflight achievements. It's good for them and I hope they light a fire under NASA's ass. IM gets another chance later this year. and if they fuck it up we have a half dozen other lunar payload providers. CLPS puts America in a very good position for lunar exploration.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:22:14 UTC No. 16205759

>>16205401
Thank you for posting it as webm so I can scrub (lel) through rather than having to wait 40 fucking seconds through a gif.
>t. zoomer

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:32:01 UTC No. 16205765

>>16205703
webm of last minute
full 2:20 clip at 1280p at https://litter.catbox.moe/nfc8rq.mp4

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:45:36 UTC No. 16205780

I am forgotten

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 04:54:19 UTC No. 16205783

>>16205703
>>16205765

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 05:02:12 UTC No. 16205786

>>16205749
she revived her twitter by for how long idk. she's a mentally ill girl, possibly schizo. @wheel_stop on X

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 05:05:17 UTC No. 16205789

>>16205786
no, just an artist

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 05:54:04 UTC No. 16205814

Yup as soon as we hit bump limit nobody talks. Proof that we are infested with newfag diaperwearing babies who just got their summerbreaks

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 05:55:18 UTC No. 16205815

>>16205703
Sped up version

https://twitter.com/CNSpaceflight/status/1797105956771561791

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 06:52:06 UTC No. 16205840

Nyoom

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 06:56:40 UTC No. 16205843

>>16205814
Americans have gone to sleep, nigger.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 07:04:53 UTC No. 16205854

>>16205765
Nice. Looked like a somewhat soft landing so probable nothing serious broke.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 07:07:12 UTC No. 16205857

>>16205840
SR-71 is not spaceflight

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:00:17 UTC No. 16205899

>>16205857
Then neither is SR-25

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:13:40 UTC No. 16205911

>>16205815
No matter how many times I see it, the fractal nature of barren terrain like that is always trippy.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:14:57 UTC No. 16205913

>>16205911
I know right, there's no end to these fucking craters

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:17:59 UTC No. 16205916

>>16205913
>>16205911
Samefag

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:20:35 UTC No. 16205919

Dear Moon,
Heh

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:23:19 UTC No. 16205923

>>16205919
Dear Nigger,
SAVE MEEEEEEE

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:25:35 UTC No. 16205924

>>16205402
SCRUBRINER

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:40:57 UTC No. 16205933

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1797071331667632569

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:43:13 UTC No. 16205934

>>16205933
https://strawpoll.com/3RnYXwmlBye
>Will Starship get through re-entry without RUDing?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:46:15 UTC No. 16205936

https://strawpoll.com/Q0Zp7JOR9gM
>Will the 'Super Heavy'-booster make a controlled water landing?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:47:16 UTC No. 16205939

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1797170976846725266

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 09:14:26 UTC No. 16205950

>>16205815
based, congrats

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 09:51:39 UTC No. 16205974

>>16204922
It's like that light novel series about the early USSR space program using a (cute) vampire to test rockets.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 09:52:53 UTC No. 16205976

>>16205974
Shut up nigger not real spaceflight

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:08:01 UTC No. 16205993

>>16205976
That show was incredibly realistic as far as spaceflight goes.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:55:20 UTC No. 16206007

>>16205993
I still seethe that slice of life waifu shit is far better at portraying spaceflight than anything in the west.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 11:04:27 UTC No. 16206012

>>16206007
Mike Tyson Adventures or whatever the fuck that cartoon was called accurately portrays a Falcon Heavy launch.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 11:41:23 UTC No. 16206031

>>16205604
interdasting.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 12:28:26 UTC No. 16206061

>>16205993
Oh shit, I didn't realise it had an anime, downloading it now.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 12:58:26 UTC No. 16206083

>>16206061
It only got one season so far but Irina is voiced by Megumi Hayashibara and the space stuff is cool.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:11:35 UTC No. 16206100

Schizodrive will fly before Starliner.

https://x.com/RaMansell/status/1796228058376204765

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:31:11 UTC No. 16206114

>>16205974
love her

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:32:56 UTC No. 16206116

Megumin moon rocket

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:46:11 UTC No. 16206131

>>16206116

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:56:25 UTC No. 16206143

>>16205265
It is because this thing never existed that I once got to see a Shuttle-on-SCA (probably Endeavour) shortly after takeoff.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:02:39 UTC No. 16206150

>>16205322
>1 launch
> <1B
okaaaay...
>60 launches
> >100B
so that's 1.66B per launch?
>lower the cost
wait, what?
(and that doesn't even include the cost of building the new launcher)

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:03:47 UTC No. 16206152

>>16206150
Hey dummy it's comparing two different options.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:11:12 UTC No. 16206165

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:22:12 UTC No. 16206186

>>16205447
Wait, so not only was this not a computer on the Shitliner capsule, it's a ground computer for the rocket that fucked up? This is one hell of a cursed spacecraft for so many different off-board things to cause scrubs.
>>16205538
>You are not going to (die in) space today.
>>16205618
I kekked out loud.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:30:42 UTC No. 16206199

>>16206186
fake nigger 'woman'

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:30:56 UTC No. 16206200

The fruity pebbles retard is on /g/.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:31:27 UTC No. 16206201

>>16206200
keep me posted

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:31:40 UTC No. 16206202

>>16206100
I’ve given up hope long ago :(

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:32:54 UTC No. 16206203

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:51:20 UTC No. 16206226

>>16205356
>of gravity less than one g but greater then zero g
Microgravity is the literal term newfag

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:52:05 UTC No. 16206227

>>16206226
it's called zero G. microgravity aint a thing

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:53:48 UTC No. 16206230

https://twitter.com/PointOrView/status/1797279886542782811
>Drilling and sample collection all wrapped up. Now time to blast off the lunar surface and kick off the return journey. Godspeed.

That was quick

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:57:17 UTC No. 16206236

>>16206116

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:01:24 UTC No. 16206238

>>16206012
https://youtu.be/6N8UlyxFAj8
Not a very good Elon Musk impression

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:01:38 UTC No. 16206239

>>16206230
JPL would literally take months to do what china did in less than a day

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:03:32 UTC No. 16206244

>>16206236
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTmb3Cqb2qw

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:03:45 UTC No. 16206247

>>16205815
Is the moon surface a fractal 3D rendering? Big craters give way to smaller and smaller ones, until suddenly the engine moves the dust and the ship lands.
But the thing is, the smaller craters look exactly like the huge ones, there is no way to tell if it is 30 miles width or 30 inches...

Is space fake?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:05:29 UTC No. 16206253

le skrub

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:06:56 UTC No. 16206256

>>16206247
Everything in space is fractal-like. It's why astronomy is a niche hobby, looking up at a dark sky through binoculars is a very similar experience to looking at the same patch of sky with a telescope. If you're lucky you get to see some faint grey smudges to break it up

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:09:25 UTC No. 16206259

>>16206256
>Everything in space is fractal-like.
*reality, you can see it while under the influence of psychedelics. "as above so below."

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:11:01 UTC No. 16206262

>>16206238
>if anything, you're an astronomer killing machine

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:11:16 UTC No. 16206263

chang won

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:17:09 UTC No. 16206268

Bros why are the chinese so good at landing plobes? Its not even normal, 4 moon landing and a mars one all 100% successful

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:24:05 UTC No. 16206283

>>16206100
Sweet schizo kino's back on the menu!

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:25:07 UTC No. 16206286

>>16206226
nobody calls 75% G "microgravity"

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:29:04 UTC No. 16206292

>>16206203
starliner will NOT be launching on june 5th

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:34:18 UTC No. 16206302

>>16206268
no DEI hires

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:50:12 UTC No. 16206319

>>16206292
It will and you will seethe retard

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:50:23 UTC No. 16206320

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1797282250574184587

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:52:45 UTC No. 16206322

>>16206320
!

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:57:49 UTC No. 16206323

>>16206268
NASA is on a 6 lander success streak to Mars. Do you think their performance is inhumanly good Chang?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:09:51 UTC No. 16206334

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1797286297960165863

what did he mean by this
is it over?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:10:46 UTC No. 16206336

Watch dearMoon get conveniently un-cancelled after Artemis launches complete, and with a completely different crew. Looking forward to mid-2030s

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:11:02 UTC No. 16206338

>>16206334
based and self aware. If I had his money I'd also build fuckoff huge shit

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:18:48 UTC No. 16206344

>>16206338
Same. Bezos should go all in on the Long Now shit like his 10000 year clock. We need more future ancient megaprojects.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:22:23 UTC No. 16206353

>>16206334
>>16206338
Perhaps the best low effort quip he's ever xeeted

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:27:41 UTC No. 16206358

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:29:16 UTC No. 16206360

>>16206358
holy shit lol

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:42:12 UTC No. 16206377

>>16206358
>>16206360
did they forget to change the channel name to SpaceX?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:43:29 UTC No. 16206378

>>16206227
It is, though people confuse the term but it is absolutely appropriate to use it colloquially when talking about the ISS especially when to achieve a true microgravity environment relative to the earth means heading out some 6 million km.
>>16206286
>https://iss.jaxa.jp/en/kiboexp/seu/categories/microgravity/index.html
JAXA does, it's not about stuff floating so much as the effects which can be simulated in LEO to do research in.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:45:16 UTC No. 16206384

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NK2Ql6mHVYg
>Starship Launch This Week! Flight Termination Systems Installed Ahead of Flight - SpaceX Weekly #117

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:46:18 UTC No. 16206385

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0zRmD0zLsQ
>Starbase Weekly, Ep.118: Starship Flight 4 Next Week - Final Preparations!

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:57:08 UTC No. 16206399

>>16206320
There he is again always taking credit for all the smart engineers so redditers think he's a genius

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 17:08:48 UTC No. 16206408

lol launch has already slipped to 6th. It's over.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 17:10:12 UTC No. 16206412

>>16206344
If I was a billionaire I would build a 200 meter pyramid (cost estimate $2 billion)

>>16206353
What's quip

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 17:19:19 UTC No. 16206424

>>16206412
I would build it from aerogel blocks with my own hands

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 17:23:56 UTC No. 16206430

>>16206412
Find it in the dictionary

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 17:30:21 UTC No. 16206436

>>16206412
Building a pyramid is great because of how hard they are to demolish after your death. What if you purchased a load of real estate near the white house then built a massive pyramid to be your tomb. The state would have to make an almost equal investment to demolish it to what you made building it.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 17:40:17 UTC No. 16206447

>>16206436
They would just rename it the George Floyd monument after you die.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 17:41:11 UTC No. 16206448

>>16206436
Yep. I was actually thinking of building a pyramid from the crushed rock made from tunnel boring. Real Egyptian pyramids are also loose rock only on the outside did the put actual carved blocks.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 17:47:00 UTC No. 16206455

Remember this?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 17:59:20 UTC No. 16206472

https://twitter.com/torybruno/status/1797322732360663540
>Ground system Launch Sequencer Repair is complete (replacement of power chassis). Retesting nearly complete. Engineering Review Board just finished up. Good to go pending successful finishing of the retesting.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:04:27 UTC No. 16206477

>>16205974
>>16206083
oh was that a light novel adaptation? that explains why it was fucking trash
>>16206455
rest in fucking piss and good riddance

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:11:14 UTC No. 16206483

Any legalfags know if Coca Cola can be prosecuted for securities fraud for claiming the drink never contained cocaine?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:12:06 UTC No. 16206484

>>16206477
Retard he got his account reinstated long ago nice job showing how new you are you cant even remember the argument between him and Isaacman just a week ago.
I fucking hate the summer and the newfags it heralds.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:13:58 UTC No. 16206486

>>16206455
Which one was he again?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:15:06 UTC No. 16206488

Lmao
https://x.com/russianspaceweb/status/1797278320293237159

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:15:49 UTC No. 16206489

>>16206455
Why was he banned?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:18:14 UTC No. 16206492

>>16206483
>solicitor forum general

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:18:49 UTC No. 16206495

>>16206489
He called some college girl a fat pig, and told a guy to go kill himself

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:19:23 UTC No. 16206496

>>16206488
for a moment there I thought he was talking about that middle eastern country.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:20:31 UTC No. 16206498

>>16206484
>a week ago
I don't keep up to date on twitter stuff, I was hoping this was a new development because it would stop his bad bait from getting posted here

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:35:22 UTC No. 16206505

>>16206495
they probably deserved it. Spacegay5 has concentrated autism butin the end he's a guy trying to do good. The people he argues with are ignorant and always wrong. I think being in the trenches against retards has hardened him against SpaceX, its understandable

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:41:45 UTC No. 16206510

Exhibit A: bad bait >>16206505

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:48:04 UTC No. 16206515

New Slosskino!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFbkUwPiH4o

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:54:50 UTC No. 16206520

Watching the Don Lemon interview where Musk bailed out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhsfjBpKiTw

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:01:53 UTC No. 16206526

>>16206520
full of bad faith gotcha questions though Musk still demolished Lemon

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:09:48 UTC No. 16206535

>>16206495
based horsefucker5

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:20:34 UTC No. 16206552

>>16206520
Love how Elon quickly starts regretting considering Hiring Lemon.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:24:27 UTC No. 16206560

>>16206520
Why would I ever want to watch this?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:31:14 UTC No. 16206569

>>16206560
because you are interested in Elon Musk

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:31:27 UTC No. 16206570

Suppose - purely as a hypothetical - that a nuclear aircraft carrier had suffered visible damage and wanted to avoid being photographed by any satellite until it could be repaired. Would it be theoretically possible for the carrier to keep hiding under clouds, given moderate minds and cloudiness? It is said that nuclear carriers can go in excess of 30 knots

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:35:25 UTC No. 16206575

Suppose - purely as a hypothetical and not related to any current rumors - that a nuclear aircraft carrier had suffered visible damage and wanted to avoid being photographed until the damage had been repaired. Would it be theoretically possible for the carrier to avoid being photographed by satellites by hiding under clouds, given moderate winds and cloudiness? It is said that nuclear carriers can go in excess of 30 knots

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:36:48 UTC No. 16206577

>>16206575
optical satellites can't into clouds sure. Why are you asking this anyway?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:37:31 UTC No. 16206579

>>16206575
no, clouds just disappear all the time
also if it was damaged it wouldn't be able to go 30 knots

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:38:02 UTC No. 16206581

>>16206577
Off topic for this thread. Look at /pol/ if you want to know why

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:39:21 UTC No. 16206584

>>16206560
You don't have to. Happy pride month by the way!

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:40:35 UTC No. 16206587

>>16206581
/pol/ are retarded
also there are amateurs who watch the ports and drydocks that it would use to be repaired at, if it was actually hit then a shot of that would show up sooner or later
also only the US has the space imaging capabilities to take that picture

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:40:59 UTC No. 16206588

Russian space enthusiasts are seething about the latest Chinese moon lander

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:41:44 UTC No. 16206589

>>16205227
why don't they just put a little robot monkey thing in the Starship with IR detecting goggles on and during reentry if it sees a hot spot on the hull where it's about to burn through it directs a cooling stream of ice water at it?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:45:33 UTC No. 16206594

shipping more parts for tower 2 in starbase

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:47:22 UTC No. 16206595

>>16206575
Go back to /pol/, shitskin. Your credible citizen journalist posted a footage from Arma 3 as a proof.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:47:53 UTC No. 16206596

>>16206588
>it's an integral part of the hybrid war
It's really not. It's China flexing their technical muscles to claim a cold war-style trophy while also doing something everyone acknowledges as interesting science. I despise China and the Chinese people but I'll still get excited when the bugmen do something interesting

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:49:18 UTC No. 16206597

>>16206575
This shit belongs in /k/, not /pol/. Either way, get the fuck out.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:49:56 UTC No. 16206598

>>16206587
I think that strictly speaking it would depend on the extent of any damage. Damage need not be so major that it can't be fixed at sea or at least superficially covered up before going into port. For example, scorch marks could be washed or painted over. Small holes could be patched. Destroyed aircraft could be dumped overboard or brought below deck. Warships are designed to be quickly repaired while at sea, and carriers are meant to be able to repair modest damage to the flight deck while at sea, no?

And I think it is as you say, the US has the highest resolution optical satellites, and damage might be so minor that it requires the highest resolution to see anyway.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:50:33 UTC No. 16206600

>>16206100
Hopefully the glowies don't manage to sabotage this one

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:51:15 UTC No. 16206601

>>16206588
the real propaganda victory is to let your opponent see you seething. back in the day the us and soviets were both gracious in defeat - you gain nothing by doing otherwise.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:52:56 UTC No. 16206605

>>16206598
>Destroyed aircraft could be dumped overboard
I wish to recover such aircraft from the seafloor as well as recover spent F9 boosters from the seabed.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:53:05 UTC No. 16206607

>>16206595
There's always a torrent of BS online. The more "credible" people are more focused on the carrier's supposed movements, that the captain supposedly posted archival footage of the deck after the alleged incident, and an alleged Chinese SAR image.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:53:46 UTC No. 16206608

>>16206520
mirror neurons too strong for this degree of cringe, the feedback will kill me

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:54:21 UTC No. 16206609

>>16206601
>back in the day the us and soviets were both gracious in defeat
what were the strategic advantage of this approach, and was the USSR gracious after America landed humans on the moon?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:57:42 UTC No. 16206613

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:57:58 UTC No. 16206614

>>16206581
no thanks
/pol/ has been under constant raiding since 2015

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:59:40 UTC No. 16206617

>>16206588
>Russian space enthusiasts
So, basically Anatoly Zak is seething?

Based on his wording, it doesn't seem he likes China. In fact, he doesn't seem like someone who likes either Russia or China

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:03:51 UTC No. 16206624

>>16206613
>Cabina de peaje

LMAO

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:04:00 UTC No. 16206625

>>16206609
>what were the strategic advantage of this approach
You don't look like sore losers or unstable freaks. The Cold War was about not just national power but a competition of entire world views and systems of living. Visibly seething when you get BTFO makes potential client states think twice about picking your side.
>was the USSR gracious after America landed humans on the moon?
Yeah.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:05:33 UTC No. 16206628

>>16206601
>back in the day the us and soviets were both gracious in defeat
my Yugoslav uncle is seething about this to this day by denying the landing.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:05:55 UTC No. 16206631

>>16206510
Not even bait buddy. Why do you assume anything you don't like is bait? Such a low IQ world view.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:07:12 UTC No. 16206633

>>16206617
>like someone who likes either Russia or China
not as if that's rare lol

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:08:15 UTC No. 16206634

>>16206633
I think he's pointing out that that's weird given his twitter handle of RussianSpaceWeb. You'd assume that he'd be a vatnik.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:10:42 UTC No. 16206638

>>16206634
I think the target audience and customer base of RussianSpaceWeb.com are non-Russian-speaking English speakers

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:11:19 UTC No. 16206640

>>16206609
>what were the strategic advantage of this approach
both sides had to pretend that they were dumping all this money and effort into space exploration because they were primarily interested in advancing mankind's scientific and technological frontiers. if you were publicly mad about losing that would give away the game - it'd be an admission that you ultimately just care about winning international prestige.
>>16206628
in private they were absolutely seething. the soviet press claimed that apollo was irrational and that the luna sample return probes were a much smarter way of doing the same thing. luna 15 would've beaten out apollo 11 by mere hours to become the first spacecraft to return lunar surface samples if it hadn't failed to land, and the soviets took the rare step of announcing luna 15 to the world BEFORE mission success just to distract from apollo 11's press coverage internationally.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:26:07 UTC No. 16206660

New Hullo video on NTP
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlKAMB71wT4

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:26:49 UTC No. 16206662

>>16206595
>shitskin
/pol/tard newfag detected nobody says this here except /pol/ newfags

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:27:45 UTC No. 16206663

>>16206662
Cool

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:35:50 UTC No. 16206670

>>16206660
soon.jpg

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:36:09 UTC No. 16206671

Apologize.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:36:51 UTC No. 16206673

>>16206671
For what? Shuttle was garbage.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:37:00 UTC No. 16206674

>>16206671
It has more payload than FH

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:38:58 UTC No. 16206677

>>16206671
Killed 14 astronauts. I will never forgive or forget

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:42:10 UTC No. 16206680

>>16206671
I'm sorry F. Richard Scobee, Michael J. Smith, Ronald McNair, Ellison Onizuka, Judith Resnik, Gregory Jarvis, Christa McAuliffe, Rick Husband, William C. McCool, Michael P. Anderson, Kalpana Chawla, David M. Brown, Laurel Clark, and Ilan Ramon,

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:45:08 UTC No. 16206683

>>16206680
fuck off with your emotional shit on anonymous imageboards.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:45:50 UTC No. 16206684

>>16206683
>t. Rockwell/Boeing marketing executive

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:47:07 UTC No. 16206685

>>16206671
No!

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:48:21 UTC No. 16206687

And fuck that weak faggot that died in our plane from heart attack. We're losing millions over this.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:49:39 UTC No. 16206689

>>16206520
What IQ is Don Lemon? I'm halfway through this and it's basically him saying "but I did have breakfast"

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:50:21 UTC No. 16206692

>>16206689
explain how he got such a good job is he is low IQ?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:51:00 UTC No. 16206693

>>16206613
>holocausto de americano dolares
lmao
the ISS is now the HAD

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:51:24 UTC No. 16206694

>>16206692
He's black.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:52:25 UTC No. 16206695

>>16206692
explain how he's so smart if he got fired

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:52:53 UTC No. 16206696

>>16206692
and gay

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:53:00 UTC No. 16206697

>>16206671
oh yes, lanzadera da mierda

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:53:35 UTC No. 16206698

>>16206695
Explain why Tesla stock dropped if Elon is so smart

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:55:05 UTC No. 16206699

>>16206671
I'm sorry they stopped painting the tank which led to Challenger.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:55:12 UTC No. 16206700

>>16206671
I deeply and genuinely regret that this is the kind of country where STS, SLS and similar abominations are not merely allowed to exist, but funded at great expense to the productive workers of America.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:55:53 UTC No. 16206702

>>16206698
it's down? brb buying some more

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:56:04 UTC No. 16206704

>>16206520
Is there any Spaceflight in this? If not >>>X.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:56:21 UTC No. 16206705

>>16206692
It's a literal nigger faggot

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:56:38 UTC No. 16206706

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1797332703731237260

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:57:39 UTC No. 16206708

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1797333794116014287

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:57:41 UTC No. 16206709

>>16206706
that's so funny ah ha ha

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:58:01 UTC No. 16206710

>>16206617
the most fervent haters of Ziggers are those closest to them
and who could be closer to them than a Russian?
TZD
>>16206638
is he not Russian himself? or is he an expat or just reporting on them? I've never been quite sure.
>>16206693
it's an old image, anon; it wasn't funny enough to quote back then and it's still not that funny now

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:58:04 UTC No. 16206711

>>16206671
i didn't always agree with shuttle, but you've gotta give it this much: it had the courage to put men aboard for its test flights. that takes more guts and conviction than starship will ever have.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:58:42 UTC No. 16206712

>>16206695
there is a legacy of slavery that's undeniable

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:59:13 UTC No. 16206714

>>16206706
lmao

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:59:22 UTC No. 16206715

>>16206710
its pretty funny, need to add starliner and artemis capsule

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 20:59:43 UTC No. 16206716

>>16206692
Don Lemon had incredible opportunities as a person of color

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:00:14 UTC No. 16206718

>>16206710
He's jewish.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:01:30 UTC No. 16206720

>>16206702
enjoy your average profits. Market is efficient.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:01:51 UTC No. 16206721

>>16206711
ah yes, "guts" and "conviction", words which are apparently synonymous with ignoring the dangers and charging in blindly
leave that to the Russians, we can change the world without getting ourselves killed
>>16206718
that doesn't answer the question though

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:02:42 UTC No. 16206722

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/02/world/americas/starlink-internet-elon-musk-brazil-amazon.html
>The Internet’s Final Frontier: Remote Amazon Tribes
>Elon Musk’s Starlink has connected an isolated tribe to the outside world — and divided it from within.
Thank you, Musk, for completing the work of the colonizers. Many pre-Columbian civilizations were destroyed not because Europeans were superior, but because they brought with them diseases from the old world that devastated the native populations. This led to the deaths of elders and the orphaning of children, ultimately facilitating the conquest of their lands and the enslavement of their people. Now, you are introducing a new kind of disease that will destroy their minds and spirits in less than one generation: addiction to the internet.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:02:51 UTC No. 16206724

>>16206718
whomst

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:03:57 UTC No. 16206726

>>16206722
Hate that these literal jungle inhabiting spear hunting tribespeople have faster internet than me.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:05:01 UTC No. 16206730

>>16206711
>it had the courage to put men aboard for its test flights
They had no choice since it couldn't be flown remotely like the superior Buran. As it was STS-1 nearly aborted on ascent

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:06:13 UTC No. 16206734

>>16206722
>Muh colonizers
Yeah let's just leave the hapless fuckers for illegal gold miners or other nefarious shit going on down there instead of hooking them up to some fucking internet.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:08:12 UTC No. 16206738

>>16206720
bought my first home in cash thanks to Tesla :)

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:10:05 UTC No. 16206741

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:10:21 UTC No. 16206743

>>16206699
Correct. That paint held the foam together.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:10:25 UTC No. 16206744

https://x.com/TheHoustonWade/status/1796994575325917188

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:11:30 UTC No. 16206747

>>16206692
He's CIA just like Anderson Cooper.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:11:46 UTC No. 16206749

>>16206744
Who?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:12:37 UTC No. 16206751

>>16206749
some dude that is seething about musk and arguing with like 20 people
lmao

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:12:40 UTC No. 16206752

>>16206744
He's right. 33 engines has not and will not ever work

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:12:45 UTC No. 16206755

>>16206744
>muh scientific research
Let me guess, another useless paper pusher with ESD?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:13:25 UTC No. 16206756

>>16206708
It's not like the Chinese would respect any SpaceX patent worth filing

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:14:14 UTC No. 16206757

>>16206751
nah it's perfectly worded bait

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:14:38 UTC No. 16206759

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:15:33 UTC No. 16206761

>>16206757
then he is really dedicated, he has like 40 post long back and forths with random people seething about musk, completely clueless in them

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:22:35 UTC No. 16206769

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:24:18 UTC No. 16206772

Wen is dreamchaser launchan?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:25:35 UTC No. 16206777

>>16206772
the 5th (but not really)

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:27:07 UTC No. 16206779

>>16206744
I wonder what could be different between now and 60 years ago

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:29:15 UTC No. 16206782

>>16206772
2025

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:29:22 UTC No. 16206783

>>16206711
>just blow people up for no reason when you can just remote control the vehicle
retarded boomer

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:37:14 UTC No. 16206793

>>16206782
who is this

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:38:11 UTC No. 16206795

>>16206782
At this rate they'll be able to replace the OMS with QI thrusters.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:38:13 UTC No. 16206796

>>16206793
My wife

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:38:15 UTC No. 16206797

>>16206782
>>16206793
oh, it's dreamchaser
cute

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:39:16 UTC No. 16206798

>>16206796
your wife is cute

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:39:27 UTC No. 16206799

>>16206680
>Judith Resnik
I wonder if she planned to make more foot fetish content once she got to orbit the second time. If so its especially a shame that it blew up.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:41:37 UTC No. 16206804

>>16206797
it's tenacity-chan

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:49:23 UTC No. 16206813

>>16206752
Already did. Landing them softly is another issue altogether but they're working on it.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:10:03 UTC No. 16206833

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:10:46 UTC No. 16206834

>>16206833
Who cares

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:11:05 UTC No. 16206835

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:12:49 UTC No. 16206839

MEMORY HOLED

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:13:00 UTC No. 16206840

>>16206759
Barely 2 days into gay month and we're already being bombarded with trans nonsense.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:13:46 UTC No. 16206842

>>16206834
/sfg/ cares. You can leave.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:14:08 UTC No. 16206843

>>16206835
>>16206833
OMG RGV AERIEL PHOTOGRAPHY!!!1!1!1111

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:15:29 UTC No. 16206845

>>16206833

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:15:35 UTC No. 16206846

>>16206843
No green arrow that YOU are saying this therefore you look like that

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:16:25 UTC No. 16206847

Poland wins university rover challenge
https://x.com/URConMars/status/1797082430144225761

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:16:30 UTC No. 16206848

>>16206845

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:17:20 UTC No. 16206850

>>16206848
>GATEVAV TO MA

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:17:31 UTC No. 16206852

>>16206843
are you retarded? genuine question

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:18:56 UTC No. 16206856

>>16206847
why into space when you can just into utah instead?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:19:09 UTC No. 16206858

>>16206852
He posted an uncommon soijak meaning hes a shartytard newfag so thats a yes.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:19:36 UTC No. 16206860

When is the Tim Snot tour?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:20:43 UTC No. 16206863

>>16206847
>no hot girls

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:21:39 UTC No. 16206864

>>16206860
should be any day now I guess if its supposed to be before the launch
kind of doubt they will release it before the launch though, they would have to give it to SpaceX to see there is no ITAR violations and then Everyday would have to edit it
so probably a few weeks after launch, would be end of June

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:22:40 UTC No. 16206865

>>16206848
it's over

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:25:47 UTC No. 16206869

>>16206848
its pretty big

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:26:18 UTC No. 16206873

>>16206699
all just to save 600 lbs

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:27:29 UTC No. 16206875

>>16206869

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:28:25 UTC No. 16206878

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:33:59 UTC No. 16206884

>>16206873
>Next on My 600lb Death, Christa McAuliffe

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:41:27 UTC No. 16206891

what sort of putting surface would a lunar golf course have?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:43:16 UTC No. 16206894

>>16206891
melted regolith

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:44:43 UTC No. 16206896

>>16206891
The LunA-10 study had some bots that made roads by melting regolith infront of the minirover so probably that

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:46:42 UTC No. 16206898

>>16206891
grass

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:47:50 UTC No. 16206899

https://x.com/Ringwatchers/status/1797397412471865698
>Production Diagram #18 | 2nd June, 2024 | "Die-agram"

>*The model for the Ship diagram does not reflect the design of the Block 2 Starship.*

Updates since last diagram:
S29 & B11 conduct 2 wet dress rehearsals ahead of launch, NET June 6th.

S26 conducts a cryo at Massey’s.
S30 receives its engines and conducts the final static fire at the suborbital site.
S31 conducts a cryo and experiences an anomaly involving the raceway.
An aft flap is freshly tiled, it’s unclear if this is for S32.
S33 payload bay is recovered in the Starfactory, where it has been for months.
S35 nosecone base is spotted and subsequently scrapped.
A block 2 forward flap is delivered, featuring a new shape.
Another aft flap is spotted.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:48:53 UTC No. 16206901

>>16206899
B11 receives its hot stage ring.
B12 engine status promoted to likely, purely based on how long it has been in Mega Bay 1.
B13 conducts 2 cryo tests.
B14 stacking is concluded on April 26th.
Putative B15 common dome section moves to Mega Bay 1 doorway.
Putative B15 aft tank #2 section spotted in Starfactory.
Putative B15 forward dome is spotted in Starfactory.
Possible B17 aft is seen in the Starfactory, likely sleeved.
B14.1 test tank is assembled and moved to Massey’s.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:52:07 UTC No. 16206904

https://rgvaerial.org/archive/subjects

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:01:26 UTC No. 16206912

>>16206899
is ship 26 supposed to be a hls mockup or a depot? Or both?

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:08:40 UTC No. 16206920

Holy shit, our boy is done.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:09:29 UTC No. 16206921

>>16206920
Heres hoping its a brain amoeba

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:14:49 UTC No. 16206929

>>16206920
The AIDS is starting to take its toll

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:15:36 UTC No. 16206931

>>16206920
God is punishing him

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:23:06 UTC No. 16206939

>>16206920

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:27:39 UTC No. 16206942

>>16206920
K. Don't keep me posted.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:29:32 UTC No. 16206944

Can multiple high-energy starlink beams converging on a single location boil water kind of like cellphones positioned around a corn kernel can cause it to pop? Asking for my schizophrenic friend.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:30:08 UTC No. 16206945

>>16206878
>ywn whisper sweet nothings to a spacecraft before it launches

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:32:06 UTC No. 16206949

>>16206944
No because that would violate FCC guidelines

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:35:20 UTC No. 16206953

>>16206711
It seems easy to bait in these threads lol. The autism density is high enough.
Speaking of, should I make a new thread now? kek

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:46:26 UTC No. 16206971

>>16206944
Maybe if they were all gathered in one room.

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:46:47 UTC No. 16206972

Staging

>>16206969
>>16206969
>>16206969
>>16206969
>>16206969

Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:47:47 UTC No. 16206974

>>16206953
No need to worry about that

Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 01:41:16 UTC No. 16207087

>>16206878
>V'ger meets The Creator

Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 02:21:00 UTC No. 16207123

>>16205185
If an insufficient amount of gays work for the company the plane won't fly, it's science.

Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 02:22:07 UTC No. 16207125

>>16205201
>The narrator voice
So he chooses to have that cracking squeaky faggoty voice intentionally?

Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 03:01:57 UTC No. 16207180

>>16206472
Was it approved for launch by the same people who incorrectly approved it for launch the last ten times?

Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 03:04:37 UTC No. 16207181

>>16206839
based knower

Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 03:07:06 UTC No. 16207182

>>16207180
"it might blow up" is not a disqualifier for launch
"it could hurt somebody" might be, but it's never hurt somebody

Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 03:15:10 UTC No. 16207190

>>16207182
they cancelled because it was fucked up
it was fucked up in ways they failed to realize during each previous check