Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:17:23 UTC No. 16212293

>>16212288
I can't wait to watch this blow up tomorrow!

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:18:13 UTC No. 16212296

>>16212288
This is the one

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:19:03 UTC No. 16212299

Clearbro, paging Clearbro

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:20:13 UTC No. 16212301

>>16212296
i like resnick for the foot fetish content she produced.

🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:22:36 UTC No. 16212308

We will recycle the other thread after this one, its actually a pretty good bake so I good job both OPs

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:23:00 UTC No. 16212309

>>16212301
Just for you anon

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:26:02 UTC No. 16212316

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FAoG__Iuuo

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:26:05 UTC No. 16212317

>>16212309
Impressive zero-g 'fro.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:26:23 UTC No. 16212318

>>16212309
Why so erotic? I'm not even a footfag.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:26:54 UTC No. 16212319

>>16212309
they say sex in space is practically impossible but this is clearly just a lie right? a couple of freaks would obviously still make it happen no?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:28:17 UTC No. 16212323

>>16212309
it should be nromalized and even expected for female astronauts to not wear socks. Judy was leading the way! So sad she was silenced. Challenger was a hit job.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:29:47 UTC No. 16212328

You know what really grinds my gears? Earthers

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:30:37 UTC No. 16212330

>>16212323
I'll never forgive NASA for moving from short shorts to long khakis.

>>16212319
An astronaut couple got secretly married before their flight, and it's rumored they consummated it on the flight.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:30:57 UTC No. 16212332

>>16212288
Uhhh... it's actually called Flight 4, sir.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:32:02 UTC No. 16212334

>>16212288
STARSHIP IS OVERWEIGHT

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:33:11 UTC No. 16212335

alo je li neko zna u kolko sati sutra lansira Starship raketa?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:33:44 UTC No. 16212336

>>16212334
According to Zack/CSI, extended Booster will be lighter and more streamlined than current one. Its gonna be wild

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:33:59 UTC No. 16212337

>>16212328
OK, will you use a better lubricant next time?
I assume you went with Earthers because they were cheap where you are, so I hope you've learnt your lesson.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:36:19 UTC No. 16212342

>>16212330
>An astronaut couple got secretly married before their flight, and it's rumored they consummated it on the flight.
like we literally are going to have to wait for elon to send a couple up and allow it to be confirmed
fucking nasa decorum

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:36:32 UTC No. 16212343

https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1798452210285863382

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:36:42 UTC No. 16212344

>>16212319
it's 'impossible' because the only people who fly in space are old and probably already have erectile dysfunction on earth.
There is a reason they call them ass-tronauts
Noone can convince me that you can't bounce a naked woman on your cock like a sex toy until you jizz in her womb. There is not a single reason why. Nobdoy has ever even tried fucking in sapce yet, so Idk why they jump to these conclusions.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:36:54 UTC No. 16212345

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:39:06 UTC No. 16212348

So, uh, they're just going to launch with missing tiles?
I thought they said they were focused on surviving reentry for this one?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:39:10 UTC No. 16212349

>>16212344
yeah, friction would not be affected by gravity so I'm not sure where this myth comes from
might be mechanically more difficult and perhaps you would have less blood near your feet so it might be more difficult, but impossible?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:40:29 UTC No. 16212351

>>16212330
why dont we just ask the astronaut couple?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:42:39 UTC No. 16212356

>>16212344
>>16212349
they say it's something about bloodflow but I have my doubts
>>16212351
they can't admit to it as such acts are forbidden

I just think it's gay they have to maintain that it's 'not possible' to quiet any rumors
They're fucking scientists they could say "we don't know we've never tried" but they have to maintain the cover for squeaky clean image

It's literally gonna come down to musk sending up two pornstars or like. kanye and bianca censori or something "ye nigga you never thought you'd se ye fuck in space nigga"

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:43:35 UTC No. 16212357

>>16212336
>extended Booster
when are we getting that

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:45:11 UTC No. 16212361

>>16212356
>yfw the first sex in space happened during the apollo era

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:45:34 UTC No. 16212362

Had this shit on in the background while cleaning my apartment, did I get it right in that this shitbox doesn't have enough bandwidth to send video before it's docked to the ISS?
Jesus. Elon, send them a fucking starlink terminal.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:46:06 UTC No. 16212363

>>16212357
Next year.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:46:10 UTC No. 16212364

>>16212348
It will turn out that the missing tiles aren’t a big deal and he next starship will launch with thinner tiles and upwards of half of them missing to save weight.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:46:11 UTC No. 16212365

>>16212361
>it was mike collins jorking it during comms blackout

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:46:41 UTC No. 16212367

>>16212363
they already started building those or not yet?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:47:17 UTC No. 16212370

>>16212362
I was wondering why we didnt get to see video of the astronauts after orbit. Fucking boeing

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:49:17 UTC No. 16212375

>>16212365
>come to the dark side

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:49:30 UTC No. 16212376

>>16212375
kek

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:49:31 UTC No. 16212377

>>16212356
Astronauts tend to get bloated heads and pale feet/legs in space (especially in the first week) due to your body being used to gravity. So there might be a little more difficulty in getting an erection?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:51:15 UTC No. 16212379

>>16212349
surely it would be mechanically easier? you can just pull back and forth and turn her insides. No need to worry about positioning like under earth gravity, you can do it in any pose so long as you have arms. And hell, the woman could just do the fucking with her legs if you are a ukrainian war veterain with no arms

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:51:23 UTC No. 16212380

>>16212377
Surely. But is it impossible? Especially after a period of time?
Truly.. can the body adapt to zero gravity? proving sexual function would be kind of huge

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:51:38 UTC No. 16212381

>>16212362
You remember how much trouble SpaceX used to have getting a continuous stream on Falcons from launch to landing? The existing TDRSS network is just not built for high-bandwidth functions like that, and because it's riding on a Centaur Starliner goes a lot further downrange before staging so line of sign comms are impossible. "Just adding starlink" would technically work, but it's also a design nightmare that Boeing really doesn't want to have to address.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:52:15 UTC No. 16212382

>>16212367
No. They are working on Raptor 3 and Block 2 currently. Block 2 is the biggest hurdle aside from Raptor 3, and Block 3 can't happen until Raptor 3 is being made at scale. If there are delays with Raptor 3 then I could see Block 3 being pushed to 2026/7. Block 3 is otherwise very easy as it's basically just a taller version of Block 2 where as the bulk of Block 2's changes are in the Booster/Starship and not the engine.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:52:23 UTC No. 16212384

>the biocensor mutiny during XIII was so that swigert and haise could fuck without raising any eyebrows

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:52:26 UTC No. 16212385

>>16212377
viagra would work. Another earther export to the mars colony.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:53:26 UTC No. 16212386

>>16212381
Do you remember Demo-2?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:54:05 UTC No. 16212388

I haven't been paying much attention to any of the lead up to IFT-4, any obvious or known changes in the vehicle or launch procedures?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:54:37 UTC No. 16212389

>>16212388
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ytl1efG1sBw

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:54:44 UTC No. 16212390

>>16212388
Improved RCS, which I said they were going to do.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:55:19 UTC No. 16212393

>>16212388
interstage is getting jettisoned, new filters to try to stop ice blockage

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:55:45 UTC No. 16212396

>>16212288
>I FarT-4
terrible choice of names

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:56:27 UTC No. 16212398

>>16212343
When does the launch window close?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:56:29 UTC No. 16212399

>>16212389
>>16212393
Oh that's interesting. Were there issues caused by it in the last flight?
>>16212393
Figures with all the control issues they've had.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:56:43 UTC No. 16212400

>>16212396
OFT technically

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:57:17 UTC No. 16212403

>>16212399
YES. ICE IN THE TANKS CHADS VINDICATED AGAIN.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:59:49 UTC No. 16212407

>>16212399
Yeah, Zack proposed a theory that the stage separate damaged the hooks that hold the interstage to the booster and that's why it didn't release when it was supposed to which he backs up with footage and simulations in the video. This is potentially why the Booster lost control and came down at fucking Mach 1.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:01:59 UTC No. 16212411

Jwu did the shartliner explode

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:03:04 UTC No. 16212413

>>16212345
>still using Russian engines

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:05:22 UTC No. 16212416

>>16212413
One launch a year starting next year until 2030 then it'll never fly again. Mark my words.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:06:41 UTC No. 16212419

A reminder and a request: when making the launch thread, please add the twitter link that does not have the /i/broadcast/ stuff in it, because it requires an account. Thanks in advance.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:07:16 UTC No. 16212420

Mate I can Coom upside down with gravity working against me I don't know why you faggagots keep saying sex in space is impossible

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:08:19 UTC No. 16212424

>4 hour fucking recap
Thanks, Boeing.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:08:23 UTC No. 16212425

>>16212419
How come I haven't seen that pic before

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:08:52 UTC No. 16212426

>>16212293
>Objective for IFT-4 is to make it farther than last time
How many more of these until SpaceX goes bankrupt?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:08:55 UTC No. 16212427

>>16212420
I can cum under water baby

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:09:23 UTC No. 16212429

>>16212398
the window is 2 hours

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:10:04 UTC No. 16212431

>>16212426
They launched 90% of everything going up last year. They're not going bankrupt. Even should they completely mismanage like fucking McDonnel-Boeing, they won't be allowed to go bankrupt.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:11:03 UTC No. 16212432

>>16212389
>Hot staging shielding on the booster weighs at least 9 tons
Wondering if applying tiles to the top would work

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:12:14 UTC No. 16212433

>>16212432
I believe the idea is zero ablation for max reuse. Tiles will ablate.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:13:21 UTC No. 16212434

He confirmed it

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:13:34 UTC No. 16212436

>>16212426
>bankrupt
You mean "Finally runs out of the HLS money their NASA puppet forked over so she could further her career at SpaceX".

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:16:11 UTC No. 16212438

>>16212434
I didn’t notice it before but those are both on the engine skirt, aren’t they?
I suspect a burn though there would be less likely to be catastrophic than if they were covering part of the pressure vessel.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:16:22 UTC No. 16212439

>>16212434
Elon's alt

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:18:18 UTC No. 16212440

>>16212438
At best, it would cause Ship to RUD later. It burns through the steel, damages engines and then the whole thing explodes.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:19:52 UTC No. 16212443

https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1798461219516633271
>Astra, which once traded at up to $209 a share, will pay investors 50 cents a share as part of its deal to go private.

https://investor.astra.com/sec-filings/sec-filing/defm14c/0001193125-24-154412

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:21:02 UTC No. 16212444

>>16212443
What a great deal

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:22:03 UTC No. 16212445

>>16212444
Buy high sell low. It's the /biz/ method.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:22:07 UTC No. 16212446

>>16212443
that covid QE stock bubble sure was ridiculous.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:22:07 UTC No. 16212447

>>16212419
>"How does this guy smokes pot beat us?"

>"Why isn't the second string quarterback out there out there on the field with the regular quarterback?"
>"Why isn't the understudy singing a duet with the headliner?"
>"Why aren't the Vice President and President giving their State of the Union speeches at the same time?"
Are MuskRats so fucking retarded they don't understand how government contracts work?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:22:08 UTC No. 16212448

>>16212443
it was actually 293, not 209
lmao

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:23:55 UTC No. 16212451

https://www.space.com/maunakea-hawaii-volcano-telescope-removal
>1st telescope removed from controversial astronomy hub on Hawaiian volcano

Does anyone know any good slurs for Hawaiians? Asking for a friend

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:24:19 UTC No. 16212453

>>16212344
The real reason why dearMoon got cancelled was because Maezawa couldn't get it up for the planned orgy on the far side of the moon.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:24:47 UTC No. 16212454

>>16212447
cope, faggot

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:25:06 UTC No. 16212455

>>16212453
how is anyone supposed to get it up when you have estronaut baseding all over the place

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:27:37 UTC No. 16212463

>>16212454
Get madder and see if the truth stings less, groupie.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:29:00 UTC No. 16212469

>>16212440
They can practice belly flop up to flip maneuver. Not too bad for the first time through max heating.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:29:50 UTC No. 16212471

>>16212439
enjoy it before normies ruin the experiment. Elon used to try and look at every single reply he got on twitter, a long time ago. He only had a couple of thousand followers so it was maybe 30 replies at most. Now he is overwhelmed with replies every time he tweets something. Carcinogenic salad bowl of jeets and meatriders and cryptobros and 1s and cyber whores and reply guys. He isn’t reading through shit.
But back in the day (a long time ago) you could ask Elon stuff and get a reply. He lurked for a long time though

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:30:02 UTC No. 16212472

https://x.com/cyb3rgam3r420/status/1798434640165994516

why is he posting with the alt

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:30:07 UTC No. 16212473

>>16212440
Even in a best case scenario for IFT-4, it's going in the drink for a rather scheduled disassembly. Do you think they give a fuck about two missing tiles when it's going to lose many more on ascent alone?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:31:02 UTC No. 16212477

>>16212451
>Until recently, the telescopes on Maunakea were managed by the University of Hawaii, but in an attempt to work more closely with indigenous Hawaiians, management of the observatories has been handed over to the newly established Maunakea Authority. The Authority contains representatives from local government, the university, as well as the observatories themselves. It is also intended to feature people with experience and understanding of Hawaiian culture in order to help guide the most appropriate use of the mountain.

>As part of the handover — and as part of a deal to hopefully obtain a permit for construction of the Thirty Meter Telescope — the University of Hawaii has agreed to decommission three observatories on the mountain. Now, the first of these — the University of Hawaii Hilo's 36-inch Hōkū Keʻa Telescope, which was used for teaching — has been removed.

>removal of the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO), which is much larger with a radio dish that's 10.4 meters (34 feet) in diameter. Having seen first light in 1986, the CSO actually closed in 2015 having been superseded by new instruments such as the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile.

>The third telescope to be removed will be UKIRT, the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope, a 3.8-meter (150-inch) telescope originally owned and managed by the U.K., but which, in 2014, was handed over to the University of Hawaii. Since then, it has continued operating in an automatic, unassisted mode.

They're all cucks but couldn't give two shits about a tiny teaching telescope and two outdated one's being removed. EBO is going to die within the next 20yrs anyway.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:31:38 UTC No. 16212478

https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-4

https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OwxWYzDXjWGQ

~14 hours till official livestream up

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:32:03 UTC No. 16212479

>>16212477
This nigga got the gist of it.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:32:30 UTC No. 16212481

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:32:52 UTC No. 16212482

>>16212469
Unfortunately they don't do the belly flop maneuver anymore even though it is more efficient. They go straight back down as much as they can. I guess SpaceX decided it wasn't worth the trouble. At least we got that one clip of it happening


>>16212473
They should add them anyway. Elon said the whole goal of IFT4 is to get through the fucking reentry and he skips on tiles, lol

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:33:11 UTC No. 16212483

>>16212451
>empower shitskins
>they immedietaly fuck things up
classic

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:34:12 UTC No. 16212489

https://x.com/RocketLab/status/1798444944136589664

50s vid of the launch

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:35:25 UTC No. 16212492

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqf0HEmfOHI

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:35:47 UTC No. 16212493

>>16212489
Oh huh I totally wasn’t paying attention. Good for them I guess

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:52:54 UTC No. 16212518

>>16212482
they dont do the bellyflop? SOURCE!!?!???

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:55:41 UTC No. 16212522

>>16212343
why is the window always at the same time at 7am
it's just a test flight

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:56:31 UTC No. 16212524

>>16212518
They literally didn't do it the last time they landed a Starship by itself. They burned much earlier, higher in the sky and slowly descended using vectoring to correct any sliding

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:58:35 UTC No. 16212526

>>16212522
because it's gonna be sunset around the landing zone in the Indian Ocean I guess?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:01:18 UTC No. 16212528

>>16212524
anon if you thought the bellyflop maneuver meant to land on its belly...

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:02:35 UTC No. 16212530

>>16212528
Watch the last SN landing. People were typing up a storm seething about them not doing it at the time

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:03:06 UTC No. 16212533

>two tiles have already fallen off

It's over before it's even begun...

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:04:26 UTC No. 16212536

Are you guys excited?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:07:22 UTC No. 16212541

>>16212536
It's hard to get excited for another suborbital test flight.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:08:37 UTC No. 16212545

>>16212451
>>16212477
they're all going...or else
#AntiAstroonomerAktion

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:09:51 UTC No. 16212548

>>16212541
Honestly surprised that they made the new launch date. I figured they'd spend like a month figuring out what caused the fan failure and the problems on the ground.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:11:04 UTC No. 16212550

>>16212518
Compare

https://www.youtube.com/live/ODY6JWzS8WU?si=qXJuZ8eIgR9uzbrj&t=689

https://youtu.be/7CZTLogln34?si=cJ_Vta7NjYtPDJxE&t=33

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:14:37 UTC No. 16212556

Let it be known, the only reason Starlink isnt flying on IFT-4 (or IFT-3) is the FAA would rip them a new asshole if it didnt go 100% as planned, regardless of successful deployment.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:15:56 UTC No. 16212558

>>16212550
after elon bought twitter it was all downhill

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:16:06 UTC No. 16212559

>>16212556
Starlink isn't flying only because the world's best space company can't figure out how to open a door in space

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:17:30 UTC No. 16212562

>>16212536
I'll get excited if Insprucker returns.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:17:59 UTC No. 16212564

>>16212550
that's still a bellyflop and in a full reentry it'd be holding that position for a long time until it goes subsonic, they're just flipping out of it a little bit earlier.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:18:09 UTC No. 16212565

>>16212562
he was there last time, what do you mean man

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:18:10 UTC No. 16212566

>>16212536
Yes!

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:18:12 UTC No. 16212567

>>16212426
They could feasibly do this forever

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:19:06 UTC No. 16212568

>>16212565
he wasn't on the ift-3 stream

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:20:49 UTC No. 16212571

>>16212426
The money ran out decades ago. Running on fumes ever since. Bankruptcy is not only certain, it already happened

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:21:30 UTC No. 16212572

>>16212536
Hard to be excited when it probably won't make it through reentry, no guarantees of the RCS being fixed, or half the Raptors not succumbing to the sloshing when they attempt landing, desu. I expect slight progress then another month or two of waiting, not as much progress as last time unfortunately

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:21:37 UTC No. 16212573

>>16212568
yes he was

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:22:08 UTC No. 16212574

>>16212573
where?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:22:16 UTC No. 16212575

>>16212541
Perfectly wrong lol
I don't remember people being so pessimistic about JWST

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:24:17 UTC No. 16212577

>>16212573
okay I guess not, I browsed through it, maybe it was another recent spacex launch then
but I remember him being shown at least, just not hosting it

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:25:30 UTC No. 16212578

>>16212564
>a little bit
SN10 does it dramatically faster and lower than SN15. 15 just sort of tilts down gradually using the Raptors, whereas 10 visibly slid horizontally through the air when it flipped. It is very anticlimactic

>>16212558
I agree

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:26:36 UTC No. 16212582

>>16212426
I mean if they can stabilize the orbit this time, they could start lifting payload with it after maybe one more flight with a dummy payload. Landing is optional for rockets may I remind you.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:29:13 UTC No. 16212583

>>16212447
What are you even saying? SpaceX got it done five years earlier for a third the price. Boeing reported a $1.5bil loss on top of the $3bil from NASA. The guy who smokes pot is beating them

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:29:21 UTC No. 16212584

>>16212533
no way that's ai generated.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:31:27 UTC No. 16212585

>>16212550

i couldnt tell the difrunse.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:32:18 UTC No. 16212587

>>16212472
Great. Now I just remembered the cringe he posted from an alt at one of his exes once.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:32:25 UTC No. 16212588

>>16212584
Don't confuse shitty cancerous upscaling and webp artifacts of extremely low res images for AI.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:33:01 UTC No. 16212590

>>16212447
Boeing and SpaceX got similar contracts, Boeing just got paid more money
how do government contracts work? Is there something there that means Boeing must take 4 years longer than SpaceX and still get paid more?
I don't get your point

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:34:02 UTC No. 16212592

>>16212587
you're welcome

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:37:12 UTC No. 16212594

>>16212588
oh right, it actually looked exactly like something dalle3 would pump out with all those random blurs and imperfect shapes on the letters, but the fact all of it was spelt correctly and as part of a coherent joke made it too good to be true.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:39:20 UTC No. 16212596

>>16212559
They might as well separate the door if need be.
The interstage is expendable already anyway so full reuse went overboard anyway. And rapid reuse is a complete fantasy as long as they stick with the fucking tiles.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:39:49 UTC No. 16212598

>/sfg/ isnt excited for yet another super heavy lift launch
That's how you know we're infested by newfags

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:40:22 UTC No. 16212599

>>16212590
Boeing actually did more work. SpaceX got gibmedat technologies from NASA which is part of why they got a lower funding. Dragon 2 was a NASA capsule from start to finish in all but the design frills. the one substantive design element Musk wanted (propulsive landing) never happened. Everythign else was done in house by NASA and given to SpaceX. Boeing took it upon themselves to do almost all the design on Starliner.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:43:03 UTC No. 16212602

>>16212598
how do you think sfg is gonna be like during the 15 or so refueling launches?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:43:45 UTC No. 16212603

New Zubrin reaction image.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:43:54 UTC No. 16212604

>>16212599

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:47:28 UTC No. 16212605

>>16212398
They can keep boats and planes out of the launch corridor for two hours.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:48:39 UTC No. 16212607

>Boing actually did it without messing up
I refuse to believe this timeline is real

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:50:12 UTC No. 16212610

>>16212599
Pretty decent bait, 6/10 some retards will bite.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:50:33 UTC No. 16212611

>>16212562
The hosts for ift-4 will be the gayest darkest niggers they have, talking 20 minutes about being proud about homosex, because it's gay month. Screencap this.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:50:47 UTC No. 16212612

>>16212599
lmao even

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:51:11 UTC No. 16212613

>>16212607
wait for docking

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:52:03 UTC No. 16212615

>>16212607
It hasn't even docked or come back yet

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:53:24 UTC No. 16212618

Wageslave here who couldn't watch the Shitliner launch. Am I really supposed to believe everything just worked?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:54:06 UTC No. 16212619

>>16212599
xD

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:54:23 UTC No. 16212620

>>16212607
Don't count your chickens before they open the hatch, anon.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:54:50 UTC No. 16212621

>>16212613
>THERE IS A MOMEN-ACKK

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:55:14 UTC No. 16212622

>>16212603
Good job DrZ

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:56:33 UTC No. 16212624

Yes, yes, well done, whistleblower. Well done. HOWEVER

https://youtube.com/shorts/ETw4B37_tbU?si=ZD9I4YXJU3BuefRW

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:58:39 UTC No. 16212625

launch thread anon standing by for the flight 4 launch thread

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:01:50 UTC No. 16212627

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:01:58 UTC No. 16212628

how have you prepared for the kino tomorrow?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:02:42 UTC No. 16212629

>>16212625
please see >>16212419
thanks

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:03:25 UTC No. 16212630

>>16212628

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:06:06 UTC No. 16212632

>>16212628

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:06:38 UTC No. 16212635

>>16212628
I've been edging all week.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:08:18 UTC No. 16212637

>>16212628
I've already taken my Imodium

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:10:46 UTC No. 16212639

>>16212625
I've lied to all my customers so when they call me I will ignore them to watch the launch and they will think it is becasue my wife has cancer

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:14:22 UTC No. 16212644

>>16212618
dont buy the psyop. they deleted all the original streams because it was BAD

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:16:30 UTC No. 16212648

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1798493697904189580

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:17:26 UTC No. 16212649

>>16212628
I am preparing to get drunk so that I wake up angry and hungover 2 hours after the launch window opens.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:19:20 UTC No. 16212652

>>16212628
I don't like waking up so early.
But I am reasonably excited.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:20:31 UTC No. 16212653

Fools in here making preparations when they know its just going to scrub

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:24:44 UTC No. 16212658

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:25:46 UTC No. 16212660

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:26:52 UTC No. 16212662

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:28:05 UTC No. 16212663

>>16212649
already drunk. catch up homo


nswr supremacy

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:29:26 UTC No. 16212664

https://x.com/planet4589/status/1798495424040591480

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:30:40 UTC No. 16212667

>>16212664
>they unironically track every piece of debris
KSP is real

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:31:15 UTC No. 16212669

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:32:52 UTC No. 16212672

>>16212628
Did a beer run, so fridge is comfortably full.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:33:26 UTC No. 16212673

Jessie better be hosting the Livestream. I want tits with my blastoff.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:34:42 UTC No. 16212674

>>16212648

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:35:34 UTC No. 16212675

>>16212319
>sex in space is practically impossible
women can't open their mouths in space?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:36:35 UTC No. 16212676

>>16212328
based detester

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:36:39 UTC No. 16212677

>>16212662
Imagine working for IBM in the 70s and getting to rock a rad company jacket while you get paid to smoke cigarettes, drink coffee, and land man on the moon

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:38:58 UTC No. 16212679

>>16212336
This information source has been rated
BROWN
by the Shitposters Association of Spaceflight General

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:40:33 UTC No. 16212681

>_< can't wait to watch another Starship flight with Clear.
I'll have to get up extra early but seeing starship fly and Clear happy will be worth it.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:45:26 UTC No. 16212685

>>16212536
of course I am
I am old and dead inside, but this shit gets even me going

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:48:10 UTC No. 16212688

>>16212664
>starliner launches
>a bunch of space debris appears
everything appears to be in order here

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:49:39 UTC No. 16212692

>>16212377

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:53:14 UTC No. 16212694

>>16212692
How do you become a billionaire selling clothes, what am I missing here?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:53:34 UTC No. 16212696

Status of the second starbase tower?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:55:09 UTC No. 16212698

>>16212694
all clothes in the store drop in price with each day, so chicks were all over that shit

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:59:37 UTC No. 16212701

Hop 12 hours

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:04:12 UTC No. 16212707

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:10:19 UTC No. 16212711

>>16212667
even small debris can clap cheeks

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:10:54 UTC No. 16212712

>Growing the Lunar Economy
>…the future at the Moon holds promise for a robust lunar marketplace.
Oh interesting, like what?
>Anemic CLPS, a mismanaged spacesuit program, one dinky little rover
Oh… yeah, there is no such thing as a “space economy” is there?

https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/growing-the-lunar-economy/

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:12:25 UTC No. 16212714

>>16212712
glass landing pads

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:12:56 UTC No. 16212715

>>16212712
Is the USD going to be used on the Moon eventually? How does that work

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:13:55 UTC No. 16212718

>An update from CAPCOM just indicated there are new helium leaks.
Boing bros...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:15:27 UTC No. 16212719

https://twitter.com/cbs_spacenews/status/1798502162957218178
>A5/Starliner CFT: Flight controllers have told the Starliner crew they are isolating the spacecraft's port helium manifold, the one known to have a small but persistent leak. Mission control to the crew: "No action on the caution message. To catch you back up, we're taking a look at the port helium manifold, we just isolated it to characterize this leak rate."
>A5/Starliner CFT: NASA commentator: "The team here on the ground keeping an eye on the port side of the spacecraft, particularly the manifold valves, noticing some helium increasing (sic) coming out of that valve, so the team is going to step through procedures to close that valve."
>A5/Starliner CFT: These exchanges came down about an hour ago; mission control just now told the crew they're still assessing; no indication yet on whether this is a real concern or simply precautionary; managers said before launch leak would have to dramatically increase to be any sort of worry and for what it's worth, commander Butch Wilmore doesn't sound at all concerned; the crew is about to turn in for the night after a busy first day in space

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:16:52 UTC No. 16212720

>>16212718
>>16212719
are these new leaks or just the same leak getting worse?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:19:44 UTC No. 16212725

>>16212720

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:24:00 UTC No. 16212729

>>16212719
If they have to do an early abort, will they cancel Starliner?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:24:33 UTC No. 16212731

QRD, what is the cope script for when StarShit blows up tomorrow? Are we claiming we "got great data" or maybe blame sea turtles?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:26:15 UTC No. 16212732

>>16212719
>my nudes in profile
I thought Elon would fix Twitter and remove all bots

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:29:40 UTC No. 16212737

https://x.com/FelixSchlang/status/1798502816459153812

Camping near Starbase for tomorrow

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:33:04 UTC No. 16212739

>>16212715
They will issue lunar scrip, like company dollars in the old west.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:35:03 UTC No. 16212741

thank god they picked Starliner over Dream Chaser LMAO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:35:48 UTC No. 16212742

>>16212701

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:36:24 UTC No. 16212744

>>16212741
Don't forget that Dream Chaser crashed during that simulated landing and probably would have killed the crew, and then from what I understand vastly understated how bad the accident was.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:37:43 UTC No. 16212746

>>16212715
They will obviously use loonies, anon.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:39:01 UTC No. 16212747

>>16212694
they're good clothes

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:40:33 UTC No. 16212750

>>16212301
How does she score on wikifeet?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:41:04 UTC No. 16212751

Boing-Boing needs to purge their QA/QC department like it's a faulty helium feed...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:41:28 UTC No. 16212752

>>16212694
The richest man in the world sells handbags

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:42:38 UTC No. 16212754

>>16212746
There will be a currency of dessicated neapolitan ice cream bars, obviously

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:45:29 UTC No. 16212756

>>16212377
>>16212692
nothing a cock ring can't fix

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:45:41 UTC No. 16212757

>>16212694
Look at the french billionaire, that sells womens clothes and shits.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:46:49 UTC No. 16212759

just got on,
so is Boeing being Boeing again?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:48:02 UTC No. 16212761

>>16212759
We'll know if their morning wakeup exchange sounds like Alvin and the Chipmunks.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:48:26 UTC No. 16212762

>>16212759
no, they haven't killed them yet

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:49:58 UTC No. 16212764

is the starliner crew dead yet?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:50:06 UTC No. 16212766

>>16212694
>>16212757
85% of the economy is just women buying perfume

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:51:26 UTC No. 16212769

So wen are we launcheon?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:53:14 UTC No. 16212771

T-minus 7 minutes until Eelon begins shilling NFT's

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:53:36 UTC No. 16212772

>>16212764

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:54:40 UTC No. 16212773

starliner ground crew team all going home as their shift just finished during a mission critical anomaly, you cannot make this up.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:55:45 UTC No. 16212775

>>16212751
Boeing needs to remove everyone from a management role who doesn't have a background in actual engineering

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:56:43 UTC No. 16212777

Boeing has UFO technology which is why they have been wildly successful

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:57:25 UTC No. 16212778

>>16212775
what'bout dis nigga?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:57:56 UTC No. 16212780

>>16212775
True the problem probably does start from higher up

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:59:20 UTC No. 16212781

>>16212777
Bruh

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:59:24 UTC No. 16212782

>>16212777
Isn't Starliner a much simpler project...?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:59:45 UTC No. 16212783

>>16212778
Mr. Didn't Earn It can get sucked out a jet at altitude

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:02:14 UTC No. 16212784

2024... I am forgotten...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:03:05 UTC No. 16212785

>>16212777
social media brain rot

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:04:35 UTC No. 16212787

>>16212777
Call him a nigger

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:05:26 UTC No. 16212788

>>16212787
Hey thats racist

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:08:26 UTC No. 16212789

Thoughts on racism towards belters?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:10:57 UTC No. 16212790

>>16212777
Nobody is insisting that... literally everyone knows what iterative design is and that NASA and oldspace dont do it. Strawmanning pro-SpaceX side and doesnt mention how many delays it took and how much sooner and more often Dragon runs than Shartliner. Dishonest and shameful.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:11:04 UTC No. 16212792

>>16212777
Dragon did it 4 years ago lol

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:12:03 UTC No. 16212793

>>16212777
What did I tell you? Negative attention

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:12:05 UTC No. 16212794

How does everyone think the flight will go?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:12:11 UTC No. 16212795

>>16212777

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:14:41 UTC No. 16212796

>>16212794
Up. And then down.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:15:50 UTC No. 16212798

>>16212794
Exactly the same as last time but no rolling out of control :(

>>16212784
Yeah I'd love a "lander" that spends 22 days sitting in one place drilling tiny holes before it freezes and dies, so based.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:15:51 UTC No. 16212799

>>16212790
He's just a terminally online academic that gets a rush out of shitflinging. I count my lucky stars I am not as pathetically miserable

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:16:52 UTC No. 16212800

>>16212787
This, there's no actual reason to debate people anymore just hit them in the face.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:18:14 UTC No. 16212802

>>16212777
Didn’t OFT-1 fuck up horribly? And then OFT-2 got delayed a year because of salt water?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:20:14 UTC No. 16212804

>>16212798
>"lander" that spends 22 days sitting in one place drilling tiny holes before it freezes and dies
no way, jupiter radiation would kill it way faster than that

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:21:07 UTC No. 16212805

>>16212804
Nope, Juno probe proved it's completely harmless

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:21:07 UTC No. 16212806

>>16212794
>

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:21:07 UTC No. 16212807

Starship/SpaceX IS this master project that is sure to transform humanity and I'm tired of pretending its not. Total earther death.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:21:55 UTC No. 16212808

>>16212805
>>16212804
NASA gave it only batteries because they’re scared an RTG will contaminate Europa also it only hangs out on the surface and doesn’t drill into the ocean or whatever

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:22:55 UTC No. 16212809

I know a classmate of mine who was working on starliner something like 5 years ago. I should check if she is still with the project. Absolutely the corporate politics type to still be there milking this. I'll check LinkedIn later.

The one guy I know that went to SpaceX left years ago after burning out. I know he worked on engines, not sure if it was raptor or merlin.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:23:26 UTC No. 16212810

>>16212799
We are posting on 4chud in the science board which is constantly flooded with retards and baiters talking about rockets because we are allowed to say nigger. I hate to say it but you, me and everyone else here are just as pathetic as he is, and the 'people' here make us miserable so.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:23:28 UTC No. 16212811

>>16212807
Niggas said the same thing about dyna-soar / the space shuttle program when it was still on the proverbial drafting table

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:23:35 UTC No. 16212812

>>16212807

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:24:14 UTC No. 16212813

>>16212809
I had sex with a chick who worked (works?) on raptor
it was pretty cool but the sex was dull she was dead in the eyes

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:24:52 UTC No. 16212814

>>16212810
The difference is I can go to Chris Combs' house and

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:26:05 UTC No. 16212815

>>16212808
>OH NO DONT IRRADIATE THE IRRADIATED PLANET!
Why are they like this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:27:49 UTC No. 16212816

>>16212815
The more likely you are to find life, the less likely NASA wants you to go there

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:28:02 UTC No. 16212817

>>16212777
we should do the really shitty thing of contacting his university so he gets fired

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:28:10 UTC No. 16212818

Just a little reminder that SpaceX still cant even reenlight a raptor in space so were not having a orbital flight until next year

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:28:31 UTC No. 16212819

>>16212805
something on europa's surface would take ~15 days to get a bigger radiation dose than juno's gotten in its entire mission

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:28:39 UTC No. 16212820

earth = massive diverse welfare state that is highly authoritarian with mass surveillance
mars = military junta that expects everyone to be total bootlickers with mass surveillance
belters = free society but dangerous

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:29:44 UTC No. 16212821

>>16212820
Can there be a casino on Phobos?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:30:26 UTC No. 16212824

Dig down to Martian groundwater? Nope.
Methane submarine on Titan? Nope.
Submarine on Europa? Nope.
At least let us go to the Enceladus geysers? Nope!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:34:45 UTC No. 16212825

>>16212824
if you try interesting missions then the risk of something interesting happening is too great. don't ask questions, just consume jpl rock pictures and get excited for next rock pictures.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:36:02 UTC No. 16212826

evety timr i shit my pa ts i think to myse f if i weres on mars wat if i did my space suit?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:38:11 UTC No. 16212828

>yeah we gotta put latinx bipoc transbian people on the moon to own the chinese. take THAT libruls. it costs too much for how much goes up? shut up, youre probably a chink arent you, or worse a commie.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:40:58 UTC No. 16212831

>>16212828
As an American I can admit I fucking reek like shit right now! Haven't showered in three days. It's 107 in phx today and I turned the AC off. it's 87° inside!!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:43:03 UTC No. 16212833

>>16212821
that would be too based

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:46:17 UTC No. 16212834

Bringing a Zamboni to Ganymede to make the world's largest ice skating rink? Nope.
I hate NASA.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:47:07 UTC No. 16212835

>>16212831
Phoenix is not terraformed and is entirely uninhabitable by humans without extensive life support infrastructure.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:47:20 UTC No. 16212836

Will Saturn and Jupiter turn into interplanetary Saudi Arabia? Exporting Helium-3 and whatnot

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:53:37 UTC No. 16212840

>>16212836
>Helium-3
Nothing but a meme

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:57:09 UTC No. 16212844

>>16212840
I mean it's pretty good for clean nuclear power

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:58:25 UTC No. 16212846

https://twitter.com/cbs_spacenews/status/1798528269416911143
>A5/Starliner CFT: Apologies for the delay updating; as it turns out, flight controllers have detected two additional helium leaks, one in "top" manifold 1 and the other in "port" manifold 1; that's in additional to the small leak in port manifold 2 that was known before launch; top manifold 1 and port manifold 1 have been isolated, taking 6 reaction control jets off line; port manifold 2 remains open

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:58:42 UTC No. 16212847

ON THE MORROW, SPACEX WILL CONDUCT A FOURTH FLIGHT TEST OF ITS FULLY INTEGRATED STARSHIP ROCKET, A COMBINATION OF THE SHIP UPPER STAGE AND THE SUPER HEAVY BOOSTER.

ABOUT SEVEN MINUTES AFTER LIFTOFF, THE SHB WILL COMPLETE ITS LANDING BURN AND SPLASHDOWN IN THE GULF OF MEXICO.

THE SHIP UPPER STAGE WILL CONTINUE ON UNTIL IT PERFORMS A LANDING FLIP A LITTLE MORE THAN AN HOUR INTO FLIGHT WITH A LANDING IN THE INDIAN OCEAN SHORTLY THEREAFTER.

SACRIFICES TO MERCURY AND VULCAN FOR SAFE TRAVELS HAVE BEEN RECOMMENDED BY THE AUGURS.


THIS NEWS UPDATE WAS PROVIDED BY THE STARBASE BROTHERHOOD OF WELDERS.
THE BROTHERHOOD USES ONLY THE FINEST STAINLESS STEEL.
TRUE AMERICAN STEEL! FOR TRUE AMERICANS!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:01:32 UTC No. 16212849

>>16212844
Sounds nice, where do I go to see such clean Helium-3 nuclear power being produced?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:02:01 UTC No. 16212850

>>16212844
i like fusion fuels that don't get blown away by solar wind

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:02:33 UTC No. 16212851

https://x.com/spacesudoer/status/1798527001374187980

Elon/Erryday Numale interviewing

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:03:01 UTC No. 16212852

>>16212847
AYYYY NICE SEEING YOU BRO

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:05:45 UTC No. 16212854

>>16212847
Thank you. I kept asking when we were hopping but no body answer

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:06:00 UTC No. 16212855

>>16212846
it's over

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:06:32 UTC No. 16212858

>>16212847
They actually use Japanese steel at starbase. You fucked up romeposter.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:07:03 UTC No. 16212860

>>16212849
when did anyone say about using it today?!
obviously it cannot be utilized right now, maybe in 100 years who knows.
I think you may suffer from some degree of schizophrenia, should get that checked before your cognitive capacity declines even further.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:07:42 UTC No. 16212861

>>16212846
Jesus fucking wept

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:10:17 UTC No. 16212864

>>16212858
Shut the fuck up pussy

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:10:26 UTC No. 16212865

>>16212861
They're going to get waved-off from docking at this rate.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:10:34 UTC No. 16212866

>>16212860
Absolutely fuming, kek

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:12:00 UTC No. 16212867

>>16212778
I got a math degree and the only time there was a black in any of my classes over several years was one who had wandered into a classroom on the wrong floor.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:14:11 UTC No. 16212869

>>16212846
>taking 6 reaction control jets off line
i'm a retard but won't they going to have to abort if they can't get those back on?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:14:17 UTC No. 16212870

>>16212846
jesus fucking CHRIST boing GET IT TOGETHER

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:15:38 UTC No. 16212872

>>16212788
Exactly!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:16:21 UTC No. 16212873

>Artemis lands a bucket on the Moon that falls over rendering it useless
>this has multiple helium leaks
>Space X keeps launching and crashing ships

>somehow we went to the Moon almost a hundred years ago with no casualties

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:16:34 UTC No. 16212874

>>16212869
Depends what ones they are, 6 is bad though

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:17:30 UTC No. 16212875

>>16212873
>with no casualties
Yeah they happened before we even got off the ground back then and due to gross incompetence.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:17:40 UTC No. 16212877

>>16212852
Real life shit keeps me busy but I come back every now and then to lurk. I can't believe Starliner actually launched I expected that piece of shit to be canceled.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:17:50 UTC No. 16212878

>>16212873
>no casualties

Erm

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:18:49 UTC No. 16212879

>>16212807

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:18:53 UTC No. 16212880

>>16212869
Starliner has seven RCS thrusters on each of the four doghouses, for a total of 28. It's really looking like it was designed with hyper-massive redundancy as a necessary feature. "It doesn't matter that the shitty thrusters we bought from Aerojet fail all the time because we have so many of them!"

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:21:13 UTC No. 16212881

>>16212873
back then NASA engineers were mostly White Christian straight males most of which were Korean war veterans

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:21:24 UTC No. 16212882

>>16212810
you come here to say the nigger word
I come here to sneedpost
we are not the same

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:21:28 UTC No. 16212883

>>16212847
Good thread, this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:21:48 UTC No. 16212884

>>16212873
“we need to go there, now” vs “we should go back”
Two completely different mindsets, two completely different priorities, 1960s with the Russians ≠ 2020s with…. no space adversary, or any other means of rousing congress (the purse) to throw money and resources your way

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:22:56 UTC No. 16212886

>>16212883
most random celebrity death of all time

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:24:05 UTC No. 16212887

China and USA will wipe their ass with the "outer space treaty"

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:27:49 UTC No. 16212889

a lot of people forget the 60s space race was literally a war and also that landing on the moon was the only noteworthy accomplishment realistically possible and still is

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:28:06 UTC No. 16212890

>>16212846
another retard here. are they going to be able to come back alive?
also, how the fuck does that happen?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:28:35 UTC No. 16212891

>>16212873
My schizo theory is that there were failures and casualties but the government had much more complete control of information at the time. This has been completely drowned out by retards who don't think it happened at all

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:28:43 UTC No. 16212892

>>16212846
I told you fags that the orbit insertion didn't look good. RCS was firing like crazy, as if trying to compensate for asymetrical thrust. You can see it in the stream, just before the claps.

Chances are a ton of RCS fuel was wasted on the insertion.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:29:55 UTC No. 16212893

>>16212890
They will send a crew dragon to rescue them

>CNN EXCLUSIVE:NASA astronauts stranded because of faulty capsule, Elon Musk forced to send replacement

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:30:54 UTC No. 16212894

How do we fix this?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:31:02 UTC No. 16212895

>>16212880
Redundant Arrays of ThrusterS, RATS in space again.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:31:15 UTC No. 16212896

>>16212892
>Chances are a ton of RCS fuel was wasted on the insertion.

Plus the helium leak

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:31:38 UTC No. 16212897

>Boing is now killing astronauts right in their path to the space station
is this the time to short the shit out of Boing?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:33:13 UTC No. 16212899

>>16212890
OFT-2 made it back despite multiple thruster failures. NASA seems fake unconcerned, but they're not the kind of fake unconcerned you'd see if there was a serious crew risk. The worst likely case is that the thrusters fucked them on ascent like >>16212892 said and they have to abort the docking.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:33:56 UTC No. 16212900

>>16212886
Wtf I didn't know he was dead, just last year too.
Weird.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:34:11 UTC No. 16212901

>>16212890
>That review did turn up something he called a “design vulnerability” with Starliner’s propulsion system where, in a rare circumstance, the spacecraft would not be able to perform a deorbit burn if two adjacent “doghouses” that contain RCS and larger orbital maneuvering and attitude control (OMAC) thrusters failed. That failure, he said, would knock out enough OMAC and RCS thrusters to prevent existing backup plans for carrying out a deorbit burn from being implemented.

>Engineers developed a new deorbit reentry mode that would use two burns of four RCS thrusters in that scenario. Such a failure mode would be “very remote,” Nappi said, appearing in less than one percent of potential combinations of failures.

as of right now they should be fine on coming back. they'd need many more failures before that'd be a concern.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:35:15 UTC No. 16212902

>Leaky Boeing
Nothing new.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:37:26 UTC No. 16212904

>>16212894
by doing what we're currently doing and waiting?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:37:26 UTC No. 16212905

https://www.youtube.com/live/lCBxOYOhG74
in case you missed it!!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:37:57 UTC No. 16212906

>>16212905
QRD? I can't stand to listen to either of their voices.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:38:26 UTC No. 16212907

>>16212847
Ave

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:40:06 UTC No. 16212908

When are we going to get an all-in-one package von-neumann device/robot?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:40:38 UTC No. 16212909

>>16212873
All the top engineering talent back then, versus whoever is left after the top engineering talent of today goes to AI/IT/cryptoscams/gamedevs/smartphones/microchips etc. etc.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:41:23 UTC No. 16212911

how kino would it be if the starliner crew comes back in a dragon

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:43:09 UTC No. 16212914

>>16212873
I sometimes wonder how normies see space, then I see this post and realize whats happening. The inability to understand the core and the changes of the rockets must really make normies confused and angry

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:43:25 UTC No. 16212915

>>16212899
idk about the docking, but they will surely get short of RCS fuel for re-entry. If they can't orient the main shield front for re-entry, chances are they will burn uncontrolledly. I don't think they will risk that much.
Especially after many days docked at ISS while leaking He (it is a gas that likes to leak).

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:43:30 UTC No. 16212916

>>16212858
Mexican-American welders turning Japanese steel into a South African-American's dreams, looks like the melting pot is back, anons.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:43:47 UTC No. 16212917

>we went from landing on Luna, to crossing outlr fingers that the 5th attempt won't explode. What changed?
We need to bring them back and LISTEN
Black Women are Speaking;
You have one job.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:44:19 UTC No. 16212918

>>16212906
Idk i missed it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:44:26 UTC No. 16212919

>>16212911
Boeing humiliation ritual would be kino

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:48:36 UTC No. 16212922

>>16212917
ITT great works of fiction

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:49:32 UTC No. 16212924

>>16212911
Lets see if they arrive safe first. A leak can rotate the capsule and the RCS will fire automatically to correct it, thus wasting even more fuel.
Worst case they are left tumbling in LEO preventing a dragon or soyuz rescue.
Starshit might get delayed just so that NASA can crisis-manage this shit.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:49:51 UTC No. 16212925

>>16212847
thanks newsman

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:52:08 UTC No. 16212927

>>16212924
I'm going to seethe if starship gets delayed because of boing fuckery

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:53:08 UTC No. 16212930

>>16212922
So when is starship gonna replace shuttle as the default spaceship in popular media?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:53:13 UTC No. 16212931

>>16212922
kek

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:54:45 UTC No. 16212935

IFT-4 in 9 hours

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:57:21 UTC No. 16212938

>boeing has an rcs problem on starliner's third test flight
BOEING IS KILL BOEING IS KILL LOL
>spacex has an rcs problem on starship's third test flight
YEAH, IT'S A *TEST* FLIGHT, IDIOT. THE RCS IS SUPPOSED TO FAIL.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:58:17 UTC No. 16212939

>>16212938
How many people were on that Starship flight?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:58:37 UTC No. 16212940

>>16212938
One has living people aboard

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:59:03 UTC No. 16212942

>>16212917
Them foolish whyboiz... [that she always thinks about, every time she schlicks herself to sleep [every single night]]

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:00:13 UTC No. 16212944

>>16212938
this MUST be bait

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:00:15 UTC No. 16212945

>>16212901
Nothing new, NASA has always played fast and loose with astronaut lives

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:01:49 UTC No. 16212947

>>16212944
it probably is. anon is fishing for (You)s.
welcome to 4chan

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:02:02 UTC No. 16212948

>>16212938
Switch them around and you're 100% right

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:02:20 UTC No. 16212949

now in hindsight Boeing killing their astronauts was always to only plausible outcome to come out of this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:02:45 UTC No. 16212951

>>16212947
I can never be too sure which one of us is more autistic

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:03:22 UTC No. 16212952

>>16212949
was always THE only plausible*
>correction

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:03:48 UTC No. 16212953

Someone mentioned Aerojet supplying thruster equipment.
Does BoingBoing learn from this helium leak, or do they continue taking thrusters from the same bin, secure in knowing today was a freak occurence?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:05:48 UTC No. 16212955

>>16212953
They'll probably do the shuttle trick and assume that if nothing serious happend because of this leak then it's ok if it leaks, nothing to see here.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:08:35 UTC No. 16212958

>>16212939
>>16212940
>>16212948
>>16212944
I'm sorry, but did Starliner already fail the mission? Oh, that's right. The mission isn't even over yet. In fact, it's only day 1. Does not having all your RCS jets on day 1 count as a mission failure? Is that what you're saying? Because if you're saying that I can assure you that you're wrong. Why would you make these posts when the mission is still on? Boeing is still financially solvent right now and they have been the best company in the Commercial Crew program for how many years now? They're up against one of the worst companies in spaceflight who just happens to be ahead in crew launch because they're feeding off the energy of having a competitive fixed-cost contract. But you know what? They still fucking suck. Boeing is one of the best fucking contractors in spaceflight, they launched the biggest rocket ever 2 years ago and would've launched it again this year if fucking Lockheed didn't choke. Maybe you should shut the fuck up before you make retarded topics like this. You know why? Because you're going to be embarrassed when the Chargers wins and someone bumps this topic. Oh look at that, S29 just lost another tile when it needed to keep it on, just like the S28 did. Are you a fucking drunk? Are you retarded? Are you autistic? You are a fucking idiot and you should never make a post on this general again and I'm fucking serious. I almost have a feeling you're the only guy making all these anti-Boeing topics because you're a faggot hater who doesn't like the company because they're good. Fuck you, be good at something in YOUR life and then maybe try to troll these fucking corporations on the general, like I give a fuck. It's so easy to spot out your posts now, you're a retard. Always doing stupid shit like this. Why don't you try to be a good poster? Just for once? For once in your fucking life try not to make a topic like this. That's just you, you're always right at getting it wrong. Fuck you. You are nothing.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:08:45 UTC No. 16212959

>>16212953
It not a freak occurrence. OFT-1 had its own share of thruster failures which were written off as "not a real problem." It looks like it's just a trait that Starliner isn't going to escape without a serious redesign that no one wants to do. Boeing has to ride with it because when it comes to propulsion the only real options anyone has are build their own thrusters of buy them from aerojew, and Boeing doesn't have a space propulsion division.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:09:58 UTC No. 16212962

>>16212846
>Just reenter the earths atmosphere with less than 80% of your control authority bro

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:12:02 UTC No. 16212964

>>16212958
I just shit my pants

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:12:16 UTC No. 16212965

>>16212847

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:12:39 UTC No. 16212967

I'm sorry, but did Starliner already fail the mission? Oh, that's right. The mission isn't even over yet. In fact, it's only day 1. Does not having all your RCS jets on day 1 count as a mission failure? Is that what you're saying? Because if you're saying that I can assure you that you're wrong. Why would you make these posts when the mission is still on? Boeing is still financially solvent right now and they have been the best company in the Commercial Crew program for how many years now? They're up against one of the worst companies in spaceflight who just happens to be ahead in crew launch because they're feeding off the energy of having a competitive fixed-cost contract. But you know what? They still fucking suck. Boeing is one of the best fucking contractors in spaceflight, they launched the biggest rocket ever 2 years ago and would've launched it again this year if fucking Lockheed didn't choke. Maybe you should shut the fuck up before you make retarded topics like this. You know why? Because you're going to be embarrassed when the Chargers wins and someone bumps this topic. Oh look at that, S29 just lost another tile when it needed to keep it on, just like the S28 did. Are you a fucking drunk? Are you retarded? Are you autistic? You are a fucking idiot and you should never make a post on this general again and I'm fucking serious. I almost have a feeling you're the only guy making all these anti-Boeing topics because you're a faggot hater who doesn't like the company because they're good. Fuck you, be good at something in YOUR life and then maybe try to troll these fucking corporations on the general, like I give a fuck. It's so easy to spot out your posts now, you're a retard. Always doing stupid shit like this. Why don't you try to be a good poster? Just for once? For once in your fucking life try not to make a topic like this. That's just you, you're always right at getting it wrong. Fuck you. You are nothing.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:13:16 UTC No. 16212968

>>>/pol/470276254
Fun to watch

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:13:33 UTC No. 16212970

Oh, right, it just the first day of this blunder, looking forward to what fails next

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:14:51 UTC No. 16212972

>>16212877
Don't speak too soon, it still hasn't landed yet.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:15:17 UTC No. 16212973

>>16212958
>>16212967
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're fucking dead, kiddo.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:15:21 UTC No. 16212974

>>16212847
The Romans would be so proud.

Confused, but proud.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:17:55 UTC No. 16212978

>>16212893
The tweest is that SpaceX has already been covering for all the missions that Boing hasn't done yet because they keep scrubbing.
>>16212894
>How do we fix this?
with pic related

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:22:22 UTC No. 16212981

>>16212978
Dios mio....
La aborto de un avión cohete....

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:23:24 UTC No. 16212982

>>16212978
People say "it's a design from the 70's!" and I always wonder what, other than a better zero-g toilet and more efficient CPU's, would you even change?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:25:10 UTC No. 16212984

I report trolls instead of replying

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:30:11 UTC No. 16212987

>>16212958
Kek, nice one, but you missed one in the middle there.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:30:16 UTC No. 16212988

>>16212978
there is another way

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:30:58 UTC No. 16212989

Hey dipshits dont forget to wake up tomorrow

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:31:18 UTC No. 16212991

>>16212973
We need a space variant of this ancient meme

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:33:15 UTC No. 16212995

Dubs and helium leaks into Starliner's crew compartment

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:34:18 UTC No. 16212996

>>16212987
yeah there's just so many words in the thing

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:35:23 UTC No. 16212997

>>16212988
all great empires are founded on slavery and genocide. unfortunately there are no martians to genocide but 1/2 isn't bad

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:36:48 UTC No. 16213000

>>16212388
>any obvious or known changes in the vehicle or launch procedures?
They are trying out spray paint tiles.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:40:47 UTC No. 16213003

>>16212991
What the actual frak did you just say about me, you little spacelet? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class at the Astronaut Training Center, and I've successfully completed numerous classified missions for NASA, with over 300 spacewalks logged. I am trained in zero-gravity combat and I’m the top pilot in the entire Space Force. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will erase you from existence with the precision of a quantum laser, the likes of which have never been seen on this planet, mark my cosmic words. You think you can get away with saying that crap to me over ARPANET? Think again, spacetrash. As we speak, I am contacting my secret network of satellites across LEO and your IP is being traced right now, so you better prepare for the rods from GOD, maggot. The storm that annihilates the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re done for, kid. I can land from orbit anywhere, anytime, and I can neutralize you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just in a vacuum. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed space combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Space Command and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable existence off the face of the cosmos, you little snipe. If only you could have known what celestial retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your wormhole. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn terrestrial. I will guide an meteor storm of fury all over you and you will be obliterated by it. You’re star dust, kiddo.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:44:46 UTC No. 16213012

>>16213003
Reddit

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:44:58 UTC No. 16213013

>>16212522
If I had to guess I'd say the airspace over the gulf gets busier after 9am. Plenty of daily flights from ATL DFW and MIA heading to CUN and MEX. Probably easiest to schedule their NOTAM at that time window and still have day light for cameras

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:47:54 UTC No. 16213017

>>16212522
convenience for the lightening engine when rendering it

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:49:27 UTC No. 16213018

>>>/pol/470276254
>>>/pol/470276254
>>>/pol/470276254
Looks like we have some allies on /pol/

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:51:13 UTC No. 16213020

>>16213018
Make sure to advertise the OFT-4 launch thread on /pol/ and everywhere else

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:53:50 UTC No. 16213022

>>16213020
Choke on a dick and die

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:54:40 UTC No. 16213024

>>16212911
If that happens the tears from Boeingfags will be delicious.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:54:42 UTC No. 16213025

>>16213018
How about you stay there faggot?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:00:15 UTC No. 16213027

>NASA stream: Boeing has assured us the vehicle is safe

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:01:55 UTC No. 16213030

>>16213020
>>16213022
>>16213025
Nah i'll make a OFT-4 thread there. But I'll need some help to keep the brics shills from derailing everything

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:03:24 UTC No. 16213031

>>16213030
pls KYS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:05:15 UTC No. 16213033

>>16213030
how 'bout you don't

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:05:28 UTC No. 16213034

>>16213030
It's ok we don't mind if you bring them here

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:06:57 UTC No. 16213036

>>16213027
The vehicles is safe, but what about its crew?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:08:14 UTC No. 16213037

g'night friends
see you all in the early early morning

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:08:43 UTC No. 16213038

>>16213036
Collateral

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:09:37 UTC No. 16213039

8 HOURS

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:10:04 UTC No. 16213040

boing antis and muskrats in this thread setting themselves up for ridicule tomorrow

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:10:28 UTC No. 16213041

>>16213030
Ok, I'll spam flat Earth memes

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:10:33 UTC No. 16213042

>>16213037
Goodnight, Kuria!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:13:40 UTC No. 16213046

>>16213037
Hope you brought Clear to this launch too

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:15:23 UTC No. 16213050

>>16212908
>When are we going to get an all-in-one package von-neumann device/robot?
Anon, you may need to sit down before you hear this...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:16:08 UTC No. 16213051

>>16213031
>>16213033
Why would you care if I spread spaceflight info on /pol/
>>16213034
Don't worry I wont
>>16213041
why?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:17:04 UTC No. 16213053

>>16213051
Because fuck you poltard, stay in your shithole

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:17:45 UTC No. 16213054

>>16212911
Is that even possible? The docking ports are androgynous, right? That would take some very tricky flying from SpaceX ground control if Starliners RCS is inop

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:19:40 UTC No. 16213055

>>16213053
I was in the threads here before /sfg/ was created. Who are you?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:20:19 UTC No. 16213056

>>16213055
Your mom

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:22:05 UTC No. 16213058

>>16213053
Minsinformation is super duper gay

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:23:51 UTC No. 16213059

>>16213040
Shartliner blowing up the ISS will be very funny

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:24:12 UTC No. 16213060

>we are going to launch with a leak
>what could possibly go wrong

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:24:37 UTC No. 16213062

https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mnxepdEkwLJX

NSF live

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:25:26 UTC No. 16213063

They're gonna wave them off from the ISS aren't they?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:29:42 UTC No. 16213065

>IFT4 succeeds in both water landings
>Starflop has to go back without docking
Wouldn't that be funny

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:30:34 UTC No. 16213066

does anyone know when tomorrow morning is?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:32:03 UTC No. 16213068

>>16213066
Are you on drugs?
It's already morning

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:32:51 UTC No. 16213069

>>16213068
it is 7:30pm retard

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:33:53 UTC No. 16213072

>>16213069
Look again idiot, it's 7:30am

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:34:05 UTC No. 16213073

>>16213051
>>16213030
>>16213018
>election season /pol/ tourists incoming
Just don't do it retard. We've already had one faggot trying to bring /pol/tards here and the general still hasn't recovered.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:34:06 UTC No. 16213074

~T-7 hours 45 mins

Roughly speaking

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:39:28 UTC No. 16213076

>>16212989
unlike the crew of starliner

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:48:50 UTC No. 16213084

>>16213073
I'm not going to link this board at all. But I am going to make OFT-4 threads on /pol/ because it needs to be known.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:50:51 UTC No. 16213085

>>16213084
can't you just wait to see if it's successful before announcing it soviet-style

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:53:44 UTC No. 16213088

>>16213085
It's the 4th launch. It's a success in of itself.

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:00:11 UTC No. 16213092

I JUST SHAT MY PANTS FOR SHARTLINER OHHHH SAY CAN YOU SEEEE BY THE MART DO WE SHAAAART

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:14:55 UTC No. 16213098

>>16213084
Why not make it on just about any other board, it's not even politics

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:27:19 UTC No. 16213106

>>16213098
It 100% is political and why are you afraid of /pol/?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:28:34 UTC No. 16213107

>>16213106
because it's full of retards who come over here and become terrible posters

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:32:20 UTC No. 16213111

>>16213106
Go back there then and stay there faggot

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:34:18 UTC No. 16213114

Whoever made the other thread is a retard.
Starliner and Flight 4 are the biggest events going on right now, and the edition the faggot OP chose is the JPL and that mockable image of all female staff? It has to be a troll

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:36:41 UTC No. 16213116

>>16213018
pol doesn't think space is real

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:39:18 UTC No. 16213119

Not too fond of Mars Sample Return

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:41:16 UTC No. 16213120

>>16213114
IFT-2 was far worse. Also its not he seems like a genuine OP that just forgot.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:44:29 UTC No. 16213123

>>16213119
why?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:47:34 UTC No. 16213127

>>16213116
Of course it can't think. It's just a big rock.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:52:02 UTC No. 16213130

>>16213123
Nigger

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:58:20 UTC No. 16213135

>>16213130
nigger what?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:58:21 UTC No. 16213136

>>16213107
How will they come over here without a link?
>>16213111
Blah blah blah

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:59:22 UTC No. 16213137

>>16213116
Before the flat earth bots /pol/ had excellent space elevator threads.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:59:48 UTC No. 16213138

When does starliner dock with the iss?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:03:07 UTC No. 16213140

>>16213137
not sure it's all bots. As a rule pol basically doesn't believe in anything mainstream. It's like if someone normal says something then the opposite must be true. Leads to funny contradictions/horseshoe effects

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:03:23 UTC No. 16213141

>>16213138
12 pm EST

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:07:06 UTC No. 16213142

>>16213140
Stop talking about /pol/ you stupid immigrant newfag baby we dont want you here go back RIGHT FUCKING NOW

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:10:57 UTC No. 16213145

>>16213141
So right after ift4...Busy day tomorrow

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:14:11 UTC No. 16213150

>>>/wsg/5576705

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:16:27 UTC No. 16213154

>>16213138
When it stops being adrift

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:20:59 UTC No. 16213157

>>16213138
As it stands, it doesn't. They have all the helium valves closed to try and stop the leaking. Carrying on with the mission like this is fucking madness, they need to abort. Although I wouldn't want to be riding the first shartliner with fucked up thrusters back through re entry. Non zero chance they open the valves to maneuver to the ISS and shit goes horribly wrong, leaves them tumbling, even if they manage to dock I'm pretty sure they will have to call off taking the shartliner back and call a SpaceX uber to collect them.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:28:57 UTC No. 16213162

>>16213157
They said they were going to test the thing all the way to the ISS and boy are they getting their money's worth

I'm glad they have the instrumentation at least to know that they have additional leaks that were not detected on the ground

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:34:56 UTC No. 16213167

>>16212696
the foundation pilings have been drilled, filled with rebar and concrete and cured, a foundation rebar cage has been built on top and they should pour the foundation pile cap soon
new piling locations are being drilled as well
all but two tower sections are waiting at Sanchez build site/staging area

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:35:31 UTC No. 16213169

>>16213142
you are the only one new here
>>16213140
Its botted, we figured it out back when it started. I wish I would have saved the evidence.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:41:44 UTC No. 16213178

>>16213169
Holy shit fuck off

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:53:19 UTC No. 16213190

>>16213150
reminder that this is /sfg/'s official ift-4 theme until somebody comes up with a better one

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:54:43 UTC No. 16213193

I'm ready

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:00:06 UTC No. 16213198

>launch before Starliner disaster
Devilish, Elon. Devilish.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:00:14 UTC No. 16213199

https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OwxWYzDXjWGQ

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:01:45 UTC No. 16213203

>>16213198
They have fitted the chomper fairing in secret to collect starliner when it starts tumbling.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:02:01 UTC No. 16213204

>>16213199
~4 hrs 30 mins till live

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:05:04 UTC No. 16213205

>>16212851
so two weeks?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:08:43 UTC No. 16213209

>>16213205
I LOVE REDDIT AND ELON!!!!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:10:54 UTC No. 16213210

>>16213209
Seethe harder fagboy. Excited to see how assblasted you can get when it hasn't launched even.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:11:57 UTC No. 16213211

>>16213209
Does seething about Musk 24/7 really give you meaning in life? lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:15:26 UTC No. 16213215

>>16213178
Holy shit go away

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:26:53 UTC No. 16213226

>>16213211
>>16213210
Samefag, notice the minute apart

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:29:19 UTC No. 16213229

>>16213226
We're all nevermuskers here

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:36:29 UTC No. 16213240

Goooood morning /sfg/. launch thread going up at T-1 bong

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:37:23 UTC No. 16213241

>>16213150
>>>/wsg/5576749
Starliner theme

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:37:33 UTC No. 16213242

>>16213240

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:38:36 UTC No. 16213244

>>16213241
>punjabi music
lmaoooo

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:39:42 UTC No. 16213245

>>16213241
Brutal

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:51:12 UTC No. 16213257

chipmunk status?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:54:03 UTC No. 16213263

>>16213209
This. God bless Elon

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:59:10 UTC No. 16213266

3.5h until stream start

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:04:33 UTC No. 16213270

https://x.com/sivb503/status/1798510241057014247
>Incredible things are happening in the LabPadre discord

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:08:36 UTC No. 16213275

>>16213270
powerful

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:09:33 UTC No. 16213278

>>16213270
Lmfao

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:09:52 UTC No. 16213279

>>16213278
the Chinese hacker?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:18:08 UTC No. 16213289

is this a troon?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:18:28 UTC No. 16213290

>>16213289
yeah

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:20:21 UTC No. 16213292

Bunch of livestreams, the ones below are live

NSF commentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTkhv4fvOgA
>SpaceX Launches Fourth Starship Flight Test

NSF non-commentary multicam
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJRzQsLZGg
>Starbase Live: 24/7 Starship & Super Heavy Development From SpaceX's Boca Chica Facility

Everyday astronaut
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VESowgMbjA
>[4K] Watch SpaceX Starship FLIGHT 4 launch and reenter LIVE!

Labpadre multicam
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8QLrVAOE1k
>Starbase Live 24/7 Multi Plex - SpaceX Starship Super Heavy Launch & Production Facility

Labpadre commentary (not live until 1h 15min until launch window opens)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c49s4fiyM3A
>WATCH STARSHIP IFT-4 - LIVE Commentary With Spaceflight Now

Spaceflight now, this might be the same stream as the one above (it starts at the same time and they mention LabPadre)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFkqZF-Ss7o
>Watch live: SpaceX launches Starship/Super Heavy Booster on fourth test flight

Link to official SpaceX stream on X, hasn't been posted by SpaceX yet so it might not work
going live 30min before the launch window opens so in 3h 10min
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OwxWYzDXjWGQ

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:23:36 UTC No. 16213294

>>16213270
I'm going to join to tell them about my DMT and gateway tapes psychonaut history and how it applies to rocketry.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:24:54 UTC No. 16213295

>>16213292
>grift stream
>grift stream
>soi stream
>grift stream
>grift stream
>grift stream

No thanks, I'll be watching the anime girl commentary.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:25:37 UTC No. 16213297

>>16213295
>watching the simp stream
lol

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:25:53 UTC No. 16213298

>>16213295
Same

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:33:39 UTC No. 16213305

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:34:58 UTC No. 16213306

>>16213305
i had this dream too

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:36:07 UTC No. 16213308

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:39:49 UTC No. 16213312

>>16213305
that bitch cute

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:39:53 UTC No. 16213313

>>16212694
He lost a lot of money recently and isn't even gonna fly on Starship

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:40:15 UTC No. 16213314

>>16213289
Yes. Or in the process of being one. You can tell from the way he speaks, dresses and acts

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:41:51 UTC No. 16213316

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApMrILhTulI

hype

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:42:00 UTC No. 16213317

Iscthe launch in 3 hours and 20 minutes?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:44:37 UTC No. 16213322

>>16213317
Iscthe will not be launching today, sorry.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:45:21 UTC No. 16213325

Don't worry, when Starship explodes again no one will notice Starliner's fate.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:46:24 UTC No. 16213329

>>16213317
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OwxWYzDXjWGQ

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:47:26 UTC No. 16213331

>>16213325
>ELON MUSKS MEGA ROCKET FAILS, TWO ASTRONAUTS DEAD

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:47:45 UTC No. 16213332

>>16212909
this

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:53:15 UTC No. 16213335

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:54:17 UTC No. 16213336

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:55:18 UTC No. 16213337

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:55:20 UTC No. 16213338

will be launch be streamed on yotutube? I still don't have a twitter account

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:56:41 UTC No. 16213339

>>16213338
there might be re-streams, but officially no

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:57:52 UTC No. 16213340

>>16213339
there was a stream on yt last time though

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:58:16 UTC No. 16213342

>>16213203
>They have fitted the chomper fairing in secret to collect starliner when it starts tumbling.
No, the tumbling Shartliner would make that too dangerous. Elon has contacted the top rodeo lassoists and they're on standby

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:58:34 UTC No. 16213343

I had a quick goon sesh before launch, everyone get your popcorn ready its time to watch Starshit explode and prove that NASA is the best, most safe and reliable choice.
>pic unrel

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:59:01 UTC No. 16213344

BOOOING docking attempt going to happen basically right when Starship re-enters the atmosphere

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybaWL0J-Tbw

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:00:02 UTC No. 16213346

>>16213340
not an official one

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:04:44 UTC No. 16213348

>>16213338
https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-4

Works fine

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:06:24 UTC No. 16213349

>>16213346
i'm pretty sure it was official, only elon has enough money for the bitcoin giveaways they were doing

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:07:36 UTC No. 16213351

>https://x.com/cbs_spacenews/status/1798641920819785730
>We still dont have full picture of the helium system status
>We'll just dock with ISS and see from there

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:09:45 UTC No. 16213354

>>16213351
they can always hitch a ride back on dragon

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:09:47 UTC No. 16213355

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:13:12 UTC No. 16213358

cars going to the pad

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:14:17 UTC No. 16213360

>>16213343
excuse me, what the fuck is going on in the middle?
thats supposed to be someone helping a wheelchair bound girl on the tard-toilet right? right?!
because it kinda looks like a guy in a suit piping a girl in a school uniform.
not that this wouldn't be "efficient use of space", but japan is seriously taking their solutions to their fertility crisis too far if they have dedicated breeding chambers in the middle of their public restrooms.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:14:28 UTC No. 16213361

>>16213351
They ded

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:14:37 UTC No. 16213362

>>16213338
>will be launch be streamed on youtube?
looks like it, it's cycling through the synopsis of the flight, kinda sounds like the speech was generated by ChatGPT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BUrRiI_6d4

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:15:54 UTC No. 16213364

Boats cockblock the launch in 3 hours
>t. knower

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:16:33 UTC No. 16213365

>>16213362
you're not very smart

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:17:05 UTC No. 16213367

be honest, how can Boeing even hope to compete?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:19:07 UTC No. 16213369

Any guess on Starship IFT-5 days before flight?

My guess is ~55 days

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:19:46 UTC No. 16213370

>>16213369
80 days

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:20:33 UTC No. 16213372

>>16213365
ahh fuck, I hit a copycat page huh? These fucking things pop up like flies. I think the actual thing is streaming officially only on Twitter. Plenty of youtube restreams though

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:21:37 UTC No. 16213373

>>16213369
depends on how successful IFT-4 is, but I'd say around 70-90 days

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:21:43 UTC No. 16213374

>>16213372
All cryptofrauds.

Nice youtube there. Its unusable unless you want to be scammed like a good goy

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:23:48 UTC No. 16213375

>>16213374
got it, turns out you have to type "@spacex" to get the actual page (no livestream on their channel btw). Fucking retarded if you ask me, but youtube has been getting worse and worse every year so I shouldn't be surprised

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:24:00 UTC No. 16213377

>>16213372
youtube should be lawsued

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:24:09 UTC No. 16213378

>>16213374
From what I understand, youtube botting is not cheap, to hit 100k+ CCV is really fucking expensive. I don't see how they are getting enough money back from their AI voice double your bitcoin scames to make it back, people dumb enough to fall for that font have the IQ level to figure out how to even buy bitcoin.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:24:51 UTC No. 16213379

>>16213378
they must be doing something right, because they're fucking everywhere nowadays

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:25:02 UTC No. 16213380

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:25:06 UTC No. 16213381

>>16213378
>youtube botting isn't cheap
Every single day for nearly a decade. Multiple SpaceX/Tesla live videos from scammers running 24/7.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:25:50 UTC No. 16213382

>>16213375
youtube unironically peaked in 2016

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:26:51 UTC No. 16213383

>>16213380
REEEEEE ANOTHER DELAY

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:27:04 UTC No. 16213384

>>16213367
they can't, neither can anybody else

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:27:51 UTC No. 16213385

>>16213367
>PAYLOAD CAPACITY 100-150 t
DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT LOL

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:27:59 UTC No. 16213386

>>16213381
>>16213379
There's a dude on /vt/ who bots streams and posts shit about it. It's seriously fucking expensive. I think youtube jews must be in on it, roundabout musk defamation method to try and keep their Tesla shorts in profit.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:28:00 UTC No. 16213387

BOAT STATUS??

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:28:50 UTC No. 16213388

>>16213387
Revving their motors

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:28:54 UTC No. 16213389

>>16213387
youtube boating is out of control

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:30:46 UTC No. 16213390

>>16213387
NEW RADAR SIGNATURE JUST ENTERING RANGE

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:32:37 UTC No. 16213391

>>16213390
THE ULA MISSILE BOAT AIIIIEEEEEE

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:32:46 UTC No. 16213392

FYI - Current T+0 timing in different time zones:

New York (EDT) 8:20 AM
Los Angeles (PDT) 5:20 AM
London (BST) 1:20 PM
Paris (CEST) 2:20 PM
Moscow (MSK) 3:20 PM
New Delhi (IST) 5:50 PM
Beijing (CST) 8:20 PM
Tokyo (JST) 9:20 PM
Sydney (AEST) 10:20 PM
Toronto (EDT) 8:20 AM

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:39:33 UTC No. 16213398

53 years ago today, dobrovolsky, volkov, and patsayev launched aboard soyuz 11. they had zero rcs jets fail while rendezvousing with salyut 1 and at this stage in the mission they were having a more successful flight than starliner.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:41:49 UTC No. 16213400

>>16213392
I like how he timed the launch so it's most convenient to watch for us Eurochads

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:42:33 UTC No. 16213401

>>16213398
Boing mogged by drunk soviet garage engineers

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:42:51 UTC No. 16213403

>>16213398
How come RCS issues only became a problem in modern times. Did they use different fuels back then or something?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:43:04 UTC No. 16213404

>>16212922
I vaguely remember liking this.
Can't remember much about it though.
>>16213241
beautiful

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:44:57 UTC No. 16213406

berger talked about politics of space a bit and that it is important to show they are making progress so starship isn't the long pole

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:46:02 UTC No. 16213407

>>16213406
Starship can take my long pole, if you know what I mean

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:47:09 UTC No. 16213409

>>16213407
I don't follow

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:47:43 UTC No. 16213410

>>16213406
Yeah NASA will be watching this launch pretty closely.
How's the weather looking?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:49:58 UTC No. 16213411

>>16213409
I want to fuck that rocket

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:53:10 UTC No. 16213413

>>16213403
before apollo every manned craft used HTP monopropellant for RCS. soyuz still uses it. it's always needed helium as a pressurant too so somehow they managed to keep helium leaks from being a problem back in the 1960s.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:54:48 UTC No. 16213415

>>16213406
if we don't get a demonstration that the heat shield more or less works this time there's going to be trouble in congress.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:55:58 UTC No. 16213417

>>16213295
https://youtu.be/Em55I0Q9kFg
frame is up

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:56:28 UTC No. 16213418

Berger thinks rapid reuse might not happen until Block 4 of starship
and that they will launch expendable starships before that, maybe even do artemis with expendable starships

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:57:12 UTC No. 16213419

>>16213415
Yeah, we'll start seeing a lot more senators grilling ballast over artemis. Will be easier to cancel and try to replace with a 'saner' option. Either way, it won't really affect SpaceX TOO much if they flop here.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:59:31 UTC No. 16213422

>>16213419
yeah starship is already too far along, Starlink is printing money and Starship will just enable it more

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:04:47 UTC No. 16213425

We should probably start the launch threat at T-1h or so?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:05:17 UTC No. 16213426

Berger doesn't expect Polaris 3 mission until 2030s, but is pretty confident it will happen
He wasn't surprised about DearMoon getting cancelled

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:05:19 UTC No. 16213427

>>16213418
i still figure they'll be able to get the basic tanker-to-leo-and-back ship fully reusable in time. but if anything that goes beyond leo gets expended that'd simplify a lot of things in the short term...

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:05:34 UTC No. 16213428

>>16213425
>start the launch threat
ULA snipers are already inbound anon

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:06:00 UTC No. 16213429

Two hours left

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:06:17 UTC No. 16213430

>>16213425
yeah

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:06:22 UTC No. 16213431

>>16213425
>>16213240

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:07:51 UTC No. 16213434

getting giddy, its really happening
was kind of like meh before but its only 2h 12min left now

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:07:51 UTC No. 16213435

>>16213425
Prob.

Just found out they now do 1080p now. Neat.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:07:54 UTC No. 16213436

>Shuttle & SLS: did not require any integrated flight tests to achieve a perfect mission
>Starship: requires up to 9 tests before it can do anything
not a troll but can anyone explain why this is the case?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:09:00 UTC No. 16213437

>>16213436
you got us anon, elon doesn't understand that things should just work

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:09:23 UTC No. 16213438

>>16213436
hardware rich development
they test physical test articles instead doing it on paper (and taking much longer)

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:09:31 UTC No. 16213439

>>16213436
>>16213436
They have decades of experience and simulate every possible failure for the next few years until it is literally impossible for the rocket to fail

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:09:45 UTC No. 16213440

>>16213436
SLS is a 50+ year development project utilizing space shuttle components. Even formal SLS was a 10+ year project. Before that it was constellation project which is same as SLS. And so on.

Starship is rapid iterative project

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:10:19 UTC No. 16213442

>>16213425
that's my plan
t. launch thread anon

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:10:46 UTC No. 16213443

RUD time soon muskrats, prepare your copes

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:10:54 UTC No. 16213444

>>16213439
and yet it still fails lmao
SpaceX has shown that the hardware rich approach is much better

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:13:54 UTC No. 16213445

>>16213372
You do this shit every fucking time. Stop pretending to be retarded and just stop posting altogether.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:15:36 UTC No. 16213447

>>16213436
If you're not willing to destroy shit to make progress you'll end up making the same rocket over and over and over again because it worked in the past with similar margins.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:16:12 UTC No. 16213448

reminder we are 3 months away from the world's FIRST operational 40-ton SHLV sending a payload to mars. domination is coming to spaceflight.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:16:52 UTC No. 16213449

>>16213426
snails pace

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:18:12 UTC No. 16213450

>>16213443
The engines are the biggest problem

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:19:39 UTC No. 16213451

Berger: NASA not going forward with Hubble servicing mission is a missed opportunity.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:19:51 UTC No. 16213453

does anyone know when 2 hours from now is?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:20:40 UTC No. 16213454

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:21:43 UTC No. 16213455

>>16213454
Go on a diet, berger.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:21:56 UTC No. 16213456

>>16213453
Nobody does, fa.m

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:22:07 UTC No. 16213458

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:23:09 UTC No. 16213459

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:23:32 UTC No. 16213460

>>16213455
>>16213454
I was distracted by berger, so I didn't notice the creature in the top right.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:24:10 UTC No. 16213461

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:24:48 UTC No. 16213462

>>16213461
LIVE, FROM THE BASE OF THE LAUNCH TOWER IT'S TIM DODD!

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:25:27 UTC No. 16213463

>>16213462
KEK