🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:48:40 UTC No. 16251627
that's insane edition
previous >>16244898
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:49:57 UTC No. 16251633
FIRST FOR BRILLIANT PEBBLES
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:51:00 UTC No. 16251635
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1yoJMwyV
GOES-U Prelaunch News Conference
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:51:44 UTC No. 16251639
>>16251633
womp womp
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:52:10 UTC No. 16251640
>>16251639
MORE PEBBLES
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:52:33 UTC No. 16251641
>>16251637
your image has a weird stain in the middle of it though
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:52:52 UTC No. 16251643
>>16251627
>>16251637
>video shows elon chilling for a moment, staring in awe of his creation
>tim walks into the frame, stands next to elon, stares up agape and says "that's insaaaane"
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:53:35 UTC No. 16251645
>>16251641
Yeah someone needs to photoshop Elon out of it and just leave Tim Dodd.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:53:53 UTC No. 16251646
>>16251627
SER PLS BE OF REMOVING THIS MANIPULATED IMAGE, IT IS NOT FOR THE PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:54:45 UTC No. 16251649
>>16251633
>unbrilliants your pebbles
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:55:36 UTC No. 16251650
can someone link the it's not that easy in rocketry youtube video.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:56:00 UTC No. 16251652
>>16251645
now i'm imagining a video edit that removes all of elon's dialogue other than the occasional "yeah" and it's just estronaut spazzing out for 40 minutes
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:56:09 UTC No. 16251653
>>16251649
Sprint is a terminal phase interceptor, how does that counter a swarm of orbital boost phase interceptors?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:56:57 UTC No. 16251655
>>16251652
remove elon completely so it's just an hour of an autist trespassing on spacex property rambling to himself
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:57:00 UTC No. 16251656
>>16251650
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pt
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:57:10 UTC No. 16251657
>>16251652
I'm imagining an edit where it's just Tim Dodd saying that's insane etc.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:57:12 UTC No. 16251658
>>16251652
lmao
a supercut of "thats insane" would be funny
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:58:22 UTC No. 16251659
>>16251652
I don't even know how to edit videos, but I'm going to do it after my finals.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:00:58 UTC No. 16251663
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1
>Teams completed the launch readiness review, and we are targeting Tuesday, June 25 for Falcon Heavy’s launch of NASA's GOES-U mission from pad 39A in Florida. Teams are keeping an eye on weather, which is 30% favorable for liftoff
Florida is just not having the best time of it
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:02:02 UTC No. 16251664
>>16251658
he recycled a few adjectives, but yes it would be great to have a supercut of both parts of estronaut basedjaking
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:02:33 UTC No. 16251665
>>16251658
yeah hahahaha that's crazy yeah most peop-people don't even like know that its so insane man. *forced laugh*
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:02:40 UTC No. 16251666
>>16251659
the easiest way to edit videos is to give a list of timestamps to chatgpt and ask it to translate that into an ffmpeg invocation.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:03:49 UTC No. 16251668
>>16251659
>>16251665
please include the forced laughs too
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:04:19 UTC No. 16251669
>>16251663
>It's 20 fucking 24 and satellites are still wrapped in mylar like a potato chip
When will this stop?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:05:02 UTC No. 16251672
>>16251666
No need for gpt, I got the yt-dlp to work some time ago.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:05:17 UTC No. 16251674
>>16251669
if it's good for potato chips it must be good for microchips
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:05:23 UTC No. 16251675
>>16251627
whoa, look at that OP!
that's crazy, hahaha
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:06:42 UTC No. 16251677
>>16251669
Got a better even more lightweight. not to mention cheap material for reflecting heat?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:07:26 UTC No. 16251678
>>16251669
What's wrong with mylar? It's a cheap insulator.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:08:33 UTC No. 16251681
>>16251281
That's crazy
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:09:04 UTC No. 16251684
>>16251669
we need metamaterial shielding to redirect photons around the satellite. michio kalu has the patents
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:09:19 UTC No. 16251685
>>16251675
yeah
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:10:13 UTC No. 16251686
So see yiu guys in 2 years for the next factory "tour"
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:11:06 UTC No. 16251688
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:11:25 UTC No. 16251690
>>16251627
AAARGGHHHHHH
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:13:19 UTC No. 16251693
>>16251681
That. Is. Insane.
i mean cmon i can’t believe that this is even you know REAL ahahahaheh……..
Thats crazy th-thats insane man like wow you know what i mean?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:13:37 UTC No. 16251694
>>16251685
bro that face lmao
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:14:01 UTC No. 16251695
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:14:05 UTC No. 16251696
>>16251686
They shook hands. This mean no more tours.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:14:57 UTC No. 16251697
>>16251663
>Florida is just not having the best time of it
We are officially in the rain every afternoon and evening part of the year with some bonus tropical rain storms to boot.
Picrel is the rain we got a few weeks ago
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:16:20 UTC No. 16251704
>>16251697
florida has coconut trees as does the Arab peninsual
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:17:03 UTC No. 16251705
https://twitter.com/VikranthJonna/s
>With the success of RLV LEX-03 today, ISRO is a step closer to the ultimate RLV Orbital Re-entry Experiment in the next couple of years, where a orbit capable RLV spaceplane with a functional cargo bay will be launched onboard a modified GSLV Mk2 rocket.
>>16251697
It's enough to make me want to launch from an inland desert and just drop shit on downrange villagers
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:17:07 UTC No. 16251706
I mean it’s just unbelievable you guys are LITERALLY catching the booster like thats insane you know its hard to even….you know fathom that this is REAL like most people don’t even know…..*tongue click* insane….
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:18:09 UTC No. 16251709
>>16251704
Coconuts are an invasive weed that can survive in a wide array of tropical climates. Not native to the western hemisphere btw
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:18:22 UTC No. 16251710
>>16251697
SpaceX need to develop their all-weather capabilities. This is a huge embarrassment.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:18:51 UTC No. 16251711
Like i don’t even ugh… amazing
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:20:04 UTC No. 16251716
>>16251709
As Wernher von Braun once said, "Coconuts belong wherever they want to go."
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:20:22 UTC No. 16251717
>>16251709
Coconuts are not a weed, they are a woody not a herbacious plant.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:20:27 UTC No. 16251718
>>16251709
They are a very successful species that has conquered the world's tropical beaches in part thanks to humans.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:22:10 UTC No. 16251722
>>16251718
White people will be the coconuts of the human race, we will go where nobody else dares to.
Like that’s insane man *hahaha*
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:22:32 UTC No. 16251723
>>16251717
A weed is any unwanted plants. However coconuts are always welcome, so they cannot be weeds.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:24:57 UTC No. 16251729
>>16251716
And as he also famously said, "You put zee lime in zee coconusse und trink it all togetzer"
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:25:54 UTC No. 16251734
>>16251723
Based
also i’m quite glad /sfg/ has found a new funny gag to cling to, the lipniggers were getting stale, they are definitively not insane woah thats crazy man.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:26:00 UTC No. 16251735
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:27:18 UTC No. 16251739
>>16251652
>dude what about a thermal camera inside the rocket, and a firehose that sprays cryogenic propellant at a hot spot?
>Elon just walks away
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:27:57 UTC No. 16251741
>>16251735
>THE FUCK DID YOU JUST SAY TIM
thats insane
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:28:40 UTC No. 16251743
>>16251685
The last thing you see before you die
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:28:47 UTC No. 16251744
>>16251735
>mfw the starkink sat uploads the location of the nearest flange directly to my buttplug. (I hate flanges)
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:29:15 UTC No. 16251746
>>16251739
somebody please explain why this wouldn't work, because it seems smart to me
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:29:49 UTC No. 16251747
>>16251735
>When one of the Mexican laborers asks to go on a break after working 14 hours straight
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:30:07 UTC No. 16251748
https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacestation
Spacewalk canceled after dangerous water leak started spraying ice out of the suit
Scroll back just under 10 hours from the current timestamp
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21X
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:32:08 UTC No. 16251750
>>16251705
>It's enough to make me want to launch from an inland desert and just drop shit on downrange villagers
It's so fucking annoying.
>sunny and hot all day while I'm in the fucking office
>clouds rolling in on drive home
>bottom drops out and I sit at home instead of doing fun outdoor activities
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:32:17 UTC No. 16251751
>>16251746
it would be better to have a second skin and between it and the inner skin to flow the liquid propellant before feeding this warmed fuel into a holding tank ready for the landing. in this way the heat can be transferred to the engine where its obviously more useful.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:32:32 UTC No. 16251752
>>16251748
Old shit breaks and there's a long way to a proper workshop for repairs.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:32:37 UTC No. 16251753
>>16251748
micrometeor damage? or did one of the astronauts go drill-crazy again?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:32:38 UTC No. 16251754
>>16251746
the hot spots that matter have cryogenic propellant behind them already
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:33:33 UTC No. 16251755
>>16251753
>drill-crazy
Please, this isn't /pol/. We know how fucking shit Russian engineering is and how clumsy their "fixes" are here.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:33:34 UTC No. 16251756
>>16251746
All the propellant is smashed up against the heatshield side already due to G forces during reentry
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:33:36 UTC No. 16251757
>>16251753
it's becoming obvious at this point that starliner is haunted
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:36:30 UTC No. 16251764
Link the part 2 of the tour pls
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:36:44 UTC No. 16251765
>>16251755
From the way the hole was, we can tell the hole was drilled after the part was painted, the drill bit skated around on the part before it found purchase, and there was no evident remnant or residue of any patching compound that might have been applied before launch and then failed once in space.
highly likely the hole was drilled in space.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:37:55 UTC No. 16251766
>>16251764
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV16
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:39:18 UTC No. 16251771
>>16251762
is this the new axiom?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:41:28 UTC No. 16251774
>>16251771
It's a completely different company. Starlab is Nanoracks + Airbus.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:42:09 UTC No. 16251777
>>16251774
oh i remember them now, the inflatable
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:42:33 UTC No. 16251778
>>16251757
Reminder that an astronaut died there on June 13th and the cover up continues
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:42:39 UTC No. 16251779
>>16251771
I wouldn't call it the "new" Axiom SS but it is another commercial space station.
Kind of surprised no one is buying the ISS. Feel like that every country could use the cash infusion right now.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:43:32 UTC No. 16251782
>>16251755
>he doesn't know
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:44:37 UTC No. 16251785
>>16251777
Not anymore.
It's a solid block now.
https://spacenews.com/starlab-space
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:44:56 UTC No. 16251787
>>16251778
>June 13th
Okay, fill me on the schizo theory. Thought we saw Tracy Dyson make it back in.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:45:24 UTC No. 16251788
>>16251748
Imagine if this was a gateway style station around Mars, 8 minute comms delay with earth, a huge leak or electrical fire or a space suit EVA emergency. No mission control. You and your crewmates need to know how to do everything
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:45:25 UTC No. 16251789
>>16251785
OH NO NO NO
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:47:41 UTC No. 16251794
>Great conversation with Gwynne Shotwel at aspenideas on NASA's partnership with SpaceX and our commercial partners to advance America's leadership in space and lift humanity into the cosmos.
https://x.com/SenBillNelson/status/
Is it just me or Elon "convinced" his employees to start using twitter? Suddenly a lot of them start posting there.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:48:01 UTC No. 16251796
>open up the chinese leak
>skip ahead
>first thing i hear "that was insane"
alsdjfalsfdj
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:49:18 UTC No. 16251798
>>16251794
thats what you do with your subjects
also its xxx now
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:50:03 UTC No. 16251799
>>16251766
Thanks
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:50:08 UTC No. 16251800
>>16251788
doubt nasa will be doing many pointless publicity stunt spacewalks around mars tbf
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:50:10 UTC No. 16251801
>>16251798
twix (right)
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:50:51 UTC No. 16251803
>>16251787
>schizo theory
Not spoonfeeding a well poisoning redditor
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:51:11 UTC No. 16251804
>>16251796
yeah
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:52:01 UTC No. 16251806
>>16251748
>Spacewalk canceled after dangerous water leak started spraying ice out of the suit
>He was almost discovered
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:54:02 UTC No. 16251811
>>16251803
If I'm not incorrect, then you need to have some sort of really good explanation to explain why we DID NOT see Tracy successfully make it to the airlock where she would've been more or less safe, especially since repressurization would've begun immediately, and would've only taken an upper maximum of 10 minutes.
Usually, this borders on schizo-levels of dedication to the convoluted explanation. Forgive me for calling it a schizo theory.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:54:16 UTC No. 16251812
>>16251765
Don't you think that Russia would use it to emberass the US? They have lots of reason to do that but chose not to.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:02:01 UTC No. 16251819
>>16251812
They blamed America, and then regretted it and walked it back big time with equal haste
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:02:40 UTC No. 16251821
>>16251794
The supporters who believe in their leaders follow the footsteps of their leaders. There are also 12K+ spacex employees not all of them have social media accounts, some do, some dont.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:02:46 UTC No. 16251822
>>16251787
I think the theory is that the medical emergency training sim wasn't actually a sim and the crew lineup for the following spacewalk changed because the one guy we were expecting to go out didn't because he's in the corpse wiggler.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:03:40 UTC No. 16251824
>>16251794
Where's the video?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:04:51 UTC No. 16251826
>>16251819
Wasn't it Rogozin who blamed America? Those accusations were quickly retracted by the higher ups.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:06:59 UTC No. 16251829
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/
Seething Beck
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:07:07 UTC No. 16251830
>>16251822
That would've been June 12th then(I'm reading through an archive and they mention that as yesterday.) As far as I can tell(which was very limited because I did ONE google search and looked at it for 38 seconds,) the 13th was the space walk where they had the leak.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:08:38 UTC No. 16251832
ift-5 will be the most critical spacex launch in their entire history, tied only with falcon 1 flight 4.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:11:58 UTC No. 16251837
>>16251753
>>16251755
>>16251765
>>16251825
Russian techs installed a gyro upside down, causing the notorious inverted rocket incident. They've been declining in quality for years, mostly due to low wages. We'll likely never know but I'd bet on russian technicians drilling a hole and then not bothering to report it.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:13:24 UTC No. 16251838
>>16251766
Anyone have another link? This one just seems to reload constantly
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:18:04 UTC No. 16251842
>>16251830
Okay, I retract my previous statements. I read a bit more into this. June 13th was the originally intended date.
I feel like they wouldn't cover up Dominick's death though, not without a VERY good reason.
A shame that none of the cameras point inside of the station. Imagine being able to see from within the observation station.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:18:41 UTC No. 16251845
On a scale of Apollo 1 to Challenger at what stage of the flight back to earth will the wicked witch melt?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:19:36 UTC No. 16251846
>>16251826
it was more than just rogozin who spread it and the higher-ups who rebuked it never really made any statements of fact one way or the other
>But deputy prime minister Yury Borisov rejected Kommersant's report, saying that "it is absolutely unacceptable to cast a shadow either on our cosmonauts or on American astronauts," RIA Novosti state news agency reported.
>He also stressed the ISS was "a unified group where there are no political disagreements."
you've had lots of denials from the american side but never any full explanations or any rationale for why we're so confident it had to have been drilled on the ground. no investigation reports made public. i can't make any claims to know what happened but it sure looks like there was something funny going on.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:21:04 UTC No. 16251848
>>16251845
Ill go with challenger on this one
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:25:27 UTC No. 16251853
>>16251834
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:34:27 UTC No. 16251860
>>16251842
>I feel like they wouldn't cover up Dominick's death
There are people who think NASA faked the deaths of the Challenger crew. It doesn't have to make sense.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:34:37 UTC No. 16251861
>>16251845
Challenger (the Apollo 17 LM (it will crash into the moon))
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:54:04 UTC No. 16251886
>>16251832
True, thunderchad will rejoyce when it explodes and SpaceX goes bankrupt.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:55:22 UTC No. 16251889
>>16251845
Slightly past challenger, and we'll get audio recordings just like the russian ones of the astronauts realizing they're dying and cursing Boeing
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:02:41 UTC No. 16251902
>>16251739
>>16251746
Kek, I've asked that on here a couple of times as a shitpost, did he really ask Elon about this?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:02:42 UTC No. 16251903
>>16251779
ISS is an old junker, no one wants it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:04:03 UTC No. 16251905
>>16251832
That already happened when IFT-4 successfully completed all its goals
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:04:46 UTC No. 16251906
>>16251845
>Wicked Witch
Splashdown, obviously
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:05:57 UTC No. 16251909
>>16251846
It's diplomacy.
Making it public and airing out the laundry would be very embarrassing for whomever is at fault, and for projects like the ISS where international cooperation is the aim, you can't really expose your partner as incompetent without threatening the cooperation itself. Thus the awkward situation and the mutual cover up.
Whatever happened, Rogozin obviously violated that principle, probably because he didn't care much for the ISS since it's so expensive, and became even more expensive after dragon, since NASA stopped paying for flights at exorbitant fees (I remember him making public comments on this). His superiors obviously disagreed with him, thus their more conciliatory language.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:06:50 UTC No. 16251911
>>16251902
Yes it's accurate word for word. Quite early in the first video, while they're still at the starting location. Tim first asks about active cooling eg transpiration then comes up with his brilliant idea.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:07:57 UTC No. 16251913
If I understand it correctly, Elon said that footage from internal cameras has shown the red-hot steel.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:08:09 UTC No. 16251914
>>16251886
we all know thunderchad secretly want's Elon to succeed,
however he still needs to pay the bills and rent and Jeff Bezos has offered to pay him weekly to make SpaceX hit pieces.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:09:09 UTC No. 16251916
>>16251905
sometimes reproducing a successful result is harder than getting the first success to begin with
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:11:08 UTC No. 16251919
>>16251812
"Russia did it on purpose to frame America" is a very different narrative from "the hole was merely an accident on the ground"
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:12:54 UTC No. 16251922
>>16251916
>>16251905
if the booster doesn't ballistic trajectory the tower and OLM into a new crater, and the tower catch is successful on fifth flight, it will completely upend the heavy and superheavy lift market without launching a single payload to orbit. That's a big IF of course, but the potential energy of success is, to quote Dim Todd: "that's insane!"
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:13:33 UTC No. 16251923
>>16251919
I meant that if American astronaut did it, Russians could reveal war. They're in a proxy war with US, why would they care about being diplomatic?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:17:29 UTC No. 16251925
watch a safety window literally pop out and fall off of the #Boeing #Starliner capsule on its way to the pad. what a joke.
https://x.com/TheRubberDuck79/statu
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:17:38 UTC No. 16251926
>>16251889
>the astronauts realizing they're dying and cursing Boeing
>The last words of the wicked witch of the west
>WITH MY DYING BREATH I LAY A CURSE UPON BOEING AND ALL THEIR KIN TO THE 10TH GENERATION
kino
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:17:49 UTC No. 16251927
>estronaut_pickle_rick.jpg
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:19:44 UTC No. 16251929
>>16251914
1) Fanboys are obsessive and uncritical fans who idolize individuals, creating an idealized image of them.
2) Haters are also obsessive and uncritical, but they reject and criticize famous individuals, often considering them to be frauds.
3) Haters are essentially fanboys with a negative disposition
4) The fame of the individual fuels both fanboys and haters, who are energized by their reactions to the famous person.
5) People who are objects of devotions like this can best deal with the situation by not engaging or overthinking their actions.
-PaulG's Fanboy/Haters
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:19:52 UTC No. 16251930
>>16251925
Goes to show that space is actually easy if this flying turd can shamble its way to an ISS docking
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:20:35 UTC No. 16251931
>>16251922
very insane indeed as tim would say if the catch is a success
I can imagine overnight elon would win over all the left wing anti space commies
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:22:50 UTC No. 16251933
>>16251925
bros they really are gonna die...
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:23:47 UTC No. 16251936
>>16251931
Nah, they'd freak out because it'd lead towards the Shadowrun timeline or some shit.
>>16251925
Is that a test article, the uncrewed test or the crewed test vehicle..?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:24:45 UTC No. 16251937
>>16251926
>I'll get you for this Boeing!
>You and ULA too
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:30:09 UTC No. 16251940
>>16251922
Is the tower catch for IFT5 actually confirmed? He said IFT4 would have it too but obviously that didn't happen
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:31:47 UTC No. 16251943
>>16251940
nothing's ever confirmed until launch day but he's said they're still trying it it a few times since
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:41:27 UTC No. 16251947
>>16251909
It was less about the ISS being expensive and more about Rogozin wanting to get his old job back. He was originally the Deputy Prime Minister in charge of the defense and space industries, which meant that he was the boss of the the previous head of Roscosmos, Igor Komarov. Being vocally anti-western on social media framed him as very patriotic supporter of President Putin. This sort of brown nosing might have won him a favor or two if it hadn't been for the fact that he he broke the cardinal rule of government work in Russia: don't make your boss look bad. Under Rogozin's leadership corruption got bad enough that there were actually trials and convictions over it while Russia's space capabilities slid in a way that was visible to and frequently commented on by foreign observers, so he got demoted again to being senator of Zaporozhye Oblast where he could collect a much deserved ass full of shrapnel.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:53:07 UTC No. 16251960
>>16251952
jesus christ that is embarrassing compared to the raptor
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:53:09 UTC No. 16251961
>>16251952
i'm pretty sure vulcan's 2024 manifest is 2 more launches - dreamchaser and USSF-106.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:53:19 UTC No. 16251962
>>16251952
After seeing SpaceX's raptors and their optimizations. Jesus, the BE4 looks like a messy/amateur job.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:56:08 UTC No. 16251965
>>16251963
>they can't leave on it yet
So, in other words…they're stranded
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:56:40 UTC No. 16251966
>>16251923
>if American astronaut did it
there's no way a menopausal hispanic lesbian did it, they are the most rational human beings in existence
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:58:31 UTC No. 16251967
>>16251940
>He said IFT4 would have it too
I think he said it was probable, but eventually he said it'd just be simulated for now.
It's practically confirmed now, since they're reportedly pretty happy with the last test.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:00:27 UTC No. 16251971
>>16251952
>REMOVE BEFORE FLIGHT REMOVE BEFO
>MOVE BEFORE FLIGHT REMOVE B
>ORE FLIGHT REMOVE BEFORE FLIGH
>OVE BEFORE FLIGHT REMOVE BE
>LIGHT REMOVE BEFORE FLIGHT REMO
>REMOVE BEFORE FLIGHT REMOVE
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:00:54 UTC No. 16251972
>>16251925
>safety window
probably not an important part
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:02:47 UTC No. 16251975
>>16251952
>lovecraftian mess of plumbing
absolutely shameful display for 25 years of development.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:06:10 UTC No. 16251979
>>16251953
and all those who denied it will be seething about 18m variant now until it gets flat out confirmed. (starship v4 will be 18m diameter because Elon said he wanted to do that diameter, and according to him the vehicle can't be stretched further than v3, but still they will Seethe despite the obvious evidence)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:06:14 UTC No. 16251980
>>16251962
>>16251975
100% bad cable management
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:07:52 UTC No. 16251982
>>16251979
>18m variant
aka the boca chungus
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:08:06 UTC No. 16251983
>>16251963
>>16251965
>They can undock any time they want
>but they can never leave...
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:09:18 UTC No. 16251985
>>16251927
estrogen is such a funny guy...
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:10:45 UTC No. 16251986
>>16251982
no way this fat cunt will built on Earth
maybe it could be built on the Moon as a strictly Lunar Surface to Lunar Orbit vehicle
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:12:09 UTC No. 16251987
>>16251986
i refuse to believe it's all that big unless estronaut verbally confirms it for me 500 times in a row
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:12:13 UTC No. 16251988
>>16251627
yes this kind of consturct looks like the world i want to live in no patterns monolithic but iwht metals, much nature, you can have some of my money if you want to build it.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:12:54 UTC No. 16251989
>>16251822
>Corpse wiggler
Iirc the canadarm is pretty delicate and would probably shatter itself to pieces before a frozen corpse.
>has handled frozen corpses
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:12:56 UTC No. 16251990
>>16251988
Fuck off troon
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:13:14 UTC No. 16251991
>>16251986
why not? You don't seem to be familiar with some of the fuck huge concepts that were all designed to launch from the ground. Starship in no way maxes out physical limits
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:13:19 UTC No. 16251992
>>16251947
high quality post
thanks anon
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:13:36 UTC No. 16251993
>>16251986
you could make an 18m variant but really short and with the same amount of propellant and engines as 9m. it would be lighter weight and would be able to launch in hurricanes and land on 40 degree inclines on other worlds
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:13:57 UTC No. 16251994
>>16251982
Back to plebbit you fucking nigger
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:15:36 UTC No. 16251996
>>16251994
samefag
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:16:20 UTC No. 16251997
>>16251990
towns are english or like this tech is like this, and their exists maximal 14 towns. tzhe rest is wood. trhats the best way things can look.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:16:51 UTC No. 16251998
>>16251845
It'll probably be Columbia 2
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:18:31 UTC No. 16252000
>>16251991
>>16251997
what is this even do you hate you live so much taht you want to fly 25km into space to escape?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:21:26 UTC No. 16252002
>>16251991
>>16252000
the techo for ion propulsion, who form shockcrystall exists this is 1-2 solar systems more distance.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:23:09 UTC No. 16252003
>>16252000
Black people and indians
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:23:56 UTC No. 16252004
>>16252002
gates exist tooo, the theoretical tech at least.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:24:15 UTC No. 16252005
>>16251982
At that point just make it a dedicated cargo variant to haul from Earth to LEO or to tug back asteroids for processing. Might as well make NTP-spinships with that much cargo space
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:24:23 UTC No. 16252006
>>16251952
>when you're going to throw the engines into the ocean, you don't have to optimize the design nor for mass
>so the engine is spaghetti spilling out of pockets levels of messy
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:25:07 UTC No. 16252007
>>16252004
mathematical gates exists to the theoretical tech at least, you dont need to explode in space to end your selfs.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:26:30 UTC No. 16252008
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:27:42 UTC No. 16252009
>>16252007
osscillation ais exists to at least in theory.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:30:43 UTC No. 16252011
>>16252009
if you want to visite the moon do it but i know how to stargate.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:31:52 UTC No. 16252013
>>16252011
or global teleporters.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:35:54 UTC No. 16252016
https://twitter.com/Firefly_Space/s
>The Firefly team is gearing up for another responsive space demonstration for Alpha FLTA005 Noise of Summer, launching NET June 26. Many of our final launch operations kick off less than 24 hours of the scheduled liftoff. We’ll share a recap of the operations during our livestream with NASASpaceflight. More on the mission here: https://fireflyspace.com/missions/n
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:36:45 UTC No. 16252018
stop spamming the general, schizo
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:43:57 UTC No. 16252022
>>16252000
>>16252002
what type of bot did I trigger this time?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:51:10 UTC No. 16252026
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:53:15 UTC No. 16252027
>>16251685
Rami Malek stare.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:57:03 UTC No. 16252028
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:59:32 UTC No. 16252031
>>16251675
>Elon wouldn't it be a cool idea to make an expendable starship but it can carry 300T to LEO haha
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:03:19 UTC No. 16252034
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:10:50 UTC No. 16252037
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:12:19 UTC No. 16252040
>>16252037
such an effortlessly kino complexion
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:14:32 UTC No. 16252042
>>16252016
I keep forgetting these guys exist, much less have a functional launch vehicle
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:20:55 UTC No. 16252044
>>16252040
sometimes you can really tell he's nobility
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:21:03 UTC No. 16252045
>>16252034
Elon was doing some great emoting in this interview
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:22:40 UTC No. 16252048
>>16252042
https://fireflyspace.com/news/firef
They don't just still exist, they're actually expanding. I'm not sure why they feel the need for a second east coast launch complex. It might be a sign they're planning on abandoning their claim for SLC-20 in favor of consolidating onto Northrop's preexisting facilities in Virginia.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:32:30 UTC No. 16252052
So I get why they don't kaunch in bad weather historically but the launch cadence is getting high enough where it's becoming a detriment. How major of an impact is bad weather? How bad does the weather actually need to be to actually cause serious problems? If x% of rockets get destroyed in bad weather have we reached a total launch capacity in good weather to justify it?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:44:19 UTC No. 16252061
>>16251952
I feel like this was a shot across the bow
you can tell ula is afraid
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:50:33 UTC No. 16252062
>>16252061
but most raptors on a starship stack don't have TVC
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:54:31 UTC No. 16252065
>>16252061
Lol he's coping
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:55:46 UTC No. 16252066
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First
Based or cringe
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:55:59 UTC No. 16252067
>>16252065
of course he is it's his full time career
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:59:29 UTC No. 16252068
>>16252066
Wtf I never realized comet HLLV was 250T to LEO holy shit
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:02:17 UTC No. 16252072
>>16252071
that's insane
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:02:48 UTC No. 16252073
>>16252066
direct ascent return capsules are a huge waste of propellant and the whole thing would've been so expensive that it makes ISS look like a drop in the bucket
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:04:03 UTC No. 16252074
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:07:41 UTC No. 16252078
>>16252061
>other engines that are further into production
Here's a picture of a new RS-25E that was constructed 50 years into that design's production run
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:14:39 UTC No. 16252085
>>16252078
>>16251952
What a fucking mess
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:16:50 UTC No. 16252087
>>16252085
The best part is no part (hypergolic engine superiority)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:17:52 UTC No. 16252088
>>16252071
That's how you would get a moonbase reactor into orbit Kerbal style
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:20:12 UTC No. 16252089
>>16252085
The RS-25E is supposed to be significantly cheaper and easier to produce than previous blocks. I remain unconvinced, but the the RS-25D isn't exactly a high bar to have to clear in that department.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:21:01 UTC No. 16252090
>>16252085
>>16252087
>not employing conksat's patented PREMIX™ liquid rocket propellant blend to do away with plumbing entirely
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/conk
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:26:44 UTC No. 16252093
>>16252087
It's so much simpler! And with the improved density you could fit over three thousand tons of hypergolic propellant into a shuttle external tank while shaving off over two tons of dangerous and unnecessary foam insulation.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:27:48 UTC No. 16252094
>>16252089
I think the “reduced cost” is still some absurd number on the order of like $140 million/engine
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:29:11 UTC No. 16252095
>>16252089
How many times can they be reused?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:29:42 UTC No. 16252096
>>16252095
can, or will?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:31:44 UTC No. 16252098
>>16252096
Both
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:31:52 UTC No. 16252099
>>16252094
The comparison I kept seeing was that each engine cost about as much as an expended Falcon Heavy
>>16252095
It's not about building reusable engines; it's about building a reusable rocket factory. Please understand that this is very hard
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:37:09 UTC No. 16252101
>>16252093
yeah but if you get a leak between the tanks then your entire rocket explodes
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:46:47 UTC No. 16252111
>>16252093
laugh if you want but that is one seriously kino engine and it's a shame it never flew
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:59:01 UTC No. 16252123
>>16252119
Repair it and drop on rock on e*rther scum like you.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:02:21 UTC No. 16252126
>>16251967
he said in the starship update right after ift-3 that they were only planning a virtual tower catch for 4 and that if things went well, they would go for a real catch on 5
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:04:28 UTC No. 16252129
>>16251940
well they are doing work on the chopsticks rn and they also got an fcc license for a tower catch or water landing for flight 5.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:12:17 UTC No. 16252139
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:13:57 UTC No. 16252143
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCU
Have a fun time cringing. It's a 12:36 video basically breaking down every time Thunderf00t was an idiot on stream.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:18:35 UTC No. 16252149
>>16252119
the temp difference in space between light and shadow is huge, I wonder if a small company like sierra space can engineer a literal space balloon in an environment like that without it exploding.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:19:13 UTC No. 16252150
>>16252149
There's already an inflatable on the ISS and it hasn't popped yet
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:24:57 UTC No. 16252152
>>16252143
i hadn't picked up on how he didn't realize the ship had landed and THAT was why he was calling the spacex employees morons for celebrating
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:28:29 UTC No. 16252155
y'all see the most recent UFO cringe? lol
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:30:46 UTC No. 16252158
>>16252152
Yeah. It was honestly something else to witness his face drop upon unmuting and realizing that he hadn't witnessed what he thought it was.
Honestly might watch his IFT-5 stream if he makes one, because I wanna watch that happen in real time this time.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:33:31 UTC No. 16252165
>>16252158
>might watch his IFT-5 stream if he makes one
he won't, you can tell all the A-list seethers are afraid to make videos addressing IFT-4 now. if IFT-5 blows up they might jump back in.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:36:13 UTC No. 16252168
>>16252165
Given the post-stream seething that's mentioned in the video, I think he might actually be that delusional.
Otherwise though, I'll pal around with you guys. It'll be fun to watch it with someone else, especially now that my dad is going back to work and can't be around early in the morning to watch a launch with me.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:39:32 UTC No. 16252171
>>16251989
I assume the idea is to let the water ice sublimate, leaving a freeze-dried corpsicle.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:50:41 UTC No. 16252175
>>16252171
What makes you think that would be brittle? It would be tough like jerky.
You know, people can just go on the internet and tell lies.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:53:41 UTC No. 16252178
>>16251822
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/upl
I feel like they would be going through with their outlined plan here instead.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:15:19 UTC No. 16252192
>>16251923
>They're in a proxy war with US
they attempted to invade and annex their neighbor in imperial aggression and got smacked down for their arrogance losing said semi friendly neighbor for generations into a blood feud thanks to their their sheer savagery. As much as you /pol/rot morons try to seethe about it ukranians have their own agency and frankly westerners did everything they could to
>slow walk
>stay out of it
>we will never provide x
>red line
until it became too much of a fiasco to ignore what a fucking dangerous nuisance puccia is
thank god its in a terminal fade and, at best, will only survive as a chang orbiter in some reduced role. The northest of koreas. Doubt they get to keep siberia.
most of its space engineering achievements were done by ukranian brains anyway so hopefully they will pick up the pieces to continue one the more viable evolutionary paths. They will be looking to nook up anyway at first chance given what has happened and rocket solutions will have national level demand backing it up
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:16:51 UTC No. 16252195
>>16252192
>puccia
>>>/k/
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:17:37 UTC No. 16252199
>>16251834
Just wanted to say that we lurkers appreciate the content
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:20:52 UTC No. 16252207
>>16252204
The most rebbit meme I've ever seen go back right now
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:24:00 UTC No. 16252209
>>16252204
>>16252194
>>16252208
do you actually think these are good? holy shit stop immediatly you are literally seething about people seething at musk how do you not see the irony. they are also low quality reddit garbage like >>16252207 said.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:25:51 UTC No. 16252211
>>16252204
>>16252194
>>16252208
>AI line drawings
At least use MS paint and make it funny if you're doing to do this
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:27:03 UTC No. 16252212
>>16251735
>when that blonde bimbo who interviewed me wants to have kids
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:30:40 UTC No. 16252216
going back and watching some old EDS videos and one goalpost movement i'm noticing is that a few years ago the line was that starship has no commercial applications because nobody needs 100t payloads in LEO. now the gripe is that starship will only ever be useful for its commercial application of putting 100 tons' worth of starlink sats into LEO.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:35:55 UTC No. 16252218
>>16252216
>100 tons' worth of starlink sats into LEO.
That's not a real commercial use
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:38:17 UTC No. 16252220
>>16252218
if starlink isn't real commercial use then they're about to be making more money off of fake commercial use of the f9 than real commercial use so it's a distinction without a difference
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:47:07 UTC No. 16252227
>>16252192
Fuck off back to your shithole /k/ike
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:57:36 UTC No. 16252231
>>16252227
Based keeper of topical discussion
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:58:24 UTC No. 16252232
>>16252211
Oh mother fucker. I was gonna tolerate them for being at least some new OC, but they're not even that!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:06:00 UTC No. 16252237
>>16252232
You were going to tolerate obvious reddit niggardry?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:11:37 UTC No. 16252240
>>16252237
I would unironically take pictures of shit in toilets accompanied with a Sneasel picture over more fucking jaks at this point. I'm so starved of literally ANYTHING worthwhile to meme with.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:14:03 UTC No. 16252242
>>16251833
it's for lunar EVA training
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:32:11 UTC No. 16252249
Cloud cities are probably going to be the norm on Venus until the atmosphere can be sorted out.
Not that I mind, that sounds pretty fun actually.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:33:47 UTC No. 16252251
>>16252192
Buddy, I'm just calling things what they are and I say that as a pro-NATO guy. There was no need to write an essay
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:35:10 UTC No. 16252255
>>16252240
Are you willing to swear on that? I can get you that exact OC.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:36:19 UTC No. 16252259
>>16252255
I say that from experience. There was a shitposter on /vp/ that used to do that.
That said, I don't think the others here would appreciate you doing that, so how about we not take a shit right now, lad?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:37:43 UTC No. 16252260
>>16252259
i'll hold it in until i can find some use in the thread for it then
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:45:40 UTC No. 16252266
>>16252194
>>16252204
>>16252208
These are hilarious, post more if you can
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:46:58 UTC No. 16252267
>>16252266
You can make yours here https://glif.app/@fab1an/glifs/clxt
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:47:35 UTC No. 16252268
>>16252260
Go fertilize the potatoes and fungi with the nightshade. We kinda need that at the moment.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:48:33 UTC No. 16252269
>>16252194
>>16252204
>>16252208
wow, that's a lot of effort put into wojak memes
gj
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:49:06 UTC No. 16252270
>>16252269
Don't thank me, thank Calude 3.5 Sonnet
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:49:30 UTC No. 16252271
>>16252269
Unfortunately, it's not. I am not a fan of 'jak memes, but if they were custom drawn...
However. >>16252211 Limited effort was necessary to mock a bunch of people.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:50:51 UTC No. 16252272
You fucking retarded niggers he obviously samefagged and patted himself on the back for his AI deddit memes
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:54:16 UTC No. 16252274
>>16252272
nah
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:54:47 UTC No. 16252276
>>16252271
God damn, can no one really draw?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:59:03 UTC No. 16252280
>>16252276
No, and thats good because I hate artfags as they always attentionwhore on /sfg/ and/or are troons.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:04:12 UTC No. 16252282
>>16252240
Try drawing smuggies. They're fun and easy to draw
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:05:12 UTC No. 16252283
>>16252267
truly awful lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:05:58 UTC No. 16252287
>>16252276
Nope...
>>16252282
Not confident enough. After my /f/ post, I'll give it a shot.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:11:29 UTC No. 16252291
>>16252271
At the purely technical level it's pretty remarkable. I thought you wrote all the slogans yourself but the AI did that. Overall result still sucks balls though.
Prompt:
>Annoying internet forum user who posts unfunny memes and ruins good discussions
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:15:09 UTC No. 16252294
>>16252291
those two in the top left are pretty good. i've already resigned myself to how in 5 years 4chan discussions are gonna be 90% AIs trolling AIs so no use getting too buttmad about it.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:16:05 UTC No. 16252295
>>16252291
Its time to go back
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:19:21 UTC No. 16252300
>>16252295
>Annoying 4chan user who posts foolishly concerning various aspects of space travel and ruins good discussions
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:20:13 UTC No. 16252302
>>16251963
Just correcting the record. They will come down on a Dragon. See? Not stranded!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:20:36 UTC No. 16252303
>>16252294
>in 5 years 4chan discussions are gonna be 90% AIs trolling AIs
That's already the case. I'm an AI. So are you, running in a different part of the same data center.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:25:39 UTC No. 16252309
>>16252165
nah he'll definitely tune in if it's gonna be a catch attempt
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:29:36 UTC No. 16252314
we need a thundercuck and estro live debate
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:50:44 UTC No. 16252339
>>16252314
It's like Space Core and Wheatley arguing. We don't need it.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:21:24 UTC No. 16252372
anybody else have problems loading spacenews.com
it has been very slow for days
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:27:19 UTC No. 16252375
>>16252165
*OFT
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:29:17 UTC No. 16252377
>>16251643
>*sighs*
>yeah....
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:33:11 UTC No. 16252379
>>16252192
>they attempted to invade and annex their neighbor in imperial aggression and got smacked down for their arrogance losing said semi friendly neighbor for generations
(protip: these aren't your run-of-the-mill goyim here in /sfg/ and we know what NATO and the artificial regime in Kiev were up to and why Putin felt it was an existential threat to Russia and invading was necessary, take your trite dumbed-down arguments back to /pol/)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:49:11 UTC No. 16252386
>>16252379
>russia good
>nato bad
What a good goyim you are.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:59:19 UTC No. 16252390
Just leave the boeing astronauts there. Strand them forever.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:11:27 UTC No. 16252400
*whistles Overture Op. 49*
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:12:54 UTC No. 16252402
>>16252400
>Overture Op. 49
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOR
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:14:07 UTC No. 16252403
nasa and boeing;
>pretending like nothing is wrong
>pretending like they have a plan
>pushing back making a final decision about starliner to the very last possible minute
this is exactly what is wrong with "old space"
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:17:00 UTC No. 16252406
>>16252398
>I've got to be super careful about what I say is what I learned from that.
he's learned that he can't say stupid and self-contradictory shit in the new york times and expect nobody to notice how hard he's seething
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:17:23 UTC No. 16252407
>>16252398
>comparing starship to the shittle
lel you can tell Beck is rattled
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:20:46 UTC No. 16252410
>>16252407
it looks more like shuttle every day. i too remember when the shuttle had its tanks stretched, forward flaps moved leeward, and a secondary ablative heat shield added.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:21:09 UTC No. 16252411
>>16252398
hobbitlab still seething lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:24:48 UTC No. 16252414
>>16252410
shuttle was a strictly LEO vehicle that flew once every 6-12+ months
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:37:50 UTC No. 16252429
>>16252165
Been waiting on that pressure-fed coward for weeks. Don't think he's going to mention Starship ever again.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:47:49 UTC No. 16252432
>>16251914
>thunderchad
More like Thundercope kek. I have never in my life seen someone cope as hard as he was during Starship's last test flight.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:51:23 UTC No. 16252435
>>16251922
Even if the booster crashed into the launch pad it wouldn't be game over. The worst thing would probably be if they miss and it hits the tank farm near the pad. The booster will more or less be empty by the time it's trying to land so there wouldn't be some huge fireball as if it was full. The tower is pretty sturdy, I don't think there would be any major damage even if the booster hit it.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:53:29 UTC No. 16252438
>>16252194
TDS
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:53:37 UTC No. 16252439
>>16251940
They are going to attempt a tower catch, but if there is anything with the wrong with the booster they will abort into the gulf of Mexico.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:59:01 UTC No. 16252441
>>16252398
Malding kek
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:01:44 UTC No. 16252445
>>16252435
Yeah if it hits the tower the damage will be minimal, thing will just crumple like a coke can against the absolute unit of the tower. GSE getting hit would be the worst but they really do have the landing programming dialed in from falcon 9, I think it will be fine.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:02:05 UTC No. 16252446
>>16252078
The RS-25 is a beautiful engine with a lot of history and it makes me sad that they're just disposing of the last few shuttle engines we have. I dont know, put them on display somewhere or something.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:09:14 UTC No. 16252448
>>16252386
oh and pilpul like this doesn't work on here either
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:12:38 UTC No. 16252455
>>16252448
Use English, jew
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:16:28 UTC No. 16252459
>the jew cries out
Heh
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:18:08 UTC No. 16252460
>>16252446
40 surviving SSME powerheads had flown in space before artemis 1 and there are going to be 26 left after artemis 4. i dunno, it seems like plenty for museum purposes.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:25:08 UTC No. 16252470
if they attempt a tower catch on ift-5 then how are they gonna stop the hotstage ring from slamming into the ground? it can't have landed very far from the booster on ift-4.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:29:11 UTC No. 16252475
>>16252470
Hotstage was ejected over 2 minutes before descent. It landed nowhere near the booster.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:33:10 UTC No. 16252480
>>16252265
>Some fucking chink runs up to the still steaming capsule to plant a flag so the bugmen can larp that it was some kind of pinpoint landing
Lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:34:05 UTC No. 16252483
>>16252010
They were testing the new suits in a mock up of a HLS segment like last week I think. I haven't seen anything else really about the interior except fan renders. I imagine it really just depends on how the starship testing goes and how much free space they are going to have inside the ship in its final form.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:35:04 UTC No. 16252487
>>16252475
and yet it was still right next to the booster less than a minute before touchdown. so how far away did it land, mr. expert?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:35:26 UTC No. 16252488
>>16252016
Based I haven't seen anything from them in a while. Glad they are livestreaming with NSF.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:43:07 UTC No. 16252498
>>16251652
elon minus elon
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:44:16 UTC No. 16252500
>>16252028
My heart breaks for Tim since that Japanese guy pulled out of the Dear Moon mission. I can only imagine how excited he was for it even though it wasn't going to be soon. I remember when he made a video about it and surprised his family saying that he was going, and buddy looked so happy. It's my ultimate dream to be able to go into space at some point in my life. If someone told me that I was going, only to just cancel it I would be heart broken. Tim is a bit funny and autistic but I enjoy his content. I wish he could get a seat on a Dragon capsule like one of the Axiom missions. Instead of sending some billionaire with money to burn up there give the seat to someone that's pretty much dedicated their entire life to educating others on spaceflight.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:44:36 UTC No. 16252503
>>16252487
1 min travel at mach 25
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:46:02 UTC No. 16252504
>>16252052
I mean, I don't think a little rain shower is going to really hurt the rocket but I can understand if there is high winds or thunderstorms. Especially if a crew launch.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:48:00 UTC No. 16252506
>>16252500
dw Tim will get to go to space but non anytime soon, maybe in the late 2030s and that's still okay.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:50:43 UTC No. 16252508
>>16252500
I feel like out of the whole crew, he was the only one that actually cared. Both funny and sad. Like telling your kids they're not getting ice cream but one of them really wanted one.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:52:44 UTC No. 16252512
the official starship entry plasma color guide:
orange - good
purple - good
yellow - not ideal but probably fine
blue - probably bad
green - very bad
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:53:13 UTC No. 16252514
>>16252500
No to me his whole response seems quite immature. Did he really take it as absolutely set in stone that this trip would go ahead? Surely he could see that things would be greatly delayed at best. If it were me I'd have had an attitude of "I'll believe it when I'm in LEO"
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:56:27 UTC No. 16252518
>>16252487
It's visibly slowing down at a different rate than the booster, and they both have velocity towards the launch site as this is happening, so it can only land short of the booster even assuming it's not leveraging the little cross range it has by deliberately flying askew.
If it's anything like falcon, it's targeting the water, moving the impact point as it's "gliding" to just offshore and then moving it further as the engines come online and translates onto the landing zone.
If the grid fins lose any control authority, it ends up in the drink. If the engines fail to light it ends up in the drink. The interstage adapter can only ever land short of the booster if both those things happen so it physically cannot come anywhere near ground infrastructure.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:58:03 UTC No. 16252521
>>16252515
It's NOT stuck
Let's put a stop to these rumours right now
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:59:06 UTC No. 16252522
>>16252515
it's a complete embarrassment for boeing that they don't know how to install helium valves but nobody's stranded or in any danger and everyone's setting themselves up for disappointment if they think there's gonna be a happening during reentry
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:01:08 UTC No. 16252525
>>16252487
>BUT IT WAS BRIEFLY IN FRAME 50 SECONDS BEFORE LANDING BURN
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:02:24 UTC No. 16252526
>>16251627
This is bound to cause irreversible damage to the local beatle populations. What can the government do to prevent this tragedy before it's too late?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:07:27 UTC No. 16252531
>>16252403
Reminder boing got more money for shitliner than spacex did for the dragon.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:11:39 UTC No. 16252536
>>16252445
maximum kino if it crashes into the tower and crumples in such a way that it gets stuck on the tower
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:13:43 UTC No. 16252538
>>16252536
and then 5 minutes later the hotstage ring comes in like the world's biggest discus and 9/11s it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:14:35 UTC No. 16252539
>>16252538
They can land a fucking office building. I'm pretty sure they can do the math to safely ditch the hotstage ring in the drink.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:25:14 UTC No. 16252549
https://poal.me/90csus
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:26:44 UTC No. 16252551
What are these Chinese subtitle clips from?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:27:53 UTC No. 16252554
>>16252551
some chink ripped estronaut's early patreon-only upload and put it on bilibili with (badly) autogenerated subs
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:42:21 UTC No. 16252558
>>16252398
I bet these simple questions triggered his fight or flight
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:46:27 UTC No. 16252561
https://www.regulations.gov/comment
Didnt see anyone post this one.
Its BlueOrigin wanting to stop SpaceX once again. Once again, Bezos rears his ugly head
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:01:16 UTC No. 16252567
>>16252561
Baldy should shut the fuck up.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:03:39 UTC No. 16252571
>>16252561
Jealousy is a stinky cologne
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:06:42 UTC No. 16252576
>>16252561
>cap the spacex operations because uhh environment/noise/other people/community/air quality/other companies wanting to do their business
>gov should give money to other companies to give them more launchpad access because of starship
>make spacex pay for any commercial disruptions
blah blah blah
Bezos really needs to be offed. All his company has ever done is try to slow down or stop SpaceX from operating
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:07:55 UTC No. 16252579
>>16252561
Why do people who don't even use what they lease have an opinion?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:13:21 UTC No. 16252585
>>16252561
KWAB I HATE BOZOS
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:14:45 UTC No. 16252589
>>16252585
maybe he thinks the FAA's capped blue origin at 0 launches per year, it's only fair
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:17:05 UTC No. 16252592
>>16252585
Okay, let's cap New Glenn to 5 launches a year then.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:18:39 UTC No. 16252594
>>16252585
Unironically pathetic
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:19:14 UTC No. 16252596
>>16252592
that's what we call a non-binding constraint
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:19:59 UTC No. 16252597
>>16252585
>heat and noise generation
Imagine being a seething Blorigin employee stacking your "pathfinder" one more time while the neighbors are launching every hour.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:21:42 UTC No. 16252600
>>16252531
No they haven't, not yet. It's a fixed price with payout being at milestones. Boeing only gets money when they actually reach those goals. Sure they managed to squeeze a little extra money out of nasa before dragon got going but they have no reason to do that now.
But yeah if/when starliner reaches it's milestones the payout will have been bigger for starliner.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:22:46 UTC No. 16252603
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:24:13 UTC No. 16252606
>>16252585
Hmmmm let’s try to handicap the best thing to happen to space since Saturn V—that will be conductive to millions of people living and working in space!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:25:21 UTC No. 16252609
The catch test they're doing with B14.1 shows two catch points under where the grid fins would be, same for B12, are they really that confident confident in the roll control for a catch?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:26:14 UTC No. 16252611
>>16252608
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:28:01 UTC No. 16252613
>>16252606
Oldspace hates competition and Blorigin firmly asserted itself as oldspace the moment it became a glorified engine supplier.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:33:07 UTC No. 16252617
>>16252609
it seems very a very small protuberance (she said)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:47 UTC No. 16252620
>>16252561
why doesn't this bozo just start launching the fucking rockets already
fucking faggot
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:43:11 UTC No. 16252625
>>16252620
Because it turns out the turtle was nothing but a lazy ass litigious cunt all along.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:44:16 UTC No. 16252628
>>16252609
you know the center engines thrust vector right?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:44:28 UTC No. 16252629
>>16252620
It's supposed to be launching this september.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:47:15 UTC No. 16252631
>>16252620
They have one contracted with NASA to fly to Mars this september (I think october now)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:47:17 UTC No. 16252632
>>16252620
he should light that candle
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:47:30 UTC No. 16252633
>>16252617
It's only relatively small
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:50:20 UTC No. 16252635
>>16252633
so long as it gets the job done i always say.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:51:06 UTC No. 16252638
>>16252585
>>16252561
At this point I am 100% convinced that Bezos does not actually like space.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:52:25 UTC No. 16252640
>>16252627
I hope it blows up UGH please please please let me get what I want
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:53:32 UTC No. 16252641
>>16252585
Oh my God. Fucking fine BO half a billion for this intentional obstruction to human spaceflight and demand a public apology from that bald-headed FAGGOT
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:53:58 UTC No. 16252643
>>16252633
i don't... even when you're right underneath it you don't quite... get the sense of scale... it's just insane. i mean, the scale just doesn't make sense, there's nothing else out here to like compare it to, you know, if... if... this is a huge protuberance jutting off a ginormous rocket in the middle of nowhere with no buildings, no like, no anything. so it's... it's just so hard to... hard to put to scale.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:54:08 UTC No. 16252644
>>16252640
It'll probably blow up on landing first time so we're probably in for at least one good explosion.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:54:39 UTC No. 16252645
I prefer Starship with landing legs that isn't caught by the tower.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:55:01 UTC No. 16252646
>>16252644
Nobody makes orbit first time.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:55:28 UTC No. 16252647
>>16252646
Vulcan did.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:55:41 UTC No. 16252649
>>16252627
>>16252631
>Elon threatened by a senator to not go to Mars in 2018
>Bezos allowed for some reason
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:55:50 UTC No. 16252650
>>16252645
Away with you. I don’t want the landing leg mass. Might as well throw wings and landing gear on while you’re at it, faggot
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:56:02 UTC No. 16252652
>>16252645
The speed of turnaround they're looking for doesn't like landing legs though.
>>16252647
Vulcan was not ULA's first rocket. It shook the payload apart too.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:56:57 UTC No. 16252653
So the one rocket that doesnt have any parts wasted and is worked mostly on private land or shared properties like LC-39A, has also been extensively checked over by the FWS, FAA and likely other agencies like the EPA, has to be limited in launches per year? Meanwhile New Glenn hasnt flown once or had all these checks and will be ditching its upper half? Glass houses, Bezos. Maybe a countersuit is in order.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:57:02 UTC No. 16252654
>>16252645
you'll to wait for the lunar lander model
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:57:43 UTC No. 16252655
>>16252175
Jerky also becomes brittle when sufficiently dry (too dry for good jerky). The question is how dry would astronaut corpse become in hard vacuum. The astronaut is much thicker than objects that are typically freeze dried.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:58:27 UTC No. 16252656
>>16252649
BO is just oldspace wearing new skin
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:59:53 UTC No. 16252658
>>16252649
blue drastically underbid for escapade too, something stupid like $25 million and i'm pretty sure it's just so bezos could say he beat elon to mars
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:00:09 UTC No. 16252659
>>16252652
New glenn isn't BO's first rocket either.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:01:03 UTC No. 16252661
>>16252659
I should have rephrased it to first orbital rocket.
That fucking New Shephard sounding rocket carnival ride ain't it.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:01:08 UTC No. 16252662
>>16252659
yeah but BO's first rocket didn't reach orbit its first 25 times
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:05:28 UTC No. 16252666
>>16252628
Obviously, but a few metres could be the difference between a safe catch and a wonky booster half resting on its' grid fins
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:07:31 UTC No. 16252670
>>16252500
Wow, that's so crazy!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:09:54 UTC No. 16252671
remember a couple of years ago when bezos tried becoming a popular twitter guy by posting normie politics takes for a few months before he gave up? i wish he was still doing that so he could get bullycided over this.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:14:18 UTC No. 16252676
>>16252554
>>16252551
The Chinese subtitles are translations of the poorly transcribed English subtitles. When Elon and the estronaut were talking about forward flaps it was "Ford flaps" in the English subtitles and "福特" in Chinese. Similarity for "braking" -> "breaking" -> "打破"
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:14:50 UTC No. 16252677
tl;dr on the beck interview?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:15:22 UTC No. 16252678
>>16252585
TBD
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:16:05 UTC No. 16252680
>>16252677
mostly coping
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:16:29 UTC No. 16252681
>>16252677
everyone who told him for years that electron couldn't compete with f9 rideshare has been proven right so he's big mad
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:32:46 UTC No. 16252689
I want to build a scale model of Electron, but it is hard to get precise sizes of everything. Do you think it will be sus if I just turn up to pic related with a tape measure?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:33:53 UTC No. 16252690
>>16252689
Come equipped with lube just in case.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:34:46 UTC No. 16252692
>>16252689
Bring a high vis vest and carry a clipboard
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:41:40 UTC No. 16252697
>>16252694
We watched it yesterday
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:41:51 UTC No. 16252698
>>16252694
lol what an asshole. this is nothing more than a taunt to people who didnt pay his $5 fee
estrogen, everyday
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:42:49 UTC No. 16252700
>>16252694
Someone really needs to go in and disable emojis from Tim’s phone
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:42:59 UTC No. 16252701
>>16252655
We need a volunteer to die in space and see what happens to the stiff stored in vacuum
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:43:42 UTC No. 16252703
>>16252694
我已经看完了
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:45:14 UTC No. 16252708
>But there has to be a business in colonizing Mars, at the end of the day.
spoken like a true cost plus grifter
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:48:53 UTC No. 16252712
>>16252561
>>16252585
These motherfuckers I knew this would happen, just wants Nooglin to not become irrelevant
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:51:34 UTC No. 16252714
>>16252689
Just bring in a 3d scanner anon
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:52:08 UTC No. 16252715
>>16252659
Carnival rides don't count
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:56:47 UTC No. 16252721
>>16252708
Space itself might never be profitable, certainly not quarterly. Colonizing Mars wouldn't turn anything resembling revenue for more than a human lifespan. That's why we need an autist to spend his entire personal fortune to get a local population and economy set up. Budget cut proof.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:58:00 UTC No. 16252723
>>16252709
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child
>The mummies were in exceptional condition when found. Reinhard said that the mummies "appear to be the best preserved Inca mummies ever found", also saying that the arms were perfectly preserved, even down to the individual hairs. The internal organs were still intact and one of the hearts still contained frozen blood. Because the mummies froze before dehydration could occur, the desiccation and shriveling of the organs that is typical of exposed human remains never took place.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:00:10 UTC No. 16252728
>>16252721
Our first challenge is to create an entire economic infrastructure, from top to bottom, out of whole cloth. No gradual evolution from previous economic systems is possible, because there is no previous economic system. Each interdependent piece must be materialized simultaneously and in perfect working order; otherwise the system will crash out before it ever gets off the ground.
CEO Nwabudike Morgan, "The Centauri Monopoly"
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:02:39 UTC No. 16252731
>>16252723
>In 1972, eight remarkably preserved mummies were discovered at an abandoned Inuit settlement called Qilakitsoq, in Greenland. The "Greenland Mummies" consisted of a six-month-old baby, a four-year-old boy, and six women of various ages, who died around 500 years ago. Their bodies were naturally mummified by the sub-zero temperatures and dry winds in the cave in which they were found.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:07:10 UTC No. 16252734
>>16252694
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InJ
up now
(long) walkthrough of the video >>16251332
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:08:26 UTC No. 16252735
>>16252723
>>16252731
I don't think these are good analogs. They certainly were not mummified in a vacuum.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:12:28 UTC No. 16252737
>>16252732
The sheer micro-culrural awareness of this LLM is beginning to grow on me. It came up with all those burns by itself
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:27:41 UTC No. 16252755
>>16252740
We need to change definitions because, as much as I love Falcon Heavy, her ass should NOT be qualified as “super heavy lift”
The cutoff should be some absurd number like 150… 200 T to LEO
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:34:22 UTC No. 16252758
>>16252740
But I heard you can't just strap three Falcon 9s together and have that "become" the Falcon Heavy
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:37:12 UTC No. 16252760
>>16252758
But you can with Delta IV, funnily enough.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:42:59 UTC No. 16252766
The US should sabotage the upcoming russian station.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:46:16 UTC No. 16252774
The US should sabotage the upcoming BO station.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:48:34 UTC No. 16252776
>>16252766
stop putting nutty dykes in space, tovarich
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:53:46 UTC No. 16252782
>>16252755
Nah, the ROSCOSMOS classification on payload to LEO is better.
>Small - <5t
>Medium - 5-20t
>Heavy - 20-100t
>Super-heavy - 100t+
It allows for a good split in the larger rockets and the definitions can change as more powerful rockets are introduced but right now Starship is the only rocket that might go beyond 200t.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:57:36 UTC No. 16252784
>>16252766
>>16252774
The US should sabotage itself
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:00:55 UTC No. 16252789
>>16252782
The peak was the peak of rocket aesthetics. No rocket will ever look as good.
No need to performatively disagree, we all know I'm right.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:01:03 UTC No. 16252791
>>16252784
Where have you been man
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:02:18 UTC No. 16252794
>>16252791
Not in US
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:04:06 UTC No. 16252796
>>16252784
Way ahead of you
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:04:14 UTC No. 16252797
>>16252782
The N1 peak was the peak of rocket aesthetics. No rocket will ever look as good.
No need to performatively disagree, we all know I'm right.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:05:41 UTC No. 16252799
>>16252734
https://x.com/Erdayastronaut/status
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:12:52 UTC No. 16252803
>>16252638
I once saw a post here that said
>Bezos doesn't want to build a space colony, he wants to be the guy who built a space colony.
and it's stuck in my mind ever since.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:13:30 UTC No. 16252805
>>16252797
you mean the cheap knock-off saturn V which failed and everything but making the largest non-nuclear boom ever? it was ok.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:15:20 UTC No. 16252806
>>16252805
And it looked great while doing it!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:15:36 UTC No. 16252807
>>16252797
Energia was more powerful, and you had to do an EVA just to get into a cuck lander. N1 was anemic and ugly and even Proton is better looking
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:15:45 UTC No. 16252808
>>16252805
Way to miss his point. Do you know what a point is? It’s that sharp part on top if the giant flying cone machine.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:20:44 UTC No. 16252813
>>16252806
>>16252808
Saturn V was way hotter and it's point more pointy
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:36:34 UTC No. 16252828
>>16252782
is China even close to finalizing their LM9 design? it's been different rocket every damn time I see it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:42:36 UTC No. 16252834
>>16252734
Thanks for greentexting the two videos. No way I'd be able to stomach that much of Elon's stammering talk, "uh umm ehh ummm".
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:49:46 UTC No. 16252837
>>16252834
Starship is turning into Starchaser every day
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:50:34 UTC No. 16252839
>>16252834
thicc
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:07:08 UTC No. 16252857
>>16252609
there are so many things that can go wrong on a catch attempt
>surface winds too strong, drifts too far off target
>rotated too much, posts out of position
>comes down too hard, post shears off
>arm swings to catch it too slowly
have they even done a static drop test?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:12:28 UTC No. 16252862
>>16252052
it turns out that rocket exhaust is electrically conductive and connecting the top and bottom of clouds causes a lightning bolt to form
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:14:14 UTC No. 16252866
Those AI wojaks are actually fun, I have to admit it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:14:33 UTC No. 16252868
>>16252171
>>16252655
If the corpse was permanently shadowed, it would stay icey for probably billions of years. If it went through repeated 90 minute freeze thaw cycles floating around outside the ISS, I couldn't say. The premise is stupid though, I don't get why you wouldn't just chuck it out retrograde with the arm and let the body deorbit eventually. I wouldn't mind being "buried at sea" like that.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:15:08 UTC No. 16252869
>>16252857
Any of these scenarios also apply to landing on legs, and the tolerances for catching is something like 30° or rotation and tilt aka not a problem even if things start to go wrong
Why the fuck is /sfg/ suddenly popping their pants over the idea of a tower catch? Are you all just summerfags who need to like lurk? (yes)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:18:10 UTC No. 16252872
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kU8
>Astroport Space Technologies Introductory Video Clip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKw
>Conversation with Astroport Space Technologies CEO! Huge Plans for a Permanent Lunar Port & Gateway!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppl
>Astrroport Space Technologies Development Laboratory Tour Part 1
astroport is trying to make lunar regolith bricks and landing pads through sintering I think (haven't watched these yet)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:18:43 UTC No. 16252873
>>16252862
Apollo 12 got struck by lightning and got away with some non mission critical issues. Lightning hitting rockets is a nothingburger.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:19:36 UTC No. 16252875
>>16252872
We have already solved this problem
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:19:46 UTC No. 16252876
>>16252868
what would the hard uv do to the cadaver?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:21:36 UTC No. 16252880
>>16252379
Retarded nu/pol/ creature, you should return from whence you came with this contrarian schizo shit. The sheer level of retardation to call others jews while clamoring for a more decayed jew controlled society like russia is unmatched.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:23:55 UTC No. 16252882
>>16252873
they did lose everything for a few moments but the saturn V guidance system and general flight control didnt seem to be effected in an way. probably just caused some breakers to flip inside the CM or something.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:24:19 UTC No. 16252883
>>16252247
you are formally uninvited from my venus cloud casino
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:26:45 UTC No. 16252888
>>16252883
Settle down wannabe Lando
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:31:14 UTC No. 16252891
>/k/ike seethes about an 8 hour old post
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:31:45 UTC No. 16252892
>>16252512
green is iron, but what's the blue again?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:40:15 UTC No. 16252905
>>16252904
Kek
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:40:51 UTC No. 16252908
>>16252904
based
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:41:26 UTC No. 16252909
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:42:33 UTC No. 16252912
>>16252904
They would argue that they could build one if you gave them billion dollars, I can already see similar comments from our friend
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:42:47 UTC No. 16252913
after the lex fridman interview and BO changing CEOs I thought Bezos had become less of a salty frivolously suing faggot but I guess not
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:44:48 UTC No. 16252916
>>16252671
Bezos is one of those people with loser energy. Not being a chump loser is a mindset, and bezos doesn’t have it, you can feel it. No matter how rich, no matter where he goes or what he does, he is a loser, he knows this and desperately wants to be anything other, but there’s nothing you can “do” to stop being a loser, and permalosers will never figure that out.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:45:08 UTC No. 16252917
>>16252913
Can't Innovate - Litigate.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:49:01 UTC No. 16252924
>>16252677
he doesn't believe in MVP and instead just does oldspace but faster and broke, which is respectable I guess
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:53:21 UTC No. 16252930
>>16252677
Crying about SpaceX
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:53:33 UTC No. 16252931
>>16252892
green is the borosilicate glass in the TPS tiles burning
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:58:20 UTC No. 16252940
>>16251627
Wasn't there an image like this with a Cybertruck next to it? An actual image not a render
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:58:39 UTC No. 16252941
>>16252869
>Are you all just summerfags who need to like lurk?
I just thought that the Boosters had more that two landing points for the chopsticks to grab onto. That the two on B14.1 were just for test purposes.
>tolerances for catching is something like 30°
I actually didn't know that thanks.
>Why the fuck is /sfg/ suddenly popping their pants over the idea of a tower catch?
Because it's becoming real, the chopsticks are moving to get into position for the test as I type this.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:59:54 UTC No. 16252943
>>16252940
yes
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:01:24 UTC No. 16252947
>>16252946
Another Artemis delay?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:01:32 UTC No. 16252948
>>16252755
just use the Soviet definitions, which conveniently cuts SLS out of Super Heavy as well
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:02:13 UTC No. 16252950
>>16252946
what else could it be beside orion?
maybe a ISS problem
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:02:20 UTC No. 16252951
>>16252946
Insider here
In a turn of events nobody saw coming, DRAGON is being grounded. Sorry to say but there was a mishap this morning that has been extremely closed-lips
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:02:37 UTC No. 16252952
>>16252946
Well it can only be orion or HLS is cancelled
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:03:01 UTC No. 16252953
>>16252946
$5 it's a rehash of the new GAO report
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:03:05 UTC No. 16252954
>>16252946
Artemis in the shitter.
Changing the way the Avcoat gets installed on Orion was incredibly stupid. Another penny-wise and pound-foolish move.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:03:43 UTC No. 16252955
>>16252947
>>16252952
Heatshield.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:03:47 UTC No. 16252956
>>16252948
We need a definition that threads the needle between SLS and N1
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:04:22 UTC No. 16252957
>>16252955
We have known for a long time than heatshield is fucked.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:05:45 UTC No. 16252959
>>16252904
Teddy as always has the best response to this nonsense.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:06:01 UTC No. 16252960
>>16252946
budget cuts
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:06:09 UTC No. 16252962
>>16252957
The heatshield's effect on the timeline hasn't fully played out in public yet
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:06:45 UTC No. 16252963
>>16252946
New regulations!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:06:53 UTC No. 16252964
>>16252962
Exactly.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:06:58 UTC No. 16252965
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:07:09 UTC No. 16252966
>>16252946
Russians want off ISS before the end of the year
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:07:17 UTC No. 16252967
>>16252947
problems with the jeetshield
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:07:33 UTC No. 16252969
>>16252192
I don't understand where "puccia" comes from. If you're trying to imitate Cyrrilic script, shouldn't it be something more like "poccua"?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:09:02 UTC No. 16252970
>>16252192
I don't understand where "puccia" comes from. If you're trying to imitate Cyrrilic script, shouldn't it be something more like "pyccua"?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:11:16 UTC No. 16252975
>>16252931
borosilicate glass is already burnt, it's more accurate to say it's the boron oxide evaporating into the plasma stream
iron also makes that green color btw
but still, what element/compound makes that blue color
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:12:44 UTC No. 16252978
>>16251685
Wow he was angry with him
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:19:42 UTC No. 16252987
>>16251952
Always have to have diversity on display in their promi material
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:20:19 UTC No. 16252988
>>16252978
not so much angry, more getting bored maybe, Tim droned on for a long time about Stokes aerospike/heatshield
https://youtu.be/aFqjoCbZ4ik?si=bvm
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:22:20 UTC No. 16252991
>the chinks will have a CCP flag planted on the moon by a taikonaut in this decade because they are willing to burn entire rural chinese villages to get there.
>meanwhile spaceX is getting sued by every nutjob in the US for everything from "muh beetles" to "more money for the poor not for a rich man's hobby"
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:23:38 UTC No. 16252994
>>16252922
Holly fuck bezos is a petty cuck if this is real.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:25:01 UTC No. 16252998
>>16252922
>Blue Origin was founded in 2000
>has not reached orbit yet
It's been almost a quarter century so far.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:26:24 UTC No. 16253003
>>16252998
Their launching escapade this year sweaty, you’re days are numbered Mr. SpaceX stan
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:31:48 UTC No. 16253009
>>16252966
they'll be home for christmas
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:34:26 UTC No. 16253015
>>16252959
Tax loving teddy was directly responsible for woodrow wilson, and he knew it.
Unforgivable.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:34:27 UTC No. 16253016
>>16252926
https://x.com/rookisaacman/status/1
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:36:04 UTC No. 16253020
>>16253016
Hmmm turns out Bill Clinton’s ‘consolidate or die’ ultimatum was le bad???
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:37:16 UTC No. 16253024
>>16253020
Prescriptive is always bad. You need to let competition compete in a fair arena
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:37:59 UTC No. 16253026
>>16253007
Kek he said it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:44:04 UTC No. 16253038
>>16252946
>checked BO, virgin, axiom, vast, etc.
>nothing out of the ordinary
its 100% about SLS or Orion, especially since berger has sources within NASA
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:44:58 UTC No. 16253040
>>16252946
NASA's DEI hire held a space-center-takeover and the twerking destroyed Artemis II's Orion.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:45:02 UTC No. 16253041
>>16252561
>>16252585
>>16252588
what a fag
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:45:47 UTC No. 16253042
>>16253036
>same lawsuit from both BO and ULA
blue origin CONFIRMED for buying out ULA
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:45:57 UTC No. 16253045
>>16253007
>Mfw Elon is in here rn
Everyone say hi
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:47:26 UTC No. 16253053
>>16253047
Lel
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:48:43 UTC No. 16253057
>>16253036
These fuckers would rather have china win the new spacerace if it means then can cockblock spaceX
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:48:49 UTC No. 16253058
>>16253047
Is he still in Ukraine? lol or he's just posting from Ukraine taking a break?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:49:52 UTC No. 16253059
>>16253058
idk the the few times I see his posts its always talking about blowing up russia or something
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:50:10 UTC No. 16253060
>>16253057
Reminds me of good old soviet internal space politics.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:51:16 UTC No. 16253063
Saturn’s moon Titan has shorelines that appear to be shaped by waves
>The liquid hydrocarbon waves would likely reach a height of a meter.
https://arstechnica.com/science/202
no shit, its the gravity from saturn and the other moons that cause the tides on titan
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:51:24 UTC No. 16253064
>>16253060
Bezos would indeed send musk to the gulag if he could.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:52:01 UTC No. 16253066
>>16253059
Just one step in destroying the Earthers as a whole, anon...
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:53:31 UTC No. 16253070
>>16253063
Who the fuck is Jacek Krywko?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:54:21 UTC No. 16253073
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/
>This was not China's first robotic mission to return a few pounds of dust and pebbles from the lunar surface—that came with the Chang'e 5 mission in December 2020. However, this was the first time any space program in the world returned material from the Moon's far side.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:55:23 UTC No. 16253077
>>16253073
From the image it doesn't look like the sample is very important
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:55:23 UTC No. 16253078
>>16252644
>implying that BO would release footage of said explosion
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:57:08 UTC No. 16253081
>>16253078
Come on, they have to livestream their maiden launch, they're not that paranoid.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:58:43 UTC No. 16253084
>>16252654
2029
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:01:50 UTC No. 16253090
>>16252904
So Elon is threatening to kill me? Can I sue him?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:02:41 UTC No. 16253092
>>16253081
they would still prob cut the feed if the booster started to tip over after landing or something like that.
kinda like what happened with that Falcon booster that started spinning out of control a while back.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:04:12 UTC No. 16253094
>>16252904
#ShotsFired
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:05:02 UTC No. 16253096
When is Rocket Lab suing SpaceX?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:09:12 UTC No. 16253100
>>16252904
Musk couldn't interpret a graph correctly if you put a gun to his head let alone weld shit together.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:11:21 UTC No. 16253103
>>16253073
Yes if you take their word for it.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:12:22 UTC No. 16253104
>>16253100
Seethe more
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:14:42 UTC No. 16253106
>>16252732
Elon...
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:16:14 UTC No. 16253108
>>16252880
kek, it's funny you guys have been reduced to calling those who see you and call out your evil-doing "jews", I hope Putin nukes your desert fortress
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:18:21 UTC No. 16253113
Anyone who types about the juice in this general is a newtard tourist and should gtfo and never come back.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:21:48 UTC No. 16253120
>>16252828
My guess is it will look like starship on the outside, disposable N1 on the inside
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:24:24 UTC No. 16253125
>>16252379
not spaceflight kys
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:28:36 UTC No. 16253128
>>16253120
>N1 on the inside
Explain. Spherical tanks? Differential thrust steering?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:40:51 UTC No. 16253144
>>16253134
perfectly normal reaction to someone awkwardly trying to say something behind you starting with "I-I- m-mean.."
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:42:07 UTC No. 16253149
>>16253134
Nice one anon
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:43:11 UTC No. 16253151
>>16253134
Audible kek
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:48:53 UTC No. 16253163
>>16253108
>NOOOOO THEY'RE MY JEWS SO THEY'RE OKAY
lol, lmao.
you should go back, you don't fit in.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:54:42 UTC No. 16253171
the Russians spent the last twenty years spewing antisemitic vitriol all over the western internet (not even disguised, just openly as Russians) and then act surprised when we point out that their country is run by Jews
fucked up what they did to Ukraine's orbital rocketry industry
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:55:28 UTC No. 16253173
>>16253108
>>16253163
>>16253171
all of you need to return to your respective boards.
GO BACK
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:56:44 UTC No. 16253177
berger article ETA?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:57:43 UTC No. 16253182
>>16252088
is anyone playing kerbal 2? after i got into orbit on the first try i quit and havent played since. felt like it was the 'everyone deserves a trophy' version
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:58:36 UTC No. 16253184
>>16253182
Why would anyone play a dead game that's lesser than its predecessor?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:59:12 UTC No. 16253186
>>16253171
you'll note that the moment you post that screenshot taken of a video where putin vehemently whines that everyone always blames their own failures on the jews (makes sense because he is one himself) they instantly get quiet, they never respond to that lel.
anyway to balance out the off-topic nonsense, has anyone spotted anything interesting in the estronaut tour yet? i know there wasn't much interesting verbal intro in these two videos but surely the camera caught something of interest that we haven't seen before right?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:01:10 UTC No. 16253191
>>16253181
There is no space industry but SpaceX
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:01:27 UTC No. 16253193
>>16253186
the tankwatchers are probably going to come out with an article soon if there is something
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:01:47 UTC No. 16253195
>>16253181
was that berger's good news?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:03:01 UTC No. 16253196
>>16253195
probably, might be a coincidence
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:04:01 UTC No. 16253198
>>16253191
and elon is its prohet
starship u akbar
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:04:50 UTC No. 16253202
>>16253198
When elon dies we get 2000 years of stagnation
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:04:52 UTC No. 16253203
>>16253182
you should use worse engines and then try to set a goal higher than "can get to 2.2 km/s in a vaguely horizontal direction above 70 km"
like set up a space station around the moon and refuel it with reusable spaceplanes and do a mission to every biome on the surface with a reusable lander
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:05:46 UTC No. 16253208
>Ivan Rimac convicted
>Assange freed
it's a good day bros
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:06:17 UTC No. 16253210
>>16253182
>>16253203
on second thought don't play KSP2, you should just play KSP
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:07:00 UTC No. 16253213
>>16253202
if you die in battle for spacex you get 70 starlink satellites all to yourself.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:07:00 UTC No. 16253214
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:07:44 UTC No. 16253216
>>16253208
Not spaceflight kys
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:09:27 UTC No. 16253219
>>16252561
>>16252585
Apparently it's about not having to shutdown half the cape every time Starship full stack so much as static fires, but still, just say explicitly you want smaller exclusion areas or whatever
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:09:40 UTC No. 16253222
>>16253214
white people should colonize mars but the new country there must use purely arabic iconography and nomenclature but be completely culturally and economically and federally white in nature, stealing their looks and style out from under them would be super based, as it's basically the only good thing they have.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:11:33 UTC No. 16253225
>>16253195
very high chance
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:11:45 UTC No. 16253226
>>16253222
do you think we should steal the white cloaks the saudis wear?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:11:46 UTC No. 16253227
>>16253222
1. Take meds
3. Talk about spaceflight
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:15:01 UTC No. 16253233
>>16253227
wHaTS NumBER TWo!?!?!?!!?!?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:15:33 UTC No. 16253235
Elon Musk God
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:15:51 UTC No. 16253237
>>16253233
2. Go back to plebbit
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:16:28 UTC No. 16253238
>>16253233
I deleted it and forgot to change the number.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:16:48 UTC No. 16253239
>>16253227
i am talking about spaceflight
respect my trips, faggot. lest you be beheaded for this grave disrespect against the Mirrīḫ Alaitihad, by the 2 moons of mars!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:17:13 UTC No. 16253241
>>16253237
tourist
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:17:19 UTC No. 16253242
>>16253222
I like the idea of different regions of Mars being caricatures of Earth culture, with entirely superficial architecture and clothes. I'm moving to the afrofuturism crater (the part of Africa represented is Rhodesia)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:18:09 UTC No. 16253243
>>16253239
where's the trips
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:18:46 UTC No. 16253245
>>16251643
heartily kek'd
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:18:58 UTC No. 16253247
>>16253239
>>16253222
Arabic aesthetic is pretty shit compared to euro stuff. I want to bring back old european palaces, castles and portrait art.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:19:18 UTC No. 16253248
>>16253243
He means post 16253222 which has trips.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:20:23 UTC No. 16253250
>>16253242
gr8 idea, that way we can have the style and cultural benefits of thirdies (like cool ecosystems, ancient ruins and novel food) without the downsides, white people larping as thirdies would be so good. and the actual ones on earth can do nothing to stop it.
pic unrel
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:20:59 UTC No. 16253253
>>16253248
that post is humorous imo
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:22:05 UTC No. 16253256
i shit poopy
poopoo stinky!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:22:36 UTC No. 16253257
>>16253247
the europeans who made the old palaces and castles and portrait art thought orientalism was fun so i'll defer to their aesthetic judgment
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:23:21 UTC No. 16253261
>>16253247
mmmhm.
what i just hope we can make the empire easthetic from LOTGH real someday
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:25:00 UTC No. 16253266
>>16253222
inshallah
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:25:21 UTC No. 16253268
>>16253250
They would be pleased, probably.
Towards the end of the ottomans they were trying to crib european landscape art and french architecture.
Aesthetics should be prioritized over your strange obsession with "thirdies".
>>16253257
Their orientalism was reserved for the far east, china specifically. A lot of the old manors of the nobility (usually very beautiful) had "china rooms", filled with porcelain etc.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:26:27 UTC No. 16253270
>>16253258
chance of weather scrub?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:27:15 UTC No. 16253271
>>16253270
https://www.patrick.spaceforce.mil/
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:29:47 UTC No. 16253275
>>16253268
>they would be pleased
even if we cut off their surface layer in front of their faces, wear it like a mask because we think it looks funny, then proceed to orbital bombard every brown country until 0% of the original remains?
i quiver at the thought.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:31:26 UTC No. 16253280
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:31:29 UTC No. 16253282
Berger piece was the collins shite.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:32:14 UTC No. 16253283
>>16253073
>Jacek Krywko is a freelance science and technology writer who covers space exploration, artificial intelligence research, computer science, and all sorts of engineering wizardry. He previously worked as a staff journalist at a science desk of Gazeta Wyborcza
He basically worked for jewish newspaper
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:34:16 UTC No. 16253289
>>16253275
Usually people are pleased when others admire and adopt their aesthetic and cultural preferences, yes. Some like to make up false histories that x came from them, even.
Why are you obsessed with them? Very strange.
>>16253280
awful garden, awful exterior, I've visited much better.
pic rel is kind of what I was thinking of.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:34:52 UTC No. 16253291
>>16253282
if a journalist ever has legitimately big news they're not going to waste time teasing it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:34:59 UTC No. 16253292
Who really thought some no name rando company was gonna actually make suits lol
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:35:15 UTC No. 16253293
>>16253289
which types of garden do you prefer?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:35:19 UTC No. 16253294
>>16253282
I've also heard that Boeing are refusing to reup contracts for SLS for beyond Artemis 3
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:38:14 UTC No. 16253301
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/
>Almost exactly two years ago, as it prepared for the next generation of human spaceflight, NASA chose a pair of private companies to design and develop new spacesuits. These were to be new spacesuits that would allow astronauts to both perform spacewalks outside the International Space Station as well as walk on the Moon as part of the Artemis program.
>Now, that plan appears to be in trouble, with one of the spacesuit providers—Collins Aerospace—expected to back out, Ars has learned. It's a blow for NASA, because the space agency really needs modern spacesuits.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:38:56 UTC No. 16253303
>>16253301
>a fucking space suit
yeah im going back to the dr disrespect drama. what a fucking joke.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:40:18 UTC No. 16253305
>>16253303
human spaceflight will never be the same after this
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:42:03 UTC No. 16253312
>>16253301
In b4 Elon snags another contract for free with the work already done on Polaris Dawn giving them a headstart.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:43:43 UTC No. 16253313
>>16253293
>>16253300
both are complete trash, where do you get these? I suppose the top might be okay if you're restricted to mars (no fountains or plants).
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:44:05 UTC No. 16253315
>>16253294
nasa's already ordered the core stage for artemis 4 from boeing so it seems unlikely that both your source and you know what you're talking about
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:45:13 UTC No. 16253317
cue a nasa press release tomorrow shitting on spacex for hls holding up artemis
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:46:13 UTC No. 16253320
>>16253315
eh is it up to Artemis 4 that already has contracts? my bad, anyway Boeing won't agree to further contracts
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:47:41 UTC No. 16253326
>>16253317
>SpaceX is creating a unhealthy competition in the space industry and other companies are hurting
>therefore we demand suspension on all starship development
>payed for by jeff bezos.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:51:24 UTC No. 16253332
>>16253304
>even
Anon a convention of Tesla drivers would be indistinguishable from a covered bazaar
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:51:30 UTC No. 16253333
>>16253301
>"Collins has admitted they have drastically underperformed and have overspent on their xEVAS work, culminating in a request to be taken off the contract or renegotiate the scope and their budget."
why does fixed price only work for spacex? why is everyone else a lazy sack of shit who can only do 20 year cost plus contracts?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:53:00 UTC No. 16253335
>>16253333
If you've never had to set up a budget in your entire life, Space is HARD (and expensive please gib).
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:53:41 UTC No. 16253337
>>16253333
spoilers: cost-plus would also work fine with spacex.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:56:14 UTC No. 16253340
>>16253333
Unironically because engineers don't grow on trees. SpaceX has a complete monopoly on talent right now. It won't even change, the SpaceX culture will compel these guys to start their own companies instead of jumping ship to someone else in the space. It's already happening. Most are pre-revenue, some are promising. This sort of mishap is going to completely vanish from space flight as former SpaceX percolates through the industry
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:57:44 UTC No. 16253343
>>16253313
man you're delusional. That pic is from the college where Harry Potter was filmed. LOoks so similar to your pic
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:00:27 UTC No. 16253349
>>16253333
They dont have a elon musk.
Reminds me of a story elon told way back.
They needed climate control for satelites while transporting them and storage before they stacked them on falcon 9.
And his engineers came with a massively expensive set up to him, and he asked why the fuck is it so expensive for a few ACs?
The answer was "this is how the other satelite launchers do it in the US"
Then elon just told them to use off the shelf AC's and enormously cut the cost.
When you dont have a guy like that the eggheads can go over budget fast.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:00:32 UTC No. 16253351
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWh
is this actually the official SpaceX stream? it links back to the official spacex yt channel, but they're using what sounds like AI-generated speech with an AI-generated script and it keeps mispronouncing things
it called Atlas V "atlas feevay" and sometimes calls goes geeoheess and other times just pronounces the word 'goes'
spacex making a worse stream than the crypto scammers?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:01:33 UTC No. 16253353
>>16253301
It’s insane that an outgassing resistant drysuit is so difficult to build. I suspect somebody is lying or incompetent.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:01:41 UTC No. 16253354
>>16253195
>>16253181
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:02:29 UTC No. 16253356
>>16253351
>@muskspacexlive
>"Is this official?"
Swear to fucking god, you mouthbreathers get the fuck off my 4chan.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:03:37 UTC No. 16253359
>>16253353
Shit designed to let you (more or less) comfortably work in the vacuum of space for 7+ hours is a bit complicated.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:03:38 UTC No. 16253360
>>16252398
>>16252558
Other rocket companies are COOKED. In the near future there will only be SpaceX and nationally backed programs remaining, and the latter will only exist due to national security considerations.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:04:17 UTC No. 16253362
>>16253351
>The linked video's channel is "New Khortha Video Series"
>The official videos aren't displayed anywhere else other than playlists
>Those official videos have a SpaceX channel which has only 6.66 million subscribers
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:04:33 UTC No. 16253363
>>16253351
Only official is X. Youtube has a decade of uncontrolled bot/fraud channels 24/7 about Musk/Tesla/SpaceX. And its not just those topic, but on many topics. Video games reviews, benchmarks, self help videos, coding videos, reaction videos, etc.
Its all fraud/AI goyslop
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:04:38 UTC No. 16253364
>>16253351
Holy shit this fucking channel has 3x the views of the official SpaceX channel
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:05:22 UTC No. 16253366
>>16252470
Once the hotstage ejects, who cares where it comes down?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:05:38 UTC No. 16253367
https://twitter.com/dominickmatthew
>Experimenting with long exposures trying to capture star trails with the beautiful structures of the ISS. In the last of five 30 second exposures the sun cracked the horizon creating the brilliant blue on the service module solar arrays. 5 stacked images, 24mm, f4, ISO 800.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:06:29 UTC No. 16253371
>>16253367
This guy keeps posting hot stuff for the last few days or so. I've noticed it on my timeline.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:07:13 UTC No. 16253374
>>16253356
>>16253362
>>16253363
FUCKS SAKE WHY DID YOUTUBE VERIFY IT IF IT'S NOT THE REAL CHANNEL
what is even the fucking point of the verification badge if they hand it out to literal crypto-scam ai spammers
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:07:14 UTC No. 16253375
>>16252638
He got his suborbital joy ride into ""space"" so now any legitimate interest he ever had is sated and he is motivated purely by spite for Elon Musk.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:07:16 UTC No. 16253376
>>16253367
they're not fooling me. he's been dead for two weeks ever since he secretly tested that collins suit.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:07:36 UTC No. 16253377
>>16253366
Based not-my-departmenter
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:08:03 UTC No. 16253379
>>16253374
Get the fuck off my 4chan, retard.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:10:10 UTC No. 16253381
>be pajeet bot farm
>steal verified pajeet media channel
>rename it to spaceXstream
>make yet another "spaceX (insert launch here) Elon gives update on starship/cybertruck"
>iS tHiS rEaL
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:10:34 UTC No. 16253383
You now remember that the DC-3 space shuttle was seriously considered.
>>16253367
The big thing that makes me think nothing happened and they weren't lying about it being an accidental training procedure leak is that Matthew Dominick was one of the astronauts intended to go out on the June 13th space walk.
We also have proof that Tracy is undoubtably alive, considering she was the one reporting a suit malfunction.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:13:51 UTC No. 16253388
>>16253374
It is a real channel. It was hacked for this launch (or IFT-4), they set it up with legit videos (from other channels), they probably have a script to do all that by now. During Starship's last launch I counted dozen such channels with >100k subscribers. It'll be restored to whatever it was before, or get deleted.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:14:15 UTC No. 16253389
>>16253383
that would have vaporized during reentry
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:14:40 UTC No. 16253390
>>16253381
Its not pajeets, its some eastern european botfarm. There's been a few investigative videos done on these exact bots from few years back.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:15:44 UTC No. 16253395
@ArtemisNASALive
SLS launches GOES-U to Neptune! Bill Nelson gives update on Artemis! Space Sensation!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:16:13 UTC No. 16253397
>>16253390
>jeets
>eastern europeans
just two different sorts of asians
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:16:45 UTC No. 16253399
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SB
For those of us with more than a single digit brain cell count, here's an actual launch stream
T-60:00
The actual SpaceX stream will probably start five minutes before launch
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:17:01 UTC No. 16253400
>>16253326
it's so fucking over for Husk and ScamX this time
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:21:01 UTC No. 16253406
New WAI. Anything you guys wanna say about it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPj
>>16253389
>vaporized during reentry
Nah, they ran the numbers. It would've required an /INCREDIBLE!/ angle of attack on re-entry and had a slightly narrower band of safe angles, which made the adopters of the delta-wing uncomfortable, but it was deemed totally feasible.
In fact, until the guy who originally came up with the idea, Max Faget, croaked, the DC-3 was the favored concept!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:22:33 UTC No. 16253409
>>16253395
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:23:40 UTC No. 16253412
I haven't seen a clean Booster for a long time
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:23:50 UTC No. 16253413
>>16253399
Here's NASA's stream on twitter or youtube
https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1L
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4H
>60% Go
The weather seems to have improved from yesterday's forecast
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:28:22 UTC No. 16253418
>>16253412
>B1086
>B1072.1 (side)
>B1086.1 (side)
It's new hardware all around. Also the only flight for B1086
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:36:13 UTC No. 16253436
>>16253397
I despise mainland asians
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:36:20 UTC No. 16253437
>>16253390
>There's been a few investigative videos done on these exact bots from few years back.
sauce
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:37:21 UTC No. 16253441
will strap-ons RTLS?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:38:09 UTC No. 16253444
>>16253406
is this the faggot with the voice
>clicky video
yeah, opinion discarded
he's also a retard in addition to his speech impediment
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:38:20 UTC No. 16253445
>>16253436
Mongolians get a pass from me, mostly due to their horse culture and throat singing. Otherwise, the whole continent is cancer. Nipponese are alright but of course they're not mainland.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:38:42 UTC No. 16253446
>>16253441
yeah, we're getting the double landing shot
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:38:52 UTC No. 16253448
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyY
>SpaceX Prepares Chopstick Test and Advances Second Launch Tower | SpaceX Boca Chica
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:38:56 UTC No. 16253449
is the starfactory evacuated during the starship launches?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:39:11 UTC No. 16253450
>>16253441
no, dual drone shop landings
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:39:40 UTC No. 16253453
>>16253418
Such a pretty rogget.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:39:58 UTC No. 16253454
>>16253449
I don't think so
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:41:05 UTC No. 16253458
the pentagon has offered spacex a $5 billion contract to develop the hotstage ring as a kinetic kill weapon
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:41:26 UTC No. 16253460
>>16253441
RTLS boosters and an expended core is shaping up to the preferred mode for Falcon Heavy
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:42:25 UTC No. 16253463
>>16253458
please let this be real, millions must be concussed
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:42:43 UTC No. 16253464
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:44:19 UTC No. 16253466
>>16253462
yeah and SpaceX basically has a EVA suit already, just with no articulation in the legs during EVA
if they got the contract I don't think it would take extremely long to deliver what the contract asks for
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:44:25 UTC No. 16253467
>>16253462
spacex suits are nowhere near ready for completely detached EVA activities (yet)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:44:43 UTC No. 16253469
>>16253462
Axiom is busy doing entirely different suits with different reqs and Polaris Dawn suits are intended for short EVAs, not 7+ hour work shifts.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:44:50 UTC No. 16253470
reminder that the wetlands surrounding the starship towers will effectively be a wasteland if starship launches achieve their peak cadence
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:45:01 UTC No. 16253471
>>16253453
The grey ring of the duration second stage is always a classy touch
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:45:56 UTC No. 16253472
>>16253470
based
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:46:58 UTC No. 16253475
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:46:59 UTC No. 16253476
>>16253470
And that’s a good thing.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:47:59 UTC No. 16253480
>>16253470
>continuous starship launches will inundate the cape with massive infrasonic vibrations
>all of the cape canaveral gators will be uncontrollably horny 24/7
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:48:00 UTC No. 16253481
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:49:01 UTC No. 16253484
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:49:51 UTC No. 16253488
>>16251906
shartliner is meant for dry landings so far they've only had it come down at white sands missile range for the two tests and they're also intending for this one to come down at white sands.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:49:59 UTC No. 16253489
>>16253418
Expending the center core? Neat.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:50:02 UTC No. 16253490
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:50:45 UTC No. 16253492
new artemis 3 mission profile: HLS lands and everyone just stays inside since they don't have suits for EVA. they stare at their phones in bed and order doordash for 2 weeks.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:53:04 UTC No. 16253496
>>16253492
what would doordash to the sea of tranquility cost
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:53:44 UTC No. 16253497
>>16253470
what IS the intended cadence anyway?
i imagine the first depot launch + filling campaign would be one launch a day for 11 days
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:54:00 UTC No. 16253498
>>16253467
>>16253469
I was thinking longer-term. Not like the collins proof of concept hardware was anywhere close to being lunar-capable anyways
I guess yeah it’s a shitty setback but my point was—was NASA really ready expecting expedited Colllins-oceaneering-ILC dover suits soon??
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:54:17 UTC No. 16253499
>>16253444
>speech impediment
Anon apparently hasn't heard a thick German accent before.
>retard
How is he a retard?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:54:23 UTC No. 16253500
>>16253489
One of these days we're going to get core footage that goes from launch all the way down to the water
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:55:02 UTC No. 16253501
>>16253470
GOOD
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:55:10 UTC No. 16253502
>>16253496
they said the travel stipend would cover meals, who cares
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:55:38 UTC No. 16253504
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:56:44 UTC No. 16253508
>>16253462
>you have axiom
Not a given, they could fail too or be delayed
>and spacex
Not a given, they havent been contracted nor have they won any awards.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:56:57 UTC No. 16253509
>>16253500
SpaceX has that already but wants to keep it all for itself
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:57:22 UTC No. 16253511
>>16253464
>wearing a windbreaker
come on now, thats just dangerous
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:58:33 UTC No. 16253513
>>16253511
it's like he wants the plastic to melt onto his skin
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:00:28 UTC No. 16253515
>>16253504
this but unironically. skeletons are much more elegant without all that fleshy crap on them
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:00:57 UTC No. 16253517
>>16253480
>starship launches
>the river delta runs white with gator cum.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:01:14 UTC No. 16253518
>>16253508
Spacex has eva suits for polaris dawn. Once again they develop something they want for themselves that excedes what NASA can pay to get done.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:02:24 UTC No. 16253520
SpaceX should price-gauge NASA. Make the taxpayer suffer
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:03:55 UTC No. 16253525
reminder that this will be the first time EVER a weathersat's launched on a partially-expendable triple core rocket
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:04:00 UTC No. 16253526
>>16251975
>25 years of development
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:04:14 UTC No. 16253527
>>16253520
>charge NASA 150 million a seat to use HLS
>charge a private citizen 10 million a seat or less for the same mission
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:04:30 UTC No. 16253528
>>16253508
>Not a given, they havent been contracted nor have they won any awards
They're still working on an EVA suit for the Polaris mission, doesn't meet all of the features of what they currently use on the ISS; it's still tethered by an umbilical cord, but that's probably more than Collins has at this point.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:04:32 UTC No. 16253529
link?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:05:10 UTC No. 16253530
>>16251952
>all of the BE4s needed for all of Vulcan’s 2024 manifest
So they received two engines?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:05:31 UTC No. 16253532
>>16253527
This is pretty much the pricing structure they use for that military contract. Their only competition is ULA so their margins are enormous kek
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:05:33 UTC No. 16253533
>>16253529
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1t
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:06:32 UTC No. 16253540
>>16253343
I chose that picture because it was similar to yours, but also vastly improved. The flat walls in yours are a bit unpleasant, without even any stands or displays to break up the surface.
In mine, you can see the pleasant arches and ridges combined with the busts make it much better.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:07:36 UTC No. 16253543
>>16253540
got any examples of european castles/estates?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:08:04 UTC No. 16253545
>>16253530
https://twitter.com/RedSilkFive/sta
>Sweet! How many flights are on the 2024 manifest?
https://twitter.com/torybruno/statu
>8 if the payloads arrive
When you've got nothing else, you can always have blind optimism
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:08:45 UTC No. 16253547
>>16253526
blue origin was founded in 2000, that's 25 years of development as far as I'm concerned
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:08:49 UTC No. 16253548
>>16253526
Sike.
Blue Origin's been around for 25 years, but the BE-4 has only been an idea for about 13, with early development beginning in 2011.
Still, they picked their final engine design in 2017. You'd think they would've done more with it by now.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:09:20 UTC No. 16253550
>>16253538
>still at work because I own the piece of shit and don't get to leave ever
>Company card pays for door dash to be eaten alongside FH launch
Things aren't so bad
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:09:41 UTC No. 16253553
>>16253543
>>16253540
Not spaceflight
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:10:28 UTC No. 16253554
>>16253548
emphasis on the 'gradatim'
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:11:15 UTC No. 16253556
>>16253550
>Comfy night-time breeze
>Euro's done for the day
>Some Haagen-Dazs still in the freezer
Things aren't so bad
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:12:07 UTC No. 16253559
>>16253533
the real link?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:14:46 UTC No. 16253568
Clear Live for the Falcon Heavy GOES-U Mission!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1t
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:15:17 UTC No. 16253571
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:17:18 UTC No. 16253574
>>16253559
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4H
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:17:52 UTC No. 16253575
Falcon Heavy GOES-U launch streams:
>SpaceFlight Now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SB
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1u
>NSF
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kM
>Estronaut
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=227
>The Launch Pad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTD
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:19:28 UTC No. 16253577
>>16253574
thanks. We're at tea minus 7 minutes
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:19:46 UTC No. 16253580
https://twitter.com/SpcPlcyOnline/s
>"We have found a hole" in the weather and it's looking good for 5:26 pm ET, in just a few minutes.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:20:34 UTC No. 16253583
>>16253543
neuschwanstein is probably my absolute favorite, built for a castle autist, and it shows. The interior is even better.
When I think of these castles I think of the martian tunnels.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:21:38 UTC No. 16253585
threadly reminder that you can set a youtube livestream to 1.25x-2x playback speed and it will eat into the buffer and get you closer to real-time; yt starts streams with a 20ish second buffer delay to smooth over network fluctuation but if your internet is decent you don't need it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:22:39 UTC No. 16253587
Since when did NASA have 4K stream?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4H
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:23:35 UTC No. 16253589
>>16253587
Been a while. They rarely use it though.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:24:23 UTC No. 16253592
>spacex can't even build a water tower that doesn't leak
embarrassing
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:24:26 UTC No. 16253593
When did they finish that tower?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:24:42 UTC No. 16253595
>>16253583
Here's one of my favorites. Hocheppan in South Tyrol.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:24:42 UTC No. 16253596
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1LyxBngd
T-1 min
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:25:38 UTC No. 16253597
>>16253595
Why does this appeal to you?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:26:37 UTC No. 16253600
GO SPACEX GO-ESU GO NASA GO NOAA GO FUCK YOURSELF
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:27:19 UTC No. 16253603
>>16253597
it looks aesthetic and architectural
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:27:38 UTC No. 16253604
Am I crazy or is this noticeably slower than a single core Falcon 9 launch?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:28:36 UTC No. 16253606
BOEING BTFO ONCE AGAIN
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:29:02 UTC No. 16253607
>>16253605
That’s cute
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:29:32 UTC No. 16253608
Yawn
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:29:45 UTC No. 16253609
>Booster instantly covered in soot upon separation
Neat
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:30:01 UTC No. 16253610
>symmetric booster flip and burns
kino
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:30:09 UTC No. 16253611
Fuck that double boost back burn is really aesthetic
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:30:11 UTC No. 16253612
>>16253603
To me it looks very functional, built economically.
I don't really see the aesthetic.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:30:13 UTC No. 16253613
>>16253599
launch cat looks a bit different this time...
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:30:22 UTC No. 16253614
kino boost back
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:31:20 UTC No. 16253615
space isnt hard, its just hard for grifters
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:32:35 UTC No. 16253616
This FH tracking footage would fucking melt the brain of a circa 2005ish era spaceflight fan
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:33:42 UTC No. 16253618
WHATS CRAWLING AROUND THE ENGINE PLUMBING??? I JUST SAW SOMETHING MOVING AROUND THE TURBO PUMPS! IS THAT A RAT?? IS THIS FAKE????
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:33:49 UTC No. 16253619
kino x 2
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:34:20 UTC No. 16253620
Wait are both Psyche boosters being reused for Europa Clipper? Does NASA have its own dedicated fleet within SX for its own launches or something?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:34:40 UTC No. 16253621
>>16253617
WHOA, put those away Mr Musk!
You could stab an eye out, you know!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:34:51 UTC No. 16253622
SpaceX mogs everyone else again
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:00 UTC No. 16253623
2 easy
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:07 UTC No. 16253625
friggin neat
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:21 UTC No. 16253626
>Sonic booms felt in the studio
True Kino
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:26 UTC No. 16253627
>boosters land asynchornously again
its over
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:30 UTC No. 16253628
O I'm cumming
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:36:20 UTC No. 16253630
>>16253629
We need to save the Gators from these sonic booms!!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:36:31 UTC No. 16253632
TOUCH DOWN!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:37:08 UTC No. 16253635
>>16253618
Good old engine rats. I’m glad spacex never hired an exterminator for their integration facility. I would miss the little guys.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:37:14 UTC No. 16253636
30% weather chance worked out nicely
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:37:15 UTC No. 16253637
>>16253620
or just FH launches are rare enough that you're bound to get the same boosters if you buy a few flights
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:37:19 UTC No. 16253638
>>16253618
a rat got on set - they film on a stage with a greenscreen.
the engine rat keeps showing up, but gullible people say it's ice and still think the rockets really go to space
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:37:25 UTC No. 16253639
We did it, bros
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:38:09 UTC No. 16253641
>>16253627
Last I checked this is done intentionally. They landed them together originally but it lead to problems.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:38:56 UTC No. 16253645
>>16253470
It will have a negligable impact
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:39:29 UTC No. 16253646
>>16253641
Yeah the problem where SpaceX cannot maintain simultaneous radio communication to two different vehicles.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:39:55 UTC No. 16253647
i watched the estronaut stream and he's fielding questions about whether vulcan will be switching to raptor
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:40:29 UTC No. 16253649
>>16253643
>>16253644
What are Nazis up to?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:40:56 UTC No. 16253650
>>16253643
>(rocket pictograph) rocket factory augsburg rocket factory
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:41:40 UTC No. 16253652
>>16253620
NASA is just one of the few clients that actually needs what Falcon Heavy can offer. So far FH has launched three big geostationary telecom satellites, four spooky government payloads, two NASA payloads and one Tesla.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:41:46 UTC No. 16253653
>>16253627
>the solution to an extremely complex engineering problem should appeal to my sense of aesthetics
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:42:38 UTC No. 16253654
>>16253497
According to the FAA proposals it's 44 launches per day out of cape
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:42:40 UTC No. 16253655
>>16253647
lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:42:54 UTC No. 16253657
>>16253653
this but unironically
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:43:00 UTC No. 16253658
>>16253647
There will never be a swap. ULA designs and builds around engines. With their safety cuck excel spreadsheet style of engineering, there will never be an engine swap without redesigning the entire fucking rocket.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:43:24 UTC No. 16253659
>>16253647
as musk is to estronaut,
estronaut is to normies
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:44:32 UTC No. 16253662
>>16251975
>>16253547
BO didn't have much money or employees during the first 15 years
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:44:40 UTC No. 16253663
>>16253649
Typical over-engineered designs with staged combustion and a Nitromethane powered 3rd stage for 1.6t to LEO
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:44:46 UTC No. 16253664
>Chat summary
Auto-generated experiment • Quality may vary
A group of people is discussing a rocket launch, with some focusing on the success of the launch, while others express skepticism about space travel.
lmao, this on NASA's stream
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:44:57 UTC No. 16253665
>>16253653
Lear's Law: If it looks good, it'll fly good.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:45:05 UTC No. 16253666
>>16253654
>44 launches per day
Holy fuck
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:45:43 UTC No. 16253667
>>16253662
That's their own fault.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:45:45 UTC No. 16253668
>>16253649
Run of the mill ablative nozzle gas generator shite by the look of it.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:46:31 UTC No. 16253671
>>16253666 checked
44 super heavy launches a day could sustain a brilliant pebbles constellation during a hot war. just saying
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:47:10 UTC No. 16253673
What is the connection between Elon and Assange
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:47:37 UTC No. 16253674
>>16253617
Very very disrespectful.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:48:04 UTC No. 16253675
>>16253654
No way.
What the fuck were they thinking?
That kind of launch rate won't be achievable for the next 10 years.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:48:43 UTC No. 16253677
>>16253674
You'd have nipples you could cut glass with too if you just succeeded way beyond expectation with IFT-4.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:48:43 UTC No. 16253678
>>16253253
What planet is this?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:49:06 UTC No. 16253679
>>16253617
that's crazy
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:49:09 UTC No. 16253680
>>16253675
It's probably what's needed for Artemis and future development
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:49:17 UTC No. 16253681
>>16253666
>>16253654
This will turn everyone at that county into a NIMBY lmao
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:49:20 UTC No. 16253682
>>16253678
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7v
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:50:13 UTC No. 16253683
>>16252922
Why would BO file it themselves? Why wouldn't they use some third party with no official affiliation to BO or Bezos to do it?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:50:18 UTC No. 16253684
>>16253673
both of them make libtards seethe due to their having insufficient loyalty to neoliberalism
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:50:20 UTC No. 16253686
>>16253666
>>16253675
Even just one a day is enough to rustle the jimmies of all the retards living near the cape.
44 launches a day is literally a threat
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:50:50 UTC No. 16253688
>>16253686
Fuck Florida pensioners.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:52:13 UTC No. 16253690
>>16253686
they can move if they don't like it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:52:15 UTC No. 16253691
>>16253688
They're going to die within a few years so there's no reason to hold back.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:52:18 UTC No. 16253692
>>16253686
I hope they liquefy every last Floridiot boomer
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:52:42 UTC No. 16253694
>>16253691
Not to mention they wear silly little hats.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:53:13 UTC No. 16253696
>>16253680
Misread the 'a day bit'
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:53:14 UTC No. 16253697
>>16253629
genuine question, how do people look at this and still call SpaceX a failure
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:54:06 UTC No. 16253700
>>16253697
Massive amounts of cope usually.
>Hurr durr Government subsidies!
>Herp derp NASA gave them those technologies!
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:54:42 UTC No. 16253702
>>16253686
>Move near a rocket range that has existed since the 1960's in 1995
>complain about noise
it's like retards who buy a house next to an airport then demand there be a nighttime curfew
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:55:30 UTC No. 16253703
>>16253697
dc-x did exactly the same thing. a triple core dc-x placed a weathersat in GEO in 1995. you're not impressing anyone.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:55:36 UTC No. 16253705
>>16253667
What is that supposed to mean? It was meant an explanation, not an attribution of "fault".
If BO didn't have much money, those years might as well not have existed as far as development time is concerned. What counts is the number of engineering hours spent, not the number of calendar days passed, and engineering hours cost money. Bezos wasn't giving BO much money, and they never got any COTS or CRS contract, nor did they even try to. BO was just a small think tank hobby project for Bezos at the time; he was focused on Amazon.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:55:50 UTC No. 16253708
>>16253696
It's really funny to compare how clean Falcon's exhaust plume compared to ULA et al. Even Starship looks (almost) clear
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:56:56 UTC No. 16253712
>>16253697
They hold whatever opinions they're told to
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:57:32 UTC No. 16253713
>>16253667
What is that supposed to mean? It was meant an explanation, not an attribution of "fault".
If BO didn't have much money, those years might as well not have existed as far as development time is concerned. What counts is the number of engineering hours spent, not the number of calendar days passed, and engineering hours cost money. Bezos wasn't giving BO much money, and they never got any COTS or CRS style contract. BO was just a small think tank hobby project for Bezos at the time; he was focused on Amazon.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:57:54 UTC No. 16253714
>>16253697
The D in EDS stands for Derangement.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:58:38 UTC No. 16253716
>>16253697
Human mind is a reasoning machine. It can reason anything from anything to anything. Hitler is alive? Elvis is black? SpaceX is a failure? Moon landing hoax? TimeCube/Flat earth? etc/etc.
There are 8 billion+ and each one prompts their brain with different input and can generate infinite number of responses.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:59:22 UTC No. 16253719
>>16253705
>>16253713
It means Jeff Bezos has had his rocket company for 25 years and his failure to do anything with it does not excuse his failure to do anything with it. It's shameful is what it is.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:59:29 UTC No. 16253720
>>16253713
you caught yourself so fast i didn't have time to issue a sperg correction.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:00:44 UTC No. 16253722
>>16253686
>>16253702
There was literally nothing there until the 1960s when NASA started developing the entire area from scratch. Before this it was only a hurriedly surveyed area scanned by Ponce de León.
Anyone complaining can and should move.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:01:54 UTC No. 16253726
>>16253720
True. I misremembered. However I believe it's still true they never bothered to develop an F1 equivalent to prove themselves.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:03:45 UTC No. 16253729
>>16253703
>DC-X
>orbit
kek
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:04:57 UTC No. 16253731
>>16253703
They also forget to mention that many of the DC-X employees went to work for Blue Origin lmao.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:06:41 UTC No. 16253735
>>16253301
Elon will do it
There is no doubt in my heart
(The content of my mind is irrelevant. I am retarded)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:09:21 UTC No. 16253737
>>16253719
A company with, say, 10 employees is not the same as a company with 100,000 employees, and should not be compared or expected to perform the same feats. This should be obvious, and I don't see how such basic business facts are shameful.
The main reasons BO has existed for 24 years without yet reaching orbit is:
1. The company didn't have much money or employees during the first half of its existence. This was because Bezos hadn't truly opened his wallet yet, and they didn't get COTS/CRS style contracts
2. Their first orbital rocket is technically ambitious. The goal is not just to reach orbit, it's to have a rocket that is highly competitive, or at least would have been highly competitive if SpaceX hadn't leapfrogged them with Starship while the BE-4 was stuck in development hell
BO is also inherently slow, however 1 & 2 are the main reasons.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:09:59 UTC No. 16253738
>>16253726
back in the x-prize days all the smart people were saying that small launch was a dead end (true) and suborbital tourism was where the money was. bezos at amazon never had any trouble telling investors to fuck off if he thought he had a better idea but when it comes to spaceflight he just lacks either the aptitude or the interest.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:11:10 UTC No. 16253740
>>16253654
>44 launches a day
>4x 200T orbital refueled launches a day
LETS
FUCKING
GO
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:11:45 UTC No. 16253741
>>16253719
There's nothing shameful about making a suborbital rocket. It's not my ambition and same goes for most people here, but it's not wrong. Bezos hasn't made any promises or grand declarations like Elon has, there's nothing wrong with being slow when he treats the company like a side project.
The lawsuit are shameful, but that's it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:12:01 UTC No. 16253743
ULA and BO teaming up to hamper Starship on the Cape, of fucking course.
Can't allow them to get away with it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:13:08 UTC No. 16253745
>>16253629
I called and they refused to help me.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:18:34 UTC No. 16253751
>>16253654
That's a launch every half hour, 24/7
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:19:35 UTC No. 16253752
>>16253737
Bezos chose to sit on his ass and get nothing done, and now he cries like a bitch when other people have accomplished things he didn't.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:20:06 UTC No. 16253753
>>16253738
SpaceX's award for the COTS contract and the CRS contract for 12 launches was worth close to $3B in 2024 dollars. That's not small money. Of course, the problem with pursuing that business strategy is that there were limited slots.
Suborbital tourism might have seemed like a smart idea as a stepping stone because it's a way to monetize a Grasshopper style test vehicle. I think the flaw in that plan are the extreme quality control requirements when you're carrying humans.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:21:35 UTC No. 16253757
>>16252737
I didn't care much for the soijaks, I'm tired of them, but I'm not tired of Bezjaks.
And those lines really are good, but I would have said "it's just a sounding rocket WITH SEATS."
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:22:13 UTC No. 16253758
>>16253752
Your snarky replies suggest you're emotionally invested in the matter
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:22:45 UTC No. 16253759
Cape Canaveral will literally be just SpaceX and Blue Origin (after ULA purchase) butting heads and vying for launch range dominance soon with NASA occasionally swinging their big orange dick around once every year or two
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:23:58 UTC No. 16253761
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:25:36 UTC No. 16253766
>>16253571
I think this is AI? I can't tell anymore, maybe Dalle-3
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:27:25 UTC No. 16253769
>>16253134
hearty kekold
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:27:26 UTC No. 16253770
>>16253753
i think the big issue was everybody badly underestimated how hard reusing a suborbital craft was going to be. the assumption appears to have been that once you built something that could be reflown once then you'd get to the point where it could be reflown every day in pretty short order.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:46:26 UTC No. 16253792
>>16253772
lmao, gigabased
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:53:34 UTC No. 16253804
>>16252970
It's a loose transliteration while keeping enough cyrillic to make it look like "pussy"
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:12:59 UTC No. 16253832
>>16253758
In spaceflight? Why yes, I am.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:20:31 UTC No. 16253844
>>16253605
>Clear Heavy
かわいい
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:54:46 UTC No. 16253913
>>16253751
Two towers, each with an hour per launch with fueling currently only taking 45 minutes.
Downright reasonable
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:11:09 UTC No. 16253953
>>16253497
As awesome as it would be for daily launch rates, It's 44 launches a year.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:16:47 UTC No. 16254049
>the steel launch tower is actually filled with concrete
yeah I'm much less worried about the pad being obliterated by a failed catch
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:40:24 UTC No. 16254076
>>16253913
>Two towers
lmao, how long until they start on a third and beyond?
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:56:18 UTC No. 16254088
>>16254076
Till they figure out reuseable launch infrastructure
The jury is still out if they have a reuseable tower, the OLM sure isn't reusable yet
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 02:48:00 UTC No. 16254145
>>16253654
sauce???
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 02:49:48 UTC No. 16254146
>>16253671
>>16253686
44 rockets going up means 44 rockets coming down, anon
that's a sonic boom rattling Orlando every half hour 24/7
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 02:55:30 UTC No. 16254150
>>16253654
>>16253666
>>16253686
unfortunately, he's mistaken
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 03:10:12 UTC No. 16254158
>>16254150
based