Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:28:42 UTC No. 16422305

stage license?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:28:52 UTC No. 16422306

>>16422298
Previous thread: >>16419878

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:29:56 UTC No. 16422308

>>16422305
We hit the image limit, Mr. comissioner

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:32:03 UTC No. 16422312

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:37:29 UTC No. 16422321

Toruschads, when do we get our comfy life in an artificial gravity utopia? This is what Bezos should be working towards, not just another yet-to-fly "it's like the Falcon 9 but twice the size" rocket.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:37:45 UTC No. 16422322

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:38:49 UTC No. 16422323

>>16422312
>drop the highest quality launch closeup footage in the past 45 years, possibly ever
>refuses to elaborate
>never posts again

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:39:21 UTC No. 16422324

>>16422321
The whole reason blorp exists besides EDS is building an architecture for high cislunar space. If their hydrologgs depots and reusable moon lander work that will actually be a good start. Big spinhabs rely on regolith and lunar/NEA ice.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:40:57 UTC No. 16422326

>>16422323

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:42:00 UTC No. 16422328

>>16422326

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:43:08 UTC No. 16422329

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:43:18 UTC No. 16422330

>>16422326
Looks like cgi to me bub

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:43:35 UTC No. 16422331

>>16422328

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:44:10 UTC No. 16422335

>>16422330
You can tell its real by how fake it looks

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:44:53 UTC No. 16422336

I waited a day too long and all the hotel rooms were sold out, but surprisingly enough a number of tent sites are open in Isla Blanca. I have no idea where in the park these tent sites are and I was hoping to not sleep in my car this time, but that's life.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:45:09 UTC No. 16422337

>>16422331

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:46:06 UTC No. 16422339

>>16422329
why posting ai garbage when reality is even better
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1629538776111280130

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:46:26 UTC No. 16422342

>>16422322
>Hot staging ring basedjack
Cinema

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:46:45 UTC No. 16422343

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:47:08 UTC No. 16422344

>>16422321
Bezos is working closely with sierra space to launch inflatables. That's as big as it gets for the near future. Once the 19 meter sierra space habitat is tested, that will be a spacecraft with the BARE MINIMUM diameter for a rotational space station. Two counter rotating 19 meter habitats for rotational stability?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:47:10 UTC No. 16422345

>>16422339
Absolute mad man

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:48:12 UTC No. 16422346

>>16422343

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:48:47 UTC No. 16422348

>>16422339
Input: AI image
Output: Negative reaction

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:49:37 UTC No. 16422349

>>16422348
AI and memes disgust me, kys

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:49:37 UTC No. 16422350

>>16422324
>Welcome to the spinhab, anon, the governing council has decided I'll be your gf until you get settled in and get up to speed in the singles scene here.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:50:22 UTC No. 16422351

>>16422298
Very based.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:52:59 UTC No. 16422353

>>16422345
one of us
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1113545297311948803

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:56:07 UTC No. 16422361

>>16422350
>a 4/10 on the spinhab

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:57:02 UTC No. 16422363

is this the actual hardware going into space or is it just a mockup?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:57:52 UTC No. 16422365

>>16422339
AI Krystal when?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:01:09 UTC No. 16422369

>>16422363
flight hardware

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:01:41 UTC No. 16422371

>>16422365
>when
Like 2 years ago. I've made probably a thousand images of her myself.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:03:52 UTC No. 16422372

>>16422363
>le cuck docking port
why can't they make it bigger so that astronauts don't have to crawl like worms every time they go in and out the module??

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:04:25 UTC No. 16422373

>>16422372
its to discourage fat people from trying to get a ticket

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:05:21 UTC No. 16422374

>>16422363
kinda cool how they milled that entire thing out of one 2000 ton block of aluminum, too bad 97% of the aluminum ended up as shavings

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:05:34 UTC No. 16422375

>>16422373
based fat hater

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:06:17 UTC No. 16422376

>using literal links for previous
well. atleast its not the launch bread

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:07:24 UTC No. 16422377

>>16422329
Fuck off Mercrantos

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:15:49 UTC No. 16422387

>>16422377
no

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:16:54 UTC No. 16422390

>>16422387
Disgusting fat pig. I hope I never have to meet you in my career, EVER.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:18:47 UTC No. 16422392

>>16422374
Nah, it's welded parts. Just extremely autistic welding.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:19:54 UTC No. 16422393

>>16422392
Impressive either way. It's hard to weld aluminum

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:21:05 UTC No. 16422394

>>16422393
??? You think its hard to weld aluminum? I can do it just fine on TIG, whats holding you back. Certainly hardER than steel but its not hard

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:22:39 UTC No. 16422397

https://x.com/SawyerMerritt/status/1844940110246314377

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:23:17 UTC No. 16422399

>>16422390
I'm not fat. There are plenty of pictures of me naked online you can see if you want.
Also you won't meet me IRL unless you work at the Canadian Space Agency.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:24:49 UTC No. 16422401

>>16422394
Man, I've never welded anything in my life, I'm a carpenter. I just heard that it's hard to weld aluminum and I saw a big thing of aluminum and said it was hard to weld. I'm so drunk.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:25:04 UTC No. 16422402

>>16422399
Ofcourse youre a fucking leaf why wouldnt you be. Nobody wants to see they 20 fat rolls you have on you either no amount of lying changes that. Thank god I will NEVER go to Canada, just being within 1000 miles of you sickens me.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:45:37 UTC No. 16422408

sfg - Scorning Fats General

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:47:01 UTC No. 16422410

!No mas!

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:57:18 UTC No. 16422415

>>16422399
>a fucking arm

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 05:59:39 UTC No. 16422418

>>16422410
Literally just
>we're willing to do this blatantly illegal thing in order to slightly delay you and cost you legal fees getting it overruled because we will face no repercussions from our state government

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:02:27 UTC No. 16422419

>>16422415
I'm just a janitor

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:02:57 UTC No. 16422420

SPEHS

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:03:22 UTC No. 16422421

>>16422397

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:03:51 UTC No. 16422422

>>16422419
>a JANITOR for an agency that made a fucking ARM

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:04:23 UTC No. 16422423

>>16422421

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:05:58 UTC No. 16422424

>>16422418
really retarded that there will be no repercussions

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:09:03 UTC No. 16422425

>>16422423
controls are fucking backwards

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:13:12 UTC No. 16422428

>>16422422
One day I hope to be a janitor on the ISS or on Mars

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:13:26 UTC No. 16422429

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc6Lq5MKLfI
>Rocket Lab CFO: We Can Build a Lot of Rockets

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:14:10 UTC No. 16422431

>>16422410
Very nice...let's see ULA's labor record...

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:14:28 UTC No. 16422433

>>16422372
It's designed to use standard Shuttle compatible docking ports like the ISS so Dragon can dock to it. Go tell SpaceX to make a bigger port for Starship for stations to dock with.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:16:56 UTC No. 16422434

>>16422429
Rocketlab is limited in Electron launches not due to how many they can build but how big the market is for small launch sats

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:17:30 UTC No. 16422436

Daily reminder that there's no reason to go to Mars

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:18:35 UTC No. 16422437

>>16422431
>"what's an ULA?"
nobody cares about them, that's why they always get away with it lol

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:19:05 UTC No. 16422438

>>16422436
simply wanting to go is a reason

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:20:39 UTC No. 16422440

https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/10/the-us-militarys-x-37b-spaceplane-is-preparing-for-a-novel-space-maneuver/

>"When it’s close to the Earth, it’s close enough to the atmosphere to turn where it is," she said. "Which means our adversaries don’t know—and that happens on the far side of the Earth from our adversaries—where it’s going to come up next. And we know that that drives them nuts. And I’m really glad about that."

So the X-37B has perigee *inside* the atmosphere and uses its aero surfaces to change inclination? And it's maintaining this family of orbits for months? That's fucking cool. Total validation of baby-shuttle.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:24:26 UTC No. 16422442

>>16422424
There will be no consequences either, is federal land

If they want to get all states rights on this I would laugh my ass off

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:25:59 UTC No. 16422444

>>16422442
Vandy is a Space Force Base. Why the FUCK does a state government get to tell the military what roggets can launch from their own base? If California pushes this they're going to permanently decrease states' rights when they get slapped down.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:26:13 UTC No. 16422445

>>16422440
>Artists renditions of re-entry are being influenced by the starship footage
You love to see it

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:28:13 UTC No. 16422448

>>16422445
A Boeing artist, no less.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:35:35 UTC No. 16422450

>>16422444
Because congress are a bunch of naive cucks who pass laws saying the military has to work with these people instead of just doing what it needs to.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:45:36 UTC No. 16422453

>>16422410
>their labor record is bad because I think it is
Not germane.
>his political posts are problematic because I don't share his opinions
Even less germane. Elon is not SpaceX nor is he the sole owner. They really fucked up here by mentioning his politics instead of keeping about enviromental concerns.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:50:48 UTC No. 16422456

elon's social media obsession will be the end of spacex

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:53:11 UTC No. 16422459

>>16422456
He did it to stop them from stealing it from Trump again because Kamabla would be the death of spacex.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:55:02 UTC No. 16422461

> This is a big deal guys!

If it was, you'd be there:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAPt5vbr-YU

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:59:02 UTC No. 16422466

>>16422461
imagine not showing up to a historical event because your friend is getting married to some roastie

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:00:54 UTC No. 16422468

>>16422444
I wouldn't be surprised if California gets told to fuck off, Space Force Bases are a national security concern and if you have a problem with that, go cry about it, move

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:01:55 UTC No. 16422469

>>16422468
if Trump gets elected that is, otherwise perhaps not

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:29:07 UTC No. 16422482

When exactly is the launch supposed to happen? Texan Sunday could easily be my Monday.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:32:30 UTC No. 16422484

>>16422482
Morning

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:33:07 UTC No. 16422486

>>16422482
7AM Texas, Rajesh. Same time as all the previous launches.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:43:27 UTC No. 16422491

>>16422482
based samoan poster

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:44:22 UTC No. 16422492

>>16422482
12Z

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:47:24 UTC No. 16422495

>>16422482
8 AM EST.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:52:00 UTC No. 16422497

>>16422495
Mouf, now

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:58:52 UTC No. 16422503

>>16422436
Brown skin detected

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:05:31 UTC No. 16422507

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1844962203805405282

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:05:40 UTC No. 16422508

>>16422421
wait a minute that thumbnail

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:06:34 UTC No. 16422511

>>16422507

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:10:03 UTC No. 16422514

>>16422511

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:12:40 UTC No. 16422516

>>16422514
>>16422511
Not reading your gay fanfic

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:13:12 UTC No. 16422517

>>16422514
>the viewership on this is going to be huge
lol

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:17:52 UTC No. 16422521

>>16422514
he's such a fucking Redditor oml

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:18:12 UTC No. 16422522

>>16422511
>>16422514
If anyone is wondering, the book is called "Elon Musk" by Walter Isaacson.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:29:41 UTC No. 16422525

>>16422397
fuck level 14

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:32:06 UTC No. 16422526

>>16422514
Holy shit he's cringe
I'd go to Mars just to get away from this guy

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:44:02 UTC No. 16422530

>>16422525
im stuck on 12 lol

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:47:58 UTC No. 16422531

>>16422514
where's the part when he starts headbutting cars, and firing employees left and right?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:49:25 UTC No. 16422532

>>16422444
Funny enough, something sorta kinda like this happened before and Congress ended up expanding states' rights in the CZARA because of it.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:51:17 UTC No. 16422533

>>16422530
I finally made it up to 17 before giving up. The booster is too fuel heavy on that one and you can barely slow down enough, then you have to hover in with super low TWR so you can barely lean to steer.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 09:03:22 UTC No. 16422537

the dome is multilevel right? reminds me of sword art online's world. i bet elon watched that shit.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 09:14:47 UTC No. 16422539

>>16422421
Tommorow better look something like this

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 09:26:24 UTC No. 16422542

>>16422539
Based and flippilled

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 09:39:52 UTC No. 16422548

>>16422482
>>16422486
>>16422495
in case anyone needs to know, this would be at 2 PM in the Netherlands

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 09:40:57 UTC No. 16422550

Done. That was fun.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 09:52:08 UTC No. 16422553

YAAAAY

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 09:58:28 UTC No. 16422554

>>16422419
clean it up, eh

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:02:52 UTC No. 16422556

i blew my back out jeeking off to rocket-tans

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:06:44 UTC No. 16422560

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYvWYp0--bQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAPt5vbr-YU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ub6HdADut50

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:06:53 UTC No. 16422561

im up. where the rockets at

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:08:49 UTC No. 16422564

>>16422560
No what about it? no austin her? no black guy? no trump guy with baseball hat? no labpadre? useless post

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:10:10 UTC No. 16422565

>>16422564
did they make extensive videos analyzing how the catch would work?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:18:09 UTC No. 16422569

>>16422565
How would I know if you refuse to post them

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:20:54 UTC No. 16422571

>>16422569
Who is austin her?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:33:41 UTC No. 16422577

>>16422410

its pretty funny how elon being hated by 50% of the population exposes the fact that a majority of americans not only dont care about space but actively hate it and think it's a waste of time

much like trump he exists as a sort of howard roark like figure in our culture, his existence amplifies the pointless cruelty and ignorance in the society as it rejects a physical manifestation of progress, and makes it visible how pathetic they are.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:37:47 UTC No. 16422581

>>16422577
That side is all vaxxed at least.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:40:29 UTC No. 16422583

>>16422581
They prefer to be called The Raped.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:43:29 UTC No. 16422584

i can't get beyond level 17, there's just no way to cancel out the left momentum and the downward momentum and then still make it back towards the tower

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:43:49 UTC No. 16422585

>>16422482
one more day

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:46:02 UTC No. 16422589

>>16422585
And I say this to the mouf of you, are you sure you can?

RKSHT

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:54:49 UTC No. 16422595

>>16422328
He should have them rearranged into a smiley face.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:59:58 UTC No. 16422598

maybe its everyday astronauts own wedding (hint: he is a homosexual)

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:01:35 UTC No. 16422601

>>16422584
do a flip

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:18:05 UTC No. 16422607

>level 1
Impossible on mobile jfc

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:25:32 UTC No. 16422611

>>16422564
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxOju_tL-So

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:57:03 UTC No. 16422633

aaaaargh fuck i can't wait any longer.
i'm tweaking because of this launch.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:00:16 UTC No. 16422637

>>16422633
You can and you will.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:06:51 UTC No. 16422643

>>16422637
no i am actually gonna grab my shooty and force them to launch early.
it's a few hours drive from here.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:12:15 UTC No. 16422646

24h to go

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:21:51 UTC No. 16422653

>>16422410
Lol, and then commiefornians wonder why so many companies are leaving commiefornia.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:29:35 UTC No. 16422657

Why are all you fags counting down lol. The FAA hasn't released shit. It's going to come and go.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:30:40 UTC No. 16422658

>>16422657
this is a great ironic post

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:38:26 UTC No. 16422663

>>16422507
>>16422511
>>16422514
>>16422517
>>16422522
>have this book but haven't read it yet
>see these posts
>flip through it
kek

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:40:37 UTC No. 16422668

>>16422663
it's still difficult for my brain to process that normies actually thought blue origin and galactic were "rivals" to spacex.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:57:45 UTC No. 16422683

>>16422668
>The billionaire space race between Blue Origin, SpaceX, and Virgin Galactic
This was said enough in the mainstream that every non space person still believes it

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:03:10 UTC No. 16422686

>>16422653
They literally don't care. The Coastal Commission exists to protect the property values of rich Californians.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:19:00 UTC No. 16422702

https://x.com/BocaChicaGal/status/1845088549919498254

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:21:30 UTC No. 16422709

https://spacenews.com/anduril-and-impulse-space-to-collaborate-on-ai-driven-satellite-mobility/
>The companies plan to pursue military and defense contracts for space missions that involve complex orbital maneuvers, Anduril said Oct. 11.
>The collaboration will focus on demonstrating “highly maneuverable space missions,” including military operations in nontraditional orbits that require more sophisticated navigation and agility.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:26:34 UTC No. 16422715

>>16422709
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/10/rocket-report-europa-clipper-on-hold-for-milton-spanish-startups-big-ambitions/

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:42:11 UTC No. 16422727

>>16422709
> in nontraditional orbits
What the fuck are those? LEO, MEO, GEO and HEO, there aren't any orbits after that which are useful.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:43:58 UTC No. 16422728

>>16422702
>the mars base is stored in the balls

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:44:18 UTC No. 16422729

>>16422312
Is this the IMAX footage? Also virtual aerospike.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:45:18 UTC No. 16422731

Are they really doing the tower catch tomorrow?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:46:05 UTC No. 16422732

>>16422727
NRHO is useful for rockets that can't do a full lunar insertion

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:56:02 UTC No. 16422738

Guys... I think the James Webb Space Telescope may have "other" capabilities.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:00:58 UTC No. 16422741

What went so wrong?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:03:16 UTC No. 16422745

>>16422741
nothing went wrong, what are you insinuating?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:03:24 UTC No. 16422746

>>16422702
is that a regolith radiation shield or what?
the thing around the ball

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:03:54 UTC No. 16422747

>>16422741
JPL reacted to the disturbance in their grift cycles

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:04:24 UTC No. 16422748

>>16422731
yes

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:05:30 UTC No. 16422749

https://x.com/KathyLueders/status/1845095201343230085

one of the rare times Kathy Lueders has posted
(ok not so rare it turns out lol)

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:06:32 UTC No. 16422752

>>16422749
https://x.com/KathyLueders/status/1845097516544442557

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:10:19 UTC No. 16422755

>>16422746
It's a sintered regolith shell, meant to help against radiation and dust storms

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:10:51 UTC No. 16422758

https://x.com/johnkrausphotos/status/1845087824145678533

btw tomorrow, make a separate launch thread and keep /sfg/ going as its own thing so the tourists go to the launch thread instead
hopefully the janny stickies that thread instead of /sfg/ so there isn't weeks of tourists again

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:12:17 UTC No. 16422760

>>16422429
If you were trying to be efficient with capital, why give it to rocket lab?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:14:41 UTC No. 16422763

>>16422758
i hope so too.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:15:29 UTC No. 16422764

>>16422758
seconded on separate launch thread
start it early enough to catch the tourists

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:18:40 UTC No. 16422765

https://x.com/StarshipGazer/status/1845106302952825327

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:18:56 UTC No. 16422766

>>16422764
right so early in the day of launch then? should keep most of the filth away from /sfg/.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:19:44 UTC No. 16422767

>>16422765

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:20:10 UTC No. 16422769

>>16422758
>>16422764
Its never going to work, its like herding cats.
This place will be a disaster of split threads and shitposting tourists, despite the best efforts of the few conscientious /sfg/ users. Tomorrow you can tell me I was right.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:20:57 UTC No. 16422770

>>16422767

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:21:29 UTC No. 16422771

>>16422769
Not one good gaem
NOT ONE GOOD GAEM

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:21:57 UTC No. 16422773

>>16422436
On its face this claim is false if anyone has any reason to go to Mars. If Elon pays someone to go to Mars, that person has a reason to go to Mars. The first people to go to Mars will be famous. That is a reason to go to Mars.

Presumably you mean that going to Mars accomplishes nothing. But building a new civilization on Mars is itself an accomplishment.

Perhaps you mean that there will be no practical consequences to the existence of a human presence on Mars. This is doubtful enough that there's no reason to believe your bald assertion.

Maybe instead you mean that there are better alternatives to going to Mars, but in that case you should explain what they are and why they're better.

In summary, your post was low effort bait. 0/10, would not reply again.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:22:00 UTC No. 16422774

>>16422770

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:22:26 UTC No. 16422775

>>16422769
it's all about triage and damage control, anon
we need a thread that jannie will sticky, an hour or two or three before the launch, to deflect most of the primary horde

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:24:45 UTC No. 16422776

>>16422436
There is no reason to go to Antarctica

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:25:11 UTC No. 16422777

>>16422773
>The first people to go to Mars will be famous. That is a reason to go to Mars.
We should be sending influencers to Mars.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:25:30 UTC No. 16422779

>>16422765
its over launch is slipping

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:27:11 UTC No. 16422780

>>16422758
oldfag launch thread anon here. I'll make a launch thread, of course.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:28:07 UTC No. 16422781

>>16422780
nice

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:29:19 UTC No. 16422782

>>16422780
sasuga anon.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:29:43 UTC No. 16422783

WHAT?

HUH?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:30:21 UTC No. 16422784

>>16422769
Whatever happens tomorrow we must make every effort to stage only once page 10 has been reached.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:30:46 UTC No. 16422785

>>16422663
>Bezos's

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:31:43 UTC No. 16422788

I am currently on a flight to Brownsville.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:32:02 UTC No. 16422789

>>16422709
>AI-driven satellite mobility
they're full on meme space companies now

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:35:36 UTC No. 16422792

>>16422788
how long are you staying?
have any of these launched on the first day without scrubbing? I don't remember lol

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:37:38 UTC No. 16422793

>>16422792
Everything that wasnt IFT-1 launched first day no issues. This launch looked especially good with clear skies for days. You will not get any more info of my personal details, datamining fed.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:43:44 UTC No. 16422800

https://x.com/spacex/status/1845112864207667648
WHAT THE FUCK IS EVEN GOING ON

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:48:15 UTC No. 16422806

>>16422517
>>16422514
>>16422511
>>16422507
If the public is on your side, the government can't do shit without significant blow back. That's called being genre savvy and Elon understands this better than most people of his generation. It's how Tesla went on to, briefly, become a 1Tn megacap without a single dollar in ad spend.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:51:17 UTC No. 16422808

>>16422793
IFT-4 was pushed back

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starship_flight_test_4
>Starship flight test 4 was initially scheduled to launch on June 5, but was pushed back a day to June 6.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:52:00 UTC No. 16422812

>>16422800
GOTY

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:52:32 UTC No. 16422813

>>16422800
lol

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:53:15 UTC No. 16422814

>>16422812
>>16422813
meh
the other won earlier in this thread is better ngl

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:55:48 UTC No. 16422817

>>16422731
WE GAAN

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:58:07 UTC No. 16422819

>>16422731
no loicence granted yet

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:59:29 UTC No. 16422822

what happens if no loicence?

🗑️ Barwkn at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:00:37 UTC No. 16422824

You don't get no pretty Bicameral girl saying 'id fart in your mouf'

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:00:55 UTC No. 16422825

>no raptor relight test in space
lol

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:00:58 UTC No. 16422826

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:02:23 UTC No. 16422829

>>16422822
elon hunger strike until loicence

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:03:12 UTC No. 16422830

>>16422800
Ol musky chud got BTFO out by a indie developer

>>16422397

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:05:54 UTC No. 16422833

>>16422826
inshallah

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:07:31 UTC No. 16422836

sapex

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:09:35 UTC No. 16422838

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:10:47 UTC No. 16422840

https://x.com/ZhanPoasts/status/1845116635331334255
>Update to the PEA released by the FAA:
https://faa.gov/media/85696

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:10:56 UTC No. 16422841

Were the Optimus bots being remotely controlled or fully automated? I ask here as this is pretty much the the Elon Musk general

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:12:31 UTC No. 16422842

>>16422841
yes

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:12:37 UTC No. 16422843

>>16422819
>>16422822
Berger said it would be today tho

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:12:39 UTC No. 16422844

>>16422840
> does not require the preparation of a new or supplemental EA or EIS

this was expected I guess but still good news

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:13:54 UTC No. 16422847

>>16422841
I think they run on a scripted route, but use onboard shit to adjust for anomalies like people in the way, obstacles, or weird anomalies with the ground its walking on
like the boston dynamic robots

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:14:14 UTC No. 16422848

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:14:55 UTC No. 16422851

>>16422843
>berger
lol

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:15:44 UTC No. 16422852

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:16:09 UTC No. 16422853

>>16422841
either situation is a big deal. remotely operated human robots means third worlders can work here in the first world for third world wages. fully automated just cuts out the third worlder. we need UBI now.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:17:42 UTC No. 16422855

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:17:57 UTC No. 16422857

>>16422840
>>16422844
>>16422848
Who is ready to do this all over again when SpaceX adds two inches of height and new flaps to the next Starship flight

I AM!!!!

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:17:57 UTC No. 16422858

>>16422741
JPL lawfare

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:18:43 UTC No. 16422859

so the consultations are done I guess, license seems to be almost a given now?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:19:49 UTC No. 16422861

what the fuck is this

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:20:50 UTC No. 16422862

lmao

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:21:51 UTC No. 16422864

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-capped_petrel

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:22:53 UTC No. 16422866

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:23:24 UTC No. 16422867

>>16422862
TPD

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:25:32 UTC No. 16422869

okay so now that the loicence is pretty much a guarantee,
what are they doing at the booster and could it potentially lead to a delay?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:26:34 UTC No. 16422870

>>16422869
Inside sources suggest plans to replace a few of the raptors lol

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:27:04 UTC No. 16422871

>>16422870
source from where tho?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:29:38 UTC No. 16422876

>The FAA requested the Service separately consider new information provided by SpaceX, including updated sonic boom overpressure contours from sonic boom monitoring data collected during the landing of the Super Heavy booster in the Gulf of Mexico during Flight 4, and provide an expedited response solely for the proposed Flight 5, prior to the conclusion of the reinitiated section 7 consultation for the larger program
>and provide an expedited response solely for the proposed Flight 5

page 25 of the document, first page of FWS response

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:34:40 UTC No. 16422884

>>16422876
This game will never end

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:39:01 UTC No. 16422886

Can we finally admit IFT1 was a massive failure?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:40:38 UTC No. 16422887

https://x.com/Alexphysics13/status/1845126237900939344
>Starship's fifth flight is now part of the FAA ATC Planning Advisory
>Reminder: this is a PLANNING advisory for ATC, it is NOT any confirmation of anything (other than they're planning for it I guess?)

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:41:28 UTC No. 16422888

>>16422825
raptor cant do it. its obvious that spacex starship program is a COLOSSAL shitshow but noone wants to say it. the emperor has no clothes.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:41:39 UTC No. 16422890

>>16422886
it wasn't

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:44:15 UTC No. 16422894

>>16422888
>t.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:44:48 UTC No. 16422896

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:45:19 UTC No. 16422897

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:45:30 UTC No. 16422899

>>16422887
nothing ever happens. people o think the lisence is dropping tomorrow are delusional. the same people who beleivied Musko when he said IFT5 would be a month after IFT4.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:45:51 UTC No. 16422900

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:47:04 UTC No. 16422905

>>16422897
Rule 34 when?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:48:18 UTC No. 16422911

>>16422841
I'm guessing pre-learned routines, 3D mapping and LLM
first you scan a guy doing stuff (like animating NPC model in a videogame)
then you scan the room and turns it to 3D model (like a map in a videogame)
you tell it to go sit next to the garbage bin and language translates that to [x,y] coordinates on the map
I imagine it like ordering around NPC squadmates in SW: Republic Commando

But even if they were 100% remotely operated by some guy, they still are impressive pieces of hardware
I've been to Munich Robotics Expo and Optimus is already above the industry standart

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:49:21 UTC No. 16422916

>boyfriend doesnt think humans will go to mars any time soon
how do i convince him?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:50:00 UTC No. 16422919

>>16422916
you have to hawk tuah and spit on that thang!

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:50:50 UTC No. 16422921

>/sfg/ still thinks we're going to allow Starship to launch this weekend
Did you guys not see your dude at that other dude's convention of climate change deniers?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:50:54 UTC No. 16422922

>>16422916
kill him (in minecraft)

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:51:18 UTC No. 16422924

>>16422886
>>16422888
You're just a loser castrato who is uncomfortable with how the sausage is made.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:54:23 UTC No. 16422929

>>16422916
Cocksucking faggots arent welcome in /sfg/

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:56:01 UTC No. 16422931

so uhhh...
how do we pass the time until tomorrow?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:56:33 UTC No. 16422932

>>16422931
Play those booster web games

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:00:30 UTC No. 16422939

https://x.com/Alexphysics13/status/1845124449453937049
>In its concurrence, the FWS does agree that SpaceX could repeat launches using the Flight 5 profile, within the scope of the license, for up to five flights per year as has been the case for the current PEA which is being re-evaluated in this process.

SpaceX can repeat the IFT-5 flight path 5 times, but I guess that is going to be pointless yet again because if they succeed, SpaceX will modify things again

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:01:08 UTC No. 16422940

>>16422862
https://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2018/06/06/birds-never-go-deaf-why-do-humans/

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:03:40 UTC No. 16422943

>>16422886
that's called a loaded question, which is an dishonest form of rhetoric used by dishonest people.
there is nothing to admit, IFT-1 simply isn't a failure, end of story.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:05:14 UTC No. 16422945

>>16422916
you are a fag and therefore too unstable and neurotic to ever go to mars.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:11:42 UTC No. 16422953

>>16422788
how the fuck do you have an internet connection

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:13:42 UTC No. 16422957

>>16422886
>It didn't blow up on launch
>It didn't destroy the tower
>It actually took off
>Showed that they need a deluge/deflector
>Showed that the spin-separation manoeuvre doesn't work
>Shows that tiles need a better attachment system to withstand launch
For a first launch of a prototype SHLV built in the shithole that was early star base it was full of successes, which have been iterated on with each launch

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:14:31 UTC No. 16422959

>>16422862
>to determine if the bird exhibits indicators of hearing damage
and if one single bird does, then it's over, and the whole site is shut down. but hey, oldspace can keep killing birds like it's nothing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUqlN4lG8AQ

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:14:33 UTC No. 16422960

>>16422298
Does anyone knows how early IFT4s official launch date was postponed?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:15:29 UTC No. 16422961

hello men

is the launch confirmed tomorrow? I am very drunk, information gathering not possibel!

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:23 UTC No. 16422962

>>16422960
on the same day I'm pretty sure, they modified one of the flaps

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:17:24 UTC No. 16422965

>>16422961
no license yet, but it is expected very soon
and then after the license is issued, the launch might be scrubbed of course

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:19:18 UTC No. 16422967

>>16422953
starlink, duh

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:21:39 UTC No. 16422970

>>16422953
He must be using Amazon's Kuiper service.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:27:53 UTC No. 16422972

Duning-Kruger clown Eager negro doesnt understand the difference between straight paths on a mercator projection and a globe,
https://youtu.be/ki5UBcXOIUs?si=i5CC2Npd0Uh9hlBE&t=594

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:28:28 UTC No. 16422974

>>16422957

>Showed that they need a deluge/deflector

SpaceX already knew that. It was being fabricated, but they decided not to wait for it to be installed and went in dry.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:33:07 UTC No. 16422982

>>16422972
Elon can't interpret a velocity-drag graph correctly

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:33:11 UTC No. 16422983

>24 hours to pre-announced launch
>still no FAA approval
What radical violent actions must take place to end this unacceptable state of affairs

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:36:43 UTC No. 16422988

>>16422983
Find the people trying to steal the election and beat them with hammers.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:37:00 UTC No. 16422990

>>16422983
I urge you to be more restrained

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:38:16 UTC No. 16422992

License status?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:38:25 UTC No. 16422994

>>16422982
can you prove this statement to me?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:38:30 UTC No. 16422995

>>16422992
oi m8

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:38:47 UTC No. 16422996

>>16422988
based

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:39:22 UTC No. 16422998

THEY WILL RECEIVE THE LICENSE MINUTES BEFORE THE LAUNCH, STOP ASKING

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:39:27 UTC No. 16422999

>>16422992
Licenses will be denied until the health of the beetles improve

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:40:37 UTC No. 16423000

>>16422988
I LOVE ISRAEL!
>I LOVE ISRAEL!
I LOVE ISRAEL!
>I LOVE ISRAEL!
I LOVE ISRAEL!
>I LOVE ISRAEL!
I LOVE ISRAEL!
>I LOVE ISRAEL!
I LOVE ISRAEL!
>I LOVE ISRAEL!

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:41:08 UTC No. 16423001

>>16422994
At this moment I am unable to supply you with the screenshot of a tweet from Elon Musk wherein his misunderstanding of a velocity-drag diagram is clearly apparent.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:41:12 UTC No. 16423002

they grant the license at the last minute to reduce lawsuits. how do you guys not know that by now?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:42:11 UTC No. 16423003

>>16423002
So FAA is colluding with SpaceX to deprive the citizens their right to sue?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:42:22 UTC No. 16423004

>>16423002
Then the originators of the intentionally-delaying lawsuits themselves must be tracked, identified, and beaten to death with shoes.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:43:16 UTC No. 16423005

>16422998
>16422999
>16423000
>16423001
>16423002
>16423003
>16423004
Uhhh bros why is nearly every post on /sci/ on /sfg/

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:44:31 UTC No. 16423007

LOICENSE ACQUIRED
https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/DRSDOCID173891218620231102140506.0001?modalOpened=true

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:45:49 UTC No. 16423008

>>16423007
>drs

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:46:51 UTC No. 16423009

>>16423007
this is krystal porn btw, the license got denied

https://x.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1845143827755012306

https://x.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1845143792229163212

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:46:56 UTC No. 16423010

>>16423005
/sci/ is nothing without /sfg/, we are the most powerful thread on this board and it isn't even close.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:47:23 UTC No. 16423011

>>16423007
Just glanced through it.... the catch attempt isn't authorized in this license...

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:47:27 UTC No. 16423012

>>16423007
ISRAEL

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:47:56 UTC No. 16423013

>>16423008
It's dot gov froggie.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:48:24 UTC No. 16423015

>>16423013

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:49:34 UTC No. 16423016

>>16422738
It looks at child galaxies

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:49:36 UTC No. 16423017

no no no no no no
fuck elon and trump, someone stop him

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:51:10 UTC No. 16423020

total plover eardrum destruction

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:51:42 UTC No. 16423021

>>16423007
land that bitch

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:51:44 UTC No. 16423023

>>16423011

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:52:16 UTC No. 16423024

If you eliminate the population of brownsville, is there anyone left to complain about hearing 30 sonic booms per day?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:52:25 UTC No. 16423025

>>16422871
Cool hard facts lose to the power of imagination every time

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:54:19 UTC No. 16423028

>>16423001
so basically you don't have it and you made it up.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:54:25 UTC No. 16423029

>>16423024
>Added paragraph 11(b), “SpaceX must confirm that all population centers that contribute greater than 1E-6 estimated casualties within the day of launch 1E-11 probability of casualty contour are contained by the 1E-11 probability of casualty contour used to justify the extent of the high-fidelity population model, to ensure that all statistically significant local populations are of sufficient fidelity in accordance with 14 CFR 450.115(b).”

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:55:29 UTC No. 16423030

>those October 12th changes
SpaceX getting kneecapped hard

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:56:12 UTC No. 16423031

>30 minute window
guys...
i dont feel so good

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:57:15 UTC No. 16423032

>>16423020
see >>16422940
bird ear follicles literally regrow, the hearing damage meme needs to die now.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:57:45 UTC No. 16423033

>>16423031
What is the likelihood that it will not happen tomorrow? IT CANT HAPPEN ON MONDAY THIS WOULD BE TERRIBLE.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:58:14 UTC No. 16423034

>>16423031
they launched the last 3 times at the start of their window with no delay, pending good weather
tomorrows weather is clear, low wind speeds all morning

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:58:48 UTC No. 16423035

>>16423031
high altitude wind shear?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:59:24 UTC No. 16423036

>>16423033
THIS SO MUCH THIS
>>16423034
boats could be an issue
or any ground issues

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:00:38 UTC No. 16423037

>>16423036
Total boater death

Barwkne at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:00:43 UTC No. 16423038

>>16423036
For I'm just a teenage, dirtbag, baby
I listen to Iron Maiden baby with you

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:00:48 UTC No. 16423039

>>16423035
altitude shmaltitude.
starship will simply ignore the wind shear.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:01:14 UTC No. 16423040

>>16423031
so either it launches or scrubs

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:01:54 UTC No. 16423041

>>16423040
classic 50% chance

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:02:01 UTC No. 16423042

>>16423028
I have it but am unable to find it currently. I swear today everyone doesn't believe shit I say because I can't provide a source

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:02:17 UTC No. 16423044

Reddit NSF gaslighting commie seething

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:02:52 UTC No. 16423045

what is launch? baby don't hold me, don't hold me, no more

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:03:19 UTC No. 16423047

>>16423036
i RGV astroturfers try to delay the launch with boats we need to have anons ready on shore with high caliber firearms.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:03:27 UTC No. 16423048

>>16423040
so the latest they can launch is 22 minutes into the window right?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:04:20 UTC No. 16423050

>>16423042
yeah that's how things work, you randomly say some shit and then expect people to believe you without any proof.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:04:29 UTC No. 16423051

Are Berger's two books worth reading?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:04:41 UTC No. 16423052

>>16423045

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:05:21 UTC No. 16423053

>>16423051
yeah, they're great reads, you should buy both.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:06:20 UTC No. 16423055

>>16423051
Just ignore his political opinion on musk

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:06:37 UTC No. 16423057

https://strawpoll.com/Qrgewmk0jyp

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:07:20 UTC No. 16423058

optimist bros we're eating good today

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:07:50 UTC No. 16423059

>>16423051
no, they're terrible reads, you should buy neither.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:08:30 UTC No. 16423061

>>16423051
they're amazing reads, you should buy both

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:09:04 UTC No. 16423063

So NASA had this thing a couple of months ago where they would etch name of people on some wafer and put that on Clipper and send it to space. I totally forgot I applied but apparently my name is going to space. Does someone know if JPL released the picture of the wafer so I can check for sure?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:09:31 UTC No. 16423064

>>16423051
they're mediocre reads, you could consider buying or not buying either.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:10:28 UTC No. 16423066

>>16423029
makes sense to me

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:11:09 UTC No. 16423067

>>16423059
>>16423061
>>16423064
the tripleality of man

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:11:47 UTC No. 16423068

>>16423051
i never heard of them, i can't say for sure

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:12:17 UTC No. 16423070

>>16423051
i've heard of them, i can say for sure.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:15:28 UTC No. 16423072

>still no solution to the jello baby problem

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:17:08 UTC No. 16423075

>Annual Certification. SpaceX must submit an annual certification,
under penalty of perjury, signed by a responsible official, attesting to
SpaceX’s compliance with all applicable environmental laws,
regulations, permits, or other authorizations related to FAA-licensed
activities at Boca Chica, Texas.”

ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME??

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:17:39 UTC No. 16423076

>>16423072
just put the baby/mother into a spinning tube

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:17:55 UTC No. 16423077

>>16423075
sneed about it
feds won

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:18:40 UTC No. 16423078

>>16423075
sounds like boilerplate to me

Obliterate the regulatory state at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:18:45 UTC No. 16423079

Added paragraph 10, “Environmental Requirements:”
11. Added paragraph 10(a), “SpaceX must conduct its licensed activities in
accordance with the representations made in its license application
and must comply with all applicable Federal, Tribal, State, and local
environmental laws, regulations, and standards in carrying out its
license activities. SpaceX has a continuing duty to obtain and maintain
current all applicable environmental permits, licenses, authorizations,
and approvals for activities under this license.”
12. Added paragraph 10(b), “SpaceX must continue to comply with or
carry out, as appropriate, the conditions, limitations, mitigation
measures, and monitoring plans set forth in any and all documents
prepared by the FAA pursuant to the National Environmental Policy
Act, appended to this license, and relied upon to reach a
determination that the proposed licensed activities are consistent with
applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect
the quality of the human environment.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:19:27 UTC No. 16423081

>>16423075
That could be the escape they used to get the license faster. It's much better for them if they just do this scheduled yearly faggotry instead of having FAA individually contact every retarded agency to get their opinion on compliance. This is much better for SpaceX assuming FAA will no longer fuck with this aspect.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:19:48 UTC No. 16423082

>>16423075
NSF is saying this is better since they don't have to do it for each launch

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:20:06 UTC No. 16423084

Why are doomcucks so low IQ?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:20:29 UTC No. 16423086

>>16423081
>>16423082
ohh okay, I would've preferred they be exempt from all environmental fuckery but good enough

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:20:40 UTC No. 16423087

>>16423075
so this means an annual license instead of one for each launch? Sounds like a win to me

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:21:13 UTC No. 16423088

>>16423031
Wayward boat sisters wagmi

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:21:16 UTC No. 16423089

>>16423084
ikr
they were wrong about milton
the solar storm
and now flight 5

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:21:56 UTC No. 16423090

>>16423087
sounds like a massive win actually
depending on how long the review takes you could have arbitrarily high cadences with something like this

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:22:56 UTC No. 16423092

>>16423086
I would've preferred if you just learned to read DESU

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:23:43 UTC No. 16423094

Tomorrow sounds like a great day for fishing

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:25:27 UTC No. 16423098

>>16423094
What kinds of fish are around Boca Chica anyway?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:25:50 UTC No. 16423099

>>16423090
There's no way the FAA intended to give SpaceX carte blanche to launch as many times as they wish within a given time period, those bureaucratic cunts would never grant that kind of leeway.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:26:23 UTC No. 16423100

>>16423094
>tomorrow sounds *ack*

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:26:25 UTC No. 16423101

>>16423072
>still no solution to the problem that exists inside of my head and nowhere else.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:26:48 UTC No. 16423104

Can SpaceX borrow a single A10 for any potencial boaters?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:27:25 UTC No. 16423106

https://x.com/BCCarCounters/status/1845153328210018448

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:27:40 UTC No. 16423107

>>16423063
cool stuff

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:28:07 UTC No. 16423108

>>16423106
What's Flight 6 though?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:28:26 UTC No. 16423109

>>16423094
>>16423100
we should put CSS, thunderf00t, and ESG hound in the same boat desu

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:28:33 UTC No. 16423110

>>16423108
Suborbital

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:28:48 UTC No. 16423111

https://x.com/BCCarCounters/status/1845153091965833399

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:29:26 UTC No. 16423112

>>16423108
either a repeat of flight 5 unless they jump to ship 33(v2) which would likely be the first orbital flight

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:30:12 UTC No. 16423113

>>16423112
>to ship 33(v2)
Have all the tests been using V1 engines so far?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:30:56 UTC No. 16423114

>>16423111
oh great, a single thing goes wrong with Super Heavy catch and FAA immediately goes MUH MISHAP and grounds Starship altogether again

god, I hate this kind of hyper-bureaucratic micromanagment it seriously pisses me off it's like SpaceX has no breathing room to experiment and test to destruction

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:31:42 UTC No. 16423116

>>16423106
https://x.com/wapodavenport/status/1845154291968831690

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:31:58 UTC No. 16423117

>>16423113
no they've used v2 raptors since ift-1
v3 raptors are gonna be used on v2 starship

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:32:45 UTC No. 16423119

>>16423117
Thanks

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:32:48 UTC No. 16423120

>>16423106
https://x.com/Alexphysics13/status/1845155171233399165

I wonder if they change the tower, perhaps that doesn't affect the license? so fly a similar flight but modify the tower only (or the ships so little it doesn't matter)

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:32:53 UTC No. 16423121

>>16423116
Doesn't matter, prepare to wait another 3-4 months between flight 5 and 6 until the FAA is personally satisfied >>16423114

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:32:57 UTC No. 16423122

overbros what do we do now?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:33:25 UTC No. 16423123

>>16422829
at what point does Elon put on Joker makeup and start wrecking things to "send a message"?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:33:31 UTC No. 16423124

>>16423122
bet on boats or any last minute ground issues

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:33:54 UTC No. 16423125

>>16423120
SpaceX change their minds after literally every single test flight so far so yea

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:33:58 UTC No. 16423126

>>16423122
Make up hypothetical scenarios to preemptively seethe and doompost about

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:34:00 UTC No. 16423127

I read somewhere that Elon used part of the NC Starlink hooplah to get Secretary Pete on the horn so he could bring to his attention the absolute level of FAA regulatory nonsense. Pete also mentioned during a CNN interview that there was a "coordination issue with the FAA that has now been resolved." Though he didn't relate it to the NC events and made it as a passerby comment. I wouldn't be surprised if Elon didn't point out that China announced a spacesuit to be used on the moon, with all NASA contracts currently imploding to deliver the same, and that they intend to land the first woman on the moon before US does--and holding back Starship with regulatory jockeying is going to lead to the country being humiliated on the world stage under a potential future admin (independent of who wins)--if this nonsense continues any longer.

And there's no greater incentive for a politician to put his foot down to get something done, than the probability that he/she will be publicly declared incompetence and humiliated because leadership within his administration created conditions where a rival state won a race involving national prestige.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:34:12 UTC No. 16423128

>>16423116
Two for the price of one?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:34:26 UTC No. 16423129

>https://mechazilla.io/
Do you have what it takes?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:34:38 UTC No. 16423131

https://x.com/KenKirtland17/status/1845148960039764348

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:34:53 UTC No. 16423133

>>16423127
the "coordination issue" was FAA workers struggling to coordinate their hands with their brain.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:35:22 UTC No. 16423134

>>16422323
The track looks too good to be amateurs, there's also Artemis I footage on the youtube channel. It could be FOIA request, and the footage could be from one of the NASA tracking aircraft. I think they're usually in the area when SpaceX does testing, but I don't remember exactly.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:35:27 UTC No. 16423135

>>16423129
Could nnot go past level 4 so I just had fun with the destruction physics till I experienced every possible scenario, that was fun

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:35:35 UTC No. 16423136

>>16423131
When will someone deal with his spy network?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:35:54 UTC No. 16423137

>>16423129
gave up at level 17

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:36:04 UTC No. 16423139

>>16423108
Be in about a years time after booster destroys tower one on landing

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:36:56 UTC No. 16423141

>>16423122
we bit our time and wait out until tomorrow when the booster will demolish the tower.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:36:57 UTC No. 16423142

The catch will unironically be near-perfect

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:37:29 UTC No. 16423143

>>16423127
>Elon used part of the NC Starlink hooplah to get Secretary Pete on the horn so he could bring to his attention the absolute level of FAA regulatory nonsense
"Hey queerboy now that I've got you listen to this shit:"

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:38:29 UTC No. 16423144

>SuperHeavy comes in for landing
>almost on target but a little bit too far from the tower
>catches at the very edge , engines stop , cheers and celebration
>seconds later tower arms shear off from the offset weight balance
>FAA declares a mishap 1 microsecond later

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:39:13 UTC No. 16423145

Super Heavy will bellyflop onto Starbase

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:40:02 UTC No. 16423146

>>16423144
They overloaded the arms with water balls quite a lot, it probably shouldn't shear off. I'd sooner bet on just flat out crashing into the tower due to minor control issues.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:40:17 UTC No. 16423147

>>16423142
Trust the algorithms

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:40:39 UTC No. 16423148

>>16423145
Hopefully into the YouTube camera cars again

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:41:22 UTC No. 16423149

Super Heavy will land.. on land

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:42:29 UTC No. 16423151

>they didn't go with my trampoline catch idea

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:42:54 UTC No. 16423152

>>16423146
It’s gonna be something stupid like missing the pins and Elon be like maybe we should have had landing points all around the booster

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:44:09 UTC No. 16423154

>>16423152
landing points on a semi-circular rail that can adjust to match the position of the chopstick landing rail, moving instead of fixed, much more accurate

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:44:28 UTC No. 16423155

when are the cryptoscam streams gonna pop up?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:44:32 UTC No. 16423156

last time it couldn't make a straight landing into water and now it's supposed to land into the arms

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:45:01 UTC No. 16423157

>>16423155
give me a minute

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:45:06 UTC No. 16423158

>>16423155
Already saw one hours ago.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:45:25 UTC No. 16423159

>>16423156
yeah part of me feels this is just too soon, Superheavy could still pop on return like Flight 4

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:45:38 UTC No. 16423160

>>16423156
>last time it couldn't make a straight landing into water
That is what it did though. Why you lying?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:46:06 UTC No. 16423161

Crashes into Galveston.
Everybody claps.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:46:08 UTC No. 16423162

>>16423156
0.5cm accuracy nigga

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:46:36 UTC No. 16423165

>>16423160
you are delusional SpaceX deliberately only released a shitty landing video

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:47:23 UTC No. 16423166

>>16423017
>this is the future you chose, normies, with your mail in ballot counting and your launch license denying

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:47:32 UTC No. 16423167

>>16423165
That shitty landing is exactly what it's supposed to do.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:48:03 UTC No. 16423169

>>16423167
was it supposed to explode too?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:48:53 UTC No. 16423170

>>16423167
you are diluted

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:49:13 UTC No. 16423172

>>16423169
after it completed the simulated catching, which it did? yes.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:49:31 UTC No. 16423173

>>16423169
After falling over? It's going to explode tomorrow, too, if the chopsticks don't catch it.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:49:34 UTC No. 16423174

"I call this one The Triple Lindy."

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:49:57 UTC No. 16423175

>>16423172
if that happens again even if they catch it, it will be a mishap, and the usual grifters and obstructionists/media will have a field day too

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:50:09 UTC No. 16423176

>>16423167
engine shitting itself during landing?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:50:50 UTC No. 16423177

>>16423094
kek

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:51:52 UTC No. 16423180

>>16423176
It doesn't matter if one engine fails, it still reached target.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:52:07 UTC No. 16423181

ETA on the establishment of SX Station (pronounced Sex Station)?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:52:15 UTC No. 16423182

>>16423136
he is too deeply embedded, they will never pull him out.
thus he will always be there to make oldspace and EDSers look ridiculous.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:52:34 UTC No. 16423183

>this is the future /sfg/ wants

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:52:43 UTC No. 16423185

The whole chopstick idea is pure delusion and will set back (or already has set back) Starship's development by years

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:53:33 UTC No. 16423186

>>16423156
you are lying, why are you lying? can you stop lying please?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:53:34 UTC No. 16423187

The whole chopstick idea is pure brilliance and will speed up (or already has sped up) Starship's development by years

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:54:10 UTC No. 16423188

>>16423180
and we can trust SpaceX is landed exactly where it was supposed to because?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:54:20 UTC No. 16423189

>>16423165
You are a faggot, if I see you at the /sfg/ meetup I'm going to beat you up and take your lunch money.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:54:20 UTC No. 16423190

>>16423181
two weeks

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:54:23 UTC No. 16423191

Should've went with the fork idea

Devil's advocate at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:55:23 UTC No. 16423192

>>16423186
let's look at the video again. It definitely fucked up the landing. Even it it was exactly where it was supposed to land(something we can't actually verify)

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:55:33 UTC No. 16423193

>>16423170
that's true, i'm a slime girl.
because of all the rain due to milton recently, my body has become a bit diluted.
that's why i need more cum to become undiluted.
will you give me your cum, anon?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:56:08 UTC No. 16423194

>>16423188
believe whatever you want and get humiliated once again
yeah gerstenmaier is blatantly lying during a NASA meeting
that might be something oldpsace does, but I have never seen it from SpaceX, they simply don't need to and would have nothing to gain

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:56:30 UTC No. 16423196

Ain't that a shame
My tears fell like rain

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:56:34 UTC No. 16423197

>>16423189
trust me faggot if you ever saw me you'd be keeping your head low hoping I don't notice you

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:56:53 UTC No. 16423198

>>16423192
>it fucked up the landing
>by landing perfectly with sub-centimeter accuracy
not how that works anon.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:57:09 UTC No. 16423199

>>16423156
beat this guy with hammers

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:57:28 UTC No. 16423202

>>16423180
>It doesn't matter if one engine fails
We saw during starship test landings that it does in fact matter

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:57:28 UTC No. 16423203

>>16423192
I'm gonna kick you right in the dick twice in a row.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:58:10 UTC No. 16423204

>>16423196
so they didn't drop the program
more hilarious shenanigans to come

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:58:38 UTC No. 16423206

>>16423198
Does SpaceX have access to sub-centimeter accurate GPS systems? Does such a thing even exist?

My bullshit alarm went off when I heard this claim.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:58:49 UTC No. 16423207

>>16423007
SpaceX full name is Space Exploration Technologies Corp? Wtf

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:59:11 UTC No. 16423208

>>16423202
super heavy is not starship

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:59:47 UTC No. 16423209

>>16423197
>trust me
No, you're an untrustworthy bad-faith poster, you lie and nobody should believe a thing you post.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:59:48 UTC No. 16423210

>>16423206
>Does such a thing even exist?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:59:48 UTC No. 16423211

hit a nerve you absolutely delusional schizophrenic?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:00:00 UTC No. 16423212

>>16423199
*water hammers

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:00:41 UTC No. 16423215

>>16423206
Differential GPS can be very accurate close to the reference station. I assume that's what their drone boat was providing.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:00:44 UTC No. 16423216

>>16423106
Flight 6 uses a slightly different starship design so it will need a new loisence

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:01:32 UTC No. 16423218

>>16423212

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:01:34 UTC No. 16423219

>>16423082
Gaslighting faggots can't be trusted

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:02:33 UTC No. 16423220

>>16423206
who said it is solely using GPS?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:03:15 UTC No. 16423222

>>16423216
the changes are small enough that they approved both 5 and 6 at the same time
as long as ship 6 isn't modified further they should be good to go

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:03:59 UTC No. 16423223

Daily reminder that there's no reason to go to Mars

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:04:22 UTC No. 16423224

>>16423207
Yeah, they're basically named with the intent of becoming a consortium of megacorps in the future. Transport is one part of the business, communications is another, colonization will be the third. Mining and manufacturing will inevitably be the fourth, and then research & development for energy, material science, manufacturing, biotechnology, agriculture, sustainability, and what not will probably be the fifth. Each subcorp will be designed to scale into the multi hundred billion cap range easily with Starlink on Earth, Moon, and Mars, generating the revenue necessary to fuel the rest until they're self-sufficient.

Fun fact, Elon only wants to colonize the solar system; Gwynne wants to colonize Alpha/Proxima Centauri.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:04:47 UTC No. 16423225

>>16423209
you need to take a deep breath and watch the superheavy landing video.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:05:17 UTC No. 16423226

>>16422886
I can admit you are a failure

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:06:08 UTC No. 16423228

>>16423206
in addition to nearby marine assets, there's also starlink onboard which can be used to locate itself

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:07:29 UTC No. 16423229

>>16423225
the one where the camera onboard that buoy is perfectly lined up to film it before it even enters through the clouds, that one?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:07:49 UTC No. 16423230

>>16423226
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u24C9XnXzzo

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:09:19 UTC No. 16423234

>>16423223
There is no reason for YOU to go to Mars. You will always be an Earther

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:12:46 UTC No. 16423240

>>16423229
Yeah the one the the camera on the buoy is in the perfect position to film the landing but we switch to the onboard camera last second.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:14:17 UTC No. 16423241

>>16423240
so what?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:15:38 UTC No. 16423242

https://x.com/LibertyCappy/status/1844958674768289982

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:16:36 UTC No. 16423244

>>16423225
You need to be drowned.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:18:55 UTC No. 16423248

>>16423031
Tomorrow is like the only day I'm busy this year. I've been religiously waiting for this for the last 3 months. It's literally the only thing I am excited about. Can't it just delay for once please pretty.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:19:27 UTC No. 16423250

>>16423244
least upset landing failure denier

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:20:47 UTC No. 16423252

>"I'm going to assert an obvious untruth and keep at it even when people tell me I'm wrong and stupid"
-t. anon

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:21:07 UTC No. 16423253

Barbecued plover is back on the menu boys

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:21:16 UTC No. 16423255

>>16423248
why are you busy

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:22:15 UTC No. 16423257

>>16423007
>FAA kneeled and kowtowed
ummmm leftybros? you told me this was the end for fElon and spacex was gonna get nationalized? what happened?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:23:40 UTC No. 16423259

Flight 5,

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:24:36 UTC No. 16423262

>>16423252
why don't you reply to me with actual proof it did a proper landing you little bitch? All we see is superheavy coming down rocking side to side and when it's supposed to make the landing it switches to the onboard camera where you can't see shit. Assuming it fucked up the landing is very reasonable. Much more reasonable than assuming it nailed the landing and SpaceX refusing to release the footage even though they surely have lots of footage.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:24:43 UTC No. 16423263

complete FAA buckbreaking
they even threw in IFT-6 license

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:25:44 UTC No. 16423265

>>16423262
it is not in fact reasonable because we have commentary saying it went nearly perfectly

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:30:37 UTC No. 16423269

>gaming night before the launch
Kind of sad, he should find a wife.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:30:47 UTC No. 16423270

>>16422298
If they launch tomorrow at time, the lightning conditions at catch attempt will be more or less like in this picture.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:31:33 UTC No. 16423272

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:33:39 UTC No. 16423276

there will be 5 (five) parts to Dons canto

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:34:40 UTC No. 16423278

motherfuckerrr

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:34:43 UTC No. 16423279

>>16423276
what

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:36:47 UTC No. 16423282

I'm going to fuck all you guys right in the ass because I'm going to wake up in the middle of the night to watch this launch, which guarantees that it will be scrubbed.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:37:24 UTC No. 16423283

>>16423057
damage means delay due to mishap investigation

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:41:16 UTC No. 16423293

>>16423262
Why don't you go fuck yourself, faggot?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:43:13 UTC No. 16423296

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:46:37 UTC No. 16423302

>>16423282
>which guarantees that it will be scrubbed.
>30 min launch window

yeah probably, why the fuck is it so short

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:46:40 UTC No. 16423303

>>16423224
>Mining meme
loving every laugh

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:47:43 UTC No. 16423304

>>16423296

Can't wait for tomorrow attempt to show how absolutely stupid booster catch is compared to even simply landing close by the tower and for SpaceX to abandon this shit

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:48:59 UTC No. 16423308

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:49:30 UTC No. 16423309

>>16423224
>Gwynne wants to colonize Alpha/Proxima Centauri.
BASED, as we should

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:50:01 UTC No. 16423310

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:50:31 UTC No. 16423312

>>16423308
-WASTED-

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:51:00 UTC No. 16423314

>>16423309
It's just right over there, begging for people to visit it.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:51:14 UTC No. 16423316

>We got too cocky catchbros!

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:52:03 UTC No. 16423319

>>16423296
Why did he post a video about how the catch will probably succeed a couple days before they test it? I don't see the point from his perspective.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:54:38 UTC No. 16423323

>>16423116
They said the same about Flight 5 after 4

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:55:07 UTC No. 16423326

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO5rlco5m3M

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:55:52 UTC No. 16423329

>>16423304
I somewhat agree. how do you think the landing will fail tomorrow?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:57:40 UTC No. 16423333

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJRzQsLZGg

17h to go

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:59:08 UTC No. 16423335

>>16423319
so he can make a prediction
probably gets more views this way too, then you can make a new video referencing this one after the catch attempt (whatever happens) talking about the old predictions

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:00:08 UTC No. 16423337

How in the fuck are you supposed to lvl 17? It locks the steering when you get low enough

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:02:00 UTC No. 16423340

https://x.com/rookisaacman/status/1845173768722792500

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:05:09 UTC No. 16423344

>>16423340
>jared shillman
Ignored.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:05:58 UTC No. 16423346

>>16423344
he will be the first person launching on Starship

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:07:30 UTC No. 16423347

>>16423329
In some unexpected and bizzare way that forces SpaceX to do massive redesigns of booster and tower arms to try again and also repair them and FAA declares a mishap and Starship doesn't fly till early next year again.

Call me a doomer, call me an overfag, I'm just noticing patterns

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:07:39 UTC No. 16423348

>>16423344
He got scammed by the muskman into going to space..:(...he doesnt know it's a dome

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:09:16 UTC No. 16423349

So long earthers

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:10:17 UTC No. 16423351

>>16423347
>Starship doesn't fly till early next year again.
If that happens we can just throw the Artemis timeline out of the window

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:12:02 UTC No. 16423353

>>16423351
dunno if they can even fit Flight 6 in this year anyways tho

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:13:00 UTC No. 16423356

>>16423353
Late November early December maybe? I don't expect it either but I still want to hope.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:14:13 UTC No. 16423358

>>16423356
Just for fucking once already I wanna see how fast Starship cadence can be

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:14:19 UTC No. 16423359

>>16423353
Flight 6 is Ship 31 and Booster 31. Only Booster 31 has yet to perform a static fire and assuming no delays, they should be ready to fly in December.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:16:09 UTC No. 16423364

>>16423359
>Booster 31

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:17:10 UTC No. 16423365

>>16423364
Booster 13, my bad.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:17:45 UTC No. 16423366

>>16423359
Booster 311

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:20:11 UTC No. 16423370

https://x.com/whoisheartbreak/status/1845181970382278672

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:21:37 UTC No. 16423371

>>16423370
Scrubtober

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:22:06 UTC No. 16423374

>>16423370
>2PM CEST
Not me :)

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:23:16 UTC No. 16423375

At this point the IFT-6 objectives should be another catch + successful re-entry with the inflight demos from IFT-3 with IFT-7 being the ship to ship transfer demo That should happen latest by July 25' for an uncrewed HLS demo by the end of that year.
Mind you that's assuming all of the other Artemis milestones are on track and are not pushed back a year, either way cadence should step up once the factory gets fully outfitted and the second OLM is finished.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:24:42 UTC No. 16423377

>>16423374
Yeah I noticed they usually time the Starship flights so we in Europe have it easy.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:25:17 UTC No. 16423379

>>16423377
God bless America

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:25:43 UTC No. 16423380

We already did Artemis 1 only two more Artemises to go.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:25:55 UTC No. 16423381

https://youtu.be/wClsTj3a9PA

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:26:49 UTC No. 16423382

>>16423381
I remember watching a video where a guy said that California is basically ruled by 4 dynasties.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:27:13 UTC No. 16423383

>>16423309
SpaceX plans to do that obviously but how? Every engine that is capable of just a few percentages of the speed of light is something only the government has a loicense to build

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:27:47 UTC No. 16423385

>>16423381
If he really offered "free internet" to the Floridians but they have to buy the dish first that really is pretty cringe of him

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:30:07 UTC No. 16423387

>>16423383
They won't, or at least not in our lifetimes. There's zero chance of an orion drive being built this century and fusion engines don't exist yet

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:30:29 UTC No. 16423388

>>16423383
Warp drive probably

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:32:27 UTC No. 16423389

>>16423385
it was free service and mainly done so the people who got donated starlink dishes could use it without having to signup
it was never about giving "free internet" to everyone

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:32:41 UTC No. 16423391

>>16423269
He should find a better taste in videogames

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:32:46 UTC No. 16423392

>>16423383
Build it on mars. Fuck the Earthers

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:32:46 UTC No. 16423393

>>16423387
>There's zero chance of an orion drive being built this century
We have 75 years left in it and the plans have been sitting around since the 1960s, it could be built today with existing materials. Only will prevents the right future from occurring.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:32:53 UTC No. 16423394

Nuclear powered lightbulb drives could reach 10% the speed of light and yet we aren't using them.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:33:31 UTC No. 16423395

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:34:08 UTC No. 16423398

>>16423391
>no factorio
>no ksp
>no train simulator
fake autist

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:34:13 UTC No. 16423399

you idiots are fucked. an actul popular person has spoken.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGfoqiClbSg

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:34:19 UTC No. 16423400

no good deed goes unpunished, I remember reading that this (too) would be tried to turn against Musk when he first announced it and at that time I thought how could they?
they did, found an angle and now they are running with it

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:34:38 UTC No. 16423401

>>16423398
no eve online

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:35:20 UTC No. 16423402

>>16423399
>communist

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:35:25 UTC No. 16423403

>cockroach eceleb
/sfg/ has reached a new low

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:35:32 UTC No. 16423404

>>16423399
Hamas statistics do not count as people

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:39:01 UTC No. 16423408

>>16423391
I like the Ace Combats, they're neat. In AC3 there's a mission where you're launched off a carrier plane and rocket up to LEO on a suborbital trajectory, you get about 5 minutes to chase down/lock on and fire at a passing satellite before you start to lose altitude and fall back into the atmosphere.
>inb4 why not just shoot the missile from within the atmosphere like real ASAT
Less fun

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:39:16 UTC No. 16423410

>>16422514
I am not literate. what does it say?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:39:48 UTC No. 16423411

https://x.com/blueorigin/status/1845186534267572563

lmao New Shepard is launching during IFT-5

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:40:13 UTC No. 16423414

>>16423411
During re-entry too. LMAO

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:40:36 UTC No. 16423415

>>16423398
You’re putting words in my mouth, i just think diablo 4 is a shit game, kys.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:41:17 UTC No. 16423416

>>16422514
Based

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:41:23 UTC No. 16423417

>>16423411
this will pull so amny viewers away from IFT5. spacex should move the event if they dont want to be overshone.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:42:20 UTC No. 16423418

>>16423417
3view

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:42:39 UTC No. 16423419

>>16423411
greatest live mogging of all time incoming

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:42:39 UTC No. 16423421

>>16423411
Lmao. Can't wait to see how many guys in the mission control room are watching the SpaceX launch. Knowing BO they probably wont allow it>>16423414

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:43:09 UTC No. 16423424

>>16423094
gtfo here bezos

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:43:11 UTC No. 16423425

>>16423414
We’re gonna have another dichotomy where in one stream we have a gay penis shaped rocket too small to even touch space’s G-spot. And in another stream the largest heavier than air flying vehicle in the world is performing somersaults, surviving deadly reentry plasma and getting caught mid air by a giant tower with arms.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:44:21 UTC No. 16423426

Anyone have the status for the environmentalist lawsuit
Doesn't sound like a ruling will happen before launch

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:45:03 UTC No. 16423428

>>16423426
They can go sniff their own axewound

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:45:13 UTC No. 16423429

>>16423425
Size doesn't matter

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:45:50 UTC No. 16423430

>>16423408
>that mission in 4 where you defended a rocket launch
kino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwlOsn6WsMY&list=PL0CigZQT1ZFUqK-eMytR-cjcOm0F9VtmX&index=6

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:48:25 UTC No. 16423434

Im heading to Brownsville court right now. No rocket factory or millionare will stop me from going fishing on my sunday.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:49:29 UTC No. 16423436

>>16423395
no way that was taken on 03/14/2024

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:51:10 UTC No. 16423440

>>16423430
>launching during an air battle
God I fucking love Ace Combat 4

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:52:41 UTC No. 16423442

>>16423393
The FAA will never let us visit another star

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:53:52 UTC No. 16423445

https://x.com/BocasBrain/status/1845187877724094744

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:56:19 UTC No. 16423450

>>16423426
hopefully they win. im not a hater but spacex does fuck up the surrounding environment to an unacceptible extent.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:56:55 UTC No. 16423451

>>16423394
>lightbulb
>Zubrin saltwater nuke rocket
>fission fragment engine
>pulsed NTR
Did I miss anything?

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:57:16 UTC No. 16423453

>>16423426
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/texas/txsdce/1:2024cv00148/1976360 not so much as a single court filing yet after the initial complaint
The lawyer is someone out of Austin, originally from Oregon

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:57:26 UTC No. 16423454

>>16423450
then they try to bully the govenment into accepting flagrant violations as the new normal. we are better than this.

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:57:30 UTC No. 16423455

>>16423450
You need some hammer time

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:58:44 UTC No. 16423457

What a manifest!

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:59:43 UTC No. 16423458

>>16423450
>>16423454
samefag

Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 20:00:08 UTC No. 16423459

both New Shepard and Starship fly only once every few months what is the probabilty that they're going to fly within an hour of each other. No coincidence if you ask me.