🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:39:37 UTC No. 16236717
Shartliner Edition
Previous - >>16234355
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:43:07 UTC No. 16236724
first for based pebbles
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:46:43 UTC No. 16236733
>>16236724
https://archive [dot] ph/D2zIG
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:50:20 UTC No. 16236738
Lets hear your /sfg/ hot takes
>the final iteration of starship tiles are going to be almost as much of a pain as shuttle tiles, but it will be fine because they will have more than 5 ships to cycle through
>SMART reuse would have been good if they stuck with it
>reusable booster expendable second stage (falcon 9 clones, if you will) will be a commercially viable rocket architecture for the next half century at least.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:51:43 UTC No. 16236741
>>16236724
* wipes out your fruity pebbles *
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:55:37 UTC No. 16236747
>>16236738
>tiles
I could see this happening. We could have seen much higher launch rates with the shuttle if there had been 10-12 orbiters, although I'm not sure if that sort of flight rate could have saved the program's economics
>SMART reuse
It would have been great if someone had bothered with it twenty years ago
>reusable booster expendable second stage
This might not be true, but I can see it kinda working out that way anyway just because it's what made SpaceX successful and everyone is going to take twice as long to catch up to where they are now
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:57:52 UTC No. 16236748
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:01:10 UTC No. 16236751
>>16236738
Starship tiles will not be a Criticality 1 because the steel is invincible
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:06:50 UTC No. 16236754
>>16236717
>>16236159
It must be powered by some massive fissile stockpile with a very long half life. It has to be built like a pyramid and designed to stay put for millions of years. As long as cheap penny pinching democratic governments aren't financing it, it's doable.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:09:12 UTC No. 16236755
>>16236733
>chatGPT slop
I hope you realize that none of the information these things put out is accurate.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:11:32 UTC No. 16236758
>>16236738
Will each tile be its own custom shape like on the Shuttle or will they be interchangeable?
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:13:08 UTC No. 16236763
>>16236755
it's not a leak of secret information, it's just a simple deductive argument from publicly available information. Not even a novel argument, many here and elsewhere have connected these dots before, but it's amusing because it's Elon's own chatbot doing the connecting this time.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:15:36 UTC No. 16236769
>>16236763
Chatbots can't make deductive arguments or any kind of argument at all. All it's doing is regurgitating information from its training data with no ability to check if that information is actually correct or not. In fact, the ONLY things it checks for are if the next word it spits out fits with the context of the previous words, and if the word is commonly used after the previous word.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:16:23 UTC No. 16236770
>>16236769
>muh stochastic parrot argument
that's been debunked try to keep up
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:18:53 UTC No. 16236775
>>16236770
Has it? Do you have a source for that?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:20:47 UTC No. 16236779
>>16236775
yes:
While the "stochastic parrot" metaphor raises important concerns about large language models (LLMs), there are compelling arguments that LLMs are more than just statistical mimicry. Here are several key points suggesting that LLMs aren't mere "stochastic parrots":
1. Generalization and novel combinations: LLMs can generate coherent responses to prompts they haven't seen verbatim during training. They combine concepts in novel ways, suggesting a capacity for generalization beyond rote memorization.
2. Few-shot learning: LLMs exhibit an impressive ability to learn from a small number of examples and apply that learning to new situations. This adaptability is hard to explain if they are simply regurgitating patterns.
3. Emergent abilities: LLMs demonstrate capabilities, such as basic arithmetic, commonsense reasoning, and even coding, that aren't explicitly part of their training data. These emergent abilities hint at a deeper understanding of language and concepts.
4. Consistency over long contexts: LLMs can maintain coherence and consistency over long generated passages, keeping track of topics, entities, and previous statements. This level of contextual awareness suggests more than superficial pattern matching.
5. Sensitivity to subtle prompts: LLMs can pick up on nuances and implications in prompts, generating responses that are situationally appropriate. This sensitivity to context and subtext goes beyond simple word association.
6. Engaging in dialogue: LLMs can engage in back-and-forth conversations, building upon previous exchanges and asking relevant questions. This interactivity suggests a capacity for tracking and participating in the flow of ideas.
7. Multilingual capabilities: Some LLMs can operate in multiple languages, exhibiting similar competencies across linguistic boundaries. This hints at a more general language understanding rather than just memorizing patterns in a single language.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:21:16 UTC No. 16236781
>>16236758
the vast majority will be one design but there are several locations on the ship with unique tiles. these are probably also some of the most critical and easily damaged areas
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:21:49 UTC No. 16236783
>>16236779
While these points don't prove that LLMs possess genuine intelligence or understanding, they do suggest that the "stochastic parrot" framing is overly simplistic. LLMs are exhibiting behaviors that are difficult to dismiss as mere statistical approximation. As our understanding of language and cognition advances, the debate around the nature of intelligence in LLMs is likely to evolve. For now, the most constructive path forward may be to recognize both the impressive capabilities and the current limitations of these models, while actively researching ways to develop AI systems that are more transparent, accountable, and aligned with human values.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:22:56 UTC No. 16236784
>>16236756
>unless the ablative part just just the backup in case they lose a tile.
that is the case, obviously
>>16236769
>"Chatbots can't make deductive arguments or any kind of argument at all."
It demonstrably did.
>nooooo it doesn't count because the machine doesn't have a soul
Irrelevant.
>"with no ability to check if that information is actually correct or not."
It doesn't need to, because the reader can. The basic claims presented in that argument are factually correct. The premise of Brilliant Pebbles, the origins of the DC-X project, Mike Griffin's relationship to both space-based interception projects and SpaceX, the requirement for Brilliant Pebbles of being able to put massive number of satellites into LEO, and SpaceX's ability to do so. All of these are true, even if you don't like hearing them said by an LLM. Connecting the dots between them is trivial to anybody with an ounce of creativity and curiosity, the LLM is not the first to do so and probably got the idea to do so from others anyway.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:23:47 UTC No. 16236785
>>16236779
pro-tip, tell the LLM to avoid the use of lists in your prompt.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:24:44 UTC No. 16236787
>>16236779
>suggesting
>hard to explain
>hint at
>suggests
All I'm hearing here is that LLM are the new blockchain when it comes to hyping up VC bros into giving away their money
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:25:43 UTC No. 16236789
>>16236787
block chains can't write book reports for grade schoolers
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:26:22 UTC No. 16236790
>>16236717
Deep down I want starliner to fail spectacularly and set oldspace back so BO and SpaceX can dunk on crusty boeing boomers but I dont want test astronauts to die.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:27:04 UTC No. 16236791
>>16236784
>"We built a machine that produces incorrect answers to questions. This is an important step forward in Artificial Intelligence because you're capable of finding the right answers on your own."
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:28:07 UTC No. 16236792
>>16236790
While that would be greatly amusing (ideally without killing any astronauts), it will soon be irrelevant anyway. When SpaceX catch the Starship booster in a few weeks it will be truly over for old space anyway.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:28:08 UTC No. 16236793
>>16236790
It is indeed a quandary.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:28:08 UTC No. 16236794
>>16236789
Neither can LLMs
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:29:26 UTC No. 16236796
>>16236792
yeah, I know and I can't wait. the seethe will be hilarious
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:32:39 UTC No. 16236799
>>16236791
You keep saying the machine is wrong, but what you really mean is you can't be certain the machine is right, while also being unable to actually falsify anything the machine said. You could say the same about any argument made by any human.
>but the human COULD verify what it said
Did the human? Do posts on /sfg/ come with extensive citations up front? Sometimes yes, but usually no. Does that mean you shouldn't take any claim at face value? Sure, check anything you like yourself. You can also check what the LLM claimed. Only a fool would blindly trust anything an LLM claims.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:33:56 UTC No. 16236801
>>16236794
I don't know what rock you're living under, but students are already using LLMs to write their book reports and other school essays and teachers are pretty livid about it.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:36:36 UTC No. 16236803
>>16236792
I'm not sure Starliner is going to be irrelevant that soon. It's already obsolete, but the number of orbital destinations is going to increases rapidly going into the 2030s and we don't have that much in terms of crew launch capacity. We have four operational Crew Dragons plus a fifth on the way, as well as two Starliners, that are going to need to move crew to at least three stations. There'll be enough of a demand for Boeing to find work for its capsules if they're interested in perusing it.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:39:09 UTC No. 16236804
>>16236803
>I'm not sure Starliner is going to be irrelevant that soon.
It's going to be irrelevant as soon as we run out of atlas 5 rockets.
No way boeing will foot the bill to human rate vulcan and redesign the adapter to fit on it.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:40:36 UTC No. 16236806
>>16236763
OK schizo lmao
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:41:45 UTC No. 16236807
>>16236779
People are learning that they aren't as "conscious" as they thought they were, and the response has been outright denial. The only thing holding artificial intelligence back is the lack of a body, the mechanical things we can construct are just downright primitive.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:42:28 UTC No. 16236809
>>16236804
Vulcan itself will be a horse buggy once Starship starts in earnest. The entire space industry, both old space and the new space startups, will be totally left in the dust. Such a hilarious overpower mogging hasn't been seen before in our lifetimes, possibly ever. Honestly, even horses got a more graceful phase out.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:43:10 UTC No. 16236811
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/14/
A chinese company has faked papers and sold subpar titanium to boeing (and airbus and other companies)
Wonder if any of that made it's way on starliner;
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:44:22 UTC No. 16236813
>>16236811
this would be the least of starliner's concerns at this point.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:46:19 UTC No. 16236815
>>16236813
How is that going anyway?
i know there where some leaks and even main stream media has been reporting on it, but how bad is it really?
Is it still safe enough to return to earth?
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:48:52 UTC No. 16236816
>>16236815
They don't know yet. My guess is they'll probably do it, but it seems like they're still evaluating the situation.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:49:37 UTC No. 16236819
>>16236779
>>16236783
>AS AN AI LANGUAGE MODEL HERE IS WHY I AM ACTUALLY USEFUL OKAY PLEASE DON'T STOP USING ME EVERY TIME YOU ASK ME SOMETHING AND I GIVE A BULLSHIT ANSWER IT MAKES OPENAI'S STOCK GO UP
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:52:18 UTC No. 16236824
>>16236815
They shut down the helium manifold after they docked so the leaking stopped. It'll start back up when they reactivate the thrusters but it's fine until then. They have something like 80 hours of gas left at the current leak rate and they only need a few hours of that to run through their earth return maneuvers, so it shouldn't pose a risk to the crew. That said, it's not a great look that they weren't able to fix the problem after OFT-2.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:52:22 UTC No. 16236825
>>16236819
this >>16236733 is elon musk's LLM, not openai's. please try to get a grip, you're clearly in denial:
>LLMs can't write book reports because... I just don't want to believe they can okay?? nevermind that literal children have already figured out how to make them do this
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:54:32 UTC No. 16236828
>>16236825
>i-it's elon musk's LLM so i-it's better than other LLMs even though it's the exact same technology just without a filter to keep it from saying nigger
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:57:32 UTC No. 16236830
What are the most realistic ways starship will flop?
>Barely reusable - turns out heat tiles needs to be replaced every 3 flights, or engines seem to always fail after 10 uses, etc.
>Unreliable - flight test 4 was lucky. It turns out these things have a high chance of blowing up. New problems keep popping up every few flights
>no market - turns out all those "private space station" projects were grifts, and Starship isn't even economical for starlink satilights, and NASA doesn't have any 100t things to put into LEO
>sea turtle rebellion
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:58:06 UTC No. 16236831
>>16236830
>What are the most realistic ways starship will flop?
On it's belly.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:59:09 UTC No. 16236834
>>16236830
>no market - turns out all those "private space station" projects were grifts, and Starship isn't even economical for starlink satilights, and NASA doesn't have any 100t things to put into LEO
sweet pea, the US military contracts alone will pay for the development.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:07:58 UTC No. 16236840
>>16236738
>SMART reuse would have been good if they stuck with it
Would have been good for ULA, since they make a living off building and selling tanks and launches, not engines.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:08:51 UTC No. 16236842
>>16236828
Racism outside /b/
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:13:11 UTC No. 16236848
>>16236748
those cloud shock waves are kino of the highest order
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:19:32 UTC No. 16236853
>>16236830
I'd say engines. If they can't be a combination of expected performance and reusable
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:21:15 UTC No. 16236856
>>16236733
>>16236763
It's literally just paraphrasing mainstream media and wikipedia here, the AI isn't doing any kind of "deduction."
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:22:39 UTC No. 16236857
>>16236779
lmao this is quality bait
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:26:17 UTC No. 16236860
>>16236717
Who took the picture?
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:28:02 UTC No. 16236861
>>16236856
Wikipedia doesn't argue that spacex is trying to build brilliant pebbles, and I don't think many/any mainstream articles do either. It would be more accurate to state that it's pulling facts from wikipedia and mainstream articles and paraphrasing BP theories from internet comments that string those facts into the deductive narrative it presents.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:34:52 UTC No. 16236869
>>16236857
hehee
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:39:46 UTC No. 16236877
>>16236860
fake astroNOT on the international SCAM station!!
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:40:34 UTC No. 16236878
>>16236853
>flop
They are always boasting about how chamber pressure is getting higher and higher, but thhat clearly eats into engine lifespan
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:59:25 UTC No. 16236897
>>16236738
>expendable second stage
Next step is figuring out how to turn the upper stages into tugs on orbit.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:59:42 UTC No. 16236898
>>16236891
Another inflatable SLS, why has nobody made a SLS cake yet? Cowards.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:02:49 UTC No. 16236906
>>16236834
Starship is like SUSTAIN for an entire brigade.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:04:12 UTC No. 16236908
>>16236878
>thhat clearly eats into engine lifespan
Clearly?
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:08:35 UTC No. 16236914
>>16236811
>yfw the Starliner's helium tanks and valves are made of 100% pure Chinesium
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:08:58 UTC No. 16236917
>>16236897
You can't. For those stages to be useful as tugs you'd need a way to refuel them on orbit, which you can't do without launching more fuel on more fully expendable rockets. It's an economic model that can't be closed.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:09:58 UTC No. 16236919
>>16236891
Inflatable, just like its budget.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:11:01 UTC No. 16236921
>>16236811
>Buying off China
Get what you fucking deserve.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:12:33 UTC No. 16236925
>>16236923
By creating reusable inflatable rockets.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:12:51 UTC No. 16236928
>>16236891
Take the knee, SLS!
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:13:16 UTC No. 16236930
>>16236830
>no market -
that aint no problem as spacex creates its own supply and demand. That followed by as soon as retards figure out the value of getting tonnage cheap to LEO it leads to constructing whatever you want in whatever configuration you want to send wherever you want. No more ultra over engineering with exotic material to account for 1 million+ possible failure scenarios
just make it cheap and robust enough and away it goes
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:13:21 UTC No. 16236931
>>16236923
damn, that thing looks a lot bigger on the launch pad
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:16:39 UTC No. 16236935
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:27:55 UTC No. 16236948
>>16236930
>make cheap rocket
>cancel it because yanks offer you an amazing deal
Brits may be retarded
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:28:47 UTC No. 16236949
>>16236908
>driving my car with the foot down in 1st gear everywhere doesnt cause any damage
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:32:11 UTC No. 16236957
>>16236875
All hands on dick
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:33:42 UTC No. 16236961
>>16236957
steel dick
steel chode
steel didldo
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:40:10 UTC No. 16236967
>>16236948
In their defense it was the early seventies and Europe wasn't nearly as familiar with how willing America was to screw with them on spaceflight issues
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:54:20 UTC No. 16236980
>>16236967
The british had been around the block their fair share of times by then, they had no excuse for being naive in matters of geopolitics.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:57:46 UTC No. 16236982
I got the “you’re not a doctor” bullshit from utter idiots in response. Yeah, I’m not a fucking doctor, but I do oversee the design of spaceships with life support systems that keep astronauts alive and healthy in a goddam vacuum!
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:01:26 UTC No. 16236986
>>16236982
doctors are shit, all the real work is done by nurses and surgeons (and all they're really good for is fixing wounds). with doctors it's always
>you have X and there's nothing I can do about it
or
>you have X so take these pills which will cause even more problems
>oh the pills didn't even fix X? take these other pills instead then...
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:17:15 UTC No. 16237002
>>16236986
I could beat you to a curb in a street fight. Just saying. Wherr Is your mom at?
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:18:01 UTC No. 16237004
>>16236980
>>16236967
>>16236948
that money was better spent on the nhs. i love the nhs.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:22:02 UTC No. 16237009
>>16236930
Starship does kind of rely on exotic materials though. Namely two: the engine internals that need to resist the corrosive effects of high pressure oxygen, and the heat shield tiles. That's why I like Stoke Space, they're less reliant on very strong materials science. They're also less proven, so I guess that balances out.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:25:10 UTC No. 16237012
>>16237002
if you beat me up, I'd rather go to surgeons and nurses than to a doctor!
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:27:19 UTC No. 16237014
the next multi-trillion dollar industry will be space based
how do we get in early?
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:28:46 UTC No. 16237016
Back before SLS launched there was a /sfg/ thread were we all shat over SLS and one anon wrote something along the lines of
> you all are hating on SLS but you will COOM anyways when it launches
However I did not coom when SLS launched nor was it an exceptionally exciting launch. Therefore this anon has been proven wrong.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:29:29 UTC No. 16237019
>>16237012
I'll beat you down again. I'm s doctor in beatdownehytboinomics. I graduated sum a cumbeatdown at Beatdown State University it's not just a colored college anymore. We got advanced watermelon studies, shoemaking, java script, beat downs, fat white women psychology, you know. I'll beat you down real nice sugar tits. Jews started all the wars
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:30:33 UTC No. 16237022
>>16237014
>how do we get in early?
investing would not be a good strategy as proven by the efficient market hypothesis which brainlets continue to deny but the math doesn't care about your feelings
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:30:49 UTC No. 16237023
>>16237014
invent a cheap but effective space suit
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:31:26 UTC No. 16237024
>>16237016
advantages of SLS (exhaustive list)
>1. solid boosters sound cool
>2. jobs in alabama
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:32:50 UTC No. 16237025
50 advantages of the SLS rocket
jobs in:
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:33:56 UTC No. 16237027
>>16237025
and much higher c3 than LEOCONSTELLATIONship
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:34:28 UTC No. 16237028
>>16237014
I've been thinking about it for a long while. It's important to keep in mind that even if the technology for a space industry becomes available in the next few years, it's likely the market won't respond to it for even a decade if not more, and many companies can go under in the meanwhile and so your investment plans. Wishing I could've dumped money into SeX forever ago, but it wouldn't have gotten where it is today if it were public. Maybe some other sector(s) that'll supply to the space companies, but can't think of any predictions now.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:34:50 UTC No. 16237029
>>16237014
invest early into commercial deep space construction or mining companies.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:37:32 UTC No. 16237030
>>16237013
I honestly love him, he is actively trying to make America great again.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:41:17 UTC No. 16237032
>>16237013
Just started drinking and I am tired of Musk's redditry
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 23:51:34 UTC No. 16237045
>>16237032
and twittery
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:01:16 UTC No. 16237049
>>16237025
silence, congress slut
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:10:17 UTC No. 16237053
>>16237047
what will you do if they don't?
(Totally impossible, I know)
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:12:30 UTC No. 16237057
>>16237047
Chinamen can time travel back to before 1969?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:12:37 UTC No. 16237058
>>16236738
holy shit, those teeth are going to give me nightmares
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:13:38 UTC No. 16237059
>>16236741
wtf does MC Escher have to do with anything?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:13:46 UTC No. 16237060
>>16236738
It's cute how Tory's lips matching the Vulcan mascots lips
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:15:49 UTC No. 16237063
>>16236833
I wish
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:17:01 UTC No. 16237064
>>16237053
if they don't then we're going to have to deal with you know;
>first person of color on the moon
>first non binary on the moon
>first lgbt flag on the moon
on and on... and on
I need China to mog us just for this one time
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:21:31 UTC No. 16237071
>>16237064
so will you cry or something?
eat a hat and post it here?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:23:16 UTC No. 16237072
>>16237057
>1969
that was so long ago it doesn't matter anymore,
the same reason why no one gives a fuck the Vikings landed in America centuries before the Spanish did with Columbus.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:26:28 UTC No. 16237074
Explain to me why there exists an actual patent for a Nazi flying saucer.
https://patents.google.com/patent/D
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:32:14 UTC No. 16237079
So when artemis lands i will stop jelquing. How big will my peener be when humans land on the moon.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:32:34 UTC No. 16237081
>>16237064
she has a cute name and she's cute from certain angles, but she'd be like a 7/10 in shanghai
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:34:20 UTC No. 16237082
>>16237074
>A vehicle that uses regular combustion in atmo and an ion engine in outer space
Lame also pic related
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:48:46 UTC No. 16237095
>>16237064
You just know American space enthusiast zoomer females are going to look up to Wang Yaping instead of "woman" astronauts from their own country, when she becomes the first woman to go to the Moon.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:49:53 UTC No. 16237097
>>16237082
Do you happen to know what the OHW code means?
And why does it say pending on the main page if it was rejected?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:50:06 UTC No. 16237099
>>16237064
>>16237095
Go back to china
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:51:20 UTC No. 16237101
>>16237095
There isn't enough Russian tech left to go to the moon
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:57:33 UTC No. 16237111
>>16237095
I will congratulate the chinese if they get there.
It just doesn't look like it right now.
Domestically, I think the only thing that would happen if they did get there before artemis would be a thorough investigation into artemis, maybe even a complete restructuring. If Musk is perceived to be holding it up, he and SpaceX may catch all the blame.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:07:47 UTC No. 16237125
Hypothetical time. Could you have a Mars like planet which retains its atmosphere in a far off solar system, because a hot jupiter near to the star outgasses replenishing the mars planets atmopshere?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:13:01 UTC No. 16237138
>>16237129
big fan of these guys, nothing else like em
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:17:15 UTC No. 16237146
>>16237134
turn these moons into rotating space stations
>for the belters!!!
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:17:49 UTC No. 16237147
>>16237134
how come nobody ever told me hale-bopp was bigger than phobos? that's kinda crazy
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:18:57 UTC No. 16237149
>>16237147
Phobos and Deimos are actually a joke. Mars doesn't deserve them.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:21:22 UTC No. 16237153
>>16237146
those are comets not Saturn's moons dumb dumb
though some of Saturn's smaller moons would be a prime targets for belter lyfe
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:23:43 UTC No. 16237157
>>16237047
I am going to laugh out loud when their spacecraft suddenly falls apart halfway to the moon because some chainsmoking manager at a factory decided to embezzle a few dollars by using low quality materials.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:26:07 UTC No. 16237161
>>16237149
The joke was Bottomos.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:45:14 UTC No. 16237182
>>16237168
fake.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:51:08 UTC No. 16237193
>>16237069
Not sure I understand the play here of going so quickly to 35 engines
They don't even utilize fully the 33 they have now
Unless V2 is such a drastic rengineering they might as well include it
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:55:09 UTC No. 16237199
Why is the sun rising ar 2-3 AM at this time of the year?
>captcha: 8j0ys2
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:56:35 UTC No. 16237201
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:01:38 UTC No. 16237208
>>16237201
what a rat's nest. Saturn needs to do some housekeeping
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:16:08 UTC No. 16237230
what can all those people actually be doing.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:18:10 UTC No. 16237233
>>16237193
I am betting they want redundancy for the center ring of engines. Total speculation, but the current weight of the booster might be so high that they can't afford even a single engine out on the center three engines, but if they kick it up to five, they retain the ability to gimble and might be able to sustain a single engine out scenario.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:21:56 UTC No. 16237242
>>16237153
>Methone
what happens here?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:32:48 UTC No. 16237252
>>16236748
>thrust plume is so intense it punches a literal hole in the cloud layer
based
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:36:09 UTC No. 16237253
2 months is a long time to wait for IFT-5. what's happening in the meantime besides screamliner hijinks?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:45:05 UTC No. 16237260
>we never made a plane to travel faster then SR71
>60 years and counting
>lockheed just makes up more shit to blow up peoples asses for government funding like boeing scams
>anons think space anything other then shooting internet satellites into orbit for big tech surveillance will ever happen
gonna be real comfy the day spaceX shuts down and elon runs off with all the scam money for his X idpol AI bots ego projects and china collapses before landing on moon.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:47:16 UTC No. 16237264
>>16237253
Uhhhhh... second tower is being built, so we'll at least see that happen over time. We got the environmental review happening for the modifications at 39a. We'll get to see the changes to Ship 30 before they launch. Uhhhh, that's all I got.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:47:46 UTC No. 16237265
>>16237260
>anons think space anything other then shooting internet satellites into orbit for big tech surveillance will ever happen
But it already has happened.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:48:22 UTC No. 16237267
>>16237260
X-15 was faster
>nooo that doesn't count because it was a rocket
rockets are awesome so that makes it count even more
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:55:26 UTC No. 16237271
>it's going to be 10 years before we have any active probes outside the orbit of jupiter again (assuming dragonfly actually launches in 2028)
>uranus never
>neptune never EVER
It's not that I'm not excited for Dragonfly but goddamn. I want to see Neptune in high definition. And I don't want to wait like 10 years for the fucking thing to actually get there after it launches.
Hurry the FUCK UP Elon and make an extra large Starship that can get a probe to Neptune without spending a decade fucking around getting gravity assists.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:57:01 UTC No. 16237272
>>16237129
>inceladus
Over before it started
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:58:26 UTC No. 16237274
>>16237149
They were put there so we could crash one each into the poles
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:01:02 UTC No. 16237278
>>16237260
>gonna be real comfy when an epoch changing technology vanishes because I'm jealous of one rich person
Get help
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:39:21 UTC No. 16237307
>>16237260
>spaceX shuts down and elon runs off with all the scam money
So all the NASA and DOD launches are a scam?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:40:21 UTC No. 16237309
>>16237307
Space doesn't exist, anon, every launch is a scam.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:43:26 UTC No. 16237312
>>16237309
Steak doesn't exist,,,, anon,,,,,,,,,, every lunch is a sham
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:46:17 UTC No. 16237316
>>16237312
kek
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:47:18 UTC No. 16237317
>>16237309
So how does GPS work in the middle of the ocean?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:51:49 UTC No. 16237320
>>16237317
Implants in your brain report your position based on inertial sensing.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:54:14 UTC No. 16237322
>>16237320
2/10 b8
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:54:57 UTC No. 16237323
>>16237309
>Space doesn't exist
this is true but you'd be surprised how easy it is to get through the firmament with a rocket.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:56:30 UTC No. 16237324
>>16237322
Not every stupid joke is bait, anon.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 04:20:32 UTC No. 16237339
>>16237334
mid august
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 04:28:48 UTC No. 16237342
>>16237339
False late July
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 04:32:04 UTC No. 16237345
>>16237342
late july elon time. real starbase time is only starting to catch up
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 04:39:26 UTC No. 16237347
>>16237334
After IFT 4.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 04:54:30 UTC No. 16237355
>>16237253
>polaris dawn
>crew dragon to iss
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 04:57:26 UTC No. 16237358
>>16236935
This guy thinks he's so funny
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:26:10 UTC No. 16237384
>>16237312
Ok I was high the other day and I got thinking. Ablative heat shields work because they burn off instead of the actual spacecraft right? So why not use shitty cheapo material rather than hyperspecialized silicates or whatever. Imagine a big slab of steak as a heatshield.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:33:50 UTC No. 16237389
>>16237324
>kek I'm baiting
You're a retard, you will always be a retard.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:35:55 UTC No. 16237391
>>16237260
https://boomsupersonic.com/
total bobo death
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:53 UTC No. 16237394
>>16237384
The point is having materials which are predictable, otherwise it burn a bit too much a bit too fast, and then you don't have a heatshield anymore
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:39:15 UTC No. 16237396
>>16236779
Fucking LOL
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:40:59 UTC No. 16237399
>>16237394
Sounds like a job for $1000 an ounce lab-grown aerospace grade steak to me. Just need to put the labs in a few swing states.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:45:09 UTC No. 16237403
>>16237047
>Luna
Kill yourself larper
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:55:09 UTC No. 16237412
>>16237334
2 weeks
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 06:08:08 UTC No. 16237427
>>16237384
>Ablative heat shields work because they burn off instead of the actual spacecraft right
Not really; that description implies it's a simple matter of substitution, with the sacrificial heat shield absorbing the same heat flux as the unshielded spacecraft would have.
They work because as they burn/char, they produce exhaust gas (which is cool compared to the shock layer) that insulates the heat shield and reduces the heat flux it has to handle.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 06:30:24 UTC No. 16237440
>>16237430
I think she is too close to the rocket
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 06:33:57 UTC No. 16237445
>>16237440
She is a convicted criminal on mars. This is justice.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:19:59 UTC No. 16237474
>>16237430
that lil girl fucking dead
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:26:44 UTC No. 16237478
>>16237430
giwtwm
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:46:53 UTC No. 16237490
>>16237478
the rocket or the girl?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 08:04:55 UTC No. 16237516
>>16236830
Even if Starship re-entry consistently fails couldn't they just put a cheap second stage on top of super heavy and lift massive space stations in 1-2 launches with crews going up on Dragon? No Mars but it would still change everything.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 08:34:10 UTC No. 16237535
>>16237516
Aka expendable ship, the proposed lunar mission itself uses one.
It would be definitely a game changer, it's just their goal is even higher.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 08:58:52 UTC No. 16237542
https://youtu.be/igbtIOBdLUg
great news from the faa, no imvestigation needed
launch can happen in 1 week, but elon said maybe in a month, meaning for sure it will happen in august or later
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 09:24:22 UTC No. 16237561
>>16236769
They absolutely can make arguments and they tend to be fairly rational. The main problem is when you start asking it questions and trying to nudge it in a certain direction, it seems to always want to agree with what you are saying. To the point where it just starts inventing shit. I was asking it to find the name of this rare documentary about a guy who thinks he's a vampire, made in the 2000's, and it just invented a name, cast, synopsis, everything, it was unsettling. Also I asked it to show me times when Blue Origin had delays with the New Shepard rocket and it just invented something in 2012, I asked it to provide the source and the source website was a ps4 game news website, wtf. Just don't ever rely on these things saying shit at face value
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:12:37 UTC No. 16237583
>>16237561
No, they can't make arguments because they are not capable of logic. They can APPEAR to make arguments, but they can't think. They don't have the capacity for reasoning. When you "argue" with a chatbot/LLM all it's doing is choosing what word it should pick next.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:15:10 UTC No. 16237587
>>16236779
based
feeding someone else's shitpost into chatGPT so it can come up with a respond for me really is peak efficiency. the effect is that I can reply to one extremely low quality post with another extremely low quality post, except mine took zero brain energy on my part, but my post is still information-dense enough that the other guy needs to think about it
thanks Sam
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:17:33 UTC No. 16237590
>>16237583
Identical to humans.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:18:12 UTC No. 16237591
>>16237583
>it doesn't have MY logic so it can't have logic at all
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:19:33 UTC No. 16237592
>>16237583
Just like you buddy
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:24:41 UTC No. 16237598
>>16237590
>>16237591
>>16237592
The difference is that I am capable of thinking about a topic and using logical reasoning outside of the space of "check if next word is common after previous word in database, check if next word fits with context, add random variation."
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:26:04 UTC No. 16237600
>>16237598
[X] Doubt
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:26:29 UTC No. 16237602
>>16237355
polaris yawn. i hope one of them dies.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:26:46 UTC No. 16237604
>>16237598
I asked the bot and it said you're wrong.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:48:24 UTC No. 16237626
>>16237260
>we never made a plane to travel faster then SR71
Space Shuttle
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:52:06 UTC No. 16237629
>>16237604
Not that anon but the AI is brochuring itself here. Whether or not this is factual is up to interpretation. LLMs don't use low level logic, aside from hooking it up to classical computing to do math. They also don't attempt to model reality and iteratively improve the model with reasoning. They aren't AGIs. If you want to know what that anon is talking about, ask the LLM the difference between it and AGI.
It says it's "capable of reasoning beyond merely predicting the next word based on a database of text". The weird thing about that statement, is that just predicting the next word based on a database is often enough a good substitution for genuine reasoning. The AI can fake it to make it. As far as the user is concerned, when you ask the AI to engage in deductive, inductive, abductive reason the results are going to be good enough for general use that you won't give a shit. Probably because you won't ask it a novel question its unfamiliar with, or try to break it by walking it into a contradiction. You'll do that a few times then get bored and just use it find out what you want to know.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:12:26 UTC No. 16237673
>>16236751
This is the riddle of steel.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:19:14 UTC No. 16237680
>>16236875
>>16236957
All decks on dick
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:21:22 UTC No. 16237681
>>16237675
Real talk what happens if a cat 5 hit starbase? Would it end everything?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:24:43 UTC No. 16237682
>>16237681
probably flooded and the tanks all dented up
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:24:53 UTC No. 16237683
>>16236738
we're just one world war away from airbreathing SSTOs and fusion engines with 6-digit ISPs. starship will look as outdated as the dc-3 did in 1945.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:25:34 UTC No. 16237684
>>16237014
It will really take off once there's something outside Urf's gravity well that can use space mining resources. There's just nothing out there worth taking back down that we don't already have here, but it can be cheaper than sending stuff up.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:28:08 UTC No. 16237687
>>16237682
Would all the boosters and ships be swept out into the gulf?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:29:26 UTC No. 16237689
>>16237681
They launch into the eye of the hurricane.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:29:53 UTC No. 16237690
>>16237687
maybe
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:31:53 UTC No. 16237692
>>16237161
>Bottomos
>>16237242
>>Methone
>what happens here?
rednecks and illicit drug labs
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:37:04 UTC No. 16237700
>>16237681
I mean, if it can take a rocket launch it can probably take a hurricane.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:37:37 UTC No. 16237701
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:46:19 UTC No. 16237709
>>16237701
any tinfoil about a massive secret space presence requires a massive earth orbit launch capability that's also kept totally secret. this isn't completely impossible if you have some secret sea launch platform in the middle of the pacific that nobody would see, but posters always gloss over what a massive undertaking it would have to be in their fanfics. i also think you could probably evade detection in LEO if you got in and out of it fast enough but it's getting harder every year.
not gonna go through all of the guy's posts but "lunar GEO" doesn't exist so any attempt at plausibility falls apart then and there.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:48:17 UTC No. 16237711
>>16237681
They would have to scrap a lot of shit due to flooding. The buildings can take the winds just fine.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:52:08 UTC No. 16237714
>>16237701
Nammu? I remember the Hillenkoetter.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:58:53 UTC No. 16237721
>>16237701
I really wish the secret space program conspiracy were true.
New Barkon at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:00:00 UTC No. 16237723
Prrrrrrrb
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:08:39 UTC No. 16237730
>>16237721
I wouldn't even be mad, I'd be too happy knowing that humanity wasn't stuck using chemical reactions to escape Earth's gravity anymore.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:14:45 UTC No. 16237736
>>16237252
clouds are literally made of air though
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:17:35 UTC No. 16237737
>>16237730
>stuck using chemical reactions
I don't like these sorts of reductive framings, it reminds me of retarded environmental groups criticizing nuclear because it generates electricity 'just' by boiling water.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:19:23 UTC No. 16237740
>>16237737
>criticizing nuclear because it generates electricity 'just' by boiling water.
Funny, I think that but I view it as a positive.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:22:03 UTC No. 16237742
https://youtu.be/KRkDQVw4UjQ?si=Ly7
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:22:10 UTC No. 16237743
so we were supposed to have people on mars this year, whats the REAL eta ??? nothing before 2030 huh
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:23:17 UTC No. 16237746
>>16237743
I think we'll have unmanned starship on mars in 2028 and people by 2030.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:37:56 UTC No. 16237769
>>16237629
It does twist itself into circles when you keep pushing it, but also you can point out these contradictions to it and it does notice the logical fallacies. The main problem is the hallucinations, the actual logic and reasoning is usually very good for most topics - but the LLM shenanigans does put it up to the human to force logic out of it
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:41:39 UTC No. 16237773
>>16237681
Hurricanes are big nothingburgers. Before we had space imagery of them, nobody even knew they were anything other than big thunder storms.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:47:12 UTC No. 16237776
>>16237773
True. For example, if you look up the great historical disasters it's all a bunch of floods and earthquakes and tsunamis caused by earthquakes, not hurricanes.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:48:11 UTC No. 16237777
>>16237773
oh no, the chatbot deboonked me
>Yes, the spiral structure of hurricanes and other cyclones was known before the advent of satellite imagery, although the understanding was less precise and detailed.
>The spiral structure of cyclones was inferred from several sources:
>Observations from Ships and Coastal Areas: Mariners and coastal observers noted the patterns of changing wind directions and intensities as a storm approached and passed. These observations suggested a rotational structure.
>Barometric Pressure Readings: Early meteorologists used barometric pressure data to understand the pressure gradients within a cyclone. The pressure patterns often indicated a spiraling nature around a central low-pressure area.
>Cloud Patterns and Precipitation: Descriptions and drawings of cloud movements and rainfall patterns also pointed towards a spiraling structure. Cyclonic storms were known to have bands of heavy rain and winds that curved around a central eye.
>Theoretical Models: By the mid-19th century, scientists like William Reid and James P. Espy had developed theories about the rotational nature of cyclones. Reid's observations during the Great Havana Hurricane of 1844 and Espy's convection theory contributed to the understanding of cyclonic spirals.
>Early Weather Maps: By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, meteorologists were creating weather maps that depicted the isobars (lines of constant pressure) around cyclones, showing the spiraling wind patterns.
>While these methods provided a general understanding of the spiral nature of cyclones, the detailed and comprehensive images provided by satellites since the 1960s have significantly enhanced the accuracy and understanding of these structures. Satellite imagery allows for a complete and continuous view of cyclones from space, revealing intricate details of their spiral bands, eye formation, and overall dynamics that were not possible to observe directly from the ground or sea.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:49:06 UTC No. 16237778
>>16237773
Kek they annihilated entire towns and were feared, what are you talking about.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:51:38 UTC No. 16237779
>>16237773
lol
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:52:29 UTC No. 16237781
>>16237778
>>16237779
just some rain and flooding, this kind of thing happens all the time but usually it's not a SPOOKY SPIRAL CLOUD so people don't make a big deal out of it.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:52:45 UTC No. 16237782
>>16237773
they make the roggets get wet and cold
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:00:47 UTC No. 16237789
>>16237781
No one cares because usually it's some residential areas that get flooded that has next to no national impact.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:02:32 UTC No. 16237792
>>16237789
>"anon does not care about residential areas."
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:04:01 UTC No. 16237793
>>16237789
Same with hurricanes yet everybody loses their mind about those.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:05:10 UTC No. 16237794
>>16237782
I want to see Ares anthropomorphized too.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:08:52 UTC No. 16237800
>>16237794
Leggy beanpole-lookin' ass
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:13:37 UTC No. 16237803
>>16237800
SLS's weird top heavy sibling.
I didn't know this, but this was the proposed "final form" for the Ares Rocket: Ares V.
Looks awfully familiar, doesn't it?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:20:37 UTC No. 16237810
>>16237803
Ares V had recoverable SRB segments. SLS is such a disappointment even compared to its predecessors and previous designs, and the EUS is a joke opposed to the EDS.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:28:02 UTC No. 16237821
>>16237803
They've been trying to make that stack for 40 years.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:28:15 UTC No. 16237822
>>16237810
Ares V was a paper design..
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:30:22 UTC No. 16237824
>>16237822
And that's a good thing. Such cursed shittle-hardware reuse should remain in the minds of those fools.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:38:19 UTC No. 16237833
>>16237821
>let's put our super advanced engines, made for reusable vehicle, on the expendable rocket
That's a quite retarded choice.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:40:39 UTC No. 16237838
>>16237833
since we didn't have any existing engines that could do the job and new engine development would add on more years and more $$$ to the development process it was one of the least retarded choices made regarding SLS
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:40:54 UTC No. 16237839
>>16237833
Prease undastand shelby is a senator not a rogget designer
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:41:52 UTC No. 16237841
>>16237833
but enough about Vulcan
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:44:16 UTC No. 16237844
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:45:53 UTC No. 16237846
>>16237838
Making SLS was the retarded choice in the first place.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:50:33 UTC No. 16237849
>>16237833
engines made in the 80's are not super advanced
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 15:39:51 UTC No. 16237898
NEW SLOSSKINO!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Gz
>SLS core stage going onto barge in a month for Artemis II
>KSC Environmental Control Unit tested as part of Artemis II ground systems testing.
>The Mobile Launcher is now expected to stay at pad 39b until midsummer.
>HALO pictures posted, undergoing testing in Turin, Italy. Will be transferred to phoenix, Arizona for outfitting. HALO is an important element of Gateway.
>Current issues being investigated after discovery during Artemis I: launch imagery, launch loads, post mission repair and foreign object debris. Issues are expected to be resolved this summer.
>Orion's only post-flight issue is the heat-shield char loss. Independent review is expected to close this summer.
>SLS also had vibrational and debris shedding anomalies during Artemis I. ETA to close these is unknown.
>Vacuum testing for orion is coming up.
>Recently NASA exploration leadership talked about looking into alternate missions to reduce irregular gaps between SLS missions.
>Apparently Orion cannot cope with a LLO gateway even if SLS had the DV since the thermal environment is more harsh there. For this same reason, Orion cannot be used for long term stays in LEO, and would need more cooling to do so. (Orionbros...)
>Above reason is why NASA is having trouble looking for alternate missions for SLS. A test docking with Starship HLS in LEO for example would require a minor redesign and certification.
>If the picture posted recently of the Artemis II SLS core stage is representative of it's current state, they have a lot of work to do before they can ship it, since it's still configured for Final Integrated Flight Testing, which Michoud said they completed four months ago (weird). Getting on the barge in a month is going to be tight.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 15:43:41 UTC No. 16237901
NEW SLOSSKINO!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCl
>SLS core stage going onto barge in a month for Artemis II
>KSC Environmental Control Unit tested as part of Artemis II ground systems testing.
>The Mobile Launcher is now expected to stay at pad 39b until midsummer.
>HALO pictures posted, undergoing testing in Turin, Italy. Will be transferred to phoenix, Arizona for outfitting. HALO is an important element of Gateway.
>Current issues being investigated after discovery during Artemis I: launch imagery, launch loads, post mission repair and foreign object debris. Issues are expected to be resolved this summer.
>Orion's only post-flight issue is the heat-shield char loss. Independent review is expected to close this summer.
>SLS also had vibrational and debris shedding anomalies during Artemis I. ETA to close these is unknown.
>Vacuum testing for orion is coming up.
>Recently NASA exploration leadership talked about looking into alternate missions to reduce irregular gaps between SLS missions.
>Apparently Orion cannot cope with a LLO gateway even if SLS had the DV since the thermal environment is more harsh there. For this same reason, Orion cannot be used for long term stays in LEO, and would need more cooling to do so. (Orionbros...)
>Above reason is why NASA is having trouble looking for alternate missions for SLS. A test docking with Starship HLS in LEO for example would require a minor redesign and certification.
>If the picture posted recently of the Artemis II SLS core stage is representative of it's current state, they have a lot of work to do before they can ship it, since it's still configured for Final Integrated Flight Testing, which Michoud said they completed four months ago (weird). Getting on the barge in a month is going to be tight.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 15:46:15 UTC No. 16237902
>>16237901
fuck me I fucked the link again.
it's pCIzVf62ozs
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 15:46:59 UTC No. 16237904
>>16237833
The older idea for using expendable RS-25s came from a time when the shuttle was supposed to be flying a hundred times a year and there would be a lot of SSMEs that were ageing out of their reusability. Rather than just junking the old engines you could plug them into a big rocket and get one last useful flight out of them.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 15:58:57 UTC No. 16237921
>>16237901
>>Apparently Orion cannot cope with a LLO gateway even if SLS had the DV since the thermal environment is more harsh there. For this same reason, Orion cannot be used for long term stays in LEO, and would need more cooling to do so. (Orionbros...)
IT IS THE ONE THING IT WAS SUPPOSED TO DO
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:00:31 UTC No. 16237924
>>16237921
It's alright for prolonged stays in NRHO at least. But basically useless for anything else.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:17:22 UTC No. 16237947
>>16237921
So … what? What would be better? Build a service module and an upper stage for Dragon? Can Dragon even do any of those things listed?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:22:50 UTC No. 16237953
>>16237921
Wait Orion can't even resupply gateway? Wtf?
Do I have this right?
Full list of uses for sls+Orion:
>Artemis 2 moon flyby
>LLO to earth for Artemis 3
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:24:29 UTC No. 16237957
>>16237953
You can also splash it into a big pool on a hot summer day and call it a test!
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:30:18 UTC No. 16237965
>>16237953
Upon reread I think it means this
>orion can support NRLO gateway
>Orion can't support LLO gateway
>therefore gateway is NRLO
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:30:51 UTC No. 16237966
>>16237947
dearMoon was originally going to be a circumlunar Dragon flight launched on a Falcon Heavy. It'd need a lot of internal upgrades in addition to a real service module if it was going to fly a mission in deep space, but it's probably the quickest way to replace Orion's capabilities.
>>16237957
Please understand, the thermal environment of a hot summer day is too severe for some of Orion's systems to handle. You'll have to deploy Orion into the pool without those components and only call it a partial test
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:32:49 UTC No. 16237970
>>16237844
Whats the joke? I don't get it, I'm at a loss.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:39:11 UTC No. 16237974
>>16237833
getting the engine module back was quite possible
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:42:58 UTC No. 16237979
>>16237974
>we don't like how reuse made the shuttle is so expensive, so we'll just build a cheaper expendable version
>but we don't like how that's expendable, so we'll design a way to reuse it
I think that humoring shuttle-derived launch vehicles might have been an even bigger mistake than the shuttle itself
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:44:15 UTC No. 16237980
>>16237965
>>16237953
>>16237921
source for LEO claim is PDF below.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:46:29 UTC No. 16237983
>>16237979
reuse didn't make shuttle expensive, needing to carry crew and choosing to carry 7 of them did.
SLS has shown that the RS25s alone would have been the full cost of a shuttle flight if we threw them away.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:49:16 UTC No. 16237985
>>16237979
getting a SHLV out of stuff you've already built wasn't dumb, making that SHLV partially reusable wouldn't be dumb either
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:50:53 UTC No. 16237987
>>16237921
No fucking way lmfao
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:51:02 UTC No. 16237988
>>16237966
kek
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:56:28 UTC No. 16237991
>>16235742
We know how to handle this already.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:57:35 UTC No. 16237992
>>16237980
screenshots of important bits from this and "Options for staging orbits in cislunar space".
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:01:07 UTC No. 16237998
>>16237991
The real trick is getting the first stage to land itself back in the water so you can reuse it
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:07:40 UTC No. 16238004
>>16237998
>land back in the water
How would they even deal with the salt corrosion to make it reusable
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:16:57 UTC No. 16238013
>>16237992
What causes the massive disparity in heat flux in LLO? The Moon radiating heat? How did the Apollo CSM manage?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:18:36 UTC No. 16238016
>>16237901
The video got deleted
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:28:59 UTC No. 16238027
>>16237970
They have reusable engines already. Ula is a joke.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:35:07 UTC No. 16238031
Will Starliner destroy the station when they power it back up?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:36:40 UTC No. 16238034
>>16238031
No nothing ever happens
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:44:52 UTC No. 16238044
>>16238013
My guess is low anything orbit would be too much flux since you spend 50% in sun, 50% out of sun, so there's to much thermal expansion movement. Constant sun is better since at least its not changing
But that's just my guess
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:47:59 UTC No. 16238047
>>16237992
>Water sublimator
Falling back to Apollo designs is a good move, they know it works
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:52:15 UTC No. 16238050
>>16238004
the whole thing was made out of 2 inch thick steel plate like a navy ship
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:27:58 UTC No. 16238086
>>16238013
You're right, it's the moon: It radiates a lot of heat.
No clue how apollo did it.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:32:13 UTC No. 16238097
>>16238086
Reflecting heat and light from the sun?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:41:29 UTC No. 16238111
Are there cases where a permanent cloud deck can make a planet significantly colder rather than significantly hotter?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:41:54 UTC No. 16238113
>>16238086
>>16238097
>>16238013
>>16237992
bit by bit they are feeding you that apollo was fake for a multitude of reasons. and you are too slow to realise.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:45:44 UTC No. 16238116
>>16238086
>>16238013
apollo 17 csm spent over 6 days in LLO without thermal issues
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:57:01 UTC No. 16238125
>>16237947
Larger heat shield on Starliner. Boeing! claims Starliner is lunar-capable with a beefed up heat shield
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 19:02:09 UTC No. 16238130
>>16238116
My favorite part about Artemis is how shitty it is compared to 60 year old technology we already tested and used lol
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 19:16:02 UTC No. 16238147
>>16238130
it has USB-C!!!!
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 19:39:30 UTC No. 16238184
>>16236748
>>16237252
Half-Life 2 Episode 2 super portal confirmed real.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 19:59:47 UTC No. 16238210
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 20:06:14 UTC No. 16238223
>>16237680
All 'icks on 'eck
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 20:19:45 UTC No. 16238257
>>16238125
It isn't even ISS worthy.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 20:23:45 UTC No. 16238265
Fuck foam. All my homies hate foam.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 20:29:12 UTC No. 16238270
>>16238223
'ick on 'ace 'ation
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:00:02 UTC No. 16238333
>>16236917
>It's an economic model that can't be closed.
Is the same true for aerial refueling of combat aircraft?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:09:33 UTC No. 16238355
>>16238349
How's it taste
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:23:05 UTC No. 16238386
>>16238333
If KC-135s were disposable, there wouldn't be a business case there either. If you want a depot system to work you need to base it around a tanker like what the Shuttle planned to be or what Starship is going to be.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:34:01 UTC No. 16238417
>>16238386
I could 'sure but' this but the endless grind over propellant depots and upper stages has been happening since the '80s with very little shift.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:47:18 UTC No. 16238443
When starliner return? I'm very excited to see what will happen
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:53:58 UTC No. 16238452
https://x.com/xanderevans9/status/1
can some1 make webm for wsg?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:07:43 UTC No. 16238470
>>16237099
gladly
women 20-29 years old are more than 5% of China's population, or over 70 million women
on the other hand, Asians are about 5% of the US population and there are roughly 22 million women 20-29 years old in the US, so it's reasonable to estimate there are about 1 million Asian women 20-29 years old in the US
even if it were as easy to get laid in the US as in China (false) and even if women in the US didn't have abhorrent world views (false) and even if women in the US weren't fatter and uglier (false) there is 70 times more prime pussy in China than the US
you can't argue with the science
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:08:14 UTC No. 16238471
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:08:58 UTC No. 16238475
>>16237134
>>16237147
OMG is that HALE-BOPP?!
who else is cutting their nuts off?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:14:41 UTC No. 16238481
>>16238086
What do you think all the reflective stuff was for?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:16:28 UTC No. 16238483
the artemis program is embarrassing honestly. it's the most half-assed shit that's ever been half-assed.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:21:01 UTC No. 16238488
>>16238471
Thank you, do you use ffmpeg? parameters?
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:22:11 UTC No. 16238490
>>16238111
well Volcanic clouds on earth tend to lower temperatures globally on earth.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:22:21 UTC No. 16238491
>>16237312
t. knower
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:29:56 UTC No. 16238502
>>16238111
probably depends on a lot of factors. clouds warm planets up by blocking the infrared heat radiated by the surface so that it doesn't reach space and is instead re-radiated back towards the ground. you'd need some other method of radiating the heat to counteract this. although maybe some exotic clouds made of different chemical compounds would be transparent to infrared light.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:34:44 UTC No. 16238509
>Kidney shrinkage puts Martian mission in doubt
Spacebro's... it's over
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:36:29 UTC No. 16238511
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:37:36 UTC No. 16238515
>>16238513
December
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:38:53 UTC No. 16238518
>>16238475
I wouldn't buy a used car off Do, let alone have him convince me to cut my nuts off and join the Away Team.
That was a weird fucking time, man.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:46:05 UTC No. 16238535
>>16238509
>zero g for long periods of time is bad for human health
So put a fucking spinning cylinder on the ship then. durrhurr.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:51:14 UTC No. 16238545
>>16238509
so basically i will pee less? sounds good to me
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:51:57 UTC No. 16238548
>>16237384
Chinese used wood for a spy sat.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:53:12 UTC No. 16238550
>>16238513
next September after the FAA environmental review, lobbying from the Sierra Club, and the local tribal land owners
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 23:03:13 UTC No. 16238573
>>16238548
afaik some euro heat shields used cork&resin, charcoal is actually an effective ablative material and shares properties with ceramic tiles.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 23:09:55 UTC No. 16238576
>>16238573
SLS uses cork paneling in the core stage.
https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artem
>Cork is heavier than foam but provides even stronger protection for certain applications. Cork comes in sheets and is applied to areas that have high predicted heat loads, like the core stage engine section, which houses four RS-25 engines that produce 2 million pounds of thrust. Cork is applied under the solid rocket boosters that provide 75 percent of thrust at liftoff and on the fairings, the areas where feedlines come out of the intertank and run down the rocket to connect the intertank to the other hardware.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 23:14:06 UTC No. 16238580
>>16238535
NEVER!!!!!
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 23:19:01 UTC No. 16238585
>>16238548
Cheap, light, easily workable bioplastic? It's a wonder there isn't more in space
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 23:30:27 UTC No. 16238603
>>16238580
This seems to be the attitude that every space agency has towards actually testing rotational gravity in space.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 23:32:29 UTC No. 16238607
>>16238603
gemini did it. 0.0001 g but still
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 23:41:46 UTC No. 16238623
>>16238488
mpv with ekisu-webm
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 23:48:42 UTC No. 16238635
>>16238603
It would make space interesting and that must be stopped at all costs
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 23:56:47 UTC No. 16238649
>Some 30 to 100 planes had been considered to make the descent, each gliding downward over what was expected to be the course of a week to several months. If one of the planes survived to Earth, it would have made the longest flight ever by a paper plane, traversing the 250 miles (400 km) vertical descent. In a test in Japan in February 2008, a prototype about 7 centimetres (2.8 in) long and 5 centimetres (2.0 in) wide (reported by other sources as 30 centimetres (12 in)[5]) survived Mach 7 speeds and temperatures reported to be 230 °C (446 °F) in a hypersonic wind tunnel for 10 seconds.[6] Materials designed for use in conventional reentry vehicles, including ceramic composites, withstand temperatures on the order of 2,200 °C (3,990 °F).[7] The planes were to have been made from heat-resistant paper treated with silicon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:00:16 UTC No. 16238655
>I think we will launch the first starship to Mars in... Less than 3 years.
Musk is BACK BABY!
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:03:58 UTC No. 16238659
>>16238655
You realize that 3 years musk time is 6 years real time, right?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:08:00 UTC No. 16238665
>>16238659
Mars cargo by 2030 would be awesome. Previously he was saying 5+ years for Artemis
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:09:01 UTC No. 16238667
>>16236930
>constructing whatever you want in whatever configuration you want to send wherever you want.
That's the problem. Nobody really wants to send anything into space because there's nothing out there.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:10:50 UTC No. 16238673
>>16238659
And that is... a bad thing??
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:11:26 UTC No. 16238674
>>16238667
your dad is out there... on my cock.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:15:23 UTC No. 16238676
>>16238674
go back to /lgbt/
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:17:30 UTC No. 16238678
>>16238184
We're reading a mass excess of about 3.5 kg on the rocket...
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:18:32 UTC No. 16238680
>>16238678
It's probably fine. Probably...
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:23:02 UTC No. 16238683
>>16238681
?? this guy retarded?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:23:10 UTC No. 16238684
>>16238354
What is stored in those balls?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:24:19 UTC No. 16238687
>>16238333
Aerial refueling doesn't have to be economical
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:27:26 UTC No. 16238689
>>16238684
pee for the pisslock
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:27:48 UTC No. 16238690
>>16237773
>>16237781
Why did they call them cyclones then if they didn't know they were a spiral
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:29:50 UTC No. 16238691
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
Jun 15
Legalize humor!!
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:32:21 UTC No. 16238693
>>16238691
Why would he say that on juneteenth?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:55:07 UTC No. 16238712
>>16238655
Yeah hes been saying that since 2011 with "red dragon"
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:59:53 UTC No. 16238713
>>16238659
>i will be a 30 years old boomer when this happens
bros... its over. I was born too late. If only mars would have will happened in 2027
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:00:51 UTC No. 16238715
>>16238713
i will be a 60 year old boomer. cheer up.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:03:07 UTC No. 16238717
>>16238715
why are you on 4chan at 54?
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:09:10 UTC No. 16238722
>>16238717
we are here forever
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:24:06 UTC No. 16238735
the wait is agonizing.
I NEED FLIGHT 5
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:27:29 UTC No. 16238738
>>16238735
I have good news, you only have to wait two weeks.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:32:43 UTC No. 16238745
>>16237267
>doesnt count its a rocket
Yes. Imagine thinking a rocket shit out of a plane is special timmy
>>16237278
>umad at elon bro
rent free kek
>>16237307
>NASA and DOD fake launches
yes
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:37:41 UTC No. 16238754
>>16238745
>not liking the X-15
Go be a woman someplace else.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:50:02 UTC No. 16238769
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:04:12 UTC No. 16238782
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:05:59 UTC No. 16238785
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:09:18 UTC No. 16238790
>>16238717
i like to think eagerspace might be here and he seems about that age
also >>16238722
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:14:20 UTC No. 16238798
>>16238717
62 next month.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:20:41 UTC No. 16238806
>>16238548
>>16238585
I think Japan builds a lot of wood structures for satellites because it has superior re-entry characteristics (in terms of it breaking up cleanly and not being polluting). Wood is pretty cool, relatively structurally sound and relatively light biological rigid foam.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:33:20 UTC No. 16238827
>>16238823
I was bored by IFT2
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:35:02 UTC No. 16238830
>>16238823
The third consecutive successful chopstick catch will be the start of boredom.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:40:38 UTC No. 16238844
>>16238830
This seems like a pretty good metric. There are a ton of other milestones though. HLS, first interplanetary Starship mission, first outer-planets Starship mission, first crewed Starship mission. It's going to be doing cool stuff for a long time. Pretty much the same as Falcon 9. I still watch a lot of Starlink launches but even I will admit that after over a hundred consecutive perfect launches it's become a bit routine. I tune in for crewed launches, cool payloads and trajectories, and stull like Polaris missions.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:40:58 UTC No. 16238845
>>16238717
4chan is older than you are anon
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:42:56 UTC No. 16238849
>>16238823
even after launch and landings become routine, there will always be interesting on-board cam moments like orbital refilling, deploying giant payloads, internal volume cams, eventually crewed flights, views of the moon etc.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:46:36 UTC No. 16238853
>>16238823
it’s already boring to me not gonna lie. Didn’t even have an elevated heart rate for the last flight, which I had for the first three
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:48:53 UTC No. 16238854
>>16238853
>the most kino reentry in history didn't elevate your heart rate
maybe spaceflight isn't your thing
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:51:20 UTC No. 16238857
>>16238853
I still get an elevated heart rate for Starlink launches if I'm watching, but I don't always go out of my way to catch them these days, since there's so many. Saying that you didn't care about flight 4 makes me think you're just a demotivation psyop guy from somewhere in Asia, probably Russia since they've got the most fragile egos about the relevance of "their" achievements that all actually happened under the USSR with the robbery of dozens of nations worth of technical expertise and economy to make miracles happen.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:55:28 UTC No. 16238863
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:58:19 UTC No. 16238870
>>16238863
Armstrong is surprisingly less chill than Aldrin
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:01:53 UTC No. 16238875
>>16238863
tweaking vs locked in
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:03:50 UTC No. 16238876
>>16238870
It might have something to do with the fact that he was piloting the fucking LEM.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:09:18 UTC No. 16238881
>>16238717
WHEREAS, the Merriam-Webster's dictionary defines "nigger" (the N-word) as "usually offensive: a black person; member of socially disadvantaged class of persons...;" and
WHEREAS, the N-word has been established to be derogatory, degrading, dehumanizing and is one of the most offensive words in history; and
WHEREAS, the N-word is too often freely and casually used by some individuals in popular media, literature, and general society with usage broadened across racial and generational backgrounds; and
WHEREAS, the stigma of this word embodies and invokes painful memories and inhumane ill-will; and countless individuals including NAACP freedom fighters, have lost their lives due to the beliefs perpetuated by the use of this word.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that you are a fucking nigger.
In my 40s, by the way.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:14:21 UTC No. 16238888
>>16238823
They'll do the catch next time. It will be great. Hopefully we'll get a new model of Starship on the next test and the propellant transfer after that, plus we need to see a fully working reusable heat shield, so at least for the next few flights things will be exciting.
I don't know what's going to happen between then and manned Starship, HLS tests or a Mars flight. I guess the first few Starlink flights will be cool, too.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:15:21 UTC No. 16238891
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:19:21 UTC No. 16238898
>>16238888
Do you think they will get "factory" Starship ready quickly, is that the current plan? i.e. with a fully working heat shield and a deployment door for Starlink?
I wonder if they will, at some point, focus more solely on HLS to keep with seemingly strict NASA demands
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:21:39 UTC No. 16238902
>>16238898
There isn't a good reason to mass produce before they've ironed out all the problems with tests and reworks and tests.
If FT5 happens soon after they put in the new heat tiles, that is a VERY good sign, because that means the only thing slowing starship down is literally the labor of replacing all the heat tiles.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:21:50 UTC No. 16238903
>>16238898
They are building HLS at MacGregor AFAIK since that actually requires support that the Boca Chica facility doesn't have and the Starbase factory is still very far from being complete.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:22:21 UTC No. 16238905
>>16237736
Clouds are in fact not made up of air anon. You'd know this fact if you actually hadn't ascended to orbit on the Starliner.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:24:11 UTC No. 16238911
>>16238903
Wait what for real?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:26:47 UTC No. 16238915
>>16238911
That's what I heard, and it makes sense considering that Starfactory will probably be in some state of unfinished until they force that retard who won't sell the land to sell the land considering it is probably fucking up their entire floor plan.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:26:55 UTC No. 16238916
>>16238903
lies
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:29:28 UTC No. 16238921
>>16238870
Aldrin was always cool under pressure, which is a big part of the reason why they chose him for Apollo 11.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:31:24 UTC No. 16238925
Is Russia done for or will they regain their momentum?
>Angara finally launching
>New Cosmodrome in Siberia
>Third most launches behind China and US
>Still one of three countries that can launch humans to space
Issues and constant delays
>Eagle Spacecraft
>Amur reusable rocket
>Constellation Starlink clone
They have stuff on the table but they’re not executing.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:46:23 UTC No. 16238937
>>16238925
done, no
lapped by China permanently, I’d say likely
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 03:50:37 UTC No. 16238943
>>16238870
Because he was drunk
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:04:41 UTC No. 16238957
>>16238925
LOL there will never be a russian launch market ever again
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:06:57 UTC No. 16238961
>>16238957
Faultliner is a mess, anon; and there will always be a need for two means to reach the ISS.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:11:14 UTC No. 16238966
>>16238961
>need for two means to reach the ISS.
1) Crew Dragon
2) Starship
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:16:40 UTC No. 16238973
>>16238966
Still only one supplier, anon.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:19:22 UTC No. 16238975
>>16238957
These sanctions won’t last forever. I’m more concerned that they won’t innovate or keep up with competition.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:26:07 UTC No. 16238979
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:26:48 UTC No. 16238980
>>16238823
It's already boring lol
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:30:17 UTC No. 16238981
>>16238979
schwenty seven heif
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:35:50 UTC No. 16238986
>>16238903
you can't move a starship from macgregor to kennedy
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:39:13 UTC No. 16238989
>>16238981
Ancient meme
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:41:12 UTC No. 16238990
>>16238986
E2E
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 04:57:22 UTC No. 16238999
Any news today or was it kinda slow? Also /sfg/ is finally back to normal.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 05:23:37 UTC No. 16239016
>>16238823
It will get boring if they don't do anything with it. If they only used starship for more starlink deployments... Ugh
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 05:38:47 UTC No. 16239028
>>16238872
I'll do you one better, Nolan and his cinematographer of the week will be there with IMAX cameras to capture everything
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 05:51:28 UTC No. 16239037
>>16239016
Shut up nigger
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 05:55:52 UTC No. 16239043
>>16238975
They're pretty much slower than Europe at this point when it comes to developing launch vehicles. If someone was really asking me how long they have left, it's a matter of how long soyuz can stay relevant. (10-15 years tops?)
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:21:45 UTC No. 16239057
>>16239043
Fuck off faggot
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:23:57 UTC No. 16239062
>>16239057
what's the matter? your country hasn't progressed in space in multiple decades?
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:30:20 UTC No. 16239069
>>16239062
Why dont you kill yourself you stupid amerishart, oh wait your blood presure will do that anyways! Fucking stupid mutts
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:33:13 UTC No. 16239071
>>16239069
getting mad at me won't pay for the cosmodrome pidor lmao
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:48:14 UTC No. 16239084
Guys
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:48:43 UTC No. 16239086
Goys
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:50:16 UTC No. 16239088
Gays
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:51:37 UTC No. 16239090
Ayys
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:57:23 UTC No. 16239094
>>16239043
>soyuz
The rocket or spacecraft?
The Angara is new and it’s relevant.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:59:02 UTC No. 16239096
>>16238481
you mean all that foil it was wrapped in? That was to hide that the whole thing was made of carboard tubes and wooden sticks, but Kubrick didn't care and thought it would look real in his camera but he was wrong
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:02:09 UTC No. 16239100
>>16239090
Lmaos
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:09:45 UTC No. 16239106
>>16238943
He would punch you for saying that to him.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:58:55 UTC No. 16239146
>>16238823
it will be boring when they showed every important task of the starship live on camera. once they catched super heavy and starship, succesfully refueled a starship in orbit, dispensed payload into space, it will be boring. the truth is that elon musk could have done all of this in the first flight test but he want to give us a great show which dosent get boring after the first test.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 09:24:27 UTC No. 16239191
>>16238603
Vast seems like they wanna try it out, I can't remember if that was the station they're currently building or a future one.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 09:25:04 UTC No. 16239192
>>16238823
it depends what starship is launching. falcon flights are boring but every now and then people will turn in for an important launch. once starship starts launching shit to the moon or mars then people might be hyped for launches for a long time. currently there's not much hype for falcon launches because it's just satellites and satellites are boring compared to people.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 09:32:36 UTC No. 16239197
>>16237149
The phobos ring system will be peak tho
Also there is enough mars detritus on the surface of phobos to warrant a sample return (RIP Fobos-Grunt lmao)
And we can use phobos as a testing ground for in space mining tech.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 09:36:16 UTC No. 16239199
>>16238973
When Starship is fully operational musk should spin off starlink, falcon 9/heavy and crew dragon into an independent company and sell them Starship launches for starlink.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:03:15 UTC No. 16239264
>>16239256
Thunderf00t is so smart
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:05:17 UTC No. 16239267
>>16238863
why did collins and aldrin flatline for parts of the flight?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:11:45 UTC No. 16239270
>>16239267
>Both the Commander and the Lunar Module Pilot were closely monitored during the performance of lunar surface extravehicular activities, but because only one channel was available in the Lunar Module data were collected for only one crewman.
It's not really explained well. I guess they only monitored Armstrong when he was the one flying and the EVA records are not from both simultaneously.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:15:00 UTC No. 16239273
>>16239256
remember why he keep doing it
he's no better than some only fan whore now
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:35:12 UTC No. 16239283
>>16239256
LMAO, at 8 minutes he actually called him Dim Todd
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:35:19 UTC No. 16239285
>>16239256
>spends half the video talking about poopy farts, other half about timeline quotes from a decade ago
Bravo Mr F00t
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:37:44 UTC No. 16239288
>>16239256
He's really gone mask off grifter now huh
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:39:52 UTC No. 16239291
>>16239256
>a company that was planning on paying spacex to fly them around the moon shuts down
>this is spacex cancelling a moon mission
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:41:04 UTC No. 16239292
>>16239256
Does he actually make any interesting points here or is it just him misrepresenting dearmoons cancellation for 43 minutes?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:43:20 UTC No. 16239295
>>16239292
> thundertrAAsh
>make any interesting points
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:48:11 UTC No. 16239303
>>16239295
It's possible.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:48:33 UTC No. 16239305
>>16239285
Poopy farts?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:50:57 UTC No. 16239307
>>16239283
Fuck that's actually funny and clever kek. Sometimes that phd brain shines through
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:52:43 UTC No. 16239310
>>16239303
the whole thing was canceled because the jap faggot ran out of money
the video is pointless to even make, it's just gifting
I report every single one of his video for misinformation now
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:55:18 UTC No. 16239311
>>16239310
Thats why I asked if he talked about anything interesting or if it was just that for 43 minutes.
seething at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:57:15 UTC No. 16239315
>>16239292
I'm going to guess without watching
>blaming NASA moon landing delay on SpaceX hls
>a clip where a balding Elon says a year
>starship prototype not self assembling into a city after IFT1 arrived on Mars
>an unbroken 40 second clip from a movie where someone is laughing, as if it's still 2011 youtube
>hyperloop mentioned
Saved you 40 minutes
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:01:13 UTC No. 16239319
>>16239315
Anyone who watched confirm?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:01:55 UTC No. 16239323
>still no commercial chinese space station announcements
whats taking them so long?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:22:15 UTC No. 16239351
>there's a credit check required to join the space force
>if your credit score isnt good enough then you cant join
lol lmao even wtf
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:25:49 UTC No. 16239354
>>16239351
Apparently they have way more people applying to the space force than available positions so probably just a way to narrow the field.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:34:29 UTC No. 16239359
>>16239351
is it surprising that they only take the goodest of the good goys ?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:35:46 UTC No. 16239360
>>16238903
>AFAIK
God I hate reddit
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:35:53 UTC No. 16239361
>>16237701
cute fanfic
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:38:35 UTC No. 16239364
>>16237777
civilian useage of early high altitude bombers also allowed you to get above them and take pictures looking down at them
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:40:43 UTC No. 16239366
>>16239354
imagine how bad it'll be if a major war breaks out
>"ooh it says here that you dont come from a billionaire political family? off to the front with you poorfag."
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:44:18 UTC No. 16239368
>>16239351
People with bad credit are more likely to take bribes/sell state secrets?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:45:11 UTC No. 16239370
>>16239351
The excuse I heard when joining the navy was it is a potential security problem if you have unpaid debt for security clearance. Since the space force probably doesn't have many grunt jobs that don't need security clearance I would assume that would be the main reason.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:54:24 UTC No. 16239377
>>16238863
This is interesting, I never knew they were recording EKGs during the landings.
I found another one, Aldrin's heart is stressing hard, it almost looks like he is starting some ST elevation there - the heart isn't getting enough oxygen.
And Armstrong's heart is going insanely fast, I'm surprised he didn't pass out.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:06:07 UTC No. 16239385
>>16239315
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:06:38 UTC No. 16239386
>>16238513
>4 months
Less. I'm thinking 1 month - maybe 2 if you include all of the support hardware like tanks and such. The tower hardware is pretty much done and waiting to be bolted together.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:08:29 UTC No. 16239387
>>16239256
This trash showed up in my recommendeds, I just told it to not show me this channel anymore.
I swear I'd done this before, more than once even.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:16:14 UTC No. 16239392
>>16237902
>>16237901
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCI
>>16238354
PROPELLANT IS STORED IN THE BALLS
>>16238576
they keep catching on fire which is really funny
>>16238681
this guy is a VAB fetishist, which is based
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:17:46 UTC No. 16239394
>>16239351
Places with high security do this because if you are not in a secure position financially you can be bought off. They don't want you selling state secrets because you are overleveraged on your mortgage.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:28:29 UTC No. 16239403
>>16239386
the concrete legs take a long time to cure
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:34:00 UTC No. 16239406
>>16239386
you need to let the legs sit there for half a year full of wet concrete before you use them, anon
that much concrete takes a lot of time to cure
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:34:56 UTC No. 16239409
>>16239256
I wonder what posesses someone to photoshop a clown wig and nose on a picture of Musk, put it on a thumbnail, and upload it unironically. Does he have a shred of self-awareness?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:35:56 UTC No. 16239412
>>16239409
it isnt even well photoshopped
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:36:51 UTC No. 16239413
>>16239403
>the concrete legs take a long time to cure
>>16239406
>you need to let the legs sit there for half a year full of wet concrete
Fair point, but were people not saying the same thing about the first OLM? I do remember it going fairly quickly.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:37:54 UTC No. 16239415
>>16239413
they put down the legs and then did nothing for a few months, we were just distracted by the rest of the launch site going up (eg: the tower)
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:39:05 UTC No. 16239416
>>16239415
>they put down the legs and then did nothing for a few months, we were just distracted by the rest of the launch site going up (eg: the tower)
Derp, you're right, I remember that now. Disregard.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:43:59 UTC No. 16239423
>>16239377
Collins gives zero fucks
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:46:43 UTC No. 16239428
>>16239423
He was busy chilling in orbit while the other two guys were shitting their space britches during their suicide-burn landing.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:50:53 UTC No. 16239435
>>16236803
>number of orbital destinations is going to increases rapidly going into the 2030s
I wouldn't hold my breath. Everything is getting cancelled. Nothing ever happens anymore.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:55:40 UTC No. 16239437
>>16239315
the laughing clip is probably from the simpsons. and dont forget the captain picard facepalm
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:16:05 UTC No. 16239455
>>16237079
Humans will not land on the Moon. Our society is collapsing, we'll be back in the medieval ages in no time.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:17:19 UTC No. 16239457
>>16239419
no way fag,
roggets >>> everything else
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:21:13 UTC No. 16239459
>>16237265
It will never happen again. There's no will for it to happen. Society is collapsing, space is the last of our concerns.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:23:33 UTC No. 16239464
>>16239459
polaris dawn is in like 3 weeks
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:24:33 UTC No. 16239466
>>16239455
>>16239459
>society is collapsing
Even if that were true, you don't need a 'society' to land on the moon retard.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:28:53 UTC No. 16239471
>>16239466
It's ghouls, I tell ya. Religious ghouls in rockets looking for a land to call their own. Don't you laugh at me. I know a spell that'll make you show your true form. Cave rat taught it to me.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:29:14 UTC No. 16239472
>>16239459
>>16239455
Can you go be a crazy town-crier somewhere else
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:50:19 UTC No. 16239491
>>16238684
Monopropellant
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:53:18 UTC No. 16239493
>>16238513
About 2026
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:14:37 UTC No. 16239507
If they are going to remove shielding on future Boosters, what was the point of installing it in the first place?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:16:10 UTC No. 16239510
>>16239472
Actually, I'm a depressed town-crier.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:33:14 UTC No. 16239522
>>16239510
depressed people are crazy albeit
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:35:19 UTC No. 16239525
>>16239507
stopgap while they wrangle to raptors to stop killing eachother
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:10:38 UTC No. 16239567
New tower base is not cast concrete.
All steel just like the upper sections, you can plainly see this in the image that was posted
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:25:11 UTC No. 16239584
>>16239510
you're not going to make it bro
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:25:26 UTC No. 16239585
>nobody posted pics of the new tiles
grim
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:25:51 UTC No. 16239586
>>16239585
do it yourself faggot
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:26:12 UTC No. 16239587
>>16239585
if you have pics of the new tiles you should post them
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:30:24 UTC No. 16239591
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:40:34 UTC No. 16239611
>>16238961
How do the Russian alternatives perform on the crucial helium leak and smearing greasy fluorescent green diarrhea across the night sky metrics?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:42:33 UTC No. 16239615
>>16239106
he's more jewelry than man at this point
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:44:41 UTC No. 16239620
>>16239283
>>16239307
lel, that's what I always call him
now I'm a little ashamed to have that in common with an obvious retard
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:46:17 UTC No. 16239623
>>16239310
>I report every single one of his video for misinformation now
okay, now this is based
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:47:44 UTC No. 16239626
>>16239323
even if they could do it (this is not clear not me) directly competing with a national prestige project is not politically viable
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:00:14 UTC No. 16239641
>>16239611
anon the "fluorescent green diarrhea" was the aurora, that was from the sun
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:01:15 UTC No. 16239645
>>16239620
he's the everyday estronaut, anon
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:09:18 UTC No. 16239805
>>16239641
extremely disrespectful of ULA to do that to the sun
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:51:27 UTC No. 16239878
>>16239376
the russian space web watermark makes this funnier kek
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:55:23 UTC No. 16239889
>>16239423
The only thing that scared him was claustrophobia. He claims he almost had a complete freak out during training when suiting up or going through a docking tunnel to the vomit comet or something (I can’t fully remember), but he forced himself to calm down/not show it because he knew it would ground him out of Apollo—and he felt he had a duty to the nation to stay in and help get to the Moon.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 20:08:21 UTC No. 16239909
>>16239364
I've heard of airplanes flying into hurricanes, but not over them.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 20:15:24 UTC No. 16239918
>>16239909
they top out around flight level 550, and only a few planes can fly higher than that, typically stuff like the WB-57 Canberra that NASA uses or the U-2 or the SR-71
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 20:16:26 UTC No. 16239919
>>16239909
>>16239918
forgot my image