Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:20:29 UTC No. 16212302

>>16212289
looks like you got sniped anon. This looks like it would've been a pretty good thread though.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:21:06 UTC No. 16212304

The other thread was made 7 seconds earlier, but this is still a good thread. The other thread already has replies so everyone go over there and we will recycle this after that thread.

>>16212288
>>16212288
>>16212288

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:24:01 UTC No. 16212312

that black-dude is black-pilled (no pun intended) because despite being ina roomwith like 200 women he gets no bitches since he isnt chad.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:25:22 UTC No. 16212315

this thread has better continuity with the previous thread in terms of the OP pic, I'm staying here

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:28:43 UTC No. 16212325

>>16212312
Since a child he dreamed of launching rockets, instead he has to help launch the stem careers of ugly women with no business being in the building.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:34:16 UTC No. 16212338

>>16212304
huh pretty sure the other thread was made sooner

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:43:39 UTC No. 16212358

>>16212338
thats only because the other thread had less thought and effort put into it, see >>16212315

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:44:21 UTC No. 16212360

>>16212338
This thread was made at 20:15:52, and the other thread was made at 20:15:47, so the other thread was made slightly earlier.

This thread was mentioned on the previous thread at 20:16:53, and the other thread was mentioned at 20:16:21, so the other thread was linked earlier as well.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:47:30 UTC No. 16212371

>>16212312
He's the only one there who cares about science

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:48:12 UTC No. 16212373

>>16212360
The other thread is a troll thread, its labeled "IFT-4 Edition", is IFT-4 happening today?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:52:15 UTC No. 16212383

>>16212373
Yes*
*if you live in japan

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:55:34 UTC No. 16212395

>>16212289
>Image

Hmmm why is a private company able to do more than NASA can in getting into space cheaply... maybe because NASA is 85% non-essential personnel.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:57:14 UTC No. 16212401

>>16212395
Not as white as I thought it would be.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:05:14 UTC No. 16212415

>>16212371
singles of truth

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:40:34 UTC No. 16212682

>>16212289

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:19:26 UTC No. 16212724

>>16212312
he's not at all worried about getting pussy
he has sex with whoever he wants
because he is a rapist

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 02:52:40 UTC No. 16212928

>>16212724
really?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:31:05 UTC No. 16212990

when moon?

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:32:10 UTC No. 16212992

>>16212682
KEK

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:43:49 UTC No. 16213009

>>16212395
Real answer is that NASA is beholden to Congress and the President instead of shareholders. The mandate has never been there for cheap government spaceflight, nor colonization.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:09:52 UTC No. 16213441

>t-3 hours
>no hype
It's over