🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:17:45 UTC No. 16375672
Dawn EVA Edition
Previous - >>16373880
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:19:21 UTC No. 16375674
rook is a cool dude
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:20:04 UTC No. 16375677
>>16375674
Agree
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:22:53 UTC No. 16375681
>Trump edition
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:25:56 UTC No. 16375686
>>16375681
You just know hes seething
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:25:57 UTC No. 16375688
Dragon is like Gemini in the best ways.
>cheap
>reliable
>LEO space station bus
>free flying EVA host
>testbed for deep space missions
Orion looks like dogshit compared to Apollo. It's old, clunky, uncomfortable inside, and has an undersized propulsion system. A real successor spacecraft would be the size of Orion CM + Orion ESM + ICPS all together. If only EUS hadn't been cripplingly late.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:26:59 UTC No. 16375689
>>16375686
lol I was shitposting lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:28:44 UTC No. 16375692
>>16375683
Are they in deep space? I think not.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:28:53 UTC No. 16375693
the girls have wiiiillddd hair in dragon. I like it
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:29:20 UTC No. 16375694
>>16375683
livestream with actual camera for the space walk would be epic, both livestream version and post-production movie
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:32:34 UTC No. 16375697
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:33:36 UTC No. 16375698
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:34:37 UTC No. 16375700
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:35:28 UTC No. 16375701
>>16375700
HAIR
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:35:34 UTC No. 16375702
...would a narrower nozzle (not the cone, although the cone does kinda matter, but rather the actual exhaust hole) make it faster or slower since while it is shitting out more pressure, its also getting rid of less fuel
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:36:39 UTC No. 16375703
>>16375700
god i cant wait until someone posts a memoir of sweet forbidden space sex
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:43:03 UTC No. 16375708
>>16375688
Yeah this is way more like what I'd expect from a real spaceship with real delta-V. Drop the AJ10 and propellant tanks for ~20t mass savings, add another 10t of hydrolox propellant, and spend the rest on bigger tanks, more solar+batteries, and active cryocooling. Of course then you'd need an LEO hydrolox depot to get to the moon and back, but hey, then the whole spacecraft is arbitrarily reusable if you can solve hydrogen embrittlement!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:54:20 UTC No. 16375715
>>16375702
If you make it too narrow the pressure backs up into the combustion chamber and your engine explodes.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:02:39 UTC No. 16375720
anyone still up
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:06:10 UTC No. 16375722
>>16375714
it's another 2 hours from now, duh. go watch another movie
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:06:30 UTC No. 16375723
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OyJAZnw
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:07:30 UTC No. 16375724
>>16375722
It was 55 mins to go when I started it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:07:32 UTC No. 16375725
>>16375701
>>16375700
cant wait til everyone just uses a gallon of hairgel like in the Expanse
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:18:23 UTC No. 16375731
>>16375725
Why's her neck looking like tony stark in IM2?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:32:07 UTC No. 16375736
>>16375702
Raptor 2/3 went with a wider throat for greater mass flow but a slight loss of ISP. The greater thrust being worth it for a rocket stationary at sea level.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:32:36 UTC No. 16375737
>>16375688
>LEO space station bus
We were robbed
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:32:58 UTC No. 16375739
this promo vid is so corpo-garbo
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:38:02 UTC No. 16375742
>>16375740
who is ast, and why do i think theyre arianne space tompany?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:38:13 UTC No. 16375743
cringe host on AST
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:42:40 UTC No. 16375747
>>16375742
ASTS Space mobile, not affiliated with Arianne
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:45:38 UTC No. 16375750
>>16375747
space jnternef is iffy? Who fuckin knew?
ahyways call me back when they start mining asteroids
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:50:10 UTC No. 16375753
2 minutes to launch
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:51:08 UTC No. 16375754
>>16375723
>https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OyJAZn
live
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:52:09 UTC No. 16375755
>>16375754
>Polaris Dawn Mission | EVA
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:52:51 UTC No. 16375756
watch this one, it's rtls
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:52:52 UTC No. 16375757
>>16375702
>since while it is shitting out more pressure
Once your flow goes supersonic, the opposite actually happens. Delightfully counterintuitive
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:54:47 UTC No. 16375758
fags. This thread was beautiful. You have great minds. Pity you couldn't harness the pain. In effort to tolerate it. Cause you didn't have a good start.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:55:40 UTC No. 16375759
>>16375758
bot?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:57:27 UTC No. 16375760
he's about to get away with it again
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:59:34 UTC No. 16375764
>>16375754
restream https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ih
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:00:02 UTC No. 16375765
F9 1st stage landed. nice view coming in.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:00:04 UTC No. 16375766
>>16375761
Here we go
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:00:20 UTC No. 16375767
>>16375761
>>16375754
>>16375723
actual footage started 5mins ago
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:00:26 UTC No. 16375768
How much longer until I can escape the dumbasses running our civilization into the ground? There's nowhere left to run on earth.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:01:03 UTC No. 16375770
mmmm Kate https://www.spacex.com/launches/mis
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:01:06 UTC No. 16375771
>>16375700
Imagine the smell
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:01:23 UTC No. 16375773
>>16375764
>watching a pajeet restream
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:02:25 UTC No. 16375774
no one watched the landing but me? come on its not THAT routine yet
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:02:57 UTC No. 16375775
5:58 a.m. ET.
56 min until spacewalk
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:03:32 UTC No. 16375776
>>16375774
I was watching it but it just happened to overlap with the start of the EVA stream so it's understandable
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:03:43 UTC No. 16375777
>>16375773
a youtube restream is practically mandatory with how abysmal video-scrubbing is on x
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:04:00 UTC No. 16375778
Who would have thought someone from Shane's family would become an astronaut
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:04:42 UTC No. 16375779
Bros, imagine a kikeless and niggerless world.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:05:07 UTC No. 16375780
>helmet cam
wtf
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:05:51 UTC No. 16375782
the two women look eerily similar outside of their hair
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:05:59 UTC No. 16375783
>walker
>won't be on the spacewalk
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:06:22 UTC No. 16375784
>>16375782
Both are hags.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:06:59 UTC No. 16375785
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:07:02 UTC No. 16375786
>>16375784
would both (in the name of science and space exploration)
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:07:43 UTC No. 16375787
>>16375786
I would in the name of love.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:07:59 UTC No. 16375788
reminder, first new *US Eva suit in 43 years!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:08:11 UTC No. 16375789
kate is quite cute today
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:08:40 UTC No. 16375790
The all-black flightsuits are /fa/
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:10:04 UTC No. 16375793
Why is X still shit, bros? It was supposed to be the everything app.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:11:06 UTC No. 16375794
>>16375791
>12 minute EVA
A nothingberger. What's with all the hype?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:11:12 UTC No. 16375795
>>16375779
not gonna happen, forced diversity will be present on mars too
elon isn't immune to jew bullshit
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:11:16 UTC No. 16375796
>>16375793
Give it two more weeks
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:12:32 UTC No. 16375797
>>16375794
private company doing an EVA with a new suit. it's a step towards walking on the moon again.
>you all really don't think SpaceX is going to use Axiom suits, right?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:12:47 UTC No. 16375798
>>16375794
They might die.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:13:41 UTC No. 16375799
>>16375794
it shows this is possible, tests all the systems
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:15:20 UTC No. 16375801
Man, Isaacman is getting cooler by the day
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:15:23 UTC No. 16375802
>>16375794
Ever watch Mars Attacks?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:16:00 UTC No. 16375803
I wonder why they didn't try this on ISS, on an Axiom mission.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:16:38 UTC No. 16375806
>>16375797
Would it be as simple as adding a life support backpack to it?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:16:49 UTC No. 16375808
>>16375793
>mpv https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OyJAZnw
works on my machine
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:17:16 UTC No. 16375809
with what suit?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:17:23 UTC No. 16375810
Can you imagine a tethered EVA with Starship on lunar orbit ?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:17:36 UTC No. 16375811
>>16375806
would need way more than that. the Apollo moon suits were absolutely incredible
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:18:42 UTC No. 16375813
>>16375810
No, only because ive never 0g'd before. Would love to, though. The moon is very pretty
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:18:57 UTC No. 16375814
SpX : The crew has been in what’s known as pre-breathe since shortly after their arrival in space, which prepares them for the environment inside the EVA suits by gradually lowering Dragon’s cabin pressure and increasing the oxygen concentration
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:19:51 UTC No. 16375816
The guy with the right stuff will stay strapped to his seat while a pencil pusher girl goes outside. I guess he is used to being ever so slightly mogged since he was assigned to an F-16 and not an air superiority fighter.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:20:31 UTC No. 16375818
>>16375808
Fuck sake its difficult to troubleshoot online because nobody calls it Twitter now, and searching "mpv x cannot stream" is not helpful
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:21:17 UTC No. 16375819
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:21:43 UTC No. 16375821
>>16375816
Jared gets to do all the cool stuff by default so he never had a chance
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:22:18 UTC No. 16375822
>>16375779
No kikes on Mars but there are a few nigs
There are always a few
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:23:29 UTC No. 16375823
>>16375818
Its because you created a fake problem and want to claim its a problem that no one can report on. Its your own problem.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:24:02 UTC No. 16375825
>muh Overview Effect
Yawn
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:24:09 UTC No. 16375826
>>16375818
It works with mpv + yt-dlp
https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:24:13 UTC No. 16375827
>>16375821
there will be additional missions
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:24:32 UTC No. 16375828
>>16375825
>>16375824
don't be lame
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:24:50 UTC No. 16375829
>that timepiece floating in space
i need a high quality webm of it
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:26:19 UTC No. 16375833
>>16375827
And Jared is on all of them and will get to do all of the important things because he's funding everything
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:27:18 UTC No. 16375836
>>16375824
it's real but it's gay to bring attention to something so personal and contemplative with an edited compilation of 'inspiring' quotes and music
reminds me of William Shatner's profound experience being interrupted by Jeff Who's champagne spray
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:27:49 UTC No. 16375837
>What was that?
oh shit, Ramirez is outside
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:28:10 UTC No. 16375838
Guys have you ever thought about how fragile the Earth is? That thin layer of atmosphere is all that stands between us and the void.
Is there a name for this feeling?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:28:39 UTC No. 16375840
>>16375838
overview effect
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:28:48 UTC No. 16375841
>>16375838
aware
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:29:11 UTC No. 16375842
>>16375836
God that was so disrespectful. Shat powered through it well though.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:30:07 UTC No. 16375843
>>16375833
if they build space stations, moon bases etc there will be plenty to do
this is probably the start of a private human spaceflight programme that will continue to Starship and then missions with that
I wouldn't be surprised if Kidd is the commander of some future mission
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:30:12 UTC No. 16375844
>hundreds of steps to do a spacewalk
That's bullshit isn't it? You pre-breathe, pull on the suit, and off you go. It's not like you have to do quicktime events to not die.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:31:02 UTC No. 16375846
>>16375844
space is hard (no really though)
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:31:07 UTC No. 16375847
>>16375843
i.e. Kidd commander, Rooki Isaacman not even going necessarily to every one
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:32:09 UTC No. 16375848
>>16375844
those have substeps
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:33:14 UTC No. 16375849
>>16375844
you're in space for 5 days for a 40 min EVA. might as well take it slow.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:34:13 UTC No. 16375851
I didn't follow everything, but does Dragon have an airlock room, or does the whole capsule gets to be a vacuum?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:34:35 UTC No. 16375852
>>16375851
all vacuum.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:34:39 UTC No. 16375853
>>16375851
the latter
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:34:49 UTC No. 16375854
>>16375851
the whole capsule is evacuated
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:35:31 UTC No. 16375856
>/ourguy/ Thunderf00t not streaming
Anyone know if he is streaming on his patreon? I got a new card and had to cancel my sub till my new card is in. I would love to see his take debunking this, Nasa space flight is too much of musk suckers to listen to this garbo with
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:36:25 UTC No. 16375857
>>16375842
>It was among the strongest feelings of grief I have ever encountered
>The contrast between the vicious coldness of space and the warm nurturing of Earth below filled me with overwhelming sadness
>It filled me with dread. My trip to space was supposed to be a celebration; instead, it felt like a funeral.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:37:19 UTC No. 16375860
>>16375857
Kirk was way tougher than Shatner
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:37:28 UTC No. 16375861
>>16375852
>>16375853
>>16375854
Damn that sounds scary, I doubt anything can go wrong but said like that it sounds prone to fuck ups
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:37:29 UTC No. 16375862
>>16375859
Mouf now faggot
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:37:51 UTC No. 16375864
>>16375857
we need more artists and entertainers in space
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:38:35 UTC No. 16375865
>>16375843
>This is probably the start of private human spaceflight program.
Gosh no shit. Almost like there are commercial space stations in development that will need private astronauts to man them.
>Starship
Not for space station crew ferrying. Way too huge for current and near term stations. Starship is really only good for moon/mars missions in terms of crew missions.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:39:02 UTC No. 16375866
>>16375856
just play any (any at all) of his videos on the background, doesn't matter which one you choose
you are going to get a similar experience
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:39:19 UTC No. 16375867
>>16375864
we need more blacks and women in space
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:39:33 UTC No. 16375868
>>16375864
Shatner should have been the commander of Dear Moon, not that Jap dweeb
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:39:37 UTC No. 16375869
>>16375864
>we'll never have Steve Aoki throwing cakes at Tim Dodt in 0G while orbiting the moon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:39:50 UTC No. 16375871
>>16375867
big titty women
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:40:34 UTC No. 16375873
EVA when
I thought they were going outside in 15 minutes
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:40:43 UTC No. 16375874
>>16375871
>thicc babes in the skintight SpaceX suit V3
I'm in
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:41:04 UTC No. 16375875
>>16375865
yes, so this is just the first in a long string of things that will happen, Kidd will have plenty of missions in the future
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:41:10 UTC No. 16375876
>>16375873
soon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:41:39 UTC No. 16375878
>>16375873
two weeks
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:42:10 UTC No. 16375879
>>16375864
Musk could sponsor a DearMoon but not take faggots (and not go himself of course)
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:42:44 UTC No. 16375880
more than 4 people on a dragon when?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:42:52 UTC No. 16375881
>>16375866
I miss his live ones, The last starship launch was way better with his commentary.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:43:08 UTC No. 16375882
fucking jumpscare
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:43:10 UTC No. 16375883
LMAO they are selling Mars again.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:43:27 UTC No. 16375884
>>16375873
end of November, need to consult with the FWS
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:43:29 UTC No. 16375885
>>16375864
where's the fucking movie tom cruise
xenu and the galactic confederacy are waiting
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:43:34 UTC No. 16375886
cool vid of the suit lab
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:44:17 UTC No. 16375887
>>16375882
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:44:28 UTC No. 16375888
>>16375881
I'm sorry, you're retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:44:31 UTC No. 16375889
>>16375883
I'll take it. How much?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:46:29 UTC No. 16375891
How do you deal with the fact that you'll never do anything this notable or cool in life?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:46:56 UTC No. 16375892
>>16375880
Never. There isn't enough room for both cargo and more than 4 people.
Don't worry though. As commercial space grows larger crew vehicles will be inevitable.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:47:18 UTC No. 16375894
I hope that faggot Mark Hamill is seething at SpaceX for using the name Skywalker
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:48:01 UTC No. 16375895
>>16375893
-ACK
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:48:32 UTC No. 16375896
>>16375893
That clause has been in the starlink EULA for years.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:48:35 UTC No. 16375897
>>16375893
based alpha centauri anon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:48:38 UTC No. 16375898
>>16375891
I am a useless human. I am content with dying alone and unloved.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:48:40 UTC No. 16375899
>>16375891
buy a big telescope (10' minimum - ~1-2000$) and start exploring the ether on your own . Thats cool
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:49:00 UTC No. 16375900
>>16375893
Honorary Zeon Elon Musk is not what I expected today (it was a chocolate fudge brownie), but nice.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:49:14 UTC No. 16375901
>>16375893
Old news
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:49:29 UTC No. 16375902
>>16375891
i've done both tho
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:50:08 UTC No. 16375903
>>16375893
>book a flight to Mars
>congrats you're sex slave now
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:50:15 UTC No. 16375905
Are they wearing underwears in the suit? Imagine getting hit by your (women) (female) colleague's bare ass when changing in zero G ahah
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:50:32 UTC No. 16375906
These scam streams are relentless https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBq
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:50:37 UTC No. 16375907
>>16375903
acceptable tradeoff.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:50:39 UTC No. 16375908
>dragon will fly over my house during EVA
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:50:43 UTC No. 16375909
8 mins
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:51:45 UTC No. 16375910
>>16375909
It'll be delayed because isaacman's fat ass isn't fitting
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:51:45 UTC No. 16375911
>>16375908
>A DRAGON JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE
and he wouldn't even be lying
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:51:49 UTC No. 16375912
>>16375890
To prevent any electrical infetterence
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:52:34 UTC No. 16375913
>not a single skyrim joke talking about dragon
ONE
FUCKING
JOB
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:53:12 UTC No. 16375914
>>16375913
Fuck off, Todd
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:53:12 UTC No. 16375915
>>16375913
>his vocab is limited to skyrim
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:53:13 UTC No. 16375916
>>16375903
first come first serve
should have trusted musk and gone on the colony establishment flight
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:54:05 UTC No. 16375917
>>16375873
Somehow they forgot one suit
So they need to figure out a way to use one suit for two people
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:55:09 UTC No. 16375918
>uhmmm achtuakly it's 1 hour away from the walk not like our timer says, please donate!
This is why thunderf00t streams are objectively better in facts and commentary
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:55:14 UTC No. 16375919
>>16375873
You should know how long it takes women to get ready to go out.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:55:37 UTC No. 16375920
>>16375919
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:55:52 UTC No. 16375921
>EVA will be performed at the perigee (~200km)
LAME
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:56:10 UTC No. 16375922
Ev1 glove issues lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:56:48 UTC No. 16375923
>>16375922
This is why we test.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:56:48 UTC No. 16375924
>>16375913
>not a single imagine dragons joke
ONE
FUCKING
JOB
>This is it, the van allen belt
>woah
>I'm radioactive
>radioactive
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:56:56 UTC No. 16375925
>no video
it's scared
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:57:02 UTC No. 16375926
>>16375919
kek
>you told me you'd be ready 10 MINUTES AGO FUCK
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:57:08 UTC No. 16375927
We rotation now
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:57:29 UTC No. 16375928
wow, they nominally rotated some seats
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:58:32 UTC No. 16375929
>"2 decimal one eight. Suits at 8.6psia section 3 one point for gag tummy ips amoled shit
SHOW ME LIVE VIEWS NOW
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:58:56 UTC No. 16375930
"Support-1" is first loser
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:58:57 UTC No. 16375931
>>16375928
HUNDREDS OF STEPS
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:59:40 UTC No. 16375932
>women on spaceships
ngmi
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:59:57 UTC No. 16375933
>>16375930
>Psh, nothing personnel, Kidd...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:00:25 UTC No. 16375934
So the 4 of them have to be on a pressurized suit since there is no hatch, right?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:00:32 UTC No. 16375935
They call him the Poteet Kid
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:00:36 UTC No. 16375936
LIVE VIEWS
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:00:38 UTC No. 16375937
is he deceased ?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:01:16 UTC No. 16375939
>>16375937
No just sleeping
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:01:20 UTC No. 16375940
>>16375937
heem sleepy
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:01:30 UTC No. 16375941
Knowing myself that'd be the moment when i get hit with a oncoming diarrhea
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:02:36 UTC No. 16375944
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1834170
>Deployment of all five BlueBird satellites confirmed
SpaceX's multitasking ability is unmatched
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:02:46 UTC No. 16375945
>>16375942
use PIP
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:02:49 UTC No. 16375946
>>16375938
>masks aren't on
Are americans ACTUALLY this dumb? Space has no O2 even me in Malaysia knows this.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:02:52 UTC No. 16375947
Do we get a picture a the HUD?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:03:05 UTC No. 16375948
Helmet cams let's go
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:03:48 UTC No. 16375949
>>16375946
Covid is over vaxxie, they don't need no masks
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:03:53 UTC No. 16375950
>>16375942
use yt-dlp+mpv
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:04:31 UTC No. 16375951
>>16375941
>prrrzzzrrrzrzrzrzr
>"whats that smell my god open the door"
>"Dragon is still at full pressure"
>"omg i cant stand the smell *open the hatch*"
>*pssssss wooop*
>*Jared flying into the darkness forever *
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:06:14 UTC No. 16375953
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:06:42 UTC No. 16375955
>>16375942
Use pip and resize to your hearts content.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:06:46 UTC No. 16375956
>they finally go out
>look at the camera
>show a small paper
>"follow this qr code to buy some cheap etherum from sapceX!"
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:07:42 UTC No. 16375957
>>16375945
>>16375955
Looks blurry get your shit together Elon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:07:42 UTC No. 16375958
>>16375956
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:07:47 UTC No. 16375959
>>16375951
Dark Star vibe
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:07:49 UTC No. 16375960
>>16375942
here
https://www.spacex.com/launches/mis
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:08:39 UTC No. 16375963
>>16375956
>They finally go out
>Turn on helmet cam
>Hand reaches off camera...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:08:56 UTC No. 16375964
>>16375962
SHOW US THE HUD.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:10:35 UTC No. 16375967
>Jared gets out the hatch
>Takes the Ipad from inside Dragon
>Takes a photo
>shows to the camera live
>"Look , its flat , i knew it"
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:10:38 UTC No. 16375968
shouldnt they have visors closed lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:10:38 UTC No. 16375969
The helmets look so thin and flimsy, crazy to think it will stand the vacuum of space
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:11:03 UTC No. 16375971
>>16375964
it was shown in one of the clips, posted in the previous thread
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:11:47 UTC No. 16375972
>>16375969
its only 1atm of difference . Its not that hard
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:11:51 UTC No. 16375973
GO FOR SPACEWALK
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:12:08 UTC No. 16375974
ITS HAPPENING
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:12:09 UTC No. 16375975
>>16375969
You'd be surprised how much pressure even a 2L soft drink/soda bottle will take.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:12:36 UTC No. 16375977
>switching away from internal cam for the start of depress
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:12:42 UTC No. 16375978
one day this will be routine and boring like every other spacewalk
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:12:45 UTC No. 16375979
where did the fucking cameras go!?!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:12:45 UTC No. 16375980
LETSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:13:05 UTC No. 16375983
>EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
TURN IT OFFFF
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:13:09 UTC No. 16375984
HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:13:09 UTC No. 16375985
BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP
They ded.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:13:13 UTC No. 16375986
Great OP image
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:13:20 UTC No. 16375987
Jared you’re a chad this is so based
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:13:25 UTC No. 16375988
>>16375976
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1834165
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:13:26 UTC No. 16375989
>>16375977
Incase they asplode LIVE on the internet
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:13:30 UTC No. 16375990
no video
its over
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:14:08 UTC No. 16375991
>>16375977
>>16375979
if they suddenly get sucked o-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EY
they're making sure if they suddenly get blown out into space it doesn't get broadcast lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:14:58 UTC No. 16375995
imagine if she farted while inside the capsule
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:15:02 UTC No. 16375996
why is not depressurizing ?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:15:12 UTC No. 16375997
>pure oxygen
uhhhhhh what are the chances of fire?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:15:15 UTC No. 16375998
they look so cool.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:15:28 UTC No. 16376000
>>16375995
What do you think that beeping is...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:15:30 UTC No. 16376001
>>16375951
The only way back is to point your ass into space and shart your way back to the ship
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:15:31 UTC No. 16376002
>>16375993
but it's not september seventy twoth yet?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:15:35 UTC No. 16376003
>>16375996
i think they are
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:08 UTC No. 16376005
EARF SPOTTED
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:08 UTC No. 16376006
>>16375995
They're all suited up so she will be the only one to smelle it
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:13 UTC No. 16376007
reminder that you could easily build a suit that could move at 14 psi if you had a powered exoskeleton
NASA refuses to touched powered suits even though fix nearly every problem
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:19 UTC No. 16376008
>tax money is being spent on pointless garbage
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:30 UTC No. 16376009
>>16375996
A billion checks and tests first.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:35 UTC No. 16376010
>>16375997
Not a chance my Hindu friend.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:36 UTC No. 16376011
HHHHIIIIIIIIISSSSSS
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:38 UTC No. 16376012
Will they be re-pressurizing with farts instead of oxygen ?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:58 UTC No. 16376014
lmao my winter jacket is thicker than these, crazy to see them go to space with that
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:58 UTC No. 16376015
>>16375997
Apollo 1 happened like 50 years ago anon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:17:06 UTC No. 16376016
>>16376008
better than throwing it into ukraine
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:17:11 UTC No. 16376017
>>16376006
All the suits are linked
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:17:26 UTC No. 16376019
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:17:35 UTC No. 16376020
>>16376007
Honda is already developing an exoskellington.
JAXA will probably be the first to use one.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:17:52 UTC No. 16376022
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:17:59 UTC No. 16376023
im kinda scared
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:18:05 UTC No. 16376024
>that heavy breathing
Prebreathing or nerves?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:18:11 UTC No. 16376025
>>16376016
Ok Ivan.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:18:14 UTC No. 16376026
>>16376008
this is a completely private mission
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:18:35 UTC No. 16376027
>>16376008
moron
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:18:35 UTC No. 16376028
Altitude climbing is fine right?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:18:41 UTC No. 16376029
when they fuck are they getting out of this tincan
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:18:47 UTC No. 16376030
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:18:52 UTC No. 16376032
What are those people in suits. Are they all americans?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:19:33 UTC No. 16376035
better than discord noise suppression
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:19:38 UTC No. 16376036
>>16376026
>>16376027
>defending some billionaire spending money on a joy ride rather than ACTUALLY paying their taxes
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:19:48 UTC No. 16376037
ahah imagine having a panic attack now
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:19:48 UTC No. 16376038
HANDS ON THE HANDLE
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:20:05 UTC No. 16376039
>>16375700
Space makes the 80s real again
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:20:13 UTC No. 16376040
>>16376036
no you're just dumb
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:20:23 UTC No. 16376041
>>16376036
you are mentally ill
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:20:30 UTC No. 16376042
>>16376008
>tax money
Is this bait or are you genuinely retarded?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:20:35 UTC No. 16376043
inb4 they can't hear comms
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:20:49 UTC No. 16376044
how the fuck can they understand anything they say there
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:20:52 UTC No. 16376045
do you think jared has a speech prepared?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:20:54 UTC No. 16376046
the noise is deafening
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:21:19 UTC No. 16376048
>>16376008
>Complaining about how other people are spending money that you're not going to be able to take from them to spend on graft, incompetence, and bullshit
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:21:23 UTC No. 16376049
>>16376036
masterfully done goalpost move my friend
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:21:24 UTC No. 16376050
shkhskhskhskhskhshks
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:21:25 UTC No. 16376051
>starting the eva time before the capsule is even depressurized let alone before they're actually out
lame and gay
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:21:32 UTC No. 16376052
lets hope those seamstresses did a good job
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:21:39 UTC No. 16376053
IT'S OVER
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:21:44 UTC No. 16376054
>>16376046
they need to pump air hard to get the womens farts out of there
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:21:52 UTC No. 16376055
>In space noone can hear you scream... oVER ALL THE FUCKING STATIC
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:21:54 UTC No. 16376057
what is the pressure in dragon and suit supposed to be
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:22:10 UTC No. 16376058
Why are they not using throat mics?
It's not new technology...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:22:21 UTC No. 16376059
imagine not being able to transmit video because of poor ground coverage
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:22:26 UTC No. 16376060
How are we going to get to Mars if we can't talk between two buildings?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:22:38 UTC No. 16376061
>19 minutes
jesus
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:22:41 UTC No. 16376062
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:22:48 UTC No. 16376063
>it will last 19 mins
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:22:50 UTC No. 16376064
>>16376052
The best
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:22:51 UTC No. 16376065
>19 more minutes of this
yeah i'm going to bed
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:22:52 UTC No. 16376066
Elon musk naked mating press
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:23:05 UTC No. 16376067
suddenly they realize they have acrophobia
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:23:09 UTC No. 16376068
>>16376051
so you want to start the timer after it has been depressurized?
are you retarded?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:23:23 UTC No. 16376069
>>16376036
>get called out because the mission is privately funded
>move the goalposts half way around the world
Classic.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:23:25 UTC No. 16376070
>>16376064
Elon knew a man would be better at doing it
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:23:31 UTC No. 16376071
>>16376040
>>16376041
>>16376042
>>16376048
>>16376049
Found the incel muskrats. Keep sucking the cock of a man that will never even acknowledge your existence!
Nationalize SpaceX! Jail Musk! NOW!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:23:51 UTC No. 16376072
>>16376064
>USA ACKMAN
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:23:52 UTC No. 16376073
>>16376068
I'd start the timer when the go External to the Vehicle.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:24:27 UTC No. 16376075
>>16376068
No it should be when they leave, or at the very least open the hatch. It's an EXTRAvehicular activity.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:24:42 UTC No. 16376076
>>16376073
you are retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:24:53 UTC No. 16376077
I didn't realize space was so loud
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:25:01 UTC No. 16376078
>barely able to communicate at 250km in space
>on mars orbit : ""aa....hel...h...elp deppres.-.gzzgzgzggzd uuuhhhhhh ...heeel ..p ..the veh.....icu...le is depressuriz....ing ...aaaahhhhhh heellp----.....hhooohi gzgfzgzgzgzgzgzz sststststststst aAGHHHHHHHHHH
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:25:23 UTC No. 16376079
>>16376068
Yes? They're not even out yet and the EVA elapsed time timer is saying 11 mintues. Retarded.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:25:56 UTC No. 16376080
>>16376079
Hello tourist.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:26:06 UTC No. 16376082
well its clear from this mission that spacex needs to provide better starlink coverage for spacecraft
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:26:08 UTC No. 16376083
>>16375844
>locate button
>move finger towards button
>touch button
>apply pressure to button
>keep pressing button until you feel it click
>retract hand from button
>look for next button
In space even simple tasks have many steps
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:26:20 UTC No. 16376084
>>16376071
Jail him for what?
Because you don't like him?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:26:55 UTC No. 16376086
>>16376057
0 and 8.6, but 13.3 in one suit, they're doing a leak check maybe 17 minutes long; sea level is 14.7 psi.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:27:07 UTC No. 16376088
>>16376078
>som kin.... THING.... outsi...gzgzgz... save yoursegzgzgzgz...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:27:08 UTC No. 16376089
>>16376080
ok retard
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:27:27 UTC No. 16376091
>>16376047
Cringe
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:27:36 UTC No. 16376092
>>16376090
anon no
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:27:40 UTC No. 16376093
They should just open the door. Skip the wait.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:27:47 UTC No. 16376094
>>16376090
thank you o helpful frogposter
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:27:51 UTC No. 16376095
Commercial airplanes fly laser straight lines, according to the tool gyroscope, that keeps drift from rigid point in space, that confirms flat ground under all over from Europe to Australia.
So earth is continents surrounded by flat surface of water? Yes.
Observe able ? Yes.
Measurable? not by every baboon, but yes.
Ok. Let's check the Ball. It is observable ? No
Can we measure if "curvature" is correct ? No, no one have find yet any curvature = no ball, sorry
CGI pictures and fake videos are real. Take your time to see.
Fire work rockets real and $19.4 billion from taxpayers pockets real.
But how about "space" ? As real as Godzilla we all sow it on the screen, right? =O)
Funny how musk & NASA spend trillion of dollars to hide from american public the truth of "Space" and "Globe"
How many does he pay for posting here ? A lot? Any thing for a dollar I guess ...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:27:54 UTC No. 16376096
>>16376087
This is like some petty shit Blue Origin would do to bump up their numbers. Very unbecoming of SpaceX.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:27:55 UTC No. 16376097
>>16376088
thats scary
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:28:26 UTC No. 16376100
>>16376090
ANON ABORT STAGE
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:28:36 UTC No. 16376102
>>16376088
>sent 17 mins ago
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:28:41 UTC No. 16376103
Oh I see how it is
No video throughout the entire spacewalk
No (((groundstations)))
Very convenient
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:28:56 UTC No. 16376104
>>16376095
meds schizo
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:29:19 UTC No. 16376105
>>16376103
>>16376095
did someone link to us from /pol/?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:29:35 UTC No. 16376106
>>16376084
He has stolen trillions of tax payers money. That should be more than enough. Otherwise, ESGhound on twitter (no, I refuse to call it X) has some real good environmental cases to charge him for.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:29:48 UTC No. 16376108
>>16376070
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:29:49 UTC No. 16376109
>>16376105
ironic trolling is still trolling
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:30:36 UTC No. 16376110
>>16376106
So basically, it's because you don't like him...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:30:50 UTC No. 16376112
cabin venting!!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:30:51 UTC No. 16376113
>>16376107
Nitrogenbros... I don't feel so good...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:30:52 UTC No. 16376114
their suits are fucking fat
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:31:17 UTC No. 16376115
the inside views almost looks like the interior from the movie Europa Report (without the kraken ofcrouse ... or maybe not)
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:31:23 UTC No. 16376116
Where does the vented gas go????
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:31:50 UTC No. 16376119
>>16376116
into the sussy chamber
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:31:52 UTC No. 16376120
>>16376114
italian suits
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:31:53 UTC No. 16376121
>>16376071
I know you're baiting, but get real: we're not youtube personalities that need hits for ad revenue, and we don't have interesting questions or any validation to gain by talking to the man. Personally, I just want him to keep doing what he's doing, so that it finally becomes possible for the United States of America and its allies to realize the future in space that went on indefinite hiatus with the 30 years of functional failure that came from the Space Shuttle.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:32:18 UTC No. 16376122
>>16376116
they are polluting Space ...can you imagine ? the hypotenuse
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:32:33 UTC No. 16376124
>>16376093
> Who cares if they still have nitrogen in their blood. Baby wanna spacewalky nao!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:32:34 UTC No. 16376125
THERE'S AN ALIEN OUTSIDE THE CAPSULE
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:32:39 UTC No. 16376126
>>16376099
PURGE
ALL
EARTHER
ATMOSPHERE
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:32:43 UTC No. 16376127
>>16376110
Yes, I don't like nazis. That's common sense.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:32:44 UTC No. 16376128
>>16376109
Am I expected to believe they can vent 6 million molecules in 8 minutes?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:33:07 UTC No. 16376130
>"ANYONE HERE?"
what the fuck did I really hear that?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:33:24 UTC No. 16376131
>>16376128
6 billions molecules must die
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:33:32 UTC No. 16376134
>>16376124
give me ONE (1) good reason why they need to worry about that
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:33:35 UTC No. 16376135
>>16376129
>history eraser button
That sounds ominous
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:33:45 UTC No. 16376137
The truth about the simulation theory is not that we are being simulated in an alien's computer but rather than we live in a mockup of the USA build in Antarctica. I did these pendulum experiments (I am a physicist by trade) to determine which hemisphere I was in. At the time, the appearance of my environment sugested Long Island, NY, North America. However, the counterclockwise precession suggests a location in the southern hemisphere and the rapidity of the precession suggests a location near the pole. If I was in the nothern hemisphere when I did this experiment, the plane of precession would have rotate in the clockwise direction.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:33:45 UTC No. 16376138
>"you should not have come up here"
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:34:03 UTC No. 16376140
>>16376099
Nitrogen bros... this is bad for us
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:34:20 UTC No. 16376141
>>16376125
IT'S ME, RAMIREZ
LET ME IN
HOLA AMIGOS
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:34:34 UTC No. 16376143
whats the point of this anyway? why are they making these new suits? why do the spacewalk? obviously its to push boundaries, but surely there is a direction for it all aside from docking with starship...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:34:43 UTC No. 16376144
what stream are we watching? there are so many out there.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:34:52 UTC No. 16376145
>let me open this h-ACK
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:34:53 UTC No. 16376146
I repeated the experiment several times to make sure I wasn't getting results dominated by experimental errors. This is a what the "John Mandelbaur disproves COAM with a ball on a string" threads are about on /sci/.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:34:55 UTC No. 16376147
>>16376143
sex with men
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:02 UTC No. 16376148
>>16376143
mercury gemini apollo
this is the gemini
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:03 UTC No. 16376149
>>16376143
Because it is there.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:16 UTC No. 16376151
>>16376144
The official one ofc.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:17 UTC No. 16376152
>RAMIREZ outside Dragon looking through the window
ugh ?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:20 UTC No. 16376153
>>16376129
You press the History Erase button to undo your mistake
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:23 UTC No. 16376154
>>16376137
If you were to live in a simulation don't you think they'd also manage to simulate the proper gravity?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:25 UTC No. 16376155
>>16376143
How do you live on Mars without suits moron
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:25 UTC No. 16376156
>>16376138
>never should have come here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKR
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:34 UTC No. 16376157
>'open hatch' is just a button on a touchpad
terrifying
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:44 UTC No. 16376159
>>16376143
They're just going to strap astronauts to boosters KSP style to save money so need to test the suits.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:56 UTC No. 16376160
>goyim in this thread unironically believe this is real
keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeek
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:35:57 UTC No. 16376161
>>16376143
isaac wants to do a lunar eva
my pet theory is he wants to be the first man on mars
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:36:22 UTC No. 16376162
>>16376160
nghh fuck im cumming ghhgnn gnhh
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:36:26 UTC No. 16376163
>>16376153
Why not call it the Mulligan button?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:36:32 UTC No. 16376164
Stop edging me and open the damn hatch!!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:36:32 UTC No. 16376165
let's go boys
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:36:32 UTC No. 16376166
>>16376154
A month ago or so, I stopped at a grocery store to get some water. While I was waiting in line to pay, someone sprayed me with SHIT SPRAY and I looked around to see who had done it. Because I have an implant (or something) that allows my rapists to constantly turn my brain off so they can poison my food and water and fuck me in the ass, I brought my camera into the store to film. When I came out of the store, it was obvious that my water had been poisoned and I consulted the video I had recorded. Although I know 100% for sure that I looked around when I got sprayed with the SHIT SPRAY, that had been edited out of the video. Instead, where I should have looked around there was a white flash of light and then some little midget running through the frame. Whoever uses their rape ray on me to turn my brain off can also not only deactivate my camera, but can actively falsify the video that my camera records.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:36:42 UTC No. 16376167
>why there is suddenly a turd free floating?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:36:45 UTC No. 16376169
>>16376157
>*achoo*
>*knocks button and everyone gets sucked out*
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:36:55 UTC No. 16376170
Why are they venting the air instead of compressing it?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:37:23 UTC No. 16376171
>>16376157
You can a latch in the webcast bro.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:37:27 UTC No. 16376172
>>16376143
For SpaceX to actually get people out into the solar system, they need the know-how and in-house capability to do things in space. NASA's old achievements can't be leaned on for anything except baseline technical data because none of that stuff was designed to scale and no existing suppliers can even make the stuff. SpaceX needs to be able to do it all on their own, so they're doing it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:37:44 UTC No. 16376174
>near apogee (700km)
WE ARE SO B-ACK
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:37:47 UTC No. 16376175
who invited the schizo to sfg? jeez
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:37:51 UTC No. 16376176
>>16376170
its simpler
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:38:04 UTC No. 16376177
4 ALIENS CONFIRMED
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:38:25 UTC No. 16376178
>>16376143
They said in the little cutaway interview with the suit lab, they want to mass produce suits so anyone can strap in, go out and do the work they need to do, anywhere in the solar system (their words)
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:38:42 UTC No. 16376179
>>16376159
>2 tons to LEO - SSTO - NO MODS - manned and back
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:38:45 UTC No. 16376180
Did they just said ....ALIENS ???
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:38:55 UTC No. 16376182
>>16376177
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:38:56 UTC No. 16376183
where's the betting sites for whether they die or not?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:39:02 UTC No. 16376184
>>16376179
kek I love those sorts of videos
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:39:08 UTC No. 16376185
>>16376170
Compressing air into a storage tank with a vacuum pump is more complicated, would take longer, and is heavier than just bringing a tank with more air.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:39:26 UTC No. 16376186
>>16376173
They vent the gas, but have spare tanks for one full refill. No more refills though so you can only vent once.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:39:46 UTC No. 16376188
>>16376161
Will NASA etc allow the first HUMAN BEING EVER to set foot on another planet be some literal who on a privately funded mission. I can already see the "muh billionare" headlines etched in the anals of history for all time.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:40:05 UTC No. 16376189
someone posted either here or on twitter that a modified MMU could get you to the moon
is it actually possible?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:40:14 UTC No. 16376190
ITS HAPPENING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:40:39 UTC No. 16376192
>>16376188
but humans walked on another planet over 50 years ago?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:40:45 UTC No. 16376193
>>16376188
NASA isn't really calling any shots.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:41:06 UTC No. 16376194
>>16376188
>allow
they can't stop them, they have no authority over it
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:41:08 UTC No. 16376195
>>16376192
Name 1 planet man has walked on.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:41:24 UTC No. 16376196
>>16376188
All that matters is that the first martian is American and not Chinese
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:41:26 UTC No. 16376197
>>16376195
Jackie chan
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:41:41 UTC No. 16376199
>Still 1.2psi and slowing down
cmon hurry up , im getting booored
i will fire up subway surfers for a bit
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:41:46 UTC No. 16376200
>>16376192
You're referring of course to the secret Venus program. The "hell planet" thing is a cover story.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:41:48 UTC No. 16376201
>>16376188
Who do you want to do it? Taylor Swift?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:42:22 UTC No. 16376203
>>16376199
1.0 now
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:42:27 UTC No. 16376204
>>16376201
>Who do you want to do it?
donald trump
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:42:28 UTC No. 16376205
here we go! go jared!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:42:47 UTC No. 16376208
>>16376194
Anon found the one weird trick. Just murder people on international waters. Governments hate it as they have no jurisdiction.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:42:47 UTC No. 16376209
>>16376194
FAA authority has no altitude limit.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:42:56 UTC No. 16376210
>>16376195
the venera probes had cosmonauts in them.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:43:12 UTC No. 16376212
>>16376188
They will and all other systems besides capitalism will be put into the grave forever, which is the whole point of spaceflight to begin with.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:43:14 UTC No. 16376213
>picking alien radio transmissions
IT'S HAPPENING
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:43:22 UTC No. 16376214
hatch prep? prep h?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:43:36 UTC No. 16376215
OH NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:43:48 UTC No. 16376216
>>16376203
Still at 10 Mars atmospheres in the cabin
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:43:49 UTC No. 16376217
hatch time. spacex's first Eva. whooooooo
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:43:56 UTC No. 16376218
GO
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:43:57 UTC No. 16376219
>>16376188
yeah cuz its too risky of a mission for nasa. nasa will eventually arrive and have a large presence on the planet.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:01 UTC No. 16376220
>uafuffguguajebnfrkjac`posdfdojfeij
>spaceX copy
?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:04 UTC No. 16376221
HATCH STUCK
HATCH STUCK
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:14 UTC No. 16376222
Sphincter clench moment is go.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:15 UTC No. 16376223
HE BE DOING IT
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:19 UTC No. 16376224
METAL PIPE
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:20 UTC No. 16376225
>>16376195
your mom (ham planet)
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:26 UTC No. 16376226
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:33 UTC No. 16376227
STEEL PIPE
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:34 UTC No. 16376228
>psi dropping in realtime as he cranks it
neat
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:37 UTC No. 16376229
CHECK THE STREAM THEY JUST DIED
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:38 UTC No. 16376230
CRANK THAT THANG
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:43 UTC No. 16376232
INANIMATE CARBON ROD
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:45 UTC No. 16376233
>>16376105
>>>/pol/481420659
There is a thread up but I'm not seeing a link so probably just from a few days ago
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:49 UTC No. 16376236
>>16376220
It's space jargon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:51 UTC No. 16376237
righty righty lefty loosey
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:44:53 UTC No. 16376238
ITS HATCHPENNING
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:45:14 UTC No. 16376241
EVA fail can't push the hatch open
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:45:28 UTC No. 16376242
>4.9 suit PSI
IT'S JOEVER
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:45:32 UTC No. 16376243
Someone post "IT'S HAPPENIN" gif
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:45:38 UTC No. 16376245
its stuck lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:45:53 UTC No. 16376246
the getting away with continues. I now continue to doubt Artemis will use Axiom suits
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:46:07 UTC No. 16376248
>>16376240
electrocuted
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:46:12 UTC No. 16376249
WTF THERE'S AN ATMOSPHERE OUTSIDE HOLDING THE HATCH CLOSED??
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:46:16 UTC No. 16376251
>too weak to open the hatch
lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:46:39 UTC No. 16376254
The hatch... it's too powerful...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:46:40 UTC No. 16376255
this is epic
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:46:50 UTC No. 16376256
>>16376249
yes, the hollywood studio has an athmosphere
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:46:54 UTC No. 16376257
correct, six thousand hulls
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:47:18 UTC No. 16376259
>AGHHH I tried to sneak through the hatch, man! Can't make it, can't make it, the shit's stuck! Outta my way son! HATCH STUCK! HATC-
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:47:27 UTC No. 16376260
here we go
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:47:30 UTC No. 16376261
>HATCH EDGING
HATCH EDGING
>HATCH EDGING
HATCH EDGING
>HATCH EDGING
HATCH EDGING
>HATCH EDGING
HATCH EDGING
>HATCH EDGING
HATCH EDGING
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:47:36 UTC No. 16376263
>>16376246
They will, the spacex Eva suit doesn't have its own life support systems
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:47:39 UTC No. 16376264
hatch is coming apart
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:47:40 UTC No. 16376265
>>16376257
The fools! Why didn't they build with 6001?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:47:44 UTC No. 16376266
>>16376259
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:47:54 UTC No. 16376267
What is this hatch edging about
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:47:57 UTC No. 16376268
DOOR STUCK
I BEG YOU
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:03 UTC No. 16376269
welp
he broke it
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:04 UTC No. 16376270
Why don't they open it with small explosive charges?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:05 UTC No. 16376271
man this is TOO cool
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:13 UTC No. 16376272
BRO OPEN THE HATCH
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:22 UTC No. 16376274
there's a fly in the cabin
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:24 UTC No. 16376275
This is so fucking clunky and difficult. We've made no progress since Apollo. We're still 1000 years away from any sort of casual space travel.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:24 UTC No. 16376276
A loose hatch just flew over my house at mach 25
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:34 UTC No. 16376277
>>16376267
Slow and steady so as to keep the pressure equilibrium and not to provoke any extreme differences
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:35 UTC No. 16376278
>>16376261
>>16376267
Space in general has too much edging. Speed this shit up
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:40 UTC No. 16376279
Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:41 UTC No. 16376280
ABORT ABORT ABORT
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:44 UTC No. 16376281
>ev1 return to seat
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:46 UTC No. 16376282
???
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:48:52 UTC No. 16376283
>>16376276
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:01 UTC No. 16376284
>>16376267
venting residual atmosphere
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:07 UTC No. 16376285
>STUCK
STUCK
>STUCK
STUCK
>STUCK
STUCK
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:18 UTC No. 16376286
show the video nigger
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:21 UTC No. 16376287
It's stuck, it's over!!!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:22 UTC No. 16376288
>>16376267
Probably testing and making sure they get some form of confirmation on everything working.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:30 UTC No. 16376289
is it over?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:36 UTC No. 16376291
>>16376275
ENTER
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:37 UTC No. 16376292
literally door stuck lol
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:42 UTC No. 16376293
>sorry goyim, we need to abort and bring them back home. do NOT investigate this
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:42 UTC No. 16376294
>>16376279
I'M AFRAID I CAN'T DO THAT DAVE
IT'S STUCK OR SOMETHING
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:48 UTC No. 16376296
LMAO THEY OPENED IT WITHOUT SEEING IT
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:53 UTC No. 16376297
HATCH OPEN
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:53 UTC No. 16376298
>>16376273
Is that tosspot still making videos?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:49:59 UTC No. 16376299
NO VIEWS
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA
MUH GORUNSTATIONS
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:03 UTC No. 16376300
Somebody is holding it shut on the other side
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:03 UTC No. 16376301
missing the moment of hatch opening because there aren't any ground stations in the indian ocean
starlink is a SCAM
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:06 UTC No. 16376302
HATCH STUCK
HATCH STUCK
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:07 UTC No. 16376303
>camera cuts when they do it
OH WOW SPACE IS SO REAL AND NOT GAY!!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:14 UTC No. 16376304
erm
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:34 UTC No. 16376305
>no views
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:40 UTC No. 16376306
why do they keep losing the feed? don't they have satelites all over?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:42 UTC No. 16376307
>sorry goyim, we need to turn the cameras off
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:43 UTC No. 16376308
>>16376300
IT'S RAMIREZ
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:45 UTC No. 16376310
HAHAHAHAHA VIEW BACK SCHIZOS BTFO
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:50:56 UTC No. 16376312
>>16376275
Air travel is the same fucking way. You know when the seatbelt sign goes off and people immediately stand up so they can be the first ones off the plane? Have you ever measured how long they need to wait to actually disembark? It's ridiculous after this many decades of air travel.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:11 UTC No. 16376314
Why did they cut the video, did they think something was going to go wrong?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:15 UTC No. 16376315
time to do some burpees on the Skywalker
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:20 UTC No. 16376316
>>16376306
the capsule is ass backwards for thermal/sightseeing reasons, so the laserlinks are pointing in the wrong direction
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:22 UTC No. 16376317
>POV shot
kino
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:23 UTC No. 16376318
KINO POV
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:27 UTC No. 16376319
COOOOOOL HELMET CAM
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:29 UTC No. 16376320
>>16376306
they said something about using ground stations for the video feed and not starlink for some reason. no idea why
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:40 UTC No. 16376321
KINO!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:46 UTC No. 16376323
HELMET CAM
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:48 UTC No. 16376324
>>16376314
shut up goy
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:51:57 UTC No. 16376325
Hatch 1/2 open.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:04 UTC No. 16376326
KINO KINO KINO
I APOLOGIZE ELON
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:21 UTC No. 16376328
ROOK'S EYEBROW SPOTTED
fucking AWESOME VIEWS
good job spacex
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:24 UTC No. 16376331
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH SEXO!!!!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:31 UTC No. 16376332
fuck its so beautiful bros
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:32 UTC No. 16376333
there it is
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:32 UTC No. 16376334
IT'S TOTALLY NOT AI GOYM
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:32 UTC No. 16376335
OMG IM CRYING
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:36 UTC No. 16376336
kek did he say "fucking"??
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:43 UTC No. 16376337
HOREEEEEEE SHIT
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:47 UTC No. 16376339
HOLY SHIT
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:49 UTC No. 16376340
Shut the fuck up crowd. Imagine if the first steps on the moon had some dorks cheering in the background.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:52:57 UTC No. 16376342
>back home we got a lot of work to do, but from here earth looks like a perfect world
CRINGE
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:07 UTC No. 16376343
The fuck is he doing with his left arm?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:08 UTC No. 16376344
Holy fucking KINO. /tv/ WON.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:09 UTC No. 16376345
holy fuck that's cooler than i thought it would be
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:32 UTC No. 16376348
Looks fake as fuck
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:33 UTC No. 16376349
that earth darkness gradient is KINO
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:33 UTC No. 16376350
*does a fortnite dance*
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:36 UTC No. 16376351
THIS IS TOO MUCH TO HANDLE ... IM SPEECHLESS
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:42 UTC No. 16376352
lmao dragon cam makes jared look like a fucking thunderbird marionette
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:45 UTC No. 16376353
>>16376347
>>16376348
looks like a Thunderbirds puppet lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:54 UTC No. 16376357
this looks fake as heck
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:58 UTC No. 16376358
>>16376343
controlling his maneuvering thrusters
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:53:58 UTC No. 16376359
>this obvious fucking green screen
KEK
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:54:02 UTC No. 16376360
>up down left right are 3s maybe 2
>pitch is a 4
>yaw is a 2
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:54:09 UTC No. 16376362
>>16376340
Now just because we're being broadcast on... X, there's no need for obnoxious hollering and hooting.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:54:24 UTC No. 16376363
suit mobility looks great compared to the EMU
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:54:43 UTC No. 16376365
is this a farther distance space walk than they did in the apollo missions?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:54:48 UTC No. 16376367
I can see the shadow of his ass crack
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:54:52 UTC No. 16376368
>39C in the suit
>cursing
>barely moving
Yup this is a failure
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:54:55 UTC No. 16376369
looks sick
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:54:55 UTC No. 16376370
>>16376352
>>16376353
>like a Thunderbirds puppet
hivemind confirms
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:54:58 UTC No. 16376371
DO A FLIP
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:00 UTC No. 16376372
THE P E N U M B R A
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:10 UTC No. 16376373
SPACE BUTT CONFIRMED
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:12 UTC No. 16376374
Isaacman got a phat ass
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:14 UTC No. 16376376
>>16376352
>>16376353
>one second apart
THUNDERBIRD MIND
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:25 UTC No. 16376377
>>16376365
Apollo actually did some EVAs on the return flight to get camera film out of the SM
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:29 UTC No. 16376378
just jump nigga
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:31 UTC No. 16376379
>>16376368
>he says nigger and the mission is aborted
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:42 UTC No. 16376380
TO NOT GO INTO THAT GENTLE NIGHT ... RAGE ! RAGE ! AGAINT THE DYING OF THE LIGHT
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:44 UTC No. 16376381
>>16376363
More mobile but the old bulky suits were more kino
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:50 UTC No. 16376383
>>16376273
that guy is such a salty retard kek. and wrong.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:55:54 UTC No. 16376384
Canonball!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:56:01 UTC No. 16376386
>>16376367
>Isaacman looked disgusting in the new EVA suit, buttcheeks protruding. Disgraceful.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:56:10 UTC No. 16376387
>EVA on terminator
>trunk pointing to sun to shadow hatch
Well that was a bit conservative.
I wonder if these suits can take the full sun.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:56:32 UTC No. 16376388
>>16376368
33.9c moron
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:56:40 UTC No. 16376389
>>16376380
It's 'do not go gentle into that good night' and that poem is about dying mate
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:56:42 UTC No. 16376391
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:57:22 UTC No. 16376393
he looks like he's going to float away at any second
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:57:30 UTC No. 16376394
>>16376392
His live video and optimism? Restored.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:57:38 UTC No. 16376396
This looks like a cheap movie set lmfao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:57:40 UTC No. 16376397
>thrusts up
>hand slips
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:57:41 UTC No. 16376398
What's up with his wrist? Seems like it's got no mobility
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:57:44 UTC No. 16376399
you just know he wants to jump
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:57:51 UTC No. 16376401
his movements look like he is obviously connected to some wires on top
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:57:57 UTC No. 16376402
this suit looks so fucking gay lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:03 UTC No. 16376403
It's actually crazy we can get footage like this live.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:04 UTC No. 16376404
>>16376398
he's got some kind of display on there to read off of
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:05 UTC No. 16376405
>>16376393
surely he's attached to a rope or something right?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:11 UTC No. 16376406
>>16376396
If it was fake they'd make it look better
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:13 UTC No. 16376407
alright sun's going down time to seal up again
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:16 UTC No. 16376408
>>>/pol/481420659
>>>/pol/481420659
>>>/pol/481420659
Share the love
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:17 UTC No. 16376409
>>16376398
5.2psi is up with his wrist.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:20 UTC No. 16376410
>>16376393
Ya think if he did the crew could use the umbilical cord to pull him back?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:25 UTC No. 16376411
Who's watching this secretly hoping something goes terribly wrong and they get sucked out into space?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:31 UTC No. 16376412
>>16376396
That's how space looks. We're shitty entertainment for our alien overlords.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:32 UTC No. 16376413
>>16376401
>>16376395
>>16376396
CONFIRMED for HOLLYWOOD
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:58:43 UTC No. 16376414
>>16376388
33 is still dangerously hot, whilst I took holiday to Japan earlier this year it was 30 and I couldn't bear it. Humans aren't meant to live in an environment over 25. Even the commentators agreed with me, cry harder
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:00 UTC No. 16376415
he should be like that one gemini mission where they refused to get back in lol
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:01 UTC No. 16376416
if they took 5 minutes longer to open the hatch it would just be some faggot infront of a black background for the whole thing
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:02 UTC No. 16376417
>>16376405
He is, the umbilical doubles as a harness
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:04 UTC No. 16376418
>>16376408
nigger
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:05 UTC No. 16376419
>>16376411
some commie pedos probably
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:13 UTC No. 16376420
Did he just ask to go back? He must be terrified, I don't blame him.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:16 UTC No. 16376421
>>16376406
the fact that it's looked exactly the same since gemini should tell flerfers something but it doesn't
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:19 UTC No. 16376422
HE'S COMING OUT
also that suit looks so fucking gay
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:22 UTC No. 16376423
>33 Celsius
So space is fatal to Brits?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:23 UTC No. 16376424
>he's waving to the cameraman
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:31 UTC No. 16376425
>>16376399
He's gonna do the sickest canonball ever.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:35 UTC No. 16376427
>>16376415
>they refused to get back in
qrd?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:35 UTC No. 16376428
USA USA USA USA USA USA
SPACEX SPACEX SPACEX SPACEX
MUSK ELON MUSK ELON MUSK ELON
BASED BASED BASED BASED
KINO KINO KINO KINO KINO KINO
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:59:59 UTC No. 16376430
>>16376415
That was a myth. Ed White never refused to go back in
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:00:00 UTC No. 16376431
>>16376382
Did you forget to open your eyes after blinking?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:00:05 UTC No. 16376432
>>16376422
based martian poster
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:00:13 UTC No. 16376433
>>16376429
It stares back
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:00:20 UTC No. 16376434
is he just going to stay there? fucking cuck go outside
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:00:29 UTC No. 16376435
Man I wish i could achieve even 0.1% of what Jared has achieved
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:00:34 UTC No. 16376436
>>16376426
Photoshop potential
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:00:45 UTC No. 16376438
>>16376429
>Kenada, what can you see?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:00:47 UTC No. 16376439
why do spacewalks look so gay and undignified? Very unflattering desu
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:01:02 UTC No. 16376441
>>16376427
ed white
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:01:18 UTC No. 16376442
>>16376420
no he asked does he have time to do something and mission control said only 1min left before he has to go back
womans turn now
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:01:21 UTC No. 16376443
bruh what kind of "EVA" was that? he literally poked his head out and that's it? gay
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:01:33 UTC No. 16376444
>>16376443
He's turning this rocket around and heading back to Earth all because you couldn't behave.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:01:49 UTC No. 16376446
What even is the hype surrounding this? Spacewalks are a dime a dozen. Is it because this time it's muh based billionaire doing it?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:03 UTC No. 16376448
>>16376430
ah my bad then. there is a lot of myths like that (I do know that the Skylab mutiny thing is 100% a myth)
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:07 UTC No. 16376449
EV2 will be during "night" ?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:15 UTC No. 16376451
a turd just flew over my house at mach 25
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:20 UTC No. 16376452
>>16376447
It's just like real tourism.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:21 UTC No. 16376453
>>16376445
1 billion shitskin lives are worth less than 1 space mission
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:28 UTC No. 16376454
> Jared has reentered. Says hatch seals look good
Please clap.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:48 UTC No. 16376455
>mom says it's my turn to do the spacewalk, jared!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:49 UTC No. 16376456
>>16376439
the suit is basically a full balloon, difficult to move in
this is gen1, the suits will get better but these don't have great movement in the lower limbs for instance
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:51 UTC No. 16376457
>>16376446
because its a civilian doing it on a fully private mission
kys
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:54 UTC No. 16376458
>>16376446
There's zero hype, what the fuck are you talking about? Where do you see hype?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:56 UTC No. 16376459
>>16375672
maybe they will gather important data through this space walk but it looks pretty boring, like a grandpa whose feets touch the water but he is too afraid to swim.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:02:58 UTC No. 16376460
>>16376443
What did you expect? The first time you also just poke the head around and it's over quickly
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:05 UTC No. 16376461
>EV 1. I SEE NO GOD UP HERE.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:11 UTC No. 16376462
>>16376453
I'd like to agree but at that exchange rate we'd only get about 6 space missions before we run out of shitskins
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:13 UTC No. 16376463
>night side of the planet
>sees nothing , just darkenss
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:15 UTC No. 16376464
wahmen about to be sucked into space
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:19 UTC No. 16376465
Did you hear that cough?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:25 UTC No. 16376466
>>16376458
>2.1 million views
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:38 UTC No. 16376467
>>16376446
Okay. Show us some pictures from your spacewalk.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:43 UTC No. 16376468
wait so the space walk is just to peek out for a couple minutes? that's gay
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:51 UTC No. 16376469
>>16376445
History is a circle
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:54 UTC No. 16376470
odds that she fucks something up?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:55 UTC No. 16376471
>>16376466
out of 8 billions? That's nothing actually
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:56 UTC No. 16376472
>seal unseated
>just push it back in
It's that easy in spaceflight.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:57 UTC No. 16376473
>BULGE IN THE SEAL
BULGE IN THE SEAL
>BULGE IN THE SEAL
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:03:58 UTC No. 16376474
>>16376463
don't they see the stars when on the night side?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:04:00 UTC No. 16376475
>I see a little bit of a bulge
can't women stop thiking about sex for just one second?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:04:12 UTC No. 16376476
Poteet probably bored out of his mind right now
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:04:14 UTC No. 16376477
>more viewers than AEW has even gotten
stay in the mud tony
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:04:19 UTC No. 16376478
>>16376466
And at 4-7am to boot.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:04:21 UTC No. 16376479
>>16376468
For a capsule that was only designed to go to the ISS and back, it's pretty good.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:04:30 UTC No. 16376480
I RECOGNIZE THAT BULGE
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:04:44 UTC No. 16376482
>>16376477
still vince
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:04:52 UTC No. 16376483
>Pop out, look around
>Pop back in
This is too fucking gay ngl
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:04:57 UTC No. 16376484
>>16376478
>Anon still doesn't understand time zones
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:05:04 UTC No. 16376485
Boeing never had to deal with bulges in seals.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:05:13 UTC No. 16376486
>>16376479
do you not remember the dragon around the moon plan circa 2018 with that old billionaire and wife?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:05:19 UTC No. 16376487
>>16376480
pffffffff
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:05:20 UTC No. 16376488
>>16376473
>female astronaut touches the seal
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:05:28 UTC No. 16376490
>>16376484
only america matters
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:05:43 UTC No. 16376491
>>16376470
> Her period starts
"Oh oh! Aunt Flow just stopped by!"
OUTER ANON at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:05:45 UTC No. 16376492
ONE SMALL STEP FOR ANON
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:05:57 UTC No. 16376493
>>16376486
>plan
Yeah it still wasn't designed for that.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:05:58 UTC No. 16376494
>>16376485
No just leaks
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:05:59 UTC No. 16376495
>darkness
cool
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:12 UTC No. 16376497
she's going to float away
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:28 UTC No. 16376499
HER BUTT CRACK IS ABOUT TO SHOW ON LIVE TELEVISION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:32 UTC No. 16376500
>view is intended to look at her chest
YIKES!
>make joke of "that tunnel is longer than you think"
Sexism MUCH???
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:37 UTC No. 16376501
Good luck, Mr. Gorsky.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:39 UTC No. 16376502
>>16376491
You can take pills to delay menstruation.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:40 UTC No. 16376503
WHY AREN'T THE STARS VISIBLE IF THEY'RE ON THE DARK SIDE?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:42 UTC No. 16376504
>>16376466
literally nothing
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:43 UTC No. 16376505
Fucking disappointing it's during the night side transit.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:45 UTC No. 16376506
I wish when they got out there, they could talk about how it feels instead of just your science 'check' talk
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:50 UTC No. 16376507
How long until sunrise at that altitude?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:06:58 UTC No. 16376508
>Spacewalk
>Dark as shit outside
>No sight of star
GAYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:07:00 UTC No. 16376509
why didnt plan to make the EV's during sun time???
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:07:01 UTC No. 16376510
they couldn't have waited 20 minutes so they're in daylight? cringe
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:07:08 UTC No. 16376511
>billionaire
>SpaceX employee
So they can send basically anyone to space nowaday? That's cool actually
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:07:10 UTC No. 16376512
>>16376503
exposure time of the camera, relative brightness
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:07:11 UTC No. 16376513
>>16376489
yes, two of the astronauts are SpaceX employees
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:07:23 UTC No. 16376514
>>16376503
you can only see one star and it's on the day side of earth
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:07:39 UTC No. 16376515
>>16376463
I don't think these suits can take full sunlight. They have gray parts that can get very hot.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:07:43 UTC No. 16376516
>>16376512
But they get to see them right? So they still get a nice view
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:07:51 UTC No. 16376517
>>16376509
It got delayed because the hatch wasn't cooperating
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:08:01 UTC No. 16376519
>>16376507
Similar altitude to iss so do the math
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:08:01 UTC No. 16376520
>>16376515
Why don't they make them all white
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:08:09 UTC No. 16376521
>>16376503
cause it's looking back at Earth right now
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:08:18 UTC No. 16376522
>>16376511
tourists have been going to space for decades now
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:08:22 UTC No. 16376523
>>16376520
That would be racist
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:08:29 UTC No. 16376524
>>16376511
this isn't just some random billionaire going on a joyride, its a dev mission
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:08:35 UTC No. 16376525
WHERE ARE THE STARS ANON?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:08:48 UTC No. 16376527
>Spacewalk
>No actual walk taken
Explain this spacexer
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:08:50 UTC No. 16376528
well that was boring
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:08:56 UTC No. 16376529
>>16376522
Under government contracts.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:09:01 UTC No. 16376530
>>16376519
>collides with iss
>eey i'm spacewalkin' here
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:09:02 UTC No. 16376531
>do a spacewalk
>unable to see the earth
must suck
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:09:05 UTC No. 16376532
>>16376516
Doubt it, their helmets have a HUD.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:09:18 UTC No. 16376533
>>16376526
pretty based ngl
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:09:25 UTC No. 16376534
>>16376522
yeah but not for a spacewalk. Though I wonder what's the physical minimum to go to space, if it's as exigent as being a fighter pilot or not.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:09:32 UTC No. 16376535
>>16376526
Bringing women to space can only end in extreme catastrophe.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:09:35 UTC No. 16376536
>>16376524
>joyride
more like goyride
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:09:46 UTC No. 16376538
>>16376527
You can't walk in space.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:09:51 UTC No. 16376539
>>16376534
bob and Doug were pretty fat
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:10:01 UTC No. 16376540
>>16376505
Started over light side. Do you clowns not realize what "orbit" means?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:10:21 UTC No. 16376541
>>16376538
There's a Walk in Space Museum.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:10:26 UTC No. 16376542
Okay so now how will the media will turn this into an "Elon Musk failure"?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:10:27 UTC No. 16376543
TEMPERATURE WENT FROM 31 ISAAC TO 21 FOR GRILL
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:10:29 UTC No. 16376544
>>16376503
You are looking toward earth and they are over the south pacific ocean
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:10:31 UTC No. 16376545
>>16376526
>Furthest women have been from kitchen
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:10:34 UTC No. 16376546
what exactly are they testing here? wouldn't it be enough to just stay in the capsule to see if the suit survives? they aren't exactly leaving the capsule to do propulsion tests
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:10:46 UTC No. 16376547
>>16376537
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1834184
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:10:50 UTC No. 16376548
>"do you have camera"
>"yes we do"
>"ok starting-"
>camera cuts
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:10:59 UTC No. 16376549
I wonder what would happen if a pregnant woman went to space for the full 9 months and then gave birth, the baby would look like an ayy lmao.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:11:05 UTC No. 16376550
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:11:09 UTC No. 16376551
>>16376540
More than you do.
The timing was still poor.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:11:15 UTC No. 16376552
>>16376538
Call it space swim then
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:11:39 UTC No. 16376553
weird that they planned the orbit like this to go over the pacific (no ground stations) at night (can't see shit)
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:11:49 UTC No. 16376556
>>16376546
They want to test mobility for climbing, going out, back in, etc. This laying the ground works for future missions.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:11:56 UTC No. 16376557
>>16376543
That's why girl's always have a space heater by their feet in the capsule.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:12:04 UTC No. 16376558
>>16376553
stop asking questions you antisemite
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:12:05 UTC No. 16376559
>>16376538
Call it space floating then, it's misleading
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:12:24 UTC No. 16376560
>>16376547
This all makes sense in the context that Polaris 2 was originally supposed to be the Hubble repair mission, hence why the suit and mobility tests.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:12:25 UTC No. 16376561
>>16376553
they were running about 15-20 minutes late due to suit fitting
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:12:45 UTC No. 16376564
>>16376553
yeah, probably a bit of miscalculation .
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:12:47 UTC No. 16376565
>>16376554
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1834187
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:13:18 UTC No. 16376566
How much is Boeing seething right now?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:13:22 UTC No. 16376567
>>16376559
They're not floating though. Floating implies buoyancy.
They're space falling.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:13:26 UTC No. 16376568
It's actually easier to make out what women say on comms to me
Am i the only one? guess they're just built for chatter
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:13:34 UTC No. 16376569
>>16376565
>@ing them every time
>come back to earth
>23947230423 missed messages
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:13:39 UTC No. 16376570
>see if the handle has been stowed in the do not stow window
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:13:44 UTC No. 16376571
Wait so one guy just had to sit there in his seat the entire time doing nothing?
Man that must suck
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:13:49 UTC No. 16376572
did rook stow the handle wrong?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:13:51 UTC No. 16376573
>stowed in the
>"do not stow window"
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:14:03 UTC No. 16376574
>>16376562
All of us spacefags are tired of Musk's bullshit claims. I fell for it in 2016, even in 2019 after Starhopper.
Just build the fucking rockets Elon.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:14:06 UTC No. 16376575
>handle stowed in the 'do not stow' window
why even allow this to be possible?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:14:18 UTC No. 16376577
>>16376571
1 dude and 1 woman
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:14:32 UTC No. 16376578
>>16376570
in case of italians
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:14:36 UTC No. 16376579
Yeah one of them bumped the handle on egress I saw it. This is what happens when you don't have the right stuff.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:14:43 UTC No. 16376580
>>16376576
jak him
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:14:47 UTC No. 16376581
>spend two years training to open a door
>do it wrong
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:14:49 UTC No. 16376582
>opened the 'do not open' hatch
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:15:13 UTC No. 16376584
>>16376560
Imagine believing they could do that.
The suit alone is a joke.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:15:26 UTC No. 16376585
>>16376567
Space dive.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:15:26 UTC No. 16376586
>>16376583
That's for a later mission. For now they test shidding and farting.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:15:28 UTC No. 16376587
>>16376583
space sex is illegal
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:15:34 UTC No. 16376589
>>16376436
template
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:15:36 UTC No. 16376591
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/18
>>16376556
also gives them data to iterate on the suits and all the systems on dragon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:15:55 UTC No. 16376592
>>16376546
>>16376556
Also how it handles heat in full sunlight
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:16:08 UTC No. 16376593
>>16376587
is it actually?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:16:36 UTC No. 16376594
>>16376574
you are retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:16:41 UTC No. 16376595
WHAT IS THE TIME IN SPACE ANON?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:17:03 UTC No. 16376596
>>16376589
oh exploitable!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:17:06 UTC No. 16376597
>>16376347
Holy shit
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:17:09 UTC No. 16376598
>>16376592
how are they testing that when they are behind the earth?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:17:17 UTC No. 16376599
>>16376595
UTC.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:17:19 UTC No. 16376600
>>16376583
>tfw elon gets embroiled in even more drama by recording a 'reproductive experiment' in orbit (and then selling it on X as the first space porn as a 'joke')
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:17:23 UTC No. 16376601
>>16376595
The mission clock, duh.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:17:27 UTC No. 16376602
>>16376589
If only I had Nikocado's brownhole saved on my PC
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:17:37 UTC No. 16376603
>>16376584
what do you mean? it worked
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:17:51 UTC No. 16376605
>>16376589
This is just asking for a goatse.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:18:01 UTC No. 16376607
>>16376602
Nikocado should be the first man on mars
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:18:04 UTC No. 16376608
>>16376594
Hows your Dogecoin? To the moon yet bub?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:18:26 UTC No. 16376609
>>16376605
i immediately thought of nicocado when i saw the template
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:18:33 UTC No. 16376611
>>16376553
>>16376558
embarrassing posts
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:18:45 UTC No. 16376612
>>16376576
Predict his video
>video starts by not having 24/7 live stream of crew
>complains that capsule is too crowded as well with 4 people
>The hatch didn't open on first try unlike <random flight>
>they didn't even let go of anything
>the space suits were too hot
>complains only 2 of the 4 people did a "not real space walk"
>doubles down on 'problem' with the hatch
>complains about live video showing how starlink is a failure
Did I miss anything?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:18:46 UTC No. 16376613
>does EVA during night time
>over the pacific , no grounstations
>10 min each
LAME
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:19:26 UTC No. 16376614
so is it over? are they not going back outside?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:19:33 UTC No. 16376615
Jared-sama, I fucking kneel
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:19:48 UTC No. 16376616
>>16376614
yup
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:19:55 UTC No. 16376618
>>16376613
They get the timing according to the launch window. Timing is limited.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:20:05 UTC No. 16376619
>>16376614
Not until they launch again.
But Dragon's quick to turnaround so it should be about two more weeks.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:20:09 UTC No. 16376620
>>16376612
>HA HA HA WHY ARE YOU CLAPPING YOU MORONS WE DID THIS ON GEMINI ON A REDSTONE ROCKET THAT IS PRETTY MUCH A FALCON 9
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:20:21 UTC No. 16376621
> Hatch is closed - good hatch seal
Forgot to get parking validated and have to go back outside.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:20:30 UTC No. 16376622
for a brand new EVA suit this is plenty of testing for a first test. I'm not sure it's smart to do more.
success regardless
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:20:36 UTC No. 16376623
>>16376620
YOU MORONS, YOU ABSOLUTE MORONS
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:20:55 UTC No. 16376624
>>16376612
need to have a 10min section about hyperloop in there
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:21:15 UTC No. 16376625
>>16376613
You would think they'd have a Hawaii ground station.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:21:37 UTC No. 16376627
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:21:51 UTC No. 16376628
>>16376612
completely wrong idiot, 70% of the vid will still be about Tesla and Hyperloop
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:21:51 UTC No. 16376629
>>16376542
Both astronauts failed to leave the vessel due to numerous hatch equipment failures.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:22:01 UTC No. 16376631
>>16376625
you would think they would use starlink for everything
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:22:07 UTC No. 16376633
>>16376589
OH SHIT IT'S FL-
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:22:20 UTC No. 16376634
>>16376627
why are sharty posters so gay?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:22:23 UTC No. 16376635
>>16376627
saved
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:22:31 UTC No. 16376636
> Sarah Gillis becomes the youngest person to perform an EVA! A few weeks younger than Alexei Leonov was when he performed the first EVA!
First space loli space walk.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:22:34 UTC No. 16376637
>>16376627
fucking lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:22:42 UTC No. 16376638
>>16376603
Yeah it "worked" to get out of the hatch in shadow environment and do nothing.
Now add full sunlight/shadow orbits with extreme temp swings, all while carrying an EVA backpack and moving arms, hands and legs, using tools to do complicated repairs.
That would require a real EVA suit and tons of training.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:22:52 UTC No. 16376640
>>16376614
this is basically the minimum viable way to do these tests in space
no airlock, only the shoulders are articulated
now they use the data to iterate on the systems and test egaina
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:23:23 UTC No. 16376641
Is that Michael Hopkins? What is he doing here? I just tuned in so I have no idea who is commentating rn besides Kate
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:23:33 UTC No. 16376643
>>16376612
There won't be any video. Dragon/Falcon is too successful to make grift videos out of.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:23:52 UTC No. 16376644
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:23:53 UTC No. 16376645
>>16376626
hahaha
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:24:00 UTC No. 16376646
>>16376641
works for spacex now
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:24:21 UTC No. 16376648
>>16376633
i knew it
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:24:38 UTC No. 16376649
>>16376638
And would not fit inside a Dragon, you absolute mutt.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:24:43 UTC No. 16376650
>>16376625
>he thinks Hawaii is real
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:24:54 UTC No. 16376651
>>16376631
probably need more than one link
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:25:02 UTC No. 16376653
>>16376626
I woke up 10 minutes before hatch opening to watch 2 people poke their heads out like ground hogs
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:25:14 UTC No. 16376654
>>16376627
'cado in 'ace!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:25:16 UTC No. 16376655
is there a reason why they can't use starlink for video uplink?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:25:19 UTC No. 16376656
POST your face when Jared looked outside Dragon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:25:29 UTC No. 16376657
>>16376638
It's a fucking test you spastic
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:25:33 UTC No. 16376658
>>16376643
Lol, I had some of the Starship launches up checking in on that dumbass. People were throwing him $20's $50's and even some $100's just so he would save FUCK MUSK or call anyone clapping a moron. You have no idea how terminally mentally ill his fanbase is.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:25:47 UTC No. 16376659
>>16376633
Post the real one, faggot.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:25:56 UTC No. 16376660
>>16376638
that comes later, this demonstrated a number of systems and worked as expected
you want them to start doing complicating repairs as the very first test? are you fucking retarded?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:25:58 UTC No. 16376662
>>16376626
I don't have to work so I'm gonna take a nappy
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:26:04 UTC No. 16376663
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:26:07 UTC No. 16376664
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:26:15 UTC No. 16376665
>>16376655
The spacecraft has limited Starlink pointing capability and the spacecraft's altitude and orientation during the spacewalk are wrong for it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:26:16 UTC No. 16376666
>>16376657
are you british?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:26:23 UTC No. 16376668
> Repressurization of Dragon is underway. Teams will raise the cabin pressure up to 8 psi, pause, let the atmosphere equalize, and perform a cabin leak check prior to resuming repress all the way up to 14 psi
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:26:27 UTC No. 16376669
>>16376654
'cado lost
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:27:10 UTC No. 16376670
>>16376329
>>16376330
need a webm of the helmet pov egress
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:27:15 UTC No. 16376671
>>16376638
I remember when Gemini did extensive repairs on EVA... oh wait, you're a gigantic faggot
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:27:21 UTC No. 16376672
>>16376666
are you gay?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:27:26 UTC No. 16376673
they really have to fix that hissing sound
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:28:13 UTC No. 16376675
>>16376670
sorry anon, I can only into GIMP
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:28:24 UTC No. 16376676
>>16376673
Send robots that don't need air.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:28:25 UTC No. 16376677
>>16376666
Jesus christ you guessed
Fucking waste of didgets
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:28:48 UTC No. 16376680
>>16376673
should be trivial to cancel that white noise
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:28:54 UTC No. 16376682
alright I trust they can get this thing finished up safely. I'm going to sleep
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:29:40 UTC No. 16376684
>>16376673
Thanks asshole, I can't unhear it now.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:29:44 UTC No. 16376685
>>16376673
What hissing?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:30:09 UTC No. 16376686
>>16376638
>oldspace faggot is seething
You love to see it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:31:04 UTC No. 16376687
>>16376656
I set an early alarm and watched it while next to my wife in bed. I started tearing up and she called me a faggot. She's so based
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:31:19 UTC No. 16376689
So it's orge now? Time to turn the stream off, well unless the capsule straight up got exploded by getting hit with a fucking comet coming out from nowhere
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:31:48 UTC No. 16376690
How come they can't use starlink so they don't lose feed?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:31:56 UTC No. 16376691
What distro are they running
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:32:41 UTC No. 16376694
>>16376691
Custom one Elon worked on
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:32:43 UTC No. 16376695
>>16376685
Space snake
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:33:08 UTC No. 16376696
>>16376690
Then you'd see how bad starlink is lol musk btfo!@!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:33:10 UTC No. 16376697
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okq
>Polaris Dawn - Your Very Own Human Space Program
video about why SpaceX is doing these tests
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:33:20 UTC No. 16376698
>>16376691
gentoo
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:33:31 UTC No. 16376699
>>16376690
Why would they have a satellite over the middle of the ocean?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:33:36 UTC No. 16376700
>>16376688
Imagine if it turned out that there were no other stars, ours was the only one.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:33:56 UTC No. 16376701
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:33:56 UTC No. 16376702
>>16376695
IM TIRED OF THESE MOTHER FUCKING SPACE SNAKES ON THE MOTHER FUCKING SPACE CAPSULE
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:34:19 UTC No. 16376703
>>16376690
starlink terminal is on the ass end which is pointed into space at the moment
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:34:20 UTC No. 16376704
>>16376690
FCC said no.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:35:07 UTC No. 16376706
>>16376699
Don't cruise ships use Starlink?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:35:38 UTC No. 16376707
Oh boy I can't wait to watch ift5 which will come shortly after this
Oh wait...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:35:39 UTC No. 16376708
>>16376706
Yeah
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:35:50 UTC No. 16376710
>>16376699
Nigger how do you think satellites in LEO orbit?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:36:21 UTC No. 16376713
>>16376710
starlink isn't geostationary lil bro
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:36:29 UTC No. 16376714
>>16376710
heh you can see the damage from the progress impact
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:36:51 UTC No. 16376715
>>16376700
we are alone.
truly alone.
there is nothing but space.
forever.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:36:51 UTC No. 16376716
>>16376690
Because the capsule is above the orbits of Starlink.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:37:26 UTC No. 16376717
>>16376712
WTF THERE IS A TIC TAC UFO THERE!!!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:37:31 UTC No. 16376718
>>16376713
Yes retard, that's my point.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:37:40 UTC No. 16376719
>>16376699
Anon do you know what Starlink is?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:37:42 UTC No. 16376720
>>16376716
Wasn't for the EVA.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:38:07 UTC No. 16376722
>>16376707
>there was a world where we could've had a live stream of starship launching from 200km up
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:38:27 UTC No. 16376724
reminder that we can just drain the van Allen belts https://spectrum.ieee.org/hacking-t
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:38:35 UTC No. 16376725
>>16376712
>6 years after the spacedrive
>a fucking spacewalk
We're going backwards.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:38:46 UTC No. 16376727
>>16376717
I wouldn't worry about it
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:39:08 UTC No. 16376728
>>16376725
walkable space is the future, chud
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:39:24 UTC No. 16376729
>>16376210
Redpill me on this.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:39:27 UTC No. 16376730
>>16376719
>what Starlink is?
something to annoy starwatchers?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:40:13 UTC No. 16376731
>>16376670
seconding this, i need to send it to my dad
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:40:18 UTC No. 16376732
>>16376690
Starlink lasers work nicely on Starlink sat to Starlink sats. However thats on predefined orbits and timings. So everything is designed around that. Dragon orbit/timing isn't designed around Starlink so thats why there's cuts. Here/there. Its pronounced due to the fact that Starlink laser is bit fresh/experimental on top of Dragon's current experimental flight.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:41:15 UTC No. 16376735
>>16376731
Wait for spacex to release the 4k ultrahd helmet cam footage
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:41:30 UTC No. 16376736
>>16376729
They stuck a starving Ukrainian midget peasant into the Venera landers. Their job was to remove the lens cap of the camera after it landed. The high failure rate of the lens cap is attributed to the midgets dying too fast.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:41:35 UTC No. 16376738
>>16376719
To use Internet in the wilderness where traditional providers don't cover, the ocean doesn't have many people living in it so I assumed that it would be a waste to even provide cover there
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:41:53 UTC No. 16376739
>>16376732
Voice comms is going via satellite. All video footage via ground station.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:42:16 UTC No. 16376741
>>16376734
>continues to repress
Is Dragon ok? Does he need to talk?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:42:33 UTC No. 16376742
>>16376740
Lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:42:38 UTC No. 16376743
>>16376738
Satellites go around the entire Earth
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:43:07 UTC No. 16376744
Imagine doing this inside a Starship. Depressurizing 1km^3 of space would take an eternity.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:43:52 UTC No. 16376746
>>16376714
shit happens
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:43:57 UTC No. 16376747
>>16376744
You moron starship is big enough to have an airlock like the shuttle did
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:44:40 UTC No. 16376748
>>16376744
Starship is going to have multiple airlocks
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:44:47 UTC No. 16376749
>>16376744
What if... we built a small room to trap, no, LOCK the air in. And then we depressurized that?
Nah it'd never work.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:44:52 UTC No. 16376750
>>16376738
retard
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:44:57 UTC No. 16376751
>>16376744
1000 cubic meters is not a cubic kilometer anon....
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:44:57 UTC No. 16376752
>>16376663
>Out of the way Starliner fucking shit!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:45:26 UTC No. 16376753
Why is his arm always up? What the fuck is his problem?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:45:39 UTC No. 16376754
>>16376751
kilo is the 10^3 prefix you moron.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:46:06 UTC No. 16376756
>>16376593
No, NASA just doesn't allow married couples in space after a two astronauts secretly got married just before their flight, that they had sex is a rumour.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:46:10 UTC No. 16376757
>>16376753
Why lower it? There's no gravity pulling it down.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:47:16 UTC No. 16376758
>>16376757
He lowered it and it jerked back up around when anon posted that.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:47:28 UTC No. 16376759
>>16376753
Nazi dogwhistle.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:47:29 UTC No. 16376760
>>16376757
Obstruction
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:47:36 UTC No. 16376761
>>16376754
It's cubic you mongrel it's, 10^9
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:48:26 UTC No. 16376763
>>16376740
was waiting for that.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:49:29 UTC No. 16376764
>>16376761
yes exactly. one cubic kilometer. aka 1 kilo of a cubic meter
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:50:01 UTC No. 16376765
>>16376746
is this real?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:51:09 UTC No. 16376769
>>16376765
It's an animation, but yeah it did happen lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:51:51 UTC No. 16376770
>>16376765
read the book
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:51:56 UTC No. 16376771
>>16376764
one cubic kilometer is 1x1x1 kilometers you illiterate nigger
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:53:00 UTC No. 16376772
>>16376770
>nasa
>mir
oh so it was sabotage
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:53:17 UTC No. 16376774
>>16376771
It's a /sfg/ meme
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:53:17 UTC No. 16376775
>>16376440
I always wanted you to go to space man
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:54:14 UTC No. 16376778
>>16376774
false
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:54:31 UTC No. 16376779
>>16376746
>cheapens out on docking software because you don't want to buy it from Ukraine
>crashes into the station
lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:54:32 UTC No. 16376780
>>16376445
Black people aren't human.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:55:07 UTC No. 16376781
>>16376778
this is true, because a cubic kilometre is obviously 1000 cubic metres. that's how the metric system works.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:55:15 UTC No. 16376782
>>16376776
soon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:55:20 UTC No. 16376783
I'm gonna sleep like a rock after they are done giving their post eva speeches or whatever
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:55:51 UTC No. 16376785
>>16376771
wrong
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:56:06 UTC No. 16376786
>>16376751
It's more properly a kilo cubometer
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:56:52 UTC No. 16376789
a hypermeter
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:57:04 UTC No. 16376790
>>16376751
Guys, it's correct, you just have to write it as k(m3) so that it is unambiguous.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:58:05 UTC No. 16376791
>>16376691
TempleOS
Only one that works above the firmament
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:58:10 UTC No. 16376792
In an alternate universe, the hatch got stuck open and the helpless astronauts had to be rescued by a Startliner
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:58:25 UTC No. 16376793
>>16376756
Wasn’t one of them a crazy yandere bitch?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:58:41 UTC No. 16376794
>smell that? space
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:58:41 UTC No. 16376795
>Smell that?
>Space...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:00:03 UTC No. 16376797
>>16376657
I was just commenting on the naivety of thinking that one could repair the Hubble from a capsule with a glorified cabin suit.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:01:06 UTC No. 16376800
>>16376797
moving goalposts faggot
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:01:29 UTC No. 16376801
>>16376794
>Farts and freeze dried food.
You may not like it, but that's what peak human achievements smells like.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:01:33 UTC No. 16376802
>>16376798
now what?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:01:37 UTC No. 16376803
>>16376660
That will not happen anywhere soon.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:02:04 UTC No. 16376804
>>16376802
FAA complaining
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:02:38 UTC No. 16376805
>>16376802
a red bull ad.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:03:11 UTC No. 16376806
>>16376802
space sex
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:03:11 UTC No. 16376807
>>16376802
Polaris 2
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:04:19 UTC No. 16376809
>dragonrider
badass
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:05:05 UTC No. 16376811
well that was awesome
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:05:58 UTC No. 16376813
>>16376800
Read the comment I was responding to, faggot:
>>16376560
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:06:13 UTC No. 16376814
well that was somewhat underwhelming
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:06:14 UTC No. 16376815
>>16376811
That was awesome. It'll be fun to see how they take it further for Polaris 2.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:07:18 UTC No. 16376817
>>16376814
Honestly, it's exactly what I expected.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:07:25 UTC No. 16376818
>>16376813
You still did what they accused you of doing, wanker
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:09:20 UTC No. 16376819
>>16376646
Seems to be a common theme lol. Once you finish your NASA career, why not go to the company that is pushing the boundary
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:10:13 UTC No. 16376820
>>16376819
Buzz Aldrin should get a job running these streams for spacex
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:10:36 UTC No. 16376822
>>16376819
If you can't make it at NASA, you go work at SpaceX. I'm not kidding.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:10:39 UTC No. 16376823
>>16376814
Why are so many of you guys underwhelmed? This was the plan the whole time. It’s the grasshopper equivalent of EVA suits and will only get better, and do so rapidly
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:11:22 UTC No. 16376824
>>16376818
And what was that? Denouncing Elon's big mouth? We got a load of Mars BS today. These biker suits have zero chance of being of any use over ground and dust. They are cabin suits with some emergency EVA capabilities.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:11:58 UTC No. 16376825
>>16376822
More like “if you want even more than NASA provides”
Kathy Lueders wanted more. Hopkins was an astronaut who probably wanted to help push the envelope. They recognize SX as top dawg
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:14:01 UTC No. 16376826
>>16376824
>"DUST could be here", he thought, as the cheap martian fungus whisky coursed through his veins
>"With a rover, you can go anywhere you want" he thought to himself, out loud.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:14:15 UTC No. 16376827
>>16376822
You're right they switch because they don't make anything at NASA
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:14:17 UTC No. 16376828
can someone make a gif or webm of the suit with the globe as a visor that spacex posted?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:14:36 UTC No. 16376829
>>16376824
You think the prototype suits being used today are gonna be the same ones used during surface EVAs?
Retard
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:14:38 UTC No. 16376830
>>16376822
Can't blame them, few would be able to make it at that stagnated bureaucratic mess.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:15:58 UTC No. 16376832
>>16376399
>>16376400
That's what I said a few days ago, I'd be unable to resist the urge to let go and just float unsupported through space.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:16:48 UTC No. 16376833
>>16376824
Iterative development retard, ever heard of it?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:17:38 UTC No. 16376834
>>16376342
See? You DO have to fix Earth
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:19:58 UTC No. 16376837
>>16376824
>Bleh they only achieved an enormous milestone on the way towards commercial spaceflight becoming a reality but they can't walk in mars yet so they failed chud!
Why even bother with these people. They will forever move the goal posts and never admit they are wrong. Reminder that reuse was "impossible" and a private company sending humans to space was a pipe dream until SpaceX made it routine
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:20:25 UTC No. 16376838
>>16376342
best response to the naysayers desu
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:26:58 UTC No. 16376844
>>16376827
You mean they don't get government stock options?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:29:11 UTC No. 16376846
>>16376342
Alright big guy, what would you say instead?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:29:21 UTC No. 16376847
make the new thread retards
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:30:38 UTC No. 16376850
>>16376844
they don't make anything during their work
its demoralizing for the people that actually care about achieving something instead of just getting a paycheck
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:30:40 UTC No. 16376851
>>16376846
baba booey, baba booey
>>16376847
You should be shot
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:32:54 UTC No. 16376854
>>16376846
>this was truly our Polaris Dawn™
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:34:02 UTC No. 16376857
>>16376846
>Fuck earthers, demigod war NOW
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:34:40 UTC No. 16376858
>>16376846
>At long last, after all these years
>I am become... Polaris Dawn
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:35:20 UTC No. 16376859
>>16376855
Fuck off
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:35:24 UTC No. 16376860
>>16376846
>Later, virgins
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:35:26 UTC No. 16376861
>>16376855
he is doing on purpose to bait you
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:37:24 UTC No. 16376862
>>16376846
>SNEED
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:38:35 UTC No. 16376864
>>16376846
>More like Polaris Midnight, i hope somebody got fired for that blunder
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:38:52 UTC No. 16376865
>>16376846
>After all these years, finally, Polaris dawns
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:39:03 UTC No. 16376866
>>16376846
>Two steps ahead, I am always two steps ahead
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:41:15 UTC No. 16376867
more like thermosphereflight general
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:47:17 UTC No. 16376871
>>16376867
kek gottem anon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:49:12 UTC No. 16376873
>>16376866
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:50:09 UTC No. 16376875
nothing ever happens
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:56:12 UTC No. 16376885
where can i watch the eva?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:59:17 UTC No. 16376887
>>16376866
>In space, we all weigh the same. It's time to end fatphobia.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:59:29 UTC No. 16376889
>>16376885
kissanime
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:01:07 UTC No. 16376890
>>16376889
kissanime has been dead for like half a decade lmfao
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:02:57 UTC No. 16376891
>>16376885
https://www.spacex.com/launches/mis
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:06:31 UTC No. 16376895
>>16376600
Someone needs to suggest this to him. He's autistic enough to make this happen
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:12:56 UTC No. 16376899
they missed a marketing trick not getting him to fully climb out the vehicle. the pictures would have been iconic seeing him fully out in space. Instead he was standing with his legs in the vehicle which looked sort of lame.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:15:09 UTC No. 16376901
>>16376855
Whomever did this is retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:16:39 UTC No. 16376902
>>16376846
ravioli ravioli, I can't see my home from this far away-oli
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:23:55 UTC No. 16376908
>>16376814
That's what she said
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:24:29 UTC No. 16376909
>>16376823
your dad hopped on my cock.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:25:53 UTC No. 16376910
>>16376823
They're newfags, anyone who was interested in this flight new the EVA profile well in advance and wasn't surprised. These anons are filthy tourists.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:26:51 UTC No. 16376911
>>16376899
its clear that musk was not involved with polaris. too deep in the k hole probably.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:27:34 UTC No. 16376912
>>16376899
>marketing
This was a science mission
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:27:55 UTC No. 16376913
>>16376823
SpaceX does space tourism, we get /pol/ tourism.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:29:38 UTC No. 16376914
>>16376913
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:30:14 UTC No. 16376916
Re-nationalize space. If people are eventually going to die exploring space, it should be for science, or their country, or the greater good. Not for Elon, Boeing, or McDonalds Space Burgers.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:31:27 UTC No. 16376917
>>16376912
its superficial at best. the mobility tests were mostly redundant because they had already been done on earth. it was primarily about conducting the first commercial eva, not muh sience
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:37:12 UTC No. 16376919
>>16376916
Yeah the agency that did nothing for 50 years should seize control of the company that finally started making progress
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:38:00 UTC No. 16376920
EVA tests plus ISS deorbit vehicle = hubble reboost and servicing
You heard it here first
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:38:23 UTC No. 16376921
>>16376917
Oh it wasn't about testing the spacesuits? Well if a /pol/ tourist says it, it must be true
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:38:24 UTC No. 16376922
>>16376919
unironically. how else do you better propose that we drain goyim of their life force?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:39:09 UTC No. 16376923
>>16376526
Furthest a woman has ever been from a kitchen.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:39:57 UTC No. 16376924
>>16376920
Just let the piece of shit die. In like five years starship will be able to launch a cheap glass mirror telescope for a fraction of the price. A university could do it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:40:58 UTC No. 16376925
>>16376923
There's a food prep area in the capsule
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:42:34 UTC No. 16376926
>>16376916
Normalize dying in the outer space.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:44:24 UTC No. 16376930
>>16376920
>Hubble reboots
Pointless unless they fix the failing gyroscopes
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:44:55 UTC No. 16376931
>>16376921
you suffer from a severe mental illness. i hope you get the help you need.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:48:11 UTC No. 16376934
>>16376931
Everyone here knew the mission profile, only tourists are surprised and disappointed >>16376899
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:49:53 UTC No. 16376937
>>16376924
Bring Hubble home, it belongs in a museum
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:50:36 UTC No. 16376939
>>16376934
your dad knew my cock was going down his throat. he was still surprised when i started...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:50:44 UTC No. 16376940
>>16376929
Kinda funny record to break though
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:51:40 UTC No. 16376941
>>16376924
Yeah. SpaceX wanted to do free stuff but if NASA doesn't want to, its their loss. SpaceX can do other things.
I do want SpaceX to talk to industry like NASA/NSF to see if they want to rent space telescope that SpaceX will pay/develop/build/put themselves.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:53:23 UTC No. 16376942
>>16376937
Won’t be possible until starship is operational and has free mission slots, no other vehicle has the capability to do it. Will that happen before it deorbits?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:55:16 UTC No. 16376943
>>16376942
why are you such a doomer?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:59:03 UTC No. 16376946
>>16376943
FAA niggers
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:16:47 UTC No. 16376960
>>16376941
SpaceX probably won't do that sort of thing themselves, but they may be compelled to shrink their margin for something exceptionally cool. Consider a space telescope on starship. Rolled steel body, ground telescope mirror from the UoA mirror lab, and several dozen cheapo cubesats gyros. Heavy stock parts slapped together with redundancy and sent on one starship launch. The Harvard astronomy department could afford this.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:17:35 UTC No. 16376963
>>16376846
I could sure go for a Monster Energy Ultra right about now!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:17:38 UTC No. 16376965
>>16376837
There is nothing genuinely 'commercial' or 'private' in SpaceX. Everything emanates from NASA or defense contracts. Except for a minority of civilian sat launches, which are themselves transitively public in some form.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:17:48 UTC No. 16376966
>>16376948
Thanks. This was my favorite part. Mind blowing
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:18:54 UTC No. 16376967
>>16376948
Absolute kino, gobbless SpaceX. It was less kino the first time I saw it because Xitter shat the bed and I had to watch it with Clear in the corner. It's difficult to take monumentous occasions seriously when there's an autistic anime girl in my peripheral vision.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:19:07 UTC No. 16376968
>>16376965
What is Starlink
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:20:21 UTC No. 16376969
>>16376960
>several dozen cheapo cubesats gyros
You would need massive reaction wheels to turn a starship around. Nothing cheap about that.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:21:01 UTC No. 16376970
Starship is going to change everything, isn't it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:23:53 UTC No. 16376975
>>16376968
A pentagon program to provide comms for spies operating in enemy countries and to guide/stream live from drones.
It's a glowpeople dual purpose program.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:24:01 UTC No. 16376976
And Io, do I see my father
And Io, do I see my mother
And my sisters and my brothers
And the line of my people,
Back to the beginning...
And Io, they do call me,
In the halls of Valhalla
Where the brave may live forever!"
Many brave warriors
chanted such a prayer
before battles that raged
In times untold.
Their stories are gone
lost in histories depths,
to never be heard again
except as tales from the old.
But try as you may
to find such valor now,
It just doesn't exist
in the world today.
Heroes are myth,
brought from out of a book.
When someone fights against evil
they get nary a second look.
So just remember a time,
lost in the mist.
And remember to treat
All brave men today,
as the heroes they are.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:26:21 UTC No. 16376982
>>16376969
No you would launch the telescope in a starship. Plans to integrate with the vehicle have a fundamental misunderstanding of what the architecture represents
>>16376970
Yes
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:28:03 UTC No. 16376985
>>16376975
Please, just go back you subhuman /pol/mutts.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:29:19 UTC No. 16376986
>>16376975
Go back to wherever you blew in from, fag.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:37:27 UTC No. 16376990
>>16376985
>>16376986
Bo ho
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:38:03 UTC No. 16376992
>>16376975
Go back the entire site hates /pol/ niggers
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:40:44 UTC No. 16376997
>>16376975
Shithole mindset produces a shithole life, homie. Aspire to be something greater than your current mental situation.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:41:17 UTC No. 16377001
>>16376751
newfag
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:42:55 UTC No. 16377003
>>16376751
That thing is a fucking MONSTER.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:43:47 UTC No. 16377005
>>16377003
It is NECESSARY. You can't build cities in space with small rockets.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:44:25 UTC No. 16377006
>>16376751
>someone actually fell for it
To be this new...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:45:41 UTC No. 16377009
>bump limit reached
baking a new thread, prepare to switch
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:47:17 UTC No. 16377013
>>16377005
How many smaller missions can fit into that beast per trip? Holy shit that thing is insane if you think about it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:48:05 UTC No. 16377014
>>16377009
NO YOU STUPID NIGGER WE STAGE AT PAGE 10 OR IMAGE LIMIT
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:48:57 UTC No. 16377016
>>16377014
Calm down. There are a bunch of new people here
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:48:59 UTC No. 16377018
>>16377009
We will all report it as spam if you do. This IS a threat.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:49:22 UTC No. 16377019
Ahhh~
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:50:03 UTC No. 16377020
Like, Starship will fundamentally change the way stuff is designed, no more autistically small and horrifically expensive modules etc, just chuck whatever the fuck into that flying warehouse and you're good to go.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:55:54 UTC No. 16377027
>>16377016
>being this new
true oldtroons would reply to the bait
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:56:07 UTC No. 16377030
ah, yes, """space""" walk
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:07:13 UTC No. 16377045
>>16377020
Nah we will still optimize the fuck out of probes
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:07:50 UTC No. 16377046
>>16377020
We are going to image exoplanets in our lifetime. Carry up several 8m mirrors with basic controls and organize them in orbit to make a 1km wide mirror for cheaper than the hubble
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:09:14 UTC No. 16377049
>>16377046
Pic
>>16377045
Only JPL because they can't do anything else. Imagine mass optimizing 100 tons kek
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:09:48 UTC No. 16377050
>>16377045
There are huge benefits to being able to fit retarded amount of quickly and cheaply built shit into a ship, anon.
>>16377046
Micro tetris autism means months and years of painstaking design and materials and shit to make shit simply fit and lite, with a rocket powered warehouse you can afford to do insane shit.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:14:04 UTC No. 16377055
>>16377049
>>16377050
Sure early on you may just want fast and hard but eventually you are going to be sending a single probe somewhere and the eggheads are going to want every instrument possible on it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:14:53 UTC No. 16377056
>>16377049
Yes but that's what makes a retard strong and big ship like Starship so cool, anon, you can do stupidly cool previously impossible projects for "cheap", we're on the edge of the age of MASS.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:15:31 UTC No. 16377057
>>16377049
>pic
God I want to see an exoplanet so fucking bad
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:16:18 UTC No. 16377059
>>16377055
Yeah of course you'll have people who are hyper economic about the stuff they send up but Starship opens a new chapter of choices where if you want to build fuckhuge stuff you can do fuckhuge stuff now, it just changes the landscape completely.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:18:00 UTC No. 16377061
>>16377046
Interferometry requires sub wavelength accuracy between telescopes. There is no way you can do that with multiple optical satellites
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:18:49 UTC No. 16377062
>>16377059
Im not arguing with that but mass optimization isn't going away and starship is big but it isn't containership big yet.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:19:36 UTC No. 16377066
>>16377062
shut the fuck up.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:20:43 UTC No. 16377067
>>16377062
No offense man but compared to everything else, Starship is a fucking straight up freight train.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:20:58 UTC No. 16377068
>>16377066
No I don't think I will.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:21:39 UTC No. 16377069
>>16377062
>the ship has to be exactly like my scifi fantasies if its going to build stuff in orbit because im limited by my own imagination and know nothing about real space operations
Shut up man
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:23:26 UTC No. 16377072
>>16377069
Used to be perplexed in scifi how they got all that mass up there, turns out the answer is just fuckhuge cheap to operate fatass ships, kek.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:24:51 UTC No. 16377075
>>16377067
Yes compared to the tiny fucking shit we put up right now. That doesn't mean its big enough that we will all of a sudden stop caring about being efficient with payloads.We are going to get bigger ambitions the second starship is operational and that is going to make it limited in payload almost immediately.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:26:14 UTC No. 16377078
Reminder that it is Felonious Moskal Huskrats fault Starship isnt in space right now because he didnt submit his documentation right after IFT-4
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:26:42 UTC No. 16377081
>>16377062
The cool thing about having a giant fatass cheap ship is you can actually quickly have assembly facilities in orbit or on the moon and just continuously send up loads of material and component shit on the cheap.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:28:13 UTC No. 16377084
>>16377081
It takes ~15 Starships for just one to go to another astronomical body.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:28:35 UTC No. 16377085
>>16377075
"The cost of sending a kilogram of payload to orbit with SpaceX's Starship in an expendable configuration is estimated to be around $500."
Anon, the landscape is changing. The way you think about slinging cargo into orbit is changing.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:29:59 UTC No. 16377091
Nobody is going to spend years autistically optimizing shit when it's like $500 per kg. Dumb and huge, that's the immediate future.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:30:19 UTC No. 16377093
>>16377085
>expendable configuration
>no greentext for a quote
Shut up you retard get the fuck out of this general
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:31:19 UTC No. 16377094
>>16377093
If it's $500 per kg, what will you send into orbit, anon?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:31:20 UTC No. 16377095
>>16377091
And thats the EXPENDABLE configuration that anon is blatantly mischaracterizing what the future will be. Ask him how much reusable configuration is per kg
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:32:34 UTC No. 16377097
>>16377087
Requires long exposure I believe? The ship is also always moving and adjusting so its likely that its not stable enough I guess. Idk Im not a photographer
>>16377094
Check the expendable config nigger
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:33:07 UTC No. 16377098
>>16377095
Hope the immediate future isn't just rich bored retards sending their favourite sports cars and shit up there.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:33:36 UTC No. 16377099
>>16377097
Reusable config**** your retardation is seeping out and infecting others.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:34:33 UTC No. 16377101
If KSP has taught me anything, it's that you optimize your payload no matter how big your rocket.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4L
Autistic 1000x folded designs are optimal.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:35:12 UTC No. 16377106
>>16377101
It's $250 per kg in reusable config, who cares, man.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:35:13 UTC No. 16377107
>>16377087
You can't see stars in space. Because eh,, and uhm..
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:36:14 UTC No. 16377109
>the virgin terminal autist spending years optimizing
>the chad sending up tonnes at $250 per kg on a week's notice
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:36:31 UTC No. 16377111
>>16377069
I'm sorry you can't understand the simple fact that we won't abandon mass optimization just because we have higher payload capacity. An average cargo ship on the ocean today has the payload capacity of about 1,650 Starships. The Starship simply isn't large enough to abandon mass optimization nor would it be smart to do so.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:36:32 UTC No. 16377112
>>16377101
if you were a girl i would bust my nut down your throat for being such a stupid whore.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:37:03 UTC No. 16377113
>>16377075
It's a total paradigm shift. The JWST was 6 fucking tons. 6 out of 250. You could go 40x bigger. Mass optimization is over
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:37:40 UTC No. 16377115
>>16377113
>Mass optimization is over
Guaranteed to trigger the living fuck out of autists.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:40:06 UTC No. 16377119
>>16377085
I don't think you understand. Even with the cost dropping and capacity increasing we are still going to put a fuckhuge amount of volume into space. That means every kg will still be important.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:41:52 UTC No. 16377120
>>16376542
>Okay so now how will the media will turn this into an "Elon Musk failure"?
The only coverage it gets is from people who look for it and specialty YouTube channels.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:42:21 UTC No. 16377121
>>16377119
It'll of course be important but not "suddenly extend project by 6 months because we need to hyper autistically save 10kg at a cost of 2 Billion in material R&D" type of bullshit that's been the norm as we knew it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:43:04 UTC No. 16377122
>>16377106
>>16377112
Payloads will always be space-optimized, we could have a functioning space elevator and you're still going to carefully pack your payload for the trip up.
You are wrong.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:44:22 UTC No. 16377123
>>16377113
And the JWST is small. Our capabilities are going up and our demand is going to keep right up with it. Mass optimization is never going away, go do some time in naval, trucking or aviation.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:44:38 UTC No. 16377124
>>16377122
Prepare your autism because the entire discipline of space engineering is going to change very suddenly.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:45:12 UTC No. 16377126
>>16377123
This
>>16377124
Prepare your mouth for deez nuts
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:45:40 UTC No. 16377127
>>16377121
Sure but its also not going to suddenly use cast iron tools because thats what is on hand. Mass optimization isn't going away.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:46:19 UTC No. 16377128
>>16376313
>or house homeless veterans
I assure you there's a dozen well-funded programs to do this, and just because the bum on the corner begging for change is wearing tiger-stripe camo pants this does not make him a real veteran, just a POS smart enough to know idiots like you will fall for it, retard
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:47:06 UTC No. 16377130
>>16377126
>>16377123
It'll change in the sense where you move up from being hyper expensively autistic about grams and kilograms into tonnes, that's not a small change to the way you approach design and budget in space projects.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:47:43 UTC No. 16377131
I'm glad Muskoid will be able to send thousands of pounds of mexican welders into space, but I really wish he picked a better name for his rocket. Starship? Really? Falcon and Dragon are awesome names, but for his life's work he couldn't come up with a better name than starship? Combined with his electric car obsession and retarded looking space suits, I've realized he has no taste at all. I hope a light space industry develops so future astronauts and colonists don't have to see his retardation every day in their various living environments or miscellaneous tools.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:47:57 UTC No. 16377133
>>16377130
Just a scaling issue
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:48:57 UTC No. 16377135
>>16377127
>Mass optimization isn't going away.
Absolutely not, but you also won't be spending ages of project time and millions in capital dedicated to saving grams and kilograms anymore.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:49:59 UTC No. 16377137
>>16377111
Do you seriously think we're going to machine a 100 tons rover out of a single block of aluminum?? Do you think we will document every microgram, literally 10^-14 of the payload like other rovers? I'm not saying we can stop caring. Are you just not aware of HOW mass optimized this shit is?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:50:30 UTC No. 16377139
>>16377131
I think it's a very fitting name.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:52:30 UTC No. 16377140
>>16377130
Nope its not hoing to switch from kg to tons, lighter materials are still going to be prioritized because masd is money. The only difference is that super expensive methods wont be chosen over cheaper methods.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:53:29 UTC No. 16377142
>>16377137
It must be some kind of autism thing, I don't think he understands that maximizing weight efficiency to extreme degrees that you traditionally would do in space related logistics costs a fucking absolute fortune compared to Starships "cheap" shipping cost and changes the way you do things entirely overnight.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:53:30 UTC No. 16377143
>>16376627
>>16376545
>>16376923
everyday we stray further from god's light
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:56:54 UTC No. 16377148
>>16377140
Let me paint a scenario to help me get my point across.
A 1 tonne mirror costs $250 000,00 to ship via Starship, or you could redesign the mirror to have the same volume but half the weight, which will cost $26 000 000,00, the changes to the mirror will take two years, minimum.
What option will your boss take?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:57:06 UTC No. 16377150
>>16377137
Was that my argument? Also that is still mission dependent. Who is to say we dont have a 100 ton probe packed with probes going to an out of human reach celestial body? Starships aren't unlimited and 100 tons gets small really quickly if you do things at scale.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:57:22 UTC No. 16377151
Anons are arguing because they define "mass optimization" differently than one another and can't realize they're saying two different things.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:03:35 UTC No. 16377162
>>16377148
And what aren't you shipping because that mirror is 1 ton? What if both elements are critical but you only have the 1 starship? What if you are just doing a rideshare on a SpaceX mission and your alloted mass isn't enough? What if you need to ship 200 of them and the cost of 2 starships isn't worth it? What happens when all the starships are full and they fill up faster than they cab be made? I can keep going
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:06:25 UTC No. 16377165
>>16377162
Oh so you literally don't understand. That's fine. Ruminate for a bit before posting again please
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:14:46 UTC No. 16377172
>>16376620
>GEMINI ON A REDSTONE ROCKET
You are of retardism. Go back to /pol/ aka reddit.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:15:04 UTC No. 16377174
>>16377107
Starlight is dim and requires long exposure to see, especially when the sun which is far brighter it makes short exposure just not viable for star images. And long exposure also isnt viable since the ISS always moves so fast and orbits the Earth quickly, its extremely difficult to train the camera long enough to see shit. Thats why we have massive space telescopes so that we can easily keep them trained on a certain star and they gather enough light with their wide diameter lens vs a normal cam.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:20:29 UTC No. 16377182
>>16376965
> a privately owned company fulfilling defense contracts isn't commercial or private
You have brain damage.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:29:22 UTC No. 16377189
>>16377111
As we know, every fixture and fitting on cargo shits is autistically designed with advanced composites and exotic alloys to save every gram possible.
Wait no, that's bullshit.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:33:44 UTC No. 16377194
>>16376965
>Everything emanates from NASA or defense contracts.
>Everything
Less than half their launches are government launches and less than half their revenue is from launches.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:33:56 UTC No. 16377195
>>16377189
You do pack things in to make sure every ounce counts, because you're paying to ship those items and you want each trip to carry the maximum possible payload.
You and anon have been arguing past one another for 10+ posts, lol. You both are correct in what you are saying, and they are not mutually exclusive points.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:34:53 UTC No. 16377197
>>16377072
sci-fi settings always have the one widespread cheap ship that does its job
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:37:49 UTC No. 16377202
>>16377162
>What happens when all the starships are full and they fill up faster than they cab be made?
>He doesn't know
Falcon 9 already cleared up the launch market and Starship will launch 10x more, be 10x faster to produce, and have 10x faster turnaround. Even if JPL manages to shit out ten full Starship launches worth of probe a year, it'll be a footnote against starlink and Mars cargo launches
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:39:28 UTC No. 16377204
The amount of haters on YouTube is insane. Do these people just hate everything? Space is the one thing, the ONE THING the Jews haven't ruined, the one thing we can't exploit for money and pointless wars, and they're AGAINST it? What the fuck? Why?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:39:31 UTC No. 16377205
>>16377202
>Falcon 9 already cleared up the launch market
This. The reason falcon heavy gets used so infrequently is because there’s too little market for it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:39:35 UTC No. 16377206
>>16375783
>space walk
>you don't walk, just float
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:40:59 UTC No. 16377209
>>16377204
They were told to. Just ignore and move on
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:41:49 UTC No. 16377210
>>16377087
>>16377097
>what is exposure
Do you want the foreground objects that have an apparent brightness thousands of times greater than the stars to have details or just be giant overexposed blobs?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:43:06 UTC No. 16377212
>>16377206
>float
No buoyancy
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:53:05 UTC No. 16377225
>>16376155
It's called faith
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:53:53 UTC No. 16377226
>>16376155
business casual
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:55:01 UTC No. 16377229
>>16376426
How can you face this absolute darkness a without panicking instantly? We humans are truly creatures of light...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:56:54 UTC No. 16377231
>>16377214
When Falcon 9 lands on a droneship it can manage about the same payload to Starlink's initial injection orbit as Endeavour could when it launched with a super-lightweight external tank. Back in the late seventies NASA was planning to have a fleet of four orbiters operating with a two week turnaround, for 96 total Shuttle launches per year. Falcon 9 managed 96 launches exactly in 2023.
Falcon 9 IS the good space shuttle. Starship is more like a real life Boeing Space Freighter.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:57:46 UTC No. 16377232
>>16377229
The terminator is probably still visible to the left in his field of view as well as the stars.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:01:56 UTC No. 16377237
>>16376155
I'm glad you asked!!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:02:15 UTC No. 16377238
You just know that the first Mars Starships will be named after Star Trek ships
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:03:15 UTC No. 16377242
>>16377214
but why
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:04:16 UTC No. 16377244
>>16377238
I remember Elon mentioning years ago that "Heart of Gold" was going to be the name of one of the first Mars ships. The man draws references from more than one fandom.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:05:17 UTC No. 16377246
>>16377204
Don't go to reddit lmao. The bots are having a meltdown.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:06:06 UTC No. 16377249
>>16377244
Starship Enterprise
Starship Nostromo
Starship 42
Starship Bebop
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:10:36 UTC No. 16377254
>there are only 11 NASA EVA suits
Holy shit I understand the significance of Polaris Dawn now. They designed these things to be mass produced and they worked
>>16377249
>Bebop
I wouldn't be mad
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:11:55 UTC No. 16377255
>>16376329
Wait, THAT thing is Earth? I don't like it. Get rid of it.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:14:07 UTC No. 16377256
>>16377249
SS Valley Forge
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:16:15 UTC No. 16377259
The Space Shuttles had great names
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:18:52 UTC No. 16377264
>>16377259
"Endeavour" is low energy, imagine calling yor ship "an attempt"
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:19:03 UTC No. 16377265
>>16377260
No more or less than everyone else, which is to say extremely fucked
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:23:08 UTC No. 16377270
>>16377259
"ESS TEE ESS"
fuck off
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:23:08 UTC No. 16377271
>>16377260
Elon himself says Mars is probably over if she wins.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:23:53 UTC No. 16377272
>>16377260
Nothing will change from its current situation idiot. Doing this every fucking day makes me less inclined to vote at all. Go back to /pol/ and shill there.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:24:25 UTC No. 16377274
>>16377260
Probably not very different than what happens now. You'd have to have a majority in both houses that really want to fuck SpaceX over before any real damage was possible. SpaceX is also indispensable in many ways at this point.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:24:37 UTC No. 16377275
>>16377260
Proper fucked
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:26:02 UTC No. 16377276
>>16377260
Same thing that’s happening now. They’re getting launch approval slow rolled, lawfare, threats from government employees. With orangemanbad commercial space hummed along. Not because he gave a shit about space, but because he could show up for a photo op when cool shit happened. Everyone else is too busy selling us out to the lowest bidder to care about space and since Elon is on the naughty list he gets rusty wheels instead of greased ones.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:27:08 UTC No. 16377279
>>16377254
>People think I'm joking when I say I'm too tall to be an astronaut
Those suits gatekeep in more ways than one
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:29:16 UTC No. 16377283
>>16377260
>artemis canceled
>budget cuts for space programs
>wealth tax
>unrealized capital gains tax
>food price controls
>end of ISS
>mars no longer in sight
Only darkess awaits. Darker than anything Jared saw when he stuck his head out.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:31:10 UTC No. 16377284
>>16377283
>tourist thinks cancelling artemis and ISS dying are bad
youre not convincing anyone.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:37:04 UTC No. 16377288
>>16377284
>everyone has to share my opinions
kill yourself lefty
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:38:25 UTC No. 16377291
>>16377284
Women can not lead men, period.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:39:19 UTC No. 16377294
>>16377291
>>16377288
>immediatly get political and assume my leaning
ywngts
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:44:52 UTC No. 16377298
>>16376846
>man, i wish i was on the moon
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:47:14 UTC No. 16377300
>>16377298
The only response made by an /sfg/ regular.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:47:46 UTC No. 16377301
>>16377291
this
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:51:13 UTC No. 16377305
>>16377291
Concerning. That must be why Argentina won the Falklands war.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:51:59 UTC No. 16377307
>>16376846
>Holy shit it's actually flat!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:00:19 UTC No. 16377319
>>16377312
dragon needs better cameras
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:01:31 UTC No. 16377322
>>16377312
film vs digital
soul vs soulless
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:02:25 UTC No. 16377324
>>16377322
Once Starship comes online it'll become economically feasible to fly up 1960s-era film cameras again.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:05:38 UTC No. 16377328
>>16377322
>film vs digital
This. Even the shittiest throwaway 110 camera back in the day was equivalent to something like 20 megapixels.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:08:26 UTC No. 16377330
>>16377260
1) Harris FCC said Starlink is a monopoly. They will break Starlink from SpaceX.
2) Endless regulatory delays for Starship
3) SpaceX will be subject to dozens more lawsuits by her admin
4) SpaceX wont be allowed to compete
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:09:27 UTC No. 16377331
>>16377283
>wealth tax
>unrealized capital gains tax
Those will kill SpaceX unironically if they were passed. Musk will have to sell his shares in Tesla/SpaceX
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:12:21 UTC No. 16377337
>>16377283
>unrealized capital gains tax
this is the most stupid tax ever fuck you americans for ever thinking up of that one
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:13:38 UTC No. 16377341
>>16377337
Government officials are pretty clear that they're not Americans and feel nothing but contempt for Americans
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:16:59 UTC No. 16377343
>>16377337
idk if it's gonna go through. would be bad for congressional stock portfolios
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:18:00 UTC No. 16377346
>>16377337
The so called "americans" pushing this dont respect american constitutions nor the state
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:18:57 UTC No. 16377349
>>16377337
These people aren't Americans, they're something else. Something evil.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:31:09 UTC No. 16377358
Butch & Suni talk and answer some questions tomorrow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvR
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:38:24 UTC No. 16377367
>>16376538
You can but you need velcro or magnets or something else to provide a "downward" force. Bungee cords work fine.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:52:06 UTC No. 16377381
>>16377322
This, and film still has much better dynamic range than digital. Saturn V launch slowmo is the best rocket porn
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:53:48 UTC No. 16377384
Ukraine and the disputed holy land
take ur space cash
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:58:11 UTC No. 16377388
>>16377381
SpaceX should film the next Starship launch, instead of simply recording it digitally.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:15:39 UTC No. 16377404
>>16377330
I've been saying for ages that Starlink should be a seperate company, spacex still gets the money cause no-one else can launch as many as they need to keep everything going.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:22:21 UTC No. 16377413
Looked fake as fuck.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:27:06 UTC No. 16377420
>>16377413
Is it the lack of atmospheric effects on the lighting that makes it look fake?
Small models and CGI will usually not have atmosphereic effects on lighting
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:28:33 UTC No. 16377422
Hearing couple rumors of delayed New Glenn maiden launch, the worst one goes to April 2025....
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:42:03 UTC No. 16377443
>>16377422
source?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:44:45 UTC No. 16377448
FAA is secretly delaying starship FT5 to be on the same day as new Glenn for peak kino
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:54:04 UTC No. 16377455
The latest brain dead take
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:55:14 UTC No. 16377456
>>16376975
kek, this anon must be right over the fucking target to cause this much kvetching
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:59:24 UTC No. 16377465
>>16377455
arent the FAA an oversight branch of the Us government?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:00:58 UTC No. 16377468
>>16376580
It's been done
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:03:45 UTC No. 16377469
How much did he pay for the chance?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:03:46 UTC No. 16377470
General is unusable until this happening is over.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:10:08 UTC No. 16377480
>>16377469
how much did your dad pay to blow me? same question.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:16:42 UTC No. 16377489
>>16377479
id rather rotate the city in orbit, where we dont have to mine a massive pit for the cities
or, use the preexisting lava tunnels as natural protection for our lunar habitation.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:17:58 UTC No. 16377491
>>16377172
How about you go back, who can't even remember thundercunts infamous "F9 is basically a redstone rocket that runs on methane".
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:31:28 UTC No. 16377506
>>16376816
W-would..
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:39:34 UTC No. 16377517
>>16377479
The effects of gravity plus centrifugal gravity are too cool
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:43:27 UTC No. 16377521
>>16377517
>not a giant cone
Missed opportunity
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:46:07 UTC No. 16377524
>>16376948
sent the webm ro dad, he sent back this
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/
Future polaris missions are going to be sick. I want to see a modern SpaceX MMU catch some Boeing junk.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:51:53 UTC No. 16377530
Due to the presence of water and heat from the light tube, you'd get clouds. I think the top few levels could function like a greenhouse, but without any enclosure. Just let the heat and water rise on its own.
>>16377489
You can sort of tell from the colors, it's in a partially excavated and backfilled crater. You'd want the housing around the rotor city anchored to something solid
>>16377521
Shaping the station to the parabola of gravity means that the gravity is different at every altitude. I don't think that's practical.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:52:31 UTC No. 16377532
>wake up
>check comments
>billionaire joy ride on tax payer funded rocket
at this point people have to be baiting
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:54:49 UTC No. 16377534
>>16377465
What they're saying is for 20 years ending next year private astronaut safety regulation has been forbidden by an act of Congress.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:55:10 UTC No. 16377535
>>16377532
Not baiting, just ignorant and proud of it
There is a new version of redneck that doesn't have a name yet because they're white collar retards
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:58:02 UTC No. 16377541
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:59:04 UTC No. 16377543
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:00:05 UTC No. 16377545
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:00:08 UTC No. 16377546
>>16377543
>tfw everyone has already shit at least once
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:00:59 UTC No. 16377548
>>16377543
5 seconds
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:03:05 UTC No. 16377554
>>16377546
Has anyone measured the isp of the shitter yet
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:04:15 UTC No. 16377555
>>16375672
What is the best book about Mars? No Robert Zubrin books and no fiction books.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:14:04 UTC No. 16377570
>>16377312
ffs I wanted to search for the top left photo, but all I got was porno
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:14:47 UTC No. 16377572
>>16377546
>According to legend, Apollo 12 astronaut Alan Bean was deeply unimpressed with the adhesive bag-based waste collection system that had been designed for the lunar missions, so he had the flight surgeons put him on a "low-residue diet" and downed a heroic dose of Imodium before the launch that allowed him to not shit for eight straight days.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:24:16 UTC No. 16377582
>>16377572
...and upon returning, his massive space grogan was bronzed an put in the esoteric wing of the Smithsonian
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:27:35 UTC No. 16377588
>>16377586
cool
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:30:52 UTC No. 16377593
>>16377572
>eight straight days.
My record is seven
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:34:01 UTC No. 16377597
>>16377589
>they went the entire 3.5 minute video without mentioning musk
I'm impressed.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:35:12 UTC No. 16377601
>>16377555
Probably the Viking lander photos
https://www.abebooks.com/book-searc
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:41:19 UTC No. 16377611
>>16377570
Seems misattributed.
https://images.nasa.gov/search?q=Ge
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:41:24 UTC No. 16377612
>>16377555
How To Industrialize Mars: A Strategy For Self-Sufficiency: How To Settle A Lethal Vacuum In 400 Easy Steps
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:48:45 UTC No. 16377616
>>16377274
>Probably not very different than what happens now.
>>16377272
>Nothing will change from its current situation idiot.
Is there a name for this kind of complacency?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:49:55 UTC No. 16377619
brilliant pebbles
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:53:18 UTC No. 16377623
>>16377589
>end of the video
>two more missions
>one of which could be to orbit the moon
speculation or an inside scoop?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:59:28 UTC No. 16377629
>>16377623
would need falcon heavy and an improved dragon service module and a better heat shield (orion heat shield.jpg)
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:02:05 UTC No. 16377630
>>16377629
sounds easy
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:02:49 UTC No. 16377631
>>16377629
>better heat shield
Or you just decelerate, which spacex is notoriously good at
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:03:07 UTC No. 16377632
>>16377616
It's called being grounded and not being a schizo who yells from the rooftops that this is the most important elections of our lives.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:07:31 UTC No. 16377634
>>16377555
i keep meaning to read the book about the Mars exploration rovers by Steve Squyres - i've heard it's pretty good
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:08:22 UTC No. 16377635
>>16377612
when i see things like this i cant imagine how it will work with actual people living there. it takes one nutcase to poke a hole in the sheet and then you are all dead.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:15:08 UTC No. 16377640
>>16377202
>>16377205
Because of price and momentum. That is going to change
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:20:01 UTC No. 16377647
>>16376816
her hair's back to normal
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:20:46 UTC No. 16377648
>>16376778
everyone laugh at the newfag frogposter
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:21:37 UTC No. 16377650
>>16377635
I can’t imagine cruise ships working with actual people on board. All it takes is one nutcase drilling a hole in the hull and you’re all dead.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:27:00 UTC No. 16377655
>>16377322
Digital shouldn’t be dismissed entirely, but yeah a good 35mm has sovl. Imagine matthew dominick with a 35mm camera on artemis missions. He could capture some of the most iconic photos in history
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:27:16 UTC No. 16377656
>>16377635
Don't want to get too off topic, but we're actually in a very strange period of history where nutcases are able to do stuff like that instead of being locked up in an asylum.
If an accident did happen though, it would probably be fine. The leakage due to a hole of a given size gets less significant as volume goes up, and you're talking about a 400m ceiling with 50~70 acres of plastic sky delivered per starship. ETFE is also very easily field welded. You could have systems that detect a hole and alert some version of a fire department. Depending on severity, it may not even alert the people nearby that there's any danger, because there isn't. It isn't inconceivable that something shithead teenagers do a century from now is dare each other to slice a hole big enough to stick your head through, where the air rushing around you is enough to not explode or suffocate. ETFE doesn't really rip, and you can add fibers to make it rip even less.
>>16377650
There's really no analogy for one crazy guy being able to suffocate an entire country
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:28:14 UTC No. 16377659
>>16377586
Is the audio fucked up or just me?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:28:35 UTC No. 16377660
>>16376754
>>16376764
>>16376778
oh nononono....
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:45:38 UTC No. 16377666
dragon will have to fill the role of manned workhorse until starship takes over in 15 years
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:50:00 UTC No. 16377670
How retarded am I?
We use a sustainable sandblaster to mine asteroids. The sand is blasted onto the asteroid, and all the kicked up dust and shit is caught by funnels, sucked into the machine, and any valuable metals we want are filtered by the magnet. Everything else is reused in the sandblaster.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:51:51 UTC No. 16377671
>>16377670
You'd need a way to extract the useful materials immediately and then recirculate them into the sand blaster, which isn't something that can be done with current tech and know-how. A plasma drill would probably be more suitable here.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:51:59 UTC No. 16377672
>>16377670
Isn't this more or less what OSIRIS-Rex did to Bennu?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:02:05 UTC No. 16377680
New thred when
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:02:25 UTC No. 16377681
>>16377656
i guess my point is how fragile a system that can keep you alive on another planet is. especially if you intend to keep it working for generations. aeroplanes get repaired and maintained in the hangar, and even the best get thrown away eventually. running a system to keep a colony alive on mars is like flying a plane for a century non stop and doing the repairs mid air with emergency replacement parts arriving 3 months after you order them in the very best case. And thats understating the problem.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:05:56 UTC No. 16377683
>>16377680
when image limit or page 10 is reached
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:09:03 UTC No. 16377685
>>16377670
you can't suck something in vacuum
>>16377672
yes, with pressurised gas
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:14:50 UTC No. 16377687
>>16377685
Starliner sucks in a vacuum.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:15:54 UTC No. 16377689
>>16377681
Yeah it's sort of troubling to think about, but not particularly different to what's happening right now on Earth. Technology continuing to work is the reason 95% of people are alive right now. It's easy to pretend that isn't the case because you have air and water and some impression that animals and plants can be food, but a generalized technological collapse on either planet would kill just about everyone. That's just where we are with technology now.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:17:35 UTC No. 16377692
>>16377337
i dont even understand the concept, what is their rational behind it?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:19:22 UTC No. 16377693
>>16377692
"Give us your fucking money" is the rationale. I'm not sure how "unrealized gains" (money I didn't make?) qualifies as taxable.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:19:59 UTC No. 16377694
>>16377670
So by "valuable metals" you mean iron and basically nothing else?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:20:12 UTC No. 16377695
>>16377692
The wealthy finance their day to day lives without income by borrowing against unrealized capital gains, aka the current "value" of their investments
This particular financial maneuver avoids ever having to pay taxes on the value of those gains
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:21:51 UTC No. 16377697
>>16377694
The most valuable thing in asteroids is water, actually.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:28:17 UTC No. 16377699
>>16377632
Based
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:31:07 UTC No. 16377700
>>16377670
>asteroid mining
>blasting while stationary
>vacuum in space
>magnetic materials only
>How retarded am I?
anon I'm afraid I have bad news
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:47:48 UTC No. 16377720
what are Mars-bound Starships going to do with the passenger's pee and poop? Is it going to be dumped into space along the way Indian truckdriver style or will it be saved and brought down to the surface? If so what can be done with it? Anything good?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:50:43 UTC No. 16377722
>>16377720
You'll want to keep it. Food and water will serve as valuable radiation shielding and that'll need to be replaced as it's depleted. There's also the matter of your destination having very little biomass
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:55:52 UTC No. 16377730
>>16377720
save it for the pisslocks
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:58:44 UTC No. 16377733
My love for Space Exploration Technologies Corporation knows no bounds
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:58:50 UTC No. 16377734
>>16376778
pol tourists out
unless you're poststamp anon and shitposting
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:58:57 UTC No. 16377735
Elon Musk is A Disgusting Loser,
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:00:11 UTC No. 16377738
>>16377733
>>16377735
I agree with both
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:00:17 UTC No. 16377739
>>16377720
Saved for the pisslocks and the solids will help me film Septic 5 on Mars
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:01:04 UTC No. 16377740
>>16376846
>We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:01:23 UTC No. 16377741
>>16377720
>haha hi Elon
>so I was at burning man last year-
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:01:29 UTC No. 16377742
>>16377738
Same
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:02:32 UTC No. 16377744
>>16377720
fertilizer
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:02:39 UTC No. 16377745
this shit is fake
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Xm
whats up with that stanky arm? looks like a thunderbirds puppet.
you are welcome to discuss this fake and gay thing itt >>16377728
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:03:53 UTC No. 16377747
>>16377733
I always forget that’s their real name
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:04:40 UTC No. 16377748
>>16377745
you can tell it's fake because it looks so real.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:04:52 UTC No. 16377749
>>16377744
back to /pol/ you go
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:05:05 UTC No. 16377751
>>16377745
youre posts may be better enjoyed by others on >>>/pol/ and >>>/x/
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:06:08 UTC No. 16377754
>>16377745
Well guys, if a regular /sci/ schizophrenic says it's fake it must be. We in /sfg/ humbly apologize, and thank you for your continuing to allow our humble general to wade through your flat earth, vaccine, and race science threads
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:06:37 UTC No. 16377755
I can’t wait to see HLS Moonship in its full glory, it will be KINO
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:09:22 UTC No. 16377758
>>16377749
>suggest practical use for feces
>get told to gb2 /pol/
deranged
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:09:58 UTC No. 16377759
>>16377755
The Moon doesn’t belong the “the world,” it belongs to the United States of America.
Drop old HLSs on Chinese hardware. Land near the ILRS base and bulldoze it. Commies are NOT WELCOME on our satellite
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:14:02 UTC No. 16377765
>>16377748
does it look real though? it doesnt look very real. its way cheaper to use wires and green screen and fool all the onions nasacucks.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:18:18 UTC No. 16377771
>>16377745
yeah
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:18:51 UTC No. 16377772
>>16377758
Yeah idk what anon meant by that, must be a broken bot. Fertilizer will be required to grow plants on Mars.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:19:06 UTC No. 16377773
>>16377758
oh shit i mean to reply to >>16377745
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:20:09 UTC No. 16377774
>>16377772
no i mean to tell the "space is fake" schizo to go back to pol
i misclicked i guess
sorry
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:21:39 UTC No. 16377775
>>16377774
Next time don't give it a (you) and just report it as "extremely low quality" instead.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:21:51 UTC No. 16377776
>>16377774
im not saying space is fake, im saying this "space walk" looks like greenscreen and wires like thunderbirds puppets.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:24:16 UTC No. 16377779
How did NASA become synonymous with having a good PC?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:24:52 UTC No. 16377780
>>16377776
this is somehow even more retarded
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:26:25 UTC No. 16377782
>>16377780
It's a fair observation, the spacewalk looked a bit surreal.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:27:19 UTC No. 16377783
>>16377779
Nasa is full of smart people so people just assume they use super computers instead of 20 year old technology they are afraid to get rid of.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:31:21 UTC No. 16377789
>>16377779
Normies think they model the universe on hyper quantum computers the size of skyscrapers.
Ironic because I associate NASA with slide rulers and analog magic
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:31:36 UTC No. 16377791
>>16377780
its a flatcel trying to seem more reasonable by suggesting that no just this one specific mission was fake, and then he would eventually expand outward to being a full blown moon landing denier. they always do stupid shit like this. as i said earlier, general is unsuable atm because /pol/fags came over recently due to hte happening.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:33:09 UTC No. 16377794
dragon to dragon docking
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:33:11 UTC No. 16377795
>>16377780
I'll be honest I agree with him completely that that's what it looked like. Jared wiggling around with the stiff arm immediately made me think
>oh fuck the space is fake guys are going to love this
Of course it looking strange doesn't mean it's fake though lol
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:34:38 UTC No. 16377797
>>16377794
kinky
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:35:11 UTC No. 16377799
>>16377794
Starship ASS2ASS
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:37:30 UTC No. 16377802
>>16377801
ive shilled them for months on here ever since i heard of them. if you dont know the answer it means youre new, but you seem interested in space so welcome. hope you do some effortposts/oc if you have questions.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:39:06 UTC No. 16377803
>>16377801
axiom and vast are the future of leo spaceflight
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:39:24 UTC No. 16377805
>>16377794
Apollo/Soyuz but they're both Dragons
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:40:13 UTC No. 16377807
>>16377801
lame ngmi
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:41:13 UTC No. 16377809
>>16377805
Expect one of them is Dream Chaser or Blue Origin’s biconic capsule
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:41:18 UTC No. 16377810
>>16377805
dragon x shenzhou soon?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:42:20 UTC No. 16377812
>>16377809
>>16377810
Any combination therein would be cool to see.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:42:27 UTC No. 16377813
>>16377810
would be kino but imagine the backlash from musk collaborating with china on anything
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:45:56 UTC No. 16377816
>>16377803
Depends. Starlab also seems promising. Might end up a European destination because of Airbus, which, honestly? good for them. Euros have a lot of catching up to do and having their own station would be huge.
I hope ESA dissolves and the constituent countries each put more into their own space programs. Would grow the market significantly through an increase in demand for human spaceflight. No more waiting for ESA's blessings to get your nauts into orbit. You can just buy a seat on dragon or dream chaser and send them up yourself.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:46:41 UTC No. 16377819
>>16377801
Vast has the best chance for sucess out of any of them because their going with a minimum viable station instead of trying to build an ISS-sized multi-module space station as their freshman effort. It'll prove that they can do it and start to build up the customer base they'll need for larger projects. There's also the possibility they could build and manage a dedicated station for a company like Varda. Varda could load a Haven-1 sized station full of pharmaceutical synthesis gear and visit it in a dragon a few times a year to restock the precursors and retrieve the finished product. Then they wouldn't need to fuck around with getting reentry licenses for their capsules from the FAA.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:47:23 UTC No. 16377820
>>16377801
I foresee Spacex putting a crew-capable Starship in orbit, leaving it there, and saying "that's a space station now" just for giggles.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:51:06 UTC No. 16377822
>>16377801
>>16377816
I don't like the idea of single module stations, you gotta daisy-chain 'em together so you get big internal spaces. Don't launch one module, launch 10, 20 even. I want 5+ ISS-scale stations in the next few years, with a combined in-orbit population in the dozens or more.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:52:13 UTC No. 16377823
>>16377822
Just use a 10x bigger rocket and launch one 10x bigger module
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:53:59 UTC No. 16377830
>>16377801
I like Vast and Haven-1's simplicity.
Axiom is progressing fine. It will be the de facto successor of ISS.
Starlab I'm most unsure of. I think there's a decent chance the plan will fall apart if both Vast and Axiom succeed, especially if Vast expand Haven beyond a single module.
Orbital Reef is backed by BO, it will happen but god knows when.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:55:01 UTC No. 16377831
>>16377820
I don't really see why they would do that. They have a crew capsule they can use to service other people's stations and starship is going to be a big player in launching station modules. Why spread resources thin trying to compete in the market you already play a huge role in? They are even developing space suits which easily could be more revenue by selling those to Vast etc for use on their station. Seems more likely they will form partnerships with Vast and Axiom since they are already involved with both.
>>16377822
Anon you realize they could easily expand those single module stations with more launches right? The benefit of single launch is to have an operational station that you can immediately start sending people to and generating revenue from. If more space is needed they can just launch more modules and grow the station as needed to meet demand rather than overextending
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:55:44 UTC No. 16377833
It’s so funny but sad that, as much power as Vladimir Putin has amassed (or at the very least, as much authority as he wields and how many oligarchs he can control) he just doesn’t prioritize space or give a shit about Roscosmos lol. Like does he even give a single shit? He’s letting it rot. Corruption is amuck. Not bringing it up for political reasons, more just for the fact that I am fascinated one can have so much potential but simply choose not to do anything. So similar to the US congress / POTUS in many, many ways
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:55:58 UTC No. 16377834
>>16377819
cool concept but I don't know if varda has that kind of money. inshallah orbital drug manufacture turns out to be a huge business and they can though.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:57:52 UTC No. 16377836
>>16377833
>>>/k/ go back. i like the other /k/ommando regulars but not you.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:58:57 UTC No. 16377838
>>16377830
Starlab can cater to the euro market and others though. Nasa isn't the only customer here. Greater access to space means countries that have historically never had nauts will be able to train and fly their own nauts. It's just a matter of which countries, how many, and will that be enough to support multiple Leo stations outside of US demand.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:00:03 UTC No. 16377839
>>16377834
It looks like the first Haven is just going to be a rideshare station packed with a bunch of small payloads from a range of customers. If any of the commercial stations want to grow beyond the a single room cabin that you can launch on a Falcon 9 they're going to need a bigger customer and right now Varda is the only one that seems remotely serious.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:06:56 UTC No. 16377843
>>16377839
The big customers will be other space agencies to start. What's stopping Canada, Australia, Germany, UK, Sweden, UAE, just to name a few, from sending up people on dragon?
You don't even need to answer that question because they already have thru axiom missions.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:06:58 UTC No. 16377844
>>16377810
Are private companies subject to the Wolf Amendment or is that just NASA? It would certainly get Tesla sales up in China
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:09:24 UTC No. 16377847
>>16377844
not that i can see
>(a) None of the funds made available by this division may be used for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration or the Office of Science and Technology Policy to develop, design, plan, promulgate, implement, or execute a bilateral policy, program, order, or contract of any kind to participate, collaborate, or coordinate bilaterally in any way with China or any Chinese-owned company unless such activities are specifically authorized by a law enacted after the date of enactment of this division. (b) The limitation in subsection (a) shall also apply to any funds used to effectuate the hosting of official Chinese visitors at facilities belonging to or utilized by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:10:48 UTC No. 16377850
>>16377820
This is a real plan btw. PDR for Starship Station variant is 2028
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:12:28 UTC No. 16377853
>>16377850
>Source: Elon Musks asshole
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:12:37 UTC No. 16377854
>>16377831
>Anon you realize they could easily expand those single module stations with more launches right?
Well yeah that's my hope, my fear is that some of these might end up being one-and-done type deals, where funding just isn't there for further expansion and so the project dies without ever getting a chance to really grow.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:16:18 UTC No. 16377861
>>16377820
>>16377850
would be ok for orbital laboratory missions like what suttle did, but it would be bad as a long term station for the same reasons tat you wouldnt turn a suttle orbiter into one (even if it was physically possible)
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:17:55 UTC No. 16377863
dragon getting these upgrades from isaacman makes me think about how civilian airliners get modified for special jobs like cargo, military missions, business, etc. pic related, a 737 used for military radar.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:23:47 UTC No. 16377868
>>16377854
Unlikely.
Many counties will jump at the opportunity to send people to space. Hollywood and space tourism will also be a sizable customer base.
There will be plenty of demand, and so long as there is enough crew ship flights to meet that demand there will be enough interim revenue to keep these stations relevant until at scale in space manufacturing kicks off and the real big bucks start to flow into Leo. Honestly the current bottleneck is dragon being the only operational space capsule capable of crew transfer outside of China. Russia literally can't use soyuz because of their inclination and because of the docking adapter being different. Starliner is... Well yeah. Very very important that dream chaser does well and they start building dc201 soon.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:24:50 UTC No. 16377869
>>16377843
Smaller independent countries seem to be sending up crew as more of a national prestige measure than anything else. I wouldn't see them as reliable long-term customers. The ESA nations are sending up crew because they got spots onboard in exchange for contributing a module, a robot arm, and political legitimacy back when the station was being built. If Columbus had stayed as the independent station it was originally supposed it be it probably would have been canceled for all the usual dysfunctional European reasons. I don't know if the continentals are capable of operating a crewed space program outside of being a part of a NASA project, even if all of the management-side work if offloaded to a private company. Partnering with a private and very non-European company could be seen as a hindrance in some part of the EU. Right now NASA and JAXA are the only two governmental parties that'd I'd trust be reliable long term customers for a commercial space station.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:36:57 UTC No. 16377881
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1F
Starlink launching from Vandenberg, T-8:00
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:38:36 UTC No. 16377882
Really amazing how much shit is in orbit now. Go outside and crane your neck and look up for 5 minutes, especially after sunset, you’re guaranteed to see a spent stage or an old satellite or catch the ISS, hubble, or tiangong or something.
Seeing Sputnik must have been a weird feeling back in the day. Knowing it’s the one and only thing ever put up there by humans
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:39:40 UTC No. 16377883
>>16377881
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1yoJMyYd
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:41:27 UTC No. 16377885
>>16377882
SE NH, how much shit can I see if I look up and wait?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:42:37 UTC No. 16377886
>>16377882
Planetes space jannies soon
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:43:42 UTC No. 16377888
>>16377885
Probably a bunch of old titan stages and long march stages, that’s what I usually see. And that’s just the big stuff that’s charted as ‘likely to be super bright’.
Even with light pollution if you have a clear sky and focus on the stars you’ll notice some of the stars are actually moving across the sky very slowly but steadily. Those are satellites and rocket stages
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:45:12 UTC No. 16377890
>>16377885
Like anon said, go look outside and look up for ten minutes, you're more than likely to see something going overhead. LEO is getting busy.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:45:31 UTC No. 16377892
another day another starlink
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:46:31 UTC No. 16377894
>>16377881
>>16377883
What's that big lump on the left?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:47:32 UTC No. 16377896
>>16377894
Gridfin that looks like part of the hull.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:47:36 UTC No. 16377897
>>16377894
the gridfin?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:47:42 UTC No. 16377898
>>16377881
Fuck off
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:48:45 UTC No. 16377901
>>16377898
Why does this make you angry?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:49:37 UTC No. 16377904
>>16377882
I find for some reason Autumn has the best skies. When the air gets cold and the skies get super clear at night and in the morning. I guess we’re still technically in summer, but it was cool this morning and I was admiring Orion’s belt when a giant green meteor shot across right above me. So spiritual.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:50:05 UTC No. 16377905
cute engine rats
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:54:03 UTC No. 16377908
I hope starship is one day this boring
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:55:41 UTC No. 16377909
the cost of a dragon flight needs to come down significantly somehow
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:59:08 UTC No. 16377910
What's the math behind optimal moon base design?
I've been thinking about this for a while. If you have multiple independent base modules surely there is some optimal configuration that increases redundant paths in the event of a module failure while also retaining reasonable room space.
For example, if you have three modules you can arrange them like so. The straight line example could lead to some people getting trapped in the event of a failure of the middle module, not ideal. If arranged as a triangle that is much less likey to happen.
Scale this up to dozens of modules and dozens of redundant connections and you run into a different problem. You can't build a base where every module is connected to every other module. There needs to be wall space for storage and the like. Not to mention it would make the station more complex and probably more expensive too.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 01:59:15 UTC No. 16377911
>>16377882
I got chewed up by bugs and didn't see anything. Fuck this shithole there's an entire solar system with no bugs and I'm stuck here
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:00:16 UTC No. 16377912
>>16377911
It's nh bro their are flies everywhere
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:03:33 UTC No. 16377917
>>16377911
I don't know where you are but if you're on the east coast like me it's a bit past the window for observing objects in orbit. You need to hit the time after dusk but before the earth rotates around so far that everything passing overhead is in the Earth's shadow. It's a similar window to the one for seeing a good jellyfish during a rocket launch.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:09:43 UTC No. 16377923
>>16377910
Just add more redundancy to each module and you won't need access to all of them in the event of a disaster
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:10:23 UTC No. 16377924
>>16377909
No we must increase the $/kg to gatekeep earthers from space
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:11:04 UTC No. 16377925
>>16377917
Appreciate it man, I'll try to check it out
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:16:04 UTC No. 16377929
>>16377229
Haha, this guy sleeps with a nightlight
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:17:44 UTC No. 16377931
>>16377272
If nothing changes we're well and truly fucked
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:34:38 UTC No. 16377942
>>16377881
why did the stage 2 looked like it was losing some kind of gas from the middle of its body?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:55:17 UTC No. 16377957
>>16377910
Check gopher burrows and ant colonies. Maybe rabbit warrens but they have an instinct to run away from home.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:15:44 UTC No. 16377966
>>16377910
use the third dimension and connect every module with every other module
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:19:09 UTC No. 16377968
>>16377966
Great idea now you need to make support structures for the modules which is more materials being used.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:21:57 UTC No. 16377972
>>16377968
not much more than otherwise.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:22:04 UTC No. 16377973
>>16377970
It can be done, but assuming it's a polymer inflatable, it would be a bit too easy to burst from debris or micrometeor impacts. Someone could easily get stuck in the middle with no easy way back to the edges or inside the spacecraft as well. So, again, not that it can't be done, more that it shouldn't.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:22:17 UTC No. 16377974
>>16377970
It is being done
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:23:09 UTC No. 16377975
>>16377973
And what if its a thick ceramic with the tech they use for bulletproof glass?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:24:27 UTC No. 16377976
>>16377975
it would be tricky to get up there but it would work just fine
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:25:43 UTC No. 16377977
>>16377976
Then what are we waiting for? The stars are within reach but we still falter?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:32:34 UTC No. 16377984
>>16377975
Probably good, but you'll want a whole bunch of polymer layers to give it the resilience that ballistics glass has against impacts.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:36:58 UTC No. 16377985
What's stopping us from strapping twenty nine rdyne f-1s onto a fuel tank 25.9 meters in diameter and an appropriate second stage and sending shit up to the moon again?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:38:25 UTC No. 16377986
>>16377985
Youre asking for 29 engines. From Rocketdyne. Issue found
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:44:23 UTC No. 16377991
>>16377985
No one makes F1s anymore dude. They literally cannot make those again. Each one was made by hand. All of Apollo is old tech no one makes anymore. There is a reason rocket companies like spacex make their own engines instead of copying NASA engines.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:47:39 UTC No. 16377993
Picture this. 0G goon caves, no tissue allowed.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:48:30 UTC No. 16377994
>>16377985
That would somehow be more expensive than SLS.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:51:34 UTC No. 16377997
>>16377993
if we're being honest, Martian gooncaves will probably happen
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:53:16 UTC No. 16377999
>>16377997
But that would have gravity and not get nut everywhere
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 04:09:36 UTC No. 16378007
>>16377999
we could goon in ze shower, ja?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 04:15:06 UTC No. 16378008
>>16378007
>skylab had a shower, ISS does not
>skylab had room for gymnastics, ISS is a hoarder's den
I don't think the american public realizes how big of a step down ISS was. at least it's kept humans in space 2/7 for 24 years I guess.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 04:21:48 UTC No. 16378010
>>16378008
I guarantee that a majority of the public still believes that the shuttle isnt retired. They arent very intelligent
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 04:33:40 UTC No. 16378012
>>16378010
>They arent very intelligent
It's more of interest thing than intelligence.
Sorry, but the average person doesn't really care about space. It's not the '60s anymore.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 04:54:10 UTC No. 16378024
>>16377970
>>16377973
Waste of mass. Just put some standard windows, and if you want to get fancy, use a VR room that connects to a 360 array of ultra-high-res cameras mounted on the vehicle
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:06:01 UTC No. 16378036
>>16377388
Isn't imax film? SpaceX has recorded at least their first launch in imax
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:10:13 UTC No. 16378039
when does polaris return? saturday?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:13:56 UTC No. 16378041
https://x.com/vast/status/183433755
VAST commercial space station interview
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:17:35 UTC No. 16378045
>>16378041
>VAST will have a rotating space station within a decade
wtf
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:18:45 UTC No. 16378047
>>16378045
hell yeah
hopefully it can house more than 5 people
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:23:47 UTC No. 16378055
so how many did spacex launch in the last day or so. 3? 4? They want to beat their record inspite of all these delays
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:26:25 UTC No. 16378058
https://spacenews.com/foust-forward
NASA is pissed that OIG called out the $2.7B price tag on MLC for SLS. That puts SLS price tag from the last $4.4B to $5-6B territory.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:31:30 UTC No. 16378064
>>16378041
>first crew to the station is hoped to be professional non-american astronauts (ESA, JAXA, etc.)
>also open to high net worth but experienced individuals like isaacman
>thinks the market can support two post-ISS american space stations including VAST
>would take about 4-5 years to get a commercial starliner flight so we have to rely on dragon
>the Haven space station will last 3 years and have 4 visits of 10 days each before it gets deorbited
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:34:16 UTC No. 16378068
>>16378064
He knows his shit you can tell.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:34:52 UTC No. 16378069
>>16378068
anyone on /sfg/ could say something like that
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:38:13 UTC No. 16378073
>>16378069
I really doubt other anons would tell you the market can hold 2 CSSs max
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:39:40 UTC No. 16378074
>>16378073
split the ISS in half and it would make 2 commercial stations
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:43:20 UTC No. 16378076
>>16378074
Incredible. Spaceflight is advancing so rapidly, how did I never think of this technology
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:44:37 UTC No. 16378078
>>16378074
split it in quarters and we could have FOUR
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:47:10 UTC No. 16378079
>>16378058
ehehehehehe
>Later in the meeting, they started drafting a recommendation that the NASA administrator “seek relief from the burden of multiple external audits” by asking the White House and Congress to limit such audits unless required by law.
>limit such audits unless required by law.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:48:21 UTC No. 16378080
what is the minimum viable space station?
does a free floating astronaut count as a space station? what if he had handles for someone to grab onto?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:48:56 UTC No. 16378081
>>16378080
Starship in orbit.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:53:44 UTC No. 16378082
>>16378078
i think 3 is the max if the stations are permanently manned. if they're temporarily manned then its probably just 1 or 2.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:01:04 UTC No. 16378084
Cool video on the history of space mirror proposals and the attempt to make one in Russia in the 90s that failed because it crashed straight into Mir
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEP
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:02:52 UTC No. 16378086
>>16378084
we need russia to stay in the game because they bring the keks
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:05:57 UTC No. 16378092
>>16378080
any spacecraft that can house astronauts and station-keep
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:08:12 UTC No. 16378094
>>16378092
is starlink with a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perso
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:10:02 UTC No. 16378097
Why do racist crakkkahs only care about space?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:12:52 UTC No. 16378100
>>16378094
I feel like the life support must, at minimum, be able to last long enough to make the station-keeping capability relevant
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:14:45 UTC No. 16378101
>>16378100
Why dont you shut up huh
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:15:44 UTC No. 16378103
>>16378008
Neither of those were good things. The shower was a hazard and apparently frequently made you feel like you were being drowned. And the gymnastics/running had to be put to a stop due to the vibrations that it caused in Skylab.
The ISS is demonstrably worse, but even if they had kept the same diameter as Skylab and just remade the ISS, they wouldn't put a shower in or allow for that sort of activity because of what they learned. Best you would get is the proper toilet they were supposed to put on the ISS.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:16:58 UTC No. 16378104
STAGING (Image Limit reached w/ this post)
>>16378102
>>16378102
>>16378102
>>16378102
>>16378102
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:17:38 UTC No. 16378105
>>16378104
enough.jpg
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:22:03 UTC No. 16378108
>>16378104
>incriminating yourself with the pic showing page 9
contemplate your mistakes
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:22:22 UTC No. 16378109
>>16378103
the drowning thing can be fixed with a fan
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:22:56 UTC No. 16378110
>>16377839
Haven-1 is just a more developed pathfinder, almost everybody is waiting for the Starship class/fairing size launchers to come online
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:23:59 UTC No. 16378111
>>16378012
>>They arent very intelligent
>It's more of interest thing than intelligence.
>Sorry, but the average person doesn't really care about space. It's not the '60s anymore.
Anyone else notice that normies especially younger normies are increasingly getting dumber
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:24:30 UTC No. 16378112
>>16378108
The staging reason is the image limit, not the page count. Staging for an image limit is an overperformance and an acceptable cause for staging.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:24:37 UTC No. 16378113
>>16377853
they pitched it to NASA in some contract
https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/s
>SpaceX is collaborating with NASA on an integrated low Earth orbit architecture to provide a growing portfolio of technology with near-term Dragon evolution and concurrent Starship development. This architecture includes Starship as a transportation and in-space low-Earth orbit destination element supported by Super Heavy, Dragon, and Starlink, and constituent capabilities including crew and cargo transportation, communications, and operational and ground support.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:29:42 UTC No. 16378115
>>16378113
NASA told them to fuck off too
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:45:39 UTC No. 16378126
>>16378079
It's no joke, audits take time and money to "save" time and money, so you better be sure there's a point to them
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:50:04 UTC No. 16378128
>>16378115
not really, they just didn't give them money but this collaborative thing like they did with Gravitics for instance
so its more "we're not willing to pay for that now, but keep us updated"
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 07:40:51 UTC No. 16378169
>>16378126
Less or more than the billions of dollars that these retarded programs go over budget?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 07:43:31 UTC No. 16378170
>>16378080
Needs to have a-grav
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 07:43:36 UTC No. 16378171
>>16378169
Depends, if the audit causes a schedule slip you'd better believe that's another billion dollars
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:49:54 UTC No. 16378220
>>16377543
Why they don't tie their hair, this isn't professional.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:10:51 UTC No. 16378347
>>16378011
Helios, their proposed methalox tug. It's supposed to fit on F9 and Vulcan.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:36:48 UTC No. 16378454
>>16378347
prick.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:33:27 UTC No. 16378504
>>16378113
I would be hard pressed to find a benefit to SpaceX for including NASA in anything human and StarShip to LEO related.
Remember "human rating" a vehicle makes static its design, the antitheses of what StarShip is,
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:17:06 UTC No. 16378560
STAGE
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:17:53 UTC No. 16378561
>>16378504
They can just flesh out certain blocks (of older starships in service) for crew, while the experimental branch is separated.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:59:24 UTC No. 16378614
>>16378111
>Anyone else notice that normies especially younger normies are increasingly getting dumber
Yes, they're babied.
They're not hitting the milestones that they should; some are achieving things in their twenties that they should've before being a teen.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 15:12:56 UTC No. 16378641
>>16378561
Yeah to what end? A couple of congess controlled NASA bucks?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:06:21 UTC No. 16378786
>>16378641
That just sounds like easy money to me, especially if starship gets so cheap that spacex can charge whatever they want and still probably undercut everyone else.